November 9, 2025 • 51 mins
Clint Russell torches Ben Shapiro’s desperate CNN meltdown as he tries to gatekeep Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes while dodging every debate invite. From Mark Levin’s leaked texts calling Tucker a “Nazi promoter” to Candace Owens exposing the Charlie Kirk murder cover-up, this episode rips open MAGA’s fracture. Trump’s 50-year mortgage scam and the CIA-linked J6 pipe bomb twist prove the swamp runs deeper than ever. Liberty Lockdown delivers raw, unfiltered truth—no shackles, no apologies. Check out my show over on Fountain: https://www.fountain.fm/show/nUTYcMtl4yMuoKHljZWu Become a supporting member of Liberty Lockdown here!: https://libertylockdown.locals.com/ This is where I do monthly AMA's for supporting members only Super valuable stuff! Twitter: https://twitter.com/LibertyLockPod Pickup LL shirts over at https://www.toplobsta.com/products/ll-lakers?_pos=5&_sid=e7319ba4a&_ss=r&variant=40668064186434 NEW DESIGNS JUST DROPPED All links: https://www.libertylockdownpodcast.com/ Linktree: https://linktr.ee/libertylockdown As always, if you leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts with your social media handle I'll read it on next weeks show (audio version only)! Love you long time Liberty Lockdown presents a variety of opinions, sometimes opposing and controversial. They are not representative of the host of the podcast. Guests are encouraged to express their opinions in a safe and equitable environment.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
They is a word, so like I don't need to
always say they, like it's just a weird It's like
this is one of these psychology tactics who are like
who is they? Who is they?
Speaker 2 (00:08):
And it's like that sounds like you're saying Jews.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
Does the word they mean Jews when you're talking about Jews.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Yes, but if I'm not talking about Jews, then they
doesn't mean Jews. When I say they want us to
believe this or they want us to do that, and
you hear Jews, that's your own derangement.
Speaker 4 (00:25):
Right.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
If I want to say something about Jews, I'll say it.
If I want to say something about Israel, I will
say it. If I want to just like when I
want to say something about black people, I'll say it.
Speaker 5 (00:35):
When I was.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
Saying during BLM, they want us to believe, nobody said
do you mean Jews? And so again it's one of
these trash tactics to make people fearful to speak. When
I say Zionists run the media, I mean Zionists run
the media. People that support the political ideology of Israel
run the media. Any other things that I can help clarify.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
But are you familiar with this like very long standing trop.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
Who did give me about a trope.
Speaker 6 (01:04):
That's a pretty bold claim by Candice Owns. I mean
zionis running the media.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
I don't know. I don't know if I believe it.
Let's uh, let's get into some clips see if we
can confirm or deny her allegation the trope that she's
pushing there. Uh.
Speaker 6 (01:19):
Anyways, welcome to Liberty Lockdown. This is that Clint Russell guy.
That's right, it's me that guy, Clint Russell. Hi, Nick
fuint does I forced my way onto your radar. Sorry
about that. Just to clarify a point. You know, Nick
Is was responding to something that I don't I don't
remember Dave saying. It seemed to me he was taking
(01:41):
it as like Dave was telling him he should apologize
for things he said in the past.
Speaker 7 (01:44):
A lot of people like Dave Smith in particular, Dave
Smith has been going around and I like Dave. I'm
not trying to start drama with him again. But I
saw Dave Smith did a show with that Clint Russell
guy this week, and he said, why does Nick flent
Is take back all the horrible things he said, like
(02:05):
about Hitler and first of all, I don't think it's
that horrible. Actually, I don't know why you're all offended.
I thought you're a comedian. I don't think it's that bad.
That's number one, Number two, This is why why will
I never apologize? Why will I never do that? They're
(02:27):
never operating in good faith? Know that, understand that, bank
that when you're dealing with Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Josh Hammer,
these guys are gangsters. They're crooks, these guys are liars,
and they are never operating in good faith. You think
(02:50):
the Anti Defamation League and the SPLC, you think these
people operate in good faith. You think they're honest. You
think they're looking for a sincere apology.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
They're not.
Speaker 7 (03:01):
They are looking for submission, They are looking for humiliation.
Speaker 6 (03:06):
I think it was more of like, you might want
to move on from some of the shit posting because
you're in a position of power now and you have
a responsibility, and if you want to create a better
world and better country, which I believe you do, that
it may be best to leave some of the more
aggressive shit posting in your past. I think that was
the point he was making. I certainly didn't take it
as him saying you should apologize to Ben Shapiro or
(03:29):
Mark Levan or any of these people. So that's just
my two cents. People can go back and watch it.
I haven't gone back and watched it because I was
in it, But if you guys want to go back
and watch it and tell me what part Nick is
actually responding to here, I would love to know if
there is a point at which Dave said that Nick
should apologize. I don't remember that happening. If it did happen,
I stand corrected, but I don't think so, and I
(03:51):
don't I just can't envision Dave saying that, because Dave
is not the type they would apologize for any of
the jokes he's made, so I don't think he's going
to begin to these clips. I just want to give
a quick kudos to Candice Owans, which, by the way,
Dave Smith had Candae Sollans on yesterday. They had a
great discussion as usual, and I got a name dropped again.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
Last night.
Speaker 5 (04:11):
I was on my buddy Clint Russell's podcast at Liberty
Locked Out.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Clint Russell, by the way, criminally underrated.
Speaker 5 (04:17):
He's great, So it was meet him and Ian Carroll
and we did. Yeah, yeah, yeah, well it was a
great show. I think I bowled over everyone. I talked
too much on the show. I apologized for it afterward,
and I was like, I bet I'm gonna get shit
in the comments for this, and I did today, So
sorry about that, guys.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
It was late. I'd had a couple of whiskeys. I
was ramped in a bet.
Speaker 6 (04:34):
My life is very, very surreal, and I'm pretty sure
we're living in the simulation at this point. That's the
only assumption I can come to. I have no idea otherwise.
While of this is happening, this is simulation theory confirmed,
Elon Musk. I am your perfect case study. It's a simulation.
Speaker 2 (04:50):
You were right.
Speaker 6 (04:50):
I just want to point out this is the whole
game here, folks. This is the whole reason that our
little sphere here is dominating the commentating circle right now.
Is like everybody wants to hear people telling their honest
to god truth. They're actually more concerned about you being
honest than they are about you being right. That's how,
(05:14):
that's how just awash in lies. We have been our
entire lives, really, but very starkly so. Over the past
five years, that people are just like I want someone
who tells it like they see it, not even like
it is, but just like they see it. Kennis Owns
is a perfect example of that. And she sits down
with that CNN reporter and she's like, do you understand.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Why people don't like it when you say they though?
Can you understand given the age old trope?
Speaker 6 (05:38):
And Kennis is like, I don't give a shit about
a trope. Don't care. If I want to talk about that,
I'll talk about that. If I meant that, then I
say that. If I didn't say that, I didn't mean that.
Moving on, It's like, babam, that's exactly what people want.
You can hate Candace. You can say she's got X
y z R. It doesn't matter, doesn't matter the audience,
(05:58):
the audience, don't lie.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
You're not doing millions of views per show.
Speaker 6 (06:01):
You're not the number one political podcast on the planet
Earth because you're not delivering something that the people want.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
She's delivering it.
Speaker 6 (06:10):
And guess what, So is Nick Flentes, So is Tucker Carlson,
So is Dave Smith. These are all the people that
are telling how they see it, and as a consequence,
they are getting enormous audiences. Ian Carroll a perfect example.
So you're just not gonna stop this title? Waif you're
not gonna stop it, and let me tell you, someone
like Ben Shapiro, who's star rose like the phoenix and
(06:34):
has now collapsed down to earth, is not gonna save you.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
Guys.
Speaker 6 (06:39):
For those that don't know, the big pushback over the
past couple of days has been Ben Shapiro back hot
on the circuit, trying to undermine and replace Tucker Carlson
as the leader of the conservative commentating marketplace.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Not gonna happen, Ben.
Speaker 6 (06:54):
I guess the stop that he makes to make this
sales pitch to America CNN where all the Trump supporters
are watching, right. I mean, this guy is such a
clear crystal case of an operative. I don't know why
anyone takes him seriously anymore, and let's be honest, very
few people do. I was looking at his viewership recently
(07:16):
and I'm like, there's a distinct possibility that my show,
this little show, no marketing budget, no nothing, just pure
networking and word of mouth and friends in this world
that have helped me out, by the way, not via compensation,
just because they like what I do. I'm like, there's
a non zero chance that Liberty Lockdown will be more
influential than Ben Shapiro by next year. Like, it's a
(07:38):
distinct possibility. Think about how fucking crazy that is. Ben Shapiro,
who was the darling of the YouTube algorithm for the
past fifteen years, or at least for about a decade there.
The past couple of years he kind of fellen off.
But for about a decade it was like you go
onto YouTube, I don't care what the fuck you're looking for.
It was like Lex Friedman, Ben Shapiro and just boom
(08:00):
right in your lap, whether you like it or not.
What is Shapiro's actual role? What is his actual job?
Because he would have you believe that his job is
to commentate on the news, commentate on politics in America,
But what is his real job? When do you see
his most passionate retorts come out. It's not really against
(08:22):
the lefties, it's not against the Wolk College students. He's
kind of jovial during most of that. No no, no,
no no. Ben Shapiro gets most activated most clearly when
you critique literally anything about Israel. His number one passion
in life is the defense of the nation of Israel.
I'm just telling you how.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
I see it. That's my job, just to tell you
how I see it.
Speaker 6 (08:45):
And I think as a consequence of that becoming more
and more obvious, especially after the multi year war in Gaza,
his audience is being hemorrhaged. So what does he do
to reclaim his star on the Walk of Fame. Well,
he goes to see an end and he.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
Says this, if somebody glosses Nazis on the air, that
person probably should not be associated with a conservative thing tank,
and that everyone should have a duty to say that
that is a bad thing to do. The real issue
here is I think that Tucker Carlson's morphing from I
would say, a very edgy right wing political figure on
Fox News, but certainly within the mainstream into a conspiracist,
(09:22):
a person who ideologically wanders anti Semitism, who ideologically wanders
all sorts of anti Americanism on his show, and then
errs it for the public to hear with interviews like
the ones he did with Nick Flents, which was essentially
a massage with Nick flinnays the truth is that most
people don't watch politics all that granularly. Even people who
are in politics don't spend a lot of time on
(09:42):
sort of the fringe edged lord right that Flint has is,
and so the sort of mainstreaming, the popularization and normalization
of Flentez by Carlson is significantly more important than just
Flint as his existence. Obviously, it was a seminal moment.
I think when it comes to the right's decision as
to whether Tucker himself is a source of truth or
whether he is a destructive force inside conservatism, I think
(10:04):
the broader problem here is again that you have an
enormous number of young people who are engaging with true
white supremacist, anti Jew content and are taken in by it,
and there do need to be more voices pushing back
on that.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
Fren Spiro, we thank you for your voice.
Speaker 6 (10:16):
Thank you so much, Thanks so much, Jake Tapper of
CNN saying Ben Shapiro, we thank you for your voice.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
I'm sure you do, Jake, I'm sure you do. CNN.
Speaker 6 (10:26):
It's just the rest of America that doesn't really appreciate
it anymore. But let's be honest, what he's doing there
is gatekeeping. He is trying to topple from the highest
of heights when it comes to conservative media, one Tucker Carlson,
someone who he used to compete with head to head,
who he no longer does. And by the way, it
(10:47):
should be pointed out that when Ben Shapiro talks about
Nick Fuintes being on the fringes of the political right
and basically painting him as some sort of like freak
anomaly thing that really isn't that important, but yet it
is important enough that apparently Tucker Carlson has to be canceled, Ben,
Nick Fuentes is about, I don't know, five to ten
(11:10):
times more popular than you right now, maybe more. I mean,
if you're going to talk about fringe, what makes it fringe,
it's he's more mainstream than you.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
Benny.
Speaker 6 (11:23):
Hate to break it to you, Bud, You're no longer
the guy that you once were, at least that you
thought you were, And I, for one, celebrate that fact.
I think that's a great thing, because I would actually
like the right wing in this country to be dedicated
to this country, I know, very radical thought, and you
(11:44):
are not. So now to just push back briefly on
the entire basic criticism that he's making of Tucker Carls,
and I kind of did that on the episode a
week ago, so I'll keep it very brief, but he's
saying that he's an idea launderer. He's a launderer of
bad ideas. It's like, if you watch that interview, Carlson
makes it very clear the areas of disagreement that he
(12:05):
has with Nick Fuentes. He said his piece, he said
what he wanted to express, and ultimately it is his
platform and he gets to say what he wants. You know,
an arena in which you could actually contend with Nick
Fuente's dangerous, bad, fringe radical ideas well, that would be
your own or literally anywhere on planet Earth. As Nick
Fuintes has had an open invite to you, Ben Shapiro
(12:28):
for years now, an invite for which you have ran consistently,
you fucking coward.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
So how about.
Speaker 6 (12:38):
Instead of canceling Tucker Carlson, we cancel Ben Shapiro, seeing
as he has an opportunity to defeat with better ideas
the bad, dangerous, radical fringe ideas of one Nick Fontes,
and he's not willing. So why should you be the
leader of the right wing if you can't even contend
with free speech and debate against these very obviously bad ideas.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
Ben Yeah, I'd.
Speaker 6 (13:06):
Say that's a much bigger problem than him not pushing
back when Nick said that he idolizes Stalin, which by
the way, I have watched the clips that go into
detail explaining Nick's perspective on that, and he goes on
to say that he thinks that Stalin's an evil guy,
but he's it's just like he's an impressive historical figure
coming from poverty and being this basically the most powerful
(13:29):
man on earth. And Nick obviously has some affinity for
strong men. So that's not my cup of tea. As liberty,
I despise those types of figures, but I do understand
his perspective, and it's not it's kind of how I
feel about the Zionus, Like I don't really respect what
they've done, but I totally can like go like, wow,
(13:51):
that's impressive. It's an impressive amount of evil that's been committed.
So I get the point he was making. I just
wanted to correct the record on that because I did
bring that up last week and I hadn't done the
deep dive to watch the ten minute, you know, exposition
as to why he felt that way, and in case
you're still not convinced that Ben Shapiro's primary role in
American political commentating is gatekeeping. Here's what PbD had to say.
Speaker 4 (14:14):
So when we had BB, I would say death threats
at an all time high, no question. When BB came up,
then they agree, all right, Ben wants to come on
the podcast. Then when I said, you know, I want
to have Nick on, I looked at the booking team
after Ben was confirmed, I said, if they cancel, it's because.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Of me agreeing to have Nick on.
Speaker 4 (14:43):
Great, we have Nick on, I show the clips, we
have the conversations, everything takes place, fair interview. You sound
like a racist year you sound like this here? Why
are you dropping this word? So he's kind of like,
you know, even manningut. Two weeks later, Ben Shapiro cancels.
Why why do you cancel?
Speaker 8 (15:04):
So?
Speaker 4 (15:04):
What is the brand? Why not have conversations? We're not
a fire brand, We're not well, let's see maybe next year. No,
I'm not interested. Don't big shot yourself. It's unattractive.
Speaker 6 (15:20):
So I'm sure most of you have already figured this out,
but let me make it explicit. What Ben Shapiro is
doing right now is because Nick Fointes is so goddamn
charismatic and has a lot of things right. It makes
a really compelling argument that's really hard to refute. You
now have an operation to try and because he has
now gone from you know, blacklisted, third Rail can't talk
(15:41):
about him basically Voldemort and he's now getting on bigger
and bigger shows. Did candas did Tucker did Date Like
he's doing the big shows now. Problem, he's been on PbD. Problem.
So what is Shapiro doing Well, he's now withholding his
services his guest appearance is as if he's such a
fucking draw right from going on because he had funt
(16:01):
des on. You see the game and what they're what
they're attempting to do is they're attempting to make it
so that anybody that host Nick Funtes can no longer
be in the good graces of conn Inc.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Maggot Inc.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
If you will, the Benny Johnson's of the world, the
Pasobics of the world, you can't be in those good
graces if you gain it necessary to have a conversation
with Nick funt Is. And if you do have a
conversation with Nick funt does it better be you calling
him a racist, anti Semite for an hour straight and
if it's not, well, then we're going to fucking destroy
your life. That's what they're doing. It's super clear that's
(16:34):
what he's doing. And it's not just him, it's Levin
as well. But there's a lot of people that are
pushing this. A lot Denish Jesus has been doing it,
who I've done a show with, and I liked Densh
But this is like, fucking so obvious and crazy. But
there's other figures that are doing the same thing. And
that's the game. This is the gate keeping game. This
is not this is not reflective of the right wing
(16:58):
movement that I like.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
That says fuck your feelings, right.
Speaker 6 (17:02):
Remember Shapiro used to basically say that, no, no, no, this
is like feelings are paramount. Actually they're arguably more important
than principles. In fact, they are more important than principles
because one of my highest principles is free speech, letting
better ideas win an open debate. I think that's a
great way for us to move forward as a country,
(17:24):
to settle our differences peacefully so that it doesn't get
violent and crazy. That's actually what our founders believed in
that's what I believe in. That's what I thought all
Americans believed in, until someone like Nick funt does pops
his head up and suddenly everybody forgets about the First Amendment. Well,
my sincere apologies, I haven't forgotten about it. Still love it,
(17:45):
still uphold it, still willing to die for it. Actually,
and so is Tucker Carlson, So is Dave Smith, So's
Cannie Owns, so is MTG. And I think Nick funt
Is is right there with that mentality. So those are my people. Well,
right now, we don't have to agree on everything. In fact,
we don't, but we have to have shared cultural values,
(18:07):
shared principles, a shared ethos by which we formulate civilization.
And people like Ben Shapiro don't have it. Okay, this
is the exact same thing. This is the fun house
mirror of the twenty ten through twenty eighteen period, twenty
twenty one period, really just the entire woke apocalypse that
we went through. It's the same fucking thing. We all
(18:30):
see it, right, there's a particular category of human beings
that can't be criticized. Does that ring a bell for anybody?
It rings a bell for me. We just went through it.
That's what BLM was. This is what Candice Owens fought
back against. This is the reason that she was so
activated when this same phenomenon came on again, and once
(18:51):
again she found herself on the other side of it,
and God bless her, she didn't change her principles. She
actually continued to push the same talking points. No, I'm
going to say what I have to say about this
group of people. Nobody's special. Everybody is open for criticism.
That is actual Americanism, that is actual freedom. But Ben
(19:13):
Shapiro doesn't want that. Mick Levin doesn't want that. And
it's not just Ben Shapiro that's unwilling to debate these issues,
especially with Nick fluent Is. They're trying to do the
same fucking thing to Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson, who does
not have the same worldview at least certainly not the
exact same worldview of Nick fuint is far from it.
But Levin gets an opportunity and offer directly from Tucker
(19:34):
Carlson to debate their differences. And here's what Levin has
to say.
Speaker 9 (19:38):
I got a very strange text this morning from Tucker
Carlson ten and sixteen am. I'll read it to you
for probade them. Good morning, he writes it to me.
The leadership at Turning Point has asked me to debate
you at their event in Scottsdale in December. I'm happy
to do it, and I hope you'll agree as well.
Beyond the personal insults, which I'll try to keep to
a minimum, there are real important ideological differences between us,
(20:02):
and I think the country would benefit from an extended
conversation about them. So again, I hope you'll accept. Let
me know thanks. The guy is desperate. He's taking a
hit on his podcast. He's fighting like hell for his career,
he's fighting like hell for his reputation. People are awakening
to what scum he actually is, and he thinks I'm
going to platform him. He thinks I'm going to help
(20:24):
him kick up his podcast ratings. What would Charlie say?
What would Rush say? What would any rational response?
Speaker 2 (20:30):
Here?
Speaker 4 (20:30):
It is?
Speaker 9 (20:31):
I wrote him the following, My family and I want
nothing to do with you. Well, you've become your vile
libels against my faith, millions of Christians, and in my view,
what you seek to do to our country. There's nothing
to debate you're a Nazi promoter. You're the modern day
David Duke. I debate people with whom I disagree for
living we're a lot smarter than you, but for whom
(20:55):
I have some respect. I'm also disappointed in TPUSA that
continues to platform you some unsolicited advice. Stop long enough
to remember who you used to be and what you
used to stand for. So has expected knee jerk. For
the record, I'm strongly anti Nazi. Does he sound that
(21:16):
way to you America? Oh you're gonna hear more. But
that's hardly the point. This seems like the perfect opportunity
to rebut what you consider evil ideas, and to do
it to my face like a man. I think you
jump at the chance, assuming you believe your positions are defensible.
I'm offering the marketplace of ideas you often talk about.
Is it possible you can't really defend, for example, what
(21:39):
Israel has done to civilians in Gaza? They said, there
you go. You're not feared, you're despised. Well, you're a coward,
and if you change your mind, I'm here. Thanks, you
little bastard. Nobody's afraid of you. I'd rather debate a
skunk than you.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
It's moments like this where I feel like I'm losing
my mind. Sincerely, Tucker Carlson is the biggest political commentator
on the right wing, and Mark Levin says he's desperate,
he's struggling, he's trying to defend his career, defend his podcast,
his numbers. Plemitting you think I'm gonna go on and
debate you and help uplift your podcast numbers. It's like,
(22:17):
Mark Levin, what the fuck world do you live in?
Like you're you're so irrelevant it's almost impossible to overstate,
Like you're just barely more relevant than Josh Hammer. Like
you're definitionally a non entity. You probably have like every
time I respond to you on a I ratio, you
not to say that that means I'm like important or anything.
(22:38):
I'm just saying you're not important at all. Okay, so
fuck And then to to you know, read off those
private text messages, which, by the way, you're a total
bitch for that, but also to do that in a
way that's like you think you're dunking on Tucker with that.
Tucker's like, Hey, I think it'd be good for the
country that are you know, I'll try and keep the
(22:59):
personal insults to him. And I think that we our
differences are significant and the country would benefit from a
long form, you know, debate between the two of us
and what do you say? And he just goes off
like you're an any semi and I would never and
basically fuck you and your whole family. And it's like whoa.
And then Tucker's just like, well, you're a coward. If
you change your mind, I'll be here. It's like, Tucker
(23:20):
looks like total chat energy there, bro, and you come
off like a school marm, which you are. Anyways, let's
move on from Mark Levin. I shouldn't have spent that much
time on him. I apologize. I will never play Mark
Levin again. Okay, I probably will, but not often. This
is what Tucker had to say in response to Shapiro
with Magan Kelly, which, by the way, I got a
quick story. I actually went to Magan Kelly's event last
(23:43):
night and I got to meet her, very very nice lady.
Speaker 2 (23:46):
I only got like a minute with her.
Speaker 6 (23:47):
It was very brief meet and greet type deal, but
I did have enough time to say to her. Macan,
I just want you to know that if you get
the Tucker Carlson treatment.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Next.
Speaker 6 (23:59):
There are ten million people that will back you up.
You don't ever need to kneel. And she said, very sincerely,
thank you so much. I really need the support right now.
And then we took a photo and I pieced out.
But I'm just saying, I think she's a good person,
and I think she's a courageous lady, and I hope
that she recognizes that, like, you don't need to play
(24:20):
this game anymore. For our entire lives. You had to
bite your tongue. You could not tell certain truths. You
just couldn't do it. And if you did, your career
was over. You would get the Nick Fuontez treatment, no
fly list, get your bank accounts closed, de platform blacklisted everywhere.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
That's not the world we're in anymore. In fact, it's
the opposite.
Speaker 6 (24:43):
If you're courageous enough, you will shine, you will break through,
You will hit heights that you have never hit before.
That is the market speaking. All of the gatekeeping and
the parameters by which we had to function before they
have fallen. Fucking stand up, step up. And but if
you still don't have the courage to do so, you
have no one to blame but yourself. Look at all
(25:04):
of the most high profile figures in this space right now, Tucker, Nick, Candace.
What's the commonality. They tell it like they see it,
and they're independent. You have a choice. This goes for
Matt Walsh and everybody else that like people keep saying,
when are you gonna leave the Daily Wire. Look, I'll
just be straight with you. I don't give a shit
(25:24):
what Matt Walsh does. If he wants to stay there
and continue to bite his tongue about a bunch of shit,
that's his prerogative. I don't care, but I'm not gonna
take you seriously until you leave. Just being honest, you
seem compromised. You are compromised. You can't say certain things,
as evidenced by the fact that your colleague Candice Owens
got fired because she said certain things that you're not
allowed to say around bench berro Right, we all know
(25:47):
that's what happened. So anyways, the market is telling you
you will never be as successful as you can be
in the political commentating space if you don't just fucking
throw off the shackles and tell the truth.
Speaker 10 (25:59):
Isn't the this is an important race? Is not because
Lindsay Graham is like Mark Levin. You know, some when
if you're stuck an elevator with him, you'd have to
obviously kill yourself because you couldn't handle. He's not that
you would enjoy. You'd enjoy being stuck in elevator with him.
That's the new world we're in. That's a good thing,
ladies and gentlemen. That's the best fucking thing that has
happened in forever.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
It's such a great thing. And yet a lot of.
Speaker 6 (26:21):
People are still scared. They're like, ah, he's still I mean,
this is the whole James Lindsay pitch. He keeps saying
it's not too late to turn back. You can always
turn back, Clint. You can stop telling the truth and
come back to the plantation and we'll forgive you. But
the time is running out. You have to do it soon. No,
not turning back. I'm not gonna start to lie to
(26:44):
try and get along with the fucking people I don't
respect anyways, Why would I.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
I'm not going to do it. Enjoy your fucking.
Speaker 6 (26:51):
Seapack speech or whatever. I was never invited to those
things anyways. I'm a fucking radical libertarian. You guys hate
me before, you're gonna hate me after.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
We're good. I'm good with that. We're cool.
Speaker 6 (27:02):
Speaking of Benchpiro, here's what he had to say to
Makan Kelly.
Speaker 3 (27:05):
I think that what Candon's owns is doing right now
is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now. Okay,
and I say that again, but what because like.
Speaker 11 (27:15):
I don't know pine on whether it's evil or not.
But my position is it's really none of my business,
and why is it?
Speaker 3 (27:20):
But I have a question, why is it none of
your business?
Speaker 2 (27:22):
I mean, you comment on these things for a little bit.
Speaker 7 (27:24):
I'm not mother of the Internet.
Speaker 3 (27:25):
No, But but if this were on the left and
somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having murdered him,
I assume that you would be talking about it.
Speaker 11 (27:33):
Is that what Candace is accusing Erica of Yes of
murdering her own husband.
Speaker 3 (27:37):
She's accusing TPUSA insiders and other members of the right wing,
including Seth Dyllan, of being involved in the murder of
Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 11 (27:44):
Yes, Okay, Like I said, I don't take in that content,
which is an honest statement.
Speaker 7 (27:49):
I don't have time to watch.
Speaker 5 (27:50):
I believe you, I believe you.
Speaker 3 (27:51):
But the point that I'm making is that in our business,
I think it's important listen not trump. We don't even
know what I understand, but with Tucker, friendship should not
trump our manifest requirement to speak out when people do
and say things that are both detrimental to conservatism and
morally wrong.
Speaker 11 (28:10):
So I don't totally disagree, but I think the way
of handling that, at least for me, is much different.
Speaker 6 (28:16):
Imagine condemning someone for saying something that you find morally reprehensible,
which is what Ben Shapiro is doing to Canis Owns
right there, and then just whole cloth making up a
claim Cannas has never said, ever, never even hinted at.
He says explicitly that Erica Kirk killed her own husband.
(28:38):
According to Candas Owns, that's the allegation that Canis Owons
is making. Cannas has never fucking said that ever, ever, ever, ever.
That's a terrible, terrible lie, and he knows she hasn't
said that. There's no way he fucking thinks she said that,
which is why he immediately backpedals and he goes, no, no, no,
she's saying that, you know, Seth Dylan and a bunch
of the TPUSA insiders did it. She's not fucking saying
(28:59):
that either. She's saying that she believes that they're covering up.
The reason she believes that is because they are overtly lying,
provably lying. We know that for a fact. Does that
mean that they're covering up like the actual murder. We
don't know. We just know that they're lying. So that's
the position. A lot of people in Charlie's in her
circle have been proven to have lied in the aftermath
(29:20):
of his assassination. We don't know why, but it's totally reasonable,
especially if you were fucking Charlie Kirk's friend, to ask
those questions, which apparently Candace Owens is the only one
that was actually his friend.
Speaker 2 (29:32):
You sick Fox.
Speaker 6 (29:33):
You just such a bad person, such a bad person
to try and character assassinate Candis owns like that. I mean,
you can have disagreements with her tactics. I've had my own,
I've said so on this show, But to just fucking
whole cloth fiction, just make up some shit that she
hasn't said, that's really beyond the pale, obviously, and then
to attribute to Candas Owens on a platform which By
(29:54):
the way, I was at one of those events, so
I know how many people are there, thousands of people
sitting there. And to say that to Megan Kelly and
then to demand of Megan Kelly essentially that she condemn
Candice Owns, Tucker Carlson, blah blah blahlah. List goes on
and on now for things that didn't even happen. And
you're the moral arbiter. You're the moral guardrails of the
(30:15):
right wing that we have to listen to and basically
craft our lifestyles around. Get the fuck out of here, dude, No,
you're reprehensible. If you start taking your moral guidance from
someone like Ben Shapiro, you need to go to church immediately.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
Holy shit.
Speaker 6 (30:34):
I like the duplicity that I mean, it's not even duplicit,
it just overlies. Oh, I can't believe these people. All right,
one more clip.
Speaker 11 (30:42):
The main criticism, as I understand it, has been well, yes, platforming.
They say that I don't accept platforming as a valid objection.
Speaker 2 (30:48):
What is that a verb?
Speaker 10 (30:49):
By the way, you take a noun and you make
it into a verb, and nobody says anything. As a
former editor, I say no, yeah, I agree, honestly.
Speaker 11 (30:56):
But like, as far as I know, Nick Fointes hasn't
eaten anyone, you know, I mean Jeffrey Dahmer, eight people,
and he was platformed by Diane saur Did we have.
Speaker 10 (31:04):
A member, a sitting member of Congress. I spoke to
the Speaker of the House about this.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Today.
Speaker 10 (31:07):
We have a sitting member of Congress from Florida called
Randy Fine who is literally texted or put on Twitter.
We should kill them all, every single one. Someone texted
a picture of literally of a dead baby and he
laughs at it, and it's like, this guy's a lawmaker's
appropriating money to a military committing genocide and that's cool.
It's not cool now, And let's just be honest. That
(31:30):
is much worse than anything Nick Fuentez.
Speaker 6 (31:34):
That's irrefutable, obviously, factually accurate. Randy Fine and what he
has said and done is on all levels worse than
any of the worst hits or jokes or whatever the
fuck you want to say about Nick fuente is way worse. Literally,
like tens of thousands of people died. Hello, you think
(31:54):
tens of thousands of people died because Nick made a joke? No,
I don't think so.
Speaker 2 (31:59):
Rain.
Speaker 6 (32:00):
So yeah, I think this is a perfect opportunity for
those that are the morality gatekeepers, which, by the way,
I generally don't like go off critiquing people's morals in
this world. I just don't care. It's not my place.
It's not really relevant to the future of the country.
Unless I see like obvious lies, like obvious liars, I
(32:21):
will call that out. But like, if it's a difference
of opinion and your morals are you know, a little
bit questionable, I tend not to concern myself with it, Like,
do whatever you want.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
I don't care. You're not relevant, so keep it moving.
Speaker 6 (32:35):
But when it comes to the people who are doing this,
the actual woke, right, the actual people that want to
cancel others, and they actually have reprehensible morals themselves, well
then yeah, it's time for the little hypocrisy shuffle. Let's
play that game. You want to question my morals, how
about we question yours? How about the genocide you funded?
(32:57):
How about that? How about all of the wars you guys,
how about the violations of the first and second and
fifth and every Amendment? How about we talk about that
a little bit, talk about that and talk about how
You've gotten super wealthy off of destroying this country. If
you want to have a morallity debate, okay, let's do it,
especially the politicians. Just to repeat, you're not going to
(33:20):
win this debate with suppression. The entire horse all of
the horses have stampeded out of the corral. The barn
door flew open, the hinges have broken off, there are
no doors left.
Speaker 2 (33:32):
Okay.
Speaker 6 (33:33):
This is what Asmen Gold, who's one of the biggest
streamers on YouTube, had to say to a Harrison Smith
clip friend of the show.
Speaker 7 (33:39):
If you have a problem with any of that, you
hate Jews and you are a not Yeah.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
See, it's just not gonna it's not working.
Speaker 8 (33:46):
And so the right is like there are two factions
inside of right wing politics right now. There are America
first Conservatives and there are international traditional you know, neo
con is Israel like, you know, like lobbyist people, right like,
there are two groups of people here and the infighting
(34:07):
is why they're losing. They're losing because they're infighting. The
reality though, is it again the Israel issue is the
Republican trans issue. I think eighty percent a huge amount
of voters are demoralized completely fucking demoralized by the fact
that they have politicians playing like cow telling and playing
(34:29):
paddy cake with Israel constantly.
Speaker 2 (34:31):
It is. It's a massive thing.
Speaker 8 (34:34):
And the more that you play into that, and the
more that you try to like, oh no, this is normal,
this is fine, that's the problem. Who are you voting
in the best interest for American citizens or Israeli citizens
and you're in the American fucking government. I think you
know what, if you can answer that question, I have
a different question, do you want to go to Israel
today or tomorrow? Because you're getting a one way ticket
(34:55):
there and you're never coming back. That's my opinion.
Speaker 6 (35:00):
It's not a political commentator, that's just like a cultural
commentator basically on YouTube and millions of yours, millions this
is and he's reflective of his generation, the twenty to
forty year old generation is like, we're not fucking doing
this anymore. So good luck, good luck blacklisting all of us.
(35:20):
You think we won't all migrate to whatever platform allows
us to continue to have these conversations. By the way,
I'm so like in this world and so radicalize at
this point, I can't even go to normy conventions anymore.
Like they used to be really interesting to me to hear,
you know, someone talk some either politician or commentator, and
now I just hear them. I'm like barring, it's such
(35:41):
a snoozefest man. And no disrespect to Megan. I do
like her, but you know that shit doesn't do anything
for me. Like after the three hour long conversation you
have with Dave Smith and he and Carol, you think
I'm gonna go listen to Eric Trump talk and be
like riveted. No, because they can't tell the whole truth.
That's that's the whole market demand. And I'm just like
(36:01):
you guys, that's all I want. I want honest, interesting
discussions from people who are not bought and paid for.
And if I sniff that, I click, I changed the channel.
It's immediately over and I don't turn back. And that's
the whole environment. Now I probably shouldn't even be giving
these tips to them, but like they're not gonna take
(36:21):
me seriously anyways, because I'm al racious.
Speaker 2 (36:23):
I a beggoting right. So that's the truth.
Speaker 6 (36:26):
Though, if you want to win in this game, which
I don't think it's a game, but you know what,
I'm saying, if you want to win in this market,
you have to tell the fucking truth and you cannot
be compromised. And if you are well, then you better
have a huge marketing budget behind you, like mister Hollyhand,
and pray to God that you trick enough people that
you can actually make a living doing this, because best
(36:47):
I can tell, this is the first time in my
life that all that matters, literally, all that matters is honesty.
What a world, What a beautiful fucking time to be alive.
It's so good, it's so it's so refreshing, And I'm
not going back. I don't know about you. I'm not
going back. I absolutely refuse. I will never go back
(37:11):
into the fucking corral of allowable opinion. Fuck you, Let
me show you a good example of those types of
speeches that are super caned and obviously bought and paid for.
Speaker 2 (37:21):
This is our good friend, Penny Johnson. How we doing tonight? Good?
Speaker 12 (37:27):
How we're feeling? You feeling that revival spirit? You're feeling
that revolutionary spirit, that comeback spirit. One year ago tonight
President Trump won the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 6 (37:51):
You want to know how your presidency's pretty much a
total failure. On the one year anniversary of you winning
the election, the only celebration that you have is to
say that you won the election.
Speaker 2 (38:00):
That's a great sign.
Speaker 6 (38:01):
That's not like we're one year into the Trump's presidency
and here's all of the things that he's accomplished. It's
just one year ago we won. Do you feel the spirit? No,
I don't feel the spirit. And if I do feel anything,
it's anger, actually, And why can this elucidates that quickly?
Speaker 4 (38:23):
Here?
Speaker 1 (38:23):
And if you think you're going to infiltrate and convince us,
So this is the same party while we get gas
lit about everything that's happening. Like I said, you lost
the party. Maga got fractured. Not when Tucker Carlson interviewed
Nick Fuentes, but when Donald Trump looked at us in
our faces and said Epstein. Who That's when it was
(38:43):
game over.
Speaker 6 (38:44):
You guys, remember that, right a couple months ago, you're
still talking about Epstein?
Speaker 2 (38:49):
Oh my god, have and we moved on.
Speaker 6 (38:51):
Well, President Trump, it's because no one's fucking in prison
other than the guy who died in prison.
Speaker 2 (38:57):
Inexplicably.
Speaker 6 (38:58):
By the way, another friend of the show, former guest
Steve Baker, has an incredible expose that I'm not gonna
read the whole thing to you. It's gonna be out
and he's probably gonna be doing the media circuit and
I'll see if I can get him on for a
quick hit on the show to discuss it. But he
works for the Blaze, and kudos to him if.
Speaker 2 (39:15):
You got this right. He deserves the pulitzer for real.
Speaker 6 (39:18):
They think that they have basically a gate match, so
based off of the walking of a former Capitol police
officer who they believe is responsible for planning the J
five pipeon. That's the bomb that was planted the night
before the J six riots, which we now know had
hundreds of playing close police officers involved, which probably catalyzed
(39:40):
the rights to begin with.
Speaker 2 (39:41):
So I'll just tell you what I think. This is early.
Speaker 6 (39:44):
No arrests have been made, no arrest will probably ever
be made, and we'll probably never get justice because that's
just how everything works.
Speaker 2 (39:50):
Again, just being honest.
Speaker 6 (39:51):
But here's my thought process, and I've felt like this
for a long time. But if it turns out that
Steve Baker's investigation is correct and that this lady Capitol
police cop is actually responsible for planning that pipeine, which,
by the way, she then went on a couple months
later quit her job and now works with the CIA.
Ah Uh sometimes sometimes fucking Alex Jones is right, you
(40:16):
know what I mean? Anyways, if that's true, I'll tell
you what I think. I don't know for sure. I
don't know, but we know, you know what I mean.
We don't know know, but we know if she got
a job with the CIA and she's responsible for that pipeon,
the CIA did it, like, we can all acknowledge that, right, Okay,
So I think it's a CIA. I think it was
also the Democrats because they did the whole J six
(40:38):
hearings where they lied and obfuscated and hit exculpatory evidence.
So yeah, they were part of it. They were part
of the operation too, But a lot of Republicans too.
I think that's the main thing that people are not
going to want to talk about. This is a by
part is an affair. You don't set up and entrap
a thousand plus people on JA with a CIA operation
(41:02):
in plane clothes undercovers without it being a bipart is
an affair.
Speaker 2 (41:07):
You know how.
Speaker 6 (41:07):
I know that because Donald Trump's been in office for
a year now, or he won a year ago. He's
been in office for ten months, and none of those
people are in prison, not even indicted, not on trial, nothing. Actually,
So you tell me, what does that tell you? Tells
you that this is a bipart is an affair. This
is the actual swamp, which in my opinion, Donald Trump
(41:30):
is knelt to or was always part of.
Speaker 2 (41:32):
I don't know which.
Speaker 6 (41:34):
So that's my perspective on it, and I think that
the operation was specifically. This is my guess that J five,
you plant a pipe bomb. J six, you try and
catalyze riots. That's what you try to do. And if
you fail, because the participants in the protest on J six,
for whatever reason, do not get violent and do not
(41:55):
charge into the Capitol despite the antagonism and the by
the playing closed cops to get them to do so, well,
then you just detonate that bomb that you had planted
there the night before.
Speaker 2 (42:06):
That's my guess. And is it dark.
Speaker 6 (42:09):
Yeah, it's real dark. And if it's true, then it's
right up there with any of the biggest scandals in
American history right up there. I'm going to go into
further detail once we get additional confirmation, and God willing
we get some arrests on this thing, but I'm gonna
leave it at that for now. It's a huge story,
(42:30):
and you're not going to hear about this, most likely
from Fox News and CNN and all these other organizations.
Speaker 2 (42:35):
That's my guess.
Speaker 6 (42:36):
I hope I'm proven wrong on that, But my God,
talk about a tyrannical empire we live under. Framing the
populace right wing as terrorists. But don't you dare. Don't
you for a second think that they might have been
involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. That would be dangerous,
(42:57):
that would be radical. I wouldn't go there. All right,
I got one serious bit of news that I got
to get into. I mean, this has all been serious,
but like one less salacious story that I think is
really important. And this ties into my wheelhouse because this
is about mortgages, and this will be really boring for
some people and really really interesting for others. So I
(43:17):
don't know, you can judge for yourself if this is
a segment worth watching. It's gonna be very quick, but
I think it's really important. So here's Donald Trump, or
the Trump administration's brainchild to remedy the home ownership crisis
amongst the young in this country. I'm sure you're thinking
to yourself, well, they're just gonna like cut regulations and
they're gonna make it so that it's much easier to
(43:38):
build because if you increase the supply, then it might
meet the demand and then pricing will come down. Right, No,
none of that. Their big plan to remedy the crisis
of young people's home ownership is to extend mortgages from
thirty years to fifty years. Oh man, I'm so personally
offended on so many runts, like my Austrian economics background, furious,
(44:05):
my mortgage broker background, furious physical conservative background. Just I'm
so angry about this, So just real briefly, let me explain.
So a thirty year mortgage versus a fifty year mortgage, Right,
Obviously it's an amortization, so it's gonna be how many
years it takes you to pay off that loan, So
it's an additional twenty years. So if you buy that
house at twenty five years old, you're not gonna be
(44:26):
able to afford a house until're probably thirty or thirty
five or forty, So thirty five years old plus fifty
puts you eighty five when you pay off that fucking mortgage. Sorry,
I'm gonna try not to laugh through this whole thing,
but it's so fucking crazy. It makes me so mad,
all right. So then you take do the math on this,
So a thirty year mortgage at six percent, say like
half a million dollar loan, because like starter home is
(44:48):
usually six to eight hundred thousand in much of the
country now, so you take out a half a million
dollar loan, and the payment difference between a thirty and
a fifty year mortgage is about four hundred dollars per month.
And the way qualification works for a mortgage is that
your DTI, your debt to income ratio usually is capped
at fifty percent of your gross income. So say you
(45:08):
make I don't know, seven thousand dollars a month, that
means that your DTI is capped at fifty percent, which
is thirty five hundred. That's fifty percent of seven thousand.
So you can now have a mortgage payment of thirty
five hundred and qualify and then buy that home. But
in reality, what dynamic does this create. It takes a
(45:29):
lot of people that weren't able to qualify for a
home at the price level that they would actually be
interested in buying, say a six hundred or seven hundred
thousand dollars house. Now they're able to qualify for the loan,
but so are them and a million other twenty to
forty year olds who have all been renting and waiting
for the housing market to collapse. So now you have
all of these people who have been waiting patiently for
(45:51):
the market to collapse, which it will inevitably if they
don't do shit like this, and it should, and they're
going to now add a whole bunch of demand to
a market that's still doesn't have enough supply, adding more
fuel to the already historic real estate bubble in this country,
despite the fact that affordability is totally out of whack.
That's their master plan to add more demand and do
(46:13):
nothing about supply. Fucking awesome, awesome work, and to bury
you in debt literally until you die.
Speaker 2 (46:21):
That is Donald.
Speaker 6 (46:22):
Trump's master plan to make sure that you're happy again,
that the populace right is subdued, that you can then
go start a family because you can afford a house,
but you can really barely afford a house, and you're
still gonna be up to your neck in debt forever.
God bless America, right, really getting us on the right track.
And then this is their big fix, right, this is
the big fix to the fucking big problem that's radicalizing
(46:44):
all the young people in this country.
Speaker 2 (46:45):
Especially young white men.
Speaker 6 (46:46):
They're gonna put you in debt for fifty years after
you already are indebted for your student loans, which got
you a degree that gets you nothing, and then they're
gonna replace all of your jobs at AI. They're gonna
bury you in debt, and then they're gonna say vote
for me, because at least we're not woke, except we
are woke when it comes to our greatest ally, right,
So fuck dude, that ain't gonna work. I know this
(47:09):
seems like a really negative episode, but I'm just being
straight with you, Like, does that work for anybody?
Speaker 2 (47:14):
Hello? No, it shouldn't.
Speaker 6 (47:17):
I hope that people are smart enough to recognize that
scam for what it is. A thirty year mortgage is
already a fucking albatross. You go into a fifty year
mortgage just to reduce the payment on a half a
million dollar loan by four hundred dollars a month so
you can qualify it. Instead of buying a five hundred
thousand dollars home, you can now buy a six hundred
thousand dollars home.
Speaker 2 (47:34):
Like, okay, thanks, thanks Daddy Trump. It's gross. So long
story short. Basically, the conclusion of all this is.
Speaker 6 (47:46):
I lost a bunch of my relatives to fentanyl, and
we go like, Trump, could you do anything about that?
Speaker 13 (47:50):
And he's like, Israel has never had a better friend
than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 6 (47:54):
And then you're like, all right, but I mean you're
gonna end these wars, right, because like you did promise that,
and you're gonna make sure that we get justice and
disclosures on the Epstein files.
Speaker 13 (48:02):
And you're like, Trump, Israel has never had a better
friend than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 2 (48:07):
You're gonna fix that, right, That's what we voted for.
Speaker 13 (48:09):
And here, Israel has never had a better friend than
President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 6 (48:13):
And then you're like, I can't afford a house or
have kids or start a family, So if you could
do something to help us out with that, that'd be great,
And maybe I'd consider voting for Jdvans if you can
actually just deliver on the promises you made, if you
can deal with the border, and you can deport a
bunch of people, and you can actually deal with the
supply demand dynamic when it comes to housing, so that
I can actually start a family. That would be great.
But like, what do you have to say about that
(48:34):
President Trump?
Speaker 13 (48:35):
Israel has never had a better friend than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 2 (48:38):
Okay, well, I feel like you're not hearing me.
Speaker 6 (48:41):
I'm gonna be honest with you, Like, I don't feel
like you're actually hearing anything that I'm saying right now.
And that's the real problem is that you're not hearing us.
We continue to tell you exactly how we feel. We're
like the first generation maybe ever that's actually willing to
just say it like it is, tell you exactly why
we're mad and actually not be demanding handouts. Most of
(49:04):
us are not saying, like, let's vote for Mondani and
get fucking state ran grocery stores to bring the price
of beef down by fifty cents. We're like, can you
dismantle the red tape and the regulatory environment the di
skyrocketed things? Can you stop borrowing and printing and spending
us into oblivion so that I can actually afford to
get things on my own. Can you stop subsidizing the
(49:24):
housing market and handing out basically free cash to the
hedge funds to go out and acquire all these rental
properties which absorb so much of the supply of housing
and ultimately drives up prices through the roof.
Speaker 2 (49:37):
Could you do that?
Speaker 13 (49:37):
Israel has never had a better friend than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 6 (49:41):
We're not asking for a fucking handout. We're just asking
for you to get the fuck out of our way.
Speaker 2 (49:46):
And you can't even do that.
Speaker 6 (49:47):
And when there's a revolution in this country as a
consequence of this, don't say I didn't warn you because
I didn't want it to happen, and I still don't
want it to happen, and I want desperately for you
to hear. Are please pl e as no e please,
We are pleading with you.
Speaker 14 (50:04):
Publican party which is have they've lost their goddamn mind.
They're arguing about who's allowed to talk to who on
the internet, but yet all the flights from being grounded,
the airspace is being closed, We've got a government shut down.
The money is still going out the door to so
we can invade Venezuela, arm Israel, arm the Ukraine, or
(50:26):
it's a giveaway to Pallenteer so that Peter Tiel can
install surveillance technology and all the cities that riding is
going to happen in in three two.
Speaker 2 (50:36):
What I mean like it's coming.
Speaker 14 (50:39):
You can feel it, and that's where the Republican Party is.
Speaker 6 (50:44):
Please listen to us. We're not asking for the world.
Put this country first and get the fuck out of
our way.
Speaker 2 (50:52):
That's it.
Speaker 6 (50:53):
If you guys enjoyed this episode, please do it the
like button, subscribe shared around and if you want to
support the work at Liberty lock Pot on Act you
can subscribe there. I'll follow you back, or Libertylockdown to
locals dot com. Leave you comment down below.
Speaker 2 (51:05):
Love you guys. Please subscribe to Liberty Lockdown. Great podcast.
Clint is Tight
They is a word, so like I don't need to
always say they, like it's just a weird It's like
this is one of these psychology tactics who are like
who is they? Who is they?
Speaker 2 (00:08):
And it's like that sounds like you're saying Jews.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
Does the word they mean Jews when you're talking about Jews.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Yes, but if I'm not talking about Jews, then they
doesn't mean Jews. When I say they want us to
believe this or they want us to do that, and
you hear Jews, that's your own derangement.
Speaker 4 (00:25):
Right.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
If I want to say something about Jews, I'll say it.
If I want to say something about Israel, I will
say it. If I want to just like when I
want to say something about black people, I'll say it.
Speaker 5 (00:35):
When I was.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
Saying during BLM, they want us to believe, nobody said
do you mean Jews? And so again it's one of
these trash tactics to make people fearful to speak. When
I say Zionists run the media, I mean Zionists run
the media. People that support the political ideology of Israel
run the media. Any other things that I can help clarify.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
But are you familiar with this like very long standing trop.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
Who did give me about a trope.
Speaker 6 (01:04):
That's a pretty bold claim by Candice Owns. I mean
zionis running the media.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
I don't know. I don't know if I believe it.
Let's uh, let's get into some clips see if we
can confirm or deny her allegation the trope that she's
pushing there. Uh.
Speaker 6 (01:19):
Anyways, welcome to Liberty Lockdown. This is that Clint Russell guy.
That's right, it's me that guy, Clint Russell. Hi, Nick
fuint does I forced my way onto your radar. Sorry
about that. Just to clarify a point. You know, Nick
Is was responding to something that I don't I don't
remember Dave saying. It seemed to me he was taking
(01:41):
it as like Dave was telling him he should apologize
for things he said in the past.
Speaker 7 (01:44):
A lot of people like Dave Smith in particular, Dave
Smith has been going around and I like Dave. I'm
not trying to start drama with him again. But I
saw Dave Smith did a show with that Clint Russell
guy this week, and he said, why does Nick flent
Is take back all the horrible things he said, like
(02:05):
about Hitler and first of all, I don't think it's
that horrible. Actually, I don't know why you're all offended.
I thought you're a comedian. I don't think it's that bad.
That's number one, Number two, This is why why will
I never apologize? Why will I never do that? They're
(02:27):
never operating in good faith? Know that, understand that, bank
that when you're dealing with Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Josh Hammer,
these guys are gangsters. They're crooks, these guys are liars,
and they are never operating in good faith. You think
(02:50):
the Anti Defamation League and the SPLC, you think these
people operate in good faith. You think they're honest. You
think they're looking for a sincere apology.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
They're not.
Speaker 7 (03:01):
They are looking for submission, They are looking for humiliation.
Speaker 6 (03:06):
I think it was more of like, you might want
to move on from some of the shit posting because
you're in a position of power now and you have
a responsibility, and if you want to create a better
world and better country, which I believe you do, that
it may be best to leave some of the more
aggressive shit posting in your past. I think that was
the point he was making. I certainly didn't take it
as him saying you should apologize to Ben Shapiro or
(03:29):
Mark Levan or any of these people. So that's just
my two cents. People can go back and watch it.
I haven't gone back and watched it because I was
in it, But if you guys want to go back
and watch it and tell me what part Nick is
actually responding to here, I would love to know if
there is a point at which Dave said that Nick
should apologize. I don't remember that happening. If it did happen,
I stand corrected, but I don't think so, and I
(03:51):
don't I just can't envision Dave saying that, because Dave
is not the type they would apologize for any of
the jokes he's made, so I don't think he's going
to begin to these clips. I just want to give
a quick kudos to Candice Owans, which, by the way,
Dave Smith had Candae Sollans on yesterday. They had a
great discussion as usual, and I got a name dropped again.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
Last night.
Speaker 5 (04:11):
I was on my buddy Clint Russell's podcast at Liberty
Locked Out.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Clint Russell, by the way, criminally underrated.
Speaker 5 (04:17):
He's great, So it was meet him and Ian Carroll
and we did. Yeah, yeah, yeah, well it was a
great show. I think I bowled over everyone. I talked
too much on the show. I apologized for it afterward,
and I was like, I bet I'm gonna get shit
in the comments for this, and I did today, So
sorry about that, guys.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
It was late. I'd had a couple of whiskeys. I
was ramped in a bet.
Speaker 6 (04:34):
My life is very, very surreal, and I'm pretty sure
we're living in the simulation at this point. That's the
only assumption I can come to. I have no idea otherwise.
While of this is happening, this is simulation theory confirmed,
Elon Musk. I am your perfect case study. It's a simulation.
Speaker 2 (04:50):
You were right.
Speaker 6 (04:50):
I just want to point out this is the whole
game here, folks. This is the whole reason that our
little sphere here is dominating the commentating circle right now.
Is like everybody wants to hear people telling their honest
to god truth. They're actually more concerned about you being
honest than they are about you being right. That's how,
(05:14):
that's how just awash in lies. We have been our
entire lives, really, but very starkly so. Over the past
five years, that people are just like I want someone
who tells it like they see it, not even like
it is, but just like they see it. Kennis Owns
is a perfect example of that. And she sits down
with that CNN reporter and she's like, do you understand.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Why people don't like it when you say they though?
Can you understand given the age old trope?
Speaker 6 (05:38):
And Kennis is like, I don't give a shit about
a trope. Don't care. If I want to talk about that,
I'll talk about that. If I meant that, then I
say that. If I didn't say that, I didn't mean that.
Moving on, It's like, babam, that's exactly what people want.
You can hate Candace. You can say she's got X
y z R. It doesn't matter, doesn't matter the audience,
(05:58):
the audience, don't lie.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
You're not doing millions of views per show.
Speaker 6 (06:01):
You're not the number one political podcast on the planet
Earth because you're not delivering something that the people want.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
She's delivering it.
Speaker 6 (06:10):
And guess what, So is Nick Flentes, So is Tucker Carlson,
So is Dave Smith. These are all the people that
are telling how they see it, and as a consequence,
they are getting enormous audiences. Ian Carroll a perfect example.
So you're just not gonna stop this title? Waif you're
not gonna stop it, and let me tell you, someone
like Ben Shapiro, who's star rose like the phoenix and
(06:34):
has now collapsed down to earth, is not gonna save you.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
Guys.
Speaker 6 (06:39):
For those that don't know, the big pushback over the
past couple of days has been Ben Shapiro back hot
on the circuit, trying to undermine and replace Tucker Carlson
as the leader of the conservative commentating marketplace.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Not gonna happen, Ben.
Speaker 6 (06:54):
I guess the stop that he makes to make this
sales pitch to America CNN where all the Trump supporters
are watching, right. I mean, this guy is such a
clear crystal case of an operative. I don't know why
anyone takes him seriously anymore, and let's be honest, very
few people do. I was looking at his viewership recently
(07:16):
and I'm like, there's a distinct possibility that my show,
this little show, no marketing budget, no nothing, just pure
networking and word of mouth and friends in this world
that have helped me out, by the way, not via compensation,
just because they like what I do. I'm like, there's
a non zero chance that Liberty Lockdown will be more
influential than Ben Shapiro by next year. Like, it's a
(07:38):
distinct possibility. Think about how fucking crazy that is. Ben Shapiro,
who was the darling of the YouTube algorithm for the
past fifteen years, or at least for about a decade there.
The past couple of years he kind of fellen off.
But for about a decade it was like you go
onto YouTube, I don't care what the fuck you're looking for.
It was like Lex Friedman, Ben Shapiro and just boom
(08:00):
right in your lap, whether you like it or not.
What is Shapiro's actual role? What is his actual job?
Because he would have you believe that his job is
to commentate on the news, commentate on politics in America,
But what is his real job? When do you see
his most passionate retorts come out. It's not really against
(08:22):
the lefties, it's not against the Wolk College students. He's
kind of jovial during most of that. No no, no,
no no. Ben Shapiro gets most activated most clearly when
you critique literally anything about Israel. His number one passion
in life is the defense of the nation of Israel.
I'm just telling you how.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
I see it. That's my job, just to tell you
how I see it.
Speaker 6 (08:45):
And I think as a consequence of that becoming more
and more obvious, especially after the multi year war in Gaza,
his audience is being hemorrhaged. So what does he do
to reclaim his star on the Walk of Fame. Well,
he goes to see an end and he.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
Says this, if somebody glosses Nazis on the air, that
person probably should not be associated with a conservative thing tank,
and that everyone should have a duty to say that
that is a bad thing to do. The real issue
here is I think that Tucker Carlson's morphing from I
would say, a very edgy right wing political figure on
Fox News, but certainly within the mainstream into a conspiracist,
(09:22):
a person who ideologically wanders anti Semitism, who ideologically wanders
all sorts of anti Americanism on his show, and then
errs it for the public to hear with interviews like
the ones he did with Nick Flents, which was essentially
a massage with Nick flinnays the truth is that most
people don't watch politics all that granularly. Even people who
are in politics don't spend a lot of time on
(09:42):
sort of the fringe edged lord right that Flint has is,
and so the sort of mainstreaming, the popularization and normalization
of Flentez by Carlson is significantly more important than just
Flint as his existence. Obviously, it was a seminal moment.
I think when it comes to the right's decision as
to whether Tucker himself is a source of truth or
whether he is a destructive force inside conservatism, I think
(10:04):
the broader problem here is again that you have an
enormous number of young people who are engaging with true
white supremacist, anti Jew content and are taken in by it,
and there do need to be more voices pushing back
on that.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
Fren Spiro, we thank you for your voice.
Speaker 6 (10:16):
Thank you so much, Thanks so much, Jake Tapper of
CNN saying Ben Shapiro, we thank you for your voice.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
I'm sure you do, Jake, I'm sure you do. CNN.
Speaker 6 (10:26):
It's just the rest of America that doesn't really appreciate
it anymore. But let's be honest, what he's doing there
is gatekeeping. He is trying to topple from the highest
of heights when it comes to conservative media, one Tucker Carlson,
someone who he used to compete with head to head,
who he no longer does. And by the way, it
(10:47):
should be pointed out that when Ben Shapiro talks about
Nick Fuintes being on the fringes of the political right
and basically painting him as some sort of like freak
anomaly thing that really isn't that important, but yet it
is important enough that apparently Tucker Carlson has to be canceled, Ben,
Nick Fuentes is about, I don't know, five to ten
(11:10):
times more popular than you right now, maybe more. I mean,
if you're going to talk about fringe, what makes it fringe,
it's he's more mainstream than you.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
Benny.
Speaker 6 (11:23):
Hate to break it to you, Bud, You're no longer
the guy that you once were, at least that you
thought you were, And I, for one, celebrate that fact.
I think that's a great thing, because I would actually
like the right wing in this country to be dedicated
to this country, I know, very radical thought, and you
(11:44):
are not. So now to just push back briefly on
the entire basic criticism that he's making of Tucker Carls,
and I kind of did that on the episode a
week ago, so I'll keep it very brief, but he's
saying that he's an idea launderer. He's a launderer of
bad ideas. It's like, if you watch that interview, Carlson
makes it very clear the areas of disagreement that he
(12:05):
has with Nick Fuentes. He said his piece, he said
what he wanted to express, and ultimately it is his
platform and he gets to say what he wants. You know,
an arena in which you could actually contend with Nick
Fuente's dangerous, bad, fringe radical ideas well, that would be
your own or literally anywhere on planet Earth. As Nick
Fuintes has had an open invite to you, Ben Shapiro
(12:28):
for years now, an invite for which you have ran consistently,
you fucking coward.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
So how about.
Speaker 6 (12:38):
Instead of canceling Tucker Carlson, we cancel Ben Shapiro, seeing
as he has an opportunity to defeat with better ideas
the bad, dangerous, radical fringe ideas of one Nick Fontes,
and he's not willing. So why should you be the
leader of the right wing if you can't even contend
with free speech and debate against these very obviously bad ideas.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
Ben Yeah, I'd.
Speaker 6 (13:06):
Say that's a much bigger problem than him not pushing
back when Nick said that he idolizes Stalin, which by
the way, I have watched the clips that go into
detail explaining Nick's perspective on that, and he goes on
to say that he thinks that Stalin's an evil guy,
but he's it's just like he's an impressive historical figure
coming from poverty and being this basically the most powerful
(13:29):
man on earth. And Nick obviously has some affinity for
strong men. So that's not my cup of tea. As liberty,
I despise those types of figures, but I do understand
his perspective, and it's not it's kind of how I
feel about the Zionus, Like I don't really respect what
they've done, but I totally can like go like, wow,
(13:51):
that's impressive. It's an impressive amount of evil that's been committed.
So I get the point he was making. I just
wanted to correct the record on that because I did
bring that up last week and I hadn't done the
deep dive to watch the ten minute, you know, exposition
as to why he felt that way, and in case
you're still not convinced that Ben Shapiro's primary role in
American political commentating is gatekeeping. Here's what PbD had to say.
Speaker 4 (14:14):
So when we had BB, I would say death threats
at an all time high, no question. When BB came up,
then they agree, all right, Ben wants to come on
the podcast. Then when I said, you know, I want
to have Nick on, I looked at the booking team
after Ben was confirmed, I said, if they cancel, it's because.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
Of me agreeing to have Nick on.
Speaker 4 (14:43):
Great, we have Nick on, I show the clips, we
have the conversations, everything takes place, fair interview. You sound
like a racist year you sound like this here? Why
are you dropping this word? So he's kind of like,
you know, even manningut. Two weeks later, Ben Shapiro cancels.
Why why do you cancel?
Speaker 8 (15:04):
So?
Speaker 4 (15:04):
What is the brand? Why not have conversations? We're not
a fire brand, We're not well, let's see maybe next year. No,
I'm not interested. Don't big shot yourself. It's unattractive.
Speaker 6 (15:20):
So I'm sure most of you have already figured this out,
but let me make it explicit. What Ben Shapiro is
doing right now is because Nick Fointes is so goddamn
charismatic and has a lot of things right. It makes
a really compelling argument that's really hard to refute. You
now have an operation to try and because he has
now gone from you know, blacklisted, third Rail can't talk
(15:41):
about him basically Voldemort and he's now getting on bigger
and bigger shows. Did candas did Tucker did Date Like
he's doing the big shows now. Problem, he's been on PbD. Problem.
So what is Shapiro doing Well, he's now withholding his
services his guest appearance is as if he's such a
fucking draw right from going on because he had funt
(16:01):
des on. You see the game and what they're what
they're attempting to do is they're attempting to make it
so that anybody that host Nick Funtes can no longer
be in the good graces of conn Inc.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Maggot Inc.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
If you will, the Benny Johnson's of the world, the
Pasobics of the world, you can't be in those good
graces if you gain it necessary to have a conversation
with Nick funt Is. And if you do have a
conversation with Nick funt does it better be you calling
him a racist, anti Semite for an hour straight and
if it's not, well, then we're going to fucking destroy
your life. That's what they're doing. It's super clear that's
(16:34):
what he's doing. And it's not just him, it's Levin
as well. But there's a lot of people that are
pushing this. A lot Denish Jesus has been doing it,
who I've done a show with, and I liked Densh
But this is like, fucking so obvious and crazy. But
there's other figures that are doing the same thing. And
that's the game. This is the gate keeping game. This
is not this is not reflective of the right wing
(16:58):
movement that I like.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
That says fuck your feelings, right.
Speaker 6 (17:02):
Remember Shapiro used to basically say that, no, no, no, this
is like feelings are paramount. Actually they're arguably more important
than principles. In fact, they are more important than principles
because one of my highest principles is free speech, letting
better ideas win an open debate. I think that's a
great way for us to move forward as a country,
(17:24):
to settle our differences peacefully so that it doesn't get
violent and crazy. That's actually what our founders believed in
that's what I believe in. That's what I thought all
Americans believed in, until someone like Nick funt does pops
his head up and suddenly everybody forgets about the First Amendment. Well,
my sincere apologies, I haven't forgotten about it. Still love it,
(17:45):
still uphold it, still willing to die for it. Actually,
and so is Tucker Carlson, So is Dave Smith, So's
Cannie Owns, so is MTG. And I think Nick funt
Is is right there with that mentality. So those are my people. Well,
right now, we don't have to agree on everything. In fact,
we don't, but we have to have shared cultural values,
(18:07):
shared principles, a shared ethos by which we formulate civilization.
And people like Ben Shapiro don't have it. Okay, this
is the exact same thing. This is the fun house
mirror of the twenty ten through twenty eighteen period, twenty
twenty one period, really just the entire woke apocalypse that
we went through. It's the same fucking thing. We all
(18:30):
see it, right, there's a particular category of human beings
that can't be criticized. Does that ring a bell for anybody?
It rings a bell for me. We just went through it.
That's what BLM was. This is what Candice Owens fought
back against. This is the reason that she was so
activated when this same phenomenon came on again, and once
(18:51):
again she found herself on the other side of it,
and God bless her, she didn't change her principles. She
actually continued to push the same talking points. No, I'm
going to say what I have to say about this
group of people. Nobody's special. Everybody is open for criticism.
That is actual Americanism, that is actual freedom. But Ben
(19:13):
Shapiro doesn't want that. Mick Levin doesn't want that. And
it's not just Ben Shapiro that's unwilling to debate these issues,
especially with Nick fluent Is. They're trying to do the
same fucking thing to Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson, who does
not have the same worldview at least certainly not the
exact same worldview of Nick fuint is far from it.
But Levin gets an opportunity and offer directly from Tucker
(19:34):
Carlson to debate their differences. And here's what Levin has
to say.
Speaker 9 (19:38):
I got a very strange text this morning from Tucker
Carlson ten and sixteen am. I'll read it to you
for probade them. Good morning, he writes it to me.
The leadership at Turning Point has asked me to debate
you at their event in Scottsdale in December. I'm happy
to do it, and I hope you'll agree as well.
Beyond the personal insults, which I'll try to keep to
a minimum, there are real important ideological differences between us,
(20:02):
and I think the country would benefit from an extended
conversation about them. So again, I hope you'll accept. Let
me know thanks. The guy is desperate. He's taking a
hit on his podcast. He's fighting like hell for his career,
he's fighting like hell for his reputation. People are awakening
to what scum he actually is, and he thinks I'm
going to platform him. He thinks I'm going to help
(20:24):
him kick up his podcast ratings. What would Charlie say?
What would Rush say? What would any rational response?
Speaker 2 (20:30):
Here?
Speaker 4 (20:30):
It is?
Speaker 9 (20:31):
I wrote him the following, My family and I want
nothing to do with you. Well, you've become your vile
libels against my faith, millions of Christians, and in my view,
what you seek to do to our country. There's nothing
to debate you're a Nazi promoter. You're the modern day
David Duke. I debate people with whom I disagree for
living we're a lot smarter than you, but for whom
(20:55):
I have some respect. I'm also disappointed in TPUSA that
continues to platform you some unsolicited advice. Stop long enough
to remember who you used to be and what you
used to stand for. So has expected knee jerk. For
the record, I'm strongly anti Nazi. Does he sound that
(21:16):
way to you America? Oh you're gonna hear more. But
that's hardly the point. This seems like the perfect opportunity
to rebut what you consider evil ideas, and to do
it to my face like a man. I think you
jump at the chance, assuming you believe your positions are defensible.
I'm offering the marketplace of ideas you often talk about.
Is it possible you can't really defend, for example, what
(21:39):
Israel has done to civilians in Gaza? They said, there
you go. You're not feared, you're despised. Well, you're a coward,
and if you change your mind, I'm here. Thanks, you
little bastard. Nobody's afraid of you. I'd rather debate a
skunk than you.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
It's moments like this where I feel like I'm losing
my mind. Sincerely, Tucker Carlson is the biggest political commentator
on the right wing, and Mark Levin says he's desperate,
he's struggling, he's trying to defend his career, defend his podcast,
his numbers. Plemitting you think I'm gonna go on and
debate you and help uplift your podcast numbers. It's like,
(22:17):
Mark Levin, what the fuck world do you live in?
Like you're you're so irrelevant it's almost impossible to overstate,
Like you're just barely more relevant than Josh Hammer. Like
you're definitionally a non entity. You probably have like every
time I respond to you on a I ratio, you
not to say that that means I'm like important or anything.
(22:38):
I'm just saying you're not important at all. Okay, so
fuck And then to to you know, read off those
private text messages, which, by the way, you're a total
bitch for that, but also to do that in a
way that's like you think you're dunking on Tucker with that.
Tucker's like, Hey, I think it'd be good for the
country that are you know, I'll try and keep the
(22:59):
personal insults to him. And I think that we our
differences are significant and the country would benefit from a
long form, you know, debate between the two of us
and what do you say? And he just goes off
like you're an any semi and I would never and
basically fuck you and your whole family. And it's like whoa.
And then Tucker's just like, well, you're a coward. If
you change your mind, I'll be here. It's like, Tucker
(23:20):
looks like total chat energy there, bro, and you come
off like a school marm, which you are. Anyways, let's
move on from Mark Levin. I shouldn't have spent that much
time on him. I apologize. I will never play Mark
Levin again. Okay, I probably will, but not often. This
is what Tucker had to say in response to Shapiro
with Magan Kelly, which, by the way, I got a
quick story. I actually went to Magan Kelly's event last
(23:43):
night and I got to meet her, very very nice lady.
Speaker 2 (23:46):
I only got like a minute with her.
Speaker 6 (23:47):
It was very brief meet and greet type deal, but
I did have enough time to say to her. Macan,
I just want you to know that if you get
the Tucker Carlson treatment.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Next.
Speaker 6 (23:59):
There are ten million people that will back you up.
You don't ever need to kneel. And she said, very sincerely,
thank you so much. I really need the support right now.
And then we took a photo and I pieced out.
But I'm just saying, I think she's a good person,
and I think she's a courageous lady, and I hope
that she recognizes that, like, you don't need to play
(24:20):
this game anymore. For our entire lives. You had to
bite your tongue. You could not tell certain truths. You
just couldn't do it. And if you did, your career
was over. You would get the Nick Fuontez treatment, no
fly list, get your bank accounts closed, de platform blacklisted everywhere.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
That's not the world we're in anymore. In fact, it's
the opposite.
Speaker 6 (24:43):
If you're courageous enough, you will shine, you will break through,
You will hit heights that you have never hit before.
That is the market speaking. All of the gatekeeping and
the parameters by which we had to function before they
have fallen. Fucking stand up, step up. And but if
you still don't have the courage to do so, you
have no one to blame but yourself. Look at all
(25:04):
of the most high profile figures in this space right now, Tucker, Nick, Candace.
What's the commonality. They tell it like they see it,
and they're independent. You have a choice. This goes for
Matt Walsh and everybody else that like people keep saying,
when are you gonna leave the Daily Wire. Look, I'll
just be straight with you. I don't give a shit
(25:24):
what Matt Walsh does. If he wants to stay there
and continue to bite his tongue about a bunch of shit,
that's his prerogative. I don't care, but I'm not gonna
take you seriously until you leave. Just being honest, you
seem compromised. You are compromised. You can't say certain things,
as evidenced by the fact that your colleague Candice Owens
got fired because she said certain things that you're not
allowed to say around bench berro Right, we all know
(25:47):
that's what happened. So anyways, the market is telling you
you will never be as successful as you can be
in the political commentating space if you don't just fucking
throw off the shackles and tell the truth.
Speaker 10 (25:59):
Isn't the this is an important race? Is not because
Lindsay Graham is like Mark Levin. You know, some when
if you're stuck an elevator with him, you'd have to
obviously kill yourself because you couldn't handle. He's not that
you would enjoy. You'd enjoy being stuck in elevator with him.
That's the new world we're in. That's a good thing,
ladies and gentlemen. That's the best fucking thing that has
happened in forever.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
It's such a great thing. And yet a lot of.
Speaker 6 (26:21):
People are still scared. They're like, ah, he's still I mean,
this is the whole James Lindsay pitch. He keeps saying
it's not too late to turn back. You can always
turn back, Clint. You can stop telling the truth and
come back to the plantation and we'll forgive you. But
the time is running out. You have to do it soon. No,
not turning back. I'm not gonna start to lie to
(26:44):
try and get along with the fucking people I don't
respect anyways, Why would I.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
I'm not going to do it. Enjoy your fucking.
Speaker 6 (26:51):
Seapack speech or whatever. I was never invited to those
things anyways. I'm a fucking radical libertarian. You guys hate
me before, you're gonna hate me after.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
We're good. I'm good with that. We're cool.
Speaker 6 (27:02):
Speaking of Benchpiro, here's what he had to say to
Makan Kelly.
Speaker 3 (27:05):
I think that what Candon's owns is doing right now
is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now. Okay,
and I say that again, but what because like.
Speaker 11 (27:15):
I don't know pine on whether it's evil or not.
But my position is it's really none of my business,
and why is it?
Speaker 3 (27:20):
But I have a question, why is it none of
your business?
Speaker 2 (27:22):
I mean, you comment on these things for a little bit.
Speaker 7 (27:24):
I'm not mother of the Internet.
Speaker 3 (27:25):
No, But but if this were on the left and
somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having murdered him,
I assume that you would be talking about it.
Speaker 11 (27:33):
Is that what Candace is accusing Erica of Yes of
murdering her own husband.
Speaker 3 (27:37):
She's accusing TPUSA insiders and other members of the right wing,
including Seth Dyllan, of being involved in the murder of
Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 11 (27:44):
Yes, Okay, Like I said, I don't take in that content,
which is an honest statement.
Speaker 7 (27:49):
I don't have time to watch.
Speaker 5 (27:50):
I believe you, I believe you.
Speaker 3 (27:51):
But the point that I'm making is that in our business,
I think it's important listen not trump. We don't even
know what I understand, but with Tucker, friendship should not
trump our manifest requirement to speak out when people do
and say things that are both detrimental to conservatism and
morally wrong.
Speaker 11 (28:10):
So I don't totally disagree, but I think the way
of handling that, at least for me, is much different.
Speaker 6 (28:16):
Imagine condemning someone for saying something that you find morally reprehensible,
which is what Ben Shapiro is doing to Canis Owns
right there, and then just whole cloth making up a
claim Cannas has never said, ever, never even hinted at.
He says explicitly that Erica Kirk killed her own husband.
(28:38):
According to Candas Owns, that's the allegation that Canis Owons
is making. Cannas has never fucking said that ever, ever, ever, ever.
That's a terrible, terrible lie, and he knows she hasn't
said that. There's no way he fucking thinks she said that,
which is why he immediately backpedals and he goes, no, no, no,
she's saying that, you know, Seth Dylan and a bunch
of the TPUSA insiders did it. She's not fucking saying
(28:59):
that either. She's saying that she believes that they're covering up.
The reason she believes that is because they are overtly lying,
provably lying. We know that for a fact. Does that
mean that they're covering up like the actual murder. We
don't know. We just know that they're lying. So that's
the position. A lot of people in Charlie's in her
circle have been proven to have lied in the aftermath
(29:20):
of his assassination. We don't know why, but it's totally reasonable,
especially if you were fucking Charlie Kirk's friend, to ask
those questions, which apparently Candace Owens is the only one
that was actually his friend.
Speaker 2 (29:32):
You sick Fox.
Speaker 6 (29:33):
You just such a bad person, such a bad person
to try and character assassinate Candis owns like that. I mean,
you can have disagreements with her tactics. I've had my own,
I've said so on this show, But to just fucking
whole cloth fiction, just make up some shit that she
hasn't said, that's really beyond the pale, obviously, and then
to attribute to Candas Owens on a platform which By
(29:54):
the way, I was at one of those events, so
I know how many people are there, thousands of people
sitting there. And to say that to Megan Kelly and
then to demand of Megan Kelly essentially that she condemn
Candice Owns, Tucker Carlson, blah blah blahlah. List goes on
and on now for things that didn't even happen. And
you're the moral arbiter. You're the moral guardrails of the
(30:15):
right wing that we have to listen to and basically
craft our lifestyles around. Get the fuck out of here, dude, No,
you're reprehensible. If you start taking your moral guidance from
someone like Ben Shapiro, you need to go to church immediately.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
Holy shit.
Speaker 6 (30:34):
I like the duplicity that I mean, it's not even duplicit,
it just overlies. Oh, I can't believe these people. All right,
one more clip.
Speaker 11 (30:42):
The main criticism, as I understand it, has been well, yes, platforming.
They say that I don't accept platforming as a valid objection.
Speaker 2 (30:48):
What is that a verb?
Speaker 10 (30:49):
By the way, you take a noun and you make
it into a verb, and nobody says anything. As a
former editor, I say no, yeah, I agree, honestly.
Speaker 11 (30:56):
But like, as far as I know, Nick Fointes hasn't
eaten anyone, you know, I mean Jeffrey Dahmer, eight people,
and he was platformed by Diane saur Did we have.
Speaker 10 (31:04):
A member, a sitting member of Congress. I spoke to
the Speaker of the House about this.
Speaker 2 (31:07):
Today.
Speaker 10 (31:07):
We have a sitting member of Congress from Florida called
Randy Fine who is literally texted or put on Twitter.
We should kill them all, every single one. Someone texted
a picture of literally of a dead baby and he
laughs at it, and it's like, this guy's a lawmaker's
appropriating money to a military committing genocide and that's cool.
It's not cool now, And let's just be honest. That
(31:30):
is much worse than anything Nick Fuentez.
Speaker 6 (31:34):
That's irrefutable, obviously, factually accurate. Randy Fine and what he
has said and done is on all levels worse than
any of the worst hits or jokes or whatever the
fuck you want to say about Nick fuente is way worse. Literally,
like tens of thousands of people died. Hello, you think
(31:54):
tens of thousands of people died because Nick made a joke? No,
I don't think so.
Speaker 2 (31:59):
Rain.
Speaker 6 (32:00):
So yeah, I think this is a perfect opportunity for
those that are the morality gatekeepers, which, by the way,
I generally don't like go off critiquing people's morals in
this world. I just don't care. It's not my place.
It's not really relevant to the future of the country.
Unless I see like obvious lies, like obvious liars, I
(32:21):
will call that out. But like, if it's a difference
of opinion and your morals are you know, a little
bit questionable, I tend not to concern myself with it, Like,
do whatever you want.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
I don't care. You're not relevant, so keep it moving.
Speaker 6 (32:35):
But when it comes to the people who are doing this,
the actual woke, right, the actual people that want to
cancel others, and they actually have reprehensible morals themselves, well
then yeah, it's time for the little hypocrisy shuffle. Let's
play that game. You want to question my morals, how
about we question yours? How about the genocide you funded?
(32:57):
How about that? How about all of the wars you guys,
how about the violations of the first and second and
fifth and every Amendment? How about we talk about that
a little bit, talk about that and talk about how
You've gotten super wealthy off of destroying this country. If
you want to have a morallity debate, okay, let's do it,
especially the politicians. Just to repeat, you're not going to
(33:20):
win this debate with suppression. The entire horse all of
the horses have stampeded out of the corral. The barn
door flew open, the hinges have broken off, there are
no doors left.
Speaker 2 (33:32):
Okay.
Speaker 6 (33:33):
This is what Asmen Gold, who's one of the biggest
streamers on YouTube, had to say to a Harrison Smith
clip friend of the show.
Speaker 7 (33:39):
If you have a problem with any of that, you
hate Jews and you are a not Yeah.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
See, it's just not gonna it's not working.
Speaker 8 (33:46):
And so the right is like there are two factions
inside of right wing politics right now. There are America
first Conservatives and there are international traditional you know, neo
con is Israel like, you know, like lobbyist people, right like,
there are two groups of people here and the infighting
(34:07):
is why they're losing. They're losing because they're infighting. The
reality though, is it again the Israel issue is the
Republican trans issue. I think eighty percent a huge amount
of voters are demoralized completely fucking demoralized by the fact
that they have politicians playing like cow telling and playing
(34:29):
paddy cake with Israel constantly.
Speaker 2 (34:31):
It is. It's a massive thing.
Speaker 8 (34:34):
And the more that you play into that, and the
more that you try to like, oh no, this is normal,
this is fine, that's the problem. Who are you voting
in the best interest for American citizens or Israeli citizens
and you're in the American fucking government. I think you
know what, if you can answer that question, I have
a different question, do you want to go to Israel
today or tomorrow? Because you're getting a one way ticket
(34:55):
there and you're never coming back. That's my opinion.
Speaker 6 (35:00):
It's not a political commentator, that's just like a cultural
commentator basically on YouTube and millions of yours, millions this
is and he's reflective of his generation, the twenty to
forty year old generation is like, we're not fucking doing
this anymore. So good luck, good luck blacklisting all of us.
(35:20):
You think we won't all migrate to whatever platform allows
us to continue to have these conversations. By the way,
I'm so like in this world and so radicalize at
this point, I can't even go to normy conventions anymore.
Like they used to be really interesting to me to hear,
you know, someone talk some either politician or commentator, and
now I just hear them. I'm like barring, it's such
(35:41):
a snoozefest man. And no disrespect to Megan. I do
like her, but you know that shit doesn't do anything
for me. Like after the three hour long conversation you
have with Dave Smith and he and Carol, you think
I'm gonna go listen to Eric Trump talk and be
like riveted. No, because they can't tell the whole truth.
That's that's the whole market demand. And I'm just like
(36:01):
you guys, that's all I want. I want honest, interesting
discussions from people who are not bought and paid for.
And if I sniff that, I click, I changed the channel.
It's immediately over and I don't turn back. And that's
the whole environment. Now I probably shouldn't even be giving
these tips to them, but like they're not gonna take
(36:21):
me seriously anyways, because I'm al racious.
Speaker 2 (36:23):
I a beggoting right. So that's the truth.
Speaker 6 (36:26):
Though, if you want to win in this game, which
I don't think it's a game, but you know what,
I'm saying, if you want to win in this market,
you have to tell the fucking truth and you cannot
be compromised. And if you are well, then you better
have a huge marketing budget behind you, like mister Hollyhand,
and pray to God that you trick enough people that
you can actually make a living doing this, because best
(36:47):
I can tell, this is the first time in my
life that all that matters, literally, all that matters is honesty.
What a world, What a beautiful fucking time to be alive.
It's so good, it's so it's so refreshing, And I'm
not going back. I don't know about you. I'm not
going back. I absolutely refuse. I will never go back
(37:11):
into the fucking corral of allowable opinion. Fuck you, Let
me show you a good example of those types of
speeches that are super caned and obviously bought and paid for.
Speaker 2 (37:21):
This is our good friend, Penny Johnson. How we doing tonight? Good?
Speaker 12 (37:27):
How we're feeling? You feeling that revival spirit? You're feeling
that revolutionary spirit, that comeback spirit. One year ago tonight
President Trump won the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 6 (37:51):
You want to know how your presidency's pretty much a
total failure. On the one year anniversary of you winning
the election, the only celebration that you have is to
say that you won the election.
Speaker 2 (38:00):
That's a great sign.
Speaker 6 (38:01):
That's not like we're one year into the Trump's presidency
and here's all of the things that he's accomplished. It's
just one year ago we won. Do you feel the spirit? No,
I don't feel the spirit. And if I do feel anything,
it's anger, actually, And why can this elucidates that quickly?
Speaker 4 (38:23):
Here?
Speaker 1 (38:23):
And if you think you're going to infiltrate and convince us,
So this is the same party while we get gas
lit about everything that's happening. Like I said, you lost
the party. Maga got fractured. Not when Tucker Carlson interviewed
Nick Fuentes, but when Donald Trump looked at us in
our faces and said Epstein. Who That's when it was
(38:43):
game over.
Speaker 6 (38:44):
You guys, remember that, right a couple months ago, you're
still talking about Epstein?
Speaker 2 (38:49):
Oh my god, have and we moved on.
Speaker 6 (38:51):
Well, President Trump, it's because no one's fucking in prison
other than the guy who died in prison.
Speaker 2 (38:57):
Inexplicably.
Speaker 6 (38:58):
By the way, another friend of the show, former guest
Steve Baker, has an incredible expose that I'm not gonna
read the whole thing to you. It's gonna be out
and he's probably gonna be doing the media circuit and
I'll see if I can get him on for a
quick hit on the show to discuss it. But he
works for the Blaze, and kudos to him if.
Speaker 2 (39:15):
You got this right. He deserves the pulitzer for real.
Speaker 6 (39:18):
They think that they have basically a gate match, so
based off of the walking of a former Capitol police
officer who they believe is responsible for planning the J
five pipeon. That's the bomb that was planted the night
before the J six riots, which we now know had
hundreds of playing close police officers involved, which probably catalyzed
(39:40):
the rights to begin with.
Speaker 2 (39:41):
So I'll just tell you what I think. This is early.
Speaker 6 (39:44):
No arrests have been made, no arrest will probably ever
be made, and we'll probably never get justice because that's
just how everything works.
Speaker 2 (39:50):
Again, just being honest.
Speaker 6 (39:51):
But here's my thought process, and I've felt like this
for a long time. But if it turns out that
Steve Baker's investigation is correct and that this lady Capitol
police cop is actually responsible for planning that pipeine, which,
by the way, she then went on a couple months
later quit her job and now works with the CIA.
Ah Uh sometimes sometimes fucking Alex Jones is right, you
(40:16):
know what I mean? Anyways, if that's true, I'll tell
you what I think. I don't know for sure. I
don't know, but we know, you know what I mean.
We don't know know, but we know if she got
a job with the CIA and she's responsible for that pipeon,
the CIA did it, like, we can all acknowledge that, right, Okay,
So I think it's a CIA. I think it was
also the Democrats because they did the whole J six
(40:38):
hearings where they lied and obfuscated and hit exculpatory evidence.
So yeah, they were part of it. They were part
of the operation too, But a lot of Republicans too.
I think that's the main thing that people are not
going to want to talk about. This is a by
part is an affair. You don't set up and entrap
a thousand plus people on JA with a CIA operation
(41:02):
in plane clothes undercovers without it being a bipart is
an affair.
Speaker 2 (41:07):
You know how.
Speaker 6 (41:07):
I know that because Donald Trump's been in office for
a year now, or he won a year ago. He's
been in office for ten months, and none of those
people are in prison, not even indicted, not on trial, nothing. Actually,
So you tell me, what does that tell you? Tells
you that this is a bipart is an affair. This
is the actual swamp, which in my opinion, Donald Trump
(41:30):
is knelt to or was always part of.
Speaker 2 (41:32):
I don't know which.
Speaker 6 (41:34):
So that's my perspective on it, and I think that
the operation was specifically. This is my guess that J five,
you plant a pipe bomb. J six, you try and
catalyze riots. That's what you try to do. And if
you fail, because the participants in the protest on J six,
for whatever reason, do not get violent and do not
(41:55):
charge into the Capitol despite the antagonism and the by
the playing closed cops to get them to do so, well,
then you just detonate that bomb that you had planted
there the night before.
Speaker 2 (42:06):
That's my guess. And is it dark.
Speaker 6 (42:09):
Yeah, it's real dark. And if it's true, then it's
right up there with any of the biggest scandals in
American history right up there. I'm going to go into
further detail once we get additional confirmation, and God willing
we get some arrests on this thing, but I'm gonna
leave it at that for now. It's a huge story,
(42:30):
and you're not going to hear about this, most likely
from Fox News and CNN and all these other organizations.
Speaker 2 (42:35):
That's my guess.
Speaker 6 (42:36):
I hope I'm proven wrong on that, But my God,
talk about a tyrannical empire we live under. Framing the
populace right wing as terrorists. But don't you dare. Don't
you for a second think that they might have been
involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. That would be dangerous,
(42:57):
that would be radical. I wouldn't go there. All right,
I got one serious bit of news that I got
to get into. I mean, this has all been serious,
but like one less salacious story that I think is
really important. And this ties into my wheelhouse because this
is about mortgages, and this will be really boring for
some people and really really interesting for others. So I
(43:17):
don't know, you can judge for yourself if this is
a segment worth watching. It's gonna be very quick, but
I think it's really important. So here's Donald Trump, or
the Trump administration's brainchild to remedy the home ownership crisis
amongst the young in this country. I'm sure you're thinking
to yourself, well, they're just gonna like cut regulations and
they're gonna make it so that it's much easier to
(43:38):
build because if you increase the supply, then it might
meet the demand and then pricing will come down. Right, No,
none of that. Their big plan to remedy the crisis
of young people's home ownership is to extend mortgages from
thirty years to fifty years. Oh man, I'm so personally
offended on so many runts, like my Austrian economics background, furious,
(44:05):
my mortgage broker background, furious physical conservative background. Just I'm
so angry about this, So just real briefly, let me explain.
So a thirty year mortgage versus a fifty year mortgage, Right,
Obviously it's an amortization, so it's gonna be how many
years it takes you to pay off that loan, So
it's an additional twenty years. So if you buy that
house at twenty five years old, you're not gonna be
(44:26):
able to afford a house until're probably thirty or thirty
five or forty, So thirty five years old plus fifty
puts you eighty five when you pay off that fucking mortgage. Sorry,
I'm gonna try not to laugh through this whole thing,
but it's so fucking crazy. It makes me so mad,
all right. So then you take do the math on this,
So a thirty year mortgage at six percent, say like
half a million dollar loan, because like starter home is
(44:48):
usually six to eight hundred thousand in much of the
country now, so you take out a half a million
dollar loan, and the payment difference between a thirty and
a fifty year mortgage is about four hundred dollars per month.
And the way qualification works for a mortgage is that
your DTI, your debt to income ratio usually is capped
at fifty percent of your gross income. So say you
(45:08):
make I don't know, seven thousand dollars a month, that
means that your DTI is capped at fifty percent, which
is thirty five hundred. That's fifty percent of seven thousand.
So you can now have a mortgage payment of thirty
five hundred and qualify and then buy that home. But
in reality, what dynamic does this create. It takes a
(45:29):
lot of people that weren't able to qualify for a
home at the price level that they would actually be
interested in buying, say a six hundred or seven hundred
thousand dollars house. Now they're able to qualify for the loan,
but so are them and a million other twenty to
forty year olds who have all been renting and waiting
for the housing market to collapse. So now you have
all of these people who have been waiting patiently for
(45:51):
the market to collapse, which it will inevitably if they
don't do shit like this, and it should, and they're
going to now add a whole bunch of demand to
a market that's still doesn't have enough supply, adding more
fuel to the already historic real estate bubble in this country,
despite the fact that affordability is totally out of whack.
That's their master plan to add more demand and do
(46:13):
nothing about supply. Fucking awesome, awesome work, and to bury
you in debt literally until you die.
Speaker 2 (46:21):
That is Donald.
Speaker 6 (46:22):
Trump's master plan to make sure that you're happy again,
that the populace right is subdued, that you can then
go start a family because you can afford a house,
but you can really barely afford a house, and you're
still gonna be up to your neck in debt forever.
God bless America, right, really getting us on the right track.
And then this is their big fix, right, this is
the big fix to the fucking big problem that's radicalizing
(46:44):
all the young people in this country.
Speaker 2 (46:45):
Especially young white men.
Speaker 6 (46:46):
They're gonna put you in debt for fifty years after
you already are indebted for your student loans, which got
you a degree that gets you nothing, and then they're
gonna replace all of your jobs at AI. They're gonna
bury you in debt, and then they're gonna say vote
for me, because at least we're not woke, except we
are woke when it comes to our greatest ally, right,
So fuck dude, that ain't gonna work. I know this
(47:09):
seems like a really negative episode, but I'm just being
straight with you, Like, does that work for anybody?
Speaker 2 (47:14):
Hello? No, it shouldn't.
Speaker 6 (47:17):
I hope that people are smart enough to recognize that
scam for what it is. A thirty year mortgage is
already a fucking albatross. You go into a fifty year
mortgage just to reduce the payment on a half a
million dollar loan by four hundred dollars a month so
you can qualify it. Instead of buying a five hundred
thousand dollars home, you can now buy a six hundred
thousand dollars home.
Speaker 2 (47:34):
Like, okay, thanks, thanks Daddy Trump. It's gross. So long
story short. Basically, the conclusion of all this is.
Speaker 6 (47:46):
I lost a bunch of my relatives to fentanyl, and
we go like, Trump, could you do anything about that?
Speaker 13 (47:50):
And he's like, Israel has never had a better friend
than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 6 (47:54):
And then you're like, all right, but I mean you're
gonna end these wars, right, because like you did promise that,
and you're gonna make sure that we get justice and
disclosures on the Epstein files.
Speaker 13 (48:02):
And you're like, Trump, Israel has never had a better
friend than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 2 (48:07):
You're gonna fix that, right, That's what we voted for.
Speaker 13 (48:09):
And here, Israel has never had a better friend than
President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 6 (48:13):
And then you're like, I can't afford a house or
have kids or start a family, So if you could
do something to help us out with that, that'd be great,
And maybe I'd consider voting for Jdvans if you can
actually just deliver on the promises you made, if you
can deal with the border, and you can deport a
bunch of people, and you can actually deal with the
supply demand dynamic when it comes to housing, so that
I can actually start a family. That would be great.
But like, what do you have to say about that
(48:34):
President Trump?
Speaker 13 (48:35):
Israel has never had a better friend than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 2 (48:38):
Okay, well, I feel like you're not hearing me.
Speaker 6 (48:41):
I'm gonna be honest with you, Like, I don't feel
like you're actually hearing anything that I'm saying right now.
And that's the real problem is that you're not hearing us.
We continue to tell you exactly how we feel. We're
like the first generation maybe ever that's actually willing to
just say it like it is, tell you exactly why
we're mad and actually not be demanding handouts. Most of
(49:04):
us are not saying, like, let's vote for Mondani and
get fucking state ran grocery stores to bring the price
of beef down by fifty cents. We're like, can you
dismantle the red tape and the regulatory environment the di
skyrocketed things? Can you stop borrowing and printing and spending
us into oblivion so that I can actually afford to
get things on my own. Can you stop subsidizing the
(49:24):
housing market and handing out basically free cash to the
hedge funds to go out and acquire all these rental
properties which absorb so much of the supply of housing
and ultimately drives up prices through the roof.
Speaker 2 (49:37):
Could you do that?
Speaker 13 (49:37):
Israel has never had a better friend than President Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 6 (49:41):
We're not asking for a fucking handout. We're just asking
for you to get the fuck out of our way.
Speaker 2 (49:46):
And you can't even do that.
Speaker 6 (49:47):
And when there's a revolution in this country as a
consequence of this, don't say I didn't warn you because
I didn't want it to happen, and I still don't
want it to happen, and I want desperately for you
to hear. Are please pl e as no e please,
We are pleading with you.
Speaker 14 (50:04):
Publican party which is have they've lost their goddamn mind.
They're arguing about who's allowed to talk to who on
the internet, but yet all the flights from being grounded,
the airspace is being closed, We've got a government shut down.
The money is still going out the door to so
we can invade Venezuela, arm Israel, arm the Ukraine, or
(50:26):
it's a giveaway to Pallenteer so that Peter Tiel can
install surveillance technology and all the cities that riding is
going to happen in in three two.
Speaker 2 (50:36):
What I mean like it's coming.
Speaker 14 (50:39):
You can feel it, and that's where the Republican Party is.
Speaker 6 (50:44):
Please listen to us. We're not asking for the world.
Put this country first and get the fuck out of
our way.
Speaker 2 (50:52):
That's it.
Speaker 6 (50:53):
If you guys enjoyed this episode, please do it the
like button, subscribe shared around and if you want to
support the work at Liberty lock Pot on Act you
can subscribe there. I'll follow you back, or Libertylockdown to
locals dot com. Leave you comment down below.
Speaker 2 (51:05):
Love you guys. Please subscribe to Liberty Lockdown. Great podcast.
Clint is Tight
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.