Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
For months, anti immigration protesters and counter protesters have clashed
across Britain, the chaos unfolding outside hotels used to house
asylum seekers. The latest flashpoint an asylum seeker staying at
a hotel in Epping, just outside London, accused of it
sexually assaulting a teenage girl, propelling concern over immigration beyond
(00:22):
the realm of the far right. To British voters number
one issue, we don't.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Feel safe, and you know we've got all there's no.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
Families, there's no children, it's just all undocumented men.
Speaker 4 (00:32):
Could it be, could the British people have finally had enough? Well,
let's hope, let's hope that the American people and the
rest of Europe has all had enough. This is a
long time coming, and it's remarkable to me that it
took so long. I think that it's really interesting too
that it's the women that seem to be the tipping point.
(00:54):
And I guess that's probably the case with many protests
in modern times, in that men like violence is kind
of off the table, and therefore it's only when the
women have had enough that they finally stop these immigrant
floods or whatever policy is endangering little girls primarily, and
(01:15):
that's the main outcry that's happening right now, is that
there has been lots of victimization of young women in
the UK. This has been an issue that has been
not just overlooked, but actually covered up for years. I'm
not going to use the term because I don't want
to get this deboosted, but I think we've all the
(01:35):
grape gangs, you know, grape. I don't know why I
have to talk like an infant, but you get the point.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
And later this year we will set out plans to
establish a permanent framework for refugee students to come study
in the UK so we can help more talented young
people fleeing war and persecution to find a better future
alongside capped and manage ways for refugees to work here
in the UK.
Speaker 4 (02:02):
Now, I've already laid out the history as to why
I changed my opinion on the borders, on open borders
and the whole libertarian argument for them. I'm not going
to go through the entire one to one or two
to one breakdown as to why I've come to that conclusion.
You can watch prior episodes to understand it, but I
do want to explain that regardless of your philosophical outlook
(02:25):
on this issue, the people will be heard like that's
it's inevitable. You're going to have either peaceful or violent
revolution eventually as a consequence of these policies. And it
made me kind of reflect on my evolution of thought
and why I came to the conclusion that I did,
and not so much the philosophical groundwork which I've laid
(02:47):
out in prior episodes, but rather like, what what transpired
that changed my mind so dramatically. I think that my
classical liberal kind of indoctrination really was that those that
come to America come to be free. They come here
to find a freer economy, a for your labor market,
(03:10):
cheaper whatever. You know, they're just a better life, and
they come here not just to better their own lives,
but also to become Americans. That is not, in fact,
what the modern iteration of immigration has amounted to, unfortunately,
and I think it's due in large part to the
fact that it has been in such large numbers that
(03:31):
it makes it so that people don't feel the necessity
to actually integrate within the existing cultural framework. And this
is I mean, we can get in the conspiracy side
of why this has been allowed by the government. But
I just want to explain kind of my change of
heart and why I came to conclusions I did. What
I really started to reflect on was the summer of
(03:53):
twenty twenty and moreover, the incredible decade plus of woke
abuse that we all suffered. And what I concluded was
that because the minority class had been given protected status,
there was this kind of aha moment for me where
(04:16):
I was like, Oh, there is this embrace of victimhood
that is only permissible to minorities, and therefore the non minority,
the majority is basically incapable of ever being victimized or
being a victim. And this kind of it all came
about through critical theory. So it wasn't just the immigration rates,
(04:41):
which were extraordinary, but also kind of the cultural framework
or ethos or outlook that people were functioning under during
that time. And basically what I'm saying is, as a
consequence of the riots of twenty twenty and the twenty
four to seven hatre like deluge that was being laid
(05:03):
at the feet of white people, specifically straight white men,
that was the thing that they talked about constantly. I
started to realize that, oh, this is going to be
like bad, this is going to be very very bad.
And let me get specific, what I thought about it was,
it seems as if because the minority class, because of
(05:26):
ancient grievances and abuse that was suffered not by them,
but rather they're you know, great great great grandparents or whatever,
they essentially had a guilt free pass to abuse people
that look like me, and that was going to be
kind of the calling card of this upcoming revolution. Specifically,
what I'm talking about is the Black Lives Matter movement.
(05:48):
That was like when I really started to think about it,
and what I came to the conclusion was, well, this
is going to be probably violent, Like this is going
to get really really ugly.
Speaker 5 (06:00):
It seemed to it.
Speaker 4 (06:02):
Has died down over the past year as the kind
of woke moment has fizzled out slightly, so it didn't
go as bad as it could have. But if you
recall the summer of twenty twenty, every city nationwide, essentially
every major city, it seemed like, was on fire, at
least temporarily in some for many, many months, and it
(06:22):
was not pretty. It was actually a really one of
the most concerning dark times in American history, at least
in modern times. From my perspective, it was absolutely tragic.
And what you realized was like, Oh, the same people
that support decriminalization of you know, basically doing away with
property rights, the same people that also support mass immigration
(06:47):
also support the non prosecution of violent kind of revolutionaries
that were taking the streets in the summer of twenty twenty.
And you're like, oh, all right, well, this is a
real recipe for disaster, like open borders essentially replacing the
domestic population with tens of millions of migrants, not expecting
(07:07):
any of them to integrate within the existing cultural framework,
and simultaneously in doctrinating the minorities in the existing populace
to despise the majority. So you have a kind of
a pincer attack. You have two sides, right or two sides,
and it just it looked terrible. And what I realized
(07:29):
was like, Oh, this is probably not accidental, And I
know that gets me in trouble, and that gets me
into conspiracy theory land, but I think there's plenty of
evidence to document this out that like, this is not accidental.
This is now whether or not all of those things
worked in conjunction perfectly as a plot against the domestic
population of America. I'm not saying that definitively, but I
(07:51):
am saying specifically the opening of the borders, and that
policy was intentional. Also the indoctrine of the young people,
particularly minorities, but also white people. They were indoctrinated massively
as well into this protected class from minorities, whereas they
could have this green light to be just abjectly horrible
(08:15):
to white people. Those two things were intentional. Now, whether
or not both of them were worked in tandem intentionally,
I can't say for sure. But those two things were
intentional though, for sure. And basically what I concluded was
that after watching that transpire in the summer of twenty twenty,
I recognized that if I didn't change my perspective on this,
(08:36):
if I didn't actually figure out why this was happening,
And as you guys know, I did the research and
I laid out all the evidence that this was essentially
a United Nation so truly a globalist plot. Like definitionally,
if it's the United Nations that's doing it, well, then yeah,
it's globalism one to one, right, And that was what
they were doing, Like this was intentional.
Speaker 5 (08:55):
It was.
Speaker 4 (08:56):
It was essentially reparations through migration. That was the argument
that they were making that anyone that had been abused
by imperialism, which was anyone that was from a non
white nation, essentially was the argument they would be given
a green light to move to the West, to move
to those same white nations. Which why would you want
if you were abused by all of these white nations,
(09:17):
why would you then want to migrate to them? I
find that odd anyways, setting that aside, so that was
definitely a plan or a plot from the UN. So
you pair all three of those things together and you
start to recognize, like, oh, I'm losing my country. It
is absolutely going to die in front of my eyes
(09:37):
if I don't speak out, if I don't say something,
if the people that live here, that care about this
country don't recognize what's happening to their country, then it
all is lost. Like that's just inevitable. And I know
I'm already losing the Libertarians on this one. Sorry. I
hope that you're following the logic at least. Whether or
(09:58):
not you agree with my analysis you agree with my conclusions,
is kind of irrelevant. It's I think that there's tremendous
evidence to lay out all of the things that I've
just said are at least true, whether or not you
agree with the conclusion. So, as I started off with,
I had I recognized in me a sincere belief in
classical liberalism, in this idea that all men are created equal,
(10:22):
the founding documents the ethos of this country. And I
still love the idea, but what I recognized was those
ideas were not being held by the newest iterations of Americans,
aka the people that weren't Americans, the migrants. Also, that
same principle all men being created equal, and you know,
(10:45):
the kind of the ethos of America was also not
being held by the many of the minorities in this country.
And then you start to realize, well, does classical liberalism?
Does that view work if the other portion of your
population doesn't agree with it? And to me, the answer
is obviously no. It's kind of like the non aggression principle.
(11:08):
I believe in it. I think that it's the proper
way to live. I think it's the proper way to
kind of create the foundation of a civilization that is
functioning and respectful of one another. But if you are
the only one practicing the non aggression principle and simultaneously
half of the people aren't, well, then you're basically going
(11:31):
to be trampled. Correct I think the answer is obviously yes.
So what I realized was like, Oh, I'm holding onto
an idea that isn't shared by these people that are
basically furious at me for something I had nothing to
do with, and I'm going to have to reassess my worldview.
(11:52):
I'm going to have to I And the reason I
wanted to lay out my whole evolution on this is
that I think I'm not alone in it.
Speaker 5 (11:58):
Now.
Speaker 4 (11:58):
It's not to say that everyone's had the exact same
thought process or even thought about it as deeply as
I have. I hope people have, but I doubt it
because this is like my job. I do this all
the time. So I think that a lot of people
who held my worldview, who thought of classical liberalism as
kind of like this foundational premise of America and Americana
(12:19):
and that it's a value that we ought to uphold,
that if we continue to uphold it, it was probably
going to doom us to destruction.
Speaker 5 (12:29):
And I maybe it's just felt and it's not known.
Speaker 4 (12:33):
Maybe this is just kind of a feeling that people
have had, and maybe I'm trying to put into words
what I think a lot of people have felt is
that we're being conquered, Like that's what's happening. And I've
essentially concluded that it's not an accidental conquering but rather
an intentional one.
Speaker 5 (12:52):
And you can get into.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Theories as to why it might be occurring. I'll give
you mine, I'll give you my opinion. I think that
at its core, America and Americans and kind of the
white population, the stock of this country, particularly the Christians,
even though I'm not one, are people that are harder
to control. And the reason is because they put the
(13:17):
church before the state. Now, as you guys know, I'm
not one of them. I don't put the church before
the state, though I'm leaning more in that direction every day.
But it's not that it's because I don't value the church.
It's because I don't value the state. I don't utually
look at the state as an item of value really whatsoever,
other than maybe the Bill of Rights or the Constitution,
(13:39):
like I do put some value there, but broadly speaking,
I have very very little respect for or idolatry for
the state. In fact, I have no ideology for it.
But I also don't really idolize the church. So anyways,
point being, I think that because the like the white Christians,
I gotta say what it is. I think that they
are the hardest people for the government to control, and
(14:02):
they ultimately are the most independent, the least needy of
the state, and therefore the most oppositional towards it.
Speaker 2 (14:13):
There are all kinds of lessons that we drew from
World War Two that are false. And why does that matter?
It matters because the Western order, the First War order,
is based on those assumptions. And one of the key assumptions,
and it's destroyed your country, and I hope you reverse it,
is that it is a threat to the world when
(14:34):
a homogeneous European, white Christian country exists. That's just not
trip okay. And it's on the basis of that assition.
But if he says your country and Western Europe has
been destroyed by mass migration, what I'm interested in is
the current state of Europe. And as a lifelong traveler
of whose family in Europe, whose ancestors are from Europe,
who believes in European Christian culture and has watched it
(14:56):
be destroyed over the last one hundred and twenty years
since nineteen fourteen, Like, how the hell did this happen?
And how do we fix it? Because I really care
about it, okay, and I think that one of the factors,
not the only factor, but one of the factors in
the destruction of Europe was this last saying that our
leaders internalized and you were clearly taught at in school
that a homogeneous country in Western Europe is a threat
(15:19):
to world peace.
Speaker 4 (15:20):
And I'm not guessing at this like I'll immediately be
accused of, you know, racism or whatever for saying it.
But if you actually look at it, there's a reason
that white people, broadly speaking, particularly older white people, vote
so heavily either Republican or they lean libertarian. And there's
also a reason that if you go to a libertarian
(15:41):
convention you encounter ninety five percent of the people there
are white libertarian.
Speaker 5 (15:47):
And Jeremy Kaufman credited.
Speaker 4 (15:49):
Him, he's a Libertarian party in New Hampshire. He really
kind of I guess you would say red pilled on
me or red pilled me on this, but also just
events red pilled me on it. I was like, I
have to reevaluate these things, and I did, and I
came to a conclusion that I don't particularly like. But
(16:10):
I think that kind of this the idea of being
an American this I don't need the state. I don't
want this state. I can the whole lift yourself up
by your bootstraps mentality that is not shared in large
part by the migrants that come to this country like it.
Maybe historically it was, and I think it probably was
(16:31):
because there was so so much less of a welfare state. However,
there is an enormous welfare state, so much so that
you actually have billions of dollars that go through the
kind of NGO USAID funnel as well as other non
American funding sources that assist the migrants in flooding into
(16:55):
either America or Europe. So once they get here, there's
also programs to give them free housing, food.
Speaker 5 (17:02):
This happens in Europe too.
Speaker 4 (17:04):
This is a big part of the reason that I
opened up with These enormous protests have been ongoing for
months or these migrant hotels.
Speaker 6 (17:11):
Let's be honest, happening in France and in every country
now in Italy. Missus Maloney's trying to open a silent
of the Prime Minister of Italy asylum detention camps in Albania.
Not sure if that's going to work. Greece is having
to be very harsh because the Libyans said about Libery.
Government authorities sent about seven thousand Libyans to Crete literally
(17:35):
just to put pressure on Greece to accept them. And
they're all being kept there and we'll many of them
will be deported. I'm afraid the mood in Europe is
changing because so many criminals are now involved in the
asylum seeker transportation business, and those really need to be
dealt with, I think, much more severely than perhaps we've
(17:57):
had the habit of doing.
Speaker 5 (18:00):
Mygrant.
Speaker 4 (18:00):
Hotels are not being paid for by the migrants, in
large part, they're being funded by the state. Same thing
happens in many Blue cities and probably red cities as well,
but well, I don't know if there's any hardly any
red cities, but red states I meant, but definitely in
blue states there's enormous state revenue that is being utilized
on these migrants, be it in hospitals or housing, or
(18:22):
food or clothing, and if you were being handed things
to come here, well, then it's going to naturally or
necessarily attract people who are not the type of people
that I'm describing that used to be the immigration class
to this country. And no, not all of those people
were white. There was lots of people that came well,
(18:43):
I shouldn't say lots, it was still predominantly white, but
there was a good chunk of people that were not
white that came to America seventy five eighty one hundred
years ago that came for the right reasons. And there
are still plenty of people that come to America for
the right reason. So I'm talking in broad strokes, so
forget me, but I'm talking on averages. The averages for
(19:04):
immigrants historically seventy five to one hundred years ago would
have been that if you come here and you don't
strive to achieve, if you don't take care of yourself,
you will suffer, you will starve unless the church intervenes
to assist you. Whereas today, if you get to America,
(19:26):
up until the Trump administration came in, it started these
mass deportations or I don't know if it's mass, but
lots of deportations, there was a massive safety net, so
the incentive structure was laid in place. Naturally, the people
that were coming here are going to be a different stock.
They're going to have different values. They're going to be
looking for handouts, not freedom.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
Not Can I just have.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
A less oppressive government and strive to achieve on my own.
Not to be clear, I'm not laying all of this
at the feet of the immigrants, and I think I've
been clear about that. But I'm laying most of this
at the feet of the governments. And let me also add,
a huge percentage of these migrants are indeed refugees. I
don't know how huge the percentage is, but there's a
(20:10):
significant amount of people that are refugees sincerely as a
consequence of the warfare that was waged over the past
twenty five years NonStop throughout the Middle East. As evidence
by the demographics of people that are flooding into Europe
primarily but also into America to a lesser extent, is
their people from the Middle East because their countries have
been destroyed. So again, the state is responsible for the
(20:32):
destruction of their homeland.
Speaker 5 (20:35):
So therefore, yeah, a.
Speaker 4 (20:36):
Lot of these people feel as if like this, this
is justice for me to go to these countries that
destroyed my country and get helped out.
Speaker 5 (20:45):
So I'm not necessarily blaming the immigrant.
Speaker 4 (20:47):
I'm just I'm blaming the entire structure, the entire system
that created this crisis, that not just permitted but created
this crisis. And again I don't think it was accidental.
So then I started to really reassess this classical liberal
mindset and whether whether or not anybody can truly be
(21:08):
an American. And my answer is still yes. I still
believe that there are great Americans that come from all
corners of the kind of or all corners of the planet.
So I'm not saying that exclusively, you know, white Europeans
are the only people that come to America and make
good Americans. There are lots of people that aren't that
(21:29):
that have become incredible Americans, So I want to be
very clear about that. However, on average, that's just simply
not true. And I think that's the kind of revelatory
moment that I live through and I think a lot
of people have, and as evidence by the rise of
figures like fonts and others that I think, you know,
(21:52):
this is this is why I want to have r
on McIntyre and I want to have funts on the show.
Is I want to really unpack this because this is
not This is not the worldview or the philosophy from
which I arose. You know, I come from the libertarian
background pretty much exclusively, and this is this is really
it's been a challenge to my entire perspective to really
(22:16):
reassess these things and to think them through and to
analyze like the facts behind it, like what why has
this occurred? Is my Are my philosophical principles changing? Or
Am I just understanding the dynamic of things more succinctly?
And I think it's the latter personally. I'll let you
(22:37):
guys comment down below and tell me if I'm if
I'm abandoning my philosophy, I really don't think I am.
I think what I'm recognizing is that the state is
essentially predatory, and I don't think that's revelatory, but I
think it's it is revelatory in the sense that it
is my state that is predating upon my country in
(22:57):
an overt aggressive fashion with malice for decades. They are
trying to bolster those that need the state to vote
for more state and to suppress and diminish the population
of those that do not whoa I know, but that's
the conclusion I've come to, and I don't think it's
(23:18):
exclusive to America, as evidenced by these protests that I
opened up with.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
I think that this is a.
Speaker 4 (23:23):
Big, big problem, and I think that what you're seeing
is that in England, even though those people are much
more passive in my opinion than Americans, the situation has
got so dire and so just egregious that they have
hit their breaking point before we have. But I think
(23:43):
the Trump moment, his entire stick all the way back
to twenty fifteen, Build the Wall and all this stuff,
was like, was he was feeding off of that energy anyways,
and that was not certainly in twenty fifteen, that was
not an energy that I understood at all. I was
not of that perspective. I grew up in San Diego.
I was surrounded by immigrants all the time. I still
(24:05):
love so many of the Mexicans that I knew, and
I think that the kind of the middle of the country.
It was actually the inflection point, though, because San Diego
had been so much for my entire life.
Speaker 5 (24:18):
It had been just this migrant hub.
Speaker 4 (24:21):
But when the migration flood started to reach into Idaho
or Ohio or the rest of the country, the middle
of the country, that's when the Trump moment took root
took hold. And whoever advised Trump on this, because I'm
not even sure he's a real serious border hawk, but
whoever advised him on this probably Roger Stone absolutely sensed
(24:42):
this before I did, and it was brilliant. I mean,
he saw it before anybody else, and as a consequence,
he differentiated Trump from the modern GOP mold in such
a profound way that it created an incredible grassroots to
this day that even though lockdowns and war speed and
(25:02):
everything else that's gone disastrously wrong or withholding the Epstein documents,
there's so many examples of Trump's failings, but his base
is ride or die because he was the guy to
make this a topic, and I think this is not
going away. This is going to be the topic of
the next five, ten, twenty twenty five years, because it's
(25:25):
either going to stop or it's going to get insane.
So I apologize for the disjointed monologue. As you can tell,
I was kind of thinking through some of this as
I went, but I have I hope you could tell
I have put a lot of thought into it, and
I think what you realize is that, like if you
have a group of people to the millions fifty whatever
(25:49):
million immigrants it is, and then you simultaneously have a
huge percentage of the minority population in this country has
been indoctrinated to believe that they are victims, therefore they
can do no wrong, essentially, and then you simultaneously have
the indoctrination of the younger white generation that was indoctrinated
to hate themselves, which is also just tragic. Well, that's
(26:12):
a recipe for destruction, true, like total conquest. And I
think once I saw that, I was like, Okay, I
have to reassess everything. So I hope that my explanation
is cogent, coherent, logical. I hope that you can, even
if you disagree, I hope you can understand why my
(26:34):
worldview or my outlook evolved as it did. And I'm
genuinely curious to hear if I'm I don't think I'm
alone in this? But am I alone in this? What
have I missed? What did I get wrong? What have
I overstated? You know, a lot of people on the
Internet will ask questions of their audience, and it's not
sincere it's engagement farming. They want clicks, they want comments
(26:57):
because it help boost the algo or whatever whatever.
Speaker 5 (26:59):
I'm sincerely asking you.
Speaker 4 (27:01):
I want to know what you've your revolution, if you
have it all, if you're still holding on if you're
my you know, og libertarian audience, if you're still holding
on to the concept of you know, sports or borders
are illegitimate and the state's a legitimate there for blah
blah blah, or if you are a former you know,
(27:23):
I want legal immigration, but I don't want a legal immigration,
And now you're like a build the wall, stop all immigration,
no asylum either. Like, what was your revolution? And why
why did you come to the conclusion that you've come
to And if and if you've totally not evolved, then
you've maintained your perspective from ten years ago, Well then
I'll ask you why why is your perspective not evolved
(27:45):
at all? Given the changing circumstances that we face. Just
to give you an example of the kind of woke
mind virus that has conquered so much of the white population,
particularly in Europe, but also in America.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
Check this out.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
I want to it won't be a sort it with.
Speaker 7 (28:02):
Your lawyers under your guidance, have said in terms that
the rights of asylum seekers are more important than the
rights of local people in Epping Forest. Would you at
least at knowledge that that is what they will hear
and it's not.
Speaker 5 (28:21):
It's up to you.
Speaker 7 (28:22):
Ministers can say we agree with that or we don't
agree with it. You can't simply say, let's balance things.
Do you agree with what your lawyers said or.
Speaker 5 (28:32):
Don't you Yes, of course we do.
Speaker 4 (28:35):
That is a Labor parliamentarian Bridgete Phillipson, and what she
said there was very explicit that the rights of asylum
seekers take precedents, are more important than those of the
domestic population of the British born. And I want to
be very clear, as reprehensible as that statement is, it
(28:56):
is it is felt and held by a huge percentage
of the domestic population too. There's a reason these people
get into positions of power. This is a mind virus.
Speaker 5 (29:09):
Now.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
I will be very clear also that I think that
the asylum seekers they need more help than the domestic
population most likely. However, that doesn't make it the responsibility
of the people of Britain or the people of America
to provide that assistance that aid to diminish their standard
of living, to help out every needy person all over
(29:34):
the world. And it's an absurd claim to think that
that should be foisted upon those that disagree. And I
think that's the revelation that people have had, is that
if I can't like immigration wasn't so much of a
siren call when you could afford a home, when you
could actually get married and have kids, start a family
(29:57):
and succeed and have a life that felt as if
it was successful. But when standards of living start to diminish,
and a big chunk of this is because of inflation.
So I don't want to leave the Central Bank out
of this. But once your life, once your domestic population's
lifestyle starts to diminish, especially generationally, if the next generation
(30:19):
looks to their parents and they go, you guys own
a house or two and I couldn't dream of ever
buying a home, well, then people start to reassess and
evaluate all of the circumstances around them, and they go,
what changed? Why is my standard of living diminishing so rapidly?
And I think to a certain extent, it's escapegoat. Not
(30:41):
all of it is the responsibility of the migrants, obviously,
but to say it plays no role, as many of
the Open Border's libertarian crowd tries to do, is also
fucking insulting. It's obviously false Supply and demand. If the
demand for properties skyrocket as a consequence of millions of
(31:01):
people flooding into your country, well then the prices will rise,
if that's renting or if it's buying. But because there
was so many renters that were coming in as immigrants,
the hedge funds, the big money boys, started to buy
up the houses to turn them into rentals, which then
absorbed much of the purchaseable housing stock, which then decreased.
(31:24):
Supply will demand either stayed stagnant or increased as a
consequence of the rising population because of the immigrants. Again,
so the price of housing skyrocketed. So the central bank
was responsible on two sides of this, both the inflationary side,
but then also the easy money side that went into
the hedge fund side, that then went into the house
(31:45):
acquisition side, which then diminished the housing stock you follow,
or the or the housing stock that was least offered
that was on the market. So you create this dynamic
whereas the domestic population, the next generation cannot fathom ever
being able to afford a home, to start a family,
to have kids, to do anything. Well, what do you
(32:06):
think they're going to do? Do you think they're just
gonna go? Well, that's my lot in life. I'll never
own a home, I'll never have the foundation for wealth,
and an inflationary environment, I'm just going to deal with it.
The answer is, fuck you and fuck everyone that's responsible
for this. That's what they're going to say, and their
right to say it. And some people are only going
(32:29):
to point their venom at the immigrants, totally unfair. However,
to point none of the venom is also absurd. Okay absurd.
So let's just be fucking honest about all this. Yes,
this is a third rail topic, and yes this is
a cancelable offense for me to even be talking about it.
I don't care. I'm being honest. I'm telling the truth,
(32:52):
telling the truth that I probably tried to fucking bury
in my mind for years and years because it vileently
this classical liberal worldview that I had, you know, kind
of unwittingly taken on and as much as I rejected
the woke worldview, as much as I tried to fight
back against it by you know, saying inappropriate and proper
(33:13):
things and kind of holding on to these words that
were being canceled left and right, still even me, I
still felt a sense of being beaten down and kind
of this. I mean, you just you're you're so flooded
with these statements of you being a bad person, essentially
(33:34):
of you being this this racist, this imperialist, conquering stock,
like you come from this conquering portion of humanity, and
therefore you are guilty. You're guilty of something. And I
think that as much as I rejected that, it still
seeps into you, like you still feel a sense of it.
You're still very cognizant of being called a racist, of
(33:58):
being accused of being racist. And what I'm saying to
you is one, I don't give a fuck what you
call me. And two, I think that some things matter
more than any label. Is your country going to be
the country that you loved? And I said that in
past tense, because it is not the country that I
(34:19):
loved right now. And I think unless you're willing to
ask yourself what changed and have just no parameters on
asking that question. Whatever the answer may be, well, then
you're probably not going to come to the right answer
at the right conclusion. And that's what I'm doing. I'm
trying to just take off all of the guardrails, take
(34:41):
off all of the philosophical constraints, any sort of like
shaming or labeling, and just say, what has happened, what
do I think about it? And what should I say
or do about it? And that's all I'm trying to do.
I'm trying to find a way to hold on to
this extraordinarily unique country and understand why it arose and
(35:07):
why it has begun, if not entirely fallen, at this junction.
And I think until people are willing to do the same,
until they're willing to ask themselves these really difficult questions
and to set aside their preconceived notions and to not
worry about what they're Especially if you're in your forties
or fifties, you've probably got kids that are coming out
of college, and it's like, yeah, they're probably gonna hate you.
(35:29):
They're gonna hate you for feeling this way. But I
think I think less so than you'd imagine. I think
a lot of them are also coming to the same
kind of revelations that I have that you probably are,
that yeah, this is not a path to holding on
to the liberties that I cherish. There's a really sick
irony in all of it, too, because like if you
(35:51):
look at Japan, for instance, a lot of people they
they love Japan and they love they talk about it
very like glowingly, but like Japan is Japanese. You know,
there's so many nations that are like that, that still
have like an obvious like cultural backbone that has not
diminished very much at all. And then you have America
(36:13):
and kind of the broader West as people call it,
which is kind of a misnomer because there's so many
different values. Like you've got people in fucking Britain being
arrested for posting shit on the internet. They're further down
the slippery slope than we are, but to group us
all together is kind of absurd, but regardless, that's how
people talk about it.
Speaker 5 (36:30):
So anyways, point being.
Speaker 4 (36:32):
The West, scare quotes is the only group of people
that are not allowed to want to maintain the cultural
framework that they love about their nation, Like they're the
only ones until we identify the obvious double standard and
just say you don't give a fuck about integration or
(36:52):
open borders or mass migration into any of these other countries.
You just want it to go into all of the
white countries, because when people talk about the West, that's
really what they're saying. So Europe America, what's that? What
happens to be all of the countries with the white people. Okay,
So basically your worldview is everybody who's not white is
(37:13):
able to have really harsh immigration policies and no one's
allowed to go there, and their culture is fine and
it's able to be held onto. But just but everybody
else if you, and by everybody else, we mean you
white people, if you want to maintain the values of
your nation, racist problem, bigot, xenophobe, and probably a domestic terrorist,
(37:34):
and you need to be in prison. So I'm done
with that. I'm done with feeling shame for feeling this way,
for wanting my country to still be America, to still
have kind of a cultural framework that makes this country beautiful.
And until people are willing to kind of go through
(37:54):
the same evolution I have, which I'm sure many of
you have as well.
Speaker 5 (37:56):
Already. I just think that we're doomed.
Speaker 4 (38:00):
I really do, and I think it's really it's sad,
like at it at the end of the day.
Speaker 5 (38:06):
It's just it's so sad that.
Speaker 4 (38:09):
Even I felt a sense of shame. This is not
like overtly but just this lingering backdrop of shame because
I'm just you know, from pop culture to politicians to
everything else in between, talk radio and everything else, it's
just like there's just this de log just just as
constant twenty four to seven beating, like drum beating of you.
(38:32):
If you're a straight white guy, you are the problem.
And I'm just fucking done with that. I'm one hundred
percent done with that. I've I've never really felt like
it was true, obviously, but I'm just saying, like, I'm
done letting that worldview dictate anything about how I feel
or talk or analyze things.
Speaker 5 (38:52):
I'm done. I'm done.
Speaker 4 (38:55):
Join me in being done. And now i know not
everybody watching this is white, and that's fine. I'm like,
I love everybody, but I just still you have to
recognize what made America special, and they're the cultural values
that come with that. And yes, Christianity is a big
chunk of it. So even though I'm not a Christian,
I'm not going to diminish that at all. If you
(39:16):
if you are going to sincerely and honestly analyze what
made America special, you're going to have to tussle with
some ideas that you're uncomfortable with if you're like me,
if you come from that kind of classical liberal worldview.
And I think like this is the backlash that or
the kind of the pain that I see the James
(39:36):
Lindsay's and the constantin Kissens and these other you know,
thought leaders going through, is that they are holding on
to that for dear life that they and it's it's
ironic in that these guys were so good at talking
about the woke Mayan virus and fighting back against that,
as you know, all my entire you know circle of
(40:00):
friends was doing as well. But yet they've failed to
recognize that like that is this is the natural, inevitable
conclusion of the doing or throwing off the yoke of
woke to coin to turn. So yeah, I've thrown it off.
Have you let me know what you guys think. This
is going to be a controversial one. I'm still as
(40:21):
you can tell I'm still really evaluating, analyzing, evolving my
thought process on this, and this is not a finished
product by any stretch of the imagination. But I'm genuinely
I'm genuinely thinking differently, as you can tell. And I
think a lot of people are, and I think a
lot of people have had enough and they're evaluating all
(40:44):
of this anew and I think that that like whatever
politician kind of understands this is probably going to be
the one that takes the mantle from Trump. And I'm
probably late to the game, to be honest. Anyways, if
you guys enjoy this one, hit the light button. If
you didn't enjoy it, well, then don't hit anything and
just put a comment doub belong and tell me what
(41:05):
you hated about it.
Speaker 5 (41:07):
But yeah, I appreciate you guys for watching.
Speaker 4 (41:08):
As always, if you want to support my work at
Liberty lock pot on x you can subscribe there. I'll
follow you back or Libertylockdown tot locals dot com. Just
I don't do anything with it, but it's an easy
way to support the show. I really appreciate. I never
mentioned this, but there's hundreds of people that support my work.
Really appreciate you guys. I wish it was more, but
the hundreds that do already. You guys are fucking legends
and sincerely just amazing. So yeah, hit the like button, subscribe,
(41:31):
share it around, and I'll check you tomorrow.
Speaker 5 (41:34):
See so