Calls For Kushner Investigated As Agent Of I̶s̶r̶a̶e̶l̶ Saudi Arabia & Cybereason’s Nov 5 Simulation

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(01:38):
President, the United States will once again stand
shoulder to shoulder with the state of Israel.
I will support Israel's right to win
its war on terror, and we will win
fast. You have to win, and you have
to win fast.
When I'm president, we will deport the foreign
Jihad
sympathizers
and Hamas

(01:58):
supporters
from
our midst.
And I will work with you to make
sure that Israel is with us for 1000

(02:20):
of years. We're not gonna let go of
it. I will

(02:44):
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Friday, October 25th, 2024. Thank you for joining
me today.

(03:05):
Unnerving to see how obvious it is from
either side of the paradigm.
Blind support for Israel.
I I I get it would it's still
shocking to me how it seems I mean,
it's not really. I think it's all politics
and very clearly politically driven, but it's amazing
to me there are still people out there
that act like that's somehow like an affront
to their political stand. How dare you bring

(03:25):
this up? We're we're in the midst of
an election.
It's just shocking with US dollars
in I mean, this is a US agenda.
There's no way around that. Regardless of how
this began or who's driving the bus, this
is the US government is using every single
aspect of its power
and destroying pretty much everything. It's built around
its facade to engage with this. So if

(03:45):
if there's any issue that should be on
the forefront of our minds when about to
elect 1 or the other of people who
both support the same thing that's going on
in Israel, how is that not one of
the most primary conversations? I mean, e even
from a world sense,
it was supposed to say specifically from the
the American the US government and the way
they framed genocides and their efforts to fight

(04:06):
to stop those things in the world historically.
How do we frame these things looking back?
Monumental. And I'm not saying that's how you
have to feel, but we always frame these
things and we're taught to look at them
as earth shattering because they really are. We're
talking about a my earth changing event.
And yet, we're at a point where a
huge part of this conversation, and that really

(04:26):
only represents a small minority of the American
opinion and population,
it's a way they frame the political conversation.
Most people are not even partaking in this
facade.
But within that, the majority seem to be
blinded by the partisan back and forth.
And that these things are important in in
their own right,
but it's amazing to me how this is

(04:47):
still
hidden from some people. Or, really, I guess,
it comes down to the the willful desire
to not want to have to deal with
the heaviness of what that really is. And
and then, of course, the level of complicity
or ownership, you know, through the party, through
the allowance, through the bull the willful ignorance

(05:07):
of what's really happening
is everywhere.
And so one of the things I'm really
gonna highlight as we go through today is
we're gonna start with some stuff kind of
in the similar structure we've done the last
so many shows and and highlight the the
illusion around the the, you know, upcoming selection
and how this is being used, the different
dynamics around it, how both of them are
blindly still leaning into kind of all the
same agendas. It's more obvious than I've ever

(05:29):
seen. But then on the the the the
part of foreign policy, we're gonna get into
showing you how again, I I think I've
been saying this from probably the first
at least 1st month. I think it was
really early in the first so many weeks
of this conversation. That was, I think, one
of the articles I titled it was Israel
has already lost the information war. I think
that's self evident. At this point, though, where,
again, I wanna reiterate the fact that I

(05:49):
think we're at a point in the world
and I and I I'm not trying to
be hyperbolic here. I'm certain that there's a
section that might be, you know, could be
show to be not, like, aware of this
somehow or but it's it's my point is
that I think we're at a point where
it is everybody everybody everybody everywhere knows what
this is. Everybody everywhere at every corner of
the conversation is aware of what's actually happening

(06:13):
in different levels that are either okay with
it,
willing to lie to themselves about what it
is,
choosing to pretend it's something for political reasons,
choose to ignore it for political reasons. These
are all very large groupings of their own.
But I think we all have to acknowledge
we're not a point where we're still trying
to debate what this is. There's just a
never dying part of the argument that is

(06:34):
never ever from behind the bars of a
prison cell will never admit that this was
what we tell you what what it is,
what it obviously is. And that's what's so
interesting. I mean, go look at any of
this South Africa, Rwanda.
I mean, to this very day, there be
be people that will disagree with that framing.
That's how we have to remember. In the
midst of this, this is what we're dealing
with. And that we're at a point now

(06:54):
where people truly everywhere see this. And this
is what I personally have such a hard
time with.
Again, it it and it's almost like I'm
grappling with how to articulate this exactly, which
is that we have fully
in the most
clear, provable,
right in front of our faces way are
bumping up against the true nature of this

(07:15):
world. We are looking at what these government
structures are, you know, and it's not just
you know, today is different than it was
a 1000, 100 years ago, but the point
is about power structures, whatever that represents. People
with power and influence and wealth, that they
can, like, lord that over you. And so
today, we're looking at that as governments. And,
you know, the western governments have loved to
present themselves as the, you know, integrity and

(07:38):
and honor and and human rights. And, obviously,
none of that at the core was really
the case.
Not to say that certain people and certain
parts might not have been, but we see
that. And so now we're at a point
where we're watching these things. And it never
it for whatever reason, it was so much
more difficult before because of propaganda. For whatever
reason, the propaganda machine is being forced, I

(07:58):
think, to show you some of this. I
really do believe it's what it looks like
to, I guess,
succeed in a way as the independent media
that we are and that really is because
of you watching right now. All of us
could be screaming on our platforms as long
as we want. It's because you chose, as
individuals,
to get to to think about this, to
to discuss this, to throw it in front

(08:19):
of other people, and then it becomes momentum.
They can't stop, and the opportunism sets in.
They start going, maybe I should talk about
this even though I know Israel's gonna attack
me. I might even lose my job, but
maybe the job won't even be there if
later and you start they start we changed
the conversation.
And so we started to see this get
discussed, and it started getting highlighted. And that's
why people everywhere see it. My point though
is that they still kept doing it.

(08:41):
And now we're here, and they're still doing
it in the face of everybody watching their
genocide.
And so I think we're at a point
where we have to acknowledge that this is
the reality of the power structure, but on
top of that, that we need to discuss
what this means. How do we stop this?
How do we stop this from happening? Not
wait until they're done genociding and then try
to hold them accountable through corrupt power structures,

(09:02):
which is what they'll want you to do.
I think that's ultimately the plan. Let it
fizzle out and then try to minimize damage
to the real structure, not just Israel, but
they're all ultimately allowing and being a part
of the same thing.
And so most of us are saying that's
not even okay.
I want accountability, but we want it to
stop now. We want you to stop murdering
children. We want them to stop saying, we'll

(09:23):
give you 30 days to maybe show us
that you're gonna stop murdering children. No. We
want you to stop now. The peoples of
the world are tired of allowing this to
continue, whether it's under the under the distraction
of another selection or some other large event
or whatever else we're being told to point
at. Most people are saying, yes, we don't
like that too, but we're not gonna stop
pointing out you murdering children, your starvation tactics,

(09:45):
your ongoing bombing of innocent people in tents.
So the point I'm trying to make here
is that we need to acknowledge that this
is where we are. And the only thing
that seems to be able to stop a
powerful entity
with the power to ignore you no matter
what you can do and think and feel
and influence, which is what's happening,
the only thing I can think of is
that takes another powerful entity to use their

(10:06):
power,
hopefully enough power or more power than theirs
to stop that other powerful entity from doing
that. And this is why people are saying,
okay, US government. Tell them to stop. We
see someone like Massey saying we should stop
harming them. Great. I'd love to see that,
but it doesn't stop it. So what does
that end up mean being?
Is that not war? Is that not exactly
what we're trying to avoid, saying Russia or

(10:28):
China or UK or anybody else come and
use your military might to stop them from
doing that? I mean, at this point, I'm
not even gonna disagree with that. I want
this to stop. But I think it's difficult
to put yourself into a position where you
fall right back into the cycle. And this
is what I'm worried about. I'm not gonna
I'm not gonna end with some kind of
a solution here, ladies and gentlemen. I'm just
trying to highlight my thought process,
is that

(10:49):
we fall back in this way. And this
may be a last ditch effort of these
dying power structures to convince you that they
will be the ones that will
shut you know, usher us through this problem,
when in reality, they're the ones that have
funded and allowed and fostered what this has
become.
So I just want us to think about
that dynamic. And I guess the finer point
is voting for somebody right now in this

(11:10):
facade, both of which are supporting in real
time the most obvious aspect of the worst
thing we've ever seen. How in the world
do we think that that's gonna translate to
somehow a different path? So that's just the
selection part of it, and we're gonna talk
about that on continually more as we close.
But from a worldwide perspective, as I know
we reach a hell of a lot more
people. I mean, I think about only half
our audience is in the United States. So

(11:31):
all the rest of you out there listening
and thinking about this stuff,
what else can we do? Who else can
we discuss? I mean, I I think the
real point comes down to our mass action
and as many people as possible
with, I think, honestly, peaceful resistance. That's where
my mind is always at. I do not
believe violence is the answer in any context
other than personally defending your family and yourself

(11:53):
from violence being attacked, you know, used on
you.
Just a classic kind of libertarian, you know,
personal defense.
But
I think, again, if we're gonna lean into
other power structures, even the UN,
e anything that's gonna say, okay. We're gonna
try to use our power to stop you.
I just I think that all of these
things are we
there has to be some other angle of

(12:14):
this outside of leaning into
more authority to stop another authority. How long
until the next authority figure decides to start
using their authority to do what they want
at the expense of others? I mean, that's
pretty much how history has always gone. So
let's think outside the box. Let's make that
a running theme of today in ongoing shows.
How else can we handle this problem?

(12:34):
Again, like I said, people are gonna wanna
hear some that's that's the problem with a
lot of this stuff today.
I think most things of of that are
difficult, that deserve more thought are not as
simple as just going, I'm just gonna make
it. You know, I could give you thought.
I could say, let's do this. Let's lean
into this and make that happen, and maybe
it'll work. But I want everybody else out
there to go through this thought process and
to consider the different avenues that they might

(12:56):
take and share these thoughts.
Now it it seems like the whole industry,
mostly the mainstream alternative media, has built itself
around giving you an answer, you know, whether
or not there even really is an answer.
I think that's the wrong path.
So I wanna start today with with some
of these points around the 2 party illusion
and really just a couple of updates, actually,
first around the COVID 19 aspect of this,

(13:17):
the illusion therein, which I wanna remind everybody,
whether Kamala or Trump, both blindly lean into
pretty much every aspect of it despite the
flavor differences we love to kinda Coke and
Pepsi of it all when they're really just
leading you in the same direction.
We're gonna talk about that. I wanna make
a point to update you on Georgia. Just
it's a small it's it's a big update,
but it's not the update I was waiting
for.
Scott has some updates on some of the

(13:38):
things he's found very preliminary.
So he stresses that this shouldn't be used
to reach any conclusions just yet, but it
does have some insights. So I wanted to
give you what I saw there, break down
what I think of it, and I wanna
talk about some updates to a recent EPA
ban and really highlight how, you know,
as you might expect, I'm very jaded when
it comes to government action. And so for
me, as usual, I sense this is little

(14:00):
more than trying to pacify
our awareness and growing therein of how dangerous
our current situation is. And, you know, really,
we've just come to expect that to kinda
just see that as the world today. It's
not. I believe we shouldn't be dying of
cancers and being riddled with diseases and, you
know, that's because of what our governments have
allowed to happen to us. But discussing one
of the positive steps. But in light of

(14:20):
the real picture, I wanna make sure we
see it the right way. And then talk
about that in the context of the current
administrations,
and then talk about the 2 party illusion.
And an important one from there before we
get into the rest of the foreign policy
is about Jared Kushner. And a really interesting
development from, yes, democrats,
and, of course, that should make a difference
and you factor it a bit to

(14:41):
then no matter who's involved, this should never
be ignored without investigation.
Should calling out Jared Kushner and saying he
deserves to be investigated under the foreign agents
registration act, the FARA act.
Except for funding from Saudi Arabia, which is
pro which I think is valid, but it's
into and by the way, to be clear,
you could you could easily level that accusation

(15:03):
at just a I I mean, I would
probably say 90% of our current congress.
Legitimately
argue that they are acting in in whether
be through I mean, who I just,
oh, I just had his name. I was
on the tip of my tongue.
I can see his face. The guy who
just got,
charged for being a under the far act
for regarding Egypt, Mendez. I think that's his

(15:24):
name. It it just it's it's amazing to
me. And I think that's more of like
a warning or I think that the point
is that every one of them are involved
in ways that the very least can skirt
that line because they're all very dishonest. And
it's not my opinion, guys. You can literally
look at the dynamic and look at the
way they selectively apply or ignore facts because
of their true party illusion. It's always partisan
politics that melts logic, in my opinion. But

(15:46):
we're gonna go through and talk about
the
interesting selective choice of why Saudi Arabia was
applied to Jared Kushner. And the end, of
course, even that Saudi Arabia can be it's
not even it's obvious that that's another facilitating
route for Israel and the United States. And
so what it really means and why they're
deciding to go after him. And we'll go
into it, but just I think off the
gate out of the gate, it seems like

(16:07):
it's more about trying to
create this divide, but not really call out
the real culprit. Sort of like Russiagate all
over again. Now we have Saudi Arabia gate.
Right? Where in reality, it's always been Israel
gate, and I think that's by design. And,
of course, we're gonna get into the election
conversation and cyber reason with yet another
simulation,
weirdly right on 5th.

(16:28):
Because that makes sense. Right? Because you wanna
simulate
a problem for the election so that you
can make sure that those don't happen
even though you're doing it while the election's
taking place. Right? Because that's usually simulations are
so you can make sure that there is
no problem. Oh, we we figured out this
will happen. Let's make sure we don't do
it in the election. I guess they're doing
it for the next election after that.

(16:48):
Or or as usual, there's a lot more
going on around these so called,
simulations,
you know, the pandemic according to the the
the event 201, the Crimson Contagion, or many
different political dynamics therein. And I think it's
important to see this in the context of
the gaming out of this and how cyber
reason itself is directly tied to Israel. And

(17:09):
this is it's not just coincidence, guys. This
is not just seeking out that connection. It's
there, and it's obvious. And if you haven't
seen by now that Israel is doing everything,
and it's not just because of their being
exposed for genocide.
Going lot long before October 7th, Israel had
been,
I mean, I think still at the point
desperately trying to manipulate the policy here in
doing so. Now I think it's very clear

(17:32):
it's because it's
the reality of what Zionism is and what
they're doing around the world. That sheet has
been pulled back. And so now I think
it's in a absolute dep desperate sort of
damage control mode.
And we're gonna finish with a lot of
stuff on foreign policy there. And so let's
start with this point
that I think is fascinating. I mean and

(17:53):
it's weird how this has lost a lot
of attention
even though yet the same point,
whether Ukraine or Israel or Gaza, both Trump
and Kamala
absolutely support
the government agenda
despite the little, you know, different flavored narratives
and how they respond.
And Trump, well, wait. It never would have
happened if I was there, which means nothing.
It's a statement that means nothing and has

(18:15):
no standing. It just means what he wants
you to think it means. You read into
it the way you will. He will support
it like the rest of the government because
it's a government agenda and because it's an
Israeli agenda and Trump supports Israel. If you
haven't pieced that together by yet by now,
you're probably not really gonna like most of
this conversation.
We're talking about Ukraine.
Diana points this out.

(18:35):
And I don't think you really need to
see this kinda trip I mean, I think
it's pretty much a common understanding. The Zelensky
as a puppet was placed there by the
United States. I can play the clip of
of,
funny how you don't talk about these things,
and, and you forget the
I forget I forget her name. I'll just
play it real quick.
What's her name? You know, from the one

(18:56):
that was speaking about the bio labs in
Ukraine. I just her name is blanking on
the top. Let me she put put in
the chat for me. You'll see her right
here if I can pull it up. But
she's handpicking from the US government who would
be in the Ukrainian government.
You know, that's called that's called democracy according
to our government. And they don't they don't
tell you that. Even though you can literally
play her voice speaking out the names and
picking we'll pick them and that no. He's

(19:16):
not right for it. We'll pick them. And
then going on to tell you that it
was elected by the people.
I mean, it's it's it's incredible. Victoria Newland.
Thank you, Katie.
I think I have it in here. Well,
since I've since I remember since she wrote
the name for me, I won't play it
seeing as how I played it a 1000000
times. But the point is that she literally
handpicked the government.
And
now we can see that he is corrupt.

(19:38):
He's influenced I mean, the neo nazi elements
have also because of Israel and United States
that have overrun this country. And the the
amount of enrichment
at your expense to an a puppet of
the US government that's been carrying out the
I mean, we have to realize that it's
the similar dynamic we've seen elsewhere. They fund
the worst people you could imagine, and then
frame the other side as the bad guy,
which in most cases, they're not necessarily the

(19:58):
good guy. But at this point, they are
funding
the the elements that are willing to be
manipulated, willing to be bribed.
Because, really, they want their own they wanna
do what they wanna do. Right? They wanna
be able to take advantage of the situation.
They wanna gain from it themselves. And in
most cases, it grows to a point to
where they're no longer really willing to take
direction from the US government. And that's when
they have another regime change. You put another

(20:20):
illegitimate person in place, and the cycle goes
on. And this is always how it has
been. I'm pretty damn sure that I saved
them. I guess not. So I won't play
it. Oh, there it is. Right when I
say that, I find it.
On February 20,
2013, the world was shocked by video footage
of snipers firing on protesters in Kyiv, Ukraine.
21 people were murdered. And it was widely

(20:40):
assumed that president Viktor Yanukovych and his supporters
were behind the attacks.
However, a phone conversation between EU foreign policy
chief Kathy Ashton and Estonia's foreign minister, Irma
Piyat, which was leaked to the public on
March 5th, reveals the snipers were actually from
the new coalition government and that Western diplomats
knew this and covered it up.
Yeah. Yeah. So that he has some sort

(21:02):
of, what to say, trust among all these
Maidan people and and civil society. And second,
what was quite disturbing, the same Olga told
that, well, all David then shows,
the people who were killed by snipers from
both sides among
policemen and then people from the streets,
that they were the same snipers
killing people from both sides. Well, that Uh-huh.

(21:24):
Yeah. So So that and then she also
showed me some photos. She said that has
medical doctor. She can, you know, say that
it is the same same handwriting,
the same type of bullets, and it's really
disturbing that now the new,
new coalition that they don't want to investigate
what exactly happened. So that there is I

(21:45):
stronger and stronger understanding
that behind snipers, they were it was not
Yanukovych,
but it was somebody from the new coalition.
Correct. For some reason, the US media didn't
think that that little detail was worth covering.
But wait, I thought the opposition protesters were
just peaceful activists who wanted a chance to
join the European Union.
Well, yeah, that's the official narrative that the

(22:06):
US media outlets are peddling. But the real
story is far more ominous.
It turns out that the most powerful and
influential contingent in the opposition is a coalition
of literal fascists and neo nazis, and they
aren't peaceful. In fact, they're extremely brutal.
This is a picture of Victoria Nuland from
the US State Department meeting with Oly in
February.
And this is a picture of senator John

(22:27):
McCain sharing a stage with
in December.
But why would the US government work with
Neo Nazis?
Because they thought that they could control the
situation. They thought that they could install their
puppets behind the scenes and manipulate the situation
in their favor. That same Victoria Nuland who
met with Svoboda in February was caught on
another leaked call discussing who they would put
in power. What do you think?

(22:48):
I think we're in play.
The the, Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated
electron here,
especially the announcement of him as deputy prime
minister. And you've seen some of my notes
on the troubles in the marriage right now.
So we're trying to get a read really
fast on where he is on this stuff.
But I think your argument to him, which

(23:09):
you'll need to make, I think that's the
next phone call we wanna set up, is
exactly the one you made to to Yachts.
And I I'm glad you sort of put
him on the spot on where he fits
in this scenario. And I'm very glad he
said what he said in response.
Good. So,
I don't think Cleage should go into the
government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't
think it's a good idea.

(23:32):
Yeah. I mean, I I guess
you think
what
in terms of him not going into the
government, just let him sort of stay out
and do his political homework and stuff. I'm
just thinking
in terms of sort of the process moving
ahead, We wanna keep the moderate Democrats together.
The problem is gonna be tiny bulk and

(23:52):
his guys.
And, you know, I'm sure that's part of
what Yanika was just calculating on all of
this.
I kinda I just I think Yats is
the guy who's got the economic experience, the
governing experience. He's the guy what he needs
is Klitsch and Tony book on the outside.
He needs to be talking to them 4
times a week.

(24:14):
I I I just think going in, he's
gonna be at that level working for Yacineuk.
It's just not gonna work. Hey, and that's
what you call democracy in the US government.
Right? Handpicked
Neo Nazis,
they put in place, and then they scream
democracy, and we're all supposed to pretend that's
okay. Oh, and by the way, here is
Victoria Nuland from oh, I'm sorry. My mistake.
That's actually from the Ghostbusters. There's Victoria Nuland.

(24:37):
My bad. I mean, she really does look
like a monster if I were to be
really honest and, you know, personal about it,
but she is a monster, so it's not
okay. I mean, so I don't have any
issue with calling her that. But these people
like to I mean, if you look this
this is the point that's being made by
this post is being in this government or
acting in a way that kind of whether
she was a sociopath to begin or not,

(24:59):
this is what it does to you.
That's not a joke. I mean, this if
that's crazy. And if you look at these
people, look at any of them, you know,
and some of them are just sociopaths.
Some of them want the wealth, the power,
and the influence and are not. And this
is and, you know, I'm not just who
you can decide for yourself. My point is
even if you are, this it it
weighs on you.

(25:19):
Anyway, the point the point though is that
these are the kind of people that
are telling you they're fighting for freedom while
they are acting. I mean and do you
let let's put it like this. Do you
think for a second that these people were
handpicking? Like, okay. The first point is you're
you're pretending that you're electing things while picking
it for yourselves. Now some people even know
that and would go, well, but we're the
good guys. Right? They're doing it for good
reasons. They have to pick the people that

(25:40):
are the least bad. Right? Oh my god.
Doesn't that sound familiar?
Right. So,
can we not ask whether that might not
be the case? Like, maybe they would just
pick and I know most of you are
already going, absolutely. But some of you out
there who just still hold on to this
childish, like, Santa Claus lovable belief that these
people would only do the good things because
they claim to fight for freedom. If you

(26:01):
look through your history of whether government or
just the US government,
it's
a pick it's it's in technicolor. It's the
most obvious thing in the world. They have
always worked with the people that were most
amenable to being controlled. And usually, that's not
a good person.
And so the reality is they handpicked these
people, and now we can look and say
these are horrifying people. And so you have

(26:22):
to ask yourself,
was the other side of this worse?
Well, no. I mean, you could objectively look
at the people we're talking about, and maybe
they wouldn't be in pro
US government interests.
But, objectively,
they're not as criminally
bad as morally ambiguous.
So you have to realize they're willing to
work with the worst people around as long

(26:42):
as they get what they want. And how
does that work out for the Ukrainian people?
How does that work out for the American
people?
It doesn't.
Moral of the story. So here is the
point that that Diana's showing you. Eleven luxury
cars, watches, jewelry.
$1,200,000
in cash was found on the 24th at
Zelensky's
commissar,
It says, who works for a small regional

(27:04):
office. A small regional office. You know how
much money has been dumped in these people's
hands?
Apparently, half it goes up this person's the
you know,
up to the habits of Zelensky. But
it says there are a 100,000
of these locations in Ukraine. They don't serve
the army. It's a mafia with automatic guns.
Like, every other single group we've seen them

(27:24):
support in these wars.
And, also, recognize, we're talking straight up US
dollars sitting in this location in Ukraine.
So there's no really either there's a separate
funneling of of of bribery going on, which
is probably just as likely,
or this is money going to support the
war effort. It's going to their own I
mean, how many articles we've already seen about

(27:44):
Zelensky's family members, Zelensky's wife buying jewelry and
luxury cars. They are abusing it and laughing
in your face. And you'll and Israel is
an active part of this operation. They've been
funding the Azat movement on the record since
2018, but well before that.
This person says, what gets me is it's
American dollars. Diana says, all the bribes in
Ukraine are in dollars.

(28:07):
This is where we are. This is the
reality.
I just wanna make sure we saw that
before we get into other things. Now this
all of this will reflect on what we're
talking about today. Whether it's the illegitimacy of
the COVID 19 illusion operation, whether it's the
operations of our government everywhere else and the
guys are fighting for freedom. I mean, people
do not buy this anymore. Now the point
is not that we should just give up

(28:27):
and walk away because we fail. We,
as Americans, who this government is pretending to
represent, need to do something. We need to
stand up. Now I could give you all
day long what I think and what I'm
doing and what I but I it's for
individually you should decide what you think is
the correct action. Mo 1st and foremost, stop
complying.
Just like we did with COVID nineteen. Stop
consenting to a broken reality where either side

(28:50):
of it is continuing the broken dynamic.
Stand up and push back.
That's the first step. Plenty of other directions
we can take. We talk about it all
all the time. Derek, by far far by
far has so many different things more than
anybody I know where you can genuinely take
action outside of the system to try to
fight back.
But my point is that we can't just
keep going through the same motions. Now, in

(29:11):
the COVID 19 conversation, with the shots that
Trump still
supports
and even promotes,
this is from October 25th if you can
believe that, from this year. BART workers, BART
being a a shuttle or, like, a a
train or a Amtrak or whatever you wanna
call those kind of trains, it's specifically in
San Francisco and the Bay Area.
BART workers fired due to COVID vaccine mandate

(29:33):
to get over $1,000,000 each. Oh, actually, I'm
sorry. I jumped a little bit. There's our
there there are shots going out. That's what
I thought we were going into. This one
is about the idea that the people won.
Now that's that's why I put it beforehand.
So as people are still being pressured to
get shots, and in in,
Canada,
in Canada right now, they're getting
apparently breaking record at some locations for who's

(29:54):
taking them. Now this is at a time
when so much has been shown about the
reality of how dangerous the things they're giving
them are, the lack of concern for what
they claim it's for, or the fact that
people that were forced are winning all over
the place.
In this case, they're getting a $1,000,000
each because they were forced to get a
shot
or fa because they were fired or they,

(30:14):
you know, they were coerced and they chose
the right path.
Not to get an injection that would possibly
kill them, and then they get a $1,000,000
for doing the right thing. So I want
first thing I wanna point out is that
in a long term sense, this is one
of the major reasons why I why I
get the sense that we're not gonna see
COVID 2 2 point o.
Not it very well may take a different
form in the same path same kind of

(30:36):
bio
you know, what what vaccine
shots,
threats of pathogens kinda direction. But I don't
think we're gonna see, like, a a just
a retake of the same game. That's my
per I just kinda my gut. I honestly,
it wouldn't surprise me. These people seem to
be shockingly incompetent in a lot of ways
today. But for so many reasons, like, to
me, this stands out as an obvious win

(30:57):
for the average person. Right? Where they're just
they're you're showing. Look. You forced us to
do this. You thought you could fire us
because we didn't, and we win. You owe
us $1,000,000. So there are gonna be plenty
of businesses that choose to go, okay. I
can't follow along. I I don't wanna lose
1,000,000 of dollars. So I think it's a
positive thing to see.
But, you know, just as a alarming note,

(31:17):
all that would really take to do something
new would be to release something real, which
I don't think I mean, we they've done
that before. That's historically factual.
So all I'm saying though is to recognize
that the that this is an indication that
they failed in in a in at least
some capacity around how that went down. Unless
the point was to get this to happen,
which is always possible. I also wanna point
out what Jimmy Dore said about this just
to remind me to point this out as

(31:38):
well as the fact that this information's been
very clear and very
public
since 2023. And he says, does anyone know
the actual infection fatality rate of COVID 19,
it it turn,
turned to actual turned out to be, basically.
And so the beginning of COVID, you remember
seeing estimates of 3 to 5%, which is
and and that came from the Imperial College
of London, Neil Ferguson,

(31:58):
who was literally exposed for lying. He he
used well, specifically misleading using his own opinion
as and presenting it as a fact
in the context of that number. It was
false from the very beginning. And it said
or and the point was, you know, the
worst case scenario became the number they presented
as the logic, and it wasn't.
He says, but I am pretty sure that
it's actually less than 1%, but I'm not
a statistician.

(32:19):
My current understanding is that it was less
than 1% and even less for omicron. Your
help is greatly appreciated. Now, first and foremost,
the point should be that if it was
ever there at all. That is a very,
very valid point backed up by facts and
science. Always reference Danny Rancourt's point, which I
think is the easiest one to reach people
that don't may not wanna consider larger, struck
changes to things like germ theory versus drain

(32:41):
theory. The point is that Benny Rancourt, Danny
Rancourt
I might be able to put bring it
up right here.
Yeah. Right here. Perfect.
With an outstanding study, he made the point
that, look, whatever your thoughts on all this
are,
you can prove,
should they have wanted to, hypothetically,
you could've made the exact same perception

(33:02):
possible.
I mean, like, not not even just, like,
saying things, but literally had the numbers showing
up, had the rise in cases, all of
this simply using things they already had ready
without even needing a new pathogen.
Things like we talked about, like the PCR
false positives, like the get like vaccine side
effects that were later called COVID 19, or
just conflating flu and pneumonia with COVID 19.

(33:23):
He made a very just, like, statistically
clear
that was possible.
That's just a whole side conversation. That's not
to say it happened. The point is that
if you need a scientific basis for why
they could've just lied about it, it's staring
you right there in the face. And then
we can show you all the law false
things with the PCR test and everything else
we've talked about. All of it we've gone
over extensively. So I wanted to make sure

(33:44):
to include this because one thing I thought
was funny is there's people down here posting
it like chief nerd, but weirdly enough not
giving anybody the link. Why would you do
that? Welcome to Twitter files, age. That's a
stupid thing to do. Why not include the
link? It's important. Right? So I said, here
you go with the link included that no
one seems to wanna show. And the fact
is this has been around since 2023. And
we could I actually believe personally that we

(34:05):
could prove this in 2022 using science that
was being ignored. But the this was an
important one that I shared on January 22nd
2023,
which was the ionitis group. And just want
to remind everybody that it was pre vaccination
infection fatality rate. And the important part of
it was
that at a global level,
pre vaccination infection fatality rate may have been

(34:25):
as low as point 3 for under 59
and point 7 for under 69. And then
the the larger point therein is that, what
was it? 90%. Let me click it just
to be sure.
It was
94%
of the global population is in that category.
That's just such a shocking statistic. And realize
that this isn't challenged. It's not retracted. This

(34:46):
is the current standing data. No one's tried
to change that. They just don't talk about
it. 94% of the population was at a
shockingly less risk than the flu. That's for
the and, again, that's if it was ever
even there.
I just find it to be so incredibly
shocking. So I just wanna make sure people
are if you're still confused, keep asking, did
we ever find that out? Yes. Yes. We
did. And we've been showing it for a
very long time. Include this for you.

(35:09):
Denny, I recommend you check this out. Denny's
still doing amazing work on this conversation.
Now David Dixon points this interesting point out,
and this is simply just about this increase
in shots. And apparently, it says COVID shot
for as of from 24 or October 24th.
Alberta breaks all records
with a 151,881,
specifically k p 2, that's the new variant

(35:30):
apparently, shots in 1 week.
So just to recognize the point is that
that's not actually not that huge. I mean,
it is for this location, but in the
context of the the world or even just
Canada,
if that was happening everywhere, that would make
me much more concerned. But that's it only
has to start with one kind of little
popping off situation. So the point they're making
in this tweet and and there's some other
tweets in this ongoing kind of, tweeted he

(35:51):
shares his tweet from before and you can
go back through it. There's just it's say
making the case. Showing you the the article
and so on. And I agree with the
point they're making. That all you need is
this spike. Right? All you all of a
sudden, you get this spike
in cases,
which we all know how this works because
of the very clear
illness that comes I mean, what you could
I can go into 47 different things that

(36:11):
could happen after these shots, usually most of
them, which could be called COVID or be
seen as something else or at least create
the conversation that there's an illness going on.
And the point is that and on top
of the long term, very clear risk to
your health or
myocarditis or blood clots, thrombosis. I mean, it's
crazy to me that these are even still
going. And all of those were still applied.
The only thing they did was alter the

(36:32):
variant. It's the same dangerous platform shot that
we've been talking about since the beginning of
this. And his point is they just gave
all these shots. And so if like every
other thing we've seen,
die every this dynamic or situation like this
pre
since since the beginning of the COVID illusion,
you saw an increase in shots and you
saw an increase in cases. It happened every
single time.

(36:52):
So if you wanted to, this could be
taken advantage of. And thank you, We Are
All Palestine, for pointing this out.
Here's the actual article that that, the one
of the the with the same headline anyway.
I couldn't find the one he was pointing
to. But it says BC breaks one day
vaccination record with COVID 19 and flu shots.
So it's both of them, but his numbers
are accurate. It's generally
right here. Where was it?

(37:15):
This was just in one the record was
in one in a single day. They got
about 32,000
COVID 19 shots in one day and 50,000
flu shots. So, apparently, not yet giving the
the combination one, which is apparently out there,
at least in the United States, which terrifies
me. The flu COVID combination shot, which apparently
Moderna's pushing out. But we're talking in the
100 of 1,000 in regard to the how

(37:37):
many they've given so far, and that was
the graph he was showing. So I just
think we should be prepared for the
rise in whatever these things cause that then
get called COVID 19 and what that then
causes. And remember, interestingly enough, Alberta we're talking
about is the location that ended up exposing,
which I think I can even have come
up again. I think I saw it pop
up when I was searching for this.
Yeah. Look at that. It's that was probably

(37:58):
not well, this is the way back machine.
So it is still there. I I don't
think the article was even there anymore.
Oh my gosh. Look at that.
So we were just talking about this by
the way. This is what we were all
worried about. Here's a real time example. Here's
the way back machine that I had I
had this archived.
It's not there anymore.
Look at that.
Sorry. Now, I might be able to find
this somewhere else.
This was the statistic we showed you. Remember

(38:19):
we broke this in real like, it was
somebody else shared this with us. And then
we were one of the ones that was
really breaking this down in real time around
how Alberta exposed
that there's the
80 to 90% of the side effects were
happening within the 1st 2 weeks of the
shot, which they would then ignore because they
said we don't count anything within the 1st
2 weeks. Even though that's not for side
effects of the shot, that's for illness they're

(38:40):
talking about. But they just sweep it all
together. So check this out, I'm gonna include
that. That's so alarming guys. This this, you
know, burning of the library of Alexandria, however
you wanna call it. Like there there are
raise And and what what point do we
then lose track of whatever meant anything and
what was real when they start just removing
all of the ways that you can keep
track of this stuff? Let me try the
archive page.
This is one that still works. Archive.ph,

(39:03):
I think.
Yeah. There we go. Let's see if this
one works. It might be too old.
It looks to be the one.
May save this before it goes away. So
all the way at the bottom, if that's
the right spot. Let's see.

(39:24):
Maybe the archive made it look funny. Let
me see if I can find it.
Bear with me.
Didn't plow Oh, here we go. Perfect. Here
it is.
Okay. So what you're looking at here
is a note from Alberta, which by the
way, the moment this got exposed, they they
deleted this part of it and put it
back out. How else do you understand that?
And what it shows you is number of

(39:44):
days between first immunization date and COVID diagnosis.
And the point is you're seeing this huge
spike
in cases,
a huge spike in hospitalizations,
and a huge spike in deaths. All within
the first 21 days, which they then would
ignore. And I think that says it up
here if I remember correctly.

(40:05):
I'm not gonna take the time just find
it really quickly. You guys all remember the
dynamic. It's it looks different because
it's all like, the way back machine has
it on here funny. But do you remember
the dynamic? 1st 2 weeks, let me just
type in 2 weeks and see if that
comes up. There we go. Look at that.
Bingo. Now what it says,
92%
of cases were unvaccinated

(40:25):
or
diagnosed within the 1st 2 weeks of the
dose.
So the point is all of the negative
things, all of the deaths that happened in
those first two weeks, they would dump over.
And it ended up being 3 weeks after
a while. They would dump over into not
vaccinated, even though they had had the shot.
There's no way that would make sense. And
so going back to the point, is once
that starts happening again,

(40:47):
I the the there nothing has changed. That's
the quote the craziest part for me. Nothing
has changed. All of the same structure is
in place. They're just hoping we don't talk
about that.
That this is this is credit crazy to
me. The the removal of things from the
way back machine and why that may be
happening.
Include those for you. Okay. So, lastly, on
the point of this opening segment is that
Sarah Wilkerson points out yet again that it's

(41:08):
unethical,
unethically cruel.
The the it's unethical cruel bio warfare to
I guess I did read it right. She
just left the wire. It's unethically cruel bio
warfare to continue using a known
polio causing oral polio vaccine in Gaza
because it's eradicating it, it's spreading it. It
is eradicating. And the bottom line is that
we know this. And so it's interesting to

(41:30):
me that this gets so brushed over because
this is not a secret.
Here's virology bot blog, oral polio vaccine associated
paralysis in a child despite previous immunization. Oral.
That's the point. And here is so you
can press.
UN says polio outbreak in Sudan caused by
the oral polio vaccine. Here's a different one.
This is from 2019.
How the oral polio vaccine can cause polio.

(41:51):
This is why it doesn't get used, but
we give it to people in a situation
where they're already struggling.
That's call that's that's by design.
That's kinda crazy, don't you think? But no
one's talking about it except people that care.
This is where we are. We're in a
position where they are using these things. And
they just tell you to shut up.
Even though we all know it. And the
pea And the

(42:12):
access journalists and the opportunists all jump up
and pretend like they're the good people, and
they go along with it, they get patted
on the head, and it continues to create
an illusion to people that don't know better.
So speaking of health and everything around that,
I think it's important that we make a
we give an update on what's going on
in Georgia. Now, Scott Smith shared this as

(42:32):
of the, today, actually. He says, I have
preliminary results for the biolab biolab fire in
Conyers, Georgia.
And he now he has and it's only
specifically for some of the the volatile organic
compounds
found in water
within about 1500 feet of ground 0 at
the retention pond near a dead frog that
they found. He says, note. I have no

(42:54):
preliminary
results yet for dioxins. That's just that's just
because they haven't come in yet. They're still
working on those results.
And he says,
this is to let the community simply know,
on a preliminary basis, very important he stresses
that, some of the,
volatile organic compounds and it's again, specifically not
dioxins yet, he doesn't have the results back,

(43:15):
that may have been in the air to
and or in plumes with potential exposure. These
chemicals found in water are preliminary only,
subject to change, and no definitive conclusions can
be made at this time including cause and
effect related to possible health symptoms. So that's
to be as clear as possible. I'm only
even showing you this, I hesitated maybe not,
but only because I want it's I wanna

(43:35):
keep you informed. Especially if you're there on
the ground, I would wanna know this. And
but but make sure that we're stressing that
this is up in the air other than
the fact that he's finding that they're present,
not how much is there and so on.
So some of this could be simply explained
away as being something that naturally occurs in
the environment. Right? For example. So but nonetheless,
if you're there,
I would wanna know. So here's what he's
finding. He says, in the water at the

(43:56):
retaining pond within 1500 feet of ground 0,
in this in the BioLab fire,
near this dead frog that they found in
the location, the pH was measured in the
following volatile organic compounds or VOCs in the
water were identified as follows.
Now we it weirdly enough, a pH of
46.
I thought this was interesting just looking this
up. Apparently,
a decrease from pH from 7 to 4.5,

(44:18):
which is basically what it is, can lead
to the loss of most fish species including
important sport fish. So not a good start.
Right? So that means a pretty big deal.
If that if the pH is ultimately what
it ends up being in its final tests
and not just some kind of a fluke
on a preliminary test, that that seems to
be a pretty bad indication
of the immediate surrounding area.

(44:39):
And then and then the point being that
ranges for, basically meaning it's high right now,
it's pretty highly acidic, is what that would
mean, if I understand it correctly.
Then he goes on and he lists the
rest of the things he found. 4 methyl
2pentanone.
I'm not gonna try to pronounce some of
these. So here is this one. And I
just really quickly just wanted to look, okay,
what is it? What are the risks? Now
this one specifically, it it says its toxicity

(45:01):
is a no it's a known respiratory irritant
and can cause symptoms that that we're pretty
much seeing, wheezing, coughing, short of breath. Flammability
is very highly flammable, environmental concerns. So more
more than what I more of what I
was looking for, it can contain can contaminate
soil and groundwater if released into an environment.
So that seems to be the case. So
that already feels like it's not something that's
just naturally gonna be found. Potentially harming ecosystem

(45:22):
and wildlife. Depending on the level, obviously, but
that does seem to be a a bad
indication.
Health effects, prolonged repeated exposure. So that that
becomes the question about how long these things
have been there. As the health, it it
sup superior or or supervisor who died immediately
after testifying this company was hiding things,
he seemed to suggest this has been a
long thing that's been going on with multiple

(45:44):
disasters. And the community says the same thing.
So it may very well be this has
been an ongoing issue. Has been linked to
health effects, including headaches, disease, nod nausea, and
so on. So on the minor end, it
would seem. Then this one,
dibromoclonethane.
I probably
chopped the hell out of that. It is,
according to the, EWG, the environmental

(46:04):
working group, tap water database, it is specifically
a disinfection
byproduct
formed when chlorine or other disinfectants are used
to treat drinking water. So right there, I
found it interesting, but you could argue that's
simply because they're treating this water. But the
water seems to be in a location that's
not you wouldn't expect it to be treated.
We're talking drinking water. Right?

(46:25):
So the fact that that's in the water
tells me one of 2 things. Again, super
preliminary. Just giving you my thoughts.
Either this was something being done to the
water to try to hide what was happening,
or it was a byproduct of whatever the
chlorine products were being used or maybe when
it got burned that was produced. Either way,
it's not a good sign, I would argue.
Cancer risks classified as a problem with human
carcinogen, like most car carcinogens, excuse me, like

(46:47):
most of these things. And as usual, reproductive
and developmental issues suggested a possible association between
these and the things we tend to see.
Reproductive issues of, you know, spontaneous abortion.
Neurotoxicity has been shown to be a neurotoxic
issue in in animal studies and so on.
Like, pretty much most of the things that
are casually used in our environment that we
act like are safe in some levels, but

(47:07):
build up over time. And it's just this
odd that's one of the things I wanna
make next about this point about them removing
a neuro an issue, the EPA.
It's I get the
any one step is a positive step right
now. But the problem is that it's so
ubiquitous, and I and I I think we
can easily prove that they know that.
And so yet, they take this half hearted
step. And, you know, maybe it's a step

(47:28):
in the right direction. It's all gonna change.
But it's it's impossible for me to be
positive about where we are when you can
see overwhelming
evidence of how many things are there
that we can prove, the studies show are
dangerous, and they just don't care unless you
light a fire under their feet. And even
then, they try to put it out. And
some hope to dealing with the problem.
It's everywhere.
Next one is, acetone or, yeah. I think

(47:49):
acetone acetone.
A colorless solvent poses several several risks to
human health and the environment.
Poisoning and irritation of the, you know, eyes,
respiratory tract, like, all these things can lead
to poisoning in general. But larger amounts or
exposure by children can be harmful.
Environmental exposure is present okay. And this that's
what I was saying earlier. So it is
present in in the environment due to due

(48:10):
to natural and human made sources.
So natural would be
benign, I would argue, based on what I've
looked at. Small natural overlaps to certain things.
But when we're finding human made sources, that's
what we're dealing with today, such as and
it is again, forest fires, industrial activity, so
using chemicals in the environment is the same
point. Long term risks,
research show that it can cause damage to

(48:32):
livers, kidneys, nerves.
Human studies
show that it's unclear if it might affect
human over ex humans over extended period of
time,
classified as a hazardous substance by regulatory agencies.
And all these things are being, you know,
it's not and then oh, that's interesting. It
says,
workers handling
products containing this may be exposed to hazardous
levels,

(48:53):
emphasizing the importance of proper safety protocols.
Okay. That's what you're saying, something wearing something
while you're handling it. Then it says, chloroform.
Like chloroform, like we're familiar with, which is
interesting. A volatile organic compound. And it is
chloroform, so it's chlorine based. And it says,
poses significant
health risk due to its toxicity and carcinogenic

(49:13):
potential.
Acute exposure. So extreme high level, it says
it can cause liver kidney damage, like most
of these things.
Chronic, so prolonged experience, which might be the
case in this discussion.
Increased risk of liver kidney diseases, other health
issues. Cancer risk, like most of it. Environmental
per persistence
persists for a long time in both water
and air. So it's not a good sign

(49:34):
that it's there. Increasing the risk of exposure
of potential health effects. Now it could be
there from a long time ago, but the
point is it does persist. So that it's
there is not a good sign for the
issue in the environment.
Regulatory oversight, it is considered a hazardous substance
and its handling
are strictly regulated. Again, that it's there. I
find an interesting addition to all this. I
don't say I don't think personally, and I'm

(49:54):
not an expert on this, that that can
be, you know, or just randomly caused by
the byproduct.
So it seems
interesting.
Then bromoform.
Based on the searches, it is a
basically structurally similar to many other carcinogens.
The NTP, which we just heard from in
fluoride case, making sure you know that fluoride

(50:15):
is a neurotoxin and it's dangerous in your
water, and they're still fighting to make sure
they keep some level of it in your
water. That's literally what's happening right now.
As a possible carcinogen,
inhaling it causes risk, oral risk, so drinking
it obviously if it's in the water, transfer
from feed to food. Recent studies have raised
concerns about the potential transfer of this from
feed supplements containing
sewage algae to milk and meat. So again,

(50:36):
you can see a natural potential overlap there.
Regulatory guidelines,
The conclusions simply pose a potential carcinogenic risk
to humans through inhalation or oral exposure. So
in the water would meet that.
Then we have bro,
however you wanna say that. Bromod
chloromethane.

(50:56):
And that one is
similar. These are all the I mean, all
of these seem to be somehow chlorine connected,
which again is my not what I wanna
see. That is the conversation about the dioxin
overlap, which we're gonna hear about soon from
when he gets his updates. The the EPA
has classified this as a probable carcinogen. That's
more that's a higher level based on the
sufficient evidence of its carcin carcinogenicity

(51:17):
in experiment in in experimental animals.
Developmental risks for children,
as usual. Takeaways, it's probable carcinogen, can increase
cancer risks, fetal growth development, and so on.
And then butanone,
last one.
Based on research, results,
carcinogenic potential, adverse health effects, been linked to

(51:38):
potential adverse health effects in organs, nose tissue
particularly at moderate and high concentrations, so might
not be a risk in this case, inhalation
exposure. Now I wanna point out, though, just
because things are that they claim, you know,
at risk at high levels, my point is
always, it doesn't mean there's okay then there's
no risk. It just means that you have
that risk but at a much lower level.
You may not feel it, you may not
notice it, but it's a chemical that ultimately
has those risks at a high level. So

(52:00):
it's it's hurting your body, but at a
much lower level. That's the way you have
to think about these things, and it's these
things are
everywhere. So I thought that was important for
those that didn't wanna hear about it. Thank
thank you for humoring the point. I wanna
make sure people that are in Georgia know
about this stuff. Because just relate this to
East Palestine. You know how long it took
them to find out anything about what was
going on? And how how much people suffered
because of that? So Scott is trying to

(52:21):
give you the information as quick as he
can and doing it right.
Well, it seems that, yet again, the EPA
doesn't care. Because I don't I haven't heard
him mention any of this stuff. Why is
that? They've got their own testers. They've got
a $1,000,000,000,000 1,000,000,000
of dollars in their budget. No. Scott doesn't.
Interesting, isn't it? So I will include I'll
include the the the last two shows we
did about this. How, you know, the point

(52:42):
that it's potentially 6 times greater than he's
Palestine and in his recent point that he
argues this could be, based on, you know,
waiting on the results to be sure, the
greatest dioxin disaster in history.
It really does worry me, guys. I'm I'm
not just trying I mean, obviously, I've already
shown you the facts around this. The evidence
is undeniable.
The the studies that we've shown, it's all
in here. It's it's
I don't think debatable that this is a

(53:03):
dioxin risk. I think it's about how much.
And comparing it to Zveso
from Italy in 1979, that Time Magazine so
calls one of the top ten disasters in
history in in environmental disasters,
it seems to be all the basis base
the basics of the numbers seem to be
more here. But we'll have to wait and
see. I hope that I'm wrong.
Now talking about this,

(53:23):
this I believe comes from, IPAC, which is,
James Lyons Wilder's group. The title of the
platform is science, public health policy and the
law. EPA bans pesticide linked to irreversible
neurological damage to unborn babies.
It's just it's crazy. You know how long
this has been out there?
I'm gonna show you right now. This has
been discussed for years, if not a lot

(53:44):
longer.
So that irreversible
damage to unborn babies has been going on
for years, and it dragged their feet. I'm
even gonna show you right now, right out
of the gate, this is something that they
discussed
months ago.
Now think of when I'm trying to I
I get the the the reaction some might
have with one of the defendants. Say, well,
they can't just jump the gun. They have
to make sure. I get that. But what
I wanna compare it to is something like,

(54:05):
for example, the way they reacted during COVID
19, which we now know they were wrong
about, by the way. How they had to
they argued that the risk the potential.
It could be so bad, we have to
do it all now. Jump ahead. Shut it
down. Box you out. Lock you down. Right?
That's everything they did. Force the shots. Because
we could be
so why don't they apply the same like,
so now they have

(54:27):
provable evidence.
They already made the choice. We're gonna do
this. And then they wait months to do
it, and then finalize it.
So ask yourself why that would make sense.
Why they would jump the gun over here.
Again, I think we all know why. Because
there was more of the agendas, and I
don't think they really actually care about keeping
you safe. Not from the top.

(54:47):
But in this case,
irreversible neurological damage.
On the 6th August, they say, okay. We
we issue our emergency order.
Stop the use.
And then it continues to be used. Until
now, and this is October 22nd. And now
they finalize the cancellation. Okay. Now we stop.
How much one of that is still being
used? And will probably be used in a

(55:07):
1,000 different subways that we don't really talk
about, like I'll make a point about next.
Does this sound like a group that recognizes
an irreversible
threat to your babies? No. It sounds like
a group that is acting that way.
And really more so in a very
app I mean, on the surface ways acting
in the interest of business.
Which by the way, there's nobody that represents

(55:29):
that mindset better than Trump.
My obvious point would be that they're all
the same, but Trump is on the face
of the conversation
acting in the interest of business. He did
so during COVID 19 in ways that hurt
you, that we just like to pretend it's
somebody else's fault. But this written by Carrie
Gilliam says, citing a need to protect the
unborn babies of pregnant
women, you know, in this one example, so
they can make themselves look like they did

(55:49):
something good. Meanwhile, ignoring 45 other things to
do to have just the same amount of
issue. That's my point. The US and the
EPA on Tuesday banned a pesticide
that they've known about for years to kill
weeds on farms, golf courses at the because
that's that's so important. Right?
Think about the need to make sure that
these far these golf course owners can, you

(56:10):
know,
have a little bit of an easier problem
with these weeds. As opposed to dealing with
something healthier and, you know, having a little
bit more of a cumbersome problem. Damn. Those
weeds are getting in my way. Right? Now
screw with the unborn babies. I wanna kill
them faster.
That's actually what we're talking about here.
Fields, golf courses.
And farms, which is one of the biggest

(56:31):
issues because it ends up in your food.
But they let it continue based on that.
And I'm not even talking from August to
October. I'm talking about for years as this
gets debated. Shouldn't it be the immediate halt
like we were told during COVID just in
case?
And say pause everything until we find out
for sure because weeds aren't as important as
human life? Nah. You misunderstand what the EPA's
job is, apparently. But it goes on to

(56:52):
say, the action comes after years of mounting
scientific evidence just like with fluoride, by the
way, and they're still fighting to keep it
in your water, of the dangers posed by
exposure to the chemical,
simply put, DCPA,
or
dactyl.
It says, quote, with the final cancellation
again, final cancellation.
That was October, not the issued or emergency

(57:13):
order that let it go on for a
few more months. No. No. Not you'd be
mistaken if you thought that.
With the final cancellation, we're talk we're taking
a definitive step to protect pregnant women. Oh,
you're such a good person. Oh, you've shown
us you're all the white knights you pretend
to be while allowing all the rest of
Nikkiny to hurt people. While allowing I mean,
always the same point. Now maybe Michael Friedhoff

(57:34):
is the one there doing good work. Who
knows? He's the assistant administrator for the EPA.
And it says, the science showing the potential
for irreversible harm to unborn babies developing brains,
in addition to other lifelong consequences and exposure,
that's how bad this stuff is, demands decisive
action that takes us 4 months to actually
initiate.
Decisive in 5 months to remove the dangerous

(57:54):
chemical from the marketplace. And again, the joke
being it's not 5 months. This has been
going on for a long time.
So is it insulting they stand up and
say, our decisive action is to jump to
your rescue after we deliberated for years about
the thing we already could know. Just like
fluoride, guys, the science has been there.
But the company that makes money off of

(58:14):
this comes up and goes, I disagree.
My guys say different. And then what does
the EPA do? Oh, you're the administrator.
You have to make sure that we make
no. You're not supposed to worry about interest.
You're supposed to act in the health of
Americans
about the environment.
That's supposed to be your mandate, not playing
peacemaker between corporations and their interests.
But this is what a CAPTURE agency looks

(58:35):
like. It says the agency said, robust studies
demonstrated thyroid toxicity. Yes. And they've been there
for years. And said that unborn babies whose
pregnant mothers are exposed to this could experience
changes to their hormone levels. Oh, yet another
example of an endocrine disruptor.
So bottom line, that's what's happening.
Now, again, August 6th,
they feigned to stop it and let it

(58:57):
continue. And now the point is, as of
this 22nd of this month, they finalize the
cancellation. So I'd love to hear from somebody
who has any evidence that's still out there.
It's still on the shelves, still being sold,
or we know is it still being used?
I mean, I'm guaranteed that. Just like every
other example we've talked about.
And then the other point
so that's happening. It it still I'm look.
I I hate to be such a a

(59:17):
rain on the parade when that is a
positive thing. Right? It is a positive thing
to see that happen. I'm just trying to,
flavor this with the reality of what's actually
happening.
We can say that's a positive step. But
while we can prove there are other examples
of things still being used that do the
same thing and have just as much science
around them, it's
why aren't they doing that right now? Why

(59:39):
isn't that in one succession? Why isn't that
being announced today and the next day and
the next day? Because you're not making them
do that. Whatever interest drove that to happen,
whatever awareness, whatever, you know, whatever media coverage
made them feel they had to do that.
That's how I read the situation.
It's not happening here. So one of the
ones we talked about, I just quickly randomly
searched for other pesticides linked to the same

(59:59):
fetal brain damage. And you know what one
of the ones that comes up are? One
of the ones that come comes up is
pyrethroids.
That is the like, the most common pesticide
that we're using in this country. It's everywhere.
Certain pyrethroids have been shown to exert hormonal
activity, potentially altering early neurologic and reproductive you
know this already. You know why? Because we
talked about this more than once. One of

(01:00:21):
the most
recent conversations was in September 2023
when we talked about the obligatory pesticide spraying
in New York City. And GMO mosquitoes and
flying vaccinators, all of which are easily all
factual information coming from peer reviewed science.
Just because they sound like something you're told
to ignore does not mean they're fake. It's
all very easily proven.
The point was in this, we may we
discussed things like this.

(01:00:42):
This is
from, Oct it's 1998. It's an old study.
So that's my point. This stuff we know.
It says many pesticides possess hormonal activity,
and and have thus been classified as endocrine
disruptors.
Herrethroids are commonly used insecticides worldwide and the
United States in particular,
but little have been has been done. Now
I think, arguably, today, they're less you used

(01:01:04):
around the world, like, pretty much every other
thing. That's the craziest thing we're gonna make
a point about one of these articles next
is the EPA, they love just to sort
of hype themselves about DDT and how we
saved you from that. Except,
I think that probably in and of itself
was not it was a ploy. Since that
point forward, you look around look at, like,
GMOs and other things the world the world
is pretty much collectively banning. The the EPA

(01:01:25):
has allowed to continue in this country. In
some cases, things that we know are dangerous,
they stop, they just end up shooting out
somewhere else and dumping them in Africa.
The point
is that they know this. And these have
been around for a very long time. Perrethroids
are commonly used in insecticides,
but little has been done to characterize their
hormone
the the their the level of the the
level to what which they're an endocrine disruptor.

(01:01:47):
Now they tested 4 different primary ones, all
of which are used here. The main point
is exposure to certain prethroids may contribute to
reproductive dysfunction, developmental impairment, and cancer.
Yet they're still being used. Now you could
argue it's a lower issue. My point is,
as Americans,
or anywhere in the world, that's to not
be what we choose to lean into.
I can show you other examples, other natural

(01:02:08):
things that could be yes, and maybe they
don't work as well. But shouldn't we be
weighing it the other I mean, isn't it
our job to weigh it that way to
say, look. We should, you know, I don't
care if it's more convenient for you. We
should care about children having cancer. With children
being developmentally
nope. Because those things, I know this is
a dark point,
bring in more money
for the same industries.

(01:02:28):
You know that's part of this.
Or here's this one. This one's from night,
what was it again? 2015.
How science, pyrethroid insecticide exposure and cognitive development
disabilities in children.
So year after year, you've got these studies,
and it's the same point
here. Low level childhood exposure, low level. And
that's the point I found most important in
this. In particular to pyrethroid insecticides,

(01:02:51):
it says, in general,
may negatively affect neurocognitive
cognitive development by 6 years of age.
So exposing children to these insecticides while you're
pregnant,
they can have neuro neurocognitive
developmental issues by the age of 6.
How much I mean, these are these are
these studies are out there. You don't think

(01:03:11):
they know about them?
You can watch this if you want. And
by the way, the show from 21st before
this, the day before, we talked about similar
things.
So here's an interesting point. This is an
article from
2017.
Now in my research around that main point,
other things that cause neuro you know, brain
the very thing they were calling out in

(01:03:32):
that one chemical, DCPA or whatever it was,
and saying, this is why we have to
stop it. Right? I broadly search for other
things that have that problem. Right?
One I just showed you. Here's one that
you might find interesting.
In our last article, this guy's writing in
2017 for Sight Line Institute. He says,
in our last article on specifically
chlorpi

(01:03:53):
I actually forgot to look this up, the
the pronunciation.
Chlorpyrifos,
again, chlor, chlorine, that's where it comes from,
same point.
We asked. And before you go forward,
this was the point we keep making in
that CNN article from 95.
That the point was how dangerous this all
was. Right? How incredibly dangerous the the, specifically,

(01:04:14):
dioxins, but they make the case, as you
should know today because of our work. Excuse
me. Got the hiccups all of a sudden.
That chlorine is
the the the issue.
Chlorine is what makes or breaks dioxins. Dioxins
being with the TCD specifically the most dangerous
thing on the planet.
So,
the point in that article was we need
to get rid of these chlorine products, which
should be a no brainer. And guess what

(01:04:35):
happened? The chlorine industry said, no. We can't
do that. But to test each one individually
and go forward. And yeah. They said, yes.
Okay. We agree. Well And then nothing happened.
Business as usual
taking
the the lead.
So now here we are today with all
these different things and then seemingly many of
them drive connecting back to the very central
point we would have discussing. Let me see

(01:04:55):
if I can have that pop up.
What is that? Not this one. I think
that's this one of them is gone.
Here it is. Nope. That's not it.
Well, this is gone. Like I show I've
shown you this more than once.
Gone because they deleted the article.

(01:05:16):
Even though it was just there months ago,
I've shown it to you many times. Now
all of a sudden, CNN goes, hey. Delete
that article of 1995 that we've had up
for years. I wonder why, ladies and gentlemen.
I wonder why.
Could just be one of those coincidences. But
guess what? We still have it for now
on archive.ph.
This is the one I've shown you many
times. Dioxins may be creating a larger problem
down the road. Too late. We're already there,

(01:05:37):
and they knew it back then. And I've
shown you this a 1000 times. All the
way back then saying you were finding 8
to a 150
times more dioxins than EPA said was safe
in your Pizza Hut, in your Kentucky Fried
Chicken. And guess what? They said, we should
do something. This is very serious. And then
didn't do anything. Let it get much, much
worse to this point today. And as I
showed you,

(01:06:01):
the chlorine was the was the issue.
And they're saying that we need a new
chlorinated compound should be proved safe before in
our environment. Yep. And that's not what's happening.
But,
as it says down here,
the chlorine industry believes each one should be
tested and judged separately. Did that happen? I
see no evidence of that. So all they
did was pivot and act like we had
to do more investigation, and then didn't actually

(01:06:21):
follow through with that investigation. And here we
are today with these problems being hidden, and
the
chlorpyrifos
is one that should have been removed already.
Now here's the going back to the point,
2017. He goes in our last article on
chlorpyr chlorpyrifos,
they asked, will the Trump administration
cancel an old dangerous pesticide?

(01:06:42):
Well, it did not. Now this was being
put to during Trump. Now this is also
obviously overlapping with the supposed make America healthy
again dynamic. Now I will always leave open
the possibility whether Trump or anybody else
that that might change. Maybe he'll decide to
do something positive this time. You you know,
I can say the same for Kamala. What's
funny is I guarantee some of the people
will listen. No. No. She she's a shit.
You know, the point is, you should be

(01:07:03):
able to consider the possibility you could be
wrong. Maybe she will do the good thing.
Maybe he will do the good thing. I
doubt both of them. My point is that
maybe he'll listen to RFK or maybe RFK
does want the good thing. I don't think
that's the case. I think the evidence is
through the roof showing you that's not the
case. But the point is, off that hopeful
note, it didn't happen then. So all we
have is the history and the pre and

(01:07:24):
the precedents and what he did and what
he promised and didn't follow through with to
consider now.
So he and his administration chose to make
sure this didn't go away, even though everybody
was asking for it.
So here it is in 2018.
Okay? A year later. The EPA isn't taking
its own advice on a pesticide that causes
brain damage.
This is the same conversation. It says, if

(01:07:45):
there's another another another chemical
my point is they're everywhere, guys.
For whatever reason, they have to give you
a token when they want you to think
that they're doing something. The point is that
this is again
chlorpyrifos.
And after decades of research,
the EPA was on the cusp of banning
this provably dangerous thing that, by the way,
is now banned,

(01:08:05):
and they didn't.
No. That's the Trump administration. They they they
may they did not. They pulled it back,
and they didn't. Now that's despite the science.
That's not about science. That's about business. That's
the whole point I'm making. Now I don't
think Kamal is any different. My point is
for those that wanna believe Trump is the
different case, well, there's no evidence for that.
In fact, there's evidence all over the place
for the opposite.
And they allowed this to be used

(01:08:28):
and hurt children until the next conversation.
So here we are in 2019.
EPA rejects ban on common pesticide linked to
brain damage. So people were still trying to
get this dangerous thing put away, and in
2019, they rejected the ban again.
4 chlorpyrifos.
And that's, again, the Trump administration.

(01:08:49):
So knowing it's dangerous, even the EPA was
building the case that it was dangerous, and
then they, oh, well, we can't. Never mind.
Never mind. Science doesn't matter. Industry is what
matters.
Here we are in 2021.
EPA
reverses Trump era rule and bans pesticides linked
to neurological damage in children. Now
I'm not in any way suggesting good guy,
bad guy here. I don't think the Biden

(01:09:09):
administration cares at all.
But just like in any other political dynamic,
or like what's happening right now, they they
they want you to think we care.
So my point would be, if they did
care, and I hope they do, and I
hope we'll see them start to fall like
dominoes, I don't believe it,
That ultimately, they have an interest to in
in showing you that, and so they pluck
a couple about and say, look at what
we removed. What about the other 1,000 of

(01:09:31):
them used right alongside them that you all
know about? They're they're in a whole category
of dangerous things that they use in the
same exact fall. They know they moved this.
They have another one.
But they did to make sure. So if,
the facts are that the Trump administration
did not did not maintained it's being used
even with the EPA arguing it was dangerous.
They maintained it. They kept every year, they

(01:09:52):
were fighting to get it removed. And every
year, they kept it. Now in 2021, they
removed it. That's the same one. That's
the chlorpiferous.
Now, I'm right at that same point, by
the way. I didn't have time to get
into it deeper, but if how much you
wanna bet that's probably used somewhere in this
country? Probably from a government discussion.
I mean, I'm not I'm just completely
hypothetical, but I not even the slightest would

(01:10:14):
that surprise me. Even though they claim this
is the case. Because it's about you and
your perception.
Now, here is from 2022.
How the EPA's lacks regulation of dangerous pesticides
is hurting public health in the US economy.
Interesting. Since 19 seventies, the EPA has been
tasked with using the best available science to

(01:10:35):
regulate pesticides. Well, obviously, that's not true. Seeing
it's now the best available science with fluoride
or everything we've talked about, and the ones
we just pointed to. Like, even if you
argue it eventually gets banned, it took them
years
ignoring the science. Now that's again, you could
argue politics was
overtaking science in that case, but then why
weren't they standing up and protesting? Why didn't

(01:10:55):
they leave their job? If I was in
the EPA and I said this will kill
people and they go in too bad, I
would leave. Obviously, I'm not in this position.
You don't care my opinion. This is about
pa that's some of the people are doing
that today. Whether in the foreign policy conversation,
we see people yet again, a new one
of the state department resigning in protest.
But why didn't it happen here?
But it says, but a more amounting body
of evidence indicates that the agency

(01:11:17):
long heralded for its decision to ban DDT,
far far far far far too late, has
evolved into a more timid regulator that has
not kept pace with the rest of the
world. Now that's a fun that's an objective
fact.
So as Americans, shouldn't we go how we
you can't, you know especially those who like
to beat their chest and say we're number
1, well, we're not. Not even close. And
the and the sad reality is, and that's

(01:11:38):
not the way it could or should be.
It could be different,
Rather just that it could be better. We
could in crew improve what we are and
how good we are and that whatever you
feel that's the whatever moniker is important to
you. But in this case, we're not.
And they are showing that. Whether it's GMOs
or pesticides or any number of things that
are still being done. Even during the COVID
19 conversation, a lot of these things were

(01:12:00):
shown.
But just to quickly show you
this, here is a list.
Oh, this I wanted to read this part
first too. And it says, for example,
6 years after
first proposing to do so, the EPA recently
banned all food uses of, again, clopiphyros, the
one we just talked about. A pesticide known
to harm the developing brains of young children,

(01:12:22):
following multiple legal victories by farm workers and
public health advocates. That's why, guys,
there's there is the catalyst. The fact that
they sued, that it made a big splashy
case about it, that people were being harmed.
They were bringing big public case about it.
So they have to. This is what it
looks like to begrudgingly take an action that
you've been denying for years
despite the science.

(01:12:43):
But it says, however, the agency has left
in place, and here's my point,
all non food uses of the pesticide,
prolonging exposure to farm workers and nearby communities
from places like golf courses, cotton fields, Christmas
tree farms. So they lied.
So they go, okay. We'll say we'll take
it away because it's hurting your children. Right?
So we'll stop it from being sprayed on

(01:13:04):
food. But guess what? It's sprayed on your
neighbor's yard. It's sprayed on the golf course
next to you. It's sprayed on the open
fields and the parks.
This is the point where men it's everywhere.
And if they know that, then why are
they using it? They could use something that
doesn't cause those things because they do exist.
And all it's about is reducing the weeds?
It says meanwhile, many states, driven by public

(01:13:25):
outcry and serious concerns raised by scientists, have
already moved to completely prohibit the pesticide, leaving
in place a patchwork of regulations in the
US that benefits neither agriculture
nor broader public health. It benefits industry.
That's what they do. Now here's a list
of all the,
agricultural pesticides that are approved in the US,

(01:13:47):
but guess what? Are banned or in the
process of being banned in all of the
European Union, China, or Brazil.
You ready? Because it'll blow your mind.
So for those in the podcast, you're looking
at a really, really long list. And some
of these you'll recognize. Some of these you'll
go, oh, I remember that. Didn't we just
talk about Atrazine? Yeah, we did. These are

(01:14:08):
dangerous, guys. Not because of the ridiculous comment
from Alex Jones, be which actually hid the
dangers there for a really long time. But
the reality of how all of these, most
of them are endocrine disruptors. And it wasn't
just the frogs, it was about the entire
environment. And the hormonal manipulation. And not necessarily
turning them gay. I mean, you couldn't have
made that stupider because the reality is it's
a broad conversation.

(01:14:29):
Now, yeah, you may argue that saying it
like that got attention, but it got the
wrong attention. It it it buried the story.
Even if it maybe reached some of you.
It was not the way you should've been.
It's that's my whole point about this stuff.
But here's the one we just talked about,
DCPA,
the one that they are now removing. The
point is, it's all of these are banned
elsewhere. I mean, guys, this goes on forever.
These are alphabetized

(01:14:50):
down to 0.
All of these are banned other places that
are allowed in this country. They know. If
you you take the time if you want
to to look up every single one of
them. Every single one of them has a
peer reviewed study that says this will harm
your child.
How you know how many are used
all over your neighborhood?
Used at the park near your family where
your child plays?

(01:15:11):
And, I mean, it's just it's just it
kills me how obvious this is. So the
back to the larger point, if you think
this is gonna change based on the Trump
administration, I hope you're right. Every indication shows
the other shows the opposite.
Other than possibly having RFK being there.
And, again, that is if you believe, and
which is hard for me to do this
this point in time with anything he says

(01:15:32):
based on the reality of the
blind support for a genocide, while pretending to
be pro anti war. All that shows you
is that you could be you're you're anti
war, except because of interest, because of agendas,
because of compromise. Okay. Well, then you're not
honest. Or you're being driven to be dishonest.
So that's simply the reality.
But, yes, his work around of health dynamic
is amazing. And I've, like, I really do

(01:15:54):
believe and I still point to some of
the stuff he said or did around that
conversation. Because as always, it's not about him
saying it, it's about the fact that they're
factual.
But it's not like I said, this nothing
says Maha like McDonald's. Right, guys? Because Trump
was recently at McDonald's. We're funny enough, right
as there's this big discussion about quarter pounders
causing e coli all around the country,
it just it just it's almost a joke.

(01:16:15):
There's no way in the world you would
lean into a seed oil fake, you know,
fake food factory
that's all I mean, without question making you
exponentially hit unhealthy
and act like that's in any way connected
to me, why wouldn't you go to some
healthy person? The point is I'm about to
make the point with the other tweet somebody
shared,
that there's no connection between these two things.

(01:16:39):
Doctor Jane Ruby, before we get past that
on the point of the 2 party illusion,
wants to point this out about, you know,
at the same point, coming from the whole
conversation of COVID 19, the injections. Let's not
forget JD Vance and Peter Thiel. I mean,
even Elon Musk with his micro factories. They
are immersed
in this field.
And as doctor June, Jane Ruby points out,
many of you are acting okay with JD

(01:17:01):
Vance investing in future mRNA production. A deadly
biological weapon in her opinion, which I wouldn't
I I mean, I don't know if I
would frame the mRNA
production as a biological weapon, but I'll sure
as hell tell you that I that's not
a far stretch for me. I would argue
that the platform is what you can create
them with. Right? Either way, I'm very concerned
with the m one methylpseudouridine

(01:17:22):
modified RNA, not organic substance that is deadly.
Now you you could argue that that very
well makes your case for it. But my
point is simply that I do agree. This
is a dangerous thing. And she says, because
you think if you don't take any of
it, you'll be fine?
Well, realize that that means they're supporting this.
That's Trump saying the addiction saves lives,
knowing that it doesn't. Potentially killing somebody's child

(01:17:43):
or them family.
Is that okay for politics? That's okay to
happen as long as you win the election?
Like, how does anybody pretend that's even morally
sound?
It says, but his ownership in in in
a company
is in a company that is making self
replicating synthetic RNA. It means it will multiply
and were easily transferred to those who do
not take it.

(01:18:04):
It says you are well, no. This is
close to me. It says you are at
war and this is an incoming
assault on your lives and your health. But
you keep burying your head in the sand.
Maha, hashtag Maha. Make America healthy again. It's
amazing to me that we can ignore stuff
like this. Right? I mean, it's it's I
guess the only argument is that it's the
right kind of mRNA, or that it's a
it's a 4 d chess move to manipulate

(01:18:25):
it and throw it all away. I mean,
it's it's blind,
blind
wishful thinking.
You just blind I mean, you realize, they're
not even saying that. That's you looking at
a a a fact
and just making up a story to make
that fact not a problem.
Very, very alarming to me that people can
do that.
This person says, it is indeed troubling.

(01:18:46):
If recently added to his company, he may
not know. See my point? Or perhaps he
may be may believe in inoculations. Mister Gates'
daughter daughter's files were leaked that she has
not even had childhood stand in vain. Like,
where are you going? My god. Like, just
flailing about, trying to be like, but he
might not be. We we we don't need
to grasp at straws to make just argue
maybe that maybe there's something that makes that

(01:19:07):
case. That's that's the same thing as saying
maybe this, maybe that. Both are, in my
opinion, a wishful thought. She says it's not
added to his company.
What part about he started the company with
Vivek Ramaswami do you not get? 2 people
of this growing administration are part of this.
I mean, Elon Musk as well. So, technically,
3. And Theo, so 4. But he says,
and you might wanna ask yourself a very
serious question as to why you bent over

(01:19:29):
backwards to defend and protect people that are
in the act of committing crimes against humanity.
Now you may disagree with the framing, but
you realize that before this current administration, during
Trump's or even just after, before this started
developing for the next election,
Every one of these people would have agreed
with that framing in the context of the
shot
related to Biden.

(01:19:49):
But now
it's somehow this mental gymnastics feat to try
to make these things separate.
I don't know why the average conservatives that
do see these things, who don't you know,
who still wanna vote for Trump, but how
does this make you comfortable? How do you
not reckon I mean, I I almost answered
my own question in this case because I
already know what you're because
who else are I gonna vote for? That's

(01:20:10):
that's the trap that you're all stuck in.
I hope you can recognize that
I mean, there's a lot of other choices.
Even just simply not participating
is a va more valid choice than falling
in line.
But we've talked about abstention. We've talked about
3rd parties. We've talked about the vote pack
conversation. We've talked about exit and build in
general, which doesn't just mean move somewhere else,
but you can pull out of these systems

(01:20:30):
and function and and be politically active in
far more influential ways.
And it's an illusion to think that you
have to this this game is what you
have to first check yourself about.
Now here oh, I think this was yeah.
Glad I remember that because I wanna read
what she said. I'll I'll play this clip
first. Shauna made a quick a quick breakdown
about this. Now this is RFK Jr. Sharing

(01:20:52):
Tulsi Gabbard, who is sitting there with Charlie
Kirk. You know, this bastion of of intent.
It's just this is funny to me. And
the the people that are aligning that they're
lining up with this administration, it's just interesting.
And you would have never expect Gabbard and
RFP junior to be like body body with
Charlie Kirk.
About it just seems like a weird disjointed
overlap because these people have been showing themselves

(01:21:12):
to be shockingly dishonest around very partisan content.
And I'll even argue that they probably, at
one point, called them out for these things.
Now suddenly, they're all teamed up. And what's
funny is you can show every one of
them. RFK about the rest of them. Tulsi
about Trump. Trump about the others. JD Vance
about Trump. All of them saying they're terrible,
and they're a cheat, and they're a shill.
RFK is a plant for the democrats. Now

(01:21:33):
they're all together.
I just sure. Maybe that's all a positive
thing, but that's also a hope because there's
nothing that makes sense of this. But here
is what Tulsi said.
Things I'm excited about with president Trump winning
is because of the people that he's chosen
to surround himself with. Mhmm. Number 1, as
as Charlie said
One of my biggest concerns, by the way.

(01:21:53):
How funny the difference can be. Right?
He's surrounding himself with alarming people, just like
last time, in different flavors,
but she says so, so let's follow along.
The democrat told you.
There are no lobbyists for big pharma and
big insurance sitting on the transition team Right.
To pick who is going to fill his
cabinet.
That's a huge lie, and I'll show you

(01:22:14):
why. There may and and by the way,
we don't even know that may very well
may change tomorrow, because it hasn't really happened
yet. But whether they're lobbyists
or the people that the lobbyists would want
to put there.
See what I'm saying? So maybe there's no
lobbyists, but let's just say, as we'll show
you next, that they're gonna have the big
big minds from business and pharma and bank.
Yeah. That's what Howard just told us.

(01:22:36):
So the point is that those are the
people that lobbyists
want to put there. So you're just skipping
the middle man. But, nay, no lobbyists, guys.
See how it works?
That's a huge difference from any previous administration
from either party. Yep. They're the biggest lobbyists.
You've got Bobby Kennedy who is sitting in
position and already starting to choose people who

(01:22:57):
recognize how broken our sick care system is
Sure. And bring about the deeply,
the the systemic
change that we need to see that will
actually put our health and well-being first. That's
not just about pushing pills on people to
make big pharma richer, but actually dealing with
the root causes. You know, like taking a
COVID shot that Trump tells you to get,

(01:23:17):
because that all lines up. Right? Of why
our country is so sick and why how
we can improve life for the American people.
Nope. Well, based on his last administration, I
hope you're right though. I really do. Tulsa's
exactly right. There I don't care what Kirk
says. Okay. So the point is that ultimately,
that seems like a weird overlap to me.
I I I don't I don't think that
they like, if you would have told
if you would have highlighted them before,

(01:23:40):
it it just doesn't I mean, again, I
know that some people wanna look at this
and maybe you're right. The unity party, you're
bringing everyone together, except it's not what's happening.
Right? You what you have is some people
that claim they were democrats who just jumped
teams, which is an ideological
or really a principled
black hole. Like, that means that means the
exact opposite of what you pretend it means.
That means that you would never held anything

(01:24:02):
sacred or that you've always held the opposite
tenants and now suddenly you're admitting that. Like,
it just doesn't make any sense because we're
not supposed to believe that they just have
that you could just jump sides. Like, my
point has always been if you're a democrat
and you believe in this team, then then
then maintain that and simply say you're supporting
them. But jumping sides simply means that you
never truly held anything and, you know, your
integrity just is fair weather.

(01:24:25):
But my but the the overall the oh,
I had one more point. It was the,
I don't know. I I guess it's interesting
to me that they're in in general, that
the the overlap is there. There was one
other thing I was gonna say.
Shoot. But anyway, the bottom line
is that to me,
the the kind of meshing of all them
together reveals the big illusion. Oh, I I

(01:24:46):
guess the idea being that the unity party,
that's what it was. And the idea being
that, you know, just you could pretend that
that makes them the unity party, and all
you have is my point was the people
that jumped over.
But anybody else that doesn't, they're being attacked.
Right? They're calling and and half the party
is also criticizing them for even working with
Democrats. I'll show you next. So the point
is this unity party is a is a
facade within their own organization.

(01:25:07):
Because it's not a unity party if you're
only selecting. The unity would be the idea
that you're welcoming anybody. We're all we're trying
to unite everybody. Now
having some people that are token democrats is
not a unity party. What you're doing is
recreating the 2 party illusion with a very
lazy half step to a new thing. That's
like saying patriots and everybody else. That didn't
work, but they tried. Now they're just trying

(01:25:27):
something else. It's all about keeping you invested
in the illusion of this dynamic.
And and and a bigger point about the
idea of health?
I mean, really? Even after just just what
we just covered. But a 1,000 other things
we've shown you. The the pushing of ventilators
or masks or the shots itself or bit
McDonald's or any number of other things just

(01:25:48):
in the recent time frame that seem to
completely contradict that. But here's what Shauna has
to say, which I agree. I think she
makes a great point here.
She says, the unification of Maha and MAGA
is one of the most interesting, albeit bizarre
things she's ever seen. They are delivering vastly
different platforms
and don't appear to be coordinating their messaging

(01:26:08):
in any way. I I I see the
same thing. Everything each says completely defies and
contradicts the other. It's clear to anyone on
the outside that there's very little communication between
them. They host separate events and claim totally
different campaign priorities. For example, while Maha make
America healthy again travels the country touting the
idea that Trump will bring about world peace,

(01:26:29):
Trump holds rallies and interviews promising to ramp
up war with Iran, blindly supporting Israel, I
added that. Or and provide Israel any military
or monetary support they request.
Maha also says that Trump's top priority will
be our health and the environment. However, in
Trump's speeches, he promises to prioritize deporting illegal
and illegal and legal immigrants and deploy the

(01:26:49):
national guard or the yeah. The army national
guard to arrest any political opponents.
He also promotes processed food and oppose the
living wage. And a thousand other examples I've
shown you about the leaning into things that
are more business interest than health. But on
top of the the the point I think
I'll make one point about in a second
again,
the idea of deporting people. Like, it's just
so frustrating to me that people you'll come

(01:27:11):
out and say, we'll deport the foreign Jihad
supporters. Right? That's one of the recent clips
you just said. So when you come out
and say he's gonna violate your free speech,
that's not what he said. It's just it's
so if Kamala, Trump, or any other democrat
came out and said something like we're gonna
get rid of the
fascists,
the Nazis,
The point would be they're they're gonna say
that means republic. Well, yeah, you're right. That

(01:27:32):
is what it means. Why you can't piece
it together that saying that means democrats
or anybody waving the Palestinian flag as they've
already made clear, as Elon Musk said openly,
that we should deport anybody using those flags,
or Trump himself has said anybody. On the
record, I have the videos saved in that
thread I'll show you next,
that people who are supporting this

(01:27:54):
should be removed. Or simply saying the most
obvious, we'll remove the Jew haters from the
country.
Which, by the way, I would agree. If
somebody blindly hates Jews for no reason, it's
a disgusting person.
But they have a right to feel that
way and a right to express it. That's
protected
inherent rights that are outlined by the constitution.
If you don't agree with that, then you

(01:28:14):
simply don't believe in free speech, and and
that's a conversation we can have.
But it's infuriating that people can point at
that and say, that's not what he really
said. Yeah. He did though, but you're only
taking this in one context when he said
47 other times in many other interviews that
that's what be would be the case. But
even if he never did,
the argument
of let of taking somebody who is in

(01:28:35):
a protest,
waving at a Palestinian flag, who may even,
let's just say, be from another country, but
also has US citizenship, which that's most of
what they're pointing to, guys.
And you just go deport you because I
say that is a violation of their rights.
It doesn't matter what and on top of
that, the conversation about precrime is everywhere.
The idea the conversation, like he says, about

(01:28:55):
taking the guns away.
Do that and due process later.
He was talking about gun mass shooters, this
one person recently said. And yet, like, in
my I had to almost laugh out loud.
Yeah, lady. That's our point. As Whitney Webb
has outlined, you're telling us that you're gonna
take a gun away from somebody you think
is about to commit a crime? Like, as
much as you may think that's logical with
all the hype around school shooters,

(01:29:16):
even though you may and let's just even
say it may save some lives. You can
you cannot on the side of that idea,
the hypothetical, even if it's a positive,
in the lieu of your rights.
The point is that I the there are
already rules and laws in place. And, yes,
you can investigate and try. You cannot then
jump in and just go take away their
gun,
take away their free speech, and then deal

(01:29:36):
with it afterward. Even if you have the
best of intentions, that is not only a
slippery slope, that is a guaranteed
decline
in their allow or their,
in,
acknowledgment of your inherent rights.
And it's it's amazing that people can't wrap
their ride around that. That you're making our
point for us.
You because you don't like the group he's
pointing to, Whether it's well, you can call

(01:29:57):
them ISIS supporters, you can just call them
people. You know, whatever you I don't give
they may even be that.
If you're an American, you still have rights.
It's just amazing to me that we even
the US government has created this caveat where
you like, that happened during the war on
terror where there was a journalist they accused
of being an ISIS member, and they just
threw rights. It was an American. Rights were
removed.
Arrested indefinitely for the longest. And, oh, ultimately,

(01:30:19):
I believe the person was released, but the
point was that they were able to do
that.
And he was claiming he was just there
covering for for being a journalist. It's the
same reason they're calling
people covering things and Gaza terrorists.
There's an overlap to all of this.
Going forward,
he says, MAHA also says that Trump's top
priority will be our health and environment.
He says the connection between MAHA and MAGA

(01:30:40):
is nothing more than superficial.
It is clear
they have completely different intentions. While I believe
MAHA may be co opting MAGA, she writes,
in hopes of sneaking in their agenda,
There is no apparent evidence that MAGA will
oblige. Maja makes their supporters promises they cannot
keep. Now even if you believe that, doesn't
that seem like there's there's no connectivity there?

(01:31:03):
One's trying to abuse the other or vice
versa or both at the same time.
And she it says, similarly,
MAGA is totally fine with pretending to be
on board with MAGA
goals if it means more votes for Trump.
Now that shouldn't even be an attack on
Trump. That's just how politics works, guys. They're
all dishonest. They will say whatever you wanna
hear to hopefully get your vote, which by
the way is also why I make the
point about how jarring it is

(01:31:25):
that that seemingly the only conversation in all
of US politics that doesn't apply
is Israel.
Note that.
Understand what that means. In any other context,
these people would sell their grandmother for or
just just to get you to vote for
them or lie or tell you they would.
Knowing that it doesn't matter because they don't
have to do it. They'll just tell you

(01:31:46):
whatever you wanna hear. Now we've always known
about politics.
But suddenly, when it's Israel, they will shout
down their own supporters, their own constituents
for a foreign country.
That's Brian Mast for you and all the
rest. Recognize what that means.
But it says, they'll they'll they'll likely pretend
that they have no contractual obligation to Maha.
That's the point being that once they once

(01:32:06):
they, in my opinion,
obviously get selected,
then they'll just pretend like, well, you know,
we might. We'll think about it. We're on
our own. It's in
I mean, ultimately, who knows what will happen?
But I think all the writing on the
wall seems to indicate that that's not at
the very least, it's just completely up in
the air.
So there's a lot of people on this
train that think they're voting for this and

(01:32:26):
that alone. But she says, this experiment has
been a testing ground for the idea that
political groups with different political goals can find
enough common ground to unify and defeat a
common enemy.
They may succeed, but at what cost?
1 or the other will find themselves on
the hook for something they never wanted or
agreed to and may never see a slow
single policy goal enacted. Now that last paragraph,
I wouldn't even or I would agree disagree

(01:32:47):
with in the sense that I just don't
think that's what's happening. I don't think we're
in some, you know like, you may even
argue that that outcome would be sufficient for
some of these people. And maybe it is
for most people to find some kind of
a middle ground. I don't believe that they
care about any of this stuff.
I believe this is politics at its root,
at its core. And all we're watching is
them trying to throw whatever they can at
the wall and whatever sticks. Even if they're

(01:33:09):
throwing multiple things at the same time.
I don't I'm not getting it. I am
very jaded when it comes to this conversation.
But hopefully,
history has shown us that this is where
we should be lined up. Now she says,
does this, does this seem like a unified
campaign? And by the way, apparently, this keeps
happening, as Shanann Joy points out. They have
a MAHA event, and they cancel it. They
keep doing this.
Canceled now due to changes in presidential schedule.

(01:33:30):
It could be the case, but it specifically
keeps happening with the make America healthy again
town halls.
Yeah. I don't know. You can read into
what you want, or maybe nothing.
Too many McDonald promotional tour stops, she writes.
Exactly.
And then another case in point, here's Kimberly
Kimberly Ross saying, Tulsi Gabbard isn't a conservative.
So this is a freelance columnist for

(01:33:52):
a couple different platforms, a a a stated,
you know, conservative, saying that neither is RFK
Jr.
They and then she says, I don't welcome
either to the right side of the aisle.
If people we uphold
as examples of fighting the left, which that
is a what a far too many Republicans
view as the dynamic,
fighting the other side as opposed to trying

(01:34:13):
to find common ground while pushing back and
standing your ground on your principles and your
ideals. Like, why the framing of the other
side in any dynamic as the enemy outside
of ongoing war is part of a manipulation.
I mean, that's personally, it's for you to
decide. But I'm talking from, like, a governmental
perspective. They're framing other Americans as the enemy
for obvious reasons. They both do it. It's

(01:34:34):
not unique to either side. And that's why
we end up in a position and really,
really started post Donald Trump's first administration.
Where it became not just that we disagree,
but you're actually the enemy. You're gonna destroy
this country. You're going to murder me if
I let you. That's where this got that's
where it is now for most of them.
And now they're just kinda clumsily jamming in
this unity idea when most of them are
like, screw that. And you could look at

(01:34:54):
them. They're saying it online.
Saying the same thing.
If people we uphold as examples of fighting
the left can't uphold basic tenets of conservatism,
then we deserve to lose. And that's kinda
the point they're making from before, not the
same reason she is, but that you can't
pretend like somebody who's been a lifelong democrat
could just jump sides and just and that
you should even take it seriously. That you
should have respect for somebody who would just

(01:35:17):
drop their ideals and pick up a new
set because it's advantageous for them.
It's it's wild.
And that's that's an article from Washington Examiner.
Why conservatives should stop cheer cheerleading for Tulsi
Gabbard.
Here's another one. She,
she's right about democrats, but Tulsi Gabbard's no
conservative. It's interesting.
Interesting.
Now, to the point of before.

(01:35:38):
What'd Gabbard tell you? Well, we're not gonna
allow any of the lobbyists in for big
pharma, for all the rest. Oh, is that
true? Well, I still doubt that's prob I
I I I'm willing to bet you anything
that'll end up not being accurate. But even
if it is,
this is what Howard himself, who was the
one
picking the team.
Here's what he had to say.

(01:35:59):
It's,
mister Ludnick. Ludnick. Sorry. Thank you for the
pronunciation correction. Yeah. Howard Ludnick, Cantor Fitzgerald. I
do know that. I recognized you without even
having to look at So in the 1st
Trump administration,
a lot of lobbyists got appointed to prominent
cabinet positions Same point. For
defense secretary, for example, with Michael Tracy, by
the way, interviewing Raytheon, lots of other examples.

(01:36:20):
Is that a
philosophy that you would wanna see perpetuated in
a second Trump administration? Would it differ? What's
the status of that?
No lobbyists
are part of the transition.
So
I don't think so at all. I think
we have the greatest group
of potential,
you know, people who wanna serve that you've

(01:36:42):
ever seen. We have the leaders
of America from technology,
pharmaceuticals,
business,
defense. They're all Okay.
Okay.
So
if we're talking about lobbyists,
and we understand what lobbyists are doing. Right?
Lobbyists are there to try to initiate because

(01:37:03):
of who the the lobbyists are being hired
to to act in the interest of big
pharma and what any number of things, including
for politicians themselves. So the point is
you're talking about people who'd be put in
these positions because they are fighting for an
interest who's paying them.
And what are those interests?
Well, that's the same point. And that's what
what Gabor just said. No lobbyists for big
pharma, for bit defense.

(01:37:24):
You know why? Because they're already there. Because
big pharma and defense are already being placed
on the teams. They don't need the lobbyists
there to advocate for them. They're already there.
I just think it's wild that we can
pretend that anybody who's, you know, an outsider
fighting the deep state while literally aligning it's
like the last time. You say he's an
outsider fighting the deep state, but then he
picks Mike Pompeo, John Bolt. He literally handpicks

(01:37:45):
the deep state.
Oops. He made a mistake. He was fooled.
He made a mistake. Yeah. Hope so. But
pretty obviously that's not true. Now here we
are again. And is it that simple? Are
we that easy to manipulate?
He literally tells you he's handpicking the heads
of industry, why that is what people want.
I mean, let's put it this way. It's
not. It's not what the majority of conservatives

(01:38:06):
believe that they're pointing to and what they're
talking about,
at least based on my interpretation of what
I see discussed. Or they're all lying and
they want you to believe it while they
want something else. I don't know. But it's
clear that what they're presenting is the opposite.
And so all they have to do is
go, yeah. No lobbyists, but we'll just skip
that step and put them right on the
team.
Why do why do we want leaders of
big pharma? Why do we want leaders of

(01:38:27):
the the defense
on a an administration
who's supposed to be fighting what they represent?
Or it or at all for that matter.
We don't want money to interest for the
biggest issues in the country today
sitting on their team, on a transition team
for picking who's going to be a part
of everything else. It just seems like a
no brainer to me. I know we're not

(01:38:47):
this stupid.
Willing to both willing to serve. You saw
Elon Musk is willing, right, willing to add
that and Take a cabinet position? No. I
think he'll be an adviser.
Right? And he's gonna help I don't know
about that. Trump I mean, Trump seems to
have explicitly stated he'll be the department of,
of government
efficiency or something like that, that wouldn't be

(01:39:09):
an advisor. I mean, I guess you could
name it advisor
as a title like that. But to me,
that's a I mean, even if you're advisor,
by the way, you're still part of the
government. You're still part of his administration.
That still would pertain to how he conducts
himself on Twitter as any in any number
of different things. But that's one point in
a larger conversation. I'm much more worried about
him being a part of it because of
where this technocratic drive goes. But any case,

(01:39:31):
the point is simply to highlight that that's
just not true.
And she's out there toting all the
the, you know, wonders of what the Trump
administration will bring, and I think they're all
playing you.
I think just like she always has, quite
frankly. I don't know how we can take
them seriously anymore at this point. With everything
they've done. With the last time and now.
Completely leaning in. Oh, Clinton's the worst person

(01:39:52):
alive. And she like, hinting at some of
the darkest things and then leaning in.
Nobody should trust them after something like that.
Now talking about this dynamic, and here's Whitney
Webb making a point about Donald Trump specifically.
And
And I played a part of this to
start. She says, if you can't see the
neocon here,
you may have forgotten what a neocon actually
is.

(01:40:14):
President, the United States will once again stand
shoulder to shoulder with the state of Israel.
I will support Israel's right to win
its war on terror, and we will win
fast. You have to win, and you have
to win fast.
When I'm president, we will deport the foreign
Jihad
sympathizers and Hamas

(01:40:34):
supporters
from
And Hamas supporters.
Right? So so you're not allowed to support
a group that you think you should support.
Even if you even if they're the worst
terrorist group in the world, which is not
the case. The the dynamic is very muddled
with Israel funding and so on, which is
clearly a case, but it still doesn't mean
that they're co opted to the t in
every dynamic.
The point is that clearly, you have a

(01:40:55):
right as an American to have an opinion.
But not not in Trump's world. Not you're
not allowed to support this group because Israel
says a foreign government says, therefore, you're not
allowed to be in this country. Or if
you just hate Jewish people or if he
frames you that way as the ADL will
if you simply have a Palestinian flag. But
guess what? That's called free speech. That's called
freedom in this conversation. If you think Kamal
is any different, then you're blinded. The point

(01:41:17):
is they're all the same flavor with different
narratives.
But my worry, like Derek's been pointing out,
is that too many people are falling for
this version.
For Mitchell, what's this? Oh, and then what
do you think winning means?
Obviously, we know what that means. Now, he
didn't say end it or it would all
be over, it wouldn't have happened. He said
help Israel win. They already showed you what

(01:41:38):
that means. There's just I mean, there are
As far as I can tell, just as
many conservatives that recognize what Israel's doing. How
are you still supporting any of this?
The point is they're both supporting it. So
how do you support either side of that?
They're telling you they're gonna help commit the
genocide. That's what they're both doing.

(01:42:00):
Sure that work with you to make sure
that Israel is with us
for 1000 of years. We're not gonna let
go of it. I Now there's a reason
he said it like that.
K?
He is leaning in whether he believes it
or not to the prophetic angles of this
this
lunatic
administration

(01:42:20):
who believe he's part he's a prophet in
this conversation. That's not my opinion. They've said
this stuff out loud.
And the idea they're gonna be here for
1000 of years at a point when everyone
in the world is becoming more aware of
the illegal nature of their entire existence, which
even then even that being a factual point,
I'm still of the side that you argument
of people being born there in the generation
sense that should not be uprooted in the

(01:42:41):
same way. So Tuesday's solution is the obvious
path in my opinion.
Nonetheless, though, the legal dynamic is obvious that
they're an illegal entity. So let's rectify that
and make it a Tuesday's solution. The point
is that he's telling you they're gonna be
here for 1000 of years at a time
when this is happening while they're committing genocide.
That is leaning into the idea that they
are going to be the leading entity. They're
ultimately after the

(01:43:02):
end time situation and the grow the expansion
of what they are, that they will rule
the world.
If you if you have not listened to
them say these things out loud and you
think that we're making it's amazing to me
how blatant this all is. As they pretend
that the the, excuse me, the Hamas will
march and take over the world or Russia's
gonna take over the world, they literally have
written down, praised outwardly spoken designs to do

(01:43:25):
that. And we'll point everywhere else, ladies and
gentlemen. I mean, maybe maybe Russia too. But
maybe we should deal with the ones who's
who are not just saying they're gonna do
it, but then having
conventions about it. Having press conferences about it,
praising each other about how it's gonna be
the case, and then saying everybody else is
doing that. We'll ban refugee settlements from terror
infested areas like the Gaza Strip, and I

(01:43:47):
will put every So right there again,
what does that mean? We will ban refugee.
Think about what he just said.
There's no missing that. He's talking about Gaza
Palestinian
civilians
who are in refugee camps because they've never
been allowed to return to their legal territory,
which was the whole point of UNRWA, the

(01:44:07):
whole point of the 67 discussion that they
were supposed to be allowed to go back.
They never did. That's why UNRWA still exists.
It's not because of some terrorist organization.
Israel knows this. That's why right now in
the north, they're forcing people to forego those
rights. Filming them, taking their biometric data.
Literally telling them to forego a thing they
tell you isn't real. How do you explain
that? That's now a public conversation.

(01:44:28):
Listen to it again.
Infested area gonna let go of it. I
will ban refugee settlements from terror infested areas
like the Gaza Strip. I will ban refugee
settlements. You don't ban I mean, what are
you talking about?
The only way to make sense of that
is to pretend that literally everybody in Gaza
is a terrorist.
Who do you think is driving this? There's

(01:44:50):
no question.
There's no debate. This man is acting in
the interest of a foreign country right in
front of you. I've made this so clear.
Kamala's no different.
To me, this is more alarming because of
people that are supporting and the fact that
I believe this is the person being put
in place.
My god.
The I just don't understand how anybody with
a brain, anybody with a sense of compassion

(01:45:12):
can pretend that every single we're gonna ban
refugee settlements in a location that they're literally
like, they've driven them into these locations, and
now you're gonna ban them? So what does
that mean? They get to go back to
their homes? Yeah. Right. Israel is already continuing
to take these. They're gonna push them out
of the country, and your president will pretend
like that's the right thing to do. To

(01:45:33):
cheers of collective like, the people will stand
up and act like he's a hero. And
there'll be a fraction of a fraction of
a 1% of the country pretending they're everybody.
Do you want this to I mean,
it just I I it has to be
something that we care about. It's human life
and these people are being uprooted from their
territory,
and everyone in the conversation knows that they're

(01:45:53):
being moved illegally, everybody.
And he's willing to stand there and say
this to the world.
He's either compromised or a very, very, very
clear Zionist with interest to go along with
the whole plan. I don't know how else
we see this. And I will put every
single college president on notice. The American taxpayer
will not subsidize the creation

(01:46:16):
of terrorist sympathizers.
And he means Palestinian supporters. That's what he's
talking about.
Right? So now you're gonna tell them they're
not allowed to have a Palestinian flag, which
by the way, many of them are already
doing.
Which is the point. Despite what you may
try to bend his words into meaning, they've
already gone through this is from September. It's
already been clear.
They will tell them you're not allowed to
have these mindsets because Israel says that means

(01:46:38):
terrorism.
So yet again, being dictated by a foreign
government. On American soil.
No president has defended Israel and Jewish Americans
more than president Donald j Trump. He declared
Jerusalem
the undivided
eternal capital of Israel. Which was illegal in

(01:46:59):
every sense of the conversation.
And still exist to this very day. Everybody
in the any anybody who asked with a
legal standing, international law, the United anybody,
it was illegal. He had no justification, no
legal right to do it. But just like
right now, they are powerful. Israel did it.
And they go too late, and it's done.
And then everyone just goes, okay. You're it's
illegal. What you're doing is wrong. Like, same

(01:47:20):
with Golan Heights. It's illegal. You're occupying them.
You're occupying Palestine. You're occupying Syria. You're occupying
Lebanon. We all know that. It's been going
on for decades, and the powerful look the
other way. Until, hopefully, they can remove people
that are saying those things to new positions,
change out certain administrations, take care of couple
regime changes here and there. And what do
you know? Bing, bang, boom. Now we're not
talking about it anymore.

(01:47:41):
Decade after decade after decade. Now we're here
again.
Don't let it happen. And moved our embassy
there.
On December 6, 2017,
at my direction,
the United States finally and officially recognized Jerusalem
as the true capital of Israel. No. This
is supposed to be the capital of the
new location. This was the whole point. This

(01:48:02):
is something that Israel even agreed to in
the 67 conversation.
I just it it so this is the
point. Does everything they like, all the promises
are are
historically, without question,
hollow.
They say whatever they need to say. They
never follow through with their side of it,
and we've seen historically over and over as

(01:48:24):
anybody with an honest engagement of the conversation
can see that Palestinians have of continued to
come to that table. And the lies manufactured
about the first Nokba, the second Nokba, even
right now, as they're literally murdering children in
front of you and saying, no. This is
justified. How are we supposed to pretend like
we don't know that of the first many?
Everything we've seen from this point forward
or from from set from 48 forward.

(01:48:45):
If we can see them lying about genocide
now,
pretty easy to recognize what's always been happening.
Today, we follow through on this recognition
and open our embassy in the historic and
sacred land of yours.
Trump imposed
crippling economic sanctions on Iran, aimed to curb
their nuclear ambitions. Okay. So how clear is

(01:49:07):
that? Don't you love this campaign video where
they just said he's been the greatest asset
for Israel,
and he even did this. Oh, whoops. I
thought that was supposed to be because of
national security. No. No. No. Israel needed it.
That's why he did it. They're not even
trying to hide that. Isn't that perfect?
I mean, they're literally not even trying to
hide that he's acting in the interest of
foreign government because they asked.
Hardly.

(01:49:28):
Something else is going on.
And president Donald Trump brokered the Abraham Accords.
Yeah. You know, the Abraham Accords, which are
a complete failure, where they pretended like they
were for what they were doing is forcing,
coercing,
threatening countries to normalize, rather governments to normalize
with Israel even though their peoples didn't want
that, you know, a la democracy.
And most of them failed. And Saudi Arabia
is the la one of the issues that

(01:49:49):
they needed, that didn't happen because of what's
going on in Palestine. It's it's a complete
facade.
Or or this or the conversation of the
deal of the century, which was basically claiming
that the current dynamic is a Tuesday solution.
And then everybody fooled? No. Nobody bought it.
And they all love the point of these
things like some kind of a, you know,
historic moment because Trump's trying to pretend he
has this history.
Like, that's why he won't relinquish the shot

(01:50:10):
because that's his
that's apparently his history. That's his is, not
history, but,
of course, he'll put bling in the word.
Like, everything today,
that is his legacy.
Weirdly, I forgot that. Taping relations between Israel
and much of the Arab world.
Donald Trump will crack down and take decisive

(01:50:31):
action against anti semitism
on the streets and college campuses. Right. So,
you can have an opinion and the government's
gonna tell you you're not allowed to have
that opinion. Is that free speech? Remind, correct
me if I'm wrong. Is that how free
speech works?
Restoring safety and security
for Jewish Americans.
Debris College. Which by the way has been

(01:50:52):
proven 55 times over from Jewish organizations, from
the police forces of these locations, from the
call every one of them that these have
been manufactured.
The lies about the rise in anti semitism,
a 100 times over. You know, like every
other dynamic of this conversation which we've been
caught they've been caught lying for, but we
keep pretending like it's not there. President, I
say remove the encampments immediately,

(01:51:13):
vanquish the radicals, and take back our campus.
Vanquish the radicals? We're talking about Americans here.
This is for all of the normal students
who want a safe place
from which to learn. All the normal students.
Right? So you're not normal if you have
this opinion. I mean, there's just no missing
the way that he's framing this.
You have every right in the world, especially

(01:51:34):
because it's a justified opinion to recognize that
Israel's illegitimate in committing a genocide and should
stand against that.
But the point being is that you're not
allowed because he says that means you hate
Jews.
No. It doesn't.
Right? It doesn't. The idea that we know
for a fact, like, for example, that
at the exact location he was talking about,
if you remember this, he like, specifically at

(01:51:55):
the location that he was just pointing to,
saying that they were hurting Jews, they were
hating Jews. Here's one of those Jew hating
maniacs at that protest.
A holocaust survivor.
My message to the brave student protesters
in America is just keep doing it. Don't
give up. We are doing exactly the same.
And in the long term, we are going

(01:52:16):
to prevail.
I'm out from the beginning at every March.
A small group of survivors
and descendants of survivors
demonstrate
disagreement
with with the use of, the holocaust experience,
as a cover by the Zionists and the
state of Israel. What's happening on

(01:52:36):
Pretty interesting.
Like, I mean, look, you could argue that
he's a liar. He's a liar. The point
is I I confer I confront them with
this in the conversation online all the time.
So, are you calling this holocaust survivor a
Nazi? And, of course, 99.9%
of the time, they don't even respond because
you can't, Which shows you that they have
a hollow argument.
You can't pretend like everything is one way
when you can prove it's not. Like, I

(01:52:58):
you could I'll have a conversation with you
about how you wanna say there's a per
a prevalent line in this kaprote. Sure. I
I disagree, but we can have that conversation.
The point is that that's not what's happening.
Broad stroke everyone,
400%
spike in anti semitism. No. No. Those were
all Palestinian flags and mostly peaceful protests. We've
shown you all this.
So here we are.

(01:53:18):
Where they're continuing
Oh wait,
Yeah. I did finish it, the video. Where
they're continuing to to drive this in. They're
continuing to con to build the narrative that
Israel must exist to fight off all the
evil
antisemites out there. When in reality, Zionism in
its entire existence is is

(01:53:38):
the it is built on creating the very
thing they point to to justify their existence.
That's not my opinion alone. That's the opinion
of people like Zachary Foster,
who was a Jewish person himself and has
a PhD in Palestinian history from Princeton. Or
Dan Cohen, who's also a Jewish person himself,
who was in very, very one one of
the people I hold in high regard in

(01:53:59):
the journalism field.
And he's spoken about this extensively. I'll show
you a tweet from him in a minute.
Right? The point is the evidence is everywhere.
The problem is that too many people are
falling for the way that Trump is pretending
to be something else. Now I'll include this
again. This is where I played that clip.
I added this to the thread. This is
from DCENZER news I just played. But all
these are showing you the same thing. This
one saying, Trump should you know, that they

(01:54:20):
should control congress,
which again, I think is one of the
craziest clips in all this because it shows
you without question that he's saying no. It's
not, like, out of context. He didn't make
a mistake.
He's saying quite clearly that Israel used to
and should control congress.
You know, the biggest, change I've seen in
congress is Israel
literally owned the congress. You understand that. 10

(01:54:42):
years ago, 15 years ago.
And it was so powerful. It was so
powerful. And to I think you know exactly
what I what I'm saying.
They had such power. Israel had such power
and rightfully
overcome
I don't know how you ignore that.
That's one of many. And that thread that
I'm showing you right now has 5 more
examples of that in different ways, showing you

(01:55:04):
the same thing.
You all know this. You watch the show.
The point is that there's a lot of
conservatives out there that might not know this.
Get this in front of them. Share the
thread. The new one we just added. But
this is the one I think is most
alarming where he literally says we're going to
remove the Jew haters from the country. And
we know what they're actually talking about. They're
talking about people to support Palestine. That's it.
That they then just clumsily claim only hate

(01:55:26):
Jewish people, which is simply, in my opinion,
by and large, not the case.
And I again, I just showed you plenty
of examples of that.
Now here's what David Icke was saying about
Donald Trump
using God in his conversation. Now look.
I will never ignore the possibility that somebody
may
have a change of heart
and and just and and find God in

(01:55:46):
a conversation.
But as David Icke writes
I'll just read it exactly. He says it
was inevitable. This is David Icke commenting on
what Trump says down here. It was inevitable,
and I have been waiting for this one.
Maybe it was, quote, god on his journey,
life journey, that inspired the Rothchilds
and their agent, Wilbur Ross, to save him
from a bankruptcy so big you could've heard

(01:56:06):
you could've heard the crash on the moon.
That's true, by the way. They they they
and they even stated at the time that
they saved him not because it was financially
beneficial, but because he was more important to
st the person, the entity. And
that you could argue he was bought at
that point.
Because maybe it it is God that guides
him to condone Israel's mass slaughter in Gaza,

(01:56:26):
and calls on him to press for attacks
with Iran. On Iran, with its World War
3 implications.
Or maybe it's all a load of bollocks.
And god, in quotes, is being hijacked by
the fake alternative.
What a theme that has become to serve
their personal and political interests.
You should at least be able to consider

(01:56:46):
that. Because the truth is, on that one
point alone,
I don't know anybody,
anybody
who shares my belief
or any other religion for that matter, who
looks at what's happening to Palestinians
and pretends that's okay.
Frankly, I don't know very few people at
all that feel that way. The only ones
that I think are like that are not

(01:57:07):
even ones that are willing to say that,
they just ignore it. They deflect. They say,
ah, it's not why are you worried about
that? We have an election. Like, that kind
of stuff.
Somewhere in there they know. I have my
point in the beginning. Everybody, everybody, everywhere, everywhere
knows what's happening. They're either denying it or
grace embracing it. It's or or hiding from
it. But that's my opinion.
So, this?
I agree. I don't see how you could

(01:57:29):
pretend that. How you could pretend you're okay
with that. Look, let me put it this
way. Maybe he was completely oblivious. He had
never even mentioned it. You could maybe make
an argument that he was being willfully ignorant.
But he is going, continue. We'll help you
win.
You know he sees this guy as he's
be he's guarding for president. The he's getting
intelligence briefs. He knows what's going on on
the ground, which means he knows they're helping

(01:57:50):
the genocide.
So
how do you pretend in any way that
it lines up with any god anywhere?
Here's what he had to say. Now here's
MJ Truth, who weirdly, and it's the thing
I keep seeing in this conversation, says, an
emotional Trump speaks on how god saved his
life. Emotional?
That's quite projecting. You want it to be

(01:58:11):
some profound moment. It's Trump acting snipe snarky
and cocky and smug like he does everywhere
else.
Of course, turning this big moment about how
the how god say into something about him,
because that's usually what you do about about
me and how I did this. You know,
God. That he's talking about how he did
something and he saved that.
So do you think this sounds like an
emotional loan from Trump? Keeping

(01:58:32):
David Icke's point in mind.
But as I look back at my life's
journey and events, I now recognize that it's
been the hand of god leading me to
where I am today.
Despite all of the many statements in the
past that completely contradict that, you know, maybe
he changed his mind or maybe he's saying
it because you wanna hear it.

(01:58:54):
Doesn't look emotional to me, quite frankly. It
looks like the same old Trump looking around,
loving the people who are clapping for him.
Thank you.
Is that really all it takes?
You know?
Everything I am and then god too. Alright.
Yay. God. He made me and it becomes
this profound idea. Look at what he said.
It became this bombshell emotional moment. Now he

(01:59:16):
just said the word god. It's like like,
Derek Rowskie's pointing out. That he he says
some flimsy statement about the fed, everyone loses
their mind because Trump said it. It's mean
he says things that are right down the
middle with no real impact and things that
anybody anywhere
who's watched 40 seconds of James Corbett's work
know already.
But he says it and everyone goes, oh

(01:59:37):
my god. You changed the world. That's how
easy it is to play this conversation because
our bar has been set so low by
design, I think.
And my faith took on new meaning on
July 13th in Butler, Pennsylvania

(01:59:59):
Of course, it did. Where I was
knocked to the ground, essentially.
Knocked to the ground. So now we're just
allowing these fabrications to continue. Right?
All the all the different in bolstering, the
the narrative. I mean, everything about this, the
story even seems to kinda fluctuate and change
now, which is kinda what happens when you
know that you're embellishing. Doesn't have to mean

(02:00:19):
the whole thing was a lie, certainly could
be. The point being that this becomes this
fantasy story.
I mean, we understand the nick on your
ear and how that actually worked, if that
even happened because the reality is I don't
think it's even logistically
possible with the way you were looking if
it came from the where it did. But,
you know, there's all these open holes in
the story that we all just ignore apparently.
So let's move forward. Who knows?

(02:00:40):
News.
But on top of that, so many days
later, there's not even a scratch. You know,
that all perfectly makes sense, doesn't it? You
could take these things and put them, like,
you know, have this exist in a vacuum
somewhere with none of the political dynamics and
people would be like, yeah. Right. What is
this? A cartoon? And yet here somehow we
pretend like it all makes sense. Now there
could be something that all lines up. Maybe
he wasn't hit at all and he lied
about it because he wanted to be a

(02:01:00):
hero. I don't know. It doesn't have to
be some grand thing. It could be though.
I just think it's wild that we pretend
like that all makes sense.
But he got knocked to the ground apparently.
But what he's gonna make it into is
it's sort of like, my god. But that's
not what happened.
They brought him to the ground. We all
saw the video. This thing happened. He grabbed
his ear. They run up. They pull him
down.
So we're just allowing these things to be
lied about now? Is that how that works?

(02:01:22):
Bound.
Knocked to the ground, essentially,
by what seemed like a,
supernatural
hand.
Yeah. And I would like to think that
God's Oh, the sacred service? Because that's what
brought you to the tape. That that's what
brought you to the ground. So
I guess we'll just ignore that little

(02:01:42):
embellishment. They've made for a purpose and that's
to make our country greater than ever before.
Before. Because god saved him so he could
become a politician on the republican side of
the par of of the US government. Because
that perfectly makes sense. Right? Because god is
only fighting for this country and that side
of the party.
Logic.

(02:02:08):
I just don't know why we're this easy
to manipulate.
And or even if that if all it
takes is for you to believe he believes
in god, then it's so as simple as
him saying that.
When you can look at his history and
recognize that's shockingly incongruent with who he is.
It's no different than the other side. But
think about this. This is literally from the
GOP. This is the GOP Twitter page.

(02:02:29):
3,400,000
followers. It's simply a picture that says the
pro Israel ticket. So now look. Think about
how crazy it is, how tone deaf it
is to be in the midst of an
ongoing genocide that clearly the majority of even
the conservatives
recognize.
And you think it makes sense to put
out an image that says the pro to
me, that's being compromised. That means that do

(02:02:51):
like, this is my point of the the
point about politics before.
You have to recognize that from a political
perspective, they know this is unpopular.
They know this is not a good the
political move would be to try to ignore
this as much as possible.
Right? Or at least acknowledge it in the
cases that would work for the make people
think that you want the good thing that
we all want. That's usually what politics is.
But now you're at a point where they're

(02:03:12):
going, hey. You know that thing that everyone
hates and they're all saying is a genocide?
Let's make them think we support that. Let's
put a big thing out that says we're
the one that supports all of that.
Anybody wanna explain that? I mean, you've gotta
understand the very clear picture here. Either Israel
is in control of the GOP, as well
as the DNC,
and they're going, we want you to say
that. Or

(02:03:34):
they are so blinded by what their bubble
is that they can't recognize that we all
see. I don't know how that's possible.
I just find it to be mind blowing
that they can come out with this kind
of thing. And by the way, look at
what what is going on with JD Vance.
Again, I I'm not trying to lean into
this. Oh, he's a weirdo. It's like they're
they both do it. They're both trying to
label the other ones as weirdo, like they

(02:03:54):
think that this is so funny how childish
they all are. But I'm look at his
face. That's I mean, my point is only
that that's the picture they choose.
And of all the things you could've done,
it looks like he's fake smiling. He's got,
like, a grimace on.
Why would you choose that for your picture?
Maybe they want us to. Maybe the whole
point is to get you to think he's
weird. I don't know. That looks like a
like a robot. It's weird.

(02:04:15):
Again, in a sense that it's just odd
is my point. Not even to lean into
the weird game they're playing. It is odd
to me that they would choose that picture
when you could've just picked other ones. I've
seen them smile that looks better than that.
I don't know. It's very weird. So again,
pro Israel ticket when either one of them
are telling you that. Both of them are
competing for who's more pro Israel, while both
of them are telling you the other one
is. Not.

(02:04:36):
Like, the argument from their side is that
Trump's a racist.
You know, they the magazine, they hate they
hate the racist, which and even already, they've
been labeled with anti semitism during this time
frame.
And then he goes, she hates Israel. It
won't exist if she's here.
And we don't recognize how weird that is
in the midst of a genocide that everyone
in the world can see? We're in a
really bad way in this country, and I

(02:04:56):
think we have an we're in the midst
of a possibility.
And I think this this selection period is
our testing ground.
How we come through this next will define
our next period.
That's never, in my opinion, the end of
end. It's never all over after that. It's
like what they're trying to tell you. If
we don't do it now, there won't be
next time. They always do that. There's always
gonna be another opportunity. And that doesn't mean

(02:05:17):
we should stop. Point is that whatever happens
next, we can still keep fighting. My point
though is that I think right now, how
we decide to deal with this
is to decide whether Israel continues to be
a prominent factor in the world, or decide
whether or not they're gonna allow to commit
genocide, or whether the US government can continue
supporting committing genocide.
And here's a picture someone shared, which I
agree with.

(02:05:38):
For the podcast, it's just Netanyahu with both
of them on leashes, walking them like dogs.
Now here is what they're supporting. Here's the
Israel first candidate.
BM says, you entered this this what this
is, guys, you might have just heard there's,
some of the hilltop youth. That specific terminology,
the hilltop youth is the whole Ben Gavir.
Like, they are, like, the most extreme,

(02:06:00):
even called out by Israel, even called out
they're the ones, in some cases, one of
the internal groups, one of the settler groups
that they were about to sanction.
These are very alarmingly dangerous people.
B'yam, who is an anti Zionist Hebrew, as
his as his title says right there for
his pea he's speaking from this location, talking
about this, saying, here they are, speaking about

(02:06:21):
one of their this is one of the
guy's brothers who just died. Died in the
act of committing
many number you know, violence against Palestinians. He
says,
it's insane.
The brother of a killed terrorist settler soldier
gives a deranged eulogy at his brother's funeral.
Now realize, these are people that are going
around under official capacity,

(02:06:42):
burning homes down, and this is not up
for debate. It's I mean, even Israeli society
is calling this out as an alarming aspect.
Raping, murdering, pillaging, burning people alive. All of
this has happened since October 7th because of
them.
Here is what he says. You entered Gaza
to take revenge. He's speaking about his brother
like in a lovingly turn. You you tried

(02:07:02):
to take revenge. As many as possible, he
says. Women, children, everyone you saw, This is
what you wanted. They're literally speaking about this
like it's a loving eulogy.
Listen to this. You know, this is in
Hebrew, but just the way that they're acting,
there's something about this that is so deranged
to me.

(02:07:23):
He says, god almighty, we want revenge.
These are the people that are committing genocide.
Right? They are stealing homes, they are stealing
land, burning orchards.
And and many of them, by the way,

(02:07:44):
what the one of the guy the guy
right there, in fact, and his brother have
gone over and operated in Gaza. They've been
a part of the IDF and are some
of the worst examples of atrocities that you've
heard of. That's not that's that's a provable
dynamic.
They're the ones that keep getting sent. You
know, why? Because they're extreme, and they know
that they'll go in and commit atrocities.
The people that don't are the ones that

(02:08:04):
don't go because they're they're the ones suffering
from mental problems because they saw all this,
which is a huge problem right now in
Israel. Half the peep you're pee patting me.
I'm gonna get to it in a second.
Half of them don't even wanna go anymore.
Some of them are selling their old the
the ones that went have come back, and
they've all got mental disorders. Like, it's they
were just writing about this, both Harrettes and
CNN.
So the point is, these people are the
ones that are the regulars.

(02:08:24):
That's why you're seeing children snipe. That's why
you're seeing people get raped and murdered and
pillaged, because these people are the worst
at this skin. This is from Israeli coverage
of what they're doing. And what he's screaming
about is how he's sad that he went
to go do this. His heart's desire to
murder children and he died. Now he want
revenge for that. That's what he's saying.

(02:08:46):
You're the god who will take revenge.
As many women, children you can. Everyone you
saw, this is what you wanted.
He's crying.
On this day, 1 year after,
Simchat Torah,
when we thought we will massacre the enemy,
massacre everyone

(02:09:11):
that we will expel them all from this
land. We are here at your on your
funeral.
You know, infuriating it is for people like
us that are simply going, look, guys, you
you have people like like, what's her name?
Weiss, the leader of the the settlement movement
or, you know, all these people that are
having, like, conferences.
With Ben Gavir, all these different leading elements

(02:09:32):
of the government that are telling you, this
is what we're doing. We're gonna take from
them. We're gonna kill everyone we can.
And your government just comes out and keeps
lying to you. That's one of many things
that are so hard to wrap your mind
around with all this. Again, it shows you
the point from the beginning.
You have to recognize this is not some
mistake, they're not missing something, they're not high
they are committing
genocide. The Blancans and the Millers and the

(02:09:53):
Bidens and the Trump, they're all part of
this.
And these people are the ones they're supporting.
Just like the Al Zap Movement, like the
moderate rebels, like Saudi Arabia, they're supporting
the worst of the worst. Because that's who
they are. Or at least that's who they
think they can manipulate, which clearly, I guess,
they aren't even doing a good job with
that.
Now here's the guy we're talking about.

(02:10:14):
This is written from, Tamir who is, what
was it again?
Just a a local writing about this.
He's simply saying today, it was announced the
soldier, Shewal Ben Natan, was killed in southern
Lebanon. He is one of the most dangerous
and violent settlers in the West Bank settlements.
He had killed Bilal Shalal while picking olives

(02:10:35):
in the village of Al Suia,
south of Nablus,
and had also participated in burning several Palestinian
villages and burning their homes and vehicles in
the West Bank. He committed horrific massacres in
the Gaza Strip while participating in the army
and is a responsible member and instigator of
Ben Gavir's Hilltop Youth Group.
And I spoke about his heinous crimes in

(02:10:57):
a series of previous tweets. He attacked Palestinian
farms and communities with the aim of displacing
their residents. Now, again, there's no debating this.
This is happening on a wide scale
that even the US seems to gripe about,
you know, while doing nothing to stop it.
And it says, because of his many crimes,
the Israeli police imprisoned him.
Even they imprisoned him, guys. Even if it
was a token to make it look like

(02:11:18):
they cared. And it says, and the United
States was planning to impose economic sanctions on
him. So these these are the people you
heard about. It think about it. With everything
that's been happening, all of the crimes you've
seen, all the vivid real time examples of
genocide, the US government at least pretended to
wanna sanction this guy out of all of
it.
He gets killed,
and the rest of the hilltop youth and

(02:11:39):
his brother scream about how we're gonna continue
to kill children because, you know, you wanted
to and you got stopped in the process.
It's it's not my opinion. That's what's happening.
Here we are.
Debating this is even happening.
So here is the article Robert wrote in
June of this month, or this year, excuse
me. Israeli settlers consistently use arson attacks to
burn Palestinians alive. It's just referencing an a

(02:12:01):
a very famous example, this child's name was
Ali. He was burned alive in a home
because they people like that guy right there
set the fa the home on fire in
the middle of the night because the the
IDF allows them to do it. In many
cases they literally stand there and protect them
while they do it. The child burned alive
and then when the family tried to petition
the government for for some kind of just
of justice, they laughed at them. They literally

(02:12:21):
danced around the child's picture and said, always
on the grill. Here's the Times of Israel
writing it. Jewish extremists taunt always on the
grill at slain toddlers' relatives. Did they get
arrested? No. They go to jail? No. Nothing
happened.
Even though they know it's them outside
so we did it. Look at what happened.
Nothing happens.
This is what it's like to live in
the only democracy in the Middle East for

(02:12:43):
Palestinians.
Now here is,
Casey Wright pointing out, this is nothing new.
Here is a small taste of Israeli settler
colonial barbarism that predates October 7th.

(02:13:21):
That thing is this stuff used to happen
in just broad day. Like, there no nobody
was held account I mean, even right now,
nobody's being held accountable.
So imagine what it used to be like
for the last 76 years.
Day in, day out, right in the plain
daylight, nobody cared. Think about the helplessness that
causes. And then we wonder why they act
out legally, by the way, with resistance and

(02:13:41):
violence, but why they choose that path? Because
they have no other option.

(02:14:10):
All before
October 7th. I mean, really, that's just like
small small small fraction
of
so many days.
And, I mean, it's constant. Now here, here's
a real world, current example.
Just to show you how little has changed.
So here, this has been going around, you've
probably seen it. And guys, this is not
unique. You can find these younger examples of

(02:14:31):
not even settlers, but just people who live
in Israel.
Almost all of which have to go through
the IDF, I think, like, say for very
few examples,
which make them military aspects. Right? The bottom
line is they are openly saying, kill them
all. We have to kill all of them.
Show them everybody. Right? And as Steve
McGlinchey points out, great a really excellent point.
Or rather, no. Rather, excuse me. Gordon says,

(02:14:54):
quoting Stevie's point about how the what she's
saying. He says mental that we that quote,
we need to kill them, every one of
them, isn't a call for genocide, but from
the river to the sea is.
That's actually a very profound point to think
about for a second. And what that truly
shows you, while Elon Musk and the rest
were acting to censor any Palestinians said that,

(02:15:15):
even though the Likud party has that on
their on their main charter. And Israelis all
over, Mike Rapoport included, have all been screaming
that online, but that's okay. Only when Palestinians
do it because that's
free speech.
We need to kill them,
every one of them, and that's it.
And if not that, because the the country

(02:15:36):
will not let that happen. The government
just at least the least we can do
is just kick them out of our land
because this is our home, this is our
land, and we deserve it.
Wow.
The blithe disregard, the casual nature
of I mean, the entitlement.
Whether, I mean, whether and this is the
point. Remember, she's been she's been driven through

(02:15:58):
a I mean, I would argue a more
propagandized version of schooling
than we have in this country. The point
to where you have been so ingrained with
this idea that one, that you deserve it
all, that they deserve nothing, that they've stolen
everything, and if allowed to have anything, they'll
murder your children. Like, constant constant con brainwashing.
Now despite that, she's still responsible for actions.

(02:16:18):
The point is that you still have to
take that into consideration. But the point is
even it's just a casual reality.
Now my point is you could have that
opinion and I would still think you're disgusting,
you brainwashed or not, without the point of
saying, well, kill them all. Like, there's a
special level of psychosis right there. So just
kill them all?
Or just get rid of them, boot them
out of the country, because we deserve it.

(02:16:39):
This is not and you have to realize,
this is an ingrained concept in a lot
of these people. Not everybody. Not even all
of them Jewish, by the way. The point,
though, is that the majority of the country
does feel this way. That's because of their
government, because of the Zionist influence, whether Christian,
Israeli, Jewish, whatever you wanna talk about. That's
my point. There's plenty of Zionists around the
world, there's plenty of Jewish Zionists, plenty of

(02:16:59):
Zionists that are atheists, by the way, in
Israel, which would blow your mind, we've already
talked about it. Because it's not about religion,
they're using it all.
She will tell you right there, we should've
killed them all.
But yet, that's okay. Publ- Pulp stood right
there. It's being praised by Israeli accounts online
right now. And that's not a call for
genocide? How does that work out? But you
dare to post from the river to the

(02:17:19):
sea? Oh my god, you're off this platform
like that.
Think about that for a second. No. Not
really, actually. I don't know if they're censoring
on the platform. My point is that you
can see how it's being engaged with. And
now your government in the US is trying
to pass laws that say that that is
a crime.
But keep telling me about free speech and
all that. Oops.
Close one too many.

(02:17:39):
So here is Yashir Ali,
who shares a
a
a a Trump ad, which is just, I
mean,
almost too perfect for this conversation right now.
So this says the Republican Jewish Coalition Victory
Fund is targeting this ad to voters over
the age of 25
in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Nevada.

(02:18:01):
In the ad, 3 women now this is
this is a Trump campaign ad. 3 women
talk about attacks on Israel, the rise in
anti semitism, and how Trump makes them feel
safe even though you're you've never been fans
of his. 1 of the women says that
Kamala Harris is too busy defending the squad
to focus on keeping Jews safe despite explicitly
saying the opposite. They're both, like, per both

(02:18:23):
petitioning for the world to see who's more
supporting Israel. But it says that that it
says, what's that referring to? In 2019,
Harris released a statement expressing concern that attacks
on Ilhan
Omar were getting to the point where they
were engaging her life. Whatever you think about
that, the point is similar. Here here's I'll
say this first what Max says. The new
Trump ad appeals to old Jewish ladies who

(02:18:44):
vote democrat, urging them to switch sides on
the basis of their deep seated anti Palestinian
racism. That's how he perceives it. Either way,
with what we just showed you,
with the GOP saying, we're the pro Israel
candidate, and Trump coming up and saying, we'll
we'll get rid of Palestinian got refugee camps.
We'll we'll deport people that you don't like
Israel. We'll blindly support. We'll kick get rid

(02:19:05):
of the Jew leaders. We'll censor free speech.
We'll take things you don't like. We will
act in the interest of a foreign government.
Everything in that thread.
And now here's an ad aimed specifically now
they wanna claim it's aimed at 25, the
age of 25. To me, this seems aimed
at specifically old Jewish women with the ad
you're looking at. Now why is that the
case? Doesn't that seem like an odd thing?

(02:19:26):
But maybe you could piece that together.
Do you watch the news lately?
Israel's under attack. Anti Semitism like I never
thought I would see. Should we have about
Samantha's boy, Max? No. He got spit on
just walking at Penn. I mean, that's scary.
What about Kamala? Ugh. Busy defending the squad.

(02:19:47):
Hi, bae. You know, Trump, I never cared
for,
but at least he'll keep us safe. Mhmm.
I never voted a Republican in my life,
but I am voting Trump. Amen.
RJC victory funds
My god.
I just don't know why. I don't know
why this is not
jarring for almost everybody. Not this not this

(02:20:08):
the ad directed at Jewish women, but the
simple conglomeration
of all that you're looking at right here.
It seems odd. Especially, if you wanna ask
yourself, like, what what percentage you think of
the, like, how often in the past have
you seen political ads aimed at Jewish women?
Is that a huge predominant aspect of the
political dynamic? I mean, they they they just
simply aimed at generally large group. Like, obviously,

(02:20:30):
the way that's aimed does seem interesting to
me. But either way, the bottom line is
that it seems
there's something else guiding all of this, whether
Kamala or Trump. I think, sure, you can
get you can read what this is.
Right? It's not some secret. We're simply we're
talking about the Zionist influence over our government.
My point though is that what is that?
Is this because they're asking him?

(02:20:51):
Are they saying, please
aim your or is he being threatened? Is
he being blackmailed? Is he a Zionist himself?
I just don't my my point I'm making,
I'm asking questions, is that I don't understand
how all of it lines up. I've said
it many times. Why they would act in
such a clear detriment to what most Americans
think, to their political part, while they're running
for president.

(02:21:12):
It's the same question as going to Biden.
Why they've continued to support Israel to the
detriment of everything they built around the US
image.
Even though they were lies, I'm glad to
see them fall apart because they've always been
lies. But why?
As Derek Rose writes in this article, he
wrote this for TLav,
a year ago and it still applies. He
says wake up. You're being deceived. And it

(02:21:32):
says, dear freedom movement, Donald Trump is not
a friend of liberty.
No. Neither is Kamal Harris.
The point is not to say, well, what
do you know? The point if you keep
yourself trapped in this idea that you only
have 2 choices, well, it's easy to ignore
things.
Before you even start thinking about choices, first
just acknowledge the truth of the concept. If
you if you think so, you don't have
to. My point though is that if you

(02:21:54):
do recognize the things he's pointing out here,
your first thought should not be, well, I
can't over Kamala. Just first sit back and
recognize it. Go, okay. That's the case. And
that makes sense. Now look at her guest.
She's bad chick. And acknowledge the facts before
you start pretending that those things need to
bleed to some faux
fallacy. It's what we're really talking about. But
at the end of the day, you have
to acknowledge the truth of the facts first

(02:22:14):
before decisions can be made.
Also, I thought this was interesting, by the
way.
This is not the old tweet that we
showed you before.
It's weird how much we're starting to feel
from this fake alternative sphere, like this aggressive
propagandized
dynamic right now. This is from yesterday. And
it's the exact same post.

(02:22:35):
Now I said, we're posting this weekly?
And if for the podcast, it's terrible.
Posting this it says, a wise man once
said, in a time of deceit, telling the
truth is a revolutionary act. Yeah.
What's funny is bet you don't even know
where it's from. The point though is that
ultimately,
this is the same thread that we've seen.

(02:22:55):
I don't know. It's it's popped up. I
mean, it came up maybe a few months
ago. And then she just post the same
thing as as if it's brand new. Why
wouldn't you just share it again? Or retweet
it.
As I said, well, the some might call
that propaganda. They just dump the same thing
as if it's new every week. But I
said, what do you think of these quote,
accounts with integrity that she's pointing to? As
she puts it. You know, and humbly includes

(02:23:17):
yourself on that list.
I said many here have been repeatedly caught
either through dishonesty or simply lacking due diligence,
spreading false information. Elon himself included. Now I'm
not talking about making a mistake. I myself
have made plenty of mistakes over the years.
I'm talking about
spreading things that were easily proven to be
false if you even looked. And in most
cases, I argue because they didn't care. It

(02:23:39):
was politically advantageous.
But it says, unfortunately, many big accounts on
x are compromised. Well, yeah. Most of the
ones you list off right here. Chasing money.
Exactly. But real journalism is still alive, and
it says here are 30 accounts with integrity.
Now you can go through these, things like
con worlds.
Don't think integrity really lines up with most

(02:23:59):
of everything on this list.
List, you know, and this, I mean, I'm
not even familiar with a lot. These some
of these are just the same ones you
saw last time, cat turd. You know, so
shockingly and I mean dishonestly partisan to the
point where they will provably disregard very important
things because it's partisan.
Terrible, you know, include yourself because that, you
know, kinda makes sense. Right? But you can

(02:24:20):
go through all these. This, the one I
thought I'd point out which I've done before
in the same discussion, because I've a very
important dynamic, during the beginning of October 7th,
this man shared a endless stream of fake
information.
That that the one that Robert called out
about the dumpster full of what turned out
to be Hamas members
that he claimed were burnt children and then
deleted it.

(02:24:41):
Now why do you think that happens? There's
I mean, I'm not you can argue we
just beta mis the point is that it's
a lack of due diligence. You don't know
that, so that means you shared it because
Israel said. Or somebody that Israel supporting said,
and you didn't do your due diligence. They
all do this.
People I mean, like, some of the most
embarrassingly
fake people in this conversation. People that will
repeatedly,
constantly get caught lying, deleting tweets, and it

(02:25:03):
just keeps, do you think she doesn't know
that? Do you not care? Is it only
about people that are on the side of
the party? I don't know.
I don't I mean, I I do understand.
I just think that I'm hoping people can
recognize that it's quite alarming
what's going on here.
Now let's talk about
Jared Kushner.
As a central part Now, I I should

(02:25:24):
have played that before. The Howard clip that
we're playing about the transition team,
makes it clear that Jared Kushner is the
one who is basically part of the hand
picking team.
Which Daniel McGavin made the point to say,
it was oh, here we go. It's gonna
be the same thing, which I agree. It's
gonna be the same Zionist influenced
deep state swamp filled game just like last
time. And dip with a different flavor, of

(02:25:45):
course, technocratic flavor. But this and these and
these are obviously from a democratic perspective. So
the
immediate response from people that are are their
first act is to defend the party, that's
the teams who are politics side, will name
this fake news democrat stuff because that's that's
the easiest thing to do. And it certainly
could be.
The point is, Jared Kushner is without question,

(02:26:06):
an a Zionist influencing entity, which should be
registered as an act of under Farah, same
with APAC, same with the rest of them
because it's not it's not even up for
debate. It's right on the surface of the
conversation.
This person said the the senate finance committee
says,
Wyden Raskin call for Department of Justice to
appoint a special counsel to investigate Jared Kushner

(02:26:27):
as an acting as an unregistered foreign agent.
So first, I'm going, wow. Is this really
gonna be about Israel? Because that's, like, the
most front forward facing part of this conversation.
And then Ron Weidens chimes in and says,
for years, I've been investigating Jared Kushner's business
deals with foreign governments.
Oh, really?
He's masquerading as an investment manager, but the
evidence I've seen makes him look like an

(02:26:48):
unregistered agent. Ran him both of them are
calling for so at this point, you're going,
wow. Okay. This has gotta be about Israel.
Right? And Gen z girl laughs with the
point that you recognize when you read the
actual document. I'll show you next. She went,
I'm sorry. What?
You want Jared Kushner to be investigated as
a foreign agent for Saudi Arabia?
She says, FBI, for the love of god,
someone in your organization has to be honest

(02:27:08):
enough to call out this BS. What about
the 800 pound gorilla?
It's real.
It's just crazy. As here's electronic intifada, Jared
Kushner probed over Israel contacts. Like, this is
all real stats. Unquestionable.
And then look, here's APAC tracker. Looks like
Wyden is getting about 1 to 1 point
2,000,000,000 or excuse me, $1,200,000

(02:27:28):
a year from the Israeli lobby. Looks like
Raskin's getting about 214,000.
I wonder if that plays a factor. Okay.
So what I think about this, and here's
the actual documents so you can see it.
From the 24th, they call for a DOJ
investigation
for acting as a rate an un for
an unregistered agent. But, of course, you cut
to the chase in small print, Saudi funds.
Real quiet. You'd think that'd be in the

(02:27:49):
title. Right?
Okay. Or and then even more clear,
not a single mention of Israel in the
entire conversation.
I mean, that's pretty crazy, isn't it? So
there's only 2 things that make come to
mind for me.
I do believe that there is always political
gaming in this. I don't believe it's about
the facade of the election, but I do
think it's about them getting political gain from

(02:28:10):
the whole dynamic.
And in this case, they want the the,
you know, their adversaries, the the they wanna
be seen as getting a one up on
them or gaining, as well as creating the
impression that they're on 2 different sides. Get
in. My my point in saying that is
that they're all individually acting in their own
interests. They're all disgusting people in my opinion.
But when it comes to the actual left
right paradigm, in some cases, you might be

(02:28:30):
able to draw lines. My point is ultimately
they act as the government. And it's not
hard to look. Look back through history. They
all it's the same
linear progression through all of it.
But it could be about wanting you to
think that.
But then on top of that, my point
would be that it's as if we can
show you the influence coming from Israel. It
may be about an effort to try to
deviate the conversation to something else. And don't

(02:28:52):
forget, Saudi Arabia
is bucking the whole normalization conversation. They were
supposed to have normalized with Israel, but they
put brakes on because of Palestine.
So maybe this is an effort to try
to drive them back in. I who's to
say, I miss my opinion, but it's incredible
to me that a person who is so
obviously influenced by Israel gets accused of being
a foreign agent before a different country. Now

(02:29:13):
look. Saudi Arabia is also on the table.
There's obvious in you could show information there
that would make this case.
But you have to realize that Saudi Arabia
is basically a vassal state for the US
and Israel, and we've talked about this over
the years. They were created because of these
countries. But,
you know, the the the point should be
that you could make a case for this.
That was where I was gonna go with

(02:29:34):
it. But ultimately,
I think you could for every single person
in congress, for the most part.
That's the I think so the idea becomes
that you make these kind of lay these
allegations that are kind of only ever meant
to be allegations,
and ultimately kinda goes away at some point
because you weren't wanting to come back around
and sniff through your you know, look through
what you're doing.
I think all of them are completely corrupt.

(02:29:56):
But isn't that kind of crazy?
So as it says the oh, you know
what? I I I wasn't gonna read too
much on this, but it simply says that
the the, Kushner's firm, affinity partners received as
much as a 157,000,000,
which is, you know, it's a it's a
good amount. But, I mean, ultimately,
many of them get more than that from
APAC.
And fees from foreign clients, including 87,000,000 from

(02:30:17):
the Saudi government, while generating no return on
investment.
Right? So you can make a case. Of
course, the left right's gonna make this out
to be a democrat manipulation, but the the
or the fact well, facts are there. You
could make that case. So if they wanted
to make a case about it, then show
how the obvious nature of the Biden administration
in Ukraine. I mean, there's no question there.
Now, yes, the media and everybody else will

(02:30:38):
play their dynamics in it, but the evidence
is obvious. And that's why it'll probably just
go away.
All of this to me needs to signal
the effort to hide the Israel overlap. And
this is the bigger point for me.
That the Israeli influence over our policy, our
media,
the Zionist specifically, is unquestionable.
And it's been coming out everywhere.

(02:31:00):
And I think we need to take a
point to consider how clear that is before
we come into this selection. Which I think,
I don't need to convince most people. But
I'm hoping we reach a few more here.
Now, Rich People Weekly shared this, based on
a tweet from James Lee, which I think
is is a great
catch.
This one
is, I think, important.
Because, I mean, I don't like Cenk Uygur.
I don't like I don't like any of

(02:31:20):
them in this conversation, quite frankly.
But I think it's more about the way
that the these people and what I think
is this guy here who's an obvious agent
of Israel that's not even up for debate,
is so smug in the way he delivers
this. He's supposed to represent, like, a Palestinian
voice fighting for Israel. It's such a facade.
He
is so obviously acting for Israel, and my
point is that they have this smug indifference

(02:31:42):
about them. All of them. Every time you
see them come up. And I'm talking about
Jews or Israel specifically. I'm talking about the
Israeli representatives they put forward. And they very
clearly have this, like, way like, that one
woman with the Emily with her she's just
it kills me. The way here this, like,
dead eyed fake smile while you're talking about
the atrocities they commit. My point is the
way he responds to this, I think that

(02:32:03):
he's so casual and comfortable being this role
that he gets caught. He gets caught saying
something that he didn't think through. And this
is my point about their lazy propaganda, the
reactive propaganda, is that you see him almost
kind of go, oh. Almost see him kind
of sit up.
And the point is that ultimately, he tries
to frame it, and he admits
another thing. Or rather that he lies however

(02:32:25):
you wanna read it. I'll I'll stop as
we go through. But this is an important
clip.
As James Lee says, an Israeli spy threatened
to murder or at least get rid of
western politicians
if they don't
allow them to go after Iran.
Here's what he said. This is pretty important.
Nuclear program
is going to be destroyed,

(02:32:46):
and anyone who gets in the way, it
doesn't And remember, this is a civilian nuclear
program even according to the state department. Even
according to the IAEA, the at International Atomic
Energy Agency. I just showed you this. The
state department, earlier this year, made a statement
that said they are not they do not
have, and they're not seeking a nuclear weapon.
They could if they wanted to, like any
country could, but they are not.

(02:33:07):
And the only reason they're enriching their to
the the level they are is because of
the violation of the JCPOA,
under article 36, I believe. If the US
pulled out, they had that right. And that's
basically what it's worth been left to this
point.
Then why wouldn't they? And if they claim
they never will seek a nuclear weapon, they
could be lying, of course. The point though
is that what he's talking about is taking
that out regardless.

(02:33:28):
Because we decide they're not allowed to do
this, even though that's not the case. They're
not fighting for a nuclear weapon. The US
government said the same. So he's telling, if
you don't go along with our plan, we'll
take you out.
It's going to be destroyed.
And anyone who gets in the way, it
doesn't matter where they are. Even if they
are politicians in the west, they are going
to fall

(02:33:49):
because Wow. We cannot afford.
Hold on. Did you hear what he just
said? He threatened
politicians in the west that if they don't
agree with Israel's war against Iran, that they're
going to fall.
And remember, he's an Israeli agent. Are you
saying Israel will murder politicians in the West
or get rid of them politically

(02:34:09):
through bribery or whatever else? What what do
you mean the politicians in the West will
fall if they don't agree that to back
Israel's war against Iran? Look at him. Yeah.
We will not vote for them anymore. Oh,
yeah? Oh, no. Well, you don't vote for
them now. You're not in our country. Oops.
Look at his smile. Look at his smile.
What do you mean the politicians will fall?
Smug.

(02:34:31):
You're busted. And no and he knows even
democracy.
We have the right to bring them up
and to bring them down.
Those who agree with Ayahu Alaihi,
we bring one of them in office,
and all the sympathizers
with their How are you bringing down? Yourself,
we don't want them in the world. Bring
them down?
Who is we, and how are you bringing

(02:34:52):
down politicians in the west if they dare
to defy Israel?
Tell me how you're bringing them down. I
already answered you then. Are you gonna murder
them or are you gonna bribe them? Are
you gonna bribe someone else? Who are you
gonna do? Okay. So the point,
he doesn't vote in these conversations. He's not
an American citizen. Right? So we're gonna you're
gonna pretend that we're gonna vote. But who's

(02:35:13):
we? What are you talking about? He that's
exactly the way to frame it. He said
play play the first part again. Going to
fall. They are politicians in the west and
Even if they are politicians in the west,
they are going to fall
because Hey. They're gonna fall.
So, obviously, you could pretend he meant voting
them out of office. That's ridiculous.

(02:35:34):
But that's not the case because who are
you talking about? Are you talking about some
group you're working with in the United States?
Like, this has to be immediately alarming for
anybody that cares about allegations of any foreign
country, Russia, China.
Because what he is inadvertently,
clumsily stepping into with his smug indifference because
they know they're influencing the conversation
is that they are influencing the conversation. That

(02:35:56):
he is controlling, that they're literally telling you,
if you don't go along with this, we'll
take you down. Now that could mean murder.
That could mean bribery. That could mean somehow
coercing them out of office. But it's not
from a point of some kind of democracy
where we're gonna vote them out of office.
Because it's not that doesn't even translate. He's
not talking about an American group. He's talking
about an Israeli

(02:36:17):
conversation that we, from the Israeli agenda, are
going to do that.
So you just can't miss the implication there.
That either they have the ability as the
Israeli conversation to stop, and we know this
already, politicians for being in power,
or they'll take them out. Which, by the
way, is exactly what his point was. Rich
people weekly.

(02:36:38):
The JFK overlap.
I mean, you could you have to see
the way that he was smart the smile.
The way the time we and and then
all of a sudden, you see it drop.
That realization that, oops, I totally said I
I said something that is actually important. That's
what I believe.
You could read into it for yourself. I
think the obvious nature of this cannot be

(02:36:58):
denied. Here's our interview with Corey Hughes. Was
Israel behind the assassination of JFK? I think
the evidence is undeniable, as Corey does as
well. And that's the same conversation. CIA and
and Israel were completely involved in the assassination
of JFK. Let's not forget this conversation.
This is our coverage from August 13th this
year. The Israeli election interference and psychological operation

(02:37:18):
industrial complex.
This guy was caught
admitting on the record that they had influenced,
I think it was 16 of 19 presidential
elections around the world. He works for Israel.
You know how we know that for sure?
Because it was a huge investigation. Now I
don't blindly listen to corporate media, but this
was completely exposed. And guess how little attention

(02:37:39):
it got? This is from February 2023.
His name was team oh, team Jorge is
what they called it. He's all he's on
record. You can watch him. The guy is
proven to work for Israel, and he's openly
telling you they've got 30,000 bots they use
to influence Twitter and in Facebook. And on
on top of that, that they have absolutely
used this. People have paid them to topple
governments. And he mentions doing so inside the

(02:38:01):
United States.
Weird how that gets a little conversation. Right?
And we're literally watching this play out in
front of us as both of our presidential
candidates fight over who's more pro Israel.
Why do you think that is?
Now speaking of the selection,
you might find it interesting that right as
that's going on,
guess who is creating yet another simulation?

(02:38:24):
An Israeli influenced company.
As Garland points out here, Garland's favorite, though,
why would anyone want to conduct a cybersecurity
exercise on election day? That's a really good
question.
I mean, it's really stupid when you think
about it because these are supposed to be
done so you can prepare. Right? So we
can game out what we might need to
do better before the real event. After they
claimed event 201 was even though it basically

(02:38:46):
just mapped out what they did. All the
mistakes included because that makes sense. Right? So
you game it out, you learn the mistakes,
then you make the mistakes because the point
was it was predictive programming in very clear
obvious ways. Here we are where they're literally
planning this for November 5th.
Now how does that possibly make sense?
Now realize one of the things that most

(02:39:07):
people and more normies out there might not
know is that in every one of these
major events,
in almost every single one of them, you'll
find some weird kind of ongoing
simulation that just so happens to be going
on. 911?
I mean, literally. I James James Corbin has
a great breakdown where he plays these space.
1, it it's a show just about that.
And I think oh, and I think it

(02:39:27):
was a section from this 911 on the
coverage. The point being that
many different examples show where they kind of
go and one in the UK, for example,
where they had the like, specifically, like, the
the same people, the same places, the same
locations, and they were pretending it was a
simulation. And all of a sudden, guess what?
It it just turns out the real world
thing happened just like that. And that's actually
their narrative.

(02:39:48):
911 was the same thing. They were simulating
planes, flying and going, oh, what do you
know? We happen to be ready for it.
Even though they lied about that right away.
Rice was like, wait or no. Bush even
said it. We never thought about planes fly.
Yeah. He did. He did it many times
before the they just don't think you're smart
to look into it. So here we are
with
cyber reason,
yet again.

(02:40:09):
Homeland Security Conference, that's different different,
overlapping point. Now here is Morpheus codex, saying
there's actually 2 of them. This is the
one I'm pointing you. And this one you
can see as well.
Homeland Security Conference, 2024,
November 5th.
Also,
also on November 5th. Really?

(02:40:29):
This one is cyber reason. Now this is
the older one from 2,019.
We talked about that one. I'll show you
that next. So it's happening again. Here's the
one from
November 4th 4 November 5th. It's called attack
simulation hunter series. Cyber reason. And you know
why that worries me more than anything? Because
I've talked about this already. Here's Whitney's article
for TLAB from

(02:40:50):
July 2020.
Cyberreason announces new plans to, quote, accelerate access
to US government networks ahead of 2020 election.
Now the point is, a cybersecurity firm tied
directly to Israeli intelligence, guess what, unit 82100
that simulated a series of terrorist attacks occurring
during the election have announced a new hire
with deep ties to US intelligence and the

(02:41:13):
immersing with intelligence. Now and, actually, I should
grab that one too.
The main point about the infiltration
of tech. And that's in light of the
pager attack in Lebanon.
This is alarming to see how much Israel
has influenced all of us using unit 8200
start up tech companies.

(02:41:35):
Carbine 911 being one that's important.
And I think that was,
the prince and the spy. That's also an
article she wrote for TLAB.
So this is in 2020.
Here's an article she wrote in 2020 as
well from January. Why a shadowy tech firm,
can you guess who that is, with ties
to Israeli intelligence is running doomsday election simulation.

(02:41:58):
That's cyber reason.
Here,
from 2020 as well. How an Israeli spiraling
tech firm, same point, gained access to the
US government's most classified networks.
Why is it this is what we're we're
talking about, cyber issues. Why are we allowing
this?
If everyone's all up in arms about the
the even the hint of another government,
it we're just allowing the Israeli government with

(02:42:19):
the longest track record of using these things
against, in particular, the US government to have
more access. I what else do you call
that for compromise?
Here's Whitney's interview with me on March 10,
2023.
It's CIA MOSSAD linked surveillance systems quietly installed
throughout the United States.
No one wants no no one's paying attention.
It's happening right out in front of us.

(02:42:41):
Here's from 2021. Ending anonymity. Why the World
Economic Forum's partnership against cybercrime threatens the future
of privacy. So we're just watching this kind
of incestuous overlap with all of these entities.
The World Economic Forum. All and guess what?
All these things are happening while Trump is
supporting Israel, who's supporting all these same things.
The game of pretending like we're not talking
about globalism
while we're pointing what Israel's doing is one

(02:43:03):
of the biggest tricks being played right now.
As the Jones of the world wants you
to think, it's about clothes, not Israel. Well,
they're the same thing, guys. They are the
leading entities of this charge,
and they're distracting you from seeing that. Now
we also pointed out that is that Twitter
is still currently using
Authentix, an Israeli unit a200 company.
That I found out later is immersed with

(02:43:24):
a huge portion of Israeli intelligence in general
that's scooping up your biometric data from Twitter.
You starting to get the real alarming picture
here? I hope you're a new conservative to
the show, and you're recognizing why this is
such a big deal.
Now here's an interesting overlapping point to this
length this to end this segment.
This is, Khan from the ICC.

(02:43:45):
Apparently,
all of a sudden, he's being accused of
sexual misconduct, which I would we shouldn't dismiss.
He's certainly capable. Anybody, especially in government, I
would argue.
But it's going it it says that within
days of the Watchdog's shelving of the case,
the court's went work went on. Khan on
May 20th sought arrest warrants against Netanyahu,

(02:44:06):
his defense minister, and 3 Hamas leaders, as
we remember.
And said, now the point is that ultimately,
he's being accused of of, sexual misconduct, which
sorta got shelved for a minute, but there
was no evidence necessarily other than accusations, which
doesn't mean it's false. The point is that
ultimately got put to the side. Now it
says in announcing the charges against Netanyahu, Khan
hinted that outside forces were waging a campaign

(02:44:26):
to derail his investigation. Now obviously, if you
were, let's say, a sexual deviant, that might
be something you would say to cloud that
possibility.
Or it could be that he wants you
to know that somebody's out there trying to
make him look bad because he's calling them
a genocidal entity. Both of which seem likely
or rather possible.
Now it says, Israel's allies in US congress
have also seized on the would be scandal.

(02:44:47):
Lindsey Graham,
you know, who seems to be weirdly okay
with an ongoing genocide, suddenly is up in
arms about the accusation without evidence against the
guy telling you about genocide.
Sounds to kinda line up with what we
know of Lindsey Graham as a complete disgusting
person. Right? He says senator Lindsey Graham is
seeking records about whether the misconduct accusations played
any role in cause decision

(02:45:08):
in May to cancel the planned visit to
Israel.
Right? So you don't care about a genocide,
but you're so up in arms about him
canceling a visit to Israel, and maybe that
these played a role in that? That's the
big crime you wanna investigate, Lindsey Graham? That
you're gonna take your platform and funding to
do Come on. Really?
He goes, quote, another cloud, a moral one,
hangs over Khan's a duh. And look, I

(02:45:30):
am no supporter of this guy has dragged
his feet on far too many things. So
whatever the reasoning is here,
you can decide for yourself of why he's
conti deciding to bring this case against Israel.
What's interesting to me is the timing of
this, and that we should consider with the
Epstein network overlap that this may be just
how Israel operates.

(02:45:50):
It says,
hangs over his decision to abandon engagement with
Israel, which is not actually what happened, seek
arrest warrants because they're committing genocide.
That's a letter he wrote to the court's
authority. So Lindsey Graham took it upon himself
to write a letter to the influencing authority
with no evidence
because he has a side. That's that's very

(02:46:11):
clear. Kahn, who is 54 and married with
2 children, has said in a statement that
there was no truth to the accusations, which
I imagine he would say either way. Khan
added that he would be willing, if asked,
to cooperate with any inquiry.
See saying it's essential that any accusations are
thoroughly let listened to, ex examined, and subjected
to a proper process.
Now that doesn't sound
like what you would expect someone in his

(02:46:32):
position who would have the authority to essentially
derail the investigation.
You wouldn't expect them to say it like
that. But maybe that's why you would say
it. Without naming any entity directly, he noted
that both he and the court, which I
can prove, by the way, going back a
long way,
have been the target in recent months and
before that in a wide range of attacks
and threats.

(02:46:53):
Many from the US government, people like Pompeo
and Bolton, by the way. But it says
some also aimed at his wife and his
family.
Khan's office declined to provide specifics because the
incidents are under investigation.
Now it says, Israel, an interesting CBS wrote
this,
has also been waging its own influence campaign
ever since the ICC recognized Palestine as a

(02:47:14):
member.
And in 2015,
opened a preliminary investigation into what the court
referred to as the situation in the state
of Palestine.
Okay. So they're making it clear that Israel's
been going after them since they did this,
which they have every legal right to do,
and in fact in fact is legally sound.
Shouldn't Palestine have a right to exist? Don't
they have a right to defend themselves? All
the games we love to play? I guess

(02:47:35):
only one way that works.
The point is that the ICC, the ICJ,
the UN, and every other dynamic has made
it clear, it's occupied territory. So this is
all the game they love to play, where
they're outraged that you dare point to the
thing we all know. But it says London's
The Guardian's newspaper, and several Israeli news outlets
reported this summer that Israel's intelligence agencies,
for the past decade,

(02:47:56):
have allegedly targeted senior ICC staff, including putting
Khan's predecessor under surveillance,
showing up at her house with envelopes stuffed
with cash to discredit her.
Gee. Now it's starting to feel a little
different, isn't it? Netanyahu himself, in the days
leading up to Khan's announcement of war crimes
charges, called on the world's democracies, quote,

(02:48:16):
to use all the means at their disposal
to block the court from what he called
an outrage of historic portions. In other words,
the truth that we can prove with an
endless amount of information that you've been posting
on your own Instagrams.
The Dutch foreign ministry and several lawmakers in
the Netherlands have called for an investigation into
whether the Israeli embassy has been conducting covert
activities against the ICC,

(02:48:37):
which, by the way, they've openly praised.
Okay. So at this point, it's easy to
at least consider the very likely possibility that
these were these were allegations
levied at a person who they said use
everything you have to stop them from doing
this at a time when Israel's been caught
lying and deceiving and
attacking,
murdering, just about everything you point to. That

(02:48:57):
still does not mean that may that that's
not I mean, maybe he is a deviant.
Maybe he is may or maybe he just
made some kind of sexual advance that they
wanna call out or maybe he's wrong in
doing so. Who knows what the real picture
is? That is not necessarily
mutually exclusive from the fact that he's going
against Israel for this genocide. Now I think
it's interesting to consider that it might be
real. It might be the whole blackmail network

(02:49:18):
and this is how Israel has been able
to keep control. And now he's just going,
you know what? Screw it. I'm done being
controlled by this. And he did act. He
did do this. And he is guilty. And
he decided to go after Israel and that's
why they're exposing it now. I mean, it's
very interesting to see all of the hallmarks
of everything we've been talking about.
However, whichever way this goes.

(02:49:41):
And I'll include these these links that I
brought up earlier. Make sure you consider this
in because we're gonna get the next segment
is similar about the e.
E Oh, actually, no. No. That's right. We're
we're we're that so that we're gonna get
into now the rest for foreign policy to
finish up the show. But I'll include these
articles and consider this over overarching point that's
been going on long before October 7th of
Israeli government intelligence

(02:50:02):
infiltration
of your and other governments in general. It's
it's not it's it's it's
guys, even these governments have called this out
many times and they just get suppressed, they
get attacked, they get called racist, and it
gets put to bed.
Here we are again. Hopefully, this doesn't actually
get put to bed this time. Now Dan
Cohen, I mentioned earlier. He had a great
tweet he put out. Now this is Kim
dotcom. I'm not gonna read his whole point

(02:50:23):
here. But he was simply making a point.
And he's calling out Israel. But in in
the case, he's saying Israel and he does
put it in quotes, by the way, but
it says the Jewish state of the, quote,
chosen people has committed acts of well documented
injustice against the Palestinian people for decades.
It won't go into the details or he
won't, but October 7th didn't happen in a
vacuum and you know that. Israel had many
opportunities to achieve a lasting peace with the

(02:50:43):
Palestinians but failed to make an honest effort.
Or in fact, I I would even frame
it obviously more so deliberately
sabotage those efforts. That's a public matter of
record today
despite the lies that we all get told.
It really is easy to look. You Harratus
is covered. I mean, it's a it's obvious.
But he goes on to make the case
about that kind of from a point which
Dan thinks is a bad starting point, which

(02:51:05):
is where he makes his point. He simply
says Israel is, quote, the Jewish state in
the same way that Disneyland is the happiest
place on Earth. Remember, he's a Jewish person
himself. It's a marketing slogan. And the more
that people conflate Israel and Judaism, the more
they reinforce the fundamental premise of Zionism.
If you actually want to challenge Zionism, Kim,

(02:51:25):
you and that's what he's saying. You have
to take the time to learn how Zionists
first targeted
Jews
before they targeted Palestinians.
Read about Jacob, DeHaan,
who was the he who who was to
be dispatched to inform the British
that the Jews of Palestine reject Zionism

(02:51:45):
and sought to repeal the Balfour Declaration
and was assassinated
by the Zionist agents.
This is the point we're making from the
very beginning. Even this is one of the
main points is that the Jewish population
were outraged
by and large, what they were doing to
Palestinians, and that got suppressed. It got did
not and they got attacked in some cases.
It says read about the cruel Zionism

(02:52:06):
and how Israeli agents attacked Jewish communities to
terrorize them into fleeing to Israel.
Once you separate Zionism from Judaism and understand
that they are totally at odds, you'll see
that the state of Israel has stolen its
identity from a religious group that has nothing
to do with its crimes.
Otherwise, with posts like the one below, you're
doing the dirty work of Zionism.
Now it's a hard point because, you know,

(02:52:27):
Wade, Kim's making points that are that I
would argue are correct. But I agree with
what he's saying. You have to take the
right stance on this. You can't make it
about the way that he was free. You
have to make sure you frame it correctly
from the origin point. So I completely agree
with that. So in the light of what
he said here, I will include
a couple of interviews.

(02:52:48):
This one was the Yeah. This is the
most recent one
with Dan and myself and I'll include 1,
at least one from
my interviews with Zachary Foster.
Both both of which are having a similar
conversation. This one was recent. The manufactured Middle
East plight and the Zionism linchpin. Here's one
with Zachary Foster. The documented and suppressed history
of Palestine and Zionism. Remember, he has a
PhD in Palestinian history from Princeton.

(02:53:10):
Now, on that note, I do wanna play
a couple of clips that align with this.
You've seen him probably on the show before.
But speaking of Zionism, it's important to understand
where we're coming from here.
And that there is
historical precedent here. People have been speaking up
about this for a really long time.
Is a political philosophy
which has brought about the state of Israel,

(02:53:31):
the so called state of Israel. This
this political philosophy has nothing to do with
religion. On the contrary, it seeks to confuse
others and let them think that Zionism and
Judaism is 1 and the same. I am
a conscious African.
I know properly my history. I know that
Africa gave Judaism to the world. I know
that the first Jews in the world were
Africans. Not only do I know this, but

(02:53:53):
I inform everyone who has doubts about it
to read a book by Sigmund Freud entitled
Moses and Monotheism as a beginning.
Consequently, I know that Judaism and Zionism are
not the same. Zionism had his first organizational
expressions in 18/97
in Baals, Switzerland, in Europe.
Here was a man by the name of
Theodor Herzl, h e r z l. He
was the founder of Zionism.

(02:54:14):
He said that he was going to find
the state that God promised the Jews. Listen
to this very carefully. This man, Herzl, was
an atheist. He had believed that there was
no God. He said God did not exist.
Now how is it the man who believes
that God does not exist is going to
find a state that God promised to his
chosen people? I'm telling you, this man is
Satan in disguise.
Zionism is a satanic movement. It is devil.

(02:54:34):
It is imperialism. It is racist. It has
gone and taken the lands of the Palestinian
people, and through terrorism has driven them out.
And through terrorism, it maintains its power. And
the United States of America with over 6,000,000
homeless sends to Israel, 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and
1,000,000,000 of dollars everywhere to bomb Palestinian people
while homeless people are here and unemployed are
here. Zionism is going to raise this war

(02:54:55):
and make the people in America become clear
to what it is and become anti Zionist
and stop the aid to Israel and use
the money to take care of the homeless
in this country. Now whatever people would disagree,
in some cases, push back on some of
the origin points he made about, you know,
where it came from or at the end
point where the money should go. But the
internal point is the same. Right? That this
is where we are. You could then they're

(02:55:15):
desperate to make this about anti Jewish anti
Jew Judaism. But it's not.
Most people in this country are beginning to
recognize what Zionism is. And the only, only,
only path they have is to pretend that
you hate Jewish people. And the more they
do that, the more that drives people to
recognize the ploy. Now there are some that
end up falling for that because of some
of these, I argue, dishonest agents on the

(02:55:36):
side of the right that are trying to
make you think that it is the case,
that it is all Jewish people. And it
isn't it is a right now, if you're
new to the conversation, it can be hard
to see. It can be easy to fall
for that trap. But I would argue that
if you're a good person, that you would
even if the the facts lined up, you'd
be like, well, something tells me it's wrong
to broad stroke an entire religion. Yes. Lean

(02:55:57):
into that thought because that's accurate.
Even if you even if the facts they're
presenting were accurate, even if it was only
Jewish people doing this, you have to acknowledge
that it's not every Jew everywhere, so you
gotta stop making these broad stroke claims. But
then,
which is something that Dan and I were
really talking about that last interview, like, really
going to town about, it's important to to
be informed. That's the point he's making about
Kim. It's important to be informed about the

(02:56:19):
true origin point and recognize what Zionism is
and how it's play. They're using Judaism, which
a lot of these Jewish organizations are starting
to scream about. And, by the way, have
been for a long time that nobody was
listening to them. And it's starting to catch
on because it's the obvious truth.
That's the important reality, and they really would
love you to be called a racist. So
when you if you fall into that with

(02:56:39):
not knowing the full conversation,
my point would be that you have to
rec at least take the time to stand
back and look at some of the other
conversations and recognize that there are people that
seem to be helping the Zionist agenda
by creating the very thing that they point
to to make their existence make sense. That's
super important. Now here's a clip from Avi
Shalom, a highly regarded Israeli academic, pointing out

(02:57:00):
the other point that he made in this
in the, the the thread here,
specifically about
attacking Jewish communities to drive them to Israel.
Jews have lived in
Iraq,
since
the 6th century BC,
2 and a half millennia ago, since the

(02:57:22):
time of the Babylonian
exile. But the creation of the state of
Israel,
for the first time,
gave a territorial
dimension
to Zionism,
which it didn't have before. Iraqi Jews, whether
they liked it or not, were identified with
the Zionist movement. Now this is actually the
wrong clip, but that's that's actually a good

(02:57:42):
point to include with this because it actually
adds to the next clip. We're talking about
the fact that they were, you know, not
they didn't want to leave the location. Right?
And that there and and on top of
that, there was a lot of negative connotation
to them because they associate them at that
time with Zionism, which is the point.
Because they this is they weren't saying, we
are Jews. We hate you. They were recognizing
or they were in incorrectly associating them with
Zionism. And that's why

(02:58:03):
associating them with Zionism.
And that's why even the some of the
negative attention they got in that location was
the so it's a point even then to
think about how they were desperate to make
it about something that it wasn't. But this
is a clip that matters because the ultimate
driving factor is specifically from Iraq, which is
where his family was from. The driving factor
turned out to be Jewish agents,

(02:58:24):
rather specifically, Assad agents that were bombing them
to drive them to the state of Israel.
Iraqi Jews
were convinced
that Israel had a hand in uprooting them.
After the 1948
war, there was
mounting popular hostility
towards the Jews in Iraq. Five bombs exploded

(02:58:47):
in Jewish sites. The series of bombs
created a panic which led more and more
Jews to register to leave the country. And
again, that old the or the opening point.
Why was there growing hostility? Because of Zionism.
Zionists were making it a case that they
were that and and that's where the negativity
come from. Not some deep rooted hatred for
Jewish people, which I'm sure existed in some

(02:59:08):
form, like any hatred as anywhere you look.
But it's incredible the evidence we have about
these origin points that we still listen to
people committing genocide. Let them tell you why
this all makes sense while they're murdering children
in front of you. I met an elderly
friend of my mother's,
an Iraqi Jew called Yaakov
Khalkukli,
who had been in the Zionist underground.

(02:59:31):
One member of his group, Yosef Basri,
a very, very intelligent,
Jewish lawyer, and his assistant, shalom sala shalom,
were responsible
for 3
out of the 5 bombs.
Basri's controller
was an Israeli
intelligence officer
named

(02:59:51):
Max Binet
who was based in Tehran.
Based all around. They were talking about Zionist
infiltrators,
which could be more clear.
Now on this note about the reality of
what these entities are. I mean, it goes
back as far as you could look. It
goes back to the origin point, the original
NACPA. But now we're at a point where
we're watching genocide play out right in front

(03:00:12):
of us. And one of the many, many
things that we've been trying to highlight is
the accuse them of that which you are
guilty, which by the way is a is
a, you know, a nazi era propaganda tool
points like a a a,
oh, yeah. Now of course, I've been blanking
on people's names all day today.
Goebels. Right? You know, this the the that
is one of these ideas that we've talked
about in the past. It's a propaganda tool,

(03:00:33):
or you can even go back to the
origin. You know, Bernays. But the idea being
simply
that they, as the Israeli government, have a
policy, a practice of just lobbying accusations that
people have doing like, if most of these
accusations we've heard from the beginning of October
7th.
Even in even including the things that the
people that were killed that we now know
for a fact they killed, as the IDF

(03:00:53):
members, as our rats has written themselves. In
this case, we're talking about human shields.
And this is my infuriating point repeatedly with
this, is that we can look back decades
and see a
mountain of evidence
showing you directly from human rights groups, from
UN members, from locals, from even Israelis, from
IDF members that have admitted this. Now today,
with even hertz writing multiple articles admitting this,

(03:01:15):
and still
the the main portion of Western media is
about how Hamas uses human shields. Despite having
any evidence to back that up, on top
of the fact that one of the earlier
investigations that were done by a by a
international entity
found that they couldn't back it up. And
this was before October 7. Doesn't mean it
didn't happen.
My point is with this overwhelming amount of
evidence, it's still it again, it shows you

(03:01:37):
the same point.
It's not an honest conversation,
period.
And when I said with another CNN point,
this is from October 24th,
Christine Aberforth says, he told me to take
them in. In the next attack, use them
as human shields.
An IDF soldier and 5 former Palestinian detainees
tell CNN that the Israeli military has used
civilians as human shields.

(03:01:58):
Bombshell. You all know this already.
This October 24th.
But I said, I'm glad to see people
are finally admitting this, but please do not
be fooled by CNN's opportunism.
This has been verifiable
for decades
and they've all and and they've ignored it
until now, which I include this clip which
you've seen, I'll just play the quick opening
of it so you remember which one I'm

(03:02:19):
talking about. The link is actually on this
tweet so you can share it for yourself.
But it's a little mini clip I broke
down from this discussion because it's so obvious.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured,
used as shields by Israel per the United
Nations.
Reuters,
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy. It goes

(03:02:39):
on and on. It's really like it's all
the main it's Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International,
Net Salem, all of them saying the same
thing. Going back decades, and I'll include this
link
to my the rumble clip of this.
Now let's talk about some current discussions, or
I guess one of them is an older
one. But this BM pointed this posted this
on the

(03:02:59):
13th
August. And it says, Harrett's article about the
use of Palestinian human shields in Gaza as
standard practice.
Leading Israeli media, and we're still pretending like
we're not sure. Now in English as well.
Here's an archive version. No paywall.
Look at this picture, guys. This is included
in there. This gesture this is showing you
more than one thing. Not only are they
using a Palestinian child, or at least a

(03:03:22):
younger kid, as a human shield, but they've
even dressed him up. So it's harder to
detect.
They dressed him up like an IDF member.
So if they're gonna shoot him, they're gonna
shoot him. And that that's what it says
in the article. A a Ghazn dressed in
an IDF uniform
next to Israeli soldiers in a home in
Rafa.
That's that's recent.

(03:03:42):
I just don't know how would this it's
so it's so
disconcerting for me that it can still be
happening. We and this is the same point.
I I gotta say it far too often.
It just really does unnerve me that it
can be this transparent,
and yet
somebody out there still pretends like it's not
happening. Here's the article. Harratz investigation, Israeli uses
Palestinian civilians to inspect booby trap tunnels in

(03:04:05):
Gaza. That's the for that's the exact definition
of a human shield. They have an entire
article showing you all sorts of background. Read
it for yourself. From Herets.
Here's an older one. This is from July
2024. Israeli soldiers filmed using detainees as human
shields. But I guess we'll ignore that one
too. This one's from August 2024. Israel's use
of human shields on the battlefields of war
crime. I guess we'll ignore that one too.

(03:04:26):
Here's another one. This one's from oh my
god. Look at that. From 2013,
from Reuters. Palestinian children tortured, uses human shields
by Israel. Woah. Wait a minute. You mean
it didn't start with October 7th?
Yeah. It's it's almost it's it's like you
know what's you know what I'm actually having
a real hard time with right now?
What I just did right there.
Or
or getting a show ready and feeling like

(03:04:47):
I'm not like, I don't even know what
to title the show. I should title the
show genocide.
Does did they murder 45 children today? But
it's almost like because it's so common right
now, and it's like, I don't I don't
feel that way. My point is that that
seems to be the current dynamic that it's
like this is just becoming normalized.
Or the fact that I'm, like, making facetious
jokes about how normal it is. This should

(03:05:08):
not be the case. It's and it's not
by our design. I this is not how
the world should be or is. It's because
the wrong people have been allowed to control
the view of what is right and wrong
for far too long.
And they're the same ones currently running for
president.
Now here's just a a an open running
thing from Twitter about harass human shield, and
you can go through here and look at

(03:05:29):
all the pictures. These are all from October
7th forward.
I mean, the most grotesquely
obvious examples.
Literally tied to the front of a tank.
Or tied to the front of a jeep.
We've seen that one too. Or handcuffed in
front of the a tank.
On and on and on. And we've shown
you I'm sure this one will pop up
in a second. I'm here some older examples.
There it is right there. Tied to the
front of a jeep, which, by the way,

(03:05:50):
it turned out that the jeep was so
hot in the summer that it melted the
skin off his shoulder.
And I believe he later got killed by
the same people.
I mean, it just never stops.
Never stops.
Zachary Foster, a brief history of visuals use
use of human shields. That's a good thread
with a lot of examples going back before.

(03:06:10):
Ryan Yacolek points out that The Lancet reports
that the conditions in Gaza have turned pregnancy
into a this is a quote. Turn pregnancy
into a life
threatening condition for thousands of women. Let alone
the infant children that are largely not surviving
as I understand it because they just do
not have the food or if they even
get the smallest amount of problem, they can't
survive.

(03:06:30):
She says there is an unprecedented rise in
maternal deaths, miscarriages, and stillbirths, leading to, quote,
the prevention of births within Gaza.
Without accident, which is exactly the point. Without
access to proper nutrition or health care, they
are forced to carry pregnancies through conditions unfathomable
to human conscience.

(03:06:50):
Decentered news. In an interview with Max Max
Blumenthal, you'll be happy to find out Jeremy
is now home.
But
you won't be surprised to hear what happened
to him. And, also, hopefully, we'll be shocked
to find out that your government doesn't care.
Solitary confinement,
there was probably a a a maybe a

(03:07:11):
150
prisoners that were in the jail with me.
They were separated from me. They were all
Palestinian.
I was the only American.
I was the only white person from what
I could tell. It was me and all
Palestinians,
and I was held in solitary confinement
for, 3 days.
And
I mean, even that alone, why is that

(03:07:31):
okay?
That's the smallest part of this.
Is that okay for a foreign government to
hold an American journalist or any journalist for
that one? I'll just put it this way.
Is it okay for a foreign government to
hold a foreign journalist for 3 days without
charge?
Since when has that ever been okay in
any context? Can you imagine the cry if
that would have been Iran
with anybody else's I mean, it's just so

(03:07:53):
one-sided.
I mean, this is also part of the
thing that keeps irritates me is that I
I I know I don't even need to
say that. 99.9%
of people watching this already made that conclusion
in their mind. But it's always about reaching
the people that need to hear it, the
new people that see the show. If they
end even get are allowed to see the
links popping up on Twitter. The frustrating part

(03:08:13):
though is it just so stupidly obvious.
I was given 1 cup
of chocolate pudding
over the course of 3 days. That was
all the food I was given, and I
was given maybe 1 or 2 tiny little
plastic cups of water during the 3 days.
I would ask for more water. They would
act like they did not hear me.
I would ask for water, and then they

(03:08:33):
And this is this is with somebody who
they know is going to eventually do this.
And so this is the good treatment, guys.
That that's this is different than you getting
dried grains of rice, no water, and potentially
being raped, which is what's happening with most
of the rest according to even the United
Nations, according to even human rights watch. This
is not some hyperbolic propaganda point. This is
directly from the international community, many of which

(03:08:54):
are not the UN UNRWA overlap.
They would just say no. And at one
point, the embassy
apparently sent a social worker to check on
me.
And I That's the US government, by the
way. So the US government
sends what turns out to be an Israeli
to check on him. Guess what they said?
I thought that this is a great development.

(03:09:14):
Someone's got The US embassy.
Yes.
Apparently. And this social worker was were they
American or Israeli or The social worker was
Israeli, and the social worker,
introduced themselves. And I thought to myself, you
know, kind of a sigh of relief, like,
okay. This person the least gonna give me
water. I
and, her first question was, why did you

(03:09:35):
hurt Israel? You hurt Israel. And I was
A social worker.
Okay. So there's many points to take from
this. The most important in my mind is
that this is what's going on with this
dynamic all around the world.
These pea so you're not you're not acting
as a social worker right there. You're acting
as a Zionist fighting for Israel's agenda.
So that this is the problem with a
lot of these people. It's not every person

(03:09:55):
is Israeli. But you have to realize that
this person's there on the behalf, at the
behest of the US government as a social
social worker for an American who's held without
charge.
So your job should be, are you okay?
Do you need anything?
Right? Are are you being treated okay? That's
what a social worker do. When you step
in and go why you hurt Israel, that
means they're foregoing their job as a social

(03:10:16):
worker, ignoring that the US government asked them,
or maybe they maybe that's who knows? Maybe
that's what they asked for. But
foregoing what they're supposed to be doing, ignoring
their obligations,
instead deciding to fight for Israel. Now think
about what that means for, I don't know,
intelligence
adjacent
people.
Opening, I don't know, startups in the United
States who are totally not acting for the

(03:10:37):
interest of the Israeli government, especially during their
genocide. Come on. We all know what's happening.
Whether or not that was the dynamic, they've
openly praised and said that's what they're doing.
So here is the point again.
In every context, these people who the the
at least the aggressive Zionists,
nothing is sacred when it comes to them
defending Israel.
But, oh my oh oh, this is the

(03:10:58):
person who's here to give to to check
on me is is berating me because she's
seeing my, you know, my,
my paper outside of my cell that I
gave information to the enemy during wartime.
So she even the social worker who was
apparently, you know, Israeli but sent by the,
embassy to check on me is treating me
like a terrorist, did not offer me any
food, did not offer me any order, only

(03:11:20):
asked why I hurt Israel and if I
love Israel.
And and this conversation is happening.
She's outside the cell. She's opening the, you
know, the steel slide to to ask me
these questions, and then she leaves. So that
was the only type of,
care that the embassy gave me. They they
sent me an Israeli to ask me why
I hurt Israel. So you're you're in solitary

(03:11:42):
confinement. They're basically starving you, depriving you of
water as they do to Palestinians. Mhmm. Did
the US embassy provide you with any other
assistance other than that social worker who had
basically interrogated you? No.
So the US embassy did nothing for you
at that point? They they did absolutely nothing.
They knew I was an American citizen. They
knew I was from New York.

(03:12:03):
They probably knew because they
they are
I would assume they can read. They can
see that the charges are bogus,
and still they do nothing for me except
send me an Israeli to to interrogate me
further and,
call that person a social worker.
That's wild.
Okay. So it looks like I saw on
the chat some breaking news.

(03:12:26):
It does appear Israel, at least according to
BBC, launching air strikes on Iran. So here
we go.
Unclear what sites have been hit.
And remember,
just because it's being reported at this point,
especially does not mean that everything's happening the
way it is.
We're still waiting for more information about what
sites in Iran may have been have been
struck. So far, Israel's only said it's conducting

(03:12:46):
strikes on military targets. Damn it. See, I
knew I I knew, actually, I may have
saved it. Hold on a second.
There was a a tweet that somebody had,
put aside for me
in regard to Iran
and the, you know, a a tweet about
Iranian pilot. Here, let me just look at
real quick. I even included someone who's gonna
talk about Iran necessarily today, and then of

(03:13:07):
course that happens. Let's see.
I can spell right. Okay. Here we go.
At least Syrian girl talking about it. So
it's apparently, it's all over the place. Everyone's
let's look at Greg Stoker.
US pilot, pilot
re and this it's it's the two points

(03:13:27):
for 1, the indication they were about to
attack Iran, apparently, was already floated, which I
think is ridiculous. But the fact that this
guy was a American pilot about to do
it for Israel, and posted it on Twitter
then deleted it. So this gives that credence,
the fact that this just happened. But it
says US pop fighter pilot, real Daniel Uh-oh.
That's interesting.
Oh, wow. Look at that.

(03:13:49):
The account. Oh, maybe he made a mistake
on the account. That's always possible. Maybe the
he typed the account out wrong. So before
we jump to conclusions Oh, wait. Here, let's
still let's double check.
Realdanielalwan.
Oh, that's why.
I e l.
No. That does look right. Am I missing

(03:14:10):
something?
Realdanielalwan.
Yeah. I think that's right. My god. So
apparently, this is gone already. See, okay, guys.
This is important.
It there let me be very clear.
There could be something that would just like,
maybe there's a maybe we're missing a a
character,
just to be clear. But if this turns

(03:14:32):
out to be an account
that existed, that that posted they're about to
bomb Iran as an American pilot then got
deleted, then the account's gone, we have to
make sure we consider whether that was done
by Twitter.
Just like we saw before. Just like we
saw from them deleting,
you know, any number of things we like,
there there's a very clear interest by Twitter
to hide things for Israel's interest. I've seen

(03:14:54):
it countless times already. Could you keep that
yeah. Some they're saying it's still on Instagram
right now. So So here's let's read the
tweet. So it says he he breaks operational
security by boasting he's flying in Israeli airspace
on social media, hitting
at hinting at an impending attack against Iran.
He quickly deleted it. Back in the day,
this would've gotten you fired.

(03:15:16):
Yeah. It says I'm above the holy land.
Well, look at that.
Yeah. He does say holly. Yeah. Look at
that.
Well, okay.
Let's do one more quick thing here.

(03:15:39):
Oops. Let's see what's coming up here.
I don't wanna read these off like I
know I can prove what they're saying. So
I'm a just kinda skim real quick.
Like like this, she's claiming Israel's announcing the
end of the ground invasion of Lebanon. I
certainly hope so. I find it hard to
believe but
that could be there's a lot of stuff
that gets shared that doesn't end up happening.

(03:16:03):
Hey. Nothing popping up here. Let me type
in Iran, see what comes up.
Okay.
Beware old photos circulating especially by Zionist accounts.
This is not the current situation in Iran.
Okay. Thank you, Vanessa Bailey, for always being
on point. So that does not mean there's
not attacks on Iran, but as usual,
which shows you there's a coordinated thing here.

(03:16:24):
Zionists are dumping these things online, acting like
you're showing explosions in Iran, where she's proven
she's claiming at the very least, and I
trust Vanessa Billie and you should check for
yourself, that,
it's not there. Yeah. So this one, for
example,
Here, let's do this in real time. Might
as well since we've broken off the kind
of main direction here. I'll get back to
it in a second. Because it was a
good moment there to break off.

(03:16:45):
Let's go to 10 I real quick. And
you guys see all this?
Yeah. Okay. Good.
Grab this image.
And sure enough,
May 22. Let's see. Look at that, guys.
And this person simply saying that it is
being shared, but it's obvious that this this
Vanessa Beal is claiming this is all over
and it's a different image. So, Zionist are

(03:17:07):
fake you know, and it could be it
doesn't have to be people for Israel's interest.
Maybe they just wanna get clicks and shares.
But this is the dynamic that we deal
with today. And that's free speech for you.
That's allowed. And we have to just always
consider that people are dishonest, might be lying.
We look keep going.
28 minutes ago, Western media framing is misleading.

(03:17:29):
Iran, let's see.
Iran. So, okay. So this is a sole
rod highlighting the the the way they're framing
it dishonestly. It's Iran waited 2 months to
respond Israel's assassination
and its capital because it the US said
they were working on a ceasefire,
which never happened.
Then Israel expanded its war in Lebanon. Israel's
retaliating to a retaliation. Oh, so they're just
simply framing it as they're retaliating, which is

(03:17:50):
not the case. I mean, I guess it
always is. But the end of the day
is that they Iran was responding
to something that Israel did.
So if you really did wanna deescalate this,
then that would be where Especially since they
warned you first, which they did. And then
still even got through, which embarrassed them, which
is why they're doing this, I argue.
I remember, Barak Ravid is an Israeli asset,

(03:18:11):
without question.
Okay. This is a Psalm Solomon Ahmed saying
Iranian's mock
attack and are currently searching for attacks on
Iran. But see, that very well could be
propaganda the same way in reverse. It's how
we have to consider this stuff.
Is Jordan trying to shoot them down the

(03:18:31):
way okay. This is Jordan airspace. He's claiming
spotted
spotting Israeli jets. Let's go to latest.
Again, it's just this is you this is
how you have to engage with Twitter, man.
It's so There's And these days, there's more
misinformation than there's not. And I'm I'm okay
with that. As long as you have discernment,

(03:18:52):
you just have to be looking and do
your due diligence. I almost think that's a
positive. It's driving people hopefully to care
to double check this stuff and realize how
many liars there are out there. Always has
been.
Yep. Okay. Here's one example of them sharing
these images that are fake. Right? So recognize
the accounts doing this.

(03:19:15):
Okay. So let's go through some more
and we'll come back to this.
See if we get any more developments. Let
me do one more thing with this, the
main search here.
Do it from Google.
See what they want you to see,

(03:19:38):
Yeah. Okay. So here is CNN, there's NBC,
Fox News.
That's from an hour ago.
Axios says Israel launches retaliatory. That's Barak Ravid.
So my point is this is what Israel
would want you to hear. Began attacking
against Iran in retaliation.
There you go, which wasn't retaliation.
Israel and US officials believe Iran will respond

(03:19:59):
militarily. That's always the game they play. So
now begins the hype about how Iran will
create terrorism by responding. Right? And they're gonna
stress the call for a de escalation
Iran do. Don't be the bad guy. De
escalate. You never heard that to Israel, did
you? It's it's just so lazy how they
do this.

(03:20:19):
Biden administration's concern that a significant Iranian response
could lead to an all at war. Like,
this is so stupid. Like, I could have
written this out. It's a it's a lazy
script.
So now Iran's responsible for the but why
wouldn't that have been your big case for
Israel this entire time or maybe the first
time before they attacked Iran on and and
illegally
bombed an embassy or assassinated
a leader? It's incredible.

(03:20:42):
So it does, by all intents and purposes,
it does seem to be that there is
something going on.
Let's try let's just see what CNN says.
Israel says it's launching strikes.
Okay. Here's one from I woke up to
distant sounds of blasts. Somebody in Tehran
that adds a little more

(03:21:02):
breath, you know, more texture to it.
But instead of speaking anonymously to CNN, that
that doesn't make me feel like it's real.
I don't see any reason why an Iranian
would have any prob there'd be no bro
there would no reason somebody would be hurt
in Iran for speaking to Israel to media.
Despite all of the I mean, guys, the
late the narrative that responded about these places

(03:21:23):
are so stupid.
They they're just okay. Let me put it
this way.
I have there's I I would have no
doubt that your government in the United States
or the US government, let's say, would go
after, I don't know, like a Julian Assange.
Should they do something they don't like. Okay?
So that always exists. My point is that
the if you have a random person in
Iran who decides to speak to CNN about
how Israel's bombing Iran, I don't see there

(03:21:45):
would be any reason that they would suddenly
be like, oh, you're gonna get arrested for
doing that. It's not the way it works.
Unless their government wanted to go after them
because they did something they didn't like which
Iran is just as capable as the US.
But the idea there's I think the implication
is somehow that
they're all that they're they, you know, living
under this despotic regime and they're not allowed
to speak to the good guys. Right? That's
just not how this game is. But it's

(03:22:06):
it's absurd, guys. I mean, I'm just tired
of the childish dynamics of what they frame
these people as. When they are the living
embodiment of what everything they claim they're fighting
today. If you wanna look for what they
claim they're fighting, Israel is living it in
front of you right now. But they don't
care about those things.
Let's see what Fox says.
Israel begins retaliatory strikes against Iran following missile

(03:22:28):
barrage targeting Israelis. No. No. I see. This
is so see, of course. It just shows
you how lame these platforms are. No. The
missile barrage explicitly targeted military sites. Not a
single person was killed, not even a military
person. They love to pretend that means they
somehow stopped it, but they didn't. They they
bombed, went right through even though they warned
him. This has been proven. That's why Jeremy

(03:22:49):
was taken because he proved those things, so
did a local NBC person, though.
It's just my point is that they still
pretend targeting Israelis.
It's so provably not the case, but they
need the lazy reader who doesn't care about
anything other than the headline to believe Iran
bad guy and Israel fighting for freedom.
Here we are. It's the same guy, by
the way, Trey, who's always lying about this

(03:23:10):
stuff for Israel.
Explosions were heard in Iran's capital. Alright. We'll
come back to it. We'll see if there's
any updates by the time we get past
this stuff.
So where we were at, talking about
some of the the latter parts about what
Israel's doing in general, part of that was
journalism.
On the same point, by the way. So
they can float lies in places like Gaza
and nobody will know any better because no

(03:23:31):
one's there to tell the story. Very different
than what we're seeing in Lebanon as I
was telling you before. As we've shown you
about the lies of the gold where suddenly
people go, well, I'm looking and there's nothing
there. Oops.
I guess it doesn't just lay lazily use
the same like, the point is they they
felt they could just move the Gaza cut
out right over to Lebanon. Sorry. It's not
gonna work. People are there. They can investigate.
People have phones. They can share the information.

(03:23:53):
They're being caught in real time, just like
pretty much would like in Gaza, but there's
more evidence to it. Glenn points out that
these and this is one of the last
surviving journalists that they're targeting right now in
Gaza. Israeli occupation forces stormed the last remaining
hospital
in Gaza.
He says, imagine the courage required, the physical
and moral courage, to watch Israel kill more

(03:24:13):
than a 100 Gaza journalists over the last
year, seemingly that the western journalists don't care
about,
and says as he is, as a journalist,
one of the few reporters left are publicly
threatened by the IDF with assassination. They did.
They they literally put out a list with
his name on it and his picture, claiming
he was a terrorist. He's not.
I mean, there is I mean, there's no

(03:24:35):
evidence to back it up whatsoever. Other journals
are showing this, people like Glenn himself, Israel
simply saying he is with nothing to back
it up.
That's because they just simply claim they're all
terrorists because that's his best they can do
right now. And he continues to prove that
they're committing genocide. And that's why they're going
after him. Here's a young kid. This kid,
I believe, is 17 years old.
Israeli forces have now kidnapped him. He's a

(03:24:55):
well young well known young journalist named Abod
Batah.
He became famous apparently in the Arab world,
always offering, like, a level of positivity and
kinda poking fun at whatever he could, like
a level of kind of, you know, lightheartedness
to a terrible situation.
Now he's been taken by Israel. And the
sad thing is no one's gonna care.

(03:25:16):
All the people screaming about press rights and
personal freedom and free speech and human rights
aren't gonna say a word for this kid.
And like many of those, he'll walk out
of there 20 years later, a shell of
himself.
I've I mean, we've seen 5 of them
since the start of people wandering out
all emaciated with a with their brain half
gone.

(03:25:37):
They've been there for 10 years, 20 years.
No charge. That's not a fake story. Even,
I mean, even the Israeli groups point to
these things. They were the ones releasing them.
And here we have another kid journalist who's
probably being hurt right now for doing it.
Do you think that they're gonna rape a
person because he's a Palestinian? What do you
think they do to the journalists who are
trying to expose their crimes?

(03:25:57):
Your government's allowing all of this.
The credo points out Israel's killed 3 Lebanese
journalists
in intentionally targeted assassinations.
That's that's on top of the ones we
already showed you. The Reuters journalist that was
killed in Lebanon to begin with, now they're
just straight up targeting journalists in Lebanon. Why?
Because the world allowed that,

(03:26:18):
or rather the powerful allowed that
despite
what we wanted.
Here's CNN
from today. More than a 130 Israeli reservists
sign letters refusing to fight or in Gaza
or Lebanon.
Here is an Israeli from Israel
speaking up.
She says, we, Israeli citizens,

(03:26:40):
residing in Israel
and abroad,
call on the international community
and the UN and its institutions, the United
States, European Union, League of Arab States, and
all states around the world to intervene immediately
and implement every possible sanction.
Now not every Israeli thinks this obviously,

(03:27:00):
or every Jewish person,
or everybody in general. But this is an
Israeli in Israel speaking about what then I
just want you to see that there is
not this broad stroke conversation.
And and some of them do also just
care about people being hurt.
It says and it's got 1,500,000
views so far. She has towards she says
every possible sanction towards achieving an immediate ceasefire

(03:27:23):
between Israel and its neighbors for the future
of both peoples in Israel, Palestine, and the
peoples of the region, and for the rights
and security of life. Many of us are
veteran activists against the occupation
for peace and mutual existence in this land.
We are motivated by our love for the
land and its residents, and we are concerned
about for their future. We have been horrified

(03:27:43):
by the war crimes committed by Hamas and
other organizations on October 7th, and we are
horrified by the countless war crimes that Israel
is committing.
Unfortunately,
the majority of Israelis support the continuation of
the war, I agree with that, and its
massacres.
And
a change from within
from within is not currently feasible. I also

(03:28:05):
agree with that, whether Netanyahu's there or not.
The state of Israel is on a suicidal
path.
Listen to this Israeli trying to speak through
the nonsense.
And so is destruction and devastation that increase
day by day.
Now you're seeing their assets threaten western politicians
on live TV. I mean, think about the
impunity that comes along with all of this.

(03:28:27):
Whether
false or not, they believe it, and they're
continuing to be emboldened by that impunity.
The government of Israel, she continues, has abandoned
its citizens who are hostages
and has killed some. It is neglected.
It has neglected the residents of the south
and north of Israel, and it has forsaken
the fate and future of all of its
citizens.

(03:28:49):
Israelis, Palestinian citizens are persecuted
and silenced by state authorities
and by the wider public. It is our
opinion that the repression,
intimidation, and political persecution prevent many who share
our views from joining this call.
That's the point. Threats.
Same thing happens in this country to a
degree. Every day that goes by further distant

(03:29:11):
every day that goes that goes by further
distances any possible horizon for regional agreement and
reconciliation.
A future where Jewish Israelis can live with
security in this place. Achieving these required lengthy
processes, the constant massacres and destruction must be
stopped immediately.
The lack of true international pressure, that's important
because it doesn't exist right now. The continuation

(03:29:32):
of arms supplies to Israel. Economic and security
partnerships and
scientific and cultural collaborations
bring most Israelis to believe that Israel's policies
enjoy international support. They do not.
The leaders of many countries make repeated statements
about the horror they feel and verbally denounce
Israel's occup operations. But these condemnations are not

(03:29:53):
backed by practical actions
and a replete with empty words and declarations.
And she includes a link for you to
join what she's doing. Now I don't know
her or what she's talking about, so it
could be a ploy for my point is
the words matter,
And I'm hoping people can consider this.
I think it's important.
Here
is another state department

(03:30:14):
diplomat
resigning in protest.
And yet people still pretend like we can't
see this.
For an 18 year career, you don't take
the decision to resign lightly.
But it was
despite all of my efforts, despite everyone's efforts
in terms of us career diplomats,
highlighting the inhumanity,
the illegality
of this policy. The fact that it's counterproductive

(03:30:36):
policy that is actually emboldening extremism on all
sides. It is only ensuring generational cycle of
violence.
I was initially told,
good. Thank you for your feedback. I was
actually sending daily reports to the department. That
was part of my job as a spokesperson,
and I was highlighting what was happening in
Gaza from the air pan Arab media. So
I thought that my work was helping and

(03:30:58):
feeding
into Washington's formulation
of what to do next, But it it
became abundantly clear eventually that the policy was
the policy. It was not shifting. I was
actually asked in January to stop sending in
those reports. Wow. The reports also included the
images that were going viral all over the
Arab world of children being massacred, oftentimes showing
US complicity with fragments of US bomb. Any

(03:31:19):
other circumstances, this would have at least prompted
a type of review
of our, again, Leahy law, everything else. It
didn't. Instead, I was silenced.
I was sidelined,
and that is something that has been unprecedented
for me as an 18 year diplomat. There's
always disagreements within the US foreign service in
terms of policy, but it's always been a
spirit of collaboration, a spirit of we wanna

(03:31:41):
hear from you. Let's talk.
Unless it's Israel, because that's new. This hasn't
happened before. Now because it's Israel, you recognize
this again,
the weak spot could be compromised, could be
blackmail, could be that this is always who
they've been and everything else is a cover.
It doesn't really matter. I mean, it matters,
but at this point, you have to recognize
it shows you something.

(03:32:01):
They're willing to expose what they're doing, expose
who they are, show their hand
for the interest of a genocidal foreign government.
This has been different. It has been silenced,
and let me tell you, it has sent
a chilling effect across the entire I can
speak about the foreign service.
People have become to self censor themselves. They're
worried. Yep. And that hurts us as Americans.

(03:32:24):
It does because there's a lot more people
out there who see this just like with
Epstein, for example, where they've later come out
and go, we all knew. Well, yeah, we
know that. But you saying that admits that
you're
chose to hide that.
And most of them, I think, because they
just don't care.
Right? But a lot of them are afraid
of the consequences
from Israel.

(03:32:45):
And through that, the extension, your own government.
For them speaking out about what Israel's doing
so they don't say anything.
Because when you have your experts,
your experts, your US government experts silencing themselves
because they're worried about retribution or they're worried
about what it will do to their career,
we all lose. We lose as American citizens.
It doesn't keep us secure. It doesn't keep
us safe. Mhmm. And we showed you the

(03:33:07):
last one. I won't play it again, but
where he resigned because
they caught there was children being raped.
Like, literally.
And Israel went in and covered it up.
That would that is what and he resigned
in protest because of that. Now we know
that that's very far more prevalent than we
realize.
Now here is a a,
Ingle, almighty article saying Pentagon launches audit of

(03:33:28):
Israel's management of US weaponry.
Excuse me while I laugh out loud because
I think that's an absolute lie, not the
platform and the article. I mean, the fact
that they're never going to do anything. Just
like the they'll give you 30 days and
you better straighten up and then Matt Miller's
gonna say, well, they sure tried. Can't you
see? They took actions. He did it last
time.
So they didn't stop the problem. In fact,
I can prove to you that it's only

(03:33:49):
gotten worse. But you point to a couple
of hollow actions and say that they gave
it their best shot? Is that what matters?
But you guys are just so compromised, it's
insulting.
This is a, an effort to keep it
all going. Under the illusion that maybe we'll
do something,
but we won't though for sure because we
never did, and we won't do it again.
The the Israeli government, rather the US government
has shown you exactly who they are.

(03:34:11):
That's not gonna suddenly change.
The only thing that might change is a
willingness our our our ability to change the
dynamic to a point to where they feel
that they no longer are bound by whatever
is keeping this going.
And we'll come back to that to end
real quick. I'm gonna quickly go through the
rest of this, but so this is
the article that Robert wrote
about the general's plan.

(03:34:31):
Surrender or starve that they've tried to pretend
wasn't there, but has been admitted publicly by
Israeli media, by Israeli IDF members. BM is
highlighting this. An investigative piece aired 3 days
ago on channel 12 reveals that people behind
the generals plan are right wing activists who
are planning Israeli settlements in Gaza as the
next stage. And we already know this. You've
seen it. I've proven it to you with

(03:34:52):
their own post, their own conventions, their own
they have their signs ready. They have names
for the settlements.
And we're we're debating this is happening. That's
why it's so infuriating for the for the
honest people in this conversation.
So my point is that it's real. It's
obvious. It's happening. We know that. It's being
driven by the Ben Gevir settlement alarming aspect
of this.
Now here is what, as she writes, this

(03:35:13):
is what it looks like when masses of
people are transported to concentration camps
in the 21st century.
Will the people behind the wheel one day
claim they were just drivers?
Now we've heard that before, haven't we?
Just like every other time, blindfolded

(03:35:34):
in those same white covers,
many of them never to be seen again.
That's not hyperbole. That's been proven from the
beginning. There are people that have never come
back. And we're talking about people that aren't
even pal people that have been taken while
alongside foreign doctors. Who are from other locations.
They just never show up again.
Different ones have pointed this out. I don't
even know. They've never seen them again since
they were taken. Children,

(03:35:58):
women. And these are people that
chose not to leave their homes.
Guys, it's so vivid. It's so real. It's
exactly what we've seen in the past.
And this morning, Israeli forces, this is as
of today, raided the Kamal Adwan Hospital.
None the the part of the last standing,

(03:36:20):
it says, it ordered patients and staff to
go down to the main courtyard.
More than a 150 people are now trapped
inside the hospital.
That was my point. They're not these are
people that aren't able to. Babies and incubators.
Women, children, amputees. And they're just going, get
out. We don't care your sir your circumstances.
We'll tell the world that we gave you
the way out, but we know you can't
walk, so we'll just kill you anyway. Pretend
like it's your fault you're still there. Over

(03:36:41):
and over and over and over. Being proven
by even corporate media. And we still have
to debate the conversation.
Here is them sitting outside.
The the chairman of the EuroMed human rights
group. Doctors and nurses from Kamal Abin Hospital
after being detained
and mistreated by Israel. Even ISIS and Nazis
didn't go that far, he says. Now you
could decide whether that's true or not. The

(03:37:01):
point is that these are people in the
hospital.
Bundled up and sat in the dirt, kidnapped
by Israel. You know, with a with a
tank pointing at them for good measure.
Oh, here, by the way, is a is
a grouping of medical workers.
The medical team from Al Aqsa
being transferred
and then got bombed by Israeli airstrike. Look

(03:37:22):
at the bus.
All the windows bombed out.
Tire gone.
See that?
Who I mean, I don't even know if
I've I've been I'm not sure. Follow-up later
whether some of them were hurt or killed.
The point is simply, there's not even an
narrative around this. They're not trying to go,
we thought it was Hamas. Anra was there.
Hamas sold the bus. We thought that there's

(03:37:43):
nothing. They just ignore it. If nobody says
anything,
they just ignore it because they're just bombing
everything. This is a bus full of medical
workers.
And they just bombed it because they don't
want medical workers. Simple as that. It's just
not a complicated situation. They're these are terrorists
murdering people because they don't like them.
Salat Solomon Ahmed points out the Israeli forces

(03:38:03):
gathered large numbers of children and women in
a hole, surrounded with gunfire before allowing them
to flee from the Gaza Strip. This is
the testimony from a local woman in Jabali
refugee camp. They and remember, these these are
the camps that Trump tells you he's gonna
get rid of.
Think about that. He says they took all
the children from their mothers and put them
in something resembling like a pit or a
hole. A tank came and circled around them

(03:38:24):
several times until they were covered in dirt
and sand amidst the screams of children and
the wailing of mothers. After that, the soldiers
came and started throwing the children in the
direction of the mothers. If a mother picked
up a child, she had to carry them
and move quickly without confirming that it was
her child or it was somebody else's. Many
of the mothers picked up a child that
wasn't theirs. Forced to leave and other women
with other women's children. Here, a new chapter

(03:38:44):
of suffering begins as a mother searches for
her child in the hands of another woman,
claiming
calming a child in her arms until she
finds her mother.
The point is that you're rounding up children,
putting them inside of a an area, which
we've seen before already, dirt getting aiming your
guns at them like you're separating
why are you doing that?
What's the logic here? I could tell you

(03:39:05):
the logic.
Suffering.
Revenge. Like, they keep telling you if you
even care to look.
Every single one of these IDF account, they're
screaming about revenge and Amalek and destroying this
and taking new settlements and stealing lay stealing
lingerie and gold and money.
I've never seen a more ignored and obvious

(03:39:25):
dynamic
ever ever in my life. The crimes are
undeniable. Your government knows that. That's again why.
Everybody, everybody, everywhere knows what's happening.
Now here's the aftermath.
Israeli occupation bombed the, the martyr school in
Al Nusret camp. Another school in another location
they bombed many times.
Central Gaza, resulting in at least 16 Palestinians

(03:39:46):
killed, women and children. Look at them. And,
no, mind you, there's there's some graphic images.
Dead children picking up bodies,
a one child there that barely survived.
This is happening every single day. Daniel McAdams.
These rallies tell Palestinian children to go to
a safe zone. That was the safe zone.

(03:40:07):
So they moved them from North Gaza.
Say, go to this location. Go get out
of this way. Go to the safe area.
Then they bomb the safe zone. Now it's
almost become
obnoxious to say this over and over.
Because they do it every time. I don't
mean, have you know, facetiously, like, a lot.
I mean, they do it effing every time.

(03:40:27):
They move them from somewhere and say, don't
go there. That's bad. Go to the safe
zone. Then they bomb the safe zone. They
bomb the path and they bomb where they
were every single time.
And it is frustrating
because we have to pretend like we're debating
this with somebody.
Because the people in power who allowed to
continue act like it's not happening.

(03:40:48):
Here is a child who was caught under
the rubble that they bombed.
Plus, a couple of
woman, a child, a younger younger woman, it
looks like. And they're trying to work them
out of underneath the rubble.
Her name is Ghazal Bari,
the only remaining family member of her family.

(03:41:08):
They're trying to keep them happy and in
good spirits while they're digging them out.
Now this is what kills me.
They wrote at the right on his arm.
I'm I'm guessing be in case they can't
save her or they can't or maybe just

(03:41:30):
make her laugh.
That's what it looks like right there.
God. It just kills me.
Orwell's claiming she died
in the chat.
Either way, the point is that this is
just a sad ongoing reality, you know?
Now here is what I've used for a
picture today.

(03:41:51):
Thomas Massie says, if Israel insists on destroying
civilian targets, and this is Lebanon by the
way,
let them buy and build their own weapons.
American taxpayers should not be funding this. Now,
you know, I look, I know I I
know I'm jaded. I do Out of everybody
talking, Thomas Massey is the one that I
think makes more sense. But it's really easy
to say this right now.
And then have nothing happen.

(03:42:12):
Right? Wait. I mean, I if if I
were in any of these positions, this would
be the it's it's you would not stop
hearing this.
We'll be talking about sanctions. We'll be talking
about why nobody else cares.
But it's easy to say this. Now I'm
probably gonna get hate for that because I
it is a positive thing and I get
it. Sometimes I feel like I'm all there's
nothing positive, nothing good that but I just
can't feel I'm I'm just tired of pretending
like this one little thing is a positive

(03:42:34):
while we're living literally
that he said this and then they kept
killing children. It's not his fault alone.
But I'm just tired of acting like these
things are doing anything.
Yes. We all know that. It shouldn't even
be that we have to have Thomas Massie
make the case. We should already know it
because it's everywhere.
Everywhere. I've never seen more evidence in my
life. The point is to watch this building
collapse

(03:42:54):
because they bombed it in Lebanon.
For no reason, it's full of people and
civilians. They're all over, right out in front
of the area. And all they can do
is just go out of no Hezbollah. Not
even Hamas anymore. We're just shifting narratives. But
who cares? I guess that makes the same
thing.
It's not.
It's a political organization that's far more broad
than Hamas. It actually is not just even
military. It's very, very clearly pull up publicly

(03:43:15):
supported, but who cares? Because Israel can do
what it want, apparently.
Do what it wants.
But, yes, I agree. Now let's do something
about that, Thomas. Let's do something. And I'm
not trying to he is actually doing something
in some cases.
But we need to do more than just
point these things out.
It may be just my frustration coming through.
Got doctor Abusita
points out finishing operating with his colleagues on

(03:43:37):
a 4 year old with a fractured thigh
bone and several several tendons in his hand.
Maybe the German foreign ministry asked can explain
to him why it's necessary for him to
go through life with these injuries and a
dead mother and two siblings.
Bad picture here.
He says, do you understand what you're seeing?
These are the remains of Palestinians, including children.

(03:43:59):
From the Allahabad hospital. As a result of
the massacre carried out by Israel in a
school, sheltering displaced civilians in Nusret camp that
I just showed you. Resulting in 17 killed,
including 9 children. And the best they can
do is try to collect parts of their
bodies to identify them.
That's what Israel is doing with your government
support.
Now Ryan Grim also points out, the very

(03:44:20):
people we just showed you trying to save
those children, now they're being attacked.
Surprise, surprise.
He says, heroic figures who have spent a
year just digging people out of under the
rubble are now being targeted and most likely
dragged to torture camps.
And so we've completely stopped our operations in
North Gaza and the situation has been catastrophic.
Citizens have been left with with without human
services. Israel occupation forces have arrested 5 of

(03:44:43):
their personnel and taken them to unknown locations.
Fired on them.
Gosh, it's just crazy.
Jonathan Cook,
this made me more upset than just about
anything today.
When you think our mendacious politicians and media
can't sink any lower, comes along another stokes,
stonker, he says. The Guardian credulously repeats Starmer's

(03:45:05):
claims
that Gaza is starving, by the way, which
we all should know,
not because of Israel's official genocidal policy, you
know, to starve them, but because of Putin.
Not joking.
Russia hit Ukrainian ports. That's why Gaza is
suffering.
It just it it you you their new
bar is reached every day. I mean, think

(03:45:25):
about how insulting it is. So you got
Eli Lilly trying to convince you that there's
no famine at all, that there's more food
than ever. But if they are starving, it's
Russia's fault though. Whichever one you like, your
choice.
They're caught. That's why it feels like this,
guys. They're caught.
The difference is they don't care they're caught,
and they're just carrying it out. That's where
we are.
That's why and and and maybe if we

(03:45:47):
don't continue to maintain the awareness, maybe they'll
be able to get away with it too.
Hopefully not.
But here are the children in Gaza,
desperately grasping for whatever food they can get
from people that are handing it to them
because
they haven't brought brought a single piece in
since October 2nd.
Exponentially ramping up the the starvation. Here is

(03:46:09):
1,100,000
people in a famine, imminent.
This is from a couple of weeks ago
from the I the integrated food security phase
classification. I've already shown this to you. There's
no denying what's happening. The by the way,
the craziest part is they're not even trying
to make it out to become us anymore.
They do have that lazy narrative. They just
kind of expect you to put put under
everything, but they're not even saying this stuff
happened anymore. All the stuff we're looking at,

(03:46:29):
the bombing of buildings, the starvation, they just
moved on. They're talking about Lebanon, there's care
they're talking about our agenda and our defending
our they've moved on to broader ideas because
they've gotten away with this right now, at
least in their minds in regard to the
narrative.
Not in the way Not in the minds
and viewpoint of most people in the world.
Which is what I'm hoping actually carries on.

(03:46:49):
Now, of course, we go to the UAE,
pretending to send aid into Lebanon.
And it turns out they're chock full of
Israeli spy devices. Surprise, surprise.
That's what it looks like to normalize with
the government. The people don't care. People don't
like Israel and their country. But the government
has sold their souls.
And now, they're allowing them to put
You know, it's a crime. No matter how

(03:47:10):
you spin this, it's a crime. But Israel
doesn't care because they're just trying to get
what they want out of it. Now Max
Blumenthal points out,
the ex Israeli soldier,
and we've talked about this already, Amos Hoisin,
who is working for the Biden administration,
arrived in Lebanon as a US envoy
with a mission, as Max writes, and I
would agree to subvert UN resolution 1701. Now

(03:47:32):
you've heard that resolution. Right? You remember?
Particularly
the part that require requires
Israel to respect Lebanon's sovereignty. Funny how that
works.
He tacitly threatened,
Nab Haibari, the Lebanese parliamentary speaker, Amal leader,
and and the Amal leader of the party,
and interlocher
with Israeli military escalation if he refused to

(03:47:53):
elevate his terms. Because that's how you negotiate.
That's a good diplomatic stance. Right? Which includes
the right to assault southern Lebanon and attack
Lebanese territory by air.
You know, right in line with the UN
insta UN mandate. Right?
Or rather the UN, resolution.
Well, obviously not. This is the whole point.
This is what Joseph says.

(03:48:13):
He says, Amos who is
who is Israeli, but for some reason is,
quote, representing the US as an envoy to
Lebanon, which is again, how much more do
we need to see?
Loves the part of the UN Security Council
Resolution 1701
where Hezbollah disarms, but, you know, not so
much the part where his country has to
move out of Lebanon.

(03:48:33):
See how that works? So they love to
point to the resolution and go do your
part. Otherwise, you hate Jews. Or or, I
mean, otherwise or I can't talk.
But we won't do our part because you're
the bad guy.
But UN, except UN is Hamas, when we
don't like what they say. But, otherwise, you
do it you have to do what they
say.
Yeah. This is it's just it's it's a
cartoon, and this is why oddest people are

(03:48:54):
not falling for this stuff. And this is
my point.
This is the same resolution that Elon Levy
was screaming about. And by the way, continue
to do because he got the order to
do so.
Why didn't UNIFIL implement 1701 over the past
18 years? You mean the thing that you've
never even attempted to accomplish? My point was
showing you at this point, 7 other examples

(03:49:14):
of them not abiding by your resolutions going
back as as far as you can look.
But loving the point that when you want
them to do it, as well as the
point that this is the moron who tells
you UN, not UNRWA. He I've shown you
the tweets where he goes, the UN is
Hamas. Whether it's facetious or not, you're telling
us the UN is a must, but then
you want us to follow their resolutions?
Obviously, they're just saying whatever they can say

(03:49:35):
in any moment to get what you what
they want from you. Otherwise known as deceivers,
liars, manipulators.
But overall,
all you want is for them to get
their part done and you not to do
your part, which again, you can see right
here,
is
basically not giving up the occupied Lebanon territory.

(03:49:57):
Surprise surprise. But it says these two demands
contradict with the UN council resolution.
So the oh, even even Axios is going,
Israel's saying give us your part, but demanding
what they want, but that then underbides the
resolution.
It's just it's just stupid. It is it's
the definition of these things. Now to finish
up in general, here's Steve Sweeney.
For the second follow-up for the for the

(03:50:18):
follow-up. For the second part 2. And he's
simply saying his hunt for the supposed
gold under this hospital,
yet again turns up a 0. A goose
egg. Now you again, you could argue he's
lying, missed it somehow. They covered it up.
The point is that at the end, this
is what I keep saying about what's going
on in Lebanon.
The I I guess as as of, yesterday,
at the very least, they have not attacked
this hospital. I haven't seen it today either,

(03:50:39):
but this is his report.
So seems like they might, but I think
what we're seeing is the difference of Lebanon
to Gaza. We've already seen the BBC. We've
seen RT. We've seen local journalists. We've seen
many different people go through and say, well,
here's where they said it would be. And
that's that's what that's what he's looking at
right at the beginning right here. Now he
goes, well, that looks like a hot room
to me.
So they're lying, guys. They're lying. Like they've

(03:51:00):
lied about every other thing they've ever done.
And here is the this this guy is
from, was it Sky News? Yeah. Sky News?
Saying it's not there. And Frances Frances Albany
says whenever journalists are allowed to check,
Israel's claims that militant's bases are beneath hospitals
is revealed to be what it is. Excuse
to bomb civilians.
Just like with al Shifa. Just like with

(03:51:20):
every other hospital I've shown you. I mean,
every other one of them. I mean, I've
played you these clips from doctors
across the board telling you that we're here,
there's no Hamas presence, there's no tunnels, they're
lying about that, they've kidnapped my coworkers.
This is a lesson learned from Gaza since
2008.
Now just just this opening part of this
since I mentioned it, the point is that
there's a lot of these doctors who are

(03:51:40):
willing to tell you that they can prove
to you it's not the case. Not doctors
from Palestine, mind you, but doctors from all
over the world. Every single part of the
hospital has been destroyed. The whole infrastructure
of the hospital has been destroyed. When I
spoke to Marwan yesterday, he told me there
were a 107 patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff. God
only knows what has happened to them. I

(03:52:01):
think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.
Bodies have been discovered.
I've I've played that clip so many times.
The point is, he says simply that there's
no mass presence, there's no human shields, everyone
without exception has made the same point, and
Israel's carrying out genocide. All of them saying
the same thing across the board.

(03:52:25):
Here is Caitlin Johnstone saying the same thing.
Israel can't ban journalists from going to Lebanon
like the Kanjha in Gaza.
So when Israel claimed there was a bunker
under a hospital in Beirut, the press just
sent a bunch of reporters to investigate. They
immediately saw that Israel was lying. That's why
they banned press in Gaza, guys. That's why
they're murdering journalists in Gaza. And they also
just so desperate they are. But here's lord
Bebo to the rescue.

(03:52:45):
Israel finds Mein Kampf in a Hezbollah bunker.
Really?
And I simply said, why are why are
you, David. Why are you blindly boosting this
laughable Zionist propaganda?
I mean, guys, this is incredible. Like, here's
the thing. Last time they made the case
about
Gaza. Right? Except, oops, it turned out that

(03:53:05):
it was a Hebrew book. Oops.
I guess they learned their lesson. Yep. They
learned their lesson. Now part 2. Oh, here's
an Eberk one. It's just lazy.
Like, of course, this could exist. It probably
this probably exist everywhere to some degree. The
point is that it's so lazy just to
go, oh, see? Israel found a passport. Israel's
found Mein Kampf and a Hezbollah bunker. Therefore,

(03:53:26):
they're Nazis. End of story. Like, it's just
lazy. The ideological idea ideology
doesn't even line up.
But who cares though. Right? Who cares that
they're Israel's literally
supporting and funding the most obvious Nazi element
of the planet today, the Azov movement, or
that they worked with the Nazi organization during
the Zionist rise, during the final solution as

(03:53:47):
you can look up on Wikipedia, or all
these other facts they really don't want you
to see.
But just, hey, Mein Kampf. Therefore, we can
kill all the civilians. Right? I mean, it's
just lazy stuff, guys. And it looks like
he stopped falling he he stopped falling because
I said that. Alright. Fine. No. I'm just
kidding. I don't I don't I'm not gonna
be petty like that. So here's Craig Murray.
Israel is repeatedly bombing residential apartments in Beirut,

(03:54:09):
which house ordinary people like you and me.
The Guardian continually characterizes them as Hezbollah bastion
because they're lazy,
genocide supporting
supposed journalists.
How in the world would you know they're
Hezbollah bastions? And on top of that, that
doesn't mean terrorism. So you're simply admitting they're
bombing civilian locations because they say the word

(03:54:30):
Hezbollah.
And these are on video. You can literally
see, and they can go and investigate. And
turns out they're all civilians. And these are
not being done by Hezbollah investigators, guys. It
is
they've lost.
This is they've lost. Now eve and especially
if we find the reports of the pulling
back of the front line of Lebanon, I
don't know if that's true or not, that
would even add more obviousness to it.

(03:54:50):
Now to generally finish up here, last two
things, I wanna read you this and play
this clip to end. Michael r Hicks writes
this out. This is just important to think
about.
He says, while I was sifting through various
reports
on the genocide in Gaza while pursuing some
vague ideas for a story, he's an author,
I was overwhelmed by the stark realization that
Israel and the US are going to get

(03:55:12):
away with murdering
2,000,000 innocent people in broad daylight.
Looking through just a tithe of information from
over the last year left me feeling distraught.
Over 30 years of intelligence analysis, I reported
on a lot of things. Some of which
were heart wrenching, but I used to think
we Americans were the good guys. We're not,

(03:55:33):
he says. Now I don't I'm
I don't like I I don't even like.
It's not appropriate to conflate the government with
the people. As much as they come from
the people, the point is the government well,
even that seems like an illusion today seeing
as how the government or the parasite protected
political class. They all come from the same
circle. Like, they're not just normal people, by
the way. So e but even if it
was that they plucked out you know, people

(03:55:54):
got elected organically, which I we it's how
naive we have to be to believe that
today. The point would still be that they
then become part of the government.
Right? They're officially speaking, they're not the public.
They are the government. They're supposed to be
the living embodiment of your will. We know
that's not true.
My point though is that even if that
was true,
you would not frame them as them. You

(03:56:15):
would say that the government is the way
that they're acting is not simp just simply
the representation of the American people. So when
we can say that the government the American
government are not the good guys, that's not
to say that the American people,
whether being blinded to go along with bad
things or not, are the same thing. I
argue most Americans believe
because they want to or because they just

(03:56:36):
can't see it, that they are fighting for
freedom because that makes them feel good themselves.
And that's why the US government pretends to
be good because we, by and large, want
good.
But they're not good. And that's the point
he's making. They're not the the rules based
order fighting for freedom that they frame themselves
on. They're not. He says the democrats who
fashioned themselves as saviors of democracy
decry what Trump might theoretically do if he's

(03:56:58):
elected while ignoring or actively defending the full
complicity of the Biden administration and Harris's declaration
of ironclad support for Israel.
The complicity, of course, extends to all the
Democrats in congress who have been bought or
cowed by AIPAC.
Meanwhile, the Republicans are shedding no tears at
the plight of the Palestinians and are themselves

(03:57:19):
fully complicit in mass murder.
Our leaders feel no compunction to obey the
laws of our own land or the laws
reached by international accord.
The Leahy laws are US human rights laws
prohibiting the Departments of State and Defense from
providing military assistance
to nations that violate human rights.
Those laws are flagrantly violated with a hearty

(03:57:42):
round of Israel has the right to defend
itself even as US provided weapons
dropped by US provided aircraft flown by IDF
pilots
blow up civilians and their children in tent
camps or burn them alive in hospitals.
Or at this moment, American pilots
bombing for Israeli targets in Iran.
And when the International Court of Justice submitted

(03:58:03):
for arrest warrants
for the leaders of Hamas, along with Netanyahu
and his defense minister, Ben Gavir, for war
crimes
and crimes against humanity, Biden immediately rejected the
accusation of genocide.
Of course, he must reject it. And this
is the point I want you guys to
hear. I've said it before, but list this.
He must reject it because

(03:58:24):
he knows that if he accepted the ICC
prosecutor's allegations
against Netanyahu or if Trump did,
They could then open that door for their
own arrest,
along with other high ranking Americans, including previous
presidents. And I'm not even talking about since
October 7th alone, guys.
Once this door is open and it's already
been kicked in,
this goes back for 76 years. Now it's

(03:58:46):
much more difficult to charge for these crimes.
But if you go back just towards the
illegal occupation of the Golan Heights, the moving
of Jerusalem. I mean, these things are crimes,
guys. And they that maybe not as large
as genocide, but they are crimes. And so
the moment you start to open this door,
you're next in line.
Now that very well could be the only
reason these people are going along. But I

(03:59:06):
don't believe that. I think it's much more
than that. But it says, but the ICC
won't ever issue a warrant for Biden's arrest.
As the I I would argue or Trump's.
As the American
Service Members Protection Act
gives the POTUS the authority to order US
military action against the Hague.
Should it try to hold American service members

(03:59:27):
or politicians accountable? And we've heard this already.
We heard this during Trump's administration.
Pompeo and the rest were using this to
threaten them.
That the Hague being the international dynamic with
the ICC and ICJ and civil point saying
that we'll go after you.
They threatened their families
just like Israel did. Because guess what, guys?
We're talking about the same thing.

(03:59:49):
It says, while we've
been providing intelligence support, we've being while the
US government has been providing intelligence support, since
October 7th
and before. We all they've also had a
US combat unit on the ground in Israel,
and they have since before October 7th and
now and the military has directly engaged Iranian
missiles targeting Israel.

(04:00:10):
The government is now officially a party to
Israel's expansion,
as Tim's wall Tim Walz might say,
as that's what he wrote. We're also actively
and routinely firing missiles, the government is, at
the bombing at end of bombing Yemen. Excuse
me.
Because the Houthis have been attacking ships they
believe may be supporting Israel.
Ironically,
I'm not sure why it's ironic, the Houthis

(04:00:32):
are on the right side of history.
And then there's our ill illustrious electorate.
I wouldn't expect, he writes, most Republicans to
care about the plight of the Palestinians due
to good old
fascist racism, good old fashioned racism. That's what
he believes. Bring about because I I definitely
agree. There's an element to that for sure.
So that may be one part of it.

(04:00:53):
Bringing about god's kingdom on Earth in Israel
maybe or supporting corporate hegemony.
The point is that he didn't think Republicans
would care for many of those reasons, some
of them. He also have the Democrats who've
simply thrown away their moral compass if they
ever had one. They'll forgive the Biden Harris
antitrust, including intimately documenting mass murder, to avoiding
another round of Trump while stomping on anyone

(04:01:14):
who repudiates genocide.
The only, quote, good guys
are parties on the left, parties on the
left like the Green Party rights, which I
don't agree with. But even if they do
exceptionally well in this election, they won't be
in a position to save the Palestinians. Because
the point is, guys, she's already come out
herself
And undermine the argument that she's fighting for

(04:01:35):
Palestinians.
Like, it's it's very clear. It's a halfhearted
argument. I do not trust any of them.
Especially with the green party. My point when
I talk about the 3rd party dynamic is
simply about somebody
following what they actually believe.
Whatever that third party may be. Whether Jill
or anybody else. Like, the idea that you're
stuck voting for 2 people you both don't
like or one's lesser evil, if that seems
to be part of the conversation, then you're

(04:01:56):
giving up.
You're choosing to fall in when you know
that's not to to argue that that's what
adults would do, that's what children would do.
Followers of a political broken system.
But it says, I'm not saying
that we should stop decrying this madness. Far
from it. I'm saying simply, this is what
he's writing, that if there is salvation for
the Palestinians, it won't be coming from the

(04:02:18):
United States. America was built on genocide and
our national charter hasn't changed it a bit.
But what's really driving
this is greed.
A Gaza rebuilt by the likes of Jared
Kushner would rape billions.
Israel would steal the rights to the Palestinian
authorities' offshore oil and natural gas reserves, and
Israeli colonizers
could complete their takeover of the West Bank.

(04:02:40):
And that, of course, he says is just
the first step, which we just showed you
in their conquest for their Levenstrom. They're, you
know what was it again? The word mean,
like, their their origin, their building, like, their,
what was the word they used in this?
Kinda like a religious perspective, the state. Or
I guess yeah. Okay. That's right. It goes
back to, like, the Nazi I looked it
up last time for the first time. The

(04:03:01):
associate with Nazi Germany, but sort of like
their national belief of where the state should
be kind of a, you know, envisioned dynamic.
Now I believe it overlaps in the sense
with Israel's, like, prophetic Zionist perspective. And so
their quest for the Levinstrahm, I would argue,
was greater Israel, which becomes everything ultimately if
you listen to them. In Lebanon, Syria, etcetera,
no doubt happily disposing of their populations with

(04:03:22):
more US made weapons. Again, Tim Walz said
the quiet part out loud. He says, none
of this should be new to you, of
course.
But it was one thing to see so
much of this in bits and pieces, but
to see even a tiny collection of all
the horrors
collated into a semi coherent timeline was truly
disheartening and hard to stomach. So what's crazy

(04:03:43):
to me is that it took him this
long to even see it.
But in any case, the point is that
people like this are seeing through it. The
reality being that it's left, not left. Right?
It's it's the reality of right and wrong.
And ultimately, people are coming to this conclusion.
The sad thing is the people in the
partisan side of this are so desperate to
maintain their control or what they believe is

(04:04:04):
the right path that they're willing to ignore
what's right and wrong for the interest of
what's right or left.
Now before we finish with this clip, let's
go back to this real quick.
See what they're saying.
Now this says Iran portrays message of calm,
but social media shows anxiety. Now, again, social
media, which is what we just showed you

(04:04:24):
with Venice Vanessa Bili is largely manipulative today.
It always has been. My point though is
that through Twitter especially, it Zionist Israel is
just constantly using it as some kind of
massive it's it's like a like a beacon
of the of the of the false narrative.
But it says the pictures and video on
Iran's semi official regime media outlets are trying
to portray calm,

(04:04:46):
saying, unclear if Israel's going to after just
production facilities or missiles. So I I looks
like there doesn't seem to be some kind
of, like,
overwhelming
conversation right now. So we're probably gonna hold
off and talk about this
possibly tomorrow. I do have a wedding I'm
going to tomorrow, so I might not be
tomorrow. Hopefully, I'll get something covered if it's
that big.
Of course, the Pentagon says no US involvement.

(04:05:06):
Of course, you know, despite the US pilot
that got caught about to bomb from that
location. But, you know, as usual, we were
involved or even worse, maybe they didn't know
they were. That wouldn't surprise me today.
Will Iran feel the need to respond?
God, US media is so stupid and disgusting.
K. Let's check a couple more things here.

(04:05:31):
Go back to the opening here.
See what shows up
the guardian.
Yeah. I mean, it simply just says, IDF
is conducting, of course, precise strikes on military
targets in Iran. I highly doubt that's the
case. Why they would do that if they're
not bound by that literally anywhere else? They

(04:05:52):
can say that and just bomb, an orphanage
and nobody would care.
At least nobody in the in the people
with power to stop it. I'm is my
point.
3 Lebanese journalist killed in Israeli strike. See
this gets covered up by that point that
we just we've read this earlier in the
show.
Alright. Well, we're gonna leave it for now.
Let me know if you anything up in

(04:06:12):
the in the chat that you guys see.
Yeah. That's what it seems right now. Nothing
too overwhelming. Let's check Twitter one more time.
Doesn't seem like too much.

(04:06:34):
Yeah. I mean, here's Iran Observer saying another
video in Tehran right now. Everyone is still
sleeping.
You know, guys, it might be sir it
might be possible that this was completely made
up.
But I mean, let's be clear. Iran has
every reason like any other dynamic to to
downplay
if it was.
But what's interesting is that we have that
weird pilot thing, which kinda didn't make sense.

(04:06:54):
That was my point first. I was gonna
say why if I did cover it, it's
like, why would they put why would they
post that? It felt like meant to be
seen, right, in a way.
And then we got Vanessa Bealey pointing out
that people are posting fake images. I mean,
this begins to feel like it might be
less than they're making it out to be
if not there at all. But, again, we'll
put a pin in it.

(04:07:18):
Let me check one more thing.
Let's see.
Okay.
Check this here.
Some of the sounds we heard due to
air defense activity to run and air defense
success. Okay. So one usual so this is
what we get every time is like, so
they're basically saying that the defenses stop them

(04:07:38):
and that's what you heard. Well, that's kind
of what Israel said last time but ultimately
that did not like they didn't They got
through and bombed a whole bunch of areas.
They were forced to admit that after the
fact, but they didn't kill anybody which to
showed you how actual precise it could be.
So, my point is this Iran agency simply
saying that they're They stopped it.
Let's see.

(04:08:03):
Here's the oh, this is something different.
TRT World, last one. Oh, they deleted that.
Yeah. I'm getting a weird sense with this,
guys. I'm getting a weird sense that people
are jumping the gun,
but I don't I don't wanna even jump
the gun in saying that. We don't know
ultimately what's happening. Here's a state department reporter.

(04:08:24):
We understand that Israel's conducting a targeted strikes
against military targets in Iran as an exercise
of self defense. Yuck. God, these people are
so disgusting.
Like, why would you even have to say
that? Like, just say you Like, you did
You already said.
Because it's oh, it doesn't say retaliate. You
could've said retaliatory. Like, it's just a weird,
gross way to make it so you have

(04:08:44):
to force it in that they're defending themselves.
Even though that's not what this is. Not
even any context.
Yeah. Say, in response to ballistic missile and
attack, it's just lazy children. Lazy idiot children.
I swear. It's it's just hilarious. And what's
funny is I think part of them, they
know that. At some level, they know that
they're just blindly grouped in. Any journalist that

(04:09:04):
cares about integrity of journalism wouldn't go up
what they said. What Israel told us, even
though we know they're lying about everything, that
means they just don't care. That's part of
most of the journalism today or the fake
journalism. So I'm gonna end with this clip,
and I'll include these other things we pointed
to here.
As Khaleesi points out, the speech by the
foreign minister of Trinidad
and Tobago

(04:09:25):
or Emery Brown. Oh, that's his name, Emery
Brown.
And he says should be given a word.
I agree. He nails this. And I'm telling
you guys,
if you don't believe that the the world
around
is seeing this and is feeling the same
way he is,
it's amazing what we're again, I'm really somebody
needs to, like, do a case study on

(04:09:46):
what this all shows us, the the complete
cooption by whoever of the Western media that's
willing to hide this story, even while they're
giving you parts of it, still trying to
downplay it. It's wild. Or the powerful entities
still supporting this while the rest of the
world sees exactly what he's about to tell
you. It is in a way a positive
moment. It shows you that, like putting it

(04:10:07):
this way. In a hit like we've always
said, you can't solve a problem without first
acknowledging that one exists.
Well, welcome to the moment where we see
the problem.
It's right in front of you. We're bumping
up against it with everything we do right
now when we can see that they're going,
I don't want genocide. You're a racist. And
they're the only ones doing that. There's the
problem.
Anyone denying this is part of that problem,

(04:10:28):
and that's what we need to change. That's
the problem. That's what we need to recognize.
Make the acknowledgement that this problem is here.
Now we can begin to try to solve
it. So thank you for tuning in today.
We will try to cover this more as
we get updated on what's going on. I
urge you not to jump the gun. All
the usual suspects I could've looked at, I
guarantee you were screaming about Iran and World
War 3, and Israel's doing god's worm.

(04:10:51):
I doubt none of that's actually happening even
if they are bombing them. I'm sure that
it's like everything else we've talked about, but
I will wait for the facts
Because that's what TLAB does. Thank you for
being here. I love you all. As always,
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
The highest
death toll in United Nations history

(04:11:12):
and the deaths
of tens of thousands of civilians,
including
women
and children.
And this is not being done in secret.
The entire
world
is watching,
and the global south in particular

(04:11:33):
is
appalled.
The question remains,
if innocent
civilians,
including women,
children,
and United Nations staff
were being killed at this record rate in
the developed world,

(04:11:53):
how would the world's big powers have reacted?
Not likely with euphemisms
and platitudes.
The double standards
and continued
resourcing
of these ongoing violations
of international
law

(04:12:14):
send a chilling message
to the global south.
And that message is this,
There are some powerful people in this world
who are of the view
that a Palestinian
child
is less worthy of defense,

(04:12:35):
protection,
food,
water,
and life
than another child.
I am not of that view.
The people of my country
are not of that view.

(04:12:56):
Caricom
is not of that view,
and decent
people
all over the world,
including
in Israel.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Calls For Kushner Investigated As Agent Of I̶s̶r̶a̶e̶l̶ Saudi Arabia & Cybereason’s Nov 5 Simulation

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

Calls For Kushner Investigated As Agent Of I̶s̶r̶a̶e̶l̶ Saudi Arabia & Cybereason’s Nov 5 Simulation

Stuff You Should Know