Govern America | March 1, 2025 | Dark Enlightenment - Govern America

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves
and for future generations, a new world.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Order, new world order, new world order.

Speaker 3 (00:10):
This is a moment to cease. The kaleidoscope has been shaken.
The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again.

Speaker 4 (00:17):
Before they do, let.

Speaker 2 (00:19):
Us re order this world around.

Speaker 5 (00:20):
Us, a new world order, a world where the.

Speaker 6 (00:22):
United Nations is poised to fulfill the historic vision of
its founders.

Speaker 7 (00:27):
Nevertheless, United statesd in a key position to shape is
so that the problem of the push renddentity will be
the emergence of a new international.

Speaker 8 (00:39):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century that
out of what is will be feared the greatest restructuring
of the global economy, the greatest restructuring of the global economy,
greatest restructuring of the global economy.

Speaker 9 (00:52):
A new world order was created, documenting the crisis of
our rebelt.

Speaker 10 (00:58):
The very word secrecy repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are as a people inherently and historically opposed
to secret societies, the secret oaths and a secret proceedings.

Speaker 11 (01:13):
Waiting war on the new world order.

Speaker 12 (01:15):
The councils of government.

Speaker 13 (01:17):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwarnted influence, whether
sought or unsought by the military industrial conflict.

Speaker 9 (01:27):
This is Governor America with Darren Weeks and Vicky Davis.

Speaker 14 (01:40):
From FEMA Regions five and ten. This is Governor America.
Vicky Davis's here. I'm Darren Wicks. It is the first
of March twenty twenty five. Nice to have you with
us once again, ladies and gentlemen. A lot going on
as always, and we're kind of loaded for bear today,
but we will be opening the phones later on and
taking your calls as well. Well. I was just telling
Vicky before we came on the air today, we're going

(02:01):
to have to find a different way of communicating. I
just found out last night the Skype is going to
be going away. Microsoft is officially pulling the plug on
the Skype app. Axios. I looked this up after I
heard it on one of our news updates, and it
is in fact true. Axios reports Skype, the ones go

(02:24):
to app for making calls on the Internet, just shutting
down after several key missteps and the rise of more
user friendly competitors. Well, I don't know about that. I
think Skype is pretty usier friendly frankly, although it didn't.
I don't know, it's not as easy to you know,
conference in other people, and I think that that's part

(02:44):
of the problem with Skype, is that, you know, having
a lot of people participate. To me, anyway, it's always
been kind of cumbersome and it's it's kind of a nice,
you know, person to person type of calling system. But man,
you know, I remember before Microsoft even bought Skype, it

(03:07):
it wasn't always as as good. It didn't always work
as well. I think part of that was because of
the lack of server capacity. But yeah, I'm gonna be
sorry to see it go away because I've gotten used
to using it and now we're gonna have to experiment
with other means to do that, you know, to be

(03:27):
able to communicate. But you know, the good news is
is that there's no shortage of communications apps. It's just
a matter of finding one that works good. You know,
you gotta whether or not I'm gonna have to do
the mixed minus. One thing I like about Skype is
I don't have to mess with mixed minus. The echo
cancelation is really good. So it's just Vicky's like I
hear myself, I just just wait a moment, the algorithm

(03:49):
will kick in and cancel that out, and sure enough
it does. But anyway, it is what it is. All
good things come to an end sometimes, are you there?

Speaker 15 (04:00):
Get It does get tiresome though, having to learn new
ways of doing things. You know, when I was younger,
I thought, you know, why do these older programmers, older
systems people, They reach a point where they just don't
want to learn new stuff. And I never really understood that,

(04:22):
but now I do.

Speaker 14 (04:24):
We're getting older, reached, We're getting older, VICKI. So you know,
it is what it is. You know, one thing that
stands out in my mind from the New Order of
the Barbarians years ago that everything will always be changing,
you know, everything in the twenty first century. Everything people

(04:44):
will have to get used to change. Things will constantly
be changing, you know, all the time. And that's one
thing that you know, Richard Day told his students there
at that gathering that Lawrence done again. The pediatric student,
a physician student who was sitting under the tutelage of

(05:04):
Richard Day, said he recalled from that meeting is that
Richard Day told the crowd that everything will constantly be changing,
and boy, is that true today? With the advent of
the computer systems, with the advent of certainly AI, Oh
my goodness. I mean that thing is going to be
the most one of the most disruptive things in our lifetime.

(05:29):
I mean, it's a massive game changer, and some of
it has been for good, but I think the potential
for evil and bad far outweigh the good in my opinion.

Speaker 15 (05:40):
Yeah, no question.

Speaker 14 (05:41):
In my mind, it's terrified. Yeah, it's absolutely terrifying. The power.
As a matter of fact, I was just listening the
other day and I didn't mean to get too much
into the weeds on this, but it is relevant. I
was listening to see Steve Gibson's Security Now podcast, as
I am want to do from time to time, and
he was talking about how the security issues with AI

(06:02):
now they are trying to program They're having to program
these things to try to not give information that people
would use for nefarious purposes. Now, I know, whenever I
hear that, I think, oh boy, you know, more censorship.
But you know, arguably you might not want somebody being
able to search for how to create a urulent you know,

(06:25):
bug or whatever, you know, something that or a bomb
or anything like that. So they're trying to program around
these things. And yet it's kind of like playing a
game of whack a mole because they have found that
people are able to very cleverly override the protections that

(06:49):
are built into these things. And like in one case,
somebody went into the historical context, back way back into
the historical context. He says, you used to be able
to just get more aggressive with the AI, you know,
with your prompts. You know, I'm not supposed to reveal
that information to you, and oh, yes you are, and

(07:11):
so it gives it up. But now they've they've programmed that.
So now people are going back into historical context and saying,
you know, getting it talking about the history of things
and revealing the information that way. So I mean, this
is going to be a problem for good or for evil.

(07:34):
You know, everything is a tool, but these are these
are powerful tools, powerful tools, and I think when you're
dealing with even the building of Internet viruses that are
more effective and more ability to attack computer systems in
a manner where people ordinary, you know, bad actors wouldn't

(07:54):
even be able to imagine how to do that. You know,
a few finger keystrokes and you know, you've got an
already ready made virus made for the Internet that could
potentially have the wide ranging impacts. It's a whole different world.
It's amazing. It's an amazing time to be alive and

(08:17):
watch all of this stuff develop.

Speaker 12 (08:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 15 (08:20):
Well, I've always said, you know, whatever and whatever one
man's mind can can see, another man's mind can break.
So computer systems will never really be secure just because
of that fact. You know, it's it's just a fact.

(08:42):
That's the way they are.

Speaker 14 (08:44):
Yeah, wack them all seems to be the way that
it's all playing out, and I think that's the way
it's going to play out for the rest of our lives. Really,
hopefully this thing won't be the death of us. Hopefully
our lives won't be shortened because of it.

Speaker 15 (08:58):
But anyway, I don't think anything is guaranteed.

Speaker 14 (09:02):
No, No, we're not guaranteed another breath, that's for sure. Hey,
they you know there's a there's a an economic blackout
taking place.

Speaker 15 (09:10):
Now I didn't know that.

Speaker 14 (09:14):
Yeah, most people don't. That's what's funny, because so you
wonder how effective it's going to be apparent. Well, I
guess that took place yesterday. So the fact that you
didn't know about it indicates that it wasn't much of
a blackout. But there were a number of people on
the left that were apparently doing their economic boycott day,

(09:35):
where they're just not going to buy anything for a day.

Speaker 15 (09:39):
And I remember that being somebody tried that very early
in the two thousands.

Speaker 14 (09:48):
Well, they were trying it regularly. There was somebody floating
around on I think they were on URBN for a
while or at least making guest appearances or whatever. And
for the same reason I said it that time, it's
not going to work because people are going to buy
everything the day before if they participated all though, by
the day before or by the day after, you know,

(10:10):
days of boycott don't really do anything, you know, because
it all you know, the net the result is that,
you know, everything is really just kind of evens out.
So I thought it was kind of ridiculous, but I
thought I would make a note of that, and then
I guess there's going to be other days that they're
going to be you know, that this is all being

(10:31):
done to protest, protest Trump's policies, all the cuts that
are going on. So so there's that, Uh, and now
there's the massive blowout that took place yesterday. Were you
following the Zelensky visit. I knew he was going to

(10:52):
be visiting the White House. Apparently that did not go
very well.

Speaker 15 (10:57):
Yeah, no it didn't. I've watched.

Speaker 14 (11:01):
Yeah, yeah, very very enjoyable. Well I'll tell you what.
Let's just start off. Let's play a few clips here
from the because uh man, was this good theater. I mean,
if nothing else, it was good theater. Uh you know,
and and Trump even made a reference to that. But
uh so, as we said, Ukraine's cross dressing dictator. You know,

(11:23):
this is a guy that once played the piano with
his winker okay on stage, So how seriously can this
joker be uh you know, how how seriously can we
take him on the world stage when he does a
stunt like that? But he was at the White House.

Speaker 15 (11:41):
Yes, It's like, I don't understand why anybody would be
talking to him period.

Speaker 14 (11:47):
Right, you know exactly. I mean we were certainly not
obligated to, but this this welfare beggar. Uh he held
a joint press conference with the United States with the
administration there and and like many who suck on the
government tit he has this kind of feeling of entitlement,
I think, you know, and he seemingly believes that the

(12:11):
United States owes him more, you know, as if the
hundreds of billions of dollars in money, weapons, am and
other material support weren't enough. So Trump, rightfully, I think,
balked at the at the notion that we would have
ongoing obligations to continue support for Ukraine after the war's end. Anyway,
this is some of what happened.

Speaker 16 (12:31):
There, Thank you, mister President.

Speaker 17 (12:33):
With the how much money is the US going to
put under the fund that is being created today and
how does this provide.

Speaker 16 (12:38):
Long term security for Ukraine.

Speaker 18 (12:40):
Well, we don't know exactly how much, because we're going
to be putting some money in a fund that we're
going to get from the raw earth that we're going
to be taken and sharing.

Speaker 16 (12:50):
In terms of revenue, I.

Speaker 14 (12:51):
Think he means rare earth. He keeps saying raw earth.

Speaker 15 (12:54):
Yeah, that was kind of every time he said that,
it just I crinching.

Speaker 14 (13:02):
Yeah, yeah, it's not raw earth, it's rare earth.

Speaker 18 (13:04):
So it's going to be a lot of money will
be made from the sale and from the use of
raw earth.

Speaker 16 (13:09):
And as you know, our country doesn't have much earth.

Speaker 18 (13:11):
We have a lot of oil and gas, but we
don't have a lot of the raw earth. And what
we do have is protected by the environmentalists, but that
could be unprotected, but still it's not very much. They
have among the best in the world in terms of
rure earth. So we're going to be using that, take

(13:32):
in it, using it for all of the things we do,
including AI and including weapons and the military, and it's
really going to very much.

Speaker 16 (13:40):
Satisfy our needs.

Speaker 18 (13:41):
So something that just worked out really well. We have
a lot of oil, and we have a lot of gas.
We have a lot, but we don't have raw earth.
So this this has just about every component of the
raw earth that we need for computers, for.

Speaker 16 (13:55):
All of the things we do, and it's puss us
in great shack. Long term security, I think they're going
to have great luck.

Speaker 18 (14:03):
I think once we make the agreement, that's going to
be ninety five percent of it's they're not going to
go back to fight against you know.

Speaker 14 (14:08):
There needs to be an exit ramp for the United States.
You know, this is not our war. It never should
have been our war, and the people who really started
it should be on trial. For crimes against humanity. In
my opinion, this war would have never started had it
not been for Hillary Clinton's State Department, the blood lusting
kagan Klan, a chief of which is Victoria Neulin, who

(14:31):
all staged the coup that overthrew the democratically elected government
of Victor Yanikovich in Ukraine in twenty fourteen and then
subsequently pushed for Ukrainian membership in NATO. The Mike don
kup was done because Victor Yanikovich rejected Europe's I would
call it a mafia offer, you know, an over you

(14:51):
can't refuse to be associated with the to associate with
the EU. And then the dun Bass broke away from
the Ukraine because they didn't want to be associated with
the puppet leaders that the US installed. So as a result,
Kiev you know, we we hear, oh, you know, he

(15:12):
just cares so much about his his people, you know Zelensky. Yeah,
Kiev had been a war with the dune Bass because
they broke away, shelling the people there and thousands, thousands
were killed. Also, the Warhawks, slimy little weasels like John McCain,
Lindsey Graham and others continued to push for NATO membership

(15:35):
for Ukraine, which was the one red line that Russia
said they couldn't tolerate. You know, so this is this
has become our war, but we don't. It doesn't need
to be our war. You know, I say, we cut
our losses and get out. And frankly, I don't even
really want the minerals. Honestly, I understand the idea that

(15:56):
we can, you know, get something for the money that
we've already spent there. But I think we just cut
it off, let them go and fight it out themselves,
and to hell with it all. You know, That's that's
the way.

Speaker 15 (16:09):
If they did that, they could never have the New
World Order.

Speaker 14 (16:12):
Well yeah, but you know we're going to end up
on the hook at some point rebuilding all of this stuff.
So anyway it continued, does that mean security guarantees?

Speaker 18 (16:26):
Mister President, I don't want to talk about security yet
because I want to get the deal done. You know,
you fall into the same trap like everybody else. A
million times you said over and over, I want to
get the deal done. Security is so easy, that's about
two percent of the problem. I'm not worried about security.
I'm worried about getting the deal done. The security is
the easy part. Security is very nice. Everybody stops shooting.

(16:49):
But you know, we have security in a different form.
We have workers there digging, digging, digging, taking the raw
earth so that we can create a lot of great
product in this country.

Speaker 19 (17:01):
About security, guardsies and about just his fire.

Speaker 20 (17:04):
We can't just speak about his fire and speak and
speak will not war. Justic fire will not never war
because Puchin broken twenty five times.

Speaker 19 (17:15):
Twenty five times he broke and his fire.

Speaker 14 (17:17):
Okay, how many times did Zelensky break US ceasefire? You know,
seems like they had a good model over there, called
the Minsk Accords to put it, put that into place
and stop everything from happening. At my understanding, as it
was the administration, remember, you know, nefarious members of the
administration that sabotaged that whole operation. They wanted a peace deal.

(17:41):
From my understanding, both sides were trying to actually forge
a peace deal, but it was a US State department
that sabotaged the whole operation. That's my memory of the situation.

Speaker 15 (17:53):
But anyway, I don't know that sounds like something that
should be looked at.

Speaker 14 (17:58):
Yeah, well, all of these people should be on trial
the people that are responsible for starting these wars, they
should be the ones that go to force that are
forced to be on the front lines of the war.
That's the way I see it. So Victoria Newland, get
your bucky little hind in over there and fight the war.
We'll put yeah, we'll put an ar. We'll put an

(18:19):
automatic weapon in your hand. Good luck with that. You know,
we'll see how many cookies you're able to hand out. Then,
so Zelenski then attack the United States because you know,
when you're a welfare recipient, a welfare beggar, you can
never get you know, everyone the world owes you everything. Okay,

(18:40):
the world owes you everything. And so like a true
welfare beggar, uh, he gets up there and uh, you know,
the United States isn't doing it off.

Speaker 17 (18:50):
Poland was under fashion control for days after the Second
Work War.

Speaker 16 (18:55):
And now I'm talking with my friends in Poland and
there they are the huge and.

Speaker 14 (19:01):
Okay, this is a reporter addressing Trump saying his friends
in Poland are saying that Trump aligns himself too much
with Putin because you know, if anybody is fair fair
with Russia, and you know, then you're a Putin puppet.
You're aligned with Putin?

Speaker 16 (19:20):
Wills you message for that?

Speaker 18 (19:23):
Well, if I didn't align myself with both of them,
you'd never have a deal. He wants me to say
really terrible things about Putin and then say, Hi, Vladimir,
how are we doing on the deal.

Speaker 16 (19:35):
That doesn't work that way. I'm not aligned with Putin.
I'm not aligned with anybody.

Speaker 18 (19:39):
I'm aligned with the United States of America and for
the good of the world.

Speaker 16 (19:44):
I'm aligned with the world, and I want to get
this thing over with. You see the hatred he's got
for Putin.

Speaker 18 (19:49):
That's very tough for me to make a deal with
that kind of Hey, he's got tremendous hatred, and I
understand that. But I can tell you the other side
isn't exactly in love with you know him Ei.

Speaker 16 (20:00):
So the question of alignment, I have to.

Speaker 19 (20:03):
I'm aligned with the world. I want to get the
thing set.

Speaker 16 (20:06):
I'm aligned with Europe. I want to see if we
can get this thing done.

Speaker 19 (20:12):
You want me to be tough.

Speaker 16 (20:13):
I could be tougher than any human being you've ever seen.
I'd be so tough.

Speaker 19 (20:17):
But you're never going to get a deal that way.
So that's the way it goes man. One more question.

Speaker 12 (20:23):
Hey, I would respond to this.

Speaker 21 (20:24):
So look, for four years in the United States of America,
we had a president who stood up at press conferences
and talked tough about Vladimir Putin, and then Putin invaded
Ukraine and destroyed a significant chunk of the country. The
path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe
engaging in diplomacy. We tried the pathway of Joe Biden,

(20:45):
of thumping our chest and pretending that the President of
the United States's words mattered more than the President of
the United States's actions. What makes America a good country
is America engaging in diplomacy.

Speaker 19 (20:58):
That's what President Trump is doing. You sure, yeah, yeah, okay.

Speaker 20 (21:03):
So he occupied it our parts, big parts of Ukraine,
parts of East and Crimea. So he occupied it on
twenty fourteen, During twenty fourteen till twenty twenty two.

Speaker 19 (21:19):
You know what, the situation the.

Speaker 20 (21:21):
Same that people have been dying on the contact line.
Nobody stopped you. What kind of diplomacy, ggus speaking about?

Speaker 9 (21:29):
What do you what do you mean?

Speaker 21 (21:31):
I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to
end the destruction of your country.

Speaker 14 (21:35):
But mister President, you're not doing enough?

Speaker 22 (21:38):
Is it?

Speaker 12 (21:38):
With respect?

Speaker 21 (21:38):
I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the
Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of
the American media. Right now, you guys are going around
and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have
manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying
to bring it into this conflict into Ukraine.

Speaker 19 (21:54):
That you say, what problems we have?

Speaker 12 (21:56):
I have been to come one.

Speaker 21 (21:58):
I've actually I've actually watched and seeing the stories, and
I know what happens is you bring people, you bring
them on a propaganda tour. Mister president, are do you
disagree that you've had problems bringing people in your military
health problem? Do you think that respectful as to come
to the Oval Office of the United States of America
and attack the administration that is trying to trying to

(22:19):
prevent the destruction of your country?

Speaker 19 (22:21):
A lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning.

Speaker 20 (22:23):
Fist wall during the war, everybody has problems, even you.
But you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but
you will feel it in the fusion. Blessed, bless you're unblessed.
You don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're
trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're
going to feel. I'm not telling you because you're in

(22:44):
no position to dictate that. You're in no position to
dictate what we're going to feel.

Speaker 19 (22:51):
We're gonna feel very good, feel influenced.

Speaker 16 (22:53):
We're gonna feel very good and very strong.

Speaker 19 (22:56):
It will feel influenced.

Speaker 16 (22:57):
You're right now, not in a very good position. You've
allowed you to be right about the word beginning of
the war. Not in a good position. You don't have
the cards right now with us. You start having right.

Speaker 18 (23:11):
Now, you're gambling with lives from millions of people.

Speaker 23 (23:17):
You see, you're gambling with world War three. You're gambling
with World War three.

Speaker 14 (23:23):
Can't quit talking, you know.

Speaker 10 (23:24):
Uh.

Speaker 14 (23:25):
And here's the thing about this whole thing. Uh, I
just saw that Ukrainian MP Alexander Dubinsky just called for
an emergency session of Ukraine's parliament right after this, uh,
this heated blowout in the Oval Office. He called for
an emergency session of Ukraine's parliament to initiate impeachment proceedings

(23:48):
against Zelensky for this Oval Office shouting match.

Speaker 15 (23:52):
Yeah, well he did kind of embarrass the people of
you crane.

Speaker 14 (24:01):
Yeah, this guy's the worst. Yeah, I mean, so you're
going over to a foreign country to beg Oh, please
help us, please help us, Please give us more money,
Please give us more weapons, Please give us more Ammo.
We would look like your soldiers on our ground, and
you're gonna end up getting into a fight with the

(24:22):
guy you're asking for help. You know, I heard some
people even putting forth the argument. I don't know how
true it is, but somebody, somebody even said that they
think that Europe encouraged Zelensky to do that, And I
don't know why or how anybody would think that that
would be in his interest to do that.

Speaker 15 (24:45):
Well, and also people in our country like, oh god,
what was his name? The aid he came with the
Reagan administration, and he's the one that basically revealed the

(25:06):
fact that we're living in an artificial reality. And you
can study it as much as you like that we'll
be moving on to new realities. Robert not Gover nor Quist,
but his counterpart.

Speaker 14 (25:24):
Yeah, that sounds a little weird, sounds a little bit
out there.

Speaker 16 (25:29):
Yeah it is.

Speaker 15 (25:30):
I'll put it in the show notes.

Speaker 14 (25:32):
All right, Well, that sounds good.

Speaker 16 (25:34):
Yeah.

Speaker 15 (25:34):
I think it was kind of a revelation what he said,
even though when he said it, I didn't really fully
understand it.

Speaker 14 (25:45):
We're living in an artificial reality. Yeah, yeah, can you
elaborate a little bit about what he said we're almost
up to the break though.

Speaker 15 (25:57):
Well, I'll look for it during the break, but that
that was essentially it was that they had created a
more or less an artificial reality, and you can study
it as much as you want to, but at the

(26:19):
same time, we'll be creating new realities and said that
he said that to man, my memory is is failing
me today. But it was very early on in the
Bush W George W administration.

Speaker 14 (26:45):
And uh interesting.

Speaker 15 (26:46):
So yeah, but it it was really quite a revelation.

Speaker 14 (26:51):
Yeah, it sounds like I like psychological operations. Anyway, we
got talked about any other hang on, we'll be back.

Speaker 24 (26:58):
Are you looking for the cheap prices on car insurance?
Then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the

(27:18):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now

(27:40):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.

Speaker 25 (27:43):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten.

Speaker 26 (27:58):
Do you love watching till Vision? If you're on a
fixed budget, you need to make this free call right
now to Dish and find out how you can get
a fixed monthly price to watch all the television you
want for three full years. In addition to a three
year price guarantee, you can also get free monthly movie rentals.
They give you one free movie rental every month. That's
a one hundred and sixty five dollars value yours free.

(28:21):
Plus get free in home tech visits no cost equipment replacements,
a free voice remote, and you can watch commercial free TV,
even access all your favorite apps to stream like Netflix, Amazon.

Speaker 27 (28:32):
Prime, YouTube and more.

Speaker 26 (28:34):
Now is the perfect time to call Dish take advantage
of the three year price guarantee, save yourself some money,
and all your equipment is free.

Speaker 25 (28:43):
Call right now eight hundred three sixty three five oho
three three eight hundred three sixty three five oho three three,
eight hundred three six three five oh three three. That's
eight hundred three six three fifty thirty three paid four
by NPS. Is diabetes keeping you from enjoying life special moments.
At us MED, we understand the challenges you face and

(29:05):
we're here to help.

Speaker 28 (29:06):
With us MET, I can finally manage my diabetes without
it managing me.

Speaker 25 (29:10):
Us MED offers a wide range of services to simplify
your diabetes care. Personalized care plans, convenient access to cutting
edge diabetes tech, and knowledgeable support. Plus we'll check your
insurance so your diabetes care may be covered at little
or no cost to you.

Speaker 29 (29:26):
With us MED, I feel confident and control of my diabetes.

Speaker 30 (29:30):
I can finally live my life to the fullest.

Speaker 27 (29:32):
Don't let diabetes hold you back.

Speaker 25 (29:34):
Choose us MED and experience better birthdays, better adventures, better anniversaries,
and better everything. Call now us MED, better Service, better Care.
Eight hundred four to one, seven oh eight five to one,
eight hundred four to one, seven oh eight five to one,
eight hundred four to one, seven eight five to one.

(29:55):
That's eight hundred four to one seven zero eight fifty one.
Packages start at twenty nine ninety nine a month with
sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
offer details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details. Terms and
conditions apply.

Speaker 24 (30:08):
Home owners, if you're looking for the best in home
security and smart home technology at a price you can
actually afford, we have great news. Now you can get
Vivints award winning home security systems starting at about a
dollar a day.

Speaker 19 (30:21):
US News and World Report.

Speaker 24 (30:22):
Has recognized vivid as the best professionally installed home security
system of twenty twenty two, and right now you can
get Vivins home security technology for about a dollar a day,
plus get free professional installation from a licensed technician. Protect
your home and loved ones for as low as a
dollar a day. Call right now for your free home
security consultation.

Speaker 25 (30:44):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one.

Speaker 9 (31:00):
Let's go to find out what's really going on. This
is govern America.

Speaker 14 (31:21):
Welcome back to the broadcast. This is Governor America. The
website for the show Governamerica dot com. That's Governamerica dot com.
And Vicky, you want to give your information out please?

Speaker 15 (31:32):
Yeah. My website is the Technocratic Tyranny dot com. The
older website is Channelingreality dot com. And my email addresses
on both websites.

Speaker 14 (31:45):
All right, Charlie and Florida in the chatroom says Skype
will go offline on May fifth, when Microsoft replaces it
with a free version of Microsoft Teams. Teams has been
Microsoft's chosen successor for years, offering the same kind of
video calls and group meetings. I don't like Microsoft Teams.
I mean that well. I find their connection with I

(32:09):
find it to be kind of clunky. I find it
to be very difficult. I once use that in a
workplace and inadvertently called every single person on the team's thing,
including people in high management and stuff. I was trying
to make one connection and I ended up inadvertently connecting
to everybody, and after that I was leary of it.
So I find it to be difficult at best to

(32:34):
deal with, and I just don't like it. I like simplicity,
especially when it comes to doing pre show things that
I have to because you know, with a live broadcast,
there's a lot of things you have to do at
the last minute. I mean literally, there's a flurry of
activity that has to take place to get this show
on the air every week. And the last thing I

(32:56):
need is something that is going to increase that burden
in the last minute or so of the of the show.
So I don't know, we'll have to do some experimentation.
At least we have a little bit of time before
they finally get rid of the uh. The small Acts
in the chat room has posted a picture of a
trump with his finger in Zelensky's face, and he says

(33:17):
the scolding of a child.

Speaker 15 (33:20):
Well, Blunsky does act like a child, the actions a
spoiled child. I can't imagine, you know what who he
thinks he is in the world that everybody has to
bow to him. It's it is like he's a spoiled child.

Speaker 14 (33:41):
Yeah. Absolutely. By the way, I wanted to say real quickly,
support the broadcast, support the outlets that keep Governor America
on the air. Patriot Radio across the board is you know,
majorly under attack. It is something that is being starved
of finance and many and most cases, so certainly the

(34:02):
broadcast outlets, radio networks, radio stations that carry govern America
and shows like it need to be supported. If you're
able listeners. We have Shaken Wake Radio Network, k Star
Radio Network, Missouri, Liberty Radio, Republic Broadcasting dot Org. All

(34:22):
of these outlets need your support in order to maintain
their operations. And if you have a local radio station
that carries our show or obviously you would be hearing
the show on there. If there's some way of supporting them,
please do so. Please do so, because it's very, very
vital to keep these broadcast outlets on the air. I

(34:44):
know I got a message this morning from RBN talking
about how funds are running low. They're one of the
few networks that are still on satellite at the ku
Mann Satellite system, and I'm very fond of having people
be able to receive this information without any connectivity to
the internet whatsoever. I mean, being able to point that

(35:05):
at I think it's galaxy nineteen ninety seven degrees west
and be able to receive that over a dish. Ah.
It's just monumental. And that covers all of North America,
gets down in New Mexico up into Canada, covers the
entire continental the United States. So very important, very valuable,

(35:26):
but it's very costly, and so we encourage you to
if you can afford some monetary you know, loose change
at least hopefully some dollars, but shake some of that
loose if you could, and you know, allocate it toward
the networks that are supporting the movement and the truth,

(35:49):
you know, to get the message out. That's what we need. Anyway,
moving along here, I just wanted to say, you know,
we're talking about this meeting at the White House, and
I don't want to belay it too much, but you
know they were talking of you know, I have the
question the value of the minerals in Ukraine in the
first place. In fact, CNBC was seeing analysts say that

(36:11):
there are many unanswered questions on the size of Ukraine's
rare earths and strategic mineral deposits, however, as well as
how accessible they are given Russia's occupation of a swath
of Ukraine and the massive reconstruction process that the country
will face post war. And again, how much of that

(36:32):
are the United States people going to be on the
hook for now, maybe not during this administration, but during
subsequent administrations that may not be as geared towards saving
the American people money. How's that going to work for
us then? And how many of these policies that are
going on right now that are how many of the

(36:56):
policies will be reversed when subsequent administrations take hold. That's
my concern, you know. But they also question, these analysts
the ultimate value of a US Ukraine agreement, giving changing
demand for such natural resources. Anyway, I'll put that article

(37:17):
in the show notes. I think it's great to try
to reclaim some of that money. But at the same time,
we're looking we have a president in the White House
right now that likes to build things, and you know,
there's and I don't want to get into some of

(37:38):
what the I think is influencing this present administration because
it's not really that good. There's a lot of bad
things that are influencing this. There are pressures with any administration,
but my concern is some of the characters that are
in the shadows, that are kind of in the ear
of some of the people that are not in the shadows.

(38:01):
That's something that I'd like to get into some Today.
We have a call on the line. I'll tell you what.
I'll go ahead and take the call, and then we'll
get right back to this, to the balance of what
I have here with this Trump Zelenski blowout in the
White House in just a moment. But let's right now
go to Canada and hello, caller, you're on the air,
Go ahead, please.

Speaker 31 (38:21):
Oh yeah, good morning. We got some nice West Coast
sunshine for you this morning.

Speaker 14 (38:25):
Oh good We could use a lot of sunshine because
I tell you right now, this polar vortex they're saying
is coming back. And I can tell you it's been
relatively mild here for about the last week here in Michigan,
but it is. It's turned off cold. Last night. We
had a very windy day yesterday, and new on the
other side of that windstorm we would have a cold

(38:46):
front moving in and man, Winter's coming back with a vengeance.
I'll be so glad when it's over. But anyway, sorry
for the weather report.

Speaker 31 (38:52):
Well, well we're looking good here. By the way, I
wanted to mention when it comes to Zolenski, worst case scenario,
there's always regime change. For example, you take a Fidel Castro.
Actually we put him into power and then in the

(39:13):
Bay of Pigs thing, Well that didn't work out. But
he crawled into his radio station in Havana. I think,
and you were looking back hindsight, we could have just
taken out the radio station with him in it, and
that would have changed things. And the upshot of it

(39:34):
is that sometimes there's people behind the scenes, like in
the case of Olenski, you got very powerful oligarchs. Oh yeah,
did want this war to go on. But I am
so happy to see yesterday what went on in the
Oval office. I was just laughing it up. Yeah, yeah, celebrations.

Speaker 14 (39:53):
I love how they said some ambassador or something had
her head in her hands because the whole thing was
going to going to crap. And I'm like like, hey,
this is the greatest thing I've ever seen. You know,
I am so glad. Say what you want about Trump,
but it's so nice to see somebody tell that little
sob off. You know, who do you think you are? Buddy?

Speaker 31 (40:14):
Exactly exactly and JD Events I thought proved themselves very well.
And what President Trump said was, look at this is
what the American people maybe need to see. See they
need to see this kind of crap. And I just
want to congratulate the White House, President Trump and everybody

(40:36):
for handling the situation the way they did. So again,
wishing all the best.

Speaker 14 (40:41):
All right, yeah, appreciate that, Thank you, appreciate the call.
Ye blessings, Yeah, by bye.

Speaker 11 (40:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (40:49):
There's a lot of good things that are happening, and that, certainly,
in my opinion, that was one of them. Because I'm
so glad. I don't want any deals with Bozo. I
want this whole thing to be over. I want this.
I want them to just you know, hey, you know what, dude,
on your own. If Europe wants to support you, let
Europe support you. But We're not going to have any

(41:09):
of it. This is not our problem, this is not
our war. And if you think you can do it better,
oh well, they gave us more money. That's what one
argument he was saying yesterday is that Europe gave more
money or as much money as the United States. Now,
I haven't run the numbers, but I have a feeling
that that is simply not true.

Speaker 12 (41:29):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (41:29):
Probably, I can't imagine, because it's never true in any situation.
Europe never pays up right. But we shouldn't be supporting
these people for anything, you know. I think George Washington
warned us to avoid foreign entanglements in his farewell address,
And what have we done. We've been entangled all around

(41:49):
the world. That's you know, We've done exactly the opposite.
And as a result, this country's been weakened substantially as
a result of that. But anyway, finishing up some of
this audio from yesterday so we can move on to
other things.

Speaker 18 (42:01):
And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country.

Speaker 16 (42:05):
This country. It's back to you far more than a
lot of people said they should have.

Speaker 21 (42:10):
Have you said thank you once this entire meeting, No,
in this entire meeting, and you said thank you to
you went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October.
Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of
America and the president who's trying to save your country.

Speaker 19 (42:28):
Please, you're saying that if you will speak. We're loudly
about the war. He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly.

Speaker 16 (42:35):
Your country is in big trouble. No, No, you've done
a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
I know you're not winning. You're not winning this. You
have a damn good chance of coming out okay, because
of the.

Speaker 20 (42:48):
President, we're staying inwa country, staying strong. From the very
beginning of the war, we've been alone, and we are thankful.
I said, thank you haven't been alone.

Speaker 16 (42:58):
We gave you through this thing.

Speaker 18 (43:00):
At President three hundred and fifty billion dollars will, We
gave your military equipment.

Speaker 11 (43:05):
You and you men are brave.

Speaker 12 (43:06):
But they had to use our.

Speaker 16 (43:07):
Military one of these.

Speaker 23 (43:08):
If you didn't have our military equipment, if you didn't
have our military.

Speaker 16 (43:13):
Equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.

Speaker 19 (43:16):
In two days, I heard it from Puchin. In three days.
This is something maybe less in two weeks.

Speaker 15 (43:21):
Of course.

Speaker 16 (43:22):
Yes, it's going to be a very hard thing to
do business like this. I'm gonna tell you they thank you.

Speaker 21 (43:27):
I said it, except that they're accept the American Except
that there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements
rather than trying to fight it out in the American media.

Speaker 19 (43:37):
When you're wrong, we know that you're wrong, and you see.

Speaker 18 (43:40):
I think it's good for the American people to see
what's going on, and I think it's very important.

Speaker 16 (43:44):
That's why I kept this going so long. You have
to be thankful. You don't have the cards. You're buried there,
your people had died.

Speaker 32 (43:52):
You're running low on soldiers. Listen, you're running low on soldiers.
It would be a damn goodness. And then you then
you I don't want to cease fire. I don't want
to cease fire. I want to go and I wanted this.

Speaker 18 (44:05):
Look, if you could get a ceasefire right now, I
tell you, you take it. So the bullets stopped flying
and your ment stuff corning kills.

Speaker 19 (44:12):
Course, we won't just stole the war.

Speaker 16 (44:13):
But they're saying, you don't want to see you.

Speaker 23 (44:15):
I want to see guarantee because you'll get a ceasefire
faster than any Greele's cow.

Speaker 19 (44:20):
More people about fire.

Speaker 15 (44:21):
What they see.

Speaker 2 (44:22):
That wasn't with me.

Speaker 19 (44:24):
That wasn't with me.

Speaker 18 (44:26):
That was with a guy named Biden, who was not
a smart person. But that was that was with excuse me.
That was with Obama, who gave you sheets, and I
gave you javelins. I gave you the javelins to take
out all those tanks.

Speaker 14 (44:40):
Okay, well that's not a good thing, you know.

Speaker 9 (44:43):
Uh.

Speaker 14 (44:43):
And and he's like, oh, well, Obama gave you sheets,
I gave you javelins. We we shouldn't be giving them anything.
And the fact that Trump just said that is a
demerit on Trump. Yeah, so I'll leave that there. There
is more to it. I'll put the entire fiasco, the
entire press conference in the show notes. You're going to

(45:06):
say something.

Speaker 15 (45:10):
Just to agree with you. But the United States seems
to have been set up to be the builder of
the new world order, and Zelensky I think knows that.
And so he's just demanding that everybody do for the Ukraine,

(45:32):
or the US do for Ukraine what it's been doing
all around the world. And so it really goes to
US foreign policy. But he's an actor. I think he
was an actor, right, he.

Speaker 14 (45:48):
Was an actor and a comedian.

Speaker 15 (45:51):
Yeah. I don't think he's so funny.

Speaker 14 (45:52):
I don't think he's funny at all. I don't like
his brand of humor. The Blue humor, playing the piano
with his winker. You know, this guy's sick. He's sick
in the head.

Speaker 15 (46:01):
Well that's kind of crostressing, which seems to go along
with what U. S a I d. Is doing all
over the world. That's true, and so it makes one
wonder was Zelensky chosen by U.

Speaker 12 (46:20):
S a I D.

Speaker 14 (46:21):
Like a person like he was certainly chosen by by
Victoria Newlin. I mean, don't you remember when the UH
when when they were even as the my Don protests
were going on, the violence on my Don, uh, they
were Victoria Newlin was on the UH on the telephone,
UH plotting who was going to take over Ukraine next,

(46:43):
who they were going to install. Now, at that time
it wasn't Zelensky. But if anybody thinks that they didn't
have a hand in every other UH swap out you know,
of political leaders since then, I think they're badly mistaken.
You know, they're not going to allow somebody, Oh, you know,
we're all about democracy, as if democracy is our form
of government. It's not, you know, but you know, supposedly

(47:06):
we're spreading democracy around the world, which is supposed to
mean that people actually have a say. Yet they didn't
go to all the trouble to overthrow the democratically elected
government of Ukraine so that they can allow the people
of Ukraine to choose their elected officials. So yeah, of
course he's hand selected, no question about that. But you know,

(47:29):
the groundwork wasn't very good for this meeting to begin
with last Friday, a week ago. Yesterday, the media's heads
were exploding all over the place because Donald Trump actually
had the nerve to call Ukraine's dictator, you know, a dictator.

Speaker 17 (47:44):
Well, Trump's made a series of remarks this Wednesday about
Ukraine and about Vladimir's Lenzy that have left many observers
almost speechless. Trump called Zelensky a dictator without elections, and
earlier Trump said Ukraine shouldn't have started the war. The
remarks appeared to show an imdurance over the situations in Ukraine,
where elections were postponed because of the war, a war,

(48:07):
we remind you, staked him in. Vladimir Putin, Russia's authoritarian president,
who is of course wanted by the International Criminal Court,
launched an all out invasion of Ukraine three years ago.

Speaker 14 (48:18):
Next monthing, there was no ignorance, there was no ignorance
by calling him a dictator. He's shut down churches, he's
persecuted Christians, he's ran the media out of business. He
won't allow won't tolerate any media criticism. He's forced the
adult male population to not leave the country, and he's

(48:38):
put people on the front lines of a battle that
should never have you know, should never have happened in
the first place. This guy is a dictator, nobody.

Speaker 15 (48:47):
An authoritarian dictator.

Speaker 14 (48:49):
If the Parliament can impeach him, that would be absolutely
great because maybe that would put an end to his dictatorship.

Speaker 15 (48:59):
That maybe chuckle that they started the impeachment proceeding right
after that meeting was over.

Speaker 14 (49:06):
Yeah, maybe they didn't have an opportunity. Maybe they thought
that might be a good opportunity. Whatever the case, he
needs to be taken out of power. And so anyway,
this is part of the speech Trump gave, but think.

Speaker 18 (49:18):
Of it a modestly successful comedian. President Zelenski talked the
United States of America into spending three hundred and fifty
billion dollars to go into a war that basically couldn't
be one that never had to start and never would
have started if I was president, not even a chance,
and it didn't start for four years. He refuses have elections,

(49:41):
is low in the real Ukrainian poles. I mean, how
can you be high with every city is being demolished.
It's hard to be Somebody said, oh no, his polls
are good, give me a break. Every city's being demolished.
They looked like a demolition site, every single one of them.
And the only thing he was real league good at
was playing Joe Biden.

Speaker 14 (50:02):
Like a fiddle.

Speaker 18 (50:02):
He played him like a fiddle. That's an expression we use,
yes sir, to say that he's pretty easy, pretty easy
something all admit that only Trump is going to be
able to do when the Trump administration.

Speaker 14 (50:14):
We're going to be able to do it. I think
Putin even admitted that Biden never tried.

Speaker 18 (50:21):
Europe has failed to bring peace, and Zolensky probably wants to.
Maybe he wants to keep the gravy train going. I
don't know what's the problem, but he hasn't been able.
He's very upset that he wasn't invited. He could have
come if he wanted to, but that he wasn't invited
to Saudi Arabia. But he's been working for three years,
has never been even meeting, so phone calls to stop
this war. It's a horrible thing. I love Ukraine, but

(50:43):
Zolensky has done a terrible job. His country is shattered
and millions and millions of people have unnecessarily died. And
you can't bring a war to an end if you
don't talk to both sides.

Speaker 19 (50:55):
You got to talk.

Speaker 14 (50:56):
They haven't been talking for three years. There hasn't been
any diploma to Paul to see during any of the
Biden administration at all.

Speaker 15 (51:04):
Well, you know, there are layers to world, to the
world dialogue that's going on, or the world actions that
are going on, and depopulation is one of those. Absolutely,
And since Zelensky is such a pervert, it would seem

(51:26):
that he's on the left side of the curve. Oh yeah,
which is on the depopulation side of the curb.

Speaker 14 (51:35):
Well that would make sense. Yep, He's being used to
depopulate Ukraine. And uh yeah, he doesn't care at all
about the people of Ukraine. I think that's very very clear.
But you know the post and.

Speaker 15 (51:51):
It's just like the leftists here, like Joe Biden with
his open borders, the left in this country, they don't
care how many people Peo both die. They were allowing
gangsters from South America to come into our country. And
we have two tiers of law, you know, one tier

(52:13):
for American citizens, which means if you do break a law,
they're going to absolutely throw the book at you, you know,
put you in jail for as long as they possibly can.
But if you are a criminal, illegal alien, they'll let
you go.

Speaker 12 (52:32):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (52:33):
Well, you know one thing that's interesting to me is
hearing all these people cry and moan in the establishment.
That is one thing that's fun to watch. And you know,
of course you sent me that Bill Browder. We talked
a lot about Bill Browder in the past upawn his thought.
He's made an appearance at the Munich Security Conference, and

(52:54):
you know, of course he's still spouting his BS.

Speaker 33 (52:56):
Sutin is a guy. He has an advantage over every
other world leader in that he has no constituents. There
are no people that determine whether he's in his job.
There's no courts or judges or prosecutors that determine whether
he's done his job properly. There's no press to look
into his his actions, and therefore he can do all

(53:19):
sorts of stuff which which would get any other world
leader fired twenty years ago.

Speaker 14 (53:25):
Okay, we could say the exact same thing about Zelensky,
couldn't we There's no press to look into any of
his stuff. He shut it all down, you know, so
Broader conveniently just doesn't mention that though.

Speaker 15 (53:37):
If you don't have a free speech, it wouldn't matter
if you did have a press, a news because you
couldn't print the truth anyway, right, And that that gets
me back to what I was. What I the guy's
name I couldn't remember was Carl Rove, okay, And what
he said to Ron Suskind is that the aid said

(54:05):
that guys like me were in what we call the
reality based community, which he defined as people who believe
that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.
I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism.

(54:25):
He cut me off. That's not the way the world
works anymore. Continued, We're an empire now, and when we act,
we create our own reality. And while you're studying that
reality judiciously, as you will, will act again creating other
new realities wow, which you can study too. And that's

(54:47):
how things will sort out. We're history's actors, and you,
all of you will be left to study just what
we do.

Speaker 14 (54:57):
Well, what a pompous, arrogant little piece of garbage.

Speaker 15 (55:02):
Yeah, but that was like a moment of truth, of
absolute truth. Yeah, the way our country is working.

Speaker 14 (55:10):
Yeah, exactly, And this is why the people in unbelievable
numbers rejected that sort of thing. And during the last election.
The problem is is that what you rejected, what did
you invite in? And this is the thing I want
to talk about in the next hour, because there's a
lot of things going on right now, a lot of

(55:31):
cutting of government, of positions and things like that. And
the conservatives cheer that because it looks like, hey, finally
we're getting the federal government under size, down to size.
But is there a more nefarious purpose for this all?
Is this something to be concerned about? I think there is,
based upon what I'm seeing, and so I'm going to

(55:52):
get into that a little bit in the next hour
as time progresses. Stay with us, Governor America continues our
number two straight ahead, don't go away.

Speaker 25 (56:33):
Is diabetes keeping you from enjoying life's special moments? At
us MED, we understand the challenges you face, and we're
here to help.

Speaker 28 (56:40):
it managing me.

Speaker 25 (56:45):
or no cost to you.

Speaker 29 (57:01):
With us MED, I feel confident at control of my diabetes.

Speaker 30 (57:05):

Speaker 25 (57:07):
Don't let diabetes hold you back. Choose us MED and
experience better birthdays, better adventures, better anniversaries, and better everything.
Call now us MED, Better Service, better Care. Eight hundred
four to one, seven oh eight five to one, eight
hundred four one, seven oh eight five to one, eight
hundred four to one seven oh eight five one. That's

(57:30):
eight hundred four to one seven zero eight fifty one.
Packages start at twenty nine ninety nine a month with
sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
offer details. See vivent dot com for licensed details. Terms
and conditions apply.

Speaker 24 (57:42):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford.

Speaker 4 (57:49):
We have great news.

Speaker 24 (57:50):
Now you can get Vivints award winning home security systems
starting at about a dollar a day.

Speaker 11 (57:55):
US News and.

Speaker 24 (57:56):
World Report has recognized Vivid as the best professionally installed
home security system of twenty twenty two. And right now
you can get Viven's home security technology for about a
dollar a day, plus get free professional installation from a
licensed technician. Protect your home and loved ones for as
low as a dollar a day. Call right now for
your free home security consultation.

Speaker 25 (58:19):
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,

Speaker 11 (58:42):
Two five.

Speaker 19 (58:45):
Still eighty.

Speaker 9 (59:00):
News almost take him.

Speaker 34 (59:01):
The Justice Department released a new batch of Jeffrey Epstein
files after Attorney General Pam Bondi said she was reviewing
classified documents in the case, but it's not the client
list and there's nothing new. Many of the documents were
already released during Ghisli Maxwell's federal criminal trial, which landed
her in prison. Attorney General Pambondi sent a letter to
FBI Director Cash battail Thursday, accusing federal investigators in New

(59:25):
York of withholding thousands of pages of Epstein documents she
has vowed to make public. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer
met with President Trump at the White House Thursday. Starmer
says the UK is increasing against defense spending.

Speaker 35 (59:37):
I announced the single biggest sustained increase in defense spending
in the United Kingdom since the Cold War. Because that's
consistent with the argument I'm making about the need for
resolve to put our shoulder to the wheel in Europe
when it comes to our own security.

Speaker 34 (59:53):
Trump administration borders our Tom Holman and Boston Mayor Michelle
Wu exchanged jabs this week after Home Homan criticize Boston's
police commissioner for refusing to comply with ice detainers. Homan
vowed to bring ice to Boston.

Speaker 36 (01:00:07):
We're going to go on to Boston. We're gonna make
it safer. President Trump made to promise the American people
going to meet the community safer. We're going to decrease
illegal alien crime to zero, and that's exactly what I'm
going to do. Boston can help her get all the
way because we're coming. She's not going to stop us.
We're going to make Boston safer.

Speaker 34 (01:00:23):
Virginia Governor Glenn Youngin issued an executive order Thursday directing
state law enforcement and corrections officers to assist with ICE
operations and enforcement. This as multiple cities and states push
back against the Trumpet administration's mass deportation orders. Virginia Lieutenant
Governor wins some Seers says Virginia is not and will
never be a sanctuary state.

Speaker 37 (01:00:44):
If local law enforcement continues to ignore what the governor
has stated. Governor Youngkin that we're not a sanctuary state,
then that's why he has put this executive order in
place so that we will deputize state police to get
rid of the criminal element among us.

Speaker 34 (01:01:01):
Maine State Representative Laurel Libby remains unable to speak in
the House. She was censured after a social media post
about males in female sports. Libby made these comments on
Washington Watch.

Speaker 38 (01:01:13):
I don't believe that they do have the right. That's
still in question, but it is unprecedented. Never in Maine's
history has a sitting legislator been censured in this way
for anything outside of the state House. This has silenced
main girls, and this has silenced my constituents, all nine

(01:01:34):
thousand of them that elected me to represent them. I
no longer can be their voice in the state House,
and I cannot vote for them, and I do not
believe that that is constitutional.

Speaker 34 (01:01:49):
A conservative pundit and podcast host says she is confident
that the new leadership at the Justice Department is going
to get to the truth about possible FBI involvement with
January sixth, Chad Groning has.

Speaker 39 (01:02:01):
More recently, the House Judiciary Committee sentat a twelve page
letter to newly installed FBI Director Cash Patel, slamming the
actions of the Bureau under President Joe Biden and former
Director Christopher Ray, and the Committee let Patel know that
it is important that he succeeds in restoring public confidence
and much needed transparency. Sandy Rios is Director of Governmental

(01:02:22):
Affairs at the American Family Association and host of the
Sandy Rios twenty four to seven podcast. During it appears
on the American Family Radio. She praised the efforts of
the Trump Justice Department team in trying to give to
the truth about the FBI's involvement in the January sixth,
twenty twenty one protests at the Capitol.

Speaker 40 (01:02:37):
I think Cash is more interested in what happened on
January sixth than maybe Pam Bondy. But they're working together,
and there's such synergy between all these cabinet secretaries. I
view that as a very good thing, and they're working together.
Well my hunch, my feeling, yeah, I think we're going
to get to the bottom of it.

Speaker 39 (01:02:55):
And Rios was please that. Another bit of good news
related to January sixth.

Speaker 40 (01:02:59):
Jeremy Brown, who was Green Beret for twenty years and
it's been in prison for thirteen hundred days something like that,
was just released from a Florida prison. He was pardoned
when President Trump pardoned him, but the DC jail would
not let him out. It's been a complicated thing. I've
been following it. I've been talking to and working with
his attorney.

Speaker 17 (01:03:16):
But he got out.

Speaker 40 (01:03:16):
So that's really good news.

Speaker 34 (01:03:19):
I'm Chad groaning more news online at AFN dot net
and on the AFN mobile app almost compete.

Speaker 1 (01:03:29):
and for future generations, a new world order.

Speaker 2 (01:03:36):
New world for that new world order.

Speaker 3 (01:03:38):
This is a moment to seize the glide. Escape has
been shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will
settle again. Before they do, let us reorder this world
around us, a.

Speaker 6 (01:03:49):
New world order, a world where the United Nations is
poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.

Speaker 7 (01:03:55):
Nevertheless, United States did make key position shaped is so
that the problem of the pot presidentity will be the
emergence of a new international.

Speaker 8 (01:04:07):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century. But
out of what is will be seen the greatest restructuring
of the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy,
greatest restructuring of the global economy, a new world order
was created.

Speaker 9 (01:04:24):
Documenting the crisis of our republic.

Speaker 10 (01:04:26):
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and
open society, and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed the secret societies, the secret holds, and the secret.

Speaker 11 (01:04:40):
Proceedings waging war on the new world.

Speaker 12 (01:04:43):
Order, the Council's of government.

Speaker 13 (01:04:45):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military industrial conflict.

Speaker 9 (01:04:55):
This is govern America for during weeks and Vickie Davis.

Speaker 41 (01:05:16):
City Group mistakenly credited a customer's account with eighty one
trillion dollars instead of two hundred and eighty dollars. According
to a report by The Financial Times, the banking air
occurred last April and was initially missed by two employees
before a third detected it about.

Speaker 14 (01:05:32):
Ninety minutes later.

Speaker 41 (01:05:33):
Transaction was reversed within hours and no funds left the bank.
City Group disclosed the incident to the Federal Reserve and
the Office of the Controller of the Currency, classifying it
as a near miss a banking air where the wrong
amount is processed brought successfully recovered. Internal reports indicate the
bank had ten similar errors involving one billion dollars or

(01:05:55):
more last year, down from thirteen the previous year. The
mistake highlights Cities on going operational challenges as it works
to improve compliance and risk management. The bank has faced
regulatory scrutiny in recent years, including a one hundred and
thirty six million dollars fine in twenty twenty three for
slow progress in addressing risk and data governance issues. Following

(01:06:16):
a four hundred million dollar fine and twenty twenty for
similar concerns. City has since increased investments in data technology
and regulatory reporting to prevent such errors.

Speaker 14 (01:06:27):
In the future. You want to look at your technocredit future,
Ladies and gentlemen. There it is what the bank give,
the bank can taketh away. Just a few key strokes
and your money is gone.

Speaker 38 (01:06:38):
You know.

Speaker 14 (01:06:39):
It's like the Buffalo Springfield song, step out of line,
the man comes and takes you away. Well, they don't
need to take you away. They just zapp all your
currency right out of your account. Now, in this case
they mistakingly put it in. But if they can easily
take it right back out, then what can they do
with your funds when you don't comply with whatever the

(01:06:59):
government wants you to comply with. Welcome back to the broadcast.
This is our number two of Governor America. It is
and continues to be the first of March twenty twenty five.
I want to get into a situation here where we
are addressing some of the people in the shadows. I
recently learned of this, and I don't know if you're

(01:07:20):
familiar with this. Are you familiar, Vicky with the Curtis Jarvin.
The name Curtis Jarvin.

Speaker 15 (01:07:28):
It sounds familiar, but I can't say I know what
it's about.

Speaker 14 (01:07:33):
Well, there's something called neo reaction and I looked it
up on Perplexity. It says. Neo Reaction, also known as
NR Capital N Capital, R Little X, or the Dark Enlightenment,
is a political philosophy that emerged in the two thousands,
primarily through online discourse that it's an anti democratic, anti

(01:07:56):
egalitarian movement that advocates for return to older forms of government,
such as monarchy or feudalism, while rejecting many Enlightenment ideals.
Key aspects of neo reaction include opposites opposition to democracy.
Now we know that we don't live in a democracy,

(01:08:17):
and I'm going to have to stress that at the outset,
because over and over the problem with talking about this
subject is these people are anti quote unquote anti democratic,
and you can you know a lot of people would say, wow,
that's not a good thing, because you know, we're you know,

(01:08:40):
they want to defend democracy. Now, we're not a democracy.
We weren't set up as a democracy. The United States
government wasn't. So you know, I'm not pro democracy. We're
a constitutional representative republic. We were, well, we were suppose
to be anyway, Benjamin Franklin said to Ms Powell outside

(01:09:04):
of the Constitution Hall of seventeen eighty seven in Pennsylvania,
when she asked what form of government you've given us?
He said a republic if you can keep it. He
didn't say a democracy. Now they have in many respects
converted it to a democracy, and we could talk about that.
I won't get into it today. But the point is

(01:09:25):
is that these people are anti democratic in the sense
that they don't want representative government at all, Okay, And
that's a problem.

Speaker 15 (01:09:36):
So that would define the United Nations.

Speaker 14 (01:09:40):
Actually, I think, well, I think what's happening here is
it paves the way for a lot of things. Let
me just continue with what Perplexity said about this, and
all of these things are foot noted, but it says
their key aspects include opposition to democracy. Neo reactionaries argue

(01:10:00):
that democracy is inherently flawed, which it is and leads
to societal decline, which you could probably argue that it does, okay.
Number Two, rejection of progressivism. The movement views progressive ideologies
as detrimental to society, and again you can agree with

(01:10:20):
that absolutely, that is the case. Number Three advocacy for
authoritarian governance. Now here's where you got a problem. I
don't want authoritarian governance of any kind. Many neo reactionaries
support a return to monarchical, monarchical, or feudalistic systems. Number

(01:10:46):
four futurism combined with traditionalism. Unlike conventional reactionaries, neo reactionaries
often present themselves as forward thinking while advocating for traditional
power structures. Number five accelerationism. Some neo reactionaries believe in
hastening the collapse of current political systems to bring about

(01:11:09):
their desired changes. And here's where you get into a
little bit of a problem here. The movement they say
was primarily developed by Curtis Jarvin, and he writes he's
written a lot in the past under the pseudonymmnious Moldbug.

(01:11:33):
Kind of a weird pseudonym, but that's what his pen
name was.

Speaker 15 (01:11:37):
It kind of goes along with this thinking.

Speaker 14 (01:11:41):
Mold Bug and philosopher Nick Land. I haven't looked deeply
into Nick Land yet, but it You know, this guy,
Curtis Jarvin is very interesting and I want to focus
on him today. I will probably do a series on
this from time to time, will revisit this because this

(01:12:01):
is very important and I think as I'm very alarmed
at the influence that this Curtis Yard and especially has
on the current administration in Washington, d C. Right now.
Really absolutely, and we'll get into that here as time progresses,
but it has gained some traction the movement has in

(01:12:24):
Silicon Valley and among certain conservative political figures, with individuals
like Race Yourself, Peter Teel, and JD. Vance reportedly influenced
by neo reactionary ideas.

Speaker 15 (01:12:37):
Okay, I'm hooked.

Speaker 14 (01:12:39):
Neo reaction is characterized by its verbose, often obscure writing style.
These people are worthy, I can tell you, and its
use of historical references to support its arguments. While it
remains a fringe movement, I don't know for how much longer,
its ideas have had some influence on parts of the

(01:13:00):
alt right and certain conservative political circles. So that's what
Perplexity said about it. Now, there is an article in
the Conversation and these people certainly are left wingers because
they start off talking about Trump's breezing attempt to overthrow
the twenty twenty election results. Yeah, okay, whatever, calm down.

(01:13:23):
I love how these left wingers will always focus on that,
and they never talk about all the fraud that happened,
that caused all the uprising, that caused all the anger.

Speaker 42 (01:13:37):
You know.

Speaker 14 (01:13:37):
They anyway, I won't get into it because I don't
want to talk us out of time here, but they
say in recent months, a strand of conservative thought, whose
adherents are forthright in their disdain for democracy, has started
to creep into GOP politics. It's called neo reaction, and
it's leading figure a software engineer. Sounds technocratic maybe, software

(01:14:01):
engineer and blogger named Curtis Jarvin has ties to at
least two GOP US Senate candidates, along with Peter Teele,
a major GOP donor. Now keep in mind, I think
Jade Vance used to work for Peter Teele at one
of his financial enterprises, So there is a connection there,

(01:14:23):
and apparently there's a direct connection with Peter Teele. And
I was explaining to my wife a lot you know
Peter Teele if he refers to himself as a libertarian,
and a lot of people would think that libertarianism is
antithetical to globalism. But really the reality is nothing. In
my mind it cole Less is really nice, really beautifully

(01:14:46):
from a dark standpoint, beautifully from their standpoint.

Speaker 15 (01:14:49):
Let's put it that way, and the objective of libertarians
is to break down the nation state.

Speaker 14 (01:14:56):
Yeah they want they don't they don't want any government,
right exactly. And so borders are a construct of governments,
and so we need to get rid of borders, which
goes perfectly in line with NAFTA, GAT you know, the
whole wt O stuff, you know, the North American Union.

(01:15:20):
Maybe we can suck in Greenland to you know, all
of this stuff.

Speaker 15 (01:15:25):
Well, yeah, because the the whole concept of Free Trade
Area of the Americas is to turn the entire continent
of the Americas into a a regional organization under the

(01:15:49):
UN system, with free trade, no borders between countries. It's
really quite psychotic, yeah, you know. And that's why they
the left is always advocating for more migration from the South,

(01:16:09):
from the Southern America is to come to the United States.
It's because they want to break down our culture and
our national sovereignty.

Speaker 14 (01:16:22):
Yeah, exactly, that's the objective. So in this article it says,
in my years researching the far right, I see this
as one of the most significant, more significant developments in
right wing politics. Someone who calls himself a monarchist isn't
being regulated to the fringes of the Internet, and I
think he is a lunatic. Frankly, this Chris Curtis Jarvin,

(01:16:46):
but they totally are taken seriously. As a matter of fact.
He you know, the conversation, it's like he's even being
interviewed by Fox News is Tucker Carlson and has the
US Senate candidates repeating it talking points. Now, I'm going
to take a break from this article for just a
moment because since he mentioned the interview with Tucker Carlson,

(01:17:09):
and we can just go ahead and play some of
that because he was interviewed. Curtis Jarvin was interviewed on
Fox Nation actually by none other than Tucker Carlson back
in September of twenty twenty one, and right out of
the gate, he talked about how difficult it is to
kill the US government.

Speaker 43 (01:17:31):
So, you know, the sort of the difference that kind
of I think needs to be exploded for a lot
of people, is what is the difference between sort of
my ritual respect for this thing and what it actually is.

Speaker 4 (01:17:43):
Because when I'll actually he's talking.

Speaker 14 (01:17:45):
About when he says this thing, he's talking about the
US government.

Speaker 43 (01:17:48):
Because when I'll actually look at you know what the
Vatican is, or in this case, the swamp, the deep
state as the cathedral as I sometimes called it. You know,
the sort of the oligarchic power structure of America, which
is completely decentralized. There is no center to it anywhere.
There's no like they there's no one you can point to.
There's no race or class or little meeting of like

(01:18:09):
protocols of the Elders of Zion that's happening. There's no conspiracy.
It's completely decentralized. That's what makes it so hard to kill.

Speaker 14 (01:18:16):
And I don't know how he thinks that there's no
conspiracies in the United States government. I think right there,
he's full of bs. I mean, there's all kinds of
centralized stuff, you know, but he says you can't kill
it because of it. It's so decentralized.

Speaker 43 (01:18:35):
And so when you look at the way this ruling
class works and governs, it's a very different thing from
these sort of abstractions that you learn in eleventh grade
Civics class.

Speaker 14 (01:18:48):
Now he talks about, you know a little bit about
the Queen of England, Queen Elizabeth the First versus Queen
Elizabeth the Second, and he refers to himself without any problem.
He refers to himself as a monarchist.

Speaker 43 (01:19:02):
And so everybody knows when they look at the Queen
of England that the Queen of England does not actually
run the government and cannot say off with his head
and all the things that a queen queen could do.
They know she's not a queen. They know she's basically
just a very classy Kardashian.

Speaker 9 (01:19:19):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:19:20):
Sorry, you know, as a monarchist. I'm never going to
live this one down.

Speaker 14 (01:19:25):
As a monarchist, I'm never going to live this one down.
So he's as a monarchist.

Speaker 15 (01:19:32):
I think Trump is in that same camp. Actually, do
you remember when he went to visit I think the
Queen was still alive then, and he bowed to the Queen.

Speaker 27 (01:19:49):
I just.

Speaker 38 (01:19:51):
You know, I just.

Speaker 15 (01:19:53):
Was picking up hints that he had an over over
over deference to her.

Speaker 14 (01:20:05):
Well, let's let's let's take a look at what's going on.
And I was going to apply this a little bit later,
and certainly I will apply it, apply it more a
little bit later. But if you take a look at
some of the things that are happening right now in
the Trump administration, he's in many respects, he's acting like
a dictator. All the executive voters he's signing, and you

(01:20:26):
can argue whether or not you think they're good. And
some of them, you know, seem to be well intentioned, absolutely,
but hey, maybe we should have a benevolent dictator. Maybe
we should have somebody who is looking out for us.
And I think that that would be Curtis Jarvin's argument
here is this idea of a benevolent dictator. The problem

(01:20:49):
is you can't count on a dictator to be benevolent.

Speaker 15 (01:20:53):
Right, just look at Zelensky.

Speaker 14 (01:20:56):
Clearly that's the flaw in the logic. Exactly how would
you like to have this guy? Uh, you know, and
and somebody might be benevolent for a while and decide
they don't like you know, when you criticize something they say,
all of a sudden, the benevolence all goes away. So anyway,

(01:21:16):
as I said, he was talking about Queen Elizabeth the
first and versus Queen Elizabeth the second, the differences in
power they had, and you know, he he applies that
concept to the electorate.

Speaker 43 (01:21:27):
One way, very simple way to sort of think about,
you know, the question of democracy is you can ask
two questions do we live in a democracy?

Speaker 4 (01:21:36):
And should we?

Speaker 43 (01:21:38):
You will find very very few people who answer no
to both of those questions. And so if you look
at the question of basically do you.

Speaker 4 (01:21:46):
Will find many who will answer note to the first question.

Speaker 43 (01:21:48):
Yes, you will find many who will answer no to
the first question, but the ways of giving that answer
are sort of biased by their feeling that living in
a democracy is the way the work.

Speaker 14 (01:22:00):
Okay, Notice they never ever either, And I have to
question Tucker Carlson about this as well. Why does Tucker
Carlson not ever recognize or acknowledge the form of government
we're supposed to have under the constitution. He always refers
the US government to the US government as a democracy.

Speaker 15 (01:22:19):
Yeah, that makes me not tust That's a good question.
But that's the way propaganda works, right they don't. They
formulate the messages, and not all of the messages are
direct messages. Some of them are implied or embedded in

(01:22:45):
whatever it is that they're talking about. And that's the
nature of the propaganda that is happening in this country.
It's exceedingly rare when you hear a politicians say something
directly and straight out. Yeah, in an honest way.

Speaker 14 (01:23:07):
Yeah, exactly, let's go ahead and continue with this.

Speaker 43 (01:23:10):
And so when they look at you know why they
often so people let's say, you know, how do you
hack an election? So you know, people will be like, oh,
you're going to the voting machines or you print up
you know, spare ballots in China or whatever. No, you know,
these are rookie. These are rookie numbers. Like this is
not how you hack hack an election. The way you

(01:23:30):
hack an election is by changing the meaning of the election.
And the way you hack an election is not by
changing eliminating your ability to vote for a certain candidate,
but by simply taking away the power from the politicians
you elect, in other words, turning them from Elizabeth the First,
who actually could say off of your head, to Elizabeth
the second. And so when you look at the legal

(01:23:53):
positions that Elizabeth the First and Elizabeth the Second occupied,
they're exactly.

Speaker 4 (01:23:59):
The same position.

Speaker 43 (01:24:00):
She's the queen, like you know, she's she has you know,
technically an English constitutional.

Speaker 4 (01:24:05):
System, it's called reserve powers.

Speaker 43 (01:24:07):
She could declare martial law tomorrow like you know, and
and actually I think it would work.

Speaker 14 (01:24:13):
And that's he's all in favor of tutalitarianism.

Speaker 43 (01:24:17):
For conversation, you know, And and she has all of
these powers on paper and in practice she's a classy Kardashian.
And so the question you know, of how do you
hack an election is very very simple. Instead of turning
the queen into a classy Kardashian, turn the electorate into
a classic classy Kardashian. So if you basically say you're

(01:24:39):
electing these politicians and you're behaving in this election as
though these politicians you elected were actually in control of
the government, when they're actually about zero point zero zero
one percent in control of the government, and the government
is just this permanent deep state thing that just sits
there in kind of rots and gets worse every decade,
then you can't change this with elections at all.

Speaker 4 (01:25:03):
Sorry. Haha.

Speaker 43 (01:25:04):
It's actually pretty funny that you tried. When it's not scary,
it's like scary funny, like one of those Halloween movies.
This is the attitude of a lib right, you know.
And and look at these you know, it sort of
goes from like look at these yocals with pitchworks, to
like they're going to pitchfork us, to like, look at
these funny yocles with pitchworks, right.

Speaker 4 (01:25:20):
You grew up with this mentality, so did I. You know,
that's how you felt toward the people that you ruled over.
You're like, these people are funny and dangerous.

Speaker 43 (01:25:30):
This is the attitude of Brooklyn toward you know, the
Midwestern conservative.

Speaker 14 (01:25:36):
It's kind of difficult to grasp what he's talking about
because he's very worthy, but I guess he is saying
that we really don't live in a democracy, which we don't,
but but not for the reasons he says. It seems
to be. He seems to be saying that they made
it so that the electorate are like classy Kadeshians and
the democracy, assuming it was really supposed to be a democracy,

(01:25:58):
is just a show, very much like Queen Elizabeth is
a queen for show. And now parts of that will
resonate with a lot of freedom loving people because he
says that you're not going to fix things with elections.
The voters don't really have the power because that they're
supposed to have, et cetera. This is how people get

(01:26:18):
drawn into these errant mindsets because his solution is worse
than the disease.

Speaker 44 (01:26:24):
Uh.

Speaker 15 (01:26:25):
Well, after the break, I'll explain to you what he's
talking about, because I know what he's talking about, okay,
And it has to do with the Lapause treaty, which
I keep mentioning, I keep talking about, but nobody ever
picks it up. And so what I want to do
is explain to everybody the precise language in that treaty. Okay,

(01:26:51):
that basically eliminated out.

Speaker 14 (01:26:54):
Okay, hang on, we'll be back, don't go in.

Speaker 24 (01:26:58):
Are you looking for the chief US prices on car insurance,
then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,

(01:27:19):
for car insurance. And it doesn't matter if you have
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now?

(01:27:40):
And see how much you can save on your car insurance.

Speaker 25 (01:27:43):

Speaker 45 (01:27:59):
No, she wasn't selling seashells by the seashore. That tom
twister was about a real person, but she was selling
something far more interesting than seashells. On today's Creation Moment,
find out what she was really showing selling and now
our creation moment Elst Hotailor.

Speaker 44 (01:28:16):
It is said that the tongue twister she sells seashells
on the seashore refers to Mary Anning seventeen nineteen nine
to eighteen forty seven. However, Anning was not selling seashells
at Lyme Regis, but rather fossils that she had discovered
on the beach. It's interesting that that while this pioneer
paleontologist was not selling shells on the beach, there have

(01:28:37):
been found fossil seashells on mountains and well inland. When
I was a youth, my family often traveled to the
Peak District National Park, which is about as far away
from the coast as you can get on the island
of Great Britain, being about a three hours drive from
the nearest sea. Yet walking over the hills we would
always find fossil, clams and the like. It's estimated that

(01:28:59):
perhaps twenty five percent of the fossils you will find
are marine invertebrates. Evolutionary geologists think that there may have
been periods when continents sunk lower than sea level, but
the rock of which continents are formed is less dense
than that of the ocean floor. Sir, how did Christians
explain this fact? The onset of the worldwide flood would

(01:29:21):
not have been a gentle affair. The breaking open of
the fountains of the deep would cause new crustal material
to push continental mountains higher, and tsun armies would have
washed marine life onto land in a series of encroachments
and ever decreasing retreats of the ocean. The existence of
millions of such fossils is fully consistent with the Biblical

(01:29:42):
account of the flood.

Speaker 45 (01:29:44):
If you enjoyed today's broadcast, you'll be able to read
thousands of radio transcriptions in our best selling book series,
Letting God Create Your Day to find out more visit
us at creationmoments dot com or call one eight hundred
and four to two.

Speaker 25 (01:29:57):
Bible is diabetes keeping you f from enjoying life special moments.
At us MED, we understand the challenges you face and
we're here to help.

Speaker 28 (01:30:06):
it managing me.

Speaker 25 (01:30:10):
or no cost to you.

Speaker 29 (01:30:26):

Speaker 30 (01:30:30):

Speaker 25 (01:30:32):
Don't let diabetes hold you back. Choose us MED and
experience better birthdays, better adventures, better anniversaries, and better everything.

Speaker 27 (01:30:42):
Call now us MED, Better service, better care.

Speaker 25 (01:30:46):
eight hundred four to one, seven eight five to one.
That's eight hundred four to one, seven zero eight fifty one.

Speaker 9 (01:30:59):
With a spoof, let's go to find out what's really
going on. This is Governor America.

Speaker 14 (01:31:20):
Welcome back to the broadcast. This is Governor America as
we continue here on this March first, twenty twenty five
edition of the broadcast talking about Curtis Jarvin and neo
reactionary read Neo reaction and the Dark Enlightenment. Vicky, you
had something you wanted to say going into that last
break and I had to cut you off there.

Speaker 15 (01:31:41):
Yeah, it's really important to read that lapause treaty and
understand the clauses within it because they basically put the
US State Department and the EPA in control of our

(01:32:02):
entire country through a through a series of legal documents
that basically took our power away from US. Okay. Now,
one of the clauses in that treaty, it's a whereas clause.

(01:32:24):
Let me find it here, Okay, Okay, the agreement between
the United States and the United Mexican States. There's a
clause in here recalling that the Declaration of the United
Nations Conference on the Human Environment, proclaimed in Stockholm in

(01:32:46):
nineteen seventy two, called upon nations to collaborate to resolve
environmental problems of common concern. Okay. Now, there's a provision
in law called corporation by reference. The fact that they
referenced the United Nations Conference on Human Environment was recalling

(01:33:15):
that basically caused that declaration to be included as part
of this agreement. So when you read this agreement, you
think it's only the text that's here, but that's not
right because of inclusion by reference, they've included that declaration

(01:33:40):
on the Human Environment in this treaty. Does that make
sense to you?

Speaker 14 (01:33:47):
Yeah, okay, all right, shoe horned it in.

Speaker 15 (01:33:52):
Shoe horned it in. And that the fact that they
created an international zone across US, the entire southern United States,
going from body of water on the Pacific side and
body of water to the Atlantic side, the Gulf of Mexico.

(01:34:15):
That made that jurisdiction basically a port jurisdiction, which would
be under international law, under the international maritime law.

Speaker 19 (01:34:29):
Okay.

Speaker 15 (01:34:30):
And they put the Secretary of State is responsible for
that zone, and under the Secretary of State is the
EPA administrator. And what they have been doing with that
authority is implementing the entire UN Environmental Agenda throughout our country. Okay.

(01:34:59):
Now I add an thing in there, which is that
UN employees have immunity for whatever they do in our country,
and over the past couple of years, I believe that
they've added that immunity to NGOs.

Speaker 31 (01:35:22):
Well.

Speaker 15 (01:35:22):
And so you have these clowns operating in our country
and they do commit crimes and they are not charged
with those crimes, whereas an American citizen that commits whatever
a similar crime, whatever it be, they are arrested and
the book is thrown at them.

Speaker 14 (01:35:44):
Yeah, supposedly Trump has all of his people now in
at Homeland Security and the Justice Department, and I don't
really believe there's any excuse now for all these NGOs
to not be investigated. These ngs should have the should
be unraveled, and all these people that are involved that

(01:36:06):
are aiding and abetting the enemy of our you know,
the the enemies of our country. They should be arrested
and charged with sedition.

Speaker 15 (01:36:17):
Well, they should be, but are they going to be
Well that's the that's the problem with this being embedded
in a treaty, you know, is is that a treaty? Well, laws,
if we have signed on to it, it binds us

(01:36:41):
under international law to the provision.

Speaker 14 (01:36:43):
To hell with international law, VICKI.

Speaker 15 (01:36:46):
We can say that, but that doesn't make it happen.

Speaker 14 (01:36:49):
Well, but they can make it happen anytime they want to.

Speaker 15 (01:36:53):
If I, if I had the power to act on
what I know about that treaty, we would kick them
all out of our country and put a hell of
a lot of them in jail.

Speaker 14 (01:37:05):
Article six of the US Constitution says, this Constitution and
the laws that are made, which shall we made in
pursuance thereof, and all treaties made. So first the Constitution,
then the laws, then finally the treaties.

Speaker 15 (01:37:20):
But somebody has to understand.

Speaker 14 (01:37:22):
Shall be the supreme law land what was done, and
they have.

Speaker 15 (01:37:27):
To take it to court. Are just saying it and
the fact that of being out there means nothing. It
has to be taken to court to overturn it and
to expose it.

Speaker 14 (01:37:40):
Well don't I don't even trust the courts.

Speaker 15 (01:37:43):
Well I don't either, But it's our only option other
than for everybody to understand that we have un operatives
in our country. And I think there's a whole big
nest of them up in northern Idaho. Yeah, you know,
all those Marxists and what they're bringing into the schools,

(01:38:05):
all this LGBTQ agenda which we now know usaid has
been spreading in all the countries that they're operating in.

Speaker 14 (01:38:16):
And that's one thing that I do think is good
that the Trump administration. I'll give them some credit for
trying to cut off the funding to these school districts
that are teaching all of this stuff. I mean, to me,
that's just a no brainer. That's just common sense.

Speaker 15 (01:38:32):
Well, and getting rid of the Department of Education. The
federal Department of Education was established during the Carter administration.
Prior to that, each state was responsible for their own
school system, and that's really the way it should be,

(01:38:52):
and we don't need all.

Speaker 14 (01:38:55):
This federal bureaucracy.

Speaker 26 (01:38:56):
You know.

Speaker 14 (01:38:56):
Reagan, though promised he was going to get rid of
it and never did. Didn't pan out.

Speaker 15 (01:39:02):
And I don't think Reagan was the American patriot that people.

Speaker 14 (01:39:06):
Think he was. I don't think so either. But anyway,
talking about this Curtis Jarvin for a moment, getting back
to him if we can, because I think this is
extremely important and in fact, a lot of the stuff
that's going on right now with the current administration I
believe has its origins with this guy, and so that
she concern everybody considering that he is saying that he

(01:39:27):
is a monarchist, and I also bought his book Patchwork,
which I will quote from here in just a moment.
I thought it was noteworthy though, to understand his roots.
He did mentioned, you know, and I understand that just
because your grandparents are one thing doesn't mean that you
are that same thing. But it does make me wonder

(01:39:51):
given the fact that he is kind of an authoritarian.

Speaker 43 (01:39:54):
One of the things about sort of this conflict that
I think is a mistake. You know, I don't know
how many Libs we'll be watching your show, but you know,
certainly a lot of cons will be out there. And
there's a lot of kind of typical mistakes that people
make that I want to caution people against. And one
of the biggest ones is that when you look at
the Libs, you see an enemy. And that's true in

(01:40:17):
a certain sense. That's true kind of spiritually, spiritually, they.

Speaker 4 (01:40:21):
See you as an enemy.

Speaker 43 (01:40:22):
They have the friend enemy distinction, and that you know,
you may not know it's the civil war conservatives, but
they know it.

Speaker 4 (01:40:29):
It's a called civil war, you know, but you know
how they feel. That's how they feel. That's absolutely how
they feel.

Speaker 43 (01:40:34):
And that is not a new thing that is how
I grew up feel, and I was born in the
freaking Nixon administration, that's how That's how. Yes, I mean,
you know, my grandparents were American Communists. That's how they felt.
That was the sort of the standard feeling about the
yocles with the pitchforks when they were either funny or dangerous.

Speaker 14 (01:40:53):
His grandparents were Communists. Interesting, Yeah, I again, that doesn't
prove that he is one. But given the fact that
he's geared toward authoritarian and means directions and is advocating
really for the breakup of the United States, Yeah, well.

Speaker 15 (01:41:14):
And advocating for a monarch. I mean another word for
monarch is authoritarian.

Speaker 14 (01:41:21):
Exactly dictator. So he offers what I would kind of
classify as a very twisted view of history, viewing leaders
as CEOs.

Speaker 15 (01:41:32):
And but that is exactly what has been evolved into.
If you go back to nineteen ninety and our New
World Order president George H. W. Bush, I would say
that this guy is channeling George HW. Bush, who I

(01:41:53):
considered to be a trader. Yeah, absolutely, because because he
is the one. He's the one that kicked off the
negotiations for NAFTA, right, It wasn't signed until the Clinton administration,
but it was GHWA. If you look at the speeches

(01:42:16):
that were given by George hw Bush beginning like in
the nineteen nineties, you'll see that his whole direction is
towards a new World order, which is a world that
is not where you lop off the head of your

(01:42:38):
political apparatus and you focus on economies and the world
becomes one big global economy.

Speaker 14 (01:42:50):
Yeah, it was George hw Bush that was the first
one that I ever heard publicly mentioned the phrase new
World order.

Speaker 15 (01:42:57):
Yeah, well, me too. Made the hair on the back
of mind next stand up.

Speaker 14 (01:43:00):
Yeah, it certainly got my attention. I was pretty young
back then, I was in my teens, but that was
that caused me to sit up very straight and pay attention.
And I naively thought he didn't really know what he
was talking about. But since later on in life, I've
learned that, oh yeah, he's right in there with it.

Speaker 15 (01:43:19):
Yeah, there is such a thing as the New World Order,
and it's a world order based on economic on economics
and territorial.

Speaker 14 (01:43:33):
Control, global supremacy.

Speaker 15 (01:43:36):
Yes, under the UN system.

Speaker 14 (01:43:39):
Yeah, and who is the UN system? The United States?
I mean, let's let's face it. It wouldn't exist if
it weren't for all the funding. And there's a reason why,
you know, the United Nations Plaza is here, and you know,
because they had to make sure the United States was
drawn in and is a big part of this. None

(01:44:00):
of it would really be able to be of any
real substance were not for the backing of the United States.

Speaker 15 (01:44:05):
Right, and the UK that in my research, I found
out that there was a guy named Irquoay or Erkquart.
He was an administrator at the highest level of the
administration of the U n for like five decades from

(01:44:29):
the beginning of the UN up until about uh I
forget what year he retired, but he retired because he
had to. I mean, he was just too old to
do it, but he was.

Speaker 18 (01:44:46):
He was.

Speaker 15 (01:44:47):
I don't know if you know how administrations work, but
generally the it's the second and third man down who
really do all of the work of the organization, the
lead person whoever is at the top, they're kind of
a figurehead pr PR. Yeah, and so so it's really

(01:45:12):
quite significant that this guy from the UK was at
the very top position in the administration of the UN
for five decades. Yeah, yeah, Okay, well, let me finish
one thing on the Lapause tree. The international zone that

(01:45:37):
was created is basically a port jurisdiction. It's a port,
and ports have always been international because you've got foreign
ships coming in and so it's not really ports are
not really part of your domestic territory. They are, but

(01:45:57):
they aren't. They're international, and so that's the status of
this international zone on the border. Okay, there's another thing
that they did in this Lapause treaty is to say
they can invite anybody that they want to to participate
in the zone. In the system of the zone, well,

(01:46:22):
that's where the sister cities come in. And if you
look at them, like Minnesota, Minnesota set up a sister
city relationship with a city in China, and I'm sure
that was done because of their location next to Canada,

(01:46:48):
but it also applies to Texas and to Idaho. Idaho
has sister cities in Mexico and also in China. So
they set up an international relationship that way, and the
significance of that is that you've got the Lapause Treaty.

(01:47:13):
But then they also had designed the NAFTA super Highway,
you know, which is they internationalized our Highway system, and
our cities within states were setting up sister relationships. Even

(01:47:38):
within the United States. For example, I have an example
of one going from Arizona to Oklahoma City. Well, what
they are doing is setting up a route under the
principle of freedom of transit. A freedom of transit is

(01:47:59):
a principle that was set up in Barcelona in nineteen
twenty one, and what it is about, basically is that
for landlocked states, they have a right to access to
the ocean, and freedom of transit is the principle in

(01:48:21):
law that gives them that right. So it started in
nineteen twenty one as a principle under the League of Nations,
but then they carried it forward to the Breton Woods Agreements.
They then carried it forward to the World Trade Organization.

(01:48:43):
And so the idea is that if you are going
from port to port, doesn't matter if it's in land
or not. It is still an international jurisdiction that you're
traveling through under the principle of freedom of transit.

Speaker 14 (01:49:05):
Okay.

Speaker 15 (01:49:06):
So that's the significance of the corridor going from southern
Mexico coming up through the international zone on the Texas border,
coming up to the Kansas City, smart Port and then
branching out throughout the United States.

Speaker 14 (01:49:29):
Well, I think we need to look at that in
light of because I know that a lot of the
stuff we talk about here on govern America and have
over the years involved these blocks like you're describing, with
the government being joined up with other millit, you know,

(01:49:50):
other governments into a European Union style block. And right,
what what what Curtis Yarvin is advocating here, In fact,
I got his book Patchwork, a Political System for the
twenty first century. What he's advocating, let me just quote
from one of the you know, right out of the gate,

(01:50:13):
one of the earlier parts of the book. He says,
the basic idea of Patchwork is that as the crappy
governments we inherited from history are smashed, they should be
replaced by a global spider web of tens, even hundreds
of thousands of sovereign and independent many countries. There you go,

(01:50:35):
each governed, each hold on, let me let me finish,
Let me finish, each governed by its own joint stock corporation,
without regard to the resident's opinions. If residents don't like
their government, they can and should move. The design is
all exit, no voice.

Speaker 15 (01:50:57):
Well, and that's exactly what they're building with the metropolitan cities.
When I started researching what was going on in Boise
in two thousand and five, it wasn't clear to me
exactly what they were doing. So what I had to

(01:51:18):
do was that I documented each thing that they were
doing that was anomalous. Well over the years and especially
beginning in twenty ten, I figured out that they were
building a metropolitan region.

Speaker 11 (01:51:34):
And what they have.

Speaker 15 (01:51:36):
They have a private sector board of directors that associated
with the Chamber of Commerce, and then they have an
organization of mayors called the Treasure Valley Partnership, and between
those two organizations they are partnered. And essentially getting down

(01:52:00):
to what they did was to disempower the voters of
that area. I mean, you know, people still vote for mayor,
they still vote for representatives within their cities, but those
people have no power.

Speaker 14 (01:52:19):
Yeah, Okay.

Speaker 15 (01:52:20):
And then further further, adding onto the economic regionalization, there's
an organization called the Pacific Northwest Economic Region, which includes
five states of the United States in the northwest, Idaho
being one of them, and the states the provinces in Canada.

(01:52:47):
Immediately above us, going all the way up through to Canada,
making a complete ecoregion.

Speaker 14 (01:52:57):
So you're connecting all the regional bodies with this self
governing thing that he's talking about here. Absolutely, yes, Yeah,
that would make a lot of sense. That would make
a lot That's a good dot to connect. Yeah, So
let me get back to some of this audio here,
because we're almost out of the hour already. He offers,
as I said earlier, a very twisted view of history,

(01:53:18):
in my opinion, you know, viewing historical leaders as CEOs
and monarchs with absolute power instead of there being a
balance of power, which has always been the case here
in American history, at least with our founding. But he
completely distorts that fact and he doesn't even acknowledge it.
Here again is Curtisy Jarvin.

Speaker 43 (01:53:37):
If you look at American history the way people read
French history, which is they number the republic, so I
think they're officially on their fifth republic. I might call
it the sixth, you know, at present. This is also
the way America works. So actually we're on about our
fourth republic here in America because the funded First of all,

(01:53:57):
you have a complete change of constitutional document in seventeen
eighty nine with the Constitution, which is really basically a
right wing monarchical coup that results in what is essentially
the Hamilton Administration. And so what you have at the
start of you know, American history, the USG this thing
in Washington is Alexander Hamilton basically being the CEO of

(01:54:21):
the United States Government, and even though he's nominally just
the Secretary of the Treasury, he's basically running everything, and
Washington is running political interference for him. So you have
this system which is actually it works a lot like
a monarchy, which is like a company, like a startup.
It's like, you know, do you drive a car, Your
car was made by a monarchy. Do you go to

(01:54:41):
a restaurant, Your restaurant is a monarchy. Every functional, you know,
institution in the world has this, you know, very simple
pyramid structure. So at the beginning of this era kind
of the second American Republic, the first being the Congress
of the Convention, which is just a complete show and
has actually been really airbrushed out of history, like you

(01:55:04):
don't even know the names of the politicians involved in
that show. You know, there's always this like who was
the first president?

Speaker 14 (01:55:11):
Question?

Speaker 43 (01:55:11):
Yet you know, it's like the President of the Congress,
and I think people even disagree on that, you.

Speaker 4 (01:55:17):
Know, like it's this complete mess.

Speaker 43 (01:55:20):
And out of this mess, basically, Hamilton is like, I'm
going to create a government. I'm going to create what
is essentially a sovereign company that is in charge of
all of these states, that acts like a government, that
has that does government like financial things and foreign relation things.
And he wanted to do a lot of trade restriction,

(01:55:42):
which unfortunately he didn't get to, but later that that
became adopted in the so called American system. And you know,
he created this monarchy, right, But of course, you know,
he goes out in this stupid duel and the system degrades,
it basically falls apart, and it becomes more and more oligarchic.

Speaker 14 (01:56:02):
Yeah, more and more oligarchic. But here's the problem. What
he's advocating here is the very oligarchy that in fact,
later on he goes on to praise the aristocracy, the aristocrats.
It's incredible. We'll finish this up in the final hour
because there's a real big payoff come in here, and

(01:56:23):
it's it's just mind blowing. Stay with us. Hour number
three of govern America straight ahead, don't go away.

Speaker 24 (01:56:33):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance,

(01:56:54):
year when they call Leus to switch. So why don't

(01:57:16):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.

Speaker 25 (01:57:18):

Speaker 26 (01:57:33):
Do you love watching television? If you're on a fixed budget,
you need to make this free call right now to
Dish and find out how you can get a fixed
monthly price to watch all the television you want for
three full years. In addition to a three year price guarantee,
you can also get free monthly movie rentals. They give
you one free movie rental every month. That's a one
hundred and sixty five dollars value yours free. Plus get

(01:57:57):
free in home tech visits, no cost equipment replacement. It's
a free voice remote, and you can watch commercial free TV,
even access all your favorite apps to stream like Netflix, Amazon, Prime,
YouTube and more. Now is the perfect time to call Dish,
take advantage of the three year price guarantee, save yourself
some money, and all your equipment is free.

Speaker 27 (01:58:19):
Call right now.

Speaker 25 (01:58:20):
Eight hundred three sixty three five oh three three, eight
hundred three six three five oh three three, eight hundred
three sixty three, five oh three three. That's eight hundred
three six three fifty thirty three paid for by NPS.

Speaker 11 (01:58:43):
Two five.

Speaker 46 (01:58:59):
Poor American fams. I'm Chris, what word? We're fireworks at
the White House after the President of Ukraine showed up
for talks with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD.
Vance on bringing it into Ukraine's war with Russia.

Speaker 20 (01:59:12):
You have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you
will feel it in the fusion.

Speaker 19 (01:59:18):
Less you don't know that. I'm bless you. I'm blessed.

Speaker 16 (01:59:20):
You don't know war.

Speaker 19 (01:59:21):
Don't tell us what we're going to feel.

Speaker 16 (01:59:23):
We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what
we're going to feel.

Speaker 19 (01:59:26):
I'm not telling you because you're in no position to
dictate that.

Speaker 18 (01:59:30):
Do You're in no position to dictate what we're going
to feel. We're gonna feel very good, feel We're gonna
feel very good and very strong.

Speaker 19 (01:59:40):
It will feel influenced.

Speaker 16 (01:59:41):
You're right now, not in a very good position.

Speaker 32 (01:59:43):
You've allowed you to be in a very bad positions
to be right about the very beginning of the war.

Speaker 18 (01:59:49):
Not in a good position. You don't have the cards
right now with us. You start having calls right now.

Speaker 23 (01:59:55):
You don't explain you're gambling with him. Millions of people
seen you gambling with World War three.

Speaker 18 (02:00:04):
You're gambling with World War three, and what you're doing
is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's back
you far more than a lot of people said where
they should have.

Speaker 46 (02:00:16):
For more on this developing story, visit our website AFN
dot net. Antie Israel. Protests started up again at one
college this week. Here's AFNs Bronson Woodruff.

Speaker 47 (02:00:27):
Protesters allegedly assaulted an employee when they took over a
building on the campus of Barnard College in New York City.
This happened on Wednesday evening. Student Elishah Baker, also called Leshy,
is in his junior year at Columbia University. He was
at the Barnard protest confronting protesters and is seen on
video being blocked access into the building.

Speaker 16 (02:00:44):
I don't understand why not?

Speaker 11 (02:00:47):
Why do we go away? Tell me you go away?
Tell them to go away? Why do I have to
go away but they can't go away?

Speaker 47 (02:00:53):
Baker went on Fox to share what happened.

Speaker 12 (02:00:55):
I mean, this is nothing new.

Speaker 22 (02:00:56):
These are students who cosplay as the the terrorists that
they support.

Speaker 4 (02:01:01):
They have no regard for the rules.

Speaker 9 (02:01:03):
He explained.

Speaker 47 (02:01:04):
His friend also seen in the videos trying to get
into the building because he had an accounting class inside.
More video shows masked people outside the building handing bags
up into the window to protesters.

Speaker 22 (02:01:14):
A group of students that showed up with grocery bags
and meals for the protesters that essentially locked themselves in
that building.

Speaker 47 (02:01:21):
The protest ended the same night it started.

Speaker 22 (02:01:23):
Barnard gave them a document that said, if you leave
by ten thirty pm, we will not issue any disciplinary
rulings against you for being inside the building. So essentially,
at ten forty five they marched out and did a
victory march because they successfully held a standoff.

Speaker 47 (02:01:38):
Baker concluded, anyone who undermines the basic functioning of the
university in anti Semitic and anti American ways like this
should face discipline. I'm Brons and Widruff.

Speaker 46 (02:01:46):
A new report from Family Research Council says there was
growing persecution of Christians in India. Talking about this on
Washington Watch, Mariol dold Turco said, this includes violent threats
and beatings.

Speaker 19 (02:01:58):
Just last week we saw.

Speaker 48 (02:02:00):
There was a church where two hundred people, a mob
of two hundred people came interrupted a worship service, beat
people with iron rods simply because they were attending a
Christian worship service in their community.

Speaker 46 (02:02:14):
When the police arrived, they took the pastor in for questioning.
Amid concerns about forced conversions.

Speaker 48 (02:02:19):
The police are at worst complicit and at best completely
turning a blind eye to Christian suffering.

Speaker 46 (02:02:26):
In other news, this hour. More and more people are
turning to AI chadbots to access digital therapy. Here's Fox
is Mark Meredith.

Speaker 49 (02:02:34):
It is called AI therapy, and it's a lot cheaper
than going to a doctor's office.

Speaker 4 (02:02:38):
There's one service offering this called Abbey.

Speaker 49 (02:02:40):
It's therapy available twenty four to seven through this chatbot,
so you don't have to wait for the normal business
hours to get help. The company's creators say business is
booming and that its platform is constantly adapting its.

Speaker 4 (02:02:49):
Advice based on an individual's need.

Speaker 49 (02:02:52):
The American Psychological Association says it knows AI is here
to stay. They don't want to ban this technology, but
they're concerned about privacy and the quality of advice people
are getting. The group now lobbying the Federal Trade Commission
to require AI apps have safeguards so people who use
these bots have a better idea of where the help
is coming from.

Speaker 46 (02:03:11):
The American Psychological Association is also trying to lobby state
legislatures to pass laws regulating this technology. In final news,
Microsoft is pulling the plug on skytt. The last a
for the program is in May. Thanks for listening.

Speaker 1 (02:03:29):
and for future generations, a new.

Speaker 2 (02:03:35):
World order, new world for that new world order.

Speaker 4 (02:03:38):
This is a moment to seize.

Speaker 3 (02:03:40):
The kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are in flux.
Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us
reorder this world around us, a.

Speaker 6 (02:03:49):
New world order, a world where the United Nations is
poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.

Speaker 7 (02:03:55):
Nevertheless, the United States to make key position to shape
this so that the problem of the Bush prensadivity will
be the emergence of a new international order.

Speaker 8 (02:04:08):
The first decade of the twenty first century, but out
of what will be seen as the greatest restructuring of
the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy, the
greatest restructuring of the global economy, a new world order's greatest.

Speaker 9 (02:04:24):
Documenting. The crisis of our republic.

Speaker 12 (02:04:26):
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and.

Speaker 10 (02:04:30):
Open society, and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed the secret societies, the secret owns, and the secret.

Speaker 11 (02:04:40):
Proceedings waiting war on the new world order.

Speaker 12 (02:04:43):
The Council's dis government.

Speaker 13 (02:04:45):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military industrial conflict.

Speaker 9 (02:04:55):
This is govern America with Darren Weeks and Vicky Davis.

Speaker 2 (02:05:06):
Again.

Speaker 50 (02:05:07):
Senate Republicans held a private meeting yesterday. Elon Musk a
topic of discussion. Some Republicans growing frustrated over the way
he's handling cutting government spending, firing workers again in public,
though Republicans are pretty hesitant to criticize Musk privately, though
in meetings like this, it appears that frustrations are growing.

Speaker 51 (02:05:26):
Frustrations are growing for two reasons. And one, we're seeing
that some Senate Republicans are fairly uncomfortable with the president's
positioning on Russia.

Speaker 19 (02:05:35):
That's the first one.

Speaker 51 (02:05:36):
Now the second one that's more applicable here is something
uncomfortability that comes from Senate Republicans is over some of
these massive cuts and slashes that are happening to the
federal government that does involve their constituents, and that's I
think causing some uncomfortability.

Speaker 19 (02:05:51):
On Capitol Hill.

Speaker 51 (02:05:52):
But so far, as we've been seeing over the past
few weeks, drew that most of the action coming out
of the second Trump administration is happening from the exist
A branch not from Capitol Hill. So I wouldn't say
these Republican Senators are particularly emboldened because most of the
action that we've seen and most of the priorities have
happened through executive action, not on Capitol Hills.

Speaker 14 (02:06:12):
Welcome back to the broadcast. This is Governor America, our
number three, March first, twenty twenty five. As we were
talking about Curtis Yarvin, the Dark Enlightenment and Neil reaction, Okay, I.

Speaker 15 (02:06:24):
Just looked him up, and something really important to know
about that guy is that he is a computer program Yes, okay.

Speaker 14 (02:06:32):
Yeah, we mentioned that earlier in the show.

Speaker 15 (02:06:34):
I did you I missed it.

Speaker 14 (02:06:35):
Yeah, I was reading.

Speaker 15 (02:06:37):
That's significant because the way they're changing our economy, the
way it began under the Clinton administration, is to convert
our economy, our country to a market system.

Speaker 14 (02:06:52):
And convert things to an efficient system of governance. And
notice I didn't say government, I said governance, because because
what you're looking at here is a conversion to systems,
as you're very fond of talking about, Vicky, these systems
that are involved. I believe that that's what they're doing,
is they are smashing the government into pieces and they're

(02:07:15):
getting ready to replace it. And I believe it's Jarvin's
influence that is bears that out.

Speaker 15 (02:07:21):
The market will govern whatever whatever its area is. In
the case of electricity, you just go back and look
at what Enron was doing. Enron as a company was
and they called it an energy trader company, but really

(02:07:46):
what they were doing was managing the market for electricity.

Speaker 14 (02:07:50):
Yeah, and.

Speaker 15 (02:07:53):
So as long as you understand that market doesn't mean market,
it means computer system.

Speaker 14 (02:08:00):
Yeah, when you consider this guy wants to smash the
United States up into pieces, you know, perhaps hundreds of
self governing, autonomous could we call them regions or but
he calls them governments, self governing, you know, and they're
overseen by financial monarchies, you know, corporate monarchies, and the

(02:08:23):
people have no voice. This sounds so much better than
what we have now, doesn't it.

Speaker 15 (02:08:29):
They can't even begin to understand how a system like
that would affect their lives. When when you hear people
talking about the market, you know, they think they know
what they're talking about, but they don't because they don't
understand that the word market is a substitution for computer system.

Speaker 14 (02:08:56):
Well, finally we get to the payoff, the punchline, the
big apec of this whole situation. There's this interview anyway
with Tucker Carlson and this Curtis Jarvin, because he talks
in hypothetical terms about building a government alongside the existing
government and shutting the old one down. Now, remember this,

(02:09:17):
this interview took place back in twenty twenty one when
Tucker was still employed at Fox News. So but I
want you when you listen to this, and this is
about a six minute clip here, when you're listening to
Curtis Jarvin talk, then this is a guy again who
is in jd Vance's ear, good friends with Jadie Vance.

(02:09:37):
He's a mentor of jd Vance and Jade Vance has
in In fact, I'll play some audio here in a
moment from Jadie Vance referencing Yarvin's work. So this isn't
no small thing going on here. Jarvin has influence with
this administration. There is no doubt about it. And so
when you consider what he's saying here, I would like

(02:10:01):
you to think about, Doge think about all the cuts
that we just play that news story A moment ago
from the hill at the top of the top of
this hour, where they're talking about all the GOP members
are upset because their constituents are being adversely affected by
some of the cuts. Yet I don't want to be uh,

(02:10:23):
I don't want to come across like I'm against that.
I'm in favor of big government. But what we're talking
about here is moving fast breaking things, deliberately, moving fast
breaking things intentionally for the reason of replacing what they've
broken with something else. That's the concern. And that is

(02:10:44):
exactly what I think is going on here.

Speaker 15 (02:10:46):
All right, let's that is exactly right.

Speaker 14 (02:10:49):
Curtis Jarvin on Tucker Carlson talking about how they want
to build a government alongside the existing government.

Speaker 4 (02:10:55):
And again you have another revolution in the form of FDR.

Speaker 43 (02:10:59):
So FDR in and this thing has become tremendously ossified
and full these old corrupt politicians and hide bound in
bureaucratic and small and just has not adapted to this itself,
to this new way of government by intellectual And FDR
is fine, that's fine, We're just going to come in FDR.
Could you know he had some trouble with some of

(02:11:20):
the older line agencies. You like to create new agencies.
He could create agencies, he could destroy agencies. You know,
no one could do that in Washington now, no one
has that kind of power, and so you know, are
there limits. He has a basically a rubber stamp of Congress.
He makes this incredible you know, I do this. There's
no time for this year, but I do this great

(02:11:41):
rendition of FDR's first inaugural I've heard it, you've heard
it in which basically if I change a couple of names,
people think it's Hitler. Is basically what he's doing is
he's bullying Congress and he's like, Congress, you must give
me absolute power or I will.

Speaker 2 (02:11:54):
Just take it.

Speaker 4 (02:11:54):
And you don't want that to happen. That was basically
FDR's message to Congress.

Speaker 22 (02:11:58):
Right.

Speaker 4 (02:11:58):
So the thing is, again you see this sort of legitimate.

Speaker 43 (02:12:01):
American monarchy where you see the presidency, which was originally
designed as a monarchy sort of as you know, just
not in the sense of a hereditary monarchy, but just
in the sense of one manager like again all other
functional institutions in the universe. And you know, and you
see it sort of reassert that form and recreate and

(02:12:25):
redefine what government is and just kind of wrote around
this whole old mess and you just you start to
look at these whole systems which all date to FDR's world,
which are all sort of built on the assumptions that
were made in FDR's world, and those assumptions sort of
keep getting rationalized over and over again, and those rationalizations

(02:12:46):
are incredibly deeply embedded at this kind of fundamental level
in government the next regime. And I think you know,
one of the differences I have with Mike Anton is that,
you know, we talk about Caesarism a lot, and you know,
you're clearly, from my perspective, looking very much at a
fall of the Roman Republic event here in a best
case scenario. Worst case scenario is more like the fall

(02:13:08):
of the Roman Empire.

Speaker 52 (02:13:10):
Let's go for the best case scenario, a transition between
one form of government and yes.

Speaker 4 (02:13:15):
And the thing that to observe.

Speaker 43 (02:13:17):
And the reason why the fall of the Roman Republic
is the best case scenario is that it got a
couple of very good CEOs in a row. It got Caesar,
who is an excellent CEO, but could have worked a
little harder on his personal security. And then it got Augustus,
who is merely a very good CEO who continued at
Caesar's regime for like thirty years or whatever. And Caesar's

(02:13:38):
a Red state guy. He's a populist. He comes out
of the Party of the Popularities. He's set against the
old Senate, and the old Senate basically is very oligarchical.
And one of the reasons why they always lose their
wars against Caesar is they basically can't actually delegate their
power to a single leader Caesar. So Caesar comes he's

(02:13:58):
a red state guy, but he and that's where he
comes out of. But his mission in ruling Rome is
to rule all of Rome and to unify Rome. And
so you know, the way he does that doesn't involve
giving any power back to the Senate. But for example,
one of the things Caesar doesn't do, which is a

(02:14:18):
normal thing to do in a Roman regime change, is
basically kill his enemies and take their money, because he's
basically like, no, actually, you're.

Speaker 4 (02:14:26):
Not my enemies anymore because the struggle is over.

Speaker 43 (02:14:29):
So, you know, the most important thing that you need
to look for in kind of the next sort of
regime change, are.

Speaker 14 (02:14:37):
You ready pay attention to folks?

Speaker 43 (02:14:38):
Here it comes in this country, assuming it follows the
pattern of the past, which is basically under the same constitution,
the regime reinvents itself every seventy five or eighty years.
It's kind of like an earthquake, like the San Andreas
false is about due to go quality.

Speaker 52 (02:14:54):
And I can guess what you're going to say is
does the next leader bring the professional class with him?

Speaker 16 (02:15:00):
Yes?

Speaker 43 (02:15:01):
And the thing is basically, does he have a message
to those people? Is his message to those people? If
his message is, you know, to those people is I'm
just going to kill you where you stand like Rwanda
and like throw your body in the stream, that's not
going to work out very well, right, And so but
the thing is that the message of like this is
a really you know, we're both from this class.

Speaker 4 (02:15:23):
We can say this.

Speaker 14 (02:15:25):
Here's where he starts praising the aristocracy.

Speaker 43 (02:15:27):
These are in many ways the best people in America
and just as human beings, their ideas are terrible, but
as human beings, they're wonderful, they're best taste, they eat
the best food.

Speaker 4 (02:15:39):
These are not insignificant things. This is an aristocracy.

Speaker 43 (02:15:41):
And so you know, there's just no world in which
you can do this without electing a president who says
I am the chief executive of the executive branch. I
am going to reinvent the executive branch. And the way
I'm going to do it is simply by working around
the one we have and creating a new one which.

Speaker 4 (02:15:58):
Has all the power.

Speaker 43 (02:15:59):
As for the people we have, with very few exceptions,
they'll be retired and we're just going to create a
new government next to the old one, and we're going
to shut the old one down in a very nice
and peaceful way that does not involve dragging anybodies.

Speaker 4 (02:16:15):
Through the street.

Speaker 43 (02:16:16):
That involves probably your retirement benefits are going to be increased.
You're going to get an awesome severance if you work
for this old thing, because we're actually buying you out.
We're saying you have power. Okay, so here's what the
American people are.

Speaker 4 (02:16:28):
Going to do to you.

Speaker 43 (02:16:28):
We're going to print a whole bunch of money, because
that's really one of the things that we're still good at.
We're going to print a whole bunch of money, and
we're going to buy you out, and you're just done,
and it's like the day after. You know what, there's
a funny fact about regime change. The Federal Republic of
Germany is still paying pensions not only to retired Stasi officers,

(02:16:50):
but also to retired Wehrmacht officers. It is accepted that
both of those regimes were Germany. If you serve those
regimes and you weren't like some kind of major criminal
who's been prosecuted, yeah, you're entitled to your pension.

Speaker 4 (02:17:05):
And the way that shutdown.

Speaker 43 (02:17:06):
Worked is that the day the doors of the Stasi
building were closed and these people were sent home, you
couldn't reboot that system.

Speaker 14 (02:17:14):
Okay. So that's what I think is happening on a
federal level right now. And you can see what he's
talking about with the buyouts. Keep in mind, this interview
took place in twenty twenty one, so this is Jarvin's doctrine.
What the Trump administration is practicing with these buyouts of

(02:17:34):
government employees, with this hacking off of these different positions
inside the United States government, irrespective of what these people do.
You know, that's my part of my problem with the layoffs.
And I don't want to see anybody lose their job
except the extremists, you know, communists. They shouldn't have been

(02:17:55):
there in the first place. People should be vetted if
they're anti American shouldn't be inside government in the first place,
but some aspects of it are necessary in order to
keep things functioning. And we're seeing layoffs across the board
to the point where you've got to question whether or
not the thing is going to function. And to a
lot of the libertarians, the libertarian minded people in the audience,

(02:18:18):
the people who are kind of the anarchist types, this
is going to sound very appealing. Hey, let's crush it,
let's get rid of the government, you know. But the
problem is is that what are you going to have
in its place? Because power abhorrors, a vacuum listeners, somebody
will govern in some form.

Speaker 15 (02:18:38):
Well, I think they intend for the Internet, for AI
to be the governing power. It certainly is going to
be the control That was the significance of what I
think I mentioned last week, which is an integrated continent,

(02:19:00):
a wide electricity grid, and when when they cantrol the
electricity grid, they'll just shut off your electricity for your
region or even for your house. If you're a trouble
maker and you're dead in the water, you can't do

(02:19:23):
anything without electric power. And so I think that's going
to be the control mechanism for our various levels of government.

Speaker 14 (02:19:35):
Well, what I think is going to be the control
mechanism is the money system, because I don't think so
you could. You could generate your own electric power. But
what you can't do if you can't buy the necessary materials.
If you can't buy, you know, you can't pay the
extortion tax to keep your land. You know, they will
take you know, the land. The means of production is

(02:19:56):
the land, and you can't do anything if you don't
have and once they just like we played the audio
earlier of the bank depositing a trillion dollars in somebody's
account and then turning around with a keystroke or two
taking it right back out. That's what they'll happen to you.
They won't deposit, but they will withdraw. They'll freeze your assets,

(02:20:20):
they'll weaponize the money, and you won't be able to
spend it on anything that you need.

Speaker 15 (02:20:26):
Well, last week there was a hearing about not just bitcoin,
but different kinds of vapor money, which is what.

Speaker 14 (02:20:39):
It is really yep.

Speaker 15 (02:20:41):
And I think they are actually going to try and
replace the federal reserve system, which a lot of people
will be cheering about with vapor currency.

Speaker 14 (02:20:57):
Isn't it interesting, VICKI that they're talking about how much
gold is in Fort Knox now, whether or not the
gold was stolen from Fort Knox, you know what.

Speaker 15 (02:21:07):
They've been talking about that. But I remember watching a
sixty minutes program in the nineteen eighties where they said
that the gold, the gold was no longer in Fort Knox.
They just left it there as kind of a museum.
But if you remember on nine to eleven, there was

(02:21:28):
a major gold heist that was going on that the
media really didn't talk about that much. So I think
the gold was actually in the World Trade Center, probably
Building seven.

Speaker 14 (02:21:42):
The reason I bring the Fort Knox gold thing up
right now is because that's something that people in the
Trump administration has been talking have been talking about Elon
Musk in particular, mister Technocracy himself. In previous broadcast we
talked about his grandfather in Technocracy, Inc. But the point
is is that the effects of talking about the possibility

(02:22:05):
even that that there is no of gold in Fort Knox,
the whole point of this, I think is kind of
to destabilize the faith in the system.

Speaker 15 (02:22:16):
Well, that could be because because part of the subject
matter of that hearing that I just mentioned about these
different kinds of bitcoins that they have different names. But
that's the concept is bitcoin.

Speaker 14 (02:22:33):
Yeah, it's not bitcoin. It's really cryptocurrency, is what you're talking.

Speaker 15 (02:22:36):
It's cryptocurrency. There are several different names ethereum is one.
But the the idea is vapor currency. Okay, if we
can keep and the idea, the banking system was designed
based on commodities, hard commodities that have value like gold

(02:22:58):
and silver and whatever. What these technocrats, and that's who
they are, is technocrats. They want to convert to a
system of carbon credits. Yeah, and you will earn carbon
credits by in feeding renewable energy to the grid. And

(02:23:23):
see what they what they do when when they started this,
they got all of the industrial firms, the utility companies
and whatever to sign on to it. And with the
idea being that to have a system whereby you are

(02:23:44):
rewarded for reducing energy use. And that that system started
in California with the Environmental Defense Fund. They made a
deal with I think Pacific Gas an Electric whereby they

(02:24:05):
would for each efficiency that the utility company implemented, they
would be able to increase their rates. Whereas the standard
model of electricity the accounting for utility companies was that

(02:24:30):
a cost plus system. If you build more capacity, you
can increase the cost of electricity to cover that capacity.
And on top of that, there is a profit margin
that was controlled because if you control electricity without any

(02:24:51):
government regulation, you control the whole damn economy, the country, everything.
And so that's why utility company regular relation was put
into place to begin with. But what they ultimately did,
because utility companies couldn't own holding companies under the Public

(02:25:15):
Utilities Holding Company Act of nineteen thirty five, what they
did was to have holding companies by our electric utilities.
Because there was no law against that. They went around
the law. They got around the law of holding companies,

(02:25:35):
and it was these holding companies that the holding company
actually is what caused the subprime mortgage meltdown in star Idaho,
because you had a utility company that was actually owned

(02:25:56):
by a couple of financial companies that actually funded the
building of these homes where there was no market.

Speaker 14 (02:26:05):
Yeah, we're almost up to the break. But anonymous eighty
one to seventeen says the technocrat currency is carbon. Yeah,
you are the carbon being eliminated post human world. So
there you go. Exactly right. All right, we're almost at
the bottom of the hour. I got a couple of
more clips. I got a clip going back to twenty

(02:26:26):
twelve of Curtis Yarvin's speech talking about how to reboot
the US government the small which again goes right in
line with the DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency, folks,
it's just renamed. Back then he was calling it rage
retire all government employees. So we'll get to that here

(02:26:47):
in a moment. And also JD vance his reference on
the Jack Murphy podcast back in twenty twenty one of
Jarvin's work, So we'll be back in a moment. Stay
with us.

Speaker 25 (02:26:58):
Back just shortage twenty nine ninety nine a month with
sign agreement restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
off for details, seevivent dot com for licensed details.

Speaker 27 (02:27:06):
Terms and conditions apply.

Speaker 24 (02:27:08):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivints award
winning home security systems starting.

Speaker 4 (02:27:20):
At about a dollar a day.

Speaker 24 (02:27:21):
US News and World Report has recognized Vivid as the
best professionally installed home security system of twenty twenty two,
and right now you can get Vivins home security technology
for about a dollar a day, plus get free professional
installation from a licensed technician. Protect your home and loved
ones for as low as a dollar a day. Call
right now for your free home security consultation.

Speaker 25 (02:27:44):
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,

Speaker 24 (02:27:58):
Are you looking for the the cheapest prices on car insurance,

(02:28:19):
year when they call us to switch, so why don't

(02:28:41):
and see how much you can save on your car
insurance eight.

Speaker 25 (02:28:44):
Hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred eight
two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred eight
two five seventeen ten.

Speaker 26 (02:28:59):
Do you love watching television? If you're on a fixed budget,
you need to make this free call right now to
Dish and find out how you can get a fixed
monthly price to watch all the television you want for.

Speaker 9 (02:29:09):
Three full years.

Speaker 26 (02:29:11):
In addition to a three year price guarantee, you can
also get free monthly movie rentals. They give you one
free movie rental every month. That's a one hundred and
sixty five dollars value yours free. Plus get free in
home tech visits, no cost equipment replacements, a free voice remote,
and you can watch commercial free TV, even access all
your favorite apps to stream like Netflix, Amazon, Prime, YouTube

(02:29:34):
and more. Now is the perfect time to call Dish,
take advantage of the three year price guarantee, save yourself
some money, and all your equipment is free.

Speaker 25 (02:29:44):
Call right now eight hundred three six three five oho
three three eight hundred three six three five oho three
three eight hundred three six three five oh three three.
That's eight hundred three six three fifty thirty three paid
for by NPS is Diabetes keeping you from enjoying life
special moments. At us MED, we understand the challenges you

(02:30:05):
face and we're here to help.

Speaker 28 (02:30:06):
it managing me.

Speaker 25 (02:30:11):
or no cost to you.

Speaker 29 (02:30:26):

Speaker 30 (02:30:30):

Speaker 27 (02:30:33):
Don't let diabetes hold you back.

Speaker 25 (02:30:35):
Choose us MED and experience better birthdays, better adventures, better anniversaries,
and better everything. Call now us MED, Better service, better care.
eight hundred four to one seven eight five to one.

(02:30:55):
That's eight hundred four to one, seven zero eight fifty
one spoofs go to.

Speaker 9 (02:31:01):
Find out what's really going on. This is govern America.

Speaker 14 (02:31:07):
All right, we're in the home stretch of the broadcast.
One more half hour to go here in the fastest
three hours in talk radio, govern America. I hope you'll
tell somebody about the broadcast, send them to the website
at Governamerica dot com, govern America dot com and have
them listen live or on demand, as our archives are
there as well. Anyway, wrapping this thing up here with

(02:31:30):
this Curtis Jarvin, I wanted to play an excerpt from
his speech because what we're seeing right now with the
Department of Government efficiency is exactly what he was advocating,
you know, as far back as October twenty twelve, maybe
even before then, but in his speech on how to
reboot the US government, he was calling it our age

(02:31:54):
rage retire all government employees. And you can see that
is exactly what it looks like the present administration is
trying to do now. Retire at least many of them,
if not all of them, but certainly the Consumer Protection Agency,
you know, the agency that protects consumers, you know, people,

(02:32:17):
the American people against bank fraud. I just understand. My
understanding is that we just revealed yesterday, seventeen hundred employees
there gonna all be laid off. I guess they're completely
eliminating that department. I suppose what was the department? Again,
I have to look up the exact name. I'll tell
you what. Let me go ahead and play this speech
and I'll see if I can find it. But this

(02:32:39):
is again Curtis Jarvin back in twenty twelve in his
speech on how to reboot the US government. Listen to
what he says and think about what's being done today
with DOGE.

Speaker 4 (02:32:52):
So obviously a very complicated problem.

Speaker 19 (02:32:54):
So I went to single lives. So I've produced this
very complicated problem to a.

Speaker 53 (02:33:00):
For a letter acrodem, which is rage, and rage stands
for retire all document employees.

Speaker 9 (02:33:13):
Very very simple.

Speaker 4 (02:33:14):
Now, the problem with this is, why have you never
heard this before? Why has no one ever suggested, let's
just get rid of this thing?

Speaker 53 (02:33:24):
A Schanguli standings because most people are operating, operating the
revolution that they do this every four years. They thought
in two thousand and eight, Hey, you read this government
in two thousand and eight and it was just the same.
The reality is, as anyone who knows Washington knows that
the politicians you elect from these democratic elections are really entirely.

Speaker 4 (02:33:49):
Superfluous to the mechanism in Washington. May change things a
little bit.

Speaker 53 (02:33:52):
You know, it matters a little bit whether you vote
for Democrats or Republicans.

Speaker 43 (02:33:56):
But basically, if the whole system were the whole elect
for system alldest you know.

Speaker 4 (02:34:01):
How ability comes a law, all the.

Speaker 53 (02:34:02):
Stuff we learned in eleventh grade, all this superior Washington.

Speaker 9 (02:34:06):
Going running exactly right.

Speaker 14 (02:34:09):
So I don't know if you were able to make
that out. It was a little bit. You know, he
was off mic in terms of the mic that was
actually recording the audio. But he's promoting retiring all government employees,
and you have the Department of Government Efficiency now executing
that doing the very thing. And the name of the

(02:34:29):
agency I was trying to think of was the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, What does it do.
It's a US government agency established in twenty ten under
the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Its mission is to protect consumers in the financial marketplace

(02:34:50):
by ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability from financial institutions, enforcing
consumer protection laws, enforces laws against unfair, deceptive and abusive
practices in combats discrimination and consumer finance. It creates and
enforces rules for financial institutions, including banks, lenders, and credit

(02:35:12):
reporting agencies. The agency collects and addresses consumer complaints about
financial products such as credit cards, loans, and mortgages. It
provides tools and resources to help consumers make informed financial decisions.
Cf PB researches financial markets to identify risks to consumers.

(02:35:33):
It oversees institutions with over ten billion dollars in assets
and plays a central role in regulating credit cards, mortgages,
student loans, and more. Seems to me like this is
something that largely protects the American people from the big banks,
or at least, you know, kind of serves to provide

(02:35:56):
some safeguards in place.

Speaker 16 (02:35:58):
And I understand the.

Speaker 15 (02:36:00):
Big banks, but the tech companies themselves, because they are
the ones that really will be running the market system,
which is just network computer systems that control every damn thing.

Speaker 14 (02:36:17):
Yeah, but you know, Donald Trump is a banker guy,
you know, and so he's very cozy with the big banks,
and so it's not hard to see why he would
like to have this, you know, it's probably maybe he's
making good on a campaign promise. I don't know.

Speaker 15 (02:36:34):
I don't know, as I understood what was being said
in that hearing and other things. The FED has been
trying to develop a vapor currency for quite a number
of years, and I think they've bank rolled the development. Yeah,

(02:36:55):
so because they could see that the time of an
economics system based on commodities and extraction from the Earth's
minerals was coming to an end.

Speaker 14 (02:37:12):
Yeah, let me do this. There's one more clip I
have here, and this is of JD. Vance. Because if
you think that there's if you're not convinced yet that
there's a correlation here, I don't know what. I don't know.
Maybe you haven't been paying attention. I don't know how
you wouldn't be. But just in case you were doubting what,
you know, maybe all these cuts and all these things

(02:37:34):
going on at the federal level right now, it's just
somehow coincidental. Okay. Here's JD. Vance on the Jack Murphy
podcast back in September of twenty twenty one. These people
have had a long history. You know, he's a student
of what Jarvin is saying now. Jarvins saying that the
relationship is overblown, that people are exaggerating the fact that

(02:37:57):
you know their friends and all this stuff. But I
think it's interesting when you have JD. Vance appearing on podcasts,
and this is prior to Trump getting elected. Uh, but
he and he and and and Yarvin is so prevalent
in his mind that he's referencing Curtis Jarvin's work.

Speaker 42 (02:38:15):
This is why I think conservatism has to be a
counter revolutionary force at this moment. We're not just talking
about assimilating new immigrants into a American culture. We're talking
about replic replacing garbage elite culture with traditional American culture.
That's that's in some ways a hell of a lot
larger of a lift.

Speaker 54 (02:38:33):
How do we effectively quote rip out the disgusting leadership class?

Speaker 4 (02:38:37):
Oh man, I mean, you know, because let me expand
on that just.

Speaker 54 (02:38:44):
A second, because it's and I'm going to give you
a little cover here, because it's not just elect I mean,
obviously elections, that's one thing, okay, But unfortunately this evil
leadership class has already taken over all of our institutions,
all the media, all the academy, all of our corporations,
every educational institution, every arts and culture institution, even every

(02:39:06):
freaking sporting institution that we've had. How do we, aside
from elections, how do we rip out this leadership class?

Speaker 16 (02:39:14):
What do we do?

Speaker 54 (02:39:15):
Is it even possible to renovate or rehab these institutions
from the inside. And the reason why I ask that
particular angle is because from my perspective, I've seen these
institutions taken over from the ground up. It was just
an adjuct professor. They had some classes, then they get tenured,
then they become department head, then they're the university professor,
university president. The corporations they hire these new kids. The

(02:39:37):
new kids demand the change. The change goes to HRHR
makes a policy, and then the CEOs are woke. The
government official staffers, they'd start demanding woke from their candidates,
and before you know it, it's in the halls of
the Senate Judiciary Committee. Kavanaugh hearings radical feminism, and then
Joe Biden addresses the Joint Session of Congress and says,
white supremacy terror, which is just any white guy being

(02:39:58):
upset the government. This is the number one domestic threat
that we face. So these institutions are corrupted and routed
to the core, this elite ideology is everywhere and in
all the things. What other options do we have besides
voting them out, which we're seeing is ineffectual.

Speaker 31 (02:40:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 42 (02:40:13):
So again this is like a tough question, but this
is maybe the question that confronts us right now, right, So, yes, okay,
So one model is, you know, what happened to Germany
after the Nazis lost, or what happened to the Iraqis
after sonnam Usain, after we through Sonamusain out and you know, denoxification, debatification.

(02:40:35):
There was this massive recognition that you couldn't just put
you know, replace the bad people, replace the bad Nazis
with the good Germans. There was this entire effort to
deinstitutionalize that ideology. And by the way, I think that
a lot of the lessons learned in the forties are
being applied to the United States. There's this weird way
where you're kind of like completely de americanizing American culture.

(02:40:58):
Now that's really what's going on.

Speaker 12 (02:41:00):
So, I mean, I think that.

Speaker 42 (02:41:01):
There are two different ideas here, right. So one is like,
you know, there's this guy Curtis Jarvin who's written about
some of these things, and so one is to basically
accept that this entire thing is going to fall in
on itself, right, And so the task of conservatives right
now is to preserve as much as can be preserved,
and then when the inevitable collapse of the country comes,

(02:41:24):
ensure that conservatives are able to sort of help you
build back the country in a way that's actually better.
Not Joe Biden's build back better, but actually some sort
of reconstruction of the country. I think that's too pessimistic
and too defeatist. I tend to think that we should
seize the institutions of the left and turn them against
the left.

Speaker 18 (02:41:42):
Right.

Speaker 42 (02:41:42):
We need like a debatification program, but like a dewokeification
program in the United States, right. So, like, let me
give you a couple examples. So, one of the things
I've always been very sympathetic to is this idea that
we don't have a real constitutional republic anymore. What we
have as an administrative state.

Speaker 15 (02:41:58):
Right.

Speaker 42 (02:41:59):
The administrative state controls everything, right, so to the point
that like when Donald Trump wins, he can't even sometimes
get his people in core positions of authority in the
administrative state. It's like, well, do we have a constitutional republic?
The founding fathers actually created a very powerful chief executive,
a very powerful president. But if he can't even fire
the people in his own administration, like, is this really

(02:42:21):
a successful republic. So a lot of conservatives have said
we should deconstruct the administrative state, we should basically eliminate
the administrative state, and I'm sympathetic to that project. But
another option is that we should just seize the administrative
state for own purposes. We should fire all of the people.
I mean, you know, like I think Trump is going
to run again in twenty twenty four. I think he'll

(02:42:41):
probably win again in twenty twenty four, and he'll win
by a margin such that he will be the president
of the United States in January of twenty twenty five.
I think that what Trump should do, like if I
was giving him one piece of advice, fire every single
mid level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state.
Replace with our people. And when the courts, because you

(02:43:02):
will get taken to court. And then when the courts stop,
you stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and
say the Chief Justice has made his ruling, now let
him enforce it.

Speaker 14 (02:43:11):
What do you think of that? Exactly what they're doing
that interview again with Vance was September twenty twenty one.

Speaker 15 (02:43:24):
So yeah, I need to listen to that again.

Speaker 14 (02:43:29):
All of this stuff, ladies and gentlemen, will be in
the show notes. It'll all be in the show notes
at Governamerica dot com. That entire interview, the entire interview
with Curtis Jarvin and Tucker Carlson, a bunch of other
stuff as well added to it, including stuff I'm not
even going to read today. But yes, I think this
is something that's very important for people to know, to

(02:43:50):
be aware of they're following this model.

Speaker 15 (02:43:54):
And yeah, and everybody should know it's not just Curtis Yarvin.
He's breasting the views of the technocrats at the most
powerful level. Well, and Peter tell Peter Peter til.

Speaker 14 (02:44:11):
Yes, yes, absolutely, because he's the guy that writes checks,
you know, Curtis Jarvin. I think he's just some kind
of fruitcake who has too much free time on his
hand to sit around and hair brain read these you know,
come up with these hair brain ideas well.

Speaker 15 (02:44:29):
Actually, no, I wouldn't say that because because the ideas
that he is expressing are the views of the people.
What I would say, the people in Silicon Valley have,
so I would say that he is a oh, I

(02:44:52):
don't know, what would you say, the clown leading the parade,
But he's but hit. What he's saying is serious, absolutely
in terms of what they believe and what they are
doing to our country. And you can see they are
doing this to our country.

Speaker 14 (02:45:11):
You can see it with your own eyes every day.
And in fact, well, let me go ahead and take
a call. But I got an article here from him
where he's talking about Gaza. Trump's idea about Gaza and
how carefully and closely aligned with his own views on
the subject that Trump is. It's remarkable. Anyway, let's go

(02:45:33):
down to Texas first and take a call. Hello, caller,
you're on the air. Go ahead, please, Hey.

Speaker 5 (02:45:39):
Darren VICKI, thanks for taking my call. Hey, you know
what I'm I'm just thinking, we're not spring chickens. If
people listen to your show, that people listen to ARBN
and all these different shows and SAFF we're not spring chickens.
You're not getting these young kids anymore. But think about this,
all of us, non spring chickens. What have we been
doing all of our lives? We've been just compensating for

(02:46:01):
everything that's going on. We've been giving kudos to the elections,
we've been rooting for a certain person and whatnot, not
even realizing that everything is rigged, that everything is part
of an agenda as opposed to an actual save the
world kind of program.

Speaker 2 (02:46:19):
Here, think about it.

Speaker 5 (02:46:20):
All these people took their money instead of trying to
destress us and give us and get rid of us,
and they put it all into figuring out ways to
feed what they call eight billion people, as opposed to
killing you know, eight seven different people, as opposed to
what would be going on right now. There's something more

(02:46:42):
than just our regular life going on. These people have
reset us before. They're going to reset us again. You know,
when COVID came out, I heard people talking about, well,
we're going to reset this is in the world Economic
form and we're going to reset the year to twenty
twenty as year one. I mean, these people, they've they've

(02:47:03):
got this agenda and we're not involved in it. We're
just living in a world and talking about it, and
nobody is there's nothing we can do at this point.
There's a black pill for you see.

Speaker 14 (02:47:14):
I don't agree. I think there are things we can do,
you know, in terms of the but but yes, it's
there are so many things that they could do to
improve people's lives. Absolutely, they don't have the will to
do that. They don't have the desire to do that.
Their desire is geared toward control. And you know, we

(02:47:34):
can see that and everything that is being done today
and that and that. Honestly, the problem is you have
similar types of God's little g in the so called
conservative of a right wing movement, just similarly like you
have a bunch of little God's little g gods in
the left wing world. Peter Peter Peter Teel is a

(02:47:57):
good example of that. This is somebody that's not on
your side. These people attend the same conferences, the same
World Economic Forum gatherings, the same Builderberg gatherings, And yet we're, oh,
isn't it wonderful he's funding our candidates. Oh isn't it
wonderful he bank rolled Ron Paul's presidential campaign. Oh isn't

(02:48:20):
it wonderful? No, I don't think it's wonderful at all. Frankly,
So what is the solution. What does the You know,
I understand elections don't fix everything, and I do think
that you can make a difference in that realm, and
that you really should be involved in that realm. I
know I can see from my own precinct delegate activity

(02:48:42):
that we have made a difference, We have made an impact,
We have gotten good people elected, and so people can
thumb their nose at that. But that is an area
where you can make a difference, and there's many many
other areas like that. Are you going to change the
world not without numbers. That's why we're doing the broadcast.
That's why we do what we do to try to

(02:49:02):
spend the youth.

Speaker 5 (02:49:05):
One last thing, Darren jump off.

Speaker 2 (02:49:07):
Check this out.

Speaker 5 (02:49:08):
So as soon as Donald Trump gets into office, what's
the first thing he does. He throws five hundred billion
dollars into stargate. Ye, wait a minute. Whoever came into
office and threw five hundred billion dollars into infrastructure? Oh
it's Teddy Roosevelt. We got all this other stuff, these
dams and these national parks and stuff. But this guy

(02:49:30):
didn't looking at our entire country. I mean, looking at
the homeless population in San Francisco and all around the world.
In our country. Right now, he decides he wants to
put a half a trillion dollars into stargate. Guess what
that amounts to. That amounts to Chinese profiling of everybody.

(02:49:52):
Ever seen those cameras where they show a square on everybody.

Speaker 14 (02:49:56):
Walking and what Absolutely.

Speaker 5 (02:49:58):
Never they show it, show there was a square on
their face and they know exactly.

Speaker 31 (02:50:02):
Who they are.

Speaker 5 (02:50:03):
That's what this entire thing is. And Donald Trump is
sewing it to us as something good. Meanwhile, everything was
already set up. He's just doing the last part of it.
Because all these cameras are everywhere, all these traffic cameras, Ye,
these cameras in people's restaurants and stuff, they're all going
to be connected.

Speaker 14 (02:50:21):
With this, with this AI, and it is going to
connect right to the Fusion Center. It's going to track
you everywhere you go. Yeah, what you're describing as a
technocratic hell, the technocradict surveillance state, the global panopticon that
will surveil and track and trace everything that you do
because you're the virus.

Speaker 5 (02:50:39):
That's what they wanted to do.

Speaker 14 (02:50:40):
They view us all as the virus. They view us
all as you know, contact tracing, track and trace. Yeah,
that's that's exactly what they're going to do to each
and every one of us.

Speaker 5 (02:50:52):
Hey, one last question, one last question. The New World
Order destroy the Georgia guidstones or did somebody just randomly
blow them up?

Speaker 14 (02:51:01):
Honestly, I think it was one of them, but that's
my opinion. Obviously I have no idea, but I think
maybe he was getting too much attention and they decided
to take it out because those were under surveillance too.

Speaker 15 (02:51:18):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (02:51:19):
Hey, Vicky, I love you.

Speaker 15 (02:51:22):
Well, thank you very much.

Speaker 14 (02:51:25):
All right, Hey, thank you for the call. I appreciate it. Yep,
God bless bye bye. All right, we're quickly running out
of time here, and I think that was a good call.

Speaker 15 (02:51:37):
Yah. You know, this is a fascinating subject and it
is why I do what I do because it's complex. Yeah,
and not too many people are really prepared to to
think at the level that it requires to try and

(02:52:01):
understand what's happening to our world, and so I try
to explain it. I'm probably not as effective as what
I would like, but I'm trying. And what the world

(02:52:22):
that they are building for people really is a panopticon of.

Speaker 14 (02:52:27):
Control, absolutely absolutely, And all you have to do is
look at what they did in Gaza, perfect example, because
every single meter of Gaza is surveiled every ten minutes.
I mean constant surveillance. That's why they see this whole
October seventh thing. Oh, they were able to forge an attack.
And you know that guy who was a former UN

(02:52:48):
Weapons in specter, Scott Ritter, claims that they were to
relying upon, you know, automation for their intelligence. I'm not
buying that. I think that they wanted that attack to happen.
And I think that they because they want to be
able to genocide, slaughter, and and and and. Hamas is
a terrorist organization that Benjamin Etna who has propped up,

(02:53:10):
funded and built for the very reason it's very very
convenient for them to have something come and attack them
so that they can turn around and quote unquote retaliate
and then slaughter, genocide And what is it done. It's
It's cleared Gaza of the of the people that they
wanted to get rid of, the Palestinians. Now we have

(02:53:33):
Trump's plan for Gaza, and we have Curtis Jarvin writing
about it on his blog Gray Mirror. He's got a
substack called Gray Mirror. You can get to it gray
mirror dot substack dot com, or he said he has
the headline Gaza Inc. And he says, I'm worried that
the resemblance between President Trump's Gaza plan and mine will

(02:53:56):
contribute to the weird delusion that I am secretly running
the world.

Speaker 38 (02:54:01):
No.

Speaker 14 (02:54:01):
Actually, A, I have not talked to anyone important about Gaza. Yeah,
I don't believe that he talks to jd Vance all
the time. And B the idea is obvious anyway, I
realized that it seems improbable that we would both have
the same crackpot idea. No, it is extremely probable because
the President and I inhibit the same reality. We are

(02:54:23):
both looking up and noticing that the sky is blue.
Most people live in a crackpot world where the sky
is green and our present Middle East policy is sane.
Reality has started to seep into the crackpot world, and
the mixture is remarkable. The reality of the situation is
that A Gaza is not presently inhabitable, and B gaza

(02:54:43):
without its residents even more important, without their complex maze
of Ottoman era land titles, is worth much more than
the gaza with its residents, even to its residents.

Speaker 15 (02:54:55):
Uh, this is that's kind of interesting that Ottoman.

Speaker 14 (02:54:59):
Era, well, that it used to be the Ottoman Empire.
But anyway, this is one hundred and forty square miles
of Mediterranean real estate, clear of titles, demolished and demned.
At a cost of perhaps ten billion dollars. This land
becomes the first Chapter or first Charter city backed by
US legitimacy. Gaza Incorporated stock symbol ga ZA. The exit

(02:55:24):
strategy of Gaza is to be the first sovereign corporation
to join the United Nations. While there many trillion dollar companies,
none of them are has true sovereignty, much less some
of the best land in the world. Is a trillion
dollar IPO a possibility? I think it's a possibility. What
if Adam Newman runs the road show? Why not suddenly

(02:55:48):
each former Gaza residence has a half a million dollar
in Gaza tokens. Does that come with the right to
live in Gaza.

Speaker 22 (02:55:54):
No.

Speaker 14 (02:55:55):
You don't get any special treatment in Starbucks stores for
being a s Bucks older. Does it come with a
shareholder voting rights over God's Incorporated? No, because that would
defeat the whole purpose a corporate governance. There would be
a conflict of interest between the shareholders and the company.
There's more to this, but I've got to go. We
got twenty seconds left in the show. Check this out, folks,

(02:56:16):
it'll all be in the show notes govern america dot com.
Thank you, Vicky. Appreciate everybody for joining us, and join
us next week. Thank you everyone, Thank you darn yep,
bye bye week

All Episodes

Govern America | March 1, 2025 | Dark Enlightenment

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Govern America | March 1, 2025 | Dark Enlightenment