Conyers, Georgia BioLab Fire “Could Be The Greatest Dioxin Disaster In History”

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:13):
We know times are strange.
We know how you paint.
Time to break the game.
Make them feel the same.
They lost too many

(00:36):
not to say
for all their lives
and their
gain. As the world stands,
we can't back away.
The truth will come.

(00:56):
The truth will
come today. The truth will come
whether or not you stay.
Because when we stand,
their power drifts away.

(01:22):
Will
you stand?

(01:45):
Stay?
Will
you stand
with
me?
We know what they've done,

(02:07):
what they've stolen and what they've shun.
Time to grab your gun.
They're coming for everyone.
They come for you.
What will you say?

(02:29):
Dragging you down,
never to see the day.
Will you stand,
or will you back away?
The truth will come

(02:51):
The truth will come today.
That's when we stand,

(03:12):
Will
you stand?
Will
you stand
with me?

(03:39):
Will
you stand
with me?
We know it's hard to change.
We know there'll be pain.

(04:03):
Nothing will be the same,
but we will preserve the flame.
We will remove
all they have grown.
Undo,
unteach
all they have shown,

(04:26):
and we will strike a path
guiding us back home.
The truth will come today.
The truth will come

(04:48):
Because when we stand,

(05:16):
We know time's a strict. Welcome to the
daily wrap up, a concise show dedicated to
bringing you the most relevant independent news as
we see it from the last 24 hours.
Sunday, October 13, 2024.
Thank you for joining me today.
Well,

(05:36):
as I often do, it seems frustratingly enough,
I forgot to play that at the end
of the show that I promised I would
as and it's a long show too, and
I'm sure some of you waited till the
end. So I'm really sorry. I mean, it's
probably good that you waited till the end
to see what was going on, but that
that's our that's, my new song.
Now, unfortunately, I wasn't there's a few people
that are maybe tinkering on making a music

(05:58):
video. I really would love to do it
myself, but I just end up taking far
too much time and there's a lot going
on.
Important stuff to get into today, so I'm
gonna make it short to open. But
I wanna make sure I threw it out
there that I reached out to a few
different people, just kind of throwing it out
to people saying I'd love it if somebody
could make a music video. Whatever you feel
from that, which is kinda what I like
to do with with all the stuff we

(06:19):
do. You know, whatever that makes you feel,
a thought whatever jumps into your head, whether
it's me doing my show or it's just
compilations like we just saw or a number
of things. If you'd like to put together
a music video that I could, you know,
consider using for that, which I'll make the
official video, Your name will go along with
it.
Reach out to me, make something, throw up
my way. And if I if I like
it more, you know, the most, then that'll

(06:39):
be the one that I use going forward
indefinitely. The one that was playing right there
was actually made for me a while ago
for money game. I just weirdly enough, it's
like the almost exact time almost exact right
amount of time. I didn't think it was
gonna be enough, but that video is just
a compilation we used to go around money
game. So I'd like to make something specific
for this because this song, the truth will

(06:59):
come,
it's it's important to me. It's weird how
much I wrote that around. My my mindset
was more around sort of like the great
reset, maybe COVID time frame,
but more so like the food aspect of
it. But weird how perfect that is to
what we're dealing with right now,
Whether it's about the election, the 2 party
illusion, like, it's just the point about pushing
back against

(07:21):
the control structure. And the idea that if
we stand up,
whatever that means to you,
you know, individually, but especially when we stand
up in in unison,
their power drifts away, and we all see
that. There's a there is a number, ultimately,
when that begins to happen.
So I just really I've it's it means
a lot to me, and the and the
song itself is is something that it's just

(07:44):
long story short is something that really resonates
with me on a level more than just
the music. But I I hope somebody will
reach out to me with something that you
wanna make around that because I really do
think it could be something pretty cool. So
on that note, I will show you oh,
well, again, really quickly, the only thing we're
gonna talk about today. That's where I'm kind
of jumping at the bit to get into
it. Like, I had a whole lot that
I'm gonna talk my plan is, and I'm

(08:04):
I'm gonna near I mean yeah. Today, I'm
gonna guarantee it. I'm gonna be going live
tomorrow
right out of the gate as fast as
I'm gonna get up, quickly look at what
else might be happening that's big enough to
maybe mention the beginning, and I'm gonna do
the the rest of the show that I
was gonna you know, day before yesterday into
today and what's going on around Middle East,
foreign policy, Lebanon, Israel, the Irish peacekeepers,

(08:26):
a whole lot of stuff.
Something in me told me I had to
make this focus today. Again, because we've done
a couple shows on this already
in in a larger context, but nothing that
I've done were just this as the topic.
Now based on the title today, I imagine
you can probably see why.
This is not something that I will put
out lightly
even though it does say could be, and
this is based on the expert opinion of

(08:47):
Scott c Smith, who we've interviewed more than
once. And his tests, his tests from Conyers,
Georgia are about to come back. And as
soon as they're ready, he's gonna jump on
and do an interview with us as I'm
sure a lot of other people that are
waiting to talk to him about it. I
spoke to him on the phone today before
we went live for just briefly around a
couple of different things. I wanted to get
it get him on the record for this,

(09:09):
which which I I made sure he was
aware of.
And it has to do with what he's
seeing before the actual results come in based
on a few things that he's seen. And
I'll give you the stuff we talked about
over the last couple of days. But I
wanted to specifically ask him about a a
disaster. It's called the the the, make sure
I actually just say it correctly first time
we mention it, the Seveso disaster, which was

(09:30):
in Italy.
Now this, according to Time Magazine, is if
not if not the one of the most
the worst disasters in history.
And this was specifically it's even called the
Seveso dioxin cloud or the dioxin disaster.
Interesting how we can know that and be
such a historical discussion as one of the
top disasters we all know of and yet
weird how

(09:52):
EPA, the CDC, even though I'll show you
I mean, I don't even need to reprove
this for the 45th time where they've been
covering this stuff for a really long time.
And yet when the perfect conditions where, you
know, chlorine being present, if not the primary
issue, massive combustion along with pallets and styrofoam
and all that. I mean, the if if
you couldn't have picked a better circumstance to

(10:12):
make the worst possible dioxin disaster.
You don't think they know that? You don't
think that the people involved whose very job
it is to know these things? Why aren't
we hearing about dioxins? Whether from this, even
East Palestine, they dragged their feet for weeks
until even the corporate media was asking about
it in press conferences, and they still act
like they weren't really sure until they had
to address it. Or the Richmond fire, by

(10:33):
the way, that happened after east Palestine that
we didn't even focus that much on, but
I made a point about, which again is
probably one of the biggest dioxin releases that
we know of in living memory. And these
things aren't being discussed and I'll go over
why I think that is. And as Scott
c Smith says, as I spoke to him
today, this could be the worst, the biggest
I'll just so I say, actually, exactly what

(10:53):
he said.
The greatest, I just wanna make sure in
quotes because that this is what he said
on the phone, could be the greatest dioxin
disaster in history or release in regard to
how much is put out in the in
the atmosphere. And, you know, to me,
this is such a big deal for two
reasons.
Well, I guess, technically, 3. 1, because, you'll

(11:15):
see if you dive into the local conversation,
this is a huge, and it should be,
a huge deal for people in Conyers specifically,
in Georgia in general. There's a big conversation.
There's a big movement to get specifically biolab,
which is the name of the company. It's
not actually a biolaboratory
removed from the town entirely, and this has
been going on for a long time. We
know that the person who is speaking up

(11:36):
about this, who's been speaking up for a
long time about this, was short short in
breath while giving his testimony and then later
what left left the building and died right
outside.
They and whether that's because of the disaster
or because of some ongoing problem or because
he was taken out, who ultimately knows? But
there's a lot around this story, and yet
it's barely
registering on

(11:57):
on the federal the the national conversation.
Obviously, there's a lot going on in the
world, which I too would point out. But
from a local conversation with now and, again,
not even just from a local
state even dynamic. We're talking about a national
problem that goes beyond, oh, I trailed off.
So one being the the fact that no
one's talking about it. Number 2, the fact

(12:19):
that this is a serious problem
by all accounts.
Even if it wasn't involving dioxin, this is
a major release of very dangerous chemicals, chlorine
itself. But the dioxin issue that doesn't even
get addressed and how big that really is.
And then the third issue is the fact
that this is what I've really been bumping
up against, and it's kinda awesome.

(12:39):
This is why I'm jaded.
It's it seems that every single thing we
talk about seems to end up in this
similar position where it goes, oh, it turns
out they've known about it for 40 years.
Turns out they flirted with doing something and
then sort of ignored it for the last
20, and then it seems like they've been
trying to throw it under the rug. Or
in fact, the worst situation, which I'm seeing
more than anything, almost as if they try

(13:00):
to make the problem as worse as possible
so it becomes so ubiquitous that there's really
no liability issue anymore.
I mean, it's hard not to think the
worst when we've seen what we've just come
through, whether it's East Palestine itself, whether it's
the COVID 19 illusion. I mean, we can
go on
for a really long time about different stories
that we can prove the government,
you know, specific aspects of it at the

(13:22):
3rd least.
We're more concerned I mean, look. We're talking
about North Carolina right now or or, you
know, the the greater area around these, Milton
and Helene, where you can see that they
do not have your interest at least in
the number one position
from a from a group that is
arguably there for the number one reason of
keeping you safe. And yet they're more worried
about liability. They're more worried about, you know,

(13:44):
whether it's the appropriate places things from the
appropriate places because of bureaucracy and red tape.
So back to the larger point about Georgia,
because that's all we're gonna talk about today.
It seems very obvious to me that this
is they know this is a problem, and
Scott's numbers are gonna come out. And I
I hope that I'm wrong. I really do.
But I think his point is we'll go
into his estimates around this, the amount of

(14:06):
chlorine compounds.
As he said a different quote, and I'll
play all I'm gonna catch up on all
this for you. Some of this will be
redundant for those that have been watching the
previous shows. I hope this is a one
stops one kind of stop shop for this
whole conversation as it is now.
6 times
the issue of east Palestine at a minimum.
Because he's saying at least £12,000,000

(14:27):
of chlorine compounds were burned, possibly up to
20, whereas east Palestine was £2,000,000.
I just don't see how we could pretend
that this at face value is not already
a bigger issue. Because you have to understand,
the actual issue is that chlorine itself, per
the pure veed science we've shown you and
everything else we can find, is the catalyst.
It is the problem. The higher the chlorine,

(14:49):
the more the dioxins. The lower the chlorine,
the less there are dioxins. And that's what
Scott will tell you as well.
So
we're gonna start
actually really briefly, and we're gonna go through
a lot. I mean, I didn't even mention
it all right there around the other disaster
in Italy, comparing the two points, recognizing the
overlap of what we're seeing in these Palestine,
seeing now, and comparing it with what's supposed

(15:10):
to be one of the biggest disasters in
history and recognizing the alarming overlap of not
a part of it, but almost more in
the case that we're seeing now, the long
term side effects because they've been studied for
40 years.
Reproductive issues,
immune issues, all sorts of cancers and all
sorts of problems, And the common factor that
showed that they had an issue right in

(15:31):
the beginning, the chloracne.
We've talked about this already from East Palestine.
The acne that comes out after a massive
exposure of some chlorinated
products, and that includes the byproduct of the
dioxins and the vinyl. So east Palestine was
vinyl chloride. One of the things that were
burning and the dioxin byproduct of what was
burned and people had I mean, we all
heard about it. It was a lot of
acne and chloracne being discussed. And the point

(15:53):
then is I tried to argue that showed
you a
acute exposure, a problem immediate, and that
dissipates.
And suddenly you feel a little bit better
and your acne's gone, but guess what? That
comes along with decades of long term serious
problems because you had a very real exposure,
but they're hoping you don't know that. They're
hoping that a week goes by and you
think, oh, I got something else. It must
be related to what I had that day.

(16:15):
I'm telling you that they're very aware of
how that gets played. And if they drag
their feet and look the other direction, realize
if if even the EPA, these are people
that move along.
Right? They're some next next administration, you got
somebody new in there. So they're hoping, look.
If I just don't say anything and they're
not pressing me to do anything about it,
I'm not the one that has to take
this on my shoulders. And especially if they
know that the problem is so ubiquitous and

(16:37):
no one's acknowledged that Americans are willfully ignorant
about it, that
they won't understand that. So if you're the
one that wants to be honest and you
step up and say, there's a vaccine problem
that's been going on for 50 years or
really a lot longer than that, and let's
do something about it. You will be the
one as the EPA director who has to
hang that on your shoulders that I'm responsible.
I can't solve that problem. And that's just

(16:58):
like I mean, I made the same point
last time with the Vietnam War.
At least as the story goes, they were
aware that this was not going to be
won, but they kicked it down the road
from administration after administration,
allowing Americans to die so they wouldn't have
to be the ones that dealt with it.
I think that's what we're dealing with right
now. Genuinely do. But we're gonna get into
a lot more. I'm gonna start off by
pointing out the

(17:19):
song I I just played, and here is
the actual page from our SoundCloud.
And this is just the truth will come
featuring James Eknows, but the overall,
page has all my other my other music
on it as well. But if you'd like
to share this, please do. I'm gonna be
putting out I haven't really shared on Twitter
anywhere else because I wanna actually get a
video to go along with it because I
think it'll get better reach, but there's a

(17:40):
link for you if you like, check it
out. Briefly to start, I just wanted to
highlight 2 things. 1, 2 upcoming events, and
then one point about North Carolina. I just
wanna make sure you guys saw. I'm gonna
be in Mexico for Derek's event, the people's
reset.
We're looking forward to that. This will be
the first time that I've got to go
to one of those events.
The with the new location, which by the
way, side note has saved us quite a

(18:01):
bit of money in the long run, even
the way to put some out to put
this together in the the student studio. It
really is ultimately paying off despite paying, like,
crazy out for the lawyers. I mean, that's
going I'll be updating soon in the future
about that. The point is that
the situation now has allowed me to have
a little bit more freedom and be able
to go
to this or
the one in Sedona, which I'll be also
going to. But check I'll be looking forward

(18:23):
to this one. That's more that's in January,
but we also have the event the sooner.
This one's up November 1st to 3rd. I
think, technically, the second is the day that
you guys will be able to tune in
and watch.
This is called
the liberty on the rocks,
the volunteerism conference. And we're looking forward to
this as well.
Etienne or Howard is gonna be the one

(18:43):
putting it on. James Corbett will be there,
I think, virtually. Larkin Rose, who I'm gonna
be playing his interview probably in the next
couple of days. For sure, actually, I've decided
I'm gonna get that out even though there's
a lot going on in the Middle East.
I just really didn't want this conversation to
be missed. He's such an intelligent guy. I
really hope you guys will listen to what
he has to say, but exciting for this.
And this is gonna be I I'm gonna
give you a lot more on this the
next couple of days. I'm gonna be making

(19:03):
a page for the last American Vagabond where
you can to, you know so because the
point is I'm gonna be doing, like, a
a TLAB
special
where this conference is ongoing and you can
pay to see these while it's it it
the the actual
delivery will be behind a paywall, but my
stream will be an all day kind of
a stream. Well, Well, I'll be doing my
stuff too. I'll be talking about my stuff
and content, whatever else, but I'll be interviewing

(19:24):
people that go up before they speak like
Derek and Howard and Larkin,
and doing stuff in the crowd and talking.
It'll be like an all day stream. So
it'll be kind of a TLIVE version of
this promoting the the conference. So that's the
one and the same, but it'll be on
TLAB website. You'll be you guys can engage
in in our chat, and it'll be our
community. As well as everybody else who wants
to watch this and maybe don't wanna pay
and wanna join our community. Right? So we

(19:44):
can raise money for TLAB. We can raise
money for the conference. It'll be a whole
fun thing. It's gonna be going on all
day. It might be the longest one we've
done so far. So honored, Howard. Thank you
for inviting me. I'm looking forward to being
there. More coming your way. I'll be touching
on this more, so looking forward to that.
And here's the actual page for you guys
to check out.
Now briefly, shouldn't include this because I'm gonna
talk more about this as it goes forward

(20:04):
because it seems to be catching attention and
it's a good time to open minds.
But just the idea again about North Carolina
or or the broader area because, you know,
both Milton, Helene, the idea about this, the
idea of weather modification, because this does in
a way overlap for larger conversations.
70 70th anniversary of the first hurricane seeding
experiment
from the oceanic

(20:25):
Atlantic ocean oceanic excuse me. I can't talk
right now. Atlantic ocean ocean actually, how do
you say that?
Oceanographic?
That's interesting. I've never said that out loud.
I can't I can't even think that's hilarious.
And meteorological
laboratory.
And, yeah, hold let me let me look

(20:45):
this up really quickly. Sorry. I'm fascinated by
this.
I wanna see how to pronounce that.
It's interesting. It's
a odd word.

(21:07):
I don't wanna take too much time on
this. Sorry. This is taking forever.
Oceanographic?
Really? Sorry. That took too long. That is
a oceanographic?
I never would have thought that's how that's
pronounced. Any case, it's weird how you find
a word like that that you could you've
read, but you never said it out loud.
Any case, the point is this larger discussion
about how this is a very real and
obvious conversation.

(21:28):
This is just seeding, mind you, and it's
funny how they love to split those out
and make it about you know, that's always
been there even though at the end of
the day, even most people deny cloud seeding
is real either. But the bottom line is
this is going back a really long way.
And it's all it it's whether it's research
or patents, this has been there for an
incredibly long time. And this and the and
there's a part 2, by the way, that

(21:49):
TruStream Media recently put out of the whole
what's actually going on North Carolina, what they
do a more amazing work. I really hope
you'll check it out. I I wanna include
that for you to see. But the idea
of weather modification is a is an open
secret. The technology has been there forever, and
whether it's cloud seeding or direct influencing
whether as as Dane has talked about, the
using of of
energized nanoparticles to sort of direct the location

(22:10):
or what. I mean, there's a 1,000 different
things, and this is not a secret. But
yet for some reason, it's ignored by a
lot of people in the mainstream conversation. Secondarily,
you get people out there who are saying,
because we can prove that it exists,
therefore, we know what happened in North Carolina,
and that's also ridiculous.
I I'm
the first person who will say that's absolutely
likely, but I keep bumping up against this.

(22:31):
I want if you have some evidence of
act like, proof that this was done, not
that the tech exists, therefore, that's what it
looks like.
That I mean, I don't need more convincing
for that. People reach out to me and
send me information showing that this is the
case. I'm like, well, I agree. That's what
I've been saying. It does exist. But do
we have evidence of something more?
Of something, like, for example, the actual seeding

(22:51):
that took place beforehand, like, they would point
out. That's important to me. And I know
that seems to irritate some people that but
that's like saying, for example, that well, we
have water filtration. Right? So here's some water
over here. Because water filtration exists, that means
that water must be filtered. Well, no. It
doesn't because you don't know that it was
actually used on that water. I think that's
an important thing for us to be objective
about,

(23:11):
but I'll include some of these things for
you. I'll show you this clip really quickly
because I do think this is an incredibly
interesting clip. This is something I just I
grabbed from his documentary called dimming,
and I just pretty much broke this opening
clip down. So it's from me, and I'll
include the link for him to check for
you to check out from his documentary around
how this is real stuff, but just look
at this opening clip from his documentary.

(24:08):
This engine, a high bypass turbofan jet engine.
This is the engine that is on all
military takers and all commercial carriers. Is in
essence a jet powered fan. 90% of the
air that moves through this engine is noncombusted.
This engine by design is nearly incapable of
producing any condensation trail except under rare and
extreme circumstances. And again

(24:29):
and we have film footage
of aircraft flying at altitude with nozzles visible,
turning on and off.
That is the end of the argument.
It is. It's simple.
Even on online, we're not arguing with stuff
like that. It's like, this is not debatable,
guys.

(24:49):
Before man could fly,
there was an effort to try and modify
the weather.
We have
weather modification patents going back a 100 years
plus.
I know patents don't mean that they're real
and have actually effectively been used, but we
do know that as well. These patents are
step 1.

(25:18):
One. Right there, the the, actual documentary.
Now the reason I even wanna show that
today the the here's the actual link to
his page. Hopefully, watch it somewhere other than
YouTube, but here is what I saw today.
This is the reason I wanna include this
just because I think this is crazy to
me. Now one, there's, well, 2 things here.
This is what I saw this morning
in, you know, Tennessee,

(25:40):
which is nothing new. I mean, this is
probably a light day, but I just think
it's crazy.
Crazy.
You know, I even Aria people going, yeah,
it's not real. Like, yes. It is. It's,
like, everywhere all the time. Little tic tac
toe right over the top.
I simply said, despite the recent legislation,
geoengineering in Tennessee only seems to be increasing,
at least in my view. Either way, I

(26:00):
thought this was stopping. Now I'm not appealing
to these politicians. You guys should know me
by now. I'm simply trying to make a
point that gets people to think. I don't
think they care. I mean, I've some people
have different opinions about especially people in Tennessee.
I'm jaded against politicians, but I tagged them
all. Blackburn,
Lee, Nicely, all everyone involved with the bill
and and I point I I gave them
the link to the actual discussion of the
bill on the actual bill. So they know

(26:21):
all this. My point is that's not supposed
to be happening. Right? Even though I already
knew that was gonna happen. And exactly how
people comment.
I I I even think some of the
people involved with the bill made a point
to say, well, over a certain altitude, they
can do what they want anyway. Okay. Well
so it really was a toothless end you
know, I shouldn't say that. It's a good
step. Either way, it's a good step to
get this moving, show people what is real.

(26:41):
But what's frustrating is that it's they I
knew it would be they wouldn't ultimately stop
it. Or there's some kind of arbitrary definition
that they just go, okay. Well, we'll add
one thing and guess what? No longer do
engineering by your definition. Right? That's how they
work.
But as trailer park pundit writes, it just
blows my mind how unaware most of the
country is, period. I put that point around
everything. It seems to be the case, but
I argue by and large, most people are

(27:03):
waking up to
the general awareness that we're being deceived.
I really believe that. It says they want
us to believe some pilots are up there
just playing tic tac toe, and it's perfectly
normal, and it's happening all the country. I
mean, it is worthy of laughing about it.
That's really silly to think that's just the
way it works. And they sit there for,
you know, go back 30 minutes later and
they'll basically be there a little spread out.
I mean, that's contrails are not what you're

(27:24):
looking at. That's not how that works. And
even the other conversations of how there's, like,
new arguments about why at the end of
the day,
that is not
the arguments being put out about what that's
supposed to be are not actually valid in
the context of how they frame them because
of a thousand different reasons.
But, my point is to go into this
all right now. I just wanna open with
this so you can see it, but I've
done a 1,000,000 shows about this. Derek has

(27:45):
done a lot of work on it as
well. The reality is every single excuse
doesn't meet
doesn't explain why these things are there like
they are or that it's happening the way
it is, and there's a reason people are
pushing back. But the drunk and scoundrel, what
she says is automated, which I think is
funny. So the bot, I guess. So good
bot response. It says, and then the same
people who won't even entertain the whole

(28:07):
the don't won't that won't even entertain the
thought whine about people not believing in science.
What a great bot response. That's hilarious.
True. Because the funny part is that people
are screaming about you not trusting the science
when you're like, well, here's an effing scientific
study
proving this is no conspiracy. The point is
it's what you choose,
science included. And we all know that's how

(28:28):
this works these days, but be smarter than
that. Don't be the minority, I think, of
people that act this way. Now
more to talk about that in the coming
up coming days, probably tomorrow even. A lot
to go into to start, including the point
about mask mandates. And right right now, you
might be inundated by all these claims of
another Trump assassination,
otherwise known as a guy that got caught
with a gun outside before anything happened. But

(28:51):
that's an assassination attempt. Don't let anybody tell
you otherwise. Right? The bottom line is there's
a lot that's gotta happen that takes away
from what I think are the bigger point
that we should be discussing. But you discuss
whatever you want.
I think we should discuss all of it,
quite frankly. But I think what's important is
to not be pulled into the subjective partisan
hyperbolic conversation, which I think is, like, 90%
of the corporate mainstream alternative media,

(29:13):
and miss things like this.
Or what's going on
in foreign policy land and all the different
her you know, you know, one of the
main reasons I think it's so important that
we pay attention to what's going on in
foreign policy even with what's going on like
this in the United States, because it truly
shows you what your government is as well
as what your world is seeing or the
world is seeing your government is.

(29:35):
And it's only your government because they've made
that the case. I don't think that they
represent us or act like we rep or
or that we have any say in putting
them in place, at least not anymore if
that was ever the case. But looking at
what's happening around the world, it really does
show you that they don't care about any
of the things they pretend to, and that
has to matter. And then recognizing that your
money and tax dollars and everything else are
being used to carry on terrible things around

(29:56):
the world. So when you bring this back
home and you start paying attention to what
they're doing, like, you need to realize that
it's not be I mean,
that it's just
I mean, the best way to look at
it is that's just who these all these
entities are.
I even I even hesitate in calling them
as human beings.
That this just if if they don't if
they care

(30:17):
so little about their people, they claim they're
do like, I guess that I'm struggling in
saying this is so like, so they're claiming
they're carrying out foreign policy, which is just
genocide
in your name to keep you safe and
yet then coming back and doing this or
even recognizing that what they're doing overseas is
at your expense. It just shows you that
there is nothing sacred.
They're willing to test on you. They're willing

(30:38):
to leave you in these positions. They're willing
to pretend that not only that they're
helping you in a broad sense,
but telling you that when you're being hurt
by these things that they're doing their job.
It's the same thing overseas. It's not just
they're hurting you, but they're hurting you and
then asking for you to thank them for
it. Please give me now now pay my
salary and tell me I'm doing a great
job while we let we ignore the one

(30:59):
thing that is our mandate.
So I have a bunch I'm gonna include
from East Palestine. This one's this is from
March 11, 2023.
The point being, East Palestine is
is the same conversation. It is a,
malfeasance by the government,
including corporate malfeasance overlapping 1 and the same
at this point.
Now however it starts, the point is that
the government chooses

(31:20):
to ignore the problem.
Even as people like myself, who I'm not
by no means, an expert in this topic,
but I looked into it sure as hell
as it started. And then what do you
know? Basic things began to connect. And then
what do you know after Ryan, who knows
nothing about the story, shut up. You should
be talking about it. Turns out he was
right 2 years later.
Damn like everything else that's going on around
these conversations. It's not because I'm some expert.

(31:41):
It's because I chose to do my due
diligence. It's because I chose to look into
it, consider all sources, even the ones they
tell you you shouldn't look at, and it
looks
like there's a problem.
Brian Festa interview, lawsuit against the EPA for
criminal malfeasance in East Palestine. I believe that
went nowhere ultimately, but good for the good
on them for trying.
This one's from March 18,

(32:02):
2023.
Dioxins in East Palestine, 100 of times greater
than the safe level. Ex they ignored this.
Even at this point, I don't even think
they were acknowledging dioxins were present at the
at this point in the conversation.
I don't think.
The point is they drag their feet for
a really long time. And don't don't remember
that there wasn't just Scott c Smith. There
was Texas A&M, at least 2 other independent
experts, all of which found the same overwhelmingly

(32:25):
obvious problem that they were not not just
again, not just
saying it was less than, saying
you're wrong. They're safe. Everyone's okay.
Don't mind the bleeding of the nose, the
chloracne,
which, again, I'm gonna prove to you that
they know that's alone
is the main thing they look for. Going
back to the Seveso disaster from 40 years
ago, that is what they used as the

(32:47):
main point. They actually studied going forward anyone
that had chloroquine in the 1st week and
use that as the basis for how we
know they had acute exposure.
These don't these things don't just get ignored.
That's on the record somewhere. So either we've,
through administration after administration and, like, the dumbing
down of our own government and maybe inadvertently
have forgotten these things, which is certainly possible.
It's still their fault.
I don't think that's what's happening. I think

(33:08):
they know these things. They know there's a
problem, and then they're just continuing to ignore
it for their own interests.
This was March 22, 2023, EPA forcing
Ohio
toxic way
forcing Ohio toxic waste on facilities not able
to process dioxins.
So this even inside of Ohio, they were
still and this is the point about shipping

(33:29):
the stuff around when they knew and had
yet to address that dioxins were prevalent.
The PFAS even, forever chemicals were prevalent,
and they were just spreading the problem around
probably by design
to maximize
the exposure, to minimize their own liability.
That's a common tactic because once it becomes
so ubiquitous,
it's impossible to tell what they were responsible

(33:51):
for. You this is not a joke. This
is a common understood tactic in these situations.
This was an update written by corporate America
on on, Twitter. He wrote this for TLav,
an update on East Palestine, how chemical cleanup
leads to harmful exposure. It's a good article.
Now this was about the clean harbors point
from March 28th.
The places they even did ship even outside

(34:12):
of Ohio, provably, on the record.
If there was any honest aspect of this
media field, this would have been a huge
story.
They were moving this is after they had
acknowledged some level of dioxin. I called them
on the phone, on the record, and they
say, no. We don't have an incinerator here.
Okay. So you're being sent
dangerous chemical laden
soil,

(34:32):
full of dioxins as now they've even admitted
to, and you don't have a way to
get rid of them? That mean, I didn't
ask them that. I simply asked, do you
have any? No. Okay. So you're you're taking
from his Palestine. Right? Yes. Okay. So you
don't have the ability to take care of
dioxins. I even asked them point blank about
the level dioxins PFAS in 2 cases, and
they said, we'd no. We do not.
But they weren't being told that they had

(34:52):
dioxins in this problem. Your government knew what
they were doing.
Norfolk Southern knew what they were doing. My
point in showing you this now is to
recognize that we're going through this again.
Now here's an example. In April 11th, while
they were shipping this toxic stuff all over
the country,
knowing they couldn't get rid of it, knowing
it was there as we can prove, well,
they spilled £20,000

(35:12):
of it,
which then caused this to say but my
point is no one's even there. No one
then jumped on the scene to test for
vaccines.
They just said, oh, well, let's clean it
up. Move on. But that's toxic waste from
east Palestine.
Did anybody care in this? No. They didn't
bring it up again.
That's because this is a problem they're aware
of, but, no, they can't deal with, so

(35:33):
they just hide from it.
This one's from December 14, 2023. East Palestine
forced to treat Norfolk Southern Wastewater.
That's not a joke. So after all this
effort to ship it away because they're then
they just quietly said, well, we'll just deal
with it in Ohio, and
he's Palestine even. Inside this community, we're gonna
deal with the waste,
which they knew and I could prove they

(35:53):
weren't able to actually get rid of dioxins
or PFAS, and they did it anyway.
Scott c Smith interview, June 6, 2023. East
Palestine disaster and the continuing EPA cover up,
which goes on to this very day. The
next one we had is January 18, 2024.
EPA, Norfolk Southern continue to hide East Palestine

(36:13):
stocks and poisoning.
And then one I don't want you to
miss, which I've talked about a lot, is
this important one from July 19th back in
2023,
which was the simple point that most people,
if you have not heard this, please
digest this. Take this into your mind, make
sure people know this. This was in a
court proceeding
where it came out that Alan Shaw, the
CEO of Norfolk Southern

(36:34):
personally
withheld information from their experts
that this was treated vital chloride. I say
again, it was treated vital chloride, which he
told him was likely not to explode, most
likely would not explode.
He took that information and withheld it when
telling the fire chief about what they needed
to do, which was we need to dig

(36:55):
this is going they basically relayed the story
without that fact, drove and pressured them as
the story goes from them themselves
to explode this. Why would you pressure that
to happen? Why would you drive or omit
important information around why you wouldn't need to
explode it? Because this story would have gone
on a lot longer.
They would have been stuck with this problem.
They would have to clean it. The they
blew it all up, which spread this problem

(37:18):
everywhere
so much further than it ever would have
gone because we would have been dealing with
largely just vinyl chloride, which is dangerous, but
then they burnt the vinyl chloride, which turned
it into a dioxin disaster, possibly one of
the worst we've ever seen.
We don't even know that still because they've
never barely even tested it in the context
it needs to be tested in.
That's because they lied or rather withheld information

(37:40):
knowing that if they knew that, they wouldn't
have exploded it.
They even railroaded
literally the evidence, built a track, took the
train out of there only for them to
dig it back up and keep cleaning. Why?
Because there was either something far, far more
important going on there that we never got
wind of. I always thought about that. There's
something in this train, something they're doing. Just

(38:01):
my personal opinion. Because the way they handled
it or they wanted to maximize
disaster to minimize liability
or they just wanted to cause a disaster.
And all these things seem possible today. The
point though,
they found that the supposed control burn was
unnecessary.
That's what these peep believe it or not,
people there suffering from cancers and birth defects

(38:21):
and reproductive issues in East Palestine
for generations.
I'm gonna go over the data again on
this in a broad sense about the half
life and the reality of these docs and
the super. I mean, everything about this is
a major problem.
So bringing this to Georgia, which is the
point today,
this one's from October 2nd.
Major dioxin risk in Georgia, East Palestine 2

(38:42):
point o. Unfortunately, that seems to be the
case, if not much, much larger. I'll include
this for you to check out. The next
one we did on 10th, George Jackson risk
6 times greater than his Palestine according to
Scott c Smith. That's his own that's the
expert's opinion.
So wanted to start with this. Of course,
the highlight's gone away, but I can suss
this out from in here. The point was

(39:03):
simple. I wanna make sure we understand, as
Scott himself has pointed out, that
burning of chlorine products and the and the
other aspects of the burning around it guarantees
you're going to cause dioxins,
Specifically,
TCDD,
the most dangerous dioxin,
the most dangerous substance in the in the
world according to the experts.

(39:25):
That's a crazy thing to realize.
If you knew they were talking about the
most dangerous chemical on the planet,
don't you think they would act differently?
That's what we're talking about. They that was
never even mentioned. Don't you think the media
who loves to be bombastic about things would
have no. They were all real quiet about
that. Funny how that works. It believes it
leads except when you have an agenda. Right?

(39:46):
But it says based on these search results
oh, this is just basically searching for the
general points. It's burning chlorine can produce, which
we already know, dioxins.
But this it mentions the 2 p c
d PCDD
and PCDF.
The point, though, is it says the formation
of dioxins during combustion processes, which is what
we're talking about, including burning chlorine,
is attributed to the chemical reactions that occur

(40:07):
between the organic compounds and the chlorine of
the materials. This can result in the production
of, specifically,
TCDD
and TCDF,
one below.
The most dangerous things we know of in
the context of chemicals.
I don't know why
that's not a bigger deal to people. Just
so we're clear on that. That's what we're
dealing with. So on 11th on 11th, Scott

(40:29):
put this out saying he he has completed
the 1st preliminary initial round of sampling for
soil. Now right here in the next maybe
10 minutes, this will be a little bit
redundant for some of people that have watched
the last couple of shows, but it's important
to keep all this in your mind
to before we go into the the main
part of the my opinion is the overlapping
this and his Palestine with the disaster,
the

(40:50):
the,
Sibesso
disaster
in in Italy,
which was a major, major disaster.
40 years, and then this peer reviewed study
going back and looking at all the byproducts
and all the side effects.
And by all accounts,
this might even be smaller.
This is what's so alarming to me. Now
once that we have enough research, I'll be

(41:10):
able to literally compare these based on this
science, which I don't think anyone's even tried
to do. And then I'm gonna go into
this when we come past it. This is
about knowing the actual square kilometer
per like, per the kilogram per square square
kilometer of dioxins released.
And if we know that, which we will
soon, we'll be able to compare what happened
in in this disaster, the Seveso disaster,

(41:30):
which is called to this day one of
the biggest disasters in history. So that'll be
important to find out, won't it? We'll have
a statistical, provable
metric.
But as he says in his 1st preliminary
rounds of sampling for soil, water, air conditioning,
intake surfaces
you know, you're testing everything as he always
does, soot, ash, be it build vehicles, the
whole thing. He says after being on the

(41:51):
ground for 3 days, sampling over 15 sites,
the impact of toxic plume, but but which
as far as I understand it, I just
spoke spoke to him an hour before this,
little little bit more. Today,
it's still smoldering,
which I didn't even know.
It's that in fact, it's apparently still it's
not burning, but smoldering. That means it's still
releasing dioxins.

(42:14):
And he says the impact of the toxic
plume is far more extensive and widespread than
he initially thought.
He's gonna have the the testing within 4
weeks
as of 11th, but
he says, and this is the most alarming
part for me,
he's the one he's testing specifically for incomplete
combustion dioxins and PAH.

(42:34):
He's saying they are they're extensive and appear
to be greater than what he experienced in
East Palestine. Now it's preliminary,
but this is what he does.
Oh, wait. Hold on. There's this one too.
Oh, I think I already showed it.
Yeah. I'm just simply saying, oh, that's what
it was. But I've what I'm most afraid

(42:55):
of looks to be the case, which is
that this is far worse tax and release
than even East Palestine. And I said, still
incredible to me how few are covering this.
I guess there's not enough partisan draw, at
least not yet. Get ready for them to
flood the scene, which I'm not even kidding
about that. Like, usually, once this becomes something
that everyone's paying attention to, you're gonna get
them all jumping on the scene, trying to
help everybody, which in reality is causing more
problems than not. Now I'm not saying people

(43:16):
shouldn't want help help, but my partisan aspect
of this, which we've seen in every story
more than I've ever seen in in my
doing this and over the last year, where
it just becomes this partisan mayhem.
And you most cases, lying.
Using things.
People jumped in and say, you know, get
donations to go help Lahaina, but end up
staying in a 5 star hotel, and they're

(43:37):
getting nothing done with what you know, the
always how these things go. This person said,
it smelled mostly like burnt plastic to me,
which is that's the issue,
from 35 miles away, says Jimbo here. It
also lasted over a week. Not sure why
they couldn't or wouldn't put the fire on
completely.
Now Scott says on 11th,
given
that £2,000,000

(43:57):
of chlorine compounds burned in East Palestine, Ohio
from the train derailment, it now appears that
at least at least 12,000,000, he said upwards
of possibly £20,000,000
pounds of chlorine compounds have burned in the
biolab fire in Conyers, Georgia, which would make
the bio lab incident 6 times that of
East Palestine when it comes to products of
incomplete combustion such as dioxins and other chemicals.

(44:19):
That's what we're talking about, guys.
This is in line to be and this
this is a clip from, East Palestine if
you wanna watch it, just showing like a
town hall.
Also,
keeping you updated on the last, you know,
week or so plus of what's going on.
I mean, if you haven't seen it, the
environmental
official dies after testifying at the Georgia capital,
which I'll play for you. Now, of course,

(44:40):
I saw the New York Post miss
incorrectly framing the story as, you know, it
I'm I just have a hard time right
now not calling out some of these, like,
deliberately bad partisan nonsense out there.
The point is that he was in the
meeting
while speaking. I'll play the clip for you.
He he's talks about being short of breath.
Then when he gets up, he walks out,
and, apparently, he died right outside. Like, whether

(45:02):
that's in the hallway or outside the building,
the point is he left, and it was
pretty close after he left the the room
and given this meeting. That was a lot
of
people asking questions.
What happened? Was he killed?
Is it a heart attack gun? Did he
die from a COVID shot? Did he die
from dioxins? I mean, all all of these
are certainly possible

(45:22):
Despite what states funny how people out there
already gotta pretend some of those couldn't be
possible. Yeah. They're all actually possible. No matter
how crazy and extreme it might be, still
possible.
The point though,
that the timing of it couldn't be more
interesting in a, you know, macabre way, like
the timing of how that happens, and I'll
play it. And you the when you hear
what you actually had to say,
even more so.

(45:43):
I you're welcome.
The state
representative
for Solid Water Conservation.
I'm the 1st black man to be elected
to this position. Since 1937,
since the creation
of Solid Water.
I,
worked in a field like this before
and,
because my breath.

(46:04):
But this company is called a COD.
What I mean is is a chemical oxygen
demand.
They treat their own water.
And the chemicals that they keep on
property,
sulfuric acid.
M I b k.
That would kill you.
Everybody in Rockville County need to

(46:28):
go to the doctor
and, check out the blood
for toxin.
Now if you remember, he's Palestine. I even
have that video, by the way. It's just
too long to play. It's, like, 5 minutes
of of her calling and getting told this.
And he's Palestine.
They were being directed
by the government
to not give them test for dioxins.
And she's on the phone talking to them,

(46:49):
and they're like, well, we were told not
to. It's like, what are you talking about?
We're being told to come here by doctors
to test for this, and they're being told
not to test for that only for VOCs
and the the generalized compound? Yes.
Why I mean, how what a better example
to see that they're trying to minimize
the view
of that one thing while looking like we

(47:09):
care.
Now you can you look I mean, in
your mind, even if you know for if
let's just say it's the provable reality, which
I believe it is, that they don't know
how to deal with this, and they also
know it's a ubiquitous problem,
what do you think they're gonna do?
Tell you, yes. We know you might have
cancer and you might end up having, you
know, but we don't know what to do
for you. Sorry. And, yes, I guess, if

(47:30):
the bigger the the more you dig, you're
gonna find out we've known for 50 years.
You see my point? What do you do?
Like, you can almost understand from a very
selfish perspective why they wouldn't wanna tell you
what's going on because they don't know what
to do. There is no answer to this
problem, so they might as well just go
ignore. My problem is not that I mean,
that's part of the problem, but the bigger
problem I have is not that they're ignoring
because they don't know what to do, but

(47:51):
they then backwardly allow it to get worse.
And that might just be by accident or
through
lack of, you know, just
government malfeasance.
But part of me wonders whether it is
by design
to maximize the ubiquitous nature of it like
life of sake. Because what are you gonna
do? Who are you gonna sue now? You're
gonna go sue Monsanto? We should. But at
the end of the day, it wasn't just

(48:11):
months the government was allowing this. People were
using I mean, the point is that this
becomes the ubiquitous problem. It becomes impossible
to deal with.
Please get that out.
Please just send me out every time,
at least
every other month.
So
please,

(48:31):
the next thing is
I asked for a federal
criminal investigation.
This is not the first
time. This is the second time.
All the way. Thank you.
I've been asking for this 3 weeks ago
to send it to also
send it to one of

(48:51):
and promising to Hank Johnson.
Both of the off all the officers say
is gonna do an inquiry
and have the DOJ
get involved.
I had the HOA
on the on the phone calls with me.
3 weeks later Mister Johnson, what are you
talking about? Okay.
3 weeks later,
what we have?

(49:12):
Fire.
But they say it's an accident.
West and MSPS.
Yes.
He's clearly suggesting that it wasn't an accident.
You can decide for yourself whether you think
that's the case,
but that's important. So he's called for multiple
investigations and what's really happened. Now one of
the other points that Scott was stressing
was the idea that

(49:33):
that as we've already talked about, there's been,
like, 3 fires in this plant going back
years.
So the point is that the the the
actual problem and this is the real issue
of this kind of problem.
The half life on the human body, I
think, is like a decade.
So, I mean, it's gonna sit in your
body for a really long time and cause
these prob but the problem is this has
been many examples of this exact problem in

(49:55):
this place. So the people in this town,
like, I would I would I really want
someone to do a study of this town
comparatively to a town where, you know, has
at least the minimal amount of dioxins that
we can find, which is that's the problem
of today. They're everywhere, and I'll show you
that again today. And then compare them to
somewhat of a control. Or do they have
more reproductive issues or or, you know, less?

(50:16):
Like, there's I mean, all of these things
we're gonna go over. I almost guarantee that
will be the case, just like we gotta
show you from.
That is the case. 40 years down the
line, they're still dealing with these problems, guys.
And the problem is that if you never
had the study, if no one ever acknowledged
the word dioxin, we would never even know.
We wouldn't be connecting things 40 years down
the line with dioxin releases in Italy.

(50:38):
They would never even draw those comparisons, and
they know that today. So today, we just
draw it away. We put it off on
something else, and a week later, they're telling
you we're onto something else. Look at the
COVID 19 discussion.
You know what? You know how obvious it
is? We're still dealing with the fallout of
these dangerous injections, but guess what? It's the
flu now or it's bird flu or it's
whatever else we wanna point at and people
will follow along.

(51:01):
Something like this is even harder because barely
one even we even knows about these things.
So with that many fires, the problem of
the dioxin issue,
that is prime one of the main reasons
why he thinks it might be one of
the largest docks and releases in history because
of this major one comparatively in and of
itself might be. But then you add on
the other fires of the same location going
back decades.

(51:21):
This
town needs to I mean, this we're I'm
gonna get to it. This town there there
need to be class action lawsuits whether I
mean, I'm not gonna promote anything. You guy
I I my point is I already see
it happening. You guys wanna reach out and
find the person doing it. I saw 1,
but I don't wanna wreck them. I don't
know who they are if I believe them
or think they're honest. But there's a lot
of it going around. An entire momentum, like,
I'll show you the website.

(51:42):
We need to get this BioLab look company
out of our town. It's got momentum.
And we have the material safety data sheet.
We have the layout of the
company? Why why the chemicals were stored in
the dry place?
Why they didn't call out
foam truck like they did in 2004?

(52:06):
But they put water on the chemical
that reacts.
Now here there's a new part of this
that I I didn't know about this. This
is an article that just came out. And
this this might have been earlier. I just
didn't see it in the coverage. But apparently,
one of the primary reasons this became as
big as it did is because they sprayed
water on the fire, which caused another reaction
that made this get worse.

(52:26):
Think about that. See, that's
it's starting to really seem like there's more
going on here than just a clumsy accident.
How are we gonna solve this?
We need a federal criminal investigation.
Criminal investigation. ETA region 4 is the worst
region
in the United States.

(52:48):
Look it up.
Yes. Rockdale County been out of federal
compliance
for 4
decades. Federal compliance
county been out
Yes. Rockdale County
This part.
EPA
in region 4 is the worst region in
the United States. He just made my point

(53:09):
for me.
Why do you think that is? Why do
you think this specific region, which is exactly
what we're talking about, is the worst in
the country?
Maybe because it's had multiple a series of
major dioxin releases over the process of many
decades.
Maybe that's why.
Apes.
Look it up.

(53:30):
Yes. Rockdale County been out of federal compliance
for 4 decades.
Oh, wow.
I've been God. For
6 years.
They put a guy on a ballot illegally.
He wasn't a incoming,
so I'm pulling out warrants now.
Yeah. The governor is scared.

(53:52):
I've been frightened a bit saying that that
Remember, this guy died after he left this
meeting.
I mean, you know, it's I mean, it
despite people who just will
the kind of person that will dismiss anything
that makes them feel like they're getting close
to something that others might call conspiracy theory.
Like, that's how dumb it that's the way
I have to explain that. Like, it's so
dumb. People have a rational like, you know,

(54:14):
it it may it may that could be
something that's easily proven like this. Or, I
mean, in the case of he was saying,
like, the point being whether or not something
happened after the fact is what we're discussing.
But that you suggest that something that I
don't know. That somebody in a powerful position
might have wanted him killed.
And you know people, especially in the corporate
field, they just be like, that's just that's
ridiculous.
Well, why exactly?

(54:34):
Like, actually, why? Why is that ridiculous? I'm
sure it's it's it's extreme.
Yes. Historically, oh god. It's happened to hell
a lot of times. Okay. But it's still
crazy to you? Yes. Because that's ridiculous.
Why?
Like, honestly, ask why is that ridiculous? Powerful
people have done it before. People in government
have done it before. People have gone government
are doing it right now.
It's just because we're taught

(54:56):
to pretend
that that's not how it works.
That's how the that's how the flow of
information works. The reality is obvious, whether we're
talking about espionage
or intelligence
or just personal action.
Somebody in the government right now knowing he's
the one that might go to jail if
this guy gets his story through,
they might do something. I'm not suggesting that
that's the case,

(55:16):
but I'm suggesting that it is possibly the
case.
And you know that. And based on what
he's saying now, it's like a conspiracy
it's like the you know, it's exactly he's
saying that we need to investigate,
that they have that they did this intentionally.
We need a criminal investigation.
I mean, everything he's showing is exactly what
you might expect with somebody that later show
up dead. Company was gonna explode.

(55:38):
No one listened.
Mhmm.
We got to remove this company out this
community.
Yes. Alright.
Now we got one other company. Oh, point.
I forgot it. The ballot. He's talking about
putting somebody on the ballot illegally and it
got warrants. Like, it's these are
majorly powerful influential company, $1,000,000,000 company. That's what
they would do. If they just I mean,

(56:00):
this is the kind of thing I really
wanna stress is that it's amazing to me
that we can at least, like, why wouldn't
that be one of the possible things to
consider from anybody's perspective? We all know that's
possible, but it's just not. Which says something.
I'll make that sweet name.
The same way. It's called prop,
p r a t t.
My 8:8 o'clock that night, you can smell

(56:21):
the chlorine.
Being out of 1.7
tons
of recycled
paper. Yep. And that's what was burning alongside
the chlorine, which is exactly like a worst
case scenario, docs and release.
I'm the only one to inspect.
We don't have enough inspectors

(56:41):
to go in these companies. Yes. They know
that. Yes.
And they're not qualified.
Right. They know that.
What I'm gonna add to
is that
$850,000,000
of our taxes
went to this company.
Yeah. That works.
Right? You're subsidizing your own your own poisoning.

(57:04):
The pillows.
Yeah.
Y'all is so crazy that he later he
died after this, and he's literally talking about
it.
Charge. Y'all have left your decision.
We need a federal criminal
investigation.
Thank you. Thank you, mister Johnson.
And then he died.
I just can't it's just really wild to

(57:26):
me. Now, lastly, I wanna play this clip
again of Scott c Smith discussing this, and
then we'll jump into some of the newer
information that I think is really important.
Everything from there you go. And,
joining times.
You've been to Flint and testing
health community, so I'm not complaining. But I
can really tell when there's something without my

(57:47):
testing results in.
Something was just 48 hours ago, there were
people coughing up blood passing out. And I
was, you know, around the perimeter and the
people East Island, Georgia, just so it's clear.
People around me, we all had intense headaches
and,
now I got a sore throat. So And
this is recent. Right? So we're talking like
a week afterward. This is still happening. I

(58:08):
don't know how you explain that without something
like this. The dioxin is a long term
issue.
Right? That's why people in this Palestine, as
far as I could tell, were are to
this day are still suffering problems. I mean,
he he even mentions in this, one of
the first people reach out to him for
his Palestine is now dead.
I mean, it's just this is
like everything else we discussed. I really feel

(58:29):
for these people. Fortunately for me, I'm, you
know, back where I live
and have relatively fresh air. But these people
that are continuing to be inundated by the
ongoing plume, I really feel for them. Also,
I want to give a special acknowledgment
to
Kenny Johnson, who died. He was the
supervisor for the,

(58:49):
water for the county,
for the water and the soil. And he
was speaking out
almost like a whistleblower.
And he has been talking about this. So
these are 2 deaths too many. As you
know, Courtney Miller was the first one to
reach out to me in East Palestine,
and she passed away,
recently. And,

(59:09):
just my heart and thoughts go out to
Kenny Johnson's family. You know, I've been a
whistleblower with EPA Region 5 in East Palestine.
I give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
And I wanna put things in perspective,
from the scientific team today that it has
been verified
that at least £12,000,000
of chlorine compound
has burned.
Could be as high as 20,000,000.

(59:31):
We don't know yet. East Palestine, as bad
as it was, was £2,000,000
of chlorine compounds,
including bile chloride.
And in and in English, to dummies like
me, what does that mean to the average
person? Twelve years Here's what it means. The
products of incomplete combustion,
dioxins,
and cancer causing benzene compounds that are called

(59:51):
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
I Jordan, we were both involved in this.
I never thought there'd be an event that
is now 6 times
greater of chlorine compound burn.
And it's worse than that. All these chlorine
compounds were sitting on plastic pallet.
And there was styrene

(01:00:11):
and styrofoam in the building.
And all of these, all of these compounds,
when they burn, create dioxins
and a whole host of other chemicals,
irrespective of the phosgene and all the other
gas.
And this is, from Shana. Shana was the
first one. She reached out to me and
tested.
I I'm see you see this right here?

(01:00:32):
This is a retainer. This is off this
is what you see there, that's polystyrene.
And this is picked up from her yard.
This came
basically,
right now, 20 to 30 miles away. This
was an invasion of people's airspace.
You see that, Ash?
20 to 30 miles away. And that's heavy,
large pieces, not the drifting ash that I'll

(01:00:54):
show you yet again goes
thousands of miles away.
1000.
As they've now admitted, the e the East
Palestine
chemical spread
went 16 states away. That's according to the
Guardian.
Too bad they weren't listening when we were
saying that in the 1st week after that
happened about the past because we've read the
peer reviewed science. It's amazing how the experts

(01:01:15):
on corporate media I don't mean the the
so called journalists. I mean, the experts in
quotes they bring on can't deduce that for
themselves or are paid not to
until way later, and then it works for
them for some reason. I kept a lot
of stress. And this this got delivered to
the lab on Tuesday.
That is the polystyrene
or styrene foam. It is a scientific fact.

(01:01:36):
When that burns,
it gives off dioxins.
And unfortunately,
the EPA said, we're only testing for asbestos
and there's no well, of course, there's no
asbestos. And it it just ties in, you
can't find what you don't look for. If
you're Same exact thing. Oh, and he says
it right there, actually.
As in, you can't find what you don't

(01:01:58):
look for. Here we go again.
Right? It's exactly the same thing.
VOCs,
asbestos, and there's more now, but they're not
at least being told they're not testing for
dioxins.
And that's why people are being told, go
back. You're fine. And they go back, and
they're still getting sick just like East Palestine.
This is not an accident. They don't they're
making the same exact mistakes again. They're making

(01:02:20):
deliberate choices again.
How is it that it's okay to go
to work? It's okay for kids to go
to school in surrounding areas. It's okay to
do things,
during the day, but there's a shelter in
place at night. Do they care? First of
all, there's not one person on my scientific
team that agrees with that, and I don't
have any answer for what it says totally

(01:02:42):
illogical.
And the alleged reason is that at night,
the plume descends towards the ground. But from
my experience of being on the ground I
was on the ground Friday through Tuesday.
The smell is there. The plume is there.
Just yesterday,
You saw the video I sent you. They
said, Well, there's dangerous gases you can't approach.

(01:03:02):
But yet,
the contractor
that was trying to stop us was illegally
saying the police,
would arrest us, which was a complete bluff
and was illegal and wrong. The police admitted
they could not stop a private business owner
from accessing property to test. Yeah. So if
it's so when you want to try to
get to ground 0 to do independent testing

(01:03:24):
with with a property owner that wants you
there, it's unsafe to enter the area.
But yet then it's okay to go to
work. It's okay to go to school. So
they're using that as a it it's the
deception.
Right. Right. So you can go in
go go to work and play and everything,
but when Scott needs to come test to
see if it's dangerous, oh, no. It's not
safe. It just it's it's on its face.

(01:03:46):
It got it it obviously is dishonest. There's
something else going on here. Now here is
an article.
Now that's from pretty much what we covered
before.
And and what and the and the other
watch the shows. There's plenty more we went
into in general.
This one is from
where's the date on it again? The 3rd.
So the day after the first show we

(01:04:06):
did on this.
Now this is what I found here to
be very interesting. Now this is, got the
the the actual title is
they need to close quick. And they're talking
about the, you know, BioLab being the name
of the company, not actually a BioLabatory,
at least as we're told,
saying that she went to the hospital twice
after breathing breathing the chemical plume, and the

(01:04:27):
doctors told her that she was the 80th
80th, 80,
80, 80th person
to seek treatment on since Sunday.
Sun so since we're this is on there's
2 days later, 80th person.
Now it says days after the biolab fire,
those who live by the facility refused to

(01:04:48):
go home.
And just to remind you, this is despite
being told they can, just like East Palestine.
Many residents say the smell of chlorine and
smoke are too strong to handle.
We know it happened because the sky is
black or was black.
It says right now, I'm struggling to breathe.
My chest is hurting because of what happened
in the explosion.
Days later. 1st, she went to the urgent

(01:05:09):
care and got treatment. Then she got sick
again and ended up in the east the
the Piedmont Eastside Medical Center in shell
shell by her mom's house. You know why
she got sick again? Because they told her
it was fine, then she went back home.
So they said that I was the 80th
person from Conyers Conyers to to come and
see them. So they've been getting a lot

(01:05:29):
of patients
coming this way to get checked out, and
it's terrible.
We're not hearing much about this, are we?
She and her husband evacuated to her mom's
house, and they get her 2 year old
son away from the smoke. A day later,
they were told the evacuation was lifted. A
day later,
you realize they're still testing right now, like,
a day not not even not vaccines. No
one's telling you about that, but they're still

(01:05:50):
trying to figure out whether this stuff is
dangerous. They're telling them to come home.
I mean, literally, I don't I'm not gonna
keep saying it, but this is exactly like
we saw in East Palestine.
It says, but it wasn't
wasn't safe is your point. We know that.
Smelling the smoke again made her and her
husband
who had her her their asthma symptoms worse.
It says, quote, this is dangerous, especially for

(01:06:12):
her because she never had breathing problems
before.
And now she had to go buy an
inhaler and the machine.
Yeah. Never had it before, but now she
needs an inhaler.
This is a median. This is not the
long term.
It says, no. This is unacceptable.
Machines reading the quality and air quality
by biolab,

(01:06:32):
get this,
are 20 minutes away.
Not even tested for dioxins, but the acute,
you know, whatever, chlorine or whatever they claim
their asbestos,
but 20 minutes away because that's how you
do it. Right?
You don't test ground 0. You make it
20 minutes away because that's convenient
and most likely to be look like it's
lesser than this has officials say overnight. The

(01:06:53):
officials say we're some in exceedances
above the action level just for chlorine, though.
Not the thing that we bur the chlorine
burned and released, but just the chlorine.
And even then, there were tests the day
of that were 22 times above the safe
level for chlorine.
That was that was from local media we
showed you. Actually, I think I can grab
that real quick. I forgot to pull that
one up. Let's see if it pops up.

(01:07:16):
There it is.
From the local media,
Brad Nitz, meteorologist,
he says they found chlorine 22 times higher
than the action level.
22 times higher. So over here, they found
some exceedances above the action level for chlorine
as the product's neutralization process at the sites
get but they what they they told me
to come back anyway.

(01:07:37):
It says if you feel symptoms, this is
just in case you have these. If you're
in there, if you're in Georgia, anywhere around
this, even much further away, and you're having
symptoms all of a sudden after coming or
just in general, coming in contact with the
smoke, they're saying in Georgia Emergency Management and
Homeland Security Agency recommends that you call your
health provider, the Georgia Poison Center 404-856-6252.

(01:07:57):
JAMA says the best ways to protect yourself
are to limit
time outside.
Well, except for the fact that, I mean,
that is the case. Let me include this
too. Except for the fact that in East
Palestine,
all the way in July
2023, he was still finding up to 14,000
times more dioxins in the East Palestine homes
than compared to the controls, testing their filters

(01:08:19):
in their houses inside their houses,
finding 14,000
times more dioxin than the control.
That's why they're suffering.
Now here's what EPA is saying.
The EPA is using multiple monitoring instruments to
monitor the air quality for chlorine and related
compounds. Now you could argue that might mean

(01:08:40):
vaccines, but I'm pretty sure we know that's
not the case.
I mean, if they're testing it, why wouldn't
they tell you? And if they're not, when
you know they know it's there, I think
it's obvious why. What are they gonna do?
We can't ship it anywhere. We can't take
care of it. We can't remove it, so
we're just gonna pretend it's not there. And
even if you actually thought what they should
be telling you, the point is still they
don't even they wouldn't have an answer for
it. They don't know how to stop it

(01:09:01):
from being a problem. They don't know where
to take it to remove it.
So here we are.
I genuinely think that's what's happening, in my
opinion. It says air quality in the surrounding
community has improved over the last week, and
chlorine levels should continue to decrease.
That's it. Not a single metric dioxins despite
how clearly we know this is a problem,
and they know that too.

(01:09:23):
Now here
is the local, this is from channel 2,
Atlanta.
Lawmakers demand EPA regulate biolab following chemical fire.
That's from October 12th.
Says Georgia US representative Hank Johnson says that
he and several other lawmakers from Georgia congressional
delegation have sent a letter to the head

(01:09:43):
of the EPA
urging him to, quote, enhance federal oversight of
facilities that manufacture and or store the hazardous
chemical
trichlorosocenearic
acid, however you pronounce that, which is interesting
to me.
That's what they're asking for. Following the devastating
fire that broke out at the biolab facility

(01:10:04):
in Rockdale County. Okay.
So I find it interesting that these are
the people that were dragging their feet
that Terry, the one that died, was speaking
up about.
Now all of a sudden, he's no longer
here, and they're pointing at a different chemical
and saying, this is what we have to
care about and asking for some kind of
follow-up, asking for the very government that's been
allowing this to step in and do something

(01:10:25):
about it.
I find that interesting. See, they're not calling
for a criminal investigation. They're calling for more
regulation.
To me, that's just simply the illusion of
some kind of process. We don't need more
regulation. We need them to do what they're
supposed to do now,
period. I mean, and and on top of
that, you even if you wanna go in
the direction of regulation, my point is these

(01:10:45):
people don't care. They're already not meeting
or upholding the current regulations. So what does
it matter whether they add more regulations to
the book? It's like governments that don't care
about the law. What do we care if
they add more laws for themselves if they
don't follow them anyway? So I think that's
a problem.
And I think it's weird to me how
suddenly they act like this is an issue
despite the fact that Terry's been asking for

(01:11:06):
investigations for a long time with nothing happening.
And, again, they're not asking for investigation.
Now it says as firefighters put out the
flames, this is where I saw this reported,
the
at the plant, the the water to put
out the fire reacted with the chemicals inside
the plant to produce a chemical plume that
impacted the area.

(01:11:27):
So are you really telling me yet again
that their response
was what caused the problem?
I just just I honestly I don't actually
believe that that is act the the fire
itself,
which was burning long before they tried to
put it out, is arguably
in my opinion, that's the problem.

(01:11:47):
Either way, there's 2 things to point out.
That's crazy that yet again the response is
what caused it to be much bigger than
it would have been otherwise,
or that's the cover story. To to yet
again blame it on the fire department just
like with east Palestine.
Either way,
it's not the fires. I mean, the the
the chem I mean, eve as even, the

(01:12:09):
the how I'll just see you guys remember
what I'm talking about. The health official who
died said,
where are the MSDS sheets? Like, what is
here? That's the point. They don't know. So
they come in spraying
water or fire, but they're not ready to
deal with this because they weren't aware of
what was present.
How is that not a problem? Shouldn't they
be shouldn't they be able to for that
alone?

(01:12:30):
This does seem like some kind of a
larger cover up, some kind of a deliberate
action. That's what he that's what he seemed
to suggest. There's no reason this fire pops
up the day after they were supposedly gonna
do something about it. And then they spray
it and it causes a bigger problem. It's
harder to see how this all lines up.
County officials said chlorine, chloramine, and chlorine compounds
were released into the air from the fire.

(01:12:52):
Interesting how that's what they're still not a
word of the oxen. I think there's a
very deliberate effort to keep this always out
of the conversation,
and maybe the chlorine compounds means that or
maybe not.
In the letter to EPA, Johnson along with
US senators, John Ossoff, Rachel Warnock, and representative
David Scott, Lucy McBath, and Nyckma Williams told
the EPA administrator that the, quote, toxic substances

(01:13:14):
continue to rise into the air from the
smoldering ruins of the plant.
And with corporate and government officials being unable
to offer a specific timetable
as to when the danger will end?
Doesn't that seem outrageous?
So as somebody pointed out in the chat,
yes. Smoldering is almost even worse because there's
far so it's more smoke and more it's

(01:13:35):
it's the bottom line is
there's a I mean, I guarantee there's people
like Scott who would have some kind of
direction to say, here's how we can stop
that from producing dioxins.
It begins to feel like that's not the
desire here.
I'm not saying individuals on the ground, the
fire department, they they know that. My point
is from a larger game of this, I
keep seeing the same outcome. The maximization

(01:13:58):
the maximizing
of the spread, it almost designed to make
it 1, the ubiquitous nature of vaccines everywhere,
but also to spread this so far that
you can't be like, that's your fault.
As we get into the testing part, we'll
talk about next because there are ways you
can prove this.
Now it says the gravity of the situation
underscores

(01:14:18):
the need for changes to the federal and
state regulatory systems. Oh, is that what it
is me? Is that what it is? We
shouldn't how do we acknowledge that they're already
currently ignoring those?
To me, this is BS.
We need more regulation is what they're actually
calling for. Changes to the regulatory system. No.
They just need to actually do their job.

(01:14:38):
Now we need to change it's it's like
I've always talked about in the past. We
don't need more laws for more extensions of
the same crimes. Hate speech and lynching and
all. No. You just need a crime that
is violence or, you know, assault.
So you attack somebody. You don't need to
make new variations to say, well, if they
did it with this one well, if they
were thinking of this while they did it,
well, that's worse. That's stupid. The law is
the law. It applies. The bottom line is,

(01:15:00):
in this case, it's already there. We don't
need to do more abstract. That's
the point. They wanna get you as far
away from acknowledging where we currently are in
this conversation. I genuinely think that.
Now I'll include
the study we looked at before.

(01:15:21):
I'll include this one because I think this
is, again, primary source material. This is a
pyramid study from 2,001,
chlorine and combustion chlorine combustion and dioxins.
Does reducing chlorine and and waste just decrease
dioxin formation? The answer is 100% yes.
The summary is since every single molecule dioxin

(01:15:42):
contains 2 or more atoms of chlorine,
chlorine is an absolute necessity for dioxin formation.
Therefore, when no chlorine is present present, no
dioxins are formed.
Pretty easy to see how that works. So
when you burn a plant full of chlorine,
you maximize the possible dioxin release.
So bringing this to

(01:16:03):
oops.
Okay. I don't wanna close that.
Bringing this to the overlap. Thank you to
Casey Wright for bringing this to my attention.
It's a it's just,
with no t, but this is the Time
Magazine discussion of this disaster.
So in 1976, an explosion at a chemical
plant in Seveso, Italy

(01:16:24):
released a thick cloud of dioxin,
a highly toxic and car and carcinogenic substance.
The disaster ranked 8th in Time Magazine's
list of the worst man made environmental disasters,
had far reaching consequences of the local population,
and we're gonna go into this. So when
you begin to see that the the breadth

(01:16:45):
of the problem is decades down the line
and all they dealt with in the immediacy
of the problem, just even though it's called
one of the worst man made environmental disasters
in history,
what do you think they dealt with?
Bloody nose,
headaches,
passing out, vomiting,
chloracne.
That's it.
And yet still, conser consider the worst men.

(01:17:07):
You know why? Because they know what it
was, and they can see the long term
effects.
Right now, East Palestine,
you're in I argue in a worse position.
Same with Georgia, worse than all of them,
it looks like. And they're never going to
allow you to connect the dot because they
don't want this happening.
There's a reason. And whether it's been we're
at some point in history in a more
honest place to or versus today, I don't

(01:17:29):
know. Bottom line, the disaster caused widespread contamination
with animals dying shortly after exposure, which is
also exactly what we saw. Long term effects
is where we're going with this.
Researchers since linked the disaster
to reduced fertility in both men and women.
Well, what do you know?
Almost like every single thing they've ever done

(01:17:50):
seems to have 2 common effects,
reduction in fertility, reproduction,
and reducing your immune system,
increased risk of cancers and other diseases. Look
at that.
And the 3rd, which also seems to be
almost every single time, endocrine disruption and developmental
abnormalities.
So here is just what Time Magazine wrote

(01:18:10):
in their little kind of sum summary. Top
10 environmental disasters. One of them is the
cedesodioxin
cloud.
First, animals began to die. Now it says
if it was 4 days after people began
to feel the ill effects,
including,
listen up, East Palestine,
Conyers,
nausea, blurred vision,
especially among children,

(01:18:32):
the disfiguring sores of a skin disease known
as chloracne,
and weeks before the town itself was evacuated.
Of course, again, same point. The people are
being allowed to be there right now or
rather specifically in the the week after it
was I mean, right now is the same
point, though. But while it was the most
impactful,

(01:18:52):
they were told to leave for a day
and they were told to come right back.
All of these things are what we're seeing
right now in Georgia. Same thing we saw
in this Palestine.
Chlorachne being one of the most common issues
we saw in East Palestine.
A large park sits above 2 giant tanks
that hold the remains of hundreds of slaughtered
animals. This is a today, a park around
the area. The destroyed factory in the soil

(01:19:13):
that received the largest doses doses of dioxin.
I just wanted to be clear of how
common and open this is discussed.
And yet, today,
it's regarded as something that almost is unknown.
Unspeakable almost. We don't even know how to
pronounce it half the time. The EPA is
like dioxin.
That's what they did in a live broadcast

(01:19:34):
live discussion when they brought it up after
he's Palestine.
Now here is
the Cervaiso accident,
a look at 40 years of health research
and beyond.
In 1976,
chemical factory explosion near Cervaiso, Italy
exposed residents to high levels of TCDD,

(01:19:56):
again, which is what we're talking about,
which is what Scott said today.
Dioxin is a known human carcinogen and potent
potent endocrine disruptor.
To me, that's wild. That's potent.
Every single thing we're talking about, the COVID
shot itself, glyphosate,
PFAS,
all of these things are

(01:20:18):
endocrine disruptors.
Docs and what seems to be everywhere is
the potent endocrine disruptor.
And I'll read to you what it says.
What I mean, this you already know what
this means. In fact, I'll just include those
articles again if you wanna read them,
because it's important to understand that this stuff
is a big problem.
This is a broader discussion because a lot
of things fall into the category of endocrine

(01:20:39):
disrupting chemicals or EDCs.
And I simply asked the question because this
was kind of during the time frame of
the trans
fever.
The The point being is that now it's
still happening just more quietly, but it's still
there, mind you, even though
everything we said had been proven to be
correct, every single part of it. In the
UK, they mostly pulled this back. It's it's
almost illegal outside of trials right now. But

(01:20:59):
it says, and that's while it was being
proudly pushed on young children with transitory time.
Now think about a hard turn that was,
and yet nobody went to jail for that.
Isn't that funny? Causing gender is are these
chemicals causing gender dysphoria?
The peer reviewed science says 100%
that can happen. That these things being prevalent
in your system can lead to gender dysphoria.

(01:21:20):
Peer reviewed science.
Now this is where I referenced before the
conversation of, like, the whole atrazine.
Too bad we got, you know, screaming clowns
telling you things returning gay instead of recognizing
that this was a larger problem that just
hormone manipulation of the larger context of the,
you know, the the environment and runoff.
Now, yes, what he was saying was, I
guess, quote, right, if you will, in a

(01:21:43):
very ridiculous, dumbed down, small part of the
story way.
But those of us that were actually covering
this and showing you the full picture all
the way back then as well, mind you,
was that these things were actually endocrine disruptors,
hormone manipulators, and it wasn't just astrozine. It
wasn't just frogs. It was the environment at
large,
including you, by the way. But because it
was framed as which I guess arguably is

(01:22:03):
not his fault
as ridiculous, it got dismissed by everybody, including
people that might have wanted to hear it.
I actually think there's a design by that.
But, anyway, this is for you guys to
check out.
There's a lot of them.
Dioxin is a known human carcinoid, potent endocrine
disruptor. It is highly

(01:22:23):
lymph,
lymphophilic
and has a long half life in humans.
Much of what we know and can learn
about the risk of the accident exposure on
human health arose from the tragic
circumstances
of Sineso.
So even right now and this this art
this study was, put out in 2018.

(01:22:45):
So they're saying in 2018,
most of what we currently know comes from
this disaster.
And yet when the exact circumstances are met,
they somehow just don't even know how to
connect the dots.
Again, that's either shocking incompetence,
which wouldn't even surprise me, or a deliberate
disregard.
Possibly both.

(01:23:05):
But it says, summarize the results of 40
years of research on the health of this
population. That's what I'm interested by.
That's just the introduction. It says because it
is a combustion byproduct, dioxins,
it is a widespread
environmental
contaminant
in industrialized areas and background exposures,
while declining,
are ubiquitous. Now that's not because it just

(01:23:26):
always is, mind you, which I'll point out
again.
The problem, though, is it's mentioned more than
once in this, is that because it has
become a background noise,
that is largely why they ignore it.
I think there's the design to that, like
glyphosate, guys. I really do.
That means they know what's happening. Now in

(01:23:46):
here, it says it is again, a potent
endocrine disruptor,
highly
dang it, keep doing that highly
lymph, lympho, phallic and extremely stable with a
half life of 7 to 9 years
up to a decade
stays in your body.
And I think it's important just to really
understand what that's saying. And I was saying

(01:24:07):
while declining, but realize that I don't think
that's the case
and realize they're saying this in 2018, we're
gonna go over the CNN article. We get
again, that shows you in 1995,
how they were showing you how crazy this
was. It was everywhere. 150 times the actions
are in your food you're eating right now.
What are we gonna do?
No. It wasn't declining. In my opinion, it's
far worse than it's ever been, and this

(01:24:28):
is why because they just don't point at
it.
Widespread environmental contaminant. Widespread 2018.
Why don't you know about that?
Are ubiquitous.
Now it says the plant in back going
back to Italy,
1976,
was manufacturing
a a form of

(01:24:49):
tricloforphanol,
which is an intermere interme intermediary
for cosmetics and pharmaceuticals.
That was always the side point is how
much you wanna bet we could make these
things without these dangerous chemicals?
I bet you it's cheaper. Right? I bet
you it holds together better,
But I promise you,
we could get rid of all of these

(01:25:09):
things and we'd be okay.
But the companies would suffer because we care
about the company's profit, don't we? Some people
do, like Trump and Kamala. But it says
a runaway chemical reaction resulted in a release
of an aerosol cloud
and an estimated, and this is what I
think is important,
15 to 30 kilograms of TCDD
over an 18 kilometer squared area.

(01:25:30):
So as soon and I this is one
thing this is what I was talking with
him the most about.
As soon as those results are ready, I'm
gonna get Scott on the show, and that's
one of the first questions I'm gonna ask.
Based on your results,
what is the kill per kilogram per square
kilometer that we're dealing with now? Because wind,
hopefully, it's lower. We get the number, and
it is anywhere in that realm if not

(01:25:52):
hopefully not, but worse, it will show you
a metric you can use to prove this.
It says area residents in the path of
the aerosol cloud developed nausea, headaches, eye irritation,
and 19 children were admitted to local hospitals
with skin lesions.
Sound familiar?
And this is the one of the worst
disasters, environmental disasters in human history.

(01:26:14):
Nausea, headaches, irritation of the eyes,
Look, nausea,
core acne.
That's what they're talking about.
That's exactly what happened in East Palestine.
Funny how we regarded that as a, you
know you I mean, I'm not gonna harp.
The point is that, obviously, this should be
regarded as a similar problem. If the same
things that happened there because of the same
byproduct, maybe we should acknowledge that was equal

(01:26:37):
at least.
And realizing the area, right, I mean, that's,
like, the same point, 15 to 30 kilograms
of TCDD over 18 kilometers. I'm gonna show
you that this went 16 states across.
£2,000,000
of chlorine compounds were burned.
I think it's obvious to say that was
worse.
And it says, in the ensuing weeks, back
to back to 1976,

(01:26:58):
the area experienced high animal and plant mortality.
What did we see in this Palestine? The
entire river was dead.
Fish, frogs. We saw chickens. We saw animals.
We saw wolves. We saw, what was it?
I mean, many different things. These are not
my opinions. These are provable examples that we
very carefully researched.
Look back at our work. I gave you
a lot of links to look back through

(01:27:18):
our shows. It's all easy to prove.
Wait. I there were 3 people that I
know personally that were there on the ground,
one of which we had an interview with.
So, I mean, it's all this stuff is
easy to prove,
And nearly 200 cases of specifically chloracne were
reported, and that is what they used to
base this entire study on,

(01:27:38):
primarily. The idea of those who had chloracne
and the locations they were in compared to
those who didn't.
Why? Because they they just that was a
deciding factor that showed they had an acute
exposure.
So if you had chloracne out there, recognize
what that's showing you.
Excuse me. Now it goes on to say,
although soil dioxin levels

(01:27:58):
have been used as a proxy of exposure,
these levels do not reflect variation in individual
level frequency and duration of contact with dioxin
contaminated media. Their point is, yes, we can
test the soil, and we can tell you
what the kind of broad general problem is.
What they wanna know is whether the individual
levels were based on the chloroquine as a

(01:28:19):
kind of base for whether you got exposed
and then testing that versus those that had
no exposure. And it says in 1987,
11 years after Sebastian,
11 years,
the CDC,
so they do know what this is, developed
an analytical method
specifically for testing this problem to measure TCDD
concentration in humans in human blood.

(01:28:41):
So ask yourself. They developed sort of like
this
seminal
this test that we've decided is the way
analytical method to test for dioxin in the
blood,
And yet they were telling the somebody in
the level of the hierarchy was telling the
hospitals not to test them for this in
east Palestine.
And on top of that, why aren't they

(01:29:01):
making sure we know about this in all
sorts of locations? Well, they CDC sure as
hell knows how to test this against the
background to know whether you're in dangers, but
they're not doing that. Wouldn't they be rushing
to the scene as the center for disease
control prevention and the EPA for, you know,
environmental
Protection Agency jumping to the ground and say,
look. We wanna make sure you're safe because
that's what our mandate is. We have a

(01:29:22):
test that we do just for this. No.
They're not even mentioning the word.
It says this new method and nearly 30,000
stored samples at the university laboratory of the
hospital of Desio
opened the door for more precise measurements of
individual exposure to be examined in relation to
the health of the population.

(01:29:42):
That's important for even right now. That means
the and also, as we point out again,
next down the next point down,
why is the CDC
doing this in Italy?
That is interesting, isn't it? Do you think
that's because they're kind, they just decided that
we're gonna go help out Italy? Probably not.
30,000 samples they currently or I would imagine

(01:30:02):
currently have stored in a hospital
for this exact idea to be able to
examine them in relation to the health of
population even today. So you could compare your
blood samples to these stored CDC samples. You
got a request?
I doubt they're gonna wanna want you to
know what it looks like to have high
level of action in your blood because then
you'll be able to know what you're dealing
with. But I think we already know where

(01:30:23):
we're at. But down here, it says 1996,
20 years after the explosion, a historical cohort
study was initiated on the female residents,
which we're gonna go through all this next.
But guess what it was funded by?
The NIH.
Interesting. So the NIH and the CDC get
involved with a with a, an Italian disaster

(01:30:43):
decades later. Why do you think that is?
I'm gonna show you why. 1996,
ladies and gentlemen, this is this article from
1995 from CNN where they're going, what are
we gonna do? This problem is crazy. It's
everywhere. It's in your food. We can't wait
any longer. And then it did, though.
And just to make sure you don't miss
the point right now, here they are in
1996 going, we're gonna study your females to

(01:31:05):
see what they're dealing with after this thing
that we don't we pretend is not happening.
They knew it was there.
They found out they couldn't do anything about
it, and they
swept under the rug.
Now that's my opinion, but what we can
see for sure is that they were knowing
it was there. They were studying it. They
were asking they were literally working with I
mean, realize this is 1987.

(01:31:26):
So the disaster happened in 76.
A decade later, the CDC is like, hey.
We wanna test these people. Why?
And then another decade later, the the NIH
goes, we wanna test your women. Why?
Because they know that there's something to this.
They know that there's a long term issue.
They know that there are,
or maybe it's because they wanna use it
as a weapon, which is what they ultimately
did. They used TCDD about another decade later

(01:31:48):
against a Ukrainian president.
It's this is all Wikipedia for crying out
loud. So they're studying this to be able
to use. They know it's there. They're also
finding out that it's a background level and
they and still to this day, not mentioning
that.
I just find that to be damning. But
it goes on to say men who were
youngest at the time of exposure, back to
1976,

(01:32:09):
had significantly
lower sperm concentration,
significantly.
Percent,
then it says,
percent oh, yeah. So that's all had a
significantly lower sperm concentration percent progressive mortality
or motility,
and total motile sperm count than similar aged
unexposed men. That's pretty obvious. Then it says

(01:32:31):
examine the relationship between dioxin TCDD exposure and
time to pregnancy for the women's 1st post
explosion conception resulting in a live birth.
Fertility
among, oops,
fertility among women
was reduced
with increasing TCDD
serum concentrations in the blood.
A tenfold

(01:32:53):
increase
in serum TCDD
concentration
in 1976
was associated with a 25%
increase in time to pregnancy and almost double
the odds of infertility.
I hope you're paying attention in this policy
and everywhere else.
Women

(01:33:15):
who had high levels of TCDD
concentrations
in 1976
and realized they're doing this study in
1996, and they're finding
tenfold increase
or rather a tenfold increase of that in
their blood in 76
was associated with a 25% increase. So you

(01:33:36):
might have a premature birth, 25% increase at
the time of your pregnancy, and then double
the odds of infertility. Double.
If you were told that you might have
a 50% increase in in a in a
infertility problem, I'm pretty sure everyone in the
country would care.
But yet,
no one's talking about any of this.

(01:33:57):
Problematic, to say the least.
Now here is Daily Mail just going business
from,
March 13, 2023.
The truth about East Palestine train disaster 5
weeks on, and it says the residents are
ill with sore throats, rashes, nosebleeds, which you
all know. I just wanna point out yet
again one of the primary points.

(01:34:18):
My skin is breaking out, and that's never
happened before. 1 of the officials
looked at it and said it looks like
chloracne,
which is a reaction to the chemicals.
This is a very I wanna make sure
you saw. This is a very prominent part
of what happened in East Palestine, and we're
already seeing it in Georgia,
which means acute exposure to exactly what we're

(01:34:39):
talking about. That is the problem.
40 years later,
people are being told that they're having 50%
increase in fertility.
Children at the time have dramatically decreased fertility,
sperm count.
I just don't know what else we need
to see here, guys.
Oh, and what I found interesting, by the

(01:35:00):
way, I just typed this in to see
what would come up, East Palestine Chloracne, because
I was looking for an article like that
just to show you that there was an
example. You know? And, again, if you remember
my research, it was everywhere.
But guess what? This shows up now. And
this actually kind of blows my mind. So
we're at the time screaming about this problem,
and other than independent media, very few people
seem to care about this.
But now what does it say? Did dioxins

(01:35:20):
spread in East Palestine after the derailment?
Dioxins in Ohio train crash? Dioxins in poisoning?
Like, hold on a minute. I didn't even
mention dioxins. I mentioned East Palestine and chloracne,
and every single article
Johnny come lately style are going dioxins in
East Palestine. Dioxins. Okay. Why? Why? It's because
chloracne is exactly the point. They know this,

(01:35:41):
and even the search engine is directing you
to dioxins because that's what it leads to,
or rather that's what it's an example a
sign it signifies that is a problem.
I just think it's hilarious that we'll search
for chloracne, and all of these mainstream articles
are like toxins even though nobody could even
find that word when it was actually important
for people to know they were at risk.
And it is now still in this Palestine,

(01:36:02):
in my opinion, based on the even the
human half life of a decade.
Futch it's but just the fact that in
that moment, they could have gotten out of
the way.
Now for those that haven't seen this, if
you have, you've seen this before, but I
want to reiterate this. With all that in
your mind,
this is from 1995.
This is from CNN.
An article called dioxins may be creating larger

(01:36:23):
problems down the road. Yeah. You have no
idea.
1995.
Now it says from the moment you get
out of bed, chlorine is part of your
life,
but there are potentially
harmful side effects from our chlorine use.
One of the side effects is a group
called of unwanted chemicals called dioxins. Oh, how
casual that is. You're not gonna find them

(01:36:45):
even mentioning that word today unless they're forced
to.
As dioxin becomes airborne,
it travels
thousands
of miles away.
Thousands of miles away, which I back up
with this study
from 2000 or from the year 2000, which
I've said showed many times. Very quickly, a
study from Arctic Canada,

(01:37:07):
long range air transport of dioxin from North
American sources.
Quickly summed up, you have Inuit populations. Some
people call them Eskimos. In this case, it's
incorrect. In this location, they're called Inuits. And
the point is, in Nunavut, Arctic Canada,
these people are breastfeeding these women are breastfeeding
their children and finding
dangerous levels of dioxin in their breast milk.

(01:37:29):
Despite the fact that there's not a dioxin
source within 200 miles of where they live.
And the study found it's literally because of
long range air transport of the axons from
where you live.
Think about that.
If it's dangerous for their children and their
breast milk, all the way in Arctic Canada
with not a source in 200 miles,
maybe we should be asking about the people

(01:37:49):
that live right next door to these places
producing the chemicals. What do you think?
Right? Or how about anywhere in the United
States? If they're that far away and they're
still getting hurt, guess what's happening to you
and your children? Why aren't we talking about
this? Which seems to be the biggest thing
I've seen in any of these conversations. And
I've been talking about this kind of stuff
for a long time. The more I dig
into this, the more it becomes obvious to
me that we're in a pretty bad way.

(01:38:11):
And then we wonder why do we all
have cancer? Why does that one in 2
people in this country get cancer before they
die? Why are we all suffering from all
sorts of chronic illnesses? You know, these things
don't just happen. You don't just, oh, yeah.
You know, you just get these things sometime.
No. You don't. These things are happening because
your body is dealing with a problem. That's
what that's what the reality is. You wouldn't
be having any kind of problem. You don't
just wake up without cancer. Sometimes you just
get cancer. No. You don't. Your body is

(01:38:32):
dealing with something.
That's the point.
This is why we could tell for sure
they know about it, and 2, it is
happening in your backyard.
So back to the article.
As dioxin becomes airborne, it travels thousands of
miles away. Like with this Palestine, the smoke
and the uncontrolled burn, that was a catalyst.

(01:38:54):
That's why it propelled itself
16
states across.
I'm I'm gonna be able to bet you
it's more than that. Again, this is from
The Guardian,
June 2024.
Hey. Way to catch up. We were there
the week this was happening. Chemicals from East
Palestine derailment spread 16 states.
Too late now, though, but glad they're reporting
it after the fact.

(01:39:17):
And it goes on to say dioxin ends
up in animals or fish where it's stored
in their fatty tissue, again, with a decade
long half life. And when we eat these
things, dioxins move into our fat.
So you're just building this stuff up. And
it says the environmental the EPA says chlorine
compounds like dioxins can cause serious problems. Oh,
funny. They do know about it. Funny how

(01:39:37):
they're just confused about it right now, and
researchers say it's everywhere.
That's literally what it says. Researchers say it's
everywhere. I wonder how to do that.
Gosh darn. This thing is driving me crazy.
There we go.
No. If you can acknowledge that in 1995,
why wouldn't we be talking about it? I

(01:39:58):
mean, I'm just I'm only again, I'm not
actually asking these questions. I'm hoping to trigger
that thought to connect with what I was
saying earlier in your mind. We know why.
Because it is already everywhere in 1995. Can
you only imagine where it is now? I
genuinely think they don't know what to do.
To see how widespread it is, we commissioned
a study.
A dioxin specialist, doctor Arnold Sector, he gathered

(01:40:20):
several of our favorites at the sound of
the lab, and you guess what he found?
From reading what you found on the fast
food, doses of dioxins in hamburger, chicken, and
pizza are already higher than what they say
is safe.
Yep. Big Mac or Pizza Hut, pay personal
pan pizza, supreme pizza, 3 pieces of KFC
give you about 8 to a 150
times more dioxins than the EPA feels would

(01:40:43):
be reasonably safe.
None of them are reasonably safe. They're dangerous
at any level, guys.
The restaurants can't help it, they say. Dioxin
has had years to build up in the
food chain.
Why?
Because they don't do anything about it. That's
why the EPA wanted to change the standards,
and guess what? Nothing happened. In fact, they
just changing the standards was ignoring it from

(01:41:03):
the conversation.
It recently
said even lower levels of dioxin may hurt
us. Yep. Guess by how or guess how?
By weakening our immunities
and attacking our reproductive system.
It's almost like it's almost like design.
Though EPA's review board thinks that maybe the
lower levels are too restrictive,
while others say not enough. So even then,

(01:41:25):
the EPA was going, yeah, maybe we shouldn't
care. You see? It's not hard to see
how this went down.
Dioxins in the doses we're talking about will
not kill us.
And, again, that's not even the huge exposure
seems to immediately kill you. It's about the
long term degradation of the body.
I mean, it says you and I eat
Big Macs. We're alive. Right? Just being alive

(01:41:46):
is all we care about. Right? No. You're
not being alive, eking me out of the
system in some hospital bed. It's about being
healthy. It says what they will do is
increase the rate of illness in a population,
which is perfect for the whole entire system
the way it works today, isn't it?
And you found basically that what you were
seeing in the infants was also showing up
in the 4 year olds.

(01:42:06):
He says, right. In both cases, the children
who were exposed to higher levels of these
problems in utero
performed more poorly in tests on the short
term memory.
Right? And you combine that, this is me
speaking, combine that with the fluoride problem
that we now have admitted, but they're still
not gonna stop. What does that do? Same
thing. Reduction of immunity, reduction of your brain,

(01:42:27):
you know, lowering IQ in children.
What what an accident, it seems.
So and they know that, and they're still
using it right now. Don't you think it
was actually awareness of the problem they would
slam on the brakes? No.
Says what they do know is that children
were impacted and it happened in the fetal
stage. So, again, we just went over this
breast breastfeeding, but this is given this is

(01:42:48):
pregnant. It's
a lifelong span, and they're telling you the
way this affects your children.
So if you live in these locations, let
alone seemingly anywhere in this country, recognize that
we
your government is not caring to even tell
you about a problem. Because I there are
things I'm not even getting into this today,
but there are there are things that we
could do to some way take effects to
detox your body.

(01:43:09):
What I'm talking about is the fact they
scream they'd love to take action. They claim
it's for your safety to regulate your life
to the ground.
But with things like this, they're not even
trying to slow it down. In any context,
whether it's glyphosate or PFAS or dioxins or
any number of endocrine disrupting chemicals or the
dangerous shot they're forcing on your children. The
bottom line is that they're not doing any

(01:43:30):
of that.
When we can prove these things are dangerous,
but there's something, oh, you know, you say
a negative word about Israel. My god. You
should be in prison. It shows you how
what they actually care about.
It says it's that kind of study, more
evidence which has led some scientists to push
for the phase out of chlorinated compounds. Yeah.
I wonder why. Smart people who understand the
science are going, stop using these in general.

(01:43:53):
And they go, no. Politicians say we shouldn't
care. It says, but the chlorine
industry says the proof just isn't there.
Oh, I see. So the industry who has
a profit motive and would lose everything if
you stop making these allowable
feels that you're wrong, scientist. I wonder why.
It's a shocking thing to find out. And
guess who they leaned in with? Guess who

(01:44:13):
the Trumps and the Kamalas of the world
leaned in with? Big business.
That's how this works with the GMO dynamic,
with everything we talk about, even the trans
conversation, guess what they were leaning in with
for a year? Well, the politicians say
the the
the experts in the field, when in reality,
the science was already there, no. You're killing
kids. You are

(01:44:35):
deforming them for life. In this case, you're
getting them sick. And the chlorine of the
shots you're giving them, no. You're I mean,
all of it's the same conversation.
The people with the interest in maintaining the
problem
seem to disagree. Israel will investigate themselves.
This is who we're dealing with.
But it says and that and that you
can't convict an entire class of chemicals based

(01:44:56):
on a few bad ones. Well, yeah. You
really can if we actually were doing our
job of, you know, the Environmental Protection Agency.
But instead, they did absolutely nothing. Right? So
they listened to chlorine. They went further. Just
they said, okay. We can't do all of
it, so we'll find something better. And then
they just didn't do anything.
A commission formed
by the US and Canada oh, I'm sorry.
A commission was formed to pretend to do

(01:45:17):
something to study pollution in the great lakes
agree in the pollution in the great lakes,
and they agree. It says the weight of
the evidence is there that we are, through
these findings or through these discharges,
affecting the way humans are developing. So in
this case, they tested the Great Lakes, which
are just riddled with all sorts of chemicals.

(01:45:37):
And the point is they're they're telling you
these things are in
it's ubiquitous,
and we're we're affecting the way that the
human species is developing. Children.
No one knows what's being put out there.
Very few of these things are tested. Almost
none of them being tested for anything other
than cancer,
So we don't even know what we're doing
to ourselves still. That's my point. That's like

(01:45:59):
testing for VOCs or some surface level conversation.
Even these chemicals we're pointing to, they're only
saying, well, if they cause cancer or not.
Yeah. Because that's the full scope of humans,
the human problem. Right?
No. But see, if you ignore the 40
year long reproductive issues and immunity depression,
they will and and and guess what? That
would also cause us cancer. That too. Their

(01:46:21):
point is that they're choosing to omit this
is 1995,
choosing to mist the forest for the trees.
It says wildlife experts across the nation have
long blamed these chemicals for birth defects,
thinning eggshells.
Government tests show the waters off of South
Central Florida are heavily chlorinated with pesticides or
chlorinated or heavy with chlorinated pesticides.

(01:46:43):
Fishermen like Walter, this this fisherman they're discussing,
have watched their catches dwindle and wondered why.
Lastly, it says, they wonder,
but who's doing much about it?
Who is looking at the environmental end of
it? Where is this all coming from? Nobody
wants to give us any answers. This is
then it's the same thing now. So despite
the fact that CNN was going, look at

(01:47:04):
this because people were interested, they just nobody
who was in a position to do anything
about it
was doing anything about it.
And it says it's not so much that
no one wants to give the answers. It's
just that they're hard to get. We're talking
about 100 chemicals, and the chlorine industry believes
each one should be tested and judged separately,
a process that would take years of research,
1,000,000 of dollars, and they're not gonna spend

(01:47:25):
that, mind you. And it says that issue
is whether our health can stand the weight.
Okay. So this gives the politicians of the
time, who actually don't care, an out.
They can go, okay, then start the testing,
and then somebody pretends and feigns some kind
of interest, and we begin the testing. And
then as I said last time, another administration
comes along,
2, 3.

(01:47:46):
No one's even caring. We don't even remember
what how we what color or we don't
remember what we did that morning, quite frankly,
in the political sphere, let alone what
ongoing investigations are supposed to be done by
an industry that doesn't care about your health
while pretending to.
My point is they didn't do that.
They're still using them. We're still burning them.
We're still dumping them in lakes, and nobody

(01:48:07):
cares because the industries that were supposed to
be enforcing this were captured by the chlorine
industry or captured by big pharma or captured
and captured and captured,
or were never there to begin with.
Sorry. I know I'm jaded, but that is
the reality we're dealing with here.
Now, also, just a couple of out the
door points,
it should kind of you know, just to

(01:48:27):
kinda show you how ubiquitous this truly is.
So, again, if you're gonna take this at
face value and pretend, okay. They were investing
in this, and we're looking how to fix
it. Right? 1995.
We're gonna do our best to minimize this
down. Okay. So pretend that was the case.
Then explain for me how in the world
we can have
vinyl or specifically,
polyvinyl chloride

(01:48:48):
flooring
that kind of off gases dioxins
or PVC pipe that literally use shuffles your
water around.
All of these things are literally creating dioxins.
So if they knew dioxins were a problem,
why would they become so ubiquitous to the
point that they're using these things? Not not
the actual background dioxin, but chlorinated, vinyl chloride,

(01:49:10):
all these things are used constantly in ways
that are caught right up against your health
or your body or what you're putting in
your body.
Here's a just a random article.
Artesian
wood floors, the dangers of luxury vinyl tiles
and why you should avoid them. Think about
how wild it is. This could be, like,
such a casual article, but all the way
back then, they're going, oh my god. We

(01:49:30):
need to do something about this. Does it
appear they did something about it? No. It
appears that they turned their eyes away and
took money.
It says luxury vinyl tile is made up
mainly of polyvinyl chloride.
The US government now has regulations against the
use of harmful harmful materials on everyday items,
such as PABA in bottles or lead in
paint.

(01:49:51):
That's as far as it goes, though, pretty
much. Unfortunately, no restrictions exist regarding the use
of polyvinyl chloride and other toxic chemical compounds
in some floor materials. Now this is lower
end of the risk, but it says numerous
tests have shown
that polyvinyl chloride flooring is harmful
and that luxury vinyl is toxic.

(01:50:12):
Okay. So why would it how does that
even how can it be said if if
if we could study it and go, yeah.
That's toxic.
Even if it's to a degree that it's
like, well, it's not immediately life threatening, why
would that be allowed in a supposedly regulated
industry?
Well, you're telling me I can't collect rainwater
or I can't eat raw milk, but, yo,
go ahead and put some toxic tile in

(01:50:33):
your house because it's not that bad.
These people don't actually care about your health,
and I think it's shockingly clear.
It goes on to say,
polyvinyl chloride is known carcinogen
and contains health and environmental toxins, such as
dioxins
and and, and, and, phthalates.
That was what what it was. Right?

(01:50:54):
Phthalates, I think.
Spelled p h t h a l a
d s. And the point is that these
are both dangerous.
So they can admit in this current article
that, yeah, they've got dioxins in them, but
then it comes up in a discussion where
these things might be released in an immediately
dangerous situation, and everyone's baffled by what we're
talking about.
It's just so stupid how obvious it all
is. And they're putting the so all the

(01:51:15):
way back then, we're worried about this coming
problem, but here, it's in your floor tiles.
Seems pretty silly to me. Don't you think
we could make these things without byproducts? Yes.
That means stopping using the ones that caused
them. But, no, I'm sure it's cheaper and
easily produced and lasts longer. So who cares?
Right?
It says the phthalates in the flooring,
on the other hand, this is a separate

(01:51:36):
but equally problematic issue, can become a significant
problem for you and your family.
While many phthalates
have regulations
prohibiting them from being used in children's toys
and other examples,
No current regulations are banning them or limiting
their use in flooring,
you know, that you step on all day
and you lay on and, you know, whatever
else your dog sits on. It says, although

(01:51:57):
the CDC
reports that more than 90% of Americans,
get ready for this, already have measurable levels
of ballots in their bodies from various sources,
the chemical still poses a risk,
particularly to developing children.
This is exactly my point.

(01:52:17):
See the way they frame that. So it's
okay. It's dangerous. Yes. Okay. It does pose
a risk to children. They already regulate it.
It can't be in children's toys,
but their point is, well,
it's kind of already everywhere. It's already in
your body from different sources. So you know?
But it's supposed to still there. So, like,
they're kind of brushing off the risk because
what are we gonna do about it?

(01:52:39):
How in the world are you an EPA
pretending to be what your job is and
have so many examples of a problem that's
gotten so bad that it's just everywhere. So
now we just kinda pretend it doesn't matter.
But don't don't worry about all your, you
know, your flus and your sickness and your
cancers and your all the you know, that
don't worry about all that. We're doing our
job. Get your flu vaccine. You know, it's

(01:53:00):
like, this is frustratingly obvious.
I'm gonna I'm gonna show you a point
about this next. But it says studies have
shown that phallus
can cause severe learning and developmental disabilities in
children at high levels of exposure. So, guys,
in case you realize what that
though okay. High levels of exposure. Sure.
But the bottom line is

(01:53:20):
even a small amount will cause a smaller
level of that same problem.
That's how it works. Just because it needs
it's not like at some threshold, it immediately
causes severe learning disabilities. The point is that
this stuff is dangerous. So the more you
take it and, arguably, especially dioxins, the more
it builds up, the more that problem continues.
So how about if your children are playing

(01:53:40):
on the floor? Most people that use this
stuff have no idea.
Phthalates can also affect the endocrine system.
Could you have guessed? You didn't see that
coming, did you? Causing changes in hormones, cell
signal pathways, and disrupting reproductive health.
Some phthalates are even known to be cancer
causing.
Luxury vinyl flooring is known to emit these
toxins, but it looks real nice, though.

(01:54:02):
When it comes to smaller, lesser ventilated areas
of your home, the buildup of phthalates will
be more severe due to the size of
the space and lack of ventilation.
How is that even allowed?
They're writing articles about how it's dangerous. You
should avoid them, but, sure, your regulatory agencies
are like, whatever.
Unreal.

(01:54:23):
Now here's what it says in the in
the Wikipedia.
It says, in studies of rodents
exposed to certain phthalates,
high doses have been shown to change hormone
levels and cause birth defects.
This is just
shown on your floor. A study in period
this is just balance, by the way, not
even the dioxin side of it. And and

(01:54:43):
the point they make in the article, by
the way, is, you know, heat is what
usually would cause the the polyvinyl chloride to
have a a release of dioxins. Well, what
about people on heated floors or other radiators?
Now that's the point they make in the
article. That does cause some level of release.
But it says a study in the peer
reviewed journal, environmental pollution published in October 12,
2021
found that high phthalate levels

(01:55:04):
are weakly correlated with a greater risk of
dying from any
cause and with a stronger correlation to dying
from heart problems.
Perfect.
More heart problem overlaps, more endocrine dumping chemicals,
more immune with the suppression, more reproductive downfall.
The study estimated that phthalates may contribute to
91,000

(01:55:25):
to a 107,000
premature deaths each year among people aged 55
to 65 in the United States. But no
big deal, EPA. You just keep doing your
nothing job. Right? 107,000 people's extra deck because
you, you know, like your nice flooring or
whatever else is in. Phthalates enter the bloodstream
and disrupt sex hormone production. Weird.

(01:55:46):
Interfering with sexual development in infants and sexual
behavior in adults.
So it's kind of like the remember the
point they keep making about the COVID 19
shot discussion? How they kept going, no. It's
a small problem.
And it wasn't, though. But even if it
was, my point was fine. So you let's
pretend it's a small, small, small problem. Well,
there's a 1,000 of those small problems. So
how many compile together before it all becomes

(01:56:06):
a huge risk? Well, it's obvious. Same point
here. How many things we could point to
that you can prove that are out in
your air, in your food, your water that
cause
reproductive issues, and they're disrupting chemicals
or
immune suppression.
Okay. Well, tiny bit tiny bit generally accepted
as safe. Okay. Fine. What if you have
a 1,000 of them in the water?

(01:56:28):
I think this is an obvious reality of
where we are. That says ballots act
by mimicking the female hormone estrogen, which in
turn inhibits production of the male hormone testosterone.
Phthalates are considered to be endocrine disruptors.
Surprise, surprise. Then even more interesting,
guess what? You know that endocannabinoid
system they don't really want you to know
you have because they wanna pretend like that's

(01:56:49):
something that only people who smoke weed have?
No. Your body is naturally born with an
endocrine disrupt an endo excuse me, endocannabinoid
system.
You don't have receptors for everything. Your body
was literally designed,
whatever you think designed it,
with the dis with the ability to use
and maximize your body's use using cannabinoids.

(01:57:11):
Yes. That means hemp and cannabis. I'm not
talking about smoking. I'm talking about ingesting the
plant.
And guess what phthalates do? They block that.
They literally block your your cannabinoid system.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up,
and that's very important. I'm not gonna go
into it now, but that is world changing.
Finally,

(01:57:31):
there may be a link between obesity epidemic
and endocrine disruption and metabolic interference. So it
also makes you fat, apparently.
So just thinking about how problematic these things
are.
And here, we know that they're in flooring,
and my point is PVC pipes, polyvinyl chloride.
That's what we just talked about. Now not
only is it just on the ground, but

(01:57:53):
using your water.
What about hot water, guys?
This is not a joke. This is the
one of the most obvious examples
of ubiquitous use of something that they know
makes you sick.
And then you're running 100, you know, 160
degree water through pile
polyvinyl chloride, there's no question.

(01:58:13):
This is why you need to get away
from all these broken systems. Start using
our water systems and fit, you know, the
pipe. But even then, these kind of things,
especially dioxins, are not something you can just
easily get rid of.
This is why it's such an important story
for me. The more it's not just about
these locations, it's about the developing reality that
I'm seeing. This is something that is I
mean, almost to the point that it's again,
this is why most people just ignore it

(01:58:34):
because it's like even if we go to
a point where we acknowledge nothing can be
done about it, the only story is we
need to show that they did this and
that they've allowed this, but most people don't
want that story.
It's not as exciting and enticing as all
the partisan lies and half truths, but the
truth is, guys, that they've done this to
you at at at the very least
through ignorance and malfeasance.

(01:58:55):
PTC
pipes are widely used
plumbing systems,
but they've raised health and environmental concerns about
the presence of dioxins
and phallus. We just went over this. So
the phallus also on the floor that are
clearly a bigger problem, but the immediate
immediate sense are being dumped into your water
because you use these pipes.

(01:59:16):
Dioxins produced during PVC manufacturing, incineration, fires, extremely
toxic carcinogen.
And, of course, my point is the hot
the heat is what draws it out.
Fallots
added to PVC to make them flexible,
classified as
endocrine disruptors linked to various health problems,
Exposure to dioxins and fallouts through PVC pipes,

(01:59:37):
that's what we're talking about, can occur during
manufacturing, installation, and use.
Communities near these manufacturing sites are obviously dealing
with these problems. Leaching of ballots and PVC
from PVC pipes into drinking water can pose
health risks.
So why are we using them then?
Because they don't care even though they've known
about this for decades.

(01:59:59):
Unreal to me. Absolutely unreal. Now, again, to
finish,
don't forget that in East Palestine, they're only
just you know, in June in June of
2024, are they only admitting finally that, yes,
yes, it went 16 states across
despite them screaming things like conspiracy theory and
dangerous and well, we were trying to tell

(02:00:19):
you that based on the science.
Rain and snow samples
from Wisconsin to Maine and North Carolina
have shown you these chemicals are present, which
there's only way that can happen is if
this plume went all the way to these
states, which means the dioxins went that far.
Remember, even as CNN would tell you,

(02:00:40):
travels thousands of miles away.
Very important. And it says the analysis included
inorganic compounds
because the federal government does not check
precipitation
samples for organic compounds
like dioxin or PFAS, which were also likely
omitted and spread far from the fire site.

(02:01:00):
That is in this article.
Oops. That's weird. That's so weird how that
happens.
It was it wasn't like that when we
started
and just payroll just started all of a
sudden. Hold on. I mean, I already showed
you the the,
screenshot, but I want you to see this.
Include this anyway then.
Archive.

(02:01:24):
So the analysis. So what they're showing you
here, again, this is this is from
June 2024, this year.
They're looking for the range of inorganic compounds.
Like, they're just testing 16 states away.
Why would they even think to do that?
Because they know. They know, guys.
Sixteen states. Like, why would you ever wonder
whether a fire in East Palestine was affecting

(02:01:46):
you 16 states away?
It says the analysis included or inorganic compounds
because the federal government does not
check
these samples for things like that. Why not?
You see see how exacerbating this is? They
already know that's the problem. That's likely why
they're testing, but they're gonna tell we're not

(02:02:07):
gonna publicly tell you that. We're not gonna
test for dachshund or or PFAS, mind you,
the 2 of the biggest issues that we
see growing.
And then even the Guardian says, which were
also likely emitted by the fire spread. So
the most dangerous chemical that might have gone
this far, you're not even gonna test for?
Because, let's see, that's the most dangerous chemical
in the conversation.
And even the Guardians can deduce that probably

(02:02:29):
what they did go there, and they don't
even test for it. How do you not
see
willful disregard? They don't want to look at
it. They don't want you to see them
looking at it.
Kills me. Now since we've mentioned it more
than once, just also include this article, just
showing how casually you're being poisoned.
This is an article from March of 2023.
Weirdly, after these Palestinian conversation where a lot

(02:02:51):
of us are putting a lot more pressure
on what PFAS was,
another example of something they've allowed to get
crazy, they know they can't deal with, so
they just ignore it even though it's super
dangerous for you, PFAS or forever chemicals. According
to today,
the whatever the today dot com,
exposure to PFAS
can reduce women's fertility by 40%.

(02:03:12):
So now we told you, so let's all
ignore it and move forward like it doesn't
matter because they're not gonna stop doing it
despite what that that crazy that number is.
They're still using it. They're still using all
of this stuff. How do you explain that
without acknowledging that they don't care about you?
Now corporate America also highlighted this back in
2023.
Chloracne, which we were talking about today, He

(02:03:33):
says, as you know and pointed out in
the last show, it's a while back, is
the leading indicator and marked for acute bouts
of exposure.
This could be a 1000000 times worse than
these Palestine that people are already showing those
symptoms.
No. He's not talking about today. He's talking
about one that kind of flew into the
radar, which CDH covered,
which was in Richmond.

(02:03:53):
Quote, people who have been unintentionally
exposed to large amounts of these chemicals from
a plastics,
factor that's burning
have developed a skin condition called chloracne.
Liver problems,
elevated blood lipids. That's that's rapid.
I guarantee you, if somebody studies people, they're
gonna be dealing with all those problems far
worse forever.

(02:04:14):
This is I mean, and this kills me
that we didn't even we didn't get there's
so much going on. Thank you for for
corporate America pointing this out. Here's the actual
article if you wanna read it. Definitely toxic.
100 forced from homes as Indiana plastics buyer
continues to burn. Now and, again, I know
plenty of you showed this to me. Show
some plenty of you. Send it my way.
Just how it goes. There's so much going
on. Right? There's just sometimes you just got
to pick and choose who you're gonna cover.

(02:04:34):
But the more this comes up, the more
when you start recognizing this is a huge
deal. So in Richmond, Indiana,
I guarantee there was a lasting dioxin overlapping
problem in these areas because of what this
one thing was. And who knows how many
more there are? It doesn't matter how ubiquitous
it is. They're responsible for ignoring this problem
and pretending like it doesn't matter.
And, by the way, we did talk about

(02:04:55):
this.
Fire, quote, could burn for days at Richmond
Plastic Waste Plant. This could be worse than
Ohio.
The problem was we just only we, you
know, we talked about it once, and we
probably should have focused on it a lot
more.
Now, lastly,
this was called shutdownbiolab.com.
Resources
will be updated. Base basically, this is a

(02:05:16):
site for resources and kind of focal point
reference point for you guys in these areas
or anywhere else who wants to take part
to get this dangerous thing out of their
town. Or how about we start making a
larger movement to get these things out of
our country or out of existence?
Because we need to start realizing these are
the kind of actions we need to be
calling for. We can't be talking about moving

(02:05:36):
from state to state or moving them even
out of the country. Other people are gonna
suffer. These things need to stop.
These labs, these chemicals that we know are
dangerous. I don't care what your justification is.
I don't care how people who might lose
their jobs. This is a bigger issue. And,
yes, we can find the bottom line is
I'm not trying I of course, you know
that I do. I care about people in
suffering.
My point, though, is that it's not as

(02:05:57):
simple as saying their jobs are gone. We
can find other I I would argue that
these people and anybody in these positions,
they're probably suffering by working at these locations.
In any case, the point is there are
other places that people can work. We can,
you know, shift things in different directions. I
think we can take the brunt of the
problem and just stop allowing these to be
used. My point is, like, doubt that will
ever happen until we start with much smaller

(02:06:20):
problems. You know, like recognizing we're being stolen
from and these fake selections or that our
other countries are influencing our outcomes in this
country. But maybe maybe we start with the
immediate problems. We can eventually start recognizing how
the ones that are acting not in your
name are poisoning you on top of that
while stuffing their pockets full of money. I
arguably just point that, you know, we
there is a path forward where we can

(02:06:40):
stop allowing these things to exist,
and at the same time,
seeing a a a a real benefit immediate
in in whether it's jobs or whether it's
people's experiences, whether it's the health of the
towns at large.
I just
what they're doing to us
in a,

(02:07:02):
well, in a large sense, your federal government,
let's say, or whoever we're talking about.
It doesn't have to be in your mind
that this is somehow some kind of concerted
evil plan. I don't know how you can
it's pretty hard not to consider that with
how bad this looks. But what I'm saying
this for is that if we focus on
what we can prove,
and we know that this is we can
prove they know about this, we can prove

(02:07:23):
that this is something that has been allowed,
that is where we need to begin in
this conversation and highlight the fact that they're
allowing it to continue now. And that's a
good starting point right there to initiate the
conversation like they're doing in this one location
to say, we don't want that here anymore.
We don't wanna allow these chemicals to exist
in here. We don't want train track coming
through with your with any of this stuff.
And these are real possibilities.

(02:07:45):
The problem is we need more momentum than
just a couple of people or people suffering.
We need people like you out there listening.
We need people in the in the immediate
position to start talking about it because the
change needs to happen for obvious reasons. So
thank you for tuning in today and continuing
to push these things out of the conversation
because very very few people are talking about
this right now. And I find this to
be a a

(02:08:06):
national story.
Not just what's happening there, but that too
is I mean, just like he's Palestinian. We're
talking 16 states away. This is a national
story, but it's also about recognizing how little
they truly are acting in your interests in
every part of the conversation.
So keep that in mind as we step
into another selection when both sides of the
paradigm are actively gonna maintain this problem just

(02:08:26):
like they have for decades past. Now, look,
you can appoint an RFK in the in
in the dynamic, and I'll I'll I hope
you're hope you're right, that maybe that's the
change.
I just don't see that being the case
with the different examples we've already have. But,
you know, if you believe that, then, truly,
I respect your choice. If you truly believe
that is the best option,

(02:08:47):
not just a lesser of evil in the
dynamic when, sadly, I think it's gonna go
in the same direction. So we need to
find a different path. But I'll leave it
there because it's a entirely different conversation. But
get this information in front of people that
need to see it. Show people in Georgia
if they don't know it's there. Offer the
help for people that need it.
Time to push back.
I love you all. As always,

(02:09:08):
question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Conyers, Georgia BioLab Fire “Could Be The Greatest Dioxin Disaster In History”

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

Conyers, Georgia BioLab Fire “Could Be The Greatest Dioxin Disaster In History”

Stuff You Should Know