CIA Active In Israel Since Oct 7, Gaza Biometrics & Israel Caught Lying About Lebanon Gold Stash

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:50):
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24
hours. And there we are.

(01:11):
Ladies and gentlemen, October 23rd
2024.
A little bit of a learning curve today
as you can tell, we're starting. I was
hoping not to start out like that but
we're start we're testing out our new equipment
today. So welcome to the show today. We're
gonna get into
a a few different topics.
Now, I want you go get give me
a heads up on how things sound. Let
me know how the audio is, how the

(01:32):
visual is. Not much has actually changed in
that regard but we're we're testing out the
new above book
laptop. And I don't I'll I'll give a
quick little intro about why that's important and
what this is in case you haven't heard
of it. You know, privacy
devices, ultimately.
But, I start I'm I'm that on the
note that I started there with, today in
general, there might be a little bit of

(01:52):
a learning curve. I'm I'm I'm using 2
computers at the moment to make sure that
I'm not gonna miss anything. But, ultimately, what
I'm trying to do and this this is
sort of something that I'm gonna be
discussing in a lot of different ways as
we go, you know, like, in general into
the future that this we need to kinda
bridge
and
and brave these hardships,
the uncomfortableness, the inconvenience of using something different

(02:15):
or something you're not used to in in
light of or in the interest of
your privacy,
your personal freedom.
I mean, these are really important things today
as we have things like the fake version
of that coming from,
Prince and Blackwater Academy and the the Magaphone,
which turned out to be some Chinese knock
off that wasn't really that secure.
So, ultimately, it it what I'm gonna be

(02:37):
doing today is testing this out. So just
keep in mind there might be a little
bit of a weird overlap there. Hope not.
The the beginning thing was only because I
forgot to change the setting. So
today, we're gonna be talking about
updates on what's going on, Lebanon, Gaza. A
couple of points he titled today regarding something
I talked about with Steve recently that is
just
not something that's a big you probably have

(02:58):
already seen it, but it's important for me
that you guys don't miss it. And that's
in regard to the one of the a
a flagrant lie being told by Israel around
Lebanon and gold that's already being exposed as
a lie, even by corporate media,
which ultimately shows you that that's all,
I mean, their entire agendas are based around
lies just to, basically,
extend the genocide to Lebanon.

(03:19):
But other than, on top of that, we're
gonna be talking about an important discussion that
that a lot of people in the know
have been saying long before October 7th that
or or in any other dynamic before that,
the US government is involved. They're on the
ground. They're involved in decisions. I mean, even
Axios had an article the first couple of
months saying that a 3 star general was
on the ground, and yet then you'd hear
that we don't have anybody there, the con

(03:40):
the contradiction's
there. So we're gonna be talking about the
CIA in particular. And a New York Times
article that came out, I don't think was
meant to really highlight this particular fact, but
is exposing that the CIA was deployed
set right in the beginning from October 7th
forward, but also about these fusion cells, the
dynamics that's being that are being used, why
they're being deployed, and now being used in
regard to northern Gaza.

(04:02):
And exactly something that we've talked about before
that hasn't really got much attention. And I
was sourcing this to people that were on
the ground, independent journalists as well as Palestinians
saying this. So it came with a grain
of salt saying we could be wrong, they
could be deceived,
but that they were and this is now
being proven correct. That they were forcing Palestinians
to give up their biometric data, to scan
their eyes, their face, and if they did

(04:23):
so, along with giving up and
and basically stating on the record that they
forego or they they will give up their
rights to return.
The UNRWA overlap.
You know, the thing that Israel says isn't
isn't real. Doesn't matter. You're lying. You're racist.
Except we want you to, on record, on
video, to claim that you no longer have
those rights that we're claiming you never actually

(04:44):
had.
The the whole thing is built around
not just lies,
but a sinister nature of, like,
complete disregard for human life in every possible
way around specifically whether you're a certain kind
of person or not. We used to call
that something in this country.
And it's important to see that this is
a bigger agenda. This is why Vanessa Beelied

(05:06):
and I talked about the idea that this
is not just about Palestinians.
This is about the a global resistance against
the budding technocracy of the building of the
globalist idea. And all these Republicans, they wanna
talk about globalism and ignore how Israel and
the US are a central
guiding part of that are deceiving you or
can't see it, which kind of would blow
my mind. But we're gonna talk about how

(05:27):
that's happening on the ground, the biometric overlap.
We're gonna go into a lot of different
dynamics around this. Now one thing before I
get started,
I wanted to say in general that, I
mean, I'm sure the the the long term
followers of TLav have noticed the the a
gap in the content more so than over
the last so many months, just in the
last couple of weeks. And I wanted to
I mean, I know you guys don't would
tell me not to apologize or say, you
know, but I in general, it's something that

(05:48):
I think is important to say that I
apologize to those that are long time dedicated
followers of this platform that have gotten used
to the kind of flow that we have
on this platform. The the up to date
information
in addition to everything else we're dealing with,
not to get into all of that, which
is still a constant distraction.
So many different things going on around the
gate. But but, ultimately, I'm still making sure
I find time for this in the last

(06:09):
couple of weeks. Just there's been a lot
more added to the plate and a lot
of good stuff, by the way. But just
wanted to comment on that that it's been
very difficult to to break off in some
of these things. One of which is something
exciting here. I'll start with that that this
laptop that I'm using, which is the above
book, is something that we're already,
you know, excited about, that we're talking about,
that I'm really advocating people look into at

(06:31):
the very least. I have the link below
if you'd like to get one as is
right now that you can get a discount
through,
the I don't wanna say it wrong. The
disco the discount code is down below, and
you can get discount for either the the
phone or the laptop. Laptop. But what I'm
excited about is that we were just talking
earlier at a meeting this morning about the
TLAB version of this, which I'm already going

(06:51):
through. I'm trying to find different version, you
know,
not versions, but applications, different dynamic, different things
that I think would make this ideal for
what I would choose for myself.
And then once we get that set, we're
gonna act we're gonna basically have a TLAB
version of the above phone. I'm I'm, you
know, possibly with a logo on the back
of the computer. I mean, these things are

(07:11):
up in the air right now, but
making sure we have enough RAM and memory
to be able to have 500 tabs open
and 17 things going at once because that's
what we, at least, I feel I need
to do to do the work that I
like to do and the way I like
to do it. And so if you're out
there and you wanna start doing this, if
you wanna get into this field, don't have
to do it the way I do it.
But if you would like to start with
this, the point is to have something like

(07:32):
this that you can choose to start with
and, you know, start running. You know? As
well as
a direction I think we should all be
leading into. Something that is de googled, that
is privacy, you know,
focused on your privacy and liberty at all
at the expense of everything else. And you
can choose that balance. That's the point about
this. You could buy these things and just
dump all the platforms on there that are
all spying on you if you want to.

(07:53):
Or you could choose to keep it as
privates private and
liberty focused as possible.
So on that note, I just wanna make
sure you guys saw that. I mean, frankly,
I'm kind of excited about this too because
it's taken me a long time to take
this step and it's just been about
the the as I started with, the fact
that it's inconvenient and that it takes time.
And, like, even right now, I'm like, okay,
I'm missing something.

(08:14):
Alright. So let's get into this to start.
In general, I'm gonna go over a couple
of,
as we as oh, actually, I'll bring this
up here so you guys can see the
the website we were discussing. And, again, all
the links are down below. And then this
link itself will be included. And this link
actually has the code embedded in it. So
if you use this link, you'll already be
supporting TLab as well, which don't feel like
you have to. Maybe you hate this platform
and you just wanna buy an above phone.

(08:35):
I'd rather you buy the phone and not
give it to me, you know, get it
because it's important.
So let's start with
oops. There we go.
Yeah. See, just the it's just the smallest
things. It's little things like how, you know,
the buttons work. You know? And it's interesting
the differences on how
and and that is one thing I wanna
say too before we get further in is

(08:56):
that I think that what's interesting is the
phone
we're also used to our phones.
And the phone itself is I mean, I
had the hardest experience that that changeover, and
I'm still working that in. But for me,
this laptop is very similar to what I'm
using now, and that's probably not gonna be
good for Windows users. It's very much more
like a Mac in style. So it's been
actually not that difficult to change over. More

(09:17):
it's much less than I expected.
Okay. So talking about
what we're gonna get into today. I'm gonna
start with a couple of important points around
the 2 party paradigm. Obviously, we're getting closer
and closer to the selection.
Obviously, the and by the way, as we
get it closer to the, I'll actually grab
that right now since I'm gonna mention it.
The Sedona event, which I hope you're gonna

(09:37):
be at least tuning into.
Oh, it's actually,
Liberty on the Rocks.
This will be from the 1st to 3rd.
So, obviously, we'll be there, you know, add
the the lead up to the selection, which
in a way is kind of on purpose
because, you know, we find that to be
illegitimate, if not completely unnecessary or irrelevant

(09:59):
even. So I won't be you know, in
these days, I'll be focusing on that. We'll
be doing a lot of work around that.
Pretty much the second is will be when
I'll be doing the all day stream. If
you wanna support that on our side of
it, where essentially you'll be able to watching
my side of the background and the behind
the scenes interviews, That'll be free on my
website. The links are all included. But I'm
hoping you'll also decide to join the event
itself. Maybe even come join us because that

(10:19):
supports everybody and it's also about, you know,
volunteerism, the idea of, you know, peer to
peer exchange without the government being involved. Yeah.
What a world.
So I also wanted to give you one
quick note about what Scott Smith just pointed
out for those that have not seen the
conversation around Georgia. I just did a great
little quick breakdown interview about 20, 30 minutes

(10:41):
with,
Alison Morrow.
And it really is it's
it's increasingly
be it's continuing to seem like a very,
very alarming and important conversation that's getting very
little coverage.
So I'll include some of the articles that
we recently did, rather the shows.
And as Scott said himself,
at first, simply highlighting that this is at

(11:02):
least 6 times greater than he what he
saw in his Palestine.
Then also,
saying to me on the phone, personally, after
he's reviewed this, that it seems to be
at least
possibly the greatest dioxin disaster in history
based on what he already has seen. The
12 to 20
thou 12 to £20,000,000
of of chlorine compounds versus about 2, I

(11:24):
think, he said, at East Palestine, if I
remember correctly. Either way, a lot worse.
So what he just recently put out,
he said just like the sunrise from Fort
Worth, Texas this morning, we will be shining
a light on the truth from East Palestine
to the biolab fire in Georgia.
He said I will be releasing my updated
testing data from East Palestine, Ohio with my

(11:44):
scientific team today, so keep an eye out
for that,
at, at the Society of Environmental Toxicology
and Chemistry. And this appears to have significant
relevance to the affected residents of Conyers, Georgia
too. So the point he's making, it yet
still with very I mean, I don't even
I haven't seen I mean, you tell me
in the chat. Have you seen anybody else
besides Scott, people like myself, and the few

(12:05):
that are listening to this conversation from an
independent media perspective even mentioning the word dioxin
despite the fact that this is without question,
the it's it's as if like, I've said
this about past events. You if you had
tried to make the worst dioxin disaster possible,
this is what you would have chosen. Chlorine,
plastic pallets, everything about it. It's it is
a perfect storm for dioxin disaster. It even

(12:26):
appears to be, and I don't wanna jump
the gun, more than what I've discussed from
the Civezo, Italy disaster, which is from 1979,
regarded for Time Magazine as one of the
top ten worst environmental disasters in history.
I mean, the people on the ground are
getting bloody noses, headaches. They're still dealing with
the same kind of stuff we saw from
East Palestine. And remember, this is about the
long term issue. And the studies we go
over in this in the show show how

(12:47):
they're talking about a massive re reduction in
infertility,
immune suppression, cancers.
It's it's it's alarming that nobody wants to
talk about this stuff. And I think it's
genuinely because they don't know what to do.
And they don't wanna take the the brunt
of the problem on their shoulders when they
don't even have an answer for it. And
if you don't think government would act like
that, if you don't think at a conscious
level the people, whether government or not, would

(13:09):
make a decision to go, well, we don't
even know what to do, so why tell
them? If you don't think that that's something
that makes sense with the way our government's
been acting since its inception, then I don't
think you've been paying attention.
And he goes on to say, never forget
you can't find what you don't look for.
Meaning, they're not looking for these things. And
that's what he points out every single time.
Now on some 2 party illusion points that

(13:30):
I do think are important. I recently shared
this as, you know, all the all the
kinda hubbub about the McDonald's thing, which really
was stupid. And what's even more alarmingly stupid
from the partisan side of this is it's
objectively clear that it's a dumb thing to
highlight. I mean, we all can acknowledge that
fast food is bad for you. Right? I
mean, does anybody think otherwise? I don't think
there's even a conversation about how this is

(13:51):
a good thing. It's bad for you. But,
of course, it's fast and you can pretend
it's cheaper even though it's really not. It
actually costs more when you break it down
versus Whole Foods. It's all an illusion they
play, but the idea is that this is
bad for you. Right? In every way, the
worst possible conglomeration of things, Seed oils and
fake bread I mean, everything, guys. From
mRNA packed meat with all of their hormones

(14:11):
and all of the stuff we've talked about.
Right? How does that in any way make
sense? Why would you choose that when we're
with what you're pretending you're pushing when it
comes to make America healthy again?
Right? Now, of course, you could just pretend
like it's just one thing he chose to
do. Maybe it's just a political move because
he people like McDonald. Whatever, those are all
possible.
But it's obviously an objective thing to point
out. And yet, what's funny is you get

(14:33):
the people on the right who are going,
Oh, these liberals freaking out about the
I mean, some of them, I guess, right?
But I afar I see far more people
that are aware of all of it. Or
even Republicans that are going, Well, that's stupid.
You seem to always try to make it
the, If anyone is against Trump, he's a
deep state. Or, If they don't like, he's
a Democrat. Without even looking or caring if
that's the fact, you are blind. You are

(14:53):
choosing to lean in to whatever allows you
to dismiss the thing that kind of should
matter or really does. And this is one
of those kind of things. It's a small
point. But, of course, it's obvious to point
out that somebody's going, yeah. That's dumb. That
doesn't align with what you're saying. And in
fact, why would you wanna promote something like
this that is bad for everybody?
Because it's mainstream.
That's why. And it's business. It's everything we

(15:16):
pretend these people are not. Or rather, some
of them do. But that's the same thing
as Tim Pool and the rest are all
like, all the liberals are losing their mind.
Well, anybody with a brain can see that
this is the opposite of the direction at
least they're fainting.
And this guy says, wouldn't it be nice
if fast food was healthy too? And I
obviously. Right? I mean, I mean, of course.
That's the whole point. Right? And the implication

(15:37):
there, though, is that they all think that's
what's about to happen, apparently? Because Trump stands
with the McDonald's thing and works behind the
scenes, so therefore, McDonald's is gonna be healthy
soon? Well, yeah. Yeah. I hope so. Why
in the world would you assume that? And
I said all of his blind followers are
blindly assuming that this means that.
I sure hope it means that, but I
prefer not to rest on the hope of

(15:57):
billionaires and technocrats
following through on their promises. Let alone one
they never even made, but that's just me.
This person says, majority of billionaires and technocrats
support Kamala Harris. Trump only has Elon Musk
from that class,
says Business Insider, which, by the way, doesn't
even say that. And I said,
oh, is that what the mainstream alternative media
told you? Are you really this easy to

(16:19):
manipulate? What about Adelson? What about Peter Thiel?
Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. And here's even
an article, which by the way, I'm not
blindly trusting Forbes either. You can look into
it for yourself and realize that it's right.
It's pretty much right down the middle, which
guess what? That's how it always is. Here
are Trump's top billionaire donors. And you can
go through this very long list of lots
of billionaires that are very clearly behind him,
including a lot of Zionist extremists.

(16:42):
But the point is, if you only look
at what the narrative is, if you only
look at what the partisan circles are telling
you that really don't care about the facts,
they want you to believe their narrative because
it benefits them. And, you know, and maybe
they believe in the party line. But at
the end of the day, I honestly think
people like this are just people that fall
for this stuff. They believe in this person.
They believe in the Tuckers that tell them
they're supposed to think that. And if you

(17:02):
look,
it's not true.
And then even then, a lot of times
they reject the truth in front of them
and go, well, that's probably a deep state
trick. Or the And maybe it is. But
if all you ever do is assume into
the direction of what you want to be
the case, well, you might as well be
in kindergarten. You're not looking at facts, you're
going along with what the teacher told you.
And that's not how this is supposed to
be. So my problem is that all of

(17:22):
them are the same thing, and that's what
a lot of us are trying to highlight.
And like Derek was pointing out today,
my problem is that it doesn't seem that
anyone's falling for Kamala Harris, but it seems
like a lot of liberty minded people are
falling for Donald Trump. And so if we
see it as the same thing, why would
we hyping something that no one seems to
fall for?
See, but the problem is they wanna highlight
it as only going after one side, and

(17:43):
we see them all as the same thing.
Now, of course, as always, we could be
missing something.
But it's about objective observation.
My problem here is that these people are
all like, actually, this is a good point
to go to since I put it up
here next. Oh, wait. Is this the one?
No. It's right here. Or maybe I didn't
put it close. I would have been good
to put right there. Well, there's a tweet
that I'm gonna go to in a second

(18:04):
here that is, from I will get to
it in a second. I think I put
it too far down. Oh, wait. Maybe right
here.
There we go. In this together,
says, remember folks,
every vote you cast is a vote for
BlackRock. So here's the problem is that people
don't wanna highlight the all encompassing influence of
BlackRock when it comes to things they like,
like Rumble or McDonald's for that matter. As

(18:26):
McDonald's, the top 2 shareholders are rum BlackRock
and Vanguard. But we don't talk about that
when Trump's in there banding about behind the
scenes. But here's what in, for, Ian Davis
points out from lair Larry Fink, a quote.
I'm tired of hearing
this is the biggest election of your lifetime.
This is a quote from Larry Fink, BlackRock.
He says, the reality is over time, it

(18:47):
doesn't matter.
We work with both administrations
and are having conversations with both candidates.
But you know what? You the people that
don't wanna know that will ignore it and
act like it's not real or never choose
to look into it and pretend that he's
lying. The truth is that that's the reality.
The power structures don't care. They just hope
you keep playing along. They just hope you

(19:07):
choose 1 and keep pretending like you have
an influence over it. Because
then you have given them consent, which is
all it's really about.
Now, also, the billionaires we've been discussing, like
Miriam Adelson here, who demanded that he give
them the authority to illegally take West Bank
territory, which is illegal. Nobody says otherwise. But
Trump goes, oh, Trump goes, okay. Here's a

(19:28):
$100,000,000
and he says okay. Not it's very public.
They wrote articles about it all over the
place. And if you wanna look more about
how he's publicly said, at least, what, 9
times here based on these videos, that he
will censor for Israel, that he will remove
people from this country if he sees them
as a certain thing which is not against
the
which
whatever your hated perspective might be, whether that's

(19:49):
the case or not, it's your right to
feel that way. And I have a right
to call them disgusting. But the point is
when you're saying you're gonna, let's say, remove
the Jew haters from the country, when, of
course, we can know as a fact that
that means Palestinian supporters
being conflated with that conversation, some of them
may actually feel that way, you have a
constitutionally
protected right to say or think these things.
That's free speech, guys. The whole thing this

(20:11):
party is pretending they're fighting for. Or that
as he says in this most important one,
Israel used to control congress,
and rightfully so.
That's what he has said many times.
You know what's funny about this? It's like,
I've I've shown you this so many times
and yet every time
I feel like we bring this up. Oh,

(20:31):
you know what? I don't even have it
here right now. It's on the wrong computer.
Oh, there you go. Fir first first first
little bump it bump in my head on
the on the exchange.
I was gonna play that clip really quickly.
I might even have it on the side
here. The bottom line, I I I shouldn't
have to. I my point in playing it
again today would be simply to maybe catch
the person who's here, who hasn't been here
before, who wouldn't wanna accept that until they
heard it.
But it's on the record. And he said

(20:52):
it many, many, many times.
Doesn't look like I have it off to
the side. The point is that every clip
in this, every one of them, in one
way or another, suggest that Israel should have
the right to influence our policy.
As if and one of them says, for
example, that AOC and the rest wouldn't even
be in politics today if Israel wasn't well,
yes. That's exactly the point we're saying. And
he says that's how it should be. And

(21:13):
this one simply says they used to control
congress, and rightfully so. I don't know why
Americans who are on the Republican side of
this
cannot recognize how alarming that is. It's everything
you've always been pointing out in other places,
and yet you don't wanna see it right
here. Some of you, anyway.
Now on that same note,
talking about the influence and democrat
this is what's so crazy me is how
we can all know and see. And I've

(21:34):
already shown you this from directly from True
Social. This is a real tweet
or rather whatever you call it. Social tweet,
the truth. Whatever you wanna call it on
that platform.
Is that it's amazing to me that it
on on on March
or April 26th what is that? Yeah. April
26, 2024.
That he says this about RFK.

(21:55):
RFK Junior is a democrat plant.
A radical left liberal who's been in place
in order to help Crooked Joe Biden. The
worst president in the history of the United
States to get reelected.
K. So either he thought that or he
didn't, it's irrelevant. The point is he was
saying it. Okay? So which means he that's
kinda what I read to Trump anyway. I
don't think it's ever I think it's about
what works for you. Right? So that's being

(22:15):
said because if this works that way, I
want it to be seen like I knew
that or that I called it out
or to get people to not support them
anyway. But then all of a sudden, things
start to shift and you just ignore that
you said that. Now did you mean it
or did you not? And if you didn't,
then why'd you say it? Because it's all
politics, guys. They lie. They'll say whatever you
wanna hear. Or he actually meant it and
now he works with him.
See? The point is you can't ignore how

(22:36):
obviously incongruent that is if you just care.
Of course, you could say that he was
said that he meant it and then suddenly
someone showed him something and they changed his
mind. That's what I always hope is the
case, just like you. But I don't blindly
assume that. And when you start to see
so many of these line up, you start
to ask, like with JD Vance calling Trump
a 1,000 different things until suddenly Peter Thiel
gives him money and now he's on your

(22:57):
side. It's a game. And I know people
can see that. I know you don't think
you have other choices. You do.
Stand by your principles.
He simply goes on to say a vote
for junior would essentially be a wasted protest
vote. That could swing either way, but would
only swing against the Democrats if Republicans knew
the true story about him. Oh, oh, did
that true story change when something else was

(23:18):
told to you? Come on, guys.
Junior is totally anti gun, an extreme environmentalist
who makes the green new scammers look conservative,
a big time taxer, an open border advocate,
an anti military vet okay. Let's pretend like
that just all changed. Right? It's
willful ignorance, guys. You know it, and I
know you feel it. And you don't wanna
hear it if you're even here listening right
now. But you gotta be honest with yourselves

(23:39):
about what we're talking about. And now here
and the obvious big example, and I'm gonna
be harping on this stuff even though it's
repetitive until so people see you before we
get to the selection time.
David Icke says, make America healthy again. Fool
me once, shame on you. Fool me twice,
shame on me. Voting just encourages them.
Mass peaceful noncooperation
terrifies them. Let me say that again.

(24:00):
Mass peaceful noncooperation
terrifies them. That's why they want you to
give all your collective power to an individual
of their choosing.
In the hope that they will do it
for you. They won't. The idea is simply
to buy time until the dystopia is complete.
And I really believe that. I believe we're
gonna get to a point to where once
you're in that position, it won't even matter

(24:22):
anymore.
And it's not they that's not abstract. They're
literally talking about digital IDs and technocratic control
structures, biometric control. Of course, then once you're
in that position, does it matter if you
can see that they're tricking you? No. Because
now we're in control. You can't say anything.
It doesn't even matter what you think anymore.
The mask is off. Sit back down or
you're gonna get boxed out of society. That's
what we're walking into.

(24:42):
Frankly, I think a lot of these Republicans
know that and don't even care. It's you
conservatives out there, the majority of that conversation,
that care, that want something different, but just
don't know where else to go.
It's time to stand up. Find the courage.
Our nation has achieved a medical

(25:03):
miracle.
Mhmm. We have delivered a safe and effective
vaccine in just 9 months.
This is one of the greatest scientific
accomplishments
in history.
It will save millions of lives and soon
end the pandemic
once and for all.
I am thrilled to report that the FDA
has authorized the Pfizer vaccine.

(25:23):
We have given Pfizer and other companies a
great deal of money,
hoping this would be the outcome, and it
was. I know that you are you are
pro vaccine, obviously, did everything you could to
get this vaccine now.
Let me know you guys can hear that.
Can you make sure you can hear that?
No one's commenting that you can't, but it's
not playing in my end. I gotta figure
out why. But give me a thumbs up
if you guys can hear this playing.

(25:43):
I know it was the best achievements. We
did it in less than 9 months.
The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements
of mankind,
and I came up with a vaccine with
3 vaccines. Mhmm. All are very, very good.
Came up with 3 of them in less
than 9 months. It was supposed to take
5 to 12 years.
And we say have died under COVID this

(26:04):
year, by the way, under Joe Biden Right.
Than under you. And more people took the
vaccine this year, so people are questioning how
Well, no. The vaccine worked, but Yeah. Some
people aren't telling you. The ones the ones
that get very sick and go to the
hospital are the ones that don't take their
vaccine. Very proud of the vaccines. We got
it done as you know, Brian. We got
it done very rapidly. In less than 9
months, it was supposed to take 5 to

(26:25):
12 years, and they wouldn't come up most
likely wouldn't have come up with the right
answer.
And we have,
3 of them, great ones and great therapeutics.
We got a lot of it done. Would
you recommend
to our audience that they get the vaccine
then?
I would. I would recommend it, and I
would recommend it to
a lot of people that don't wanna get

(26:46):
it. I recommend take the vaccines. I did
it. It's good. Take the vaccines. I got
my booster shot
as soon as they were available.
And just the other day, former president Trump
announced he had gotten his booster shot.
Maybe one of the few things he and
I agree on. And, look, I guess, in
a certain way, I'm the father of the
vaccine.

(27:09):
Alright. Well, that's the first thing I gotta
figure out.
Why that's not playing in mind? I thought
I had that squared away. But David Icke
is always, you know, seeing through
it. I mean, it's I again, one of
the many things I don't know how we
can ignore, how obvious that is and still
to this day, openly supporting it. Here's another
example, and this is the kind of thing
I keep seeing. Like, I'm I'm I could
not be more convinced that Elon Musk, whether

(27:30):
he even knows it or not, is playing
this Pied Piper role.
And and it's and it's it could just
be that every whatever this is is clearly
advantageous for him, and so it doesn't even
matter. But stuff like this is the problem.
So this is a small point as well,
but it's a some this Rami the Rathmas
guy shared this, and it says, did you
know? In 2012, president Barack Obama repealed the

(27:50):
the Mundt Smith Mundt Act, which, by the
way, wasn't true, which had been in place
in 1948. The law prevented the government for
putting its propaganda to be out. Now it's
a small
mistake, I would argue. It was it was
amended. It wasn't repealed. That's it it matters.
That's a fact. Right? It was the Smith
Mundt Modernization Act. Right? They they they amended
it and made it in all the and
then the main point, as you as you've

(28:12):
seen on this platform for a decade,
which is that it the Smith Munt Act
was about stopping
the government from propagandizing its people,
which obviously didn't happen. They didn't care even
though the law was there because your government
is an illegitimate
criminal organization.
But
as as Ron Paul has pointed out so
many times over the years, what they do

(28:33):
is when let's just say we start going,
well, you're not following the rules. Here's the
thing, you're not doing it. They go, okay.
We hear you. Okay. So let's they pass
the bill. And they go, okay. Well, we
just they don't say it like this, but
we just made a bill that made that
no longer illegal.
Problem solved. Right? Well, no. You just allowed
yourself to do it. They don't say it
like that, though. They just passed the bill
act like they'd address the problem. And now

(28:53):
with you read the bill, oh, so now
you're allowed to do it? There's all there's
so many times this happens. So the Smith
Mon Modernization Act simply
gave the caveat
for national security. They can say, you know,
if if they deem it national security interest,
they can
directly lie through the media in any other
way to you. And ever since then, that
was the point. So that newscast you just
saw on Fox or CNN or MSNBC,

(29:15):
it could've very well and most likely was
entirely fabricated for national security purposes. And they
don't even know that. And now they claim
they have a legal allowance to do that,
and they didn't care in the first place.
That's really important to understand. So it wasn't
repealed, it was amended. So first small point,
but that's how this point was that began
how it started.

(29:35):
And so the,
Twitter
fact check or whatever you call it says,
no. It it was not repealed. It the
act was amended
to allow the US sponsored foreign media to
make my own request. Okay. So it's a
100% true. It's very easy to look up.
And there's even articles there you can link
it. Now, no. I'm not blindly doing that
because the fact check said. It's because I
already knew that and the evidence is clear.
And any half you happen to look at

(29:56):
those links, it would also show you that.
Is that a deep state trick? Well, certainly
could be. Or it's just the reality.
So then Elon shares it and says, what
reason was given for repealing this law? How
in the world do you not know this
already?
Or he does know, and it's about trying
to mislead people in very specific ways. You
can decide for yourselves.
But the point is, it now says then
it says same thing. No. It wasn't repealed.

(30:17):
It was amended in 2012. Okay. So Bad
Kitty unleashed says, okay. I see the community
note. Here's my 2¢. Now there's really no
air in this conversation. That's an absolute airtight
fact. And it says, it was for the
state department specifically, the ones who censor us
for false reasons too. That just adding more
context to the the what it you know,
the the point is simply that it was
allowance for,

(30:38):
basically, war for the most part, but really
just national security interest of the government and,
yes, the state department in regard to being
able to lie to you. And this adds
an old one where bad kitty was simply
making this point in 2023 saying, but it
wasn't breaking news, so I just think that's
important to point out. It says breaking. They
lied to us. Propaganda really is allowed on
US soil. And what they're showing you here
is it's going to says, remember when the

(30:59):
narrative was set that Mitt Smith Modernization Act
didn't allow propaganda? So where'd that come from?
What what set narrative are we talking about?
You mean because the government denied the obvious,
provable reality that the text was stated? This
is what I get frustrated about when it
comes to partisan media. This I don't even
argue that from this person, it seems like
a genuine effort to try to show what
they think is the reality. But the problem

(31:19):
is that if you're reading if you're listening
to information for people that are trying to
mislead, you have a partisan swing to it.
Apparently, somewhere, I didn't see that, it got
set in 2023 that, Oh, that's fake, dude.
That's not the truth. Well, it was always
the easily
proven reality.
But it says we have an admission here
for Matt Armstrong, former governor. Oh, so now
that a a person from the government says,
guess what? That was real. Suddenly, now it

(31:40):
is. Or maybe they're lying.
My point is that we should not be
relying on some
authority figure to guide you around what the
truth is. Look into it for yourself.
Read it for yourself. Research it. Find the
bill and read it.
Understand what they're debating about and fine tune
it for yourself.
See, the point is, in 2023, we didn't
just discover this. We should've known this from

(32:02):
2,012 forward, as people listening to TLab did
or any other platform that talked about it.
So I think that's important.
Then I want to show you this. This
person says, the community notes on this are
bunk. What happened to the community notes? They've
been gamed. You see? And this is more
of the point that I wanted to get
to, the point.
You're gonna get a lot of this from
people in the Republican. Not conservative necessarily, but

(32:23):
the Republican TeamSport politics side because Elon said
it. Therefore, if they're saying it's fake, it
must not be the case. It's not bunk.
It's if you took 30 seconds to just
look into it for yourself, you'd realize that
it was true. But because you've taken the
stance or partisan people have taken the stance
that if it's challenged, therefore, the deep state's
after him,
It's so easy to just play in this

(32:45):
you're living in an imaginary world where anything
you've decided becomes fact. Anytime they challenge those
decided imaginary ideas, that proves they're real, and
everything goes in the way you want it
to.
Until you turn out until you wake up
in your technocratic prison and you didn't realize
how you got there. But I just think
it's an important overarching point. Using a small
point to recognize that whether it's Twitter or
whatever else we're talking about, that people like

(33:06):
this, whether they know it or not, are
guiding you to your own demise.
You are goo stepping to your own enslavement,
and people just can't stop and look at
it.
And it's about much bigger things than this.
We went over the Venezuela thing, the Haiti
conversation.
They are leading you down a very dark
path.
I think that's important to see. Let me
close some of these real quick.

(33:32):
So next oops. I'll shoot.
One too many.
A few too many.
There it is.
Okay. So next, I wanted to point this
out. Talking about JD Vance.
Chief nerd says, JD Vance says it's time

(33:53):
to introduce the drug cartels to the United
States military.
Just on its face before we get into
the point that Josh Walcos obviously calls out,
which is I'm glad there are people that,
you know, are you know, I I think
that I think I don't wanna speak for
him, but I believe he's leaning in the
Trump direction, which I don't I have my
opinions, and I you know how I feel,
but I respect somebody who makes that decision
and owns it, and that's what it's not
because I'm being forced in or lesser of

(34:14):
evils.
I'll talk to her all day long about
why I think you're making a mistake. But
if you stand by your choice and you
actually believe in that choice, well, I I
respect that even though I think you're making
a mistake. My point is to simply say
that I believe that's where he's leaning. I'm
not sure. And that's to say that even
though you have these major republican leading narrative
manager accounts that are making these statements that
he still has the the the, you you

(34:36):
know, integrity to say, well, you're wrong on
this. And that's always what I'm saying about
this whether it's left or right.
Make sure you have the integrity to stand
up if you know that they're making a
mistake and don't believe or convince yourself that
by hiding that mistake, it's somehow in the
benefit of your party. It hurts your party.
No matter what you win or not.
But he's saying about the drug cartels. Okay.
So we're gonna talk about the US military

(34:57):
going after an an entity that exists in
a foreign country. Well, yeah. Let's just start
this all over again. And we always told
you that this was gonna come that close
to the Mexico was always on the table.
And Derek's written about this. There's a much
bigger dynamic
going on. Not least of which is that
the US government is actively working with those
cartels and we don't wanna talk about that.
But he says, can you imagine if Mexico
sent gunmen across the border and killed 70,000

(35:18):
Americans a year?
Well, I'd love to I'd love to think
about what he's actually referring to when he
gets to it. But
before we talk about it, what do you
think is the 70,000? What what dynamic in
reverse is happening like that? It's not, is
the point. I'm sure somebody would jump to
immigration or but what he gets to is
Fentanyl.
You know, where 90 plus percent of it
comes through the mail from China. But we're

(35:38):
gonna make this all about Mexico because you
have an agenda.
How it works? It says, because that's about
what dies from Fentanyl.
What an abstract argument anyway. So now you're
gonna make it into Fentanyl that comes through
the mail or because drug cartels are selling
it, and that translates to men coming across
the border with guns?
These people are desperate to get you feeling
like you're under attack. And guess who's actually

(35:59):
attacking you? They are.
It says, we would be in a major
war. I think that we actually have a
2 mil a have to have a military
response at the southern border. Guys, it's so
obvious how you're being gamed. Local law enforcement,
they're telling us they're overwhelmed by some of
these guys. And we've got to be willing
to send our best people, our best fighters
to get control of the southern border. What
he's talking about isn't dating Mexico, guys. He's

(36:20):
not just talking about the border. Even if
you're pretending he means lineup along the border,
it it just it's not what they're talking
about. I think that's the most important issue,
confronting our country. And on top of that,
that means militarizing the border, which is another
thing that they really want to accomplish. But
the point, as already said, Josh points out,
little does he know the US government is
actively collaborating with the cartels. Now do you
think he doesn't know that? No. He's setting

(36:40):
up a narrative
for the government. Not one side or the
other, but just the government because it's always
about continuing the agendas.
So he is a very clearly placed entity
handed right down from billionaire Thiel himself
to execute these agendas.

(37:01):
And if you're standing there pretending like he
doesn't know that, well, then why do you
want him in charge?
Now, oh, of course, the point would be
that, well, he doesn't want that. He's gonna
step in. That's not gonna be the case.
How in the world would you think that?
Why would you assume any of those things?
Because he sits on a podcast and says
what you wanna hear? Gee, what politician has
never done that before?
The bottom line is your government, all of
it, has been working with these entities just

(37:22):
like the moderate rebels, just like Saudi Arabia,
like every other entity we can show you
that are in fact or Israel,
the worst entities that were the very thing
they pretend they're fighting.
But it's all about getting you to think
that they're fighting them so you continue to
support their agendas. Just like everything else we're
talking about. Now it's gonna come to Mexico.
Or hopefully not. But it seems like that's
always been a name.
And I'll include James Corbett's excellent breakdown of

(37:44):
Peter Thiel. The strange story of Peter Thiel.
It says, what do you call someone who
identifies as a vegetarian but who consistently chows
down on veal, mutton, and rib eye sticks?
Whatever you call that person, it's not a
vegetarian.
He says, and what do you call someone
who identifies as a libertarian?
But who has spent his entire career
actively collaborating with governments,
militaries, intelligence agencies,

(38:06):
in an effort to enrich himself
and to grow the power of the state.
Again,
whatever you call him, it wouldn't be libertarian.
Why then does every mainstream biography of Peter
Thiel bend over backwards to stress his radical
libertarian ideology?
See, this is the thing. It's if you
can't think 2 steps beyond this,
that's why you're being played.

(38:27):
Right? The idea is that, well, if the
I mean, first of all, I think I
have to take a step back, actually. If
the argument now is that if they say
it, therefore the opposite is true, which seems
to be the kind of unspoken thing that
seems to be happening more than ever today,
wouldn't it be that he's not libertarian because
the mainstream calls him libertarian?
The reality is he's not.
And the conversation of even the the fake
libertarian city in Honduras and the way if

(38:48):
if this is technocracy,
using the guise of what you believe in
to rise. And it's the same thing we've
talked about in every other context.
It's why they use the pledge issues that
they know you believe in to manipulate you
into a certain position.
He says, and basely baselessly
insists that Teal was part of a gang
of Silicon Valley renegades who are seeking to
overturn the state because they know you see

(39:10):
these problems. They're using the state to think
you're fighting the state. So the guess what?
You end up working with the state. It's
the 2 party illusion. It's everything else we've
talked about. Now read this. It's great. And
I do I think what's important to recognize
is that these people are s and almost
lazily,
like, with Musk and the MAGA idea, like,
the it's like you could tell they don't
even care believe in what they're saying. But

(39:31):
they just come out and say it and
then again, it's not even about reaching the
average people who also see that they don't
seem like they're genuine. It's about it's about
having something to point to by the people
who don't care if it's true. Right? The
leading, driving Republican talking heads and partisan people,
they're the ones that don't they wanna go,
yes. Perfect. That works. And point, we need
to support them. And they drive the rest
of you in there. That's where I'm trying

(39:52):
to wedge in right now, to make sure
that you guys can not fall for it.
Oh, and that's point on the opening stuff
and just partisan things. I made this point
more than once already. And I think this
is absolutely crazy that
I just I I yeah. I don't wanna
read I mean, I could've assume all day
hypothetically, you know, what what what this would
mean. And for the podcast, we're talking about

(40:13):
these un this incessant
text message bomb things we keep getting. And
look, I don't know about we. I am.
I I I get, like, 10 of these
a day. About all sorts of different things.
All from republican stuff. Like, going, hey. I'm
Ted Cruz. I'm your hey. I'm this you
know, literally saying like that. Tweet, like, text
message to say, hey. This is Donald Trump's
son. You should be going to Trump. Click

(40:34):
here for so and so. And I and
I guarantee it's gonna steal your identity or
something like that. Or it's gonna be not
something that's not honest. Why is it only
republican stuff? Why aren't I getting democrat versions
of that? I don't know. I I don't
know. You guys can read into it for
yourself. This is sent to me by somebody
else. It was simply saying, $15
for a signed Elon Musk dark MAGA hat?

(40:56):
It's Trump. Here are three top reasons to
donate before FECs
isn't that just strange? And I also wonder
why these phone companies are just simply going
I mean, I guess it's about anybody could
buy a a a number and send text
messages, but it seems very organized. I just
wanna point it out. I find it odd
that you'd think you'd get it from everybody.

(41:17):
Right? If this was some and or maybe
it's just a republican agenda. Or how about
this? Maybe it's a democrat agenda to make
you feel like republicans are spamming you. All
these things are possible. But I worry weirded
out by this invasive, I the way these
things are working today. Just wanted to point
that out. Found it interesting.
So let's talk about a couple of things
that are kind of straddling this, about the
the the partisan conversation, social media, but then

(41:39):
as we get into foreign policy and specifically
Israel. Glenn Greenwald shared this on the 21st.
A longtime senior Israeli government official and Netanyahu
Likud adviser,
Jordanneh Cutler,
is now, guess what, the chief of Facebook's
US censorship unit and is on Israel specifically
in Palestine.
You know, you you can't we have to

(41:59):
laugh at how stupid that is.
You and my point to make is that's
so it's not just Twitter. And if you're
pretending still that somehow that's you're if if
you're somehow able to work yourself into a
place where you're not able to see the
obvious nature of the collusion with Israel on
Twitter, the fact that Yacarino and Musk have
said they're partnered with the ADL who is
undeniably acting illegitimately to censor American voices.

(42:22):
James Lee made a great documentary about how
it's basically a spy agency, and it's not
it's so easy to see.
Or using Authentix, which is an Israeli intelligence
apparatus that is being used on Twitter to
steal your biometric data. And we're gonna get
into biometric data being taken from people in
Gaza. They're doing it right now to you
on Twitter.
He then despite the fact that he told

(42:43):
you that wasn't gonna happen anymore. That's an
alarming overlap of US or Israeli intelligence being
able to ins
have access to Americans' biometric data. Why doesn't
that worry these conservatives and republicans? I don't
know.
But now it's Facebook too, which by the
way, it's always been all of them, I
think. But now it's just right on the
surface.
Sam Bindel points this out. I've reviewed internal

(43:04):
better record that show the company's dedicated liaison
to the Israeli government has repeatedly
tried to censor Instagram posts belonging to pro
Palestinian student protest groups and other content related
to war. Not violent.
Just having a Palestinian flag protesting, saying, long
live the long live the intifada, which means
revolution,
despite all the screaming. And, yeah, you could
say that in a very mean way. You'd

(43:26):
say you could imply your revolution means killing
all the Jews if you wanted to, but
it doesn't mean that.
It's like saying the American infat intifada discussing
the revolution of our past.
But what they love to do is just
manipulate the way you view things for their
own agenda, of course, which all really ultimately
leads to the censorship of Americans,

(43:46):
as well as the murder of Palestinians.
But as Chris Mann pointed out, and this
is her as well,
saying Facebook's Jewish diaspora chief,
which by the way, why in the world
would Facebook have a a Jewish diaspora chief?
Do they have a a chief for every
other abstract part, you know, entity of the,
you know, population of the world that spread

(44:07):
around? No.
It's interesting how this works. And it says
explains how she uses her position
to censor quote, hate speech
that, quote, makes Jewish people feel unsafe. Now
let's let's not let's be clear. Facebook is
not even trying to pretend that they are
caring about free speech. They openly censor hate
speech and all that stuff. But so does
Twitter, by the way. They just love to

(44:28):
say it differently. They pretend they're not doing
that. They pretend we're about free speech while
openly censoring hate speech and antisemitism, and that's
main main
focus, which by the way, you may agree
with. I think it I think people who
express hatred towards people because of their religion
or because of what their their race is
there. I think they're disgusting, but they have
a right to say it that's protected.

(44:48):
It's enshrined. It is inherent right in this
country to be able to speak and think
what you want. And they actively don't want
that to be the case. Elon and Trump
and the rest of them, as they tell
you that they will move you from the
country. As Elon said on his platform, that
he will he would want them to be
deported if they shared a certain flag.
Then you could all argue that they were
just saying they don't mean them. Well, sure.
Ma, maybe that's the case. But they did

(45:09):
say them, and that's important that we highlight.
Because you wanna pretend they're fighting for free
speech? Well, that's not free speech.
Now, again, as he points out that either
way you go on this, you're voting for
BlackRock,
or for
Zionism,
or any number of overlaps, which should start
to begin to make you this should start
to make you wonder.

(45:30):
Why there there is more of the same
than there is different?
And you I'm not talking about what they
say out loud. They say a lot of
things that make them look different, but what
they do is what matters.
Now I'll include some article. This one's from
the COVID 19 era. The COVID coup, the
BlackRock takeover American interest, that's from June 18,
2020. That was under Trump's administration.

(45:50):
Right? And this was about the idea of,
and to be clear, they when this took
place was at the end in of and
during Trump's administration. This is the plan that
BlackRock essentially took over the US Treasury. I
mean, and it's wild. And the plan was
written before COVID 19, yet they used COVID
19 to rationalize why they did it, like
a lot of other things. But we're all

(46:11):
chalked that up to he was confused, he
was misled, whatever.
Certainly wasn't.
I'll also include the
great article written by Josh Walcos or or
Champagne Joshi on Twitter, the long shadow of
Black Rock.
Now, I wanna talk about something to start
before we get further into the foreign policy
conversation that was really interesting. Oh, you know
what? Now I'm I'm I'm

(46:32):
I don't remember who shared this with me.
I forgot to pull it aside. I I
usually love to give and if if they
want it, I like to make sure they
point out the people that share these things
with me. Maybe I'll have it on the
tweet here. But somebody reached out to me
and said, hey. You know, check this out.
This whole 911 center thing in, in a
specific in Connecticut is interesting.
And I said, interesting because we've talked about
this before. Now here's an article that Whitney
wrote, and she's covered this a lot on

(46:53):
her and my platform.
Our platform. But her on a little bit
hangout and when how what with the stuff
we do on the last American bag of
bond. The prince and the spy.
2023.
Now this is about specifically the
Erik Prince and the spy, and he is
an Israeli spy. No.
Without question.
And how this company essentially uses Americans as

(47:14):
a token to be able to have internal
access to
intelligence
and and military and and selling these things
with and on top of that, we just
talked about the pager aspect or the infiltration
of Israeli tech.
It's everywhere
in this country.
And I think it's so obviously a problem,
and I think our government is so obviously
aware and don't care because of other influence

(47:37):
over
them. It's crazy. The unit a200 overlap, the
intelligence infiltration of,
tech companies, startups, all over the world, but
all over the United States. Now that's not
meant to be some attack on Jewish people.
It's an attack on a foreign government that
is actively using this to manipulate our policy,
our outcomes for their benefit. It could be
any religion you want it to be. It's
about the reality this is happening.

(47:59):
And and what the the bigger point about
this is about one of the things they
discussed is carbine 911, now just carbine, which
is a one of those discussions, many of
them but just one of them, where the
Israeli government and through these apparatus or apparati
have
taken control of 9 one 1 car call
centers all over this country.
Now, of course, you could argue that there's
nothing nefarious going in there. Maybe you're right.

(48:19):
But it's weird to me that a foreign
government or rather and this is the main
important point.
Israeli intelligence connected companies
with former
and current
intelligence a a assets working in these companies.
Now right there, the point is, well, maybe
they don't work. They maybe they just started
a company. They're not part. They have openly
said over the years and in this article,

(48:39):
they break this down from an Israeli ar
outlet that says that they what they're doing
is acting in the interest of the Israeli
government
in this access, in what they do with
these startups. That was the whole point of
what they were doing. That was an agenda.
It was laid out. So when they do
these, they say, we're doing this for the
interest of the Israeli government no matter where
it is in the world.
So it becomes interesting.
And we start having these weird leaks and

(49:01):
hacks and different things that are happening that
always tie back to an Israeli company.
And then could you go, well, Iran hacked
us. Okay. Well, at the very least, you
should say, well, maybe you're not the best
secure asset to have here, but maybe we
should be asking whether Iran was even involved.
Maybe there's something different happening here.
Here is from October 22nd. Some service restored
after issues with 911 call centers. Now it's

(49:21):
not some big epiphany. It's just interesting to
highlight the fact that now we're having issues
with these call centers.
And it's important to highlight that, yes, in
Connecticut, this is one of these locations.
Carbine was installed in 2020
in Connecticut.
So just all the point I'm making, whether
this call doubt whether the down of the
911 call centers is, by the way, I've
never heard of was is only because of

(49:43):
this or not. My point is to highlight
that this is an alarming overlap to where
these companies, Israeli while they're committing genocide in
the world in multiple locations, that they have
internal access to these conversations. And as the
article covers, that it does have ability to
access your phone, your data through this in
this entity,
like everything else. But our your government just

(50:04):
doesn't seem to care.
Now here's the actual website if you wanna
check it out for yourself. It's not just
carbine, and you can see the little icon
there.
But as well as
your media, which shouldn't be surprising. Alan McCloud
did a great,
article, a little thread he wrote with it
here. Israeli spies are writing American news. His
new investigation uncovers a network of ex agents

(50:25):
of Israeli spying agency, guess what, unit a200,
working at some of the US' most prestigious
outlets, including Axios, CNN.
Big surprise.
That's very clear, guys. There's no way around
this. I mean, this guy specifically,
what is it? Barak Ravid, has been called
out many, many different times. It's very obvious
the overlap. But these people are now being
explicitly caught for working

(50:46):
surreptitiously in some cases for a foreign government
and writing an American I mean, this should
matter if this was China or Russia or
anybody else that they would want you to
be worried about.
It would be a huge story.
But not today.
And that's maybe why we get ridiculous articles
like this. This is from the New Yorker
from 14th this month.

(51:07):
Rationalizing
the horrors of Israel's war in Gaza,
which I pointed this out many times already,
which is absolutely abhorrent. That's even the title,
but this is the worst part. The novelist,
Howard Jacobson, has argued that too much press
coverage of dead Palestinian children is a new
form of blood libel against Jews.
That's actually what it says.
So it's not we're not worried about killing

(51:28):
children. We're worried that you're pointing at it
too much. And that that's somehow an attack
on Jewish people. No. No. It's an attack
on child murderers.
And how about we shouldn't care if you're
over discussing child murder? Right? How about we
care that children are being murdered in the
first place? But, no, let's make it about
the victim of the person killing the child.
You're making them out. I mean, it's just

(51:49):
so disgusting.
The only person talking about Jewish people here
is the Jewish person trying to pretend like
that's what we're talking about for the interest
of Zionism.
This is about anybody on the Israeli side,
whatever their religion, murdering children and nobody doing
anything about it. To the point to where
they think it's okay to make the argument

(52:09):
that you pointing it out is an attack
on Jewish people. You know what that is?
That is the most desperate thing I have
ever seen in my life.
The most flailingly desperate, like, the last ditch
effort to make you go, just stop looking
at all the children we're killing because it
makes you racist.
Unbelievable.
New York the New York the New Yorker,
this is on shelves at supermarkets. This is

(52:30):
gonna be in front of people. And I
don't know how you think in the world
this can go without
notice. Now, as Sal Diagris points out, just
a somebody's put and it looks like it's,
taxpayers for peace dot org, put up this
billboard. It says Israel kills 3 school buses
of kids daily. Right? So what should we
care more about? That Israel's killing casually 3

(52:52):
buses full of kids every day, or that
they feel like that's insulting to them that
we pointed out? That's why we need to
answer that question.
It's unbelievable to me.
Glenn Greenwald also points out something many of
us have highlighted over the over the just,
you know, post October 7th, but long before
that. The potency of propaganda is amazing, he
says. I bet most Americans don't know that

(53:12):
Israel was bombing Gaza throughout 2023,
you know, before October 7th.
Just like most Americans believe the lie that
Hamas beheaded Israeli babies
on that date and killed 1200 civilians,
both of which are not true.
And here's the article, Israel's Israeli strikes on
Gaza kills top militants and 10 civilians. Oh,

(53:33):
look at that. It's May 9, 2023.
This is just somebody else who's saying this.
This is what he's point but Glenn is
pointing out. He says, completely misleading. Israel bombs
when they are attacked by the enemy. 2023
was retaliation.
Please be honest.
And he is. You're probably a IDF bot
for all we know, just out there lying.
But either way, the the evidence is obvious.

(53:53):
And here's one of the many articles. And
then now this is actually citing UNICEF.
It was literally written on October 6th, the
day before.
UNICEF said, 2023 is quote, the deadliest year
for Palestinian children
before October 7th.
See, these are the things that should matter
to anybody honest.
Now, one interesting point that I'll include, I

(54:14):
think this is just hilariously
sad,
that this, you know, antiwar is writing this.
Please follow antiwar.com.
They're doing, in fact, great new great work.
Israel's use of human shields in Gaza sparks
calls for US probe, which, by the way,
is gonna go nowhere. Of course, specifically because
they don't care what the,
CAIR

(54:34):
National points out. This is the Muslim American
advocacy group.
The point is that everybody should know by
now how obvious it is that Israel is
using human shields.
It's a it's it's an open secret, is
the point. And here actually is the,
the video this time. I've included the article
in the past. There's one of the examples
right there. The open secret of Israel's use
of human shields. This is just the clip

(54:54):
focused on only that part.
Now the the what's highlighted here is the
simple fact that
this group is saying, look, we know this
is happening. We urge the state department to
investigate. Do you think they will? No. They're
gonna go, Israel's gonna look into it, and
we're gonna get back to you. We're gonna
follow-up.
They're murderers, guys. That that is it. When
they hear that statement, that means I support
genocide, is what it means. They're not dumb.

(55:15):
They know exactly what they're doing.
The sad reality is that it's always been
this obvious.
They just don't care.
They're willing to look this right in the
face and not care.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.

(55:37):
Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian boy, a 9
year old, as human shields
avoid jail.
The that goes on.
Example after example after example after example, As
well as the fact that Haratz recently wrote
the article talking about them using Huynh Shields
post October 7th, you know, but your government
doesn't care because they only care about what
Israel tells them to do. But here, just

(55:59):
point is that even US groups are now
screaming about enforcing the law that they won't
care
about. Now to get into the kind of
just we're gonna go over some more in-depth
about North Gaza, for example. But right this
this is just October 22nd. This is, yesterday,
I believe. Yes.
And just showing you this this is and
these this is just one example.

(56:19):
This this is about a 48 hour period,
but the point is that simply this is
constant, incessant. It never stops. And now it's
happening in Lebanon too.
Israeli military kills a 115 Palestinians in Gaza
over a 48 hour period. And that should
be shocking.
But it seems like we're just supposed to
act like this is what's supposed to be
happening, man. People will pretend maybe they're just
militant. It's it is sad.

(56:41):
It's sad.
But I'm hoping more people are beginning to
recognize
what this really is. I know that is
happening. I guess more so that I hope
we reach the people that have yet to
see it because it's constant.
Never will this be a no matter what
the propaganda machine does with this, this will
never go away. The world has seen this.
This will be always on this conversation.

(57:03):
Hopefully, it causes some consequences.
Now even in Lebanon, Israeli strikes in the
same day, 63 people in Lebanon on Monday.
All and we're talking about civilians. We're talking
about civilian locations
over and over and over. And now they're
not even caring to try to prove these
things.
And yet this is what we're getting.
The Cradle did a great article on this

(57:24):
from the 21st. Quote, everyone not dead or
injured is mentally damaged.
Israeli army hit by a silent crisis,
which by the way should be insulting.
I kinda don't feel bad for people murdering
children, but I guess the reality is not
every one of them are necessarily the same.
That's just being objective. But my point is
that
obviously

(57:44):
obviously you're struggling. If you're unless you're a
sociopath or psychopath,
you're gonna go home feeling
mentally damaged.
Even if you just stood by and watched
them rape and kill in front of you.
Yeah. Big surprise.
This is what the this is what these
things do to the human psyche. This is
what happened. This is why military people from
the illegal wars of the US government come

(58:05):
home and are completely torn because they did
things that you're not supposed to do or
see.
And I guess, yes, there's some of them
that just don't care. And we're seeing those.
Those those are the ones Israel keeps using
because they're really good at doing all the
bad things, moving them over to Lebanon. But
the reality is most people aren't. No matter
how propagandized you are, whether you truly think

(58:26):
Palestinian children shouldn't be exist, Once you do
it,
that's something the brain has a hard time
with.
So it's kinda crazy that one,
the the focus now the cradle's writing it,
covering it the way I think it should
be covered, highlighting how outrageous that is. But
as Jason Hinkle points out from this CNN
article,
which it says says he got out of
Gaza, but Gaza did not get out of

(58:47):
him. Israeli soldiers returning from the war struggle
with trauma and suicide.
Yeah. You're you're gonna have a hard time
making me feel bad about that. On top
of the fact that we're not gonna see
CNN do many articles about the struggle on
the other side. You saw them you'll see
because of opportunism, I argue. But as Jason
points out, this is what the article says.
The former soldier has spoken publicly about the
psychological trauma endured by the Israeli troops in

(59:09):
Gaza in a testimony to the Knesset Israeli's
parliament in June. Zak and Told said that
on many occasions, soldiers had to run over
terrorists dead and alive in the 100.
Can you believe that?
CNN published a piece today about Israeli soldiers
returning from Gaza. One bulldozer driver testifies that
they drove over Palestinians

(59:30):
dead and alive
in the 1,000.
Yeah. I guess we know they they put
them all through a trial to find out
that they were terrorists before they ran them
over because it's the only democracy in the
least. Right?
You're running over thousands of people? Those are
civilians, guys.
Without question. No matter whether you think half
of them are Hamas or not, the point
is you're not stopping to find out. And
we've already seen the reality of what they've

(59:51):
been doing to people, arresting them in mass
and calling them all terrorists.
He says, this is genocidal and just breathtakingly
evil.
And he says, p s, how is this
how this gets framed around psychological trauma of
Israeli soldiers and not the victim of genocidal
violence is wild.
It just shows you their true intent here,
guys. That's that's CNN for you.
How unreal that is. And the fact that

(01:00:13):
you're letting them frame this as he's troubled
by the fact that he had
to murder all of these terrorists.
He had to run off did you?
You had to run thousands of people over?
I mean, so the only way you can
really take that is if they were ordered
to do so, which is probably the case.
It's just it is this is the even
though just the idea of this is something

(01:00:35):
that's hard for me to get on my
mind.
It should be for everybody.
That it's even possible
that the the media, the government,
that any human being, that a military
would be willing, capable to order this, to
do this, to support this. And then to
manufacture an obfuscation around it
is hard for me to digest.

(01:00:58):
Now one of the obvious points here is
that your government is absolutely, without question, completely
100 percent involved immersed and driving this bus.
That we can't pretend this is any other
the the evidence is overwhelming. And there's already
been countless examples of how they're on the
ground, how they're working and just like the
game they played with Yemen where they oh,
we were giving assistance to the way we

(01:01:19):
weren't actually dictating. Yes. You were. You were
proven and taken photos of you on the
ground outside of these torture prisons that you
let the UAE run that nobody ever got
in trouble for. Right?
Same situation everywhere. They are the bad guys
in this conversation, guys. And the point is
the CIA was deployed
to the ground. You know how long they've
been lying about that? And, and this is
from the New York Times on top of
what Dan Cohen's excellent work is showing,

(01:01:41):
Israel and the US are set to deploy
a 1,000 more mercenaries
to round Palestinians in northern Gaza into walled
off concentration camps, where they'll receive humanitarian aid
only if they submit their biometric data. And
this goes into the story we were telling
you from before. Now I'm talking maybe 2,
3 months into this. There was an it
was a a story that came out from
people on the ground and one brave person

(01:02:02):
that was covering this, one of the journalists,
where they were telling you that these people
in the north who were remained there,
after they told them to go, were being
forced to not only on video,
speak out the word that they for they
give they they,
forego,
give up their rights to return.
And even and literally hand over physical keys

(01:02:25):
if they have them. And we're talking keys
to the homes that Israel claims that aren't
theirs.
That's how obvious it is that Israel knows
that they're covering this up. They know they're
lying to the world about the reality because
that's what they do. They are patent liars.
They lie about everything.
And before you think that's some kind of
a racist comment, it's not. It's about Israelis
and their government, not about anything other than
that, as well as the fact that everyone

(01:02:46):
seems to know this. Let me let me
preface these remarks with I never, never,
ever believe
Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
Point is that they will mislead about anything.

(01:03:08):
And what we're talking about here
is the forced
I mean, we all like, it's weird. It's
what's interesting is that any normal context, like,
right now, we would argue that it's a
violation to take your biometric data without but
we're talking about a war situation. Right? So
people almost dismiss this as some kind of
small thing. It's not. I keep saying this.
Where we're going in the world, we don't
even really grasp what these things will mean.
And on top of that, you're talking about

(01:03:29):
the con a structure where people in this
the people they're taking this from are being
genocided. What is so what is this gonna
be used for? Now and and that's a
side point. It's important though that they're staking
their biometric data, but they're forcing them to
give up their rights
in order to not be killed because that's
really what this is.
And the CIA has been there since October

(01:03:51):
7, probably a lot longer than that,
But he covers this. And the the company
behind this plan literally calls itself the Uber
of war zones.
You know, Bly, like, but how
should make it so benign, so avar oh,
we were just the Uber war zones. Why
is that a normal thing? Why is that
something anybody would, like, that should make you
feel disgusting.
That we're just making over just a normal

(01:04:12):
group. The fact that we have so many
war zones and they're so common and so
ongoing that you have a group that literally
call itself the Uber of war zones. That's
the problem. Your governments have manufactured that ongoing
reality. And guess what? They pretend they're fighting
for freedom.
We really still pretending that's the case? Well,
sure as hell, Republicans and Democrats are.
We all know better.

(01:04:33):
Show me one war where there was a
positive outcome. Anything,
guys. Anything.
In the context of what the US government
has done in living memory.
They have been removing people. They have been
ending con they have done every single thing
that they continue to pretend they're fighting against.
And in fact, are the most obvious embodiment
of those things in the world since they've

(01:04:53):
been doing this.
So here is what the Middle East eye
points out. Israel considering
US firm for biometric screening. Now I'm gonna
get to is a New York Times article
that makes the point that they've been here
from the beginning. So all this is is
a new step in this. So the people
the CIA group, we're talking about confusing them
for the biometric data process here.
Which again and there's the the Uber for

(01:05:14):
war zones.
Considering a plan to deploy private US logistics
and security companies to create a gated community
in Gaza where Palestinians will be subjected to
biometric screenings to receive aid.
To receive the aid, by the way, that
they are withholding from them right now. Which,
by the way, is not something that they
even the idea of withholding this in any
context should be the immediate stop of any

(01:05:35):
funding from his from the United States. And
then now we'll get to they've now said
they don't care. They've gone from it's not
happening to we know it is, but we
don't care. We're gonna keep arming them.
Because that's what it looks like to act
with impunity.
Here's New York Times, US fusion cells, which
are something we've talked about before. It really
just means these overlapping intelligence sharing between different,

(01:05:55):
what's the word I'm looking for?
Different, authority figures in different, you know, police
and FBI and whatever else. CIA. And the
point is that they are now
this this article was by, from
19th October. It says US fusion cells assist
in Israel's hunt for Hamas leaders.
So we're over here, we're talking about a
CIA group or the overlap. Right? But this

(01:06:17):
is what we're talking about from the the
bigger conversation.
As we can see, the CIA
is what we're discussing. And if you look
at this quickly
oops.
Oh, that's weird.
See? New computer. Where are we?
Where's the
find. There we go.
Cells.
So it says right here, for more than

(01:06:38):
a year, much of the attention and criticism
around American support for Israel has been focused
on US made bombs and weaponry.
But in the intelligence assistance to Israel has
also been crucial.
US intelligence helped locate the 4 hostages who
were rescued by Israeli commandos in June. So
what we have to read here between the
lines that they would never say is that
that means and it will I'll get to

(01:06:58):
the next part where it shows they were
deployed right after October 7th, is that means
they were at least alongside,
maybe not literally standing next to them, but
in authority figures, but possibly standing next to
them, when they killed hostages. When they assassinated
people they weren't sup well, you know, that
they their own people.
Or when they murdered their own hostages when
they were holding a sign that said SOS.

(01:07:20):
Or every number of them afterward.
So think about that.
As well as the possibility they might have
been there before October 7th. And what does
that mean about what happened that day? But
as it says, from near nearly the beginning
of the war, the US military and intelligence
cells
were focused not just on looking for hostages,
but hunting for top Hamas leaders. Now they
just wanna take some credit for the murder

(01:07:40):
of sin of of, Sinwar, the leader of
Hamas.
The idea being simply that they want to
be like, we were involved in that. But
they're which openly means that they're also involved
with all of the atrocities, which we already
know by now. America's top brass is not
claiming credit for the Israeli operation that killed
Sinwar, an architect on October 7th, but they
note their intelligence aided the hunt. You see
my point? They're just kinda weird, dead it
too.

(01:08:02):
Says over the course of the war in
Gaza, according to senior officials, the US fusion
cells have shifted their emphasis based on the
most current actionable intelligence. Sometimes the best tips
were the locations of hostages. Okay. So if
this is the case, you're telling me that
they have been killing
far, far, far more people than they have
been taking home. And we all know they
ordered the Hannibal directive and they seem to
be killing their hostages. So you think they

(01:08:22):
don't know this?
This has been written by the Israeli media.
So this is a pretty simple effort to
make it sound like they're so all I
mean, there's no other way to take this.
This means they've been involved with whatever choices
they've been making, and I think that's pretty
clearly adding up to the killing of their
own people.
This is other times the cells focused on
the whereabouts of the Hamas leaders, and neither
mission was ever set aside.

(01:08:44):
US officials said that White House officials regularly
meet with the CIA
about what more support the targeting cells might
need to support the hunt for Xinwar. Officials
have not revealed many details about the kind
of intelligence the cells have provided is real.
So remember, fusion cells. So now because you
realize, if you look this up, it's an
it's a concept of internal. We're talking about

(01:09:05):
the sharing of information amongst different agencies with
the worlds like it before before in the
US.
So now there's this weird overlap to fusion
cells with Israeli
of in app,
agencies?
Well, if you haven't seen it by now,
here's the most obvious reality of the in
the incestuous overlap of whatever we're calling that.
The government, the intelligence,

(01:09:27):
they're
embedded.
That's why your government can't seem to get
this tick off its back or whatever way
you wanna look at it, guys. They ignore
it. They're a part of it.
So if you the reality being that we
have now an internal
influence and overlap with our intelligence, with the
Israeli government. That's why
these intelligence apparatus, these these individuals, these,

(01:09:49):
start up companies are all scattered across this
country that are I mean, imagine if that
was China or Russia.
They would lose their minds, and rightly so,
because any government doing that should be a
problem. But I get now we're starting to
see why it's not. Maybe we're in the
world where the intel people talk about the
CIA and these being, like, the real runners
of the country, the deep state. Well, if
we now recognize that they're all kind of

(01:10:10):
that's this is why Whitney Webb calls it
the binational security state. It's what we're looking
at.
So that's a bigger point to take home.
But on top of the fact that the
CIA has been resting on October 7th forward
and then being a part of all the
atrocities we commit, There is no decoupling the
US government from what's been going on. There's
just not.
Now doctor Renee Lamont points out the US
fusion cells assisted Israel's hunt for Hamas leaders,

(01:10:31):
but she says that,
the, she says, I love this excerpt from
defense to, says the defense department officials have
insisted that they are not directly supporting the
military operations.
A campaign that has led to deaths of
tens of thousands of Palestinians under the rubble.
So this is interesting in light of the
a report by a reporter in Ghibliya camp
that 2 brigades

(01:10:53):
of American commandos are working with Israeli commandos
in actually going to house searching, conducting raids,
following the 2 Americans and 2 intelligence brigades
that are detonators of explosives.
See, the point is
there's
it is a dual operation, guys. That's my
point. And we can prove this in so
many ways. And it's things like this New
York Times article that get that forced the

(01:11:13):
the idiotic Matt Mills of the world to
have to at least give some indication. The
reality though is that we know. They're and
we've been showing this from the beginning. The
3 star general that Axios pointed out, the
CIA, the groups on the ground,
they're complicit. But you don't need to be
convinced of that. It's just more evidence. And
since I suspect that they would claim they
have nothing to do with bringing the houses
to rubble if they go in search and

(01:11:34):
raid and such. I also cannot imagine that
they are using these drones,
not using the weapons part of the drones
in these operations. Clearly, the United States is
completely in on this war, and this article
brings a step closer. I agree.
Especially with combined
when combined with the reporting out in Jubileeyah
to understand how involved the US is.
This is what I was reading shortly after

(01:11:54):
October 7th.
She says, I directly,
directed I directed special operations, quote from the
article,
Personnel and or intelligence professionals to work side
by side with their Israeli counterparts to help
locate and track Xinwar.
But yet you pretend like you weren't involved?
I mean, you're literally on the ground in
17 different ways acting alongside them, and you
just can't pre guess what? They're lying. Surprise,

(01:12:16):
surprise.
And you get the point. This is really
more highlighting the same ideas. I think that's
really important.
Here's somebody on the ground. Just to add
more credence to this. He's a journalist from
specifically Jabaliya. And he says a spec this
is on the 19th. A special American military
unit with multiple missions is participating with the
Israeli army forces on the ground in Jiblia

(01:12:36):
refugee camp.
I mean, you realize you know what this
means more than anything? That means they know
there aren't tunnels here, that there aren't hostages
or or
human shields.
They've been bombing the Jabali camp. I mean,
is if I remember correctly, is that that's
the camp they bombed that they claimed they
killed 400 people to stop one commander who
turned out not to be there. And even

(01:12:56):
Wolf Flitzer couldn't swallow that and just keep
going back. They know what they're doing.
US military personnel right alongside them.
On the in a refugee camp. And it
says for a week now, there have been
searches, raids, inspections in west in Western Jiblia
by joint American US engineering units, tirelessly and
without boredom, accompanied by intensive bombing operations.

(01:13:18):
To what end?
Annihilation, guys. Displacement, annihilation, ethnic cleansing.
It says the New York Times revealed the
Pentagon secretly sent commando forces to Israel to
advise them, which I just showed
you. Sam Husseini points out now, this is
important to think about. Now, obviously, the reality
is that it's not they've been there. Okay?
That should be obvious. But

(01:13:40):
now that we know, at least reported by
the me which they'll have be forced to
acknowledge that they have deployed.
Okay? Well, did we forget how that's supposed
to work?
That's supposed to be congressional approval. But, I
mean, that's we should all laugh out loud
about how dumb that is, since that hasn't
happened what? Since I mean, even the Iraq
war time frame, there was overlaps on that,
but that just doesn't happen.
Why? Because they know that they're, they they're

(01:14:02):
taking step by step away or rather
the Liberty, if you will,
to show you or to to demonstrate that
they are no longer bound or if ever
by the things that we pretend they are.
So it's amazing we have yet to really
engage with the reality that your government doesn't
care about these things. The when's the last
time congressional approval's given for any deployment anywhere?

(01:14:24):
There's always a loophole because they just don't
care about these. They care about using them
to enforce on you, to keep you in
line.
Just Paul foreign policy says congress never authorized
sending US troops to imminent hostilities in congress,
which, by the way, this is the not
a correct video.
US Civil Defense News shared a fake video
even though they are deploying troops, just to
make sure that's clear. But they say this

(01:14:44):
is a violation of the Constitution of War
Powers Act of 73,
which is true. Regardless of the fake video.
So remember that when it comes to that
platform that that account. But he makes a
good point. Sam Hussain. He says, why aren't
Massey and Tlaib filing articles of impeachment?
It's a pretty damn good question. Right? Biden
and Kamala, well, they should be held accountable
for this. But just so too should Trump

(01:15:04):
and so too should Obama before that, where
they all did the same things. They deployed
without congressional approval. But the point is the
same. They're all violating
what we believe is supposed to bind them.
And not even Massie and the rest are
saying anything about that. I find that concerning.
I mean, nor they say stuff, but they're
it's like with Jordan and the rest standing
up and calling out Israel, but not caring,

(01:15:25):
as Sam pointed out as well, to put
sanctions on them for what they're doing.
Now here is Biden
saying
back in 2007
that he would impeach Bush
for doing the same thing.
The president of the United States had launched
an attack on Iran without congressional approval. That

(01:15:48):
would have been an impeachable offense. Do you
wanna review that comment you made? Well, how
do you stand on that now? Yes, I
do. I wanna stand by that comment I
made. The reason I made the comment was
as a warning.
The reason I made I don't say those
things lightly, Chris. You've known me for a
long time. I was chairman of the judiciary
committee for 17 years or its ranking member.
The president
has no constitutional authority

(01:16:10):
to take this nation to war against the
country of 70,000,000 people unless we're attacked or
unless there is proof that we are about
to be attacked. And if he does
if he does,
I would move to impeach him. The house
obviously has to do that, but I would
lead an effort to impeach him. I don't
use words lightly.
Some of you may have seen me on

(01:16:31):
Stephanopoulos
or Meet the Press and the shows I've
been on on a weekly basis.
I wanna make it clear to you.
I've drafted
with the help of 17 years, I was
the chairman of the judiciary
or the ranking member.
And ladies and gentlemen, I drafted an outline
of what I think the constitutional

(01:16:51):
liberties had on the president of the war
clause.
I went to 5 leading
scholars,
constitutional scholars, and they drafted the treaties for
me. It's being distributed to every center.
And I wanna make it clear.
And I made it clear to the president
that if he takes a nation to war
in Iran

(01:17:11):
without congressional
approval,
I will make it my business to impeach
him.
Yes.
That's a fact.
That
is a
fact.

(01:17:32):
Always the same.
All hypocrites, guys. They're all hypocrites.
The president has no constitutional authority, and now
he's president and doesn't care. Right? Because it's
always about using what you believe is going
on to go after their political opponents when
they all know internally that none of this
applies.
But they don't wanna expose that to you.
There's a the golden rule, the top rule

(01:17:53):
is that they can't let you know that's
the reality, because they use all of that
to keep you in control. But they'll bandy
back and forth about the lies they use
to get power over each other.
Because they're all and say, you know, it's
a big club, and you ain't in it,
guys. That's what we're dealing with.
So this is an interesting point overlap. I
mean, we've talked about Brian Mast and his
wearing his IDF uniform. And with the

(01:18:15):
alarmingly obvious
issue with that and the idea that this
person is so blindly,
blindly,
as an American politician, if you wanna call
him that, working for a foreign government. I
mean, attacking Americans
when when when they're acting within their free
speech rights
because you don't like what they're saying or
doing.
The point is 2 congressmen

(01:18:36):
from the dominant Israel first wing of the
Republican party have introduced a bill that would
give US citizens who are foreign fighters,
and Israel's apartheid army committing genocide, by the
way, the same benefits as US National Guardsmen
or Reservists.
That's that's Brian Mast for you right there.
They're they're saying, pay

(01:18:56):
Americans
for a US person. And, again, that simply
could all that could mean is an Israeli
born IDF member who also happens to have
US citizenship.
Pay for what they're doing in Gaza. Right?
Or rather, give them benefits from American tax
dollars for what they're doing in Israel, whether
or not they've never even lived in this
country.
That's what I'm asked for you. That's that's

(01:19:18):
what it looks like to work for a
foreign government while they're committing genocide, at the
expense of Americans.
There's no racist point in there, guys, as
much as they would love to make it
about antisemitism.
This is a it is an American politician
who is rationalizing
giving benefits to a person fighting to commit
genocide. I don't care if they're American or
anything else.
They are committing genocide.

(01:19:39):
There's no question.
That's Brian Mast. Make sure you remember that.
Now here's a really weird overlapping story that
I also did find offensive. Now there's 2
things to look at it from. 1, from
a religious perspective,
which I I have that perspective too. But
for the sake of this conversation coming from
a journalistic perspective, we're gonna discuss this as
a contradiction.

(01:20:00):
Right? The the reality
of how obvious it is that there's an
and the,
I guess, the larger deception being presented to
Americans from a how the Zionists view you.
Now it says a family of Christian soldiers
who fell in Gaza
asked to remove cross from his headstone.
So these are Christian

(01:20:21):
a Christian family and this this this guy
who fought for the IDF
was a Christian.
It says the defense minister is attempting to
reach an agreement with the family of saint,
sir of sergeant David,
Badomski,
who fell in battle in Gaza. It says
this is what it says. Quote, by law,
it's not permissible to place a cross or

(01:20:41):
any other religious marker, that's not true, on
a military headstone, or rather if it is
true, nobody else cares except if it's a
cross.
Now it says this is especially important in
the Hafa Military Cemetery where fallen Jewish soldiers
are also buried. That's how the Ministry of
Defense wants you to hear that.
So this is my point about how
willfully dishonest they are.

(01:21:01):
This is my point. They're trying they're saying
that where they're also buried. But it's very
easy and even. This article points out that
that's not the way it's viewed. It's viewed
as a Jewish cemetery. And there's plenty of
other Jewish symbols all over this, which I
have no problem with. What I have a
problem with is people rather, not even a
problem. What I want you to recognize is
that these are people that are acting like
this Christian should not belong there, even though

(01:21:24):
he died and fought for Israel.
So what that needs to show you is
not necessarily about Jews in particular, but this
is the case, we're talking about the Jews
in this conversation, but we're talking about Zionist
Jews.
Or simply Zionist Jews that have been or
Jews that have been influenced by Zionism. That's
my perspective on this. But what I want
you to recognize is that we have the

(01:21:44):
reason I say that is because I know
in this conversation that there are people, as
I've highlighted before, in Israel
that would fight for that person's right to
have that there.
Maybe I'm I I guarantee it's a minority.
But it's important to see that that's not
just how Jewish people are. It's about Zionism
and the influence over it, which makes it
that Christianity is a problem. And here,
even though this person died and fought for

(01:22:04):
Israel,
they don't want him to display that. But
then they even go as far, and the
military the government I'm talking about, is to
frame it as, well, no. It's just that
nobody's allowed to do that. Because they know
that you would be offended by that.
So they lied to you.
That that whole that needs to hang over
everything happening here in every conversation. Now it
says the ministry said is working with public

(01:22:25):
committees for a soldier memorial to reach an
agreement.
And it says the defense ministry mourns with
the family, and it will continue to accompany
the family, you know, we're on their side
sort of thing.
But it says,
the family said, because it's easy to prove,
that there are other graves in the cemetery
that have religious markers on them.
Okay.
So why are we being lied to is
their point. Now, it says a Christian resident

(01:22:47):
of Hoffa
made,
oh, no. That's we're talk they're talking about
the kid the same person that passed away.
It says, earlier this month, his mother visited
the grave and found that his headstone had
been covered in black cloth
while a cemetery
was taking, while while a cemetery was taking

(01:23:08):
place for those killed or rather a a
or a ceremony, excuse me, taking place for
those killed on October 7th. And says I
don't care, I don't have words describe the
humiliation she felt.
How sad is that? Oh, you know what?
I don't think I grabbed the
that's too bad. I had an art, a
tweet. I think it was some censored man
that showed the thing being covered, but you
can imagine it. It just added a veil

(01:23:28):
over the top of the thing.
But this says, I thought my David who
gave his life to the country who oh,
you're kidding me.
I knew that was gonna happen. They've added
to the article already.
Hold on.
See, this is where I get into 2
different computers. I I took a screenshot over
it on my other computer.

(01:23:50):
It's not worth the time.
Whatever.
God, it it kills me how obvious this
all is. Just these these constant effort to
can manipulate what you're looking at. Now I
I don't even exactly remember what the other
point was. One of them was this. About
the idea that they're saying well there was
other ones there. But they made a very
clear point about this down here, about people
who just were outraged about the fact that
he was even there. They said this is
a Jewish cemetery and they now just removed

(01:24:12):
that. Of course they did.
Yep.
Well, here's one part of it,
but there was a part at the bottom,
but it says, this is especially important.
It says the ministry added citing the IDF
chief say he states that the holiness that
of the Jewish cemetery was harmed by the

(01:24:34):
cross. So explain to me how you can
argue that this is a cemetery, that no
religious symbols are allowed, but then and so
implying that it's not the case, but then
have somebody else go but the cross harms
it and it's a Jewish cemetery. My My
point is not to even argue that's a
problem. You can do whatever you want. It's
your cemetery. My point is to why do
you lie about it? And on top of
that, a person that's willing to die for
your agenda and then you won't even allow

(01:24:56):
them to represent that, like, this is the
a lie about what Zionism is doing. The
a lot the word is they perceive, as
they've stated publicly, that everybody else is lesser
than.
That's why it's an apartheid state. That's why
human rights groups have called it what it
is. Beth Selem itself calls it Jewish supremacy.
That's an Israeli human rights group. So I
just find this so incredibly insulting, and it

(01:25:16):
should be to anybody, who recognizes these people
don't care about anything they're leaning into to
get you to support their genocide.
And that is not an attack on Jewish
people or even Israelis. It's an attack on
Zionism.
Now,
talking about Northern Gaza, which is very important
here because it is what
it's just it's on top of everything else

(01:25:37):
that's been happening over the year. You know,
imagine this I mean, you know, we're literally,
not imagine. We're talking about location that has
been genocide. They are genociding this location.
Mass murder, the ethnic cleansing. I mean, it's
already happened. They drove everybody to the south
and some of them seem to you know,
there is an element to people that were
able to or chose to just stand their
ground, and now they're just doubling down on
genocide. And what they're doing here is so

(01:25:59):
over the top e literally over the top
from a year of genocide, which I don't
even
imagine something like that.
So Netanyahu now, on the 22nd,
declines
Blinken's request to publicly say he's not doing
this.
So this is my point. That's why one
of the reasons I segued from that point

(01:26:20):
right there is here they are now,
saying
in their press release that the stupid Matt
Millers of the world will blindly repeat and
act like it makes sense, that they are
not doing the thing we can all see
them doing. Right? We can literally see them
doing it. I'll show you all the videos
next. But they come out with a statement,
they go, no. That's not true. We are
not doing that thing you can see us
doing. And they all repeat it.

(01:26:41):
And yet the problem is,
Blinken
tried to give an opportunity to say that.
Well, just come up and say it. Say
it publicly so people know. And they refused.
They flatly declined to say they weren't commit
weren't doing what they're doing in God, which
it's about the general's plan, which here's the
actual article for it that Robert wrote. Israel's
and this is what I I've talked about
as well on a previous show. Their surrender

(01:27:02):
or starve plan.
That's what they called it. And it's called
the general's plan for the main name.
And it's not it's not a secret. They
that's an open conversation. They're arguing it just
hasn't done they haven't done that. It's not
it's not happening.
But it is though. And everyone knows that.
And and they're they've and and that's the
point in the article. They've admitted that to
their own Israeli media. And this is the
point that I've always made over the years.

(01:27:23):
Because they want their people to see it.
Because they think it's 2 things. They want
them to know that they're they wanna think
they're winning. And they want them to know
that they can do this over the US
government. They're more they're we're more powerful because
of how small and petty they are. They
never earned this power.
Right? So and and so that's the and
so when they come to US and go,
we're not doing that. But then go to
their media and go, we're doing that. And

(01:27:44):
they know you can see that.
And they the Israeli government almost gets a
kick out of being able to play that
game. That's at least that's my perception of
it.
But this they're starving people. They're literally starving
children. And now and the point is, if
you're gonna pretend like they never did at
the beginning,
let's just even say for sake of conversation
they weren't doing that, which was, we'll starve
you to death if you don't do what
we want. Which, by the way, that's a

(01:28:05):
crime. There's no way around it. That's why
they're denying this now. It's all everything's been
a crime. This is just not more of
an obvious crime. My point is if you
think they were never doing it, you at
least have to acknowledge that they're now proposing
doing that. So it's not outside the realm
of possibility they could have done it, which
that's only for those people that are barely
hanging on. The rest of you already know
this is happening.

(01:28:25):
But it says the prime minister,
Netanyahu and his aids, rejected the request from
Blinken. I mean, you know you know how
embarrassing it must be to be Anthony Blinken
right now? This just this pushover guy who
just gets lied to and comes out and
knows he's lying and knows that you know
he's lying and he just gets pushed back
and forth between all these liars.
And what a walking, using I mean, this
guy is a pushover.

(01:28:46):
That's my point. I mean, it's you are
going to be the one thrown under the
bus. He must even feel that right now.
But it says to publicly say that Israel's
not implementing an ethnic cleansing plan, known as
the general's plan. The report said Netanyahu and
his top aids say that the general's plan
was absolutely not our policy.
Deeply damaging to us. A lie, basically. But
the Times of Israel reported that Netanyahu rejected

(01:29:07):
the request to publicly denounce the plan, which
is funny. While Israeli officials have told the
US they're not carrying out the plan, Israeli
soldiers have spoken directly to Herets last week
that they already are underway in Northern Gaza
with this plan.
It's incredible.
I mean, why not? I mean, why not
just lie? Because they know they're going to
at least get the US government to pretend

(01:29:29):
it's not happening.
So why not? That's what it looks like
to normalize genocide, to give them the out.
Now John Cusack points this out as of
21st.
Many of these videos going around showing you
the exact plan that we're talking about. Mohammed
Shehada says Israeli public media is posting the
Jabaliyah death march as the ultimate victory picture

(01:29:50):
of the Israeli genocide. They're praising this stuff.
These are all civilians, women, children, elderly. Children,
men and women caged up in concentration camps,
starved and bombed, then rounded up and forced
to move to the next concentration camp to
be caged, starved, and bombed.
This is from Octo I mean, it's been
going on for 76 years, but this has
been going on nonstop
since October 7th forward.

(01:30:10):
And as John Cusack points out,
the fact that this is not the number
one story in the US and and it
is and will be the greatest crime and
shame of the US.
You may not think that now because of
your political agendas, or your perception of how
you should be lined up, or what somebody
told you on Fox News Show. But at
the end of the day,
history will not forget this and we will

(01:30:32):
go past this and this will and even
the politicians of tomorrow just like they pretend
they care about the assassination of Martin Luther
King, you know, of of m you know,
Martin Luther King or any number of other
things that we now know they were a
part of, they will always pretend like they're
so we you know, how we need to
rectify or we need to, you know, make
amends or whatever else. The point is that
this is a shameful thing that our government

(01:30:54):
is proving to be a part of.
And that we,
as individuals, are the people that we've always
talked about as everyone's made this point a
1000 times.
You know what you would've done in the
past examples. You're doing it right now. You
will remember that going forward. You will look
back on this with shame, if you're a
good person, for choosing to hide from this.
Because it is your tax dollars, and it
is happening in your name, and your government

(01:31:15):
is on the ground. So it is our
responsibility,
regardless of what the partisan screamers want you
to think.
Now Pelham also points this out from 17th.
Is some of the stuff I had from
back before, but I just wanna make sure
we saw it as well. This is this
horrifying image I showed you, I think, on
the last show. But just look at that
scape. Look at that landscape.
Just look at how far that goes. Just

(01:31:36):
block after block after block of just all
of it. Everything go every single piece of
this building's been bombed and shattered.
Northern Gaza's been wiped off the earth. Over
500,000
civilians have seen no food enter since October
2nd. Until 15th, and till till till till
this moment, as I understand it, there's no
food coming in. Funny how that was a
huge deal they were denying until now they
just blatantly do it and no one cares.

(01:31:57):
Same thing with the star same thing with
the starvation, starters, or kill like, it's everything
we've been telling you they're doing, and now
they're just doing it publicly. And now as
they're publicly doing it, the people denying it
won't even talk about it.
As always.
Charlie Herbert points out that the northern Gaza,
as you can see here, Israeli forces rounding
up every adult male conveniently beyond the scrutiny

(01:32:17):
of the western media, which is why they've
been killing journalists and and more than ever
to stop people from seeing what they're doing
because they understandably don't want the world to
see it. If you're still supporting this, you're
on the wrong side.
Committee to protect journalists
on 23rd. This is today. They write, the

(01:32:37):
committee to protect journalists is aware of accusations
made by the Israeli Defense Forces
against several journalists in Gaza accusing them of
being members of the militant groups.
Israel has repeatedly made similar unproven claims without
providing credible evidence. Now even if you believe
that's the case, even if it is the
case, you have to understand the law requires
that they prove that.

(01:32:58):
Whether it's a building, a hospital, a human
shield dynamic, they're supposed to prove this. They
claim they do, but then every time they
turn, oh, gussy wasn't there.
Well, you just admitted to a war crime.
See, these are the things that the world
generally are aware of that the ICC Jay,
the ICC,
the the UN I mean, whether whatever you
think about the bodies, I probably share your
opinion. The point is that for whatever reason,
they're calling it out.

(01:33:19):
And we can prove, as Scott Ritter pointed
out, when you see those controlled demolition of
the buildings, it proves every time that they
went in, proved that there was no threat,
then left, then blew it up.
All of these are being documented
by the people that have no ability to
stop this in real time. And at some
point, there will be at least the effort
of accountability. But as we go forward, it's
on us as the individuals to do what

(01:33:40):
we can to force our childish,
blind,
cowardly governments from do force them to stop
this.
Because that's the only thing it does, putting
their own interests on the line.
Now it says after killing Al Jazeera's correspondent,
Ismail al Ghul, on on in July, the
IDF previously produced a similar document,

(01:34:02):
which contained contradictory information
showing that he was born in 19 7
1997.
And received, apparently, a Hamas military ranking in
2 1,007,
when he would have been 10 years old.
Now we're not talking about working with them.
We're talking about being given a ranked position.
That's not the reality, guys. They lied. And
they don't care. That's how li clumsy this
is.

(01:34:23):
And everyone can see it, but the people
that have the ability to do something to
make them stop don't care, which means they're
part of it. So that's always that uncomfortable
realization
that we can see from, you know, the
UK government, the US government, all the people
that have been guiding you as the leaders
of the world are the worst people in
this conversation.
The worst.

(01:34:43):
The very people that are aware of how
many lies are being stolen, they just don't
care for whatever reason. It could be that
they're compromised.
Financially,
blackmail, who knows? So I what it shows
you is that they are in that position.
There's no forgetting that. They're allowing this to
continue.
And guess what the Zionist observer found? Same
thing they keep trying to do but getting

(01:35:04):
caught lying about. That's always how this goes.
Every accusation is an admission.
They've uncovered documents that reveal the journalist, Nitzan
Sharpe
Shapira
is actually a militant despite being employed by
a journalist
as a journalist by channel 12.
There we go.
Constantly happening. Now Mohammad Shehadeh points out Israel's

(01:35:26):
o now openly declaring its intention to murder
Gaza's remaining top journalists to ensure informational blackout.
The journalists in question have been receiving repeated
threats from the IDF to abandon their work
or else. And you realize they're they're showing
this stuff, guys. They're being openly threatened. Get
out of here. We're gonna kill you.
It's amazing how how much how much evidence
there is behind all this. And here it
is, the IDF for halt calling these out,

(01:35:47):
and they're simply calling them terrorists.
But they're just they're if they're but they're
terrorists. Right? But they're sending a text message
going, get out of here. We're gonna kill
you. Why don't you just kill them then?
Are they terrorists?
I mean, you have to obviously see how
clumsy all of this is. They just want
nobody to be able to report on what's
coming and what's happening.

(01:36:08):
Another local journalist on the ground says that
and this is about this is from the
17th forward in Jubileeah. The situation in Jubileeah
refugee camp is nothing short of a catastrophe.
Hundreds of innocent Palestinians, many of them children,
have lost their lives
in relentless Israeli strikes,
with many burned alive.
Entire families have been wiped out
in what seems to be a calculated effort

(01:36:28):
to devastate northern Gaza. Civilians caught under rubble
and with no safe haven
are enduring unimaginable
suffering.
The world cannot remain silent in the face
of this ongoing horror. Jabaliyah is in flames.
And its people are pleading for justice. Don't
forget, that's where the CIA was working with
the Israeli government to conduct these raids. Now
that it's burned, built now everyone burned and

(01:36:49):
killed and struck well, gee. How else do
we understand this? The CIA was committing crimes.
At least was allowing them to be committed.
Big surprise.
And it the same journalist covering this on
the 19th.
The first images of the horrific massacre against
civilians. Now this is after the math. Right?
They're trying to clean out the rubble, finding
dead bodies, survive surviving people. Israeli occupation aircraft

(01:37:11):
completely destroyed a residential block using fire belts,
targeting the homes of al Sharif, Hindi, Al
Cogut,
Drewe, and Obid families. The airstrike resulted in
the total destruction of homes. Over 73 people
killed, a 100 injured, and several others are
missing under the rubble.
Civilians.
Civilian homes.

(01:37:33):
Eva Bartlett, and I showed you this one
briefly the other day. This is unbelievable to
me.
So after genociding all of the Gaza over
a year, Israel is very quickly genociding Gaza's
north with the complicity of the US government,
which armed it and all the governments which
enabled it. The simple point here, as they
always do, as she points out, they do
in Syria, they bomb a location, they kill
or rather they snipe a child. That's who

(01:37:54):
it is, a child.
And then they run.
They close it up, they bomb the wall.
That's not by accident. That's by design.
Let me ask you a question, guys. Can
you hear that?
Can you hear this video?

(01:38:15):
Give me a thumbs up in the chat
if you can hear this video.
That would be great if you could. That
would be the best way to do this.
I have to download the videos.
The the point is this is just like
with Yemen or anywhere else. This is by
design. It's it's it's one of the most
egregious types of war crimes. Right? Killing somebody
and then waiting for the ambulances to come
in, bombing the ambulances. That is what the

(01:38:36):
CIA with Saudi Arabia and this is what
they did. This is what they did. Alright.
Not necessarily just the US government, let's say.
In this case,
it's obvious. And we know they're there. And
they're murdering innocent people, children included, for hatred.
Oh, you said here at low. Okay. It's
okay. It's you're just getting it through my
microphone. I know some people can just play
these live and it works for them. I'm
not sure how to do that on on

(01:38:57):
StreamYard. But in in any case
now this one that I showed you again
is from 17th, I believe. That's everyday, guys.
Israeli strike on a Gaza school kills 28.
5 children.
5 children. This is everyday this happens.
They're they're not tied to some person's leg.
There's not even an argument. There this is
some human shield. They just don't care anymore.
Your government knows that and is desperate to

(01:39:19):
keep this going.
Marion Burgudi says North Gaza is facing the
harsh conditions since the start of Israel's genocidal
campaign. It killed 450
people
just in the last 2 weeks in Gaza
alone.
Our Palestinians are intentionally starved, especially in the
last weeks where no aid has been allowed
at all.
Breastfeeding mothers, wounded people, starving children are being

(01:39:41):
bombed and riddled with bullets while enduring Israel's
savagery with no shelters, no hospitals, no water,
barely a glimpse of electricity.
That's a set, assuming that they're not gonna
get stopped and raped and tortured by people
that might catch them,
which is obviously happening.
And I already showed you this the other
day. Oxfam
is reporting

(01:40:03):
water engineers, 4 of them, were killed by
Israeli military.
Now what's crazy about this kinda story? Remember
in the beginning when the first UN, whether
UNRWA or anybody else was killed? It was
a huge story. I was covering that, like,
almost blown away that it wasn't getting more
covered. Remember that? I was counting the UN
people killed. Until finally, they just were like,
oh, by the way, you and UNRWA's Hamas.

(01:40:23):
And all of the blind, cowardly corporate media
went the other direction.
Well, here's Oxfam.
They're not they they should they're I mean,
they're they're not UNRWA.
Just like doctors without borders. I mean, they're
just straight up murdering these people. Where's the
conversation? Where's Matt Miller? Where's Biden? Where's Trump?
Wouldn't they be screaming about this? How they
killed America? They killed their aid workers. Nope.
Nobody cares. They're not even trying to give

(01:40:45):
you a narrative for why this makes sense.
They just ignore it.
That has to be some of the most
powerful points. Now as well as the fact
that, as we just showed you the other
day, Haaretz recently wrote the article telling you
that Netanyahu's own party, the Likud party,
sent out invitations in for an event titled
preparing to settle Gaza.
Surprise, surprise. It's already been there. If if

(01:41:06):
you didn't already know that, then you gotta
think about who you're listening to. This has
been publicly sh they've been having conferences. Ben
Gavir's been dancing with the settlers. We're gonna
take Gaza. They've already built things in the
orliest parts of Gaza. It's already been happening
and your government is pretending it's not there,
or rather that you're racist for saying it's
possible.
And Arnab Atran makes the excellent point to

(01:41:28):
show you how dishonest it all is. Netanyahu,
in July,
said Israel does not seek to resettle Gaza.
He went to the UN last month, and
he said again, we don't seek to resettle
Gaza. Yet now his own party puts out
the invitation to literally prepare to settle Gaza.
You don't think he knows that? This guy
is a disgusting liar. He's standing there getting

(01:41:50):
I think almost getting off of the fact
that he's able to lie and that this
government, who knows he's lying, will parrot it
anyway.
Think about the power that he must feel
even though it's not real.
Now here's Ben Gavir.
Mikko, Pilate, who you should follow, by the
way. Anti Zionist Israeli, author of the general
sun.
He says violence is escalating against the Palestinians

(01:42:12):
at a dangerous rate, and the world is
doing nothing.
The lies that Netanyahu spreads unchecked on platforms
like Jordan Peterson enables this violence. We must
call these people out and organize to take
action to protect Palestinians.
Jordan Peterson, Netanyahu
lays out the groundwork
that justifies everything that comes next. Basically says

(01:42:33):
this. The Arabs came to the land of
Israel in the 7th century, forced all the
Jews into exile, and colonized Israel. Then they
left it barren. Then they decided to come
back, and the Jews who had just come
to the land of Israel and made it
flourish, welcomed the Arabs back. And then 1948
comes along, and the Arab countries attack us.
They tell the Arabs in the land of
Israel to leave, and then they blame us

(01:42:54):
for the refugee problem. Again, the world according
to Benjamin Netanyahu, which has nothing to do
with reality. It was a country that was
flourishing, cities
and villages,
agriculture,
industry, a political life, a judiciary, an academic
life, hospitals, schools.
Now as Netanyahu is spewing this nonsense, the
most radical
elements of the Zionist world, their people on

(01:43:17):
the ground are marching through Palestinian
towns and neighborhoods, from Sheikh Jarrah to Al
Khalil to Hebron to all over the place,
shouting, another Nakba is coming. So was there
a Nakba, or wasn't there a Nakba? Now
the man responsible here is Benjamin Netanyahu. Under
his watch, Palestinians are suffering every single day.
They're being killed. They're being arrested. They're being

(01:43:39):
tortured. Their homes are being destroyed. Their lands
are being taken. Their water is being denied
to them. Their kids are being tortured and
killed every single day under his watch. Palestinians
are being irritated in all of these issues
at the same time. The refugees,
the prisoners,
Jerusalem,
Ramadan,
Al Aqsa. What do you think is gonna
happen? What can anybody expect to happen,

(01:44:00):
especially
when the man holding the keys
to all of this
is the madman,
the lunatic, the racist thug, Itamar Binguvere.
The future
couldn't be more dangerous.
People need to stand up.
People need to organize.
Make sure that your elected officials or unelected
officials
understand that it's time to act. Challenge people

(01:44:22):
like Peterson, who interview Netanyahu and don't challenge
him. People like Joel Olsteen, people like Bill
Maher. Shame on them for giving this platform
to a criminal,
a war criminal, a vicious liar. Get informed.
Get other people informed. Get other people angry.
Get other people ready to act. This cannot
continue. We cannot pretend like nothing is going

(01:44:43):
on.
Well, he's absolutely right.
Oops.
It's very obvious that people, I mean, whatever
or whatever it is the swaying him. It's
obvious that this is what allows this to

(01:45:04):
continue.
Now here's another clip that's in in Hebrew,
but men men press news points out exactly
what we're coming off of. He's this is
Ben Gebir.
The one he mentioned at the end. We
are giving you the option to go from
here to other countries.
Right. Just like they pretended before. And like
they and even though you can look in
their own documentation where it's very clear this

(01:45:24):
is about expelling them
with violence,
the narrative changed. Now we pretend like we're
gonna let you go. This is their territory
according to everybody but the Israeli government of
the US, and it doesn't you don't allow
they're not going to go anywhere. So what
this is is setting the narrative that when
they do, it's their choice, even though you're
gonna force it to happen. Or if they
don't, then it must be terrorists.

(01:45:45):
These people are absolutely genocidal maniacs,
a term that gets thrown around almost casually.
If you've ever wanted to understand what a
real genocidal maniac looks like, it's right there.
These people are lunatics. And I and, understandably,
I think that even or rather, as I
understand it,
according to in Israeli media,
the argument is that even

(01:46:06):
Benjamin Netanyahu is terrified of these people. That
he used them to keep stay maintain power
and stay out of prison. And now they've
essentially been able to take control in a
large way using these settlements I mean, these
people are extremists
of extremists.
And Hind Kudari says, as they're doing to
them, you either leave or you die.
And that's what we're looking at. Look at

(01:46:28):
their world behind them.
Pinpoint targeted precision. Right?
Must have been pinpoint targeting the tunnels on
the top bill top floor of that building.
Right?
It's just it's just such willful ignorance.
This is this is I'm also sure we'll
end with a a tweet from,
Torah Judaism.
Showing you the overlap to what happened during

(01:46:48):
World War 2. And if you wanna compare
these images, this is what you will always
be shown. And, of course, all the people
that were taking a part of it, hopefully
not. Hopefully, they're held accountable. But the way
the world tends to go in the past,
all the ones that were letting this happen
will be the ones crying tear crocodile tears
about how we can't let it happen again
while they're the ones literally making sure they
can do it again.

(01:47:09):
And here's Robert's article about this as it's
continuing in Northern Gaza. This is what's happening
to people.
Here's B'Tselem.
The world must stop the ethnic cleansing of
Northern Gaza.
The magnitude of the crimes
Israel is currently committing in the Northern Strip
Gaza Strip. Now this is just in the
what's recently happening in the Gaza Strip, in
the Northern. It is in its campaign to

(01:47:31):
empty it of however many residents are left
is impossible to describe.
Not just because 100 of thousands of people
enduring starvation,
disease, without access to medical care, and incessant
bombardments and gunfire defies comprehension,
but because Israel has cut them off from
the world.
Ever since Israel's

(01:47:51):
current operation in the northern Gaza Strip began
on October 5th. Right? The the one they
pretend they're not doing now because the corporate
media and the US government are so cowardly
that they'll blindly lie for them. But this
is the general's plan since October 5th that
Bethsaida was very aware of.
Since that point, the area has been under
a near complete siege, relentlessly pummeled by the
military. Other than in the most exceptional cases,

(01:48:12):
Israel does not allow humanitarian aid or emergency
crews in, taking advantage of the fact that
global attention has been diverted to adverse
to irreversibly
change reality on the ground.
According to reports from humanitarian agencies, about 50,000
people have already been forced out of their
homes since the offense it began.
Now that's not post October 7th. That's post

(01:48:32):
the beginning of the general's plan.
These the 3 hospitals that still operate in
Northern Gaza, and realize even then, that's only
because they've been mended and refixed. They bombed
all of them.
It says they they're on the brink of
collapse yet again, and then they and themselves
vulnerable to attack. The same goes for public
buildings used as I IDP camps, where many

(01:48:53):
people who had sought refuge were killed in
these is by in Israeli bombardments
of refugee locations with no justification for the
bombing because no one's paying attention. The few
testimonies that have trickled out from northern Gaza
describe dead bodies lining the streets, hunger, drinking
water nowhere to be found, and civilians being
killed as bombs are dropped on their homes
without warning or as they flee for their

(01:49:15):
lives. You know, even not even the faint
effort of dropping leaflets anymore.
And then bombing up bombing everywhere anyway.
For a late for a year now, it
says, since the war began, the international community
has shut shown utter impotence
to stop
indiscriminate attacks on civilians in the Gaza
Strip. I wouldn't say impotence. That almost implies

(01:49:35):
they're unable.
A willful eff desi
they choose to not act. They could act.
Maybe to their own detriment, but they could.
They're choosing not to.
Now it says, when it is clu clearer
than ever that Israel intends to forcibly displace
northern Gaza's residence by committing some of the
greatest crimes under the laws of war, the

(01:49:55):
world's nations must take action. Without immediate, decisive
action from the international community, without ev without
using every tool available, political, legal, economic, the
mass killings of the northern Gaza Strip will
continue.
And the suffering of its besieged civilians will
grow. All international
bodies and institutions must act now to compel
Israel to stop the war and end the

(01:50:17):
carnage.
This is the Israeli leading human rights group.
You'd think that would matter to the US
government, whether Trump or Biden or the talking
heads like the Millers of the world. How
does it not? Because they know it and
they don't care, guys. This is not some
confusion. They're not misunderstood.
They're willfully taking part in genocide and willfully
covering it up.

(01:50:38):
In case you need to be reminded
Oh, of course that's the one that doesn't
pop up. Hold on. Let me bring this
up on my other computer real quick.
Pull this over. One second.

(01:50:58):
Miracles of technology, Just as scary as it
is. Interesting.
Alright. Here we go.
This is the B'Tselem
post from dot 20 21.
The regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan
River to the Mediterranean Sea. This is apartheid.

(01:51:18):
That's from the Israeli human rights group. The
lead one of the leading in the world.
Here they are telling you what they're doing
right now in northern Gaza. It's the worst
thing I've seen yet.
And it's from 2021, it's been it's been
since far back as you could look, they're
publicly telling you, not only Jewish supremacy. And
again, that's there's plenty of Jews in this
location that don't agree with that. So it's
a Zionism influence on that perspective, but that

(01:51:39):
it's apartheid. The worst kind of racism.
All of this is easy to see.
Oh my gosh. I just realized something.
Damn it.
Well, heads up for those watching. I don't
think I'm gonna have my links. I'll try
to fix that afterward, but I forgot I've
been closing them, and I don't think I
have them saved because I did it on
the other computer. There you go. Another hitch

(01:52:01):
in the game today, but we'll get it
all sorted out. So I won't close anymore
because I guess I'll have to at least
get these ones. But so to finish up
here in general, after recognizing what's really going
on,
Don't forget this as well. Forensic architecture, a
year ago today, doctors stood among the bodies
of victims at the Al Ali blast. You
know, the one that tried to pretend with

(01:52:21):
somebody else, warning that if Israeli impunity continued,
more attacks on Gaza's hospitals would follow, which
they were right. Among them was surgeon doctor
Ghassan Abusita,
a firsthand witness to the blast which nobody
gave nobody ever ignored,
whose testimony was overlooked.
They've recovered it here. Here's the actual article
which again, it's from
Forensic architecture has done a great job on

(01:52:42):
this so far, from the beginning of this,
showing you with evidence, forensic evidence, what's actually
going on.
Now here and you and you can watch
this if you'd like. It's it's you've seen
it before. It's him speaking about
or we've talked about this point before. There's
a new video of him discussing how he
knows this was a crime.
But we also have a new video, and
I'll show you some more of them from

(01:53:02):
a doctor speaking out.
And, I mean, I'll include the thread that
I've been trying to share as much as
possible. I've added a whole bunch more doctors
to it.
Just how many doctors are speaking up telling
you that they're watching children get killed? They're
watching assassinations. They're watching torture.
Here's another doctor telling you what's going on.
Most people died. I mean, some days, the

(01:53:22):
most you could do is just
hold people's hand and look them in the
eyes. You watch them die either because,
they were malnourished, they were starving,
or we had no blood to give them.
Every day has felt like that. Every day
in the north felt like that. And,
you the directors there only got a chance

(01:53:43):
to breathe once a shipment of fuel
and medicine and food,
came in. And that was always,
that was always a hail Mary. That was
always,
always felt like it was last minute. And
now that it's now that it's really cut
off and and they're not getting supplies in,
they're not getting fuel in, they're not getting
medicines in, they're not getting food in,

(01:54:04):
now they're really desperate because before before people
would arrive last minute, they would arrive before,
before the point of no return, and,
now that seems to be happening.
And can you talk specifically
about the children
in these hospitals?
The number of children who are died, who
are maimed, who've had amputations,

(01:54:26):
well over a1000 now are alive but amputated.
The situation there and this latest situation where
one of the hospitals was the site of
what was supposed to be a vaccination
program today?
Yeah. That's I mean, you leave all of
them behind. That's the hard part. You you

(01:54:46):
hate to see anyone suffer or die, but
the,
when when you're just seeing innocent kids, it's,
it's not just the physical wounds too. I
remember one little girl,
she was caught in an airstrike and she
was buried alive for 12 hours next to
her dead parents.
And then she got dug out and we
had to, perform emergency surgery on her leg.
There's another little girl, 5 years old.

(01:55:09):
She came in with both legs just just
mangled after an explosion, and the mom was
begging us not to amputate her legs. And,
we both knew the we both knew
her legs weren't gonna make it, but, I
mean, those are the conversations
we have to have. And I remember another
7 year old girl came in with her
her her arm just missing. Her arm was
just it was blown off.

(01:55:30):
And the the surgeon across from me just,
a very stoic, unemotional,
strong, resilient surgeon,
just broke down in tears. It's just he
had had it after after 6 months.
Just couldn't take it anymore.
So that toll that toll is very exacting.
I mean, the physical wounds, you can get
to heal. You can get an amputation wound
to heal, but it's

(01:55:50):
it's the psychic scars of,
of of seeing your your parents buried alive,
or you're buried alive and they're dead, and
you're looking at them.
Everyone in Gaza, every bed you go to
has a horrifying story of of loss, of
losing a home, losing a loved one, losing
a limb, losing an eye.
And it never ends. And it it just

(01:56:12):
every day, you wake up to more and
more of it.
And that's that's just what makes it so
horrifying.
So I can't hear it, unfortunately. I'm I
could comment generally, but usually, I comment on
specifics that he might have said. But overall,
the point and I have listened to it
earlier. The overall point is just how
constant this is, how constant

(01:56:34):
all of these different doctors telling you all
of the same things, and it just doesn't
change the conversation. Or New York Times can
write an article about all the 60 65
doctors that signed the same thing, and it
all just keeps continuing forward. That's the hardest
part for people like us to continue to
see it. It's all right there. Here's another
point. Huge deal. The doctor who provided the
New York Times
the photos of children shot through the head

(01:56:56):
went with Palestinian,
Pal AMMed
oh, what? P m p a m a,
who posted to Facebook this week that their
doctors were quoted in the article. Israel has
now banned them and others from Gaza.
Simple as that. Right? So you you you
prove that they did something wrong, then you
get banned. Right? We've already shown you this
this example of the the state department person

(01:57:18):
who says that the moment they found out
that they were raping children, what they do?
Well, they shut the awareness down. They didn't
stop the raping, though. We have to condemn
the atrocities that happen every day to Palestinians
in the West Bank. You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
and a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,

(01:57:39):
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault, actually the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in the Muscabia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible. We put them
to Israel to, the government of Israel. And
you know what happened the next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and

(01:57:59):
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone, Not sexual atrocity not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification
where people are not seen

(01:58:20):
The problem here, on top of the obvious,
if you look at the conversation beneath these
videos when that was first posted, half of
them are calling that guy a racist.
Simply showing you how dumb this is, how
lowest of the bottom of the barrel, lowest
common denominator. You're talking about children
being raped and the cover of that up,
and your only issue is that he he
must hate Jews then. Right? Like, that's that's

(01:58:41):
desperation, guys. Desperation. And that's why this has
become so obvious.
The dishonesty is everywhere. Now to the end
point here about
aid.
Right? Because the whole reality here is that
on top of the we know because of
the new plan that they've openly stated that
they they surrender or starve.
And now we can prove on top of
that. Not a single piece of aid has

(01:59:02):
come in since October 2nd.
So everything by the way, that's already mostly
been happening from the very beginning. But now
it's explicit.
And yet, where's the speaking now? Everyone was
denying it back then. Now that you can
all prove it, we're the same people denying
it haven't said a word. Where's Matt Miller?
Because here here he is right here telling
you that it's okay, that we're gonna do

(01:59:22):
it anyway.
So all this time, the point was, yes.
It's not happening. That's why we don't have
to stop a. But now that we know
it is, we're gonna go ahead and give
them that, which, by the way, there you
go. Like every other stage, they're now just
telling you what we've always been telling you.
That's why. Because they don't care. Now that
they're forced to acknowledge, now they just have
to go, well, too bad. We don't care.
Move on.
That's where we are. They are gonna continue

(01:59:42):
to fund these people because that's the plan.
They don't care if they break the law
because they're all breaking the law. Here is
Assad Assadrad pointing out that they are going
to continue to fund them, to arm them
regardless of their violations.
Thank you, Matt.
Our colleagues at Politico
reported that a US envoy told aid groups
the US would not consider withholding weapons to

(02:00:05):
Israel for blocking food and medicine, that essentially
the rules don't apply to Israel.
Given Not essential. No. Forget what the essentially
that's not not at all an accurate representation
of of her comments. That's not all. That's
not all. Source. Not all of which not
all of which were accurate accurately presented in
that article. I would say should note as
always with these, you have what becomes a
secondhand

(02:00:26):
presentation
put into an article. Not all of those
comments were in any way accurate. Sure. But
was the the basic
characterization of her describing you I'm not gonna
speak to a to a private meeting, but
we have always made clear that we are
committed to the defense of Israel. We will
continue to support the defense of Israel, but
we also are gonna enforce US law.
So you will enforce US law including

(02:00:47):
If you look at the letter that the
secretary if you look at the letter the
secretary sent, the other day, he said that
there are number of US laws and policies
that are implemented by, Israel not taking steps
to,
allow humanitarian assistance to get in, and we
will enforce US law. But we're gonna we
wanna see
Israel take increased steps. We've seen them take
some increased steps over the last few days,

(02:01:07):
but we need to see much more. I
guess there have been previous instances for which,
like, this threat has been to flow whether
it's in the wake of this 7 central
kitchen workers that were killed, whether it was
in,
before, any sort of major operation in Rafa.
Of course, administration,
maintains there wasn't a major operation. But, nevertheless,
there have been instances for which this threat

(02:01:28):
has been offered, and yet there hasn't been
any actualization of it. So
I know that your objective is to see
the end of US support to Israel. Our
objective
is to see
Israel take steps to
increase humanitarian assistance getting into Gaza. We have
other steps as well, but that's relevant to
the conversation we're having now. And so our

(02:01:50):
engagement with them
on this question has been to push them
to take steps.
And at times, we've seen them take really
important steps. When we had this last,
major engagement with them in April, we saw
them take a number of steps to open
new crossings, and it got trucks up to
300 to 400 in some days. Now we
saw significant first stagnation and then backsliding over

(02:02:11):
the come last few months, which is why,
the secretary felt it was important to send
that letter, this Sunday. To be clear, my
objective is not to do My objective is
to ask about the US enforcement laws. Understand.
Sean. Yes, sir. Can
we actually go to Western Sahara?
Sorry to make you listen to this clown,
but the point is obvious. Right? How he
tries to frame Thacker as somehow the problem.
No. He he cares about you, the law.

(02:02:32):
You know? You you see, it's funny how
you project. You know, you just have the
agenda to frame it this way. No. It's
what you guys are doing. Now he may
as well. But in that context, it's obvious
to point out that he was simply acknowledging
the fact that you are in and the
clear reality is that they're gonna continue to
do so. Now here's another clip of Matt
Miller before that.
Embarrassingly denying that it was happening, but at

(02:02:54):
the same time admitting it was happening. That's
how stupid this is.
Our president's a political one.
It's
it's pertinent that you you have made a
a an assessment or the secretary made an
assessment that Israel has not been blocking aid.
And that was kinda based on the fact
that they were making improvements. Since they've gone

(02:03:14):
backward, would you
revisit that assessment? It sounds like things have
gone backward from that. So what we said
in when the secretary made that assessment, if
you look at the the language inside the
National Security memorandum report, it's quite clear that
this would be an ongoing assessment and that
we expect progress to continue,
and that if

(02:03:36):
we see a change in situation, it'll change
our policy. And at the moment, for the
purposes of US law, is Israel blocking the
delivery of the humanitarian aid? We have not
made that assessment at this time, but that
goes to the point that it is urgent
that they correct the situation and allow humanitarian
aid to get in.
It's just so stupid.
It really is just like the epitome of

(02:03:56):
of, like, you know, I think they know
he knows he's caught. Right? You you don't
you can't ask them to stop what they're
doing to allow aid to get through if
they're not blocking aid. I mean, it's just
patently stupid. And, again,
whether it's ProPublica or anybody else, I mean,
there it's obvious because we all will see
it. We've seen the settlers blocking aid. We've
seen them admitting blocking aid. We've seen them
say no water, no food, no fuel. We've
seen these things. And yet here, we have

(02:04:18):
to have ProPublica tell you there's 2 US
state government agencies that are admitting you're blocking
aid. Blinking gets caught. He even gets reprimanded
for it. And here's Miller's telling we're not
doing that. It's just it's especially stupid, and
it's incredible how dishonest these people are. Now
just in case you need more convincing, here's
the Jerusalem Post. Israel stops processing key food
imports to Gaza.

(02:04:38):
But fake news, though, of course. Here
is Heretz from 22nd October.
Netanyahu
isn't willing to hear about an end of
the war, which by the way has been
the case from the entire point, the from
the whole thing, as Ivan Haret has covered
from months ago, how he has systematically
thwarted these talks.
They've covered it countless times, and your government

(02:04:59):
just loves to lie to you about it.
Sources well versed in the negotiations say the
state of the talks hasn't changed.
He's not budging on the deal, which means
he's allowing his own people to continue to
die
while they bomb them, while they starve them.
There's no way around that. And guess what?
Almost all of their conversation in Israel is
very aware of that. They are screaming mad

(02:05:19):
about them stopping what they're doing, but not
because they care about Palestinians, because they want
their families back. Like anybody would. My point
is that
everybody wants that to start. They just keep
going. It's not about anybody, it's about their
agenda, and everyone's beginning to realize that, and
they're killing everyone to get there. Here again
is just the United Nations pointing out the
as of October 16th,

(02:05:40):
the shocking
decline,
which by the way again has never once
crossed over, what, 200 and I mean, even
that that says 165.
So we're talking about how many a day?
500 a day before 2023
was the norm, and that was barely hanging
on. That was including fuel.
They've never once apparently even gone over 165.
Look. The the and these are the oh,
I can't how do I forget how to

(02:06:01):
zoom in all of a sudden. Oh, that's
a new computer. That's right. So as you
can see here,
zoom in for yourselves.
I'll figure that out later.
0 since October 2nd. The point is that
they've never gone over. This is the systematic
design to starve.
As everyone's been telling you, as the IPC
and everybody else at a point, this is
a mass famine. They know that. They're all
lying about it. And even have the

(02:06:23):
whatever whatever there's not a word bad enough
for people like Elon Levy. Who are out
there tap dancing around acting like everything's fantastic
and calling oh, they've got more food than
ever.
There's there's a special place in hell for
people like that. Who are just the mouthpieces
of they're not even getting but there's the
mouthpieces of genocide. They just like to be
close to power, even when they're murdering children.

(02:06:45):
I hope they're held accountable.
The point is they're denying a famine in
real time. Kate Brown points out Israel, because
they're totally not stopping everything, has now barred
6 international medical charities from entering Gaza, according
to the WHO.
The denial follows say the senator Blinken warning
the US could suspend aid.
We could. We could suspend aid if you

(02:07:06):
keep doing what we've been doing for a
year.
Because nobody believes you, Blinken, because you're a
feckless liar who's been caught over and over.
And in this case, you're demonstrating that you're
gonna wait 30 days to do something as
you've been maybe breaking it for a year
straight. You're not going to stop. It's all
a fa it's a facade.
US warns the they better boost aid even

(02:07:27):
though they're not stopping it though. We just
want you to increase the aid even though
you're giving them more than they need. Right?
Like they like, we can't piece that together
or risk losing weapons funding. Like, it's a
lie, guys. They've already been caught lying about
this from the beginning.
You you know what the difference with Trump
would be? They wouldn't even pretend to stop
it. They would just ignore it. Here it
is.

(02:07:47):
Breaking, they say. 30 days?
You better stop genocide
by 30 days or we'll pretend something else
changed. We won't the point is they're gonna
pretend. They're gonna say we'll stop it. The
genocide won't stop. And then they're gonna pretend
a new narrative started. Or another event will
happen, and we'll stop talking about it. It's
a game.
A game of human life that they don't
care about.

(02:08:07):
And guess what? They've given 5,200,000,000
more dollars to the genocidal entity. That's real.
That's happening right now. They're giving more bill
1,000,000,000 upon 1,000,000,000 of dollars. And maybe that's
why. Give us 30 days to give you
all the money you need, then we'll pretend
to stop.
That's how criminal they are.
Please do not miss that fact. Now lastly,
on the yet the the the Lebanon point,

(02:08:28):
And it's just embarrassing
how obvious this stuff is. Now this guy
is one of these I've I've only just
recently seen him pop onto this but he
seems to be this prolific Zionist manipulator.
It goes amazing. The IDF releases a video,
you know, like the thousands of other videos.
Weird. This looks just like the Shefa dynamic
that never turned out to be real. How
funny how they they just reproduce them because
they're lazy. It tells the Lebanese people exactly

(02:08:51):
how to locate the gold, apparently, the money
that's buried in a certain location.
So get this. Not only they lie about
how there's money in gold stores they've stolen
from them that turns out to be fake,
I'll show you next, but they dump this
into the population and go, Lebanese people, here
it is. Go get it.
Because that's about helping people. You want them
to start in what they want is chaos.

(02:09:12):
They want these people to start breaking down
doors and invading government buildings so they can
turn around and call them crazy and use
it to justify their action.
They don't care about anybody. They will hurt
their own people. They'll kill any civilian. They
they it's how we don't know that by
now if you don't, it blows my mind.
They've been publicly executing civilians from day 1.
Now they're trying to turn them against each

(02:09:32):
other. That's how this works.
It's like
sanctions from the US and starving Iranians. They
blame it on them even though you're going,
yay, look, they have to sell their organs.
That's how this works. And then blame it
on Ron.
It's not working anymore. People see through them.
The point though, is I I won't I
won't play them just for, you know, I
feel like wrapping up right now. But here's
Steve Sweeney. Well, I I guess I'll play
this one. I think it's pretty short. Yeah.

(02:09:53):
50 seconds.
Here's the one that Steve played on AM
Wake Up. This is the BBC.
Literally walking through in every aspect of the
building and so, yeah, that's not here. Now,
yes, they could've missed it. They could've been
lying. The point though is that this is
my point about Lebanon. This is not Gaza.
There's people that can investigate.
There's you can go and look and prove
there's no tunnel under that house. And they're

(02:10:13):
still doing it anyway. And in real time,
getting exposed for lying. I mean, guess what's
happening in Gaza anyway. The point though is
that now it's such a real time example
and it's something that they can't hide from.
They can't just go I mean, they could
bomb again.
But they're getting exposed in real time.

(02:10:44):
Now what you're seeing, right, you have the
BBC example, but this is them, you know,
a groupings of people walking through there. Now,
of course, you could also say they moved
it, but it's be kinda hard to move
a lot of gold like that in a
rapid succession. But my point is that ultimately,
they just float these narratives, nothing to back
it up. And before this, there was nothing
like this to happen. They would've do not
just demolish the entire building and say, we
did it.

(02:11:05):
And your governments didn't care.
Now it's a different dynamic. But is anything
gonna happen? Probably not.

(02:11:27):
Well, we're on level minus 2
in the Alsahal Hospital.
The area just behind me is where
medical waste is stored.
Even that was opened up for us to
have a look. The morgue was opened up.
All of the drawers were opened
to show us there was nothing inside.

(02:11:48):
Doctors have been opening
piles of surgical scrubs,
boxes of equipment,
very, very keen
to show us everything there is to see
and to prove
that there is
nothing here.
Well, I'm just coming now from
the basement on minus 2

(02:12:09):
up to minus 1.
We've been brought around the hospital.
Now
here
is Lebanon yesterday. It's a picture I used
for today.
So the bottom line is obviously we have
even corporate media going through independent journalists. I
mean, it's the reality is they tried to
float a narrative to kill and and guess

(02:12:31):
they'll probably still try to use the narrative.
Again, why wouldn't they, if they know the
power structures they need to rely on to
make this happen, don't care.
Probably bomb their own people on top of
that. And we've already seen them kill Americans,
and your government doesn't care.
Seen an arrest American journalist. Your government doesn't
care. Where's all the American first people out
there? You don't think Trump would be different?
The same thing happened with him in other

(02:12:51):
dynamics.
The point
is they're bombing these locations.
Civilian locations in rapid succession, and people are
just ignoring it.
Steve Sweeney again points out this as of
today. This is this is right before I
went live. Beirut is under attack once more
with heavy bombing in the southern suburbs. The
suburbs.
The offices of al Mayadeen have been struck,
a journalist outlet, despite what you think about

(02:13:13):
it, in an area close to the Iranian
embassy.
I mean, they're just they're just pulling out
all the stops, guys.
They have also been bombed for the second
time since Monday, these different families, when at
least 18 people were killed after a missile
destroyed an apartment block, pretty much wiping out
2 families.
The reason for the attacks on these areas
are in part an attack on the Amal
movement. It is the same reason for the

(02:13:35):
pressure,
okay, to
so a hospital whose director is an Amal
PMP,
part part of their governmental process coming after
parliamentary speaker, Bari Berry,
also from Amal, rejected the US Israel surrender
deal. So the point is they rejected a
certain deal they wanted and they bought the
bottom line is they'll do whatever they want.
That's the real point. They'll kill who they

(02:13:55):
want. They'll bomb government buildings, which they've been
doing from the beginning. They'll kill journalists, bomb
hospitals, schools, children, and seems like there is
no red line for Israel. The big surprise,
you probably recognized this months ago.
Dan Cohen says Israeli Air Force Brigadier General,
Amichai Livin,
says warplanes
dropped about a 100 bombs
on the Beirut residential complex that killed Nasrallah.

(02:14:19):
That's actually even more than the figure of
83 bombs that was reported.
Of course, they could be blustering, which means
they they want it to sound worse than
it is, which shows you how genocidal they
are. But his point is, it wasn't a
precision strike, which my god, we should already
know by now.
It was a mass destruction attack on a
location that I still argue they weren't even
sure he was there.

(02:14:40):
This is genocide in every possible way.
Oops. Now I'm actually gonna go into this
more
in another discussion about Iran. But I'll end
with the point that now here's Netanyahu and
Blinken, after everything we just discussed, discussing how
they're gonna unite against Iran.
You know, the same Iran that we've been
pointing out was always a central part of

(02:15:01):
this that have nothing to do with what's
going on, or that they're allied with the
people that are suppressed.
And all they want you to think is
it's all evil bad guy Iran because that's
been Israel's agenda for decades. And your government
is willing to allow genocide, play out genocide,
be a part of genocide to allow that
to continue.
There is no evidence that backs up what
they're trying to call out here. The real
obvious state sponsors of terrorism are, you know,

(02:15:22):
the ones sponsoring terrorism that we can prove
everywhere. Israel, the United States in spades. But
we'll always point somewhere else because, well, they
wanna go out to Iran, so we'll make
up a narrative. And the partisan screamers will
go right along with it. I'm trying to
reach the rest of you. You know, the
actual majority.
Time to stand up. Time to do something.
Time to care enough to stop being, you

(02:15:44):
know, meekly following along with the power structure
because you think that's what you're supposed to
do.
Find the courage.
Toward Judaism, Gaza is today's Auschwitz. The irony
of becoming what you had once hated.
Now, whatever you think about this, this is
a Jewish organization that's making this allegation. Zionism
is Nazism.
Today's

(02:16:05):
Zionists are today's Nazis, they write. The Zionist
state of Israel is today's Nazi state. Israel,
they write, is no different from the Nazi
state. Once upon a time, the Nazis forced
Jews from their houses, and now Israel's doing
what the Nazis did and forcing 100 of
1000 of Palestinians to leave their homes.
Right? This is right now. This is exactly
what this is the comparison that should matter
to you.

(02:16:26):
Whatever you think about what actually happened, whatever
you think about any of the dynamics. The
point is this is a Jewish organization, an
orthodox Jewish organization
that is telling you they are the problem.
Hopefully, that reaches some people to understand that
it's not about Jewish people. It's not about
Israelis. It's not about it's about Zionism influencing
all of those things.
Now I'm gonna make a point about Iran.

(02:16:46):
There's a tweet about Trump that I was
gonna get into about what he said here.
We'll come back. We're gonna I wanna do
a bigger point about that in general. Talk
more about the issue over the the highlighting
of Iran and how Trump's organization is clearly
driving that forward.
It's important to understand. They're they're making all
sorts of allegations about people in the government
because they're Iranian, without any evidence, by the
way. Just because we accused them, because Israel

(02:17:07):
said so. And now they're starting to have
a witch hunt against American politicians because Israel
says they do something? Like, how does this
not become
the obvious this is reminiscent of so many
other examples of history that we all look
down on.
Today,
again,
people are just so afraid to stand up
for what they know is right in the
midst of the political fervor. I get it.

(02:17:29):
I deal with every day. The you have
no idea the amount of attacks, the amount
of threats, the amount of negative content that
I get every day that I don't even
care to talk about. Emails and texts and
horrible things.
Because that's what happens when you stand up
against a power structure. But you know what?
It's the right thing to do. And I
know you know that. That's why you're here.

(02:17:50):
That's why you care. You're looking for something
else. You're looking for some information that doesn't
this doesn't make sense over here. But don't
stop here. Look everywhere else too. Stand back.
Put it all together. Come to your own
conclusions.
Because that's what we need more than anything
today.
So thank you for tuning in.
Thank you for being a part of, you
know, a growing group of people in the

(02:18:11):
world
that care more about human life and care
more about what's right, who care more about,
you know, your integrity and your principles than
you do about some party line, about some
let color or some hat that you care
about what's right.
And that may differ between people, but the
point is you stand by your principles
because you know that. I mean, it's a
core value. It's it's, you know, what we

(02:18:32):
talk about being better. Right. Just a little
bit better every day, trying to strive to
make yourself a better person or a stronger
character or whatever else it is. The, the
people out there who are acting in the
petty, small ways and their self interest, their
immediate gratification,
they're not waking up in the morning asking
how they can be a better person that
day, about how they can change somebody's life.
They don't care about those things. They want

(02:18:53):
you to think that, though. Hopefully, you can
see through it. Hopefully, you can find that
path
because we need to today, more than ever.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}CIA Active In Israel Since Oct 7, Gaza Biometrics & Israel Caught Lying About Lebanon Gold Stash

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

CIA Active In Israel Since Oct 7, Gaza Biometrics & Israel Caught Lying About Lebanon Gold Stash

Stuff You Should Know