Govern America | September 20, 2025 | Consequence Culture - Govern America

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves
and for future generations, a new world.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Order, new world order.

Speaker 3 (00:09):
New world order.

Speaker 4 (00:10):
This is a moment to cease. The kaleidoscope has been shaken.
The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again.
Before they do, let us reorder this world around.

Speaker 5 (00:20):
Us, a new world order, a world where the United
Nations is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.

Speaker 6 (00:27):
Nevertheless, United Dated in a key position to shape is
so that the problem of the put rentidentity will be
the emergence of a new international order.

Speaker 7 (00:39):
The first decade of the twenty first century. But out
of what is will be feared the greatest restructuring of
the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy, greatest
restructuring of the global economy.

Speaker 2 (00:52):
A new world order was created, documenting the prices of
our rebelt.

Speaker 8 (00:58):
The very word secrecy repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are as a people inherently and historically opposed
to secret societies, the secret oaths and a secret proceedings.

Speaker 2 (01:13):
Waiting war on the new world order.

Speaker 7 (01:15):
The councils of government.

Speaker 9 (01:17):
We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether
it's sought or unsought by the military industrial conflicts.

Speaker 2 (01:27):
This is Governor America with Darren Weeks and Vicky.

Speaker 10 (01:31):
Davis from FEMA Regions five to ten. This is Governor America.
Nicky Davis is here. I'm Durren Weeks. It is the
twentieth of September twenty twenty five. Nice to have you
with us once again, ladies and gentlemen. There's a lot
going on, a lot developing this week in the Charlie

(01:54):
Kirk assassination thing. I don't want to spend the whole
show on this, but I did want to touch upon
a few things I see in the chat room. They're
already talking this stuff about Charlie Kirk didn't really die.
I don't buy that. Sorry, I saw it happen with
my eyes. So I just don't think everything that happens

(02:14):
today is a hoax. But we're being lied to about it,
I will give you that, and there's plenty of evidence
that we're not being told the truth. Good morning, VICKI,
Good morning.

Speaker 11 (02:26):
Yeah, we're being lied to every single day, and so
it's difficult to take anything that the government says as true.

Speaker 10 (02:36):
Have you seen any of Candice Owen's work this week, No,
I haven't. Okay, good I noticed we were playing just
prior to our coming on the air her one of
her shows, and I actually ironically just clip some stuff
from that very show. So to those that were on
the stream, our stream prior to the show, I apologize

(02:58):
we had to interrupt that. I'll try to drop that
in at the end of the show so you can
hear the rest of it those of you who don't
have internet access. For those of you who do, the
link will be in the show notes to the entire thing,
So we'll try to get that in for you so
that you can see it those of you who are
hear it, so that those of you who were happen

(03:20):
to be listening to it. And we're maybe a little
frustrated when our automation kicked in and interrupted it. Sorry,
they stream exists for this show, but we can certainly
put that in again for you anyway. So, as we said,
last week, we covered the article from the Grey Zone
which talked about Charlie Kirk being threatened by Israel and

(03:42):
particularly bb Net Yahoo in the days leading up to
his assassination. Now you may recall Vicky. The article spelled
out how Charlie had refused a large cash infusion returning
point USA and net and Yahoo was trying to get
him to come to Israel. Charlie refused that too. Now,

(04:05):
the Gray Zone had cited sources close to Charlie but
didn't name names. Now we have some confirmation as a
few of those people in Charlie's orbit have come forward
and have confirmed what the Gray Zone was reporting. We'll
get to that in a moment, but first, in the
way a context. Charlie was complaining about the massive pressure

(04:25):
and smear campaign against him by Zionist forces. You know,
he was very pro Israel, but toward the end of
his life he had started asking questions, and particularly in
light of the fact that this Gaza massacre has continued
to go on. And you know, if you're not one

(04:45):
hundred percent in favor of Israel, immediately there's a smear
campaign that happens. There's a massive pressure campaign. Oh my goodness,
one of our spokesholes, one of our mouthpieces are getting
out of line. We got to immediately slam them, immediately
smear them. So here is Charlie Kirk. I just want

(05:08):
to play a clip here. This was August sixth, okay,
August sixth of this year, and he was venting on
Megan Kelly's show about how his character was being called
into question because he dared ask questions about Israel.

Speaker 12 (05:23):
I don't want to judge an entire group, because there's
been many people in the per Israel world that have
been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie, you
know you're with us.

Speaker 13 (05:32):
You don't have to agree all the time.

Speaker 12 (05:33):
However, and I will say this, the behavior by a lot,
both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and
me away, not like we're gonna be pro Hamas, not
like we're gonna but we're like Honestly, the way you
are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages
Meghan calling me an anti Semiti. I am learning Biblical

(05:55):
Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor
the Shabbat, the Jewish Sabbath, I visit Israel and fight
for it. And there's another article out in the Times
of Israel today. I could read it on air. I
was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are
you doing?

Speaker 13 (06:09):
Like? Why are you what am I doing.

Speaker 12 (06:12):
I'm sorry, Like, let's just take a step back here, Like,
I'm an American citizen, Yes, i want Israel to win.
Yes I'm a Christian. But like the some of the message,
you saw it, you've seen how I have been treated
in Meghan by some, not all by some.

Speaker 14 (06:27):
No, it's very irritating.

Speaker 12 (06:28):
It's been unfair.

Speaker 15 (06:30):
They were coming after you after a turning point for
among others, show you a Dave Smith there, Dave.

Speaker 16 (06:35):
Smith is allowed tomize Israel. What both sides are the Israel.

Speaker 12 (06:40):
Not allowed though, No, you're not allowed to. It's even
worse than that. Again, I just want to repeat for
the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win.
But my moral character is now being put into question, Meghan,
not my decisions, not like hey are you doing this?
Is it smart or is it dumb? But no, I
am a bad person. If if I do this and

(07:01):
it's I could go. I mean, you saw it, Megan.
It was trending on Twitter, thousands of tweets and text messages.
And if I were to be charitable and generous, I
will say the people that are attacking me are in
a hyper paranoid state because they're at war and war
tends to make things black and white, and you're a
hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally,

(07:23):
I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right,
They go, Okay, what would it be like if all
of a sudden, I'm starting to see a pattern of
behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties
Germany online?

Speaker 17 (07:33):
How would I behave?

Speaker 12 (07:34):
So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit.
At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's not
defensible to be dumb, right, yeah.

Speaker 14 (07:45):
So, and it's offensive.

Speaker 15 (07:47):
It's offensive to those of us who have been out
there defending them in many instances against critics on our
own side. And now you have a couple accounts like,
well what about this? Well has it gone on too long?

Speaker 18 (07:59):
Like?

Speaker 15 (07:59):
Is it time to wrap it up? And the thing
about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who
he was an agent for it?

Speaker 10 (08:04):
Oh, she's talking about there, wrap it up. She's talking
about the war, the assault on Gaza. This has gone
on too long time to wrap it up? And uh
anything it.

Speaker 15 (08:12):
Might have been Israel or an asset, or it might
have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate about that.
It's like, but you can't go there when it comes
to Israel.

Speaker 12 (08:21):
Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans
first period, end of story. We are citizens of this nation, Okay.
And Israel we have funded, we have supported, and they're
up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism and we should
be cheering for them.

Speaker 10 (08:38):
Yeah, this is the part I really don't agree with.
But we'll let Charlie speak.

Speaker 12 (08:41):
Right, because they're up againsts and monsters and we want
them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie
Kirk combined probably thirty million social media followers, like pretty right,
and you and I have been holding this down and
you you probably get the negative, Oh you're just shilling
for Israel. I'm like, Okay, I'm gonna do what's right,
regardless of the feedback.

Speaker 19 (09:02):
Right.

Speaker 12 (09:03):
But then all of a sudden, like I host a
person that I moderate the debate of my right right
and I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time
to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is
being put into question, and so I just I think
it's a hyper paranoid like we're just gonna try to

(09:27):
We're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice.
But it goes to the point where if, for example,
if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize
the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do, and
that's really really weird, isn't it.

Speaker 13 (09:46):
Megan, That's not right.

Speaker 10 (09:48):
Okay, what do you think so far? VICKI.

Speaker 11 (09:53):
I didn't know any of this, the you know, the
deal with Israel, but my observation over my lifetime is
that you can't criticize Israel.

Speaker 18 (10:07):
They are untouchable no matter what they.

Speaker 10 (10:10):
Do, especially if it's a high profile person like Charlie
kirk And who has in the past taken a lot
of money from Israel, apparently to help grow Turning Point USA.
As we said, he refused the latest cast infusion, and
because I think he started to see how he was

(10:30):
being how they were trying to use the money to
control him. I'm hoping now that his wife is the
head of Turning Point USA, she's taken over for him
as CEO. I hope that she continues to refuse money
from them. We'll have to wait and see, because I
know the pressure is going to be overwhelming, and like

(10:55):
I say, we'll have to wait and see.

Speaker 11 (10:58):
Yeah, it's going to be interesting. I've always been on
the sidelines because I'm not a religious person, so I
don't the whole Israel Palestinian thing.

Speaker 18 (11:15):
It's about, at.

Speaker 11 (11:18):
Least as my understanding goes, it's about religion, so I
don't want anything to.

Speaker 20 (11:23):
Do with it.

Speaker 10 (11:24):
I think it's more than religion. I think I think
it's religion's being used. But what it really is about
is control of the area, the land, and certainly control
of the new world order ultimately.

Speaker 11 (11:42):
But I would I agree with you on that, but
it's all presented in the context of religion. Yes, And
you can't really win any kind of debate with religious zealots,
and that you know, I don't care whether they're Islamic

(12:03):
or Jewish or Christians, there radical Christians. You can't win
an argument with a religious zealot.

Speaker 10 (12:14):
Or even somebody who is an extreme political zealot. I
would any zealot, anybody who's who goes, who adheres any ideology,
whether it's religious, political, or otherwise, that is so steeped
in their ideology that they refuse to listen to number

(12:36):
one reason and number two common sense. And we have
a lot of examples of that, some of which we'll
explore on today's show because there is a censorship debate
going on right now, and I have a problem with
a lot of stuff that's being said on the right.
We'll get to that as time progresses. But I got
another clip from Charlie on September ninth. Okay, that one

(12:58):
that we just played was an August August sixth of
this year. On September ninth of this year, which was
the day before Charlie was shot dead. He had been
he had been Shapiro on his show. Ben was promoting
his book and during the interview, Charlie asked Ben to

(13:19):
respond to Israel's detractors. I want to think Mark and Texas,
by the way, for locating this clip for me. He
I think serchs through a lot of different clips, and
he nailed this one down and sent me the link.
He's been after me all week. Did you watch it yet? Yeah,
I've been busy, but I did finally watch it, and yes,
I clipped some from it because he was asking Ben

(13:43):
Shapiro on his show again the day before he was
shot on September ninth. This show took place, so he
was shot on September tenth. He was asking on the
day before he was shot. He was asking Ben Shapiro
to respond to Israel's detractors who say, among other things,
that Israel's guilty of genocide. Now, when he brought up

(14:06):
the question, it's really interesting to watch Ben Shapiro's face
because those eyebrows, those big monster eyebrows, his went high
in the air when Charlie brought this subject up. And
here's here's if I can get the right moules. Here,
here's the right clip.

Speaker 13 (14:23):
I have one or two other questions on Israel.

Speaker 12 (14:25):
I think it's very important for audience to hear this, though,
because there is an incessant campaign and one thing a
friends send to me, interestingly, which is okay, Charlie, We've
pushed backed against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine,
on the border on so maybe we should also ask
a question is the media totally presenting the truth when

(14:46):
it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know that
maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says, because I
know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical
questions over the last couple of years.

Speaker 13 (14:56):
Ben Shapiro, stay right there.

Speaker 12 (15:00):
Ben Shapiro continues to thus author of Lions and Scavengers. So, Ben,
some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.
Some people in the Israeli government are saying, again, it's
all over the place, right, you have opinions all over.
In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years
from now be, and how does one respond.

Speaker 13 (15:18):
To the claims of ethnic cleansing.

Speaker 21 (15:20):
So ethnic cleansing, the idea presumably that that population movement
is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. I think ethnic cleansing is
a term that's been fairly recently coined to describe population
movement during war and the realities that's been ongoing for
literally all of human history. The idea that Israel is
quote unquote forcing people out of the Gaza strip, that
is not the stated policy of the Israeli government.

Speaker 10 (15:42):
It's not the stated policy of the Israeli government. That's
kind of be interesting that that's what you call weasels.
I thought that was kind of funny.

Speaker 21 (15:50):
Idea is if people want to leave, they can, but
they're not being forced to leave.

Speaker 10 (15:54):
That's not what I understand.

Speaker 21 (15:55):
But anyway, again, moving people out of heavily urbanized areas
that are honeycombed with or a booby traps pretty much
everywhere is not the same thing as quote unquote ethnic cleansing.
And I think that ethnic cleansing is very often used
as sort of a soft re form of the genocide attack,
the idea being that Israel is trying to kill everyone, which,
of course.

Speaker 10 (16:12):
Which of course the evidence spells out.

Speaker 14 (16:14):
Is not true.

Speaker 21 (16:15):
As far as the earlier question about what we believe
from the media, one of the things that I find
kind of astonishing in some of the folks on the
right who are highly critical of Israel is actually the
lack of credible the lack of skepticism when it comes
to legacy media.

Speaker 14 (16:27):
Legacy media radically anti Israel overall.

Speaker 21 (16:29):
The New York Times can certainly not be accused of
being a pro Israel outlet.

Speaker 14 (16:33):
Be very difficult to make the.

Speaker 21 (16:35):
Accusation that the Associated press, which is work can in
love with kmos for years or Royal.

Speaker 10 (16:38):
Okay, let me just stop them there. I'm not relying
solely upon the legacy media for my opinions. This goes
way way way back, these attacks on the Palestinians. This
is nothing new. This is just the latest salvo in
the murderous campaign against the Palestinians. And I don't rely
upon the legacy media. I rely upon people that I know,

(17:03):
that I trust, who have been over there, and they
have talked to the people, uh firsthand and uh and
and what they say about this whole situation. And I
listen to all sides and for my opinion, not just
the legacy media. Matter of fact, I watch very very
little legacy media.

Speaker 18 (17:24):
So you and me both, I don't.

Speaker 11 (17:26):
I just don't watch the big network news tunnels.

Speaker 10 (17:31):
And it's not for a lack of trying. I mean
I do try, but I just can't still make it.
It makes me, it makes me nauseous. I mean, the
lies are just so every single thing they say are lies.

Speaker 14 (17:43):
These are these are wildly pro Israel outlets.

Speaker 21 (17:45):
And yet when it comes to the reporting, it seems
to be sort of the the the conception of the
legacy media is like owned by the Jews.

Speaker 12 (17:52):
I was going to say, you Jews own the media,
ben So I mean, come on, as you can tell
by all the wonderful headlines, you guys get now.

Speaker 10 (18:00):
He's trying to couch this in tongue of cheek, tongue
in cheek. But it's really interesting the fact that he's
even joking, quote unquote about the legacy media being owned
by the Jews. This is something that would never be
anywhere near mainstream years ago. And what's fascinating about this

(18:21):
is now, even if it's a kind of put forth
like he's joking, the fact that he would bring it
up at all is problematic.

Speaker 18 (18:31):
Yeah.

Speaker 11 (18:32):
Yeah, And actually I'm not sure that there's any truth
to it. That might have been true, you know, in
the nineteen eighties, but when they globalized our economy, I
think the Jewish voice in media was really overtaken by

(18:59):
the left point of view.

Speaker 10 (19:01):
Yeah, I think it's still true, I honestly. Well, certainly
Fox News is own.

Speaker 18 (19:10):
News.

Speaker 11 (19:11):
Yeah, but what about Disney Media, for example, or ms
NBC that was started by Microsoft?

Speaker 10 (19:20):
Right, Well, isn't is whatever his name is the CEO?
Isn't he a Jewish? The head of the CEO of Disney?
And then if he is, I don't.

Speaker 18 (19:36):
I think is a monster myself.

Speaker 11 (19:38):
Yeah, absolutely, I don't care, you know what his Uh,
I don't care if he wears a ya, he's a monster.

Speaker 10 (19:46):
Yeah. Well, and that's the thing is I don't care.
You know, Look, I have nothing against Jewish people per se. Okay,
I want to make that clear. I went to school
with some people who were Jewish broadcasts, okay. And the
people that I knew is I'm especially thinking of one

(20:06):
particular girl named Laura was a very She was a
very nice girl, and we worked on projects together and
she knew I was a Christian. She teased me about it,
but she was a very nice girl. And I think
about her, and you know, I don't have a problem
with her. I don't have you know, And I think

(20:27):
a lot of things. But here's the thing, folks, when
you're coming down to subjects of like Israel and being
an objectivity on a particular subject, if you have a
certain group of people who own the media or own
a lot large portion of the media, are we getting

(20:49):
objective information on the subject. And when you consider the
amount of money that's flowing over here as well from
over there, then you've really got to ask yourself some
serious questions about information and control of not only media sources,
but our politicians and everything else. And this is all

(21:10):
really in light of the fact that this whole Charlie
Kirk thing and the fact that he was under threat,
very very agitated. You heard the first clip where he's saying,
my whole character is being assassinated now, And what happens
when they fail to assassinate your character, Well, maybe then
they have to graduate to assassinating the person physically, which

(21:32):
is clearly what happened here. But anyway, let's finish up
with this clip here.

Speaker 21 (21:35):
Well, I mean, dude, the accusation that we own the
media has not prevented, you know, the Daily Wire from
employing people who radically disagree with me on all of
these matters.

Speaker 14 (21:45):
I mean, I don't agree with Matt walshron foreign policy.

Speaker 21 (21:47):
Matt obviously is a major host over at Daily Wire,
and that's just my shop when I'm overtally pro Israel, right,
I'm not making any bones about this.

Speaker 14 (21:54):
I made you, and I'm a Zionist. I'm not going
to pretend that to say.

Speaker 21 (21:57):
Otherwise would be absolutely silly, suggest that some sort of
atheistic Jewish person by birth who does not care about
Juda is more Israel. Owning the New York Times means
The New York Times is pro israel Is to ignore
literally every bit of coverage they have ever done for
my entire lifetime.

Speaker 12 (22:14):
Were running out of time here, But just last question
on this, Ben. I know this might be a tougher question,
but BB said quote, I didn't like you said this.

Speaker 13 (22:22):
I'll be honest.

Speaker 12 (22:23):
You can't be maga if you're anti Israel. I don't
like it for a couple of reasons. How did you
analyze that statement from BB?

Speaker 21 (22:30):
I mean, and I think that there is the un
generous way of interpreting that, and then the generous way
of interpreting that. So the un generous way is to
suggest that you have to hold a particular position on
every Israeli governmental activity in order to in order to
be maga, which of course is not true. I mean,
you can disagree from the.

Speaker 14 (22:46):
Right or from the left with bbe's policies and you
can still be planning maga.

Speaker 21 (22:50):
I think the idea that BB is putting out there
is that if you are taking Commas's side against Israel
in a conflict, it is very difficult to align that
with the stated positions of the Trump administration or what
President Trump himself is doing right now.

Speaker 12 (23:03):
You cannot look I think you can have disagreements on
Israel and still be mega. Obviously you should be America first,
but if you're Pearl Hamas, you're something darker.

Speaker 10 (23:11):
Yeah, And what Charlie should have said is why did
Israel helped start Hamas? I wonder if he knew that fact.

Speaker 11 (23:20):
Yeah, I wonder because distribution of information is not even,
it's not level, and so you know, you really have
to follow one line of thinking or another line of thinking.
And I think that's really what has created the divide
in our country.

Speaker 10 (23:40):
Because it's true that Israel. I've covered it on the
show in the past in depth, but Israel, it's well documented.
This was the Israeli papers that reported it that Israel
helped beget Hamas. They continued fun Hamas. Benjamin Netanyahu himself

(24:04):
advocated for that and said that they want.

Speaker 11 (24:06):
To tell you what the objective of Hamas was.

Speaker 10 (24:11):
Well, originally, originally they were going up against Yaser air Fat.
But I think the objective of Hamas today, in my opinion,
is to create the false flag necessary for Israel to
go in and do the killing. That's what I think. Now, Oh,
that's a conspiracy theorist talking. Okay, fine, whatever, say whatever

(24:36):
you want, but I guess they would say that it's
to create terror. Hamas is to go ahead.

Speaker 11 (24:51):
Terror is a good motivator, you know, in one direction
or another. It's used in our country just just about
every day.

Speaker 18 (25:00):
Day, you know.

Speaker 11 (25:04):
Yeah, the and they're being funded, you know by known
wealthy people, known wealthy groups, and so our our media
just doesn't really cover that aspect of it. So yeah,

(25:24):
I mean, what can what what can people expect? You know,
if if you're propagandized every damn day.

Speaker 18 (25:32):
By these different.

Speaker 11 (25:34):
Groups, you're going to fall into one camp or the
other camp. And there really is no analysis of you know,
where is the truth between these two polar opposites.

Speaker 10 (25:46):
Yeah, let me squeeze in one more clip before the break.
This is This is Megan Kelly on The Tucker Carlson Show.
This week, Tucker did a really good tribute to charliekirk
Uh brought on Megan Kelly and they got into the
bullying and intimidation that's going on to stifle any narratives
that aren't pro Israel. Again, this is Megan Kelly talking
to Tucker Carlson.

Speaker 15 (26:05):
Charlie is not the only one who's been threatened or
was threatened to cut ties with you or not platform you.
I too have gotten met, especially since you've been more
outspoken on Israel, and I couldn't care less the amount
of pressure they put on, Like what are you talking about?

Speaker 18 (26:23):
This is madness.

Speaker 15 (26:25):
Why would you want to silence such a powerful, important
voice just because you disagree with them on one subject,
one on which we've all watched you sincerely evolve as
you grapple with principles you've been espousing for years, like
America first, Like what's happening to Christians? Like what's best
for us in our kids here? How do I keep

(26:45):
them safe? That's my number one priority?

Speaker 10 (26:47):
Okay, I gotta cut out of that for a moment.
We'll finish that up right after the break. Stay with us,
ladies and gentlemen. At bottom of the hour, we'll be back.
This is Governor America.

Speaker 22 (26:58):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance?
Then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,
you're guaranteed to save money on your car insurance. Most
car insurances can be canceled at any time. That means
if you find a better deal, you can switch right away.
We're not just one company. We offer most of the

(27:18):
major brands of car insurance. We're like a discount supermarket
for car insurance. And it doesn't matter if you have
a good record or a bad driving record. Our agents
are experts at finding you the right car insurance for
your needs. Our average customer saves hundreds of dollars a
year when they call us to switch. So why don't
you make this one hundred percent free call right now

(27:40):
and see how much you can save on your car insurance.

Speaker 23 (27:43):
Eight hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight
hundred eight two five one seven one oh eight hundred
eight two five one seven one oh. That's eight hundred
eight two five seventeen ten.

Speaker 24 (28:01):
Hi, I'm Chandler, a student at Hillsdale College. Here is
President of Hillsdale College, doctor Larry arn on the continuing
relevance of the Constitution.

Speaker 25 (28:09):
When you argue today that the Constitution is outdated because
it addresses problems secular to the eighteenth century, so long ago,
and some of it does read sort of quaintly, but
consider the injunction against titles of nobility in Article one,
Section nine, for example.

Speaker 10 (28:25):
Is that so outdated?

Speaker 25 (28:26):
The purpose of that injunction is to prevent the government
granting special privileges for partisan reasons.

Speaker 10 (28:33):
This strikes it the.

Speaker 25 (28:33):
Rule of law, the rule under which were all to
be treated the same. The cony capitalism so common today,
where the government gives favors and tax dollars to some
businesses and advantages over others, is exactly the kind of
thing the Constitution was meant to prohibit. The Constitution is
not outdated at all.

Speaker 24 (28:49):
This Constitution minut was brought to you by Hillsdale College.
To receive a free pocket constitution and declaration, go to
constitutionminute dot com.

Speaker 26 (28:58):
We love your neighbor as yourself. We've likely heard it
hundreds of times in our lives, but how does that
apply to motherhood?

Speaker 19 (29:06):
Hi?

Speaker 26 (29:06):
I'm Dana Gresh, founder of True Girl. The word neighbor
in the command to love your neighbor as yourself literally
means any other person that includes your kids. This brings
a question to mine, doesn't it. Do I love myself
in godly ways? Depending on how you were raised or
your personality, this might sound selfish to you, but when

(29:29):
you joyfully embrace your identity in Christ and take care
of yourself out of love for who God created you
to be something amazing happens, We're more likely to naturally
overflow with healthy love for our kids. Loving our children
out of our own healthy place is a valuable example
of loving our neighbor as ourselves. For more tips on

(29:51):
how to raise your kids, go to danagresh dot com.

Speaker 23 (29:57):
Package just start at twenty nine ninety nine a month.
Sign agreement restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for complete
offer details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details, terms and
conditions applying homeowners.

Speaker 22 (30:08):
If you're looking for the best in home security and
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,
we have great news. Now you can get Vivints award
winning home security systems starting at about a dollar a day.
US News and World Report has recognized vivid as the
best professionally installed home security system of twenty twenty two,

(30:28):
and right now you can get Vivins home security technology
for about a dollar a day, plus get free professional
installation from a licensed technician. Protect your home and loved
ones for as low as a dollar a day. Call
right now for your free home security consultation.

Speaker 23 (30:43):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one.
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty.

Speaker 2 (30:57):
One with a spool. Let's go to find out what's
really going on. This is govern America.

Speaker 10 (31:24):
Welcome back to the broadcast. This is Governed America. The
website for the show is Governamerica dot com. That's Governamerica
dot com. My email address is radio at Governamerica dot com.
And Vicky, you want to give your information ont please Yeah.

Speaker 11 (31:38):
My website is the Technocratic Tyranny dot com. The older
website is Channelingreality dot com. My email addresses on both websites.

Speaker 10 (31:48):
Before the break, we were sharing audio from Megan Kelly
who was on the Tucker Carlson Show. By the way,
batlink also will be in the show notes. I encourage
everybody to go watch that entire show. It was excellent.
But Tucker did a really good tribute to Charlie Kirk there,
but he also brought on Megan Kelly. They got to
talking about the bullying and intimidation that's going on by

(32:13):
Israel and pro Zionist forces to stifle any narratives, anything
that doesn't that the Israeli government wouldn't approve of. Now,
what's ironic about this whole situation is that the same
kind of thing is going on here with the Trump administration.
There's a lot of lot happening, major attacks on the

(32:35):
First Amendment, but it's totally getting a pass by the right.
And I will get to that here as time progresses.
This is these are very important issues, ladies and gentlemen,
because what it really strikes to is strikes to the
heart of whether or not we're going to be able
to live as free people. If you don't have your

(32:56):
freedom of speech, you don't have anything. And that's really
what we're getting at here. You should be able to
talk about any subject. You should be able to criticize
any politician, criticize any government, and criticize any group. You know. Now,
other people can disagree with you. You don't have to
agree with something or they don't have to agree with you,

(33:18):
But if you can't even say it without being fingered
as a hate criminal. As a matter of fact, I
wasn't going to do this here, but let me just
go Last week on this very show, I predicted that
because of the Israel questions that were being asked, that
we were going to have somebody start pushing for hate

(33:41):
crimes legislation. Well, isn't it interesting? I didn't have to
wait long that stupid blonde bimbo at the Department of Justice, Pambondi,
came right out and in here she is saying that
she's going to start prosecuting hate crimes or hate speech.

Speaker 11 (34:02):
There's free speech and then there's hate speech.

Speaker 15 (34:05):
And there is no place, especially now, especially after what
happened to Charlie in our society.

Speaker 27 (34:12):
Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups
who are using hate speech and on people.

Speaker 14 (34:21):
So we show them that some action is better than
no action.

Speaker 15 (34:25):
We will absolutely target you, go after you if you
are targeting anyone with hate speech anything.

Speaker 14 (34:33):
And that's across the aisle.

Speaker 11 (34:36):
Okay, yeah, define hate speech, you dumb bimbo.

Speaker 10 (34:40):
Anything that she disagrees with, exactly, anything that I'm sorry,
the Trump administration has gone total authoritarian, you know. And
if Biden had done this, the screaming and yelling and
hollering and gnashing of teeth and pulling out of hair
on the right would have been absolutely well, you know,

(35:01):
and and and to be fair, there was a lot
of pushback from the right and thank god because she
did walk it back, you know, and said, oh, wow,
we're not really gonna target We're just you know, we're
gonna do uh. You know, it's just stuff that leads
to violence. But this was a floater, folks.

Speaker 11 (35:20):
Anything can lead to violence. Yeah, if you know, if
a person disagrees with it, and if there if they
happen to be of a criminal mindset. I mean, it's
just that is a slippery slope.

Speaker 10 (35:37):
Absolutely absolutely it is. So she was definitely floating that
out there, you know, to see what would I think
there was a test testing the water, you know, putting
a toe in the water, putting the finger in the wind,
when wedding the finger, putting it in the wind, seeing
what they could get away with. Uh. And but I
wouldn't be a bit surprised if they don't start trying

(35:59):
to target it. And it's just remarkable to me. I
thank god that the right had some sense about them.
But there's a lot of things that the right is
going on going along with right now that I think
that they should be objecting to. And you know, all right,
let me just get back to this clip. I started

(36:21):
the clip before the show. I wanted to finish it
out again. I'm going to start it from the beginning.
This is only about a minute long. Megan Kelly on
the Tucker Carlson jow.

Speaker 15 (36:28):
Charlie is not the only one who's been threatened or
was threatened to cut ties with you or not platform you.
I too have gotten met, especially since you've been more
outspoken on Israel.

Speaker 16 (36:41):
And I couldn't care less the amount of pressure they put.

Speaker 11 (36:45):
I'm like, what are you talking about? This is madness.

Speaker 15 (36:48):
Why would you want to silence such a powerful important
voice just because you disagree with them on one subject,
one on which we've all watched you sincerely evolve as
you grapple with principles you've been espousing for years, like
America First, Like what's happening to Christians? Like what's best
for us in our kids here? How do I keep

(37:09):
them safe? That's my number one priority? And I've been
just absolutely disgusted and recoiled from people who have tried
to pressure me on it. Of course never happened, but
I know from speaking to Charlie he felt it too.
You've heard it from Charlie that he felt and there
is a layer here of nefarious pressure to have certain
narratives go only one way that must be called out

(37:32):
and must be thought.

Speaker 10 (37:34):
Okay, So there's confirmation again that Charlie was being pressured
and that others in his orbit was being pressured. Megan, Kelly, Tucker, Carlson,
you're not allowed to ask questions about Israel, and you
just heard Pam BONDI say that if you do, you
might be guilty of hate crimes and the federal government
might be looking at you a little more carefully. I

(37:55):
don't want to live in under America like that. I
don't want to I want to live in America where
the First Amendment means something. You're going to say something, VICKI, Yeah,
I was gonna say.

Speaker 11 (38:10):
You know, when they globalized the economy, they globalized our government,
and so what they're purporting to represent are global values,
not American values.

Speaker 10 (38:24):
It certainly seems that that's the transition. We hear a
lot about transitioning today, don't we.

Speaker 11 (38:30):
They transitioned us right out of our country.

Speaker 10 (38:34):
Yeah, all right. So one of the people who has
been asking questions is Cannie Owens, and now she's got
her own show called Candish, and she's confirming also a
lot of that what was reported in that Gray Zone
article that we covered last week about Netanyahoo and Israel.

Speaker 28 (38:55):
How are to be very clear that I believe fact
I know that towards the end Charlie was fighting for
custody of himself.

Speaker 16 (39:03):
I want to say that.

Speaker 28 (39:04):
I want to say that plainly, and there are lies
that are being told and they need to be slapped down.
Right now, there's one person who's been out there acting
like he is a widow, you know, just saying the
absolute most tweeting first about what happened to Charlie, following
ad minute to minute, you know, and doing hits in
a foreign country, right like making time to do hits

(39:25):
on Fox News. Two of them, bb net and Yahoo
is who's fighting. I think like an eighty four front
war with everyone made a lot of time for Charlie Kirk.
You would have thought they were the best of friends,
as close as him and Trump were. But I will
say I don't recall Erica mentioning bibntan Yahoo in her speech.
The way he's presenting it is like he was. I mean,

(39:48):
this is just the worst loss for him. But I
don't think that that is the truth. In fact, I
know for a fact that he is misrepresenting some things
that happened there towards the end, But it really sounded
like it was about bebe to establish a narrative, a
narrative that we saw reinforced by a lot of people
that Charlie kind of meane it almost sound like he
died for Israel. There definitely is a little bit more

(40:10):
to the story. First and foremost, that letter he is
holding up, he is severely misrepresenting.

Speaker 16 (40:15):
Those sentences are real.

Speaker 28 (40:18):
But I am calling upon bib Net and Yahoo The
Dear Friend to Charlie Kirk to publish the letter's entire contents, Like,
don't start with just two sentences, publish.

Speaker 16 (40:27):
The entire thing. You're holding it.

Speaker 28 (40:29):
I'm saying, you're severely misrepresenting the contents that in May,
Charlie was concerned about Israel and their influence on American
politics and how they were pushing things that he felt
were in conflict with his beliefs free speech here in America.

(40:49):
Bibi's holding it up like Charlie just in May said, Hey,
you know what, I just want to write a love
letter at Israel. That's how it was presented. Would you
guys agree that's not how it happened.

Speaker 10 (41:00):
Okay, So what do you think so far?

Speaker 11 (41:03):
That's interesting. Yeah, I think I've short changed her. I
probably should go back and listen a little more to
what she's had to say. When when she left, I
don't know, what was a turning point USA, and she

(41:26):
kind of went off my radar.

Speaker 10 (41:29):
Yeah, I did she leave turning Point because she was
still speaking at their events. I don't know that she
was ever she was an employee or something.

Speaker 11 (41:39):
But I'm not sure. I'm not sure, but it seemed like.

Speaker 10 (41:42):
I think she was. Wasn't she working for the Daily
Wire or something, and that's when she run a foul
of them. Wherever it was she was working, it might
have been the Daily Wire. It seems like that's what
I remember.

Speaker 11 (41:56):
Yeah, I don't know, but it seemed like that she
was everywhere for a while and then she was nowhere. Yeah,
and so she kind of went off my radar.

Speaker 10 (42:06):
But on her podcast, she was talking about George Zen.
You know, this seventy one year old weirdo who created
a distraction so that the real killer could get away
and who's now been accused by the way of possessing
child porn on his phone. That was the latest. They
sure didn't see that one coming. Yeah, but I shouldn't laugh.

(42:29):
It's not funny, but I mean, she was just only
unexpected and bizarre.

Speaker 16 (42:34):
So she addressed that first and foremost.

Speaker 28 (42:36):
What always stood out to us about this shooting was decoy. Boy,
Never in my entire life have I seen a situation
when a shooting happens and then somebody completely unrelated to
the shooting that just happened jumps up and down and
says that they did it and gets arrested for that

(43:00):
they did it, implying that they did it well.

Speaker 16 (43:02):
For whatever reason, Jeorge.

Speaker 28 (43:04):
Zin, who is a seventy one year old man, was
moved to do that right.

Speaker 16 (43:10):
Instantly, Charlie Kirk gets shot.

Speaker 28 (43:11):
Suddenly the seventy one year man jumps up and creates
what is obviously some sort of a distraction.

Speaker 16 (43:18):
Well, now it's about to get.

Speaker 28 (43:19):
Even stranger because since he's been arrested, he's now facing
charges of obstruction of justice because he didn't do it right.
Why would you do that? Why would you obstruct justice
in this manner? And now, in addition addition to those charges,
we learn that he's been harboring images of child abuse.

Speaker 16 (43:39):
Okay, he has kitty porn.

Speaker 28 (43:41):
What that signals to me about George Zinn is that,
I mean, I've read a lot about Jeffrey Epstein. I've
read a lot about blackmail operations. The people they tend
to go after are people who are.

Speaker 16 (43:55):
Into children full stop.

Speaker 28 (43:57):
Now, I'm not saying I obviously he's just been charged,
so I guess we have to say allegedly. But that's
what's coming up now that they found images on his
cell phone.

Speaker 16 (44:06):
So this guy who is into this sort of thing.

Speaker 28 (44:10):
We also figure out that in the past he has
given interviews related to September eleventh and al Qaeda. He
is in Utah, and he is obstructing justice, and he
also happens to have this totally disgusting addiction of some description.

Speaker 10 (44:33):
Okay, So another thing that she pointed out but I
didn't have time to clip, was one of the text
messages has Tyler supposedly saying that he changed his outfit.

Speaker 11 (44:45):
Yeah, that's kind of a weird thing for a guy
to say. Guys don't use the word outfit normally.

Speaker 10 (44:51):
You know, it's funny that you picked up on that too.
I found it very interesting that you know that I
think women are better at that than men are, because
I might not have noticed that, but she picked right
up on it. And and and you're both right. I
never say I changed my outfit. Yeah. I never call

(45:14):
my clothes outfit. I say I changed my clothes, or
I changed my change my pants, change my shirt, whatever.
I never had. I don't ever use the word outfit.
And that that that's very interesting. So the fact that
he's texting back and forth between him and his alleged
trans lover and uh, and he uses words like outfit.

(45:36):
But she got into the text messages a little more
and there were other weird anomalies that she found there.

Speaker 28 (45:43):
I want you to grab your cell phone and I
want you to go to your text messages.

Speaker 16 (45:48):
And search for certain terms.

Speaker 28 (45:51):
Okay, that you just use when you speak to your friend's,
terms that were just casually tossed into a conversation the
alleged conversation between the twenty two year old alleged killer
of Charlie Kirk Tyler Robinson and his twenty two year
old boyfriend, Lance Twigs.

Speaker 16 (46:08):
Okay, the first term I want you to search is retrieve.

Speaker 10 (46:13):
Lookot up.

Speaker 28 (46:14):
When is the last time that you use the word
retrieve between you and a friend retrieve. I'm going to
retrieve something. I played this game with my entire staff
and I was able to find since dating back for
the last three years, two messages where someone used that term.
The first person was somebody that was former military and

(46:36):
the second person was a cop. Makes sense. Okay, we're
not done playing this game. Second term that I want
you to look for in your phone is vehicle vehicle. Well,
I mean, what pops up for you? Does that something
that you say, I'm just going to go outside to
my vehicle. I left something in my vehicle. I'll be
right back.

Speaker 16 (46:53):
I just I just parked. I parked my vehicle outside.
I don't remember where I parked my vehicle was popping
up for you? Oh? Probably literally nothing.

Speaker 28 (47:03):
Maybe something related to the DMV that's came up for me,
things about the DMV. I think for Skyler something came
up for his car wash. Your vehicle is ready sounds
pretty professional. I don't know what to tell you guys, though,
because what they're telling us is that that is just
the way the twenty two year olds are speaking these days.
Apparently they just shoot the breeze with one another and

(47:26):
they say vehicle and retrieve. I love vehicles, love fast vehicles.
I'm a big vehicle person, said nobody ever. The text
messages that were released yesterday in the indictment of Tyler
Robinson make perfect sense if you don't think about them
at all. Now we are more broadly considering how stupid
the FEDS believe that we are, and the frankly obnoxious

(47:50):
messages that someone strung together must clearly be for either
hour or their own entertainment. So I want to hyper
focus on those first and foremost. The obvious thing, there's
no timestamps right away, major red flag. I also want
to point out the fact that the language, which many
people said online, somebody actually left a very funny comment.

(48:12):
It's like borderline poetic. He's got commas it there. It's
like perfect English. And that's actually a striking contrast compared
to what's inscribed on the casings.

Speaker 10 (48:26):
Okay, And she also talks about how evidently repeatedly in
the FEDS use the number thirty three gratuitously in the indictment.

Speaker 18 (48:39):
Yeah, I did hear a bit about that.

Speaker 10 (48:41):
Masonic number thirty three, and there was no reason for
it because they could have put the actual date and
time of things, but they said no, this happened thirty
three hours after the shooting. Okay, can you have any
bigger Masonic flag than that? I mean, what's the need
to flag things with the number thirty three? It's bizarre

(49:08):
unless you're trying to convey a message to people that hey,
you know, this is all part of the club. So anyway,
I would say to everyone, you need to go to
kandas Owens channel and Rumble and watch her shows. I
will put the links in the show notes because there's
a lot there. Obviously I can't clip it all. There's

(49:30):
just too much. But she makes a lot of great points,
and of course they're now smearing her as an unhinged
and a conspiracy theorist. I do have one short final
clip from her because they raided the apartment of where
Tyler Robinson, this alleged shooter and his alleged training lover lived,
and seized electronics. Now before they even had a chance

(49:53):
to go through the electronics, Governor Cox, the Utah governor
announced on TV we got them, you know, implying that
the investigation's over and they're leading everything toward closure. They
released the training lover without charging him and that's what
Candie went, I address.

Speaker 16 (50:13):
This night eleven pm ish.

Speaker 28 (50:14):
We'll tell you around eleven pm, Lance Twigs is brought
in for questioning.

Speaker 16 (50:20):
Okay, and surely thereafter that apartment is rated.

Speaker 28 (50:24):
And I say overnight into the wee hours of the
morning is when they first read Tyler Atlanta's apartment.

Speaker 16 (50:31):
Now, why am I really stressing this out to you?

Speaker 28 (50:33):
I'm stressing this point to you here because this would
signal to you that it would be absolute bs if
the fedch you're gonna tell us bright early the next
morning that the case is closed, they would know nothing.
According Tolance's family, they see this is when they seized
his electronics. They say that he's deep on the internet web,
that there's definitely gonna be something there. And yet they

(50:55):
told us that quite oddly, Lance gets released right back
to his parents, right, not right back, Lance just gets
released to his parents while they're raiding his apartment. Why
would they release Lance? Wouldn't you think that you would
be detained like for at least twenty four hours?

Speaker 29 (51:13):
Right?

Speaker 28 (51:13):
If we're putting this at around eleven pm ish that
they have brought him in and they are questioning him,
and they are now moving to raid his his apartment
in the wee hours in the morning. Why would they
very quickly release him? And beyond that, I'm going to
let you know, let's jump into Friday on a timeline.
Like I said, early hours, Tyler and Lance have their
apartment rated and the device is seized for whatever reason.

(51:36):
The FBI quickly releases Lance, and I'm told that he's
dropped off at his parents' home allegedly, allegedly. And then
it's at six am that President Trump announces with a
high degree of certainty that they have the suspect. And
here is what the governor is Then two hours later,
as when his press conference began.

Speaker 2 (51:54):
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, we got him.

Speaker 30 (51:57):
This is a very sad day for again for our country,
a terrible.

Speaker 2 (52:03):
Day for the state of Utah.

Speaker 30 (52:05):
But I'm grateful that at this moment we have an
opportunity to bring closure to this very dark chapter in
our nation's history.

Speaker 16 (52:13):
Closure, he says, closure.

Speaker 10 (52:16):
We got him.

Speaker 28 (52:17):
They already start in that. He starts talking about the messages.
He starts filling in the blanks. He said he had it,
he put it in a towel. We have messages. It's
all over. We found it on discord. Discord is going
to say that's not true. So who made up these messages?
When were these messages made up?

Speaker 16 (52:32):
Is the question?

Speaker 28 (52:33):
If Discord saying they don't exist, this signals to me
that these messages were just created, right, And I'm further
feeling that way because there's no time stamps and we
got them. It's over and we can turn the page
with finality. Would you if you were an honest governor
and you knew that only again ish four hours earlier,

(52:58):
how long does it take.

Speaker 16 (52:59):
To rate a home?

Speaker 14 (53:00):
Is it quick?

Speaker 28 (53:00):
Is it like a ten minute thing? It feels like
gonna be a long thing to grab a device? Is
if you knew that you had not even begun going
through those devices, how would you say that we can
close this chapter?

Speaker 16 (53:10):
Why would you say that we can close the chapter?
I would have said, honestly, And he does not.

Speaker 28 (53:16):
We raided his home and we are looking for more information.
We think that there's going to be a lot more information,
but we want to let you know that we at
least have one person that we feel is definitely involved.
As somebody says it says it over, it's done, wrap
it up. We're not gonna even tell you about the
fact that we just rated this place a couple of
hours ago, and the person who's place we raided, who

(53:38):
is the one that the family says is super Internet,
We just kind of released.

Speaker 16 (53:42):
We weren't interested in that. What are we to discern
from all of this.

Speaker 10 (53:45):
So any reactions.

Speaker 18 (53:48):
Yeah, it's.

Speaker 11 (53:51):
If they know that it's an AI event, then then
they could do all of that. You know, the search
of the house was perfunctory. It takes a long time
to search a house. I know, if anybody came into
my house to search, and I have a small house,

(54:13):
it would take a long time to go through everything.

Speaker 18 (54:16):
It would take hours.

Speaker 11 (54:17):
Yeah, and so but if they knew that this was
an AI generated event, then no need to investigate, right
because they know who is behind it.

Speaker 10 (54:31):
Well, I don't think it's an AI generated event now
that that's being floated out there and I'm not buying it.

Speaker 11 (54:38):
Well, the reason why I am is because I remember
years ago there was a system that they developed that
was a predictive type system that you know, people could
bet on the outcomes, you know, what what might happen,

(55:04):
you know, pick pick your favorite, and it was a
gambling kind of system and I haven't really looked into it,
and I didn't really think about this ahead of time
until I just heard her description of what they were doing. Yeah,
and so, uh, I want to say, there was a

(55:29):
guy who talked about that sort of thing, and I
think what he was writing about was a tontine. Do
you remember the word tontine?

Speaker 10 (55:45):
No?

Speaker 18 (55:46):
Okay.

Speaker 11 (55:47):
It's a a group of people that all get together
and they they bet on events and as a group
as a cartel. Yeah, okay, I'll tell you after the commercials.

Speaker 10 (56:06):
Okay, Yeah, because I was just gonna say, I have
to bet that an event is going to happen here
in just a few minutes, and it's at the top
of the art. Break. Stay with us, ladies, gentlemen, Our
number two of government America is straight ahead, don't go away.

Speaker 22 (56:33):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance,
then call the Cheap Car Insurance Hotline right now. Hey,

(56:53):
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have

(57:15):

Speaker 23 (57:18):
eight two five seventeen ten. Packages start at twenty nine
ninety nine a month with sign agreement restrictions apply. Speak
to a representative for complete off for details. Seevivent dot

(57:40):
com for licensed details. Terms and conditions apply all owners.

Speaker 22 (57:43):
smart home technology at a price you can actually afford.

Speaker 14 (57:49):
We have great news.

Speaker 22 (57:50):
Now you can get Vivints award winning home security systems
starting at about a dollar a day. US News and
World Report has recognized Vivid as the best profestionally installed
home security system of twenty twenty two, and right now
you can get Viven's home security technology for about a
dollar a day, plus get free professional installation from a

(58:11):
licensed technician protect your home and loved ones for as.

Speaker 14 (58:14):
Low as a dollar a day.

Speaker 22 (58:15):
Call right now for your free home security consultation.

Speaker 23 (58:19):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one,
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one two.

Speaker 31 (58:51):
Eason American Family News Almost dep dozens of protesters, including
multiple politicians, were arrested Thursday after they tried to inspect
holding rooms at an ICE facility in New York City.

Speaker 17 (59:11):
Channeley Painter reports.

Speaker 32 (59:12):
That group staged a sit in to demand access to
the ICE office. ICE sources claiming officers had to secure
doors with locks and zip ties after protesters pushed to
inter chanting from outside the facility door, and meanwhile, downstairs,
a separate group of protesters blocked ICE vans from leaving
the facility. Overall, seventy one protesters were arrested, including New

(59:36):
York City Comptroller Brad Lander, two New York State senators,
and nine New York State Assembly members. DHS has confirmed
the building had to be put on lockdown because someone
called in a bomb threat.

Speaker 31 (59:49):
Police in Washington State announced Thursday they believe they found
the remains of Travis Decker, who was accused of kidnapping
and killing his three daughters earlier this year. Shelani County
Sheriff of Mike Morrison says police are still waiting to
confirm the identity of the remains, so we.

Speaker 33 (01:00:02):
Do feel pretty confident that there's a high probability that
says him, just based off the clothing, some of the
person items that we found on scene.

Speaker 31 (01:00:08):
ABC decided to pull Jimmy Kimmel Alive off the air
due to remarks Kimmel made suggesting that Trump supporters were
capitalizing off the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The
FCC suggested that ABC's broadcast license was at risk due
to Kimmel's comments. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr shares his views
on the situation and the importance of public interest obligation.

Speaker 34 (01:00:29):
We're going to continue to hold these broadcasters accountable to
the public interests, and if broadcasters don't like that simple solution,
they can turn.

Speaker 10 (01:00:36):
Their license into the FCC.

Speaker 34 (01:00:37):
There's other things that we can do with it that
would serve the national interest.

Speaker 31 (01:00:41):
In the House Overside Committee chair her testimony from former
White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zionce behind closed doors Thursday,
where lawmakers inquired about former President Joe Biden's use of
the auto pen and his mental decline. House Overside Committee
Chair James Comer says the former president's son was involved
in major decisions.

Speaker 35 (01:00:59):
We believe he was the main user of the autopan.
He also said that Hunter Biden was there at present
in discussing a lot of the pardon.

Speaker 31 (01:01:07):
Comra questions whether or not the former president was even
aware of every document signed by the autopen Republicans allege
age took advantage of the former president's mental state to
enact their own agenda. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has signed
House Bill seven. Chris Woodward has more.

Speaker 36 (01:01:22):
The law aims to protect women and their unborn children
from abortion drug traffickers who illegally mail the drugs into
the state. Texas Right to Life pushed for the law,
so did Life News editor Stephen Erteld says thousands of
abortion pills are trafficked into Texas every single year, and of.

Speaker 37 (01:01:40):
Course that undermines the pro life laws that they've passed
to protect babies from abortions. So here's what the law does.
It basically allows Texans to file a suit against all
of those companies that are selling abortion pills to Texas from.

Speaker 38 (01:01:54):
Out of state.

Speaker 37 (01:01:55):
There could be fines up to one hundred thousand dollars
in violation, and any one can file a suit. Somebody
who is a woman who has been injured by the
abortion pill can file a suit, a father whose baby
was aborted could file suit. Anyone in the state can
file a suit for damages. And the goal here is
if enough lawsuits are filed these illegal abortion companies that

(01:02:17):
are selling pills from out of state and even out
of the country in some instances, they might be able
to be shut down.

Speaker 36 (01:02:22):
Kevin or Rabbit signed HB seven in the law on Thursday.
Alliance Defending Freedom said the state of Texas is setting
an example.

Speaker 31 (01:02:30):
And finally, a pair of brothers from Texas spend their
time helping their community.

Speaker 17 (01:02:34):
Jennis Dean explains.

Speaker 39 (01:02:35):
Daniel and Martin Hernandez both work full time, but when
they're not on the job, they're helping their community. The
men offer their services like mowing the lawn, clearing the driveways,
a sidewalk and patios, or powerwashing. Martin says, you never
know what people are going through, but a simple act
of kindness can brighten a day or change an outlook.
The brothers began their mission several years ago doing paid

(01:02:58):
outdoor jobs with their dad, a meta client who told
them she couldn't afford her medical bills, and that's when
they decided to start doing things free of charge for
people who couldn't afford to pay them. Daniel and Martin
are now well known through their community and have so
many fans. They say they do it because it makes
them feel good to do good.

Speaker 31 (01:03:17):
More news online at AFN dot net and download the
AFN mobile app, where your Apple or Android device almost bepe.

Speaker 1 (01:03:28):
and for future generations, a new.

Speaker 17 (01:03:35):
World order, new world or the new World Order.

Speaker 4 (01:03:38):
This is a moment to sease. The clidoscope has been shaken,
The pieces.

Speaker 2 (01:03:42):
Are in flux.

Speaker 4 (01:03:43):
Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us
reorder this world around us.

Speaker 5 (01:03:48):
A new world order, a world where the United Nations
is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.

Speaker 6 (01:03:55):
Nevertheless, the United States that to make key Potician two
shaped is so that the problem of the push predjudicity
will be the emergence of the new international.

Speaker 7 (01:04:07):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century, that
out of what will be seen the greatest restructuring of
the global economy, greatest restructuring of the global economy, greatest
restructuring of the global economy, a new world order was created.

Speaker 2 (01:04:24):
Documenting the crisis of our republic.

Speaker 8 (01:04:26):
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and
open society, and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed to secret societies, the secret holds and the
secret proceedings.

Speaker 2 (01:04:41):
Waging war on the new world order.

Speaker 9 (01:04:43):
The councils of government we must guard again the acquisition
of unwanted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military
industrial conflict.

Speaker 2 (01:04:55):
This is Governor America for Daring Week's and Vicky Davis.

Speaker 10 (01:05:05):
From FEMA Regions five and ten. This is the Governor America,
our number two. It continues to be the twentieth of
September twenty twenty five. As we get right back into
the show. Here, Vicky, the clock interrupted you. You were
about to say something and I wanted to do. Yeah.

Speaker 11 (01:05:20):
I remember the name of the guy who talked about
ton teens. It was David Hawkins. Okay, you remember him
from I don't know, it was like in the early
two thousands.

Speaker 10 (01:05:35):
No, I don't remember him.

Speaker 11 (01:05:37):
Oh okay, well he somehow he got hooked up with
Field McConnell. I don't know if you remember him or not,
But anyway, he's the one that talked about ton teens
as an insurance kind of product. When they when they

(01:06:00):
globalized our economy, they basically deregulated our banking, our financial industry,
the insurance industry. They just started taking our country apart,
and you know, left us in the middle of the field,
like sheep in the field with the wolves surrounding us.

(01:06:21):
And most people had no idea and I include myself
in that.

Speaker 18 (01:06:26):
And anyway, this.

Speaker 11 (01:06:30):
You remember in the early two thousands when AIG had
the meltdown, Yeah, you remember those hearings. Well, I just
found out recently AIG moved offshore. They moved over to China.

Speaker 10 (01:06:47):
Well wasn't that convenient?

Speaker 11 (01:06:48):
Yeah, isn't that? Isn't that nice? And it seems to me,
now people have to understand I'm just thinking here, but
I think that with what this event was, with the

(01:07:10):
shooting and killing Charlie Kirk, it's just too wrapped up
to too nicely in a package, and there's something very
very wrong with it.

Speaker 10 (01:07:24):
Yeah, well I think they're lying about it. That's one thing.
Let's go to the phone's got a call on the line.
I think this is art in Georgia. Go ahead, you're
on the air.

Speaker 40 (01:07:34):
Hey, guys, got two things I'd like to talk about,
and I guess probably only going to have time for one,
so I'll let you pick. We can either talk about
Pam Bondi and her comments on hate speech, or we
can talk about this video on Jeffernce's website, which is
poppycock claiming that a palm gun was used to kill

(01:07:58):
Charlie Kirk, Which one I want to talk about.

Speaker 10 (01:08:00):
Well, go ahead with number two first, because I'm interested
in I've seen some references to this, so let's hear that.

Speaker 40 (01:08:07):
Okay, this this so called palm gun.

Speaker 10 (01:08:11):
In the video, it shows a guy, Well, are you
talking about that security guardan?

Speaker 40 (01:08:17):
I don't know if he was a security guard. He's
kind of standing on the outside of the of the fence.

Speaker 10 (01:08:21):
Yeah, that's directly behind Charlie, right.

Speaker 40 (01:08:27):
Not directly behind, more off to the side of it.

Speaker 19 (01:08:29):
Okay, all right, and he was wearing a brown shirt.

Speaker 40 (01:08:33):
He also helped carry Charlie's body to the SUV that
carded him away. But let's talk about this palm gun
and why this is not possible. First of all, you
have to understand the palm gun was first manufactured in
eighteen ninety two, I'm sorry, in eighteen eighty three in France.

(01:08:59):
I'm sorry here in the United States at the Minneapolis
Fire Company. It was invented in France in eighteen eighty.

Speaker 19 (01:09:07):
Two, a year prior.

Speaker 40 (01:09:10):
Now, there are two different calibers related to this gun.
The first one is a thirty two caliber, which is
equivalent to the eight millimeter, and then there is the
twenty five ACP which ACP stands for Automatic cult pistol

(01:09:30):
the sixth millimeter, which is equivalent to the twenty five caliber.
Now here is the problem. I have a thirty two revolver,
so I know the kind of recoil that comes with it.
When you watch the video, there's no recoil. There's also
no sign of anything happening in this man's hand other

(01:09:53):
than what looks like him scratching his bset. Now, at
that range ten to fifteen feet away, no palm gun
is going to be accurate enough to make a kill shot.
The palm gun only works when you are extremely close,
like standing right next to the individual, where you know
you are guaranteed to strike your target. You are not

(01:10:16):
gonna stand ten to fifteen feet away, standing sideways to
your target and fire from the bicep level and make
a kill shot. Nobody is that good. It's not possible. So,
and here's the thing.

Speaker 41 (01:10:34):
The ammunition that went into the palm gun.

Speaker 40 (01:10:37):
Yes they make thirty two caliber today, Yes they make
twenty five caliber today.

Speaker 41 (01:10:42):
But the problem with that is the calendar. The ammo
for the palm gun is an extra short. They do
not make these anymore. They stopped manufacturing the palm gun
in nineteen and Remington was the last company to ever

(01:11:03):
manufacture this type of gun. They don't make the extra
short ammo anymore. You can't get it.

Speaker 38 (01:11:11):
Now.

Speaker 41 (01:11:12):
Here's another problem. You're talking about a reckon that is
one hundred.

Speaker 40 (01:11:16):
And five years old at least, finding one in operating
condition is nearly possible.

Speaker 10 (01:11:25):
Yeah. Well, I've seen a number of different and I
hate to use the phrase conspiracy theories, but that's really
that is what it is. It boils down to a
theory that people are making about this conspiracy. I mean,
I do think it was a conspiracy. I think there
was more than one person involved, and I think that

(01:11:46):
a lot of what we're being told by the FEDS
is total bs. That being said, I saw some pictures videos,
you know, the main video of the folks, the people
who are part of Charlie's security team making hands gestures,
hand motions just prior to his being shot, and people
saying yeah, yeah, that's exactly right. And and the fact

(01:12:08):
that it happened when he communicates yeah, I mean they're
talking to other people in the security team, making motions,
making hand gestures, and this is how they are keeping
him safe. You know. Uh, that's just normal, you know.
And and and so this is what a lot of

(01:12:28):
times people do out of ignorance, when they don't understand something,
They fill in the blanks, you know, and formulate theories.

Speaker 40 (01:12:37):
And when you start talking about and when you start
talking about firearms and AMMO, it really helps to know
what you're talking about, right, And a lot of people
make the mistake of watching a video or reading an
article from somebody like Jefferentz, who's about as reliable as
a part and windstorm, and then they run with it

(01:12:58):
and it's like, did you do any research? Did you
verify what he said? Obviously not, because had you done
any research into this, if you actually knew something about
weapons and ammunition, you would know that Jeffrence doesn't have
a clue what he's talking about. He's spouting bs that
he heard from somebody else probably most likely, or it's just

(01:13:23):
something he invented because it sounded good.

Speaker 10 (01:13:27):
Well, there's a lot of people and they have a
lot of different motives. And I'm not speaking to any
one individual here myself, but there broadly, there's a lot
of individuals out there that say things just to garner
attention for themselves.

Speaker 11 (01:13:42):
And they because there's money to be made in it.

Speaker 10 (01:13:46):
Well in some people make their living. Some people make
their living doing broadcasting and selling ads and what have you.
And I'm not casting shade on people making money or
people selling ads, but when the truth takes the back
see to people making money and people selling ads, advertising

(01:14:08):
and again, I'm not talking about any particular person here,
but the truth needs to be forefront of everything that
you do. Don't sensationalize things, tell the truth, and I
think that's really the best philosophy across the board. But
you were going to say something about Pam Bondi. I'll
give you a chance to do that.

Speaker 40 (01:14:27):
Okay, Yeah, there's an article. Let me get in here
to my computer real quick. There's an article on and
the link has been posted early on in the chat.
It's on First Amendment dot ntsu dot edu and it
talks about Sambondi's comments about hate speech. For well over

(01:14:53):
a decade now, ever, since this whole hate speech thing started,
people on the right were talking about.

Speaker 41 (01:14:59):
No no, no no no no no no, we can't
never go down that road.

Speaker 19 (01:15:02):
No no, no, no no.

Speaker 40 (01:15:03):
Now, all of a sudden, we see people on the right,
like Ambondi and others talking about we're going to investigate
hate speech. Well wait a minute, when did our attitude
change on hate speech? And I want to read just
one paragraph from this article. What constitutes hate speech is

(01:15:24):
inherently subjective, so it's impossible to narrowly define it in
a way that passes constitutional muster let alone in a
way that doesn't empower the government to target speech at
this favors, which goes to what you said earlier, as
Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Carlincond wrote in nineteen seventy

(01:15:44):
one Cohen v. California, one man's vulgarity is another man's lyric,
or is Justice Samuel Alito wrote almost four decades later
in Mataldtam this boast of our free speech jurisprudence is
that we protect the freedom to express the thought that

(01:16:09):
we hate. There is no provision in the First Amendment
it talks about hate speech. Speech is speech. We have
a right to free speech. And if we allow the
government these are my words, not the article. If we

(01:16:29):
allow the government to now begin to investigate hate speech,
who is going to define exactly what hate speech is?
And another really scary thing about this is if we
allow this to stand with the Trump administration, with a
Republican administration, Republican Congress, Republican House and Senate, whatever, If

(01:16:53):
we allow this to happen here, what's going to happen
when the Democrats getting.

Speaker 10 (01:16:58):
Party exactly in power. And I got the perfect definition,
I can tell you and change.

Speaker 40 (01:17:04):
Now they can come along and change the definition of
hate speech. And this will happen over and over and over,
with each new administration redefining what hate speech is, until
we get to the point to where nobody anywhere in
the country will ever be able to say anything and
will be too afraid to say anything because no one
will be no one will know what is allowed to

(01:17:27):
be spoken about.

Speaker 10 (01:17:29):
Yeah, I got the definition of hate speech of art.
I got the definition of hate speech. Hate speech is
speech that the government hates.

Speaker 11 (01:17:39):
Yeah, period, whichever government is in power.

Speaker 10 (01:17:43):
Yeah, and it'll be increasingly communistic, so it's perfect in
line with and you're seeing a taste of it right now.
You're seeing the taste of it. Oh yeah, with the left.
And I use that broadly because it won't be everybody
on the left right now. The left, Oh, they're all
they're all for free speech now that Kimmel has gotten

(01:18:04):
taken down. Isn't it funny how you know they're all
about it. But Tom Elliott, who owns Gravyan, you know,
the multimedia marketplace they call themselves. I've bought in clips
from there before. Sometimes you can find good stuff on
Graviyan that you can't find anywhere else. But he has

(01:18:27):
compiled a list of headlines from the COVID era because
the Democrats are all talking about Oh oh, isn't it terrible?
You know, even Hillary Clinton. Even Hillary Clinton came out
this week and said we defend freedom of speech. I'm like, really,
where was this tweet in twenty twenty when you guys
were all deep platforming everybody on the right. You know. Here.

(01:18:51):
October thirteenth, twenty twenty four, Tim Waltz said, quote, there's
no guarantee to free speech for misinformation or hate speech, okay.
August twenty seventh, twenty twenty four. Facebook admits bowing to
Biden administration pressure to censor Americans posting accurate info about COVID.

(01:19:12):
March seventh, twenty twenty four, Dan Goldman laments Republicans are
trying to stop government censorship. The First Amendment is not absolute.
These are the people that are now all about the
First Amendment, All free speech champions, ladies and gentlemen. September nineteenth,
twenty twenty three, Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

(01:19:33):
says free speech is a weapon of war and censorship
is necessary. July twentyth twenty twenty three. I got more.
I got more. July twenty, twenty twenty three. Representative Dan
Goldman votes to censor RFK Junior. He says no to
hate speech. July fourth, twenty twenty three. Biden FTC attacks

(01:19:55):
Twitter after Elon stops censoring wrong Think. Twenty twenty three.
Biden administration appeals Federal Appeals Federal Appeals Court telling him
telling them that they cannot censor Americans online. February third, Februe,
I'm sorry. February ninth, twenty twenty three. Plasket Delegate Plasket

(01:20:21):
says racist and hate speech is speech that cannot be
constitutionally protected anyway. It goes on from there, there's more. Yeah.
Kreene Jean Pierre. On September seventh, twenty twenty two, she
defended directing social media to censor Americans by saying, it's

(01:20:42):
critical for the American people. You know, it goes on.
I could I could go on and on, but you
get the drift. These are the so called free speech
champions of today. Yeah, give me a break.

Speaker 40 (01:20:56):
No, I'm actually having a I'm actually having a blast
watching these videos of people on the left screaming and
crying about getting fired and losing jobs and all of
this and how cancel culture is such a bad thing,
and it's like, look, you guys are the ones who
made the rules for this.

Speaker 10 (01:21:14):
Yeah, they were the initiators of.

Speaker 40 (01:21:16):
It is not cancel culture. What cancel culture has been
up till now is getting people going out of your
way to get people fired simply for saying something you
don't like. What we're seeing right now with these people
losing their jobs because they're celebrating the death of Charlie

(01:21:37):
Kirk and all this bs going on with this, this
is not cancel culture that you're seeing. What you're seeing
is consequence culture. What we're seeing is like that scountability culture,
you're seeing accountability culture. These people are now being held responsible,

(01:21:57):
being held accountable, and paying the consequence for their actions
and their words. You cannot, in the case of Jimmy Kimmel,
for example, you cannot go on syndicated television and make
those kind of incendiary comments.

Speaker 10 (01:22:15):
See that's where I disagree. I disagree on that and.

Speaker 41 (01:22:20):
Expect that ABC is not going to retaliate.

Speaker 10 (01:22:24):
Well, there's a reason why ABC dead, and I'm glad
you brought it up, because here's where I depart from
the right on this. Okay, I'm not down with the
Jimmy Kimmel suspension, and it wasn't a firing, as a suspension.
He'll probably be.

Speaker 40 (01:22:39):
Back a suspension. Yeah, he might be back.

Speaker 10 (01:22:42):
Yeah. And in fact, I think they're still paying them,
you know. Yeah, There's there's some factors that weighed in here,
and I want to get into that because this, to me,
is a First Amendment issue, and here's where I think
the left does have some reason to complain, legitimate reason

(01:23:04):
to complain. I have to point out the hypocrisy because
if you're and this is why I come down on this,
and this is why I have to be completely honest
about this. Now, if I'm a free speech advocate, I
have to be consistent across the board, okay, and I
think I think that really should apply to everyone. We

(01:23:25):
have to be consistent even if we don't like the person.
And I don't like Kimmel, even if I don't agree
with Kimmel. Does Kimmel have the right to say what
he wants to say, even if I think it's wrong, incorrect, abhorrent,
or whatever, as long as he's not violating other people's rights.
And I would say calling. I'm not saying he did this,

(01:23:46):
but he, you know, like getting on TV and saying,
you know, you should gun down somebody, or calling for
violence or you know, that's a different story. That's not
what he did. What he did was he told what
I view to be a blatant lie about the whole situation,
and that's what got him in trouble, right, that's what
got him in trouble.

Speaker 41 (01:24:06):
Trouble was he outright lied.

Speaker 10 (01:24:09):
But that's okay because lying, I'm saying. I'm not saying
it's okay from a moral standpoint, a spiritual standpoint or
something like that, but I'm saying it's okay from a
free speech standpoint. He's got a First Amendment right to lie.
I think we can agree on that right, right, I don't.

Speaker 40 (01:24:28):
But at the same time, with with with that, you know,
there are potential consequences. And this is the consequence of
going on a syndicated rate TV station and.

Speaker 41 (01:24:43):
Outright lying to the audience. This is why he was suspended.

Speaker 10 (01:24:48):
Okay, I think Vicky might be muted why he.

Speaker 40 (01:24:50):
Was suspended because he lied.

Speaker 10 (01:24:53):
Yeah, I think Vicky might be muted, well because of
what he said. She was trying to disagree with me.
We're almost up to the break, VICKI, yeah, I for
some reason, you're real quiet. I don't know why, all
of a sudden, yeah.

Speaker 11 (01:25:08):
Sort of the microphone. I think that there are so
many lies in our public dialogue, you know.

Speaker 18 (01:25:20):
I think that.

Speaker 11 (01:25:23):
Lying when you're a TV host and you are listening
to I mean, you are projecting out to a particular
targeted audience, I think lying should be against the law.

Speaker 10 (01:25:39):
No, I don't agree at all. I couldn't. I couldn't
disagree more because they will tell you that you're lying
to remember when.

Speaker 40 (01:25:48):
You got to remember though, when we talk about this
kind of thing, there are two words. What is libel?
What is slander?

Speaker 38 (01:25:56):
Now?

Speaker 40 (01:25:56):
One of them is in written form, the other is
in spoken form.

Speaker 19 (01:26:02):
Yeah, And when you Onion.

Speaker 11 (01:26:05):
He's libeling the entire.

Speaker 10 (01:26:08):
Hold on, let them let him finish real quick.

Speaker 40 (01:26:12):
When you go on ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, I don't
care which one it is.

Speaker 41 (01:26:18):
You go on any of these platforms and you outright lie,
you are committing a crime.

Speaker 10 (01:26:27):
I don't agree.

Speaker 40 (01:26:29):
Depending on whether it's in written form or in spoken form,
one libel one, slander. Those are crimes.

Speaker 10 (01:26:37):
Yeah, I have to disagree with you on that. We
can ferret that out, but we got to take the
break here. Hey.

Speaker 11 (01:26:43):
Thanks, We've got two against one, so that's ok.

Speaker 10 (01:26:48):
You're right out there to be wrong.

Speaker 11 (01:26:52):
Anybody ouse out there that has an opinion on that,
you know.

Speaker 22 (01:26:57):
Hold on, we gotta looking for the prices on car insurance.

(01:27:19):
for car insurance. And it doesn't matter if you have

(01:27:40):

Speaker 23 (01:27:43):
eight two five seventeen ten.

Speaker 2 (01:27:58):
What do the.

Speaker 42 (01:27:59):
Trails of falling meteorites tell us about the age of
the Earth and the universe? Plenty, as you're about to
find out on Today's Creation Moment. In now, our Creation
Moment's host Paul Taylor.

Speaker 43 (01:28:10):
Two rocks float through silent space, unaware that they'll soon
cause a scientific debate millions of miles away on Earth.
On Earth, these two small asteroids added together may weigh
only a few hundred pounds. However, the conclusions that can
be drawn from them might be weighty enough to overthrow
a powerful theory that summarizes the status of a scientific

(01:28:30):
debate over patterns in which meteorites fall. Evolutionary theory says
that when these two asteroids smash together in space, the
result in chunks will separate during the millions of years
before they ever strike the Earth. As a result, meteor
falls cannot possibly follow a pattern. However, a pattern has
now been discovered. Researchers from Perdue University and the State

(01:28:54):
University of New York say they've discovered seventeen meteorites that
struck the Earth in May between in eighteen fifty five
and eighteen ninety five form a broad line that extends
for several thousand kilometers because the Earth revolves. However, the
line is mathematical rather than geographical. The meteorites are classed
as H chondrites. When scientists analyze thirteen of the stones,

(01:29:18):
they found that each had similar amounts of rare trace
elements not found in forty five other H. Chondrite meteorites.
The meteorites did not fall into the geographic line researchers
had discovered. The findings strongly suggest that these stones had
not been drifting through space long enough to separate before
they hit the Earth. If the Solar System is billions

(01:29:40):
of years old, there is virtually no chance of the
stones remaining together, which suggests a young age for the
Solar System.

Speaker 42 (01:29:47):
Creation Moments as a listener supported broadcast. To find out
how you can become a part of the work we
are doing. Visit us at creationmoments dot com or call.

Speaker 14 (01:29:56):
One eight hundred four to two.

Speaker 23 (01:29:58):
Bible packages start at twenty nine nine unite a month
with sign agreement. Restrictions apply. Speak to a representative for
complete off for details. Seevivient dot com for licensed details.
Terms and conditions apply homeowners.

Speaker 22 (01:30:08):
we have great news. Now you can get Vivits award
US News and World Report has recognized Vivid as the

(01:30:28):
and right now you can get Vivins home security technology

Speaker 23 (01:30:44):
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one spoofs.

Speaker 2 (01:31:00):
Go to find out what's really going on? This is
govern America.

Speaker 44 (01:31:07):
Jimmy Kimmel has been silenced for now after creating an
uproar on his late night talk show on Monday. Kimmel
commented about Tyler Robinson, the man charged with Charlie Kirk's murder,
connecting him to President Trump's MAGA.

Speaker 45 (01:31:20):
Followers, with the Maga Gang desperately trying to characterize this
kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one
of them and everything they can to score political points
from it.

Speaker 44 (01:31:31):
That was followed by harsh reaction from FCC Chairman Brendan Carr,
who appeared on a podcast Wednesday.

Speaker 46 (01:31:38):
I mean, look, we can do this the easy way
or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
change conduct, to take action frankly on Kimmel, or you know,
there's gonna be additional work for the FCC ahead.

Speaker 44 (01:31:51):
And late today, ABC Network announced that Jimmy Kimmelive will
be preempted indefinitely, saying it quote strongly objects to recent
comments made by mister Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk.
That came after next Our Media Group, one of the
biggest owners of local TV stations in the country, said
it was pulling the late night show indefinitely from its

(01:32:12):
more than two dozen ABC stations. Brian Steinberg is senior
TV editor for Variety.

Speaker 47 (01:32:18):
Kimmel appears to have touched the nerve and as setting pushback,
and I think Disneys wants to get off the grid
for a little while and let things settle out.

Speaker 44 (01:32:26):
Jimmy Kimmel Ive debuted in two thousand and three and
has long been a thorn in the side of politicians,
including most notably President Trump, who pointed him out soon
after the announcement ending the Stephen Colbert.

Speaker 48 (01:32:38):
Show Fallon has no talent, Kimmel has no talent. Then
next they're gonna be going I hear they're gonna be going.

Speaker 47 (01:32:44):
Chilling is then you know, these are people who were
supposed to have be able to talk freely, make joaches
they see fit and the fact they're being pulled off
the air by their owner because of doing their own thing,
as they've done many times in the past is a
little discombobulating and not norm.

Speaker 44 (01:33:04):
And affiliate programming will now fill that time slot. It's
unclear if Kimmel will return to the air and what
this decision means for the larger media landscape moving forward.

Speaker 10 (01:33:14):
Okay, welcome back to the broadcast. That was a backgrounder.
Now we know what's going to happen because ABC pulled
the Kimmel's show. But I think this is a test
for all of us. I'm no fan of Kimmel, Okay,
I doubt that I would agree with him on anything,
and he expressed a viewpoint that was clearly, in my opinion,
it was clearly a lie. It is well documented at

(01:33:36):
this point in the indictment that the alleged shooter of
Charlie Kirk, this Tyler dude, was on the left and
he was not Maga. His family was, but he wasn't.
But that doesn't even really matter all that much. The
point is is that the comments were the comments, and
Kimmel's comments were followed by an uproar from the right.

(01:34:00):
Next Star is the largest, they said, one of the
largest in that report. I think it is the largest
owner of TV stations in the United States, many of
which are affiliated with ABC, the network that carries Kimmel's show.
Next Stars said that they were indefinitely suspending Kimmel's show,
And when that happened, I said, it wouldn't be long,

(01:34:21):
probably before ABC canceled it because that was going to
be a huge hit in their ad sales lots of markets.
Then that wouldn't be airing ABC TV ads. So sure enough,
it didn't take all that long at all for ABC
to announce that they were indefinitely suspending him. Now, now,
these companies have the right to refuse to carry Jim

(01:34:43):
Jimmy Kimmel. Okay, ABC doesn't have to carry him. Next
Star doesn't have to carry them on their TV stations.
Those are their TV stations. They have every right to
cancel the show if they want. Uh, that's fine if
that's all it was. But when you go deep for
you find that the reason Next Star made the decision

(01:35:05):
is that Next Star isn't an acquisition deal with Tegna,
another broadcast company, and they feared government retaliation. The deal
would be turned down by government regulators. And this fear
is very real, especially given and you heard them in
that report, the comments of the FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. Again,

(01:35:30):
you just heard him say, he issued direct threats. You
know that, Hey, we can either do this the easy
way and they can take action, or the FCC can
take action against them. That's kind of like mafia. You know,
you could refuse. Okay, then Disney followed suit.

Speaker 18 (01:35:51):
That's what kind of government we have at this point.

Speaker 10 (01:35:54):
Yes, Disney followed suit and pulling Kimel's show because of
the threats, and they are actually in a merger an
acquisition deal as well, you know, And then that's that's
a sub story there that should be more prominent. All
these big media companies making acquisitions and mergers to the
point where there's only going to be one media company left. Well,

(01:36:17):
the consolidation.

Speaker 11 (01:36:19):
I wrote about the consolidation of the media in the
early two thousands. We were down to like six big
major media companies and they were further consolidating, and so, yeah,
we have consolidation of the media. They eliminated the laws

(01:36:41):
that we had that restricted ownership of media properties, and
the big companies.

Speaker 18 (01:36:49):
Went out and they bottom all up.

Speaker 11 (01:36:52):
So we really are swimming in a propaganda soup of
just a few media companies.

Speaker 10 (01:37:00):
Yeah. And my point is, though, is that this is
direct government censorship of a TV show, and conservatives are
cheering it because they don't like the host or what
he said. I am not down with this. This is
not okay. Just because you don't like what is being
said does not give you the right to censor people.

Speaker 11 (01:37:23):
You have to be What I'm not okay with is
the consolidation of the media down to a couple of companies.

Speaker 10 (01:37:31):
Well, and why are you not okay with that? Because
it's very easy to censor viewpoints you can't make.

Speaker 11 (01:37:36):
It's very easy to propagandize, Yes, And I see it every.

Speaker 10 (01:37:40):
Day exactly, so that that's if.

Speaker 11 (01:37:44):
You can propagandize people and lie to them, tell them
things that are just simply not true. I mean, we're
on the we're on the verge of a civil war.
It's tearing our country apart, yea, and people people believe
all kinds of false things. We don't need that at

(01:38:08):
this point in time. We don't need that, and I
think they have to stop it. What they could do,
what they should do, is break up the media monopolies.

Speaker 10 (01:38:20):
Yeah, let me. I think art's still hanging on art.
I don't know if you had something else to say
about this, to me, them, lying is completely irrelevant. You
have a constitutional right. Look, here's the thing. If we
start we're going to start saying that lying and I'm
not saying directing this directly at you, I'm directing it

(01:38:42):
at at people in general. Because if we're going to
start making lying a a token of you, you only
have the right to free speech if you're telling the truth.
Then my question is who's going to be determining that
the fact checkers. We saw how well that went the
other side is trying to tell us and was just

(01:39:03):
a few years ago. And this is the amazing thing
about this whole debate right now is how quickly the
right is completely forgetting about what we just went through.
The whole uh yeah, the whole ministry of truth that
we had going on during the whole COVID era in
the war. You know, we played the audio from the
think tanks. Oh we got to crack down and missing disinformation,

(01:39:26):
and then to have this go on and oh what
he lied?

Speaker 41 (01:39:30):
He lied?

Speaker 10 (01:39:31):
Okay, so what free speech is free speech? Well, that's
go ahead.

Speaker 40 (01:39:36):
That's why I was making the That's why I was
differentiating between these videos I see of people getting on
the internet. I just got fired because I said XYZ
about Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 41 (01:39:48):
Blah blah blah.

Speaker 10 (01:39:48):
Yeah, that's a different issue.

Speaker 40 (01:39:49):
It's what I'm calling that's that's what I'm calling consequence culture,
accountability culture. What happened with Jimmy Kimmel. And this is
where I make the distinction. This this was not a
case of cancel culture or anything like that. Although he's
being held accountable for what he said, he's having to
pay the consequence for what he said. What he did

(01:40:11):
by lying the way he did, was he slandered, He
engaged in slander. Libel is written, slander is spoken, and
he what he did was he engaged in slanderous behavior,
telling an outright lie. And what ABC Disney, because they're

(01:40:32):
all connected, ABC is actually an affiliate of Disney, a
subsidiary of Disney. What they did was they made a
decision at the corporate level to suspend his show because
of what he did. This is their attempt at damage control.

Speaker 10 (01:40:52):
Yeah, I would I would say it's deeper than that, though,
because they the Trump administration was making noises about taking
at against the companies that carry his show. That's that's
a different issue. True that they're well within their right
to cancel the show for whatever reason, because it's their show.
They're paying him to do a job. They said, But

(01:41:15):
when when the government let me let me just finish,
When the government is putting pressure on a company because
they don't like what a particular host is saying, If
if the Trump administration can shut down Jimmy Kimmel or
any other host that they don't like. They can shut
certainly shut me down. They can certainly shut any of

(01:41:37):
our affiliate our affiliates down. They can certainly shut Yeah,
they can shut anybody down, absolutely. And that's the problem,
I think. What's that?

Speaker 40 (01:41:48):
According to their presser, According to their presser, what ABC said,
I'm going off memory at this point because I'm in
the kitchen working on my dinner. But what they said
again I'm going on memory. In their presser was the
comments made by Jimmy Kimmel. And this is verbatim. The
comments made by Jimmy Kimmel do not meet our community standards.

(01:42:11):
This is what they said. This is the reason why
he was suspended indefinitely. And you know what, Hey suspend
me indefinitely and let me sit home and draw thirty
million a year. I'll be happy with that, you know.
I mean, come on, But he will most likely be back,
but hopefully the result of this, again, he is suffering

(01:42:35):
the consequences for his lies. This is consequence culture and
action here.

Speaker 10 (01:42:40):
All right.

Speaker 40 (01:42:41):
Hopefully when he comes back, and I believe he will
come back, hopefully he will have learned his lesson and
not be so ignorant as to outright lie like this.

Speaker 10 (01:42:53):
Yeah, well public, good luck with that. Hey, thank you
for the call. I appreciate it. Takula, all right, man,
you have great what you do? Bye bye, Let's go
to Kentucky. Now, hello, you're on the air. Go ahead place.

Speaker 38 (01:43:08):
Well, I was taught probably, and I'm trying to remember
what year it was that I had a media school,
and then wasn't long after I got out of school.
Nineteen eighty there were something like fifty different news and
wire services in this country, and you know, twenty twenty five,
twenty six years years later, it was consolidated down the
six sometime after, you know, September eleventh, that it was

(01:43:33):
merger Mania. You might say, but I just rewatched the
nineteen ninety nine movie about Jeffrey Wygant and it gets
into a lot of the uh, the Jude what would
you say? Journalism protecting your sources type issues, and during

(01:43:54):
that time, you know, they kind of hung out Jeffrey
Wygant to dry. He was a whistleblower. The movie, somewhat,
I guess, Drown dramatizes some of the threats and stuff
he got, like a bullet left in his mailbox. His
computer was hacked and all this stuff. His wife ended
up leaving him over. But the CBS was merging or

(01:44:20):
was being acquisitioned for eighty one dollars a share by
I think a Westinghouse or some other you know, huge
corporation was buying CBS, and they were worried that if
the deal fell through because they were sued by Brown
and Williamson. Brown and Williamson would end up owning a

(01:44:43):
CBS because you know these huge corporate conglomerates that of course,
the Big Tobacco merged with Big Food. They have captured
the government, so they get whatever they want. The SEC
has basically a whoror for the telep phone industry probably
since the.

Speaker 10 (01:45:03):
Midnight and it's still true today. Uh they're they're a
horror for the big like Verizon and uh AT and T. Yeah. Uh,
they're getting In fact, they're taking away a lot of
the spectrum from over the air TV broadcasters and giving
them over to the cell phone companies. I just was

(01:45:24):
reading not too long ago in one of the trade
journals that they are in the process. They're good, they're
getting ready to have another spectrum auction. They got Congress
to approve it.

Speaker 38 (01:45:36):
Monster corporations are essentially psychopaths in their behavior if we
look at their modus opera, modus operado. These monster corporations
have become like psychopaths. The FCC waived any environmental concerns
for Elon Musk and his thousands of Why five satellites,

(01:46:00):
and of course Jeff Bezos has got their own Life
five satellite. What damages it's doing to the ozone layer
to have all these rocket launches to sustain because none
of these satellites last more than about five years. Plus
they get technology upgrades that makes them mops let even
them if they're still working, and every time they get

(01:46:21):
deorbited over the South Pacific somewhere or nobody sees it
damages the ozone layer. Plus whatever's burning up is you know,
chemicals and stuff, Yeah, batter ease and all that.

Speaker 10 (01:46:31):
Are they still dropping them into the ocean when they're
done with.

Speaker 38 (01:46:34):
Them, you know, Yeah, and they put them into the
ocean where nobody sees it down in the South Pacific.
But they do control deorbits. But what I'm getting at
is that I've heard various estimates is there's three different
companies that are going to be allowed to do this,
and the SEC has a quote International Bureau, so that

(01:46:55):
you know that division is that even under the control
and oversight of Congress. But they just wave, you know,
the environmental issues. And of course the attitude of Sam
Wheeler probably fifteen years ago when somebody asked legitimate journalists
asked him a question about what about the environmental effects

(01:47:17):
of this five G and effects on biological systems and
stuff like that, and he just says, ask the health people,
Ask the health people, and then he moves on. And
of course, you know, talk about the free free speech limitations.
There's a video where this guy simply opened his backpack

(01:47:38):
and showed a guy who had a press credential the
T shirt that he wanted to wear into this public hearing,
and he just simply showed it to him. The guy
didn't even take a picture of it. They both got
kicked out and he lost his press credential because the
guy wanted to wear this T shirt that dealt with
the electromagnetic field effects on biological systems or something, you know,

(01:48:02):
And so uh they they, you know, after a ruckus
was raised by other people in the press corps, they
gave him back his press credential. But that's that's where
we're at. These monster corporations have captured so many of
our government agencies. Uh, we have to be our own
health advocate. We have you know, we have to.

Speaker 10 (01:48:23):
We have to.

Speaker 38 (01:48:24):
We're going to be do it yourself ers and the
government is useless.

Speaker 10 (01:48:27):
Yeah, well to the point that we are able to
because yeah, as they cracked down, how can.

Speaker 38 (01:48:33):
We trust that there? How can we trust that they're
screening our food even if the Chinese wanted to inoculate
uh port products with something that would cause disease over here.
You know, like if you saw JFK the movie and
you go in and look into the unpublished clips of it,

(01:48:56):
and part of the plotline, man, it was that they
were working on a binary biological weapon during the height
of the Cold War. They're testing vaccines on the Russians,
but they're working on the American companies were working with
the intelligence community to make a biological binary weapon where
they gave Castro a vaccine that when he got his

(01:49:18):
lungs X trade for emphysema, boom instant cancer. That's part
of what the Joe Pesse thing was with the mice.
The movie edited that to the point where you couldn't
actually tell what was going on. And there's a scene
with where Chief Justice Warren interviews Jack Ruby and Jail

(01:49:42):
that was cut out of the movie where he says, look,
they're gonna kill me with cancer. They're gonna give me
a flu vaccine. It's gonna kill me. Because they knew
what was going on.

Speaker 10 (01:49:50):
Then this is, yeah, they can't have people putting that
together that they're killing people with vaccines.

Speaker 38 (01:49:56):
I'm sure Olives don't. Probably was under pressure to edit
that out. Oh yeah, time because it was just short
clips that you can find on the internet. Now they're
in black and white because it's proofs from when they
used them, you know, So it was a proof cut
and that that that's like edited scenes or unpublished scenes

(01:50:17):
from JFK if you're want to look for it. But anyway,
that's that proved to me that the entire Cold War
was a scam. Is the Russians? Why would do you
think the Russians are that stupid that they're going to
let the American drug companies experiment on their entire population
or huge chunks of the population with experimental vaccines, knowing
that this research is going on to make binary biological weapons.

Speaker 11 (01:50:40):
Only the American government would allow that, and they do
allow that.

Speaker 10 (01:50:45):
I'm not so sure that the Russian government doesn't do
its own experimentation on its own people. They had the
COVID shot run.

Speaker 38 (01:50:53):
What I'm getting at is that we're in a loggerheads
cold war here, with the bomber gap, the missile gap,
and all this junk that they were selling the American people,
which was all military industrial complex money making stuff that
r think Russia was the best enemy money could buy.
And the whole Cold War was a scam because why
else would they allow us to experiment on their population

(01:51:16):
where they ethically couldn't do it in America at the
end in nineteen sixty, if there was a real Cold War,
the Russians should have been very paranoid about that. I
don't know what kind of deals were made, like, hey,
here's just some eighty tons of wheat, we just want
to experiment on your people. There's these vaccines, you know. Yeah,
it just it debunks the whole Cold War that the

(01:51:38):
Russians would even consider to allow that, I mean, how
much you know? Of course, I was also heard that
Russia's economy has always been pretty much about the equivalent
of Italy.

Speaker 10 (01:51:50):
Yeah, and we're facing another Cold war which threatens to
be a hot war. So it's like the more history.
They say, history doesn't repeat itself, but at rhymes. Well,
it's doing a lot of rhyming these days, isn't it. Well,
moving more and more towards conflict. I'll give you a

(01:52:11):
final shot there.

Speaker 38 (01:52:12):
It seems like that. It seems like they want us
to think that because then, guess what, it justifies all
the military expenditures. And they spend so much they can't
even keep track of it. At the last I heard,
the Pentagon alone is unable to properly track something like
twenty seven trillion dollars.

Speaker 10 (01:52:29):
Yeah, and they're moving right now to get weapons. You know,
Trump is bombed like three now, supposedly Venezuelan drug cartel vessels.
We don't know what these vessels are, but they're telling
us that they're drug cartel members. You know, how do

(01:52:49):
we know? But the point is what authorization exists for
Trump to do this? You know? Does he just have
carte blanche ability now to bomb whoever he wants, whenever
he wants at will?

Speaker 11 (01:53:03):
Is he does in international waters?

Speaker 19 (01:53:05):
Yeah?

Speaker 18 (01:53:06):
Yeah, I don't think so.

Speaker 10 (01:53:08):
I don't think so. That's not The Constitution requires a
declaration of war. Congress is supposed to declare war. And
even during the Obama administration where the nine to eleven
Mission Creep, of the creep that started the mission I'm
talking about George W. Bush and the War on Terror

(01:53:28):
being the mission, the Mission Creep that existed under Obama,
Obama repeatedly pressured Congress for an authorization and updated authorization
for use of military force. He understood that what he
was that all the military's activities were unconstitutional.

Speaker 11 (01:53:48):
And every war we've been in since the end of
World War two has been a police action. And what
you could say about Venezuela is that it was a
police action.

Speaker 10 (01:54:03):
Yeah, well, it's not our job to be policing the world.

Speaker 11 (01:54:06):
That's well, But what we think and what they do
what they're legally authorized to do are two different things.

Speaker 10 (01:54:13):
Well, I don't know if they're legally authorized to do it,
but they seem to do it anyway. Hey, Mike, I
appreciate the call.

Speaker 38 (01:54:19):
Okay, One last thing was the legal mechanism they're using
is that something is a clear and present danger and
so these boats at least initially, at least initially these
boats were being they attempted to make them stop and
pull over, and if they wouldn't, then they hit them.

(01:54:39):
But I saw others where they're sitting seal and the
water they blew up, and I mean you can see
the packages of something dope or whatever. And you've got,
you know, four engines and two or three guys in
a boat headed for America. And so I mean, if
they refuse to stop, we don't know if they've got
what they've got there. They could have biological weapons, they

(01:55:02):
could have any number of things.

Speaker 10 (01:55:03):
That's what we have a coast guard for. It's what
we have a coastguard for. And we've never bonded them
in the past, that's my point. And well, yeah, well they.

Speaker 38 (01:55:16):
Don't.

Speaker 10 (01:55:18):
Coast Guard has been dealing with that kind of stuff
since there was a coast guard. Hey, hey, appreciate the call.
Thank you. I'm up against the clock here, But be careful, beware,
ladies and gentlemen of the necessity of force, because every
authoritarian thing that's ever been done throughout history has always
been couched in the venear of necessity. We had to

(01:55:43):
do it.

Speaker 11 (01:55:43):
I care about I care about the young people of
this country and them getting a hold of fentanyl not
even knowing that it's fentanyl. I mean, a member of
my own family died.

Speaker 10 (01:55:58):
I'm not going to defend f a and I'm not
going to defend drug traffickers, drug cartel members. But what
I am going to say is we have to adhere
to principles of the Constitution, or at least get back.

Speaker 11 (01:56:10):
I don't care about principles. Whether it's a navy boat
that bombs the drug boat or whether it's coast guard.

Speaker 10 (01:56:20):
You can't have situational ethics. It's just that's the problem.

Speaker 11 (01:56:25):
What's the coast guard doing down in Venezuela. They have
question There are coast guards, So we got to take
a break.

Speaker 10 (01:56:35):
We'll be back.

Speaker 22 (01:56:35):
She is on car insurance, then call the Cheap Car
Insurance Hotline right now. Hey, you're guaranteed to save money
on your car insurance. Most car insurances can be canceled
at any time. That means if you find a better deal,
you can switch right away. We're not just one company.
We offer most of the major brands of car insurance.

(01:56:55):
We're like a discount supermarket for car insurance. And it
doesn't matter if you have a good record or a
bad driving record. Our agents are experts at finding you
the right car insurance for your needs. Our average customer
saves hundreds of dollars a year when they call us
to switch. So why don't you make this one hundred
percent free call right now and see how much you

(01:57:16):
can save on your car insurance.

Speaker 23 (01:57:18):
eight two five seventeen ten. Packages start at twenty nine
ninety nine a month, with sign agreement restrictions apply. Speak
to a representative for complete offer details. Seevivent dot com

(01:57:40):
for licensed details. Terms and conditions apply.

Speaker 22 (01:57:43):
Homeowners, if you're looking for the best in home security
and smart home technology at a price you can actually afford,

(01:58:03):
and right now you can get Viven's home security technology

Speaker 23 (01:58:19):
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one.

Speaker 2 (01:58:43):
Two still.

Speaker 31 (01:59:00):
American Family News almost dep Dozens of protesters, including multiple politicians,
were arrested Thursday after they tried to inspect holding rooms
at an ICE facility in New York City.

Speaker 17 (01:59:11):
Channeley Painter reports.

Speaker 32 (01:59:12):
That group staged a sit in to demand access to
the ICE office. ICE sources claiming officers had to secure
doors with locks and zip ties after protesters pushed to
inter chanting from outside the facility door, and meanwhile, downstairs,
a separate group of protesters blocked ICE vans from leaving
the facility. Overall, seventy one protesters were arrested, including New

(01:59:35):
York City Comptroller Brad Lander, two New York State senators,
and nine New York State Assembly members. DHS has confirmed
the building had to be put on lockdown because someone
called in a bomb threat.

Speaker 31 (01:59:48):
Police in Washington State announced Thursday they believe they found
the remains of Travis Decker, who's accused of kidnapping and
killing his three daughters earlier this year. Shelani County Sheriff
Mike Morrison says police are still to confirm the identity
of the remains, so we do.

Speaker 33 (02:00:02):
Feel pretty confident that there's a high probability that says him,
just based off the clothing, some of the person items
we found on scene.

Speaker 31 (02:00:08):
ABC decided to pull Jimmy Kimmel Alive off the air
due to remarks Kimmel made suggesting that Trump supporters were
capitalizing off the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The
FCC suggested that ABC's broadcast license was at risk due
to kimmel's comments. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr shares his views
on the situation and the importance of public interest obligation.

Speaker 34 (02:00:28):
We're going to continue to hold these broadcasters accountable to
the public interests, and if broadcasters don't like that simple solution,
they can turn their.

Speaker 10 (02:00:36):
License into the FCC.

Speaker 34 (02:00:37):
There's other things that we can do with it that
would serve the national interest.

Speaker 31 (02:00:41):
In the House Overside Committee chair herd testimony from former
White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zionce behind closed doors Thursday,
where lawmakers inquired about former President Joe Biden's use of
the auto pen and his mental decline. House Overside Committee
Chair James Comer says the former president's son was involved
in major decisions.

Speaker 29 (02:00:59):
We believe he was.

Speaker 35 (02:01:00):
He's the main user of the autopan. He also said
that Hunter Biden was there at present in discussing a
lot of the pardon.

Speaker 31 (02:01:07):
Comra questions whether or not the former president was even
aware of every document signed by the autopen Republicans allege
age took advantage of the former president's mental state to
enact their own agenda. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has signed
House Bill seven. Chris Woodward has more.

Speaker 36 (02:01:22):
The law aims to protect women and their unborn children
from abortion drug traffickers who illegally mail the drugs into
the state. Texas Right to Life pushed for the law,
so did Life News editor Stephen Ertild says, thousands of
abortion pills are trafficked into Texas every single year, and of.

Speaker 37 (02:01:40):
Course that undermines the pro life laws that they've passed
to protect babies from abortions. So here's what the law does.
It basically allows Texans to file a suit against all
of those companies that are selling abortion pills to Texas from.

Speaker 38 (02:01:54):
Out of state.

Speaker 37 (02:01:55):
There could be fines up to one hundred thousand dollars
in violation, and anyone can file a suit. Somebody who
is a woman who has been injured by the abortion
pill can file a suit. A father whose baby was
aborted can file suit. Anyone in the state can file
suit for damages. And the goal here is if enough
lawsuits are filed these illegal abortion companies that are selling

(02:02:17):
pills from out of state and even out of the country,
in some instances, they might be able to be shut down.

Speaker 36 (02:02:22):
Kevin or Rabbit signed HB seven in the law on Thursday.
Alliance Defending Freedom said the state of Texas is setting
an example.

Speaker 31 (02:02:29):
And finally, a pair of brothers from Texas spend their
time helping their community.

Speaker 17 (02:02:33):
Jennis Dean explains.

Speaker 39 (02:02:35):
Daniel and Martin Hernandez both work full time, but when
they're not on the job, they're helping their community. The
men offer their services like mowing the lawn, clearing the driveways,
a sidewalk and patios, or powerwashing. Martin says, you never
know what people are going through, but a simple act
of kindness can brighten a day or change an outlook.
The brothers began their mission several years ago doing paid

(02:02:57):
outdoor jobs with their dad. They met a client who
told them she couldn't afford her medical bills, and that's
when they decided to start doing things free of charge
for people who couldn't afford to pay them. Daniel and
Martin are now well known through their community and have
so many fans. They say they do it because it
makes them feel good to do good.

Speaker 31 (02:03:17):
More news online at AFN dot net and download the
AFN mobile app where your Apple or Android device almost epe.

Speaker 1 (02:03:29):
and for future generations, a new.

Speaker 49 (02:03:35):
World order, new world for the new world Order.

Speaker 4 (02:03:38):
This is a moment to season. The clidoscope has been shaken,
The pieces are in flux.

Speaker 14 (02:03:44):
Soon they will settle again.

Speaker 13 (02:03:45):
Before they do.

Speaker 4 (02:03:46):
Let us reorder this world around us.

Speaker 5 (02:03:48):
A new world order, a world for the United Nations,
is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.

Speaker 6 (02:03:55):
Nevertheless, the United States that did make Key Potician shaped,
is so that the problem of the push prensidentity will
be the emergence of a new international.

Speaker 7 (02:04:07):
Order the first decade of the twenty first century. But
out of what will be seen the greatest restructuring of
the global economies, greatest restructuring of the global economy, greatest
restructuring of the global economy, a new world order was created.

Speaker 2 (02:04:24):
Documenting the graces of our republic, the very.

Speaker 8 (02:04:27):
Word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society,
and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed
to secret societies, the secret holds and the secret.

Speaker 2 (02:04:40):
Proceedings waging war on the new world order.

Speaker 9 (02:04:43):
The councils of government we must guard against the acquisition
of unwanted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military
industrial conflict.

Speaker 2 (02:04:55):
This is Governor America with Darrenweek's and Vicky Davis.

Speaker 10 (02:05:02):
From tamer Regions five and ten. This is the third
and final hour of Governor America. Vicky Davis is here.
I'm during weeks It continues to be the twentieth of
September twenty twenty five. As we get back into the
show here, Vicky, did you finish what you were saying
before the clock rudely interrupted.

Speaker 11 (02:05:19):
I don't remember what it was that I was saying.

Speaker 10 (02:05:23):
Well, we were talking about the cartils.

Speaker 11 (02:05:25):
I do want to say that the United States has
been working with the Soviet Union since nineteen forty eight.
And there's an organization that you can do a search on.
It's called the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis that

(02:05:49):
they're over in Europe, and what it is is that
they do systems analysis on the global and those their
policies are actually implemented. And I really encourage everybody to

(02:06:10):
go go to that website and look. They were chartered
in nineteen seventy two in London and the website is
ii ASA dot AC dot at. That's their website, okay,

(02:06:34):
and so and that was started by a guy, a
former military guy, right after the war nineteen forty eight,
I believe it was, and you know, to work with
the Soviet Union. So you know, just about everything that

(02:06:55):
we think we know that we've learned in the public
in our country is a lie.

Speaker 10 (02:07:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 11 (02:07:04):
Absolutely, It's not an accurate representation of the real world.

Speaker 10 (02:07:10):
Yeah. I wanted to finish up with this Kimmel thing
and the free speech more broadly, because a lot of people,
as we said, on the right, are cheering this, And
I don't know how you cheer government intervention causing a
talk show to be off the air. Now, you may

(02:07:33):
not like Jimmy Kimmel, and I don't like Jimmy Kimmel.
I don't watch Jimmy Kimmel. I probably would disagree with
him on just about everything. That being said, Jimmy Kimmel
has a First Amendment right. And if we don't, if
we advocate that the FCC goes after companies for what
hosts on shows that those companies own say, then that

(02:07:58):
is a very slippery so indeed, and and and slippery
slope is already being slid down by the way.

Speaker 11 (02:08:06):
I just want to say, agree with you, except to
the point of being a liar. Well, you're a lying
to the public at large.

Speaker 10 (02:08:14):
Again, again, who determines what the truth is? See? If that,
if that's the standard you're going to apply, then that
standard will be applied to you when the other administration
is in office. If you allow them to shut you
down or shut somebody else down because they're lying, quote unquote,

(02:08:39):
then they will say you're lying when they're in power,
and they will shut you down.

Speaker 11 (02:08:44):
That's why I take pains. I take pains to document.

Speaker 10 (02:08:49):
They don't care everything was documented during the COVID era.
They shut people down all the time for the truth.
So that's my point. Speech has to be protected, even
if it's even if it's falsehoods. They have their right.
There's nowhere in the Constitution that says it has to
be truthful speech. There's nowhere in the Constitution. The only

(02:09:11):
stipulation is that your rights in where somebody else has begun,
meaning that you can't call somebody call for violence against
them than that sort of thing. But here's the thing
already now the FCC is going after the View. I
don't like the View for their opinions, but they're now

(02:09:33):
because they've managed to get Colbert and Kimmel at least
for now off the air, and Colbert probably, I mean,
both of these were probably on their way out anyway
because of poor ratings. But now it's like, hey, where
do we stop. Let's go after the View.

Speaker 50 (02:09:50):
That f SAC chairman Brendan Carr says it may also
be worthwhile for his agency to target the View another
ABC program, and this comes after Jimmy Kimmel was taken
off the air for his remarks on his show after
the death of Charlie kirk Car says the FCC's equal
Opportunity rule requires stations to grant political candidates the same

(02:10:10):
amount of airtime. However, most talk shows and late night
programs are exempt under the agency's bonafide news classification. Karr
questions whether the view should continue to qualify for that exemption.
If the show is stripped of that privilege, it would
be forced to change its formats.

Speaker 10 (02:10:28):
Okay, so where does this end. We criticize Biden for
using his office to target his political opponents, is it
okay that Trump is doing the same thing. We have
to stand on principle now, now Trump is floating the idea.
The latest thing is he's floating the idea of revoking
the FCC licenses of network affiliated TV stations that don't

(02:10:49):
cover him in a positive light. I mean, this is
nothing short of authoritarian control of the media.

Speaker 17 (02:10:55):
Would you like to see replaced Kimmel on Late Night?

Speaker 51 (02:10:57):
A lot of people anybody could replace. Some guys had
no talent kim Look, he was fired. He had no talent.
He's a whack job, but he had no talent. And
more importantly than talent he had do because a lot
of people have no talent to hit ratings. But he
had no ratings. His ratings were worse than Colbert. I
think they got rid of Colbert, which is a good

(02:11:20):
thing to do, and that's something that you'd be talking
about for licensing to when you have a network, then
you have evening shows and all they do is hit Trump.
That's all they do. But when you go back and
kick a look, all they do.

Speaker 10 (02:11:38):
Is a Trump.

Speaker 18 (02:11:39):
They had license.

Speaker 10 (02:11:40):
They're not allowed to do that. They're not allowed to
do that. Yes they are. It's called the First Amendment.
It's called free speech. He says, all they do is
hit Trump. All they do is hit Trump. They're not
allowed to do that.

Speaker 11 (02:11:54):
Well, that's Trump's point of view, but that's that's not
my point of view. I wouldn't care if they hit
Trump every every day and every night. But see, that's
long as long as what they're saying is the truth.

Speaker 10 (02:12:10):
That is an authoritarian talking And this is why I
can't defend it. Well, no, I don't so be. I
don't want it to be.

Speaker 11 (02:12:22):
And the thing is, I'm looking at the condition of
our country, but I'm looking.

Speaker 10 (02:12:26):
At the fact that Vicky, we're losing it, We're losing
our freedom, and Conservatives are supporting the fact that we're
losing our freedom.

Speaker 11 (02:12:36):
Well, the Conservatives and the Democrats, they work together at
the political party level, you know, the National Democratic Committee
and the National Republican Committee, they are working together at
that level. But what they present to us are you know,

(02:12:56):
you can have this choice or that choice, when when
it's not really true, it's that you know, there is
one one doctrine that's being presented as as being two
sides of an issue, and it's all bs.

Speaker 10 (02:13:17):
Yeah, let me finish up the Trump clip real quick.
They're an arm of the Democrat parties.

Speaker 52 (02:13:22):
President, Are you going to ask Brendon Carr to weigh
in on other late night posts that you have no?

Speaker 18 (02:13:29):
Essentially all the airin.

Speaker 51 (02:13:30):
Host is on network television. There is a license. I'll
give you an example. I read someplace that the networks
were ninety seven percent against me. I get ninety seven
percent negative, and yet I won it easily, won all
seven spake stay's popular with, won everything, and and then
ninety seven percent against They give me holybad. But listening

(02:13:55):
for press, I mean they're getting a license I would
maybe their license should be taken away.

Speaker 10 (02:14:03):
It will be up to Brendan Carr. It's not up
to Brendan Carr. Brendan Carr has basically got his head
so far up Donald Trump's hind end. He'll do anything
for Donald Trump but thin skin. Donald Trump wants to
forcefully stamp out all bad coverage of him by going
after the licenses of network affiliated television stations. How is

(02:14:26):
that any different from Kim Jong nung what he does.
How is that any different from any authoritarian communist Cuba?
Good example, here's an example. Let me just jump to this,
since we're talking about authoritarianism and free speech, a lack
of free speech. There's a couple that I've been following

(02:14:48):
on YouTube and it's pretty interesting and inspirational to watch.
They're a Cuban couple and they came to America. Now
pression I get is that the woman, her name is
Mary or Mary or Marie. She came here first. That's
the impression I get. Then later on she managed to

(02:15:09):
get him to be able to come. Some of the
videos they put out showed her showing him a grocery
store for the first time here in America. They have
some video of how things were in Cuba, and they
have him her showing him how the grocery stores here

(02:15:32):
are full of food I mean, and different varieties, different brands,
and he was just overwhelmed with how you can get
anything you want. In fact, he at one point started
to cry because the people back home in Cuba don't
live like this. Every day is a struggle. They stand

(02:15:52):
in long lines to get to the store, and then
the store is often out of the things that they need,
so or if they have it, they never have more
than one option. It's a struggle to get the basics.
So when he came here to America and he can
see not only do they have the basics, they have

(02:16:14):
all kinds of varieties and different I mean everything. It's
just it's like a paradise. It's like a heaven of bounty.
And he's just overwhelmed and emotional that to realize how
badly managed things are back home. We in America take
a lot. For granted, we take a lot. There's still

(02:16:36):
a lot of great things about this country, and that
is exactly why so many around the world are dying,
sometimes quite literally to get here.

Speaker 11 (02:16:47):
Okay, well, I'll tell you what though that's changing. I
go to my local stores and there's like one brand,
it's called Kroger, and the store is with Kroger products
and there is no choice.

Speaker 10 (02:17:05):
Well, I see a lot of choice in my stores here.
I can't speak for IOH. You know, maybe they didn't
stock the shelves, you know, or whatever, but I don't know.
The point is is I think if we had to
go through one day of living in Cuba, we would
realize what we have here and I thank god I

(02:17:27):
don't have to, so this country is worth protecting. But
the reason I brought up this couple is because they
put out a video about Charlie Kirk and about free speech,
and I think it's worthy of hearing some of what
they have to say.

Speaker 53 (02:17:44):
I wanted to do this video with your aim to
give you a different perspective than a lot of other YouTubers.

Speaker 54 (02:17:50):
We have lived in a country, in a society where
Charlie Kirk and what he represents and what he did
would have never been possible have been published.

Speaker 55 (02:18:00):
He would have been silenced in many way.

Speaker 2 (02:18:03):
You went for the.

Speaker 54 (02:18:04):
First time has seen political violence at this magnitude in
a country where we're supposed to be free, where all
of our content shows the beauty of America, shows the
moral morals and ideology of a free of America, of
a free country.

Speaker 55 (02:18:23):
I think it's everything is like a out of control
because you know, well, how you say, we come into
the one of the moss country in the planet. They
know like a like a free and speech and all that.
When you see what what what happened with Charlie kirk
is like a that's impossible.

Speaker 18 (02:18:43):
One.

Speaker 53 (02:18:44):
I reached out to the College Republicans of Arizona State
University and also the College Democrats. Now the College Democrats
never got back to us before, but the College Republicans did,
and he invited us to a couple of events. By
the time we got there, there was hundreds of kids. Yeah,

(02:19:07):
so that was your first time seeing people debate like that.

Speaker 55 (02:19:10):
Oh yeah, what's crazy, It's what's fun. It was really good.
Can you imagine Cuba University than Cuba now, two people
inside is university talking different perspective in ideology?

Speaker 2 (02:19:24):
Impossible?

Speaker 20 (02:19:25):
In Cuba, an event like Charlie Kirks would have never
been allowed.

Speaker 53 (02:19:30):
Ever, ever, ever, it would have never been allowed. And
there is only one ideology they teach, which is Marxism.

Speaker 56 (02:19:38):
There's only one side that they preached. They never even
introduce other ideologies inside the classroom.

Speaker 14 (02:19:46):
Against the law, against the law.

Speaker 56 (02:19:48):
And if you dare speak against even your professors in Cuba,
they would not allow you to graduate, they would not
allow you to get exactly, they would get you out
of the school. They wouldn't allow you.

Speaker 2 (02:20:01):
To get a job.

Speaker 20 (02:20:03):
And to see the debate that Charlie Kirkie just put
up a tent and he put a microphone, and he
allowed people to get in line and disagree with him.

Speaker 57 (02:20:15):
So it just makes me crying because.

Speaker 58 (02:20:17):
It's not about Charlie. It's not about Charlie as the person.
It's not about that he's a conservative or a liberal
or whatever or whatever. It's about that I brought you
to the United States with this, with the with the
thought that people are free to say what they want
to say, because our families fled from a country that

(02:20:42):
did not allow that. To come here and see that
has been very emotional for me to come here and
see that people.

Speaker 54 (02:20:50):
The reaction of people celebrating that is disgusting.

Speaker 18 (02:20:54):
It's vile.

Speaker 56 (02:20:55):
And this is a warning to Americans who have absolutely
no idea what it means to come from it, to
devolve our society into a place where we left.

Speaker 18 (02:21:07):
You have no idea. You do not want that.

Speaker 57 (02:21:11):
You do not want a society where people are scared
to say what they think.

Speaker 55 (02:21:17):
You don't want it that, you don't want all the
school here in the United State control for the government.
When you say public, it's not calling where I'm from.
If the owner is the government, and what that happened,
they do and whatever you want you can think and
you can't do nothing for yourself because in the end

(02:21:37):
of that is you need to do it like us.
When I say us, say.

Speaker 3 (02:21:42):
Another QB on people.

Speaker 55 (02:21:43):
They need escape for thinking in friendly I'm free that
we are. We see, we see. That's why you saw
us here in the United States, the people coming here
because we follow you every cue. I think all the
Cuban people in my case, we love United States.

Speaker 18 (02:22:04):
We follow you, idea, we want it.

Speaker 10 (02:22:07):
What are you have?

Speaker 55 (02:22:09):
And you are lamb and you are soil lad.

Speaker 57 (02:22:12):
But for me, this moment is much like I said earlier,
this this moment is much more greater than being a conservative.
It's greater than Charlie Kirk. It's the fundamental right as
every human being to just debate, even if it offends people,
to debate those ideas and to get murdered for it.

Speaker 55 (02:22:32):
It's not a solution.

Speaker 57 (02:22:34):
It's just really disheartening to see, and the reactions have
been really disgusting to see, because, like I said, this
is a warning to Americans. You do not want a
country where the only opinion is a sanctioned one.

Speaker 11 (02:22:51):
What do you think, Well, I agree with her, obviously,
But the thing that they aren't talking about is that
the over in Cuba, they control the media the information
so tightly that the only information they get is what

(02:23:11):
comes from the government. I'm not advocating that.

Speaker 10 (02:23:16):
At all, but that's where we're headed.

Speaker 18 (02:23:18):
Yes, well we are headed that way.

Speaker 11 (02:23:21):
And so what I am saying is that if you
have a program and you're presenting information to the public,
you better buy God, tell the truth, don't lie, and
if you lie, I want you taken down, I want

(02:23:42):
you out of it.

Speaker 10 (02:23:43):
I don't agree, I don't agree, and I'm not in
favor of lies. I'm not in favor of lies. But
it's people's right to speak has to be protected. Let's
go to the phones though. Speaking of people speaking in
their rights, let's go to Missouri and take a call there. Hello,
you're on the air. Go ahead, please. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:24:02):
First of all, where you're not getting out on the streams,
we're getting some other commercials and other stuff instead of you.

Speaker 11 (02:24:11):
Oh wow, we're being censored.

Speaker 10 (02:24:13):
I don't know that that's true, that we're being censored.
But hold on, let me see. That is weird. All right,
let me see if I can shut this down and
reset it. Hold on, folks, you folks talk amongst yourselves here.

Speaker 3 (02:24:26):
Okay, now you're just now came back, but you've been
down for about ten minutes.

Speaker 10 (02:24:31):
Well, thanks for letting me know that. I think we're
still going out over RBN. Let's see if let's see
if we stay up.

Speaker 29 (02:24:46):
Yep.

Speaker 3 (02:24:46):
That's mainly all I want to let you know is
you guys were busy talking and carrying on there and
we weren't hearing a bit of it.

Speaker 10 (02:24:52):
I'm sorry to hear that. Hopefully, Well, we'll have the
file posted quickly after the show. I know I think
you were you play it, so we'll post that for
the affiliates. Thank you, not a problem, I just god,
let you know, all right, Thank you appreciate it. Blessings
all right, bye, Let's go to Arizona. Now, Hello, you're

(02:25:15):
on the air.

Speaker 19 (02:25:15):
Go ahead, please, Yes, during y good morning, at the
end of the last hour, you were talking about the
Venezuelan boat being blown up, yes.

Speaker 59 (02:25:29):
And about how they got their right to do that. Now,
I had called your broadcast back on twenty fifth of
January two thousand and five. It was the third hour,
at about forty five minutes into the hour, and I
explained to you the authorization comes from Title ten of

(02:25:55):
the United States Code. It's sub section one two seven.

Speaker 19 (02:26:00):
Like echo.

Speaker 59 (02:26:02):
You can look it up on the internet. Just type
in one two seven echo okay.

Speaker 10 (02:26:07):
Can you start that, sir? Hey, can you start that
reference over so I can jot it down here.

Speaker 19 (02:26:14):
Title ten K ten one two seven E like echo, okay.

Speaker 59 (02:26:24):
At To save time, so you don't have to go
to all the law books and up and down the pages.
Just pipe into your search engine the number one two
seven and then the word echo ec ho.

Speaker 10 (02:26:41):
All right.

Speaker 59 (02:26:42):
This was passed in the National Defense Authorization Act in
two thousand and eighteen. That was seven years ago. But
now I hear the Democrats because President Trump is in office.
Now that the Democrats making speak. Just on the house
floor about Congress has them.

Speaker 10 (02:27:02):
Hey, can you hang on just a moment. I'm sorry,
I got the break. Hang on just we'll be back here.

Speaker 2 (02:27:07):
Flying homeowners.

Speaker 22 (02:27:08):

(02:27:28):
and right now you can get Vivin's home security technology

Speaker 23 (02:27:44):
Eight hundred five eight seven four to two eight one
That's eight hundred five eight seven forty two eighty one.

Speaker 60 (02:27:58):
Many relationships for lack of an.

Speaker 61 (02:28:01):
Apology, Doctor Gary Chapman with a love language minute.

Speaker 60 (02:28:05):
Offenses are real, and they fracture relationships. Time alone will
not heal a broken relationship. The healing process begins with
a sincere apology. The apology doesn't immediately restore the relationship,
but it does open the door to forgiveness, and forgiveness
opens the door to reconciliation. Why, then, do some people

(02:28:29):
find it so hard to apologize, Perhaps because they view
apologizing as a sign of weakness. In reality, it is
a sign of maturity In an apology, I accept responsibility
from my behavior. I'm showing that I value our relationship.
Until you apologize, nothing is more important.

Speaker 61 (02:28:51):
Doctor Gary Chapman is the author of the Five Love Languages.
For more, visit Fivelove Languages dot com.

Speaker 14 (02:28:59):
My friends call guys all the time and ask them out.

Speaker 42 (02:29:01):
I mean, it doesn't seem that strange to me.

Speaker 32 (02:29:04):
If girls waited for guys to make the first move,
we'd never get together.

Speaker 52 (02:29:07):
You know, girls and women today have been encouraged to
be the aggressors in relationships with men. So many have
never been taught the beauty of God's created order, where
men are primarily responsible to initiate and women are to respond.
Proverb seven gives us a picture of a foolish woman
who entraps a young man. It says she caught him

(02:29:28):
and kissed him.

Speaker 16 (02:29:29):
It says that she had an impudent face as she
talked with him.

Speaker 52 (02:29:32):
Another word for impudent is shameless or brazen. This woman
throws herself on this man physically and verbally. I think
a lot of women are doing the same thing today.
They may not have immoral intent like this foolish woman,
but they're showing a lack of discretion as women. Let's
ask God to show us the beauty and peace that
come from being a responder with seeking him. I'm Nancy

(02:29:57):
demass Woggamouth.

Speaker 22 (02:29:59):
Are you looking for the cheapest prices on car insurance?

(02:30:19):
for car insurance, and it doesn't matter if you have

(02:30:41):

Speaker 23 (02:30:43):
eight two five seventeen ten with a spoof.

Speaker 2 (02:31:00):
Let's go to find out what's really going on. This
is Governor America.

Speaker 10 (02:31:12):
All right, welcome to the broadcast, ladies and gentlemen. I
don't know what's going on. I've got two computers freaking
out here, and I am having trouble keeping the stream up,
so I don't know if we're on the air on
our stream or not. We're just going to kind of
keep muddling through and hopefully I just had the encoder

(02:31:33):
crash on me. In the meantime, the interface for our
cloud server is also acting up, so I don't know
what's going on. Maybe Vicky's right, maybe somebody is messing
with us. I don't like to go there first, but anyway,
we have a caller on the line, and you were
just telling me about ten USC one seven E. I

(02:31:54):
think it was.

Speaker 19 (02:31:57):
Correct, okay, and then you can just go to your
search engine.

Speaker 59 (02:32:01):
The quickest way is finding it is just type in
the number one, two seven and then the word echo.
It was passed in twenty eighteen National Defense Authorization Act.
Now I noticed, because you know, it's kind of like
what you're talking about, the free speech and depending on
who's in charge that because this was passed during the

(02:32:26):
Biden administration, I don't know who voted for that, but
I'm pretty sure all the Democrats voted for it. So
they basically gave the president the authorization to use military force,
especially if in there in one twenty seven E. It
gives the US Special Forces Command up to one hundred

(02:32:50):
million dollars annually to attack terrorist organizations. And since President
Trumps by signing an executive ordered designating the drug trafficking
organizations they're cartels as terrorists like the CJNNG, the Sinaloa Cartel,
the Golf cartel, and Flende Albagua as terrorist organizations, it

(02:33:15):
opens that up so there is no need for a
declaration of war. Congress already gave the president the authorization
to use military force to go after these people.

Speaker 10 (02:33:28):
Any questions, no we have a king.

Speaker 11 (02:33:31):
Thank you for that information. Gives me an opportunity to
say that people should really watch the National Defense legislation
because a lot of stuff unrelated to military has slipped
in there.

Speaker 10 (02:33:49):
Oh yeah, there's there's writers writers on all of that.

Speaker 11 (02:33:53):
Yeah, because nobody pays attention because the bills are just
too big.

Speaker 10 (02:33:57):
Yeah exactly. Hey, thank you callerreciate it. Thank you so
much for that information.

Speaker 59 (02:34:02):
No sweat, enjoy your broadcast.

Speaker 19 (02:34:04):
Thank you very much, Thank.

Speaker 10 (02:34:06):
You, God bless all right, bye bye, All right. Let's
hopefully we can keep our operations going here, because apparently
we've got band aids and bubble gum that we're sticking
things together with. I don't know why. It's very bizarre
that I would have more than one computer freaking out
at the same time. That is kind of annoying. But

(02:34:29):
all right, let's go back to the phones. Hello, you're
on the air. Go ahead, please. I'm not sure where
this caller is from, but.

Speaker 49 (02:34:36):
Hey, hi, Darren Chris Steiner here at Cwater, Florida.

Speaker 19 (02:34:40):
Hi.

Speaker 49 (02:34:40):
To address the veracity of what somebody says, whether it's
legal or not. There are statutes like here in Florida
that there is a statute that outlaws slander and libel,
but it's not punt. For the research, I find that
it's not very much in forest, which perhaps it should be.
If you find somebody who's you know, like in my case,

(02:35:05):
has called a white supremacist. After I called in a
community sponsored station and I give my full name, I
did make a police report, so at least I was
allowed to make a police report to document it for
the public record. And you know, I contacted the radio station.
Their attorney got back to me. They deleted, but first

(02:35:26):
they had already deleted the whole show from the archive,
and I went into archive dot org first. When I
notified them to cease and desist, I referenced the link
to what I already backed where I backed up the show,
so even though they did delete it, that it's still
available out there, so you know, and then when this

(02:35:47):
kind of stuff happens, like I said, you know, you
call into a show and they lie about you. I've
already given my first and last name, I've given my
websites before being a public figure in the area, having
had a radio show on six Florida stations and planning
to restart it. By the way, but you know on
the Tan Talk network here and so you know, if

(02:36:09):
you can show that you've been damaged, then you can
civilly soon. It's just very difficult to afford an attorney
and see if it's worth your time. But at least
if you can document and put on the records and
then expose it and maybe call up again and ask
them on the air or maybe on their Facebook pages, well,
what do you think about yours radio station deleting the show?

(02:36:33):
You would would you like to apologize publicly? It might
be good for the donors if you want to get
more donors that you know you're trying to turn people
off by calling the listeners a white supremacist. For this
had to do with when I was explaining the Kyle
Rittenhouse case called in and asked them if they'd seen
the video. They admitted they hadn't. Before that there was

(02:36:54):
they had a lot of bravado saying I dare you
to call in and disagree with this, but they hadn't
seen the video. He was being chased across the parking lot.
The video that was the grainy video the FBI had released.
But then the in the proceedings they came out with
a clear video showing he was chased down and that's

(02:37:14):
when he defended himself. So for that, I was called
the white supremacist, white supremacist apologist, and even accused of
calling myself a white supremacist.

Speaker 10 (02:37:25):
Yeah. Yeah, that's that's definitely a civil infraction or a
civil matter. It's certainly not a criminal matter. But I
understand you call the police to have it documented so
that at least you have a complaint on the record.
But yeah, this is the problem is that these people,
I think they need to be held accountable. I was

(02:37:46):
very happy to see Kyle Rittenhouse himself come out and
sue a bunch of the big networks who lied about him.

Speaker 11 (02:37:55):
Well, that brings up a problem with civil lawsuits.

Speaker 18 (02:38:00):
Being our only remedy.

Speaker 11 (02:38:03):
That's not really a remedy because there are very few
ordinary people who can afford to hire an attorney, and
there are just a minuscule number of attorneys that will
take cases in the public interest.

Speaker 10 (02:38:19):
Yeah. Yeah, well that's obviously.

Speaker 18 (02:38:22):
So we don't have any remedies.

Speaker 10 (02:38:25):
They're few and far between. I do have to say, color,
did you have anything else? I think you were about
to say something else.

Speaker 49 (02:38:33):
Yeah, just well, thanks for that, Vicky, I didn't know
that or I haven't thought of that.

Speaker 10 (02:38:37):
And yeah, Kyle.

Speaker 49 (02:38:38):
Rittenhouse, I can't find where he has sued somebody. I
see a lot of fact checking sites claiming he hasn't,
But I would love to know if he has, so
if anyone can tell me where he's I.

Speaker 11 (02:38:49):
Think he did.

Speaker 18 (02:38:50):
He got quite a bit of money.

Speaker 10 (02:38:53):
Yeah, I'm going on memory, but.

Speaker 49 (02:38:57):
I can't find where who did he sue and how
much did he get or settle?

Speaker 11 (02:39:03):
Uh, I'm not sure if he sued a media company.

Speaker 18 (02:39:06):
I'm not sure he did.

Speaker 10 (02:39:07):
In fact, he was even setting up uh he last
I knew he was going to set up some kind
of organization to hold media companies accountable just for the
purpose of suing. Now I don't know if if he
ever followed through with that or not. But uh, let
me see if I can find some information on that.

Speaker 11 (02:39:29):
Oh, I remember there was some wealthy guy that funded
his lawsuit. And I can't remember the guy's name who
actually funded Kyle Rittenhouse's lawsuit.

Speaker 49 (02:39:46):
I'll let you go. I just wanted to know if
anybody had any details I've been I mean, I'd love
to know if he has.

Speaker 10 (02:39:53):
I just see all these Yeah, according to.

Speaker 49 (02:39:56):
People that I can't validate them.

Speaker 10 (02:39:58):
Yeah, news Week and Fox six and also well, I
guess that's the news Week. Also. He sued Whoopi Goldberg
on the View, he sued sink Uger from the Young Turks,
he sued Lebron James, and he sued Joe Biden in

(02:40:19):
his campaign.

Speaker 18 (02:40:22):
Wow, I didn't know that.

Speaker 10 (02:40:24):
So those were at least some of the ones that
he sued, and I don't know that. I think at
least some of them were successful. I'm not sure. I
have to look into it deeper, but yeah, there were
some lawsuits that were found.

Speaker 49 (02:40:39):
I'll check into those for I've looked into those most
of those before. But I'll go back in the archives
and review what you just said and just some more research.

Speaker 10 (02:40:47):
Okay, all right, sounds good. Hey, thank you for the call.
Appreciate it. Yeah, blessings to you. All right, yep, bye bye,
Let's go to Kentucky. Now I think this is Corbyn Kentucky. Hello,
you're on the air please.

Speaker 29 (02:41:01):
Uh yeah, yeah, Darren, very good show this week here
you thank you for the First Amendment?

Speaker 10 (02:41:07):
What's that?

Speaker 38 (02:41:07):
Yes?

Speaker 29 (02:41:08):
Uh, By the way, this is ed This is ed in.

Speaker 10 (02:41:10):
Utah okay, oh, utah okay, very good. Yeah, your color
I d.

Speaker 29 (02:41:15):
Comes up by listen, I've got some I've got some
pretty breaking stuff here. You're talking about Charlie Kirk right here,
of course, on your ground zero of the terrible tragedy,
the shooting of Charlie Kirk last week. I'm about a
little over half an hour away. I'm going to tell
you right now we have a great patriot hero here

(02:41:36):
pushing back at the censorship and the narrative and the
cover up of the killing of Charlie Kirk. And I'm
talking about Republican GOP candidate for governor and former state rep.
Phil Lyman. Now, Bill Lyman is a fairly big name here,
and he's calling out Governor Cox and Patel right to
their face and to everybody who listens. And he does
get on media here as well as alternative media. Phil

(02:41:59):
Lyme and great American but the big news. And I
understand that his people are reviewing the rents video r
ns dot com. Are you familiar with the nine second
video that emerged last Tuesday, Darren, Yeah, I believe so.

Speaker 10 (02:42:19):
If it's the same video, I think it was referenced
earlier in the broadcast.

Speaker 29 (02:42:23):
No, I'll tell you.

Speaker 38 (02:42:26):
Are you there?

Speaker 10 (02:42:26):
Yeah?

Speaker 29 (02:42:27):
Yeah, yeah, no, you would know write what I'm talking about.
Let me just say this full throated. The killer has
been identified, not by name yet, we only have a
first name. I'm talking about the nine second video that
not even Alex Jones will review. His comments lines are
bloaded with people say, Alex, what about the guy in

(02:42:49):
the brown shirt, the man closest to mister Kirk standing
right outside of the first perimeter on the barrier, fifteen
and a half feet away this man, and then a
frame by frame setup of him being one of the
security detail carrying the lifeless body of mister Kirk to
the suv. When you when you see this, uh, how

(02:43:11):
they pull it off is absolutely brilliant. He used a
Chicago poem pistol.

Speaker 22 (02:43:16):
Uh.

Speaker 29 (02:43:16):
Once you see it, Derek, you cannot unsee it.

Speaker 22 (02:43:19):
Uh.

Speaker 29 (02:43:19):
There are now four videos on rents dot com.

Speaker 10 (02:43:23):
Yeah, that's what. That's what I think, what what Art
was talking about earlier?

Speaker 29 (02:43:28):
Oh it is that is good. This needs to grow
legs and fast. Alex Jones is sitting on this for
some reason, and uh, I'm hoping, uh, and it probably
will happen in time here that rbn uh will go
ahead and on the newsfeed have the click linkage to
Rents dot com. This man, Rents and his team have

(02:43:49):
unearthed the killer.

Speaker 38 (02:43:50):
Of Charlie Kirk.

Speaker 3 (02:43:51):
Uh.

Speaker 29 (02:43:52):
They have a first name for him, a likely first name, justin.
This man has a tattoo on his right arm that
is totally identifiable. This man looks like a killer. He
looks like the quintessential CIA killer.

Speaker 10 (02:44:05):
Okay, but this is what Art was saying. This video
was not real, it was not valid, So we have
a difference of opinion on that. Apparently, Matt.

Speaker 29 (02:44:15):
Let me tell you, well, guy Darren, Darren.

Speaker 10 (02:44:18):
Yeah, go ahead.

Speaker 29 (02:44:19):
There's another guy of the on the web, a guy
named zeb. I watched his twenty two minute video the
other day. This twenty two minute video of this zeb
he's a nice guy, former marine, and he's showing this
guy in the brown a shirt and I thought, oh,
he's going to zero in on it. He doesn't. He
starts talking about the ear lobe of Charlie kirk totally

(02:44:41):
missing it. And he did that honestly, he's not covering
it up because he showed the guy in the brown
shirt Kaki, standing fifteen feet from Kirk, but he doesn't
see it because nobody pointed it out to him. I
wouldn't have seen it. When you see the barrel of
the gun, you're starving down the barrel of the killer
of the gun.

Speaker 10 (02:44:58):
Okay, well all right, Kirk, all right, well I'll take
a look at it. I'll take a look at it.

Speaker 29 (02:45:02):
Yeah, that's what I call it for.

Speaker 10 (02:45:04):
Okay, thank you for the call. I appreciate thank you.

Speaker 29 (02:45:06):
Yep, you bet.

Speaker 11 (02:45:08):
I do have one thing to say about the gun
that Art was talking about.

Speaker 18 (02:45:13):
Okay, just because the model of a.

Speaker 11 (02:45:16):
Gun was manufactured in the nineteen twenties or thirties or whatever,
they can today. They can make any kind of gun
you want. So a gun that isn't old. I mean
that when you hear the model of it, you say, oh,
that's an old gun. Well not necessarily, yeah, I don't know.

Speaker 10 (02:45:39):
See the problem is there's not I have no doubt
that there are other people involved, and I would I
am completely open to the idea that this guy is
a patsy, the one that they arrested. I mean, and
in fact, I would say the likelihood exists. I mean,
just like Canis Owens was saying, I have never seen

(02:46:03):
a person get up at an event and start yelling
and screaming by an event, I mean a shooting event
that says hey it's me, it's me, it's me, shoot me.
I mean, this whole thing is just so bizarre.

Speaker 11 (02:46:18):
Oh well, wait a second on that. There are always
people who for whatever reason, you know, psychiatric disorder, that
when something makes the media and it's a big time crime,
you'll have people come in.

Speaker 10 (02:46:35):
And confess, well, they're actually getting up at the event,
at the actual shooting seconds later and start screaming and hey,
hey it's me and get And then later he reportedly
said he did it so that the real killer could escape.

Speaker 11 (02:46:51):
Well, that's that's a possibility that he he was what
would you call a diversionary tactic. Yeah, that's a possibility.

Speaker 10 (02:47:04):
And and in fact he's been actually interviewed in other uh,
in other media reports too. That's the other thing. It's
very bizarre about this guy.

Speaker 11 (02:47:15):
Yeah, well, you would wonder why the police didn't arrest
him just for his participation in it, whether it was.

Speaker 18 (02:47:23):
Well they have official or not.

Speaker 10 (02:47:26):
They actually are charging him with obstruction of justice and
now apparently reportedly possession of child pornography as well.

Speaker 18 (02:47:38):
Well good, So.

Speaker 10 (02:47:43):
It gets more and more bizarre all the time. But
I wanted to cover you when we talked a lot
today about free speech. And I can't think of anything
more important, because if you lose your freedom of speech,
you lose everything. And uh and and I think it's
fair to say that both the left and the right,

(02:48:04):
as far as administrations are concerned, are majorly attacking freedom
of speech. But there's other authoritarian, in my opinion, authoritarian
items going on with the Trump administration. And right now
it looks to me like martial laws being rolled out
in our cities. The military is being sent, the National

(02:48:27):
Guard and other military forces, militaristic forces, federal forces are
being are occupying our cities. We saw it happen in
the District of Columbia, and that's already under federal control,
so technically that's under federal control. They can do that.

(02:48:49):
But where they're not supposed to be doing it is
in Memphis, Tennessee, and that is the next frontier with
more to follow.

Speaker 62 (02:48:57):
This morning, the green light has been given for the
National Guard and other federal law enforcement to be sent
to Memphis, Tennessee.

Speaker 48 (02:49:03):
We're not going to allow this kind of savagery to
destroy our society anymore.

Speaker 62 (02:49:07):
President Trump late yesterday establishing a task force in Memphis
to crack down on crime, similar to actions recently taken
in the nation's capital.

Speaker 48 (02:49:15):
The effort will include the National Guard, as well as
the FBI, atf DEA, ICE, Homeland Security investigations, and the
US Marshals and more.

Speaker 62 (02:49:26):
The move welcomed by Tennessee's Republican governor, I'm.

Speaker 10 (02:49:29):
Tired of crime holding the great city of Memphis back.

Speaker 62 (02:49:32):
But Democratic city leaders in Memphis calling the move unnecessary.

Speaker 63 (02:49:36):
I'm certainly not happy about the National Guard. I am
looking forward to trying to find ways to invest in
the things that we're already doing to address crime in
our city.

Speaker 64 (02:49:46):
We should have to walk out the door feeling like
we're in the militarizeze.

Speaker 2 (02:49:50):
This is not the Gaza strip.

Speaker 62 (02:49:52):
FBI figures show Memphis ranks first in the country in
the rate of violent crime, but local officials report making progress,
claiming historic reductions, saying the murder rate is at a
six year low.

Speaker 10 (02:50:03):
Okay, now we know that they manipulate the murder rate,
they manipulate the crime statistics, so I would be cautious
about believing anything they're saying about crime statistics. Memphis is
a crime ridden hell hole, and that is just a fact.
But the Democrats need to quit arresting the police and

(02:50:28):
allowing the police to do their job. The answer is
not federal trips. Let me finish the report.

Speaker 62 (02:50:33):
Trump insists the city is overrun with crime and is
vowing to take similar action in other cities run by Democrats.

Speaker 2 (02:50:39):
We're going to be doing in Chicago, probably next.

Speaker 62 (02:50:41):
Nicole Antonio, ABC News, Washington.

Speaker 10 (02:50:44):
So is this martial law? It certainly looks like it.
We're going to Memphis.

Speaker 51 (02:50:48):
I'm just announcing that now, and we'll straighten that out
of the National Guard and anybody else we need.

Speaker 10 (02:50:53):
And by the way, we'll bring in the military too
if we need it.

Speaker 65 (02:50:56):
That message this morning from President Trump sharing his plans
to send the National Guard to Memphis. President switching up
his original plan to send troops to help police in
crime ridden Chicago, instead opting for the bluff city.

Speaker 10 (02:51:10):
Well, he's saying Chicago could very well be next. So
he's not going to stop at Memphis. If he gets
his way in Memphis, He's going to Chicago and probably
a city.

Speaker 65 (02:51:18):
Near you, Trump hinted, as you heard, he's ready to
send additional military forces there if needed.

Speaker 51 (02:51:23):
The marriage happy and the governor Tennessee.

Speaker 66 (02:51:27):
After calling the city deeply troubled when it comes to
violent crime, President Trump is now sending National Guard troops
to Memphis. This comes after Trump says the railroad and
shipping company Union Pacific CEO asked him to take the
city's crime rate seriously.

Speaker 2 (02:51:42):
This is to our city, witchie.

Speaker 66 (02:51:43):
In reaction Friday, Memphis Mayor Paul Young reminded media the
choice was out of his hands.

Speaker 17 (02:51:49):
I want to be clear.

Speaker 64 (02:51:50):
I did not ask for the National Guard, and I
don't think it's the way to drive down crime. However,
that decision has been made as mayor of the city
that I of Memphis, Tennessee. My commitment is to make
sure that we work strategically to ensure that this happens

(02:52:11):
in a way that truly benefits and strengthens our community.

Speaker 66 (02:52:15):
He also noted the city's improvements, including a decreasing crime
in twenty twenty four, the lowest numbers in twenty five years.
Even so, gun violence in Memphis still poses a major concern.
In twenty twenty three, the cities set a record with
more than three hundred and fifty homicides.

Speaker 67 (02:52:32):
Unfortunately, Memphis stands out both in Tennessee and in the
nation for their violent crime numbers.

Speaker 66 (02:52:37):
State Representative William Lambert met with us to say he
supports targeted temporary relief using the National Guard.

Speaker 67 (02:52:43):
So few of the murders are being solved, and so
many of those murderers are walking the streets, it creates.

Speaker 14 (02:52:49):
An environment of fear.

Speaker 67 (02:52:50):
And again that's where the Guard can commit in a
support role and really make sure that everyone is safe
and secure and knows that they can report these evil
people that are committing these horrible crimes.

Speaker 10 (02:53:01):
Okay, again, authoritarianism. Authoritarianism is always, always, always painted with
a veneer of benevolence. Well, but let's.

Speaker 11 (02:53:15):
Take a look at the Let's take a look at
what happened to our country during the Clinton administration. They
implemented global to local. One of the things that I
researched here in Idaho was that the governor of Idaho
was taking delegations of Idaho businessmen over to communist China. Yep,

(02:53:41):
and a delegation of communist Chinese came over here to
one of our what was a small farm town, and
they were looking at investing in Idaho in that small
farm town.

Speaker 19 (02:53:59):
Yeah.

Speaker 68 (02:54:00):
Out, if you're having your state officials go seek foreign
direct investment and they do that, and a foreign corporation
sets up business in the United States and he can

(02:54:20):
that business can bring in their own workforce, You've destroyed
the United States and that is precisely what they did.

Speaker 10 (02:54:29):
Well, we're becoming communists China. You know what happened in
Tienaman Square, I could see it happening in the future
here in an American city because of the military being
involved in policing the general population. I mean, people, conservatives
need to be more objective. Conservatives need to stand up.

(02:54:53):
Authoritarianism is wrong, regardless of whose side is implementing it.
The attacks on free speech, the martial law type activities,
it's got to stop.

Speaker 11 (02:55:05):
What people need to do is to look at the
organizational structure of our administrative state. You don't learn anything
from the media, and I don't care which side left, right, whatever,
But if you look at the organizational structure and what
they did to our government, it was basically a deconstruction

(02:55:27):
of the American system of government.

Speaker 10 (02:55:30):
Yep. And with that we are deconstructing the rest of
this show, because the clock is actually doing the deconstructing.
We are out of time, journey of the clock, the
tyranny of the clock. It's the ultimate authoritarian is So
we got to go. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Thank
you Vicky as always, appreciate everything that you do. Appreciate

(02:55:50):
the debates. We may not agree on everything all the time,
but hey, that's what America is supposed to be about. Debate, deliberation,
free speech. Listeners defend it, civilized deep Amen, God bless
you folks, Thank you for everything, and we'll talk to
you soon. Bye bye bye.

Speaker 44 (02:56:13):
Truth by the rest, by bye.

Speaker 18 (02:56:22):
Shine Gobe

Speaker 2 (02:56:27):
RecA

All Episodes

Govern America | September 20, 2025 | Consequence Culture

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

Crime Junkie

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Govern America | September 20, 2025 | Consequence Culture