Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves
and for future generations, a new.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
World order, new world order, new world order.
Speaker 3 (00:10):
This is a moment disease. The kaleidoscope has been shaken.
The pieces are in flux.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
Soon they will settle again.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Before they do, let.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
Us re order this world around us.
Speaker 5 (00:20):
A new world order, a world where the United Nations
is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.
Speaker 6 (00:27):
Nevertheless, United States it in a key position to shape
is so that the problem of the put rensidentity will
be the emergence of a new international.
Speaker 7 (00:39):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century. But
out of what is will be feared the greatest restructuring
of the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy,
greatest restructuring of the global economy, a new world order.
Speaker 8 (00:53):
What's created documenting the crisis of our rebublic.
Speaker 9 (00:58):
The very word secrecy repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are as a people inherently and historically opposed
to secret societies, the secret oaths and a secret.
Speaker 10 (01:12):
Proceedings waging war on the new world order and.
Speaker 4 (01:15):
The councils of government.
Speaker 11 (01:17):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether
sought or unsought by the military industrial conflict.
Speaker 8 (01:27):
This is Governor America with Darren Weeks and Vicky Davis.
Speaker 12 (01:40):
From Female Regions five and ten. This is Governed America.
Vicky Davis is here. I'm during Weeks. It is the
eighth of November twenty twenty five. Nice to have you
with us once again, ladies and gentlemen. Well, the government
shut down is continuing to go forward. Lots of chaotic
mess going on and the world that we're I think
(02:00):
there's a lot of games being played.
Speaker 13 (02:02):
On a national totally on.
Speaker 12 (02:05):
Congress is level, and but the American people largely are
so far unaffected. The government contractors are not going to
be paid, I guess, and that's very bad for those families.
The air traffic controllers, TSA, federal employees, they're all not
(02:29):
being paid. And you know, if you do a work
for somebody, you should be able to be paid.
Speaker 13 (02:33):
And which government contractors did they say?
Speaker 12 (02:38):
I the ones with contracts. I don't know that they're
I don't know what the lag time is from when
the companies receive their compensation from the government versus when
they actually get their check. So I know some people
who are contract acted, who are actually I know a
(03:02):
particular person which I'm not going to name, of course,
who does have a security clearance and does do contract
work for the for the Defense Department through a company.
And I will talk to this person and ask them
how they're doing and whether this has impacted them yet.
I think that would be a good exercise. But regardless,
(03:28):
if this thing continues to stretch on, they will be impacted.
If they're not already being impacted, but certainly government employees
already being impacted, and air traffic controllers and stuff that
the government just implemented a plan the Trump administration did,
I guess, to cut like forty of air traffic around
(03:50):
the major airports. Yeah, to try to relieve some of
the pressure, because you know, my understanding is some of
these air traffic control people or even maybe even TSA
agents or whatever they're having to do uber they're having
to you know, in other words, like Michelle was just
telling me about this morning, one of these people were
(04:10):
actually going around and I shouldn't chuckle, but it seems ridiculous.
They were going around hanging people's Christmas lights for them,
just to have some extra cash. Oh wow, So a
lot of people, you know, I imagine their federal employees
are probably no different than anybody else in that regard.
Had great jobs and you know, it's probably lucrative working
(04:31):
for the federal government on a normal basis. But when
they quit paying you, you know, and most people live
paycheck to paycheck these days. That's just the way it is.
It's very difficult, that's true.
Speaker 13 (04:47):
Well, I know that the contractors it contractors that work
through subcontractors get paid very very well.
Speaker 12 (04:58):
Yeah, the more you get paid, the more you find
ways to spend that money. Is very very few people,
unfortunately in this day and age. Yeah, I remember years ago,
many decades ago, the government used to or encourage people
to save money. Now it's just a case of credit
(05:19):
card this and credit card that. You know, spend, spend, spender.
It's just like what George W. Bush said. You remember
what he said, after nine to eleven, you want to
help go shopping exactly, run up your credit card, whatever
you got to do. You know. One of the things
that Michelle lamented about Kmart and their decline is that
(05:41):
they had a lay away program. You could lay away
something and pay make payments on it and they would
store it for you so nobody else could buy it,
and then some you know, then eventually when you made
your last payment, it was yours, but the store god
onto it for you.
Speaker 13 (06:00):
I didn't know about that. I mean, I haven't heard
of anybody having a layaway program in decades.
Speaker 12 (06:08):
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, in decades. But actually km art
still had their layaway program. So and sometimes, in fact,
it was miles away that she we had a kmart
that last kmart closed. Uh, in our it's anywhere within
somewhat within dark driving distance. I mean that was still
(06:29):
a long drive. I forget which town it was in now,
but here in Michigan you could actually drive far enough
you could actually get to a kmart. And Michelle would
do that sometimes around Christmas time just to have, you know,
be able to lay stuff away and make payments and
get Christmas gifts. All of that is all gone, huh,
because it's now pay later.
Speaker 13 (06:53):
Now. I have two came or walmarts within uh about
an eleven mile circle. So so I wonder why why
why would that be? Well, we would have two so
close and they have none.
Speaker 12 (07:17):
You know, you got two walmarts or kmarts.
Speaker 13 (07:20):
Yeah, Walmarts oh yeah.
Speaker 12 (07:23):
Walmarts yeah, Walmarts are everywhere. I'm talking about Camart.
Speaker 5 (07:27):
Oh.
Speaker 13 (07:27):
Km yeah, they're they're shutting that down. I thought, I
think they filed for.
Speaker 12 (07:31):
Bankrupt Yeah, they did. They did. In fact, I think
they filed for bankruptcy a couple of times. And I
was very disappointed when they bought Sears, another retail giant
that was a legacy. Oh man, making me nostalgic talking
about all this stuff. But a lot of people can
go back to the series Robot Catalog, which some people
(07:54):
even used for other purposes in the outhouse back in
the day when they were done with it. But uh,
the Amazon, I think has put a lot of these
companies out of business. And what I really hated to
see was Craftsmen Tools bought up by kmart, the brand
(08:17):
because you could go into Kmart after that. I mean,
Craftsmen at one time they made they made great tools,
but then they they ended up Kmar ended up buying
the brand and the whole thing, and maybe it started
to go to crap before that, I don't know, but
Kmart bought the brand and then the next thing, you know,
everything was Craftsmen at the Kmart stores and they used
(08:41):
to have back in the back in their heyday, back
when they were the apex of the tool world, or
at least among them. They used to be able to
if you broke a socket or something, you could take
it in, or a wrench or a ratchet. You broke something,
you could take it to your local Kmart store and
get it replaced free of charge.
Speaker 13 (09:00):
Yeah, my dad always bought Craftsmen tools.
Speaker 12 (09:05):
Yeah, they just bought.
Speaker 13 (09:05):
Them from Sears, you know, when Sears was but you know,
Sears was the like, if not the first, then one
of the first internet retailers, and it put it put
them out of business. I think because they were just
(09:28):
a little bit too early. They were too far ahead
of the market.
Speaker 12 (09:36):
Mhm. So yeah, and it's really it's sad to see
these things go because what we're talking about here is quality,
and it seems like today a lot of things are
no longer built on quality. That's the understatement of the age,
isn't it.
Speaker 14 (09:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 13 (09:52):
They import crap from China and a lot of their
stuff doesn't even meet our specifications, you know, our safety
standards and stuff like that.
Speaker 12 (10:05):
So yeah, that's true.
Speaker 13 (10:08):
Getting we're getting junk Yeah.
Speaker 12 (10:11):
We're getting junk, and we're getting junk from our government.
We're getting junk. We're getting punched in the face every
direction and taken to the cleaners every direction. And uh,
but it just makes you nostalgic for when things actually
work properly and people actually had a good heart for
each other, uh, and wanted to help each other, wanted
(10:32):
to work together for a better tomorrow. Boy, that sounds
like kumbah Ya and New World Order handholding today, But
back back in the day, it was. It was pretty
much the reality the way people lived. People wanted better
things for each other. Yeah, and now it's just there's
such a lack of morality today, you know. And we're
(10:53):
talking a lot about nostalgic. It isn't of an era
in another way too, Vicky, And and oh, I'm not
talking about the death of Dick Cheney. You know, despot
Dick passed this past week. But war crimes, tortures, and
killings are going to continue, even though he's gone to
(11:13):
his eternal judgment. What I'm talking about, though, is the
Farmer's Almanac. He had a goat.
Speaker 13 (11:19):
They don't publish anymore.
Speaker 12 (11:21):
They're going they're going to end their publication. Twenty twenty
six will be the last year that the Farmer's Almanac
is going to be published. Had a great run started
in eighteen eighteen, and I had a great reputation, and
you know, all in my life I heard about how
accurate the Farmer Farmers Almanac was and is, But then
(11:44):
I actually started to buy it, and spoiler alert, it
wasn't that accurate. I think when they were where they
ran a foul as they started trying to predict the
weather down to the day. You know, they had like
a few days here and there where. I mean, they
(12:05):
would go month by month and they would publish from
this day, you know, like this day to this day.
Let's just say, like November six to the eighth, it's
going to be like this, and November eighth, you know,
ninth to the thirteenth it's going to be like this. Well,
any meteorologists can tell you, if they're worth their salt,
that you can't predict the weather down to the day
(12:27):
months out. You just can't do it. There's too many variables.
They don't even like the seven day forecast. So I
don't know if the Farmer's Almanac always did that, because
I wasn't an avid reader, but I do do know
the copies that I've bought in my lifetime they have
(12:48):
had that forecast in it. And you know, but there's
a lot of things that were cool about the Farmer's Almanac.
They did have some cool stuff in there. But I
just think, you know, predicting basically, what they were doing
is trying to predict it based on climb on climatological cycles.
You know.
Speaker 13 (13:06):
Oh, well, that that makes sense because the the Weather
Service was one of the first global systems. I believe
you're I'll have to I'll have to look that up.
(13:26):
But I know that the our weather broadcasters were some
of the first to be involved in in Internet. In
the Internet, So I shouldn't have brought that up because
I can't give you more detail than that, but but
(13:49):
I yeah, but I do know that that they were
among the first to promote the Internet. My I had
to do with CNN Global International, you know, International Weather
prediction or something.
Speaker 12 (14:08):
Well, yeah, Cna'm not quite worthy for being accurate either
in the news reporting or anything else for that matter.
But ABC ABC News is all gushing about the Farmer's Ominac.
Speaker 15 (14:20):
I remember using the almanac for any kind of important
event coming up in our lives. In my house in
the days before the internet, if you wanted to find
out what the weather would be like on a certain date,
I know, I sound like I like wrote on walls
without so if you wanted to know what time high
time would roll in, or which month would be best
to plant your tomatoes, you would consult the Farmers Almanac.
Speaker 13 (14:43):
If it sounds a little.
Speaker 15 (14:44):
Outdated to look in a book to check the weather, well,
sadly it probably is. The makers of this American institution
have announced twenty twenty six will be the final year
of publication, the end of an era. It was first
published in eighteen eighteen, and the almanac was staple in
American households with folklore and advice on gardening, fishing, and
(15:04):
astronomical events. It used a secret formula to predict the
weather that included sun spots and lunar cycles, and maker
say it had been almost eighty percent accurate in its
two hundred and seven years. I can remember it being
so spot on. A more recent study from the University
of Illinois says it's more like fifty two percent of guys.
Speaker 12 (15:24):
That's not bad, No, he has fifty percent accuracy is
perfect standard to journalism for ABC. So anyway, rest in
peace to the farmer Zaminac, and I hope all the
people working there find other jobs in journalism and do
(15:46):
land on their feet. As they say. One thing, speaking
of accuracy, I wanted to correct the record, so to
speak for my own self. Last week, we were talking
about politicians on the show who get elected to certain
districts and they don't live in their district, they don't
even live in the state to which they're elected to represent.
And I made I made the mistake. I said Mike
(16:09):
Cox was one of those people. What I met was
Mike Rogers. I got my MIC's mixed up, and so,
uh it's Mike Rogers that I was thinking of that
moved to Florida and got elected in you know, to Michigan,
you know, and so uh not Mike Cox. It was
Mike Rodgers. So I wanted to correct the record on
(16:31):
that because facts matter anyway, As we said at the
top of the show, who knew who knew that facts matter?
Speaker 13 (16:45):
Yeah?
Speaker 12 (16:46):
Uh. This is day thirty nine of what has now
become the longest government shut down, and the games continue
a number of bills have been put forward to get
people paid. Nothing's passed.
Speaker 16 (16:59):
Uh.
Speaker 12 (17:00):
Judge in Rhode To Island ordered Trump to fully fund
the SNAP program that's the supplemental nutrition whatever whatever, you know,
the program that basically it's food stamps. Everybody knows it
as food stamps, but telling the administration basically they had
to find the money, which I find interesting because the essentially,
(17:24):
I mean, the executive branch doesn't have the authority to
appropriate funds. That's the House of Representatives role, so as
I see it, And maybe I'm wrong here, but I
don't think so. The judge was basically ordering Donald Trump
to do something that was unconstitutional.
Speaker 13 (17:46):
Did court though, didn't it?
Speaker 12 (17:48):
Yeah, he did appeal in the Supreme Court just actually
late yesterday, it was actually last night, last yesterday evening
reversed that, and I think rightfully so. So SNAP mamines
partly funded with the reserves that the an earlier court
quote unquote ruling had ordered the administration to use all
of the reserve funds. Uh. And you know, all of this,
(18:11):
the whole this whole thing is because the Democrats in
Congress want to extend Obamacare subsidies without fixing the core
core issue. Insurance costs continue to skyrocket, and as long
as the government's funding it, it's going to continue to skyrocket,
and as long as people are able to you know,
(18:33):
there's there's really as I see the insurance tobacco, there's
very little incentive for the prices to go down.
Speaker 13 (18:43):
Well, there's none at all. As a matter of fact,
there are incentives for it to go up.
Speaker 12 (18:49):
Right, and especially when you're talking about government healthcare.
Speaker 13 (18:55):
Well, it's not healthcare, it's insurance.
Speaker 12 (18:58):
Good point yep, Yeah, they marketed as healthcare.
Speaker 13 (19:02):
Yeah, but it is at all period, end of story.
It's insurance. And the the insurance companies get big subsidies.
So that's who the Democrats are lobbying for holding out
for is big subsidies for big insurance.
Speaker 17 (19:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 12 (19:26):
Yeah, Well they will also want to give Obamacare coverage
to refugees and asylum seekers. Yell, anybody.
Speaker 13 (19:35):
I have a suspicion, and I haven't found anything that
actually says this, but I think that Obama Care is
part of a global system of health insurance. And you know,
a lot of the debate between the Democrats and the Republicans,
(19:59):
they're not neither side is telling the whole story.
Speaker 12 (20:03):
Oh wow, you mean they're both liars.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
Yeah.
Speaker 13 (20:06):
Yeah, I would go so far as to say they're
both liars.
Speaker 12 (20:12):
They're really going out on a limb there, VICKI.
Speaker 13 (20:15):
I know I'm a risk taker.
Speaker 12 (20:17):
Yeah, I hope you're not proven wrong. Actually, I'm being facetious.
I would love for you to be proven wrong on that. So,
you know what's interesting about this. There's a lot of
things interesting. But the Democrats trying to die on that
hill giving Obamacare coverage to refugees and asylum seekers. But
(20:41):
even the Republican senators can't even agree on a measure
to suspend the pay of Congress while the shutdown's going on.
Speaker 13 (20:49):
I know, I think that's the least they could do.
Speaker 12 (20:53):
Yeah. I will give props to Marjorie Taylor Green. She's
been making the rounds on even The View. She went
on the View, but she's uh, she's she said she's
not taking a paycheck right now because she doesn't feel
right about taking a paycheck while the American people are
suffering without pay many of them. So I don't know
(21:15):
how many other members of Congress are, but most, I'm
thinking are still getting their paychecks. And what's interesting is
that this debate between the Republicans, you know, Senators John
Kennedy put forward a couple of bills to stop Congress
from getting paid during the shutdown, the idea being that
they should share in the pain that's being felt by
(21:37):
the American people. And guess who objected to that? Who
fellow Republican Senator Ran.
Speaker 13 (21:46):
Paul Oh huh, Well that's a surprise.
Speaker 12 (21:51):
Yeah, yeah, this is This is some of how how
the whole thing their interaction went.
Speaker 17 (21:55):
For the members consideration.
Speaker 18 (21:57):
So starting with my first bill, which would say members
of Congress can't be paid and don't get back pay
even after.
Speaker 17 (22:06):
We on the shutdown.
Speaker 18 (22:08):
That's called the No shut Down Paychecks to Politicians Act,
I asked a unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to
the immediate consideration of my bill, that bill which I
just described, which is at the desk. I further asked
that the bill be considered, read a third time and passed,
and that the motion reconsidered be considered made and laid
(22:30):
upon the table.
Speaker 19 (22:32):
Is there objection, Yeah.
Speaker 12 (22:35):
You want to do say something?
Speaker 13 (22:37):
Yeah, I was gonna say, I'm not impressed because he
put the poison pill in there, that they wouldn't get
their back pay even even when the government restarts.
Speaker 12 (22:51):
Well, hold on, hold on, because he does have another
bill that addresses that issue. Okay, So it was the
poison pill number one and Paul ran Paul objected to that,
so he had a backup plan. So that was the
first salvo. So let's keep this president.
Speaker 17 (23:14):
It's really right to object.
Speaker 20 (23:16):
I think it's time that instead of closing the other
of government down and further, that we begin to open
up government.
Speaker 12 (23:22):
What I will offer.
Speaker 20 (23:23):
Is legislation that, instead of closing government down further, begins
to pay those who are working. Pays our soldiers, pays
our air traffic controllers.
Speaker 12 (23:31):
Now bear in mind they've already voted down those very measures.
Speaker 20 (23:35):
Pays everyone who's showing up for work. I think this
should become a permanent feature of our government. I think
it's disruptive, I think it's unfair, and I think it's
wrong that we don't pay the workers that are showing up.
But a better way than isolating out different groups and
punishing different groups is to actually pay those who are working.
Speaker 17 (23:52):
And I think we should do this.
Speaker 20 (23:54):
If we're passed this legislation, this would never be a
problem again. We're going to run into disagreements in the future.
We're going to have times when the government shuts down,
but there's no reason that we shouldn't be paying our
government workers. So I asked that the Senator modify his
request so that instead of the Senate proceeding to the
immediate consideration of Calendar Item one ninety one that s
(24:17):
three to zero one two, that the bill be considered
read a third time in past, and the motion to
consider be considered made and laid upon the table.
Speaker 19 (24:25):
Mister President would would the Center modify his request?
Speaker 18 (24:29):
I will not, mister President, And I'd like to explain why.
I understand Senator Paul is making a good point. What
are you saying is rather than saying, as I am,
that nobody else is being paid, so members of Congress
shouldn't be paid. I think what Senator Paul is saying,
(24:51):
let's pay everybody. That's what I'm understand to be saying,
and he wants me to agree to that instead of
my bill. What Senator uh Paul is proposing is uh
Senator Ron Johnson's Shutdown uh No Shutdown Act that we
voted on several times, and I'm for it.
Speaker 17 (25:12):
I voted for it several times.
Speaker 18 (25:14):
Here's the problem I have with Senator Paul's proposal of
pulling down my bill and UH going with Senator Johnson's bill.
Speaker 17 (25:24):
UH, for several reasons.
Speaker 18 (25:26):
Number One, I'm interested in passing something. I'm not interested
in just putting on a shut. My bill will pass
the House of Representatives, and my bill will be signed
by the President.
Speaker 17 (25:38):
UH.
Speaker 18 (25:39):
Senator Paul's bill, I can assure you will not pass
the House of Representatives and President Trump will not sign it.
I'm not saying someone's right or somebody's wrong. President Trump
does not considered to be Senator Paul to be part
of his MAGA agenda, and he will veto it, and
then we're right back to square one.
Speaker 17 (25:58):
So for that reason, I can't.
Speaker 18 (26:01):
Substitute his for mine, because his is gonna gonna gonna
be as dead as fried chicken here in a few days.
Speaker 12 (26:08):
I love. This is what I love about listening to
John Kennedy. He's he's dead as fried chicken.
Speaker 18 (26:14):
And mine has a chance to pass. Now I need
some clarification, mister President UH, parliamentary inquire if you will
do I understand that Senator Paul has objected to my
bill correctly.
Speaker 12 (26:27):
Since Kentucky asked if you would modify your wiles.
Speaker 19 (26:30):
The senator from Kentucky ask if you would modify your request.
Speaker 18 (26:34):
And he is his modification, if I might ask, is
to substitute his bill for mine.
Speaker 19 (26:40):
That is that is the understanding of the chair.
Speaker 12 (26:44):
Okay, let let's let's put a pause in that for
just a moment, and we'll come back and finish that up,
and we'll move on to other things. Interesting things going
on on Capitol Hill. Although things aren't moving at all
very rapidly, we will on this show when we come back.
Stay with us.
Speaker 21 (27:00):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance,
then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the
(27:20):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance. And it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now
(27:42):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.
Speaker 22 (27:45):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten.
Speaker 23 (28:02):
Hi, I'm Hadley, a student a Hillsdale College. Here is
President of Hillsdale College, doctor Larry arn On. The great
principle of equality set forth by the Declaration of Independence.
Speaker 24 (28:12):
The Great Abraham Lincoln described the Constitution as a picture
or frame of silver built to guard or protect an
apple of gold. This apple of gold was the Decoration
of Independence and its principle of equal rights for all.
This principle of equal rights, Lincoln said, clears the path
for all, gives hope to all, and by consequence, enterprise and.
Speaker 17 (28:31):
Industry to all.
Speaker 25 (28:32):
There are many today.
Speaker 24 (28:33):
Who seek to limit or distort this great principle by
employing a distorted definition of equality and equality of condition
or outcome, regardless how people live their lives. This distortion
if generally accepted will lead to an America less prosperous
and less free.
Speaker 23 (28:48):
This Constitution Minute was brought to you by Hillsdale College.
Speaker 8 (28:52):
Receive a free.
Speaker 23 (28:52):
Pocket constitution and declaration, go to constitutionminute dot com.
Speaker 26 (29:02):
Do you feel like you need to orchestrate big events
to create memories for your kids, We'll breathe the sigh
of relief, sister, because the little things can make a
big impact. Hi, I'm Dana Gresh, founder of Two Girls.
When we see other parents taking their kids to Disneyworld,
or buying concert tickets, or making their family a huge,
eight course home cooked meal for dinner, it's easy to
(29:24):
feel well less than don't believe the lie. Little things
done in a special way can have a big impact.
Let your kids take turns deciding which music to listen
to in the car, have a night when you all
eat under the table instead of on it. Write a
stilly joke on the bathroom mirror every Saturday morning. Surprising
(29:45):
your children with little traditions can have a big impact,
and that's a treasure money can't buy. For more tips
on how to raise your kids, go to Danagresh dot com.
Speaker 22 (30:00):
Packages start at twenty nine ninety nine a month with
sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
offer details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details. Terms and
conditions apply.
Speaker 10 (30:09):
Homeowners.
Speaker 21 (30:10):
If you're looking for the best in home security and
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivints award
winning home security systems starting at about a dollar a day.
US News and World Report has recognized vivid as the
best professionally installed home security system of twenty twenty two,
(30:30):
and right now you can get Vivins home security technology
for about a dollar a day, plus get free professional
installation from a licensed technician. Protect your home and loved
ones for as low as a dollar a day. Call
right now for your free home security consultation.
Speaker 22 (30:46):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven.
Speaker 10 (30:54):
Four to two eight one.
Speaker 22 (30:56):
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one
with a spoof.
Speaker 8 (31:02):
Go to find out what's really going on. This is
govern America.
Speaker 12 (31:15):
Welcome back to the broadcast. This is govern America. The
website for the show is Governamerica dot com. That's Governamerica
dot com. My email address is radio at Governamerica dot com.
At Vicky. You want to give your information, I'll please.
Speaker 13 (31:28):
Yeah. My website is the Technocratic Tyranny dot com. The
older website is Channelingreality dot Com. And my email address
it is on both websites, but I'll tell you what
it is anyway. It's eyes wide oope n at Channelingreality
(31:49):
dot com.
Speaker 12 (31:50):
Yeah, we're talking about the ongoing government shutdown. The Yeah.
I really had to eat crow because I started the
whole start of this yell recall. I said, what if
they have a government shutdown and nobody noticed? Boy, they
sure have proven me wrong on that. A lot of people.
Everybody's talking about this now because it's dragged on for
(32:11):
so long, and it is impacting some people in the
country and has the potential, as we've pointed out in
recent broadcasts, to affect a whole lot more people. Because
if the food programs that people have become accustomed to
or dependent upon, rightfully or wrongfully, some some rightfully, some wrongfully,
(32:33):
it's never good. It's never a good idea to be
dependent upon the government for anything. But I get it.
Some people can't work. They have handicaps, they have disabilities,
whatever the case. But there's a whole lot of people
on these programs that certainly can put their pants on
every day and go to work.
Speaker 13 (32:51):
They just believe. What I believe is that they replect
when they gutted our economy. What they did was to
replace private sector jobs with uh government welfare type jobs,
(33:14):
you know, the community social programs that they have in
your community. That I do believe that they actually replaced
private sector employment with these government programs. Yeah, and so
(33:36):
that's why there's so many people that are dependent on
those programs. So rather rather than being able to that's
why they're lobbying so hard, you know, for the government
to restart.
Speaker 12 (33:56):
Yeah, it's only going to get worse to you know,
the more of these types of mayors and elected officials
like Kami man Donnie you know in New York City.
He just got elected mayor. At least that's the official story.
I don't know what the ranked choice voting system that
they have there, whether or not he actually got elected.
(34:18):
But somebody posted in fact, I retweeted it on my
Twitter account or x that they have you know with
this is they they were showing pictures inside the subway
of New York City, and they said, you want to
know how Mam Donnie got elected, this is how. This
(34:40):
is the electorate. And it's got people swinging from the
ceiling of the subway, it's got people fur ease coming on,
it's got you know, somebody was on a leash crawling
into the subway, the least being held by another party.
They got all these crazy lunatic people on the subway.
And they just did an tage of all these types
(35:01):
of videos that people have shot of the New York
subway and the whack job lunatic people that are coming
on there. And so when you look at that and
you see, oh, okay, those are the types of people
that are voting. Yeah, it doesn't you know, it doesn't
inspire hope that there's going to be any real substantive change.
Speaker 13 (35:22):
And so there's no way to audit that vote. It
extends the election out for weeks.
Speaker 12 (35:31):
And that's exactly the reason why they want to do it. Yeah, yeah,
that's exactly why they want to do it. And the
Democrats here in Michigan are pushing that they're wanting to
do ranked choice voting here in Michigan as well.
Speaker 13 (35:43):
Yeah, sounds like a good idea.
Speaker 12 (35:45):
But when you really think it doesn't sound like a
good idea to me, well.
Speaker 13 (35:49):
It well it's a terrible idea, yes, thank you. Yeah, Well,
the idea of always having this choice or that choice.
And if you're a person like me and you think
they both suck, it doesn't matter you got to vote
for one.
Speaker 12 (36:10):
You don't have to. You can just vote not vote
for that particular thing. If you don't like either candidate,
just don't vote for the either candidate you can vote for.
There's other things on the ballot. To show up for,
all your local stuff, the proposals. Usually there's proposals there.
There's a lot of things. I always show up to
(36:31):
vote against the tax milages every time because they're always
trying to put their hand in my wallet more and
more all the time. I don't care what the issue is.
You know, the Jackson County Police Department here wants a
new jailhouse, and apparently it's gotten pretty bad over there there.
They got sewage leaking and dripping on people, desk workers
(36:54):
and stuff.
Speaker 13 (36:54):
Yeah, like they can't call a plumber.
Speaker 12 (36:56):
Well, I don't know. You know, they're offering to get
people tours of the facility. So I'm sure it's probably
really bad, but I can't encumber my own property to
fund your jail. I'm sorry. Find another way.
Speaker 13 (37:14):
They're rebuilding our country to implement the technocratic tyranny. Bill
Clinton's program on protecting critical infrastructure that was to focus
on information systems to control our infrastructure. And of course,
(37:38):
once they controlled your infrastructure, they've got you by the
short hairs.
Speaker 12 (37:43):
Yeah. Yeah, well that's the thing. And I'm thinking part
of this, we're talking about government shutdown. I'm thinking, you know,
everybody needs to keep their eyes peeled for privatization schemes,
you know, as I got something on that here in
a moment, but in trumple was asked about that at
the Oval office by a Fox News reporter. We'll get
(38:04):
to that in a moment, but first let me just
finish up with John Kennedy and then we'll go to
the phones. And got a call on the waiting in
the wings. But John Kennedy and Ran Paul going back
and forth on whether or not Congress should get paid
during the government shutdown.
Speaker 18 (38:20):
Okay, I have said I will not substitute his bill
from my.
Speaker 19 (38:25):
Objection to the modification it's heard, objection to the modification
is heard. Is there an objection to the original request?
Speaker 17 (38:32):
Reserving the rights President consider from Kentucky reserving the right
to object.
Speaker 20 (38:40):
I think it's actually not clear at all that the
President wouldn't sign a bill to continue paying federal workers.
Speaker 12 (38:46):
I think it's actually.
Speaker 20 (38:47):
A universal sentiment among both parties, among the American people,
particularly among the soldiers, that we ought to continue to
pay the soldiers, continue to pay the workers. I'm perhaps
the most conservative member of the Senate.
Speaker 12 (39:00):
I vote cut spending on everything. I think we spay went.
I think we spend way too much.
Speaker 20 (39:04):
But I'm not for cutting the salaries of people who
have a contract and who are doing their work now.
Speaker 12 (39:09):
I probably would not.
Speaker 20 (39:11):
Hire new people, and I would probably let the federal
government shrink gradually.
Speaker 12 (39:14):
Through Attrician I'm not sure he's talking about cutting the
contract workers. He's talking about Congress, Isn't he Isn't it
funny how Rand Paul is kind of broadening what.
Speaker 13 (39:25):
I don't know, play that again, because I thought he
was talking about contractors.
Speaker 12 (39:30):
Okay, I don't want to play the entire thing. Let
me see if I can.
Speaker 20 (39:34):
I vote to cut spending on everything. I think we
spay went. I think we spend way too much. But
I'm not for cutting the salaries of people who have
a contract and who are doing their work.
Speaker 12 (39:43):
Now.
Speaker 20 (39:44):
I probably would not hire new people, and I would
probably let the federal government shrink gradually through attrician because
I think we need to be smaller them. But if
you work for government, you're doing your job, and you
have a contract, I think you ought to be paid.
So I don't think it's not clear that the President
wouldn't support this. I think it's actually quite confusing that
this is being objected by the Democrats, and I think
(40:05):
actually be nice to let the Democrats, you know, have
around at this and explain to us why they don't
want to pay their traffic controllers. Look, we can have
a dispute over spending. I think the Republican proposal spends
too much. I think the Democrat proposal spends too much.
But I think we got to pay the workers while
we're working out the debate over what the spending level
ought to be.
Speaker 12 (40:24):
I think it's actually an untenable.
Speaker 20 (40:26):
Position of Democrats to come before this body and say, oh,
we want to give subsidies to people who make two
hundred and twenty.
Speaker 12 (40:33):
Five thousand dollars a year. That's what they're arguing for them.
Speaker 20 (40:36):
The Obamacare subsidies are not the basic subsidies. These are
add on subsidies that started two years ago. If you
make one hundred thousand dollars a year, the Democrats want
to give you thirteen thousand. Meanwhile, people who make twenty
thousand and are on food stamps are not going to
get food stamps. But somebody making one hundred thousand is
going to get fifty thirteen thousand dollars.
Speaker 12 (40:57):
That doesn't sound like the Democrats.
Speaker 17 (40:59):
Are for the working class or for the poor.
Speaker 20 (41:02):
Sounds like the Democrats are for people making two hundred
thousand dollars a year to get a subsidie.
Speaker 17 (41:07):
But I think in the midst of all this.
Speaker 20 (41:09):
With pressure, I think the Democrats could be made to
understand and support paying the government workers. I mean, I
just think it is something eminently reasonable. I think it
is something very passable, and I don't see the President
objecting to this. I think the President would sign this
in a heartbeat. So I object objections heard.
Speaker 17 (41:31):
Mister, that's for clarification.
Speaker 18 (41:34):
I have offered him a bill a bill to say
that Congress does not get paid like everybody else is
not being paid. Diurner setting down. There's been a little
bit back and forth. Is is I understand it Sactor
Paul is objected to that bill.
Speaker 17 (41:49):
Is that correct?
Speaker 19 (41:50):
The Center from Kentucky objected to your unanimous consent request.
Speaker 18 (41:54):
To my bill to keep to psy Congress isn't paid
Diurner shut down.
Speaker 17 (41:58):
It's not correct the.
Speaker 19 (42:00):
Bill you ask unanimous consent to pass. The objected to
the nanos consent.
Speaker 17 (42:04):
I want to bring up my second bill.
Speaker 18 (42:06):
It's called the Withhold Member Pay during Shutdowns Act.
Speaker 12 (42:10):
Okay, so this is what this is the part two
I was telling you about. Okay, he introduced the bill.
The first bill said that they wouldn't get their back pay,
and you said that's the poison pill. But he's got
another bill where they could get their back pay.
Speaker 18 (42:29):
Remember my first bill that Senator Paul objected to would
have said members of Congress don't get paid, just like
our staffs don't get paid, just like air traffic controllers
don't get paid, just like the military doesn't get paid.
Speaker 17 (42:44):
We don't get paid.
Speaker 18 (42:46):
Until the shutdown is lifted, and we don't get our
money in arrears. In other words, we don't recoup our
money wants to shut down is lifted. Perhaps Senator Paul
will find my second bill to be more palatable to
him and his pocketbook.
Speaker 17 (43:03):
The Withhold Member Paid during.
Speaker 18 (43:05):
Shutdowns Act would say, while we're in the shutdown and
everyone else is not being paid, Congress would not be paid,
but members of Congress, including Senator Paul, including me, including
all members of Congress, would have the right to get
(43:25):
the money back, to be paid after they're out of
the shutdown. In other words, the money would be x
road and they would get it once we came out
of the shutdown again.
Speaker 17 (43:36):
There is there is precedent for that.
Speaker 18 (43:41):
I talked about what Senator Obama did back in twenty
and thirteen, and for that reason, mister President, I'm going
to ask unanimous consent on that one. I asked you
animals consent that the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs be discharged from further consideration of S.
Speaker 17 (44:01):
Three to five seven. Is that the right bill number?
Speaker 18 (44:06):
Okay, he's not the right bill number, Mountain Clark, you don't.
Speaker 17 (44:11):
Know, Okay, Yes, S.
Speaker 18 (44:15):
Three oh five to seven, And the Senate proceeds its
immediate consideration. I further asked that the bill be considered
read a third time in pasted, and that the motion
to reconsidered to reconsider be considered made and laid upon
the table.
Speaker 19 (44:29):
Is there objection was President Jerk has a center from Kentucky.
Speaker 12 (44:33):
There you go, and he objects again. So he can't
even agree to that.
Speaker 13 (44:41):
Yeah, Rand Paul is a true believer.
Speaker 14 (44:46):
You know.
Speaker 13 (44:46):
He he has a rigid set of beliefs, and I
don't believe there's any flexibility. And as far as I'm concerned,
there's nothing worse than a true believer because they they
don't use reason, they use their own dogma, and it's inflexible.
Speaker 12 (45:13):
And I know he's a true believer that he should
he should get paid. But you know, here's the thing.
You know, I get a problem. I have a problem.
I had a problem with his dad too. When his
dad was you know, Ron Paul. I was one of
the few Patriot broadcasters that would criticize Ron Paul. But
I had a problem with Ron Paul because every single
(45:36):
time the most favored nation trading status for communist China
would come up, Ron Paul would be a yes vote.
And nothing has destroyed this country worse than having MFN
for communist China, and what's MFN. You know every country
who is in the group, in the trading group. But
(45:58):
you know, and you talk about a rigid set of beliefs.
That's what I think it really is is he doesn't
want tariffs because they're libertarian. They want to remove tariffs
on imports. But the problem with tariff removal is globalization.
In my opinion, all these libertarians like Peter Teele, same thing.
(46:21):
He's a globalist, but he's against he's against all of
this stuff because they're all in favor of open borders,
free movement of goods and services and human capital and
all that stuff. Everything moves freely. We don't want to
tax anything, including imports on goods and services. The problem
is when you have a big corporations are free to
(46:44):
import without any kind of tariff on what the import,
you have a global race to the bottom. And that's
what this country has suffered from go ahead.
Speaker 13 (46:55):
And it's not just American corporations, it's multinational corporations. So
I really think that libertarians are traders to our country
because it doesn't take a whole lot of brain power
to figure out got a billion and a half people
in China, got about one point two one point three
(47:18):
billion people in India. And if their corporations are just
free to import, I mean they swamped our economy. This
is what they did, and it's still going on. They
they have moderated it a little bit, but I think
(47:40):
it's voluntary moderation, not enforced moderation, because they were killing
our country.
Speaker 12 (47:50):
Yeah, and the Supreme Court, by the way, I should note,
is hearing the tariff measure right now, whether Trump can
do tariffs imposed tariffs, and so that's that's before the court.
I have not had a chance to look and see
if there's been any movement on that yet, but that
is my understanding right now that it's currently before the court.
(48:12):
All right, let's go to the phone. Six ten, six
hundred seventeen seventy six. Is the number six ten, six
hundred seventeen seventy six or toll free eight four four
six four six eight three seven six. That's eight four
four six govern Art in Georgia's on the line. Go ahead, Art.
Speaker 27 (48:28):
Hey, Darren, First of all, I saw that video on
your tool.
Speaker 12 (48:34):
Well yeah, yeah, thanks for posting that into the chat room.
Speaker 27 (48:38):
I think My favorite one is Banana Man.
Speaker 12 (48:42):
What he's talking about. I just mentioned a moment ago
about the h the wakadoos that are on the New
York subway system, and there's just a montage of videos
where people have shot the different loonies. You know, you
got you got puppies licking people in the face as
they read things on their smartphone. You've got mice crawling
(49:02):
around on people's necks, and then they just keep looking
at their smartphone like it's nothing even going on. I mean,
it's just like a normal day in New York, you.
Speaker 27 (49:10):
Know what that I don't know what that green fuzzy
thing was, my God, And people wonder why I have
not been to New York, and probably I think about
twenty years.
Speaker 12 (49:23):
Yeah, I've never been to New York. But after seeing
a lot of this stuff, I remember David Letterman many
years ago talking about the rats, how bad they were.
So it just sounds like the place has really gone down,
and it just it continues to go down, and it's
not going to get any better with a communist in charge,
because that's what you know. It's it's amazing to me
(49:46):
how people think that when you do communism, you know
the answer solving the problems that communism creates is to
do more communism.
Speaker 13 (49:57):
Yeah, you know, I don't recalls. I know that in
New York they were going down hill, and until Rudy
Giuliani came in as mayor, Rudy Giuliani really cleaned up
at least Manhattan.
Speaker 5 (50:19):
Now.
Speaker 13 (50:19):
I didn't go out to the Burroughs. I went out
to Brooklyn once and once was enough. But I stayed
in Manhattan, And so I guess I was living in
an area that was very well maintained.
Speaker 12 (50:36):
Yeah, that's so I didn't.
Speaker 13 (50:37):
I didn't really see rats in the subway.
Speaker 12 (50:40):
And and and to be honest, there's a lot of
problems that we can say about Juliani, but that was
my understanding too, is mayor he did. He did clean
some stuff up in New York City. Why these other
jokers don't do that? Uh, clearly, it can be done, Clearly, I.
Speaker 13 (50:57):
Don't think they want to. They No, the people that
are being elected in the bigger cities, they are part
of the Global Cities Network under the United Nations mm hm,
the United Nations as a division on cities.
Speaker 12 (51:18):
Yep, it does. Yeah, absolutely, and we should we should
revisit that. Wait, that's go ahead, go ahead.
Speaker 27 (51:23):
Art that that's not That's not really what I called
in about. But I just wanted to comment on that
video real quick. Yeah, I actually called in about two
different things. I originally I wanted to talk mention, talk
about the snap the snap thing, and the this uh
what is it judge out of uh out of Maine.
I think it was ordering Trump to pay Snap, but
(51:47):
that's not in Trump's Trump doesn't have any authority on that,
So I don't know what that judge is talking about.
But you already mentioned that. So that leaves me with
two topics. The first one is New York just so
like a socialist, communist, Marxist, Islamist, Muslim socialist as mayor.
(52:09):
And I found it very interesting that not even twenty
four hours after he won the election, he goes on
does a a press conference where he says, I know
I told people to stop donating, blah blah blah blah,
(52:30):
but now I'm asking people to once again begin to donate.
I'll tell you why he's doing this. People are already
now since he's won, people are already talking about leaving
New York.
Speaker 12 (52:42):
Well, they're already doing it.
Speaker 27 (52:43):
Well, they're planning, They're they're planning on they're getting they're
going they're already planning on getting out of New York
because they're not going to put up with this crap.
Who's going to be left the middle and the middle
and upper middle class people, they're going to be the
ones who are now going to be taxed to pay
for all of this stuff. And that's also why he
now needs donations to pay for his agenda. This is
(53:05):
how socialism works. What we are going to see now
gonna I've already predicted all of this. Now it's everything
I said was going to happen is already happening. So
now here's what I'm going to say, and let's see
if I'm right. First, we're going to see Wall Street
will begin to suffer. There are going to be major
(53:25):
impact on Wall Street, and I would not be surprised.
I don't know if this is possible. Maybe you can
help me out here, but what do you think the
possibility is that Wall Street may end up relocating to
another city, in another state, somewhere that is safer.
Speaker 12 (53:48):
Well, you know, it's funny that you mentioned that, because
I was just having this conversation with Mark and Texas yesterday.
Speaker 27 (53:53):
New York being with New York being our financial capital
of our nation, I don't see how he can continue
to function as it is under a socialist Islamist program.
I don't see how it's even possible.
Speaker 12 (54:13):
Yeah, my understanding is that there is a uh and
I don't haven't looked deeply into it, so I have
to put that as a disclaimer. But there is a
movement to or a push. I guess they're setting up
some sort of a stock exchange or something like that
in Texas, and maybe somebody else can call in if
(54:34):
they know more about that. I know market Texas. He
and I were talking about this just yesterday, So it's
possible that it might move move to Texas. I don't know.
I don't there's a there's I'm not sure what all
would be involved in that, but I know that they
have plenty of money, so they could move wherever they
(54:55):
want to move.
Speaker 13 (54:58):
Well, confuses me because they Wall Street. There was already
an exodus from Wall Street, which is what put the
World Trade Center at financial basically financial bankruptcy, and so
(55:23):
that already occurred. Now they still have, of course the
stock Exchange building. But the Wall Street Brokers they left Manhattan.
Speaker 28 (55:35):
You know.
Speaker 12 (55:37):
Here's the thing, VI. Here's the thing, VICKI. It doesn't
really even matter where they're located anymore because a lot
of the transactions that take place, as far as the
market is concerned, are done online now. So really exactly,
I think largely it's inconsequential where it actually exists in
the physical world. Do you have anything else there?
Speaker 27 (55:59):
I believe New York is about you know, they've left
around and now they're about to find out and it's
just New York is gonna go down to Prepper and
everybody is going to see that Web socialism has never
been done correctly, but we can do it right. Yeah,
it doesn't work. Yea has worked all right now with respect.
Speaker 12 (56:19):
To I got to take the break, but I'm just
saying if I can get that down. Yeah, Unfortunately we
got ten seconds prior to the break. So stay with us.
You're gonna have to call back too, because you're breaking
up really bad. Stay with us, folks, our number two
of governor America. Straight ahead, don't go away.
Speaker 21 (56:35):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance,
then call the cheap car insurance hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the
(56:55):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now
(57:17):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.
Speaker 22 (57:20):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh that's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten. Packages start at twenty nine
ninety nine a month with sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak
to a representative for complete off for details seeviivent dot
(57:42):
com for licensed details. Terms and conditions apply.
Speaker 21 (57:44):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford.
We have great news. Now you can get Vivins Award
winning home security systems starting at about a dollar a day.
US News and World Report has read recognized Vivid as
the best professionally installed home security system of twenty twenty two.
(58:05):
And right now you can get Vivin's home security technology
for about a dollar a day, plus get free professional
installation from a licensed technician. Protect your home and loved
ones for as low as a dollar a day. Call
right now for your free home security consultation.
Speaker 22 (58:21):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty.
Speaker 14 (58:34):
One two.
Speaker 29 (58:46):
Rest signs.
Speaker 30 (59:02):
For American Family News.
Speaker 10 (59:03):
I'm Robert Gorton.
Speaker 30 (59:04):
A bill to pay federal workers impacted by the government
shutdown fails in the Senate once again. More from Fox's
Chad Pergram.
Speaker 31 (59:11):
Democrats blocked a bill by GOP Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson
to pay all federal workers. Democrats objected, so the shutdown deepens.
As the Senate stares at weekend sessions. The Democrats move
infuriated Senate Majority Leader John Thune.
Speaker 30 (59:28):
We're going to keep federal employees hostage.
Speaker 31 (59:31):
Thun is drafting a bill to fund the government through
sometime in January. The bill would also reopen the Departments
of Agriculture and Veterans Affairs, plus it provides money for
Congress for nearly a year. Democrats offered a plan to
fund the government, but it also renews Obamacare money on
a temporary basis.
Speaker 30 (59:51):
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer says the Democrats offer addresses
both positions while creating new pathways negotiating an even longer
healthcare extension. According to the flight tracking website flight aware,
there were at least four thousand plus flight delays and
nine hundred and seventy five cancellations within arriving in or
departing the US. Plenty of nervousness remained as more cancel
(01:00:14):
flights are expected in the coming days to comply with
the Federal Aviation Administration's order to reduce service at the
busiest airports. President Donald Trump accused foreign owned meat packers
of driving up the price of beef in the US
and asked the Department of Justice to open an investigation.
The President made the announcement on social media. He said
we will always protect our American ranchers and that they
(01:00:36):
are being blamed for what is being done by foreign
owned meat packers and that they inflate prices artificially. White
House Prices Secretary Caroline Levitt ripped into a mainstream media
reporter at a meeting between President Donald Trump and Hungarian
Prime Minister Victor Orbond. The Prime minister said he wanted
to hire Levitt.
Speaker 32 (01:00:54):
And I've been watching the TV all day saying that
he doesn't want to talk about affordability. That's what he's
working on every day, and that's what this ministry been
doing now.
Speaker 33 (01:01:02):
But you know why they refused to cover it connect
because they're fake news.
Speaker 17 (01:01:05):
That's why I got sure.
Speaker 33 (01:01:09):
Caroline, the Prime Minister would like you to work for
him in Hungary political Please go see you know what, that's.
Speaker 17 (01:01:17):
A very good decision.
Speaker 33 (01:01:18):
You just mean, please, please, please don't leave us, Caroline.
Speaker 30 (01:01:22):
Trump is working to bring Ukraine and Russia to the
negotiating table and hungry to end the war. Generation Z
those between the ages of thirteen and twenty eight, are
the least religious generation.
Speaker 10 (01:01:33):
In American history.
Speaker 30 (01:01:34):
According to data compiled by a Christian political scientist and
statistician here's AFN Steve Jordal.
Speaker 34 (01:01:40):
For each successive generation since the Baby Boomers, the percentage
of Americans who profess no religion has been growing from
nineteen percent of Boomers those between sixty one and seventy
nine to forty three percent of Gen Z teenagers and
young adults. That according to data compiled by political scientists
and author Ryan Burge, Doctor Alex McFarland, Truth for a
(01:02:00):
New Generation says, despite strong anecdotal evidence of a youth revival,
the data show that a once devout Christian nation is
a mere shadow of itself.
Speaker 35 (01:02:09):
By God's grace, there's a saint echo, this dying aroma
of some Christian past that with a little effort we
can remind people of and call them back to it.
Speaker 34 (01:02:23):
But he says, the trends are in the wrong direction.
Speaker 35 (01:02:26):
Many more elections like November of twenty five, and the
shadow of the shadow, the residue of the residue, it
will be gone.
Speaker 34 (01:02:36):
That's not to say the world hasn't seen the pendulum
swing back and forth with regard to belief and faith
in God.
Speaker 35 (01:02:42):
There have been plenty of would be anti Christ, and
yet the Church ministered and soldiered on. And we are
to do that too.
Speaker 34 (01:02:51):
McFarland says, we as Christians, need to do the work
God has set before us, and let Him take care
of the percentages.
Speaker 35 (01:02:57):
Things do look bad and things are add but nevertheless,
we don't quit because we don't know. I mean, Christ
may come very very soon, or it may be another century.
Speaker 30 (01:03:11):
A big jail is ahead for the East and southeast
US in the coming days. Record loads are possible across
the Southeast by Tuesday morning. Some locations of forecasts to
come close to tie or break record low temperatures by mornings.
Speaker 36 (01:03:24):
At AFN NET, we have before us the opportunity to
forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world.
Speaker 2 (01:03:38):
Order, new world for that new world order.
Speaker 3 (01:03:40):
This is a moment to cease. The glyde escape has
been shaken. The pieces are in flux.
Speaker 4 (01:03:46):
Soon they will settle again.
Speaker 10 (01:03:47):
Before they do.
Speaker 22 (01:03:49):
Let us reorder this world around us.
Speaker 5 (01:03:51):
A new world order, a world for the United Nations,
is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.
Speaker 6 (01:03:57):
Nevertheless, of the United States that did make key position
to shape is so that the problem of the prensidicity
will be the invergence of a new international order the.
Speaker 7 (01:04:10):
First decade of the twenty first centuries. But out of
what is will be seen as the greatest restructuring of
the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy, greatest
restructuring of the global economy, a new.
Speaker 4 (01:04:22):
World order was created.
Speaker 8 (01:04:26):
Documenting the crasis of our rebublic.
Speaker 9 (01:04:28):
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and
open society, and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed to secret societies, the secret oaths and a secret.
Speaker 10 (01:04:42):
Proceedings waiting war on the new world order.
Speaker 4 (01:04:45):
The councils of government.
Speaker 11 (01:04:47):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought, by the military industrial conflict.
Speaker 8 (01:04:57):
This is govern America. Darren Weeks and Vicky.
Speaker 12 (01:05:01):
Davis from Faber Regions five to ten. This is the
second hour of Governor America. Continues to be the eighth
of November twenty twenty five. As we get right back
into the show here, I took the opportunity to look
up during the break the question to try to answer
the question as to whether Texas was setting up its
(01:05:23):
own market and stock market type of deal to compete
with the New York Stock Exchange, and in fact that
is actually happening. So The Texas Tribune reported that the
Texas Stock Exchange on Tuesday crossed its latest hurdle toward
becoming a direct competitor to the dominance of the New
(01:05:45):
York Stock Exchange and the NASDAC. The announcement that the
US Securities and Exchange Commission had approved the Dallas based
startup to operate as a national exchange was met with
celebration by tech As lawmakers, including Governor Greg Abbott, who
declared Texas is swiftly becoming America's financial hub. The hype
(01:06:08):
around the Texas Stock Exchange or TXSE pronounced Taxi, has
been building since June of twenty twenty four, so this
has been going on for a while under my radar.
The announcement came that month, June twenty twenty four, that
the exchange was intended to launch with one hundred twenty
(01:06:31):
million dollars in backing from investment large firms Oh Boy,
and of course naturally firms like Black Rock and Citadel Securities,
making it one of the most well funded attempts at
a new national exchange in decades. So anyway, you know,
I find it's interesting interesting. Now, will that replace the
(01:06:52):
New York Stock Exchange, No, but it will be a
competitor to the Kami Memdani Exchange in New York City.
Speaker 13 (01:07:03):
So yeah, you know what, I don't even know why
the Stock exchange still exists because it's all computerized.
Speaker 12 (01:07:11):
Well, it's all markets. It's markets and determining market prices
of things. It's a place where companies can go and share,
you know, sell shares of their companies. Well, I like,
I kind of maybe maybe I'm wrong here. I kind
of look at it as kind of a grocery store
or a department store for shares of companies.
Speaker 13 (01:07:33):
Well the yeah, but the thing is is that it's
all computerized, and so the fastest computer wins. Yeah, so
you know, I thought they should have just broken it
up a long time ago.
Speaker 12 (01:07:52):
People can make money off of it. I know a
lot of people in the Patriot efforts say you're going
to lose your shirt, and you can lose your shirt too,
But there's ways to make money. I mean basically, if
you if you buy good solid companies, uh and and
you know, they say diversified, diversified, diversify, So don't just
(01:08:12):
put all your eggs in one basket, so to speak.
You assuming that the overall economy is growing, then you
can over time, you know, with the companies you make money,
and you know there's ups and downs along the way,
and even diversifying outside the American economy. You can buy
(01:08:32):
stocks from European companies or Asian companies or whatever. You know.
But and this is the basis of a lot of
people's retirement funds. You know, people have four oh one
k's and stuff like that that uh, they you know,
more and more people are are invested somehow in the market.
I don't think it hasn't really been all that that way.
(01:08:54):
You know, people used to I think, start a job
and work their entire life lives and not really have
any kind of retirement savings.
Speaker 13 (01:09:05):
So they put four one ks in. I believe it
was the early nineteen eighties when they first Now they
may have called it something else, but that was the idea,
is that your company would start a fund and you
(01:09:26):
contribute to that fund and they invested.
Speaker 14 (01:09:29):
Right.
Speaker 12 (01:09:30):
Yeah, let me let me get back to the phone,
because Art has had another point, and he's still on hold. Hello, Art,
go ahead and make your second point.
Speaker 27 (01:09:39):
Please, Yeah, hopefully you can hear me better now I
can at the moment. Well, let's hope to stay that way.
You mentioned earlier about members of Congress for going their
paychecks during the shutdown. Well, people, people might be interesting knowing,
(01:10:01):
and I have the full list. There are currently thirty
senators and representatives who have officially filed the paperwork to
confirm that they are going to either forego or donate
their pay.
Speaker 12 (01:10:18):
Yeah, okay, shutdown continues. I'm glad you mentioned that because
I was wondering about that. I do know. I think
I might have mentioned earlier in the show that Marjorie
Taylor Green, being one of those that has been making
the rounds on the media shows, she mentioned on the
View that she had foregoed her payments while the shutdown
was taking place. I don't know if they intend to
go back and get it afterwards, like being reimbursed or
(01:10:42):
whatever for the back pay, but she's one of the ones.
I don't know, but I was wondering how many others
had done that.
Speaker 27 (01:10:49):
It's very interesting. Of these thirty senators and representatives, ten
of them are Democrats and Marjorie Taylor's Marjorie Taylor Green's
name is not on this list. Oh really, huh so
that means that she has not filed official paperwork at all,
(01:11:12):
which tells.
Speaker 12 (01:11:13):
Me, well, no, blow, no, no, did you say they
were senators? Those are the senators that you're looking at, though,
because she's a representative.
Speaker 27 (01:11:21):
They're both sent there's both senators and okay, presentatives. There
are four senators and twenty six representatives.
Speaker 12 (01:11:32):
Okay, well that's a discreption.
Speaker 27 (01:11:33):
It is not on this list.
Speaker 12 (01:11:35):
Hhmm. Interesting. I don't know what to make of that.
I would hope she wouldn't lie like that.
Speaker 27 (01:11:41):
I'll post I'll post the link to that in the chat.
Speaker 12 (01:11:45):
Okay, sounds good. I appreciate it. Thank you so much. Yep, yep,
God bless all. I talk to you later. And there
goes art in Georgia. Well, that's interesting and a little sad.
If in fact she's pulling up I.
Speaker 13 (01:12:02):
Would look for an explanation because she's pretty.
Speaker 12 (01:12:06):
Well, that's pretty blatant. I mean, it isn't like people
can't check that out right, So I guess.
Speaker 13 (01:12:12):
She seems to me to be pretty much of a
straight arrow for what she expresses that she believes in.
I haven't always agreed with her, yeah, but you know.
Speaker 12 (01:12:27):
In some of her problems. I think we've been a
little bit critical of her at times because she's been
a little bit petty, shall we say, about certain things.
But anyway, getting back to this, you know, the question
(01:12:47):
of whether or not the end of filibuster is in
going with a simple majority vote. You know, I think
that it's way past time. Unfortunately, they've tried to do
that too. Senator Ted Cruz recently said that did the
votes just start there?
Speaker 37 (01:13:02):
I'm sure you're at the Republican breakfast with President Trump,
all right, he wants to end the philibuster, okay, and
he's you know, campaigning on it, talking about it, tweeting
on it. You talk to you all at the breakfast meeting.
What does Senator Ted Cruz think about this?
Speaker 38 (01:13:20):
Look, the votes are not there to end the filibuster.
Speaker 10 (01:13:23):
It is not.
Speaker 38 (01:13:24):
Every president of our lifetime has wanted to end the
filibuster because if you want to move legislation through, the
filibuster necessarily slows things down. I can tell you that
when Joe Biden was in the White House and Democrats
had the House and Senate. It is only the filibuster
that stopped us from absolute devastation.
Speaker 12 (01:13:43):
All right, So take that with whatever you want to
take it. With the filibuster ending is not going to happen, apparently.
Speaker 13 (01:13:51):
Yeah, well, I have very mixed feelings about that. I know,
it seems to me like that they could modify it
such that it's not just one senator, but you know,
maybe half of the senators of a party or something.
(01:14:14):
But just one senator being able to shut down the
business of the Senate I think is pretty absurd.
Speaker 12 (01:14:22):
Well, the whole thing is absurd, and something has got
to be done. I mean, this can't go on this way.
It just can't. You know, you got Chuck Schumer out
there putting forward laughable proposals. Just give us everything we
want for a year, and then we'll reopen the GOP.
Speaker 39 (01:14:39):
After so many failed votes, it's clear we need to
try something different. What the Senate is doing isn't working
for either party and isn't working for the American people.
Democrats have said we must address the health care crisis,
but Republicans have repeatedly said they won't negotiate to lower
(01:14:59):
the health care costs. Until the government reopens, So let's
find a path to honor both positions. Democrats would like
to see an end to this shutdown, and we want
to respect Leader Thun's desire not to negotiate on ACA
until after the government reopens. Therefore, we'd like to offer
(01:15:20):
a simple proposal that would reopen the government and extend
the ACA premium tax credits simultaneously, and then have the
opportunity to start negotiating longer term solutions to healthcare costs.
Let's do all three. I've spoken with my caucus, and
(01:15:42):
Democrats are offering a very simple compromise. Democrats are ready
to clear the way to quickly pass a government funding
bill that includes healthcare affordability. Leader Thun just needs to
add a clean one year extension of the ACA tax
credits to this so that we can immediately address rising
(01:16:03):
healthcare costs. That's not a negotiation, it's an extension of
current law, something we do all the time around here to.
Speaker 12 (01:16:12):
In other words, just give us everything we want, kick
the can down the road a year, give us everything
we want, and then we'll talk to you. Yeah, that's
what you're saying. I mean, as I see it, it's
terrible as the situation is. The Republicans can't give in.
They can't give in on this, right, You're never going
(01:16:33):
to fix anything if you give in on this, and
boy will their base be pissed if they do. Oh yeah,
So it goes on, you know, with neither side willing
to give an inch, and you know a lot of
how they are being expended, but nothing substantive ever even happening. Now.
(01:16:56):
I mentioned earlier that one of the things that people
need to keep an eye out for during this government
shut down is the dialectic for privatization, the privatization of
the TSA, the air traffic controllers, other functions of government,
because as the government becomes more dysfunctional, the calls might
well become louder and maybe well, it does present the dialectic,
(01:17:20):
the dialectic for functions to be privatized.
Speaker 13 (01:17:25):
I thought, I thought they already were privatized.
Speaker 12 (01:17:29):
I don't know that that's what they're talking about now. Well,
their government employees. And do you want pollunteer running your airports?
Speaker 13 (01:17:41):
No volunteer running anything.
Speaker 12 (01:17:45):
Well, that's what could happen under some kind of proposal
like that. Brian Glenn of Fox News asked Trump what
he thought about the privatization at the airports, and for now,
for now, I'm happy to say Trump does and seem interested.
Speaker 2 (01:18:00):
In regards to TSA. Would you ever consider privatizing TSA?
Speaker 21 (01:18:05):
That question comes to us from our viewers all the time,
and I told.
Speaker 2 (01:18:08):
Them I would ask you.
Speaker 33 (01:18:10):
I think of privatizing a lot of things. But generally speaking,
you know, you have government, and a lot of people
don't like privatizing, but some things that they really do,
they work out better privatize. But it is government, and
sometimes government can be better.
Speaker 2 (01:18:27):
It's something a lot of people talk about.
Speaker 33 (01:18:28):
I've heard that government as far as air traffic controllers
is two thumbs up on that. I've heard from dozens
of pilots who have flown the last ninety days, particularly.
Speaker 4 (01:18:37):
Under all the stress of the governmentship.
Speaker 33 (01:18:39):
Right, they tell me, Brian, that is the one thing
the government does right is air traffic controls.
Speaker 10 (01:18:43):
Well, we're gonna do it a.
Speaker 33 (01:18:44):
Lot better too, because we're going to buy a new system.
It's under bid right now about four different companies, all
the top of the line, like these two great companies,
except you know, in a different, slightly different field.
Speaker 12 (01:18:56):
Okay, now, what he is talking about. There is the
air traftic You remember, the air trafft control systems kept crashing.
The whole thing. The system kept crashing and causing delays
and havoc, and uh, you know, they didn't have their
radars in place while there were planes in the air,
and it was a very dangerous situation. And they're talking
about trying to fix that now. And Trump is talking
(01:19:17):
about fiber optics. He said glass, We can't have glass
going into copper, which that granted, it's not optimal to
have fiber optics going into copper, but companies do it
all the time. They oh yeah, yeah, the Internet that
(01:19:39):
I am talking to you on right now is writing
on copper, which goes to fiber optics. Okay, you have
certain things that are you know, you know, the so
basically the last mile type of deal or the last
you know, to the to the final destination. A lot
of times it's cop but you know, as long as
(01:20:02):
it and as long as it's straight fiber optics, you know,
you don't have a lot of twists and turns and bends.
Fiber optics don't like bins because it needs to be straight.
But you know, it can be anyway. The bottom line
is is that apparently they have a lot of that
with the airports right now, and it's just because the
(01:20:24):
technology is older. Things have been upgraded since then. But
an anyway, they're trying to trying to fix some.
Speaker 33 (01:20:29):
Of that now and the air traffic control equipment is
forty five years old.
Speaker 10 (01:20:36):
Buddha deads.
Speaker 33 (01:20:37):
You spent billions of dollars trying to fix it and
didn't even use the right wire. You looking up glass
into copper and you can't do that. You know, most
if they went to a reasonably good school to find
out you can't help glass into copper, and they spend
billions of dollars that it was actually made the system
much worse. We're going to get rid of the entire system,
(01:20:58):
put a brand new system in. It'll be expensive, but
we'll have the best air control system many you know,
the control towers. They'll be stripped down down to the
down to the bone, and brand new equipment is being
install and we'll give out that it's a big contract.
We'll give out that contract over the next six weeks.
Speaker 12 (01:21:18):
Volunteer. Volunteer gets the contract I'm getting. I'm just joking.
I don't know have any idea who's going to win
the contract, But I wouldn't be surprised though. Does polunteer
new internet infrastructure. I'm sure they.
Speaker 13 (01:21:31):
Do volunteer as far as I know they are. They
are the keepers of data like our vital statistics, and
they gather information from businesses. I think Polunteer is a
(01:21:53):
very dangerous company. I would not cry one tier if
they shut down Pound here.
Speaker 12 (01:22:02):
Yeah, I agree, but I don't see that happening because
it's continued to grow, especially under the Trump administration. You know,
and it's Peter Thiel's organization. You know, he's the guy
that gave Mark Zuckerberg the seed money for Facebook the
day after the Pentagon ended the lifelog program. I'm fond
(01:22:26):
of saying that all the time because I think people
need to know it. It needs to be pounded into
people's head that the government wanted to log every single
moment of your life, every single event in your life,
every meal you ever ate, every movie you ever watched,
every friend you ever had, every book you ever read,
everything about you, from cradle to grave. They wanted to
(01:22:50):
log it. And that was going to be the Pentagon's
lifelog program. And that ended because people pushed back in
the early two thousands, and the day after they did
announced that it was ending, Facebook was born. So there
you go, people.
Speaker 13 (01:23:07):
I think all of that data is uh, Palunteer is
in palunteer. See. People thought they got rid of it,
but all they did is to hide it. I think
yea pollunteer Lexus nexus feeds into pallunteer.
Speaker 12 (01:23:28):
Yeah. Well, I'm sure they all interconnect. It's a global
total information awareness system.
Speaker 13 (01:23:34):
Yes it is.
Speaker 12 (01:23:36):
Yeah. And by the way, this is a good time
as any I think to uh to do this. I
did a little songwriting this week, Vicky.
Speaker 13 (01:23:47):
Uh oh oh, go ahead.
Speaker 12 (01:23:51):
Yeah, I got inspired. I decided to write a song,
you know. And uh because the absurdity of all these
connected devices everywhere and uh it's a little bit of
a ragged a type of thing.
Speaker 27 (01:24:05):
Uh.
Speaker 12 (01:24:05):
And and and I because I don't have a big band,
I put it into AI to to create the music
part of it. But I wrote the lyrics. So uh,
I called it connected man. And so this is this
is a little bit of what I did here.
Speaker 40 (01:24:47):
I am a connected man. I've got the technology the
balm of my head. I have the smart bitter smartphone,
smart TV, and I'm pretty sure they're all smarter than me.
Speaker 30 (01:25:11):
My figger or there's my milk from the store.
Speaker 41 (01:25:17):
I have Fusion Center cameras on my windows and doors.
Big brother knows when I get diarrhea. But my toaster
has been hacked by no Chorean.
Speaker 12 (01:25:36):
And tripe windows.
Speaker 42 (01:25:38):
Mack diotes five barotics.
Speaker 14 (01:25:40):
Why you didn't do the matrix?
Speaker 40 (01:25:42):
Since the gram, Facebook, Google X humping my.
Speaker 12 (01:25:46):
Data to the EHS and.
Speaker 40 (01:25:49):
Try Windows, Marc bos fiberoptics.
Speaker 14 (01:25:53):
Why you're dinto the matrix?
Speaker 30 (01:25:55):
Is the gram, Facebook, Google X my data?
Speaker 43 (01:25:59):
Tod Well, So that's it.
Speaker 13 (01:26:09):
So did you just feed the idea into no?
Speaker 12 (01:26:13):
I wrote the lyrics. I'll expand on it a little bit. Unfortunately,
we got the break coming up, so we'll go ahead
and take the bottom of our break and I'll tell
you how I did it. Stay with us, ladies and gentlemen,
bottom of the hour. This is Governor America. Don't go away.
Speaker 21 (01:27:01):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance?
Then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the
(01:27:21):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now
(01:27:43):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.
Speaker 22 (01:27:46):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten.
Speaker 44 (01:28:03):
Are crows in Europe evolving? Surprising though it may be.
Even evolutionists agree with creationists when we say the crows
are not evolving, but are just doing what God created
them to do. In now our Creation Moment host Paul Taylor.
Speaker 29 (01:28:17):
A recent report on the Science Alert website discussed the
evolution of two species of crow in Europe. The two
species concerned are the carrion crow, which is black and
the gray hooded crow. These crows are very different in appearance.
They both populate continental Europe, with the gray hoods in
the east and the carrying crows in the west. Their
(01:28:38):
boundary appears to be approximately where Germany's Elbe River is.
At this overlap point, it's possible for birds of the
two species to interbreed. The hybrid birds are themselves fertile, which,
while unusual for hybrids, is by no means unknown. Evolutionary
researchers have found that these birds are almost genetically identical,
(01:29:00):
differing only in the genes that cause coloration. In both species,
it appears there is a preference among birds to mate
with those of the same plumage, So these researchers have
concluded that the two populations were originally one species which
split into two. As creationists, we can affirm that everything
these evolutionary researchers are saying is correct, though we would
(01:29:22):
use different terminology, a lead researcher said, defining speciation as
the build up of reproductive isolation. Carrying crows and hooded
crows are in the process of speciation. This is certainly correct,
but is not evolution in the Darwinian sense. What is
happening is natural selection from an existing gene pool. Darwinian
(01:29:44):
evolution would require new genetic information to have been created
and then selected. In fact, this research is consistent with
biblical principles and not with Darwinism.
Speaker 44 (01:29:55):
To find thousands of biblical creation resources, find us online
at Creation Mormon style dot com.
Speaker 22 (01:30:01):
Package has start at twenty nine ninety nine a month
with sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for
complete offer details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details. Terms
and conditions apply.
Speaker 21 (01:30:10):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford, we.
Speaker 14 (01:30:17):
Have great news.
Speaker 21 (01:30:18):
Now you can get vivints award winning home security systems
starting at about a dollar a day. US News and
World Report has recognized vivid as the best professionally installed
home security system of twenty twenty two, and right now
you can get Vivint's home security technology for about a
dollar a day, plus get free professional installation from a
(01:30:38):
licensed technician. Protect your home and loved ones for as
low as a dollar a day. Call right now for
your free home security consultation.
Speaker 22 (01:30:46):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty.
Speaker 8 (01:30:59):
Two one where the spoofs go to find out what's
really going on. This is Governor America.
Speaker 12 (01:31:10):
All right, we're back. This is Governor America, our number two,
the bottom of the hour as we continue here on
this eighth of November twenty twenty five. And uh, now, Bicky,
before the break, you were asking me how I produced
that song. I I started off, are you there?
Speaker 17 (01:31:28):
Yeah, I'm here, Okay.
Speaker 12 (01:31:29):
I started off with the lyrics. I don't for some reason,
I just these things just start coming in my head.
You know how sometimes you get inspired. Yeah, and I
was contemplating the how you know, the connected device is
the matrix, the technocracy, the you know, everything going on,
and I just I was actually getting ready to go somewhere,
(01:31:51):
and I decided to start jotting these things down on
a pad. So I started with the lyrics, and uh,
and then I got thinking, well, you know, how am
I gonna put this together? Because I I played the piano,
but I don't I don't have a full band together.
And so I thought, well, I wonder if I could
find an AI tool or something that would maybe put
(01:32:12):
together maybe a raggae type song. And so I did
some searching and I found Okay, yes, they these things
do exist. So I went about my business doing things,
and then I came back and revisited later on in
the week, and I decided to download things. And there
was one app in particular called Suno a s u
(01:32:34):
n O I thought I would try, and so I
just took the lyrics and I put it into this
thing and told it I wanted a raggae type, a beat, rhythm,
and and and and I was amazed. I was blown away.
It's just how good it came out.
Speaker 13 (01:32:53):
So yeah, I don't know they had that kind of thing.
Speaker 12 (01:32:56):
The thing that I really wanted was really I wanted
just to the music, but the singer was actually good enough.
And it does kind of multiple versions of it. You
can modify it if you want. I haven't tried a
whole lot of modification on it because frankly, I thought
(01:33:17):
the original was pretty good. But yeah, so this is
I think, based upon what I'm seeing that if you
make a living, if someone makes a living as a singer,
they should be very worried at this point because this
(01:33:39):
is a game changer.
Speaker 13 (01:33:42):
This well, I think they can pretty much simulate everything.
There's no room for people anymore.
Speaker 12 (01:33:50):
It's getting that way, and there's a lot of people
that have been laid off by AI. But when you
can produce, you know, usually like if you like, we
people joke about AI writing poetry, for instance, and it's
really hokey, really bad. But the quality of this is improving.
(01:34:11):
The quality of everything that artificial intelligence is doing is
getting better with time. And I've even told my family,
you know that at some point, you know, there was
a situation recently with my daughter who was worried about
a friend of hers. She had been dating some guys.
(01:34:33):
Actually she had been married to a guy, as is,
married to a guy who was committing adultery and watching pornography.
And she recently this friend of my daughter's had recently
gotten saved and she was trying to she it really
bothers her that he was number one unfaithful to her.
(01:34:56):
I mean that would bother anybody, I think, But but
the fact that he's watching pornography and all this other stuff.
So she but she had went through a period of
time where she hadn't heard from this friend and nothing.
The divorce was going to going forward and they were
(01:35:17):
dissolving their marital bonds and Jessica hadn't heard from her
and got worried about her, and so she texted and
the friend texted back. But Jessica's like, you know what,
anybody can text off your phone, She says, I wanted
to hear her voice, and she didn't answer her phone.
(01:35:39):
It went either straight to voicemail or she didn't answer
her phone right away. Well, so after calling repeatedly, and
my wife actually called this girl as well, finally she
did return the call and my daughter was able to
talk to her. Everything was fine. But this whole situation was,
you know, got me of thinking that the day is
(01:36:02):
coming where just talking to somebody on the phone isn't
going to be good enough to reassure you that they're okay.
Because when AI can simulate conversations. Now, I'm sure that
starting out, it will be where there will be things
that you can detect in the conversation that won't be
(01:36:26):
exactly like the person would say. But as things continue,
if you with a large enough sample of somebody's conversation,
a large enough sample of how they talk. It will
get to the point where it won't be enough. The
more AI knows about you, the more AI can simulate
(01:36:51):
or understand how you talk, your mannerisms, talking to somebody
on the phone, it could be just like you. You
never you might not know. You won't know whether you're
talking to an artificial intelligence bot or the actual person.
(01:37:12):
We'll have to get to the point where we share
secrets with each other that only the other person knows
and can recall. Yeah, like a past phrase that you give,
and we'll have to have to be changed periodically. I mean,
(01:37:32):
I know this sounds crazy, but that's where we're headed, folks.
This is the brave new world here that we're embarking upon.
Speaker 13 (01:37:44):
Actually, I don't think it's crazy at all. And just
consider yourself a useless eater, you know, which is I
think where the concept came from. Anyway, Because computers are
going to take over everything, management of everything, and the
(01:38:09):
way that the Wall Street firms operate. Are they going
to want to feed people who are not productive? No,
of course, not right, And so it's where the world
is headed. Is not a good place, I don't think,
(01:38:29):
not in my opinion.
Speaker 12 (01:38:31):
Totally I totally agree with you. All right, let's go
to the phones. California. You're on the air, go ahead, please, Hi.
Speaker 45 (01:38:41):
I'm an avid listener and I have already had a
situation where there may have been an AI person on
the other end of the phone that I tried to
contract within one of the rb IN hosts who has
a consulting service. And I called the consulting number and
(01:39:03):
spoke with this person and I asked them if they
could record our consultation and they said, oh no, no,
I don't have the equipment for that. And I was thinking,
that's rather suspicious. And that person called at the appointed
time and we had a one hour conversation where I
(01:39:24):
did all the talking, mostly, you know, to explain what
was going on, and this person said they got back
to me and they I'd asked them a second time
could they please record, and they said, oh no, no,
and they sent me back something by email that was boilerplate.
It wasn't individualized at all. So I ended up calling
(01:39:48):
this person live on the air and I said, if
somebody was arranging a consultation with you and they wanted
you to record the consultation, would you do that?
Speaker 12 (01:39:58):
And they said, oh, of course, hmm strange and yeah,
I don't know what to make of that.
Speaker 45 (01:40:07):
Well, they said, I said, well, then that wasn't you.
They replaced you on the other end of that phone line,
and they said, he said, oh, I'm not important enough,
And I said, well I am, because I was trying
to start a class action that they don't want to
have started. And I've been sitting here now several weeks
waiting it to see if that person on the air
(01:40:31):
is going to say, well, then you were defrauded and
they sold my identity and we should work together on
getting this exposed. But I haven't heard anything from them.
Speaker 12 (01:40:40):
So well this so this is another host, is what
you're talking about, not necessarily.
Speaker 45 (01:40:44):
RBN, someone who talked to live on air.
Speaker 12 (01:40:48):
Yeah, another host. Well, I don't know anything about that.
I you know, certainly I can't say for one way
or the other. But more broadly speaking, I think as
time progresses, we're going to have to be more careful,
uh in when we when we were having conversations with people,
(01:41:11):
to know to question whether or not we're actually talking
to the person. Mike, you know, I'm concerned because the
frauds there there are fraudsters out there. You know, we
know that with the Internet there's a lot of You
got to be careful what you click on. You got
to be careful about email attachments, you got to be
(01:41:34):
careful about email links, You got to be careful about people.
They call it social engineering attacks, where people try to
induce you to douce take certain actions that will infect
your system. But you have the more broader, uh social
(01:41:55):
engineering attacks that can be developed and these you know,
there are people out there that will exploit these if
they get a voice sample of your daughter, for instance,
or a voice sample of somebody that you care about,
maybe your mother, and they're able to turn that into
(01:42:15):
an AI statement where you know, they sound like they're
in distress, and they'll tell you that you need to
take certain actions, you know, give them money, give them ransom,
or even lure you out of your house to a
certain place so that they can attack you. I mean,
(01:42:37):
I know that this sounds again, that sounds crazy. And
I don't think it's going to be next week or
the week after, maybe even not a month after, maybe
not a year after. But it's coming, folks, It is coming.
Speaker 13 (01:42:50):
Scam. The scam that you're describing has been done by
phone fraudsters for a long time, but the ability to
do it with AI, Yeah, that makes it incredibly.
Speaker 12 (01:43:08):
Dangerous, realistic, very very realistic. So yeah, it's it's a
warning shot. It's a warning for everyone to realize that
we are living in an entirely different world today. And uh,
go ahead, go ahead, caller.
Speaker 27 (01:43:27):
I actually believe the radio host.
Speaker 45 (01:43:30):
I believe he's honest, and I don't think his love
of money would exceed his would be that excessive. And
there must be ways of tracing the call, the interference
with his phone number, and so I am a little
(01:43:53):
shocked that he hasn't fallen through a trying to figure
out how they were able to steal his identity.
Speaker 12 (01:43:59):
Yeah, and I appreciate a you not naming the particular host. Uh. Here,
here's here's the thing about that. And this is the
problem with every host, anybody who has a podcast, anybody
who has a talk show host. There is hours, hours
of samples of voice, you know, voice samples that they
(01:44:20):
could feed into an AI. And uh, it's literally just
about infinite. I mean because the hours that you know,
we I know, we we've spent talking to people on
the air it's you have more than enough out there
to feed to an AI to produce a scam. And
(01:44:42):
I'm not trying to give anybody ideas, but the frosters
don't need to have ideas anyway, they've already thought of it.
And uh if you're able to then circumvent somehow their
phone number at the same time or in conjunction with that,
you've got a powerful tool to de fraud people, and
and and yes, even to ruin somebody's reputation, ruin somebody's business,
(01:45:05):
ruin somebody's life. It's horrifying when you think about it.
Speaker 45 (01:45:11):
Well, you can copyright your voice.
Speaker 12 (01:45:16):
I don't know that copyright has is that sophisticated. I
guess you probably could, but I don't know how that
would be enforced because copyright's already a freaking mess. It's
a disaster. The patent system is a disaster. There are
people that sit on patents just for the sake of
(01:45:38):
making money. Like everything else the government does it. It's crap.
But uh so, I you know, how would you decipher
what one voice if somebody can sound like somebody else.
I could see them trying to do that, but I
(01:45:58):
don't know how that would work actually, but yeah, that's
a part of the biometrics, and it would have to
be coupled with something else. I think. Anyway, it's certainly
something to think about, isn't it.
Speaker 16 (01:46:11):
That's really kind of a scary thought now that you
bring it up. I mean, I I've known about those
scams for a long time, but I have family members
that are a prime age and I that's very scary.
Speaker 12 (01:46:33):
Yeah, absolutely well, Cynthia, thank you for your call. I
appreciate it. God bless you. All right, blessings to you.
Let's go to another call. Hello, you're on the air,
Go ahead please.
Speaker 17 (01:46:50):
Today.
Speaker 46 (01:46:50):
Yes, that's fantastic. Okay, do you verify the numbers that
you're talking to or you don't do that?
Speaker 12 (01:47:00):
Do I verify the numbers?
Speaker 46 (01:47:03):
Like if I told you what area code it was,
would you verify it?
Speaker 12 (01:47:07):
I I have caller ID if that's what you're talking about,
but I don't have any way of verifying like you're
coming up anonymous, so I don't know.
Speaker 46 (01:47:19):
Yeah, okay, all right, Well let me just ask you
this and we don't have to resolve this now. I
suppose we'll still be discussing it in fifty years. But anyway,
Do you know what compeld Nancy de Lessandro to make
the announcement that she made, because I mean, I'm not
complaining about it, of course, but I just wonder, you
(01:47:40):
know what compel that? And you know what what what
the you know reason behind it is because you know,
just just what what do you have to say? Because
I I don't, I don't know that we have the
full story on that.
Speaker 12 (01:47:55):
Are you talking about Nancy Pelosi?
Speaker 46 (01:47:58):
Yes, I am.
Speaker 13 (01:48:01):
I think she's just getting too old.
Speaker 12 (01:48:04):
She can't put She can't hardly. She's almost as bad
as Joe Biden. I mean, she she's going to pieces.
I mean, she can't. She can't put it together anymore.
You know, it's amazing to me that she held on
as long as she did. Yeah, I think she's got
dementia anymore, right exactly, And I think she's I'm not
(01:48:30):
trying to diagnose her from afire, but just observing her
over the years, her press conferences, even when she was
still house speaker. We're all over the place and completely discombobulated,
and it looked like a jigsaw puzzle that was shaken
in a box and stirred and not well, let's put
(01:48:53):
it this way. Her speeches at her press conference looked
like an unmade bed, like an unmade bad looks. So
that would be my guess is that she just can't
she can't hold it together anymore, and so and and
and Frankly, if ever there is a reason for term limits,
(01:49:17):
look at Nancy Pelosi, and I think you have a
good poster child for why Congress needs term limits.
Speaker 13 (01:49:27):
Yeah, I think you could go through go through the
register of members of Congress and there are a lot
of them that should have retired years ago.
Speaker 10 (01:49:39):
Yeah.
Speaker 46 (01:49:40):
What were you saying there, caller time, Why is this
going to make a thirty second comment? What do you
think of the response that the voters are the ones
have been posed for limits because every two years, every
four years, every six years, somebody has to be re elected.
Do you think that that's adequate because it's gone into
(01:50:01):
the point where the voters are loyal to candidates, like,
no matter what the candidates do, they're still put back
in office. But I just wondered what you thought of
that statement that it's the voters that don't keep term limits.
Speaker 12 (01:50:14):
Well, the problem is with these lifelong politicians who keep
going over and over and over again, is they have
ways of embedding themselves in institutions, embedding themselves with the
donor class and all these big businesses. And yeah, the
name recognition is something that people continue to vote for,
(01:50:38):
and there is the aspect of it. I don't know
the degree to which the elections I think there are rigged,
and I think you do have a problem with that
as well. But yes, you're right to point out that
there's a lot of voters that look at the names
and just vote for the names and don't even pay attention.
(01:50:58):
They don't even give a thought as to what the
person's actually doing. Oh yeah, Nancy Pelosi, Yeah I recognize
that name, so I'll just I'll go ahead and vote
for them. You know, it's it's a problem. It's a problem.
I think people are paying attention more to political stuff
today than the year used to be before. But you
still get these people on the streets that you ask
(01:51:19):
them questions and they have no clue. They have no
answer even even the most basic questions about government and
how it should operate. They're they're completely clueless. So there's
no easy answer to all of this. But I think
it would solve some of the dementia problem. I mean,
think of Dianne Feinstein. You remember Diane Feinstein, She's another one.
Speaker 46 (01:51:45):
She she was you know, she was hardly recognizable. You
look from Times and you said that Dianne Feinstein, right, yeah.
Speaker 12 (01:51:54):
And Mitch McConnell same thing. I mean, Michigan, Mitch McConnell
stands it up odium and he just zones out. And
what it looks like to me is he's he's having
And again not trying to diagnose somebody from Afar, but
Mitch McConnell as somebody who's had a lot of family
(01:52:16):
members on my wife's side unfortunately with epilepsy. I can
tell you that what Mitch mcconnoe has, I can't say
one hundred percent because I'm not a doctor and I
haven't diagnosed him, But it looks like he might be
having partial focal seizures, because that's what happens a lot
(01:52:38):
of times is somebody will be talking and they just
zone out and it's not like the full Grandma seizures
because it's only on one side of the brain. But
Mitch mcconnoe, but but you know a lot of people
look at that as as being and and then and
that's sad, you know. But he has been there long enough,
(01:52:58):
he's done enough damage to the country, and that's really sad,
and it's time for him to go. But these people
keep getting elected over and over and over again. You
can never get rid of them, and and the beat
goes on. But anyway, thank you for your call.
Speaker 13 (01:53:20):
Yeah, let's could be fixed. Yeah, but but rather than
pass an amendment, you know, get an amendment going, that
guide keeps trying to get a constitutional convention and yeah,
(01:53:40):
and so you know that would be the last thing
in the world we should ever do, is call a
constitutional convention.
Speaker 12 (01:53:50):
Yeah. I agree.
Speaker 13 (01:53:51):
There's no way to no way to control.
Speaker 12 (01:53:53):
No way to control it. And it's the money. The
people that are behind the constitutional convention calls are big,
big money. When you go and dig into it, you
find big big money is backing that whole plan. So
that's the thing that you really have to be concerned
about and be aware of. And you know, we were
(01:54:16):
talking about the government shutdown. We have food banks. As
Congress won't vote to give up their paychecks. Their staffs, however,
are not going to be paid, but they are going
to continue to draw the money. You know, except for
the thirty or so some odd ones that Art was
talking about earlier. We have from the economic collapse blog.
(01:54:38):
Food banks all over the US are being hit hard.
They're being overwhelmed by a tsunami of hungry people. As
grocery prices have risen, demand at food banks throughout the
country has searched to very alarming levels. And at the
end of twenty twenty four, he says. Michael Snyder says,
I wrote about how demand at food banks has risen
to record levels all over the United States. Unfortunately, the
(01:55:00):
man has continued to rise in twenty twenty five, and
now with the government shutdown, that has shifted America's hunger
crisis into overdrive. Millions very hungry people are showing up
at food banks looking for something to eat, and resources
are being stretched to the limit. I don't think that
this is going to end well. And we've been warning
(01:55:22):
about this. It's it's coming, folks. When people get hungry,
when people get to the point where they don't have
anything to lose, nothing is more dangerous than somebody with
nothing to lose. Yeah, all right, we got the end
of this hour. Hour number three of Governed America is
straight ahead. Your calls are welcome six ten, six hundred,
(01:55:44):
seventeen seventy six or toll free eight four four or
sixty four six eight three seven six. We got to
United Nations conferences coming up. I've been doing some digging
into the THESD, the what they call it, the Earth
Negotiations bullets, and so I have some stuff on that
as time progresses, if we get to it. But your
(01:56:05):
phone calls are certainly welcome. Seventeen seventy six, we got
our number three straight ahead, don't go away.
Speaker 21 (01:56:35):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance,
then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the
(01:56:56):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now
(01:57:18):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.
Speaker 22 (01:57:20):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh that's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten. Packages started twenty nine ninety
nine a month with sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to
a representative for complete offer details. Seevivent dot com for
(01:57:43):
licensed details. Terms and conditions apply all owners.
Speaker 21 (01:57:46):
If you're looking for the best in home security and
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivins award
winning home security systems starting at about a dollar a day.
US News and World Report has recognized vivid as the
best professionally installed home security system of twenty twenty two,
(01:58:06):
and right now you can get Vivin's home security technology
for about a dollar a day, plus get free professional
installation from a licensed technician. Protect your home and loved
ones for as low as a dollar a day. Call
right now for your free home security consultation.
Speaker 22 (01:58:22):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven, four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty.
Speaker 14 (01:58:35):
One two five.
Speaker 47 (01:58:48):
Stallion for American Family News.
Speaker 8 (01:59:03):
I'm Robert Thorny.
Speaker 30 (01:59:04):
President Donald Trump with Hungarian Prime Minister Victor Orbon as
he works to bring Ukraine and Russia to the negotiation
table in Hungary during their war. The President defended Orbon's
strict immigration policies.
Speaker 12 (01:59:16):
I stick up for Victor Robin.
Speaker 33 (01:59:18):
Not a lot of people do, because in many cases
they're jealous.
Speaker 2 (01:59:22):
They wish they did what he did.
Speaker 4 (01:59:24):
I think they respect him a lot.
Speaker 33 (01:59:26):
They don't agree with him, but actually, inwardly I think
they probably do agree.
Speaker 4 (01:59:30):
What he was right on immigration. They were wrong.
Speaker 33 (01:59:34):
They are flooding Europe with people from all over the world,
and Europe is becoming a different place.
Speaker 30 (01:59:40):
Orban has styled himself as a defender of Christian values,
but his government has been criticized by human rights groups
for attacks on free speech and freedom of the press,
and for a pattern of corruption and abuse. His government
also has sought closer ties with the Russian president Vladimir Putin,
creating tensions with other EU members. Police are investigating two
(02:00:02):
teams connected to a thwarted terror plot on Halloween and Michigan.
Here's fox Is Alexis McAdams.
Speaker 32 (02:00:07):
Investigators are trying to figure out, though, how two New
Jersey men radicalized after the FED say one was arrested
at Newark Airport on his way to the Middle East,
where they believe he was going to become an ISIS fighter.
Tamas Con Guzelle and Miloceteratca wasn't pictured in the federal documents.
Both were hit though, with charges in federal court after
investigators say Gazelle was conspiring to provide material support to
(02:00:29):
a terrorist organization of ISIS, and Cetera was charged with
transmitting violent anti Semitic threats to people all across the country,
including in New Jersey. So the duel was charged in
connection to this ISIS inspired terrorist plot. In Michigan, police
say they were going to target LGBTQ bars on Halloween.
Speaker 30 (02:00:47):
Authority say more arrest could happen soon. Secretary of War
Pete Hegseth announced another deadly US strike on a boat
he said was trafficking narcotics in the Caribbean Sea The
attack killed three people to board the bed, according to Hegseeth,
bringing the death toll from the Trump administration's campaign in
South American waters up to at least sixty nine people
in at least seventeen strikes. Senate Republicans voted to reject
(02:01:11):
legislation that would have put a check on President Trump's
ability to launch an attack against Venezuela. Cornell University has
agreed to pay sixty million dollars and accept the Trump
administration's interpretation of civil rights laws to restore federal funding
and end investigations into the Ivy League school. Cornell's president
announced the agreement and set it upholds the university's academic
(02:01:33):
freedom while restoring more than two hundred and fifty million
in research funding. A portrait of Justice Clarence Thomas, provided
by a donor has finally been hung in Yale University's
Alumni reading Room, six years after it was donated. More
from Afen's Bob Kellogg.
Speaker 25 (02:01:48):
Matt Limb of the College Sick speculates with the long
delay in hanging the portrait, donated by Harland Crowe, a
friend of Thomas's, was probably due to the fact that
the Justice is a conservative on the Supreme Court and
a black conservative as well.
Speaker 42 (02:02:05):
The six year delay certainly suggests a bias against him
because he is known as a conservative. Yale has thousands
of administrators, so it cannot be a lack of manpower
to spend twenty minutes hanging a portrait.
Speaker 25 (02:02:24):
Maam also reports not only was Yale slow to hanging
the portrait, he says that the school's slow to respond
to media inquiries.
Speaker 48 (02:02:33):
The college fix recently emailed three times and actually spoke
to someone in the public affairs office who suggested that
the school would be responding, but as of yesterday, I
don't believe that they have not responded.
Speaker 25 (02:02:46):
Mallam also notes that the law school has faced criticism
in the past several years for its handling of free
speech issues. I'm Bob Kellogg.
Speaker 30 (02:02:56):
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxson's office says it's successfully stopped
several school districts in the state that attempted to unlawfully
use taxpayer funds to electioneer for ballot propositions to raise taxes.
After throw our investigations into the matter, Packs and sent
letters to four districts informing them that their conduct potentially
constituted a viihilation of Texas laws prohibiting schools from electioneering.
(02:03:20):
Following this, the school districts removed the material and agreed
to abide by the laws. See more news at AFM
dot net.
Speaker 1 (02:03:33):
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves
and for future generations, a new.
Speaker 2 (02:03:40):
World order, new world for us, new world order.
Speaker 3 (02:03:43):
This is a movement to seize. The clidoscope has been shaken.
The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again.
Before they do, let us reorder this world around us.
Speaker 5 (02:03:53):
A new world order, a world for the United Nations,
is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its.
Speaker 6 (02:03:59):
Found Nevertheless, United States is in a key position tool
shape is so that the problem of the pot prensidentity
will be the emergence of a new international order.
Speaker 7 (02:04:12):
The first decade of the twenty first century, that out
of what is will be seen as the greatest restructuring
of the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy,
greatest restructuring of the global economy, a new world order
was created.
Speaker 8 (02:04:29):
Documenting the crisis of our republic, the very.
Speaker 9 (02:04:31):
Word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are as a people inherently and historical opposed
to secret societies, the secret owns and the secret proceedings.
Speaker 10 (02:04:45):
Weasing war on the new World order.
Speaker 4 (02:04:48):
The Council's dis government.
Speaker 11 (02:04:49):
We must guard again the acquisition of unwanted influence, whether
sought or unsought by the military industrial conflict.
Speaker 8 (02:05:00):
This is govern America with Darren Weeks and Vickey Davis.
Speaker 12 (02:05:17):
From Female Regions five to ten. This is the third
and final hour of Governor America. Bicky Davis is here.
I'm Darren Weeks, and it continues to be the eighth
of November twenty twenty five as we enter into the final,
the final shots, the final part of the show here
as we continue on. Been talking a lot about the
(02:05:38):
government shutdown. I want to get away from that a
little bit. There is some good news, and that is
that the downward spiral, this is zero heads, the downward
spiral of sustainable equity stocks built on environmental, social and governance.
Globalist movement has deepened under the Trumpet era as investors
focused on capital flows. Apparently the ESG outflow bloodbath has
(02:06:03):
said nine consecutive months, so evidently ESG stocks that benefit
from ESG aren't doing so well, and so that is
a good thing. Under the Trump administration. You know, we've
beaten up a lot on Trump, and I think deservedly
so in the cases that we've beaten up on them.
(02:06:26):
But it is also good to know that there are
some good things happening too, and I think we have
to keep things in balance. I got a call on
the line. Let's go ahead and take the call and
we'll continue on afterwards. Arizona, you're on the air. Go ahead, please, Yes,
good morning, Darren Hie.
Speaker 28 (02:06:44):
Yes you earlier you were discussing pall andeer and AI
and things.
Speaker 12 (02:06:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 28 (02:06:51):
I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but this
article is out of Army Dot Mill and it's the
headline is Army Law Detachment to zero one, Executive Innovation
Corps a drive tech transformation. It was from June of
twenty twenty five, and what it boils down to is
(02:07:14):
the Army and the Army Reserve has recruited some people
from the tech firms and sworn them in as Lieutenant colonels.
And the first one on the list of Schiam sang Caar.
He's the Chief Technology Officer for Pallenteer, Andrew Bosworth, the
(02:07:38):
chief technology officer for Meta, Kevin Wheel, chief product officer
of open Ai, and Bob McGraw, the advisor at Thinking
Machines Lab and former chief research officer for open Ai.
Are you aware of that?
Speaker 12 (02:07:56):
No, I wasn't aware of it. Were you aware of it? VICKI?
I have to say it doesn't really surprise me. Unfortunately.
It looks like from what you're describing there, that they
are integrating all these tech companies and the leaders of
the tech companies with the military. And I know that
the two have worked together. You know, this is a
(02:08:17):
defense every technology. The military wants to use every technology
if it'll help to advance the battlefield and even war
by other means, shall we say a force multiplier? I
guess was the phrase that I'm looking for. Then they'll
(02:08:39):
utilize it. But what you're describing there, where they are
actually swearing them in you said, as actual lieutenant colonels
in the military. Yes, that seems to be taking it
to another level, doesn't.
Speaker 28 (02:08:52):
It sounds like it. Well, there is an expression nowadays,
it's called data as firepower.
Speaker 12 (02:09:01):
Wow.
Speaker 13 (02:09:02):
I think the military has always been behind the technocratic
tyranny because they had the capacity. One of the systems
that comes to mind is the military healthcare systems, you know,
(02:09:22):
the active military, and then the VA and then if
you look at Medicaid, that's a federal system. So and
I have a report. It was the Heart the Heart Commission.
I can't remember the exact name of it, but they
(02:09:46):
named the military as being the leaders, you know, for
the systems for the reinvention of government, and they created
home scam security as kind of a bridge over the
divide between the military and the government civil service workers.
(02:10:10):
So I've thought for a long time that we are
very much in trouble because I do believe that the
military is the guiding hand behind the technocratic systems.
Speaker 12 (02:10:28):
Well, when you think about it, the technocratic systems wouldn't
be possible were it not for the Internet. And it
was the military that was started the arpinet back in
the day, and the Internet certainly evolved from that. And
so yeah, I mean back when Technocracy Inc. Was first
a thing, it was kind of a pie in the
(02:10:49):
sky type of deal where they were trying to implement
all of this stuff. But now get with all the technology,
it makes it very very possible and not only possible,
but seems like almost inevitable, doesn't it.
Speaker 13 (02:11:05):
I hate to say it, but yeah, one.
Speaker 12 (02:11:11):
Of the biggest, one of the biggest challenges. And I
heard James Corbett talking with a gentleman this past week
on this subject, what do we do about this central
bank digital currency? That did you know the Well what
it was is digital ID. It was the broader subject
of digital ID.
Speaker 13 (02:11:30):
Yeah, they've got to have that. They have to have
it because you're they computerized people's medical records. They haven't
really said that, but if you have ten thousand David Smiths,
you have to have an absolute positive ID. And the
only way to do that really is well, a chip
(02:11:53):
is the most convenient way. And I know that the
military has experimented with chips in your armor, in your hand.
Speaker 12 (02:12:04):
Yeah, And the associate of Claus Schwab was very fond
of saying the next step is under your skin. He
was always using that phrase under your skin. And as
much as we would like to think that there is
a place that you can go to escape all of this,
you know, look, let's look at Russia. Take Russia for instance.
Of a lot of enmity between the United States and Russia,
(02:12:25):
at least overtly so, but beneath the surface, there's they're
implementing the same types of systems over there that we're
getting here.
Speaker 13 (02:12:35):
And look, they are exactly the same. Because in nineteen
ninety four the G seven Gang of seven, it was
the G eight at that time, they approved a list
of about eleven systems that were going to be global.
(02:12:58):
Global health was one of them.
Speaker 12 (02:13:01):
And so.
Speaker 13 (02:13:04):
Behind the scenes they have been coordinating building these systems
for a long time. And of course the military with
military I know they have a big health facility over
in Germany, and so medical records was almost almost given.
Speaker 12 (02:13:28):
For that reclaim, The NET says, Russian lawmakers are moving
forward with a proposal that would make the country's biometric
and e government systems the mandatory gatekeepers for online age verification.
If implemented, the measure would tie access to adult or
potentially harmful content directly to a person's verified state identity,
(02:13:51):
dissolving any remaining expectation of online anonymity. Now nobody wants children,
at least not if you're a decent person accessing say
pornography or any other content on the Internet that's harmful
to them. But The problem is is, like so many
other things, the road to hell is paid with paved
(02:14:14):
with good intentions. You have digital identity or digital ID,
that is essentially becoming the driver's license for the Internet,
but not only the Internet, but everything else. You do,
you know, in a digital world. Everything is the digital world,
you know. I think we talked about before Vicky how
(02:14:37):
in Ukraine right now they're building a system of governance
that is online. Everything's online, yeah, so you can have
all these data centers controlling functions of government. You don't
need actual government buildings anymore. It's just like the stock exchange.
How We're talking about the New York Stock Exchange earlier.
(02:14:59):
It's all everything's in the cloud.
Speaker 13 (02:15:01):
Now they've been phasing that in since. Oh gosh. Well,
it was George Herbert Walker Bush that kicked off the
project I remember nineteen ninety New World Order. Well, the
New World Order that included something called the Enterprise of
(02:15:24):
the America's Initiative, which was to integrate the Mexican economy
into our economy. He kicked off the project for nationalized
medical records. He kicked off a project for insurance reform.
(02:15:44):
And then, of course when Bill Clinton came into office
Clinton and Gore. Gore was I forget what he called himself.
He called himself something like the internet. He invented the internet.
It well, he's the one that ushered through the legislation
(02:16:06):
to begin the Builder to Build Systems, the Reinvention of
Government project, to rebuild the systems of government, and that's
really where the whole technocratic tyranny started. Yeah, and you
can begin looking at that with the President's Commission on
(02:16:30):
Sustainable Development.
Speaker 12 (02:16:32):
Right exactly, color, Did you have anything.
Speaker 28 (02:16:35):
Else, Yes, I have a couple of other things. You
had also mentioned about talking on the telephone. I'm not
sure if the person you're talking to is an actual
person or if it's voice generated. There's already been reports
of a voice coming onto Grandpa's telephone and they're claiming
(02:16:55):
that they went down the spring Break in Mexico and
they were arrested. And if you can, please send money
to throw my bail to get me out of jail.
So it's not like it's something that might happen, it
already is happening. I'd like to also draw your attention
to a website. It's called War on the Rocks dot com. Okay,
(02:17:18):
and there's a fairly new article. It's from the twenty
ninth of October of twenty twenty five. Has a lot
to do with Israel and their operations in Gaza and
their AI and target selection, and there's a lot of
hyperlinks in there, and it's very informative. Talks about the
(02:17:39):
algorithm called Lavender ok So Gospel and the headline of
the article is will Israel's algorithmic counterinsurgency puriferate to the West.
Now I'd had the article and then I went back
(02:18:00):
yesterday to try to find it and typed in the
headline but it didn't come up. But I've typed in
the author's name and it came right up. So his
name is Mohanad and it's m u h A n
A D. And the last name is Selum se LM.
(02:18:25):
That's I found it. I was an easy way to
cut through and it's about a seven page article and
it talks about Pallunteer, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, they're all providing
the cloud nay Ai services for all these things and
they're part of this feedback loop where the battle tested
algorithms are going to refine Western systems and data mining
(02:18:49):
and everything. And lastly, sometimes technology is a good thing.
And this is certainly nothing new, and it may not
be as fancy as say AI and computers. But about
one hundred years ago, my aunt, I think she was
about fourteen, she could play the piano really well. And
(02:19:12):
this was back during the Silent movies, and when they
would get the film, they would also get a set
of sheet music, so the person that they had hired
to play the piano during the movie.
Speaker 12 (02:19:28):
You ever watch Oh yeah, I went movies, You'll.
Speaker 28 (02:19:31):
Hear that ragtime piano playing in the background. Yeah, Well
that's what.
Speaker 27 (02:19:35):
My aunt did.
Speaker 28 (02:19:36):
And she had a job and she was happy because
as a fourteen year old she had a good job
and everybody was proud of her for being selected the
piano down at the BSU. Oh and behold, when the
talkies came in, she got she lost her job. So
people being replaced by technology is not something that just
(02:20:00):
occurred in the last two weeks, right.
Speaker 13 (02:20:03):
Yeah, But there's a big difference between a piano player
at a theater and the kind of technology that's replacing
people today.
Speaker 12 (02:20:14):
Yeah, it's the scale. The scale is massive.
Speaker 28 (02:20:18):
Yeah, oh, I understand that, but I'm just using that
as an example. But in this article from War on
the Rocks with Israeli's algorithmic counterinsurgency. See, they've taken the
human being out of the loop, and they feed all
these people from Gaza their names into computer and depending
(02:20:38):
on your ranking, if you're just a lowly private in
the in hamas, or if you're a mid level leader
lieutenant captain, or if you're like a battalion commander, they
give you a certain number. And basically what that number
is is how many people civilians are they willing to kill.
(02:20:59):
To kill you is the same time, and they feed
everything phone data records in there, your address, what time
you go to work, what time you come home, and everything,
and mostly that most people come home in the evening
and go to bed. And this is where they're deciding
to blow these people up at. And if they kill
everybody in the family or the neighbor or somebody else
(02:21:22):
in the apartment complex, they really don't care because they
got their target. And that's all what this War on
the Rocks has to do with of about the algorithmic
and what they call this lavender and gospel and how
they've developed these systems to feed everything in here, and
it's all it's taken the human being out of the
(02:21:44):
decision making loop. It generates thousands and thousands of airstrikes
and sorties for the Air Force, and the air forces
just sold go over here at six pm or ten
pm and bomb this certain building at one, two, three,
four five Main Street and boom, it's gone and you're gone.
(02:22:05):
And they go, oh, well, that's what the computer told
us to do. But I enjoy your broadcast. Thank you
very much for me. I'm God blessed.
Speaker 12 (02:22:13):
Thank you for the call, and thank you. Yeah, very
good point. It's very interesting, very interesting call. Thank you.
All right, let's go to Kansas now, Sherry, he's on
the line. Hello, Sherry, you're on the air. More Hi.
Speaker 49 (02:22:33):
You know, a lot of technology or inventions that regular
people do, or even scientists, usually get hijacked for military purposes.
I remember James mccanney saying that when he was working
(02:22:57):
with the Russian scientists in the nineties and they developed
a way to uh steer hurricanes and they didn't get
hurricanes there, so they actually offered it to the United States,
(02:23:17):
you know, told him he should offer it to the
government here. And what did they do? They started using
technology different that and different forms of weather modification as
a force multiplier, you know, to what they called sauce
(02:23:42):
from the target.
Speaker 13 (02:23:44):
And I heard.
Speaker 49 (02:23:48):
A guy on John Moore's show say a couple weeks ago,
his Tuesday Morning show that people, you know, inventors get
their you know, patent proposals hijack or where they can't
(02:24:10):
use them and government takes them.
Speaker 14 (02:24:15):
You know.
Speaker 49 (02:24:15):
I remember years ago, Patrick flat Flattery, I think that
was his name, and he was like twelve years old
when he developed technology that I believe eventually became It
was a precursor to the neurophone, you know, to help
(02:24:36):
deaf people here vibration. But it's like that, and and
you know, everything's about.
Speaker 27 (02:24:47):
War, yeah, and.
Speaker 12 (02:24:51):
But yeah, so many new technologies come out of wars.
The microwave certainly came from the military. It was an adaptation.
So many of our technolologies that we use in everyday
life were the advent of military operations and especially to
help facilitate war, to execute the war, to get an
(02:25:12):
edge on the battlefield, so to speak. Yeah, And it's sad,
but that's it is a reality, isn't it. Yeah?
Speaker 49 (02:25:23):
And I was I'm reading a book by Colonel Fletcher Prouty,
and he talks about how the CIA goes in and
and this is part of the Cold War deal that
happened after World War Two, and they go in and
they destabilize these lesser developed countries and it's on. They
(02:25:46):
get the per people in charge that they decided to
put in charge, and those people in there, uh, you know,
the people they choose, usually family members, but people they
choose to enrich, you know, as long as he said
(02:26:06):
a lot of times, it's like working with a big
people in our government or our big commerce people too,
you know, take imports from America is how he said
it works. And then like he gives an example of
this guy in Olivia, I believe that wasn't and then
(02:26:31):
a guy in Philippines too. They started chorking from other countries.
So it's not about communism, you know, it's about commerce.
Speaker 10 (02:26:43):
Yeah.
Speaker 12 (02:26:44):
Why, that's a good way of saying it. And we
pay for it. Yeah, I gotta, I gotta right, I
just want to throw that in. Yeah, I appreciate that.
Thank you, I got the break hold your thoughts, Vicki,
and well thanks, Sherry, appreciate it. Blessings. We'll be back
in a moment.
Speaker 22 (02:26:59):
For package just started twenty nine ninety nine a month
with sign agreement restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for
complete offer details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details, terms
and conditions applying homeowners.
Speaker 21 (02:27:10):
If you're looking for the best in home security and
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford.
Speaker 10 (02:27:16):
We have great news.
Speaker 21 (02:27:17):
Now you can get Vivints award winning home security systems
starting at about a dollar a day. US News and
World Report has recognized Vivid as the best professionally installed
home security system of twenty twenty two, and right now
you can get Vivins home security technology for about a
dollar a day, plus get free professional installation from a
(02:27:38):
licensed technician. Protect your home and loved ones for as
low as a dollar a day. Call right now for
your free home security consultation.
Speaker 22 (02:27:46):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one one.
Speaker 50 (02:28:01):
The Scripture's view marriage as a covenant relationship for a lifetime.
Speaker 51 (02:28:05):
Doctor Gary Chapman with a love language minute.
Speaker 50 (02:28:08):
But what if your spouse breaks the covenant? Are you
to abandon them or try to cover up for them?
Neither of these are biblical approaches. Jesus said that when
a spouse sins, we are to confront them, hoping they
will repent so we can forgive them.
Speaker 8 (02:28:26):
If they don't repent, we're to try confronting again.
Speaker 50 (02:28:29):
If they ultimately refuse to repent, we're to treat them
as an unbeliever. How do you treat unbelievers? You pray
for them, you love them, and you return good for evil.
Who knows when they may repent and the relationship can
be restored. God often confronted Israel and always stood ready
to forgive them when they repented.
Speaker 10 (02:28:50):
He is our mom.
Speaker 51 (02:28:53):
Doctor Gary Chapman is the author of the Five Love Languages.
Speaker 12 (02:28:56):
For more, visit Fivelove Languages dot com.
Speaker 51 (02:29:00):
We've all heard the story of the prophet Jonah. He
thought he had a right to hate the pagan Ninovites.
When they repented and God showed them mercy, the Bible says,
Jonah was greatly displeased and angry. God's response, do you
have any right to be angry? Jonah thought he had
the right to control his own life and environment to
(02:29:22):
have things go his way and to get upset when
they didn't. Sadly, that sounds a lot like me. I
often find myself annoyed when things don't go my way.
A rude driver, a decision at work, a long line
at the checkout counters enough to leave me moody and uptight.
Then I have to answer the question, just like Jonah,
(02:29:42):
do you have any right to get angry as you
face annoyances and frustration today? Remember the way to get
off an emotional rollercoaster is to yield our rights to
God's plan and purpose for our lives.
Speaker 12 (02:29:56):
With seeking him.
Speaker 10 (02:29:58):
I'm Nancy DeMoss Walkmouth.
Speaker 21 (02:30:00):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance?
Then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the
(02:30:21):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now
(02:30:43):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.
Speaker 22 (02:30:45):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen.
Speaker 8 (02:31:01):
With a spoofs go to find out what's really going on.
This is govern America.
Speaker 12 (02:31:16):
Welcome back to the broadcast. Sorry for coughing in your ear.
There as clearing my throat, and I forgot I opened
my mic already. All right, we're in the home stretch
of the broadcast. One more half hour ago. We got
plenty of calls on the line, but Vicky, I wanted
to give you a chance to respond to Cherry. You
were going to see something.
Speaker 13 (02:31:33):
Yeah, What I wanted to say is that computer systems
are designed to be management and control systems. That's what
they do. That's why the big corporations they can be
multinational corporations, and they function with incredible efficiency, even to
(02:31:56):
the point of keeping track to the minutes that the
you know, one of their lowest level employees, keeping track
of the minutes that he's spent doing a particular task.
And so when they decided now the global systems that
(02:32:18):
I mentioned, when they decided on that, there were two people.
There was a guy named Martin Bangemann over the telecommunications
systems in Europe, and then there was Robert something or other,
can't remember his name off off the top, but he
(02:32:40):
was at and T. And the planning for the global
systems was done because of the agreement of those two
telecoms to function together, okay, And then they designed something
called EDI I think it was Electronic Data Interchange. That
(02:33:04):
was like the first pass of coming up with common
transactions across corporations. So you could have like a health
insurance company, for example, your health insurance company gets claims
your doctor just sends them into a centralized location and
(02:33:28):
those they're analyzed and split out and sent to the
proper insurance company, whether it's medicare or private insurance. And
so that's what computer systems, the big systems do. And
when they when PCs came on the scene, the people
(02:33:56):
that were involved in PCs, they had no free clue
whatsoever about big machines. And as a matter of fact,
I remember a story about Dell Computer when they finally
got big enough that they had to move to a
mainframe system. They were stunned, they were shocked. They had
(02:34:18):
no idea of the capacity and the internal complexity of
big systems.
Speaker 12 (02:34:28):
Yeah.
Speaker 15 (02:34:29):
And so.
Speaker 13 (02:34:31):
The global systems that they're implementing, they will make everybody slaves.
Speaker 12 (02:34:40):
Yep. That's really the summary of it all, isn't it.
Speaker 13 (02:34:43):
Yeah. As a matter of fact, John Brennan, you know,
he was involved in setting up a group called five Eyes,
And if you do a search on five Eyes, you'll
see there were five leaders of countries that got together
(02:35:06):
to make their corporations function together, you know, to act
as a well what to call it. It's more than
a consortium. It's like the beginning of global governance for intelligence.
Speaker 12 (02:35:25):
Yeah, exactly. Yeah, it's very frightening.
Speaker 14 (02:35:28):
Uh.
Speaker 12 (02:35:28):
And then of course they inter mingle their intelligence knowledge.
They're gathering everything they gather into one database or one
at least shareable system.
Speaker 52 (02:35:42):
Uh.
Speaker 12 (02:35:42):
And yeah, shared across there all you know, all the countries. Yeah,
it's a consolidation of all the information, all the total
information awareness.
Speaker 13 (02:35:54):
And consolidation of power.
Speaker 12 (02:35:56):
It is a consolidation of power exactly, electronically and every
other way. All right, let's go back to the phones. California,
you're on the air. Go ahead, place blue, Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 53 (02:36:09):
In regarding a couple of things for California, as far
as Nancy Pelosi goes a Senator Scott Wiener, who anybody
from California that's familiar with him knows he's very dangerous,
possibly more dangerous than Pelosi announced he was going to
be running for her spot. He was tired of waiting
for her retirement, and he was running for her spot
(02:36:32):
in October about October twenty second about there.
Speaker 12 (02:36:35):
That's very disappointing.
Speaker 52 (02:36:38):
Yeah, so that probably led to her because there's no
way that she would be able to camp in against him.
Speaker 27 (02:36:46):
That she just couldn't do anymore, right, Yeah, And.
Speaker 52 (02:36:49):
That makes sense as far as as I that was
where it can reproduce, but people and things and voices.
That was one of the things that was the extended
reason for the SAG strike that they were fighting that
(02:37:09):
and they still are, I believe, because there has been
reproductions of of SAG members that have been used.
Speaker 12 (02:37:19):
Oh, wow, okay something Yeah that that makes perfect sense
and I could see that. Yeah, go ahead, I'm sorry.
Speaker 52 (02:37:28):
I was going to say the writers of w g
A they left it on the table in there the
extended strike that was back in two thousand and seven
to two thousand and eight, and one of the writers
was talking about it, and I didn't know at the
time what AI was, but somebody, a member of w
(02:37:49):
g A was extremely worried way back then that it
was left on the table that it could be something,
uh that could take away jobs.
Speaker 12 (02:37:58):
So yeah, they absolutely good.
Speaker 13 (02:38:02):
Yeah, taking away jobs is the least of it, at
the least of what we have to worry about with AI.
And as a matter of fact, did you hear Pete
hegg Set's latest press conference.
Speaker 12 (02:38:23):
In what Regard.
Speaker 13 (02:38:25):
Where he announced that the military and military contractors are
going into business to sell he said weapons, but you know,
he didn't specify what kind of weapons. But we know
that the military has been involved in that technology. As
(02:38:50):
a matter of fact, their campaign Military of One or
Army of One campaign in the nineteen nineties had to
do with technology. And if you go back and research,
why were we in Kosovo Because the guy who was
(02:39:11):
the leader of Kosovo would not turn over his telephone
company to the telcoms to be included in the technocratic tyranny.
And as a matter of fact, the idea of the
technocratic tyranny is all of the computer systems. Now, they
(02:39:33):
make it sound like that they have been slow on
the mark, you know, automating the systems of government. That's
pure bs. They have been doing it and doing it
as rapidly as they can since about nineteen ninety nine.
(02:39:56):
Prior to that, they were doing the analysis, you know,
where you define what systems you're going to do and
how you're going to put those systems together. So we
really have a single operating system for our government, and
it's technocratic and it's psychopathic.
Speaker 33 (02:40:18):
You know.
Speaker 12 (02:40:18):
It dawns on me that we were talking earlier about
the privatization threat, and that is a threat, but an
even bigger threat is the movement toward AI systems governing everything,
whether it's private or whether it's controlled directly by the government.
It doesn't really mean they had they had.
Speaker 13 (02:40:40):
To do the privatization because government could only do what
is authorized in law, and corporations can do anything that
they're not prohibited from doing.
Speaker 12 (02:40:55):
The law, perfect, perfect way of saying it absolutely have
anything else.
Speaker 52 (02:41:02):
Yeah, I was just going to make a comment about
the AI on about but there's no way. Copyright was
basically banished by Trump to push the AI d s
is AI executive orders and it's AI was about twenty
five pages is AI sing by his executive order. So
(02:41:25):
copyright is helth the window.
Speaker 12 (02:41:26):
Now there you go.
Speaker 13 (02:41:28):
Yeah, it's been out the window for quite a long time.
As a matter of fact, Michael Jackson sued, spent a
long time suing because his music was being put onto
the internet and shared. That was one of the first cases.
So copyright has been and and and they put the
(02:41:53):
copyrights online so that people can go in. And drug
manufacturers did this. They went in and found the formulas
for drugs and then they would tweak it just a
little bit, you know, add an ingredient or subtract an
ingredient an ingredient. So copyright patents have been have been.
(02:42:19):
You know, basically I think worthless for a long time.
Speaker 12 (02:42:25):
Well not totally worthless, but I certainly diluted in my opinion. Hey,
thank you, cal, I appreciate it. God bless you. Yeah,
there's there's copyrights, and then there are patents. The patents
have been put online copyright nobody's allowed to copy what
what you your brainchild. The problem with the copyright in
(02:42:47):
that I see one of the problems is that government
has extended the protection of copyrights long past used to
be I think like twenty years, you know, the life
of the person plus twenty years, something like that, and
then you know, and Disney has been a big problem
with this because they haven't wanted their Mickey Mouse and
(02:43:09):
what have you to be used by the public. So
they have continually lobbied Congress to keep expanding or keep
it lengthening the copyright terms because at some point, you know,
the whole reason for the copyright system is so that
people would be rewarded for their brain childs, their brain children,
(02:43:31):
you know, their thoughts, their ideas, and be able to
use them for a period of time. And then at
some point, after they had able they were able to
make their money off of that idea, it would open
up to the public for further innovation. You know, it
would become the public domain and then you by then
you would have a chance to come up with other
(02:43:53):
ideas that you can then copyright and use for your
own purposes, patenting those ideas and what have you. But
when you have the lengthening of time to unbelievable levels
where you have the life of the person who thought
(02:44:14):
of it plus one hundred years, let's just say, you
never really have a chance to have it opened up.
And that's a big problem. That's a problem for all
of us because you stifle you then stifle innovation by
having the entity who owns quote unquote owns the idea
to be able to sit on it essentially forever.
Speaker 13 (02:44:37):
And there was a guy in Idaho that he actually
invented the mechanism for television. I forget what his name is,
but the big corporation stole his his idea and it
was patented but or copyrighted one or the other.
Speaker 12 (02:45:00):
I was the same way with the intermittent winchal wiper.
I remember back years ago when I was a kid,
or when I was a teenagers first starting to drive
the intermittent winchil wiper. You know how they have start,
you know, on and off they start and stop. You know,
back when I was first started driving, it was your
winshield wipers were either on or they were off. There
(02:45:23):
was no in between. The guy who invented that, he
had his his patents stolen. I think it was by
Ford Motor Company, if I remember correctly, and they started
implementing it in models and didn't want to pay him anything.
He went to sell the idea to the car company,
thinking that they were going to pay him. Well, they
(02:45:45):
just took it and it was years. I don't know.
I think eventually his children got one won a lawsuit
and they ended up getting something, but it was a
it was a small penance compared to what they had
actually made off the product.
Speaker 13 (02:46:00):
Well, that's the same story with the guy with the television.
He was from Rigby, Idaho, and he finally won his
case around in the early two thousands. So he fought,
he fought that for like sixty years and finally got paid.
Speaker 12 (02:46:23):
Yeah, and probably nowhere near what it was worth, nowhere
near what he deserved. Let's go back to the phones.
Let's go up to Canada. Now, Hello, you're on the air.
Go ahead, please.
Speaker 54 (02:46:35):
Yeah, the TV guy, I think you're talking about Filo
Farnsworth out of Utah.
Speaker 13 (02:46:41):
But no, he was from Rigby, Idaho. Maybe he moved
to Rigby. But when I read, well, about him. He
was from Idaho.
Speaker 12 (02:46:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 54 (02:46:50):
Well, I wrote the essay on genetic engineering and quantum mechanics,
and I published it on one of those internet things,
and I sent me a message saying that they did
a video on it. They published it themselves in a
video form. I have to he had to see what
it looks like. But we got a new social technology now.
(02:47:12):
It's called Islam. You probably saw the election in New
York this week, and I've been beating the drum on
this for more than a year on RBN. I've been
following New York City politics and it was I believe
(02:47:33):
a Ciao. It was voter fraud. The polls are not accurate,
and I just wanted your comment on that. I think
they're militarized and militarizing back to you guys.
Speaker 12 (02:47:49):
Yeah, I don't know if you heard were listening earlier,
but we did comment on it. They have that ranked
choice voting in New York City, and I really believe
that that has a chance. It has a possibility to
have played a role and getting him fraudulently elected. But
as we pointed out, I don't know that that would
(02:48:10):
even have been necessary given some of the little communists
that go to the polls to vote. Well, there's crazy
people in New York City, just saying if.
Speaker 13 (02:48:20):
You have computerized voting in any way whatsoever, you know,
you can just write off your election system because it's
tackable and so you know, they decide who wins.
Speaker 54 (02:48:36):
The question A question for you. They said that two
million of people voted. What were the the total number
of eligible voters in New York?
Speaker 12 (02:48:46):
You know, off and I could look it up. I don't,
I don't know, Off.
Speaker 54 (02:48:51):
It doesn't matter. I'm just saying people were asleep at
the wheel here and now. If they can have this
kind of organized Islam in New York City, if you
can make it in New York you can make it anywhere.
It's going to be all over the whole whole country.
Speaker 12 (02:49:08):
On back to you, Apparently New York has five point
one the total number of eligible voters.
Speaker 54 (02:49:18):
Yeah, see that's the deal right there.
Speaker 12 (02:49:20):
And that is according to the publication City and State
New York. I'm assuming the New York has bureau numbers.
Speaker 13 (02:49:30):
It must be it must be New York City that
has five million New York City.
Speaker 12 (02:49:41):
That Yeah, yeah, that's what we're talking about. Five point
one million in New York City as of twenty five.
But that number, that'll be interesting number to keep in
mind because it will be interesting how how that shrinks
as the communist policies of Mandani come into fruition.
Speaker 13 (02:49:59):
Yes, well, I don't know how they could implement rank
choice voting and come up with the answer that fast.
What they announced it like five minutes after the polls
closed or some something like that.
Speaker 12 (02:50:14):
I don't know. They have multiple rounds. Yeah, thank you, sir,
I appreciate it. Well, yeah, thanks, yeah, bye bye.
Speaker 13 (02:50:23):
Or you can't get you can't do something like that
in five minute rounds. I don't believe unless it's totally computerized.
If it's totally computerized, it's totally rigged.
Speaker 12 (02:50:37):
Yeah, well hello, yeah. Turning to a story now I
wanted to cover up this is I first heard about
this from my wife Michelle, because we talk a lot
about on this broadcast how the farmers and ranchers have
been under attack massively. Uh, and this is just another
(02:50:58):
example of that. Michelle has been following this story for
some time. We ironically, we were just talking to the
color in Canada because this was in Edgewood, British Columbia,
there's a family owned ostrich farm. You hear about this, Vicky.
Speaker 13 (02:51:13):
I heard that they were thinking about killing the ostriches.
Speaker 12 (02:51:18):
Well they're thinking they finally did it. Yeah they did it, Yeah,
they did it. This these were over three hundred, more
than three hundred ostriches living there on that farm, and
the Canadian Food Inspection Agency said that they were going
to call the family's entire flock of these more than
(02:51:41):
three hundred I think it's something like three hundred and
thirty ostriches, and they claimed that they had detected each
one or I'm sorry h five in one bird flu
avian influenza at the site late last year. But the
you know, the matter has been tied up in the
courts since then. But the family has finally lost their
(02:52:02):
final appeal. And if the flock was ever really sick,
it seemed to have recovered. But the bureaucrats don't care.
They won in court. They weren't going to do any
testing now and nothing else matters. So they've killed the birds,
healthy or not.
Speaker 14 (02:52:20):
So we know that.
Speaker 55 (02:52:20):
At about just after six o'clock Pacific time last night,
about a thirty minute period, our CBC reporters at the
scene heard multiple rounds, about five rounds of about twelve
shots each at the Universal Ostrich Farm in Edgewood, b C.
Shortly after or shortly before rather the shots were heard.
They saw this a scene of the floodlights coming on
(02:52:42):
in the area that illuminated this pen that had been
built by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency made out of
straw bales to sort of pen these birds in. They
say the shots that they heard were coming from inside
the enclosure. Reporters also heard a drone flying above. The
operation came after the CFIA said it was moving ahead
(02:53:04):
with the quote complete depopulation and disposal of the ostriches
hundreds of birds at the farm or subject to a
call order. After that lengthy legal battle ended yesterday the
Supreme Court declining to hear an appeal to save the
flock from the call. This case attracted international attention. It
continues to The call was ordered by the CFIA last
(02:53:26):
December after this flock was detected to be positive for
avian influenza. It's about three hundred to three hundred and
thirty birds in total that would be part of this call.
They believe crews from the CFIA went in and has
Matt suits started to try to round up the birds yesterday,
using those straw bales to create that enclosure.
Speaker 17 (02:53:46):
Our colleagues say that these.
Speaker 55 (02:53:48):
Straw bales are in the way of them really getting
a good sense of what has been going on there.
It's difficult to see, but the farm owners are on
social media saying that the shots have ended, dated that
the call has begun. We don't have confirmation of that
from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Supporters had also been
setting off firecrackers in an attempt to sort of spook
(02:54:11):
the birds and get them to run and scatter and
see if I has not said how the call would
take place. They said it would be humane and done
with veterinary oversight. The owners insist that the birds are
now healthy and that they could be potentially used for
research in you know, using their antibodies to prevent avian flu.
Speaker 12 (02:54:33):
Okay, I'm going to leave that there. There's about probably
a half hour a quarter to a half left of that,
but they went ahead with the killing.
Speaker 13 (02:54:43):
Look. That brings up another issue. The more computers are
in use, the more danger were in because they hire
lesser qualified people, and you know, which is the point
where the people can't question. The computer. Yep, the computer
(02:55:07):
makes all the decisions, and at that point we're in
big trouble.
Speaker 12 (02:55:14):
Yeah, and I think we're in big trouble anyway. What
this really boils down to is depopulation, killing off of
food supply, killing off another source. And they're doing it
here all the time. We covered the stories, you know,
from pigs from swine swine flu to all the chicken
culling that's going on here in the United States. It's
(02:55:36):
a global process. It's a global project. So but the
good news about all of it is people are waking
up to it, more people are talking about it, more
people will be pushing back. It's thank god this has
gotten international attention, and so we just got to keep
the pressure on, keep the heat on these officials. Don't
(02:55:57):
let them continue to get away with it. We're out
of time. Thank you ladies and gentlemen for being with us.
Join us back here next week, same time, seam outlet
we'll do it all over again. Thank you, Vicky, as always,
appreciate everything you do as well.
Speaker 13 (02:56:09):
Thank you, Darren, Thank you, God.
Speaker 12 (02:56:10):
Bless you folks. Talk to you soon. Bye bye, true reste.
Rick