HHS’ Human Trafficking Problem, Make BlackRock Great Again & ICC Issues Arrest Warrant For Netanyahu

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Central bankers of the g 7 nations went
into
the room in Jackson Hole in August 2019,
and they voted on the going direct reset.
Everything that's happened to us right now is
part of the going direct reset, and they
voted on it. It was a plan.
Okay? So they wrote a plan.
They decided to do this.
So they've been

(00:20):
they've been engaged in the financial coup for
20 years. We're now coming into the end
game. They have to consolidate the financial coup,
and they vote on the going direct reset.
And with that one decision,
they made a decision over the next year
to put 500,000,000 people out of work.
That's the equivalent of dropping several nuclear bombs

(00:41):
around the world.
That's financial warfare
and they made it intentionally,
they made it knowingly,
and it was a plan.
And
what is very important to understand when you
think about this pandemic
is
people are not dying from
magic viruses. People are dying from tyranny.

(01:02):
They're dying from a great poisoning that's part
of that tyranny.
But
our problem and the thing we need to
be afraid of is tyranny because the tyranny
is about to get much, much worse.
And and it's the passports
and and that system of Central Bank Digital
Control
that will give them the ability to do
that.

(01:42):
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Saturday, November 23, 2024. Thank you for joining
me today.
Been a minute. A lot going on in
the background. I wanna try and get caught

(02:03):
up on some really important things. But today,
definitely standing out to me is the
continual overlap of I mean, BlackRock is something
that really stood out because of a couple
of the conversations that I was having today
and some planned IMA panels and different things
we have coming up in the next couple
of weeks.
But interesting how many different examples like that
are standing out

(02:23):
that would be called out
in any other context.
The interesting part of this is it's beginning
to show people on all sides of the
paradigm
that something different is happening right now. Something
a little bit more disconcerting than just the
other side fighting against our side. The reality
that we're always talking about that it's bigger
than
2 false a false paradigm. Two sides pretending

(02:44):
to fight each other with the people not
knowing that, but ultimately allowing them to distract
you from what's really happening. And what Catherine
was talking about there in the opening has
extended this is that was from during the
COVID 19 illusion era, which is not really
ended, of course, but now we're in a
different phase.
But whether we're talking about passports
I mean, it all kind of center centers

(03:06):
around as Catherine and I have talked about
on this show many times. Digital identification,
you know, vaccine passports, social credit. These things
are all sim all synonyms, really. I mean,
it's really just about how it's applied. Because
at this point, whether it's under a vaccine
conversation or some threat of a biological weapon,
which we'll actually talk about early in the
show today, or
the border.

(03:27):
Bad immigrants.
Whatever it is to get you to go,
yes, I want that control structure. And that's
what's happening right now. And I honestly
and again, this is a seemingly unpopular opinion
anywhere today.
I actually think most people see this,
especially in the conservative movement, but they just
don't know what else to do. Now, I
could be wrong about that, of course. But
more people that I talk to

(03:48):
are increasingly uncomfortable about the picks that he's
making, about the people that are in the
cabinet. And as much as this is, of
course, the way that it flip flops aimed
now at the Republican administration, if you've been
watching this show long enough, this is not
about left or right. It's the same concerns
we had about the people packed into Biden's
administration or Obama's you know, any you go
far back as you wanna look. And today,

(04:08):
the reason it's more, in my opinion, concerning
as I've expressed many times in the you
know, a long way back, but recently more
than than
probably the most last so many weeks more
than ever,
it's clear to me that they're escalating this
direction. I mean, really, I think it's clear
to anybody that's paying attention to the signs
and what's coming. And it's certainly possible as
well that Trump and his inner circle don't

(04:29):
even know that. I find that really hard
to believe,
but we're gonna go over that to start
in general today about these
the the well, actually, I I forgot I
rearranged a little bit. We're gonna get into
that at general middle part of the show
around the different picks, the continuation of that,
which, again, are are only more so relevant
once these things become official, but important to
demonstrate the direction, at least the nods to

(04:51):
people that are paying attention to that. But
the concerning direction of the policy that's being
laid out and what this shows you as
we were just highlighting. But I wanted to
start today with 2 things that are, 1,
sort of a deviation from what we've been
talking about recently, which is something that stood
out to me that I think makes an
important point
around
just the government in general, which, again, if
you don't know that and new to this
show, I'm of the mind that this is

(05:13):
not a left right concept. People are on
one party or are you know, identify as
being a liberal or democrat. People identify as
being conservative or republican.
But my point is that from the government's
perspective,
it's just different facades of the government control
structure in order to stop you from paying
attention to who's actually controlling your life. And
at this point, it's becoming more and more

(05:33):
obvious, which is why it's getting more and
more uncomfortable and more and more pressured and
more and more vick full of vitriol and
anger and negativity and pointing at your neighbor
as the problem.
And if that doesn't make sense to you,
if you stand back and look at the
kind of as I've said recently, the kind
of linear progression of the agendas,
The main in war focused foreign policy, the

(05:55):
agendas have continued to go in the same
direction. Now that doesn't mean everybody involved knows
this, but at least ask yourself if you
think that's possible. At least it may be
some core
driving,
you know, inner circle of whatever we're dealing
with, the deep state, if you will, recognizing
that, hey. If we keep these people fighting
each other, we can keep the agenda going.
That includes the Trump cabinet and the Biden
cabinet and the different parts of the DNC,

(06:17):
the RNC. I'm convinced there are people within
all of that. They're in some somewhat
some level of no, if not possibly all
the way aware of it. But I don't
think these people represent the deep state, whatever
that means to you, the unelected power structure.
So if we look at it like that,
which is interesting because Trump's
kind of focus is fighting the deep state.
Right?
Well, if his actions are continuing, what we

(06:38):
can prove is the deep state's, whatever that
means to you, and just simply the unelected
power structure behind all this, the oligarchs, and
what they have continued to progress and drive
forward, and we can see that continuing, at
least ask whether even if he thinks he's
doing that, maybe he's not. Maybe they're all
being played. But that's the main point is
the outcome.
What can we see happening? What has always

(06:58):
been going on? And connect the dots. And
that financial part stands out more than any.
And that's going back to BlackRock. We'll talk
about that in a minute. But I wanted
to start on the point of opioid crisis
and the kind of ongoing not just that
crisis, but using that as a lens to
see the government corruption in all of it.
And that's what I was explaining that for
is the point that it's just gov your
the government continuing to allow itself and people

(07:20):
that it's using in certain circumstances to just
completely skate by with no accountability. And we
see that nowhere as obvious as in politics.
It never stops. A perfect example of what
we'll get to in the later part of
the show with Netanyahu and the ongoing genocide.
Maybe, breaking the kind of logic I put
forward there, hopefully, that they will see some
accountability there. But with what's been going on,

(07:42):
it's you know, I don't I I I
am actually of the mind that we're gonna
see something. I don't know how in the
world they could let you need some hell
of a release valve to let us think
something has shifted. I I think someone like
a Netanyahu or somebody in the context of
COVID, for example, like a Fauci, is going
to be held accountable in some way. But
oops.

(08:02):
Bitch. Bitch shoot again. That happened yesterday. I
don't know why I bet she started doing
that. But, anyway,
the point is I do think there's gonna
be some level of accountability, but I worry
that it'll be used to pacify as opposed
to actually solve the problem. And I see
the same thing going through the Trump administration
dynamic. But I wanna start with this opioid
point because I think it's interesting how long
this has been going on and how few

(08:23):
people have actually been legally held accountable. Not
financial
ish like with Wells Fargo, not a a
$1,000,000,000
slap on the wrist because that's what it
ultimately amounts to when they're making 1,000,000,000 a
year,
but actual legal accountability for cheap for deliberate,
proven choices that show that they meant to
do things that cause death. Because of finances,
because of profit. Same thing with the government.

(08:45):
And we're also gonna talk about the idea
of the HHS and the human trafficking dynamic.
I was recently on Ben Swan's show talking
about that. I I haven't actually seen it,
but I'm sure it'll be out there somewhere.
And I think this is important to think
about in the context of the, again, the
same kinda point. Obviously, there's eras to point
at, and specifically, as as Derek wrote today,
the Biden administration's legacy of migrant children trafficking.

(09:07):
But it goes beyond just Biden's administration, and
it's not about Trump's either. It's about the
government and how long this has been going
on regardless of what party is in place.
Very important. But there are very important moves
that happened during Biden's administration
that should not be broadened out to one
or the other. This is important to show
that Biden's administration and Biden, if you think
he's the one making these decisions,

(09:28):
are either way, he's accountable for it, are
making have made,
I mean,
unnerving shifts that show that I don't know
how you can look at this without seeing
something a lot darker than just
incompetence.
We're gonna go over that early, and then
we're gonna get into the BlackRock overlap with
Trump's administration
and different picks that are being made. Of
course, surprise, surprise, very pro Israel. Even the

(09:49):
Matt Gaetz kinda switcheroo,
she seems to be I mean, interestingly, Matt
Gaetz being one of the only that does
not seem to have provable APAC funding. Get
in out of the way. Here's somebody who's
aggressively pro Israel all the time. It's it's
pretty much what we expected. And we're gonna
talk about the ICC conversation, what's going on
there, and get into some other foreign policy
overlaps that I think are very important. But
I wanna start with a couple of points

(10:10):
that I thought stood out in regard to
censorship that I recently touched on. We did
a show
not too long ago where this
basically
mid show, the entire thing broke down.
And if you guys remember, I don't forget
what exact show it was, but I felt
like I identified
Restream as being the kinda choke point. Doesn't
mean the thing was done deliberately and isn't

(10:32):
nothing to this day has really stood out
as something we can pinpoint as approval. You
know, someone did something.
But, nonetheless, I find it interesting that this
was the response, and it does show you
the only point I'm making with this before
I read it is that this is where
we're going. It may this could have been
something above them, beyond them, something they're using.
That there's choke points everywhere that can be

(10:52):
pulled, and I think we're rather
choked. And I think we can see as
we continue down this technocratic path, we're gonna
see more and more of this. We've already
seen some jumps in much more serious directions
in the context of censorship, but I think
they don't wanna let that out of the
bag just yet. But I think you know,
I'm surprised we have not seen entire domain
names pulled, things like that. Or even further,

(11:13):
once we get into the digital ID dynamic,
just kind of shutting you out in general.
But I wanted to make sure you saw
this. So oh, but but for those who
didn't see the original point, we were streaming
and all of my main show my connections
went down to Odysee, Rock,
Rumble,
BitChute.
Well, some of the other Basically, all the
main ones that we broadcast to. It was
mid show. And I was I I basically

(11:33):
had to cut down short because I knew
I was gonna be rehashing it the next
day and I wanted to be redundant about
it. But it was really difficult to do
that. That all work does all going on
in my mind and I had to shut
it all down and reached out to them.
I said, what's going on? Because I had
Rockstream that was still
excuse me. Rockfin that was still streaming.
And I only have one data stream. And
I just use different platforms to put it

(11:54):
out there. So the point is that means
there was no disconnect from my end with
the data because Rockfin did miss a beat.
I checked it. And so I reached out
and said, guys, what the hell? That's crazy.
Even if it was a mistake, your entire
platform is built on this. You know, I
I I kind of expected explanation,
which things can happen. Here's what they said.
After their investigation, which good on them for
getting back to me because

(12:14):
places like PayPal and the rest, they've never
responded. And I ultimately stole my money, never
responded, pretended there was a process. We all
know how that works out. But here's what
Restream said. To let us know that the
the cause they've discovered,
they're as advised by the developers, the issue
I experienced seems more similar to what they
might encounter from StreamYard.
But I'm using Restream to broadcast for them,
which we it's both, but the point is

(12:35):
that this was their part that got shut
down. StreamYard never stopped.
But it says it's possible that your encoder
got stuck in a way similar to how
our compositor sometimes freezes.
Or it could be that the server got
over overloaded which caused the issue. So it
seems like you're kinda pointing in both directions.
Point is they don't really know, which I
find interesting.
These types of technical problems can sometimes happen

(12:56):
when there's a lot of traffic or temporary
glitch in the system.
So So I mean, we had pretty much
the same traffic we tend to, but at
least as we're being shown. For all we
know, we were spiking a 1000000 viewers and
we just didn't get shown that. Who knows
how this works today? But rest assured, this
is the only it's only an isolated incident,
they say. Once it happens again, feel free
to chat with us again. Fantastic.
So we don't know what's going on. If
it happens again, let us know. That's that's

(13:17):
great. But, you know, at least they wrote
reached out. So my point is we're at
a point now where I don't really know
what happened. Our data never stopped, but Restream
says that they lost connection. So what happened
there? I'm just gonna hope it's a glitch
for now. But you see my concern for
where this goes going forward. I have a
few points on censorship today. On top of
that, you might find this interesting.

(13:37):
Dropbox
randomly
bans my account. I'm going through this today.
So bottom line is, I re I I
was sending I never use Dropbox. I I
usually use WeTransfer.
And I couldn't access it for some reason
the other day, and so I decided to
try to send a large file from the,
Sedona event

(13:58):
for them to use. Because I had I
had many interviews there.
And randomly they emailed me saying, we your
your account's been banned. To unban it, go
through this process. And I click on it
and this is what I get. Unable to
unban account. And I reach out and apparently
nobody can tell me what's going on.
It's just it's crazy. I'm I just laugh
at it these days. I don't if it
was something I use more often I would
be more frustrated about it. But this it

(14:19):
just goes to show you I literally do
not know anybody else in this entire field
that has gone through as much. And I
wouldn't you know me, I'm not someone to
even go into that. For a while, long
time, I even kind of got I didn't
I I didn't like to embrace that. I
don't know. There's probably people more censored than
me. But my god, it just never stops
for me. It's just I I literally have
talked to so every platform I just anyways,

(14:40):
it's unreal. Unreal how this happens. Again, this
could just be some kind of a weird
glitch, but it gets hard to kind of
continue to pretend that's what's going on when
this continues to happen over and over and
over for unjustifiable reasons on platforms that I
barely touch. The moment I start trying to
use it and there's something, you know anyway,
it's it's it never stops.
But we'll talk more about the couple points
about censorship today when it gets back to

(15:01):
the Elon Musk, Twitter overlap. Because, yeah, there's
censorship happening like always, and we've been telling
that for a really long time. Max Egan
got his account back, apparently, but it won't
let him they removed all of his followers,
and they won't let me I they the
followers keep resetting every day. It's very, very
strange.
Now other people
in the kind of Musk circle that they've
happened to like that, they make a big
stink about it and then something changes.

(15:23):
Like, for example, Brooke Jackson, not to say
that she's in Elon circle, but was somebody
that got same thing kind of happened recently.
We all pointed it out.
And then I think the people my point
to make is there's people that are which
I think everyone should support her. I think
she's fantastic. In the more of the Trump
circle that support that because of the COVID
19 focus is her work. And, again, I
think everybody should. If you guys don't remember

(15:44):
Brooke Jackson, she was the whistleblower from from,
the the Pfizer trial, then we were the
first one to interview her. And I think
that's important to point out again. The point
is
that she got it back right away. And
I think it's because a lot of people
were poking Elon about it. This case, we'll
wait and see what happens. But let's not
forget how often this is happening on the
platform that's supposedly saving free speech. We'll come
back to that. Now, Amazon

(16:05):
Piss Jugs is the account that shared this.
Once again, giant corporation avoids criminal prosecution for
destroying the lives of millions. This is a
quick point I wanna make, and I really
think this is so crazy how often this
happens. And it's not just things like this.
One of the most obvious stories where we
have documented
emails back and forth court filings that prove
that not just this company, but,

(16:27):
what's the what's the one I'm blanking on
all of a sudden? The main one.
Gosh. It's frustrating.
The the main companies involved with this to
pull jump put in the chat for me
if you remember the name. It's just not
popping in my head.
Basically, the point is that
prove the proven I have these articles I'll
show you in the next where they knew
what they were doing. They recognized that people
were getting addicted. They recognized that, and they

(16:49):
covered it up, tried to hide it, downplayed
the risk, and then even found ways to
press this where they knew it would benefit
them because people were addicted. And then rolled
that into the NARCAN conversation and tried to
make, Purdue Pharma. Thank you, Katie.
For the point being is they rolled this
in to start making NARCAN or Narcan, excuse
me,
Which was used

(17:09):
to basically save someone's life as they were
OD ing. Like, think about how nefarious that
is. You manufacture the problem. Now, you could
even argue in the beginning, they weren't aware
that it was as bad as it was,
which I know isn't true. But when they
found out they did not they not only
didn't pull back, they pushed harder.
They leaned into all the worst parts because
they were making so much money. And now
we're at a point where even though we

(17:29):
know that, these companies are getting a slap
on the wrist. When they make 1,000,000,000
And by the way, their profits never even
slowed down. And they go, here's a $600,000,000
settlement.
Right? So and by the way, I guarantee
that's probable well, I I don't wanna guarantee,
but by it it's these are class action
lawsuits happening all over.
So,
for example, there was something that happened with
one of these old,

(17:50):
I don't forget one of these companies that
got sued for something that that my my
was one of the companies that I'd used
a long time ago and my data got
caught up in it, you know, whatever. That
happens all the time. And they reach out
and say, you're involved in this because you're
a president. All you gotta do is sign
your name. And you get a check 5
years later for, like, $15.
That's what happens because they reach out to
so many people who are affected by it,
and the lawyers make plenty. And ultimately, I'm

(18:12):
even willing to bet you that there's stuff
behind the scenes that go on between that
and the company to downplay. Ultimately, everyone makes
money,
including the company, except the people that got
suffered that suffered. I mean, this is
the whole thing, and this is what we're
talking about with the dioxin conversation, with glyphosate.
It's organized.
I mean, again,
right out of what we're talking about for

(18:33):
the bigger conversation, It's organized crime. It's what
we're dealing with. That's what these governments are,
if not government in general. And it kills
me that this never stops happening. Here's the
actual article.
Mackenzie nears $600,000,000
settlement with US over opioid claims. And it
says a settlement, and this is the important
part, could come with within weeks, one person
said. And and again, I you can look
into the whether this is 1 person, 40,000,000

(18:55):
people. At the end of the day, it's
about no accountability other than money.
One person said, and says, and would include
a deferred prosecution agreement in which the DOJ
agrees to drop the charges
against Affirm
after a period of time if conditions are
met, along with a settlement of related civil
claims. The details are likely time timing
are and likely timing of the settlement were

(19:16):
first reported Thursday by Reuters.
It just kills me. You you mean, this
is not some small thing.
I mean, even if you want even if
nobody ever died, the amount of criminal activity,
the amount of money that was and we
just go, here. Give us some of the
money back.
I mean, and this this is I guarantee
you there's an overlap with the government as
well. That's usually how this goes, especially when

(19:37):
it's a government fine. What does that look
like? Give us our cut is what it
looks like to me. Now in this case,
we're talking about people getting their settlement. But
either way, they're not gonna get in trouble
for it.
People lost their entire lives to this stuff.
Anyway, we should talk a lot more about
stuff like this because you realize there is
still,
to this day, a state of emergency in
place because of this. We don't talk about

(19:58):
that anymore, but that's my point about this
forever state of emergency and the executive order
governance that we live under today. We do
not live in the place we think we
do, and we need to start being honest
about that.
And I'll include these articles for you that,
you know, again, anytime you're having something a
topic out there and you new thing you
know, something that pops up and you haven't
seen it, look on TLav, put it in

(20:19):
the search bar. I guarantee you we've talked
about it, most likely.
Most of the major topics over the years,
we've had either I've covered on the show.
People have written about it. Or I've in
the past, when we used to do more
of sharing other people's work, you know, it's
it's there's so much there's a decade plus
of work on here. So here are the
few that stood out to me. This is
one that I wrote back in 2016.

(20:39):
The orchestrated addiction of the masses. The sweeping
epidemic affecting you and your children. Nice to
go over this a lot.
And still to this day, I bet you
this will blow your mind. Even though it's
only gotten worse since then, we never talk
about it. This is about the amount
one part about it. This is about the
general it overlaps opioids and a lot of
other things. This graph still today still to
this day blows my mind. How I bet

(21:00):
you it's even gone by now. Let's see.
And it looks like a new site. Gosh,
man.
Just the or the age we live in
is absolutely crazy. And the bot though this
was a government,
posting. And I'll I'm gonna actually make a
point to make a note to find this
again and repost it.
At the time we covered this, This is
about the the the types of drugs that

(21:20):
were in you know, being used.
Now what you'll see here,
under the classification of all psychiatric drugs and
just between the year 0 5 years old,
over a 1000000 people.
Explain for me how often you need psychiatric
drugs for under 5 year olds. How about
just 0 to 1? 204 74,000

(21:43):
month old babies
on psychiatric drugs. Think about how crazy that
is. But it gets more crazy when you
look into specifics like ADHD. You've got month
month old babies,
1500 of them on ADHD drugs. Can you
imagine not making sense to anybody with a
brain?
Or
antidepressants. That's the that's the worst one to
me. 26,000

(22:05):
under 1 year olds, and this is in
2016
on antidepressants,
guys.
Antidepressants,
antipsychotics.
27,000 out of the year 5 5 years
old. I mean, I can go on forever.
This stuff is mind blowing. And this is
it's only gotten worse since then. So I
just think the point is the stuff like
this lingers, and we all get kicked down
the road. We get government BS,

(22:26):
different politicians muddying the waters because they're funded
by some lobbyist. That's where we live in.
Now, again, it's not to say
that there's obviously, it might be like, you
can compare the world we live. Let's still
say the United States to things that existed
100 of years ago. Yeah. And we live
we live comfortably.
We got we have it's but the point,
nonetheless, is that we live I don't we
don't live in the type of world we

(22:47):
think we do.
We're more it's it's sort of like a
brave new world dynamic. We're very pacified.
We there's level of comfort that we have,
but that all stops the moment that you
suddenly do something you're not supposed to and
recognize that you don't have the power you
were told. That's the kind of thing we're
coming up against right now. And most people
are getting very uncomfortable about it, especially those
that have lied to themselves about the world

(23:07):
we live in.
And here's some from 2018.
Rachel Blevins wrote this. Before US troops protected
poppies in Afghanistan, there was no opioid epidemic
in Afghan and in America.
Not not epidemic necessarily, but this was the
point. You can see the correlation with the
occupation of Afghanistan,
the you know, as and remember, don't forget,
and I write about it in this article,

(23:27):
enduring Operation Enduring Freedom, the United States opium
trade in 2016. I wrote this as well.
That, ultimately, you saw a perfect correlation. I
might even have a graph in here, I
guess not. With the occupation
and the increase in opioid use in this
country and realized that the Taliban had this
almost entirely eradicated.
And within the 1st year, over 90% increase

(23:48):
in production
after the US took over and controlled the
area. But that's total coincidence, we're told. And
the moment they you know exactly what happened.
Now we see this disconnect. Oh my god.
Where are we gonna get our drugs from?
That's that was a conversation after they left
Afghanistan. And we can't connect the dots?
This is being done to you
like a lot of other things.
Lastly, the just general search for opioid opioid.

(24:09):
You'll find so many things we discuss on
this that it blow your mind.
For ex this case was,
COVID culprits, same as opioid culprits. Of course,
no surprise there. Opioid crisis leaves 700,000 Americans
dead. Epidemic continues to worsen and evolve. That's
2018.
Opioid crisis not enough. FDA approves drug 10
times stronger than deadly fentanyl back in 2018.

(24:30):
Never stops.
This is the problem,
is that we get pacified by partisan politics.
We as in just the, you know, general
collective, not that everybody feels that way, but
realize that
we, as the population of this country or
the world,
can and do make a difference when we

(24:50):
find our courage to stand against these things
and collectively. And the point is that right
now, I think that's happening. That's where I'm
going with this. Is it right this moment?
That's why we're getting shuffled down the line
into some technocratic control structure because people are
starting to go, I don't know about this
anymore.
Whether it's this conversation, the opioid conversation, the
dioxin conversation, the foreign policy conversation,
you see it too, and I know you

(25:11):
do. Not just the normal people in this
chat, but the people out there in general
are recognizing something's amiss. Now, many of you
may think that Trump's the one that's gonna
fix it, but that's the point. And he
may I hope you're right. But the point
is you'd notice it, and that's why they're
shoving this in your face. So Derek put
a great article out today, the Biden administration's
legacy of migrant children trafficking. Now what's so

(25:31):
horrifying about this is this is not new
at all. And most of the people that
got pay basically
relegated to some Pizzagate category conversation without recognizing
there was a whole lot more than that
that couched conversation that was muddied by all
of the mainstream and even mainstream alternative media
which existed even then, which I in my
opinion, are just not real independent media, were

(25:52):
making it all about the
parts of the story which were relevant to
conclude, but were not even remotely the main
point.
My point is there's always been an issue
with trafficking, with child trafficking, with with
all sorts of conversations. And this is not
by the way, if you care about this
conversation, you already know this. Whether it's about
a documentary or the evidence of the the
the the statistics you can get from the

(26:13):
US government that show that there's a problem.
And now this is about the evidence of
how clearly it's been allowed.
Now be to be clear, this is specifically
focusing on the very important
data points from the Biden administration that are
important to make sure we see that are
specifically
during this administration, but also to recognize this
is not a one administration problem and goes

(26:34):
back a lot longer than even Trump
and has continued.
Now there's been ebbs and flows, but even
during Trump's administration as well, there was clear
points to be made. Now you can make
the same point either way. There wasn't Trump's
fault. There wasn't Biden's fault. There was something
else around them. Either way, it's not about
either of those ideas. It is about the
government
and the US government's continued facilitation of all

(26:55):
of these problems. Opioid crisis,
human trafficking. And these are not jokes. These
are not bombastic claims.
On November 19th, the US senator Bill Cassidy
of Louisiana released a report accusing the Biden
administration of failing to secure the southern border,
resulting in the exploitation
and abuse of migrant children.
The report, the Biden Harris administration's failure to

(27:17):
protect an
unaccompanied children from abuse and exploitation
lays the blame for the crisis at the
feet of the HHS
and their office of refugee resettlement or the
ORR and the d o o l, the
Department of Labor. Cassidy says the Biden administration's
lax immigration policies led to the current situation
where thousands of unaccompanied children have fallen prey

(27:40):
to human trafficking, damn it, and and forced
labor.
I gotta remember that. I hate that. I'm
the one that edits these, sort of miss
something, it drives me crazy.
Write that down.
But
that's just I hate when I see these
mistakes.

(28:01):
Now the point
is we have to remember that there's a
lot more going on than even just the
US government,
you know, percept the way the what the
US government would be trying to achieve. There's
a lot of other entities involved with this.
Now, obviously, the overlap to Israel has to
be discussed in the context of what's going
on today with the weaponized migration overlap. But
it's more than that. Because we can show

(28:22):
plenty of other players in this around the
world. Ukraine being an obvious example.
And the idea that this is not just
a one government dynamic. Now you'll see more
if I mean, if you haven't you don't
understand this yet, as we go through just
this article, you'll see plenty more. But I
hope you'll take the time to research this
more, because I'm telling you, the evidence is
not something to be dismissed.
Who and why absolutely discussed that? But to

(28:44):
pretend like this isn't happening, like, pretty much
happened during the the
Pizzagate dynamic
is irresponsible, to say the least.
And I think that's why that got dismissed.
Because remember, the whole point actually, if I
let's see if I have this.

(29:06):
The point
is that the origin
I'm gonna spell that.
Clinton and trafficking from Haiti,
which is actually here it is right here.

(29:26):
1 of the end since I'm bringing this
up, the point is that if you don't
remember how this went down, there was a
lot of very interesting information swirling around the
hashtag pizzagate.
And, of course, there's a lot of very
deliberate misinformation.
There was a very small part of the
story that had to do with the pizza
shop and what was going on there, but
there are relevant points around that or the
code words and all of this. Read it
for yourself. These things are very, very, very

(29:47):
anomalous. But at the same time,
I would argue and you can clearly point
out, we're not provable at that point. You
could say they meant something else around those
words. But when you start digging into the
rest of it, which is why they got
it couched around the things like I remember
David Seaman, and I'm convinced that person was
part of the manipulation,
Was was relentlessly
focusing on only these code words, and that
was the only thing we have everything about.

(30:08):
And without this supplementary information,
it it was basically it didn't have the
same impact.
And when you find out stuff like this,
the Clinton Silsbee trafficking scandal, the true origin
of Pizzagate, the point being that she got
caught, Silsbee
here, leaving Haiti with with Haitian children,
got arrested and charged with human trafficking. Hillary
Clinton stepped up and got her out, brought

(30:28):
her back to the United States. And to
this I mean, at least at the point
we wrote this,
she now she changed her name to Laura
Gaylor and became a VP of marketing at
Alert Sense, a place for child for child
alerts, missing children. Here's a report from the,
this was Chuck Todd at the time, discussing
discussing how this
allegations of of human trafficking at the state

(30:49):
department. This was literally on ABC.
Read it for yourself. The point is this
was a real story. And this was beginning
this started unpacking much larger story, and I
believe it got manipulated by a lot of
propaganda and some points of those were accurate.
So the reason I bring that up is
to recognize this is not some

(31:10):
this is a story that has been deliberately
couched and covered up for a long time.
Not just HHS, but the idea that the
US government or at least parts of it
have very clearly been involved in stuff like
this.
Now Cassie's report, one of these whistleblowers concluded
the Biden administration took several steps
several steps over the years, which altered the
process by which unaccompanied children are assigned a

(31:32):
guardian, often known as a sponsor.
Typically,
the sponsors must be a family member or
a family friend
who has undergone a vetting process, including a
background check.
And this is where it gets interesting. Why
in the world would there ever be a
situation where you would allow a child to
come? Like, even the conversation of, like, being
sent back to a place that's dangerous or
whatever the whatever the narrative is.

(31:54):
I don't get why it makes sense to
bring a child in and put them through
a process which is which is rife with
abuse in this country. Like, a situation where
there's no parent or no guardian.
The point would be that why wouldn't that
per what child be sent back to the
government processes
of that country? Mexico, for example. Because it's
not necessarily the government of the process. Well,
I personally would find it to be just

(32:14):
as risky. My point is from a political
standpoint. I get why people to me, what
I'm trying to make the point here is
from a human perspective, you can argue that
you wanna keep the child safe.
But it's not doing that when you put
it through a process that seems to be
exploiting them. And that's that is the government
CPS HHS process.
Maybe not all of it or all deliberate,
but that is what's happening. I'll show you
some articles as we finish this. Showing you

(32:35):
how rife this is. And their own data
shows there's a connection to human trafficking through
child services and foster care.
But in this case, my point is, so
people rightly point out, well, why is that
being done? I think it's because of things
like this. Trying to use our humanity to
get us to call for the thing that
helps facilitate this process. I know it's a
dark thought, but there's part of that.
Like, we see with everything else we're dealing

(32:56):
with. Where they like, for example, telling you
they wanna stop child abuse online, so we
have to pass this bill. And all it's
really about is censoring you for all sorts
of other things under the guise of protecting
children that you which, by the way, we
should want. But not in the sense where
the government is gonna use that to shut
everything else down, or in any context that
suppresses your right to free speech.
It's obvious what they're doing. We should absolutely

(33:16):
be fighting this battle, but what they're doing
is the opposite.
So it says, typically, the sponsors must be
a family member, oh, and then,
or a family friend who has undergone a
vetting process including a background check. Now what
you'll find out is all of these things
were, at least some points, completely dismissed.
However, Cassie says the Biden administration weakens the
sponsor vetting process. Now this is my point.
This happened specifically during the Biden administration which

(33:39):
I find unreal. How anybody would make sense
of this? Now actually, one step back, Obama's
administration
is the one that really rolled out some
of these major changes but it seems the
Biden administration has been continuing a lot of
them are making it worse. In August, the
Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector
General, the OIG, released their own report
blaming immigrate blame blaming ICE

(33:59):
for failing to consistently, quote, monitor the location
and status of unaccompanied migrant children once they
were released.
Now what's interesting is it seems this kind
of contradictory point comes keeps coming out where
they go, well, well, tech not ICE necessarily,
but HHS. They say, well, once we give
that over to the family, then you're no
the people involved with that process are no
longer responsible. You're not supposed to be following
them, checking up on them, which seems a

(34:21):
little bit ridiculous. At the same time, they
say that they do have processes where they
continue to make sure they're okay, but then
push back anytime somebody tries to do that.
You'll see what I mean. It's very again,
speaks to exactly what we're talking about.
Now it says the OIG report says that
between 2019
and and, 2023,

(34:41):
448,000,
UCs, meaning
under unaccompanied children,
were transferred from ICE to the US Department
of Health and Human Services, HHS.
More than 32,000
unaccompanied minors did not appear for follow-up immigration
court hearings during the same period.
That means that ICE was unable to confirm
whether these children were still with their sponsors

(35:03):
or whatever or whether they were safe. Now
with with an adult,
obviously, that's very different, but we're talking about
an unaccompanied minor
that you vet, you supposedly vet, and then
hand rather than vet the person as an
adult as the sponsor, and then the government
hands them over.
And then suddenly,
32,000 of them you can't get in contact

(35:23):
with. How is that not immediately the responsibility
of the group since you're the one that
chose the sponsor?
It's not like these are the child picking
and no family member. This that's the point
of the article. As you get into it,
we're talking about them deciding to pick a
sponsor because there's nobody, and they just
can't find them again.
There's no explain there's no need to do
an explanation there. There's something, whether they ended

(35:45):
up in work labor or something else. The
child is no longer accounted for even from
the person that they said was safe to
give them to. There I mean, guess you
could probably think of some other possibility for
why that might happen with not a trafficking
dynamic, but it's obvious to see where that
slants.
When it says,
where was I? That means that ICE was
unable to confirm whether they were still safe

(36:06):
or with their sponsors. Quote, based on our
audit work and according to ICE officials,
unaccompanied minors who do not appear for court
are considered at higher risk for trafficking, obviously,
exploitation, forced labor. The the OIG
also notes that the number of unaccounted for
children may have been much larger.
But due to ICE's failure to issue notice

(36:27):
to appear in court to all un unaccompanied
minors, the changes of contacting
and monitoring the children are to verify their
safety is limited. But let me ask you
something. If we're talking about a notice to
appear that goes to not the child, to
the sponsor that you chose,
why the point is that if you're not
even mailing them, doesn't that seem to or
in some of these cases, doesn't that seem

(36:48):
to add to the picture? It's not like
you tried and they weren't there, but you
just this shows that even if that person
wasn't there, they failed to even begin that
process, which it makes even more clear as
we go through it. I don't know how
you look at that besides deliberate kind of
muddying of the waters, loosening the dynamic so
somebody could take advantage. And even if that's
not your game plan,
obviously, if you're not vetting, if you're not

(37:09):
checking and following up, that's where people will
take advantage.
I mean, it's it's a no brainer. It
says quote, without an ability to monitor the
location and status of the undercover miners, ICE
has no assurance that they are safe from
trafficking, exploitation, or forced labor. And all of
these things apparently are happening by their own
investigation,
many of which are just forced labor where
their, you know, 12 year olds will show
you they're out there doing 14 hour days

(37:30):
of work because they don't know what else
to do. And they're being I mean, it's
it's same difference. Whether it's sex trafficking or
or labor trafficking, I mean, we're talking about
people that are being taken advantage of,
and, of course, children. Now it says under
the exploitation crisis, senator Grassley said in the
that beginning in 2015,
he received whistleblower
information

(37:51):
warning about minors being released to sponsors with
criminal records,
including domestic violence and child molestation.
They're right there, guys. That's a the record
record screams. There's no way
you could possibly reconcile wreck how in the
world they could say, oh, he's got a
record of child molestation, but we'll pick them.
And if anybody we could pick as their
sponsor, because that's what they're talking about.

(38:13):
Minors being released to sponsors that they obviously
choose, or I guess you could argue in
some cases that they didn't choose them, but
that's the main point of this. The children
that are kind of coming through without any
adult with them and they figure out how
to work through the process,
child molestation.
I mean, somebody should go to jail for
something like that. I mean, that's unbelievable. Or
violence for that matter, and these are clear

(38:34):
obviously, there are better paths to be taken.
And that's why the point becomes the obvious
question is there more to that story. What
else are they doing behind this? Now it
says Health and Human Services' unaccompanied
minor program, whistleblowers, Tara Rodas and Deborah White,
were the ones that testified.
Now both Rodas and White confirmed
that the Biden administration's office of refugee settle

(38:55):
resettlement failed to vet sponsors
before giving them guardianship over unaccompanied children.
So which one thing you're gonna see as
we go through this is the it's this
refugee resettlement dynamic.
Is it it's the whole thing coming from
a lot of the right conversations that these
people are the problem. But yet, how do
we not see from every possible angle that
these people are the ones being abused,

(39:17):
taken advantage of? You know? And and then
the whole thing, though, is it's interesting as
you can see that they they get used
in this dynamic, but then also get blamed
as, like, the villain of the problem when
it's on all sides of this, it's governments
using
mostly innocent people.
And even within that, you wanna argue there
are military age males, I'm which I wouldn't
dismiss, the possibly that's the weaponized migration dynamic.

(39:38):
But that's still them using mostly innocent people
to couch their agenda. And there's nobody more
obviously
behind these right now than Israel in multiple
ways, and we've proven this on the show.
That's after she began to express concerns about
corners being cut to more rapidly pay place
children with sponsors,
including
allowing MS 13 gang members to sponsor children.

(40:02):
I mean, that's just there's not I don't
even need to explain that. Rhoda says she
was silenced,
removed from position, and escorted from the agency.
Now not to necessarily try to overlap this
with Israel, but I find it interesting
how how close this is. And to me,
this is not even about the bigger conversation.
It's just about how whether it's the UK
government, the Israeli government, the that they are

(40:22):
of a similar mind in the way that
they respond to these things. At this you
we saw this clip. I just wanna reiterate
it because of how interesting the timing is.
We have to condemn the atrocities that happen
every day to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights vetting
process for arms going to Israel,
And a charity called Defense of Children International
Palestine,

(40:43):
drew our attention at the state department to
the sexual assault, actually the rape of a
13 year old boy that occurred in an
Israeli prison in Moscabia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible.
We put them to Israel to, the government
of Israel. And you know what happened the
next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices and

(41:04):
removed all their computers and declared them a
terrorist entity.
I think it is vital that atrocities not
happen to anyone. Not sexual atrocities, not sexual
violations, not any kind of gross violation of
human rights. We are looking at a situation
where there is so much dehumidification
where people are not seen.

(41:24):
Right.
I mean, just think about the
interesting overlap to that. Right? Instead of going
after the problem,
you go after the person pointing to the
problem. I mean, this happens more than we
recognize, guys.
And so
she was the one
escorted from the agency, removed from her position
because she dared to call out the idea
that it was wrong to give a child

(41:45):
to a gang member. And important, she says,
if I hadn't seen it with my own
eyes, I wouldn't have believed it. And she
goes it goes on to say, Rhoda's also
described a situation where a young girl from
Guatemala was being sponsored by an older man
claiming to be her brother.
After the girl was released to her sponsor,
Rhoda says she found pictures on the sponsor's
social media where he was touching the girl

(42:05):
inappropriately.
She says it was clear her sponsor was
not her brother.
And further, Rhoda's claim the ORR
federal field specialist said the girl, quote, looked
drugged.
And that her sponsor made posts on social
media as if she was for sale.
I just
it says Rodas
and her colleague, Deborah White, a federal employee

(42:27):
for the HHS's ORR program,
claimed they first discovered a case of child
trafficking across the border in June 2021,
but nothing was done.
These are really hard things to overlook.
Because, I mean, obviously, what we're talking about
is the evidence that indicates a child like,
the whole premise of all this is that
we care about children. Right? We have we're

(42:47):
compassionate, so we can't just let them suffer.
And then, obviously, that's not the case, at
least at some level, when you're not following
up or you're you're removing somebody from position
for highlighting that this girl looks like she's
drugged and being sold online.
You're fired. I mean, clearly, there's something amiss
here. Now I'm not gonna be I do
not argue that this is everybody in every
position. That's rarely the case. There's usually good

(43:08):
people, and they just don't know they're part
of something bad. But recognize that this is,
at some level, has to be just a
a systemic thing because of how long this
has been going on and how big can
I mean, if somebody can be fired for
pointing these things out, that means other people
can see it too? So something to consider.
Now it says instead,
White said the children continued after they pointed
out an actual case of human trafficking they

(43:30):
could prove, continued to be sent to dangerous
locations with unvetted sponsors.
How in the world you could pretend unvetted
in any case makes sense?
So your whole point is we need to
keep these children safe, but then just pick
a random adult with no vetting process. And
it says, White called the ORR program, quote,
the biggest failure in government history that I've
ever witnessed
or a deliberate

(43:51):
dynamic. Not saying everyone knows that, but at
some level, creating these kind of shortcuts and
and openings for this to be abused. And
and one of the points we always make
on the show is about war in general.
Right now, there's missing children
all over the place in Gaza, even the
West Bank. In Syria, there were tens of
thousands of children that just never got found
again. Of course, you could argue they got

(44:11):
killed during bombing. But realize that it's darker
than that. There's an entire article about the
missing children of Syria. You know? And this
is what happens on any of these dynamics.
People take advantage of this. And this is
where people then push back against the general
idea of human trafficking like it's a conspiracy
theory. Guys, that is a worldwide industry and
it is nowhere more prevalent than in the
United States. If you're shocked by that, look

(44:33):
into it. They should we we should make
sure we're aware, while we're pounding our chest
and saying the number one greatest thing in
the world, that they're also number 1 in
things that are pretty disgusting.
It says she claims
lead the that the o the HHS's
ORR leadership,
this is what she claimed, allowed children to
be trafficked under their watch.

(44:54):
Quote, what I discovered, she says, was horrifying.
Children were being trafficked with 1,000,000,000 of taxpayer
dollars by a contractor failing to vet sponsors
and process children safely.
With government officials complicit in it,
Deborah White stated during the roundtable.
White recalled situations where children are sent to
abandoned or nonexistent
houses.
Now that stands out to me as something

(45:15):
especially dark because we've had different conversations over
the years about this very topic.
About, you know, during, what was the main
focal point there. There was that whole southern
border conversation
and that that there these have popped up
periodically. But there's one where they found these
these migrant processing locations that were being accused
of some pretty dark things. And a politician,
a member of congress showed up, and they

(45:36):
they called the police, wouldn't let them inside.
It was very there's a lot of these
things that keep popping up over the years
that show you that there's
something that we're not that are being hidden
from even people with power to access what's
going on. And then these companies end up
popping up and disappearing, and it's very, very
strange. And I'm of the mind that there's
this is going on. And this is being
facilitated, being allowed at some level, or people

(45:58):
are being paid to just look the other
way. Lobbying or foreign countries.
But it's saying they recall situations where children
are sent to these abandoned nonexistent houses. In
Michigan, quote, a child was sent to an
open field.
Even after we reported
making a 911 call after hearing someone scream
for help,

(46:19):
yet the child was still sent.
Again,
that's either the most shocking level of
laziness and malfeasance
or deliberately looking the other way.
Having a non existent house, an open field
in this case.
Having 911 calls, hearing people screaming for help,
and they go, no. Go ahead and send

(46:40):
them there.
But that's at least what they're testifying to.
Of course, also consider that there's there's a
they're lying or they have a motivation to
do it, but I mean, the evidence
historically is backed up by this is many
there's more cases than this one.
Mrs. White also said she was admonished when
she brought her concerns
about fake identification
documents to her superiors.

(47:01):
Quote, we never saw sponsors face to face,
and fake documents were rampant.
When we questioned documents,
HHS ORR leadership said, quote, you're not fake
ID experts, and your job is not to
investigate the sponsor.
Your job is to reunify the child with
the sponsor.
How in the world could you make that
statement? So you're the one that's reunifying them

(47:22):
with the sponsor, but you're not supposed to
take responsibility to find out whether they're not
a monster?
Seems pretty crazy to me. And they say,
when I checked on a child's welfare at
another facility, I was told, do not do
that again.
So bringing up fake documents, shut up. You
don't know what you're doing.
When you ask about being brought to a
it says when I checked on a child's
welfare

(47:43):
to make sure that they weren't being heard
after the fact. Do not do that again.
Once these children leave here, this is a
quote, they're gone and you're no longer your
they're your responsibility. So whose is it then?
You're sure as hell not doing it from
the leadership of the HHS.
Doctor Jared Sadolsky,
an associate professor in the school of security
and global studies with 2 decades in the
field of criminal justice and a master's degree

(48:04):
in criminal justice from American Military University,
also testified about his interviews with child traffickers.
He warned about the danger of criminals harvesting
organs from unaccompanied minors.
He said it's a pretty booming industry, and
he even said that he found a 12
year old's eye being sold for $15,000
in Mexico.
The program, quote, prioritize

(48:26):
speed over safety.
HHS,
ORR,
and Cherokee Federal,
which is actually a subsidiary
of Cherokee Nation,
the prime contractor, it says, created a quote
unquote strike team to remove children faster.
Ignoring warnings that came from case managers that
children were being trafficked.
So this is my point. On top of

(48:47):
everything else, you're getting people that are literally
reporting that children are being trafficked and they're
ignoring that. Imagine ignoring that.
When you're
charged to deal with children, to keep them
safe, to get them with somebody to make
sure they're safe, and someone goes, I think
they're trafficking children, you just ignore it. Whoever
ignored that needs to be investigated right now.
It says, please understand,

(49:08):
this is taxpayer funded child slavery, she says.
Sanctioned by our government and brought to you
by NGOs like Cherokee Federal.
Now it says CNB CEO Chuck Garrett also
told the Cherokee Trial Committee now, yeah, there's
parts here we're skipping over, but the point
is they had a they accused Cherokee Federal
being involved, then they went in front of
their tribal council's executive finance committee, and basically

(49:30):
saying that they're making they're wrong. That's not
true. And it says they they told the
Cherokee tribal tribal committee that Cherokee Federal was,
quote, caught in the middle
of an of the national immigration debate. It
has resulted in outrageous and false associations.
There is zero evidence
and zero basis for these claims. Now what's
interesting,
we have to make sure we do give

(49:51):
credence to the fact that this is an
interesting time.
Look, to be clear, in no way am
I disagreeing this is happening. Now when you
get into the idea of where whether Cherokee
Nate tribal
rather, Cherokee
federal
is knowingly facilitating this process or is being
used in the process,
that well, that's really the question. But what's
interesting is you can ask or really just

(50:12):
acknowledge that we see what's going on in
the world.
How there are a an an overwhelming amount
of just shocking lies.
Just completely baseless, bombastic claims that are being
flown out by left and right partisan screamers
about anything we talk about. Obviously, with immigration
and these things are constantly abused. In no
way does that mean we should pretend this

(50:34):
is real, but it's worth considering
that they could be or any number of
these things could be,
as Derek points out later in the article,
part of a
a I mean, they could just outright be
lies, but part of what I continue to
see as partisan
exacerbate or,
exaggeration.
Constantly.
But as we go through, you'll see the
point in this is that it's either way.

(50:55):
That's the point. The the the government
is clearly responsible.
And whether the Cherokee federal is part of
that and knowing should be investigated, for sure.
And and the many other different NGOs that
are being used to facilitate it. By the
way, that's what I was pointing to earlier
about these trafficking migrant centers. There's a lot
of NGOs involved that pop up and, you
know, the it's dip it's more difficult than
the rest of them to actually hold them

(51:15):
accountable,
seeing as how these things are kind of
shell games usually. But it says the allegations
raised by roundtable participants are shameful, they say.
Sickening and unequivocally false. The Cherokee Nation and
its subsidiary entities have not and would never
traffic children, says one of the people involved.
Case managers in in Pomona
were trained to precisely follow all federal guidelines
and policies to vet parents and sponsors, including

(51:37):
criminal background checks. So they're claiming they, at
least, are trained to do so, then weirdly
didn't say we do, but I that's the
point. We do, and we're not doing what
you're saying we're doing, is what their their
statements are. Now it says, I've done some
follow-up on that,
and this is,
senator James Lankford, I believe,
saying, here's the tough part with Cherokee Federal.
Cherokee Federal was drawn into this.

(52:00):
Now this is a person from the government,
so consider that this is them covering for
something else. But either way, he's saying they
don't actually do the selection of where those
kids go, which does seem to be accurate.
Health and human services actually do the final
selection. And then it comes back to the
main point.
Regardless of whether or not Cherokee Federal was
wrongly implicated, Derek writes, in the shortcoming of
HHS's ORR program,

(52:20):
the fact remains that the policy set by
the federal government,
all sides of it are just simply your
government, guys, are to blame.
NGOs like Cherokee Federal were likely overwhelmed due
to the Biden administration's immigration policies,
welcoming tens of thousands of migrants into the
US.
However, these policies predate the presidency of Joe
Biden. But but important to highlight the fact

(52:42):
that the Biden administration, more than anybody,
maybe safer Obama's time frame, have been facilitating
this in very dangerous ways. But on top
of
that, recognize that you could point back to
just the idea of
I mean, one point to make for example
was during the the caravan from Venezuela, and
you could show somebody like Matt Gaetz, who
was or, was it

(53:04):
I think it was Matt Gaetz. Now I
can't remember off the top of my head.
A a Republican senator that was pushing to
allow maybe it was Rubio. I can't remember
now. Pushing to allow more
Venezuelan migrants to be led in the country.
And there's a lot of examples like that.
Of course, that doesn't get included in the
conversation. We point to the idea of whose
fault it is and what but it's I
think it's clearly slanted like most of these

(53:25):
partisan games are, but meant to manipulate you
from looking at all of your government, but
there is accountability on both sides of this.
But in this case, it's important to highlight
that Biden's administration
was centrally responsible for these changes during this
time frame. And that's I mean, there's that's
when there comes to accountability like this, whether
we can point out that historically these other
administrations have done similar things, We're here now.

(53:46):
We have the evidence. These people need to
be held accountable.
But that goes for everything we're talking about
today. But it says, in February 2023, New
York Times journalist Hannah Dreier reported that HHS
data
obtained by the New York Times showed the
agency had lost contact with more than 85,000
children.
That's crazy.
Overall, the agency lost immediate contact with a

(54:08):
third of migrant children.
Dreyer's reporting
was part of the series Alone and Exploited,
which explored the life of migrant children who
crossed the US border without parents and often
end up being exploited.
It says, quote, and this is crazy. This
is just the work part, but still, just
think about this. The shadow workforce extends across
industries in every state. Flouting child labor laws

(54:30):
that have been in place for nearly a
century.
12 year old now what's funny is well,
it's a question about if there's a, you
know, a child that's in his early teens
that wants to get a job and they're
like, there's a different dynamic in there. But
but when you're talking about children that are
being
exploited in the sense that they don't abs
you know, they're being moved into this country.
They don't know what else to do. Many
times, they don't speak the, like, the the

(54:50):
language. They're trapped.
Right? So I my point in saying the
first point is that there are there are
some examples where you can argue when you're
closer to being 18 that there's parts in
there that are frustrating for somebody who wants
to get out. I I just say that
because I was at that point when I
was younger, frustratingly
not able to find a job because you
were being seen as a a minor.
Nonetheless, in this case is the point. You're
talking about kids that don't know what else

(55:12):
to do. They don't know that they're being
trapped, they're being abused, they don't know where
to go, they don't know who to reach
out to. In many cases, they're told that
they do if they say anything, they're gonna
be sent back to where they came from
and they they get stuck.
Now it says, in the extending from in
every state flouting the child labor laws, 12
year old roofers in Florida and Tennessee.
Underage slaughterhouse workers in Delaware. That's just crazy.

(55:32):
Mississippi, North Carolina. Children sawing planks of wood
on overnight shifts in South Dakota.
Now what happens if they hurt themselves?
Who knows? I mean, maybe they never get
seen again. Like, that's the kind of world
we're living in with this stuff, guys. Because
if you're working with undocumented
children labor, you're not gonna take them to
the hospital.
These people are operating under the law or,

(55:52):
outside the law. Excuse me. Now it says,
Dreyer's 2023 reporting confirms that Tara Rhodes and
Deborah White
would shit would share
at the July 2024 roundtable,
the Department of Health and Human Services failed
to ensure the sponsors of these children protected
them from abuse and exploitation.
Her reporting also confirms that the Biden White

(56:13):
House, quote, ramped up demands on staffers to
move the children quickly out of shelters and
release them to adults. This led to rushing
through vetting sponsors, including skipping background checks. Now
in no way am I gonna argue that
people like Biden or if it was Trump
at that point, the person at the highest
level of power should in any case be
removed of accountability.
My point what I'm about to say is

(56:34):
simply to highlight that there are other ways
to look at it that could be possible,
which for in this case would
be the the political dynamic we saw. Right?
Where suddenly, you have the Biden administration who's
interested in getting moving people out of the
location so they're not being point look at
the kids in the cage. Right? It becomes
a political point. Not that they care about
children,
but they want the appearance to be different.
And so they rapidly escalate this process. But

(56:55):
my point is that even if it's not
them that made the choice for trafficking,
somebody could have done created the dynamic to
justify why this always continues.
Just important to think stand back and think
about the bigger picture. But my point would
be that the Bidens or the Trumps or
the Obamas are still 100%
accountable for the actions. But it's usually something
bigger than just their choice or their agenda.

(57:16):
There's a larger dynamic at play.
But it says,
her reporting also confirmed that they ramped up
the demands.
This led to rushing through vetting sponsors, including
skipping background checks. In response to the reporting,
the Biden administration announced a crackdown on child
labor exploitation
while the Congress and Department of Labor launched
their investigations, of course, because that that'll do

(57:37):
it. Right? When you're exposed for putting children
in abusive situations, you go quickly. Let's ramp
up an investigation for those very things. You
know, it's it's didn't work. In March 2023,
Health and Human Services,
secretary Xavier Barcera
challenged Republican senators for using the 85,000 figure
saying, quote, those statistics that you've mentioned, as
I've said previously, in regards to another question

(57:58):
by one of your colleagues, those are the
same those are unfamiliar to me, he says.
I have no idea where those statistics come
from. Statistics come from if they're based in
reality or not.
And we do everything we can to make
sure any child before we allow them to
be released to a sponsor that this sponsor
has been vetted. Everything we can. Not really
the same as saying we've had everybody. Right?
But he also makes it clear

(58:19):
that he doesn't know where they come from.
He said, what I don't know if they're
real or not. Which, by the way, if
he's actually meaning that, is even more alarming.
Because guess where they come from? HHS press
office.
And he doesn't know that or he's lying
about it. I'm not sure which one's more
alarming. He says in response to Barcera Drier
shared a clip of his statements and responded,
in several congressional hearings, HHS secretary has been

(58:42):
asked about our reporting
that HHS couldn't reach 85,000 migrant children right
after releasing them. He says he doesn't know
where they came from. For what it's worth,
they're from the a HHS press office.
Quote, I would like to set the record
straight. And this is coming from
Don Marcos,
Robin Don Marcos, who is the
office of of the refugee resettlement director,

(59:05):
I said, I would like to set the
record straight. We did not lose anyone, she
says. We provide safety and well-being calls between
30 37 days after release. Dunmarchos stated he
also emphasized
that ORR's
custodial authority ends
when they are discharged to a vetted sponsor.
Okay?
Donmarco stated that h HHS, quote, have a

(59:25):
number of things in place where we tried
to maintain contact. Now you might be feeling
the same if those things seem contradictory.
Basically, what they're saying is we do it
when we wanna say we do it. But
when we don't want you to do it,
we say we don't. I mean, think about
it. He's saying we provide safety well-being calls,
30 to 30 to 7 days afterwards, which
obviously anybody would expect.
Making sure that they're safe if you're the
one picking everything and choosing where they go.

(59:48):
And then he then he emphasizes that the
custodial authority ends when they're sponsored. So he's
basically trying to say, we do it to
the goodness of our heart.
And then
when if we have a number of things
in place, we're trying to maintain contact. But
you just said you're not responsible. So the
point is,
they're just kinda saying, well, not our job,
but we're doing it kind of anyway. That

(01:00:08):
seems outrageous to me that we would allow
that process to go forward. And we can
prove that they're not even vetting properly and
they're acting like it's not our responsibility.
Well, whose is this then?
When Rothman pressed on going back to your
earlier point, if that's the case then, then
send them back to a process in the
country they came from where the that their
government can process them through the their foster
service process if you're not gonna actually do

(01:00:30):
anything to keep them safe, which, by the
way, you could argue is not their responsibility.
But from a human perspective,
they're human beings.
I I mean, we have to realize that
this is largely because of US foreign policy,
and we go through the same cycle of
the conversation. But I will always air on
the side that it should not be forced
on anybody, even your tax dollars,
because it can be obviously manipulated. Weaponized migration

(01:00:50):
is a huge part of this.
He also emphasized that they
it says when Grothman pressed Dunne Marquez on
the 85,000 number, he re repeated that ORR
custodial authority ends after a child is discharged
to a sponsor, but did not deny that
the agency has failed to contact many of
the children after finding them a sponsor. Because
clearly, he just gave you made the point

(01:01:11):
that it kinda doesn't have to, but I
do anyway, but they don't is the point.
Not always. Unfortunately, this problem predates the Biden
administration, which is important. And January 2016,
the administration,
Associated Press, detailed how the Obama administration
was overwhelmed
by tens of thousands of children fleeing violence
in Central America. In response, the wave of

(01:01:32):
unaccompanied children
shoot.
Look at
that. In response to a wave of unaccompanied
children, the HHS under Obama, quote, lowered its
safety standards So they could swiftly move children
out of the government shelters and into custody

(01:01:53):
sponsors. Now, he's just basically stating what I
was just saying.
Because we don't want to look bad,
we'll ignore safety.
That might as well be your COVID 19
mantra. Right? We don't we want it to
look like it's great, so we're gonna cut
every quarter possible. Operation Warp Speed.
And, obviously, we know it's much much more
than that, but just for the point we're
making today. In response to the wave of

(01:02:13):
unaccompanied children,
they lowered the standards. Quote, the procedures were
increasingly relaxed,
according to the Associated Press. The investigation found
that US government stopped fingerprinting many adults who
were claiming children.
In 2014,
HHS stopped asking for copies of birth certificates
to prove their identities, and later chose not
to use forms asking sponsors for personal and

(01:02:34):
and identifying information before handing the child over.
That's it's just grotesque how obviously you're
seizing responsibility for this child and then throwing
them at whoever guys, I don't know. That
there's no way in my mind that's just
irresponsibility.
There's there's something obviously darker happening here. Finally,
the HHS stopped using FBI criminal background checks

(01:02:54):
for many sponsors.
No. No. Stop FBI background checks. Stop fingerprinting.
Stop asking for ID. Now, obviously, it's my
opinion that there's something worse happening here. But
I I mean, the worst the the the
whistleblower testimony shows you this is happening.
As a result of these policy changes, the
AP was able to identify,
to the point specifically, actual evident actual proof,

(01:03:16):
more than 2 dozen children,
just by looking into it for for the
their their one investigation, who were placed in
homes where they were sexually abused,
trafficked for labor, or severely abused and neglected.
Directly from the hands of HHS not doing
their job.
I don't know who else you blame for
that.
Now in the the point he comes to

(01:03:37):
at the end, is Donald Trump's militarization of
the border and the military deportation
the solution?
He writes, the solution being promoted by Trump,
the solutions are likely to lead to curtailing
of civil liberties
of of Americans and and
arguably well, specifically, Americans in this context

(01:03:57):
while for, failing to address the roots of
the the root of the problem,
which is always how this goes. Now, whether
this was the whole organized plan or they're
just taking advantage of a problem to roll
out the solution for you that you react
to the problem about. The point but I
think it's more than that.
But I think clearly we can see that
this is how these things tend to go.
Pointing at this problem and saying, well, we

(01:04:18):
need I mean, how long until we start
using this exact dynamic, which I think is
coming?
Say, I mean, we're I I mean, I
take it back. It's already happened. That was
that older conversation about the southern border, the
whole rape tree conversation. These these things have
popped up over and over. Now, there is
a real problem here. But every time this
comes up in a real way, it's always
because we they want to fulfill the next
step of something.

(01:04:39):
But that's as simple as just some kind
of border conversation. But now we know as
they keep rolling out, as we'll get to
in a minute, about the the biometric wall,
the biometric scans, the iris scans, the facial
digital IDs. All of these things are right
this moment being presented because of this.
Now I'm all this needs to stop, but
those are not the answer, guys. Those are
the those are more of the same. Those

(01:05:01):
will allow them to continue these things right
here.
The reality is that the border crisis has
been allowed to fester by design, in my
opinion, to the point of Americans demanding something
be done about the child's trafficking problem, obviously.
Not to mention violent crimes from illegal immigrants,
which very clearly exist, and ridiculous policies, which
allow violent repeat offenders to roam American streets.

(01:05:23):
Now these are not unique to Democrat administrations
as much as we love to make those
arguments. Clearly, there's a slant as usual.
The point though is these things are contain
even, like, look look from,
Trump's administration into Biden's.
You could point the steps that he took
that you could argue. There was I mean,
there were some positive things that I hailed
about the shutting down of trafficking networks and
things like that. But clearly, we can see

(01:05:44):
that it did not I mean, even the
numbers show that it didn't really slow down.
So it's really just a a window dressing
even if they really tried. But on top
of that,
that they
did not the problem continued.
Alright. So they allowed this thing to for
for decades to continue to get worse until
it gets to a point to where it's

(01:06:04):
you can't deny it anymore. And then because
we're so desperate because of the way this
has worked, we call for action that we're
willing to accept extreme action.
That's the whole point. That's how this tends
to work.
Now it says, now that the domestic pollop
population, excuse me, is pumped full of fear
based on on on, based on half truths

(01:06:25):
and often exaggerated claims of immigrant caused violence,
the solution of a smart border wall with
facial recognition cameras and biometric scanning can be
presented as the solution. Now what's this is
what I love about Derek. Many things, but
the point to make is that look. Anybody
honest is going to be able to acknowledge
that there are, I would argue, deliberate actions
like repeat offenders being allowed to go out

(01:06:45):
or illegal immigrants that are very clearly committing
crimes. Now that doesn't mean that because they're
immigrants, they're gonna commit crimes, which is what
they love to argue from Trump's administration right
now. Everyone's a violent criminal when they talk
about immigration. It's not the truth. But the
point is that there are some. And that
is still and that's the accountability of the
group that's allowing that to happen. But the
point is, on top of that, you can

(01:07:06):
also point out that it's also true that
there's a lot of very bogus exaggerated,
sometimes outright whole cloth fake narratives about this.
Both those things can exist at the same
time. That's why you have we have to
be honest about this.
And the smart the border wall smart border
wall, which if that had been proposed by
Clinton, they would have flatly said no way.
That's never gonna happen. But because now Trump's

(01:07:27):
the one putting it forward, the very people
that would normally push back are going, yay.
Stop the bad immigrants.
Now a smart or virtual border wall has
been supported by Trump and Biden and their
administrations.
In February 2021, the last American vagabond reported
that more than 40 privacy immigrant
privacy, immigrant rights, and civil liberties organizations called
on Biden and his administration to abandon a

(01:07:49):
bill which would extend the Trump administration's border
policy,
particularly the ongoing creation of a virtual biometric
wall or bi or biometric wall. Trump has
also promised to carry out the largest deportation
operation in American history.
This is the part that kills me. Even
if you think even if this is the
only way to solve it, like, this will
be used
and never taken back. As always throughout history,

(01:08:11):
guys, we can see this many times in
this country alone.
It's as if enacted, Trump's deportation operation is
likely to lead to a massive increase in
the police state measures by the federal government.
And, of course, it'll be even if it's,
like, literally marching out stormtroopers in every state
and walk pulling people off the streets,

(01:08:31):
It'll be framed as getting rid of the
illegal bad guys and the and the hardcore
Republican supporters will I would argue, hopefully not,
but will sing the praises. Even if you're
missing the fact that, you know, some red
hats get caught up in the process too,
which is what's gonna happen. I mean, I
know you don't wanna believe that, but it's
going to. And then what happens if it's
a die hard Trump supporter that just also
happens to be here illegally, but because there

(01:08:51):
was a little bit of a mishap and
he's waiting for his papers. Well, by the
way, those are gonna be people who get
caught up in this that are not what
you guys claim they are.
What happens when you find out that they're
on your side? Is that gonna change your
perspective on it? I mean, the point is,
there's a lot of nuance in this. And
to act like we're gonna roll out the
military to mass deport people that, you know,
you're gonna frisk in the street to find
out if they're how do you not recognize
where that goes?

(01:09:12):
If it was an a different agenda
and had to do from the left, it
was the left side administration making it about
some other thing they wanna stop, you guys
would be losing your minds. And you should
because this should not be the way we
solve any problem.
It says Trump's dead horse is likely to
lead to an increase
in government power in your life. Trump's current

(01:09:32):
answer to the immigration crisis is to call
for the creation of a massive network of
temporary holding facilities
and camps.
How where have we heard this before? Isn't
it interesting how we get an argument, rightly
so, from people on the right talking about
FEMA camps and different and all of a
sudden, Trump literally proposes building those camps that
were like, woo hoo.
Save us from the immigrants. Like, it's crazy

(01:09:54):
how many different things are rolled out by
Trump that are exactly what you've been warning
about, and you don't see it. Now I'm
only speaking of the TeamSport Politics Republicans. I
know a lot of conservatives are waving their
hands about this.
Temporary holding facilities and camps as he empowers
the National Guard and or the military to

(01:10:14):
round up individuals accused of violating immigration rights.
Now, realize National Guard's technically the military, but
the the National Guard is the one that
there is a loophole for deploying in the
country, which I still argue is we shouldn't
be allowing.
But
the point is that, ultimately,
National Guard can be deployed, I guess, the
the argument is to their own state. And
there's and if they're not crossing over, I
guarantee that gets abused too. But even Trump

(01:10:35):
talked about bringing people back from overseas and
using them for this conversation. He made that
public statement.
There's no way you misunderstand that. That's foreign
deployed military come back to the United States
to operate within the country.
Trump former Trump administration officials told Washington Post
in 2024
that he was, quote, obsessed with having the
military involved.

(01:10:57):
That's a concerning statement. Imagine if that was
Obama saying that. Imagine the response by the
Republicans.
Last week, Trump confirmed he will call for
using the military. We talked about this in
the last show right here. Or no, it
was,
this one. Trump confirms plan to declare a
national emergency for mass deportations using military assets.
Confirmed he will call for using the military

(01:11:18):
to lead the deportion operate deportation operation.
While many Republicans are celebrating the move,
interestingly, which I'm very happy to see, senator
Rand Paul of Kentucky has pushed back aggressively
against this, warning conservatives that it was a
terrible image. He says, I'm not in favor
of sending the army in uniforms into our
cities to collect people. That's that's what he
said. What will happen? He's speaking with news

(01:11:39):
backs when he said this. He said, I
think it's a terrible image and that's not
what we use our military for. We never
have and it's actually been illegal, he's talking
about posse comatanas, for over a 100 years
to bring the army into our cities.
Paul emphasized that he would not support he
would not support an emergency declaration
to, quote, put the army in our cities,
calling the move a huge mistake.

(01:12:01):
Good on him. Because it's a difficult time
right now for people to push back from
within the party.
Now, here's the post about that. If you
wanna read more, Paul breaks with Trump on
using military for mass deportations. Huge mistake, he
says.
Now, just include some other articles for you
to check out on this very topic because
I think this is an it's you know,
like I said,

(01:12:22):
the last American bag of bond has been
covering a lot of these topics for a
decade or more as as a lot of
people have. Not even promote not even trying
to claim or first on anything, but just
recognize there's a body of work if you'd
like to check it out.
This is from 2018 from Matt Agarest of
the of the Free Thought Project. Make sure
you check out their work. Chilling NCMEC
report shows 88%

(01:12:43):
of missing sex trafficked kids come from US
foster care.
The you these are all site you can
read the reports yourself. This is coming from
a government report. 88%
of missing children. Not to say 88% of
foster care children go,
but the point is that the ones they
do find, 88%
of them are coming through some form of
foster care or CPS,
you know, child protective services, whatever that's called

(01:13:04):
in your state.
Guys, that's unreal. And this is back from
2018.
So my point is we have this information,
and nothing actually changes. And now we're having
even more than showing that even HHS is
handling these children from other countries and choosing
not to vet or deliberately putting them in
places they shouldn't go.
This one is from 2018.

(01:13:27):
US blocks UN Israel investigation. This is one
of my shows from then.
Foster care and child sex trafficking. Just this
one of the shows I did back then.
You I would have always seen I don't
even have the link in here. Probably difficult
to to watch just because this is so
old. I haven't updated the link from the
other platforms, But it's probably hard to watch
anyway because it's so it's probably very awkward

(01:13:47):
and uncom I mean, it's it was I
was doing it for a while then, but
either way, it's funny how much you progress
in the field. That's worth checking out. This
one is from 2018 from Alana Kettler. Evidence
suggests America's foster care system is a front
for child sex trafficking.
Same point, but she's taken a little bit
further in arguing that there's, I I didn't
like, a deliberate overlap.
This one from 2018, Isaac Davis, America's foster

(01:14:09):
care system is the pipeline for child sex
trafficking.
And we've talked about this a long time.
This is from 2017.
Out of sight, out of mind.
Seventy plus kids, quote, missing from state foster
care. No one's stopping it. I harp through
this like crazy when this happened.
This this was in one example. Seventy plus
kids were missing from this one state foster
care. No one's nothing happened.

(01:14:31):
Missing.
Not like ended up in a bad parent.
Just vanished.
It's so crazy how obvious this, if if
you're actually paying attention. Here's just an overlap
to the drug point. Government exposed for
forcing foster kids, even toddlers, to take dangerous
psychotropic drugs.
Maybe that's why 1 year olds are taking
antidepressants
because the government's taking care of them.

(01:14:53):
So many overlaps.
Oops. Now, a couple of points I wanted
to get into some foreign policy overlaps that
kind of interestingly overlap with the pharmaceutical side
of this for the Iran point. But as
we bring this over into This is just
a couple of points I wanted to get
included before we bring it over into BlackRock
and how that overlaps in general. But I
these are just points that I think are
worth seeing right now, and this is what,

(01:15:13):
Dan Cohen put out, yesterday. Now we've covered
the Haiti conversation
largely going through what Dan has been covering
because I think he's one of the best
on this topic. But going back a lot
long way. Look, just type again. Just type
in Haiti on the search bar. A lot
of recent work on that and stuff that
goes back a long time. A lot of
them overlap the Clintons.
And a doctor, for example, who randomly tried

(01:15:34):
to kill himself by stabbing himself with a
butcher knife in the chest because that's normally
how it happens, right? Or many examples of
those mysterious clu clinton suicides, right? But the
point is, obviously, if you read the article,
it's undeniable this person was murdered and it
was covered up because he was right just
about to scream about I guess I'll pull
it up since I'm highlighting
it.

(01:15:56):
The point is that it's no there's there's
no denying this. That's not what we're gonna
get into right now. But since we pointed
out the overlap with Haiti and the other
context for pizzagate,
this doctor
supposedly killed himself and the point is you
can read all about this. He was screaming
about what the Clintons were doing in Haiti.
How they said they were giving all this
money and he shows up and you got
people with maggots and wounds. No sterilizing stuff.

(01:16:19):
Cheerios and the tarmac aren't gonna get it
done, he says. They were robbing this place
behind. No one ever got held accountable for
that. And it wasn't just the Clintons, you
might understand. Hopefully, today, we're beginning to see
it's much bigger than just one group. But
they were absolutely a central part of this.
Horrifying story.

(01:16:40):
So here,
he says Haitian police, this is as of
22nd,
and armed vigilantes
stopped a doctors without borders ambulance,
slashed the tires, tear gassed the medical staff,
and executed 2 people. Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
Sounds like what's happening with Israel in Lebanon
or in Gaza.
You know why? Because these things are overlapped.

(01:17:00):
We went over to this in-depth.
Israel throughout history and especially right now seems
to be involved with funding or supporting or
arming pretty much the worst of the worst.
Every major
genocide that you can look back, Rwanda, for
example, Israel was funding the people coming to
the genocide and supporting them doing so.
I'll grab that as well in case you
wanna look it up, or Bosnia for example,

(01:17:22):
or South Africa apartheid. All these are
Israel on the record being involved. Was Israel
Israel was involved, the Rwanda genocide?
The evidence is not a it's not even
questionable. It's public information. Israel was supporting it.
But point is we're not supposed to say
that stuff because I guess that makes you
racist. Right? No. It doesn't.
My point is that this is happening right

(01:17:43):
now in Haiti. He says further threats of
death and rape have forced Doctors Without Borders
to suspend operations of Port au Prince.
The Haitian police,
the important part, are the biggest criminals in
Haiti. And right now, the US government is
pressing the UN to reinforce them with a
full invasion. Because as usual, guys, Israel and
the United States and the UK, they tend

(01:18:04):
to support
the people that are the worst because they're
more pliable,
amenable. They'll do what they want. They'll give
you some money, and they'll carry out whatever
you need.
But those are the bad guys. Right? Those
are the most dangerous. And the people that
they're fighting
may not be good people, but they're not
the ones willing to bow to US interests,
which in some cases are because they actually

(01:18:25):
care about their people. And so at that
point, they go, well, we don't want you
there because you won't do what we want.
So we'll pretend to back the the the
rebellion for freedom
when in reality, the people that you put
into place that are terrible monsters like those
moderate rebels or Saudi Arabian government or Israel
for that matter. It doesn't matter because we
can all see it,
but they just keep going forward.

(01:18:47):
And Haiti's been a I mean, when's the
last time they had election? Funny how these
people screaming about democracy don't care that the
places that they're getting what they want from
aren't having elections.
It's been a long time.
Now on another conversation from store to foreign
policy that I think is important to highlight,
this one just kills me because, guys, how

(01:19:08):
long have I been talking about this?
I really, really hope this does not happen.
I'm I'm talking about a false flag to
blame this because I don't think this is
what would actually happen. There's no even discernible
logical reason why Iran would do this.
It just makes no benefit. There's no benefit
to them. There's no political interest to them.
It seems redid just like with Syrian shit.

(01:19:28):
I mean, they they they they fold them
into this too using cat gassing children because
he's just a monster. Guys, you have to
understand I hope you remember
factually been proven that's not true
over and over whether that's, Robert Fisk proving
that or going back to Carla DuPont from
the UN admitting rebels are the ones that
used it. Always been that clear. Just like

(01:19:49):
the Ukraine Nazis, just like Israel's genocide and
Zionist occupation. The evidence has always been there.
You just get shouted away and lied to
by your government, and people seem, at least
historically, to have followed suit. Today, I think
it's changing.
But my point is, how long have I
been talking about this overlap of the vanilla
Isis
kind of virus, chemical,
you know, all these

(01:20:10):
this kind of trifecta of conversations. And I
was worried that they would emerge or rather
not emerge, but
cross paths.
So now, Heretz is reporting today,
sources in Israel and the United States assert.
Hey. Right? Mossad and CIA say totally true
something's about to happen.
Assert that Iran is developing pharmaceutical based chemical

(01:20:32):
weapons.
Syria is renewing its chemical programs, and Russia
is using chemical weapons in Ukraine. Now all
of that's certainly possible.
But is it funny when it comes from
the groups that have been notoriously lying to
your entire lives about specifically these three countries
and have been caught lying repeatedly right up
until now. And then right at the moment
when it seems to benefit them more than
ever, but not even remotely the 3 they're

(01:20:53):
pointing to, they say the thing they need
to say.
I mean, how long have I been talking
about the worry of that?
Right? My point at the time was this
vanilla ISIS, which might have this whole
MAGA Trump
overlap Nazi Russia thing, they kinda blew up
in their face. I very much think, and
I think I've proven that that's what the
Azov movement is real. That all of it
comes together with this agenda, at least in

(01:21:14):
the first point of this, to make it
look like Russia was seeding Nazis in the
country. The point is they got exposed for
that, but they still have this proxy army
that is the Azov movement.
I was worried about how they would overlap
that with the idea of the pandemic discussion,
with the idea of using chemical weapons just
like this. Now you got your pharmaceutical
overlap. You've got your
bat you know, your war on terror dynamic.

(01:21:34):
You've got your Israel weapon. You know, the
idea that Iran and Palestine are all coming
all these things are converging, that's the world's
looking for, for with this conversation.
Now let me show you why you should
laugh about how stupid this is. Not that
these things aren't possible,
but because of who is pushing this argument.
Not only a nuclear threat, which you get
right there, should make you go okay.

(01:21:55):
When when you know when you can prove
that at least from the International Atomic Energy
Agency,
the group that there's
that investigates whether there's nuclear threat, or even
the state department
recently, as well as more than once going
back, I just went over this in a
recent show, have publicly stated that Iran is
not, at least right now, seeking a nuclear
weapon.

(01:22:16):
All the evidence has been very clear. We've
written about this and talked about this many,
many times from Robert's perspective, from mine. The
evidence is that that's not true. And And
on top of that, Netanyahu has been saying
you're 30 seconds away for about 15 years.
I'm of the mind that's not happening. Whether
just have to say it wouldn't or the
shift in power might cause it or maybe
that they're secretly doing it now because they
have every logical reason to do so with

(01:22:37):
what the world is doing. The point is
Iran is not the big boogeyman they make
it out to be. It's another country like
anybody else and ultimately has the right to
do those things. They say it's not
it's a,
thought twig is what they say. It means
that it goes against their religion.
That might be the wrong word. The point
is that they don't do it because it
challenges what they believe.
Right. Of course, they could be lying about
that. So when they say not only a

(01:22:58):
nuclear threat, you get that's already starting on
a false note, in my opinion. Iran and
Syria developed chemical capabilities once again.
Now it says chemical weapons are apparently returning
to the Middle East, while Israel is focused
on a on the danger that Iran might
decide to break out and assemble nuclear bombs.
So it's your your fairy tale that you

(01:23:18):
use to keep the whole scare tactic going
on. There are growing indications that the Islamic
Republic is developing chemical weapons,
as is Syria.
In the background, there are also reports that
their ally, Russia, is using chemical weapons in
its war in Ukraine. Like, the fact that
they had to just fold in all 3
of them in one conversation is what makes
it so like, at least at least give
us different narratives.

(01:23:39):
Like, how okay. Do they connect? So are
you indicating that Russia's working with them? No.
No. Just they're doing it at the same
time. Because we're just lazy. We wanna get
out there all once. It's like, that's that's
what's happening.
So, of course, Russia could use chemical weapons.
It wouldn't surprise me.
Or Syria or Iran.
But the reality is that this benefits the
US government and Israel more than literally anybody

(01:23:59):
in this conversation. And them using any of
these things
benefits them in no way. Because let's not
forget that chemical weapons are not somehow more
effective in any way.
Bombs kill more people more effectively.
So these things are about just making people
suffer, which is why they ultimately make them
illegal because they're just it's just it's it's
an you know,
it's hard to see unjustifiably

(01:24:20):
suffering. The point is that they are more
painful and suffering and lasting, burning your skin
off, horrible things.
So logically speaking, we should ask, okay. Well,
why? And where's the evidence? Well, when it
turns out it's coming from Assad and the
CIA, well, then you can make up your
own mind, but I think that's an easy
point to go, okay. So this isn't happening
until there's more evidence.
Historically, that's the right path to take because

(01:24:40):
they've lied to you almost ubiquitously about this
conversation.
It says Israeli intelligence and western intelligence agencies
have gathered intelligence, gotta love that, indicating that
Iran is developing chemical weapons based on pharmaceutical
industry.
Interesting way to frame that. Said an expert
on chemical weapons from a western country who
spoke on a condition of anonymity.
Of course, you did.

(01:25:02):
So your
intelligence is develop is is gathering intelligence about
things that they're doing,
about pharmaceutical based chemical weapons.
And this is a another example of an
agent
speaking in an of an of
in the condition of anonymity. Now one of
the biggest examples of that in the past,

(01:25:23):
that was
John Bolton and the lipid mines. Remember that?
I mean, we really have to reflect on
how obvious that conversation was.
Undeniable at this point. It's all the evidence
would all you know, point of course, the
corporate media did not follow-up to make that
clear to everybody. But it started with the
idea that Iran, a credible threat.
Remember John Bolton, Donald Trump? Credible threat for

(01:25:44):
Iran. And, overall, it turned out to be
them moving boats in their harbors. That's actually
what happened. Of course, you could say, well,
we don't know what's in those boats, but
you where's the threat?
You have no reason to think that other
than your fairy tale about what they're doing.
It turned out not to be what was
going on, and the limpet mines were very
clearly proven to be a US, like with
the Nord Stream pipeline, a sabotage action to

(01:26:05):
blame Iran. The false flag,
like a lot of these conversations.
So here we are again, where there there
an anonymous agent is telling you the thing
that works for what they want you to
think. Don't don't dismiss it, but recognize that
that should be a that's
one level above worthless evidence in my opinion.
Confirmation of the development also comes from official
reports from Joe Biden's administration.

(01:26:28):
So you're the government. That's the same thing.
The report was published at the same time
as, guess what, Iranian hackers claimed to have
exposed secret documents that explain in detail how
a military university in Iran is developing grades
grenades laced with military grade chemicals.
What a coincidence. Alright? So right at the
same time when the US government published a
report about how we're worried about this, hackers

(01:26:49):
decide to jump up and go, you're right.
We have the evidence, but we're anonymous and
nobody gets to no. And they never followed
up to find out who they were. Right?
Because hackers are illegal. Right? They should be
finding out and arrest. No. They don't care.
So that doesn't make sense. I haven't read
anything about them seeking out the hackers and
finding out.
I mean, the point is that it's kind
of comical that they're gonna roll out, which
by the way, in the past, we've seen

(01:27:10):
examples like this where you this whole thing
comes to fruition like little bit minds. And
you look back in the story and, like,
oh, how look at that hacker part that
came out. Wonder how that didn't fit in.
Well, now we know it's a false story.
Well, then you clearly can ask, were they
really Iranian hackers? Maybe not. Were they Assad
or CIA? Maybe. Were they Iranians that were
working for the United States? Of course, that's
possible. The point is that we can't ask
these questions from people that are stuck in

(01:27:31):
the kind of the mainstream cycle.
But when you stand back and look at
history, things like this and the timing of
it and lumping them all together, like, it
just seems like they're being lazy.
And it go but again, well, always certainly
possible. But then it says, in April, the
the state department published a report about chemical
weapons about the chemical weapons convention, alleging that
Iran is attempting to obtain pharmaceutical based agents

(01:27:52):
for military purposes.
Look at the timing of this.
So you have the narrative you've constructed. Other
than that, there's no evidence. But then you
come out and say, now we can see
them doing the thing that we said they're
doing, and they all stole no evidence. Now
you have the state department saying that with
not giving you any evidence. So thus far,
you have US government and Israeli government narratives,
and that's it. That's not my opinion. That's

(01:28:14):
where this is. And it says a request
for an interview with ambassador,
Champagne, that's actually
Champine, shampaine,
shampaine,
who in the past served in the US
embassy in Tel Aviv went unanswered.
So think about that.
So they reach out to the ambassador who
previously worked with in Tel Aviv because that's

(01:28:35):
not a completely obvious overlapping coincidence,
and they didn't wanna talk to you.
Doesn't that seem interesting? Wouldn't they went all
about telling you how bad Iran is? Well,
there's something weird going on. The US State
Department report, which focused on activity in the
chemistry department from Imam Hussein University,
a military academic institution associated with the Iranian
revolutionary guards. Well, just let's just say for
a sake of conversation,

(01:28:56):
everything about this is actually happening.
So when they finally get to something they
can prove, and I don't even know if
we can prove that. That's still their statement.
But let's say pretend for the sake of
conversation you can.
So now you're talking about
a a university,
right, working on something in in the chemistry
department.
So it how do we know for sure

(01:29:16):
about the Iranian government? It's like saying Harvard's
working on a on a a weapon.
Does that verifiably mean the US government's doing
it? Well, no, but it certainly could. Of
course, they would make the argument that Iran
controls everything. That's not true. It's the same
it's just as true as you could say
about the US, which is not that far
off. Right? But it's not definitive.
So this is how this gets
we're back at boats moving into harbors. That's

(01:29:39):
what I'm arguing.
Now it says in his article, doctor Levitt
cited Israeli sources
expressing fear that Iran has shared chemical wealth
warfare
welfare know how
and chemical substances to its allies. So now
the extension out to to Syria is simply
that Israel said,
Israel Iran's been sharing its chemical know how

(01:30:00):
that they've not really demonstrated.
Right? They sure have had chemical weapons used
against them that the US supplied Saddam Hussein.
But show me the examples of what they've
done. I see you Israel Israel using chemical
weapons,
white phosphorus,
much much more, all the time. The US
government's been caught using them all the time.
I I can totally understand. I I wouldn't

(01:30:20):
dismiss Iran doing that. Certainly possible.
Show me the evidence. Not a US government
narrative, not Mossad narrative, nothing narrative. I want
facts and evidence we can prove. And you'll
find, surprise, surprise, you get a bunch of
narrative when you have a lot of evidence
to the contrary, or rather, evidence backing up
that these people making the accusation are the
the culprits.

(01:30:42):
But it says, the Shiite militias in Syria
and Iraq, and perhaps even Hezbollah. Good. So
all the people you want us to be
angry with, they're giving them bad things, we
say. Go after them.
I just don't know how people can be
this naive. Even if this is true,
what this is based on should not be
taken at face value because of how often
they've been lying. I mean, I'm willing to

(01:31:03):
bet you the Israeli governments lied 14 times
just today and I haven't even seen it
yet. That's how dumb this has gotten. Over
and over and over.
So we'll have to wait and see how
this comes to pass, guys. Because at the
end of the day, I don't know why
we would ever take that at face value.
It seems, like, laughably absurd.
How many times have we seen Israel caught
with lies coming directly from these groups? From

(01:31:25):
their intelligence just from October 7th forward. And
yet we're gonna pretend they're gonna go in
Iran and Hezbollah and Syria and maybe Russia
and whoever else you want. They're all doing
the thing that you should be mad about.
Chemical weapons. What's the evidence? Oh, well, the
US said.
It just seems silly. Now please do not
take that. It's just I'm I will continue
to look into this because these things are
concerning.
Whether it's about Iran doing it, which is

(01:31:47):
also concerning, which, again, to be very objective
about it, you can see why it might
like, I'm of the mind that they wouldn't
do this for,
strategic reasons. It doesn't make sense.
All it does is give them the excuse
to go after them. But my point is
that you can wrap your mind around how
they might end up in some position where
they would decide to because of how crazy
this has all gotten. Because of how rec

(01:32:08):
they can recognize how they're being targeted
and focused on and manipulated and lied to
about them from around the whole world. That's
not good guy, bad guy, but those things
are true whether you like it or not.
And so my point is whether nuclear weapon
or something else, I can
did I could put together how that might
actually happen because of what they're driving it
to do. Out of desperation, maybe? But in
a general sense, I just don't think it

(01:32:29):
lines up. So we have to make sure
we're standing with the facts. At this point,
it makes every everything lines up for why
they would lie about this
or why they would carry something out and
blame it on Iran. And so that brings
me back to the point about the whether
it's vanilla ISIS, which if you don't remember
that, that was just simply this ridiculous term
that was thrown out to, like, try to
make sense of why what they claim are

(01:32:50):
white supremacists were working with Iran. That's what
the argument was. So you have the MAGA
white supremacists that were working with the Iranian
Al Qaeda. You know, that's the vanilla ISIS.
That's actually what they put forward. Who cares
about the ideological
miscommunicate or, you know, incongruency? Who cares about
that? My point is that now you see
that, you see this overlap with the chemical

(01:33:11):
weapon aspect of it. There's a lot of
these things coming together and I worry how
a false flag might especially right now playing
that out, would how that would be used.
So keep an eye on it. Make sure
you're, you know, just being objective, not jumping
at shadows.
Now this is important as well.
This is a great clip from Jeffrey Sachs
talking about

(01:33:31):
the kind of the the the the real
background. And most of this we've talked about.
I mean, almost all of it except for
a few great points he brings up in
regard to, the history of Ukraine and Russia
and the United States. And how we've talked
about the the not one inch further, the
NATO conversation,
the reality of how many times this has
been the US literally driving this into reality.

(01:33:51):
So I've got my con skepticism about Sachs
in a lot of different ways, but he
really does come through with a lot of
powerful statements
that
show I mean, he's he's an insider. He's
got he knows these people. So whether he's
using this to manipulate for something else, I
still find this to be important and very
true. And this is overlapping with the conversation
of the the ICBM the the long distance
missiles and the placement of them and the

(01:34:13):
treaties I mentioned. He goes over that right
now. And so important to consider as we
briefly talk about Ukraine as that overlaps with
the Blackrock point.
This is not an attack
by Putin
on Ukraine in the way that we are
told every day.
This started in 1990,

(01:34:34):
February
9, 1990.
James Baker the 3rd, our secretary of state,
said to Mikhail Gorbachev,
NATO will not move 1 inch eastward
if you
agree to German unification,
basically ending World War 2.

(01:34:54):
And,
Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes.
NATO doesn't move, and we agreed to German
unification.
The US then cheated on this
already starting in 1994
when Clinton signed off on a,
basically,
a plan to expand NATO all the way

(01:35:16):
to Ukraine.
This is when the so called neocons
took power. Okay. Really important for today.
Not only was that the point was I
have I don't doubt they had plans to
do this right away.
4 years later, we're they're already breaking. There
there is nothing sacred to the US government.
On top of that,
a democrat

(01:35:37):
carrying out the neocon agenda. Shouldn't be surprising
with what you're seeing today.
The parties are an illusion, guys.
We're being played. Your government is playing you.
And,
Clinton was the first agent of this.
And
the expansion of NATO started in 1999
with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic.

(01:35:58):
At that point, Russia didn't much care. There
was no border other than with the Konigsberg.
But other than that, there was no direct
threat.
Then,
the US,
led the bombing of Serbia in 1999.
That was bad, by the way,
because that was a use of NATO

(01:36:19):
to bomb a European
capital, Belgrade,
78 straight days to break the country apart.
The Russians didn't like that very much. And
think about that in the context of today.
Right? Think how much has changed to where
Israel is being exposed for what's going on.
That this is why you get those ridiculous
statements from Israeli propagandists to go, well, you

(01:36:40):
didn't care about this war. And it's like,
do you not realize that you're literally going,
how come you're mad at my genocide? You
didn't get mad at that genocide? Like, it's
just the the the the hubris is overwhelming.
But the same point they're making right now
that with what, the the statements around what,
Erdogan is doing Erdogan is doing in Syria,
which by the way, there's obvious differences to
the conversation especially when you could point out

(01:37:01):
many of the places he's working overlap. It's
bottom line is, yes, people care. And, yes,
people are talking about it. But it is
a long jump away from the genocide that's
being committed on a daily basis with children
being killed right in front of us. How
you know, the point is they point to
that and go, you don't care about this.
No Jews. No news. They keep saying. It's
just like it's incredible.
You know, the point is that at one

(01:37:22):
point, these things barely got talked about.
Right? There was a narrative around it. Right?
It's all for, you know, whatever the narrative
of freedom and whatever they're talking about. But
this was just belligerence.
Killing civilians, just like in any context everyone
we've talked about. But the reason I overlap
it is how interesting it is that that
very statement we made. Right? That, well, why
you didn't care about that, genocide? You know,
it's the point is that it doesn't matter

(01:37:43):
whether people jumped at 1 the point is
what you're doing is obvious.
To deflect to something else is pretty embarrassing.
But this is not a unique part of
US history.
So time to think back and look at
these other events and and, you know, look
at them through a lens of today.
Might shock you.
But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They
complained, but,
even Putin started out, pro,

(01:38:06):
European, pro American, actually asked maybe we should
join NATO,
when there was still the idea of some
kind of mutually
respectful relationship.
Then 911
came, then came,
Afghanistan,
and the Russian said, yeah. We'll support you.
We understand to root out terror.
But then came 2 other decisive

(01:38:30):
actions.
In 2002,
the United States unilaterally
walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty.
This was probably
the most decisive event
never discussed in this context. Now this we
talked about this.
And and this well, let me make sure
the Then came 2 other decisive

(01:38:50):
actions.
In 2002, the n I So, this was
this I in 2002, I did not talk
about this. But the point is that in
where was this? I forget what context it
was. Well, anyway, I've I've stopped it for
this. But the point is that there there
we've talked about this very conversation
around the the violation of these agreements and
the encroachment from the United States as well
as others from Russia in in different ways.

(01:39:11):
But realizing that this, in my opinion, has
been driven by you know, it's always in
our guise of the US doing it because
they're about to or they're doing it. It
all amounts to them, ultimately, when you look
back at the history driving these things for
their own benefit.
And it's important, just like with Israel today,
to frame yourself as the victim as you
take the aggressive action. This is that's something
they've learned very well.

(01:39:32):
It states unilaterally
walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty.
This was probably
the most decisive event,
never discussed in this context.
But what it did was trigger
the US putting in missile systems
in Eastern Europe
that Russia views as a dire direct

(01:39:54):
threat. In 2,004,
5,
we engage
Now it's important to think about right there
is that, you know, so that's a huge
step and that Russia already sees that as
a huge threat.
2,002 and forward.
Right? So it how like, that should be
that's what he's pointing out. That needs to
be discussed in the context of why we're
where we are, with specifically Russia and Ukraine.

(01:40:15):
The US government has incrementally continued to cross
red line after red line over and over
and over. Always making it about them. And
at the end of the day, they did
the same thing with Ukraine and Russia.
And we talked about this right up until
it actually happened. All the evidence has been
there. You know? At some point, historically, you
have to go back and look at how
many things we discussed right before they actually
happened, demonstrating our value.

(01:40:36):
In a soft
regime change operation in Ukraine.
Mhmm. But in 2009,
Yanukovych
won the election, and he became president in
2010
on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine.
That calmed things down because
the US was pushing NATO, but the people

(01:40:56):
of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even
wanna be a NATO. They knew that the
country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian.
What do we want with this? We wanna
stay away from your problems. Mhmm.
So in February 22nd
2014,
the United States participated
actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych.

(01:41:17):
A typical
US regime change operation.
Have no doubt about it. Now what you
have to think about the importance of this,
like, whether it's Honduras or other things we
talked about. You know? So so they effectively
put someone in place. Now that doesn't mean
that they then from there forward, they're you
know, there's a lot going on, especially today.
That was my point. Is there earlier is
that I think that the US government is
stretched very thin. And that's why you're seeing

(01:41:38):
they're not they're not able to keep their
finger on the pulse of every one of
these regime changes right now, especially. So back
then, the point is for whatever reason that
maybe they like that person at first, but
then he suddenly is going okay neutrality, which
is not what they want. So they get
rid of him too. Even though these people
are in some some level being facilitated through
their agenda or their control structure.
Like or larger example, like Osama bin Laden

(01:42:01):
or or Saddam Hussein.
Do not forget, these people were US allies
right up until they weren't anymore. Then they
became the biggest boogeyman in the world. So
they are or were who they were to
become the boogeyman because of US funding support
and growth.
That's not up for debate.
I also point out so many times in
the past, the Washington Post has a headline

(01:42:22):
calling Osama bin Laden a warrior of peace
way back then. Saddam Hussein was their big
ally. They armed
him to use chemical weapons against Iran, and
then suddenly he became the bad guy because
they go afoul of the agenda or they're
no longer useful anymore.
That's not something good guys do.
And the Russians did us a favor. They
intercepted
a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland,

(01:42:44):
my colleague at Columbia University now,
between her
and,
the US ambassador
to Ukraine, Geoffrey Piat, who's a senior state
department official till today.
And they talked about regime change.
They said, who's gonna be the next government?
All of this is to say,

(01:43:05):
the US then said,
okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge. And Putin
kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement.
It's been by the way, I forgot to
mention in
2004,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia,
Slovenia,

(01:43:25):
7 more countries
in the not 1 inch eastward.
Right. So those aren't red lines? Right? Those
aren't reason can you imagine if any one
of these red lines were crossed and that
they could blame Russia?
We already see the belligerence they carry out.
In case you forget, here's that conversation.
On February 20, 2013,

(01:43:46):
the world was shocked by video footage of
snipers firing on protesters in Kyiv, Ukraine. 21
people were murdered, and it was widely assumed
that president Viktor Yanukovych and his supporters were
behind the attacks.
However, a phone conversation between EU foreign policy
chief, Kathy Ashton, and Estonia's foreign minister, Irma
Piyat, which was leaked to the public on
March 5th, reveals the snipers were actually from
the new coalition government and that Western diplomats

(01:44:08):
knew this and covered it up.
Yeah. Yeah. So that he has some sort
of, how to say, trust among all these
Maidan people and and civil society. And second,
what was quite disturbing, the same Olga told
that, well, all David then shows,
the people who were killed by snipers from
both sides among

(01:44:28):
policemen and then people from the streets, that
they were the same snipers
killing people from both sides.
Well, that's, yeah, that's So that and then
she also showed me some photos.
She said that has medical doctor. She can,
you know, say that it is the same
same handwriting,
the same type of bullets, and it's really

(01:44:48):
disturbing that now the new,
new coalition that they don't want to investigate
what exactly happened. So that there is now
stronger and stronger understanding
that behind snipers, they were it was not
Yanukovych,
but it was somebody from the new coalition.
Covering. Reason the US media didn't think that
that little detail was worth covering. Wait. It's

(01:45:11):
not the opposition protesters were just peaceful activists
who wanted a chance to join the European
Union.
Well, yeah, that's the official narrative that the
US media outlets are peddling. But the real
story is far more ominous. This Turns out
that the most powerful and influential contingent in
the opposition is a coalition of literal fascists
and neo Nazis, and they aren't peaceful. In
fact, they're extremely brutal.

(01:45:32):
This is a picture of Victoria Nuland from
the US State Department meeting with Ole Tanibuk
in February,
and this is a picture of senator John
McCain sharing a stage with Tunibook in December.
But why would the US government work with
Neo Nazis?
Because they thought that they could control the
situation. They thought that they could install their
puppets behind the scenes and manipulate the situation
in their favor. That same Victoria Nuland who

(01:45:54):
met with Svoboda in February was caught on
another leaked call discussing who they would put
in power. What do you think?
I think we're in play.
The the, Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated
electron here,
especially the announcement of him as deputy prime
minister. And you've seen some of my notes
on the troubles in the marriage right now.

(01:46:14):
So we're trying to get a read really
fast on where he is on this stuff.
But I think your argument to him, which
you'll need to make, I think that's the
next phone call we wanna set up,
is exactly the one you made to to
Yachts. And I'm glad you sort of put
him on the spot on where he fits
in this scenario.
And I'm very glad he said what he
said in response.

(01:46:35):
Good. So,
I don't think Cleage should go into the
government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't
think it's a good idea.
Yeah. I mean, I I guess
you think
what in terms of him not going into
the government, just let him sort of stay
out and do his political homework and stuff.

(01:46:55):
I'm just thinking
in terms of sort of the process moving
ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats
together. The problem is going to be talking
about his guys.
And, you know, I'm sure that's part of
what Yanika was just calculating on all of
this.
I kinda I think I think Yats is
the guy who's got the economic experience, the

(01:47:15):
governing experience.
He's the guy what he needs is Klitsch
and Tony Boock on the outside. He needs
to be talking to them 4 times a
week.
I just think Klitsch going in, he's going
to be at that level working for Yacineuk.
It's just not going to work.
Yep. That's called democracy
in the guys of the US government.

(01:47:36):
That's literally what you just heard. Publicly discussed,
Sachs pointing it out, how many times you
could play this, and yet it's somehow just
unknown in the conversation. It's not my that's
storm storm clouds gathering. That goes back a
long way.
It's amazing the kind of information that just
doesn't get out even though people talk about
it everywhere. It has video backup evidence documentation.
That's the socially engineered,

(01:47:57):
predicted programming,
mind cold brainwashing
world that we live in right now.
One quick note before we go forward, actually,
while I was just sharing the background looking
at this. It looks like Twitch
somebody was asking me to make sure we
were streaming on there. We are as much
as they're letting us have a channel, it
is continuing to to block us. It just
says an error occurred. We can't get it

(01:48:19):
to work, which I was trying to mess
with all day in case I should have
mentioned that earlier, but just in case you
guys are concerned about why it's not on
there. Yeah. Another another platform that won't let
us plat you know, beyond the platform.
But, yeah, so this is an important cover.
Oh, actually, I didn't finish it. Let me
let me finish this clip.
And then
now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept
saying stop. You promised no NATO enlargement.

(01:48:42):
It's been by the way, I forgot to
mention in 2004,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia,
Slovenia,
7 more countries
in the not 1 inch eastward.
And then
okay. It's a long story, but

(01:49:04):
the US
kept rejecting
the basic idea,
don't expand
NATO to Russia's border in a context where
we're putting in goddamn missile systems.
After breaking a treaty, 2019, we walked out
of the Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty.

(01:49:24):
On December 15,
2021,
Putin put on the table
a draft
Russia US security
agreement.
You can find it online.
The basis of it is no NATO enlargement.
I called the White House
that
next week after that,

(01:49:46):
begging them, take the negotiations.
Putin's offered something. Avoid this war.
Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war.
Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't
worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh,
you're gonna have a war over something that's
not gonna happen?

(01:50:07):
Why don't you announce them? And he said,
no. No. Our policy is an open door.
This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an
open door policy.
Open door for NATO enlargement.
That is under the category of bullshit, by
the way.
You don't have your right to put your
military bases anywhere you want and expect peace

(01:50:27):
in this world.
They turned down the negotiations.
Then
the special military operation started.
And 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay, okay,
neutrality.
And then the United States and Britain said,
no way.
You guys fight on.

(01:50:48):
We got your back.
We don't have your front. You're all gonna
die.
But we got your back
as we kept pushing them into the front
lines. That's
600,000
deaths
now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to
Kyiv to tell them to be brave.

(01:51:12):
It's just amazing how little what a little
truth can do. Right? You can't put your
bases wherever you want and expect peace in
this world. Well, you're damn right. That's exactly
what people are pointing out, like, the whole
the joke about
you're putting your bases too close to our
country, you know, or your your whatever the
you know, pretending like
it's their fault for your bases being right
on there. I I said it backwards, but
the obvious point is what they're doing is

(01:51:33):
hostile.
There's no way around it. These bases are
not there to maintain peace, guys. As much
as they love to make these narratives and
people are willing to gobble it up, they
are conducting
all sorts of horrifying things around the world.
The history and the evidence has been there
for a long time.
Not to say that everybody knows that.
Plenty of people think they're doing good through
these processes, and they and that's the point

(01:51:54):
is I believe we can change that.
Radical ways, most definitely, in regard to my
thoughts about government and so on. But I
think whatever. Go the point is we can
take a better step forward and stop allowing
these people under the guise of doing right,
do the worst things in the world.
And it's not it's not even hyperbole. It's
just it's all over. Now here's what's interesting
on this. This is a new report from

(01:52:16):
antiwar.com.
US well, they're they're reporting on the report,
that was, just discussed by New York Times.
US and European officials discussed giving Ukraine nuclear
weapons.
Now what's important to understand here is that
this is one of the most alarming groups
in the world right now, maybe just underneath
to say for Israel.
The neo Nazi element that is funded by

(01:52:36):
Israel and the United States in Ukraine
are belligerently dangerous. And we we can as
he just pointed out, Salomki is not in
charge.
Who knows if he who knows if even
Israel and the US are actually in charge?
Same thing with the moderate rebels and Al
Qaeda and ISIS. The point is even Saudi
Arabia admitted over the years that they were
sort of losing they lost control of what
this ultimately was. That's the whole ISIS, Al

(01:52:57):
Qaeda overlap, which makes sense. You fund maniacs
and sometimes they go awry and don't do
what you want anymore.
I mean, that's that's and they don't care
is the point. And so right here, they're
talking about at least considering
giving nuclear weapons to a and it a
deranged
racist
military group with designs on overthrowing the world

(01:53:18):
and spreading the white race everywhere. That's what
they state publicly.
Funny how Israel has a a greater re
a greater Israel dynamic where they
it's very public
to take all sorts of other countries for
their own. A group they fund has the
design to take over everything,
and everything they do is point to all
their adversaries and say, that's what they want
to do. And, you know, maybe, but there's

(01:53:39):
no evidence for it.
And they're gonna give them a considering, giving
them nuclear weapons. Do you know who's involved
in that conversation? I can almost guarantee it.
These are this your government.
The people that you think are the ones
fighting for freedom, if you believe that, are
the ones that are trying to do this
while screaming about how countries that don't have
designs to have 1 are not allowed to
have 1. And we're almost willing to destroy

(01:54:00):
them to make sure they don't have the
thing they don't want.
Now Zelensky actually put this out. This is
ridiculous. 21st.
It says today, Putin
admitted to taking a second step this year
toward escalating and expanding this war. That's what
he wrote. A new ballistic missile was used.
Do you realize how dumb it is to
make this statement right after the conversation of
you being allowed to use missiles and firing

(01:54:22):
them into, you know, into Russia?
Like, so how think about how deranged it
is to pretend, like, when they use a
ballistic missile that that's the violation, not when
you use one firing their country.
It's just it's just it's like it's like
Israel crying foul about what what some people
like, their settlers having to live in hotels
while they're literally murdering children and forcing everybody
out of their homes. I don't know if

(01:54:43):
they recognize how ridiculous that is or they
just don't care. It's the same point though.
What else are they gonna do? Zelensky and
Israel are in the same position right now.
They're losing and they're desperate.
So you can read the rest of it,
but you get the you get the point.
This is a clear and severe escalation, he
says. A violation of the UN charter. Oh,
it is. Okay. So nothing else you do
is a violation. You can ignore chart resolutions

(01:55:04):
and chart everything everywhere you look. Who cares
that you're as you're
ethnically cleansing the Donbas area or continuing to
I could go off forever. I mean, we
talked about Ukraine for so long. The Bucha
example was one of the most obvious things
I've ever seen of them dragging bodies into
place, and that's where they ended up, but
they pretended somebody else or firing a missile
in Poland and claiming it's Russia. Over and
over the vol The laws are being violated.

(01:55:26):
The point is that they
love to use the law against the people
they're fighting, but never love to acknowledge it
for themselves.
Now I'll include this article where we go
into the US or the the the Ukraine
Russia conversation from the, 20th, Trump. And this
is just the title, but the this is
within the show. The title was Trump is
solving and quotes government created problems to roll

(01:55:47):
out your Israeli tested AI control grid, quote,
solution.
So speaking of Ukraine
and the
obvious agenda that it is, the obvious puppet,
vassal state, or whatever you wanna call it.
That they regime change, put their people in
power, and the country's been destabilized ever since,
and they're using them as a, I mean,
like, whatever you would call it, the meat

(01:56:08):
grinder that is Ukraine for their own agenda.
Well, guess what? As they're continuing to do
this and as they're deciding discussing giving them
nuclear weapons, BlackRock, and this is from March,
but BlackRock and JP Morgan are backing a
$15,000,000,000
investor fund to rebuild Ukraine.
You know, sort of like all the money
that was used to rebuild Iraq. How did
that all work out? Right? I mean, we're
being robbed every moment, guys. And these these

(01:56:29):
people are constantly playing everybody.
And I mean, it's right on the surface.
So what I this the point we can
get into is not about them. We should.
We've done entire shows around this or conversations
and articles about BlackRock and the concern they're
in going back to COVID. But
this, including JP Morgan, which is interesting,
is about the influence on Trump's administration and

(01:56:49):
where that goes next.
And and interestingly, overlap with the Ukraine conversation,
where he's gonna end the war, he says.
And Zelensky says, Trump
may, you know, pull out a miracle and
end the war. Like, what do you mean
end the war? In in the tweet 30
seconds before that, you said you would never
give up because of our sovereignty. But then
Trump's gonna end the war? Like but you
have to realize what a puppet this guy

(01:57:11):
is.
Trump is not ending the war in the
context, in my opinion, of like, if he
steps in and somehow brings this to an
end, that would mean that they wanted that
to happen. That they ultimately because Russia is
not gonna accept something they
the point is they're winning. Same with, like,
there's no reason they would give any concessions
at this point other than to stop the
killing. But they won't give back land, I

(01:57:32):
would argue. So as we see this go
forward, I'm of the mind. This is going
to be either
continued, which seems like the most historically logical
as it always seems to happen under the
guise of why we must continue with Syria.
We're gonna end the war in Syria. Oh,
but wait. They did something. We have to
continue. It happens every time.
Or my mind is, and I know this
is, you know, pessimistic, but I believe this
is how they think that ultimately, it will

(01:57:53):
be
the plan was to pull back on this
because they're all failing
and use that
to convince you that he's fighting for the
good, you know, the good fight ultimately, but
the rationalization is to get you to accept
the things they're doing next. And, also, hopefully,
ignore what they're doing to Palestinians that won't
stop. But this is important to consider with
BlackRock and how this overlaps, especially since if
you already missed it.

(01:58:16):
Larry Fink from BlackRock CEO was basically floated
as the possible choice for treasury secretary.
Now as it turns out, he's the one
that said no.
That's important because remember, Trump picked him in
for his administration last time. But the point
is that he then was
contracted
to pick who that person would be. So
it might as well be the same conversation,

(01:58:37):
guys. So it's clear that Larry Fink is
aware that he's too hot right now. Right?
He's too noticed and aware. That's what I
would argue. And so, he's simply going, no,
no. We don't want me there or I'm
not gonna let you put me there. I'm
gonna tell you else to pick. You can
read it how you like.
Now, remember, this was the guy from Fox
News who broke this on 18th saying that
they had an insight into the fact that
he was going to be helping him pick

(01:58:58):
that secretary.
Now, here's an article from the 22nd,
from New York Post of all places, which
is crazy to me. You see, there have
been just there, I think, exposed themselves as
one of the worst mainstream platforms out there
today
for a lot of reasons, mostly around their
garbage around Israel. But the point on this
is that
Larry Fink is like, the republicans largely seem

(01:59:19):
to call out, like, hope rightly so, BlackRock
and that concern. Until weirdly now that it
starts to get folded into Trump, and they
kinda don't wanna talk about it anymore. At
least a lot of the team sport guys.
So what's funny about this, billionaire Larry Fink
could have Trump's ear no matter who gets
the treasury job. So based on the title,
you might think, oh, it's gonna be scathing.
Gonna go after why this is gonna be
a bad thing. Well, you would be mistaken.

(01:59:40):
They're I really just let you know why
it's gonna be great for the country, which
is kind of the opposite of what you
expect in every other context around this conversation
before he was folded in Trump's administration. It
says one of the more underreported aspects of
how Trump, president-elect Trump, will run the economy
will be influenced
will be the influence of those who don't
have a position of power publicly,

(02:00:02):
but remain in his kitchen cabinet. Yeah. That's
that's the deep state stuff, guys. That's what
we're talking about.
He says, it's a loosely defined group of
outside oh, is it? Outsiders?
I would love to see one person in
this cabinet so far, picks anyway, that it'd
be considered an outsider.
Now I know Elon Musk is the richest
man in the world and is a military

(02:00:22):
contractor and a tech ocrat and clearly invest
everything you could point to. He's a part
of it. He's not an outsider, guys. Neither
is Trump. These people are literally the definition
of an insider.
And this game they keep playing about a
group of outsiders, it's just
I how how naive can we be? They're
playing you. They're laughing at you. They're picking
the state and telling you it's outsiders. We're

(02:00:43):
yay.
Trump, it says, taps into his advisory this
advisory network of the whole
BlackRock overlap, and it says, who are these
back channel advisers?
He says, I don't know all of them,
but one name I do know is Larry
Fink,
a very non MAGA CEO of BlackRock.
That's the most scathing you're gonna get in

(02:01:04):
this. Fink is often associated with the Democrat
party. He is. Given his support for progressive
environmental social governance investing.
ESG, ladies and gentlemen.
But he's close to Trump.
He had managed the Donald's vast fortune in
the past, and the 2 still talk. Yeah.
More than that, guys.
Why wouldn't this be

(02:01:25):
very concerning for anybody who's aware of this
problem? Who seems to be predominantly the Republican
conversation? Except when they talk about Rumble and
their leader the leading this being the top
investor in Rumble because then we don't like
to talk about that. But the point is,
it's everywhere.
And this is something they've called out in
any context. Something they point this out when
it comes to stories about

(02:01:45):
hurricanes or something has to do with the
Democrat fund. Oh my god. BlackRock's involved. We
know it's a conspiracy. Suddenly, this comes up
and it's good for the country.
He's literally a champion of ESG.
I mean, it's it's I don't even know
how to explain this other than willful ignorance.
It says on The Money, the plot the
program has learned that earlier this week, in
the middle of the treasury scrum,

(02:02:06):
I quote it says in parenthesis, as I
said, there are a bunch of people vying
for the job. There were outreaches between
there were outreaches between the Trump camp and
Fink about various matters. I am told Fink
immediately took his name out of the treasury
hunt. See, that's why that's important. He
pulled himself out.
Fink's ESG,
the point let's not let's not forget that

(02:02:27):
these people are major players,
as I'll play some clips in a second,
in regard to the great reset conversation, in
regard to the going direct reset financial side
of things, in regard to the COVID 19
dynamic.
And the ESG part of that is a
huge red flag for anything except things attached
to Trump apparently.
And it says it overshadows his amazing skill

(02:02:48):
set as a risk manager and a market
expert.
You don't build a firm from 0 to
10,000,000,000,000 in assets under management without being good
at your job. Yay, BlackRock, apparently.
Great job, New York Post.
I mean, I I feel like we could
look back at their history and find them
writing about how they would destroy the world.
And here we are going, hooray. It's gonna
change the world.

(02:03:08):
Well, David Icke points out that even in
the UK,
same thing. Because this is not a one
country thing, guys. This is a global talk
about globalism. Right? Per and, actually, I'll jump
ahead. This is exactly what David Icke says.
Now the the tweet is from Keir Starmer
himself. He says, I'm determined to deliver growth,
create wealth, and put more money in people's
pockets. People, he means the oligarch.
The oligarchy.

(02:03:29):
He says, this can only be achieved by
working in partnership with businesses like BlackRock. And
here he is with Larry Fink, sitting down,
breaking down how they're gonna steal from you
tomorrow.
And it says,
this is David Icke, Starmer and his buffoons
and government are owned by the gold the
global cult.
Trump is reported to have hired Larry Fink
to suggest treasury secretaries, and Fink meets with

(02:03:49):
Starmer. And he's already picked somebody. We'll come
to that next. He meets with Starmer to
discuss a partnership with his mega global investment
company, BlackRock, the world's biggest asset manager with
investments
worth 11,000,000,000,000.
Now realize, even they call this a shadow
bank, guys.
That's what this is called. I mean, this
this this might as well be the deep
state. And he says, but this is important,

(02:04:10):
but Alex Jones of the mainstream alternative tells
us that BlackRock might as well surrender now
because the globalists are in the process of
total capitulation.
K. And he is including BlackRock in this
conversation.
And this is a big Wall Street winner
from Trump's Bitcoin bump, BlackRock.
Yep.
That's important.
The Bitcoin overlap, the strategic reserve point, which

(02:04:32):
we're gonna come to in a minute.
I'm gonna wait to see some comments on
it because we're gonna talk about this a
lot more.
But here's what we're seeing. Alright? So as
he keeps screaming about the end end of
the globalism, they're all retreating and running. I
mean, guys, those are the people we're talking
about.
This is literally the global entity controlling the
most of the financial aspect of the world.

(02:04:54):
They they're aligned with Trump. He handpicked his
treasury secretary. And Alex says, Trump and Elon
Musk are working behind the scenes to broker
a Ukraine Russia ceasefire.
Now the point is he's been screaming about
the global collapse of the, you know, the
left, the globalist idea, whatever.
But this is crazy to me. He says
that Elon I who knows if this is
even true? Based on what he does, it's

(02:05:15):
5050. It could be complete fabrication.
Trump, Elon Musk are working behind the scenes
to broker a Ukraine ceasefire. Okay. Now there's
2 ways to look at this. Peace deal,
it says. Now based on what he's been
saying in this and his other points,
as well as, we'll just go through look
at them all real quick. This one, same
thing. This is the next the next day.
Trump, days away from announcing potential Ukraine peace

(02:05:36):
deal. So that's that's the point. This is
not at first, you might say, okay. They're
just thinking
about how they might solve this, but when
they come to power in January.
Right?
No. No. He's literally saying they're days away
from announcing
a deal. Now, look. If you believe like,
well, there's 2 ways to look at this.
Even if you genuinely think that he wants

(02:05:57):
to end the war for the good of
the world,
which we all should want,
why in the world would you be doing
this now?
Like, I'm not getting in the way the
the the responses
you get online. Well, shouldn't you want this
to end right away? It's not worth talking
about. Yes. Yes. As a general sense, we
should all. The point, though, is about legal
dynamics.
If we're to believe that these Biden democrat

(02:06:19):
administration are out to get him. Right? We
wanna destroy Trump. We're gonna as Alex was
just saying 30 seconds ago, they're trying to
steal it still, and we have fighting in
the courts to stop them stealing for January.
I guess that just got put away for
a minute. The point
is why wouldn't they call this out?
Donald Trump is not the president. Elon Musk
is not even technically part of the government
at all whether or not he's got department

(02:06:40):
of efficiency, which is not a real place
yet. So you're talking about the CEO of
Twitter
and an all around manipulator
and Donald Trump
planning to release a ceasefire deal with a
foreign
nuclear armed hostile entity according to the US
government.
And that's supposed to be okay?
Like, assuming he even has good intentions because
I know you love to believe that, but

(02:07:01):
he might not.
Either way, the point is why this is
like we just showed you before. The argument
of this is being stated by in in
insider source internal sources that Elon
was meeting with an Iranian foreign minister about
some kind of that's so overwhelmingly crazy.
Even if he has good intentions, they don't
know what they're doing. What happens if they

(02:07:22):
make this worse? What if they cause nuclear
war? Like, if this was in any other
context, this is the logical thing you guys
would point out.
So let's say Trump announces 2 days from
now a a a ceasefire
deal.
And
we're supposed to I mean, why wouldn't the
Biden administration
call that a crime? Because I think, technically
it is. You're not in a position of

(02:07:43):
power to negotiate with a foreign leader on
behalf of the country.
So my point is either this is completely
made up, which wouldn't surprise me,
just to keep you thinking they're already working
for you or they're doing this, and Biden's
administration doesn't care, which would tell me one
thing.
It's all a plan. Your government is the
government, and they're all doing there's just the
plan laid out for you. Otherwise, if we're

(02:08:04):
to believe what we're told, that the Bidens
and the Democrats are out to get them
no matter what and they're trying to steal
it, there's your opportunity right there. Stand up
and declare this an illegal act because it
technically is. They have no legal right to
negotiate with a foreign leader right now. Period.
So
we'll have to wait and see, I guess.
Any of them are possible. And when this
if if this eventually goes nowhere and nothing
comes of it, we have to remember that

(02:08:25):
he said this and where it'd come from.
But if it does happen,
we immediately have to ask why that's acceptable
right now. What I don't care who it
is. Trump or Biden or whatever other president.
If RFK got picked or Jill Stein got
picked. The point is you're not in power
yet. These actions are not supposed to be
able to happen.
And then thirdly, if it does happen and
they do successfully do something, and let's just

(02:08:45):
even say it does pull the war down,
I'll say good. That's a positive. But it
has to show us
that they didn't take advantage of the most
obvious example they could have used to go
after the person we're told is their enemy,
which then has to make you realize that
they're not actually enemies.
But, of course, the second part, the globalist
could launch a false flag to sabotage it.

(02:09:05):
Okay. Well, there's your out. Right? So let's
say nothing happens at all, that's gonna be
the story. There was a thing they did,
and that's why it didn't happen. Or the
false flag is some kind of an action
that we're pointing out in other context like
with the Iran point we're making, and that
becomes the justification. It's easy to lay things
out. This is this module we queue out
on, the way this works. We'll have to
wait and see.
Also, he says Trump holding secret global peace

(02:09:26):
summit with the head of NATO at Mar
a Lago.
Man, now I find it hard to believe
he would make these crazy statements without there
being something to back it up. But, again,
if you know his past work, that's not
hard to believe.
But what's interesting,
holding a secret global summit?
I just oh, come on. I know I
don't care what kind of,
you know,
hero worship complex you have with these people,

(02:09:48):
but you have to admit that's crazy.
In any I don't I just don't know
what other context with than anything else in
the world with anybody else this would be.
Like, imagine Trump's in was president and Biden
got elected, and in November started dealing with
foreign leaders,
started committing peace deals and global summits with
people that were literally acting under Trump's administration.
You know you guys would lose your minds.

(02:10:09):
It's just about being honest and logical about
this, and this seems absolutely crazy to me.
So in the conversation of the Bitcoin overlap.
Right, and where and and the the
treasury, the BlackRock overlap, like, there's a lot
happening. Now, we're gonna get into this a
lot more. We're already planning up up an
IMA panel that'll be probably coming up soon.

(02:10:32):
Catherine, Whitney, and and the offguardian people and,
you know, Kit and Cat and everybody else.
It's gonna be a great conversation.
Because, I mean, offguardian has been nailing, you
know, they do an excellent job all the
time. But this topic in general is fascinating.
And what's interesting about this, and this is
just Derek's article you're looking at right now
from the first of August, the co opting
of bitcoin.

(02:10:52):
This conversation is kinda blowing my mind in
a lot of ways. And it's not just
about the financial side of this. I'm gonna
be interviewing somebody in a couple in a
week, I think, or more that you guys
aren't familiar with. But it's somebody that I
met in in in Sedona that just blew
my mind around the overlap of this. It
has to do specifically with artificial intelligence
and that Bitcoin is much more in his
mind than just a financial asset.

(02:11:13):
And that the way it's being used, I
mean, it's it's it's in a way, he
sees it as positive, but I it's also
very possibly dark.
Now, I don't I mean, I'm I'm gonna
I need to I need to learn more
about this myself to fully be able to
get into it, but my concern is how
this,
overlaps with
the great reset, artificial intelligence, the the the

(02:11:33):
technocratic world we're being pushed into.
And I think right now, what it's appearing
to me is that this is about more
than just using it as a reserve currency.
That we're gonna be shown something slowly that
Bitcoin or the background technology around it is
being used for something a lot more alarming.
Like, what tracking, for example, in the conversation
of carbon tracking or digital IDs. Like, that's

(02:11:54):
a a surface level if even that point
in this conversation. This gets into some much
bigger stuff that is the kind of supercomputer
bind. Like, the idea of in a future
dynamic using this is the way he's describing
it could be something that is ultimately the
next step in how they use
like, you know, like we see in dystopian
movies. Like, in a like, a supercomputer dynamic
that is exponentially grown.

(02:12:15):
Anyway, the point is that this is something
I don't I want us to consider
in the conversation of these next points.
Oh, actually, so we're gonna come to Bitcoin
next, but I'll include these. The the COVID
coup, the BlackRock takeover of American interests,
and the article from Josh Wilko is the
long shadow of BlackRock.
Now, Salar Report put this out. This is
to the Bitcoin point I was making.

(02:12:37):
Dennis Porter writes on the 21st.
Oh, look at that even talking about the
same Bitcoin
rally, fair to call it. Trump's top crypto
advisor just publicly said what we what I've
known for some time, he says.
I was just talking actually, we just spoke
with Casper on the phone about this. We're
setting up the next the next time I'm
I'm a panel. And she exactly actually, I

(02:12:58):
just didn't just have to say that because
that's what they're posting from Solari. But I
just wanna point out that they're of the
same mind. And it says the president is
going to pursue Bitcoin as a strategic asset.
The race is officially on. All Americans win
when we compete to create strategic Bitcoin reserve.
I disagree.
The states are one step ahead.
Now, my my this is exactly the opposite.
Anyone who understands what cryptocurrency and Bitcoin in

(02:13:20):
particular was at least arguably designed for, right,
in the mindset of the way at least
the community started embracing it, it was a
challenge to the system. And that was the
whole point of what Donald Trump said at
this rally. He tried to act like this
was the way where it's it's a threat
to it's a it's not a threat to
the dollar. It's a the the dollar or
how do you frame it? The point is
it is a threat to the dollar. This
whole thing was made it was meant to

(02:13:40):
be a threat to the system itself, not
be a supplemental part of it.
And on top there's so many things that
Katherine points out in this conversation about how
this is basically, using it the way they
say it's gonna be used, as RFK laid
out, she argues it's gonna be a massive
criminal action.
That ultimately, this will take from people. And
on top of that, what we're seeing in
general
is that this whole thing is gonna be

(02:14:01):
used to drive us into the next step
of the digital asset, the digital ID, digital
currency,
all of it. It's right on the surface
of this. And that's what Slari wrote. Reverse
Robinhood.
Now this is a this is what I
was pointing to, but you check out her
work in our our interviews and where she
lays this out.
She says tax other people, borrow from their
retirement savings, take the money, and spend it

(02:14:22):
to take large investors out of their Ponzi
scheme after the announcement of a government buying
program
runs up the price. Meantime, the investors take
their large, poor profits
and buy real assets. More billionaires getting rich
scamming other people's money. Now that's a surface
level point in where this goes. There's a
link to check it out.
But here's a clip that she we played
earlier that I think just considers this overlap

(02:14:43):
going back to the COVID 19 time frame.
And how this is a no one this
is a multistep process.
This is not some Trump designed idea that
he came up with for his administration. This
is another step in this process.
I hope you can see it like that
because that's what I believe this is.
Central bankers of the g seven nations went

(02:15:04):
into
the room in Jackson Hole in August 2019,
and they voted on the going direct reset.
Everything that's happened to us right now is
part of the going direct reset, and they
voted on it. It was a plan.
Okay? So they wrote a plan.
They decided to do this.
So they've been
they've been engaged in the financial coup for
20 years. We're now coming into the end

(02:15:25):
game. They have to consolidate the financial coup,
and they vote on the going direct reset.
And with that one decision,
they made a decision over the next year
to put 500,000,000 people out of work.
That's the equivalent of dropping several nuclear bombs
around the world.
That's financial warfare,
and they made it intentionally.

(02:15:47):
They made it knowingly,
and it was a plan.
And what is very important to understand when
you think about this pandemic
is
people are not dying from magic viruses. People
are dying from tyranny.
They're dying from a great poisoning that's part
of that tyranny.
But

(02:16:08):
our problem and the thing we need to
be afraid of is tyranny because the tyranny
is about to get much, much worse.
And and it's the passports
and and that system of Central Bank Digital
Control
that will give them the ability to do
that. But but here's our situation.
We are operating

(02:16:28):
on a,
on
an economic model that has to change.
And so, you know, so the so the,
you know, the central bankers got together and
said, we're gonna have a going direct reset.
And the World Economic Forum called it the
great reset. But, basically, they're doing a reset.
Now if you go back

(02:16:50):
over the last 500 years of the central
banking warfare model, every 100 years or so,
there is a reset.
And there are remarkable patterns that appears historically,
you know, to each reset. But, anyway,
so we do need a reset, and it's
a Tina Turner thing. We could do this
nice or rough.
And the risk adverse way to do the
reset, if you're the top, if you're mister
Global, is simply
to if

(02:17:11):
you're the top, if you're mister Global, is
simply to dramatically reduce the population and put
them under complete control. And that's
what they're doing. Now there's
another way to do the reset, and that's
to basically
evolve into an economic model, which is in
balance environmentally

(02:17:32):
and and and is sort of building wealth
globally together,
which I believe can be done. It's called
human civilization,
and and it can happen,
but it's much harder to do and much
riskier. And if you're the guys running everything,
you know, you're gonna be liable for all
the sort of bad news that comes out,
and you might not end up in control.

(02:17:53):
So I can understand why they're being risk
adverse and they'd rather do their reset.
But what we need to do is we
need to have a reset.
And if we don't insist on our kind
of reset, the people's reset, then we're gonna
get their reset.
Yep. And this is where we are.
Right? It's happening right in front of us.

(02:18:14):
And they're just like we keep saying,
using Trump and people, whether he knows it
or not, to make you believe that this
is not what's happening.
Now as she ref met references references the
people's reset, which was previously known as the
greater reset. This is Derek bros's,
I guess, conference dynamic. We're really just an
idea about the I about what she's talking

(02:18:37):
about. Right? Doing
there are clearly problems
that should be addressed.
So that that's kind of the way 2
the paradigm works is that instead of recognizing
that, yeah, we're clearly destroying the planet, maybe
the carbon tax b s and lie is
completely a manipulation. The whole climate agenda, clear.
But that doesn't mean we're not destroying planet.
You specifically, the people lying about that are
the ones doing the most. The burn pits

(02:18:58):
and the foreign policy and the war. The
point is that there are things that need
to be,
I guess, solved.
Right? The point of the greater or the
people's reset is that there are other paths
to take, not some technocratic nightmare dystopia to
solve the problems. And so I'll include the
link for you here to the the the
people's reset, and also shout out the upcoming
event that we're gonna be having that I'll

(02:19:19):
be at.
January 29th, February 2nd in Mexico, the people's
reset. I'm looking forward to that. Doing some
music, doing some speaking, should be pretty fun.
Now, I'll have more coming your way on
that more, like, links and so on. That
was just the the graphic you just recently
sent me. So important to consider this, guys,
and where this is all going. Now, also,
don't forget, as she's pointing to the COVID
19 time frame where this all got kinda

(02:19:40):
rolled out,
BlackRock was heavily invested in m 3 3
m masks, one of the most commonly used.
So it's you have to see that there
are much more connections to this than you
realize. Now, yes, they're invested in a lot,
most everything. But it's important to consider what
they can apply that pressure to and how
these things are used.
Now, this is something that was put forward.
This one's simply by,

(02:20:00):
Cynthia Loomis from, Wyoming,
introduces a strategic bitcoin reserve legislation. So this
is not hypothetical. This is already happening.
Right? This is from win Wyoming, but I'm
arguing you're gonna see something much more central
to the Trump administration.
But these these are the supposed Bitcoin act
20 24 tenants, and it says establish a
strategic Bitcoin reserve.
Establish decentralized network of secure Bitcoin storage facilities

(02:20:23):
distributed across the USA. Well, how long until
we realize that that is what ultimately is
being rolled out as the new digital currency?
Just because it's private doesn't mean I mean,
as far as Catherine points out often, having
a private version is far, far worse.
Bitcoin purchase program. Treasury to purchase 200,000 Bitcoin
per year from 5 years. Like, why do
we want the government controlling this?

(02:20:45):
I know they sound like you may make
a lot of money. You probably will if
you're invested in this, but the point is,
that's not what this was ultimately about. So
for those that are trying to fight for
what this was trying to build,
it's being stolen from you.
And on top of that, realize there's a
lot of more nefarious things around this. I
mean, even they reference the amount that they've
taken and using that. Well, that's money that's
already been stolen from you.

(02:21:06):
Proof of reserve system. Publish quarterly reports audited
by independent third parties in cryptographic
well, how long until that stops happening? Or
how much you wanna bet it doesn't happen
the way they say it does? I hope
I'm wrong.
Yes. I'm I'm pessimistic, but realize history of
this government, and as much as you love
to pretend like they're not part of it,
they are, shows you that you have every
right to worry that this doesn't happen the

(02:21:27):
way they say it does. My point is
the same systems we have now, they don't
really follow through.
7th failed audit from the Pentagon. They're using
that to roll into this. That's what I
want you to think about. Not that that's
a reaction of them trying to solve it,
but rather that the Pentagon failed audits and
continuing to ridiculously do so right in your
face was building to this moment. For then,
you go, well, guess what? We have a

(02:21:47):
solution for the problem that you've
reacted to.
Now, again, I'm not saying I can prove
that. I hope I'm wrong. But if you're
not willing to consider that and be on
guard for that,
there's something else going on.
Consolidate current holdings, all bitcoin held by other
agencies to be transferred to this reserve.
Voluntary state participation. States can participate voluntarily by

(02:22:10):
depositing to, withdrawing from accounts. Right. Okay. Maybe.
Then Then what happens when that becomes the
reserve currency that we use?
Well, you'll be boxed out.
So people will do it anyway. It's it's
the way that they they
create the system to where you're driven into
it. Offsetting costs, first 6,000,000,000 of the Federal
Reserve's net earnings each year go to the
reserve.

(02:22:31):
Protect Bitcoin. I mean, you know how like,
as she as Cath as Catherine was pointing
out more than anything, this is going to
be overwhelmingly rife with corruption for the most
wealthy.
Protect Bitcoin property rights, Affirming rights of self
custody. US government can't seize or confiscate lawfully
owned Bitcoin. Well, that's easy. Guess what? Yours
isn't lawfully owned for x, y, and z.
Now we're gonna take it. I mean, guys,

(02:22:52):
they'll do that everywhere else. Why would it
make a difference here? That's not pessimistic. That's
reality.
Now here's the actual pick for the set
the treasury secretary, which happened right away, which
I think is pretty easy to see. The
moment he pulled them out, they picked the
person that he suggested they pick.
Why CEOs are cheering Donald Trump's pick for
treasury secretary?

(02:23:15):
Scott
Bessette,
Besent.
I think that's how you say it. Besent.
Well, Scott Besent,
interesting overlap here. As Elon Musk says, would
be interesting to hear more people weigh in
on him on the feedback. He says, my
view is that he is a,
business as usual choice.
Well, that's interesting, which by the way, I

(02:23:36):
appreciate. Right? I'll be the first if if
the fact the idea that they're not all
saying the same thing, which but that's you
know, doesn't have to doesn't prove that they're
said, like, this very well could have been
the scripted point they were supposed to put
forward. But either way, whether that's the case
or not, which we should always consider, it's
not that's just question everything. The point is
that I'm I'm happy to see them saying,
well, I don't agree with that. That gives
you at least the slight feeling there might

(02:23:57):
not be some lockstep agenda. But what's interesting
on top of that, if it is real,
is that even Elon is pointing out, well,
that's just a normal choice. So we're not
playing the outsider game if you're just picking
normal insider people, which is not just this
one. It's the whole thing.
But this person tags and says, if my
memory serves correctly, and this is true, he
was a hedge fund manager for George Soros'

(02:24:19):
investment operations.
Of course, that's a while ago. Right? Even
though there's still clear overlap.
Well, the point is always is not that
that should be the absolute end all be
all, but if it were anybody on the
other side, it would be for the minds
of teams who are politics players. I think
we all know that. Along with everything else
we'll point out about these people, if any
one of these things, any one of the

(02:24:40):
connection to the great reason of the World
Economic Forum or BlackRock or George Soros or
it would be that's a clear example that
they're a criminal, which even then would be
an over assumption too because we don't know
that for sure. There's just a connection. The
point is to make it obvious that if
the one connection was there in another context,
it would be seen differently, and that's hypocrisy,
guys. But I agree, though. There's a reason
to be concerned about these people. On top

(02:25:01):
of that, shows you these are not outsiders,
at least not on paper.
What to know about Scott Besant?
Hedge fund mogul Scott Besant, which again, hedge
fund mogul. You know, he's funny. It's like,
I know the argument can always be made
with the insider and blah blah blah, which
didn't work out last time, but it's not
a it's not a illogical point. This guy
would probably know more about what to fix

(02:25:23):
than people that weren't inside.
But these are not usually the actions of
an outsider fighting the system or the deep
state. People that are this wealthy and moguls
of they're usually tapped in. You think he
bucks the system? Probably not.
Hope I'm wrong.
But the pro tariff Wall Street veteran and
former colleague of Democratic mega donor George Soros
will become perhaps the most prominent voice shaping

(02:25:44):
Trump's economy.
Well, BlackRock said so, so I'm sure it's
all gonna work out. Right?
Pro tariff as well as we'll get into
that and we'll see I I think we'll
wait for that main conversation for when things
start happening. But don't forget, guys, the game
of tariffs are it's it's against you.
You pay for that. No matter what Trump
keeps screaming about. The same thing with China
when it was happening. That's simply a tax

(02:26:04):
on you. You're paying for that.
Now it says, percent who lives primarily in
Charleston, South Carolina with his husband, John Freeman
and their 2 children, according to the Wall
Street Journal, could be the 1st senate approved
LGBTQ
plus member or republican cabinet, which is great.
Good. If if he's the best person for
the job, that shouldn't matter. But what I
just think is interesting to point out is

(02:26:25):
there is a is a vein going through
this the mostly teams who are politics side
of this that do have a problem with
that. That you can see them publicly saying
these things online.
I just think that's interesting. A smaller deviation
from the norm, but my point would be
the same. It's about where they're there the
best for the job. And that go that's
not that's whether you think an insider is
best or, you know, the point would be

(02:26:47):
like care like KJP,
that they should be picked for why they're
best for the job. But, of course, the
argument would be made that that won't happen
here because that's not a left wing thing.
Well, no, it's not really. You see the
same kind of things going on. So it's
just always worthy of pointing out. This says,
dissent also has called for Trump to appoint
the next Federal Reserve chairman next year, a
year before the expiration of Fed chair Jerome

(02:27:09):
Powell's term.
You can decipher what you think that means,
whether that's just talking about it ahead of
time or wanting you to think that he's
gonna get rid of him even though I
don't think technically he can.
I mean, they could do whatever they want,
but they're not part of the federal government.
As much
as Republicans keep trying to float that as
the idea, which they either don't know, which
is scary, or they're trying to conten trick

(02:27:29):
you.
But the Federal Reserve isn't is not part
of the federal government, which is wild. And
that should matter. It's a private bank,
private entity.
But it says the treasury secretary
and fed chairman are the 2 most important
economic policy roles in the US, and Trump
has often jabbed at Powell, who, by the
way, don't forget, was Trump's appointee during his

(02:27:50):
first term. Always how this tends to go.
But it says, percent is, quote, one of
the most brilliant men on Wall Street and
is, quote, respected by everybody, says Trump. Quite
the outsider.
Says Trump. Quite the outsider. Of course,
I took a screenshot, so this would be
gone. So there's 2 more points I thought
stood out to
me
from the Wikipedia page. In 2,000,
percent hosted a fundraiser for Al Gore

(02:28:14):
at his East Hampton, New York home. He
has also donated to Hillary Clinton and Barack
Obama.
Well, yeah, that makes sense to me seeing
as how they're all part of the same
thing. But if you're shocked by that, maybe
you should ask why. Realize that they're all
part of the same structure.
Besant chairs the investment committee and is a
member of the executive committee on the board
of trustees at the Rockefeller University, and most
importantly, is a member on the Council of

(02:28:35):
Foreign Relations.
Yeah. He's a real outsider, guys.
Literally tapped into every single level of the
controls. But he's an outsider because Trump
said. Council on foreign relations. Well, Whitney has
some comments on this guy. People have so
this is the statement is, I read he's
been friends with Trump for a long time
and hasn't spoken to Soros for years.

(02:28:56):
Sir, okay. I mean, it it the point
is red, which we don't know for sure.
People say what they say online. But just
because he was tet connected to Soros doesn't
prove anything necessarily,
but is usually a red flag, especially in
this conversation.
But that's the point is it becomes a,
well, I heard otherwise, so no big deal.
That wouldn't be the case if you were
talking about the people on the left. But
it says she says, people have made this
point about Scott Bissent,

(02:29:17):
but it's hard it's a hard one to
swallow when you consider his recent career.
His 2 hedge funds since leaving Soros, including
his current one,
employ or employed most Soros alum, and were
heavily financed by Soros himself.
So you can see that they're not really
disconnected. Soros
brought Bascent back to run his chief investment
officer from 2 1011

(02:29:40):
to 2016.
Everything Besent has accumulated since the early 19
nineties he owes to Soros, and maybe some
of his close pal, King Charles, who he's
connected with as well.
Hardly an outsider.
She also writes people would do well to
scrutinize the Trump treasury pick since the last
one picked
who also had a Soros affiliation through more

(02:30:02):
minor though more minor than percent,
ultimately executed the largest wealth transfer in American
history, starting with the repo market going crazy
in late 2019 and then cleverly repackaging it
as a COVID relief
when it was not.
That's
Larry Fink and BlackRock.
If you've never heard of the BlackRock design
going direct scheme, that's what Katherine was describing.

(02:30:24):
And here's a link for something Whitney wrote
about it. I mean, it it's it's very
clear, and that's actually what I should have
grabbed that for after this.
But that's the article. That's the show anyway
that we did about this exact dynamic.
So just it's already in the link, so
you can check it out. But don't forget,
this was 2020, June 18th. The COVID coup,

(02:30:45):
the BlackRock takeover American interest. This as she
pointed out, this was something from before. Already
had this lined up. And then they just
repackaged it for covid 19 like damn near
everything else. And now, BlackRock essentially runs the
US Treasury. That's where we are. It's not
hyperbole.
That happened during Trump's administration. Like the largest
transfer of wealth, like, all sorts of things
that we just pretend aren't their operation warp

(02:31:05):
speed.
Very, very concerning. Now I'll talk about more
of his picks. I'll include some previous shows
we did. This one's from 14th. Conservatives begin
to acknowledge
Trump's cabinet picks reveal Israel's first agenda. I
think that's kind of beginning to meltdown right
now in the conversation while people try to
pretend it's not happening.
But here's what David Nida to say about
Oz. We've mentioned it before, which really is

(02:31:27):
wild. I believe this is the,
yeah, these censored news put on a great
clip about Oz. Basically, just, you know, very
supportive of the trans agenda, of vaccinations, of
implanting chips. All the things we're supposed to
be concerned about and should be, except when
it aligns with Trump in some way. Now
David Knight says, now we know why Trump
loves the guy so much. It's always the
jab and World Economic Forum UN Depopulation Agenda.

(02:31:50):
Ex endorsed for senate. Now put him in
the CMS where Trump ran the bribery program.
13,000 to label someone as COVID. No test
required. 20% bonus on everything done if labeled
COVID.
$39,000 if you can put them on a
ventilator, nearly 90% died. He still promotes that
as a success.
CMS paid the Trump bribes. Then Biden blackmailed

(02:32:10):
hospitals. He'd put all Medicaid, Medicare, and COVID
bribes if staff didn't get faxed. He'd pull
it. Excuse me. That's the point right there.
See, Knight sees it. You could see the
continued con the continuation.
The left, right, didn't could,
mirage.
Now that's not to say that they have
don't have different per opinions or policies or
different personal actions. The point is the larger

(02:32:32):
places where it matters.
They just hand off the baton.
And there's this is, doctor Jane Ruby
pointing out what he's doing.
And this person responds by saying, and this
is an important point I wanna make.
Heather says, oh, this is a terrible choice.
Probably we can agree on that. Some people
can't even get to that point because they're
blinded by Trump support,

(02:32:54):
just like the democrats do, and just don't
wanna acknowledge the damning picks that are made.
Because he must know something we don't. Well,
that's just hero worship, even if you're right.
But he said then she goes on to
then say though, surprised
that RFK Junior approved him as a pick.
At least Oz will be subservient to Kennedy.
My god. See, this is how this is
how this is being used.

(02:33:16):
Now look, I hope
even with my concerns of the foreign policy
points and his lies around it, that he
does get in that position
for obvious reasons.
But we don't know that's happening yet. Like
I keep saying, the senate could not confirm
him. Trump could change his mind. RFK could
change his mind. Somebody could die. Anything could
happen. The point is that we don't know
yet. And so if you're if people are

(02:33:36):
already factoring this in, like, somehow he's
or what's his name and say he for
sure is gonna get in? Why do we
think we know that he's being just because
the narrative is he's helping,
do we know he's approving
picks?
I don't think we do. I think there's
already been multiple. I'll show you one next
that seemed to be exactly the opposite of
at least what we pretend he would pick.

(02:33:57):
Pro vaccine, pro,
operation warp speed, COVID 19, mass, everything. All
there's this person as well as the next
one.
They are not on his page. So I
think we're pretending that that's the case.
Right? I mean, so what it ends up
doing is just the illusion or the possibility
that he could be in this position and
helping makes them feel better about the bad

(02:34:18):
choices. That's exactly why I think he's there.
Former Fox News contributor, Janet
Neshawat,
has been tapped as Trump's surgeon general.
Well, you wanna hear what she has to
say?
Democrats like Alan Dershowitz have sounded the alarm.
Oops. Sorry. Vaccine This one. Sorry. I jumped

(02:34:40):
the gun. This is the one.
Right here. First of all, vaccines
save lives, and I am so excited, and
I thank and I commend Facebook and Mark
Zuckerberg for taking action because this affects everyone.
This affects our children. It affects adults. That's
for censorship, by the way. So she's praising
the censorship because we have vaccines of COVID

(02:35:01):
nineteen is what they're talking about. Where they're
saving everybody.
Still holds that opinion. I mean, just look
at the recent measles outbreak, the biggest outbreak
that we've had in decades.
Well, RFP Junior has a lot to say
about that. So if you think he's involved
in this choice,
maybe you should reflect on weight, maybe that
he feels differently than you think he does.
I'm of the mind that he's not involved

(02:35:22):
in this. With measles and and that's no
joke. Measles can cause brain inflammation
and pneumonia and ear infections and hearing loss
and death. So it's about time that they
are taking action, and I hope and pray
that other social media platforms will follow suit
and do the same thing.
Well, that's pretty telling guys.
So I just hope you can consider.

(02:35:43):
Ask yourself whether that is
why that will be the choice. Whether it's
from Trump or RFK.
Just be have the courage to acknowledge that
it does not line up with what you
were promised.
And this is what Jimmy Dore said. That
goes back to the point to the other
person just said. He says, why do you
think he's making a horrible choice like that?
It's a fair question.

(02:36:03):
But, I mean, the point is that people
pretend it's a bad choice. Well, it's a
bad choice to us.
Do you think I mean, it's almost as
if you wanna argue that he knows it's
a bad choice. He I don't think he
thinks that. But then he says, what's he
getting out of it? Like, you see, this
is the point. As opposed to just that
being their choice, there must be some reason
he's being fixed or pushed or which is
all possible too. But you're giving you're already

(02:36:25):
giving him the benefit of the doubt. Like,
he wouldn't do this. We don't know what
Trump feels and thinks. But then the worst
part is, he's got RFK in his ear.
So no way he's just making a mistake.
Come on, guys. Like, come on. We are
all smart enough to know that what do
you mean? There's no way. Well, yes. There
obviously is.
He's got in his ear. Do we know
that? I mean, this is the mirage of

(02:36:46):
the the narrative that's been constructed, and it
could be true
or maybe not.
So I think this is wild that we're
building these perceptions on the idea that, well,
because we know
no. We don't.
What's he getting out of it?
Maybe that's the pick he wanted. Maybe that's
the pick RFK wanted for all we know.
But there's no way he's just making a
mistake. Well, yes. It obviously is a way.

(02:37:08):
So I I'm really worried about even people
like this that are critical of some things
around Israel that just seem to be blinded
when it comes to RFK Junior. That's not
really an
it's just a it's a criticism for all
of us. I've got my own blind spots.
The problem is that we continue
to ignore what doesn't line up with things
that we can't prove in the first place.
I think this is the plan. People like

(02:37:29):
this, which then is either showing us that
RFK is not influenced in this at all
and is only a a token they're using
to manipulate you, or he's not what he
seems like.
Here's even Newsweek from from day. How Janet
Neshawat and RFK junior could be split on
vaccines.
The argument's exactly what you think. She's all
pro and he's not. And it's like, well,

(02:37:50):
there's clearly not something he would pick.
If we of the mindset that he believes
the way we think he does. The point
is we just don't know. And even with
Israel and foreign policy, it shows me that
he
is not all the honest. Right? I mean,
there's only one way to look at that.
You're not anti war if you support a
genocide.
Now Jake Shields adds an interesting
point, which I briefly pointed out earlier. Matt

(02:38:12):
Gaetz was Trump's only nomination. He wasn't funded
by APAC, at least as we could prove.
And he goes, I'm sure him being forced
to resign is just another coincidence. Like, that's
a really interesting interesting thing to think about.
Now that clip we play from MSNBC, for
example, about APAC, well, it makes a great
point in there where they discuss the fact
that even somebody who was over the top
publicly in support of Israel

(02:38:33):
but chose not to align himself with the
group ultimately got vote you know, they they
funded their alternative. They want people that take
their money. They want people that will go
along with the agenda, not just say I'm
support you, but leave me alone.
They they want their bought off politicians.
So the point is that whether that's him
or not, on paper, he wasn't.
So I find it really telling that he
because that's the point. On pay on on

(02:38:55):
publicly, Matt Gaetz was all the same way.
Pro Israel will support Israel no matter what.
But maybe he didn't take the funding.
And, well, all of a sudden, we see
this coordinated effort about him and some some
sex with a girl and
seems like Israel's MO.
No. That's my opinion.
But I also I find that very interesting.

(02:39:15):
Now president-elect Trump announces Pam Bondi as his
new pick for US attorney general.
Sure you can guess.
That that's now here this is the one
replacing Matt Gaetz. Right? So you replace somebody
who says he's pro Israel, but it's not
taking APAC money. Well, here is somebody who
is, who takes his place.
Michael Tracy points out, Pam Bondi participated in
the strange ritual of issuing

(02:39:37):
pro Israel resolutions on behalf of the Florida
state government.
Look at this. Okay? Why why does this
have to happen for a state government legislation?
It says state of Florida resolution. Whereas, Israel
remains a force of freedom and democracy in
the least.
Okay? And whereas, Florida continues to foster a
strong relationship with Israel and is home to
one of the largest Jewish Okay. Whereas, Israel

(02:39:58):
was steadfast ally of the United States, whereas
Hamas is the United States What are we
doing right here?
So you're right. You're passing a state level
bill about being Israel's
pro Israel and fighting bad guy. Why does
the state have to do that? They don't.
That's federal government foreign policy stuff.
The point is, guys, that these people are
being driven to do this. That's a provable

(02:40:20):
fact.
This is the new attorney general.
Or is it, yeah.
And then this is beyond headlines. This is
a clip I started to play a second
ago. Can you guess what she's gonna get
into?
Free speech, guys. It's all about free speech,
unless it has to do with Israel.
Democrats like Alan Dershowitz have sounded the alarm

(02:40:40):
over the growing virulent strain of Jew haters
in the Democrat party. It appears their agents
in the unfair press are carrying that water.
It is dangerous, is it not?
Yeah. It's very So remember, guys,
whatever you think about that and, yes, if
somebody who hates a Jewish person or hates
a Christian just because of the religion, I
agree they're disgusting people.

(02:41:01):
They have a constitutional
right to feel however they want about whatever
they want and express those thoughts.
However, just, you know, disgusting it may be
to you, and rightly so.
That's free speech. Whether it's Israel, China, or
Russia, it doesn't matter. So when they talk
about this, make sure you understand that no
matter how you feel about it. Same with
burning the US flag. The supreme court has

(02:41:21):
roundly argued and ruled that it is an
inherent constitutional right or it's protected within your
inherent rights.
Whatever you think about it, that is the
current reality.
So when she's saying this, realize that she's
saying it is okay to censor you,
violate your rights if it has to do
with Israel.
And the unfair press are carrying that water.

(02:41:44):
It is dangerous. Is it not?
Yeah. It's very dangerous, Chris. It's extremely dangerous.
And, you know, you look around the thing
that's really the most troubling to me, these
students
in universities
in our country, whether they're here as Americans
or if they're here on student visas, and
they're out there saying, I support a mosque.
No. They're not. Yeah. I mean, you could

(02:42:05):
probably find your occasional example. But even then,
you should be wondering whether there's somebody pretending
to because they recognize why that looks bad.
But they're I'm sure they exist, guys. There's
I mean, there isn't a whole grouping of
them that make that almost as a point.
That's because they have a right to say
that. It's the same as anything else, especially
since, let's not forget, Israel funds that group
right up until 2024.
Provable fact.

(02:42:26):
So bottom line, though, you have a right
to support whatever you want.
You're not doing anything.
That's the crime. You can stand up and
say you support ISIS. That's your right to
say whatever you want and think whatever you
want. And I can say you're crazy for
saying so. Just recognize how wild it is
that they have that issue with you saying
it only in the context of Israel. If

(02:42:46):
you wanna stand up and say you're part
of some terror you support a terror group
that works in some other country halfway around
the world from Israel, they won't bat an
eye.
You and I have seen that on all
of these television shows. Frankly, they need to
be be taken out of our country or
the FBI needs to be interviewing them right
away when they're saying I support Hamas. Wow.
I am Hamas. That's not They're nuts. They're

(02:43:08):
not saying it's just so stupid. And and
maybe she just doesn't know that which is
almost more alarming. But either way, guys, the
FBI, you should get them out of the
country. This is alarming radical extremist talk.
Because even if you think that you agree
with that, how long until it gets applied
to the next thing? Oh, now it's Hezbollah.
Oh, now it's just Lebanon. No. It's just
Palestinian support. Oh, well, now it's whatever group

(02:43:28):
you think you support, but they now change
their it will obviously move like it always
has.
All this is about is give saying that
we can go after you, remove
ignore your inherent rights as long as it's
within the category we've created. And those lines
can move based on however we feel and
whatever flag we have people on Twitter putting
in their profile.
Saying I support all these poor Palestinians

(02:43:50):
who are trapped in Gaza. That's not what
they're saying. Yes. It is what they're saying.
Easily
proven. So I think their student visas need
to be Guys, they're waving Palestinian flags. Don't
you think that if they were gonna make
this whole segment about Hamas, they might at
least find one example of them waving Hamas
flag? No. Because they don't have them, guys.
You know that they they probably searched everywhere.

(02:44:12):
But here they are showing you white Palestinian
flags, and all they can do is stand
up and lie about it. And even if
they were Hamas flags, you have the right
to do that.
Revoked. I think we need to reinstate president
Trump's travel ban immediately.
There's a lot of things that can be
done to stop this. But, yeah, the anti
semitism
is is rampant throughout this country now. And

(02:44:33):
it's true It's almost like somebody put that
in her ear. Did you see that? She
was mid sentence. She would go, oh, yeah.
Yeah. Anti semitism.
It's
it's a lot of things that can be
done to stop this yeah. The antisemitism
Okay. Guys, that's not normal. Something either was
slid in front of her, somebody said something
in her ear, something was put there. That's
my opinion, but come on, look at the

(02:44:53):
way she responds.
There's a lot of things that can be
done to stop this. Yeah. The anti Semitism
She she even looks down.
It's it's rampant throughout this country now, and
it's truly, truly heartbreaking
to see what's happening to all of our
Jewish friends in this country.
What exact you wanna demonstrate that for me?
You mean the fake flag in the eye

(02:45:15):
or the fake Nazi symbols or the I
mean, there is racism and there are attacks
on people for racist reasons. But what they
keep what she's pointing to is an illusion
created by the ADL that's been exposed by
Jewish people around the world. Jewish organizations around
the world. And anybody that's honest pointing it
out around the world. The only reason the
first two matter more is because those are
the people that are they're claiming are feeling

(02:45:36):
unsafe.
And you could find most of these groups
are the ones that were literally putting on
these rallies. Jewish Voice For Peace, for example.
They were some of the predominant groups that
put on these rallies at these colleges, and
that's why you've got holocaust survivors standing with
them. That's why you've got Jewish students coming
out and sitting with them. They're lying to
you.
Ask yourself why and who's pushing you to
do so. I really just I think a

(02:45:58):
lot of ignorant kids and students and people
who don't understand
that Hamas
equals terrorism, even worse, at its worst. Which
means what?
Worse than what?
Guys, people are so dumb. Like, it's just
so embarrassing.
So don't forget

(02:46:18):
the many, many, many examples of Donald Trump
explicitly saying that. And here's just the one
that overlaps with the point she was making.
We will remove the jihadist sympathizers and Jew
haters. We're gonna remove the Jew haters
who do nothing to help our country. They
only wanna destroy our country.
Agree just violation of your rights. No matter

(02:46:40):
what you fill in the blank with. Whatever
haters, you have the right to hate what
you want. You damn well know that. And
you would be screaming if this was Democrats
getting rid of the abortion haters or whatever
you wanna fill it in with. It's the
same difference.
But because it's something that you are okay
with,
you're being a hypocrite.
And we will never let the horrors of

(02:47:01):
October 7th be repeated here on Americans. We
will not let that happen, and we will
solve the problem that we have.
Yeah. Love how it just means nonsensically says,
we'll never let this happen. We'll solve that,
and we'll get this done. It'll be better
than ever in the history of the world.
Yeah. No substance, usually. Just a bunch of
statements. And the bottom line is that that
is suggesting that somehow that's gonna happen to

(02:47:23):
you even Even though it already did. It's
called 911 and Israel was involved. But, you
know, we'll forget about that because Trump will
never get into that conversation.
Make sure you're checking these out, guys, because
it's important to see that I still think
most people have not even seen these things.
Because they're not I suppose there's TLAB shared
it or not. It's not they're algorithmically being
hidden from everybody. Now here's Michael Tracey talking
about Pam Bondi, and here's what she says

(02:47:46):
on a stage in regard to Syria and
the past conversations, and it's it's just the
same thing. This is somebody who clearly does
not even know what she's talking about.
You've always been a strong supporter of the
state of Israel, and very outspoken,
on this issue.
And we're seeing, I think, a very worrying
trend,
that so many on the left, are not

(02:48:08):
are no longer supportive of the state of
Israel. And in fact, they because you see,
that's not even about qualifying it. Oh, my
god. You're not supporting of Israel? Not allowed.
Well, what if they commit genocide? Doesn't matter.
What if I change my mind? Because I
just decide to let no. It doesn't
why why is it this line in the
sand where you have to support Israel? I
isn't this a country where we have our
right to think what we want? Yeah. You

(02:48:28):
love to flex that anywhere else, but the
moment I mean, it just shows you how
clear this is.
It's, you know, it's it's almost like they
don't recognize how transparent it has become today.
Whether it's violating your rights or just this
thou shall not pass line, you have to
swear. Our ally will exist for 1000 of
years.
It's alarmingly obvious.
Whatever you think about it.

(02:48:50):
Of course, you have the right to disagree
with them or not like what they're doing.
Their own population is screaming about why their
country's falling apart, but we're not allowed to.
Attack it.
Tell us where do you think that we
need to be as a country as it
relates to our relationship with Israel?
Well, first, De Morgan, thank you for everything
you did with the Abraham Accords. A a
rem Oh, and, otherwise, nothing. Right? The lie

(02:49:11):
that was trying to force illegitimate
governments to make deals with Israel that their
peoples didn't want, and now Saudi Arabia has
pushed back on it and the whole thing's
ultimately. You realize with Egypt and the rest
of them, all you have is a government
that's ultimately making an agreement their peoples do
not respect.
That is an illusion like everything else they're
trying to accomplish. But thank you for doing
that. Or the steal of the century that

(02:49:31):
Robert wrote about, which they call the deal
of the century, which was illusion that was
basically the current dynamic presented as a Tuesday
solution.
There are other 2 stupid to know that
or they're sinister in this case, guys. They're
lying about a subjugation of an entire population.
Markable.
You and Jared Kushner
and president Trump and the Yeah. He's the
one talking about the spying, you know, beachfront

(02:49:53):
property on Gaza because he clearly cares about
the Palestinians. Right? Full team and Republicans
and
amazing. I mean, amazing. And how they could
not take that and build on that to
its Oh, because their fault. Right? Because they're
just disgusting people. Because they couldn't take what?
Given nothing? Like, this it's so embarrassing that,
again, these people, if they don't know that,

(02:50:13):
they're so woefully uninformed.
Achieve greater world peace
is really, I think, beyond all of us.
And, congressman Banks, you have too. You've stood
up for everything, for the energy independence and
the shutting down of the Keystone Pipeline
and every It's just so crazy. If you
look back, how, you know, so many decades.
Like, we have to recognize how these people
in these positions on stage have gotten

(02:50:35):
continually dumber
and, like, lazier and less informed. Like, at
least before, they used to
present better. Okay? It's just these people it's
just so funny how these people are, like,
you know, a bunch of actors, a bunch
of people right off the news channels. Like,
they really are just going through the motions
because most people aren't asking for much anymore.
Oh, you're on my team? High five. I'm
gonna pick you anyway, like we just heard

(02:50:57):
during the last selection process. I don't care
what they say. I'm voting for my team.
And this is what we get. I think
that we have to be an ally of
Israel and and all of us on this
stage are. When I was attorney general once
again,
we went to Israel multiple times, and John
and my That makes sense. Right?
Why why? What's the need? You're you're not

(02:51:18):
in some foreign policy position. Why is why
is literally every member of the US government,
no matter how low it is, going to
Israel
and standing by the wall? Like, it's very
you don't do that in every country we're
allies with.
Pretty obvious.
Has been in the audience with me. We
they took us to Golan Heights. And Yeah.
The illegally occupied territory that international law is

(02:51:39):
very clear about, that Trump had no light
right to give away that was already illegally
occupied, just like every other location they're pretending
they're that they're being attacked by. The illegal
occupation which gives them the right to legally
armed resistance,
whether or not they were attacked. So in
this context, there is no dynamic where they
were the defender, they are the victim, they're
occupying them illegally.
So any element of Syrian's situation, they could

(02:52:01):
push back and decide to fight. Legal armed
resistance, Persian eva conventions.
Simple point is it's illegal occupation. The Golan
Heights is not Israel's. It is Syria.
International law is clear on that. We were
on the border with binoculars
looking into Syria
and saw an ISIS flag.
I mean, just kidding. And so you mean

(02:52:22):
is it maybe the ISIS flag after they
treated the the ISIS member in Golan Heights?
Because that's where they treated them. I mean,
literally in articles written by Israeli media that
show that they treated them there. But the
idea that we would think that they just
have an ISIS flag waving in full view
or maybe that was planted by Israel before
they walked you along their propaganda
tour. Again,

(02:52:43):
either they're this stupid or they are completely
going along with something that that's flimsy. Like,
do you realize how dumb that is?
It's like it's like pretending Hamas. These people
have been fighting ISIS because they're very aware
that it's a US Israeli proxy.
Facts are obvious.
But that camp was shut down because Donald
Trump was president.

(02:53:05):
Yay. Let's clap at the point we don't
even understand that never actually happened.
And it is frightening though
what's happening in the world. And just for
selfish reasons as Americans,
why aren't we supporting one of our greatest
allies in the world, Israel?
It's it's unbelievable to me why we're not
and why they're not. I mean and so

(02:53:25):
thank you for everything you did with April.
Very eloquent. Well done. Well, let's not forget,
here's a report from the Jerusalem Post. Israel
treating Al Qaeda fighters wounded in the Syrian
war.
That's this is what they're talking about. This
is in that exact location.
Golan Heights.
So think about how dumb it is to
pretend that you're pointing at an ISIS flag
while literally treating, which became ISIS, Al Qaeda.

(02:53:48):
Which is it's this is the game.
These people are being played or they're being
paid not to care or they don't even
know any better.
5th gen AZ family says, the Israel haters
are not happy about Pam Bondi.
It's just amazing people. And we're pointing out
that you have a go and for the
America First Movement, pointing out these people are
acting not with America First,

(02:54:10):
and you suddenly are the one the bad
guy.
Thank you, POTUS, she writes, for standing with
Israel and making our world great again. Oh,
what? I thought it was make America great
again.
Now it's the world. No. But Israel first,
though.
Greg Reese points out,
all those influencers paid to push Trump

(02:54:31):
must be feeling betrayed by the absolute transparency.
Okay. I just think this is interesting how
Alex Jones is out there screaming the opposite,
and they were he's working currently for InfoWars.
I just don't know how that keeps making
sense.
Like, I get it. Good. That means at
least to nod to the positive point that
he does allow him to say what he
wants. But the point is that
he's not just saying I we disagree. He's

(02:54:52):
calling he is the point he's making. That
he is out there doing the same things.
And I find that very interesting to me,
but very seems to be nailing it right
now. And Andrea Lynn points out the MAGA
grifters are currently,
s h I t t I n g,
a brick, looking for excuses
in their Jabfather excuse manual.
And it just says, Jabfather excuse manual, comprehensive

(02:55:12):
guide to avoiding cognitive dissonance. That's funny.
One of those, like, response pick, memes. But
here's what Candace Owens has to say about
this overlap for Israel, was we're getting into
that next or,
in a couple more segments here. But she
says in the future, everyone will have to
account for where they stood on this issue.
I agree. I mean, I think we're almost
already there.

(02:55:33):
And I'll read what bay what, Blakely said
at the end there. But here's a here's
a Candace wrote about this. And so consider
what she who she's pointing out here. A
huge part of the republican movement who denies
what's happening.
About the life of children, innocent children slaughtered.
The numbers now above tens of thousands of
children that have been slaughtered

(02:55:53):
is not only an American value, it's a
conservative value, it is a Christian value. And
to the hypocrites and the spineless people who
can't say that, they have no place in
our future government. I truly do believe that.
And I agree with that. I would say
it's an also a it's it's a value
of Americans that care about human life, which
is a liberal, conservative.
You know, it's across the paradigm, guys.

(02:56:14):
So she makes it specifically about the conservative
point, but I agree with that.
It's it's this game they play where it
is the team sport politics side of it,
the minority of the game that are the
the the they're a virus in this whole
thing.
They're the ones that don't care about these
things at all and are driving people beneath
them to think they're honest to push them
past what they care about. The obvious truth
is what she's saying. And this is just

(02:56:34):
in regard to Israel. The undeniable obvious truth
is that they're committing genocide right in front
of us, and most everybody left and right
are blindly supporting them in the government.
I mean, no more than needs to be
said for that to be one of the
most unnerving things in the world right now.
Every corporate media platform, almost every politician across
the western world is blindly in lockstep. When

(02:56:56):
we get to the ICC point, It is
so shockingly clear.
And that's why I I say this unabashedly.
I I I just can't believe that I
cannot believe what I am seeing say of
people pretending this is about anti semitism. Like,
if somehow, if somebody else was in there,
no one would be saying anything. But, yeah.
No. I'm sure if Putin
was,
in Israel

(02:57:17):
and had murdered 20,000 children, everyone would just
be chill because this is really just about
the fact they're Jewish. I mean, it's just
it is just mind blowing. It's a good
point to make. Right? Because they always love
to overlap this with Russia and Ukraine.
Well, there you go. If it's just about
Jewish people, then what if if Russia was
doing it, you wouldn't care?
I mean, it's it's so transparently. It it's

(02:57:38):
it's very obvious, guys.
This is about their adversaries. It's like when
they like, the actually, the Russia point goes
back to before this, where they were calling
the Russia committing genocide without any investigation, without
investigating
every bomb that lands like Matt Miller stupidly
tried to argue
because they don't they that's how it works.
They go after their adversaries. But Israel has

(02:57:59):
provable evidence. The ICJ and the ICC and
the United Nations and every universe, everybody everywhere
points it out, but we're not sure. Or
rather not it's not that we're not sure
anymore. They're flat out pushing back on it.
Not true. We disagree, and now they're threatening
the ICC like happens every time.
Starting to look like some you know, let
me think about that in the larger context
of what we've ever talked about of foreign
policy, of the way the US would would

(02:58:21):
exactly what they're doing accuse their adversaries of
doing in the past and call it terrorism.
And now they're literally in that position.
I don't care how you wanna frame this,
good guy, bad guy, whatever. What they're doing
is not what they pretend to be.
In fact, I think it clearly belies the
reality. It is who they are. Your government
is,
in this case, acting as a villain.

(02:58:42):
Simple as that.
It really is. The the dishonesty,
the deception,
the western media smearing and libeling anybody who
has a soul and the decency
to say that children should not be murdered
like this.
Water should not be cut off. Electricity should
not be cut off.
You have doctor or stop border saying they've

(02:59:04):
never seen anything like this. They went over
there and they've been in multiple war zones
saying that writing pieces op ed saying this
is not a war zone. This is not
a war zone. This is a genocide. They're
they're everybody's just conspiring
to hate
Jews. I mean, it's just it's it's pointedly
ridiculous
and it is really telling when even Israeli
publications are saying that calling with anti semitism

(02:59:26):
is a joke. It just is a joke
and I am proud of myself for being
on the right side of this thing and
I'm embarrassed. I am so embarrassed that I
ever had anything to do with the woke
right. I didn't know they were woke on
this issue. Like, it it took October 7th
and all of this happening for me to
see their true colors and I am so
embarrassed I had anything to do with these
people. I really am. And I will not

(02:59:47):
allow them to forget this. I will not
allow them to forget,
that
they stood on platforms, called themselves pro life,
called themselves anti woke, collected money, went out
to donors, asked for investments, and then when
it actually mattered, they shirked. They shirked.
Completely cowered.
And to think that the majority of people

(03:00:08):
are men, it's even more sickening to me,
to be honest with you. It's even more
sickening.
Well, good on her.
I mean, seriously, whatever I mean, regardless of
the intention, which seemed like at least

(03:00:29):
gives me impression of gen being genuine. You
know, the the the calling of the woke
right. I mean, she's gonna get a lot
of pushback for that, guys. That's exactly what
the reality is. How long have we been
saying that? It's so obvious. And it's not
necessarily the same way you would look at
the woke left. You know, it's just it's
the same flavor. It's used the same way,
justifying censorship.
It's just I I I really appreciate her

(03:00:49):
being able to call that out. And I'm
I'm in the same position like we all
should be. We should be you should be
proud of yourself for not just being on
the right side of history in this because
I think, honestly, it's just about having compassion
for human life or for human beings,
but that you held it. Right? That you
did not waffle, you did not waver because
they pushed at you and called you a
racist because you knew that wasn't true. And

(03:01:10):
you stood your ground. You stood by your
principles. Even more so, if you stood by
them during this last election, all the better.
So I'm just I just like to see
that. And this person responds, this is, Blakely.
We've we've showed her videos in the past.
She says meanwhile, and this is important, this
is exactly who she's pointing at, Candace Owens,
Pete Hegseth, the Trump's pick,

(03:01:31):
said he would like to use the genocidal
Israeli regime to go after fellow Americans. Isn't
that becoming a theme here? You've got,
Vivek
saying that Israel should go wherever they need
to in the world to go after Hamas,
create a Red Wedding, a reference to Game
of Thrones, where they kill everybody in the
room to get whoever the one person they're
going after, or the couple people.
That's it's an alarming

(03:01:52):
overlap here. Or Trump and or his new
pick for attorney general saying we should get
rid of anybody that doesn't like him. I
mean, guys, this should be terrifying,
especially to conservatives who've never seen all of
this before.
She says this traitor is about to become
the head of DOD. That's Pete Hegseth.
At various points in that book, he describes
leftist progressives and democrats as enemies of freedom.
That's what I keep talking about. That's the

(03:02:13):
same thing Trump and Vance and the rest
of them are doing. The US constitution in
America and counts Israel
among the international allies who can help defeat
such domestic enemies.
Terrifying.
So talking about them, and actually, if I
let me see if I still have that.
I'll play that clip since it is pretty
crazy.

(03:02:35):
Let me see if that's it.
Oh, I'm seeing. Now first No. Filed.
If this is
Shoot. I guess I got rid of that.
I'll have to save that somewhere. That's a
it's an important clip.
Because basically he's just he's Oh, no. There
it is.
Nice. I gotta save that. Hold on one
second.

(03:02:57):
Let me play this for you. I'm gonna
save it. So this is important because what
we're this is what I'm gonna show you
is it's overlapping point. But before we get
into a point about what that can put
in in per in general, this is how
she add to it. This is what he
was just saying. And it's it's about the
divine right of Israel to exist and pushing
the idea that they have a right to
do whatever they wanna do basically anywhere in
the world. That's not explicitly what he says,
but you get the meaning when you hear

(03:03:18):
him. It's it's alarming. These are decisions
for
now is the moment for Israel to return
to its founding premise. The Jewish state
has an absolute
right
to exist.
A divine gift gifted to a divine nation
charged with a divine purpose.

(03:03:38):
Israel has an absolute
and unequivocal right and responsibility.
Says gifted to.
Well, that's not really the narrative, bud. This
is supposed to be god given. No Brit
Britain in the Delfore back declaration, a Rockefeller
himself or yeah. Basically, handed them, gifted to
them. Well, there wasn't nobody there.
Literally illegal occupation from day 1.

(03:04:00):
To defend itself to the fullest,
applying the only language that its adversaries understand,
the language of force.
As usual, the dehumanization on overdrive. Right? They're
a bunch
of barbarians in caves. All they know is
you mean you mean all the people in
hospitals and and
refugee camps that they bombed?

(03:04:22):
Same old points. Like, it's just gross. It's
gross that people like this can pretend to
be all righteous when they're what they're talking
about is genocide.
So what would David Ben Gurion say today?
He would say, don't depend
on anybody else's fleeting sympathies or permission
to do it. If Israel and Mossad want

(03:04:42):
to pull off Munich 2.0 and take out
every last leader of Hamas, wherever they may
be hiding from Doha to Dresden,
host a red wedding at the 4 seasons
in Qatar. Really? It's time Hanier and Michelle
show up. Right. So, of course, he wants
to the sim sound like he only means
over here in the Middle East. But why
is that any different, by the way? Just
because it's not in the west, it should

(03:05:02):
matter just the same. Why can Israel go
in any country it wants and carry out
execution to people? And assume that means Hamas,
but by our definition, that means anybody that
ever once brushed arms with a Hamas member.
It's crazy.
It's right on the surface of this. You're
literally saying they can go and do what
they want wherever they want, which is exactly
what Israel keeps saying. We can legislate anywhere
in the world. International law does not bind

(03:05:23):
us. They say this in the context of
the West Bank, but they've said it many
times.
And here he is saying you they're allowed
to murder a whole group of people to
go after what they want. That's the red
wedding reference. Of course, you'll brush it off
as just a reference. It means something. As
we saw at the camp where they killed
400 people to go after 1 person who
wasn't even there.
Those are human lives. It doesn't matter whether

(03:05:44):
it's in Gaza or Sacramento, California. It is
something that we know they're capable of, and
they openly tell you that we'll go after
the United States if they push back. That's
a public discussion on corporate Israeli media
saying we'll go after you if you
They're all telling you. And people like this
either know that and don't care or are
I

(03:06:04):
mean, honestly, I think it's impossible they can't
know that.
They see this the conversation, and they're willing
to lie to you.
They're willing to hide
the genocidal nature of this entity for their
own benefit or because they're influenced by it
in some other way.
How in the world is America first?
So doctor Shiva points out, Vivek, the snake,

(03:06:26):
scammed Americans by running this company into the
ground
from $200 in stock to 38¢,
apparently, in about a one day trading time
frame or a couple days, very quickly. It
says now and I want I think that
was I'll I'll I'll play this in a
minute. I'll look into this earlier today.
Says now this f this this he now
he's going to be allowed to direct the
US government tax dollars and finances.

(03:06:47):
It is pretty ridiculous to argue this person
is gonna be in charge of government efficiency,
when all it seems to be efficient at
is robbing people with a fake dump and
pump and dump stock. And it's the same
conversation we'll point out when it comes to
Elon Musk in a second. Then this guy
made a clip that we'll play for you.
And this is an important point. It wraps
it up quickly for this little TikTok video,
but realize that the evidence is all there.

(03:07:08):
And I I've even pointed to the thing
he the the the conversation he had on
Mad Money, talking about
unprecedented
what do you say? I forget the word.
It'll play in a second.
But the pointing to something that was clearly
failing, that he convinced people through his political
influence to support,
got you all to invest, backed out of
the way, dropped to nothing,

(03:07:30):
and then changed the name apparently to hide
that.
So Vivek Ramaswami
seems to be the right's new it boy
that all the conservative grifters like Candace Owens
and Tim Pool are latching on to. And
one of his big claims of the debate
the other night was that he's not bought
and paid for like all these other guys.
But how exactly did he make his money
at such a young age? And you're probably
guessing, seen as I'm making this video, that

(03:07:51):
it wasn't some sort of unethical way, but
you're gonna wanna stick around because I would
almost guarantee you it's worse than you're thinking.
After working at a hedge fund for a
while, Vivek made his big money in the
biotech space. Vivek had
Just again, in case there's new people jumping
on the show, for for the 15th time,
let's make sure we understand that the people
we're discussing have not officially been put in

(03:08:12):
position.
That should be clear by now. These are
all whether they get picked and accepted or
not, we have to wait until after January,
which we've been saying the entire time. So
make sure people remember that.
The company called Axovant that was incorporated in
Bermuda, but was pushing a drug called RVT
101 that was supposed to help slow the
effects of Alzheimer's. But where exactly did this
awesome new drug come from? Did Vivek develop

(03:08:33):
it? Well, of course not. And this is
where it starts to get a little crazy
because he actually purchased the rights to it
from a bigger company, GlaxoSmithKline,
for just $5,000,000.
But wait. Hold up. If this drug does
what they say it does, why would GlaxoSmithKline
sell it for just
$5,000,000 when they could make 1,000,000,000? Well, it's
because they had pretty much given up on
the drug after it failed. Not 1, not

(03:08:54):
2, not 3, but
4 clinical trials. Because what Vafake did is
he took one of those failed clinical trials,
put his mom on the research team who
is a doctor, but was also on the
board and had stock options in the company.
And they took some people out, reworked a
couple things, finagled a couple others, and all
of a sudden that failed clinical trial was
now a clinical trial that showed significant improvement

(03:09:17):
just like that overnight. You then, of course,
rename the drug, and now you have a
promising new drug and a finagled phase 2
clinical trial that you can cherry pick a
few lines from. You then go on CNBC
and talk about the unlimited
potential that this company has. Then all you
gotta do is file for your IPO and
watch the money roll in.
Now we talked about that exchange with him.

(03:09:39):
That's kinda where he got, like, you know,
for most people, he kinda popped into the
scene there. He was he's all energetic and
spoke well and talked about the potential for
the thing that I think at the point
that he knew was not going to succeed.
Even though before the company itself actually makes
any money, you gotta pass phase 3 clinical
trials, but more on that in a second.
And when they eventually did do their IPO

(03:10:00):
was the biggest biotech IPO ever. The stock
doubled on the first day and eventually it
went from $15
all the way up to $50
based on a hope, a prayer, and Vivek's
salesmanship. But then after the stock shot up
and enough time had passed of Vivek's family
and rich friends could sell off their shares,
it was in finally time to do stage
3 trials. And surprise surprise,

(03:10:22):
it completely flopped, which caused the stock to
drop 99%
in one trading day because it was now
a worthless stock. But he had always known
it was a worthless stock. And if you
do know anything about the stock market, you're
probably asking yourself, why does a company called
Axovant have a ticker cogene therapies? Well, that's
because after the stock completely tanked, he changed
the name because he wanted to make it

(03:10:43):
harder for people to find his pump and
dump company. So to recap, the guy that
wants to be your president made his fortune
by buying a drug that he knew was
garbage super cheap, then using one of the
trials that proved it was garbage, having his
mom rearrange a few things. He then went
out into the media and sold it as
the next great American company. And then some
poor schmuck that happened to be watching CNBC

(03:11:05):
that day invested in his company and in
one trading day lost
everything. But it's okay though because Vivek, his
mom, his brother, and all his rich friends
had already made a killing. Finally, in closing,
Vivek seems to think that wokeness is destroying
the country, but I would really like to
ask him, what is hurting the country more?
A person using they, them pronouns or a

(03:11:27):
guy that is running $1,000,000,000
pump and dump schemes on Wall Street, destroying
the lives of people that were silly enough
to believe
what he said?
Well, both. Both for sure. No question. In
very, very different ways. But if we're talking
about financial manipulation, well, obviously what he's doing.
If we're talking about societal,
psychological manipulation and a lot darker, then clearly

(03:11:49):
the pronoun dynamic. Either way, all of this
is coming together from what like, this is
what's interesting.
Even these abstract ideas, you could ultimately bring
together in the conversation about whether we're talking
about the side stepping into transhumanism
and where that goes and the manipulation of
the the chemical manipulation or the idea of
the endocrine disrupting chemicals. But all of that
leads into a larger World Economic Forum great

(03:12:10):
reset direction along with the financial side of
it. So these things are interconnected.
I hope I'm wrong, quite frankly, as always
with this stuff, but what we can see
is how these things dovetail.
Like, Catherine's pointing out, there's a much darker
darker you know, the great poisoning she points
out with regard to not just the injections.
Now here is a clip.

(03:12:30):
The I've this guy's somebody shared this recent
this guy's work, which it's interesting. He's an
odd guy with the way his demeanor and
stuff, but it's some it's funny. Just you'll
see the way he talks and everything. But
this is well done. I think what he
says here is is an important overlap to
this. Not everything I agree with, but ultimately,
the main point. I yeah. You know my
opinion about how Elon is being used in
all this or is playing a role,

(03:12:52):
the technocratic pipe piper, if you will. But
I think at the same time, I don't
believe he's as, you know, this genius level
character they're presenting. I don't think he's stupid,
but I just don't think it is pre
it's what we think it is for obvious
reasons to go back. Now this one is
specifically about the government efficiency point.
And as I've mentioned many times, like I
like I've said in regard to even Trump,

(03:13:13):
very different than being a success or to
to very different than, you know, being a
success verse
being able to have enough financial backers and
billionaire support to fail over and over and
over until you are able to succeed. Something
the average American does not have access to.
Just it worth considering.
Because inflation is government overspending because the checks

(03:13:35):
never bounce. What you mean, like, the estimated
$4,900,000,000
the government has overspent to subsidize you building
your empire?
That kind of overspending?
Imagine that between grants and tax breaks and
subsidized construction,
discounted loans and environmental credits, the government has
given this self made billionaire nearly $5,000,000,000

(03:13:58):
And that's just the US government. Globally speaking,
Tesla might be one of the more heavily
subsidized
private corporations
in history. Subs
Just in that alone and that overlaps a
lot of different things. Ask yourself how that
makes sense. If the very thing that's so
subsidizing him is supposed to be the thing
they're all fighting.

(03:14:19):
That these they receive almost entirely based on
the idea that what they're doing is good
for the environment. An assumption that seems to
be ignoring the fact that the production of
electric vehicles is actually approximately 2 and a
half times worse for the environment, which Also,
let's not forget that that's contradictory to what
basically everybody in the con in circle thinks

(03:14:41):
and Vance and Trump and everybody else and
most of the conservative party. But Elon's out
there checking every box and very adamant about
all the great reset dynamics, including this.
Is not even remembering to mention the monumental
amount of human suffering
that goes into the production, which is something
we don't even remember to mention
way too often if you ask me. Either

(03:15:03):
way, if your priority really is protecting the
environment,
not buying a new car at all is
probably
the obvious choice. But of course, consumer capitalism
doesn't like solutions that don't involve more consumption.
The name kinda gives it away. And that's
just Tesla, the state of New York subsidized
the construction of a solar powered energy plant

(03:15:24):
on the grounds that it was going to
create thousands of new jobs. But isn't that
like your job,
job creator? Isn't that like the whole justification
for why people like you exist? You know,
you take the risk, invest the capital, so
you get the majority of the reward. If
the taxpayer is subsidizing your risk, then why

(03:15:46):
do you get the reward? Why do you
get to play pretend capitalism with training wheels
on when the rest of the world is
out here actually working for a living? Now
despite what you said, I'm pretty sure another
thing that causes inflation is perpetually
increasing the money supply, which happens when banks
lend money. Yeah. Banks don't lend their own

(03:16:06):
money. They create credit money. So, when you
borrow money from a bank, it actually increases
the money supply until the loan is paid
back. Like, when you had to borrow $13,000,000,000
because you accidentally talked your way into buying
Twitter, failed to talk your way out of
it, and couldn't afford to put your money
where your mouth was. So I suppose you

(03:16:28):
are kind of an expert on inflation. You're
definitely personally responsible for creating more inflation than
the vast majority
of human beings that have ever lived.
That's an interesting point. I'm sure you can
digest that information. It would seem very clear.
I just think it's interesting to consider,

(03:16:48):
you know, how much of this is a
facade?
Whether it's their own who they are, the
the, you know, construct that is Elon Musk
and, you know, and these people, like, even
like a Donald Trump, the different times he
was bailed out, different,
bankruptcies. And, you know, ultimately, that these people
are useful
to the power structure.
It's quite the opposite than what we're being

(03:17:08):
told.
At least consider it.
Now, this is what you get. It's just
it's the world we live in. Like, this
is this is the the current political dynamic.
Who cares about the facts and what they're
talking about? Elon Musk puts out a cartoon
of himself. Government overspending causes inflation.
It's just it's based on that clip you
just saw. You know, it's just it's just
it's just funny to me. I was it's

(03:17:30):
just we we're they treat us like we're
in kindergarten.
Now David Icke, pointing into one of the
clips of of Alex Jones from before about
them working on a brokering a deal for
ceasefire for Egre Ukraine. He says, Alex just
called Alex Jones just called Elon Musk, get
this, a sensible transhumanist.
I mean, it's just crazy. This, like,

(03:17:51):
not even a slow motion mission creep. It's,
like, over the process of a week, they're,
like, rushing you into the great reset, but
it's the good one. It just seems wild.
Why aren't there more people calling this out?
And he goes, exactly the sales pitch I
have been exposing that allows Musk to sell
human AI fusion to those who were formally
warning about the transhumanist agenda. And I mean,
like like, a year ago, if not that.

(03:18:12):
Like, weeks ago. And we're literally being pushed
in front of us right now.
He says, this is nothing if not predictable
to anyone paying attention. I agree. He goes,
it's all vaudeville show and pantomime ready for
Christmas. Will Trump and must be the heroes
who pull it off right at the brink?
Will they save the world and be launched
into megastardom so the agenda they both represent
for their masters becomes so much easier to

(03:18:33):
sell?
Or will the brinksmanship go on? Oh, with
the drama.
The key to understanding current events, all events,
is to know that those controlling the Biden's
Starmer regimes allowing weapons to be used inside
Russia are the same force controlling Musk and
Trump to save the world from nuclear Armageddon.
I couldn't agree more.
He says it's a show, people. Perceptual manipulation

(03:18:55):
theater and the mainstream fake alternative media
is its program or propaganda
arm.
Well put.
Now he highlights this tweet as well, and
it's the kind of thing we're talking about.
I mean, look at this.
It's just silly. X and this person says,
x is now
is where it's at now. Forget the old
media, and I keep making this point.

(03:19:18):
I mean, this is like suggesting that the
broadcast channel that news is aired on is
the news.
Well, no. That's just the medium.
Obviously, I I agree that mainstream corporate media
is ridiculous. But
Twitter is a platform
where people then post this information. But they're
they're so lazily making it about how Twitter
is the new media, rather you are the

(03:19:39):
new media.
Well, not just because you're on Twitter. People
that are doing so, or if you that
day choose to, that doesn't make Twitter the
news.
It just seems like a lazy connection, and
they're but they're all doing it. And this
is what David had to say. Now I'll
show you another one after this. He says,
it is tragic to watch. The, quote, new
media is the old media repackaged.

(03:19:59):
100%, guys. He says old heroes replaced by
new ones. Old Pied Piper frauds replaced by
new ones. And they fall for it over
and over again through the classic and ancient
technique of telling people what they want to
hear while a very different agenda hovers in
the background.
Joe Rogan with his contract from the system,
worth 100 of 1,000,000 in the is the
new media?

(03:20:20):
Are you being you are being had, people.
Queue abuse. Not that I care.
The truth will out in the end, albeit
further down the road to AI dystopia.
Here's the point.
Nario Nafal says, Joe Rogan,
x is the mainstream media now.
Oops. Yeah. Exactly. Maybe not the way you

(03:20:42):
mean that though. He says, x is the
mainstream media now. That's the mainstream media. That's
where most people get their news now.
What's funny is first of all, we're talking
about is
using a medium of information flow, which could
apply to any of these places, but that
is information. Not news. Not necessarily.
But on top of that, we're talking about

(03:21:03):
a media
a a social media platform
that they want you to believe is the
news, not just where people can then present
news.
I I really do think that's an important
distinction that is being kind of lazily overlapped.
But what I think is hilarious is Elon
says, you are the media now. X Twitter
what you wanna what you know. Twitter what
you hear. Twitter what you see. I agree

(03:21:24):
with all that. Great. Get out there. Talk
about it. The problem is they're trying to
convince you that if it's here, that is
the truth versus them always lying. Even though
they usually lie, that's not always the case.
Very few things are absolutes.
But what's funny is they're calling it the
mainstream media now. They're too on the nose,
guys. Because that's exactly the point. And it's
not just all of Twitter. It's what they're
doing, what they're presenting. Like David, I just

(03:21:45):
showed you. It's just this is the mainstream
media now. They are just repackaging what they're
doing.
I think that's exactly the case. It's almost
it's almost like they are trying to point
these things out. But in a way that,
like, subconsciously allow it to be known, but
not to upset you.
And here's even more on the point. This
is absolutely hilarious. Even if it's just a
troll, I have two points to make here.

(03:22:06):
Autism Capital says,
noob. Says, babe, wake up. It's happening again.
And all it's showing you is Donald Trump
Junior says, hey, Elon Musk. I have the
funniest idea ever. And it says Comcast is
putting MSNBC up for sale. CNN just announced
massive layoffs coming
for sale.
So the suggestion being buy MSNBC.

(03:22:27):
Elon says, the most entertaining outcome, especially if
ironic, is most is most likely.
Here's what's so crazy about this. The same
kind of thing was how Twitter got started
with Elon buying it. And what's crazy to
me
is so if he buys it,
he would've feed the corporate media. Now, will
we suddenly start trusting MSNBC?

(03:22:47):
Probably for people to buy this game, which
would be crazy.
But if you think of it, then this
the the complete shift like Ike was talking
about is complete.
And, like, a rapid transition. But what's even
more crazy to me is this is how
everything is being framed. It's sort of like
them believing that, you know, RFK is there,
so this must be x y and z.
Well, we don't know that. In this case,
what we keep seeing is this these guys

(03:23:09):
are being ironic. He even just put this
a tweet out saying he's the the some
kind of ironic superhero or something. And he
was crazy about it. And sure, he could
be joking.
But how what if I mean, can we
not ask ourselves whether that is an easy
cover
to literally buy this and become the corporate
media and they'll act like they're just forever
trolling everybody even though it never stops?

(03:23:29):
You see how that works?
Certainly could be. Trying to troll everybody in
this context, even though we're using very serious,
influential things.
So what point does it stop being a
troll? At what point was it ever if
it actually has an effect has an effect?
You see the point?
It's really easy to pretend like it's all
this big meme troll game, even though you're
literally becoming

(03:23:49):
a, like, a vice president figure rather than
just a sidled up next to the president
of the United States, influencing actual changing governments,
trying to regime change places. It's not really
a troll anymore, is it? Even though they'll
always act like, it's all just a big
troll. You fell for it. Even though you
just started World War 3, you know, like
that kind of game.
What the and I'm being hyperbolic and and
facetious. But the point is that in this

(03:24:11):
case,
how will you ever know?
How long until we start going, well, they're
influencing media just like they were before, but
they're always kinda pretending like it's somewhat of
a joke. So is it like the Babylon
Bee now? And you never really know. It's
it's just it's just crazy.
I hope you get the point I'm making
because it clearly to me seems like this
e it's the way Trump operates.
You never really know. He meant this or
he meant that. He let it he lets

(03:24:32):
you assume the way he wanna assume.
That's the world we live in right now,
and I hope we're smart enough to see
that.
Now, here's the point to make exactly. And
this is such a very small point.
And for for the larger point, but a
very small example.
Because it's a very small deviation, but I
think it's relevant for what they're talking about.
Right? The you know, Twitter is the news
now. Right? They are the media. Okay. Well,
Insurrection Barbecue is one of these just

(03:24:54):
constant placating Elon Musk. We're all in your
circle. We love you.
Elon Musk fired 90% of Twitter, it says.
Staff and its function is if a 90%
of Twitter staff, and it's functioning better.
Government employees, and it shows them, like, that
monkey looking sideways kinda thing, like, you're coming
after our jobs because he's DOE.
Well, Elon Musk responds going 80%. But the

(03:25:15):
point remains.
Okay.
Small thing. Right? But here's what's funny to
me.
That's inaccurate. Right?
So at what point do we realize that
that's happening everywhere? And they have a right
to be wrong, as I say all the
time. Of course they do. But I find
it interesting that this is happening constantly where,
you know, 10% matters to me. That people
are sharing memes and acting like it's information.

(03:25:36):
We are the media. And which, again, everyone
has the right to do this even if
they're wrong. But we're not talking about everybody
here. We're talking about the richest man in
the world with one of the with the
most influential platform in the world, about to
be sidled next to the most powerful man
in the world,
running companies
that are connected to the most powerful entities
in the world that are literally manufacturing weapons,
building the future, driving us the great reset.

(03:25:57):
But we shouldn't care that he's literally convincing
like, 10% should matter to you. You should
matter that they're wrong versus being right. Not
just that it's like, well, whatever. It applies.
It's just the same thing anyways.
My point is that people share this and
they think it's true. It's not just some
meme game as much as they love to
pretend that in some cases, because sometimes it
is. The bottom line is we are being
misled.

(03:26:19):
Information and facts matter. It's not some, well,
it's almost there,
kind of the truth, lying for your truth.
Again, I like I said, it's a small
point. And even if this is just kind
of a fun thing, the truth is that
we are living in a time where they
are driving you to think these people are
driving you to think these people are the
ones informing you, and you should have discernment
enough to know that they could be wrong
even if they have good intentions.

(03:26:39):
But I think this matters. I think this
is Twitter files. I think what we're seeing
is this slow change and that people are
being manipulated.
Now, we talked about this already.
The WeChat
of the future for the United States, which
Elon already pointed out. Well, guess they already
came out with x payments now.
It says, x payments will do to banks

(03:27:01):
what Tesla did to legacy auto. Oh, is
that what they did? Tesla did that? Are
they still crashing today? Let me let me
check my calendar.
I mean, just this is, again, the construct.
Like, Elon floating out his Cybertruck before it
can even run. Right? But now but now
it's worked that we got you all excited
about it, got more money, and he kept
going.
The point here is, in this case, Tesla
is not revolutionized. It certainly could. Tesla, in

(03:27:22):
my mind, was just a trial balloon for
the electric car version, mapping out things with
the AI algorithms. They were allowing that to
happen. They were crashing, like, every 30 seconds.
Why did that keep getting allowed? If Ford
had half of those crashes, they would have
recalled the car. Not Tesla though.
How do we not see how crazy that
is?
So now they're gonna roll out the x
payments to revolutionize banks or at least that's

(03:27:44):
the narrative we're all supposed to say out
loud. Really, it's about control. And you being
funneled through this mechanism, which is tracking you,
which is taking your I your
personal identification, your information, your biometrics. In many
cases, dumping it over to Israel. We'll show
you that again next.
Whitney says, letting a social media site become
your bank is not really innovative.
It is a way to dupe people into

(03:28:05):
even more centralized control over their finances. If
your ex account gets banned,
you will not only be dispersoned from the
site, you'll be debanked.
Voluntarily supporting the formation of the everything app
is very slippery slope.
Limit your dependence on any one platform. Again,
even if you think he has good intentions.
What if he loses his job? What if

(03:28:26):
he dies? What if something changes? What if
democrats become in power? You have to realize
this is about any this is just the
creation of the structure.
And on top of that, I think everything
in the world shows you he's not on
your side.
Now, this was just floated as, you know,
I don't think this says absolute.
This is the only example that I have
where he made this point, but it is
on it is in a video and he

(03:28:46):
does say it. But you could argue it's
just a passing point that he doesn't really
do. But I think we all see this
coming together.
I've been working on an edit button for
a year. Well, it's a hard it's a
tricky situation,
and it's incredibly complex.
Yeah. It's a good one. Indeed. I mean,
we don't even have,
a a a an app that's as good

(03:29:07):
as WeChat in China.
And, like, in China, you, like, live on
WeChat, basically. Live on WeChat. Yeah. It's like
yeah. Everyone everyone's like, did it. Like, you
live on WeChat. You do payments. You do
everything. It's like Yep. It's great. Basically, WeChat's
kick ass. And we don't have anything like
WeChat outside of China. That's true. So I
was like, my dear would be like, how
about if we just copy WeChat?
Hey.

(03:29:28):
Hey.
Copy them.
Buys Twitter copies WeChat?
Yeah. Pretty much.
I guess.
Good times.
Say sort of the same point as before.
Right? He's just grifting and making a joke
until it happens. And still, he's trolling you.
Can't you see? You're all falling for it,
and now you get trapped in the technocratic
panopticon.

(03:29:49):
So here's what Red points out, and this
is about the
Authentix
biometric surveillance point.
He says, how many times this is from
today. Interestingly enough. How many times do I
have to say this, he says? Your ID
verification
was sent 6000 miles away to Authentix, headquartered
in

(03:30:09):
Israel.
And realize, guys, Authentix is part of the
Israeli intelligence apparatus. It's not a joke. I
went over this many times on the show,
and I'll give you a link in a
second. It says on top of that, Authentix
is a subsidiary of ICTS International.
What and I think I don't know what
to guess at what that is. It says
wait for it. Wait for it. ITCS
International was founded in 1982

(03:30:31):
by former members of Shin Bet, Israel's internal
security agency.
So if you want to monetize, don't go
around and nail to the wall the same
people you will willingly send your biometrics data.
You will you
if you want to monetize, don't go around
and nail to the wall
the same people that you willingly sent your
biometric data to and complain

(03:30:53):
how are these accounts are being doxxed. Just
typed it weird. Stupidity levels, 3 3,000.
Jake Shields pointing out this. It says this
account named Awesome Jew is almost certainly a
high ranking employee of Twitter and has access
to your IDs. It says all the docses
have the address submitted to Twitter, Eve if
they live and live elsewhere. They are privately
contacting large anons and telling them to delete

(03:31:14):
their account so they will dox them on
it. The point is he's argue arguing that
there's more going on. I just wanna point
out what he was saying. I can't verify
what Jake is pointing out. But the idea
it makes perfect sense to me. We already
saw this happen with Palestinians
through the Twitter app, censorship everywhere.
The point is that Authentix is still there.
I'll prove it to you next. AAF Post

(03:31:35):
says, in order to be monetized on Twitter
beginning July 1st, this was posted on May
30th, users will have to give Israeli intelligence
company, Authentix, access to their government issued ID
and biometric data.
I went over all of this for you.
Same thing right there. Now this one still
says it under ID verification.
What's interesting is this person points something out.
And I this is what I keep talking

(03:31:56):
to you about, guys, in regard to the
difference of the platforms
to the point where we were existing on
completely different things. Central, like, you know, channeled
and algorithmically
set specific.
Not just because of advertising, but something much
more alarming. Let me show you what I
mean. Vincent Kennedy points out the same thing
saying past 7 day metrics and and what

(03:32:17):
Twitter pays out is just to be transparent.
Oh, this is just about him talking what
he gets paid.
Same thing for him to payout seems low.
This person's where he brings the point. He
says, for ID verification, they are still using
Authentix.
So I won't be doing that. My ID
was verified through Stripe. Not that it really
matters. Privacy is dead.

(03:32:38):
Interesting.
This person says, Twitter made it sound like
you needed to verify via Authentix in order
to qualify, so I figured most people did
that until I saw others getting paid without
the ID verification label on their accounts. Something
must have changed. Or
for sec first point, for for because that's
one, maybe that is different for each person.
Maybe some people are getting stripes, some people
are getting authentics. I think that's what's happening.

(03:33:00):
How do you think they pick?
Here's what she says.
Interesting. Mine says Stripe, not Authentix. And you
see it right here.
Look at that.
This is re this is recent.
I agree. Twitter and Stripe. Using my and
here's what's interesting. And extracted biometric data. So
why?

(03:33:20):
Stripe doesn't need biometric data. Twitter's not requiring
it. So we see where this is going.
It is about your biometric data and your
and your digital identification
information.
But here's where it gets interesting. So this
is posted today, guys. So she's currently seeing
Stripe on Authentics. Right? Well, guess what I'm
seeing?
Here it is right here.

(03:33:42):
Authenticity on Twitter.
I consent, which I'm not gonna do,
to Twitter and Authentics using my images. Anyone
explain that for me?
Here she is today
showing that she's being used with Stripe.
Why am I being given Authentix?
This is a much bigger point that I
think people would recognize.

(03:34:03):
Not only are they still using Israeli intelligence
to siphon off your biometric data for something
they don't need, even though he promised it
would not be there anymore,
But I am literally still getting pushed into
Authentix while other people are being given Stripe.
Why?
I really think that's a big deal.

(03:34:27):
Now this comes along with the
I mean, it's the same exact thing, including
extracted biometric data
given to Israel's intelligence apparatus.
I find that wild.
Now I wrote about this or covered in
the show and set there on July 29th.
Twitter's still using Authentix.
And then they

(03:34:47):
claim Stripe because I think Censored Man pushed
back and got a lot of attention around
it, and yet they never stopped. And I
again, I can prove that on this website
right now. Here's let's refresh the page.
Right there.
I just think that's really important because what
this means is not only we're being lied
to,
people are getting different versions of Twitter, which

(03:35:08):
is what I keep trying to show people.
Not about advertising, but something deeper than that.
Actually, I'm gonna leave these up.
So on in regard to censorship in general,
that that very well may have to do
with that exact point. Here's Jeff here's Jeremy
Lofredo.
Since my release from Israeli prison, every one

(03:35:30):
of my posts on Twitter has been flagged
with a warning stating the content is, quote,
labeled as sensitive by him, the author,
which he didn't do.
This includes everything from innocuous screenshots of New
York Times, reports on junk food, to more
serious posts about my military arrest and incarceration
in Israel. These warnings don't appear for all
users. But based on the messages I've received,

(03:35:51):
it affects at least 50%. Look at that.
You think how so crazy this is? We're
being algorithmic, this is whether it's social engineering
or some kind of experiment
or or something bigger than that.
Why would specific why would some people be
boxed away from it, others not? I mean,
you guys can fill in the blanks. This
is something dark, and this is something that
Elon and Twitter are actively facilitating.

(03:36:14):
He plays this clip for you right here.
We can see it.
And I've seen this a lot, by the
way. This whole thing where it says but,
that was I think that was
Casey Wright or somebody we've talked to in
the past in our circle that said the
same thing was happening to them.
Labeled by the author,
not him.
That should be concerning for anybody.

(03:36:35):
Like, why they would claim you're doing something
that you're not? Shouldn't that be really uncomfortable
for everybody?
I hope we're paying attention.
Now, here's Max Egan.
Now he got deleted from the platform a
while ago. Of course, all the free speech
warriors didn't care. I shouldn't say it like
that, but a lot of the ones that
are supporting Trump and Elon chose to ignore

(03:36:57):
that even though there a lot of them
support him.
And says, hey, Elon. How come you have
restored my suspended account but removed all my
followers and follows and are continuing to keep
me at 0
no matter how many times they follow me?
Now I checked this right before we went
live. Let's look at it again.
Look at that. It's down to 6. It

(03:37:18):
was at 11 when I watch this. Follow?
7.
Oh, look.
And now it's at 7. Follow? Oh, look.
8.
Let's refresh again.
Oh, now it's an 8. Look at that.
Now it's 9. Now, if you do this
long enough and stick around, it'll randomly revert
jump around and and revert back.

(03:37:38):
When I well, I I it was at
11 when I looked earlier. And if you
if you just kinda stay and look at
it, it keeps it glitching out.
Now, why doesn't that matter to anybody? Why
why wouldn't this be a huge this this
honestly, if this was a company that cared
about what you'd you'd be embarrassed.
We're having a glitch. It's a pretty embarrassing
glitch. I don't think that's what it is.
Now, it just went up before I didn't

(03:37:58):
even click it. Now, the point is, guys,
you can come back to this later and
look.
The day before when I tweeted when I
actually shared this the other day, that there
was like 70 something, but still zero following.
Like, it just doesn't make any sense.
Actually, you know what's interesting? Hold on.
Technically, I'm so that's supposed to be the
number going up. Right? Following. His followers are

(03:38:19):
what he follows, and I'm following him, and
his followers go up.
Or followers.
Oh, no. I that is backwards. I'm sorry.
It is right. Either way,
check it out for yourself. Report this. Talk
about it. Do whatever you want. The point
is Max Egan is still being censored on
this platform, and they won't allow him to
gain his following back. And on top of
that, took his following away
even though they censored him unjustly to begin

(03:38:40):
with.
We'll go come back and check it.
Now, I'm gonna leave these up actually because
I think that's important for us to follow-up
on later. So
Elon Musk recently shared
what
Netanyahu had to say.

(03:39:01):
Now, of course, you could argue rightly so,
say that Reece's tweets are not endorsement. We
should all know that by now.
But and but realize that he has endorsed
this agenda. He has he's buddy buddy with
Netanyahu. He wouldn't see him. He he gotten
personally invited, stood up and clapped like every
other
clapping seal in congress for all the genocidal
statements and lies he put out. The point

(03:39:21):
is this is not something you would argue
is about promotion. Like, he's saying the anti
Semitic decision,
Netanyahu says, of the international court, the ICC
in Hague in The Hague is a modern
Dreyfus trial and will end the same way.
Meaning,
I think it was I think it was
Italy or somewhere else. The point was ultimately
a a Jewish soldier, I think it was
a captain maybe, that was persecuted by the

(03:39:42):
court. And they argue it was antisemitism and
it wasn't real and got the point is
that's not what's happening here. This guy is
so desperate. And I'm gonna I'm gonna show
you this directly from Israeli media, which I
really hope finds its way through all the
censorship to reach people that need to see
it today. But that's Elon Musk. And even
doctor Simon Godek pointed out. What the f?
Why would the richest man in the world

(03:40:02):
be bowing to a war criminal? Well,
very important to consider.
Ask yourself why he's rich and what's going
on there, and what influences him, or whether
he simply just doesn't care about human life.
But I wanted to point out for those
that rightly questioned this, this is indeed him.
It wasn't some other Elon Musk account, which
is a fair point to make. And I
I did look this up myself. I went

(03:40:23):
down his his account, found the actual page
so I could highlight this and show you
that it was Elon Musk. In the case,
that matters, which it should. For those wondering,
this was Musk. That should not be surprising
with what he's done already.
Hey. It's going up now. Come back to
it.
So, the ICC.
K? What's important to recognize, the International Criminal

(03:40:44):
Court is different than the International Court of
Justice. Now, the International Court of Justice is
what ruled that this was plausible genocide.
One of the things that we've been waiting
for is the will the UN really carrying
out some actual,
you know, action to follow-up on this? Or
the ICC, in this case, issuing
arrest warrants.
And everyone's been dragging their feet. But this

(03:41:06):
is I don't know whether they thought this
would shift or what, but here we are.
Now, they have been issued.
Netanyahu has an arrest warrant, as well as
Glant. And I believe it was
for the context of the conversation today, that's
what we're referencing. I believe there was, I
think the original included Hamas mem leader and
so on. But, of course, let's not forget
that that's a group that's been funded by

(03:41:27):
Hamas in order to or by Israel in
order to maintain division between Palestinian people in
the West Bank and Gaza. It's all very
easy to prove. And I'm actually gonna read
you that from this article when we get
to it from Israeli media from
yesterday.
The title is Netanyahu brought the ICC ruling
on himself, and now he's whining about anti
semitism. That's the Israeli headline.

(03:41:48):
Think about that for a second.
BDS Movement simply highlights that this they finally
issued the arrest warrants today for Benjamin Netanyahu
and Gallant,
the key architects of Israel's ongoing genocide.
Francesca Albanese says, as the carnage in Gaza
continues unabated, an immediate halt to the genocidal
assault must be imposed.
For long overdue measures must be immediately adopted.

(03:42:10):
An arms embargo, halting imports, exports, and other
transfer is absolutely necessary,
followed by
rescission, suspension of other economic and financial ties
to start with.
Of course, the opposite was happening. Mostly American
politicians are screeching about how we have to
stand with Israel, which just continues to show
you how compromised they are.

(03:42:31):
Good. This is not about a difference of
opinion, guys.
In every possible way, what they're exposing is
that they either don't care about the law
they claim to fight for
or are willing to ignore it when it
comes to Israel.
It's objectively the case.
Prime minister of Israel says the anti semitic
decision by the ICC, that's the best they
can do, is a modern Dreyfus trial. That's

(03:42:52):
what he says in his speech as well.
She says under the leadership of the current
prime minister of Israel, Israel has literally made
life hell on earth for millions of Palestinians,
rendering antisemitic label a scorn, which also shamefully
belittles real antisemitism.
He needs to be arrested not because he's
Jewish, but because he appears to be a
criminal on multiple counts. By the way, well

(03:43:13):
before this, which we're gonna get to in
a second, they're investigating him in Israel right
now
for corruption,
bribery, fraud. He's got multiple indictments.
But let's trust him on everything else because
it matters to the Israel the western world
for his genocide he's not committing. Right? The
guy is a criminal on multiple fronts, and
his own people call that out.

(03:43:37):
Here's that guy the guy was referencing before
again. Now he does that's actually the first
one I saw. He does well on this.
So this is the speech by Netanyahu
in English, of course, because it's aimed at
you Americans. That's what it's for. That's because
that's he's desperate to like, right now, as
it comes down to in this article, we'll
read again. They're putting all their hopes that
Trump
stops his rabbiting.
I mean, let's let's make it more clear.

(03:43:57):
Netanyahu
personally is putting all of his hopes in
the fact that Donald Trump will be able
to stop this,
which I believe he will.
And that should scare people that are America
first or anybody that cares about the law
or human life because these people are monsters.
But here's what he had to say directed
at you. And he's he chimes in with
the the truth of it.

(03:44:17):
What in god's name are they talking about
in The Hague? Well, they're talking about war
crimes and crimes against civilian populations, but not
in the name of God, rather in the
name of international justice. No biased anti Israel
decision in The Hague will prevent the state
of Israel from defending its citizens.

(03:44:38):
Yeah. They're not really standing in judgment of
Israel or the people of Israel, but rather
of specifically you. Also, I'm noticing you're not
really denying the charges so much as trying
to justify them. It's got tell me you're
guilty without telling me you're guilty energy. You
see what I'm saying? As it turns out,
war crimes are actually still war crimes even
when you do them in the name of

(03:45:00):
vengeance. See, in the eyes of international law,
it's not actually possible to starve children to
death in self defense. That's not a real
thing. Hamas attacked us, unprovoked, launching the worst
massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust.
Yeah. Again, with the making justifications
rather than denial, do we need to find
a kindergarten teacher to sit you down and

(03:45:21):
explain how two wrongs don't make a right?
Also, why are you bringing up the holocaust
all of a sudden? If I didn't know
any better, I think you were trying to
rhetorically hide your crimes behind the collective suffering
of the Jewish people trying to use that
collective identity
as a shield to avoid taking personal accountability
for yourself, which seems a bit anti Semitic,

(03:45:42):
doesn't it? Israel will not recognize the validity
of this decision. When Saddam Hussein stood trial
for his crimes against humanity, one of the
first things he said was he did not
recognize the court's authority
to stand in judgment of him, you know,
right before they found him guilty and then
hanged him. You might recognize this guy. I
remember him well because I'm Norwegian. Now when

(03:46:03):
he stood trial, he also
rejected the court's authority to stand in judgment
of him. And the judge in that case
responded in probably the most Norwegian way possible.
She said, we'll make a note of that,
and then she proceeded to stand in judgment
of him anyway. See, when a criminal faces
judgment,
their recognition of the judge is not really

(03:46:23):
all that important. And since you don't want
to recognize your personal accountability
to be judged for your crimes against humanity,
on behalf of humanity,
we'll make a note of that.
That's well done. Well done.
And, you know, and do you know why
he's saying that, Netanyahu? Because that's what the
narrative is. That's what every western leader you're

(03:46:45):
gonna see in lockstep is saying right now.
We don't recognize the ICC's authority over the
situation. It it doesn't matter. Because either way,
Palestine has been, and this is where the
genocide is happening. There's no way around it.
And what's what's crazy about the way that
works is what the Israeli and US governments
have been the ones telling us that there
is this location, not that they it's within

(03:47:06):
Israel, but they're supposed to be their own
entity just somewhere else even though they already
agreed to 67 borders.
So on the record and, again, the reality
of history that shows you that there was
clearly a house. So the point is that
you can't pretend like they don't have you're
constantly talking about borders and different things even
though that's not doesn't make sense. It's an
occupied territory. So as always, they're playing it
both ways. So my point in that is

(03:47:27):
to show you that they've trapped themselves with
their own broken logic. So now Palestine can
went to them and said, well, we we
we wanna you we recognize you, and we
or rather, you know, the court, and then
they recognize them. And so now they're trapped.
Now they're gonna say, well, Palestine's the one,
so we're gonna engage with them about what's
happening, and we hold you accountable for the
crimes you're committing, whether or not Israel agrees
with the court or recognizes our authority. I

(03:47:49):
mean, it's it's it's fascinating that their own
lies have trapped them here. But either way,
the bottom line is that this continues. They're
still killing children. As we're talking, they're murdering
children in Gaza and Lebanon.
And all these western politicians are just
happy to push this along.
Say that it doesn't count. It's not real.
Like Mike Pompeo, for example. Let's start with

(03:48:10):
the biggest monster in the room.
Any nation that tries to enforce its corrupt
ICC's warrants against Israel should face severe consequences.
So now they're threatening their allies because that's
what's happening too. They're saying anybody that does
this, we're gonna go after them.
What was that again about rules based international
order? You know, this is the international criminal
court. As much as they push back when

(03:48:30):
they want to, if this group was going
by the way, this is the same court
that they were calling to go after Russia
for war crimes, genocide. Right? So they have
the authority to not but see the corrupt
court is only corrupt when it goes after
people that you don't want them to go
after.
It's just lazy. It's obvious.
Mike Waltz, you know, from the upcoming Trump

(03:48:50):
administration. He says the ICC has no credibility
of these allegations have been refuted by the
US government. Oh, because that matters. Right? The
most corrupt and dishonest group in the room
is the one that sits sort of like
saying we don't represent we don't acknowledge your
authority over us, judge. Well, it's the same
difference. We don't care what the US government
has to say in your conversation about who
is breaking the law since the US government
is the most prolific breaker of the law

(03:49:11):
in the world. But it says Israel has
lawfully defended its people and borders from genocidal
terrorists. Oh, so now they're genocidal terrorists while
you're committing genocide. You can expect a strong
response to the anti Semitic bias of the
ICC. That's all they got, guys. That's all
they've got. Wait till we get to the
Israeli article talking about how they're pretending anti
Semitism.
But all the US politicians can't stop screaming

(03:49:33):
antisemitism while the Israeli media is telling you
they're using that to hide.
This is the Mint Press News graphic.
And this is true, though. I'll show you
the tweet. US senator Tom Cotton threatens to
invade the Netherlands. Now this is not even
a new conversation
because the ICC issued an arrest warrant for
Netanyahu.
But just get a drink in of these

(03:49:53):
maniacs.
These people who are pushing war with an
ally because they dare to follow the law.
Here's what he said.
The ICC is a kangaroo court and Kareem
Khan is a deranged fanatic. Woe to him
and anyone who tries to enforce these outlaw
warrants. Give me let me give them a

(03:50:14):
friendly reminder, And this is a real act,
by the way. The the American law in
the ICC is known as the Hague Invasion
Act for a reason.
Guys, these are supposed to be the rule
based good guys?
I just it's just so embarrassing that we
even pretend like anybody should take that seriously.
Sarah Lee Winston says Whitson says, the only

(03:50:36):
deranged fanatic is you, senator Cotton. Threatening to
invade a foreign country because you want to
protect Israeli war criminals from accountability for grotesque
war crimes?
Either that or you're just bought and sold
by APAC.
Probably both.
Here's another crazy maniac.
And this guy, I don't even know how
this guy is. He's still in a position
of well, I do know he's in a

(03:50:57):
position position of power. I'll show you why.
It's because of that.
1 of the highest paid senators from APAC,
over $1,000,000.
Artron Arnaud Bertrand says, we finally arrived at
the ultimate contradiction of the US' rules based
order, where the rule now is that you're
forbidden to follow the rules.

(03:51:18):
These people are cartoons of themselves. It really
is that stupid. So here he is basically
saying, so any ally, Canada, Britain, Germany, France,
if you try to help ICC, we're going
after you. That's what he's saying. Not explicitly,
like, to name it. The point is what
he's telling you is if you even our
allies, you go, you were gonna come after
you. So the only thing that matters is
defending Israel's crimes.

(03:51:39):
That's that's the point Anad is making. The
rules don't matter. The rules never matter to
them. The rules are tools used to coerce
other people to do what they want.
They're showing you who they are.
Now, ask yourself, this is everyone. From the
beginning of the genocide,
I keep making this point. How clear it
is that Biden was the biggest example to
start where he was throwing away whatever semblance

(03:52:00):
of his career, his what he built, you
know, the illusion of it, trying to create
the next election, sir. He
subsiding with the genocide
to this very day, it seems, continuing to
blindly support what everyone sees as the calling
of genocide Joe for crying out loud. Why
would somebody who spent their lifetime building a
reputation
destroy it all just well,

(03:52:21):
ask that question.
Is he bribed? Is he blackmailed?
I don't know. But it sure as hell
does not line up that he would do
that just because, hey. I support Israel.
That's crazy.
Here he is. What the ice what he
goes, what is the ICC what the ICC
is doing in Israel reeks of politics, and
the system of ICC is corrupt to the
core.

(03:52:42):
He's just this he's such a feckless follower.
You can see it in a way he's
talking about this. Like, the point is,
they're the bad guy. Israel could do what
it wants while the world sees this genocide.
It really is pretty sad.
Khaleesi points out senator Lindsey Graham threatens countries
to cooperate with the ICC. I will soon
introduce legislation that will impose sanctions on any

(03:53:04):
country that cooperates with the orders of The
Hague. So now you're going after any but
not not if The Hague is going after
Russia. That's okay. But only this order, and
we'll go after you. We'll attack you for
following what the ICC said. Think about what
that means. Even if you know even if
you're convinced they are corrupt, and they are
in plenty of ways. The point is
what they're saying

(03:53:25):
is go against the international
community, the international order that we have just
spent decades building up in your mind is
what we should follow.
There's only one way to look at that.
Senator Bill Cassidy, we just pointed to. He
says the ICC's arrest warrant for Netanyahu and
Glantz are outrageous.
Israel is fighting a 6 foot war against

(03:53:46):
Iran. See, they're still parroting these
flagrantly false narratives.
How about an indictment of the Ayatollah instead?
What are you even talking about? Based on
what?
All I mean, even if you wanna claim
everything they've ever said about them are true.
You're gonna point to what they're saying about
them and compare it to a genocide?
I don't see the Ayatollah committing genocide right

(03:54:06):
now, even if you wanna claim all the
things you think are saying are true. Or
all the nearest other nuclear bombs.
Just go after them instead. So you'd be
okay with an indictment for genocide against the
Ayatollah just because you don't like them. But
any claim against Israel despite the evidence is
unjustified and outrageous.
Right? I mean, maybe you didn't think that
one through. The point is simply to deflect
to somebody else. Go after the bad guy

(03:54:27):
that we don't like, no matter what the
evidence says. But don't go after our ally
because we don't care about the law.
Of course, $417,000
from Israel or from APAC.
Asal Rad, obviously makes the great point. ICC,
we've issued a warrants rest of warrants for
Israel's officials. The United States, we reject this.
UN commission, actions are consistent with genocide.

(03:54:48):
US, we disagree.
Aid groups, Israel is starving Gaza. The US,
false.
The UN Security Council,
we demand a ceasefire in Gaza. US, veto.
The US, we must defeat the rules based
order.
Excuse me. Of course, I have to ruin
at the end. We must defend the rules
based order. Simply showing you what a cartoon

(03:55:10):
they are. And they know they look this
way and ask yourself why they keep pushing.
What is compromising?
Well, you know, Elon Levy still acting as
stupid as ever, comes out and says every
single sentence in the ICC request was based
on demonstrable falsehoods.
He says the ICC prosecutor's request for arrest
warrants was based on falsehoods.

(03:55:31):
And when the factual mistakes were brought to
his attention, he ignored the evidence. Oh, okay.
Let's look at what he means is apparently,
these are the evidence of the fact,
factual incorrect statements. It says the statement alleges
that Israel imposed a total siege over Gaza,
so, quote, that involves completely closing the three
border crossing points. Rafa, Karim Shalom
Crossing Erez. Okay. So completely complete absolutely provable.

(03:55:55):
Every element of the allegation is false, it
says. The key facts down at the they're
they're lying.
So they're coming out and saying, you didn't
you you it's false that we closed the
siege. Despite Gallant literally saying that, despite proving
that they were shutting every one of them
down, despite proving the complete shutdown of aid,
they just come out and go, fake news.
And then when they don't bow to that,

(03:56:15):
they go, see? They deny the facts. You
mean the statement you made against the facts.
Do you realize how, like, embarrassingly desperate this
is? Because that's all they have.
Standing out in in in a very smug,
full of hubris,
confident way, you're wrong, and that's it. Don't
mind the 47 documents. Don't mind all of

(03:56:36):
the video evidence. Don't mind all the proof.
Don't mind Gallant and Netanyahu saying that. Just
pretend it's fake because racism.
That's all they have. I mean, you can
read through this, guys. It's pathetically obvious. Everything
in here is documented
45 times over.
But Elon Levy says fake news.
Well, here is what Agnes Callamard says from

(03:56:57):
Amnesty International.
The point on this, guys, is this is
oh, I don't think I grabbed that one.
Well, anyway, it's the same the point is
simple.
Every time we cite violations
by the Israeli government, we are accused of
exemitism.
Every time. That's how this works. They point,
oh, you you murdered that child. Oh, you
bombed that building.
Antisemitism.

(03:57:17):
Who cares how truthful it is? This is
how it works. How many times we have
to show you Jewish
leaders around the world or people from Israel
or former members of the IDF that say
that's how we you we use that to
hide our crimes. There's countless examples of that
because they do. Doesn't mean anti Semitism doesn't
exist. Of course, it does.
And it applies to more than just Jewish

(03:57:38):
people. In fact, it seems to apply to
everything. But the bottom line is there's racism
against Jewish people, against Semites, against all sorts
of people.
That's different than pointing out that they're using
that to hide what they do.
Holding Dems accountable from the left says today
is the 3rd day that Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris have continued
to arm Benjamin Netanyahu despite the ICC formally

(03:57:59):
accusing them of war crimes, thus making them
guilty of war crimes as well. I completely
agree.
That's today.
Continuing to do so. So this whole argument
that they were gonna destroy Israel if they
got elected is just obviously stupid and false.
Truth, you could see that they're all blindly
supporting of Israel to their detriment. Why would
they do it now?
Something else is driving these actions. They're locked

(03:58:20):
in. And it's because the government of the
US is involved. That's it. Not one side
or the other, your government.
Max Granger points out another future artifact for
the Gaza Holocaust Museum,
statement from Joe Biden about the ICC.
It says the ICC issuance of the arrest
warrants
against Israeli leaders is outrageous.

(03:58:41):
Let me be clear once again. They love
to say that. Whatever the ICC might imply,
there is no equivalence.
None. Between Israel and Hamas.
I don't know why they keep saying that.
What does that have to do with anything?
It's this is not some comparative point between
what Hamas has done and what is it's
what Israel's done. Israel's committed a crime. It
doesn't matter whether against Hamas, Palestinians,

(03:59:02):
or anything.
They've committed war crimes. So they're being charged
for war crimes to the amount of genocide.
Why they pretend like so what's the argument?
That if Hamas was worse, then it wouldn't
matter?
Again, it's like they just lost the plot.
I don't I honestly don't think they know
what else to do.
They're lost because they are criminals, and they
know we know that.

(03:59:23):
Now what's interesting is Israeli media, as of
3, 4 days, 3 days ago, reported that's
a severe delay in supply of weapons was
coming with basically, 20,000 bombs were
stuck in the midst of combat. They weren't
getting to them. So you can read this
however you want. I'm not sure how to
read. It's it's up in the air. It
seems there's some kind of trepidation about waiting

(03:59:43):
or but, ultimately, they're saying they're gonna continue
supporting them. I I it's hard to tell.
What it needs to show, I think, what
it indicates to me
is they're they're falling apart. They're falling apart
at the seams.
Doesn't mean they're stopping murdering children because they
gotta make sure they do that.
But they're
I think what's happening is you're finding people
that would otherwise support this to a tee

(04:00:05):
who just recognize they're just losing too much
to keep doing it. And they recognize the
loss of power that Netanyahu is about to
go to prison. So they're going, well, maybe
I just stop. You know, maybe they won't
come after me with that blackmail. I don't
know. But it's interesting.
Now, this is Haaretz.
The leading Israeli newspaper,
compare this to what the western media is
right now saying,

(04:00:26):
regurgitating.
Along with almost every western politician,
please reflect on what this shows us and
let it sink in.
Netanyahu
brought the ICC ruling on himself,
and now he's whining about antisemitism.
Can you imagine that being written in a
western paper? This is today.
And this is, more in Rabani saying headline

(04:00:48):
same thing, basically. Saying, if the same headline
appear in the US or European newspaper, its
author will be drawn and quartered, and their
editor tarred and feathered.
Of course, they would scream anti semitism and
Jew hatred, but here we are in Israel,
leading paper,
wild.
Here's what it says.
After the latest installment in the series, and

(04:01:09):
this is ongoing in regard to the ICJICC,
it says, quote, this and this is what
they're they they put out.
Benjamin Netanyahu and Glant came the day after
the latest installment series, quote, this is how
Will bury the state inquiry commission, a plan
by the prime minister to form a political
investigative committee.
Literally decided to form a committee to investigate

(04:01:30):
it to stall anything actually happening. It says
there's not much to say about it except
that the proposal, as usual
remember, this is Israeli newspaper, Heretz, writing about
Netanyahu today,
or rather specifically yesterday,
saying, accept the proposal as usual is based
on Netanyahu's
assumption that we are all stupid.

(04:01:53):
He wants to form a committee whose members
will fight with each other morning, noon, and
night, and become deadlocked till the end of
days. In the meantime, no other commission may
be formed in the words of this scandalous
legislation.
It says if you campaign for years to
weaken the legal system, which he's been doing,
don't be surprised
that at the moment of truth, your own

(04:02:14):
legal immunity is compromised.
Right? You reap what you sow is the
point.
Now realize, on top of that, the whole
judicial reform point, the independent judiciary that people
the morons like Lindsey Graham love to push
in your, They that's not the case. That's
why these courts need to rule on this,
which is the whole point. If they have
an independent judiciary, we don't need them to
get involved. Well, they don't.

(04:02:36):
Famous judges of Canada have wrote about this
years ago. That's what Netanyahu and his team
have been doing.
So he would hopefully not be held accountable
right now.
So he ruined it on every possible angle.
The point is that you can't pretend that
this doesn't matter because they've got an independent
judiciary when he's been breaking it in order
to try to avoid being held accountable, which
coming back hit him anyway.

(04:02:58):
That's their point. You can't go after it
this long and get mad when it doesn't
work out for you. The conduct in the
international arena, it says, was amateurish and shocking.
There are hundreds of examples for this. They're
talking about their conduct. For example, when the
national security minister from Israel encourages militias this
is important. Hope you're listening.
When he when the national security minister under

(04:03:19):
Netanyahu encourages
militias, settlers,
to set fire to trucks carrying humanitarian aid,
The responsibility
falls on the prime minister.
Isn't that interesting? It says as the saying
goes, he is the head, he is to
blame. Right? Okay. So we can he can
they can casually mention something that we're disputing
in this country

(04:03:39):
just to make a secondary point.
Yes. They're blocking aid. Yes. They're setting trucks
on fire.
But let the Matt what the
the US government pretend like we don't know
for sure when they're literally writing about it.
And by the way, we can prove it
with video and statements and evidence everywhere.
And just children starving to death. But your

(04:04:01):
government wants you to believe that you're wrong
or racist for pointing it out even though
they're openly writing about it.
Netanyahu brought the arrest warrant on himself through
his stubbornness and arrogance, he writes. Now he
is whining about antisemitism.
He moved from legal deliberations
to propaganda.
The official line is that the court is
antisemitic,
and the prosecutor better not dare touch us.

(04:04:23):
That's they're talking about the ICC right now.
So they're telling you, he moved to propaganda,
meaning there is no anti Semitism in this
conversation. They're using that to deflect, which if
you listen to them, they write about this
all the time. Now it says now Netanyahu
and his cohorts will put their trust in
the Trump administration.
But the world is not just America.

(04:04:43):
A pity, ask Mary Regev's travel agent. The
point,
if you think this is anything America first
when they're literally put
at least the point is what you can
see them doing is what I'm pointing to.
But from this side of it, at least
Netanyahu's of the mind that Trump is gonna
save him from this.
Now it says, every poll we see, what
the majority thinks about Netanyahu

(04:05:06):
and his policies toward the hostages,
his management of the war, and his refusal
to accept responsibility.
The point is, they see what he's doing.
They recognize what he's doing. And he says,
if the prime minister had shown the same
anguish and empathy for the young people and
adults who are suffering in the tunnels in
Gaza, they might already be home.

(04:05:28):
Now whether or not they're suffering in tunnels
when it seems like everybody else has said
that's not what's happening, who's already gotten free,
despite being scared and rightly so, telling them
how they did not treat them bad. They
gave them food. They took not shopping in
some cases. The point and this is all
publicly available. You can look it up.
The point
is yet again, in Israeli media, they're pointing
out what our

(04:05:48):
Paul fake politicians and fake media, both independent,
alternative, and everything else. What they're afraid or
unwilling to highlight,
that he's lying to you about what he's
doing with negotiations. My point is this is
not even the main point of the article.
It's showing you that in a passing point
to make a point for the article, they're
they're highlighting things that we've been fighting to
expose because our western media is broken, and

(04:06:09):
our politicians are completely bought off.
It says what we can say is that
Netanyahu's anger is authentic. It's not because he's
heartbroken over Philstein
just with person involved. It's because he has
no heart is what it says. That's what
they literally wrote. He has no heart. I
agree. It says Netanyahu also related to this
in the Knesset
speech, insisting that, quote, dozens of abductees would

(04:06:31):
soon be returned.
Again, using the hostages and their plight that
they allowed to happen, which we'll get to
in a second, and and in so many
cases killed themselves.
But it goes, what? How?
It's unclear.
As in how are they gonna bring them
home? Who knows? The negotiating team
doesn't think it can happen.
It is more reasonable to assume that those

(04:06:53):
were simply empty words. And then when nothing
happens, he can blame Hamas' refusal.
See how it works? Along the way, he
is playing on the feelings of the hostages'
families who are shattered by anxiety and despair.
This is the villain of the conversation.
Even they can call that out no matter
what they think about Hamas.

(04:07:14):
It really is incredible.
He says, but the idea that the person
who will remove them is the one chiefly
responsible for the debacle, the father of conspiracies,
the financier of Hamas,
and the one who disregarded the warnings
should horrify any decent person, certainly in light
of his reasons for dismissing them.

(04:07:36):
They're talking about Netanyahu.
I mean, we're they that's this is the
crazy part about not only are they referencing
the financier from us, which you all know
because you're not ridiculous in denying the facts.
But a lot of people still haven't even
haven't even seen that despite how many times
you post it because, you know, social media
algorithms.
But on top of that, that they're talking
about the fact that this is inform wait.

(04:07:57):
I'll I'll play a clip for a minute
that highlights this.
But that there's an investigation
right now in Israel, exposing the fact that
they knew
before October 7th,
Which shouldn't be the hard to wrap your
mind around because of all the stuff we've
seen. But this is coming out from within
their investigation and this is something being floated
openly. We we're we're so broken in this
country when it comes to the information flow.

(04:08:19):
This is publicly in Israeli media. We can't
even talk about it. Even though we can,
they call you racist. Because what it shows
you is their Israeli government influence over us
in this country seems to be stronger than
what's going on in Israel.
It's crazy.
At least in some context.
The father of conspiracies, the financier of Hamas,
and the one who disregarded the warnings.

(04:08:43):
It says, this is how a bill by
Ahmet Halevi, one of Netanyahu's most useful idiots,
it writes, was revived. It says,
it was a levy who signed among other
things, the donations law to do what? To
allow the prime minister to pay for his
trial with money from foreigners.
Can you guess who that might be?
So more money coming in from people all

(04:09:05):
over the world, including the United States to
help him fight
being arrested by his own people.
The bill that won a prelim preliminary vote
in the Knesset this week seeks to establish
a new intelligence body directly subordinate to the
prime minister. It's typical. The goal is to
create a body that provides the prime minister
with a second opinion. And it says the
reality is that nothing is kept secret from

(04:09:25):
Netanyahu. He sees everything. There was never any
important intelligence finding that was hidden from him,
certainly not an intelligence alert.
What they're saying is he knew about them,
not that they weren't there. Indeed, it says
the warnings he was given
by military intelligence
before October 7th regarding the judicial coup
only piled up in his inbox. The point

(04:09:46):
is they're making here and the many other
articles we've written and read
is that, ultimately,
this was at least one part of his
ability to deviate,
to distract
from the fact that he's gonna go to
jail using war yet again. So it's not
impossible that this would, some level, was allowed
to happen to hide that or use for
it. And maybe it got out of control.
Maybe they lost control. Who knows how this

(04:10:07):
plays out? It's certainly possible that all of
it was done just to save him from
prison.
That's what his own people are saying about
it. And we can't even have an honest
conversation about this in the in the United
States. Think about how alarming that influence is.
It says, quote, a second opinion
mechanism alongside the army also exists, or supposed
to, in the form of the National Security

(04:10:27):
Council that operates under the prime minister.
According to the reliable testimony of gi, Gautti
s Eisinkot,
it doesn't fill that role at all.
It's just a sign on the door
and nothing more.
That's the truth. But Netanyahu,
as always,
does not work to shape reality,
but to shape the perception of reality.

(04:10:49):
God, I wish Americans could listen to this,
especially people on their public inside. They pretend
they're supporting the good guy.
As Asol Radzi points out the hypocrisy, this
is Hillary Clinton. If Russian leadership would rather
not be accused of committing war crimes, they
should stop bombing hospitals.
Yeah. Totally. Here's the example of Israeli drones

(04:11:09):
reportedly bombing the Kamal Agar hospital or literally
every other hospital inside of Gaza or Lebanon
that's happening too now.
And important shift in general, here's the Italian
court ruling that Jerusalem status
is not recognized as the capital of Israel.
These are huge shifts that are showing you
that they're losing control in every way.

(04:11:30):
And they they're not this is not the
cap. This is supposed to be the divided
capital between the 2 stage solution and that's
what they've agreed to in the past. Not
today because they don't care.
So, here
is a couple quick points to finish with
in general. So here's what Elon so what
I wanna highlight is the the amount of
I mean, this is just what I could
pick up from the day. But you know

(04:11:51):
how many times we've covered this and showing
you how it just the overwhelming amount of
it of
evidence. But times you've seen Israel just outright
lie
over and over. And this is about, you
know, manufacturing what you might see.
And just since I said it for fun,
because I think it's important
or not. I thought I had right here.

(04:12:12):
Oh, there it is. Let me let me
preface these remarks with I never never ever
believe Israeli figures.
I've been in the government too long to
know that the Israelis are patent liars.
And you'll find that a very common sentiment
among people being honest about this. But here's
the point.
Elon Levy again shares this thing from this

(04:12:34):
other guy who's been kind of an uprising
Zionist manipulator
saying chaos in the streets of Montreal as
Hamas supporters are terrorizing the city. And Elon
says, if Western societies don't clamp down on
this pro Hamas vandalism and violence now, there's
going to be a backlash and a reckoning
that won't be pretty. It's almost like he's
threatening you.
The point is, I see masked people,

(04:12:55):
in most cases, wearing black, breaking things. The
occasional kifa and different points in there.
So we don't know what's really going on,
but certainly possible there's members of the support,
Hama the, the Palestinian supporters that have decided
to break windows. Wouldn't surprise me.
But this game they play where this is
somehow one worse than genocide and murdering children
as we speak. But on top of that,

(04:13:15):
that we can't factor in the possibility this
might be somebody else.
That's the point we're making here. Because ultimately,
here's again, this guy's sharing the same thing.
Look at these guys breaking these windows. What's
funny is Lindsay points out, you can read
the article here,
it's being reported as an is a Palestine
pro Palestine, but anti NATO demonstration.
So it's like they can't even be honest

(04:13:36):
with the basic facts of this. Because it
seems if you read the article that it's
about an it's an anti NATO thing that's
kind of overlapped with pro Palestinian. So the
bottom line is this could be any number
of things.
And just because people are do breaking law
does not mean everybody there represents that. And
I'd love to see the honest coverage of
things like, I don't know, Amsterdam or the
continuing effort efforts of their supporters

(04:13:58):
beating people up in the streets for no
reason.
But, of course, it's only the one-sided coverage.
But my point is simple. Of course, this
could be Palestinian supporters.
But why that becomes indicative of Hamas, which
first of all, it's not what they're doing.
They're Palestinian supporters. But on top of that,
why is that indicative of the entire movement
to stop the genocide? Like, the idea being
that this is what they're they really want
you to desperately think that they're coming for

(04:14:21):
you. Europe and United States, which, by the
way, Israel is helping happen. They're manufacturing that.
You could listen to them talk about it.
But they want you to think that they're
coming in and they're going to wreck you
because intifada,
which otherwise means resistance.
Which is what they're doing, resisting occupation and
genocide.
I mean, they really just have nothing. They

(04:14:41):
have fear and ignorance. That's all they have.
For example,
Canada has fallen,
Elud Fluid points out.
Over 85,000 Quebec students strike for Gaza, call
for intifada, and lit and final solution.
That sound like that makes sense to you?
Of course, they have this random cap this

(04:15:02):
image of a girl with a kifa giving
the salute for Hitler. Right? Because that's super
common. They walk around here. Oh, Hitler. We
love Nazis. Like, it's just so dumb. It
doesn't even logically make sense. Now, obviously, if
you look into this, it's either her doing
that to them because she's calling them Nazis
or they caught her in some weird pose.
The idea that that would even logically make
sense is embarrassing, but that's because all they

(04:15:23):
want you to think is Nazis. They must
be racist. They say, hey, Jews. It's so
even though they're standing alongside Jewish voices for
peace.
It's it's really that bad.
This person says, no, it hasn't. The goal
is to show our solidarity with the people
facing a genocide in Gaza. Especially, the students
of Gaza who haven't been able to go
to school for 400 days. That's what they're

(04:15:44):
saying, the spokesperson for the people that are
there.
You know, and so here's the actual article.
I did re write grab something. Oh, well,
that's all it really was. So here's the
article, you can read it for yourself.
They go basically go on to make an
entire protest against stopping genocide out to be
violent and racist.
And all they have is a video like
this,

(04:16:04):
which shows so that you hear a hearing
in the background. That's just a protest.
And they're shaking this door. That's it. For
about 2 seconds. They shake the door, and
then it's over.
They're knocking.
For the podcast, it's very benign. That's it.
It's a whole video.
So what they say is shocking footage from

(04:16:25):
students strike on campus today. Peaceful student strikes
don't usually involve attempts to break down doors.
I mean, just think of it. They have
to make it that
like, turn it into a caricature. If they
really have to stretch that far, doesn't that
show you something?
And then this is what they take this
from.
Now, watch this for yourself, and you tell
me this seems like it makes sense. Now,

(04:16:45):
of course, certainly could be somebody that feels
this way. Why would that be that? I
mean, what you could prove is that the
vast majority of people in these protests are
not fighting for murdering anybody or violence. They're
fighting for an end of genocide,
and it's very open about it.
And all they can do is pluck out
one video of a person saying this. Now
you watch this for yourself. Now, I'm gonna
show you in a second how often you

(04:17:05):
have Zionists or IDF or Mossad
in Israel or Gaza or, in this case,
anywhere else dressing up as people they want
you to think they are. It's very common
tactic for them. But I'm not saying we
know that. This could very well be a
Palestinian supporter.
But watch this for yourself.

(04:17:39):
I can't believe how dumb that is.
Now, 2 things I could point out. Pretty
sure it's a loud area. You can hear
people chanting. But, yeah, weirdly, they've got really
clear audio.
Gee, I wonder if there's a microphone to
that mask. What do you think?
I mean, reckon, just take a second to
think about this. Look how far away she's
standing.
Could be something else. But either way, the
point is the way she's saying this, find

(04:18:01):
all solos out over here. Like she's some
kind of carnival,
whatever, pucker, whatever.
I mean, it just seems dumb. Now, maybe
I'm overthinking it, but what I think is
hilarious, you got a single person standing there
walking going, you know what that is? Final
solution coming for you.
I mean, this is what I expect from
how bad they are propaganda.
Even if it is a real person, in

(04:18:21):
no way does this represent what people are
saying. You know, just she's talking about Nazi
Germany and final solution. You know, the thing
that literally you can prove, Zionism was a
part of. That they tried to become allies
during and after the final solution.
That's an easily proven fact. It's on Wikipedia.
Harrettes has written about it. Now, I probably
have,
let's see.

(04:18:43):
Yeah. Right there. Look at that. Dan's art
Dan wrote about this or put a post
out about this.
This is about one of the guys in
the in the Zionist groups that were telling
them that this is the video for they
were saying their animals killed them all to
everybody. The point is the continue, which is
a foundational element of Zionism
to seek an ally with Nazi Germany even

(04:19:04):
after the final solution. It's a Hereditary article
you can read for yourself. It's a public
fact.
If that's confusing to you, maybe you should
look into the actual, provable historical documents and
what they've actually said over the years.
So my point is when she's saying that,
you you're saying this
the group that, in fact, actually was aligned
with that, you're saying that you want the
they're coming to them with a final solution?

(04:19:26):
Who? Israel?
Jewish people in the world?
From Palestinian? Like, it just seems dumb.
You guys can decide for yourself, but I'm
telling you guys, it's so lazy. And they
just are banking on your willingness to pretend
that they're all evil Nazis even though the
ideology doesn't even make sense.
And then I'll show you some examples of

(04:19:47):
how often this has happened.
Oh, and this was another one, by the
way. I this this has been circulating as
well. This is from the 13th November this
year. Do you notice anything different? So this
person says, this is how Hamas fires at
Israel while dressed as civilians. Well, here's 2
things that stand out to me really really
obviously.
They're wearing heads and bandanas. So technically, they
would not be in civilian guard because that's

(04:20:08):
very identifiable.
So why would that be the case? And
why would they only be in the head
well, because they want they want 2 things
to be seen. This is my opinion. They
want you to see the Hamas bandana. So
you go, oh, Hamas. Okay.
But they're wearing civilian clothing. So they can
say, see, they're trying to be sneaky. But
why would they be wearing the bandanas if
they're trying to be sneaky and not look
don't think too hard about it. But, also,

(04:20:29):
try really hard not to notice that they
all have white
arms.
Oh, look at that. So that's a pretty
obviously a white guy. Okay. Let's see the
next one.
Oh, yeah. That's a pretty clear white guy
right there. And then, oh, look at that
guy. You know, pretty yeah. Totally not messy.
I mean, guys, it's just so dumb. It's
a 8 second clip of them bumping things

(04:20:51):
in
or, like,
an old navy shirts and jeans. I mean,
it's just it's so stupid.
I I mean, gosh. I just I I
do show discernment, look into it for yourself.
But I really don't understand how this has
ever worked on anybody.

(04:21:11):
Now here just to give you a couple
examples.
It's a classic conversation that goes back a
long way. This is from January of this
year, but the information is very obvious. Israeli
special forces disguised as doctors killed 3. We
talked about this when it happened. They dressed
up as Palestinians and doctors and rushed in
and murdered people in their beds, which is
a crime no matter how you spin it.
And there's this is called and this is
the Mas'ar Rabin. This is the Israeli agents

(04:21:32):
who disguise themselves as Palestinians. This is the
same point, but the article is about the
history. It's very, very public.
Same same point. The Israeli undercover agents with
a history of dressing like Palestinians.
And that's what you tend to see, the
black hoods with bandanas.
And this is an Israeli platform. It's a
I think it's a substack.
How Israel goes undercover in the Palestinian territories.

(04:21:54):
It's called the future of Jewish. If you
read this, it's basically like doing good. But
the point is they're admitting the same. They
dress like Palestinians and they go in.
And then, oh, this one. Oh, sorry. I
must have this in the wrong place. Palestinians
describe being used as human shields by Israeli
troops. Obviously, just a point. Include that.
Or maybe they're rushing them in too. The

(04:22:15):
point is simple, guys, that it's this easy
to be played, but if you just believe,
go along with what side you think you're
on, sort of like Team 4 Politics or
Lesser of Evils. I don't care what they
say. I'm gonna vote for them anyway. Well,
they're turning you into these things, but don't
fall for it.
Now here's what Abir Ponce did, and this
is actually interesting to finish. This is about
the crumbling narrative of Netanyahu

(04:22:35):
and the very important documentary, which I'll only
show you a couple clips of, that is
out there that you shouldn't miss. It's called
the BB Files.
It's important.
Now he describes some of this, but this
is important just to listen. What he's saying
is accurate. You can I've went over some
of it already, and I'll show you the
documentary next. But this is actually important because
we're being hidden from what's actually going on
in Israel. And that's probably one of the

(04:22:55):
biggest reasons why we have such deviation between
the public coverage of their media and what
our politicians in media are willing to acknowledge.
Media is not properly reporting on the crazy
drama that is going on in Israel right
now. Beside the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu, the
prime minister, is on trial in 10 days
for bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, The

(04:23:15):
prime minister and his team are being investigated
to see if they received information hours before
the October 7th attack, and they also potentially
try to cover it up. That's so important
because of all what we already know.
So now you have to realize, Israeli investigative
teams are doing are investigating them for what
we're being dismissed from talking about. Calling racist

(04:23:37):
for considering that there was some foreknowledge,
or they might have killed their despite them
admitting that they actually declare the Hannibal directive.
I just it's just amazing how much evidence
there can be. And we still I just
it just shows you something that I was
gonna talk about at the start today, but
I don't wanna get into it. Just we're
caught we're stuck in this moment where we
can tell. They know we know. We know
they know we know. And they don't care.

(04:23:58):
It just it just we the the powerful
people in the western world are saying, we
don't care what you think.
That which has to show you your vote
doesn't matter. That they're clearly just doing they're
exposing the game to support Israel's genocide.
And what that needs to do is fundamentally
change how we view how the world works.
Because if we just keep going through the
process and act like they're gonna you know,

(04:24:20):
the system's gonna work, they are the system
and they don't care.
Now, we
can make something change. We just have to
recognize that it's not gonna be through the
same voting system or legal channels. They don't
care.
Time for something new. Person in his team
got charged and detained yesterday, and another person
has been indicted. And they're also being investigated

(04:24:40):
for blackmail that this is what happened a
few hours before the October 7th attack. Benjamin
Netanyahu's team allegedly received information
that all these SIM cards in Gaza were
being activated, which would indicate that Hamas are
getting ready to come in and attack. But
they're denying that the prime minister's team was
contacted hours before the attack, but they're also
being investigated

(04:25:00):
for changing the phone records
and the records of the meetings to make
it look like they didn't know. And the
I mean, how can you not see that
as
some level someone was involved with that? Which
would then indicate that some level in Hamas,
there might have been some influence there, which
they were still funding them. But so realize,
I don't believe that means every element of

(04:25:21):
Hamas. I frankly think that's might have probably
why this changed or got out of control
because there's I don't think Hamas is controlled
by Israel completely.
That's the nuance for you. Because I really
you can prove the funding at some level,
but I don't wanna be clear. Just because
that's the case does not mean that they
invalidate the act of armed resistance. Even if
Israel funded it and made it happen entirely,
that would still be protected under an act

(04:25:42):
of armed resistance by a group from Palestine.
That's the Geneva Convention. They're unoccupied character. They
have the legal right to armed resistance.
Make that clear because I get the concern,
like, this point could invalidate the other, but
they don't. So it's important to state that.
The person who was detained and charged yesterday
has been charged with leaking false intelligence to
the media to manipulate the people's opinion on

(04:26:04):
the wall so it could continue. And on
top of that Wow. It gets so much
worse. Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to introduce legislation
into parliament to stop an independent inquiry about
the failures of October 7th. Mhmm. And he's
trying to change the laws so he can
appoint the people who will investigate himself.
Absolutely wild.
Yep. That's what I was just reading to

(04:26:26):
you. I mean, he did a good job
kind of breaking it down. And it's amazing
this can't we can't have an honest conversation
about this in the country.
So suppressed news, basically I mean, I I
get the sense these are gonna get deleted.
Some of them already have. But here's some
Telegram links to show you the the full
video as well as some of the clips
I'll play for you really quickly. Suppressed news
simply pointed out the bb files exposing Netanyahu's
corruption has been now been leaked and is

(04:26:47):
circulating online.
Now look, this one got deleted, not by
Khaleesi. Like, because you can see here's another
example right here. Media has been disabled by
a copyright owner. So this one gets deleted.
This one gets bumped out by copyright. So
it seems they're pulling strings. So let's not
pretend like Israel doesn't have influence on this
platform.
The point is, these are videos showing you

(04:27:09):
damning evidence of Netanyahu's investigation, and it's probably
very embarrassing for him. So let me play
some of these clips for you.
So this one's simply Miriam Adelson first. And
what it's saying is, why do you why
do you always pay? It says, ask them.
It says, all of BB's friends are rich,

(04:27:31):
she says.
She says, so that's the essence of your
friendship, money?
She says, what can I say? If this
comes out, I'm dead.
Wow.
Let's be clear. This is not fake. This
is a big deal. This is a this
is a real documentary that's come out about
an ongoing investigation

(04:27:51):
into corruption of Netanyahu.
Miriam Adelson is one of the chief financiers
of Donald Trump's campaign.
That should be crazy terrifying.
Get me a Cohuba Medicaid cigar. He says
get me a Cohuba,
Bee Hague cigar. That's what he asked for.
That's what he asked for. $1100
US for a box of tin. 100 US

(04:28:13):
dollars for a box of tin.
I'll give you whatever you want. I just
don't know. Something criminal you mean.
Says we're reviewing criminal activity.
There's a whole industry. It says that until
today

(04:28:34):
Industry of what?
An industry of high value gifts that you
can't even imagine.
From whom do you live?
Without specifying which gifts at which time period.
It says from super wealthy millionaires
to Sarah and Bibi. That's Netanyahu.

(04:28:58):
Now, of course, you can obviously point out
they could be lying. But why in the
world would a wealthy Israeli oligarch who is
literally funding for his benefit
admit that because she's being investigated too. That's
Adelson. The rest of them and the point
is you don't know. But the information has
been backed up over decades, and it's very
clear.
This is the culmination of that in which
you I think the only reason it's happening
is because he's lost power.

(04:29:22):
God. This one says,
I've never met a person with such great
memory. So this point, he always really saying
in this one is that Netanyahu has, like,
a,
photographic memory. That's his claim anyway. And it
goes on to show Netanyahu basically saying, I
don't remember I don't remember to everything they're
asking him.

(04:29:47):
And he remembers text, hate,
history. It's crazy. He remembers everything is what
he's saying. I can't remember exactly. That's what
Netanyahu is saying.

(04:30:30):
I really don't remember.
I'm telling you the truth. I don't remember.
Fact is, I don't remember. Over and over
and over. Doesn't that remind you of something?
It sort of reminds you of how US
politicians who are in trouble act in front
of congress.
Pretty pretty telling.

(04:30:50):
Now here's what she said underneath that blocked
v video. This is Christian, Ron Heyday pointing
out the b b files. And she says,
after seeing the full documentary, she says, I
have no idea no clue because it's in
there. Why the copyright owner would disable the
video? Everyone should watch the full documentary. And
then she says, f Israel, f Netanyahu, from
the river to the sea, Palestine will be
free. Well, here's the full documentary. I it's

(04:31:11):
an hour and 55 minutes.
I'm I I grab it before it gets
removed. Who knows if it does or not?
But the point is, it is wild.
Oh, my God. Look at that.
Right as we were doing. Oh, my God.
It's so crazy.
Wow. Hold on.
Oh my god. That's so crazy, guys. That

(04:31:32):
was right as we were looking at it.
What time is this on the thing? I
might have him clip this out.
432.
Wow. That's crazy.
Well, look at that, guys. Damn called that
as it happened.
How is that possible?
I mean, I guess it's a documentary. So

(04:31:53):
but this is crazy. So the point is
this information is being removed from the Internet
as we put it down. Thanks, Elon Musk,
for your no censorship. Now realize these clips,
this this documentary is out there now, so
you're making a clip and posting that. I
don't know. The it just it just shows
you exactly what we're talking about. So Israel
is able to it in real time, pull
things off of Twitter. That's how I'm seeing
this. That's my opinion. I think that's quite

(04:32:15):
obvious because it is damning for per at
Net and Yahoo. Oh my god. Look at
that. That is wild.
Alright. Well, to finish in general, guys, just
to point out what's still going on, as
this is happening, okay, as the ICC issues
warrants for Netanyahu and the US Western world
pushes back and says, no. We'll defend genocide.

(04:32:37):
They're continuing to displace 2,000,000 people in Gaza
as at least 90 Palestinians, including 36
children, were killed as Israel persists in starving
their population. This is yesterday.
So not only do they not stop, they
go harder. 36
children killed.
Mustafa, the journalist on the ground, one of

(04:32:59):
the last few, says sources 50 days of
Israeli military ground incursion into the northern Gaza
resulted in 23100
plus dead and missing people.
5,000 plus wounded, a 1000 kidnapped,
40,000
displaced,
6 hospitals and clinics destroyed, 9 refugee shelters
destroyed, thousands of homes demolished.

(04:33:21):
This is what's going on in Northern Gaza
right now. But let's pretend like that's not
exactly what it looks like.
Sarah Wilkinson.
This video I've seen so many of these.
Inside an ambulance with a child who was
hurt by one of their bombings getting bombed
as they drive away.

(04:34:04):
Yep. There's really no misunderstanding that.
Hey,
you could see that the medics and guys
the bottom line is this is obviously a
crime.
Like everything else you're looking at, it never
stops.
Now in Lebanon, which is also continuing, as
Al Rod points out, war criminal Netanyahu threatened
to destroy Lebanon like Gaza,

(04:34:27):
and Glan did too. And here it is.
Israel bombs homes, medical facilities, and the suburb
of Lebanon. The only thing outrageous about the
his arrest warrant is that it took this
long.
That's what that was yesterday, guys. What are
we this is incredible.
These are major civilian locations at Beirut. These
are full of innocent people that are literally

(04:34:49):
bombing. Look at these people are filming from
the street.
My god.
I mean, I'm just jumping through. This is
constant.
Do you realize they're not even trying to
make up narratives right now? They're not even
talking about, well, Hezbollah or tunnels or human
shields? They just gave up on that as

(04:35:10):
far as I could tell.
If pushed, they'll say the same thing, but
they're just straight up bombing in the middle
of an open Lebanese terror. There's this is
not Gaza. People are filming all this. They
can go right to that and prove there's
no tunnel, there's no human shield. They're straight
up murdering people. I this is the most
livestream genocide in history, the most blindly supported

(04:35:31):
by the people pretending to fight for the
freedom of the world.
We have an we are watching a complete
inversion of what we believe the world is
like right now. I guess maybe not a
complete inversion, but destroying the illusion
that these people are somehow fighting for the
freedom of all.
Cradle writes, the violent Israeli air strikes on
southern,
southern suburbs of Beirut continue. This is right

(04:35:53):
before we went live.
Sarah Abdallah writes, Israel dropped 4 bunker buster
bombs on civilian apartments. This was yesterday night.
Full of Lebanese families as they slept in
Beirut.
Countless dead and wounded, their bodies are still
being retrieved from the rubble. They're committing genocide
in Lebanon just like Gaza.

(04:36:15):
Unreal. So regarding the doc- the doc- the
documentary, I've downloaded this already. So reach out
to me if you like that somehow. I'm
sure I'll I'll maybe I'll try to find
a way to post that somewhere for you.
Bottom line is I'm sure you you probably
still find this on here somewhere. It always
gets repopulated.
Searching bb docs files.
Yeah. Here's these clips right here.

(04:36:37):
Shoot those out real quick if you wanna
grab them. I just shared it.
Yeah. It's getting getting removed.
I knew that would happen. It's just crazy.
It's like I almost like I almost like
waffle on it because I'm like, well, you
know, it's but here we are in real
time.
It's just it's just so very transparent.
And that's the thing, guys. It's like, I'd
sit here. I I know I'm I'm I'm
of the mind

(04:36:59):
that people that watch the show, you're all
you all see it. You're not stupid. If
you disagree on other things, the point is
the facts are evidence. It's right there.
But then I also think to myself, well,
all the people who are supporting let's say
they support Donald Trump, conservatives, or even the
that you see it too.
This is not about some objective question about
fact this it's an objective reality.

(04:37:20):
Whatever you think about Israel or Netanyahu, what's
happening can't be denied. And I think that's
why this has gotten so crazy.
It's time that we do something to stop
this. Like, it's it's been over a year.
And this is the point of what, Francesca
Albanese is saying. And ultimately,
it's time for something more, for people to
step up and do something to stop this
because it's
I am the last person that's gonna call

(04:37:42):
for more anything that gives power to them.
Government or international bodies. But at this point
and I'm not even I'm not even calling
for that. I'm just saying, I don't know
what else we can do at this point.
We're watching them continue to commit genocide
on and increasingly
murderous.
Day by day, moment by moment, the more
that they get called out, the more they
ramp up their genocide.

(04:38:02):
So what do you suggest we
do? Right? What and I genuinely, what should
we do next when you can recognize that
the power structure does not care? That they're
showing you that we don't care what you
think, and we will not stop because we're
just gonna keep saying you're wrong.
And that means that they influence the power
the the legal mechanism.
So what do we do in that situation?

(04:38:22):
What do we do? What is our next
step?
It's a it's a genuine question. Because at
this point, we can't just keep waiting
for this to stop.
Well, how long until it bleeds into the
next country?
Right? I mean, just a genuine question to
think about. How long until it bleeds into
Syria? And which is already kind of happening
or bleeds into Iran. All of a sudden

(04:38:42):
and, you know, at some point, that's gonna
bleed into world war, which is already happening
in many ways,
you know, based on the general metric of
what we call it in the past.
What do we do?
I plead with everybody out there to think
about this and not just
wait.
I'm not calling for violence. They'll never that's
the last thing we're calling for. But I

(04:39:04):
believe
with enough
with seeing through enough the paradigm manipulations,
we have enough people right now that are
aware of this enough to do something. And
all that is is is is applying the
pressure in the right place.
Because they can't do this at the support
of the US and the UK.
And they are on the precipice, man. They
are on the knife's edge right as we

(04:39:25):
talk.
All it needs is somebody to apply just
the right pressure to push them to recognize
that it's not in their interest. And that's
all they care about.
Whether it's blackmailed or not, there's enough people
in the in the structure that would
be able to push this into something else.
Even if it's for their own benefit, their
opportunism, which I believe is what that drives
them in general. But I'll leave it there

(04:39:45):
for tonight, guys. I just really think it's
time that we push this into something new
because I'm tired of watching this continue.
I'm a think about it myself.
I think the people that are suffering in
all this, they're pleading for your help. They
don't know what else to do either. They're
out there being called terrorists by the power
structures pretending they're supposed to support them or
watching it happen day by day. I know

(04:40:06):
we have the of the
support enough in the majority to make something
change.
Find the courage.
I love you all. Thank you for being
here tonight.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.
Let me,
sir.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}HHS’ Human Trafficking Problem, Make BlackRock Great Again & ICC Issues Arrest Warrant For Netanyahu

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

HHS’ Human Trafficking Problem, Make BlackRock Great Again & ICC Issues Arrest Warrant For Netanyahu

Stuff You Should Know