Govern America | May 6, 2023 | Chevron Deference - Govern America

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:01):
We have before us the opportunity toforge for ourselves and for future generations,
a new world order, new worldorder, new world order. This is
a moment disease. The kaleidoscope hasbeen shaken. The pieces are in flux,
soon may be settled again. Beforethey do, let us reorder this
world around us, a new worldorder, a world where the United Nations

(00:24):
is poised to fulfill the historic visionof its founders. Nevertheless, United stated
in a key position to shape thisso that the problem of the put print
identity will be the emergence of anew international order the first decade of the
twenty first century. But out ofwords will be feeling the greatest restructuring of

(00:46):
the global economy, the greatest restructuringof the global economy, the greatest restructuring
of the global economy. A newworld order was created document the crazies of
our rebublic. The very word secrecyis repub work in a free and open
society. And we are as apeople inherently and historically opposed to secret societies,

(01:10):
to secret over and the secret proceedingswheezing war on the new world order.
The councils of government we must guardagain the acquisition of unwarranted influence,
whether sought or unsought, by themilitary industrial conflict. This is Governed America
with Darren Weeks and Vickie Davis fromfewer regions five and ten. This is

(01:44):
Governed America. I'm during Weeks.Vicky Davis is here as well. It
is the sixth of May twenty twentythree. Nice to have you with us
once again, ladies and gentlemen.It's going to be a crampac program as
always. Lots to talk about,not the least of which we have the
beginning stages of World War three continuingto develop around us at all times,
it seems, and we just hada major escalation of that, which we'll

(02:08):
talk about here a little bit astime progressive. But good morning, VICKI,
Good morning. Lots going on.Oh man, is there ever?
I was, you know, gettingready for the show, and I'm gathering
up links and stuff, and Idon't think three hours is enough actually not
for today's topic. Well, what'sfunny is I spend I think I spend

(02:30):
close to eight hours preparing for theshow. And that's what been one of
my struggles, balancing everything with mywork life and my home life and this
show, you know, finding thetime to do the proper preparation to be
here, and it just the timeflies by so fast when we're here.

(02:50):
But it's just difficult to get yourfinger on the pulse of everything that's happening
at all times. And you know, this escalation that I'm talking about here
a moment ago was the fact thatnow they've flown a drone over the Kremlin.
I don't know if you've saw that. This just happened a couple of
days ago, and I saw it, but I haven't had a chance to

(03:12):
research it at all, to lookit up, because I know I'm working
on other things. But yeah,they're saying that that was an assassination attempt
putin. Certainly the Russians are lookingat it that way, and the Ukrainians,
of course, Zolenski and all ofthem are. You know, they're
denying that they had anything to dowith it, as you would and as

(03:34):
the State Department would, And I'mcertain that this is probably not the case
that their denial holds any water,that's my opinion, because would Zelenski have
done this by himself, would hehave the guts to do this by himself?
You know, and there's some peoplethat are saying that the range with

(03:55):
this drone would not have been ableto be flown from Ukraine. I'm not
so sure about that. If theyhave our drone technology, and I don't
know what all Biden has given them, then we can fly drones. I
remember during the Middle East conflict,you know, when we still had I'm

(04:16):
assuming we still have some troops,but Afghanistan, Iraq, I mean,
we had people right here in theUnited States and the Nevada Desert flying drones
over there. That was one ofthe controversies we were talking about on the
show is that these people could comeinto these rooms and essentially what appears on
a screen to be playing a videogame, but you're really affecting real people's

(04:40):
lives in the war zone, andyou sit there and shoot people and then
you go home in time for dinnerthat night. Yeah. Well, with
satellite telecommunications, it's no problem atall, right, exactly, absolutely none.
So these could very well be remotecontrolled drones in that regard. And
you know, I'm sure the UnitedStates Defense Department and State Department they have

(05:05):
technology that would probably just boggle themind if we knew half of what it
was. I'm sure a lot ofit's classified because you get to pay for
it, but you don't really getto know what it is. And h
but this, uh, you know, and what's funny is and it's not
funny, I don't mean humorous,but it's ironic that Ukraine Kiev, Zelenski

(05:32):
in his bunch are denying that theyhave anything to do with this drone attack,
and yet the Ukrainian Postal Service putsout a commemorative stamp. A commemorative
stamp. They actually have the Kremlinthere on the stamp with fire coming out
of it. Oh wow. So, uh yeah, we had nothing to

(05:58):
do with it, but we're goingto celebrate it. I mean, if
you want to really convince somebody youhad nothing to do with it, maybe,
I don't know, maybe you justmight want to not have a commemorative
stamp celebrating what you just did.I don't know. You know, I'm
funny that, especially so quickly.I mean, you know it must have
been done before, before those thingsstrike was done, so they're celebrating something

(06:23):
that hadn't even happened yet. Yeah, that's not a good look. Though.
The optics are terrible. Sou We'relaughing about it. But it's deadly
serious. I mean because uh putinnow is I mean, they're angry this
see that. This is a veryhuge embarrassment. If nothing else, it's

(06:45):
a huge and they shot it down. Um. And I heard I was
listening to George Galloway because I runhis show on the stream sometimes, and
George Galloway was saying that they thething actually landed on the roof of the

(07:05):
building. Oh wow. Yeah,this is a huge, huge, um
intelligence failure, I would say forfor Moscow, and uh, it's a
huge uh embarrassment for them. Asfar as their defense, uh, you
know shielding. You know that they'resupposed to be able to be more on

(07:27):
guard and watch for things like this. Oh, I don't know, you
know, kind of like when theChinese fly spy balloons over the United States.
Yeah, like a pattern, isn'tit. M Yeah, We're we're
supposed to kind of catch that unlesswe're looking the other way. But in
this case, I would hope thathis you know, you would expect anyway

(07:49):
that their intelligence establishment and their defensesare really working for the people in Russia
as opposed to hours here that areworking for probably China. I'm guessing,
yeah, I don't know that wecan count on that, because the United

(08:11):
Nations is trying to stand up asa world governing system, and I'm sure
there are elements in Russia the sameas there are elements aka traders, yeah,
in their country, the same asour country. So I would look

(08:33):
for the middleman instigator for world governing, for world governance. Yeah. And
by the way, I wanted tojust clarify when I say element of the
Defense Department, what I mean isthe hierarchy at the top. I'm not
talking about the average soldier. I'mnot talking about the ranking officers and that

(08:56):
sort of thing. I'm talking aboutthe people at the top being the traders,
because the scum does always seem torise to the top. And well,
there they were. The military wasincluded as part of the UN system.
That's how the Chairman of the JointChiefs of Staff came around. When

(09:18):
they passed the National Security Legislation buildingthe National Security State between nineteen forty six
and nineteen forty seven, that's whenthe position of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff was created, andthey were created as an office under our

(09:39):
representative on the Security Council. Yeah, so who are they working for now?
Who are the military working for now? I can't say, but my
gut feelings says they're working for theUN, not the US, and the
UN as a communist storyization reads atevery level. Representative gos Are has now

(10:07):
floated in a moratorium on foreign aidafter two hundred billion dollars has been sent
to Ukraine. He's I think youknow what took him so long? Really,
everything is just kind of a dropin the bucket anymore in terms of
money and weaponry and on our nationalreadiness. If they if the if the

(10:30):
military was really being represented representing theAmerican people as it should, then military
readiness here in the United States wouldhave been a priority. Our crumbling infrastructure
should be a priority as opposed torebuilding Ukraine. And I meant to Victoria
Newland just made a speech about rebuildinga Ukraine's infrastructure. I wish I had

(10:52):
clipped it. It was one ofthe things that I had that I was
planning on going back through. MaybeI can get it for next week,
but they're already talking about the rebuildingprocess. Well, what they do is
through international economic development, they willgo in and rebuild a country, but
they rebuild the entire system to becompatible with the United Nations system. So,

(11:20):
and the US military has been usedfor that purpose ever since Korea,
right, So and I the Americanpeople, I'm sure had no idea that
our military was being used for thatpurpose. Yeah, and the maintail.

(11:43):
We got all this cultural revolution stuffgoing on. You know, it's a
classic pressure from above, pressure frombelow type of situation. And we have
We're being attacked at every level.All of our key institutions are being taken
over by communists. You know,California. All you have to do is
look at California as an example asto where all of this ultimately leads.

(12:07):
I mean, San Francisco is completelycrazy town. And many of the big
cities across the country are getting tobe that way. But San Francisco,
I focus on them for a minute, because they're sliding into utter insanity from
what I've been reading, all thethings I've been researching. You remember,

(12:31):
back in the early two thousands whenthere was a movement for global cities,
San Francisco was one of the firstcities. You know, they declare themselves
to be a sanctuary city, meaningthat they will not cooperate with the federal
government on immigration, and they've beenchanging the laws I leave to harmonize with

(13:01):
the UN's concept of law within theframework of human rights. M Yeah,
as absolutely correct. The human rightsis at the top of the list.
Sorry, I'm somewhat distracted. Theyjust set off an alarm here. Oh
but uh yeah, human rights.Everything is being talked into human rights these

(13:26):
days. And yeah, well that'show they're that's how they're dragging the American
people into the UN's system without evenwithout the American people even understanding it.
Yeah, we're going to talk toa moment about some some things that they're
doing under the guise of human rights. With regard to pedophilia, the United

(13:50):
Nations wants to legalize pedophilia ladies andgentlemen, child sex, sex with children.
There's I think there's a movement rightnow. I just was seeing a
day or two ago here in Michiganto pass a law that bans it because
there was a there was a protestor something at the capitol that was scheduled

(14:13):
with people trying to stop child youknow, forced child marriages. And this
is where does that come from?Because the United States has always had laws
protecting children always. Well, we'rehaving more and more of these foreigners come
in here from the Middle East,you know, And I'm not xenophobic,

(14:35):
ladies and gentlemen. If they comehere, they need to go through the
process. Again, I sound likea broken record, but there's a process
in place of normalization where you gothrough and you learn about the culture,
learn about the laws, and andand at that point, you know,
it's designed to make you shit in. It's designed to make you assimilate into

(15:00):
our culture, into our law andappreciate what we have here, and if
you don't want to follow our laws, then go home. You know,
we will never agree to pedophilia.It's disgusting, it's a criminal act.
Well, there are certain elements onthe left that are already agreeing to it.
They're already pushing for it. Andthat's why we have the drag queens

(15:26):
in, you know, praying uponchildren in schools. This is how it
all starts. And once the societyreaches that point, I mean, you're
really in a Sodom and Gamora typeof situation. I mean, there's that's
really the last sacred cow really,I mean, and anybody out there anybody
in this country that can look atthose events and and if they're not fighting

(15:52):
against it, if they consider themselvesa moral person, I would say you
are delusional and criminal, as criminalas the people that put on the events.
Yeah, children should be off limits. I mean children must be protected.
And when you're allowing them to bebutchered by surgeons, when you have

(16:15):
an industrial complex building up around youknow, butchering children literally. I mean
first they started off doing it beforethey were born, you know, with
the abortion thing. Now they're butcheringthem after they're born, cutting off their
breasts, you know, manipulating theirgenitals. This is just cultural decay.

(16:40):
Cultural decay can only go so farbefore you have complete society collapse. But
you know, and that brings meback to San Francisco, because the district
attorney there, Brooke Jenkins, announcedthat her office would not even would not
prosecute an armed security guard at aWalgreens for shooting a black ns vestite.
Uh. And the transvestite's name wasBanko Brown. But he had tried to

(17:08):
steal from the business, so thewhole thing escalated and uh and it ended
up in him being shot. Soso as a result of that the whole
circus freak show made their appearance beforethe San Franccancisco Board of Supervisors. So
if you haven't had your coffee yet, Vicky, uh, this uh,

(17:32):
this will wake you up, Okay, and not as pleasantly as the sweet
aroma of your morning coffee. Butleading the pack was Leah McGeever and and
she had nothing profound to say.I don't have any words prepared today.

(17:52):
I just want you to feel ourpain. I don't know if you can
at this point based off your policyvoices, but I have to pretend you
have some form of empathy left.So I am going to spend the next
minute screaming because that is what isgoing on in here. That is what

(18:14):
the trans genocide in this country,in this city has brought me to.
So so she's come to this pointbecause the genocide of trans. How many
people are being killed? How manytrans have been killed that you know of?
None? Zero? This is thisis her testimony before the or the

(18:42):
UH before the Board of Supervisors therein San Francisco. Imagine that us Hi
you for the supervisors. I hateyou London Breed, hate you Jenkins,

(19:11):
Hold Jens accountable, Hold he getit amen, accountable cowards. He needs
to summer solitary confinement with that securityguard. Y'all have these armed guard he's
walking free, he's walking speaker.But that security guard to get away with

(19:34):
murder. That's not cool. Brownonly needed some food to eat to survive
at the end of the day.No so okada. Still if you just
if you need what you security guardshould ever kill somebody, but just taking
the Arizona. We keep our communitiessafe and we demand that you get your
boots off of neck. Huh saysthat thank you for your comment. Y'all

(20:00):
to thank you for your comments.Ahead failed once again. This is not
the first time any damn show won'tbe the last. But we're gonna get
justice today. My pron answer sheheard they then Black Lives Matter defund the
police, disarmed security. I findit sick that Brook Jenkins refuses the church
of secarity guard who worried one ofmy fellow trans people, Banko Brown,

(20:23):
a black trans man. I knowplenty of my white girlfriends who actually shoplift
and they don't get killed. ClackJenkins don't care about blacker trans people.
Glad and greed don't care about blackmen or trans people. We need real
solutions and staff bullshit thoughts and prayers. The city needs to ban secarity guards

(20:45):
from having guns. But most importantlywa to man housing, were to man
healthcare. We demand reparations for theblack community money. Frankly, I don't
care if this extra judicial killing leadsto riots, fire, salooting, in
graffiti. A wife was lost andlives are more import in property. Okay,

(21:07):
so what do you think about?Well, you know what, what
what can um the civil society expectwhen they dump people out of mental hospitals,
let them roam around the street,and then under this global human rights
thing, Um, they give theseuh disabled and uh minority people protected rights,

(21:34):
you know, rights greater than thegreater society? Um? What what
did they expect was going to happen? This, this whole thing with these
people, these these radicals, isan agenda to break down our laws.
And it's the implementation of the UNhuman rights laws. Ye. So if

(21:59):
they don't put a stop to it, if the police don't put a stop
to it, if the public officialsdon't put a stop to it, um,
we're going to end up in war. But the problem is it's being
pushed from the highest levels. Andhow do you know that because all the
corporate backing of it. Why wouldwhy would corporations be committing suicide by implementing

(22:22):
these types of things if it wasn'tbeing pushed from on high. Another example
of that is the women's clothing brandan Anthropology, I guess that's how you
pronounce it. Feature featured a it'sa it's a woman's clothing brand. But
yet they featured a male model andthen they were slammed by their customers and
they disabled the comments. So this, you know, it's just one example

(22:47):
of countless examples lately of of ofnational brands doing this. You know,
the beer company from Annheuser Busch,bud Light I guess it was uh did
that as well, and now theirsales just plummeted and they'll probably never recover
from that. I hope they don't. They don't deserve to recover. Yeah,

(23:07):
I'm totally with you there to throwa bud light in the trash.
I don't drink anyway, but neveragain anyway, But it's ridiculous. You
know, in the death ceiling battleis playing out on Capitol Hill right now,
and you I think it is yousent me this uh Steve Bannon war
room clip from Kingsley Cortez on theCenter for Renewing America. That's where her

(23:34):
organization is, the Center for RenewingAmerica, and she had provided a snapshot
of what the Biden's budget is fundingwith our taxpayer dollars. They are pushing
the cultural revolution, you know,the same kind of stuff that leads to
the clip we just played from SanFrancisco. They're pushing this on the rest

(23:55):
of the world. They are exportingwoke as you note, the House Republicans
recently asked a debt limit bill thatis going to stop the growth of our
debt and deficit. And the mostimportant element of this bill is that it
totally dismantles the woke and weaponized spendingof the Biden regime. Now, let
me give you some examples of that. The State Department is currently using your

(24:18):
taxpayer dollars to fund Pride parades inParrague, LGBTQ poetry in Latvia, and
LGBTQ movie nights in Australia. TheDepartment of Health and Human Services is funding
mental healthcare for trans women in Braziland abortion equity in Philadelphia, and all
across the world. The Department ofEducation is funding anti racism training for children

(24:45):
as young as three years old,and they're even funding grant programs that incorporate
the debunked sixteen nineteen project and IbrahamX. Kendis How to Be an Anti
Racist book. So what the Bidenadministration is doing is really a slap in
the face to hard working Americans.They're taking your money and pushing their radical

(25:07):
agenda not only here at home,but abroad as well. I mean,
to put it bluntly, Steve,the US is now a major export in
wokeness, in crt and in depravity. And it's a shame. And I'm
really encouraged to see the House Republicansputting forward a bill that will take a
step in slashing all of that bloatedbureaucratic spending. They are not serving the

(25:30):
interests of the American people. Imean, this money, Steve, would
be much better spent helping the folksin East Palestine, Ohio. But of
course, you know, the Buidenadministration has no interest in that. What
they want to do is fund youknow, LGBTQ initiatives halfway across the world
in places that frankly don't want it, right. The Ugandans, for instance,

(25:51):
do not want this LGBTQ propaganda pusheddown their throats. They know that
it is depraved, they know thatit is demonic, and they're fed up
with us pushing it on them.And frankly, I don't blame them.
So I do think, you know, this is the best debt limit bill
certainly in my lifetime that has comeup. But I would encourage, you
know, Republicans to just keep hammeringthese woke and weaponized cuts. Okay,

(26:15):
So I'm gonna leave it right there, because that's about all the time we
have in this half hour. Whatan incredible thing to think that they are
pushing this insanity all the way aroundthe world, and they're using our taxpayer
dollars to do it. And that'slocalization of the State Department agenda for un

(26:36):
governance. Yeah, yeah, exportingAmerican culture, the worst kind of culture.
It's communist culture. We've got totake the bottom of the hour.
Break, we'll continue here in amoment. Stay with us. This is
governed America. Let me tell youa story about Bill. Bill was a

(27:03):
normal guy in his fifties. Hehad back surgery about two years ago,
Bill was in a lot of pain. He dealt with his pain by taking
the precocesses doctor prescribed for him.Bill took more and more and more of
them to help with the pain.So one day the prescriptions weren't enough to
get rid of Bill's pain. Thenone day Bill found someone to help him
get rid of the pain with illegaldrugs. He didn't need a prescription for

(27:26):
best. Forward to today, Billlost his job and his family. The
only thing he does have is hisdrug dealer. If you know Bill's story
and you don't want to end uplike Bill, call the Detox and Treatment
Helpline right now to get away andget treatment. Eight hundred three to six
oz three one four eight hundred threesix three one four eight hundred three six

(27:52):
zo o three one four that's eighthundred three six zero zero three fourteen.
In the classic science fiction novel BraveNew World, people are little more than
products which are cloned, drugged,and developed in mechanical wounds. Sound far
fetched, Recently, scientists unveiled thefirst artificial womb. Many hope it will
eventually be used to grow embryos fortheir organs. These human embryos would not

(28:15):
only be scavenged for parts but killed. We can move toward a brave new
world, or we can build ahumane world free from human exploitation. Which
do you want? This has beena perspective on life from National Right to
Life at NRLC dot org. Thereare a ton of social networking websites,
but one stands apart for a veryspecial reason. This one saves lives.

(28:37):
It's matching donors dot Com. Matchingdonors dot com links organ donors with people
in need of kidney and other transplants. In the US, twenty two people
die each day waiting for an organtransplant, most of them for kidneys.
If you've ever considered becoming a livingorgan donor, or if you're someone in
need of an organ transplant, visitmatching donors dot com, home of the
greatest gift of all, the giftof life. Matching donors dot Com New

(29:00):
offense. But are you a littlefat when you look in the mirror?
How would you like to learn thesecrets to lose three to five pounds a
week easily without joining the gym orgoing through any crazy diets. It's called
body sculpt by med Diet. Forthe last two decades, we've been helping
people just like you that have poundsthey want to shed. We've helped millions

(29:21):
of people lose thousands and thousands ofpounds over the years, and now it's
your turn. Learn the secrets ofhow to lose weight With one simple phone
call. You'll see an amazing differencein a matter of days. Don't believe
us. We'll offer you a moneyback guarantee if you're ready to start losing
weight right now. Call right nowto learn more about your risk free order

(29:42):
to body sculpt. Call for yourrisk free offer. Eight hundred seven eight
four one nine four two, eighthundred seven eight four one nine four two,
eight hundred seven eight four one ninefour two. That's eight hundred seven
eight four nineteen forty two. Areyou retired like me and you just found

(30:02):
out you owe the Irs a tonof money? Well, what would your
life be like if they took yourretirement savings away from you? They can
do it and your property. Ifyou owe the Irs back taxes or you
haven't filed in a while, thetax Relief Line is here to help you.
They can stop the Irs from takingyour retirement savings. If you qualified,
you could have your tax bill reducedto zero. That's right. If

(30:26):
you're retired and you owe the IRSa lot in back taxes, you could
have your entire tax bill reduced tozero. Do the IRS has now hired
thousands of new employees, so they'reready to come after you. Don't let
them take your retirement savings or property. Make this free call now. Eight
hundred five nine zero four nine threethree eight hundred five nine zero four nine

(30:51):
three three. Eight hundred five ninezero four nine three three. That's eight
hundred five nine zero forty nine thirtythree with a spoofs. Go to find
out what's really going on. Thisis governed America. All right, we're

(31:17):
back. This is govern America.Govern America dot com is the website for
the show. That's govern America dotcom. My email address radio at govern
America dot com. And Vicky goahead and give your information out please,
Okay. My website is the TechnocraticTyranny dot com. The older website is
channeling Reality dot com. And myemail addresses on both websites. All right,

(31:41):
and you can get the chatroom atchat dot govern America dot com.
There's a few people in their chatdot govern America dot com. Uh,
Justin Thought in the chat room postedI've finally come out of denial. The
US has been taken over, lockstock and barrel by the Bolsheviks. They've
unpacked their carpet bags and set upshop at the White House. Nobody voted

(32:01):
for it, but nobody voted forit in Russia about one hundred years ago.
Either. It took seventy years forit to collapse under its own weight.
I don't think I'm going to bearound to see it. Well,
I hope you well, I hopeyou're around. I hope we don't.
None of us see it, butit seems to be heading that way anyway.

(32:22):
Justin thought continues and the gens withthe letters instead of names are welcoming,
welcoming it with open arms and thighs. They like communism that way,
they can spend more time gaming,less time working. So that's kind of
an very insightful thought. I feltso very, very depressing thought. It

(32:44):
is because he hits the target.But our obligations as adults, parents,
we have to turn this around.Yeah, somehow, somehow, I'm not
sure how, but we're we're workingon it every week. Yeah, we're

(33:07):
doing the best we can at leastto inform people about what's going on and
to the best of our ability,and in that vein one of the things
that I had mentioned earlier was thispush for the United Nations to legalize child
sex. This is a really nastydocument and it's under the guise of this

(33:32):
was found on un AIDS dot org. And the United Nations system really is
it's an octopus. There's a lotof tentacles which stretch really into every aspect
of society. But there's the InternationalCommittee of Jurists along with the un AIDS
and the Office of the High Commissionerfor Human Rights. Remember we were talking

(33:52):
about human rights earlier, VICKI.And and by the way, it is
a communist organization, so let's keepthat in mind. Yeah, they were
founded by communists. So the InternationalCommittee of Jurists or ICJ, the un
AIDS, along with un AIDS andthe Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights

(34:15):
or OHR, officially launched a newset of expert jurist legal principles Expert jurist
legal principles, ladies and gentlemen toguide the application of international human rights law
to criminal law. The eight MarchPrinciples as They're called lay out the human

(34:39):
rights, the human rights based approachto laws criminalizing conduct in relation to sex,
drug use, HIV, sexual andreproductive health, homelessness, and poverty,
and they quote I. N.Ciderman. I guess is how you

(34:59):
pronounced the last name Ian Siderman,Law and Policy director of the ic J,
which he who said criminal law isamong the harshest of tools at the
disposal of the state to exert controlover individuals. As such, it ought
to be a measure of last resort. However, globally there has been a

(35:20):
growing trend towards over criminalization. Andsee here's where you come down to human
rights and hit this whole social justicething. What we were talking about in
previous broadcasts with regard to the thejustice system, and um, what was
the what was the term that wewere just restorative justice? That's what I'm

(35:43):
trying to remember. We did.We did a show on restorative justice.
And if you weren't listening to thatshow, I encourage people to go back
into the archives and find it andlisten to it, and go through the
show notes and look at the documentsassociated with that, because this is the
watering of the American justice system.They select certain groups, and these groups

(36:06):
are they're able to not you know, to escape criminalization. Yeah. It
is the basis of community policing,which attempts to make policemen be social workers.
Yeah, as opposed to law enforcement. Um, they become just you

(36:30):
know, social workers with a gun. Yeah. And we talked about how
Lauretta Lynch went around during the Obamayears, she was the Attorney general then
and uh basically pressured these cities acrossAmerica to enter into these consent decrees to
implement community policing so that uh,you know, in order to solve whatever

(36:54):
controversy had taken place. You knowthat some some black man, for instance,
gets killed by the cops, whetheror not he was being a criminal.
And generally speaking, I don't know. I don't know about you,
but I find people who most ofthe time or law abiding, probably don't
have too much interaction with the cops. I'm just guessing. Well that's my

(37:15):
philosophy. I don't think I getpulled over by a cop. I just
want the encounter to end as quicklyand peacefully as possible. Yes, sir,
officer knows, Sir, give methe ticket and I'll be on my
way. Yeah. I mean,if you want to fight, go fight
it in court afterwards. I mean, I know, fighting tickets in court,

(37:37):
that's not even The problem is alot of these people who get pulled
over by the police, and whenthings escalate, they're not they're not We're
not just talking about a traffic ticket. We're talking about a lot more than
a traffic ticket. We're talking aboutillegal trafficking in illegal substances. We're talking

(37:58):
about criminal activity, crime that arebeing committed, theft many times, gang
violence, murder, stolen cars,that sort of thing. Well, and
there's also the dialectics that these civilrights people human rights people engage in.

(38:19):
They harass the cops. The cops, they harass the cops spicy, what
did I do wrong? What didI do wrong? I don't need a
license, I'm traveling, you know, all this crap. But what it
is, it's designed to cause thecop to commit what they call a human

(38:43):
rights violation. And then, ofcourse the US Department of Justice Community programs
come in and they get the localpolice department to sign a consent decree.
And I think it's the consent decreethat calls for the police department to have

(39:06):
the cultural Marxists represented within the policedepartment to change police procedure and behavior and
functions. Yeah, so it's adialectic. Every damn police officer in this
country should have to study um culturalMarxism and the imposition of the communists system

(39:36):
on the American people. They needto understand dialectics. Well, I think
all they want police to do todayis follow orders and be good order followers,
and they don't really want them tohave you know, and I know
there's a lot of good cops outthere that are well meaning. I think
I think number one, every policeofficer should have a thorough understanding of the

(40:00):
constitution and have a thorough understanding thatthe people that they pull over are not
their enemies. You know, thegeneral public. You know, the general
public is not the enemy. You'resupposed to be a peace officer, not
a policy enforcer. And that's that'sthe problem right there in a nutshell,
you know. But these cultural Marxistswho have set up this game that they

(40:22):
play with the police, they're theones that are I blamed them, not
the police. Um, the policeneed to understand how the UN is taking
over our country and how all thesecultural Marxists are representatives of the United Nations.

(40:45):
They are traders. They are thefifth column in America. They are
traders to our country. Yeah,and this, uh, this UN document
is very important because as Vicky andI believe. I don't want to put
words in your mouth, Vicky,but you've said things similar to this in

(41:06):
the past. I think I'll justspeak for myself. I think we're moving
toward the implementation on our justice systemat every level with these international you know,
human rights in the courtroom. Imean, you had you had a
case in Idaho some years ago wherethey were implementing the rights of the child,

(41:31):
didn't you, as I recall,yes, they were. Actually that
legislation was implemented all over the country. Okay, it's just that we happened
to catch it in Idaho. Andwhat it was, it was the Obama
administration was extorting the states to passlegislation that requires our state judges to owner

(42:00):
Hague court decisions. There you go, as it pertains to family and family
maintenance issues. So it's very clearthat they are implementing these types of human
rights measures into domestic law. Soour legal system. Our thesis here is

(42:23):
that our legal system is being morphedfrom domestic law to international law. That's
exactly that's exactly right. And youknow who was behind this push for world
law, world order are the threebig nonprofit foundations, Ford Foundation, the

(42:43):
Carnegie Foundations, and the Rockefeller Foundations. And they should have been stopped in
the nineteen fifties because it's in thecourt record that the Ford Foundation was reorganized
to work for the United Nations agenda. And so those three foundations have had

(43:09):
now seventy years of building their communistMarxist networks and infiltrating our local communities with
their people through their funding programs.So the Marxist Communist network that we have

(43:32):
operating in the Pacific Northwest is beingsupported by the Ford Foundation. Yeah.
Well, this makes the implementation ofthe Eight March Principles as they're called here
in this in this document from theICJ, the International Committee of Jurists who

(43:57):
who did this in cooperation with theun AIDS, an arm of the United
Nations system, and the Office ofthe High Commissioner for Human Rights. It
makes it all the more alarming thatthey're putting this document out because when you
look at the document itself, whichis called I'll just read the title of

(44:20):
the document, the eight March Principlesfor a Human Rights Based Approach to Criminal
Law, prescribing conduct associated with sex, reproduction, drug use, HIV,
homelessness, and poverty. So that'swhat the name of the document is.
When you go down to page sixteenof the document, which is actually page

(44:43):
twelve numbered on the document, youknow, you're Adobe reader software will say
sixteen. The actual page number onthe document itself says twelve in the corner.
So I'm just trying to be clearas to exactly where this is and
we can start reading. You know, they say reaffirming that whether or not

(45:05):
adopted with the stated aim of protectingculturally specific, traditional or community values or
religious beliefs, or protecting against purportedthreats to the rights and reputation of others,
national security, public order, publichealth, or public morals in any
given what's a public moral? Ithought morals were pretty much individual, But
we're getting into this whole. Wellno, no, I would say that

(45:30):
public morals are that we as asociety think that children should be protected.
Well, okay, but the problemis is that they want to change.
We're getting into this whole communitarian ideathat you know, the rights the well
being of the whole trump that ofthe individual. Your morals. You're arguing

(45:54):
for the cultural Marxists. You understandthat right, No, well, I
am understand that they would they That'swhy you have to think these things through.
And there there is such a thingas a public morality. And our

(46:15):
public morality says that children should beprotected, and we don't honor individual rights
of the pedophile right, we shouldbe throwing them in jail. I agree.
And but they're trying to change whatpublic morals are. The public standard.

(46:39):
Yes, that's kind of in anygiven country, public public health,
public morals they name off all thesethings, the reputation of others. Uh
in any given country or societal criminallaw may not be used for illegitimate purposes,
including as the justification or an excusefor human rights violations such as violence

(47:02):
or discrimination, or to defend limitationson human rights that do not comply with
the principles of liability and criminal law. The University of Human Rights or otherwise
the International Human Rights Law and Standards, concerned that criminal law is often misused
as a substitute for addressing complex structuralsocial changes. Further, concerned that legitimate

(47:25):
interests invoke to justify the use ofcriminal law, including public health or public
order, may often be better pursuedby efforts aimed at realizing gender equality and
human rights, including in particular socialin economic rights of all in all spheres,
and by supplanting and or complementing theminimal use of the criminal law with

(47:50):
other measures of prevention, reparation,and redress aimed at social injustice and structural
inequalities. That ada minimum consent setsthe boundary between justifiable and unjustifiable state interference
in certain conduct and contexts, andthat ascertaining the presence or absence of consent

(48:16):
is a matter of evidence and factualinvestigation with due regard to the structures of
the law and wants capacity to consent, acknowledging that the absence of consent may
give rise to criminal liability for theconduct concerned, emphasizing that with respect to

(48:37):
the application of criminal law and connectionwith consent, international human rights law requires
paying due regard to the legal capacityof people with disabilities to consent. We're
talking about consenting to sexts. Thelegal capacity of people with disabilities to consent,

(48:57):
including through supported decision making adolescents,evolving capacity to consent in certain contexts,
in fact, even if not inlaw, when they are below the
prescribed minimum age of consent in domesticlaw, and non discrimination and equality with

(49:20):
respect to sex, sexual orientation,gender identity, gender expression, race,
disability, and other protected fundamental characteristics. So when they finished out this thing
saying noting that the principles below concernthe criminal liability of individuals without prejudice to

(49:40):
criminal liability for conduct engaged in bylegal persons, including corporations and other business
enterprises, associations, or other actorsunder doctrines of legal personality. So as
I read this, and other peoplehave as well, they are trying to
legitimize. They're trying to bring pedophiliaunder the protection of human rights treaties.

(50:06):
Yes, and and they're trying toapply that to American domestic law by saying
that pedophiles have rights, have humanrights, and their human rights are more
important than parental rights. The rightsof the society to set limits on behavior,

(50:29):
which means, you know, usedto be the saying among guys eighteen
or get you twenty. If youif you mess around with anybody under eighteen,
you'll get twenty years in prison,and that as a is a boundary
in society that applies to all people, irrespective of their own personal beliefs.

(50:57):
You know. So what the UNis saying is that a pedophile, his
personal beliefs, his genetic composition compelshim to prey on young children, and
he's got a human right to dothat, and we as a society don't
have a right to stop him.Well, I say, bs, But

(51:23):
that's that's the kind of issue.And that's just one issue. But across
the board, we are having issueswith the United Nations pushing their communist agenda
on the people of the United States, whether you're talking about transportation issues,

(51:44):
environmental issues, public health issues.It's across the board. We are under
siege by these communist criminals. Yeah, and and and it's being pushed really
at every level, h including thecorporate level. I mean there's another number
of people. For many many years, the fashion industry, just as an

(52:07):
example, has been taken over byI believe, pedophiles. I think it's
very clear some of the designs thathave been put out, some of the
uh, the spreads in terms ofthe sales pitches in magazines. You know
that you see, uh, youknow how they show children in provocative positions.

(52:29):
Who would do that unless you're apedophile or somebody that's trying to promote
that sort of thing. It's yeah, I remember when that first started happening.
It was always a curiosity that gaymen were always the leading fashion designers.
And then it began to evolve towhere they started focusing in on children,

(52:57):
you know, for for fashion,and then they just kind of incrementally
slowly brought that in, you know, to where they they are doing provocative
advertising using children. Yeah, Iremember the Mott and Bailey approach. Yeah,
yeah, that comes to mind,the Mott and Bailey approach. You

(53:20):
know, the castle is the theMott, and they field out is the
Bailey, and uh and and wheneverthey come out and they you know,
we did a show and in factthat if you go to the website and
look look for the show titled Mottand Bailey. That was explained very well
by a sound bite that we playedyears ago, but that that really applies

(53:42):
perfectly here. The idea is thatyou know, they they they they stay
in the Mott and they come outand they they attack society. They stir
things up. And then uh,when they're implementing their horrific things and they
get pushback. In other words,I guess you'd say to continue the metaphor,

(54:04):
the villagers get upset and come withthe torches after them. They retreat
into the safety of the mot andthey're in there and until things die down
again, and they come back againonce in a while when they are pushing
this agenda forward, they will um, they will get pushback. They'll get

(54:27):
away with a lot of stuff,but people will notice certain things sometimes,
or a talk show host or somebodyon TV will point something out and they'll
be massive pushback against it, andthen they retreat to their mot and they'll
they'll go backward, you know,a step, but it's always two steps
forward and one step back. Andthat's we need to have watchmen on duty

(54:52):
one of the time watching for thiskind of stuff, you're because you're absolutely
right. They just kind of snakeit out incrementally, and then people wake
up one morning and whoa, youknow, pedophiles are going after the children
in school. Yea, how thishappen? You know? And then it

(55:13):
happened so fast it was like theflip of a switch. It's unbelievable,
and anybody saying anything against it,you're attacked. And that's how you know
you're you're attacking one of their quoteunquote sacred cows, because when you are
over the target, you get themost heat, you get the most fire.
It's horrific. And I say,attack, attack, attack, take

(55:35):
them down. Keep it going.Absolutely well. We're out of this hour
and we're going to keep the showgoing as soon as we have the top
of the hour news. And wegot some very important stuff to talk about
with regard to the Supreme Court.Wow, you're not gonna believe this incredible
thing that we have coming up herein the next hour. I'm surprised that

(55:58):
I missed it. I can't believeI did, because this is so huge.
This is much bigger than Row inmy opinion, what the Supreme Court
is about to hear. And it'sgood, folks, finally some good news.
Stay with us. Our number oneis done, our number two is
straight ahead. Please don't go away. New offense. But are you a

(56:36):
little fat when you look in themirror? How would you like to learn
the secrets to lose three to fivepounds a week easily without joining the gym
or going through any crazy diets.It's called body Sculpt by med Diet.
For the last two decades, we'vebeen helping people just like you that have
pounds they want to shad. We'vehelped millions of people lose thousands and thousands

(56:58):
of pounds over the years, andnow it's your turn. Learn the secrets
of how to lose weight with onesimple phone call. You'll see an amazing
difference in a matter of days.Don't believe us. We'll offer you a
money back guarantee if you're ready tostart losing weight right now. Call right
now to learn more about your riskfree order to body sculpt. Call for

(57:19):
your risk free offer. Eight hundredseven eight four one nine four two eight
hundred seven eight four one nine fourtwo eight hundred seven eight four one nine
four two. That's eight hundred seveneight four nineteen forty two. Are you
retired like me and you just foundout you owe the irs a ton of
money? Well, what would yourlife be like if they took your retirement

(57:43):
savings away from you? They cando it and your property. If you
owe the irs back taxes or youhaven't filed in a while, the tax
relief line is here to help you. They can stop the IRS from taking
your retirement savings. If you qualified, you could have your tax bill us
to zero. That's right. Ifyou're retired and you owe the IRS a

(58:04):
lot in back taxes, you couldhave your entire tax bill reduced to zero.
Do the IRS has now hired thousandsof new employees, so they're ready
to come after you. Don't letthem take your retirement savings or property.
Make this free call now. Eighthundred five nine zero four nine three three
eight hundred five nine zero four ninethree three eight hundred five nine zero four

(58:29):
nine three three. That's eight hundredfive nine zero forty nine thirty three two
five step Poor American Family News.I'm Chris wood Word. Doctor Rochelle Wilenski

(59:06):
is stepping down as head of theCenters for Disease Control LEND Prevention. Will
Lensky submitted her resignation saying the waningof the COVID nineteen pandemic was a good
time to make a transition. Incase you missed it, The World Health
Organization downgraded the COVID pandemic today,saying it's no longer the emergency at once
was Wilenski's last day will be Junethirtieth. President Biden is touting the latest

(59:30):
monthly jobs report. Unemployment rate isat three point four percent, which is
the lowest in fifty years. Blackemployment has hit a record low, and
the really good news is working ageAmericans are participated in the labor force of
the highest rate in fifteen years.Black unemployment is still higher than the national

(59:52):
rate at four point seven percent.Meanwhile, numbers from the last two months
were revised downward, meaning we hadfewer jobs than we thought for March.
In February, US test scores inhistory and Civics are back the same as
they were in nineteen ninety, four, months after a report in October that
said every single state saw a declinein math or reading scores amid the COVID

(01:00:15):
nineteen pandemic. Some people when politicianshear these things and talk about putting more
money towards education, but Jonathan Butcherof the Heritage Foundation says, we spend
far more today than we did thirtyyears ago. During COVID, Washington added
two hundred billion dollars Washington alone,okay in federal money to K twelve schools,

(01:00:36):
much of that money had not beenspent by earlier this year still,
and so you know, I thinkthe lesson here is that this isn't an
issue of money. It's a questionof how these resources are being used.
When asked about this by the AssociatedPress, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona used the
opportunity to say that Republicans are banninghistory books and sense ring educators. If

(01:01:00):
you ask Butcher, the left isnot helping when we talk about things such
as parent bills of rights and schoolpolicies that necessitate the creation of parent bills
of rights. I mean, theseare the things that families need to know
are happening when they feel powerless.Right, If a family's feeling powerless because

(01:01:20):
their child is not, you know, succeeding in school, or they feel
like the school's not listening to them, and they need to know that there
are lawmakers out there that are doingthings about it, that there are advocacy
groups now that are changing their relationshipbetween parents and schools for the better.
Right, I mean parent builds ofrights, these transparency bills, the school
choice programs, you know, allof these are things that these should be

(01:01:44):
everywhere, right, I mean,we need these everywhere, because but every
time we have one of these reportsthat comes by that says that kids scores
are down, I mean, you'retalking about this generation of students that we're
losing. A Christian organization is growingstrong, and a culture seems to have
turned its back on God. CharlieBuds has more. Trial Life USA was

(01:02:05):
formed a decade ago as the BoyScouts began turning against God by accepting homosexuals
and in leadership and permitted girls.Trial Life executive director Mark hancocktails AFN.
They've been growing steadily since the startand have reached a milestone. We have
a thousand troops in all fifty states. We have about fifty thousand members now

(01:02:27):
participating. In that fifty thousand,you're going to find about seventeen to eighteen
thousand adults around the country who understandthat it's valuable to pour their lives in
a focus on on the next generation. So men are stepping up and taking
their place to provide God in theleadership for boys all over the country.
The growth might also be attributed tofamilies who want their boys to be instilled
with ideas to combat the woke culture. You know, it's a great indicator

(01:02:50):
that parents are saying that they needto have their sons in a place with
people who have their shared values becausethe culture is so questionable on issues that
we used to take for granted,that parents are saying, listen, I
need my son in an organization wherewe're surrounded by men and women who share
our values. In the way thatwe're raising our children, those young people
can grow into adults who will thenbe mentoring more young boys to grow into

(01:03:13):
godly adults. I'm Charlie Buds.In final news, fauldable smartphones are making
a comeback after a Google announced anew folding phone. Find more news on
AFN dot net. Large. Wehave before us the opportunity to forge for

(01:03:34):
ourselves and for future generations, anew world order, new world forward,
new world order. This is amovement to season. The kaleidoscope has been
shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle them again.
Before they do, let us reorderthis world around us. A new world
order, a world for the UnitedNations is poised to fulfill the historic vision

(01:03:55):
of its founders. Nevertheless, Unitedstated to me, keep position two shaped
is so that the problem of theput print identity will be the emergence of
a new international order. The firstdecade of the twenty first century. That
out of words will be feel ofthe greatest restructuring of the global economy,

(01:04:16):
the greatest restructuring of the global economy, the greatest restructuring of the global economy,
a new world order. What's createddocument? The greatest of our republic.
The very word secrecy is repugnant ina free and open society. And
we are as a people inherently andhistorically opposed to secret societies, the secret

(01:04:41):
Older and a secret proceedings weezing waron the new world order. The councils
of government. We must guard againstthe acquisition of unwanted influence, whether sought
or unsought, by the military industrialconflict. This is Governed America. Darren
Weeks and Vicky Davis from Fable Regionsfive and ten. This is the second

(01:05:10):
hour of govern America. Vickey Davisis here. I'm during Weeks. It
continues to be the sixth of Maytwenty twenty three. Nice to have you
with us, ladies and gentlemen.In case you're just joining us, we
spent a lot of time in thefirst hour. We're talking about human rights,
and I highly encourage you, ifyou missed that discussion, to go
back into the archives. But movingforward, we're talking about before you do

(01:05:32):
that, Darren, I feel likeI should clarify what I said. When
I said attack, I was talkingabout attacking the issue and the agenda,
not people the way the leftist marksus twist things. They might have been
able to twist what I said.Yeah, and so that's just a clarification.

(01:05:59):
Yeah, And it's good to beclear because anytime, you know,
at some point in the future,you never know the way things are going.
I could have seen a day wherethey could go back through these archives
and try to pick us apart.And I'm not trying to be paranoid or
exaggerating anything. I think we're atthat point in America right now where they're

(01:06:21):
going to go after people. Imean, right now we're seeing it at
a top, higher level where youknow the most. They start with the
people who have the most notoriety,and then they work themselves down to more
grassroots people. And yeah, that'sthe way it always But I also want
to say, having said that,you know, attack the issue, attack

(01:06:46):
the agenda, attack, attack,attack is what I meant Okay, so
there, yeah, exactly. Soon Steve Bannon's War Room, you sent
me the clip vickey of John Fund. Now people might wonder why we run
war Room on the stream. Youknow, I've been critical of Steve Bannon.

(01:07:10):
I can't say that I entirely trusthim. Although his show has a
lot of information on it, there'sa lot there that's a value, and
that's why, you know, Itry to pick shows that are valuable in
various things, and you know,and we always disclaim them, you know,

(01:07:30):
take everything that's said with a grainassault, verify, you know,
follow through with documentation. But hehas a lot of guests on that show
which provide a lot of information thatI think our extreme value have extreme value.
One of those people on this particularepisode was and I'm talking about episode

(01:07:51):
twenty seven h six, which bythe way, was the same episode that
we played that other clip from theearlier Uh you know, I forget what
it was them blanking on what itwas exporting, how they're exporting woke to
the rest of the world. Theepisode twenty seven O six also had John

(01:08:15):
Fund as a guest. John Fund, I believe is he he's he's some
kind of journalist, isn't he.Yes, yes, he was really big
in the nineties and through the firstpart of the twenty first century, but
he's kind of faded into the background. Um, you know, with all

(01:08:35):
the media on the internet. Hewas a pundit in the old way,
you know, TV. Okay,so yeah, Well, he was talking
about an upcoming decision that the SupremeCourt is going to tackle which could have
huge, huge ramifications for the administrativestate. Negative ramifications because a lot of

(01:09:00):
the problems that we have right noware because of this massive bureaucratic octopus which
has its tentacles literally in every aspectof our lives. And so for years,
patriots on the air and off theair have you know, questioned how
this thing could be cut? Youknow, what do you do about?

(01:09:24):
I think Ralph Wineroud called it thefourth branch of government if I remember correctly,
the administrative state. Yes, yeah, and so uh so here here
we have, you know, andof course an unelected unelected you know completely
uh nobody is not in the Constitutionanywhere, but here it is. You

(01:09:46):
know, it's it's it's it's affectingus. Very draconian, lee, if
that's it accurate? Way of puttingit anyway, butchered the King's English anyway.
So they were talking about this onthe War Room with John Fund.
John Fund I picked it up.Mike Davis mentioned the day, and Fund
wrote an amazing article, as youknow, we've been after a full war

(01:10:10):
against the administrative state for a numberof years now. I talked about in
Sepack I think in twenty seventeen,John Fund this mentioned the day they're going
to take on that the Scotus isgoing to take on the Chevron case.
Tell people how important this is becausethis is a block. This is a
signal, not noise, sir,walk us through it. Well. Actually,
the administrative state, or what Icall the regulatory octopus, people started

(01:10:32):
paying attention to it right about thetime you started mentioning it on Spack.
I remember the headlines that your speechcreated, and it really struck up a
lot of people, and I thinkit's one of the reasons why the Trump
administration was in the gun sights fora lot of liberal activists. The administrative
state, the regulatory octopus has beenaround for a hundred years or so,

(01:10:55):
but it really got turbo charged innineteen eighty four when the Supreme Court made
a very bad decision called the Chevrondoctrine. And what that said is,
if Congress has not explicitly addressed acertain subject the environment, like land use,
it must defer or the Supreme Courtmust defer to the regulatory body's interpretation

(01:11:20):
of that lack of response. Inother words, if Congress hasn't spoken specifically,
the regulatory agencies, the EPA,the irs, anything, can basically
do what they want and as longas quote it's reasonable unquote, well,
you know, the definition of reasonableis different when a bureaucrat says it that.

(01:11:41):
When you and I think about it, John, how big a deal
is this that they've now said thatthey're going to take a case on.
They had the West Virginia situation lastyear versus EPA. Think that was big
enough, but this is even goingto be bigger? How big a deal
is this for them to consider,you know, maybe reversing that what you
call a very poor decision. Well, since they just ruled on this Chevron

(01:12:03):
case last year and paired it back, the fact that they're taking up it
again this year shows that I thinkit's under the chopping block. Okay,
let me stop it right there andjust clarify this Chevron They call it the
Chevron deference. This Chevron decision cameabout in nineteen eighty four, so it's

(01:12:27):
been on the books for a longtime that the decision, and as he
explained there in that clip, justa moment ago. If there, if
Congress passes a law and it's ambiguous, it's not clear in a certain area,
they can take advantage of that bureaucraticallyand essentially do what they want.
And the other federal courts have upheldbureaucratic overreaches, shall we say, even

(01:12:55):
though they're not specifically authorized by law, they've done them anyway, and the
court have upheld that based upon thisdecision. Am I accurately stating that VICKI,
Yes, Yes. If the EPAcan figure out some kind of a
loophole to impose regulations that were notspecifically called foreign law, and it goes

(01:13:24):
to court, then under the Chevrondoctrine, the court defers to the administrative
agency's interpretation. Yeah. And theextremist left wing organizations have exploited this as
well, in tandem with the Bidenadministration or the Obama administration or whatever administration

(01:13:47):
is in office that is hostile tothe American people's liberties. They have exploited
this, you know, in theclassic pressure from above, pressure from below
type of strategy and inviting lawsuits fromthese radical organizations, you know, because
of some matter which then could besaid, you know that, well,

(01:14:11):
okay, based upon whatever they ambiguityis in the law, we're going to
go all the way. We're goingto We're going to exploit this and take
advantage of it. This is theway they've been exploited. It is through
sue and settle. Yeah. Theythey collude with the environmental groups for the

(01:14:33):
environmental groups to file a lawsuit incourt, and then the EPA then demures
they go along with what the environmentalgroup wants. So that's how that's how
they've been imposing a lot of thisradical environmental agenda on people. And it's

(01:14:59):
through collusion in between the environmental groupsand the EPA just because something is not
specifically mentioned in the law that Congresswrote. And it's not just the environmental
agenda, it's every agenda, absolute, every issue. And that's that's why
I said before the top of thehour break, I thought this decision potentially

(01:15:24):
could have bigger ramifications than ROW becausewhile Rowe was a victory for the right
and a defeat for the left,I would argue, and I think probably
have argued that for the left wingpoliticians, Rowe was actually a gift because
it enabled them to raise money toenable them to mobilize the base. The

(01:15:47):
Republicans too, yea for my wholelife, the Republicans have used the abortion
issue as a dog whistle, youknow, and not that it's not important,
but it's something that gets people riledup. And but but this could

(01:16:08):
have a huge could be to dealthem a huge setback in their agenda,
because I think they're even explained inthis clip. Maybe the Biden administration is
counting on being able to use theseloopholes in the law, these ambiguities in
the law, to be able topush forward their climate agenda in a major

(01:16:32):
way. And that may be oneof the actually maybe in one of the
articles that we have as well,I don't. I think you sent me
a couple of articles and I havethose as well. But first, let's
finish the Bannon war room thing.They continue talking about it again, Steve
Bannon and John Fund. It takesfour justices to agree to hear a case

(01:16:53):
the fact that at least four justicesagreed to hear this case means they're thinking
about getting rid of it entirely.And the challenge to it that's going to
be before them is should they simplypare it back a great deal more or
should they get rid of it?I think they may well get rid of
it. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote ona previous Chevron opinion, the time for

(01:17:13):
this doctrine is over. We shouldcreate a tombstone that no one can miss
as they pass it by for it. So, I think the regulatory state
is going to continue for a longtime because they're very imaginative, and the
liberal activists basically go through a neighborhoodtrying to see if any door is unlocked
and waiting until they find one andenter it. But this Chevron has been
an open invitation to regulatory agencies tohave liberal activist groups environmental groups soothe them.

(01:17:40):
Then they have a fake settlement,and then they have a new regulation,
and the regulation is basically let inthrough the courts. The courts say,
well, Congress hasn't addressed this seemsreasonable to us. This is a
big deal. Yeah, I agreewith him. It's a big deal.
It's a huge, massive deal,and most people have never even heard of
it. I know, I hadn'theard of it. How did How did
I miss this? I don't know. If you have to, La've done

(01:18:04):
a lot of talking about environmentalism.So yeah, so, The Hill reports.
The Supreme Court on Monday announced itwill hear a case that could significantly
scale back federal agency's authority, withmajor implications for the future of environmental and
other regulations. The Justice's next termwill consider whether to overturn a decades old

(01:18:28):
precedent that grants agencies deference when Congressleft an ambiguity in a statute name for
the Court's decision in Chevron Usa versusNatural Resources Defense Counsel. The Chevron deference
has become one of the one ofthe most frequently cited precedents in an administrative
law since the decision was first handeddown in nineteen eighty four. It involves

(01:18:53):
a two step test. First,justices or judges decide if Congress has in
the statute directly spoken to the precisequestion at issue. If it is ambiguous,
courts defer to agencies as long astheir actions are based on a quote
unquote permissible construction. Some of theHigh Courts conservatives have raised concerned about the

(01:19:19):
precedent and how it has expanded thereach of agencies authority. Now the justices
will take up a case that explicitlyasks them to overturn it. The High
Court announced the move on Monday ina brief unsigned order, as is typical,
indicating at least four justices agreed totake up the case. Airing fishing

(01:19:44):
company loper Bright Enterprises is appealing aruling that left in place a National Marine
Fisheries Service, or NMFS regulation basedon the doctrine. The regulation requires herring
fishing boats to allow a federal observeraboard to oversee operations and compensate them for

(01:20:08):
their time. The company argues thatthe regulation significantly decreases their profit margin and
the agency has no authorization to imposeit, but the US Court of Appeals
for the DC Circuit ruled in favorof a federal of the federal government deferring
to NMFS, in other words,the regulatory agency, after finding that the

(01:20:30):
law at issue was ambiguous. Nearlyfour decades of judicial experience with Chevron have
demonstrated that the courts are incapable ofapplying its two steps Chevron framework in a
consistent matter, attorneys for Loper BrightEnterprises wrote in court filings, so they're
going to take it up, andwe also have a political article which is

(01:20:59):
also in on this issue. We'respending some time on this, ladies and
gentlemen, because like I said,this is massive and I doubt very many
people are talking about this anywhere,thankfully, and it's important to get up
to speed on it now because it'sgoing to be the issue for in the
next year, you know, whenthe Supreme Court, especially when they start

(01:21:30):
when they formally accept it, andso everybody needs to be aware of it
so that they can follow along withthe debate. So political rights, the
headline is Supreme Court move could spelldoom for power of federal regulators. Conservatives
get the chance to use a disputeover fisheries to deliver the final blow to

(01:21:53):
Chevron deference, a legal doctrine longdespise by conservatives were giving federal regulators ranging
power, is making yet another marchto the gallows at the Supreme Court.
The High Court announced Monday that itis taking up the case squarely aimed at
killing off the nearly four decade oldpresident that has come to be known as
the Chevron deference, the principle thatcourts should defer to reasonably reasonable agency interpretations.

(01:22:19):
Yeah, talk about an oxymoron.Reasonable agency We don't. Yeah,
we don't. We don't have anyreasonable agencies they're going to do, particularly
not at this time in our history, when they are trying to move to
global governance. You give a dictatoror a want to be dictator, which

(01:22:41):
a lot of these unelected bureaucrats,I'd say a good number of them,
uh, want to be dictators.They're like the parking meter made on steroids.
And give them the opportunity to grabmore power, and they're going to
be reasonable about I highly doubt it, but anyway, the principle is Chevron

(01:23:02):
deference is the principle that courts shoulddefer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous provisions
and congressional statutes, and judges shouldrefrain from crafting their own reading of the
laws. Overturning the doctrine would havemajor implications for the Biden administration's climate agenda.
It would complicate the administration's efforts totackle major issues such as climate change

(01:23:27):
via regulation, including possibly derailing theenvironmental protection agencies push to mitigate carbon emissions
from the electricity and transportation sectors,the two highest polluting industries in the United
States, So you can see whythey're freaking out about this. The Supreme
Court's move is another signal that thecourts conservatives have not tired in their efforts

(01:23:49):
to weaken the administrative state. Thetop target is the case that played a
pivotal role in expanding the powers offederal agencies after it was handed down in
nineteen eighty for Chevron versus Natural ResourcesDefense Counsel. The Chevron doctrine has been
in a coma for a while,so we'll see whether they want to revive
it or take it off life support, said David Donnegher, who in nineteen

(01:24:13):
eighty four argued that that case beforethe Supreme Court for the NRDC. The
NRDC technically lost that case when theSupreme Court upheld a Reagan administration pollution rule
as a reasonable interpretation of the law, but over the subsequent decades, the
Chevron doctrine became a central pillar ofadministrative law and a key part of the
legal defense for any number of environmentalor other rules by both the democratic and

(01:24:39):
Republican administrations. Although agencies did notwin all the time, studies have shown
more than more often than not,the courts used it to uphold regulations.
This would have the potential of beingone of the most and this is James
Goodwin, Senior policy analysts for theCenter for Progressive Reform. He says,

(01:25:00):
this would have the potential of beingone of the most destabilizing decisions that the
Court has ever issued if it choosesto go there. Yeah. Wow,
the world's going to fall apart ifregulators can't regulate, if they can't be
dictators, if they can't produce colorof law to force the population into submission.

(01:25:25):
So the challenge the Justice has justagreed to take up involves the power
of a Commerce Department unit to requireherring fishing corporate or operations to pay for
federal monitors on their boats. Yeah, which is really a form of taxation.
Yeah, absolutely without representation. Yeah, you know, and I'm not

(01:25:48):
too fond of defending corporations, butin this case, I totally agree that
that's a step too far. Andas a matter of fact, it was
Carol Browner who was the EPA directorof Florida. They're not EPA. Well,
she was Florida's environmental protection person andthen she was brought into the Clinton

(01:26:14):
administration. But one thing she didwhen she was in Florida is that she
would cut deals with the corporations.And this particular deal was with Disney that
Disney could do economic development somewhere ifthey donated money for the purchase of some

(01:26:39):
wetlands somewhere else. So I thinkthat is a wrong thing to do.
It's extortion, and the it's oneof those outcome based decisions that's justified based
on the outcome, but in factit's extortion. Okay, hang on,

(01:27:00):
we'll be back. Let me tellyou a story about Bill. Bill was
a normal guy in his fifties.He had back surgery about two years ago.
Bill was in a lot of pain. He dealt with his pain by
taking the precocesses doctor prescribed for him. Bill took more and more and more
of them to help with the painuntil one day the prescriptions weren't enough to
get rid of Bill's pain. Thenone day Bill found someone to help him

(01:27:23):
get rid of the pain with illegaldrugs he didn't need a prescription for best.
Forward to today, Bill lost hisjob and his family. The only
thing he does have is his drugdealer. If you know Bill's story and
you don't want to end up likeBill, call the Detox and Treatment Helpline
right now to get away and gettreatment. Eight hundred three to six oz

(01:27:45):
three one four eight hundred three sixoz three one four eight hundred three six
zoo three one four. That's eighthundred three six zero zero three fourteen.
Bible skeptics enjoy challenging Bible believers withsuch questions as how is there enough room

(01:28:10):
on the arc to fit a pairof all the animals including dinosaurs. We'll
tackle that question on today's Creation Moment. In Now our Creation Moments, host
Paul Taylor, Noah saved a pairof every kind of unclean creature and seven
pairs of every kind of clean creatureon the arc. Generally speaking, the
classification of kind is broader than today'sspecies. Creationists believe that today's species developed

(01:28:34):
from those creatures staying within the kind. For example, while there are many
species of fruit flies, they're allof the same kind. But how could
all the species we know today havedeveloped so quickly? In nineteen seventy eight,
a few European fruit flies were accidentallyintroduced to Chile. They have now
spread their population over much of NorthAmerica's west coast in that short time.

(01:28:58):
They differentiate within their kind. Forexample, those found in more northern latitudes
have the longer wingspans, while thosein the more southern latitudes have shorter wingspans.
Tests have shown that these differences aredue to differences in genetic makeup.
Amazingly, the same pattern of longerwingspans in more northerly fruit flies is very

(01:29:19):
much like the pattern observed in Europeanfruit flies. Even more astonishing is the
fact that the American fruit flies achievethe longer and short wingspans through the lengthening
of a different part of the wingthan their European cousins. But these differences
down to the genetic level have developedin a mere quarter of a century.

(01:29:39):
Illustrates how in the last few thousandyears since the flood, the various species
we know today could have easily developedfrom their basic kinds. Creation Moments as
a listeners supported broadcast. To findout how you can become a part of
the work we are doing. Visitus at creation moments dot com or call
one eight hundred four two Are youretired like me, and you just found

(01:30:01):
out you owe the IRS a tonof money? Well, what would your
life be like if they took yourretirement savings away from you? They can
do it and your property. Ifyou owe the IRS back taxes or you
haven't filed in a while, thetax Relief line is here to help you.
They can stop the IRS from takingyour retirement savings. If you qualified,

(01:30:23):
you could have your tax bill reducedto zero. That's right. If
you're retired and you owe the IRSa lot in back taxes, you could
have your entire tax bill reduced tozero. Do the IRS has now hired
thousands of new employees, so they'reready to come after you. Don't let
them take your retirement savings or property. Make this free call now. Eight

(01:30:45):
hundred five nine zero four nine threethree eight hundred five nine zero four nine
three three eight hundred five nine zerofour nine three three. That's eight hundred
five nine zero forty nine thirty three. Where the spoons go to find out
what's really going on. This isgoverned America. All right, we're back.

(01:31:18):
This is governed America. Vicky Davisis here. I'm during Wicks.
As we continue on here talking aboutthe deference, the Chevron defference, and
how the US Supreme Court is aboutto hear a case which could overturn the
Chevron deference and basically not entirely cutoff the head of the bureaucratic octopus,

(01:31:40):
but going a long way toward makingthe tentacles a lot less stinging and a
lot less far reaching. Before thebreak, I had to cut you off,
Vickie. I don't know if youhad a chance to finish what you
were saying there. I must have, because it completely is gone from my
mind. I wanted to finish upwith this political article real quick because it
has some very good information in it, and I think this is extremely important,

(01:32:03):
and we'll move on to other things. In announcing its decision to review
the case, the Court excised thequestion of what powers Congress gave the Commerce
Department to regulate fisheries. That leadsthe potential demise of Chevron deference as the
only issue to be reefed and arguedin the case known as Loper Bright Enterprises

(01:32:24):
versus Raimondo. That's the case that'sgoing before the court, Loper Bright Enterprises
versus Ramando our Ai Mondo. Ifyou want to look it up. In
recent years, the High Court hastaken up a series of cases that seem
to spell doom for Chevron deference,but it stepped back from the brink each

(01:32:45):
time. Just like mister Fund mentionedin that clip John Fund talking to Steve
Bannon that we played earlier last year, they paired it down some. But
this well, what are they goingto do this time? That's the question.
Most of the cases managed to brushback the regulators by rejecting their legal

(01:33:09):
interpretations. Last June, for instance, the Court decided a case involving medicare
reimbursements in which some conservatives and businessgroups had urged the justices to overturn Chevron.
In a narrow and unanimous opinion,the Court ruled against the medicare as
managers, but without even mentioning Chevron. And that's interesting that it was unanimous.

(01:33:33):
The Supreme Court's decision to hear thephishing case, which is likely to
be argued this fall or winter witha decision in the first half of twenty
twenty four, indicates that at leastfour justices wanted to grant review, and
that those who want to overturn Chevronfeel they may now have the five votes

(01:33:54):
to do so. Several justices haverailed against Chevron in recent years, sometimes
openly bridling at the at their colleague'sunwillingness to deliver the coupe of grace and
overturned the case that Critics say thisplaces judges from their usual role of determining

(01:34:14):
what the law means. Well,I think the laws should be written clearly
so that everyone doesn't need a judgeto determine what it means. But that's
just me anyway. Last fall,just last fall, and I think they
mentioned this in the in the audioclip as well, Justice Neil Gorsich said
the court had flinched too many timesat this late hour, and this is

(01:34:35):
his quote, at this late hour. The whole project deserves a tombstone no
one can miss. We should acknowledgeforthrightly that Chevron did not undo and could
not have undone, the judicial dutyto provide an independent judgment of the laws,
meaning in the cases that come beforethe nation's courts. Justice Clarence Thomas

(01:34:59):
wrote in twenty tw that quote,Chevron is in a serious tension with the
Constitution, repudiating one of his ownmajority opinions from two thousand and five,
concluding that the Federal Communications Commission couldinvoke Chevron deference to justify decisions regulating Internet
services. The new case on theregulator's power, the regulator's powers plural.

(01:35:21):
We'll also test the High courts continuingwell inness to overturn longstanding precedents rather than
quietly whittle away at them. LastJune, the Court took the momentous decision
to overturn Roll versus Weight, aswe all know, on a five to
four vote, unleashing a wave ofcriticism and by the way, threats,
and we have some information on thatas well. How incredible the leak,

(01:35:45):
What a big impact the leak ofthe Dobb's decision had on the court.
The Supreme Court in recent years hasmoved away from the Chevron from from Chevron,
The Cato Institute noted a survey ofrecent rulings it described in a Friend
of the Court brief urging the justicesto overturn Chevron, and the past six
years, agencies lost seventy percent ofSupreme Court cases that addressed Chevron. Cato

(01:36:10):
found and said the High Court increasinglyhas been applying the rules of statutory interpretation
even more closely. They wrote Thatincludes last year's ruling of West Virginia versus
EPA, which strengthened and for thefirst time, named the Major Questions doctrine
as a way to strike down regulations. The lower courts, however, continue
to apply Chevron since it is stillSupreme Court precedent. In twenty twenty one,

(01:36:34):
CATO found one hundred forty two rulingsinvolving Chevron. Involving the Chevron decision,
agencies won almost sixty percent of thetime. In those cases. Some
judges have already found ways to reachoutcome oriented decisions, argued CPR's Goodwin.
Releasing the lower courts from having toapply Chevron could accelerate that trend. Good

(01:37:00):
One says, I think it doesfree up activist judges to base their review
of regulations upon their policy preferences.Undoing the Chevron doctrine would also throw a
wrench into Congress's legislative agenda. Inrecent decades, lawmakers have increasingly chosen to
draft broad guidelines and delegate the technicaldetails to the agencies. See this is

(01:37:24):
where it is at every level they'retaking it, and that's a root that
is one of the ways that they'reimplementing the UN Agenda Agenda twenty one in
our country is through the regulatory powerof the administrative state. And not not

(01:37:45):
only that agency, it's also theEconomic Development Administration and other other agencies of
government. And they they've coordinated inan interagency process. Because of the Internet.

(01:38:08):
The Internet drives centralization of power.Yeah, and so that's why we're
under attack from all directions. Sothey say, climate change is one area
where the approach has been brought tobear. Although Democrats pass major clean energy

(01:38:29):
investments in recent years, Congress hasbeen unable to agree on almost any significant
new regulatory power for EPA on climatechange. That has left the agency to
try to craft sweeping regulations on greenhousegases. EPA recently proposed a rule for
cars and trucks that would require twothirds of new vehicles to be electric in
twenty thirty two, and in thecoming weeks is expected to float a new

(01:38:51):
regulation for power plants. The Bidenadministration is trying to craft those rules carefully
to avoid another loss in under theMajor Questions doctrine, but undoing Chevron doctrine
could also make justifying powerful climate regulationsunder old laws more difficult. Biden's environmental
and energy agencies were already facing aheavily tilted playing field in the federal judiciary.

(01:39:16):
Goodwin said, I think eliminating Chevron, like officially eliminating Chevron, would
make the prospects of surviving judicial reviewall the more daunting unquote. Much will
depend on whether the Supreme Court giveslower courts any new guidance undefference. One
silver lining for proponents of climate rules, the Clean Air Act requires lawsuits over

(01:39:42):
most air regulations to go straight tothe DC Circuit, preventing the Biden administration's
foes from easily seeking a more favorablevenue before the other courts. Yeah,
and that's really rotten. Yes,I agree. As a matter of fact,
our whole district courts system, thefederal courts, they there is an

(01:40:05):
imbalance of power in those courts.And so you know, the DC Court
is it is the nest you know, for government, for lobbyists, for
lawyers, you know, all theit's just all concentrated right there. So

(01:40:29):
if they if they succeed in keepingit in the third District Court, our
country is screwed. You know.To be perfectly blunt about it, a
few more paragraphs and I'll move onfrom this article, but it says.
A spokesman for the Justice Department,which had urged all justices not to take
up the fishing case, declined tocomment Monday on the High Courts move.

(01:40:51):
One member of the Court, JusticeKtangi Brown Jackson, has already heard arguments
in the fisheries dispute in her formerrole as a DC Circuit Court of Appeals
judge. She was on the panelthat initially considered an appeal in that case
last year. Jackson has recused herselffrom the Supreme Court appeal. Jackson was

(01:41:13):
replaced on the appeals panel following herelevation to the Supreme Court last June.
The DC Circuit ruled last summer twoto one that Chevron applied and the National
Marine Fisheries Service's conclusion that it hadthe power to require industry paid monitors on
fishing boats was reasonable. The dissentingjudge said, it was clear that Congress

(01:41:34):
never authorized such a requirement. Sothat's the articles, and that's the issue,
and it'll be very interesting to watchthis play out. I think now
is the time for praying people toget on their knees and pray that the
Supreme Court does the right thing inthis case. But you know well and

(01:41:56):
also pray for the conservare under fullattack, absolutely, and that brings us
really to where I was going next. You know it. We're perfectly in
tune right now because why else wouldthey be under attack? You know,
Uh, they're trying We mentioned inprevious broadcasts that they're trying to take down

(01:42:23):
uh, Justice Thomas, Clarence Thomas. They're attacking him on ethics violations,
and as I pointed out previously,you know, it's a lifetime appointment,
but only on good behavior. Ifthey can say you don't have good behavior,
that's an excuse to be able torecall people. Well, now they're
going through every transaction, and ifyou scrutinize anybody closely enough, you can

(01:42:45):
say that they took bribes or theyreceived gifts. You know, anything anybody
does for you could be interpreted asa bribe or a gift, you know.
And in this case, they're sayingthat Justice Thomas got a chance to
go to somebody's vacation home or something. I'm just doing this from memory,
so forgive me if I get detailswrong, but it's something he had been
doing for all, you know,years forever, and all of a sudden

(01:43:11):
now has become an issue. Whybecause they want to take him down.
They want to remove him from thebench, and he has no business.
The wealthy friend that Thomas has hasno business before the court, so there
is no conflict of interest. Youknow. I was feeling rather sympathetic to
the justices as I was reading aboutthis issue, because where do they go

(01:43:39):
for vacations. I mean, they'rethey're public employees. They don't make,
you know, a staggering amount ofmoney, and I imagine that it's very
difficult for them to even have friends, you know, because everybody wants a

(01:43:59):
foot in the door. Everybody's gotan agenda. Yeah, and so um,
yeah, they'll have lots lots oflots of people masquerading as their friends,
a lot of people coming out ofthe world. Word but everybody is
their friend, but nobody really istheir friend except the friends that they had
before they were put on the court. Yeah. So uh so, anyway,

(01:44:23):
here's a report from the Hill aboutthe issue of the Supreme Court being
under attacks. Some lawmakers want theSupreme Court to adopt new ethical standards.
There are no ethic guidelines guardrails atthe highest court in the land. Okay,
Now this is a congress person,uh talking about ethics? Now you

(01:44:45):
talk about ilus. A new bipartisanbill from Senators Lisa Murkowski and Inga's King,
Okay. Senator aims to force theSupreme Court to adopt a new code
of ethics within a year and toappoint someone to investigate complaints. As they're
working to strip away basic rights,they're also failing to hold themselves accountable.

(01:45:10):
In an interview with News Nation,Texas Senator Ted Cruz slammed Democrats for questioning
the ethics of Justice Clarence Thomas.Recent reports show that Thomas accepted undisclosed luxury
vacations and made real estate deals witha GOP mega donor. This is all
garbage. This is left wing andfrankly racist hatred. But New Mexico Democratic

(01:45:35):
Senator ben Ray Luhan says, theconcerns extend beyond Justice Thomas. Now there's
a question about a property sale.Do you hear what she just said?
The concerns extend beyond Justice Thomas.See, they're coming after all of them,
which is exactly what I predicted wouldhappen when we first started talking about

(01:45:56):
this first it's Clarence Thomas. Ifthey're able to take him down, it's
going to be it's in the restof them, because that's the strategy.
We got to get rid of theconservatives on the Court because they're doing too
much damage. And I think you'reright, VICKI I think this uh Chevron
deference has everything to do with it. Yeah, role maybe a part of

(01:46:17):
it, but this is huge questionedabout it, and just the idea that
the justices would reconsider old and baddecisions, um, you know, is
just making the left crazy, right. I think it's which justice was it

(01:46:40):
that whose life was threatened? Wasn'tit was? I'm thinking it was.
Yeah, but all of them,all of the conservatives really after they were
out there protesting which should not whichis illegal under federal law, because they
don't want you to be able toIt's not like your political Uh. The

(01:47:02):
Supreme Court is supposed to be abovepolitics. They're supposed to be now we
know that that's not the case,but they're supposed to be above politics and
neutral and make their decisions, maketheir opinions based upon constitution, constitutional law.

(01:47:23):
Is it in the constitution or isit not in the constitution? Is
it. You know, it's notbased upon politics, it's based upon the
Constitution, it's not based upon publicpressure. What the mob thinks. We're
not living in a democracy, ladiesand gentlemen, And that's what they're trying
to interpret or trying to push usinto democracy by having the mob outside of

(01:47:45):
the of the houses, the homesof the justices, right because what they're
really trying to do is to lobbyand influence the justices exactly, or intimidate
against the law, intimidate them,make them fearful to do anything but go
along with the mob. And thatis exactly the problem. Anyway, continuing

(01:48:11):
with this beyond Justice Thomas, nowthere's a question about a property sale with
Justice. That sale happened shortly afterJustice Neil Gorcich was confirmed to the US
Supreme Court, and he didn't disclosethat the buyer was the CEO of one
of the nation's largest law firms.Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell says the accusations

(01:48:32):
are political. Justices have proven theirsobriety and their judicial temperament in Washington.
Alexandra Lemo okay, I wasn't goingto do this in this order but I'm
going to jump to Senator Mike Lee. This is another one of your clips,
actually, Vicky. Senator Mike Leewas on the Megan Kelly Show discussing
the Dobs decision League And because thisis really germane to what we're talking about

(01:48:57):
with regard to the the justices beingunder attack, something Samuel Alito wrote about
the impact of the leak had onthe justices, how they felt their safety
was under attack, their families wereunder attack, and the fact that you

(01:49:18):
know, we still don't know whothe leaker is because there apparently has been
no real investigation into the matter andno prosecutions of any of the illegal protesters
or people threatening the courts and theand the courts justices. So this is
what we're witnessing, ladies and gentlemen, is an orderly managed decline of civility

(01:49:41):
in the United States. You can'thave a republic, you can't have a
civilized society when you have this typeof stuff to go on. But but
this again pressure from above, pressurefrom below. The Justice Department is working
with the protesters on the ground,working with people inside the Supreme Court clerks
active as Supreme Court clerks leaking thingsthat should not be leaked, and it

(01:50:06):
caught everybody flat footed and as aresult, created a lot of danger for
the people on the court. Hewrites in the Journal, the threats are
the leak of the draft Dabs opinionquote made us targets of assassination. He
said, it created an atmosphere ofsuspicion, distrust. We worked through it,
and last year we got our workdone. This year, I think

(01:50:27):
we're trying to get back to normaloperations as much as we can. But
it was damaging. He writes,I personally have a pretty good idea of
who's responsible, but that's different fromthe level of proof that's needed to name
somebody. And then he goes onto say explicitly, this was a campaign
the leak to try to intimidate thecourt. Those of us who were thought
to be in the majority, thoughtto have approved my draft opinion, were

(01:50:49):
really targets of assassination. It wasrational for people to believe that they might
be able to stop the decision inDabbs by killing one of us. He
goes on to say that these folkswho believed the leaker was on the conservative
side, whether the justices themselves orpeople who work for them. This is
infuriating to me, he writes,Look, this made us targets of assassination.

(01:51:12):
Why would I do that to myself? Would the five of us have
done that to ourselves? It's quiteimplausible. Interesting he says five instead of
six because the Chief Justice concurred withthe Conservative justices. He didn't want to
overturn Roe versus weight though, sohe's clearly not counting Roberts in this.
Who would we have done this toourselves? I don't feel physically unsafe,
but that's because now we have alot of protection being driven around and basically

(01:51:36):
a tank. So this is thestate of affairs right now for our justices.
And before I move on from hisopinion piece, is there anything left
to be done? Senator unveiling whowas behind this? It would not take
much at all. There are thingsleft to be done, and you're writing

(01:51:57):
it wouldn't take much to unveiling.All that needs to happen is that the
Marshal of the US Supreme Court needsto be authorized to conduct a new investigation
and enlist the help of deputized membersof the US Marshal Service to help conduct
that interview. That investigation they needto interview each and every law clerk and
any other Supreme Court personnel who hadclose access to the circulating draft opinions.

(01:52:21):
I'm confident they can do that.As they interview them, as they review
their phone records, and as theyfollow up on those interviews and the document
reviews, they can find the leaker. I'm quite confident of that, and
this does need to happen. Look, this is no exaggeration to say that
this put their lives at risk.I remember exactly where I was one year
ago yesterday when the leak was announced. Immediately, my concern was for the

(01:52:46):
welfare of the Supreme Court justices,particularly those whose names were attached to the
then leaked draft of the dab's opinion. Very concerned, I got on the
phone immediately and made phone calls tomake sure that they the Supreme Court was
taking adequate precautions as far as theirpersonal safety. Everyone knew, everyone understood

(01:53:08):
immediately the natural ramifications this would have, and it was of its very nature
the kind of thing that could threatenthem, intimidate them, and subject them
to a risk of physical violence.And it's unacceptable that over a year later,
we still don't know who it was, Well, you're some of your
colleagues in the government had had verydifferent reactions because we now know that Marek

(01:53:30):
Garland, our Attorney General, wasspecifically advising those who are unseen there to
protect the justices at their homes whenpeople were protesting in the wake of the
release of the draft leak and theactual opinion, when they were most vulnerable,
when, as he points out,it would have been rational to think
if you assassinated one of the fiveyou could stop the reversal. Marek Garland

(01:53:54):
was essentially telling these cops stand down, do not arrest the protesters, even
though if you protest as an attemptto interfere with the carrying out of justice
with the conclusion of an opinion,you are breaking the law. You're breaking
the law. You're committing a crimeunder eighteen USC. Section fifteen oh seven.

(01:54:15):
You're breaking the law if you showup at the home of a Supreme
Court justice in order to protest ordemonstrate trying to influence that justice in some
way. This is a crime.And based on these documents that were unearthed
by a whistleblower and through my colleaguefrom Alabama, Senator Katie Britt, we
discovered that the US Marshall Service hasissued these training guidelines saying that when you're

(01:54:40):
at the home of a Supreme Courtjustice, don't make arrests under section fifteen
o seven without prior approval from theUS Attorney's Office, which makes it all
but impossible that it's going to occur. And then they added additional elements onto
the crime elements that do not existin the statute. They have to be
criminal threats, there has to beindication of violence under the circumstances. Those

(01:55:03):
are not elements of section fifteen ohseven. And so, not surprisingly,
not a single, not one arrestunder fifteen oh seven has been made at
the home of a Supreme Court justicein the last year since this dubs leak
occurred, even though ever since thenwe've had protests at their homes. They
follow them to home, to theirfavorite vacation spots, in some cases,

(01:55:24):
to their churches, and yet nota single arrest is made. That's absolutely
unconscionable. It's unforgivable and deliberate.They're definitely working together to intimidate these men
and women women to go along withthe mob, implement this stuff and not

(01:55:50):
do the things necessary to properly rightthe ship constitutionally. That's what we're really
talking about here. We are almostout of this hour, already in the
fastest three hours of talk radio,and we're going to hit the ground running
in the third and final hour ofgovern America, which is straight ahead right
after the news. Stay with us, ladies and gentlemen, we'll be back.

(01:56:34):
Are you retired like me and youjust found out you owe the IRS
a ton of money? Well,what would your life be like if they
took your retirement savings away from you? They can do it and your property.
If you owe the IRS back taxesor you haven't filed in a while,
the tax Relief line is here tohelp you. They can stop the

(01:56:54):
IRS from taking your retirement savings.If you qualified, you could have your
tax bill reduced to zero. That'sright. If you're retired and you owe
the IRS a lot in back taxes, you could have your entire tax bill
reduced to zero. Do the IRShas now hired thousands of new employees,
so they're ready to come after you. Don't let them take your retirement savings

(01:57:16):
or property. Make this free callnow eight hundred five nine zero four nine
three three eight hundred five nine zerofour nine three three eight hundred five nine
zero four nine three three. That'seight hundred five nine zero forty nine thirty
three new offense. But are youa little fat when you look in the

(01:57:38):
mirror? How would you like tolearn the secrets to lose three to five
pounds a week easily without joining thegym or going through any crazy diets.
It's called body Sculpt by med Diet. For the last two decades, we've
been helping people just like you thathave pounds they want to shed. We've
helped millions of people lose thousands andthousands of pounds over the years, and

(01:58:00):
now it's your turn. Learn thesecrets of how to lose weight with one
simple phone call. You'll see anamazing difference in a matter of days.
Don't believe us. We'll offer youa money back guarantee if you're ready to
start losing weight right now. Callright now to learn more about your risk
free order to body sculpt. Callfor your risk free offer. Eight hundred

(01:58:20):
seven eight four one nine four twoeight hundred seven eight four one nine four
two. Eight hundred seven eight fourone nine four two. That's eight hundred
seven eight four, nineteen forty twotwos sh comer in the Family Need Who's

(01:59:02):
Almost a newly discovered emails revealing newdetails regarding the Hunter Biden laptop letter ahead
of the twenty twenty presidential election.Brook Singman reports former Deputy CIA Director Michael
Morrell and former CIA Director John Brennanwill reportedly testify before the House Subcommittee on
the Weaponization of the Federal Government thismonth. So back in twenty twenty,

(01:59:23):
Morrell asks former CIA director Brennan tosign that now infamous letter, quote can
I add your name to this list? Trying to give the campaign, particularly
during the debate on Thursday, atalking point to push back on Trump on
this issue. Brennan responds, quote, add my name to the list.
Good initiative. That this exchange camejust four days before then candidate Biden's debate

(01:59:45):
against former President Trump. Just TheNews founder John Solomon released the emails yesterday,
and he calls the operation election interference. A Chicago based reporter wants to
know why an upscale hotel in Chicagois allowed to house illegal aliens with no
inspection or oversight. William Kelly triedto enter the hotel but was denied entry.
He says, the hotel is packedwith the illegals, but no one

(02:00:09):
knows what's going on inside. Thishotel is completely close to the public.
Mayor Lightfoot is saying that this isgoing to cost the taxpayers between twenty and
twenty five million dollars a month.Where is this money going. There's never,
really, to my knowledge, beenany accounting. We don't really even
know how many migrants are at thishotel. You know, you could be

(02:00:30):
sure that if this was just aprivate you know, if this hotel was
just being run out for the public, all you know, there'd be investigating
city inspectors crawling all over this placeto shut it down. But yet,
you know, as of right now, there's nobody, no one who isn't
somehow running this very secretive operation becausehe's been allowed inside the hotel. Republican

(02:00:56):
presidential candidate Nicki Haley hild a rallyin her home state of South Carolina Thursday,
where she previously served as governor forsix years, calling for so called
transgender athletes or biological men to bekept out of women's sports. Hailey went
on to publicly out so called transactivistDylan mulvaney. Make no mistake that is

(02:01:17):
a guy dress up like a girlmaking fun of women. We don't act
like that. We don't act likethat. It is an idea that could
amount to racial and medical rationing.Chris Woodward explains academics, doctors, and

(02:01:39):
students at University of California, SanFrancisco recently published an article the New England
Journal of Medicine calling for new approachesto teaching, including dividing students based on
their skin color. Kenny Shoe ofColors United says this is not the way
medicine should be in America could amountto racial to medical rationing. For example,

(02:02:02):
the New England Journal Medicine article thatsought racial segregation in med school said
they did it. They want tobecause they believe that black students would feel
more comfortable in a world quote unquotewithout white people. That's what they said,
quote without white people. So theywant black medical residents to be sheltered
from white people. But you knowwhat that does in the future, It

(02:02:24):
could lead them to give racially preferentialcare. This is a short road to
racial rationing. That means that inthe future, will white people only trust
white doctors will black people only trustblack doctors if in that world, Asian
people will be fine because there's somany Asian doctors, But there are a
few black doctors in America, andI think that we need to be able

(02:02:46):
to trust doctors no matter what race. I'm Chris wood. Word potent thunderstorm
started battering much of Texas Thursday andare expected to continue for the next several
days. John Hart is at theNational Weather Service Storm Prediction Center. There
have been thunderstorms across parts of centraland North Texas, clusters of storms affecting
up near the Red River of farNorth Texas, with hail and wind being

(02:03:10):
reported in those storms. There's anothercluster down around Waco, and then there's
another really big storm down west ofSan Antonio around Del Rio that has produced
some very large hail as well.More news online at AFN dot net and
the AFN mobile app. I'm RUSTPU. We have before us the opportunity to

(02:03:32):
forge for ourselves and for future generations, a new world order, new world
forward, new world order. Thisis a movement to season. The galeidoscope
has been shaken. The pieces arein flux. Soon they will settle again.
Before they do, let US reorderthis world around us, a new
world order, a world where theUnited Nations is poised to fulfill the historic

(02:03:56):
vision of its founders. Nevertheless,the United States, if it makes position
to shape, is so that theproblem of the push rentudentity will be the
emergence of a new international order.The first decade of the twenty first century,
that out of orders will be feelof the greatest restructuring of the global
economy, the greatest restructuring of theglobal economy, the greatest restructuring of the

(02:04:20):
global economy, a new world order, lost greatest document, the greatest of
our republic. The very word secrecyis repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are as a people inherentlyan historically opposed a secret society to

(02:04:41):
secret owner and a secret proceedings wheezingwar on the new world order. The
councils of government, we must guardagainst the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial conflict. This is Governed America,
with Darren Weeks and Vicky Davis calledgovern America at six one zero, six

(02:05:17):
hundred one seven seven six. That'ssix one zero, six hundred one seven
seven six six one zero six zerozero one seven seven six or told three
at age four four six, foursix eight three seven six. That's eight
four four six government. This isGoverned America with Darren Weeks and Vicky Davis,

(02:05:42):
and we're back final hour of theshow here, ladies and gentlemen.
You know, we were talking alot today about the deeps reach of the
bureaucratic and administrative state, and youknow, one thing that we haven't really
discussed in that context is how theintelligence establishment would be affected by all this,
because that's is that not really apart of the bureaucracy, Vickie,

(02:06:05):
Oh, it totally is. Andit is the CIA that really I think
is behind a lot of the technocratictyranny. Yeah, because they started or
worked with an organization called Inkutel,which was venture capital provided to technology corporations.

(02:06:32):
And that that reminds me. Iwanted to bring up something about the
Supreme Court leak. Okay. Oneof the global systems was to connect universities,
libraries, and museums. And ofcourse, what is the most important

(02:06:54):
library in this country. It's theLibrary of Congress. And I don't know
if you remember or not, backabout eight or nine years ago when they
found out that there was a ringor a few Pakistani contractors who were working

(02:07:17):
the yeah on Congress's what files,And you know how with the you're talking
about the thing that involved Debbie WashermanSchultz, Yes, okay, and okay,
you know how with our monuments,our national monuments, the UN kind

(02:07:40):
of took those over. And Ihaven't tracked down what legislation it was that
allowed them to do it, butit was the designation of a World Heritage
Site that gave the UN authority overthe site, and um in in the
reorganization of the UN in the nineteennineties when they operationalized their agencies. I'm

(02:08:07):
thinking that these global systems are underthe purview of the United Nations, and
as a library the Supreme Court records, in the Library of Congress, Congress's
records, they would are they underUN control? That's my question, and

(02:08:33):
I think that needs to be investigatedbecause that that could account for the League
could have very well not been oneof the people in the Supreme Court at
all, could have been whoever isadministering the systems of the Supreme Court justices.

(02:08:56):
Wasn't these weren't these Pakistani's brothers.There were like two of them as
every call. Yes, I can't, I can't remember the thinking called the
Owen Awen brothers or Owen brothers AW A N. That sounds familiar.
Yeah, im one, that's right, Yeah, that's right. How was

(02:09:18):
the one that was arrested at theairport? I thought there was another one
too. Yeah, we don't.We actually don't know how many there were.
But you know, when they employedup our country for trade in services
and they allowed um foreign everybody inthis country was thinking, oh goody,

(02:09:41):
you know now our corporations can godo business in other countries. Well,
the reverse of that is that foreigncorporations could do business and compete against our
companies, and the government can't discriminateamongst contractors. So here you have a

(02:10:01):
situation where you have a country,a hostile country like you know, perhaps
China or name the country, andthey subsidize the bid of their foreign corporation
to get a contract for a sensitiveAmerican system. And so that's the kind

(02:10:26):
of the unspoken situation that we're inin terms of the global technocratic tyranny.
Nobody talks about that. Yeah,and the intelligence establishment is up to their
eyeballs in criminal activity rigging elections.You know, you're not supposed to say
that out loud because you're a conspiracytheorist if you do, and you might

(02:10:50):
be subject to the dis and misinformationGod's wrath if you say that kind of
thing. It's not acceptable, oryou might be sued by dominion. But
that, nonetheless is what's going on. They have been putting their finger on
the scale to put up mildly inthe elections, and in fact, there's
more information coming out all the time. Now, will anything ever actually happen

(02:11:13):
with this information, that's the question, because there's plenty of evidence out there.
John Solomon of Just the News hasjust obtained an email which showed that
former CIA director Mike Morrel pushed forJohn Brennan to sign his name to a
letter claiming that the Hunter Biden laptopstory was Russian disinformation, which we now

(02:11:35):
firmly know was not the case.But he did this in order to help
Joe Biden during the presidential debates.Both John Brennan and James Clapper are now
going to be required to testify regardingthis. Two former top intelligence officials are
facing the House Judiciary Subcommittee on theweaponization of the federal government reports released Thursday,

(02:11:58):
sale AMA or A. CIA directorJohn Brennan and Director of National Security
James Clapper will testify it in aclosed door hearing. Brennan and Clapper were
among the more than fifty X intelligenceofficials to sign the letter downplaying the Hunter
Biden laptop story. This as apanel is probing the federal government's meddling in

(02:12:20):
the twenty twenty elections by covering upstories about Hunter Biden. Brennan is expected
to saysify me eleven and Clapper isexpected to appear me seventeenth. So that's
something you can look forward to.Unfortunately, will you ever hear anything about
it because it's a closed door session. Yeah, it shouldn't be a clue.
We have a right to know what'sgoing on in our government. And

(02:12:46):
one thing is for sure, youcan't have an American government without American government
employees and with foreign foreign intelligence operativesand foreign agents allowed to operate openly in
our country. Yeah, even ifbehind the cover of um business. Yeah

(02:13:13):
exactly. You know, it's it'sa government of the people, by the
people, and for the people.All that means is that the people have
to fund it all, but youhave no say in it. How can
you have a say in it whenyou don't have any idea or any clue,
You're never allowed to know what's goingon in it, right, And

(02:13:33):
that's that that was the idea behindthe establishment of the National security state because
they intended to do Unamerican things likesign us up for the United Nations and
work towards the implementation of world governmentamen so, and that allowed them.

(02:14:00):
The National Security state is what hasallowed them to do that. Here's John
Solomon explaining more about the email thathe obtained that we were just that report
was just talking about and how itshows the intelligence establishment's collusion and pushing Russia
collusion. And I'll just call itdisinformation because that's what it was. It

(02:14:24):
was disinformation. They were pushing theRussia Russia Russia collusion and the talking you
know, that talking point to tryto rig the twenty twenty election. Just
a short while ago, Jess theNews obtained this email. This is a
very important email. It comes fromthe former CIA director Mike Morrell. Yes,
the guy that organized that letter fromthe fifty one intelligence professionals who tried

(02:14:45):
to thank you into thinking that theHunter Biden laptop was Russia disinformation when it
wasn't. It is between him andJohn Brennan. One of the signatories.
You know John Brennan is he wasObama CIA director, Right, He's a
guy that told Obama, Hey,Hillary Clinton is doing a dirty trick on
Donald Trump, called Russia collusion.Well, this is just before the presidential
debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Hunter Biden's laptop is flinging out there.

(02:15:11):
This is what Mike Morrell, FORMACIdirector, tells his successor, John
Brennan, Hey, sign this letterbecause I'm quote trying to give the campaign,
particularly during the debate on Thursday,a talking point to push back on
Trump on this issue. A manwith a security clearance, a man with
the title of CIA director, knewthat he wasn't creating an intelligence product,

(02:15:35):
americ's civic duty with fifty one people. He was trying to create a political
moment damning evidence. We'll try tofind out of Congress has this letter,
but this is a very important piece. It's the ultimate proof that what went
out on that letter was a politicaldirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign.
Okay, so what he's saying hereis that Mike Morrell, this email proves,

(02:15:58):
this document rooves that Mike Morale wastrying to get him to sign this,
uh, this document from the intelligenceestablishment to push back and accuse Trump
of colluding with Russia. Okay,for to help Joe Biden in the debate
against Trump. And in fact,that's exactly what they did. In case

(02:16:20):
you've forgotten it, here's the actualdebate where that was used. Don't give
me the stuff about how you're thisinnocent baby, Joel a corrupt politician.
Nobody I want to pay on theissue of race we're talking about from Hill.
President Trump talking about race right now, and I do want to stay
on the issue of race. President, are fifty former national intelligence folks who

(02:16:48):
said that what this she's accusing meof is a Russian plan. They have
said that this has all the care. Four five former heads of the CIA,
both parties say what he's sane isa bunch of garbage. Nobody believes
to accept them. His and hisgood friend Rudy Jelly. Do you mean
the laptop is now another Russia RussiaRussia hoax? That's exactly what way,

(02:17:11):
exactly what is where he's going Iwant to say on the issue of you
have to be kidding the Russia.There you go, That's how they did
it, That's how the game hasplayed, ladies and gentlemen. Mike Morrell,
but does anybody ever Mike Morrell belongsin jail. Absolutely, but he

(02:17:35):
won't be. Nothing's ever done tothese people, and too many people are
afraid of them because, like ChuckSchumer said, they have six ways from
Sundays at getting back at you.So none of them want to take on
the intelligency, uh, the intelligenceapperette eye. It's disgusting, it's destructive

(02:17:58):
to our nation in a major way. Yeah. Absolutely, So the beat
goes on. You know, wewe have whistleblowers. Let's see Fox News
is reporting whistleblower alleges FBI and Departmentof Justice have document revealing criminal scheme involving
Biden and a foreign national. JoeConshaw joined Fox and Friends First to discuss

(02:18:28):
the latest on the Hunter Biden investigation, and Karin John Pierre feuding with Peter
Doocey on Boorder dramatics. A whistleblower is alleging that the FBI and the
Justice Department are in possession of adocument that describes a criminal scheme involving then
Vice President Joe Biden and a foreignnational relating to the exchange of money for

(02:18:48):
policy decisions. House Oversight Committee ChairmanJohn James Comer and Senator Chuck Grassley said
Wednesday. Comer and Grassley, bothRepublicans, said the whistleblower claims the document
includes a precise description of how thealleged criminal scheme was employed, as well
as its purpose. The document andFBI generated FD ten twenty three form allegedly

(02:19:11):
details and arraignment I'm sorry, inarrangement involving an exchange of money for policy
decisions. Coma issued a subpoena Wednesdayfollowing legally protected disclosures to Grassley's office.
He Grassly said, we believe theFBI possesses an unclassified internal document that includes
very serious and detailed allegations implicating thecurrent president of the United States. What

(02:19:35):
we don't know is what, ifanything, the FBI has done to verify
these claims or investigate further. Igot I got a word for you nothing.
I guarantee you nothing. The FBI'srecent history of botching politically charged investigations

(02:19:56):
demands close Congressional Oversight. Yeah.Well, you know what, when they
created the Department of Home Scams Security, they centralized the legal and regulatory power
under one single umbrella, Home ScamsSecurity, and we have been nothing but

(02:20:22):
insecure ever since. Yeah, youknow, I think something's gone wrong in
the world. The stop clock issuddenly correct. Ah, something has aligned,
VICKI I don't quite know what Ehas aligned in the world against us.
I'm finding myself agreeing with Alexandria OccasioCortez on something. Oh my gosh.

(02:20:50):
And I never thought the calendar.I never thought this could be possible.
But she and Matt Gates has teamedup days before. That's really unnerving.
I have to say, yeah,well it's it's actually good if it.
I think days before pac West Bancorptanked from the mid twenties and the

(02:21:13):
mid two dollar range in forty eighthours. Representative Dan Goldman of New York,
a Democrat, the Levi strauss ErTrump impeachment lead counsel turned lawmaker,
sold his shares in the beleaguered bank. Okay, and we all know how
Nancy Pelosi has made a ton ofmoney. So what Matt Gates and Alexandria

(02:21:41):
Ocasio Cortez are doing. They havesponsored a bill which bands members of Congress
from trading stocks. Oh that's awesome, Okay, all right. I never
thought I would agree with Tz onanything, but God bless her on that

(02:22:03):
issue. Yeah. Yeah, ifthat's the issue, then I'm one hundred
percent behind it. It's called theBipartisan Restoring Faith in Government Act. Good
luck with that, but this wouldat least help have less faith if it
would actually be effective. I haven'tread the bill, but it as it's

(02:22:24):
being presented here, it would banmembers of Congress and their spouses and dependents
from making financial investments. Also cosponsoring the bill our representatives Brian Fitzpatrick and
Raha krish Namuthi, who is aDemocrat from Illinois, whom I don't think

(02:22:45):
I've ever heard of that person.But anyway, the ability to individually trade
stocky roads the public trust in government, oh crazy, Cortez said. She
continued by saying, when members haveaccess to classified information, we should not
be trading in the stock market onit. It's really that simple. Do
you know what? That would bethe best way to limit a politician's time

(02:23:13):
in office is to say you've gotto divest yourself of stock and you can't
trade in stock because they have allthe inside information. And I'm sure they
have just made collectively billions on thedestruction of our country. Absolutely, and
it would also, I think,going a long way to weed out the

(02:23:37):
scumbags that would even seek that officein the first place. If they couldn't
enrich themselves, why would they wantto go That's true, You're right,
I mean, and not that theyyou know, they could have other largest
heaped upon them in other ways.I'm sure, as they always do,
lobbyists are still going to hover aroundand if you could do actually know,

(02:23:58):
they're pretty um pretty closely regularly theyhave been trying to implement regulations on lobbying,
like they're so worried about. Youknow, who is that congressman in
California. He actually went to jailfor accepting some kind of a rug from

(02:24:22):
a he probably fell out of favorwith the establishment. Well that's that's what
it really is. That's the substory. But the public story was that
it was corruption. He broke thelaw when he accepted that gift. And
the moment they decide Biden doesn't needto be president. Uh, you know,
all this Hunter Biden stuff and allthese uh this money laundering through family

(02:24:46):
members that is going full speed unabatedby you know, you can point it
out. Everyone pointed out on theright. It's everywhere. I think maybe
even the mainstream media on the lefthas talked about it, but you know,
to some degree anyway, and youknow, it goes unchecked. That's

(02:25:07):
the amazing thing it can be.Our justice department is worse than useless.
It's become a criminal enterprise. Asfar as I'm concerned. The second they
decide that Biden is no longer usefulto them is the second that all of
this stuff comes out of the closet. And it's the stuff. I mean,

(02:25:30):
it doesn't even have to be HunterBiden. It doesn't even have to
be the major scandals. They'll find, you know, a pimple on the
back of his head and say thatthe pimple has too much puss in it,
and then and they'll obsess over Butthat's how they do. You know,
It's like the biblical phrase strain itand that and swallow a camel comes

(02:25:50):
to mind. That's how these peopleare. I mean, they'll ignore the
pedophila, the fact that Hunter Bidenwas apparently had child porn on his computer.
Hey, that's fine, that's noproblem. But you know, let's
focus on the puss, the pussypimple. Sorry for the horrific metaphors.
Well, puss pimple doesn't implicate anybodyelse, but the porn on his laptop

(02:26:13):
does. Oh, they don't care, though. The real criminality is that
it's fine, is just less fixateon something small and irrelevant and use that
to completely remove the person and destroythem. Yeah, they don't want to
rock the boat exactly. All right, we're out of this half hour.
One more half hour to go.We'll try to refrain from talking anymore about

(02:26:33):
pussy pimples, and yes, finishedwith good, important relevant information. Stay
with us, ladies, gentlemen,don't go away, no offense. But

(02:27:01):
are you a little fat when youlook in the mirror? How would you
like to learn the secrets to losethree to five pounds a week easily without
joining the gym or going through anycrazy diets. It's called body sculpt by
med Diet. For the last twodecades, we've been helping people just like
you that have pounds they want toshed. We've helped millions of people lose

(02:27:22):
thousands and thousands of pounds over theyears, and now it's your turn.
Learn the secrets of how to loseweight with one simple phone call. You'll
see an amazing difference in a matterof days. Don't believe us. We'll
offer you a money back guarantee.If you're ready to start losing weight right
now. Call right now to learnmore about your risk free order to body

(02:27:43):
sculpt. Call for your risk freeoffer. Eight hundred seven eight four one
nine four two, eight hundred seveneight four one nine four two, eight
hundred seven eight four one nine fourtwo. That's eight hundred seven eight four
nineteen forty two. Are you retiredlike me and you just found out you
owe the Irs a ton of money? Well, what would your life be

(02:28:07):
like if they took your retirement savingsaway from you? They can do it
and your property. If you owethe Irs back taxes or you haven't filed
in a while, the tax ReliefLine is here to help you. They
can stop the Irs from taking yourretirement savings. If you qualified, you
could have your tax bill reduced tozero. That's right. If you're retired
and you owe the Irs a lotin back taxes. You could have your

(02:28:31):
entire tax bill reduced to zero.Do the IRS has now hired thousands of
new employees, so they're ready tocome after you. Don't let them take
your retirement savings or property. Makethis free call now. Eight hundred five
nine zero four nine three three eighthundred five nine zero four nine three three.

(02:28:52):
Eight hundred five nine zero four ninethree three. That's eight hundred five
nine zero forty nine thirty three.Hi, I'm Devin, a student at
Hillsdale College. Here is president ofHillsdale College, doctor Larry Aren't. On
what the founders meant by general welfare, The Great Preamble of our Constitution states

(02:29:13):
that the purpose of the document isin part to promote the general welfare.
Contrary to the modern understanding of thatterm, the founders understood welfare I mean
public good or happiness. This wasunderstood in accordance with the principles of the
Decoration of Independence, such happiness ascontingent on securing to each citizen as natural
rights to life, liberty, andthe pursuit of happiness. Because this requires

(02:29:33):
the government be limited, the powersof the federal government were enumerated, and
local matters were reserved to state authority. This was precisely intended to secure these
inalienable rights and in turn promote thegeneral welfare. This Constitution Minute was brought
to you by Hillsdale College, Curacyof a Free Pocket Constitution and Declaration.
Go to Constitution minute dot com.Let me tell you a story about Bill.

(02:30:01):
Bill was a normal guy in hisfifties. He had back surgery about
two years ago. Bill was ina lot of pain. He dealt with
his pain by taking the percocesses doctorprescribed for him. Bill took more and
more and more of them to helpwith the pain. So one day the
prescriptions weren't enough to get rid ofBill's pain. Then one day Bill found

(02:30:22):
someone to help him get rid ofthe pain with illegal drugs he didn't need
a prescription for best. Forward totoday, Bill lost his job and his
family. The only thing he doeshave is his drug dealer. If you
know Bill's story and you don't wantto end up like Bill, call the
Detox and Treatment Helpline right now toget away and get treatment. Eight hundred

(02:30:45):
three to six oz three one foureight hundred three six oz three one four
eight hundred three to six oz threeone four that's eight hundred three six zero
zero three fourteen where a spoofs goto find out what's really going on.

(02:31:05):
This is Governed America. All right. We're in the home stretch of the
broadcast one more half hour ago,and we are headed for the sunset for
another week of Governed America. Anyway. You know, there are good things
happening. I guess that's really whatthis show today really demonstrates for us.

(02:31:26):
So we talk a lot about thebad news, and we focus a lot
about the scary and horrific things thatare happening. But it's nice to know
that there are some good things aretaking place in the world, and there's
a lot of things to be hopefulfor a lot of people waking up,
a lot of people exposing the agenda. Now, we just have to figure
out a way to get the bureaucraticdeep state under control, the intelligency under

(02:31:50):
control, certainly the Justice Department undercontrol. And one thing that I am
also encouraged by is the Australian PrimeMinister has just him out, Vicky,
you know, Julian Assange, andhow he's been held basically hostage, you
know, for many, many yearsbecause of his heroic effort at trying to
expose the deep state and the intelligenceestablishment basically and stop of war. Some

(02:32:18):
of the documents that were Wiki League'sreleased embarrassed the Defense Department brass at the
top and the intelligence establishment. Youknow, I'm thinking of that video they
put out, what was it calledthe contractors using the people in the target
practice. Yeah, and just likehaving fun. You know, it's almost

(02:32:39):
like it was fun. It wascompletely sick, really, but so there
was a lot of that that tookplace, a lot of but there were
so many documents from and not justthe US government, it was other corruptive
governments around the world. And theyyeah, because they alway they are doing
that sort of thing in elis tobring them into the UN's system. Yeah.

(02:33:05):
Good point. And here's the thing, ladies and gentlemen, I believe,
my opinion, Julian Assange is ahero and he has paid the price.
That's if you had any doubts aboutJulian Osange before it, I probably
did originally. I can think ofthings I've said on the show where I
was wrong at the time that theWiki leaks was being dripped out. You

(02:33:28):
know, I made some comments aboutJulian Assange. I didn't entirely trust him.
I was wrong. That man isa hero. And if you need
to know, you need any demonstrationas to whether or not he's a hero,
look at what he's been through.Yeah, that man has paid the
price. He didn't do anything differentthan any other journal journalists. Yeah,

(02:33:54):
in the in the past, butyou know they've what they've done. Even
though they say they protect the rightsof journalists, the UN system protects journalists.
They only protect journalists to the extentthat they go against the people are

(02:34:16):
going not going against the UN agenda. If you have a journalist that's speaking
out against a tutalitarian regime that isnot participating with the UN system, then
the UN likes that journalist. Youknow, if you have a journalist who's
a going against a UN member countryand exposing the UN system, or exposing

(02:34:41):
the intelligence establishment that's implementing the UNsystem, or the Defense Department which is
implementing the UN system, then theUN doesn't care. Hey, it's persecute
away. And that's Julian Assage.That's what he did. He touched the
third rail in many cases, andhe has paid the price dearly for doing

(02:35:03):
so so it's encouraging to me tosee the Australian Prime Minister coming out this
week calling for Julian Osande's release.He said enough is enough. Australia's leader,
Anthony Albernizi, says he's frustrated aboutthe continued attention of Julian Assange,
the founder of whistleblowing platform WikiLeaks,who is also an Australian citizen by birth.

(02:35:26):
On Wednesday, the Prime Minister spoketo broadcaster ABC in London and I
am concerned about mister Sandra's mental health. There was a court decision here in
the United Kingdom that was then Ireturned on appeal that went to mister Asander's
health as well, and I amconcerned for him. Osandras wanted in the

(02:35:50):
States on criminal charges over the releaseof confidential US military records and diplomatic cables
through WikiLeaks in twenty ten. Washingtonsays his actions lives in danger. The
source of those files was former USsoldier Chelsea Manning, but with Manning freed,
Albanesi said Australians were failing to understandthe reasons for why Assange remained in

(02:36:11):
prison. Enough is enough. Thisneeds to be brought to a conclusion it
needs to be worked through if thereis nothing to be served by his ongoing
incarceration. Albanesi did not confirm ifhe would raise the issue of Osane's detention
with President Biden during his visit toSydney on May twenty fourth for the Quad

(02:36:33):
Leader's Summit, but he said hewould engage diplomatically with American authorities. The
Australian Prime Minister has been advocating forOsane's release. Julian Assange faces a sentence
of up to one hundred and seventyfive years in the maximum security prison if
he is extradited to the US.He spent seven years hold up in Ecuador's
embassy in London after being offered refugeuntil British police dragged him out in twenty

(02:36:58):
nineteen. Sou Where this is goingto go, I don't know. Unfortunately,
I don't have a whole lot offaith in the establishment here. Uh.
Well, it's encouraging though that theAustralian government is picking up his cause
because because he's spent more time inprison already than he probably would have for

(02:37:26):
the non crime of being a reporter. Yeah, but do you know what
they were calling for his u theywere calling for him the death penalty for
him. They wanted to put himto death. And that's just nothing.
And the thing is is that hedidn't go out and get those documents.
He didn't hack any systems or anything. They were given to him by Chelsea

(02:37:52):
Manning, and they were and probablyothers, I would say, maybe especially
the ones from other countries and stuff. But the point is is that these
people, it's just just brutal.I don't know, I lost my train
of thought there, but we'll moveon. Title forty two is just set

(02:38:13):
to expire. We've talked a lotabout that on the show, and already,
you know, still we have migrantscoming into the country, flooding across
the border, and they're still beingshipped all around the country right now.
Two fresh bus loads of migrants rolledinto New York City after being shipped in
by Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Wednesday, as New York City Mayor Eric Adams

(02:38:37):
again accuses the Biden administration of turningits back on the city. So two
buses. We had, the firstbus carrying forty one migrants, including fifteen
children. This arrived at the ManhattanPort Authority bus terminal at about seven am
from the US border town of Larado, Texas. Then a second bus load,
which carried twenty seven adults and twentythree children from the same Texas town,

(02:39:01):
pulled into the station just after onethirty pm, all without warning.
New Yorkers never got any notice.The buses were sent here to the Big
Apple by Abbot, his office confirmingthis on Wednesday. Now, Adams has
intensified his pleas for federal intervention inrecent weeks. He says the cost of
sheltering the newcomers is burning and estimatedmulti billion dollar hole in the city's budget

(02:39:24):
and threatening services. Federal and stateaid has not covered these costs. Now.
Later this week, Adams attempted tountangle his earlier rhetoric surrounding the crisis
when he clarified he did not callTexas Governor Abbott or racist. This just
one day after pointing out that Abbottis sending migrants only to cities run by

(02:39:46):
black mayors. The mayor was respondingto remarks from WABC talk show hosts Said
Rosenberg, who kicked off the discussionwhen he read from a tabloid headline that
quoted Adams as describing the Texas Republicanstactic of directing migrants to places like here
in New York as racist, themayor saying, if you look at my

(02:40:07):
comment and I pull out a writtenstatement, I didn't use the term racist.
This, Adams told Rosenberg. Nowhere is the mayor from earlier this
week. You know the city isbeing destroyed by the migrant crisis, and
none of my folks came to Washington, d C. To fight for the

(02:40:28):
resources that's going to undermine. No, wait a minute, hold on a
second. I thought you were supposedto be a welcoming city. Is that
what these people all proclaim themselves tobe. We're welcoming. We're a welcoming
city, Global cities, and listento them wine and moan and cry,

(02:40:50):
say Governor Abbots press secretary said,the migrants are choosing to go to New
York, not being forced. Hesaid, Mayor Adams is once again spread
the falsehoods and outright lies. Heknow it's full well, these migrants willingly
chose to go to New York City. Since his staff saw firsthand on their
secret hip to Texas, As,migrants raised their hands to go on buses

(02:41:11):
to his sanctuary, City. Hewent on to say, migrants also sign
a voluntary consent waiver available in multiplelanguages, upon boarding that they agree on
the destination. They were processed andreleased by the federal government, which dumped
them in small Texas border towns.So right now there are about two hundred

(02:41:31):
asylum seekers arriving in the city daily, but that number is to grow one
Title forty two is lifted on Mayeleventh. That you'll remember is the COVID
our Republic health policy that quickly expelledmigrants. So New York City has opened
over one hundred and twenty emergency sheltersin hotels to host these migrants, and

(02:41:52):
we spend millions of dollars per dayon housing and feeding these so called asylum
seekers. Earlier this week, theBiden administration announced they will send fifteen hundred
troops to the border. Yet NewYorkers and citizens across all these border cities
and states across the country are waitingfor President Biden to recognize that this current

(02:42:13):
surge is not business as usual fornow. I'm Caitlin Sinclair, one of
our canoes New York, Okay.So she mentioned in that report that we've
mentioned previously that Biden was going topretend to be concerned about the border now
that the election season is on.But you know, National File points out

(02:42:33):
that the troops that are going tobe going to the border, they're not
going to be working on border enforcement. They're going to be working on data
entry. The US government has announcedit's sending fifteen hundred troops to the southern
border with Mexico to supplement border patrolforces. National File says, but the
troops aren't going to be there toprotect the border, and I've instead been

(02:42:56):
tasked with data entry, logging informationabout illegal alien before their turn lose and
let into the United States. Sothere you go. There's the trick,
ladies and gentlemen, and it reallyannoys me that Governor Abbot is doing that.

(02:43:16):
Yes, but the but on theother hand, it is calling attention
to the issue. And the thingthat really ticks me off the most is
that this is not a new issue. In the early two thousands, there
was the same issue going on,the same invasion, and the Republicans did

(02:43:41):
not do a damn thing about it. Yeah. Yeah, that's been my
issue all along, is that,you know, and it's a bipartisan thing,
just like you said, but uh, yeah, let's ship them to
other other cities. Let's ship themaround the country, deep into the heart
of the country. Yeah, italleviates resources from your state, but it

(02:44:03):
doesn't do anything for the country becausethey're still here, right, And it's
the US taxpayers that are paying forall this stuff. They're talking about state
budgets, but the money ultimately comesfrom the FEDS, and that means it's
coming from your pocket. H yeah, absolutely, yeahs As we said,

(02:44:26):
the Big Apple is one of thecities that proclaim themselves to be welcoming to
migrants. Chicago was another. Andnow that they're having to share the burden
of supporting the flood of illegals andto our country, you know again,
they're they're they're they're whining, they'remoaning. Uh it's it's amazing to hear
how differently they're talking. Oh youknow, you remember they were like,

(02:44:48):
oh, well, you know,we're going to be culturally enriched by us.
Why you know, you don't likeit. The designation of being a
welcoming city. There there is angeo both national and international that is called
welcoming you know, welcoming city,and they're the ones that lobby local officials

(02:45:15):
to get that designation as a globalcity. Now, I don't know what's
in it for the cities except maybemore economic development money. You know how
the federal government works with the povertyprograms. They fund the poverty programs,
so the more poverty you have,the more money you get. And so

(02:45:39):
what they've what the Feds have incentivizedwith this economic development system that they am
is the creation of poverty exactly.And how do you get poverty. You
import poor people, making both thecurrent residents poor and the people that are

(02:46:00):
coming are already poor. So Imean it's a it's a poverty program,
creation of poverty. Imagine all theCalifornia cities with all the poop on the
sidewalk, all the homeless tents,the tent encampments, you name it.
That's what you're welcoming every time itis. That's a good point. That's

(02:46:20):
a great point. You're a welcomingcity, so welcoming the trashing of your
city, So welcome to hit abrick wall of reality. That's which is
so called sanctuary cities are calling onTexas to stop bussing them illegal immigrants.
But Texas Governor Greg Abbott says he'snot the one to blame for the humanitarian

(02:46:41):
crisis. I'm here in New YorkCity, right outside of the Port Authority
bus terminal, and this spot overhere is a final stop for thousands of
illegal immigrants bust here from Texas.So I talk to some people in the
area to see how they feel aboutTexas busting illegal immigran to New York City.
I think they need to help them. We're a free country, but

(02:47:07):
do it the right way. Ifyou don't want to do the right way,
you may need wait in line togo somewhere else. You know what
I'm saying, Help me, helpus out here in New York. To
me, they probably want to geta job. You may probably want to
get a job. There's a while. On Tuesday, idiot, New York
City Mayor Eric Adams said this aboutthe situation. It is the irresponsibility of
the Republican Party in Washington for refusingto do real immigration reform, and it's

(02:47:31):
the irresponsibility of the White House fornot addressing this problem. Brownsville, Texas,
El Paso, Denver, Los Angeles, New York, Chicago. We
should not be burdening the weight ofthis problem, and Chicago Mayor Lorie Lightfoot
recently asked Texas Governor Greg Habit tostop sending buses of illegal immigrants to Chicago,

(02:47:54):
saying, we simply have no moreshelters, spaces, or resources to
accommodate it increase of individuals at thislevel. I know by your actions that
you either do not see or donot care about the trauma these migrants have
already faced and continue to suffer underthe humanitarian crisis you have created. Have
It responded by saying this in astatement on Monday. With Title forty two

(02:48:18):
expulsions set to end next week,the federal government has estimated that we could
have up to thirteen thousand illegal immigrantsacross the US Mexico border every single day.
If Chicago can't deal with eight thousandin less than a year, how
are small Texas border community is supposedto manage thirteen thousand and just one day.

(02:48:39):
The Texas governor also added that ifLightfoot wants to find a real solution,
she should call on the Biden administrationto help secure the border. Hab
says bussing illegal immigrants to sanctuary citiesgives Texas overrun border communities much needed relief.
Jason Perry Ent City News, NewYork. Yeah, that whole thing

(02:49:01):
is about the end of the UnitedStates and implementing world government under the regional
authority of the Organization of American States. That's what people, you know,
I just can't say it enough.They are trying to end our nation state.

(02:49:22):
Their overwhelming US with this international system. They put them the UN in
charge of refugees and immigration status,and they put the all the authority for
give giving legalization to these people tothe Attorney General. So Merrick Garlands has

(02:49:48):
the power to admit thousands of refugeesunder parole authority. Well, there's no
reason to do anything because as theborder secure, that's what That's what Alehander,
New YORKAS says. You know,despite the fact that more than six
million illegals have crossed the border sinceJoe Biden was installed as president in January

(02:50:11):
twenty twenty one, DHS Secretary AlehanderNew YORKUS says, Hey, everything's fine.
At the border is not open,It has not been open, and
it will not be open subsequent toMay eleventh, when Title forty two expires.
What a dirt bag that guy.Hey, we're living in the era

(02:50:31):
that if you proclaim it, ifyou say yeah, it's just like the
gender thing and everything else. Youknow, you could be anything you want
to be. You can say anythingyou want to say, and you can
literally craft your own reality based uponyour words. Boy, that is so
true. It's a great time tobe alive, isn't it. Oh?
Yeah, create your own reality.Yeah, truth doesn't matter, so crime

(02:50:54):
doesn't matter either. You know,we have other companies that are shutting down
now, Nords, Drum, WholeFoods, and other companies that endorsed the
Black Lives Matter and George Floyd riotduring that era, the Summer of Love
in twenty twenty, remember that,Yes, when everything burned, but it
was just a mostly peaceful protest.Well, now that a lot of these

(02:51:16):
places are going out of business,apparently the crime has spread to the point
where shoplifting and everything has put themto the point where they can't make a
property anymore. I shouldn't laugh.It's not funny because there's people that live
there that are not implicated in thismess. But yeah, Nordstrum, Whole

(02:51:37):
Foods, Walgreens, Gap, BananaRepublic. Boy, isn't it all woke?
Corporations that's who they are, somethingcalled H and M, all of
whom endorsed the Black Lives Matter movement, you know, that movement that wanted
to defund the police amid widespread riotingand looting during this summer of Floyd have

(02:51:58):
closed or are closing their oars againSan Francisco. But it's coming to a
neighborhood near you, Ladies and gentlemen. If this ideology spreads to your town,
if it hasn't already, know whatit's such a shame because I remember
Sat Francisco when I was a kid. You know, my parents took us
over there a couple of times,and it was really quite an elegant city.

(02:52:22):
You know, when the ladies wentdowntown shopping, they would be all
dressed up and have their hats on, and you know, it was elegance.
But now it's a trash heap,poop down, poop down. Yeah,
there's a video on this website andill all this stuff. Everything we

(02:52:43):
talk about being the show notes tothe degree that we can put it there
if we have an Internet link forit. But yeah, there's a video
on here of the target store.There. Every single product in this video,
they're all behind glass. They're they'relike in locked cases. I don't
even know how you'd shop. Iguess you have to have store members open

(02:53:05):
up. They'd have to follow youaround, yeah, with a key.
But that's what they have, youknow, all this stuff, everything for
every single aisle. It looks likefrom aisle to aisle, it's just all
glass showcases. And you look atwhat you want, and I guess you
pointed out to the store member,Hey I want one of these. They

(02:53:26):
have to come over and get itfor you. Unbelievable, But that's that's
that's where where where they are SanFrancisco. Well, the extra costs,
you know, I Target is adiscount kind of store. So how how
are they making any money? Idon't know. Well, it's a big

(02:53:48):
it's a big chain. I can'timagine how the people who have the smaller
stores are making any money. Though, one thing I wanted to get into
in that vein, and in thesame vein as we've been talking about with
regard to crime, the lack ofenforcement of crime, you know, the

(02:54:09):
Suros funded scumbagi Kimberly Gardners. Yeah, that that's most interesting, that story.
Yeah, she apparently has gone toofar in her efforts to not enforce
the law, and she is beingpushed out. And we are confirming this

(02:54:30):
afternoon that Saint Louis Circuit Attorney KimGardner has submitted her resignation to Missouri Governor
Mike Parson. We have a letterhere that was sent to Governor Mike Parson
from Kim Gardner. I'm going toread verbate him from this email, my
fellow Saint Louis AND's I want tostart by saying it has been an honor

(02:54:50):
of a lifetime to serve the peopleof the city of Saint Louis, a
community that is resilient and deeply committedto finding solutions to make life better for
everyone. During my time a circuitturning, I have tried to embody those
values. I believe that is whySaint Louis voters elected me twice. Unfortunately,
since the time I took office asthe first black female prosecutor in the
state outside of the city have targetedme and to advance their goals, have

(02:55:13):
also targeted the fundamental rights of thecity voters. She goes on to discuss
what's been happening in the Missouri statelegislature. This has been a tsunami really
of information. Over the last severalweeks. We have reported exhaustingly on the

(02:55:33):
different court cases that have been broughtagainst both Miss Gardner and some of her
colleagues. We have because they won'tenforce the law. Fox two Fox two
now dot com local station there saysthat her six year tenure as the prosecutor
there has been racked by controversies.For one thing, she created an exclusion

(02:55:58):
list of nearly thirty office police officers. She said, you wouldn't no longer
accept cases from them, So ifwell, yeah, I mean she's not
enforced, you know, And shewas fined more than sixty three thousand dollars
by the Missouri Ethics Commission in Decembertwenty eighteen for using campaign funds to pay
for personal expenses. You know,there's a long laundry list of things we

(02:56:20):
can't go into. But this woman'sterrible. She's horrible. But did you
did you watch the hearing where shewas supposed to show up and she sent
three attorneys instead? No, Ididn't. I've never seen anybody be so
disrespectful to a judge as she was. Well, that's symbolic of everything she's

(02:56:43):
about. She's disrespectful to the systemof justice that we're supposed to have in
America anyway, and now she's studied. She was studying to be a nurse
while she was supposed to be runningthe prosecutor's office. Can you imagine her
as a nurse. Oh gosh,she's like, you deserve care, You
don't exactly, all right, Well, that's real justice. Goodbye, Kimberly

(02:57:07):
Gardener. She's the one that,by the way, that went after the
mccloskey's for defending themselves against the mobthat went after their house and was trying
to do harm to the end theirproperty. Goodbye, Kimberly Garden. So
we're not going to miss you,no nobody anyway. We gotta go.
Hopefully everybody will miss us at leastfor a few days, and then we'll
be back. Thank you, ladiesand gentlemen. Thanks Vicki has always appreciate

(02:57:28):
everything you do. And we'll beback here next week, same time,
and we'll be thank you bye bye. But

All Episodes

Govern America | May 6, 2023 | Chevron Deference

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Govern America | May 6, 2023 | Chevron Deference