Govern America | November 1, 2025 | Polished Turd - Govern America

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves
and for future generations, a new world.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Order, new world order, new world order.

Speaker 3 (00:10):
This is a moment to cease.

Speaker 4 (00:12):
The kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are in flux.
Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us
reorder this world around.

Speaker 5 (00:20):
Us, a new world order, a world where the.

Speaker 6 (00:23):
United Nations is poised to fulfill the historic vision of
its founders.

Speaker 7 (00:27):
Nevertheless, the United States it in a key position to
shape is so that the problem of the pot prensidentity
will be the emergence of a new international.

Speaker 8 (00:39):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century.

Speaker 9 (00:42):
But out of what is will be cleared the greatest
restructuring of the global economy, the greatest restructuring of the
global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy, A new
world order was created.

Speaker 3 (00:57):
Of our rebell.

Speaker 10 (00:58):
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and
open society, and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed to secret societies, the secret oaths and a
secret proceedings.

Speaker 3 (01:13):
Waging war on the new world order.

Speaker 11 (01:15):
The councils of government.

Speaker 12 (01:17):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought by the military industrial conflict.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
This is Governor America.

Speaker 13 (01:29):
To Darren Wheats and Vicky Davis.

Speaker 14 (01:41):
From Female Regions five and ten. This is Governed America,
Vicky Davis. This year, I'm during weeks. It is the
first of November twenty twenty five. Nice to have you
with us once again, ladies and gentlemen. The day after Halloween,
everything's getting spooky in the nation. And of course, of course, naturally,
just in time for Hollow we end and the budget season,

(02:03):
we have a terror.

Speaker 15 (02:05):
Plot for a man who lives in Dearborn. Shocked to
hear the FBI thwarted a potential Halloween weekend terror attack.
Good evening, I'm David Andrews and I'm man.

Speaker 14 (02:15):
I amrik.

Speaker 16 (02:15):
Federal agents arrested five people from Inkster and Dearborn. They're
accused in a terror plot connected to ISIS extremism.

Speaker 17 (02:23):
It frightens me.

Speaker 18 (02:23):
That the FBI director of the whole country is making
a report on Dearborn right around the block from my house.

Speaker 16 (02:30):
News Times Taylor Gottni joins us in studio or break
down what we know right now and and David.

Speaker 19 (02:35):
The identities of people suspected of this plot have not
been made public yet.

Speaker 14 (02:40):
Why not? Why haven't they been made public? You know,
That's the amazing thing to me about this whole story
is how little details we got right from the outset.
Usually they just they make really big deals about this
kind of stuff. But man, did they hold it close
to the vest anyway they can.

Speaker 19 (02:55):
The law enforcement said they were able to monitor the
group over the past several days. Officials said the group
was discussing some sort of attack, and when they notice
a reference to Pumpkin Day, that's when the FBI sprung
into action. It's not clear if the suspects had planned
on moving forward with a real attack or if they
had any specific targets. The emerging details only adding to

(03:17):
worry in the neighborhood.

Speaker 14 (03:19):
There's no emerging details. What emergent emerging details?

Speaker 20 (03:24):
Yeah, Usually they're all over it.

Speaker 14 (03:27):
There's a press conference, there's charging documents there are they
go into great detail and make a big deal out
of this, and maybe they will maybe they have. Could
I have missed it? I don't know, Maybe I missed it.

Speaker 20 (03:42):
Well, they give a lot of details when the FBI
aren't involved in setting the people up.

Speaker 14 (03:50):
Well, even when they are involved in setting the people up.
And that's the thing that I wonder about, because honestly,
we know how these things go, especially around funding time.
You know, we got a government shut down, got to
do appropriations, and hey, what's better than to have a
big terror bust? And this is why you need the FBI.

Speaker 3 (04:11):
It's scary, It is scary.

Speaker 20 (04:14):
This is something I would watch on TV that would
not be in Dearborn.

Speaker 19 (04:20):
Investigators are also looking into whether the group was self
radicalized online. Officials emphasized there's no current threat to the public.

Speaker 20 (04:28):
Be very afraid.

Speaker 14 (04:31):
Maybe there never was. I don't know, you know, and
maybe there was. I don't know. It's entirely within the
realm of possibilities that there was a group planning things.
And of course, where else would you want to go
but dearborn, right Muslim rich dearborn to pull off your
orchestrated terror attack. I don't know. Maybe I'm just too cynical,

(04:53):
Maybe I've been at this too long, but I've seen
too many times. We've seen too many times where people
were set up. They take mentally ill people that are
half cocked will probably wouldn't have done anything to anyone,
But they take them by the hand, lead them through
the steps, if you will, or provide the materials and

(05:17):
then make their little bust afterwards, if we're lucky.

Speaker 20 (05:21):
Yeah, exactly, if we're lucky.

Speaker 14 (05:24):
So yeah, more things to keep an eye out for.
But terror plots certainly are always on the table if
all out fails. But hey, VICKI, it doesn't have to
be a terror plot. It doesn't have to be. I mean,
it could be a civil war.

Speaker 20 (05:42):
Yeah, well sure that's an option. Yeah, and I think
it's coming.

Speaker 14 (05:47):
Actually, yeah, well it seems to be more and more
close today than it was well last week or the
week before that. Today is I guess, day thirty two
of the ongoing US federal government shutdown that began on
October first, about midnight, and it made this they're saying
now it's the second largest shutdown in American history and

(06:10):
poise to tie or surpass the twenty eighteen to twenty
nineteen shutdown. So over the last week we had, the
Senate has repeatedly failed to pass any bipartisan bills to
reopen the government, reaching thirteen unsuccess unsuccessful attempts so far,
there's the numerology for you thirteen.

Speaker 8 (06:30):
Yeah.

Speaker 20 (06:31):
Well, and here's something else. Normally we feed poor people.
Now we're going to starve poor people.

Speaker 14 (06:40):
Oh but they're not going to starve. What they're going
to do is loot the stores. Well that's what's.

Speaker 20 (06:45):
Yeah, but I forget that. That's not the government normally
feeds people, and now they're inverting it so that we're
going to starve poor people. At least that's the plan,
and that's what's going to start your civil war, of course.

Speaker 14 (07:01):
Yeah, exactly. Well, you have Senate Democrats proposed targeting funding
for critical programs such as SNAP and military pay, but
the measures were blocked by Republicans who were pushing their
own bill and discouraging party crossover. On October twenty seventh,
the US Department of Agriculture announced that no November SNAP
benefits would be issued due to funding laps, and Speaker

(07:24):
Mike Johnson defended the prolonged closure, and he said that
House Republicans are working from their districts and will return
on twenty four hour notice. However, the House has remained
largely inactive throughout this entire period shutdown period, lawsuits have
been filed by over two dozen states against the Trump
administration over the suspension of SNAP benefits. There was some

(07:48):
ambiguity about whether or not it was legal for the
USDA to shut off funding. I don't think it's legal.
I'll tell you why in a moment. But so their
efforts to pay the military personnel during the shutdown. There's

(08:09):
a number of a lot of people working without pay
right now. So none of that passed the efforts to
re establish funding. On October thirty first, which was yesterday,
a federal judge ordered USDA to distribute SNAP benefits as
soon as possible, ruling that their withholding was illegal. President

(08:30):
Trump has publicly urged Senate Republicans via social media to
invoke the nuclear option, abolish the filibuster rule, lowering the
threshold to a simple majority for passing funding bills. You know,
I don't know why they don't do this. They keep saying, Oh,
the Democrats, if we do it, they'll do it. They
do it anyway, They have done it before. Yeah, so

(08:52):
you you know, Democrats fight like hell when they're in office.
Republicans run, you know, jaw the issue to death. That's
what happens. The Senate will reconvene Monday, November three, this
Monday with another vote to break the deadlock, but they

(09:12):
say broad uncertainty remains about whether funding will be restored anyway.
That's that's the deal. That's where we're at right now,
and it's it's not looking good, folks. That's the thing.
I was at the store with my wife the other day,
and I think the panic buying has already started. There

(09:35):
are some things. The flower was just about gone. There
were other things that were notably I don't know if
the stores just didn't stock well hadn't stocked yet, but
there were a lot of things that was indicating to
me that people were already going to the store to
stock up in case there were runs on the store.

Speaker 20 (09:58):
I hope you got a lot of toilet paper.

Speaker 14 (10:03):
Yeah, well we did buy some, but not for that reason.
I mean, honestly, and in case of a shortage, that
is the least thing that I'm really that worried about.
But yes, that that's that's the thing. It still perplexes
me how that was the first thing to go. It's like,
what are we doing Soviet Russia or something? Oh pretty close, actually, do.

Speaker 20 (10:25):
You remember Johnny Carson?

Speaker 14 (10:27):
Oh, yeah, of course.

Speaker 20 (10:29):
Yeah, well he's the one that started that with He
made a joke about a shortage of toilet paper, and
the next day people just went absolutely nuts, buying as
much of it as they possibly could.

Speaker 14 (10:45):
M Well, Johnny Carson wasn't on TV on around twenty twenty, though,
was he. I mean, he had long retired since.

Speaker 20 (10:53):
No, But there are a lot of people that that. Well,
it's the psychology of it, you know, if there's going
to be a short I mean, I think that Johnny
Carson mentioning that, I think it may have been a test,
but it worked really, really well. He mentioned the shortage
of toilet paper, and the whole toilet paper all around

(11:15):
the country was just bought up as fast as you
could imagine.

Speaker 14 (11:23):
Yeah, well, you know a.

Speaker 20 (11:26):
Lot of people remember that, and even if they don't
remember it personally like I do, then it's kind of
like a it's like a story that carries over generation
to generation.

Speaker 21 (11:42):
You know.

Speaker 14 (11:42):
Yeah, exactly. Well, here we are here, here's where we
are currently in this MODMI.

Speaker 22 (11:46):
It's hard to miss a big alert at the top
of the USDA's website. The message is simple but serious.
No snap benefits for November is.

Speaker 14 (11:57):
This is where the food banks are actually racing for
the impact.

Speaker 23 (12:01):
We need everyone to understand that if people don't receive
their SNAP benefits, this is going to have catastrophic effects
on our communities.

Speaker 22 (12:08):
The announcement comes as the federal government remains shut down
and funding talks stall in the Senate. The USDA is
telling states to hold off on sending SNAP funds until
further notice. Here in Nebraska alone, that means roughly twenty
seven million dollars in assistance won't be issued in November,
at least not yet. Across the Missouri River and Iowa,
the impact could be just as severe. According to the

(12:30):
Iowa Hunger Coalition, about two hundred and seventy thousand Iowans
could miss out on nearly forty five million dollars in
SNAP benefits with days left before benefits were set to
go out. Food Bank for the Heartland is preparing for
a surgeon need.

Speaker 23 (12:45):
There's no way of saying how long the food will last.
We are doing everything we can to ensure that we
can bring more food into our warehouse so that our
neighbors can get access to the food that they need.

Speaker 22 (12:57):
And these stacks of food will make your way to
more more than five hundred partners across ninety three counties
in Nebraska and western Iowa, but Stephanie Sullivan warns it
won't be enough.

Speaker 23 (13:08):
For every meal that a food bank provides, SNAP can
provide nine, and there is absolutely no way that we
can make up for that loss.

Speaker 22 (13:15):
And it comes as the food bank is already stretched thin.
Sullivan says, it's down three million dollars in federal support.

Speaker 23 (13:22):
Within the last two years. We've seen a fifty percent
increase in food and security. Unfortunately, we are currently not
seeing the resources at hand to meet those needs. A
Food Bank for the Heartland has experience significant cuts to
federal funding.

Speaker 22 (13:38):
In Washington, Fingers are pointing in every direction over who's
to blame for the shutdown. The Trump administration is blaming Democrats,
the USCA says because of them, the SNAP well has
run dry, but the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
says that claim is false and that the government could
send SNAP payments despite the shutdown. It's president. A former

(13:59):
White House budget official under President Barack Obama says the
Trump administration has access to billions in contingency funds that
could cover the forty two million Americans who rely on
SNAP for food. They argue those dollars were set aside
for exactly this situation. When SNAP funding runs low or
stops during a shutdown, they point to the administration's legal

(14:21):
Transfer authority, the same tool it used to boost funding
for Wick. Nebraska Appleseed says applying it to SNAP could
have a huge impact. Eric Saviano tells Straight Arrow News,
it's hard to understand how millions of hungry people and
huge lines at food pantries can happen when options are
available now to fund SNAP. The USDA and Trump administration

(14:42):
need to step up and use their authority to fund
November benefits as we think they are legally required to do,
and avoid one hundred and fifty thousand Nebraskans starting November
without the food assistance they need. And now a new
lawsuit is challenging the inaction. Democratic leaders from twenty five
states in DC, including California and New York, are suing

(15:03):
the Trump administration, accusing the USDA of illegally halting SNAP benefits.
The lawsuit, filed and federal court in Massachusetts, argues the
government has billions in emergency funds it could use to
keep food aid flowing next month. The filing calls the
move unprecedented and damaging, warning millions could go hungry heading
into the holidays if benefits aren't restored. In an internal memo,

(15:27):
the USDA says it doesn't have the legal authority to
use contingency funds for November SNAP payments. Those reserves, according
to USDA, are reserved for disasters like hurricanes or floods,
not for regular monthly benefits. The memo ends with one message,
the only way to keep SNAP running is for Congress
to in the shutdown and pass a funding bill.

Speaker 14 (15:48):
Okay, So this is why, by the way, that you
don't want a welfare state. This is why you don't
want people dependent upon the government, because when situations like
this happen, people are not independent. They are more and
more reliant. And it's just amazing how quickly things fall

(16:09):
apart when the government falls apart. Now, Mike shedlock Over
at mish Talk did a deep dive on this subject
of the legal requirements and entitlement to benefits. Eligible individuals
are entitled to SNAP benefits by law according to seven USC.
Section twenty eleven. If funds are insufficient for full allotments,

(16:32):
the Secretary of Agriculture must pro rate benefits proportionally among
all recipients, not halt them entirely. This process has never
been invoked in prior shutdowns. Snap's contingency fund holds six
billion dollars in multi year reserves from fiscal twenty twenty
four to twenty twenty five, appropriations, covering seventy five percent

(16:53):
of November's eight billion dollar cost. Law requires these two
be released when quote quote when regular funding runs short
unquote that according to the Agricultural Agriculture Appropriations Act Public
Law one eighteen dash forty two. Permanent appropriations debate. Some interpretations,

(17:15):
for example, be a Food and Nutrition Act view SNAP
as having a permanent appropriation exempt from shutdowns, like Social Security.
The Government Accountability Office has ruled similarly for entitlements, states
must continue accepting and processing SNAP applications during shutdowns. That's

(17:35):
quoting SNAP Regulations seven CFR Section two seventy three point two.
Federal reimbursements for administration costs fifty and fiscal year twenty
twenty six can draw from contingencies anyway, it looks like
Trump and the USDA. Trump's USDA does not have illegal

(17:55):
standing on this but you know, it's not just the Republicans,
it's the Democrat I mean, as we've already said, thirteen
thirteen attempts to reopen the government continuing resolutions have been
voted down by the Democrats. So this is a clown show. Really,
in my opinion, I think, honestly, I think they're trying

(18:16):
to engineer a civil war.

Speaker 20 (18:18):
Well, that could very well be, because if you have
been looking at international politics since the end of World
War Two, that's the idea, that's the big idea, is
to have the world without from tiers.

Speaker 14 (18:40):
Yeah. Now, early on I asked the question, what would
happen if they had a government shutdown? And nobody noticed.
In fact, this is what has happened over and over
again with various shutdowns. And I was thinking about the
Obama administration at the time closing off national parks, wilderness areas,
and the National Mall, you know, among other things, places

(19:00):
that don't even require federal employees to even be present,
for example, just to prove to Americans how important the
federal government is to you. Your federal family is there
for you until it's not right. But now they have
figured out a way to really make it impactful. Hey,
let's just cut off all the food to these welfare

(19:20):
recipients and see what happens.

Speaker 20 (19:23):
You know what, though, they haven't abandoned the parks because
they collect money. I was so shocked, you know, when
I was driving east and I went through I think
it was South Dakota. And here in Idaho we call
the where all of the lava rock is. We call

(19:44):
it Craters of the Moon because it's just all lava rock,
you know, from ancient volcanoes. Well, they have the same
thing in South Dakota. It's the ash from the vallvolcanoes.
And they have a park there too. I forget what

(20:05):
it's called, but I drove through it, I don't know,
in the mid nineties or something, and it was open.
But the last time I went through in about two
thousand and nine, they have a park ranger out there,
you know, collecting. I think it was like ten dollars
to drive through the craters, and so I turned around

(20:29):
and left. I wasn't going to pay ten bucks to,
you know, drive through what basically is a landscape of
lava rock.

Speaker 21 (20:39):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (20:41):
Well, but.

Speaker 20 (20:43):
You know that's a revenue thing, you know.

Speaker 14 (20:46):
No, sure, absolutely charging for God's resources. Where have we
heard that before? Yeah, that's pretty much what Agenda twenty
thirty is all about, isn't it.

Speaker 20 (20:57):
Yeah, I'm nothing free, you know, there is. We can't
enjoy the landscape of our country or the the features
of our country. You gotta pay for everything. It's because
they privatized it all.

Speaker 14 (21:19):
It's like Ron McDonald's book, They own it all, including you,
you know. So that's that's the deal there. They're going
to charge you for access to nature, charge you to
breathe the air that you breathe, and the beat goes on.
But this government shutdown, it's going to get nasty, and
already people are starting to There are people on social

(21:40):
media sounding off and one woman actually says she's planning
on cannibalizing white people.

Speaker 24 (21:46):
Fast just to make this video, just to make something
very very clear to the white man. Black Americans do
not care about your government shut down, and Black Americans
do not care about you taking away our ebt and
our government is because black Americans never depended on the
American government to take care of us and feed us

(22:07):
because we never could. We were never able to depend
on the government. In spite of what you may say.

Speaker 14 (22:14):
No, wait a minute, she's that's the inverse. I want
you the whole point of this video is that she's
making is because she's pissed because she can't depend upon
the government. But the government, and if you weren't dependent
upon the government, then why are you making the video?

Speaker 20 (22:34):
Play it again, Play that again, because it's so important
and listen for an inverted reality.

Speaker 24 (22:42):
And the Cumbro fast is to make this video just
to make something very very clear to the white man.
Black Americans do not care about your government shut down,
and Black Americans do not care about you taking.

Speaker 3 (22:53):
Away our ebt and our.

Speaker 24 (22:55):
Government assistance because black Americans never depended on the American
government to take care of us and feed us because
we never could.

Speaker 25 (23:05):
We were never able.

Speaker 24 (23:06):
To depend on the government, in spite of what you
may say and what you may.

Speaker 25 (23:11):
Try to force us to believe.

Speaker 24 (23:13):
So you can sit back and you can mock, you
can laugh, and you can think that you're about to starve.

Speaker 14 (23:19):
Okay, Now, I don't really hear anybody mocking and laughing them,
do you.

Speaker 20 (23:25):
No, of course not. Who's gonna who's gonna do that?
You'd have to be an absolute monster. Yeah, So to
laugh and mock at the fact that poor people are
not starting.

Speaker 14 (23:37):
I mean, I mean, maybe there is some rich billionaires
somewhere that are laughing and mocking, but I don't see
any of them doing it publicly anyway.

Speaker 24 (23:46):
And you can think that you're about to starve us
to death, but I'm here to let you know that
we are going to eat regardless, even if we have
to hunt you animals down and roast and eat you
the delectable crackers and cheese. We will make it happen
if we have to, just and believe me, and if

(24:09):
it takes this government shut down for black people to
finally come from under the governments and understand that we
don't need to be.

Speaker 14 (24:17):
Paying our taxes into this government.

Speaker 24 (24:20):
What we really need to be doing is taking care
of one another, buying land and growing our own food,
and building our own nation. If this government shut down
and starvation is what it's going to take, then let
the party begin. It's Black power, baby, and we rise.

Speaker 14 (24:39):
Good grief. It's all about starving the blacks, apparently, because
there's no white people at all on food stamps, right,
uh right, get a.

Speaker 20 (24:50):
Grip, lady, No poor white people.

Speaker 14 (24:53):
Yeah, exactly, So not that you need any more proof
that the seeds of civil war are sprouting in this country. Uh,
listen to this, regis racist bigot. Uh she needs uh,
she's she's talking about how white people are are genetically deformed,
you know, genetically deformed.

Speaker 26 (25:13):
Now slavery and police brutality aside, do you know how
incredibly evil.

Speaker 14 (25:19):
You by the way, police brutality. Let me let me
just say, there more unarmed white people and this has
been reported in the in rags like the Washington Post. Okay,
in the New York Times, more unarmed white people are
killed by cops every year than than blacks ever were.
And that is a fact. So police brutality, Uh, there's

(25:41):
plenty of that to go around. I I'm sure, but uh,
it's you're completely that's this is an narrative that's got
to be knocked down. Facts. Well, don't lie.

Speaker 20 (25:50):
It should it should be obvious to everybody. If your
population of white people is greater than the population of
black people, Yeah, you would expect the crime statistics to
be proportional.

Speaker 14 (26:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 20 (26:06):
So yeah, you know, white people commit more crimes because
the population is bigger.

Speaker 14 (26:12):
But I don't think they do commit more crimes. That's
the whole point. But they do have more killings, uh
by the cops. They are killed more by the cops.
I'll tell you what I got the bottom of the
hour right now, and we'll continue with this fun here
in just a moment, ladies and gentlemen. But all I
can say is keep your powder dry. It's gonna get interesting.

(26:35):
This is Governor America.

Speaker 21 (26:36):
Don't go away.

Speaker 18 (27:00):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance,
then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the

(27:20):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance. And it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now

(27:42):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.

Speaker 27 (27:45):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten.

Speaker 21 (28:03):
Hi.

Speaker 28 (28:03):
I'm Eric, a student at Hillsdale College. Here is President
of Hillsdale College, doctor Larry arn On Natural rights versus entitlements.

Speaker 29 (28:11):
America was founded on the idea that human beings are
born with natural rights, such as the rights to life, liberty,
and property. A person who holds this view of rights
makes no demands on others except that they respect those rights. Today, however,
many Americans talk about rights to a college education, state
of the art medical care, and even birth control pills.

(28:31):
These are rights understood as entitlements, and a person who
holds this view of rights, far from making no demands
on other people, is making claims on other people's money
and resources. This understanding of rights not only sets citizens
against each other, but it undermines the whole idea of
natural rights.

Speaker 28 (28:49):
This Constitution Minute was brought to you by Hillsdale College.
To receive a free pocket constitution and declaration, go to
constitutionminute dot com.

Speaker 20 (29:02):
Mom, I have nothing to wear?

Speaker 30 (29:05):
Have you heard that before.

Speaker 31 (29:06):
Even though your daughter's closet is.

Speaker 30 (29:08):
Stuffed with clothes. Hi, I'm Dana Gresch, founder of True Girl.
Now I'm shopping for trends and cool designers. This isn't
necessarily a bad thing, but it could be evidence of
a lie your daughter is believing about her worth. Ask
questions to find out where her heart is on the issue.

(29:29):
What does she like or dislike about her wardrobe? Where
does she feel her value comes from. Once you've identified
the lie, remind your daughter that the truth is her
worth comes from the blood of Jesus and the crown
he has placed on her head. Keep her grounded in
scriptures that affirm her true status as a beautiful, chosen,
unique princess of God. For more information on how to

(29:55):
raise your tween, go to danagresh dot com.

Speaker 27 (30:00):
Packages start at twenty nine ninety nine a month with
sign agreement restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
off For details seevivent dot com for licensed details.

Speaker 3 (30:08):
Terms and conditions apply.

Speaker 32 (30:10):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivints Award
winning home security systems starting at about a dollar a day.
US News and World Report has recognized Vivid as the
best professionally installed home security system of twenty twenty two,

(30:31):
and right now you can get Vivins home security technology
for about a dollar a day, plus get free professional
installation from a licensed technician. Protect your home and loved
ones for as low as a dollar a day. Call
right now for your free home security consultation.

Speaker 27 (30:46):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two with a spoof.

Speaker 13 (31:02):
Go to find out what's really going on. This is
govern America.

Speaker 14 (31:27):
Welcome back to the broadcast. This is govern America. The
website for the show is Governamerica dot com. My email
addresses radio at Governamerica dot com, and Vicky go ahead
and give your information on if you would please.

Speaker 20 (31:39):
Okay, My website is the Technocratic Tyranny dot com. The
elder website is Channelingreality dot com and my email addresses
on both websites.

Speaker 14 (31:51):
Yeah, this isn't about racial strife. By the way, I
see the comment in the chatroom, someone, oh great, governda
America is feeding the racial war and you s a
whatever that is? Okay, I guess. Uh, this is a
slam against Jews. What's funny, is uh? It cracks me
up that they are calling us out as some kind

(32:11):
of bigot, I guess. And yet they do the same thing.
Here's the thing.

Speaker 20 (32:17):
I never say things like that, but.

Speaker 14 (32:20):
Here, here's the thing about it. This isn't about beating
up on any particular race. This is about reporting what's
going on. You know, if you don't think that racial
strife is being engineered in this country right now, and
if you don't think that it's going to blow up
because of the welfare state, you know, then you have you.

(32:44):
You not me. You're the one that has your head
in the sand.

Speaker 20 (32:49):
You're the one in a delusion.

Speaker 14 (32:52):
This whole thing is being engineered, and I think it's
to provide cover, frankly, for the collapse of the monetary
system possibly and the implementation of the central bank digital currency. Now,
maybe it won't happen, maybe they'll fix it tomorrow. Really,

(33:13):
I mean, something needs to be done about the welfare
state in the first place, because it's way out of control.
This isn't a social safety net. This is a massive
grab of power from the government over the people's lives.
That's what it's about. That's what all of this is about.

Speaker 20 (33:31):
It's absolutely intentional. And I want to say something right here.
Every time I say policy, you need to understand that
in the legislative affairs, in the bowels of Congress, they
turn that policy into legislation. So when when you're looking

(33:52):
at something that says government policy, look for the look
for the legislation that puts it in to that.

Speaker 14 (34:01):
Yeah, there are many there are many people who are
of all races. They go to work every day and
they do what they're supposed to do. And there are
many people that are on these snap quote unquote benefits
that could put their pants on every day and go
to work and don't. And that is a problem, and

(34:23):
that is what needs to be dealt with. But you
have to wind things down without pulling the rug out
from under people all of a sudden, and that seems
to be what's happening. Get them all dependent upon everything,
and then jerk the rug out from under them and
let them starve, watch them riot. And that's exactly that's
what's going to end up happening. I'm afraid if this

(34:43):
doesn't change. But I started talking about these we were
talking about the crime statistics going into that last break,
and I made this statement, I don't think the white
people are committing more crimes than black people. And I
provide as evidence the fact that, you know, we play
that clip from the person from the View last week

(35:04):
where she said that she doesn't. She says, my all
white neighborhood. I'm in all my all white neighborhood. She says,
I don't. I don't I feel like the police target
my kid. Now, I don't think the police was really
targeting her kid. But that's what she claims, is that
in her all white neighborhood. Okay, well, Number one, why

(35:26):
are you in an all white neighborhood because that's where
it's safer. People affluent blacks moved to white neighborhoods because
it's safer there. And that's just a fact. Now, there
could be a number of reasons for that, and there
are reasons for that. Number One, poverty. Poverty is the

(35:48):
biggest problem. But what is causing the poverty, what is
causing the gang violence, what is causing all these problems
in the inner city, in these black neighborhoods. It's a
broken family people, it's the absence of the father. It's
out of wedlock children that are being conceived and turned loose. Yes,

(36:13):
and because of a lack of proper role modeling by
a father who's absent, this is causing them to fit
in in places where they shouldn't fit in. So there's
a number of things going on here. But this has
been orchestrated and engineered, you know. I think starting in
earnest in the nineteen fifties, sixties, actually a big attack

(36:35):
on the family, big attack on morality, and continuing on
through the decades, so that we didn't get here overnight.
And this is the point and the problem. Now we
have people who want to eat white people, and we
have people who are openly being racist against other racists.

Speaker 25 (36:55):
Now slavery and police brutality aside.

Speaker 26 (36:58):
Do you know how incredibly evil you have to be
to deny someone's food, What deep dark depths of hell
do you have to stoop to to find it in
your heart to not want the next person to have
a hot dog?

Speaker 14 (37:18):
Because that's really good nutrition.

Speaker 25 (37:20):
That's a different level of savagery.

Speaker 26 (37:22):
That's why I say the DNA, the composition of the
DNA is not normal because we've already established that all
lives don't really matter.

Speaker 14 (37:32):
Harken back to George Floyd, a drug addict. So who
will who died of overdose? By the way, go ahead, vig.

Speaker 20 (37:38):
So what's the solution. They're going to fix your DNA?

Speaker 14 (37:42):
Yeah, See, all.

Speaker 20 (37:43):
Of these, all of these kill.

Speaker 14 (37:45):
What they want to do, well, first they.

Speaker 20 (37:48):
Want to genetically modify you. They want to experiment medically
on your body. Okay, and they can do it with
poor people. I mean, they've got a whole popular of
medical research subjects out there, and that is so important.
Way I say, it's so important to understand the policy.

(38:10):
Then you can go find the legislation. Did they as
a matter of fact, That's what I've been trying to
answer all these years. Did they really do this? And yes,
they have really done that. Yeah, and they're getting close
to the role out AI is the.

Speaker 14 (38:29):
Role out yep, yep. And I got a lot of
stuff on that as well. You know, they're even building
their own power plans now because there's not enough power
in the grid to power all the AI. Uh So
now the AI companies are powering their themselves anyway. So
she continues, and it's funny that you mentioned that study,

(38:49):
you know, the genetics thing, because she talks about how
we need to study their brains.

Speaker 26 (38:53):
Even though that's what you all left to say whenever
you want to deflect, it's your brains that we need
to study. What is it with you all that you
are so like? What is with their brains that you
are so committed to people being subservient to you and
be the most mediocre people with the most mediocre history

(39:17):
and the most mediocre culture, if you even want to
call it that that I've ever seen or heard of
in my life.

Speaker 25 (39:26):
What do you have that you haven't stolen?

Speaker 14 (39:30):
You know, there are so many things that can easily
be debunked in what she just said there.

Speaker 20 (39:34):
But it's yes, because the whole paradigm is inversion. Inversion,
she's inverting reality, and that is the policy. And if
you go through the legislation, you can see where it's
been implemented, piece by piece by peace.

Speaker 14 (39:57):
Yeah, see everything that's you know, in these social media
algorithms are going to be amplifying these types of vitriolic
statements and what does it do. It fires up white
people and gets them hating the blacks. Blacks are being
fired up to hate the whites, you know, and just

(40:19):
you can break it down from there in you know,
Native Americans or Indians were fired up to hate the
white people. You know, it's all designed to turn everybody
against each other to provide cover for those who are
really engaging in the criminal activity at the top. The
real criminal activity is going to enslave.

Speaker 20 (40:39):
Us all as they are breaking up our country for
the new world coming. The new world coming is a
world without frontiers. And I found a paper from nineteen

(41:00):
eighty six from Europe. Okay, well, first of all, let
me back up and say that the building of the
European Union under the management of the European Commission was
engineered by the United States through the oee C, the

(41:22):
Organization for European something or other. It's the oee C.
And they didn't I.

Speaker 14 (41:32):
Think it's economic cooperation, isn't it?

Speaker 20 (41:34):
That could be, yeah, European economic cooperation. Okay, Well, in
nineteen sixty one they switched it and started working on
us when they changed the name of THEEEC to the
OECD for Economic Development. But it was world economic development.

(42:01):
But that's when they started working on us building the
world without frontiers by dismantling, disintegrating our nation state. And
how have they done that, Well, look at the Lapaz
Treaty with Mexico nineteen eighty three. They created an International

(42:24):
Zone nineteen eighty six, free trade agreement with Canada, open
borders with Canada for commerce and people, no frontiers in
North America. And at the same time they were starting
to work on Central America. And you can look up Plan.

Speaker 14 (42:46):
Panama, Plan Panama. Yeah, okah, all right, and.

Speaker 20 (42:54):
It started back during Carda. That's why Carter gave up
the Panama Canal because they were going to take it
back anyway once they disintegraded our nation state, creating the
American Union, Union of the Americas.

Speaker 14 (43:12):
Yeah, they're really on their way to doing that, that's
for sure. I tell you what. Let me go to
the phones six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six if
you want to call in and join the conversation six ten,
six hundred seventeen seventy six, or you can call toll
free eight four four six four six eight three seven six.
That's eight four four six. Govern let's go to Georgia. First, Hello,
you're on the air. I think this is art.

Speaker 33 (43:35):
Good morning guys.

Speaker 14 (43:37):
Hi, good morning.

Speaker 33 (43:38):
Okay, everybody knows I love numbers, so let's go to
the numbers. And I did see that video of that
woman talking about crackers and cheese. Please spare me, all right,
you're savage. We know you can't help yourself anyway.

Speaker 14 (43:57):
If you really feel that way. Well, by the way,
why would you go on on the internet and say that?
Clearly she just doesn't care. I mean, she doesn't have
Most of us, a lot of us would be concerned
about doing that in the first place, because we would
be afraid that the video might go viral and we
might not be able to get a job. But of course,
if you don't have a job anyway and you're dependent

(44:19):
upon the government, doesn't really matter, does it.

Speaker 20 (44:24):
She is an operative, she is a tool. Her message
was absolutely intentional.

Speaker 14 (44:33):
Yeah, well, and I don't know.

Speaker 20 (44:34):
And look, I've been working on this for so long.
I just automatically do the conversion. And that's what they're doing.
They are inverting our reality. And I'll tell you where
you can see it most clearly is to watch the

(44:55):
House Oversight Committee interviews of the Biden administer stration people
in the investigation on the auto pen. You listen to
those people, I've listened to almost four of them. Now, wow,
and they're describing a Biden that is totally different, totally

(45:18):
opposite of the Biden that I saw and the Biden
that I think you saw.

Speaker 14 (45:24):
Yeah, don't believe you're lying eyes. That's the amazing things like, oh,
he's solid as a rock.

Speaker 20 (45:30):
Right, It's an absolute inversion.

Speaker 14 (45:33):
Harris just recently said that, and I'm like, do you
think that we didn't watch the four years he was
in office? I mean, it's incredible.

Speaker 20 (45:42):
Okay, well, well listen to this. What comes clearly through
how would you how would you invert? How would an
inversion apply to that situation? Usually, I think we all
know that the probably the presidents have bodied doubles just
just in case. Well what but but the body double

(46:07):
they get is really close to the person, and they
have to be a normal, intelligent person. But what if,
in the case of Biden, they got a body double
that actually was senile.

Speaker 14 (46:21):
Well, now you're just getting into the realm of conspiracy theory.

Speaker 20 (46:26):
VICKI precisely.

Speaker 14 (46:29):
One of those whack jobs.

Speaker 20 (46:32):
Yeah, and and if you say it, people think you're nuts.
But but my whole website is full of these inversions, conversions,
the reinvention of our government and the and the objective
is to dismantle our nation state as they create the Americas.

Speaker 14 (46:58):
Yeah, go ahead, art, Okay.

Speaker 33 (47:01):
So anyway I did before I get what I wanted
to talk about. I did I get through my insurance company.
I have United Healthcare, and they provide for their clients
a food allowance every month, and I get one hundred
and sixty three in groceries every month through my insurance company. Okay,

(47:26):
And I went to Walmart this morning did my shopping
and it was amazing. The meat section was almost completely empty,
a lot of empty shelves. So yeah, it's already started.

Speaker 14 (47:38):
Okay, we there you go, confirmation, But let me.

Speaker 20 (47:41):
Ask you this. Go ahead, go ahead, okay. Well, what
I wanted to know was did you actually read the contract?
Because my my thinking on that is what they're really
doing is a reverse mortgage, and after you've died, they're

(48:02):
going to take your house. No, no, it didn't say that,
huh A part of it?

Speaker 33 (48:09):
Nope, okay, not par okay, anyway, And I've heard of
other programs that actually do that. But no, that's not
that's not in defined print. Anyway, last week, everybody remembers
I called in and I told you how thirty seven
percent of all SNAP recipients are white while twenty six

(48:33):
percent are black. But when you look at the demographics,
you'll notice that white people are basically let me see,
looking at my numbers again, white people make up sixty
one point six percent of the population, while black people
make up only twelve point four percent of the population,
meaning that one in every four black people are on SNAP,

(48:55):
while only one in eleven are on are white, which
means three times as many black people. When you look
at the demographics, black people are three times more likely
to be on SNAP than white people. Okay, now those
were the numbers I gave you last week. I also
talked about the Hispanics and the mixed Rays and the

(49:18):
Native Indian Alaskans and all that, okay, and what their
numbers were. But you asked about crime. So let's look
at the numbers because I actually yesterday in a conversation
I did a deep dive into the numbers again for

(49:38):
crime statistics. Okay, white people make up sixty one point
six percent of the population. Hispanics make up eighteen point
nine percent, Blacks twelve point four percent, mixed rate, mixed
race ten point two percent, other whatever the hell that
means eight point four percent, Asian six percent, Native Indian

(49:59):
life Askins two point nine percent, and Native Hawaiian Pacific
Islanders point two percent. Now, those are your numbers. Okay,
we can't deny the numbers.

Speaker 20 (50:10):
But when we back up, yeah, we can deny the numbers.
I do not trust government statistics. They lie through statistics.

Speaker 14 (50:21):
Okay, just let them, just say, let them finish this
point though, Go ahead.

Speaker 33 (50:26):
We're gonna go with these numbers because these are the
only numbers.

Speaker 14 (50:29):
That's all you can That's all you got.

Speaker 33 (50:31):
You got a better source for numbers. If you got
a better source for numbers, please give them to me,
because I don't have it. So going with these numbers,
all right, Yep, Whites make up sixty one point one
percent of the population. Blacks make up twelve point four
percent of the population. Okay, keeping those numbers in mind, Yeah,

(50:58):
we're talking about violent crime. Blacks make up fifty five
point nine percent of violent crimes unknown twenty nine point
three percent. Whites twenty nine point one percent and other
two point three percent. This means, while blacks only make

(51:20):
up twelve point four percent of the population, whites make
up nearly two thirds of the population. Blacks are nearly
twice as likely to engage in violent crime than whites are,
and more white people are victims of black on white
crime than blacks are white on black crime. So these

(51:45):
are the numbers that we have available.

Speaker 14 (51:47):
Yeah, and the biggest victims are the black on black crime.

Speaker 33 (51:49):
We're talking about all this These people talking all this
crap don't know what the hell they're talking about, right,
because none of them go look at the numbers.

Speaker 14 (51:58):
Yeah, Well, back to my earlier argument, a lot of
this is about poverty, a lot of this is about culture.
It is about culture. But the bottom line is is
that they're engineering a race war in our country, and
they want us fighting with each other instead of realizing

(52:20):
who the real enemy is because they're turning the screws,
and as time goes on, they're going to continue to
turn the screws and to the point where there's not
going to be anybody that's free, anybody that's going to
be able to And that's what these people are going
on and on and on about you know, slavery and

(52:40):
the history the disenfranchised history of the you know, whatever
minority we're talking about. Bottom line is is that we're
all going to be disenfranchised. You're not going to be
able to do anything. You're not going to be able
to move, and certainly not going to be able to engineer,
you know, buy anything at the store without having your

(53:01):
unique ID and probably under your skin at some point.
That's what's that's what they're trying to engineer. And I
don't know if this latest salvo is really going to
ultimately be the impetus that's going to implement all of that,
or if they're you know, this is just something that
we'll look back on and say, Okay, that was a

(53:22):
little bump in the road, But sir, sure looks pretty
menacing at the at the moment as I'm seeing the
store shelves start to go empty. Yeah, anyway, appreciate the
call there this morning.

Speaker 33 (53:36):
And like I said, when I went this morning, because
the only place that I can use the food allowance
on my insurance card because it's tied directly to your
insurance card. So you know, the same card you use
when you go to the doctor, is the same card
you use when you go to the grocery store. And
the only place here that I can use that is

(53:59):
the Walmart. Don't really have any choice. And like I said,
when I went in there, the meat section was it
was like probably only maybe twenty twenty five percent stopped,
and a lot of other shelves were almost I mean,
it was bad. It was pretty bad, yeah, And I
was I had been watching for the past couple of
weeks all these videos people talk about how they're gonna

(54:21):
steal and loot and all this crap, talking about we're
gonna get you when you come out of the when
you come out of the grocery store, when you come
out of the Walmart, we're gonna steal your cart full
of groceries and all that. So I left all. I
left my check book, my wallet, I left everything at
the house. I took my driver's license and my insurance card.
That was it. And when I came out of the store,

(54:46):
and this is what I told people to do when
you come out, because we don't know how many people
might actually try to follow through on these threats. When
I came out of the store, I stopped I looked right,
I looked left. I scammed the parking a lot. Everything
was clear. I walked straight to my car. I saw

(55:08):
three people, two black dudes and one black woman walking
directly in my direction. Whether they were actually headed to
me or not, no idea, but my hand immediately went
to my hip, just to be on the safe side.
Now they walked by me, didn't give me a second look.
So everything was all good.

Speaker 14 (55:29):
But well, people just need to be ready, that's the bottom.

Speaker 33 (55:33):
Line, because we don't know.

Speaker 14 (55:35):
No, we don't know, and that's the whole thing. Hey, thanks,
thanks for the call. I appreciate it. But yes, ladies
and gentlemen, the bottom line is everybody should be ready
for whatever is to come. And I got an email
from somebody from Australia just Thursday, I think it was,
and she was wanting more prep stuff on the show.

(55:59):
So we may have to dust off some of that
stuff and bring it back, come up with more tips
for people, because it's coming, folks, whether it's this salvo
or the next. They're engineering poverty for everybody. And the
Hunger Games was weren't just a movie. It wasn't just
a movie. That's predictive programming. I believe anyway, we're out

(56:20):
of this hour six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six.
If you'd like to call in and we'll take your
calls in the next hour or eight four four six
four six eight three seven six. That's eight four four
six Government. This is Governor America. Our number two is
straight ahead, don't go away.

Speaker 18 (56:35):

(56:55):
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have

(57:17):

Speaker 27 (57:20):
eight two five seventeen ten. Packages start at twenty nine
ninety nine a month with sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak
to a representative for complete off for details. Seevivent dot

(57:42):
com for licensed details. Terms and conditions apply.

Speaker 32 (57:44):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get vivits award

Speaker 3 (57:58):
US News and World.

Speaker 32 (57:59):
Report has read recognized vivid as the best professionally installed
home security system of twenty twenty two, and right now
you can get Vivin's home security technology for about a
dollar a day, plus get free professional installation from.

Speaker 17 (58:12):
A licensed technician.

Speaker 32 (58:14):
Protect your home and loved ones for as low as
a dollar a day. Call right now for your free
home security consultation.

Speaker 27 (58:21):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one twoson.

Speaker 17 (58:58):
Week for American Family News. I'm Robert Thornton.

Speaker 34 (59:05):
The Department of Justice is investigating how Black Lives Matter
used its money Your's Fox is my commanual.

Speaker 35 (59:11):
Fox News has confirmed from two sources that DOJ prosecutors
are investigating whether senior BLM leaders defrauded donors during the
twenty twenty protests, but the group is pushing back, saying, quote,
Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is not a target
of any federal criminal investigation. We remain committed to full transparency, accountability,
and the responsible stewardship of resources dedicated to building a

(59:34):
better future for black communities. The Associated Press reports the
investigation began under the Biden administration but is now getting
renewed scrutiny under President Trump's term. The Justice Department is
declining to comment.

Speaker 34 (59:48):
The investigation comes after the founder of Black Lives Matter
Greater Atlanta was convicted of wire fraud and money laundering
after misusing more than four hundred and fifty thousand dollars
in donations. President Trump has denied reports that the US
is considering strikes inside Venezuela after the US recently targeted
Venezuelan votes in the Caribbean in an effort to combat

(01:00:09):
narco terrorism. Democrats say the President cannot do any of
this without the approval of Congress. Some Republicans want more
transparency as well. Louisiana Republican Senator John Kennedy made these
comments on Fox.

Speaker 36 (01:00:22):
I have met with Secretary of State Rubio, who has
explained in great detail about why what we are doing
is legal and why the people that we are killing
are are known narco terrorists.

Speaker 34 (01:00:38):
Venezuela accuses the US of using the strikes as a
part of a grander plan to bring about a regime change.
President Trump believes Venezuela's leader, Nicholas.

Speaker 17 (01:00:47):
Maduro, is illegitimate.

Speaker 34 (01:00:50):
Former Democrat New York governor and independent mayoral candidate Andrew
Cuomo is not nervous as far left Democrat and mayoral
candidate Joe rammam Donny holds a commanding lead in the
New York City mayor oal race.

Speaker 17 (01:01:01):
Heres Fox is Alexis McAdams.

Speaker 37 (01:01:03):
All eyes are glued on this race here for the
next Mayor of New York City, Zoron Mamdani, the Democratic candidate,
has a commanding lead, but former New York Governor Andrew
Cuomo says he is gaining steam and is promising to
close the gap because, he says people here are just
starting to focus. The latest Fox News poll has Mamdannie
with forty seven percent of the vote and thirty one

(01:01:24):
percent go for independent candidate Andrew Cuomo. Republican Curtis Leewa
is in a distant third. Coloma supporters say they are
more certain now about their vote, but Mamdani supporters are
more enthusiastic here in the Big Apple. He and sliwase
though the polls really are not always right.

Speaker 34 (01:01:40):
Mam Donnie is a Democrat, socialist, and some believe he
is a communist. He says he is very excited to
win the race, but will never let confidence become complacency.
Election day is November fourth. The largest storm to ever
hit Jamaica tour through the Caribbean island this week, leaving
in its way a trail of death and destruction. AFN
Steve Jordall reports the Church is close behind, helping to

(01:02:02):
pick up the pieces.

Speaker 38 (01:02:05):
Jamaica had never seen anything like this before.

Speaker 39 (01:02:07):
We begin tonight with this monster hurricane slamming Jamaica at
this hour a Category five hurricane wins up to one
hundred and eighty five miles per hour.

Speaker 38 (01:02:15):
Jason Cox of Send Relief, the Southern Baptist Disaster Recovery Ministry,
is on his way to look at the damage and
see how the agency can help.

Speaker 40 (01:02:23):
We're working coordinating with Jamaican Baptist Union leaders will be
meeting with him as pretty soon after we hit the ground,
he says.

Speaker 38 (01:02:31):
Send Relief will have work to do in Cuba as well.

Speaker 40 (01:02:33):
It weakened a little bit before it hit Cuba, but
I mean that the impact is still devastating on Cuba.

Speaker 38 (01:02:40):
Cox says the job in both countries is to stand
alongside the local church and leverage local resources first, then
provide what's missing next whenever possible.

Speaker 40 (01:02:49):
We want to support local economy and source things locally,
so if we can't get things locally, then we definitely
can ship things in.

Speaker 38 (01:02:58):
You can keep up with the Southern Baptist recover efforts
at send relief dot org slash Melissa.

Speaker 40 (01:03:04):
Who really need the church and the States to give
some sustained attention to this disaster, and we ask people
to pray. We've prayed for those who are suffering.

Speaker 34 (01:03:13):
It's time change weekend. Remember to set your clocks back
one hour Saturday night before going to bed. And that
is all our time for now. Find more news online
at AFN dot net.

Speaker 1 (01:03:31):
and for future generations, a new.

Speaker 2 (01:03:37):
World order, new world for that new world order.

Speaker 3 (01:03:40):
This is a moment to cease.

Speaker 17 (01:03:42):
The clid.

Speaker 3 (01:03:43):
Escape has been shaken. The pieces are in flux.

Speaker 4 (01:03:46):
Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us
reorder this world around.

Speaker 5 (01:03:50):
Us, a new world order, a world where the.

Speaker 6 (01:03:53):
United Nations is poised to fulfill the historic vision of
its founders.

Speaker 7 (01:03:57):
Nevertheless, the United States, if then they keep position to shape,
is so that the problem of the pot presidentity will
be the emergence of a new international order the.

Speaker 8 (01:04:10):
First decade of the twenty first centuries.

Speaker 9 (01:04:12):
But out of what is will be seen as the
greatest restructuring of the global economy, greatest restructuring of the
global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy, a new
world order was created.

Speaker 3 (01:04:26):
Documenting the graces of our republic, the.

Speaker 10 (01:04:29):
Very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society,
and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed
to secret societies, the secret holds and the secret.

Speaker 3 (01:04:42):
Proceedings, waiting war on the new World order.

Speaker 11 (01:04:45):

Speaker 12 (01:04:47):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military industrial conflict.

Speaker 13 (01:04:57):
This is govern America, Darren Weeks and Ricky Davis.

Speaker 14 (01:05:05):
From FEMA Regions five and ten. This is the second
hour of Governor America continues to be the first of
November twenty twenty five, getting into Thanksgiving month, and of
course with Thanksgiving we're going to starve people. Apparently that's
the plan here with the government anyway, seems to be
the direction things are headed. I don't know what do

(01:05:26):
you think? Six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six. That's
six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six. Or toll free
eight four four six four six eight three seven six
that's eight four four six governed. Let's go back to
the phones. Fredericksburg, Texas. You're on the air.

Speaker 41 (01:05:41):
Go ahead, please, Hey Darren, Hi jaky, oh, good morning.

Speaker 14 (01:05:47):
Hi, good morning, good morning, good afternoon. Now where I'm
at anyway, what's on your mind?

Speaker 41 (01:05:53):
Okay? Hey, I was listening to the clip for a while,
don't know, or ago fifteen minutes ago where they were
talking about how local food banks spend eight times less,
or maybe it was five times or ten times. I'm
not as good with numbers as hard is, but I

(01:06:15):
find that seems pretty disingenuous. When I worked at a
food bank, worked for a food bank, volunteered for food banks,
I got to understand how things are inside the food
banks and how everything actually works. And a lot of
times people would donate stuff to a food bank and

(01:06:39):
they'd come in with a bag full of groceries that
they bought from our local store, and they'd give it
to them and then they'd say thank you and then
go on. And then in the back room they'd kind
of go, man, I wish they would just give money.
And I'm like, that sounds like George Bush or Bill Clinton.

Speaker 14 (01:06:56):
Yeah, just send water or just send cash. We don't
need your wife, we need your blankets. Yeah. I remember
that clip, and.

Speaker 41 (01:07:04):
I laughed at that, and I asked them why. And
so the local food bank would go to Austin and
all the food banks for the state of Texas get
together and they do a bulk buy and so they
get a really good deal on all these goods and
then they go to the local That's why they actually
would rather get money than a can of tuna. They

(01:07:26):
could get it. I think it was like eight times
cheaper when they buy in super bulk.

Speaker 21 (01:07:32):
Okay.

Speaker 41 (01:07:33):
I see these things like the Snap program, and I say, well,
the Snap program, it can get it a lot cheaper
than my local food bank can get it. I go,
how is that? Because the local store has to buy
it from a manufacturer right from the food source, then
they have to distribute it all around, Then they have

(01:07:54):
to stock the shelves, then they have to sell.

Speaker 14 (01:07:57):
It and all that.

Speaker 41 (01:07:57):
There's a lot more overhead then just selling a palette
full of cantuna.

Speaker 33 (01:08:04):
Let's say.

Speaker 41 (01:08:05):
So it doesn't make sense. But again that goes back
to that whole point that we were talking about the numbers,
where Art was going over the numbers. I think they
lie a lot. I don't think that any disagrees with that.
And it's very disingenuous a lot of the numbers that
come out and they're trying to portray something. And I

(01:08:27):
feel for the people that have gotten in the trap
of the food programs. Once they get on them. It's
hard to get off if they get in the food
programs plus the housing programs. I've had friends that got
onto that train and had the hardest time, and eventually

(01:08:51):
one of them she actually got out. But she got
her housing supported by the state of California, and then
she got her food by the state of California, and
then she got a job by her own accord, and
she couldn't get more hours because the moment that she
got more hours, they'd kick her out. Yeah, and she
wouldn't get any food stamps.

Speaker 14 (01:09:13):
And that's the problem is that it holds people. These
programs hold people into the into the poverty trap, don't they.

Speaker 41 (01:09:21):
Yeah, And how do you get out. You have to
have a major shift to get out. In what we're
seeing here is a major shift. Come to Jesus if
you were is it I'm not too sure it's even
going to happen, or if it's happening, or we're going
to have to see how it plays out. I feel
bad for the people, but I'm not You know that

(01:09:43):
that racist chick that was on just a little bit
ago was sitting there saying that we're thumbing our noses
at people, and you.

Speaker 14 (01:09:51):
Know, she said, they're kurts. Yeah, people are laughing and
mocking at her. I think she's paranoid.

Speaker 41 (01:09:57):
Always horrible. Yeah, but again, Thanksgiving is coming up. It's
a perfect time to torture people. And they do seem
to like to torture people. But there's good things that
come out. There's a lot of love that has the
potential to come out. And I don't want to be
an optimist because I damn well.

Speaker 14 (01:10:17):
Am not well. Haven't forbid you'd be an optimist? Steve, Yeah, well,
I would love to be an optimist. But what I'm
seeing unfolding around me. By the way, have you been
to the store in the last few days. I'm wondering
what's going on in your area. You're in Texas. Art

(01:10:38):
was just talking and he was he's in Georgia. He's
saying he's seeing some of the panic buying starting there. Myself,
my wife and I are here in Michigan, and we
saw it when we went to the store. What looks
like the beginning stages of it. Anyway, I wouldn't say
that the shelves are all bare, I'm not trying to
make that statement, but look like they hadn't stocked and

(01:11:02):
some of the stuff that did it look like they
hadn't stocked were the kinds of things that you would
buy if you were preparing to be without for a while.
So yeah, those are the things like flower and you know,
those kind of things. So I'm a little concerned, you know, cans,

(01:11:22):
a lot of the can goods, you know, you could
see that they had been battered. So it looks like
the beginning of it. But I could go back today,
you know, and I'll keep reporting what I see as
I go to the store, yep, week after week. If
this thing continues to drag on, Hopefully it won't.

Speaker 41 (01:11:42):
We have about two week lag time, or at least
seven days or a week of lag time when people
start reporting events like the toilet papers running or this
is running. We are a polished turd, so they keep
the shelf stocked really well because we have a lot

(01:12:02):
of tourists in town. So no, yesterday I was in
this store, and I do go buy the canned food
items because I have a buy one can of preppy food,
you know, canned goods every time I go there, and
then that way it kind of builds up over time
and so forth. So I go down the can food

(01:12:24):
and I go, what am I buying today? I'm buying
one of these and then I'm good. Right, But I
didn't see any problems in the can goods, not in
the fresh meat, not in the eggs. Those are kind
of the things that run around here. But could be tomorrow,
could be today, I don't know, you know, I know
the Panics in the air.

Speaker 14 (01:12:45):
Yeah, yeah, it's really it's really sad. Honestly, in a
land of abundance, there's no reason why there should be
any shortages of anything here in the United States. But
just like you know, the government is the reason why
there would be a shortage. Just like in a country
like Cuba, where it's surrounded by oceans full of fish,

(01:13:08):
you can have a fish shortage inside Cuba, and that
is exactly the way that they foster dependency, and that
fostered dependency manifests itself in the real world because you
get people used to relying upon somebody else and in
fact prohibiting them, prohibiting independence, prohibiting you know, I'm betting

(01:13:33):
that it's probably illegal somehow to go and do your
own thing in Cuba, and if you don't like it, well,
you might be disappeared at some point.

Speaker 20 (01:13:44):
So the reinvention of government turned our country into essentially
state capitalism, the same system that the communist Chinese have
its state capitalism. It's not capitalism, likely we're taught to think.

Speaker 14 (01:14:06):
Yeah, it's certainly not a free market.

Speaker 3 (01:14:07):
Is it?

Speaker 20 (01:14:08):
Absolutely not?

Speaker 14 (01:14:12):
So anyway, Steve, did you have anything else?

Speaker 41 (01:14:16):
No, that's it.

Speaker 11 (01:14:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (01:14:21):
Well, I'm believing to God that it will be and
I'm believing to God that this will come to some
sort of peaceful resolution, and hopefully this will be a
lesson to all people who are dependent upon government. And
you know, and I have to put the caveat I
understand that there are people who rely upon these programs
who can't go to work, who can't do anything else

(01:14:45):
physically they're disabled, maybe mentally they're disabled, or otherwise there's
some reason why they can't do it. Okay, but there
are a whole lot of them that are abusing the system.
There there there been lifelong recipients and they're stuck there
in that poverty trap. And you know, it's those types

(01:15:08):
of people. They need to try to get some skills.
And you know, there's never been any more more opportunity
now than there was before. I mean, you can make
livings online, you can get skills online, you can go
to college basically online. There's a world of education there.
You can get certified and get a career doing a

(01:15:30):
lot of different things by using online resources. And I
guarantee you every single one of these people who have
recipients have phones and have internet access, because that's just
the way it is. But hey, I appreciate the call,
Thank you so much.

Speaker 2 (01:15:47):
Thank you.

Speaker 14 (01:15:48):
You know, one of the things that is kind of
a hang up right now on this whole process. The Democrats,
they claim they're holding out. They want health care for
illegal aliens. They want an expansion of Obamacare, and that's
one of the big things that the Republicans are saying
no to. Rightfully so, and but you know, all you

(01:16:12):
have to do is go back. That was one of
the promises that Obama made, all of which were broken
by the way that healthcare. You know, it wasn't going
to be funding you know, Obamacare wasn't going to be
funding illegal aliens. You know, there were a number of
promises that Obama made to the American people, and every
single one of them was broken.

Speaker 42 (01:16:31):
We will keep this promise to the American people. If
you like your doctor, you will be able to keep
your doctor period. If you like your health care plan,
you'll be able to keep your health care plan period.
If you like your doctor or health care plan, you
can keep it. Nothing in this plan will require you
or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor

(01:16:53):
you have. The only change you'll see are falling costs
as our reforms take hold. If you like your healthcare
system and your doctor, the only thing reform will mean
to you is your health care will cost less. I
will not sign a plan that adds one dime to
our deficits, either now or in the future. It is
a cost that will not, I repeat, will not add.

Speaker 14 (01:17:19):
To our deficits.

Speaker 42 (01:17:20):
There will be a provision in this plan that requires
us to come forward with more spending cuts if the
savings we promised don't materialize. Because it is paid for
and curbs the waste and inefficiency in our healthcare system,
this bill will help reduce our deficit by as much
as one point three trillion dollars in the coming decades,
making it the largest deficit reduction plan in over a decade.

(01:17:44):
Actually reduce the deficit by four trillion dollars. Over the
long term, healthcare reform must be and will be deficit
neutral in the next decade.

Speaker 14 (01:17:54):
We have built in the law all sorts.

Speaker 42 (01:17:56):
Of measures that in the years to come, health care inflation,
which has been rising about three times as fast as
people's wages, is finally going to start slowing down. Will
eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in our health care system,
but will also take on key causes of rising costs,
saving billions while providing better care.

Speaker 8 (01:18:14):
To the American people.

Speaker 42 (01:18:15):
Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will
pay for most of this plan. We've estimated that most
of this plan can be paid for by finding savings
within the existing healthcare system. The only thing this plan
would eliminate is the hundreds of billions of dollars in
waste and fraud, as well as unwarranted subsidies in Medicare

(01:18:36):
that go to insurance companies subsidies that do everything to
pad their profits.

Speaker 14 (01:18:40):
Will start reducing the.

Speaker 42 (01:18:41):
Waste in the system for unnecessary tests to unwarranted insurance subsidies,
so that over time, Americans are going to save money.
Amilies will save on their premiums businesses that would see
their costs rise if we do not act, will save
money now, and they will save money in the future,
and save a typical family an average of twenty five

(01:19:04):
hundred dollars on their healthcare costs in the coming years. Know,
and you can offer your family the security of healthcare
that's priceless. Now you can do it for the cost
of your cable bill, probably less than your cell phone built.
No federal dollars will be used to fund abortions. There
are also those who claim that our reform efforts would
ensure illegal immigrants. The reforms I'm proposing would not apply

(01:19:25):
to those who are here illegal.

Speaker 14 (01:19:27):
Yeah, that last one, especially total BS.

Speaker 20 (01:19:31):
The whole thing is BS.

Speaker 14 (01:19:32):
Yeah, it is. You know what these were the promises
that were made to sell you that.

Speaker 20 (01:19:38):
Why why do we have profit making insurance companies? Because
the process of calculating a premium, you know, and for
medical insurance is to what is the incidence of any

(01:19:58):
kind of disease? You know, they put on the list,
whether it's cancer, whether it's an appendix surgery. You know,
they have statistics tables to calculate actually the number of
people that they can expect to have that condition in

(01:20:22):
a year, and then you take your population base and
break that down such that you know statistically how much
every person that's in the covered pool will have to pay.
That's all it is. That's all medical insurance is. It's

(01:20:42):
just a computer system of statistics. And so why do
we have profit making insurance companies.

Speaker 14 (01:20:55):
Because we have a banker economy and everything is driven
by bankers. In these bankers are the ones that are
doing it to us insurance companies. Just banks, that's what
they ask.

Speaker 20 (01:21:07):
That's exactly right. They are.

Speaker 14 (01:21:09):
It's a banker's world.

Speaker 20 (01:21:11):
Yeah, yeah, and yeah. Instead of a person with money
that they put in it's they send money to the
insurance company and the insurance company invests it.

Speaker 14 (01:21:24):
Yeah, speaking of it's a banker's world, we come back
to again, everything that's going on right now. Everything this
is all about the central bank, digital currency. It's all
about creating social unrest to provide cover because we have
a funny money system, ladies and gentlemen. You know, it's
interesting that we've had we've gone through a period of low,

(01:21:46):
you know, low interest rates. They recently Jerome Powell wasn't
going to budge on the interest rates, but now they're
the FED is now signaling, you know, caving to the pressure.
Trump has been putting tremendous pressure. He wants low rates
because it causes helps to cause the boom in the economy,

(01:22:09):
and the inflation is going to skyrocket because that's what
it's designed to do.

Speaker 20 (01:22:14):
I thought that the FED rate was already lowered. Well,
they lowered to something like three percent or something.

Speaker 14 (01:22:26):
I there's an article from David Stockman, a Brownstone Institute.
He says, we recently chanced to inopportune our FED chairman
at a cocktail party in New York City. He says,
our message to j. Powell was that there are multiple
reasons to stop cutting interest rates. So yes, they've been
cutting them, but they want them even lower in light

(01:22:50):
of the current government shut down. One of the most
compelling arguments is that the fed's cheap money policies have
essentially destroyed any semblance of fiscal discipline in America. Specifically,
we reminded him that real estate real rates on the
ballooning federal debt have been essentially zero or negative for
most of the time since the so called Great Financial Crisis.

(01:23:10):
In turn, this means that the current generation of elected
politicians in Washington has been drastically misled, euthanized as it were,
as to the true cost of massive and chronic budget deficits.
Here's the inflation adjusted yield on Uncle Sam's benchmark security.
Let me skip that paragraph. He went through twenty eleven

(01:23:31):
to twenty twenty five and placed to adjusted yield as
average minus point three zero percent during the entirety of
the span from twenty eleven to twenty twenty five. Even
now it only stands at plus one point zero percent.
So we suggested to Powell that the FED is falsely
telling the elected politicians that the swelling total of government

(01:23:54):
debt is cost free. Of course, Chairman Powell did not blink, saying,
we focus only on what's best for the economy again today. Therefore,
what's putatively best for the economy, according to Jay Powell
is his merry band of money printers, is yet another

(01:24:14):
twenty five basis point rate cut, with a hint of
more to come. That is to say, the fat appears
on track to push the real interest rate back below
the zero bound. Below the zero bound because there is
no evidence at all that the running inflation rate has
dropped below three percent and as we have previously noted,

(01:24:34):
it seems to be actually accelerating since April.

Speaker 20 (01:24:38):
You know what, I'm kind of confused because I thought
Trump had to pressure Powell to lower rates, that he
was holding the rates high as a tool against inflation.

(01:25:00):
So what you just read there is opposite. Okay, But
but let me preface that by saying that I don't
watch the stock market very much.

Speaker 14 (01:25:12):
Yeah, but we're not really talking about the stock market.

Speaker 20 (01:25:15):
I mean, well, it's all it's all combined. It's all combined.
When they deregulated our financial markets, they they deregulated at
the stock market, they deregulated, Well, we.

Speaker 14 (01:25:27):
Got to take the break insurance. Yeah, we were almost
up to the break. But you know, Jerome Powell, uh,
you know they According to Doug Casey, he says, uh.
Powell recently gave the clearest signal yet that the federal
reserves so called quantity of tightening is about to end.

(01:25:51):
Speaking at the National Association for Business Economics conference in
Philadelphia recently, Powell said, our long stated plan is to
stop balance sheet runoff when reserves are somewhat above the
level we judge consistent with ample reserves conditions, we may approach.

Speaker 20 (01:26:06):
Creative heightening, is raising the limit or raising the interest rate.

Speaker 14 (01:26:12):
Well, he said, our long stated plan is to stop
balance sheet runoff. When reserves are somewhat above the level
we judge consistent with ample reserve conditions. We may approach
that point in the coming months. So the bottom line
is they're getting ready to print more money. They're getting

(01:26:32):
ready to flood the zone, and that is going to
drive inflation in the coming.

Speaker 20 (01:26:38):
Nay, more quantitative easy.

Speaker 14 (01:26:41):
Yeah, versus quantitative tightening. Exactly. All right, we're at the
bottom of the hour. Unfortunately, we've got to take the break.
We'll be back in a moment. Stay with us. This
is Governor America.

Speaker 18 (01:27:00):

(01:27:20):
for car insurance. And it doesn't matter if you have

(01:27:42):

Speaker 27 (01:27:45):
eight two five seventeen in.

Speaker 43 (01:28:01):
Evolutionists tell us that large dinosaurs like t Rex evolved
into the birds we know and love today. If that
sounds pretty hard to believe, wait until you hear today's
creation moment. In now our Creation Moments host Paul Taylor.

Speaker 44 (01:28:14):
I like to keep ducks because I love their eggs.
Last summer, one of my ducks became ill with eggs
trapped inside her. Despite my best efforts, she died. Scientists
believe the same thing may have happened to a specimen
of Avimaya. This fossil, dated by evolutionists at one hundred
and ten million years old, had evidence of an unlaid

(01:28:35):
egg inside it. You are probably now used to evolutionists
referring to terrapod dinosaurs such as Tyrannosaurus as feathered dinosaurs,
despite the flimsy nature of such evidence. These terrapods are
supposed to have become extinct sixty five million years ago,
having evolved into birds. Yet birds like Avimaya are older

(01:28:55):
than these terrapods by fifty million evolutionary years. The best
known fossil bird, Archaeopterics, described by Wikipedia as a bird
like dinosaur, is supposedly one hundred and fifty million years old,
yet still accepted as a modern bird by a large
minority of evolutionary biologists. These deep time ages do not

(01:29:17):
make sense in the light of the creature's appearance. For example,
the fact that the Avimaya fossil has its unlaid egg
within it suggests that the process of egg laying has
not changed for these birds, which even evolutionists are having
to admit must have coexisted with the very type of
dinosaurs which supposedly evolved into them. These problems of dating

(01:29:38):
do not arise when we start from a biblical presupposition.
The fossil layers do not represent different eras, but rather
different ecosystems which existed in the pre flood world.

Speaker 43 (01:29:49):
Visit as a creationmoments dot com for a huge selection
of books and DVDs about Biblical creation in the Bible.
Or call one eight hundred and four to two Bible
and ask how you can get a free ebook on Creation.

Speaker 27 (01:30:00):
Packages started twenty nine ninety nine A month with sign
agreement restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete offer details.
Seevivient dot com for licensed details, terms and conditions applying homeowners.

Speaker 32 (01:30:11):
If you're looking for the best in home security and
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivints award
US News and World Report has recognized vivid as the

(01:30:31):

Speaker 27 (01:30:46):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two one.

Speaker 13 (01:31:02):
Where the spoofs go to find out what's really going
on is govern America, and we're back.

Speaker 14 (01:31:25):
This is Governor America. As we continue on here, we've
been talking about the monetary system and really how everything
that we're experiencing in our society right now really comes
back to that, the fact that we don't have sound
money in our country and haven't had our whole lifetime.
And that's just the way it is, you know. But

(01:31:46):
now they're using the crisis that they created, as they
always do in true a Gaelian fashion, to engineer the
next round of slavery. And that is, in my opinion,
the Central Bank digital currency. It's a perfect story and
for meltdown, create a civil war, get everybody fighting with
each other, food stamps, you know, everybody starving while they

(01:32:10):
enslave everybody, you know, implementing the Central Bank digital currency.
Greg Reese recently did a piece on how the big
banks are preparing to implement this compliance based currency.

Speaker 45 (01:32:22):
Since Israel first launch strikes on Gaza after Hamass's surprise
attack on October seventh, it has targeted residential buildings. The
UN says nearly two hundred thousand structures have been destroyed
or damaged. With so many fleeing attacks, Palestinians packed into
makeshift shelters, many of them un run schools, but they

(01:32:45):
were not safe.

Speaker 3 (01:32:47):
More than one.

Speaker 45 (01:32:48):
Thousand schools have been bombed, and Israel has destroyed most
of Gaza's hospitals, including Al Shifa, where more than four
hundred Palestinians were killed in a raid in March twenty
twenty four.

Speaker 3 (01:33:00):
We make the best weapons in the world, and.

Speaker 14 (01:33:02):
We've got a lot of them, and we've given.

Speaker 20 (01:33:05):
A lot to Israel.

Speaker 14 (01:33:06):
Frankly, and I mean, Bibi would call me so many times,
can you get me this.

Speaker 12 (01:33:13):
Weapon, that weapon, that weapon.

Speaker 46 (01:33:15):
Some of them I never heard of bybe and I
made them.

Speaker 14 (01:33:18):
But we'd get them here.

Speaker 21 (01:33:19):
Wouldn't we had?

Speaker 14 (01:33:19):
And they are the best, they are the best. But
you used them well.

Speaker 36 (01:33:23):
It also takes people to not use them, and you
obviously used them very well, but so many that Israel
became strong and powerful, which ultimately.

Speaker 47 (01:33:33):
Led to piece.

Speaker 17 (01:33:34):
That's what led to peace.

Speaker 38 (01:33:36):
So as we celebrate.

Speaker 14 (01:33:37):
Today, and I don't think this is the right clip
that that was what you call an epic fail.

Speaker 20 (01:33:46):
I was wondering about the peace thing. I know they
said they achieved piece, but I don't think they did.
I heard another news story that said they didn't.

Speaker 14 (01:33:57):
No, they're never going to achieve peace. Well, sorry about that, folks.
I don't want to up into the clip. That was
mislabeled obviously, and uh but you know that's pretty sick
bragging about using your weapon. Yeah you used them. Well
you murdered all these people. Ah yeah, just cleansed, ethnically
cleansed the whole zone, isn't it great?

Speaker 11 (01:34:16):
Yeah?

Speaker 20 (01:34:16):
Woohoo.

Speaker 14 (01:34:18):
Yeah, doesn't that make you just want to run right
out and vote it's the verse? Yeah, well, yeah, exactly exactly.
But anyway, yeah, okay, so JP Morgan staying on the
money thing for just a moment. Uh, you know, but
you know, in a way that was Yeah, that was mislabeled,

(01:34:39):
but it was also appropriate to the point where, you know,
the wars that are taking place, not just an engineered
civil war here in the United States, but the wars
around the world, they're all bankers' wars, you know.

Speaker 20 (01:34:53):
So yeah, because they're planning on converting to the UN
system of world.

Speaker 14 (01:35:01):
World peace enforced at the barrel of a tank or
a drone or whatever bombing situation that's going on. You know,
that's what we have in guys right now. It's the model,
the UN model for peace, isn't it ethnic cleansing? Oh
but the UN spoke out against it. Yeah, okay, but

(01:35:23):
that's what we had the State Department enforcing around the
world on the behalf of the UN.

Speaker 8 (01:35:30):
Uh.

Speaker 14 (01:35:31):
So we have JP Morgan Chase talking about that. We
were talking about the Central Bank digital currency. They're now
enforcing their biometric identifiers on their own employees. This comes
from biometric Update dot com. When employees began reporting to
JP Morgan Chase's new Manhattan headquarters this year, they will

(01:35:53):
be required to submit their biometric data to enter the building.
The policy, a first among major US banks, makes biometric
enrollment mandatory for staff assigned to the three billion dollars
sixty story tower at two hundred and two seventy Park Avenue.
JP Morgan says the system is part of a modern

(01:36:13):
security program designed to protect workers and streamline access, but
it has sparked growing concern over privacy, consent, and the
expanding use of surveillance technology in the workplace. International communities
reviewed by the Financial Times and The Guardian confirm that
JP Morgan employees assigned to the new building have been

(01:36:34):
told they must enroll their fingerprints or undergo an eye
scan to access the premises. So it's coming, folks coming
in every area of society. If they get their way,
if there's not massive pushback on this. What would be
nice is if every one of these employees said, you
know what, I'm not going to go into that building

(01:36:57):
if I have to do this. What would they do.
They can't fire everybody, They wouldn't have anybody to run
the place. Earlier drafts the plan described the system as voluntary. Yeah,
so was the income text. We see how that turned out.

Speaker 20 (01:37:11):
You know what, there are very few people that will
challenge authority. They just don't.

Speaker 14 (01:37:17):
Yep, sad, sad situation.

Speaker 20 (01:37:19):
And why that is, I don't know, because I've always
challenged authority. That's just in my nature.

Speaker 26 (01:37:26):
You know.

Speaker 14 (01:37:27):
Yeah, they said it early earlier reports, earlier drafts described
it as voluntary, but those that language has quietly disappeared.
Isn't that interesting? A company spokesperson declined to clarify how
data will be stored or how long it will be
retained citing security concerns. Some staff reportedly may retain the

(01:37:49):
option of using a badge instead, though the criteria for
exemption remains undisclosed. The biometric access requirement is being rolled
out alongside a work at JPMC smartphone app that doubles
as a digital ID badge, an internal service platform, allowing

(01:38:12):
staff to order meals, navigate the building, or register visitors.
According to its listing in the Google Place Store, the
app currently claims no data collected, though that self reported
disclosure does not replace a formal employee privacy notice. In combination,
the app and access system will allow the bank to

(01:38:33):
track who enters the building, when, and potentially how long
they stay on each floor, a level of visibility that,
while defensible as security modernization, unsettles those wary of the
creeping normalization of biometric surveillance in the workplace. Executives have
promoted the new headquarters as the quote most technologically advanced

(01:38:55):
unquote corporate campus in New York and in that it
is designed to employ or embody efficiency and safety. Reports
suggests that the decision to make biometrics mandatory followed the
series of high profile crimes in Midtown, including the December
twenty twenty four killing of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson

(01:39:17):
within the bank. The justifications has been framed as protecting
employees and a volatile urban environment. Well, you know, they
could just move the headquarters.

Speaker 20 (01:39:29):
You know what happened to me in the early eighties.
I was working for this company as a contractor, and
I stayed late because I wanted to get something done,
and so I had to go up to where the
computer room was to get, you know, a print out

(01:39:53):
of the program I was working on. On my way
down in the elevator, my badge expired and I was
trapped in the elevator.

Speaker 1 (01:40:05):
No.

Speaker 20 (01:40:07):
Yeah, so I had to call you know, security, there
were phones in the elevator. It was to security. Security
guard had to come get me out, released me from
the elevator.

Speaker 14 (01:40:21):
Wow, that's terrifying.

Speaker 20 (01:40:25):
Well, at the time, I was kind of young, so
it just annoyed me. But yeah, it is terrifying. I mean,
what if the time, when you're actually in some other building,
you know, they give you a temporary pass to get
in the building and it expires.

Speaker 14 (01:40:47):
Yeah, here we see from again from biometric update. US
lawmaker presses Amazon to drop facial recognition plan for the
ring doorbells. Senator Edward Markey, a senior member of the
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, deserging Amazon to
abandon its plans to integrate facial recognition technology into its
ring doorbells. In a letter to Amazon CEO Andrew jac

(01:41:12):
Marky warned that the company's new familiar faces feature represents
a dangerous step toward normalizing mass surveillance in American neighborhoods.
Keep in mind, these ring doorbells are all over the place,
all over the place. So Amazon, if they continue, if
they go forward with this, is going to be watching

(01:41:34):
people come and go everywhere, tracking everyone everywhere. We're already
face that in the digital age anyway, but this would
take it up a notch, a massive notch. Marky described
the rollout as a dramatic expansion of surveillance technology that
poses vast new privacy and civil liberties risks, arguing that

(01:41:56):
ordinary people should not have their have to fear being
tracked or courted when walking past a home equipped with
a ring camera. There's a perfect solution, by the way,
for this, don't buy a ring camera. The problem is
lots of people have and you don't have control over
what everybody else does, right, So you can walk down
the sidewalk and their ring camera catches you on on

(01:42:20):
it and you're logged, and already the cops are using
ring doorbell cameras. So really what this really boils down to.
And you know, good for Edward Markey for pushing back
on some of this. There needs to be all these
politicians pushing back on this.

Speaker 20 (01:42:40):
I mean, he was one of the key people who
was involved in writing the legislation for it, so he
knows better than just about anybody how in base that
this is. But actually he did make a statement for

(01:43:03):
the record, I think it was in the hearing that
it's great that we're doing this, but nobody knows what
it means.

Speaker 14 (01:43:13):
Which legislation are you talking about.

Speaker 20 (01:43:16):
Well, it was legislation back in the nineteen nineties when
they first started passing the legislation to build the technocratic
police state. Yeah, I mean this goes way back.

Speaker 14 (01:43:30):
Yeah, absolutely, well, the inception of the Internet. I mean,
I don't even know back then, if they could, if
people could really eat politicians could really grasp or understand
the full ramifications of how much the Internet would promote
a police state.

Speaker 33 (01:43:47):
Yeah, I can.

Speaker 20 (01:43:48):
Tell you that probably very few of them, because even
even up to the early two thousands, when I would
try to explain to people what I did for a living,
they still didn't know.

Speaker 21 (01:44:02):
Right.

Speaker 14 (01:44:03):
So so anyway, the situation is in place. With that.
Now there's a lot more there, you know, I'll just
leave that there for now Here we see from writers
in Jordan, refugees can scan their irises to collect aid.

Speaker 20 (01:44:27):
But now there you go, that's the implementation of it.

Speaker 14 (01:44:31):
At a grocery store checkout the Jordanian refugee camp, wide
eyed into the the This person name Samirah Sabooth stares
wide eyed into a scanner to pay for her shopping.
Her iris scan unlocking payment from a digital aid account

(01:44:52):
with the help of blockchain technology many have. The nearly
forty thousand Syrians who live in the camp recognize convenience.
The convenience VICKI of the cashless card, free payment method
which was going to be free.

Speaker 20 (01:45:08):
And yeah, the tech technocratic police.

Speaker 14 (01:45:12):
I just think of how convenient it all is. It's
it's and it's free. It's a free payment method. It
verifies recipient's identity by referencing a u N database. A
u N database, very important, very important, good to have
your global database.

Speaker 20 (01:45:34):
Unteer. I think plunteer built it.

Speaker 14 (01:45:36):
Actually, yep, you're probably right, you know, by by the
Peter Peter by the libertarian Peter Thiel. Yeah, no, less
but few said they few said they like it. They don't.
So apparently there's still some Syrians who have some sense
because they don't like their u N database, their biometric

(01:45:59):
and being there, they say. Seboot says, it's really tiring.
It doesn't take the eye eye scan in the first try.
It's two or three times before it takes the scan.
I wonder what this is doing to your eyesight, by
the way, Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:46:17):
I don't know.

Speaker 20 (01:46:18):
I I that's kind of creepy, you know, having your
eyes scanned.

Speaker 14 (01:46:24):
She's a mother of two from Aleppo who fled the
city in twenty fifteen. She says, I would rather have
my fingerprint scanned. Yeah, yeah, that's much better, huh. Introduced
in twenty seventeen, the United Nations World Food Programs Building
Blocks Initiative is what this is called a lot all

(01:46:45):
how they have all these names which all boil down
to tyranny.

Speaker 20 (01:46:49):
Yeah, well that's a good one. Because it's your clue
that this is just the beginning.

Speaker 14 (01:46:57):
Yeah, A good point, yep.

Speaker 2 (01:46:59):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (01:47:00):
So the Building Blocks initiative was one of the first
to harness blockchain technology and humanitarian aid delivery, and that
reaches more than one million refugees in Jordan and Bangladesh.
The system enables the tracking, coordination and delivery of multiple
types of assistance, including cash, food, water, and medicine, and

(01:47:24):
I saved about two and a half million dollars in
bank fees on millions of transactions, according to the World
Food Program. But digital rights groups questioned the use of
such new technology among vulnerable groups such as refugees and
the need for them to surrender sensitive biometric data in
order to receive vital food aid. The refugees are getting.

Speaker 20 (01:47:47):
Welcome, Welcome to your future.

Speaker 14 (01:47:50):
There you go, Peter Molnar says. The refugees are guinea peg.
He's a fellow at the Harvard University's Berkman Client Center
for Interner and Society, adding that she was troubled that, oh,
I guess it's a female. Okay, sorry about that, I misgendered.
Her experiments were being conducted on marginalized groups, She says,

(01:48:13):
imagine what would happen at your local grocery store if
all of a sudden IRIS scanning became a thing, people
would be up at arms. Well, hey, brace yourself, folks,
because it's coming, maybe sooner than you think. When the
looting starts. They might have to identify people when they

(01:48:34):
come in authenticate you and you hope you're not mugged
on the way out. Like Steve well Brian was talking
about earlier, somehow it is going. It is okay to
do it in a refugee camp. Others question whether refugees
reliant on aid are in a position to give informed consent.

(01:48:54):
The issue of consent has a question mark on it.

Speaker 20 (01:48:57):
That's a good point.

Speaker 14 (01:48:59):
Yeap Dema Somorrow said that as an independent human rights
researcher based in Tunisia, do they give consent because they
are content or are they being forced? I think obviously
we need the answer to that. Responding to the criticism,

(01:49:19):
Roland Schuenbauer, a spokesman for the United Nations Refugee Agency,
said refugees were informed about the objectives of gathering their
data when they were asked to give permission. See this
is the United Nations doing this. These are the people
that we're told are your friends. They're here to help you,

(01:49:41):
they're here to do good. The World Food Program, they're
not going to weaponize anything. Oh wait a minute. Katherine
Bertini of the World Food Program says food is a weapon.
We use it to control people. Some may call that bribery.
We don't apologize. So, yeah, they're guinea eggs.

Speaker 42 (01:50:03):
This.

Speaker 14 (01:50:05):
Roland Schaubauer says, U n HCR doesn't share biometric data
with anybody under the sun, you know, and I guess
you can. You can trust them because well they're the
un Yeah. Right, here's the thing, folks, it's just like
we were talking about the cameras in a moment ago,

(01:50:25):
with the ring doorbells. All of this stuff goes into databases.
All of this stuff is being shared with ret with
fusion centers. It's going up the chain ultimately all globally.
These are global databases, and your information will be consolidated

(01:50:45):
because it's total information awareness. That's what we're dealing with here.
And it's a technocratic state. And once they have all
the information, once they have the ability, once it's tied
to your unique idea, they can weaponize it.

Speaker 20 (01:51:02):
Yeah, you can't control.

Speaker 14 (01:51:04):
Your behavior, and they will control your behavior, they say.
As the number of people fleeing war, poverty, persecution, and
environmental disaster reaches record levels worldwide, states have turned to
a range of digital technologies to monitor the flow of
people and control control control their access to services. These

(01:51:26):
include smart ideas, GPS, monitors, and blockchain, the decentralized database
technology that underpins cryptocurrency. But while states and aid agencies
say these technologies have increased efficiency and reduced waste, the
systems have sometimes exposed vulnerable refugees to surveillance and commercial

(01:51:49):
exploitation of their data. Critics say, quote, imagine if this
were to fall into the hands of bad faith actors. Yeah,
because the UN could never be put There's no corruption
at all at the United Nations, is there?

Speaker 11 (01:52:05):
Yeah?

Speaker 20 (01:52:05):
And security on the systems is so great, right, every
major corporation in the US has been hacked.

Speaker 14 (01:52:14):
Marwa Ffafta, who is a Middle East and North African
policy manager at digital rights group access Now, warns that
refugees also had fewer legal protections and safeguards in countries
without strong data protection laws. Quote collecting data biometric data

(01:52:34):
to identify someone is very invasive. A very invasive form
of identification. It is not necessary, it is not proportionate,
and it violates international standards on privacy, which UN agencies
should subscribe to. Unquote. UNHCR has already faced criticism over
its collection of refugee data and vast refugee camps where

(01:52:56):
they live in Bangladesh. Anyway, the article goes on from there.
Will leave that there in the interest of time, because
we're almost out of this hour already. But make no mistake,
what they're doing on the refugees, they'll be doing on
everybody else in short order if people don't get wise
and start pushing back on some of this.

Speaker 20 (01:53:16):
Yeah, refugees are just guinea pigs because they have no choice.

Speaker 14 (01:53:22):
Yep, exactly. So Trump is you know, talking about we're
talking about food. There is has been a war on
farmers and cattle ranchers my entire life. This has been
ratchet up more and more in recent days. There was

(01:53:43):
a letter that was sent over by a dozen GOP
lawmakers questioning the long term fairness by the Trump administration
to allow Argentina to quadruple its exports of beef to
the United States at a time when Texas and other
US cattle ranchers are struggling that. According to borderreport dot com,
the letter was sent Monday by fourteen Republican lawmakers, including

(01:54:07):
US Representative Beth Van Dwayne of Irving, Texas, and they
received that letter also at Border Report. The letter calls
to question the safety of importing two hundred million dollars
worth of Argentinean beef into American markets from what they
say is a country that has a history of foot

(01:54:28):
and mouth disease, post.

Speaker 20 (01:54:31):
Genetic engineering, cloning of their cattle.

Speaker 14 (01:54:35):
YEP, as well as fairness of this type of trade
agreement to the Yeah, see that that's what I cattle industry.

Speaker 20 (01:54:44):
They've always called them trade agreements, but they are not
trade agreements. If they were trade agreements, the US economy
wouldn't have been gutted. What they are is integration agreements.

Speaker 14 (01:55:00):
I like to call them trader agreements. How's that?

Speaker 20 (01:55:03):
Well that works?

Speaker 14 (01:55:04):
That seems to be what it is more than anything. Anyway,
This letter will be in the show notes. They say
that they're recently announced plan to expand imports of argentine
beef as a means of easing retail prices. While we
share the administration's goal of lowering prices for consumers. We're
concerned that granting additional market access to Argentina, already one

(01:55:25):
of the largest beef suppliers, were under mining American cattle producers.
We can our position in ongoing trade negotiations and reintroduce
avoidable animal health risks. That's in the letter. Yeah, it
sounds to me. I'm concerned about that. You know, after
one of some of the biggest supporters of Donald Trump

(01:55:46):
for being president are cattle ranchers and farmers.

Speaker 20 (01:55:51):
Yeah, and this is big cattle ranchers have been making
war on the small cattle producers. I've watched that for
a long time. I wrote about that in two thousand
six or seven, something like that. They're trying to put
the small producers out of business.

Speaker 14 (01:56:13):
You know, all right, we're out of this hour. We're
going to be out of business for a few minutes,
and then we'll come back in the final hour and
continue as governor America continues, much much more to come.
Please don't go away, We'll be back in a moment.

Speaker 18 (01:56:35):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance?
Then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,

(01:56:55):

(01:57:17):

Speaker 27 (01:57:20):
eight two five one seven one oh that's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten. Packages start at twenty nine
ninety nine a month with sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak
to a representative for complete off for details. Seevivent dot

(01:57:42):
com for licensed details.

Speaker 3 (01:57:43):
Terms and conditions apply all owners.

Speaker 32 (01:57:45):
smart home technology at a price, you can actually afford.

Speaker 17 (01:57:51):
We have great news.

Speaker 32 (01:57:52):
Now you can get Vivins award winning home security systems
starting at about a dollar a day. US News and
World Report has recognized Vivid as the best professionally installed
home security system of twenty twenty two, and right now
you can get Vivin's home security technology for about a
dollar a day, plus get free professional installation from a

(01:58:13):
licensed technician. Protect your home and loved ones for as
low as a dollar a day. Call right now for
your free home security consultation.

Speaker 27 (01:58:21):
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty.

Speaker 46 (01:58:34):
One two fives.

Speaker 48 (01:58:50):
Signason for American Family News.

Speaker 17 (01:59:04):
I'm Robert Thornton.

Speaker 34 (01:59:05):
The Department of Justice is investigating how Black Lives Matter
used its money.

Speaker 17 (01:59:09):
Your's Fox is my commanual.

Speaker 35 (01:59:11):
Fox News has confirmed from two sources that DOJ prosecutors
are investigating whether senior BLM leaders defrauded donors during the
twenty twenty protests, but the group is pushing back, saying, quote,
Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is not a target
of any federal criminal investigation. We remain committed to full transparency, accountability,
and the responsible stewardship of resources dedicated to building a

(01:59:34):
better future for black communities. The Associated Press reports the
investigation began under the Biden administration but is now getting
renewed scrutiny under President Trump's term. The Justice Department is
declining to comment.

Speaker 34 (01:59:49):
The investigation comes after the founder of Black Lives Matter
Greater Atlanta was convicted of wire fraud and money laundering
after misusing more than four hundred and fifty thousand dollars
in donations. President Trump has denied reports that the US
is considering strikes inside Venezuela after the US recently targeted
Venezuelan votes in the Caribbean in an effort to combat

(02:00:09):
narco terrorism. Democrats say the president cannot do any of
this without the approval of Congress. Some Republicans want more
transparency as well. Louisiana Republican Senator John Kennedy made these
comments on Fox.

Speaker 36 (02:00:22):
I have met with Secretary of State Rubio, who has
explained in great detail about why what we are doing
is legal and why the people that we are killing
are are known narco Terrists.

Speaker 34 (02:00:38):
Venezuela accuses the US of using the strikes as a
part of a grander plan to bring about a regime change.
President Trump believes Venezuela's leader, Nicholas.

Speaker 17 (02:00:47):
Maduro, is illegitimate.

Speaker 34 (02:00:50):
Former Democrat New York governor and independent mayoral Canada Andrew
Cuomo is not nervous as far left. Democrat and mayoral
candidate zie rammam Donny holds a commanding lead in the
New York City mayor oal race heres Fox Is Alexis McAdams.

Speaker 37 (02:01:03):
All eyes are glued on this race here for the
next Mayor of New York City, Zoron Mamdani, the Democratic candidate,
has a commanding lead, but former New York Governor Andrew
Cuomo says he is gaining steam and is promising to
close the gap because he says people here are just
starting to focus. The latest Fox News poll has Mamdanni
with forty seven percent of the vote and thirty one

(02:01:24):
percent go for Independent candidate Andrew Cuomo. Republican Curtis Leewa
is in a distant third. Coloma supporters say they are
more certain now about their vote, but Mamdani supporters are
more enthusiastic here in the Big Apple. He and sliwase
though the polls really are not always right.

Speaker 34 (02:01:41):
Mam Donnie is a Democrat, Socialist, and some believe he
is a communist. He says he is very excited to
win the race, but will never let confidence become complacency.
Election day is November fourth. The largest storm to ever
hit Jamaica tour through the Caribbean island this week, leaving
in its way a trail of death and destruction.

Speaker 17 (02:01:59):
AFN Steve All reports the.

Speaker 34 (02:02:01):
Church is close behind, helping to pick up the pieces.

Speaker 38 (02:02:05):
Jamaica had never seen anything like this before.

Speaker 39 (02:02:08):
We begin tonight with this monster hurricane slamming Jamaica at
this hour, a Category five hurricane wins up to one
hundred and eighty five miles per hour.

Speaker 38 (02:02:15):
Jason Cox of Send Relief, the Southern Baptist Disaster Recovery Ministry,
is on his way to look at the damage and
see how the agency can help.

Speaker 40 (02:02:23):
We're working coordinating with Jamaican Baptist Union leaders. Will be
meeting with him as pretty soon after we hit the ground,
he says.

Speaker 38 (02:02:31):
Send Relief will have work to do in Cuba as well.

Speaker 40 (02:02:33):
It weakened a little bit before it hit Cuba, but
I mean that the impact is still devastating on Cuba.

Speaker 38 (02:02:40):
Cox says. The job in both countries is to stand
alongside the local church and leverage local resources first, then
provide what's missing next whenever possible.

Speaker 40 (02:02:49):
We want to support local economy and source things locally,
so if we can't get things locally, then we definitely
can ship things in.

Speaker 38 (02:02:58):
You can keep up with the Southern Baptis US recover
efforts at send relief dot org slash Melissa.

Speaker 40 (02:03:04):
We really need the church and the States to give
some sustained attention to this disaster, and we ask people
to pray. We've prayed for those who are suffering.

Speaker 34 (02:03:13):
It's time change weekend. Remember to set your clocks back
one hour Saturday night before going to bed.

Speaker 17 (02:03:20):
And that is all our time for now.

Speaker 34 (02:03:22):
Find more news online at AFN dot net.

Speaker 1 (02:03:31):
and for future generations, a new.

Speaker 2 (02:03:38):
World order, new world for that new world order.

Speaker 4 (02:03:40):
This is a moment to cease. The Clyde Escape has
been shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will
settle it again. Before they do, let us reorder this
world around.

Speaker 5 (02:03:51):
Us, A new world order, a world.

Speaker 6 (02:03:52):
For the United Nations, is poised to fulfill the historic
vision of its founders.

Speaker 7 (02:03:57):
Nevertheless, the United States didnt equosition to shape this, so
that the problem of the presidentcy will be the emergence
of a new international.

Speaker 8 (02:04:09):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century.

Speaker 9 (02:04:13):
But out of what will be seen as the greatest
restructuring of the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy,
the greatest restructuring of the global economy, a new world
order was created.

Speaker 3 (02:04:26):
Documenting the crasis of our republic.

Speaker 10 (02:04:29):
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and
open society, and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed to secret societies, the secret oaths and a secret.

Speaker 3 (02:04:43):
Proceedings waiting war on the new world order.

Speaker 11 (02:04:45):

Speaker 12 (02:04:47):
We must guard against the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military industrial conflict.

Speaker 13 (02:04:58):
This is govern America. Darry Weeks and Vicky Davis.

Speaker 14 (02:05:05):
From Fever Regions five and ten. This is the third
and final hour of Governor America. Vicky Davis. Here, I'm
during Weeks. As we continue on here on this first
of November twenty twenty five. They glad to have you along.
We hope you'll tell somebody about the broadcast. And we
have one more hour to go here. But let's go
back to the phone. Six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six.
That's six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six, or toll

(02:05:27):
That's eight four four six. Govern Cherry in Kansas is
on the line, Cherry, go ahead, please.

Speaker 49 (02:05:37):
Good morning.

Speaker 33 (02:05:38):
Hi.

Speaker 49 (02:05:41):
A lot of people already know this that the uh
Trump administration just build out the the president of Argentina
so he could get reelected twenty billion dollars, I believe.

Speaker 20 (02:06:01):
So, wasn't it.

Speaker 49 (02:06:05):
Well, that's what I was thinking. It was forty. I
had heard twenty at first, but then I had heard
something about another twenty or something. So yeah, and then
the rest of it is being built out on the
backs of our you know, our cattleman here. Everybody else

(02:06:26):
gets to raise their prices, but the farmers, you know, yeah,
part of it is because all of their stuff, whatever
crop they're doing wherever done. And and also the renters
are kind of constrained by this. It all comes the

(02:06:47):
market a lot of times at the same time in
an area, so the process dropped. But I was going
back over Byron stale Bert looked down on the farm
and that came out in two thousand and five, and

(02:07:08):
you know, he compares it to you know, why what
they paid for a new pickup back in you know,
the sixties, and the price of how many cattle it took,
and and nowadays and you know, our inputs what they
call their inputs, have gone up, but the prices haven't

(02:07:31):
gone up according to the stuff they need to do
their work.

Speaker 20 (02:07:35):
Yeah, yeah, because they've the these used Trade Representatives Office
and all of his people. They are the ones that
write these so called trade agreements that are not trade
agreements at all. They're integration agreements. And integration means that

(02:07:58):
you harmonize debth phoenicians, you take an inventory of all
the producers and so forth. But when I wrote about that,
they were also starting to implement something called the National

(02:08:19):
Animal Id System NACES or NAKES.

Speaker 49 (02:08:24):
And I remember that, Yeah.

Speaker 20 (02:08:28):
And what they wanted the farmers and ranchers to do
is chip all of your cattle. But the thing was
is that the big producers could buy one ship for
the whole herd, the small producers had to buy one
ship for each animal, and it was going to be
something like ten dollars per animal. Well, you know that's

(02:08:52):
completely unfair, but it was a strategy to put the
small producers out of business.

Speaker 50 (02:08:58):
Yeah, not only that possibly work, you know, it's the
idea is to track the animal. They're not tracking the
animals in those big hurts if they're letting these rights.

Speaker 14 (02:09:11):
Do that right exactly, Well, you could tell who the money,
who has the money, and who is able to buy
the influence. I think it's the big producers that were
the ones that designed the program, to be perfectly honest
with you.

Speaker 20 (02:09:26):
Well could be well, they probably designed it for cattle.

Speaker 4 (02:09:31):
But the.

Speaker 20 (02:09:33):
Identification system. Sometime in the nineteen nineties, I watched a
hearing in which Grover Norquist testified about a national ID
system for people. And of course, you know if you
take the if you forget that you're human, and you say, well,

(02:09:59):
human is just another form of animal, then you end
up with a system that is a database of all species.

Speaker 14 (02:10:10):
Right, that's really how the UN seize US. I believe yes,
because I look at how they talk about human impact
on the planet. It's clear the way they're talking they
don't seem to include themselves in that category human human
impact on the on the planet. You know, in the

(02:10:30):
early days of a lot of this stuff. I remember
back in the during the Clint administration, they used to
talk about man in the biosphere. Well, we all know
what a man is. But but now at some point
they switched to human and it's it's it's clear to
me that they don't really include themselves in that category.

Speaker 8 (02:10:52):
Right.

Speaker 20 (02:10:52):
It's like they are the global elite and we are
the proverbial human.

Speaker 14 (02:10:58):
Cattle, human capital, human resources.

Speaker 49 (02:11:03):
Other animals. What, yes, our desks found in the medical
laws or codes. You know, that's how they consider it.
You know, Vicky, you said integrative in these trade agreements,
and they're they've got to integrate the wages too, right, Yeah, they.

Speaker 20 (02:11:27):
Have databases on absolutely everything. You just look at the
United States and start putting people into different categories. Category
of white people, the category of black people that you know,

(02:11:48):
how much money do they make you put them in
that category. How many people have insurance, how many people
have credit cards, how many people have bank debt? Just
every single category that you can imagine they've designed into
this total information awareness system now because of you know,

(02:12:13):
if you think of how many David Smiths there are
in the United States, Well, that's why they've got to
have a secure ID number that includes not only the
country code, but also you're genetic markers and you know,
so that it is a true real ID. It's everything

(02:12:39):
that you can think of that they are categorizing and databasing.
And the government just became the facilitator for corporations to
collect this data and to allow access to it. It's
a true digital prison.

Speaker 14 (02:13:01):
Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 49 (02:13:03):
Now you were one thing else about Malay the president
of Argentina. His real name I've heard is Melakowski and
he just has and it's speculated that he's related to
another government guy in Israel. Bill know who that is?

Speaker 20 (02:13:28):
Well, you know what what I saw and I can't
remember the name, is that the guy over in Israel
that's leading Israel right now. He's actually a Pollock. Yeah,
who is actually a Polock? And he changed his.

Speaker 49 (02:13:46):
Name Milakowski, that's his real.

Speaker 51 (02:13:48):
Name when he was Okay, but and you know you
were talking earlier about those green cameras. Yeah, I think
we should all get you know, disguise, like I'm thinking
of the grouch of Mark glasses, and I have a

(02:14:09):
friend in which do that has a ring camera. I think,
go get some of those.

Speaker 14 (02:14:14):
Well, I don't know how accurate these things are in
the first place, because they I think I remember covering
on the show before that they have inaccurately identified people,
and so I'm not really sure. You know, the problem is,
I'm concerned that in the future, as these things become
more prevalent and this facial recognition is used everywhere, people

(02:14:35):
are going to be misidentified based upon false biometrics. You know,
our facial recognition camera as you at the scene of
this crime and you were nowhere near that you know
already the DNA people look at that like it's completely infallible.
And there have been cases where people have, you know,

(02:14:57):
shaken hands with somebody and they go on and go
into a crime scene. I remember there was a case
something years ago where there was a there were these
fishermen out on a lake or something or a pond,
and a car was there at the scene. Somebody was

(02:15:18):
murdered and uh, one of the fishermen. The cops shows
up and shakes hands with him and gets to talking
with him about you know what they saw. I think
it was the fishermen that might have even been the
ones that reported the crime in the first place, but
because some DNA passed from the fishermen to the cops

(02:15:40):
when they shook hands, then the cops went and entered
the vehicle investigating somehow that DNA got into the vehicle
that put the fishermen inside the car. Next thing you know,
they got him up on charges. So this is how,
this is how these types of things can be complete deletely,

(02:16:00):
uh you know, go completely awry. This is why you
also don't want vast DNA databases, you know, with everybody
in it, uh, vast biometrics with everybody in it, because
you could end up staying in a hotel room and
leave your DNA there in some flat fashion, it stays

(02:16:24):
there and then somebody later on's murdered in the room.
They got your DNA in the room. So there's the possibility,
all right, Yeah, there's bad situation. You know, you'd hope
that they would consider that there have been a lot
of people there, but uh, you.

Speaker 49 (02:16:40):
Know, yeah, how could they possibly clean up a room
and not you know and and say that get some
people's DNA and not others.

Speaker 14 (02:16:53):
You know, Well that's true anyway. Yeah, but that's an example. Yeah,
thank you, Sherry, appreciate the call. It's an example, and
there's many examples you can it's not really hard to
brainstorm to see how this technology can be misused. Yeah,
it's it's very concerning. Let's go to another call here. Hello,

(02:17:16):
you're on the air. Go ahead, please, Wow, that was immediate.

Speaker 52 (02:17:20):
Hello. They are a happy old thing to you and
to you okay if anybody has had itant to call in.
These people do not have the goal to keep you
on hold for a half an hour like to rest
your radio does.

Speaker 14 (02:17:38):
Yeah, it's not always as quick as you got on,
but yeah, we do what we can here in this
three hour block that we have every week. Anyway, what's
on your mind?

Speaker 52 (02:17:49):
Are you willing to discuss the currency with me? Or
doesn't have to wait for another time?

Speaker 14 (02:17:54):
No, as long as this brief, we do have some
other things to go through real quick.

Speaker 52 (02:17:58):
But yeah, go ahead, Well now I would Well, you know,
I never hear with all the issues that are discussed,
which are important issues, I never hear the currency being
discussed and you know, the currency itself is an issue
because the currency, you know, impacts the cost of living,

(02:18:18):
and the cost of living is directly or indirectly tied
to population control.

Speaker 21 (02:18:23):
Yeah, and you know.

Speaker 52 (02:18:25):
Just the currency. My understanding is that the coins are
constitutional money, but the subtle reserve notes are not.

Speaker 14 (02:18:35):
Yep, that's what the Constitution says.

Speaker 52 (02:18:38):
So we just you know, the currency itself, you know,
inflation to access blah blah blah. But the currency itself
is an issue because the currency has distorted the value
of things. I would say that the currency does not
have morality attached to it. So I'm just reminding everybody
that the currency itself is an issue and it just

(02:19:03):
needs to be addressed. That it's death based to currency.

Speaker 5 (02:19:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (02:19:08):
And it's not just the fact that it's the currency itself,
it's the fact that Congress, the Constitution that you're referring to.
The Constitution says that Congress has the power to coin money,
coin money and regulate the value thereof. It doesn't say
anything at about a private bank having the ability to

(02:19:29):
print paper and then loan it to the government at interest.
I don't find that in the Constitution anywhere. But yet
that's what's happened?

Speaker 20 (02:19:40):
Okay?

Speaker 52 (02:19:41):
Could I change the subject? Can bring something else up?

Speaker 5 (02:19:43):
Sure?

Speaker 52 (02:19:45):
Okay? I have noticed that missing from the US Congress website,
both on the Congress side, both on the House side
and on the Senate side, and all of them are
like this, And Paul is just as guilty as troll
humor is about this. I don't know why it's not

(02:20:06):
addressed and why it's like this it is, you know,
my position is that we should be able to go
Congress shopping and write to the member of Congress of
our choice. And Congress has a goal. Do not have
their email addresses on their US Congress website. They ask
you to use a form and when you call them up,

(02:20:28):
the email addresses are not available upon request. And you know,
I sit here on the phone and I say, go
get a business card and see if the business card
has an email address on it and read it to me,
and it's not. Okay. The Congress email addresses are not
on the website. And what actually should happen if somebody

(02:20:48):
should gather Congress email addresses and publish them on a website,
because it is our right to know what they are,
and it's our right to course bond with a member
of our choice and they either write back or they don't.
But it's not acceptable that their email addresses are not
published on their website.

Speaker 14 (02:21:08):
Yeah, there should be a contact information their addresses and
snail mail addresses, we call it. I'm wondering if the
reason why they took them down is it because of spam? Yeah,
volume of emails, because I do know as a web
developer myself, you know, not professionally, but developing my own projects,

(02:21:30):
I can tell you that there are spam bots that
go around collecting email addresses on the on the Internet
and pounding these things with different spam and stuff. So
I'm wondering if that's not the reason why they took
them down.

Speaker 52 (02:21:46):
But well, okay, I get that, but I mean our Congress.
You know, they're elected. They shouldn't be seventy five cents away. Yes, true,
you know it's not all right, know that, you know
we can snail mail them. That's not sufficient.

Speaker 14 (02:22:05):
Yeah. Well, I I've always wondered how effective emails are
in the first place, uh, because they can very easily
be ignored, where I suppose they could with a letter too,
although they actually have that delivered to their office. And
it's an actual object that they If they get a
ton of those, it's a lot harder to ignore them. Uh,

(02:22:28):
and and and phone calls. But yeah, your point is
very well taken. I think you should be able to
email them. And if it's but if it's a form
on the website, isn't isn't that good enough? I know,
I know a lot of people will mass.

Speaker 52 (02:22:43):
Emails, you know, and and the the no, no, I
say that the form is not sufficient. And I'll tell
you that in the meantime, and tell the email addresses
are poverished. What you have to do is you have
to go dig up their candidate email address and right
to them at their Canada email address.

Speaker 14 (02:23:02):
Oh there's an option.

Speaker 52 (02:23:03):
Oh that might be what's available to you, or somebody
is going to have to figure out the formula since
we know their name, to put the email addresses together, or.

Speaker 14 (02:23:13):
Better yet, maybe visit them at their office when they're home.
Hopefully they will make a public appearance. Some of them
are not as good about making public appearances as others. However,
we've had some in Michigan here that don't seem to
like to talk to the constituency that they supposedly represent

(02:23:34):
and that is a problem.

Speaker 20 (02:23:36):
There are services that, especially if they are promoting a cause,
they will take your name and send one email or
one letter with the message. I can't recall. I heard recently,
maybe two months ago, that there is a new one,

(02:23:59):
but I can't give you the name of it. But
I don't know. I think if you search search around
for it, you'll probably find it. I think probably John
Birch Society has one, a mass mailing email facility. But
but of course, you know, they choose their own subject.

(02:24:21):
If you want your own subject, then then you've got
to go through the whole process.

Speaker 14 (02:24:29):
Yeah, well, listen, I appreciate the call. Is there anything else.

Speaker 52 (02:24:34):
Now, you know, I mean some other time I can,
you know, discuss abortion. It doesn't have to be today
because I've got some things.

Speaker 14 (02:24:43):
Well we got we got about a minute before the
before the break. If you want to go ahead real quickly.

Speaker 49 (02:24:48):
Well, I was just going.

Speaker 52 (02:24:49):
To imagine that there's like three different tiers of you know,
your approach choice states. There are pro abortion states and
their right to life states. I was just going to
say that, you know, if your state, you know, like
sidewalk counseling as an example, if sidewalk counselors are not

(02:25:13):
allowed at every abortion office in your state, then your
state is not yet a pro choice state. So you
need to know what the definitions of what your state
is trying to accomplish by what it by, what it
spends time on, what it gives access to, what it funds,
because you know your state might be slanted pro abortion

(02:25:37):
if it spends more on the abortion industry than it
does on the right to life industry.

Speaker 14 (02:25:41):
Yeah, I for one think that there shouldn't be a
single penny spent of taxpayer dollars promoting abortion because you
should not have to fund the killing of another human being.
If that is against your faith, is against your personal beliefs,
it shouldn't be allowed anyway. Frankly, I mean, it's it's
not your body. It's not your choice when you're dealing

(02:26:03):
with somebody else's body inside of you. And so anyway, Hey,
appreciate the call. Thank you so much, God bless you,
Thank you too. All Right, we got another call on
the line, but we got the break at the bottom
of the hour, so we'll take that in the next
half hour. Much much more to calm listeners. Don't go away.
This is Governor America. Please stay right there.

Speaker 27 (02:27:00):
Package just started twenty nine ninety nine a month with
sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
off for details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details, terms
and conditions applying homeowners.

Speaker 32 (02:27:10):
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivints award
US News and World Report has recognized vivid as the

(02:27:30):

Speaker 27 (02:27:46):
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one one.

Speaker 53 (02:28:01):
The Scripture's view marriage as a covenant relationship for a lifetime.

Speaker 22 (02:28:05):
Doctor Gary Chapman with a love language minute, But.

Speaker 53 (02:28:09):
What if your spouse breaks the covenant? Are you to
abandon them or try to cover up for them? Neither
of these are biblical approaches. Jesus said that when a
spouse sins, we are to confront them, hoping they will
repent so we can forgive them. If they don't repent,
we're to try confronting again. If they ultimately refuse to repent,

(02:28:31):
we're to treat them as an unbeliever. How do you
treat unbelievers? You pray for them, you love them, and
you return good for evil. Who knows when they may
repent and the relationship can be restored. God often confronted
Israel and always stood ready to forgive them when they repented.
He is our mondy.

Speaker 31 (02:28:53):
Doctor Gary Chapman is the author of the Five Love Languages.

Speaker 26 (02:28:56):
For more, visit Fivelove Languages dot com.

Speaker 50 (02:29:00):
This is seeking Him with Nancy demas Wogglemouth.

Speaker 31 (02:29:05):
Sometimes God allows tough things in our lives so we
can be healed of a hard heart.

Speaker 21 (02:29:11):
Well, it's official.

Speaker 3 (02:29:12):
The company's bank ruts. Oh Bob, I am so sorry.

Speaker 31 (02:29:17):
We can respond to problems in different ways. Sometimes we
respond with pride.

Speaker 18 (02:29:23):
I'll show them I'm gonna build a new business and
wipe them all out.

Speaker 31 (02:29:26):
We can also respond in despair.

Speaker 17 (02:29:29):
Ah, who am I joking? I'm never gonna work again.

Speaker 31 (02:29:34):
Or we can choose to respond in humility.

Speaker 14 (02:29:37):
God has a plan for us, even if it means
that I start mopping the floors.

Speaker 34 (02:29:41):
We love God and we're called according to His purpose.

Speaker 31 (02:29:44):
Right with the pressures you're facing today, will you respond
in humility? Let God shape your life through the pressure.

Speaker 25 (02:29:56):
With seeking him.

Speaker 31 (02:29:58):
I'm Nancy demas woggamouth.

Speaker 18 (02:30:00):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance?
Then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,

(02:30:20):

(02:30:42):

Speaker 27 (02:30:45):
eight two five seventeen in where.

Speaker 13 (02:31:01):
The spoofs go to find out what's really going on.
This is govern America.

Speaker 5 (02:31:11):
And we're back.

Speaker 14 (02:31:12):
We're in the home stretch of the broadcast. We're more
half hour to go and the fastest three hours of
talk radio. I want to urge you to pray for
the people of Jamaica and yes, Cuba as well, all
the people in the Caribbean who were impacted by Hurricane Melissa, terrible,
terrible storm that came through. And my understanding is that
the death toll is up at to fifty now and

(02:31:35):
is expected to increase. And there's a big problem now,
people not having shelter, people not having the basic sustenance
of life to sustain them, and so this is a big,
big deal. So I encourage you to pray for people
and help out in however you can. As the days
go by and things become more and more challenging for

(02:31:59):
those on the ground. Uh, it's a bad situation, and
of course a situation that sadly is being used predictably
to further the push the narrative for climate change and
controls on human activity. So we'll get to that as
time progresses, maybe as we have time. But let's go

(02:32:20):
back to the phones. California. Hello, you're on the air.

Speaker 54 (02:32:23):
Go ahead, please, Hia in California.

Speaker 41 (02:32:27):
Hi.

Speaker 54 (02:32:29):
Yeah, your your comment that they weren't holding public meetings
for their for their voters. It sounds like there may
be a requirement to get a necessity of getting an
amendment to the Constitution that the members of Congress need

(02:32:50):
to not only live in their district, but vote in
their district in person an office in their district. There's
really no to be in Washington, d C. That's quite
a far ways and they're very high risk for lobbyists

(02:33:11):
visiting them there and coursing them. But if you have
to vote in a public venue here in your home district,
and of how public meetings people can confront them with
their intentions of voting on what may be an unconstitutional expenditure.

Speaker 14 (02:33:29):
Yeah, yeah, I completely agree. And I was thinking of
Mike Cox when I said that, because he's another one
that was, you know, representing people supposedly here in Michigan
and yet he was not at all living here. Not
only did he not want to meet with anybody, he
avoided people on the campaign trail he ran on a

(02:33:52):
Trump endorsement. But at the same time he also, you know,
he had a supposed address here, supposed to residents here,
but he lived in Florida. So so, yeah, you're you
you make a very good point. Although if we had
honest elections, none of this would be necessary because people
would know who was doing, you know, refusing to meet

(02:34:17):
with them, and they wouldn't vote for them. But you know,
they're in, They're in the problem. Therein lies the problem.
I don't think we have honest elections. And by the way,
speaking of that real quickly, did you see that the
which one was it one of the uh one of
the election UH voting machine companies renamed themselves to Liberty.

Speaker 21 (02:34:43):
Yeah?

Speaker 20 (02:34:43):
I saw that that. That wasn't that dominion?

Speaker 14 (02:34:46):
I think?

Speaker 11 (02:34:47):
So?

Speaker 14 (02:34:47):
Yeah?

Speaker 20 (02:34:48):
Yeah, those electronic voting machines, they are designed to steal elections.
Online voting the only secure voting is in person in
your district and have the ballots counted there, you know,

(02:35:13):
in front of in front of everybody.

Speaker 14 (02:35:17):
So yeah, I mean it was dominion voting systems, you're right, VICKI,
And it was sold to liberty vote, liberty vote. So
we've gone from dominion to liberty apparently, you know, I'm
you know, it was it was more accurate to call
it dominion because that's really what it is. They're taking
dominion over your voting systems, you know. But now, no,

(02:35:40):
they want you to think that it's going to be
a liberty vote. Okay, I don't think so, but yeah, no, anyway,
go ahead, Cynthia.

Speaker 54 (02:35:52):
Well, I pretty much shed my pH Okay, I think
the system of using the internet could be utilized by action.
We keep your presentatives that the legislation being considered is unconstitutional. Yeah,
and it may be a really cheap way to do

(02:36:13):
some campaigns like that.

Speaker 14 (02:36:15):
Yep. Well, good tip, very important points. Thank you very
much for making them, and we appreciate your out being
out there and we're weighing in for us. God bless you,
thank you, yeap, bye bye. All right, there's Cynthia in California.
We have a few more minutes left. If you want
to call in six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six

(02:36:35):
at six ten, six hundred seventeen seventy six or toll
That's a four four six. Govern You know a lot
of people are online. They're they're questioning Trump's demolition of
the East wing at the White House, purportedly to make
room for a ballroom. And I say purportedly. Yeah, I
gotta confess I haven't really paid a whole lot of

(02:36:57):
attention to this because I really don't care what they
do to the White House. Yeah, if they took bulldozers
and completely leveled that thing, it wouldn't bother me any
because it isn't my house.

Speaker 20 (02:37:08):
Well, my only concern about it, if you can call
it a concern, I'm not really concerned. But I think
Trump has terrible taste. It always does gold and marble
and you know, which I consider to be gaudy. Yeah,
but you know that's just me, I guess.

Speaker 54 (02:37:31):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (02:37:32):
You know, they'll arrest you if you try to enter
the place, just like the people in January sixth trying
to enter Congress. So I don't care what they do.
But as it turns out, there are many people who
are crunching the numbers and figuring out that this ballroom
might just be a cover for something else that they're
building now.

Speaker 55 (02:37:51):
When plans for a White House ballroom were announced in July,
reactions were mixed. But as those plans and price tags
keep changing, people online are sharing theories about what they
think is really going on.

Speaker 16 (02:38:05):
I just finished construction on a venue in Atlanta, and
the capacity of that venue is about twenty five hundred
fifteen hundred.

Speaker 25 (02:38:12):
Seated, So it's bigger. It's bigger than the ballroom he's
talking about.

Speaker 23 (02:38:16):
We did it for about just under one point five million,
two hundred million dollars.

Speaker 55 (02:38:21):
Is insane, Many have called out the ballrooms inconsistencies. The
New York Times noted major changes between July and October,
including floor plans, window placement, and an estimated cost that
has tripled from one hundred million to three hundred million dollars.
The number of arched windows has also shifted. A new

(02:38:42):
portocol replaces the longtime East Wing entrance used by tour groups,
and overall, The Times reports that no one seems to
know what the final design will really look like The
White House admits plans have changed, and Press Secretary Caroline
Leavitt defended the president's decision.

Speaker 3 (02:39:00):
President do such a thing to the White House grounds.

Speaker 37 (02:39:02):
There have been many presidents in the past who have
made their mark.

Speaker 22 (02:39:06):
On this beautiful White House complex.

Speaker 55 (02:39:08):
The White House renovations are privately funded, and officials released
a list of donors that are footing the bill for
the project, But as costs rise and designs keep shifting,
experts have been weighing in two. This discussion on social
media only spiked after architect Andrew Kerr posted a Facebook
analysis questioning the project's numbers. He pointed out that at

(02:39:30):
ninety thousand square feet in a cost of three hundred
million dollars, the projects would cost about three thousand, three
hundred and thirty three dollars per square foot, far above
even the most luxurious construction.

Speaker 14 (02:39:43):
Three three to three three. You know, the thirty three
isn't that interesting, very very high Masonic number.

Speaker 55 (02:39:48):
Kerr also noted that a ballroom for about you're going
to say something.

Speaker 20 (02:39:52):
Yeah, I was gonna say that reminds me something that
was announced last week, and I really have to look
at into this is that he is also building an
arch in Washington, d C. Now, the only buildings that

(02:40:12):
I know of that have an arch are Paris, the Paris. Oh,
New York City has an art.

Speaker 14 (02:40:23):
Well, there's an arch in Saint Louis if they call
it the Gateway to the West.

Speaker 20 (02:40:27):
Yeah, but that's a different kind of arch. It could
be it could be just a variation.

Speaker 14 (02:40:33):
You don't like variety in your arches. Well, no, I
think the President likes his golden I think.

Speaker 20 (02:40:41):
I would imagine that there is an arch at the
Vatican too, But I have to find out what the
significance of that is. I know there is a significance,
but I just need to do some research and find
out what it is. I don't like it. I don't

(02:41:02):
like the fact that he's doing that.

Speaker 14 (02:41:05):
I'm sure there's a lot of some Masonic symbolisms, you know,
coming into play here. But oh, if you thought that,
you might just be one of those whack job conspiracy
theorists to think that the East Wing reconstruction is not just.

Speaker 21 (02:41:19):
About a ballroom.

Speaker 55 (02:41:20):
Kerr also noted that a ballroom for about one thousand
guests would typically need only twenty to forty thousand square feet,
not ninety thousand, even allowing for prefunction areas. He suggests
the math just doesn't add up. Jacob Ward, a journalist
who's covered architecture and design, also says that kind of
cost is way out of line for a ballroom.

Speaker 47 (02:41:42):
But to blow, you know, three thousand dollars a square foot,
you know, that's the That's like a hospital building with
a lot of expensive equipment and special infrastructure. That's a
big university campus building.

Speaker 55 (02:41:57):
But perhaps the most viral theory from a now deleted
video claiming the project's real purpose isn't a ballroom at all,
but a private underground data center. The East Wing, which
was just abolished, sits above the Presidential Emergency Operations Center,
a bunker built during World War Two. It was built
because of a nuclear threat At that time.

Speaker 25 (02:42:18):
The Office of.

Speaker 55 (02:42:19):
Civilian Defense deemed the White House an unsafe building in
the event of a deadly fire and urged President Franklin D.

Speaker 25 (02:42:25):
Roosevelt to move somewhere else.

Speaker 55 (02:42:27):
He denied their request, but after the attack of Pearl
Harbor in nineteen forty one, Roosevelt immediately began building a
bombshell ter.

Speaker 14 (02:42:36):
Like he didn't know that Pearl Harbor was coming right.

Speaker 55 (02:42:38):
It's the same location where President George W. Bush and
his team met following the nine to eleven attacks. Because
of that existing underground space, some online are convinced it's
being expanded into a private data center that'll be used
to police Americans, all disguised beneath the new ballroom, But
a tech expert says that theory doesn't hold up.

Speaker 45 (02:42:59):
I have a forty eight inched tull rack of computers
in my basement that produced so much heat I heat
part of my house with them.

Speaker 3 (02:43:06):
In the winter.

Speaker 55 (02:43:07):
Bentley Henzel is a senior data and DevOps engineer. He
posted that data centers can't operate underground because they generate
too much heat and require massive cooling systems. The Environmental
and Energy Study Institute reports large data centers can use
up to five million gallons of water a day to
cool down their servers, equivalent to the water use of

(02:43:28):
a town populated by ten thousand to fifty thousand people.
President Trump has said his renovation is no different from
changes made by other presidents, but as was anything political
these days, A New Washington Post ABC News IPSOS poll
found that only twenty eight percent of Americans support the
ballroom projects.

Speaker 14 (02:43:48):
So I wonder if the White House renovations have something
to do with nuclear apocalypse. You know, maybe they're building
another bombmunker, you know. Trump he's recently said that the
US is going to resume testing of nuclear weapons.

Speaker 56 (02:44:01):
We have some breaking news that we want to hit
really quickly, because we are seeing a.

Speaker 10 (02:44:05):
New post from President Trump.

Speaker 3 (02:44:06):
This just came out moments ago.

Speaker 56 (02:44:07):
He says, the United States has more nuclear weapons than
any other country. This was accomplished, including a complete update
and renovation of existing weapons, during my first term in office.
Because of the tremendous destructive power.

Speaker 40 (02:44:22):
I hated to do it, but had no choice.

Speaker 56 (02:44:25):
Russia second, China is a distant third, but will be
even within five years, he says, because of other countries
testing programs. The President says he's instructing the Department of
War to start testing our nuclear weapons on an equal basis.
That process will begin immediately. He says, thank you for
your attention to this matter. We have somebody standing by here,

(02:44:46):
hel Kempher, who's done a range of events. I know
you yourself have been a part of many events, specifically in
southern California talking about nuclear weapons.

Speaker 34 (02:44:58):
How when you see this news.

Speaker 56 (02:45:00):
What's the significance of the US picking up its nuclear
testing once.

Speaker 57 (02:45:04):
More, Well, Austin, this is a huge shift in US policy.
We haven't tested the nuclear weapon in the United States
since nineteen ninety two. You may recall in the early sixties,
all above ground testing worldwide was stopped because those massive
nuclear explosions which are encapsulated and video and film I
should say that we see in movies and certainly newsreels

(02:45:27):
and stuff. Well, it was I was pushing out a
ton of radioactive material into the atmosphere and causing major
health effects. So by international treaty that was stopped. But
there are still underground testing now all the other major
nations have stopped doing it. Russia doesn't do it, the
US doesn't do it. However, North Korea has been doing it,
and North Korea has been threatening off and on to

(02:45:49):
resume their nuclear testing, which is also underground.

Speaker 53 (02:45:53):
This would be a major change.

Speaker 57 (02:45:55):
My question that immediately comes to mind is where are
they planning on doing it. The previous tests were alled
on Nevada. It's an area that's not too far from
Las Vegas, but that area has been basically shuttered as
far as being an active nuclear testing area obviously for
over three decades, and I don't know if we'd want

(02:46:15):
to do nuclear testing there. There's issues that we're discovering
with the water table and another environmental impact. So it's
an interesting policy, but it brings up not just a
question of why and what will it mean, but how
and what will the what will the impact or consequences
of those tests occur?

Speaker 14 (02:46:33):
It just seems like more and more we're headed toward
a cold war type of scenario, if not an outright
hot war. Doesn't that kind of have that field today?

Speaker 3 (02:46:45):
Well?

Speaker 20 (02:46:45):
Yeah, yeah, I mean they've been building towards war since
Trump came in office actually, and he has been asting
the idea.

Speaker 21 (02:47:01):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (02:47:02):
Absolutely. I wanted to real quickly cover something here. Kit
Knightley wrote on off Guardian recently the weather is getting
colder and that means getting back to anti woodburning propaganda. Yes,
they're coming for your wood burning stoves again, ladies and gentlemen.
Uh did you know a wood burner can kill you?

(02:47:25):
They pollute more than cars and cause cancer. Folks were burning.
We've been burning wood since the beginning of humanity. Okay,
now there's a killer.

Speaker 20 (02:47:37):
And when we did it. Nature was doing it.

Speaker 14 (02:47:41):
Yeah for us, nature still is doing it. I regularly
get smoke from Canada up here from the wildfires. Ah so,
but but to hear them tell it, they pollute more
than cars and cause cancer similar to cigarette smoke. Jeremy
that that was the is making that claim.

Speaker 20 (02:48:02):
You can't trust a word they say.

Speaker 14 (02:48:05):
Jeremy Vine is asking if it's time to ban them.

Speaker 20 (02:48:08):
They're just so full of it. You know, this is
full of it, you know what I mean?

Speaker 14 (02:48:13):
Yeah, this isn't new. For want of a better word, information.
We covered this last Christmas, then over the summer it
was folded in with a barrage of indoor air quality
fear mongering, only to re emerge now that the days
are getting shorter again, sort of like reverse hibernation.

Speaker 21 (02:48:34):
Uh.

Speaker 14 (02:48:35):
The daily mail out of the uk SS A trendy
wood burning stove almost killed me. They need to be
banned before they do any more damage.

Speaker 20 (02:48:45):
I think, what we need to ban our stupid people.

Speaker 14 (02:48:50):
Well, good luck with that, oh, I know it would
be They keep using the word trendy. It's so shamelessly manipulated,
painting the humble stove as some pretentious luxury accessory rather
than the basic means of heating your home for a
literal millennia. Uh, you know, and and by the way,

(02:49:12):
very cheaply, because wood is a very cheap source of heat,
and that's exactly what they're after. They can't have anything.
You know, you've got to be charged up the ying
yang for everything that you do.

Speaker 20 (02:49:24):
Yeah, So they're getting ready to market some new product
or something that's Yeah.

Speaker 14 (02:49:29):
The new product is carbon credits, the new carb the
product is CO two, selling you the air that you
believe but breathe and do everything else in he says, yeah.
He quotes the Telegraph as wood burners are being are
bad for you. Here's what you didn't notice. Actually that's

(02:49:51):
the the Telegraph, the Daily Mail. In other words, all
of these publications are jumping on this anti wood burning bandwagon.
So what's this all about. What's interesting is there's something
called the Eco Design Directive and I was doing some

(02:50:14):
digging on this. The European Union, they have the Eco
Design Directive and according to Wikipedia, establishes a framework to
set mandatory ecological requirements for using for energy using and
energy related products sold in all twenty seven member states. Now,
keep in mind if it's going on in the EU.

(02:50:35):
It's a global project, folks, everything that they do, they're
just a little head of the curve that we are. Sorry,
I gotta tickle on my throat now it must be
all the wood burners in the area. But anyway, the
twenty seven member states it's scope currently covers the Eco
Design Directive more than forty product groups such as boilers,

(02:50:59):
light bulbs, TVs and fridges, which are responsible for around
forty percent of all EU greenhouse gas emissions.

Speaker 20 (02:51:07):
Well, they use climate change and environment these things as
market as market excuses for having you buy new.

Speaker 14 (02:51:21):
Crap, yeah, well and selling you stuff you don't want,
forcing you to buy stuff you don't want.

Speaker 20 (02:51:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 14 (02:51:28):
From clean air dot com, clean Air dot London. I
should say implementation of Eco Design Regulations from one January
twenty twenty two is an important step on the path
to banning wood burning. And this came out December twenty
ninth of twenty twenty one, so it's a little dated,
but it's a plan that's still going forward, especially being renewed.

(02:51:51):
With all these renewed headlines, only eco design compliant wood
burning stoves will be able to enter the UK market
from January twenty two, Clean Air London has discovered weak
historic emissions standards, confusion and duplication between the new Eco
Design regulations and the Clean Air Act nineteen ninety three,

(02:52:13):
serious unresolved problems with the new emission testing regime, and
a failure by DEFRA. That's their kind of like their
EPA over there DEPTHRA to publicize the new requirements to consumers.
COEL represents that's Clean Air London repeats its call for
a ban on wood burning in urban areas, a Parliamentary

(02:52:36):
Select Committee investigation into domestic wood burning and a new
Clean Air Act before the seventieth anniversary of the Great
Smog in December nineteen fifty two. So this is what
they're doing. This is what they're pushing for, banning wood burning,
because you can't have nice things. EPA, the Environmental Protection

(02:52:58):
Agency here in the United States, has its wood Stove
Certified program. They have their own certificed certification for wood
stoves and they say all wood stoves certified under twenty
fifteen new Source Performance Standards have been independently tested by
an accredited laboratory to meet a particulate emission limit of

(02:53:23):
no more than four and a half grams per hour
Mini room heaters certified. Another nineteen eighty eight nsps also
meet the emission limit and will be included in a database.
We're hearing a lot about databases today, aren't we of
appliance is maintained by the EPA Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance.

Speaker 20 (02:53:45):
Really, when you hear that, you should just hear they're
going to force you to buy some new product that
you don't want, you don't need. But they've got to
keep they've got to keep the economy, the artbeat of
the economy going, because everything they do is an economy killer.

Speaker 14 (02:54:08):
Yeah. Well, I've got a lot of stuff here. I've
been spending some time on the International Institute for Sustainable
Development website, the Earth Negotiations bulletin. Do you remember the
Earth Negotiations bulletin? VICKI, no, I don't. I used to
cover this a lot in the past. There's a lot
of things that are going on always that never get

(02:54:31):
talked about or rarely rarely once in a while people will,
you know, like the cop Conferences, Conference of the Parties
for the Framework Convention on Climate Chains and things like
that being big among them. But there are things happening
all the time, constantly, and you know, one of the
things that we have is the sixty first session of

(02:54:54):
the International Tropical Timber Council ITTC sixty one, closing on Friday,
just yesterday, with members authorizing financing for the immediate implementation
of twenty projects, pre projects and activities. They say. The
Council adapted four decisions, including endorsement of nine projects pre
projects approved through its time bound electronic no objection procedure,

(02:55:20):
and it also extended the mandate of the Preparatory Working
Group until ITTC sixty two, requesting it to work with
the Secretariat in line with the revised roadmap to further
analyze elements relevant to the negotiation of a successor agreement
to the International Tropical Timber Agreement and to make recommendations

(02:55:40):
for addressing elements these elements. The Council also requested that
the PWG that's the Working Group, submit a report including
recommendations on the tentative roadmap for twenty twenty seven to
the Preparatory Committee and ITTC sixty two. A lot to
talk about in this stuff, So maybe we'll get into

(02:56:01):
some of this next week, because not only is the
Timber Council meeting and having met concluding their meeting, but
there's a lot of other Intergovernmental panel on climate change
and things like that. Well, we got to go for now.
Pray for this republic, do what you can to restore it.
God bless you, Thank you, Vicky, appreciate everything you do.

(02:56:24):
Join us back here next week, folks.

Speaker 20 (02:56:27):
Bye, everybody,

All Episodes

Govern America | November 1, 2025 | Polished Turd

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

The Burden

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Govern America | November 1, 2025 | Polished Turd