Israel’s “Surrender Or Starve” Will Admittedly Block All Aid, UNIFIL Gas Attack & Elon’s Great Reset

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Because we're losing a lot of people because
of the Internet, and we have to do
something. We have to go see Bill Gates
and a lot of different people
that really understand what's happening.
We have to talk to them maybe in
certain areas closing that Internet up in some
way. Somebody will say, oh, freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech.
These are foolish people. We have a lot

(00:41):
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Monday, October 14th,
2024.
Thank you for joining me today. It is
gonna be a long show. I'm gonna do
my best to not make it as long
as it probably could be, but I wanna

(01:02):
let you know out of the gate. I
tried my best to get this done early
today like I promised yesterday if you guys
tuned in. Very important show yesterday. I'll mention
out of the gate.
Added a lot more than I expected. So,
I'm gonna The reason I'm saying this today
is this where you those of you always
it's always long.
I'm gonna do my best to not rush
through this, which is the opposite of what
you usually hear.

(01:23):
I mean, what I said in the beginning
is true. I mean, I mean, content wise,
I'm gonna do my best to make sure
it's not just
unnecessarily long. But I'm not gonna rush through
these topics. So, if you have the time
today, I recommend you watch through this because
I'm gonna get caught up on a lot
of stuff that's going on in in foreign
policy conversation.
But I'm gonna start with a couple of
things that I also think are very important.
These these were things that were pushed off

(01:44):
from yesterday's show that have been added to.
And that's kind of a lot of the
stories I was building on over the last
couple of days that I could've talked talked
about probably 3 days ago, 4 days. Even
the the Unifil
Israel conversation have, you know, in very terrible
ways in some of these topics have really
flushed out.
So I I wanna talk about, to begin,
a couple of interesting things. One quick point
about some

(02:06):
impersonation of T Lab that is just almost
in in it's almost entertaining to laugh about
how small and funny it is, but it's
still wanna point it out so you guys
can report it out there so that, you
know, there's somebody out there I'm sure is
being fooled by it. And I wanna start
though with a a point about
quick about the COVID 19 injections or rather
just vaccines in general and a point about
the mask mandate point. It seems to be

(02:27):
kind of circulating that I wanna make sure
we understand the where it is right now,
the the true the reality of that point.
And I wanna talk about the
free speech
as the best way to kinda frame the
segment.
Obviously, around the 2 party illusion, the dynamic
of whether left or right, Trump or Kamala,
Biden or whatever, Elon Musk, they're all actively

(02:49):
fighting against
your free speech, and I'll make this as
clear as possible today. But it's an interesting
story that I wanna cover
about around Elon Musk and SpaceX in in
California,
where Elon Musk is apparently at least claiming
he's gonna be suing,
I forget the name of the board. I'll
reference it when we get there. A board
in California in regard to environmental aspects and
the coastline

(03:10):
that they're violating his first amendment rights,
which I just find interesting,
seeing as how that's not actually what's going
on. You could argue censorship, and I'll get
into why that might be the case. But
even that is a pretty flimsy argument for
the way that this is actually happening.
Coming from a person who's actively censoring your
opinion around very clear topics right now. And

(03:30):
who is exactly
I mean, right now even, you could argue
a part of the government. As a military
contractor or contractor for the current government, the
Biden administration. So Elon Musk works for Biden,
but let's not talk about that. Until Trump's
in there, we'll pretend like that's always the
case. But my point being is that he's
about to join Trump's administration.
And so
there's an interesting overlap to how this plays

(03:51):
out in regard to him being I mean,
the the point overall is that
him being a person with a company and
speaking out around certain things,
does that change the reality of who is
willing to work with that company?
Now, again, I'll get I'll go into this
as objective as possible around the nuance about
what censorship is as opposed to first amendment

(04:12):
violation
first amendment right violations because they're different things
and they're they they both overlap.
But it's interesting coming from a time where,
like, let's just pick one many examples.
Donald Trump's,
the first of many supposed assassination
attempts. And I'm not demit belittling the possibility
of any of them being real assassination. I
just think there's a weird way this whole
thing is being covered.

(04:33):
That that one of the things happened was
that people responded with, you know, some of
them were just obviously
almost threats on his life. But most of
them were just bad jokes. Oh, I wish
they shot better kinda stuff, which we see
from the right just as much as we
see from the left. But you saw a
lot of these right accounts start going after
them,
saying that you don't have a right, you
know, rather getting them censored and so on.
I mean, I not to go too along

(04:55):
in the beginning. The bottom line is we
got a lot from the right essentially being
that, yes, you have a right to say
what you want, but then you also have
the right to deal with the consequences
of what the speech is doing. I just
found it interesting as we swing over here
in the other side of the conversation as
Elon Musk is framing this as a violation
of his rights even though it's technically not
because we're not dealing with a government action
again. We'll go into it. But the bottom

(05:15):
line being that it's interestingly the same argument
from the other side of it. And I
wanna go over how,
one, what really free speech is in regard
to the first amendment rights and what censorship
really is and how its different realms are,
and then how it gets used by the
power structures, both sides of it, to act
like, you know, corporations are having the rights
for few or I'm allowed to say what
I want as a politician, but not over

(05:37):
here. Like, they play it when they don't
care about any of these things, and that
includes Elon Musk. And I wanna make this
a really clear point today. And, again, around
free speech in a general sense,
make sure we understand how that works, and
then go over the overlap with how all
of them are actively censoring right now around
Israel in particular, but a lot of other
things.
So it's kind of hard to take seriously

(05:57):
somebody praising the first amendment while removing, rather,
not respecting yours.
But we're also gonna get into an interesting
overlap of Elon Musk and
some of the Epstein overlap. And from that,
the lead in to the conversation of, as
I framed, Elon's great reset.
I find it really interesting that he is
rolling out and I mean, like, explicitly every

(06:18):
mark, every point,
rolling out right now in the midst of
this weird partisan
hyper hyperpartisan
situation we're in, all of the things that
are currently aligned with the great reset. Like,
literally talking about driverless cars and, cities of,
you know, autonomy cities where you don't have
like, literally, you'll owe nothing and be happy.
And there were some republicans are going, yay,

(06:39):
Elon. It's just kinda hard to take seriously,
and we're gonna go like, I'm I'm I'll
be one of the first to tell you
that, of course, these things could absolutely better
some people's lives.
But that's also coming along with the government
control of those things as Derek Burrows has
laid out very clearly.
And I think we can easily see as
somebody currently abusing those rights in first amendment

(07:00):
situations, why would he care about your rights
and other consequences? Or the bigger point to
point out that once that becomes in somebody
else's control,
obviously, the reality is these things lead in
the same direction. I'm hoping people can see
that. We're gonna go over that extensively today
and how concerning it is as well as
an alarming
government overlap with Elon Musk and
not, nondisclosure

(07:22):
agreements with the government in building some of
these locations.
This showing you yet again how immersed he
is with the very government
or deep state, if you will, that they
pretend that they're fighting.
Then, of course, we're gonna get into the
bigger conversation around the foreign policy. We're gonna
start with,
Jeremy Alfredo,
and we're gonna get into how nobody's in

(07:42):
the government or anyone screaming America First seems
to really care about an American journalist being
taken by Israel because Israel. Well, we're gonna
go over a lot of stuff in foreign
policy today. We're gonna we're gonna go over
the West Bank. We're gonna talk about Gaza.
We're gonna talk about Lebanon. We're gonna talk
about Unifil. We're gonna talk about the obvious
famine ongoing and the seemingly rising again conversation

(08:03):
about how somehow it's all a hoax. That
nobody's starving, in fact, they've never had more
food in their lives. That is actually yet
again happening and guess who's right in the
middle of it. Your favorite Elon Levy moron
is out there trying to scream at you
that everyone is fed and happy and it's
all a bunch of homos lies. It's just
incredible how desperate they really are
And how much evidence there really is. And

(08:23):
we'll go over this one last point. The
reactive propaganda of the Israeli government,
as even Kamala Harris,
I think just as an act of opportunism,
pointed out that no food has gone into
Gaza since October started.
And then because that got so much attention,
oh my god, they roll out a new
plan.
Surrender or starve.

(08:44):
Which interestingly starts to sound like, we'll not
give you food until we get what we
want. You know, like they've been doing since
the very beginning. But let's not connect the
dots. Let's keep going. No. We've been feeding
them like crazy, but only now are we
gonna tell you we'll starve them unless they
do what we want. Only now though. Hasn't
been happening for a year. It's pathetic. And
they know you see them, guys. That's what's

(09:05):
so crazy. And yet, weirdly enough, your government
will keep holding water for them.
Ask why that is. But I'll stop there.
There's so there's again, there's so many things
in in today's show. I recommend you stay
tuned. It's gonna be a long show, but
there's so much to get to. And I
guarantee you things you'll see in this show
that you won't see anywhere else. So I'm
gonna start with, this point. And, again, this

(09:26):
is I apologize for even having you look
at the stupid things this person is doing.
And that we're not even really gonna do
that.
But I just think it's such a testament.
And I could I could probably spend the
next 4 hours showing you things like this
that are going on in my life. And
weirdly, not even
connected to T Lab, but through my personal
life that I know is because of T
Lab,
it's everywhere.

(09:46):
Everywhere. But you know what? As I said
before, it's not even worth wasting time on.
I accept those consequences.
I accept them for doing the right thing.
For standing up for what we need to
be doing at a time when it's never
been more unpopular
because I believe in it and it's the
right thing. And I will I will take
it, even if let's say hypothetically we fail,
whatever it looks like,
I'll still be proud that I stood the

(10:07):
line and deal with the consequences of whatever
that may be for the rest of my
life. I will own that. And so this
is, like, one of the small, petty, dumb
things you see. My point though is that
it's just a waterfall. And that's not me
alone. There's plenty of people out there dealing
with the same thing, and that's the point.
Now this guy, by the way, I is
because I've engaged with this. I've this is
with the same ridiculous person that I've mentioned
before, or at least the account or entities

(10:30):
behind what this is. Because I keep you
know, they they reference certain old jokes that
we've gone back and forth about from, like,
a year ago.
My point is that this is the same
kind of thing and it's just always been
there. So this is an ongoing campaign of
multiple accounts. So this could just be one
idiot person, but I don't think that's the
case. And you'll see why. And I was
gonna say, admittedly, a Zionist pro Israel person.

(10:51):
So this account, which is again, I'm gonna
show you this right now. It's like I
think, actually, you can see by the letter,
have gone all the way through the letters.
Now this is not the this is the
the 3rd or 4th time this account has
shifted what it looks like. So first, it
was like some Ayesha
slash
w_abcdq
and it went all the way through them.

(11:11):
It went a always z. Every single one
of them, I blocked it and made a
new one. I blocked it and made a
new one. I blocked it and made a
new one. And every single time actually I
bet you it pops up right here.
Nope. I used to when I was searching
for them because I would look for them.
And then the point was, every time
I would report it to Twitter. And I
would say this guy is is, you know
and and my point was really to demonstrate

(11:31):
that I knew that they wouldn't care,
But the point being that there was a
bot that was clearly use abusing their terms
of service, which is that they were making
multiple accounts to continue to troll or spam.
That is against their rules. And I knew
it wouldn't happen. But my point is I
would put it front of them and they'd
respond with all the evidence in front of
them that there was nothing they could they
would say there's no violation, which is obviously
not the case, but that's the least important

(11:52):
part. But I want you guys just to
recognize that these Zionist bots being funneled through
the CHEQ company that they're working with that
Israel controls that is absolutely allowing this to
happen on Twitter while they pretend they're using
that company to fight bots. It's just it's
a perfect analogy, a microcosm of everything Israel
is doing in the world right now. The
point is that they don't care.
That's from the Twitter side of it. Now,

(12:13):
this person is going around relentlessly commenting under
every single person because I've already blocked them,
every person around my peripheral conversation,
and commenting really stupid things. Now you can
see, I'm not even gonna say it on
the show. This is what it says, which
is really silly. And it's it's obviously not
my account. But when it comments, you can't
see that, and that's by design. As well
as the actual name, which still says TLA

(12:35):
Vagabond, but then underscore q.
And just to show you really quickly,
going back to a,
it's already been suspended.
Go to b. Now for those in the
podcast, the URL says t it's x.comtlabagabond_a,
then you go underscore b. And that one's
been suspended. Underscore c.

(12:57):
You get the point. That's been suspended. I'm
not the one even reporting all these. A
lot more I I didn't even I I
went from, like, I think,
d to all of a sudden q. So
that means you guys have been reporting it.
I don't even notice. My point though is
that they either either muted or blocked. I'm
not even paying attention to these people, but
somebody keeps when I started to notice somebody
pointing it out, I thought it was worthy
of pointing out, especially in light of what
Whitney's going through, which is way, way more

(13:18):
serious.
She's got a whole thing going on where
people are, like, building major back it's crazy,
but it's the same kind of dynamic. It's
all trying to either waste our time, which
which in a way this is doing to
some degree, but also trying to get people
to think differently about you. Because you look
at the comments they're making. It's all about,
like, you know, sign up for this or
I think Muslim people are terrible. Like, you

(13:39):
know, much much more derogatory, but that's what
they're doing. And so you go all the
way to q, which is the current one,
and that one is least right now I
have blocked.
So please, first of all, mass report this
for me, just so this person will just
have to go through more hoops. But if
you look at them, you can see that
right at the top, it says, as I
continue to fight legal warfare.
Right? They're trying to make it look like
me and they're tagging this on different people.

(14:00):
And as I said, this doesn't show up
when it posts. But then of course, it
says, so if you have basically saying I've
made an OnlyFans account. They're just trying to
embarrass me, which I think is funny. It's
stupid. It really is a silly small thing,
but if you look at the replies, you'll
see that it's under all sorts of people's
accounts, you know, Kim Iverson and and, you
know, if you scroll down I've been responding
under comments, James Corbett or whatever else. So

(14:21):
all I'm showing you this for first of
all is to recognize this is there. So
please, first link in those show notes when
I'm done, report it for me. Just so
they have to go through the process.
But I want you guys to see how
often this is happening. And we're talk I
mean, and realize this is happening to a
lot of people. And it's not just some
dumb thing on Twitter, it's about trying to
manipulate you whether it is the legal law.

(14:41):
There by the way, the law fair, not
the legal law fair, you infant minded moron,
it's called law fair, it's not legal law
fair that's redundant. It just shows you how
dumb these people are, they're not very bright,
but it's all just about mass clog, you
know,
clogging up the system.
On that note about,
well, I guess just starting points but really

(15:01):
just to see that there this is other
ways to support TLav.
Our shirt actually, I'll open it. Oh, I
got it right here. Perfect. The website. Our
shirt store is gonna close soon. At least
in regard to truth clothing and that's just
because Nathan and the rest of the, and
and and his team are moving on. They've
they've done they're not gonna be in this
business anymore. So this will go away. At
the moment, everything's discounted.

(15:24):
So if you want a discounted shirt from
all the ones we currently have, now is
the time to get it. And on top
of that, the point is that I it
the main point is that once this goes
away,
we're gonna go exclusively to big frog clothing,
which is a great plat a great a
great store. Right now we only have these
2 shirts on there but what I've just
what we're gonna do is essentially because I

(15:45):
mean technically we had an agreement with with
Truth Clothing for some of these and and
they were the ones that really kinda designed
them. So what we're gonna do is ultimately
try to recreate them just well, I mean,
ultimately, if they if they're not okay with
it, we'll just use the same designs. But
otherwise, we'll just slightly alter them just enough
to where it's it's our new thing. I'm
I'm willing to bet you Nathan won't mind
that much if we just do them on
the other store. Nonetheless, the point is the

(16:05):
shirts might change a little bit, like clothing
wise or cloth wise.
Hopefully not. We're gonna do our best to
recreate it perfectly. So all I'm saying is
if you wanna get these now, there's a
limited stock at truth clothing until all these
are gone. We might not even be duplicating
all the designs.
So just throw it out there for you
guys. I I love these shirts by the
way. Both the style and the and just,
you know, what we're putting on them. So
most of you probably don't even know how

(16:26):
many we have. Stickers and all sorts of
stuff. So that's out there. So and and
honestly, this is more about just getting this
out. It's so discounted we're not even making
that much right now. It's just about getting
this out of the way, the old stock.
So it's a good time for you guys
to take advantage.
And then again, here are the new ones
which are our current normal price. The the
they shirt, the hierarchy enslaving you as well
as free speech absolutist.

(16:46):
Shout out to, big frog. They're they're outstanding.
Now
one other starting point I wanted to make
sure you saw before we show you the
other show. This is just interesting to me.
This is from today.
Mysterious drones swarmed US military bases for 17
days. Pentagon was unable to stop them. Of
course, trash

(17:07):
garbage platforms like New York Post used the
word UFO because they all they just can't
take they can't miss an opportunity to freak
you out about things. You know, misinform you
in in subtle ways. That's just so much
it's all mainstream media. My point is that
obviously it means unidentified flying object, but they
well know that people will read that as
alien.
The point though is we don't know mysterious
drones for 17 days, but they weren't able

(17:29):
to stop them? Cool. So they're bound by
all sorts of laws and regulations when they
wanna tell you a nice, neat story. But,
of course, they'll just commit genocide, just murder
peep families off the face of the earth
or starve entire generations of you know? In
other words, don't care about rules and laws
when they just don't want to. I'm just
making a point of how dumb it is
to pretend that the Pentagon, we we weren't
able to shoot them down because laws.

(17:51):
He said, that's really, really stupid. And it
says the drone side has continued for 17
days because here's what it says.
Oh, and then, you know, raising suspicions of
Russia, Chinese, or whatever they wanted you to
think when they wrote this story.
Mysterious drones have been surve surveilling, so we're
told. I mean, I don't they're not giving
you any more information other than what they
want you to think. There's no images. There's
no source material. It's just the government said

(18:11):
story that makes you think things they want
you to know for agenda. That's what the
headline should say. But it goes on to
say
oh, I I I grabbed it really quickly
from another article that I had highlighted. Let
me find it again real quick.
Saying federal laws this is the joke. So
get ready to laugh. Federal laws, which they
never care about and is about any contact
currently prevent the military from shooting down drones

(18:34):
due to the risk they could pose to
troops and civilians. Oh, yes. That makes perfect
sense. So it could be a Chinese drone
about to bomb our country, but you know
what? We can't shoot it down. It could
fall and hurt hurt hurt somebody on the
ground. But meanwhile, we're murdering people all around
the world, but we're super concerned about a
drone that might land in your yard.
Do we really believe that? Are we this
stupid?
I don't believe for a second that people

(18:55):
are this dumb, but I I willing to
bet you people will fall for stuff like
this because it aligns with the partisan mentality.
Must be Iran,
Israel says. So I bet you that's what
it is. Let's go forward pretending that's the
case.
I mean, come on. I I I being
facetious to start, but let's realize how
just outrageous that is. I mean, we could
go off for the next 25 years talking

(19:16):
about the whether it's health environmental stuff or
whether it's drugs they're forcing on you or
whether it's the fact that they're indefinitely locking
people up even in this country. Thanks, Obama.
All sorts of different things where they don't
care about your constitutional rights or the
law. But let's pretend like they wouldn't shoot
down I mean, this is as stupid as
saying that the Secret Service couldn't open fire
when that guy was gonna shoot Trump because

(19:36):
we have to let them shoot first. And
then the next time, they didn't do that
though. They shot first. Let's just ignore that
huge opening.
It's all like this, guys. And guess what?
Partisan people will ignore it.
Most of them anyway. Okay. So that, I
just wanted to talk about because I found
that to be hilariously stupid.
Let's who by the way, that's not to
say that there maybe there's drones. Maybe there

(19:57):
was something going on. I just don't believe
that they chose not to shoot them down
because law. I don't believe that. Not for
a second.
It's most likely that it was some more
there's more to the story, and it's not
about any they just wanna use it to
be used for an agenda overseas. But, also,
don't miss this important show.
This is
a a
probably one of the more important shows that

(20:18):
I think I've done. I mean, genuinely.
Con Conyers or Conners, I've heard people pronounce
it both ways. Georgia,
so the location is Connors, Georgia, the BioLab
Fire, which is remember, it's just the company's
name. Lot the a lot of these things
you'll find at different, you know, restaurant. That's
a company that makes things not necessarily a
biological laboratory, right? That's why the l is

(20:38):
capital.
But quote, according to Scott C Smith, could
be the greatest dioxide disaster in history.
And he only says could be because we're
waiting on the results to come back to
find out the actual amount of compounds that
were there as well as the amount released.
And this is the 2 things we're gonna
find out. Remembering that in East Palestine,

(20:58):
according to Scott, £2,000,000
of chlorine compounds were burned. That's in the
vinyl chloride, which, again, Norfolk Southern lied about,
which is why they blew it up in
the first place. Even though it was treated
vinyl chloride, then that's what his own experts
told him that he withheld from the fire
department. All on the record now. Funny how
nobody talks about that, except TLAF.

(21:19):
In Georgia,
he says at least
£12,000,000
of chlorine compounds,
possibly 20.
He says 6 times
greater.
Six times greater than East Palestine.
I mean, I I go over I go
over a lot in this that I think
is very important to understand.

(21:39):
Only 2 hours.
It's just short short for us when it's
a deep conversation. But I'll tell you what,
the amount of information in this to show
you not just that this is dangerous and
that people in these areas need to be
testing themselves right now because east Palestine is
already going through it. And it's not about
keeling over dead even though that is possible.
It's about the long term, decades long issues
of reproductivity,

(22:00):
immunosuppression,
cancers,
irregularities, and, I mean, all sorts of stuff.
And we go over the Cervaiso
disaster that Time Magazine calls one of the
biggest human disasters in environment in history, and
guess what it was? A dioxin release.
But, weirdly, they're all confused about what that
word even means today.
And the point was, based on the amount,
which I think, if I remember correctly, was

(22:21):
15 to 30 kilograms per
s-
per 18 kilometers squared,
that's a dioxins,
that's a number they're using. So once he
gets these results, we're gonna be able to
compare this to what on the record is
called one of the biggest environmental disasters in
history back in the set back in 1976
in Italy. And when you compare the overlap,
the point is they're dealing with the same

(22:43):
things. The chloracne, which was prevalent in East
Palestine, is a sign of acute exposure. And
they then used the chloracne in this study
to say, okay. If they had this in
1976,
therefore we know they had acute exposure so
we're gonna study them versus those that didn't.
And all the ones that had it are
suffering from reproductive issues, immune problems, cancers, I
went over the study.
So if you had that in east Palestine,

(23:03):
well, then you should be speaking with your
government because they're responsible.
As well as what I think is happening
here. Or the fire in Richmond by the
way, which is also of huge release of
toxins for the plastic plant.
So please take the time to watch this.
I think it's very important.
So starting on the point of just I
guess more of the mass mandate point, but

(23:23):
really a couple examples of the injection
conversation. I wanted to highlight this important move
in Australia,
which
I haven't really been covering every development in
the positive direction of what's been happening because
of the COVID 19 illusion. Even though if
there was nothing else going on, I absolutely
would. It's just choosing what is to you
know, there's a lot to cover these days.
There always

(23:44):
My point in saying that is that there
are I think we're all very well aware
of what's going on.
Most people.
And we are seeing positive moves like this
from certain locations. Whether opportunism or not, it's
still a good thing to point out. Or
you have places, and this is Australia, who
are removing these things or trying to from
the market.
And I think we need to see that
this is a big this is happening all

(24:05):
over the world. And yet the central parts
of every every dynamic are still pushing the
ultimate game, the ultimate agenda.
This or ultimately the agenda the point being
the injection. They're still holding on to the
idea of that and the future mRNA platforms
despite
everything pointing in the opposite direction.
So my point in saying is that I
haven't really followed up on a lot of

(24:25):
them
other than just to continue to highlight the
research of what we know. Because my what's
important to me
I'm skeptical even moves like this because the
I don't know whether this is a kind
of a sleight of hand. I just want
you to know the facts and what is
dangerous, what isn't, what we know about what
happened. And if you're armed with that, the
rest of this is less important.
That but this my point in saying that

(24:45):
is that we just need to understand it.
But we should still point to the positive
steps.
But only really hail it as a big
thing when we know something has changed. Because
that's not what this is just yet. It
says new historic moment in Australia. The action
that results from this could end sweeping end
up sweeping the world.
And it simply says a new motion brought
by the port headland council in Western Australia

(25:06):
gets a 5 to 2 majority vote to,
quote, call for an immediate suspension of the
Pfizer and Moderna COVID-nineteen products. So just the
mRNA. But all it is is a call
for immediate suspension. But it's a huge positive
step.
My point though is that
we need to make sure we're not missing
the fact that these are still there, they're
still being used,
and that they are very dangerous,

(25:28):
despite what Trump says.
But it's nonetheless a very positive move.
Once I mean, I guess, if we were
in a position where these were being forced
right now, like before that would make it
my mind much more pressing to make sure
we're, you know, that's again, it's just it's
such a hard dynamic of what is
more pressing in the moment. For me, I'm
sure you can tell, the idea of children

(25:48):
burning alive as I'm speaking kinda takes precedent
for me. But it's not like one is
necessarily less or more, it's just about what
I think is most immediately pressing. Right? And
so right now, that's what I'm talking about.
But with the these things we can't lose
sight of.
Now on that same note, Brad Miller, huge
respect for Brad Miller, one of the he
was the first person we interviewed in the
new studio.

(26:09):
Andrea Lynn who is a,
I don't even know. I've I've I look
at her account to see how she she
might frame herself. I would argue republican, conservative
probably more likely,
who has been speaking out against Trump. Saying
Trump's Operation Warp Speed was the largest medical
disaster in history. True. And not one person
has been held accountable for crimes against humanity.
Now all they have is excuses, narratives, and

(26:30):
they misled him and they tricked him and
blah blah blah despite how that's nothing provable.
And on top of that, how you can
even pretend that's the case while he still
promotes that as a positive thing.
Both the entire thing as he we did
it faster than anybody, and the injection itself.
That's a special kind of willful ignorance right
there. That's a dangerous kind.
Brad Miller says most Americans have chosen to

(26:51):
forget op warp speed even occurred.
Sad. December 8th, Trump signs executive order. Oppers
and warp speed. Why why would it even
have to be an executive order? Because the
bottom line would be that both sides supported
it.
Other aside from the partisan games they play
while they ultimately still support it. You see
how that works? They come out and go,
well, I'm not gonna take it like Biden
family said. Who's gonna take it? Who's gonna

(27:12):
take it? Well, you guys did, including Biden.
But what's funny is that was a quick
little moment where it made it seem like
they were against it, but what'd they do?
They just but narrative was all that changed.
Oh, well, now it's our vaccine. You know?
Tru Alex Jones called it sugar water. They
called it dangerous. And now it's ours. Now
it's good. Right? They're all playing the same
game.
What actually happened was they all supported it
and they all used it. That's how we

(27:33):
have to start looking at this. If you're
if you're aware enough of the dynamic to
even whether you believe in Trump or wanna
vote one way or the other, if you
are objective, you can stand back and acknowledge
that.
Even if you think, well, you're that's is
despite that being clear, I read it differently.
Right? I still think he did it. Okay.
Fine. But we still have to acknowledge, and
if you do this every time, you will
begin to see a pattern.

(27:54):
Despite the narrative,
it all still went in the same direction.
I hope we're making progress for a lot
of people with those kind of comments. Now
here
is what Brad said. And on top of
that, follow-up, he says whenever I hear the
words, this is what I I mean, and
we all know this. Every time you're making
a point about, you know, look. Trump said
this. Does it not matter? You get these
responses. And, by the way, vice versa.

(28:15):
Because I'm seeing somebody like Tiberius, for example,
who I greatly respect,
who is more so leaning on the other
side of the conversations. Because I guess he's
more tapped into the left side of the
paradigm in in his circles on Twitter, and
he's simply he's kinda coming at the same
argument. Going, if you're all you saying that
Kamala is the lesser of evils, here's what
she did today. Right? I agree. Same point,
either way you look at it.

(28:36):
My point, though, is that that's what you
get, is
Trump's not perfect, but,
right, Kamala's not the best, but she's better
than me. Same thing either way. And he
says whenever he hears those words, it's a
it's a cue that full scale brainwashing is
coming next.
He says millions of Americans
still defend his key role in the COVID
op to include Warp Speed and buying the

(28:59):
world's supply of remdesivir. Do we forget about
that? You know, the same remdesivir that we
all know, seemingly largely republicans, that it's very
dangerous according to the New England Journal of
Medicine study. That was the orig 50% of
people died in that study. They still use
it anyway.
Even I believe Trump got it when he
was going through his treatment. Of course, that
would probably be used to argue, he didn't
know. Just because somebody might not be aware

(29:20):
that they're playing the role as the bad
guy does not mean they're not accountable for
those actions.
That's the argument of unwitting stupidity is not
a good argument for a president. But it
says his continued lies about COVID shots saving
a 100000000 lives. Because that's my point. He
says that to this day. So even if
you wanna pretend he was fooled, why is
he maintaining the lie?
All that 45 d chess we're talking about.

(29:41):
Right? So, every time it just kicks it
down the road until another time comes around,
well, he's still lying about it. Well, they're
still playing the game. How long will you
hold that lie for him? He goes on
to say his unmitigated Zionism,
that's both sides, all of or just your
government,
and an other huge red flags by just
shrugging his shoulders and giving the conditioned response
of Trump's not perfect. But in my opinion,

(30:02):
he says, of course, I could be wrong.
Trump was put
into office in 2016 to do a job.
He was already bought and paid for. He's
now been selected for president again. And what
we're seeing is merely the creation of the
backstory to get the public to believe that
they have elected him on November 5th. Sadly,
I agree.
Doesn't mean that how it has always been
or has to be, but that's where I

(30:23):
think we have been stolen from.
Obviously.
It says that's why so much energy is
being put into building such a cult of
personality, which we all sense. Even republicans sense
it. It's kinda care it's it's a special
kinda crazy right now.
Cult the personality around this carefully crafted demagogue.
For those in control,
the public consent is important.

(30:46):
This is why his opponent is completely unelectable.
That's exactly what I think. She's just a
decoy for people to focus their frustration on.
The narrative of Trump being the great opponent
of the deep state was always a cover
story. It works because we Americans demonstrate over
and over that we can be made to
believe anything.
I think that's important to think about.

(31:07):
And the cover story, the fighting deep state.
And again, whether she's just I mean, we'll
talk about the free speech point next. Like,
actually making arguments, which by the way you've
gotten from either side of the paradigm going
back a decade. And I I point to
these on the this show.
But now you've got, I think, an Atlantic
article and they're going, you know, we should
just get rid of free speech. Like, they're
literally just clumsily making these arguments. And I

(31:27):
think it's it's meant to be that shockingly
dumb even though you can watch him as
I play the start by the way. Now,
yes, that's from years ago. But I don't
know how you go about changing it. But
either way, today, he's clearly so we're gonna
get rid of those Jew haters. Right? And
the point is, even if you think that
that's what he's actually talking about, he's not.
That doesn't somebody who has hatred for somebody
because of who they are is not

(31:48):
deportation worthy, or deportation worthy,
or it is
protected
under your first amendment rights. And I'll be
the first to tell you you're a gross
person for thinking that based on someone's religion.
But you have the right to feel that
way and say it out loud.
Just because you disagree with people who feel
certain ways, even though, again, he's pointing at
simply Palestinian supporters,

(32:10):
does not mean you can just, okay, we'll
just omit that from the rules we like
to pretend our shall not be
it's the same thing we every every time,
like, with the trans conversation. Shout not be
infringed. Oops. Accept those people because we don't
like them. Now not every conservative did that.
Whether conservative or democrat, or or liberal,
honest people didn't do that. Because you recognize
a contradiction.

(32:31):
Shallow not being infringed is obvious. You can
say, well, you know, maybe we should alter
this conversation a bit and discuss whether the
I see, I'm always okay with that, even
if I may strongly disagree. I don't think
we should even be do alter the idea
of altering
god given rights obviously doesn't make sense, but
I'll have the conversation. Give me your pitch
on why these things shouldn't be there. Or
why I should be limited free speech. You

(32:51):
see my point? We can have that conversation,
but they come out and just pretend to
be fighting for it. We are fighting free
speech while we censor people. Right? We we
fight for a shall not be infringed second
amendment except for trans people. Like, that's the
kind of thing we need to highlight as
left or right, as dishonest.
Now Hyun Pat Flix put out a clip
of Trump a while back talking about the

(33:13):
amazing shot that saves everyone's lives. He says,
I must tell you, no one enriched the
big pharma industrial
complex
to the detriment of America more than Donald
j Trump.
If you disagree, please let me have it.
Have a Joe Biden
because he got his shot. He got his
vaccine. He forgot. It shows you how

(33:35):
unpainful that vaccine shot is, so everybody go
get your shot.
Wow.
Think about that. This is the first one
in the compilation. Think about that.
Yeah. 2021.
Sure.
We knew it was I mean, this is
the whole thing republicans are saying about the
doc. We knew, you knew. Okay. Then why
doesn't Trump know? And if you think he
does if you think he does know, that's
even worse, guys. That means he's been pushing

(33:55):
this for years on children and women and
elderly and everybody else
to get elected or to hurt the democrats.
Anyone that can be okay with that kind
of a logic is a bad person. You're
hurtful for your benefit. Incredibly well. 95
percent, maybe even more than that. It works
incredibly well, and I would recommend it to
a lot of people that don't wanna get

(34:16):
it. And a lot of those people voted
for me, frankly. But, you know, I again,
we have our freedoms, and we have to,
live by that, and I agree with that
also.
But it's a great vaccine. It's a safe
vaccine, and it's,
something that works. I recommend you take it,
but I also believe in your freedoms a
100%.
When you have the vaccine,

(34:36):
people that do and it's a very small
number relatively.
But people that do get it get better
much quicker. That's a very important thing to
know. Now see, the point is this is
always the skate the the kind of last
grasping effort. Well, he didn't force it, but,
yeah, he did, though. Words are one thing.
Allowing this to happen as a president, whether
you you know, the same thing it was
funny how in reverse when it's Biden's administration,

(34:57):
everything anywhere that anybody does left or right
is Biden's fault. But, of course, when Trump's
in power, all the governors made their own
choices. Well, yeah, all both of those are
in a way right. The bottom line is
you don't split it down the middle. The
reality is, yes, the president is responsible. But,
yes, they also do have a level of
responsibility for those choice. He initiated the level
of emergency that created that ability. He start
rolled out the Defense Production Act, which allowed

(35:18):
them to manufacture masks and ventilators to kill
people with All of this actually happened.
Right? The idea clearly
hold on. Good for me, frankly. But, you
know, I again, we have our freedoms and
we have to Right. So the they're saying
that, well, he didn't force it. Right? Clearly,
you allowed the situation for that to be

(35:38):
the case either way, but that's not even
the main point of this. It's about how
it hurt people, how we know today that
it's deadly,
and he still pushes it then and now.
Even just saying it's okay. How do you
how are you okay with that? So when
a mother gives it to her infant child
after she hears this today,
are you okay with that?
Is that is that an acceptable loss so

(35:59):
you can defeat the Democrats? Or how do
you factor that in? That is a bad
thing. Now he's either misguided, which then how
is that possible with everything we know and
everything his base says, or he knows and
he's doing it for any number of reasons?
Those are the only options that make sense
here. Or I guess you could argue that
he somehow doesn't know, and that's almost more
alarming than anything else.

(36:19):
Live by that, and I agree with that
also. But it's a great vaccine. It's a
safe vaccine, and it's,
something that works. I recommend you take it,
but I also believe in freedoms a 100%.
When you have the vaccine,
people that do and it's a very small
number relatively.
But people that do get it get better
much quicker. That's a very important thing to

(36:40):
know. They don't get nearly as sick, and
they get it they get better. Lindsey Graham's
an example. He said Provably false. Every single
thing he's saying is so shockingly the opposite
of reality. But if I didn't have this
vaccine, I would have died. And you know
what? I believe totally in your freedoms. I
do. You gotta do what you have to
do, but
I recommend take the vaccines. I did it.
It's good. Take the vaccines.

(37:02):
But you got no. That's okay. That's alright.
You got They boo him. They boo him
all the way back then too and all
the way to now.
But then it's just, oh, it's 40 chess
and whatever and just ignore it.
You you get that kind of pass in
reverse? I mean, you could have a democrat
saying literally every single thing that they would
wanna hear except that, and they would be
like, nope. He's on the World Economic Forum

(37:23):
train. He's the bad guy.
Same point that people make in any other
context.
I think Brian Brian
made the same point in the post. Right?
If if any if if you had Biden
come out or any of the rest of
them and you said these certain lines that
you're hearing from them, you would go that
that would all that's all it would take
for you to not wanna vote for them.
But of course, the other side of it,
you ignore that because it that shows you

(37:43):
that's not even about what they're saying or
the policy. You just made a choice.
Your freedoms,
but I happen to take the vaccine. The
vaccine Okay. That's alright.
You got your freedoms.
You got your freedom. Like, he talks to
you like you're a child.
Right? We I I love your freedom. No.
This you don't
like your freedoms or respect your freedoms. They're

(38:04):
just ever present. They are god given inherent.
But the way they talk about it always
acts like he's the one letting you have
those things, and it's good.
But I happen to take the vaccine. The
vaccines do work and they are effective.
And here's my my thing. I so I'm
I am,
I think I saved many. I don't think.

(38:25):
I know. I saved 1,000,000 and millions of
lives throughout the world. We could have had
another Spanish
flu. We could have had, you know, in
1917,
close to a 100,000,000 people died, they say,
but it was really bad.
And now other countries are using our vaccines
and, you know, tremendous they're tremendously
successful.
You're playing right into their hands when you

(38:46):
sort of like, oh, the vaccine. If you
don't wanna take it, you shouldn't be forced
to take it. No mandates, but take credit
because we saved
tens of millions of lives. Take credit. Don't
let them take that away from you. Okay.
So the present
Right. Right. Because they did it. Right? It's
all your fault now, Republicans.
He told you it's your fault. You don't

(39:06):
let him take your way. It's it's about
trying to
I don't think he I think in this
moment, he's very aware of these things were
hurting people. I genuinely do. Again, I already
know how you could possibly argue the opposite
and yet he's saying that. He's trying to
hoist over it onto you. Made news Do
you agree with that?
Right?

(39:27):
Both the president and I are vaxxed and,
do you get the booster?
Yes. I got it too. Okay. So,
Oh, don't don't don't don't don't don't don't.
See?
He's shouting you back down. So So he
got it. So he got injected, he got
the booster. Of course, he would argue he's
lying. He's trying to trick Bill re for
his whatever. You you go ahead and per
manufacture whatever narrative works for you to ignore

(39:49):
what's right in front of you. And I'm
only speaking to the people out there that
are I mean, I I guarantee we have
conservatives and liberals in this conversation,
in this chat, in this show watching that
are, you know, maybe don't like that
they think Trump's better. They they don't like
that I don't think voting matters, but they
see it because they are honest with themselves.
Themselves.
More than you think out there, guys. Now

(40:10):
on the point of the mask, I just
wanna highlight this. This is so again, it's
important to know that this is happening,
but it's already kind of been just like
this for quite a long time. There's already
different little small examples like this around this
country, which I am one 100% not okay
with. The reason I'm saying it like this
is because, as usual, the partisan media has
been the last couple of days at like,
the mask mandates are back, and everyone needs

(40:31):
to stand up. And it's like, I look.
Even if you think there's a positive side
to mobilize people using a half truth, I
don't. I think being dishonest about what's going
on is designed to hurt the truth.
I the the lying for your truth dynamic,
it does it's it's it's it's lying. It's
just like lesser of evils. It's evil. So
So the bottom line is when people are
screaming, I don't think that's what's actually happening

(40:52):
yet. Now, of course, it could. I have
no question, no doubt that they might roll
this stuff back out. And there are places
like in California that have these to some
degree already.
So here's what's happening as of 10th October.
It says mass managers are coming back to
the Bay Area. Here's
where local health orders requiring face masks to
be worn in hospitals, which by the way,
don't do it. Protest. It's hard it's harmful

(41:13):
for you, which I'll play a clip for
Denny Rancourt in a moment again and show
you the science.
Requiring face masks in hospitals, skilled nursing facilities,
and other hell health care facilities. Okay. So
currently,
only for people in the hospital and not
even necessarily everybody coming into the hospital. And
it says the orders which I disagree with
wholeheartedly.
It says the orders are aimed at reducing
the spread of flu, COVID, and other respiratory

(41:34):
viruses, none of which it has any effect.
All statistically
in
none of them are statistically significant in reducing
transmission. That's directly from all the the body
of peer reviewed evidence going back decades.
We we went through this weird it's just
like we're seeing with Israel. There's these weird
moments of of chaos
where it shows you that they facts don't

(41:55):
matter to any of the people in the
ultimate power structure. And they're somehow able to
just
just run roughshod right over the top of
people that wanna point that out in the
entire conversation.
The point is that now it's drifted down
a little bit. Don't forget that at the
same moment, you had somebody on the left
and the right. Remember it was what's her
name?
Lena Wen, I think or what? You know,
both came out

(42:16):
within a day of each other on left
and right. Different CNN, Fox News. And they
said, oh, yeah. By the way, cloth masks
don't work. Remember all that? Despite we're not
giving any acknowledgement to those of us that
have been screening that from the beginning of
COVID 19 illusion, being called ridiculous, being called
crazy, and then they just came out and
said, oh, guess what? We, we just found
no. You didn't just find out. The science
has been there for years.

(42:36):
And yet still, people didn't reflect that age.
It's mind blowing. And here we are just
with this just still being drifting in the
background.
Now, I don't know whether it'll roll back
out as some kind of mass concept or,
you know, weirdly enough about to roll into
what I think will be a Trump administration.
It'd be interesting if it came back out
again around that.
Either way, the point is to be on
guard about it, be aware these things are
harmful, and do not have statistically significant effect

(42:58):
in reducing transmission. Period.
So the benefits do not outweigh the risks.
Best way to look at it that way.
Their best way to look at it through
that art, because look, the idea that benefits
outweigh risk is a general concept that could
be applied to some things. They lied about
it though. They were taking things that were
shockingly more dangerous and applying it to situations
that had very little risk. And using that

(43:19):
to trick you, like everything else they do.
Now it says, but 2 local jurisdictions, Santa
Clara, San Mateo, and counties are also extending
the requirements to visitors.
Santa Clara County is making is asking patients
to mask up. So go to some go
somewhere else. If I were you, if you
can't in California, then I would just try
your best to resist because I think this
is dangerous for you. I don't think. I

(43:39):
know. The science says that. But what's interesting
is that this is
select locations
within California, and then most of them are
only about people that are in there, not
even everyone coming into the hospital. So for
people that are screaming that mask mandates are
back and using that to mope to rise
your hype, you know, to get you all
worked up, ask why they're doing that. And
maybe you think that's okay because you think

(44:00):
that anger will be you. It's dishonest.
But here's a study
from 2024, September.
New study, by the way, to add to
the monumental
and never ending stream of peer reviewed science
that it was showing you these things have
been dangerous going back to the sixties. And
it says face masks and protection against COVID
19 and other viral respiratory infections,

(44:20):
assessments of specifically children. You know, the ones
they were really forcing it on despite having
the least risk of anything in the conversation.
There is a lack of robust
evidence of benefit from masking children to reduce
transmission to SARS CoV 2 and other respiratory
viruses.
Yeah. You don't say. The highest quality evidence
available for masking children for COVID 19 or
other viral respiratory infections has failed to find

(44:43):
a benefit impact against transmission. This is Science
Direct.
A peer reviewed meta analysis of all this
they're telling you.
It's not there.
But you already know if you watch this
show. Mechanic
mechanistic studies showing reduced viral transmission, which we
saw during the whole hype of this.

(45:04):
Mechanistic studies that showed reduction of viral transmission
from use of face masks and respirators have
not translated to real world effectiveness.
Meaning that you can't reproduce this in the
world, which, by the way, is what is
one of the major steps in actually verifying
whether something is legit. So much for the
peer review process. Right? The point is effectiveness
of child masking has not been demonstrated, while

(45:24):
documented harms of masking in children are diverse
and non negligible
and should prompt careful reflection, which they're not
doing.
So the trust the science crowd, as always,
is ignoring the science.
Because of cult like minded just like
it's partisanship,
guys. It's what it is. People who are
not blinded by their political views are able

(45:45):
to reflect on new information. That's how I
that's I I believe that.
Here is the one that I've shown going
back a long way. Remember, this is the
one from 2015 from from the, British Medical
Journal that I was highlighting the moment this
conversation started.
And this is the same one, by the
way, that for whatever reason, Tucker Carlson misrepresented
and claimed it's from 2020

(46:05):
and left out the most important parts because
that's what the mainstream alternative BD does.
Cloth masks
had significantly
higher rates of influenza like illness, which includes
COVID 19, compared to the control arm.
The inclusion says this study is the first,
first brand and controlled trial of cloth masks.
Remember, in the beginning, that's the only thing
they were telling you to wear. They had
an entire page about cloth masks they've now

(46:27):
deleted.
So ask yourself how the study was there,
the science was there, this is one of
many. Before they did this, they knew it
was more dangerous, they knew it would increase
your illness, and then said, only use those
until they've released later that it was the
one you shouldn't use and then went forward.
How do you not see that as deliberate?
At some level, somebody decided they wanted this
to be used. Just like with the Spanish

(46:47):
flu conversation, which is actually the Kansas flu,
which is where it actually started. You can
look that up in Wikipedia.
They call it the Spanish flu because Spain
was the first one to speak up about
it. And guess what the US did, like
they did today? Spanish flu.
Wuhan flu. It's the same damn thing.
Hopefully, you're connecting these dots.
Moisture retention,

(47:09):
reuse of cloth mask, and poor filtration may
result in increased risk of infection.
Increase. So like everything else they did, it
increased your risk, and then they told you
that it was your fault.
Research and further researchers needed to inform
cloth masks globally, so they didn't care. 2
so what?
7, 8 years later, they didn't do any
more research and lied to you about it.

(47:31):
However, a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not
be recommended.
They did anyway.
Then here is just Brownstone Institute telling you
the same thing. For focus this is from
2014. Oh, this is from the the October
1st, this month. This, this
this year, October 1st. Study confirms the truth
about masks in children.
Forcing anyone to mask given the substantial robust

(47:51):
evidence based showing conclusively that masks don't work,
the better way to say it is not
statistically significant reducing transmission, which I would argue
means they don't work, was an indefensible policy
decision. Reason it's better to say it that
way is that you you could then debate
what working means. Right? And that's that's dishonest
people will always try to find a way
to skirt around the facts. And not just
because it was a pointless exercise in pandemic

(48:13):
theater with 0 of evidence of efficacy, but
because it was actively causing harm
as the new study shows.
You guys know all this, but it's important
to see. Just not forget, as James Melville
points
out,
all the people screaming about the carbon problem,
even though we are definitely hurting the planet
like this,
they're pointing at the illusion being given to
them by the government that makes them think

(48:34):
that they're not the one doing it even
though they're the primary polluter of the planet,
the governments in general. The point is people
that were screaming at the environment were using
47 masks a day and 14 pairs of
gloves, and that's what happened. During the COVID
mask mandate era, a 129,000,000,000
disposal masks were thrown away every month. An
estimated 3,000,000,000 masks that takes that take 4
that take 450

(48:55):
years to biodegrade. Think about that. Now pollute
the oceans, and yet this is overlooked by
many politicians and so called environmentalists,
as well as the fact that we're all
now, like, overrun with microplastics
more than ever before and, you know, they
they saved you, didn't they? Thanks, Trump.
Or Biden, or whoever else. The point is
this all began under Trump.
Mises, Florida masks never worked. It's okay to

(49:18):
admit. And the reason I said thanks, Trump
also is that they he praises still about
the idea of using defense production act to
mass produce masks and ventilators. Because they we
needed those. Right?
And then here's Denny Rancourt
reiterating this as of 13th.
A great clip from way back in the
day speaking with Highwire.
4 years ago, he says. He was going
berserk that masks don't work. He was, early

(49:41):
in the conversation. Here is an under 2
minute clip. He was writing the WHO and
posting everywhere
that they didn't work. Just, I mean, literally,
exactly what I was saying from this conversation.
And I I'm proud of that because I
I don't I didn't know David Kore at
the time. I didn't know I mean, I
just simply looked into the research and was
like, oh my god. Look at what it
says right here. This is peer reviewed. Random
control trial. It says they do not work.

(50:02):
It actually makes you more sick. And it
blew my mind.
Shouldn't have though, seeing as how obviously this
happens pretty I mean, almost everything we've ever
investigated, but the reality is, yet again,
they lied to you. And I also it's
important to rec rec to recognize that that
doesn't mean that everybody was aware of that.
Even within the government. And it could speak
to stupidity or it can speak to willful

(50:23):
ignorance. But the point is that people
it's never that everybody involved everywhere is all
collecting the it's rarely that.
It's more so that you have people in
a in the know type position that just
decentralized the way that information was. So people
below them know just what they need to
know to execute their part of the agenda,
but nothing else. That's how this works. And

(50:43):
this is how we end up in a
position where you're still being told to wear
a mask that is actually hurting you.
To look at randomized controlled trials,
but with a verified outcomes where you've actually
measured whether the person was infected or not.
Not, you know, ask them if a week
ago they had the sniffles and things like
that. You have to measure it. If you
look at those, and there have been dozens
of them or at least, you know, many
of them over the last decade,

(51:04):
none of them show a statistically significant advantage
to wearing a mask and has caused us
to write to the World Health Organization and
say, what the heck are you doing? Why
are you now recommending masks? You know, forever,
you have been not recommending masks for use
in the general public because you've admitted that
there's dangers associated with that. The masks collect
and gather all kinds of pathogen laden materials
near your face and eyes and nose and

(51:25):
everything, and then you touch the mask and
you touch the rest of your body. So
it was thought that there was danger associated
with that concentration of pathogens, and that that's
why the the main World Health Organizations did
not recommend mask use in a general population.
It's potentially what's believed to be a dangerous
thing,
making matters worse. Evidence from 14 randomized controlled
trials of these measures did not support a
substantial effect on transmission of laboratory confirmed influenza.

(51:48):
We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness
of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning. So here's
the latest,
best study in a sense that uses only
these,
very
bias free studies that says, look,
it doesn't matter if you sanitize surfaces, it
doesn't matter if you're washing your hands, and
masks don't work. That's what the science tells
us. And there's good reason for that, and

(52:10):
the reason is that we we know and
we have known for a decade now that
the main transmission route of all of these
types of viral,
respiratory diseases is very fine aerosol particles that
are supported as part of the fluid air.
With with those kinds of particles, they're gonna
get through the sides of the masks,
even the tiny, wrinkles you have in your
skin and so on. There's no way you
can prevent,

(52:30):
these aerosol particles from either entering or coming
out. So masks are not gonna work under
these circumstances, but the the top scientists have
known this forever.
He's right. I mean, again, I show you
studies going back to, like, the sixties seventies
that talk about surgical
masks in in in operating theaters and how
they actually found in in more than one
study that by removing them, they actually saw

(52:51):
an increase in positive effect. Like, it it
just doesn't make any sense
other than realizing that we don't truly understand
what we're dealing with. That's why it's so
difficult people that are invested in the current
paradigm to change. Like, what's that classic clip
we play? Like, it says the all the
can the best candle makers in the world
back at a time before electricity couldn't envision
what our world was like with you know?
And the point was that resisted the change

(53:13):
until it was forced upon them because their
industry relied upon not seeing that possibility. And
this is the way it always works. We're
in this position now.
Now talking about the partisanship, which I'm convinced
is the largest reason that we're
unable to push away from these things. It's
it's just that it's a cult like mentality
that that gets people trapped in to a
certain line of thinking that in fact undermines
their own logical perception.

(53:39):
So one of the things we keep seeing,
and this overlaps with the Elon Musk conversation
and all of it, and it completely, in
my mind, ties in with the larger foreign
policy point.
But we're watching these people that we just
made this point the other day about the
atrazine point, which everyone seems to be hyping
again.
It's a common reality that people like myself
and others have talked about for a very
long time. Endocrine disrupting chemicals, which we just
went over as dioxins, being one of it's

(54:01):
it's the one of the worst, it seems.
What a potent endocrine disruptor that is everywhere.
But instead, of course, being focused on by
Alex and making it about frogs being gay
got turned into a comical
something that people would dismiss, which is their
fault. Even though it's stupid, and I think
deliberately so, it's still their fault they chose
not to look into it. But this is
how it works.

(54:22):
So my point is that it's easy to
see how these roles are played even if
maybe they don't know it. To get people
to dismiss information. To keep you in partisan
sides.
Camus points out what
Megyn Kelly, one of the many independent
media. Right? Funny how many of the independent
media are half a step removed from the
corporate media,

(54:42):
who are billionaires, who are you know, it's
like it's just pretty silly how some people
can't seem to recognize how obvious that is.
But it says,
Alex Jones was right. I get one of
my favorite memes.
It says, a few years ago, I interviewed
Alex Jones and sat down with him. One
of the few things he was telling me
was about fluoride and about early puberty and
about frogs when exposed and went from

(55:03):
went from male to female.
Okay.
So he's talking about fluoride, first of all,
and she's conflating the idea of fluoride when
what we're talking about was actually atrazine. But
either way, because who cares about facts at
this point? It's about saying he was right
about things that everybody
who had a brain has been talking about
for decades.
Fluoride has been in the opening like, it's
because he is pointed at as this pinnacle

(55:25):
of the conversation from what people that want
you to look at people like us as
ridiculous,
doesn't mean that he wasn't right about something
that literally everybody was talking about. And in
fact, he was not though. If you actually
look into the way it was being framed,
he is missing the forest for the trees
on almost every one of these topics because
it is hyping things that are, in most
cases, the unprovable part or the reality is
meant to be designed to keep you looking

(55:47):
the other direction. That's my opinion. I guarantee
people in my own conversation disagree.
But the point
is that, look, he was telling me all
these things all this time ago, so we
should be looking at what he's saying now.
I went back to NBC, she says, and
we had all these fact checkers. It was
all true.
We found out that all this stuff he
was saying was true. And here I I
am across from you, Harvard educated John Hopkins

(56:08):
attending, physician saying, yeah. Fluoride. Just like Alex
Jones was saying, not good. Really?
I mean, it's just so stupid to act
like that statement despite literally everybody for a
very
this is an open secret.
The only people that have been pretending that
we don't know that are people that are
abs in a partisan position or people that
are invested in a lie. It has been

(56:29):
and again, I mean, the average grouping of
people that just don't care. Right? The going
through their lives and aren't caring about what's
going on, they just have the mantra in
their mind that this is safe and effective.
For her to push this forward is obvious
to me. Another mainstream alternative media pointing to
another mainstream alternative media and saying, we all
knew it was right and you gotta keep
listening to this this fear. That's what I
said. And the cycle continues.

(56:49):
If you want more than just half truths
and hyperbolic statements, there are plenty of us
out here. Just not in the mainstream alternative
media.
Now you you can
look somewhere else than TLF.
All I want is for someone to consider
and look to other sources than people that
will give you part of the story
without any source material. Despite the 40,000 pages

(57:11):
of paper all over his desk that never
seem to be given to you. Even though
they're just printouts from what's on screen. But
I think that's important to consider.
And as this person points out, Alex Jones
made everyone think that anyone talking about atrazine
was crazy by screaming like a psycho there
turning the frog gay. Making a complete joke
out of something very serious. And I showed
you the clips the other day, it's embarrassing.

(57:32):
Dressing up like a frog.
Look, I mean, you could pretend like you
I mean, maybe you maybe that does get
more reach. Maybe I'm wrong. I think it
had the effect of actually diminishing what we
could've talked about a decade
ago and maybe changed.
Now, it's everywhere. Glyphosate,
dioxins,
everywhere. Endocrine disrupting chemicals are literally on you
right now. It says here we are a

(57:52):
few decades later and now that the damage
has been done, suddenly people wanna claim Alex
was right. It's the same difference as having
your government suddenly go, oh my god. Israel's
doing bad things. Yeah. We've known that for
40 years. How about you acknowledge that you've
been you've known that and didn't do anything
about it. It's the same kind of dynamic.
This false awakening is really something to behold,
he writes. I agree.
All I'm asking is that people consider

(58:15):
that you're being corralled.
And if you're objective,
ask for source material. Right? Ask for things
that are or dig further than the partisan
lens on these things, and you will very
quickly see that this is almost designed to
lead you in a half truth direction.
Now speaking of that, I think one of
the central roles in this current manipulation of

(58:37):
the partisan field
this is really fascinating to me. So Elon
Musk came out, this was
yesterday,
and says incredibly inappropriate.
What I posted on this plat what I
post on this platform has nothing to do
with a coastal commission
in California,
which is a which is a a,
the central what is it? I'll look. I'll

(58:57):
I'll just give you the full title. It's
a coastal commission in California that's deciding that
they don't want SpaceX.
Now, here's what's interesting.
The even the article he cites, which I'll
read I'll go of course, doesn't give you
a link, of course. But I'll I'll read
you the article.
Says more than what he's saying, of course,
and the New York Times seems to be
framing it as entirely about environmental issues that
they're not dealing with.

(59:19):
So, on top of the story I wanna
highlight, it's he seems to be leaving out
a big part of the story. Big surprise.
You You know, I think it's interesting. Let's
just take let's remove this from the
everything else we're talking about.
You have somebody like Elon Musk in a
position right now. Let's just say you think
everything he's ever done is in good intentioned
and honest. And suddenly, he recognizes a position
where he might lose something important to him.

(59:40):
Now, it's it's doesn't have to be this.
It's just a hypothetical.
And you recognize that, man, I've got this
entire momentum behind this right now. That if
I point over here and say they're after
this or the left is coming for that,
this whole thing goes crazy.
Right? So you can easily see somebody like
Elon Musk deciding to go, you know what?
I want this here. So if I flab

(01:00:01):
this allegation about a first amendment being under
attack, even though it's really about environmental issues,
these people will lose their minds. They'll go
after them and they might pressure them to.
Now, as much as you may not want
that to be the case, and that may
not even be the case,
I think we can all acknowledge that that
is certainly possible.
Whether especially for Elon Musk or a Trump
type of person. Somebody who is overwhelmed with

(01:00:22):
hubris, who has been shown to lie around
very clear partisan angles.
And that shouldn't be unique to the right.
It's not.
So all I'm saying is first point, it's
certainly possible that he could be using you
and your willingness to blindly believe whatever he
types out on Twitter.
Then he says, filing suit against them on
Monday for violating the first amendment.

(01:00:44):
Well, I'd simply point I'd say straight out
of the gate, that's not the case.
This fur the first amendment, I don't believe
is involved at all in this conversation, and
I'll show you why. Censorship, you could argue.
Because that that that doesn't have to be
the government.
But let's read the article first.
California officials cite Elon Musk's politics in rejecting
SpaceX SpaceX launches. Now even the article simply

(01:01:05):
is one of the things they point to.
It's not the only thing. And again,
I am the first person who will tell
you that corporate media should not be taken
face value.
But what's interesting to me is that people
that would say that to this conversation, why
are you listening to what they're saying about
it? Oh, fair point. I'm not. I'm considering
all viewpoints including Elon Musk's. The question could

(01:01:27):
be put back to you. Why are you
blindly taking what Elon says is the reality
at face value?
Now we have the obvious point from either
side that neither of them should be. Right?
It should be that you question all of
them. But what you can see obviously is
that people will say, they just wanna go
after Elon because he's they don't like him
in the deep state. Well, maybe maybe you're
right. But why do you believe that he
would say the truth all the time no

(01:01:48):
matter what?
Now, what's interesting is they'll give you links
and so on, but I don't trust corp
media no matter what. But all you get
on the other side is what Elon typed
out on Twitter. How do we know he's
telling the truth?
You get the point. Because you decide to.
But it says the California Coastal Commission, that's
the full title, on Thursday,
rejected the air force's plan to give SpaceX
permission. Oh, that's right. I forgot about one

(01:02:09):
of the most important parts of this. You're
gonna love this.
On Thursday, they rejected the air force's plan
to give SpaceX permission to launch up to
50 rockets a year
from van Vandenberg
Air Force Base in Santa Barbara County.
Quote, Elon Musk is ho is hopping
about the country,
this is what they're saying,

(01:02:30):
spewing and tweeting political falsehoods, which by the
way is 100% true. I'm sure we may
disagree on what those are, but we can
prove, like Venezuela for example,
he put out a whole at least 4
things that I remember that were patently false,
which were even fact checked by Twitter and
some of the people deleted.
So that doesn't mean that everything he does
is false, but, yes, he is spewing falsehoods,

(01:02:51):
like a lot of people do in the
partisanship.
And attacking FEMA while claiming the desire to
help the hurricane victims with free Starlink access,
which turns out is not free at all.
It's back a an opening, you know, for
1st month free. Give me $400 for the
device and we'll pay a $120 a month
after that. What a help you are, Elon
Musk. Seems to be taking advantage of people
in the area. But overall, the point for

(01:03:12):
me
will come back to the
discussion about something from North Carolina. We'll come
back to that. There's one thing I'm gonna
read about this next I find interesting.
But remembering this, see, they're simply going, he's
lying about the hurricane. He's lying about this
and that. Whatever your thoughts about whether he's
being honest or not, The point is that
they're saying we don't like what he's doing
here, which, of course, as an individual, he

(01:03:32):
has every right to lie, to to be
wrong,
or to say things that they claim are
false. That's free speech. As an individual, absolutely.
That's no question.
It says the agency's commissioners appointed by the
governor and legislative leaders voted 6 to 4
to reject the Air Force's plan over concerns
that all SpaceX launches would be considered military

(01:03:53):
activity,
shielding the company from having to acquire its
own permits
even if military payloads are not carried.
Okay. So we're 4 paragraphs in, and it
seems to be the exact opposite of what
he's saying.
He's it says explicitly,
the reasons they gave were because

(01:04:13):
SpaceX launches will be considered military even if
they weren't doing something military.
That's kind of a big deal, isn't it?
Okay. So hold on. Let's go back. So
what is this right here? This is being
stated by one of the commissioners
in the meeting.
So, of course, these people are petty and
about small partisan politics. That's just how everybody

(01:04:34):
seems to be. They're trapped in these positions.
But interestingly enough, what gets plucked out is
that it's only right, again, that's what he's
saying.
Even the title he highlights is only Musk's
Politics.
Well, I think it's interesting and obvious that
that's the that's not what they're saying. Now
clearly, as they read further in the article,
it says that's part of the conversation.
But there's the cited reason, which at least

(01:04:56):
has to be pointed to,
is that there's an interesting overlap to that
he's abusing the military dynamic.
It says, quote, I do believe or rather
that he could. I do believe that the
Space Force has failed to establish that SpaceX
is part of the federal government, part of
our defense.
That's what commissioner they're they're saying that he's
not they're you this is not part of

(01:05:17):
the military.
And by doing this, there's an there's a
potential risk, an overlap there. And it goes
on. The commission the commission ultimately approved
the 36 launch plan. Now this goes from
from Boer, this is, from before, about the
in May 23, the DOD asked to increase
SpaceX satellite launches to 36 a year. Now
it says they in ultimately approved that plan

(01:05:38):
on the condition that Space Force, the government
side of this, undertakes 7 measures to improve
environmental
protection and coastal, and coastal access. Now whatever
your belief in that or thoughts or whether
it matters, the point is that's what they
want. And they're just they they're saying that
we care about the potential environmental fallout from
whether where these things are launching, which I

(01:05:59):
think most people would argue is a valid
point. And it says, but military officials
didn't commit to following them during the hearing,
drawing fiery criticism from commissioners. So now you
got the government side of this who are
simply going, like, essentially,
like usual,
acting like what they did is do they
do is more important. Environmental concerns are not
their responsibility.
Says, quote, Space Force came here and intentionally

(01:06:21):
disrespected us, says the commissioner. Now, yes, I'm
not gonna argue or deny the fact that
I can almost guarantee there are petty partisan
politics involved in this.
But it says, but the goodwill evaporated
after commissioners raised concerns about the goodwill being,
essentially, you know, getting this process started after
that last discussion. And so the goodwill evaporated

(01:06:42):
after commissioners raised concerns about his political rhetoric.
So it seems this is a secondary point.
As much as it still matters, it's important
to see that it's about
the at least as they're stating,
the military overlap, meaning that SpaceX and Elon
in particular will be able to essentially
act under a military guise even when they're
not doing things for the military, which seems

(01:07:03):
pretty crazy to me. Especially and then, now
here's why I would think this would even
make sense.
Considering Elon Musk's
political views, doesn't that seem a little bit
consider concerning?
That he's been taking action very politically motivated
in very dishonest ways according to anybody objective?
And now he's gonna have the ability to
conduct things through the military despite using them.

(01:07:24):
That does seem interesting to me.
But the and then they cited environmental issues
that seem to come more from the government
side, but because of their rockets.
And then they say the political dynamic. And
that does seem to make more sense.
But I'm not even getting into the part
about free speech and everything. Yeah. I'll get
to that next.
It says slam the company, it says, but

(01:07:44):
goodwill evaporated after the Musk's political rhetoric, concerns
about that. Slam the company's labor record and
questioned the Department of Defense's contention that the
launches should benefit from the military permitting exemptions
even if military payloads aren't being carried.
Right? So think about that from a site
perspective.
Right? Should
SpaceX
be benefiting

(01:08:05):
from having military
access even when they're not using military dynamics
or payloads? Now it says, I really appreciate
the work of the Space Force, said the
commissioner. But here we're dealing with a company,
the head of which has aggressively injected himself
into the presidential race. True. And he's managed
a company in a way that was just
described by commissioner Newsom, which Gavin Newsom Gavin

(01:08:26):
Newsom's an absolute monster, that I find to
be very disturbing.
So what's interesting is this is how this
tends to work. And you could even take
a step back and argue this maybe by
design, like we're talking about, to drive you
in a clear direction. I'm not sure if
I feel that way. My point is by
Newsom coming out and going bad, Elon, we
don't want him for the Suddenly, you get
republicans who are willing to overlook literally everything

(01:08:47):
else because that becomes a partisan agenda.
That's just stupidity, in my opinion. Even if
there is a partisan agenda. We have to
acknowledge the big picture here. And especially for
those like myself that can see that it's
all just your government and the whole partisan
game is a kindergarten level, that we should
recognize that this is how easy it is
to drive us in a clear direction.
But it says commissioner Justin Cummings voted to

(01:09:08):
approve the plan, but said he was still
uncomfortable about a lack of data on the
effects of launches and that he shared concerns
about SpaceX's classification
as a military contractor. So why does that
change? Not only already have him as a
military contractor, now his company is actually a
military contractor itself.
At what point do we recognize that he's
part of the government?

(01:09:28):
He is, is the point. Especially once he
becomes part of Trump's administration.
So bringing this all the way back to
the main point,
a little bit more nuanced than just attacking
your first amendment rights because
Elon said bad things on Twitter, which is
how it's being represented in the partisan conversation.
Why?
Twitter Twitter files. Because look, a screenshot. It's
highlighted. That's all we need to know. Right?

(01:09:50):
How much you wanna bet that you could
90% of people in this conversation have not
even read the article.
You know I'm
right. It's my opinion.
I could be wrong, but I think you
know I'm right. And I think it's important
to consider.
Now, the other conversation here
is is
this

(01:10:11):
the violation?
So here is just from congress.gov.
First amendment.
Congress,
which is the important part.
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
And this all stems off that first point.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment

(01:10:32):
of religion or prohibiting free speech exercise thereof.
Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of
speech. Congress shall make no law
respecting
oh, sorry. It's of the of the press.
The the point is abridging of the press.
The point I'm just trying to make it
clear that the the congress shall make no
law is what that point is About free
speech, about freedom of the press. No. And

(01:10:54):
make no law that will affect the right
of the people to peaceably assemble. Make no
law to to stop you from petitioning the
government for a rate of redress of grievances.
So it's pretty obvious to see that a
company,
SpaceX,
and Elon's company being turned down for three
reasons. One of which is the the idea
that he's saying things on Twitter that don't

(01:11:15):
align politically,
even though that seems to be pointed out
in a way that means that that aligns
with whether he should have military
be seen as a military contractor all the
time when that's happening. Even if you think
that's an invalid point, that's just to make
sure you understand the context. So you have
SpaceX trying to get a contract and they
cite environmental issues. They cite the overlapping issue
with the military contractor and they cite his
political views and saying, we don't wanna work

(01:11:37):
with this company.
Where in there is congress making a law
stopping him from doing anything? He's able to
say these things out loud. He's able to,
speak out loud. He's able to speak to
the press. He can write an article. He
can peaceably assemble and he can redress the
government for agreement. So just to be clear,
nothing about this is violating his first amendment
rights. If you think otherwise, let me know

(01:11:57):
your thoughts. So I think that's important. So
what this needs to show you 2 ways
is 1 or 2 possibilities. Either he doesn't
understand what the first amendment means, or he's
trying to convince you
that this is another attack on their free
speech because that's part of the partisan game
right now, or simply just mobilizing all of
you to go after the enemy of of
Elon Musk's venture using the idea of the

(01:12:18):
first amendment.
See what I'm saying? I think that's important.
So secondarily though,
censorship.
Just something to look at. I mean, we
can we all know what censorship ultimately is,
but here's what it says at the free
speech center. Censorship occurs when individuals or groups
try to prevent others from saying,
printing, or depicting words and images. Okay. So

(01:12:38):
that's not happening.
Right? But I would argue there's more nuance
to what they could mean. Like, I I'll
finish that thought in an end in a
second. I would argue that you could argue
that what they're doing might be some abstract
level of censorship. At at worst though. But
so, at the moment, based on this general
point, I don't think that's happening. Censorship occurs
when groups try to prevent others from saying,

(01:12:59):
printing, or depicting words and images.
Censors seek to limit freedom of thought and
expression
by restricting spoken words. Now you could that's
what I'm saying right there. You could maybe
argue if the only thing they were saying
was they don't like what he's saying online,
therefore you can't have a contract with them.
But it says printed matters, symbolic messages, freedom
of association, books, art, music, and all. When
the government engages in censorship, that is when

(01:13:20):
you have a freedom of speech issue or,
a first amendment issue.
Right? So I don't actually believe that's what
we're dealing with here. But I'm sure he'll
make a case in in the lawsuit that
may not even be happening. Like, I if
if we end up seeing no lawsuit ever
put forward, I would argue that it was
all about trying to use this politically.
But private actors,
for example, corporations

(01:13:41):
that own radio stations, can also engage in
censorship. But this presents no first amendment implication.
Now this is important for other conversations. I'm
always trying to break this down for people.
So for example, when you're in the chat
and somebody removes you from the chat, that's
not censorship.
Right? There's no or rather specifically no first
amendment right violation. Now you could argue that
we are that individually you're being censored, but

(01:14:01):
the point is about the first amendment implications
and free speech.
I just kinda mixed up the words. So
censorship versus free speech. I think those are
different conversations
that overlap constantly.
Right? But it says as no governmental or
state action was involved. So people are constantly
going, you're violating my free speech. Well, that's
not the reality.
But censorship might be a part of it.

(01:14:22):
Various groups have banned or attempted to ban
books. That's the general point.
So back to the overarching point.
If you have a government entity, which is
what they are, the Coastal Commission, denying him
a contract because of what, in one part,
what he's doing online,
does that constitute a censorship dynamic? Does that
constitute a violation of the first amendment? I

(01:14:43):
say no. I think not at all, in
fact. But on top of that, the other
point to make and let's just make sure
we're clear on that because they're separate. Like,
I that's important to stand on principle in
regard to what these things mean. But then
the other point, then a little over broad
way, as I pointed out before about the
Trump assassination point or whatever else, where the
idea becomes
I why I point out, like, well, you're
doxxing that person.

(01:15:04):
Libs of TikTok where they're going after and
getting people fired from Home Depot and elsewhere
because they made a a a crude joke.
Distasteful, yes. But a joke nonetheless about somebody
who should've shot better.
And I call them out for it. Because
it's the same thing. You're the woke rat.
You're doing the same thing.
And they say, well, free speech. But they
have we have a they have a you
know, the point is then they have to
deal with the consequences of free speech. Okay

(01:15:24):
then. If that's the argument, then how is
this any different?
Wouldn't this be the consequence of free speech?
If you're gonna go get hired at a
job somewhere, aren't we being told today they
can look at your social media and be
like, I don't want you to work here.
Right? I mean, doesn't that almost become even
more the case when somebody is actually part
of the government or at least tangential to
it? I mean, you get where I'm going
with this. It's obviously a hell of a
lot more nuance than what he wants you

(01:15:45):
to think it is. And nonetheless,
he will censor you all day long on
Twitter.
They will work with the ADL and APAC
and the rest of these groups to absolutely
censor your speech and to
suppress any or Donald Trump or the rest
of them, all of them in fact, telling
you they're gonna remove your speech for anti
semitism or whatever else. And yet, they want
you to be upset because he is claiming

(01:16:06):
his first amendment is being violated, which should
matter if it actually was, I don't think
it is.
I think that's important.
Oops, did I move Hope I didn't lose
that, hold on.
Oh no, that was the one we just
read, okay.
So,
Elon Myles Chong, this guy that just seems
to kinda just follow along behind Elon Musk.

(01:16:27):
Right? Just
you get the point. He says, this is
what lawfare against Elon Musk looks like. Is
it lawfare?
It's lawfare now because he's suing them. Do
you understand what lawfare means? And they aren't
even hiding it. The California Coastal Commission voted
to pr- to,
to reject their proposal,
and then then he goes, citing in part,

(01:16:48):
at least that's honest, political activities of Elon
Musk. Now to be even more fair, the
way the article read was simply quoting what
one commissioner said during that conversation out of
6. So think about that. It's not even
everybody was they're all just going, it's because
of what he said in line. One commissioner
argued led by partisan lens views
said
that. The stated realities were environmental issues

(01:17:10):
and the military contractor part.
So it seems that they're trying to pluck
this out to make it but it was
stated. So it does it is valid to
include. But to make it seem I mean,
if I'm at least he said in part,
The rest of them are making it sound
like Elon Musk, that's the only thing they're
talking about. But it says these petty bureaucrats
are targeting Musk's business operations due to vocal
political stances on the platform. Okay. So let's

(01:17:32):
be clear. Ian Myles Strong does not understand
what lawfare means.
Lawfare,
legal action undertaken as part of a hostile
campaign. No one's taking legal action.
Elon's taking legal action against them.
But you see this is my point. These
things just get lobbed around because the the
lawfare point is what they're saying about Trump.
So So let's well, they're trying to make
this all seem like they're all a unified

(01:17:54):
front fighting for your democracy or your republic
or freedom of speech and liberty. No matter
what, just we're on your side and we're
all being attacked for it. Even though they're
literally the machine.
It's pretty sad and clumsy, I think, but
a lot of people seem to be falling
for it. In fact, what TLAB is dealing
with, multiple lawsuits aimed at unjustifiable
accusations, that is law fair. Or even what

(01:18:14):
Trump is dealing with, I agree, is law
fair.
E Elon just says, Trump must win or
this will get more insane than you can
imagine. See the point? Exactly.
It's all about that. You are being played,
and I think most people are starting to
feel it. Do something about it. Stop letting
these morons and the partisanship drive you into
the ground.
Now Carlos Maza, an abs this guy is

(01:18:36):
a clown,
comes out and says, free speech, in quotes,
which I don't even know what the hell
that's supposed to mean, was and is an
unmitigated disaster. Well, what's it in quotes for?
Does it not exist?
Is that what you're I mean, it's it's
there's a reason for that, guys. This is
undermining it in every way even if they
contradict each other. It wouldn't be in quotes
if it's a thing you're saying was a

(01:18:57):
disaster. That would mean that it does exist.
It's just a disaster. Not that it's not
real.
There's no other reason to quote it. It's
lazy. I think this is so clumsy, it
shows you more of my point.
You realize this is a constitutional right. You
understand that, correct? This is
an inalienable
right.
God given
means it doesn't matter whether they wrote the

(01:19:19):
constitution, it was theirs, is what the point
was. And yet, they're telling you it was
a disaster?
Because they want you to believe it was
some kind of governmental program, guys. And they'd
want you to believe they can take it
away. They cannot.
So the idea that they want you to
believe that they're gonna take away your free
speech, that's what they're telling you about the
left, that's ridiculous. Now they can sure as
hell not respect it, just like Elon is

(01:19:40):
doing and just like the right is doing
as well.
But to take it away, they're playing on
your ignorance or hoping to.
So this, I think, is meant to be
so bombastically stupid that they then that it
drives you to think, well, I know Trump
said he's gonna censor for this, but he's
not as bad as that.
Funny how easy it seems to get through
to some people. A lot of people just
don't know where else to go.

(01:20:01):
They're so they're then that's what black field
looks like, where they just give up and
go, well, screw it. She's worse. I'll go
with him.
Think about how depressing that is.
Now it says that I know it sounds
inflammatory,
but every piece of evidence points to the
fact that we need really aggressive government regulation
of speech platforms. Oh, so
violating constitutional rights.

(01:20:23):
Period.
You just need to understand, as Maybory versus
Madison,
anything that is repugnant to the constitution is
null and void. Doesn't matter whether they pass
it in congress. Doesn't matter whether it's a
law. It's unconstitutional, therefore illegal.
Simple.
And that's why I point out quickly the
reality being that the constitution
and then its first 10 amendments or the

(01:20:43):
bill of rights,
none of that's contradictory.
That's why it makes sense.
Amendments can be added if they're not contradictory
to what we outlined as inherent rights. That's
why it makes sense. Because if you're and
look. Look. And you can feel free to
argue that you just don't agree with the
constitution in general. That's a lot of people
don't. But if we are standing by it,
which I believe deeply in, the idea of
how this could be something that is powerful

(01:21:04):
and is, if actually engaged with honestly.
And that's why they call it a living
document, because you can add amendments. But if
those amendments contradict something else in the constitution,
it is legally null and void. That's supreme
court precedent.
So when they try to pass a law
that says we're gonna regulate speech, doesn't matter.
That's against the that is null and void.

(01:21:25):
Or we're gonna take away your guns, null
and void. No. Look at the bill of
rights for yourself. None of those contradict anything
else in the constitution.
They're just hoping you've forgotten all this by
now, by acting like it's so unimportant. Yet,
they swear an oath to it every single
time.
Because the free market doesn't work and it
never will.
Wow.
They just want you to lean into your

(01:21:45):
government, which by the way I think that's
what somebody said. No. I didn't grab that
part of it. You know, the point is
this is the most embarrassing argument for more
government I've ever seen is what I think
might have been
Alan McLeod, I think. I forget. But the
article is I'm running out of ways to
explain how bad this is. What's happening in
America today is something darker than miss than
a misinformation crisis.
They are actually arguing for the idea that

(01:22:05):
we should remove
free speech.
Meanwhile,
so is the right in different ways. The
point is this is a lot more clumsy,
obvious, and in your face. So you think
the other side's not doing that.
Derek wrote an excellent article on the 11th.
The Republican party platform under Donald Trump is
pro Israel and anti free speech.
Now had you had the wherewithal, the objectiveness

(01:22:27):
to actually read it before dismissing it because
it's bad against Trump, the first half of
this article is about how bad Kamala Harris
is on free speech. They're all the same
thing at the point, but the reality is
because they're so clumsy, because it's so flamboyant,
It drives people, as you rise, to think,
well, he's the better choice, but that's not
the reality.
They're the same.

(01:22:48):
Now you may not like that answer because
then you think, well, then what do we
do? Well, there is a lot more options
than just left or right. The fact that
you're stuck in thinking that's all you have,
that is the problem. I don't care if
it takes an entire election season for us
to get past it. If you think that
allowing the the bottom line is they every
and this is why every single time they
tell you it's the most important election of

(01:23:08):
your lifetime. Because they want you to think
if you don't do it this time, nothing
will be to say. Everything will change. It
will all be over. Like, he keeps saying.
Right? Elon Musk?
We can't let this happen. If Trump if
Trump doesn't win, you'll never have free speech.
If Trump doesn't win, they'll remove all these
things and there'll be no more elections. If
Trump doesn't win, all the democrats will rule.
It's just these childishly stupid, dumbed down arguments

(01:23:29):
about what he
most people laugh at this stuff.
I really believe that. Now some of them
because they think that he's lying for the
right. Some of them because they're just objective
to see that what he's saying is completely
absent of factual bat basis. The bottom line
is there's a lot of moves happening. And
your government as a whole is actively doing
whatever it can to have more influence and

(01:23:50):
control over your life. Just the government. So
if you think the left will do this,
then that's just your government they're pointing at.
And that's how they get you to ignore
the picture by thinking only part of it's
doing something.
Read this.
Sadly, it's so obvious, and I think most
people are starting to see it. Now I'll
include this thread again.
There's now more videos added to it if
you haven't seen it. Now all this is
about multiple clips

(01:24:11):
of Donald Trump saying on the record that
Israel should control should control
congress. He says they used to, quote, rightfully
so,
And then talking about how if people when
the Israel lobby was in its heyday, then
then nobody could be in congress if they
didn't want them. Like, the AOC is doing
they wouldn't be there today if Israel was
in control. Yes. That's the point. He keeps
admitting to you repeatedly that Israel should and

(01:24:32):
does control congress.
Not you whether I agree with that or
not, it's irrelevant. He's saying that is the
point.
On top of that,
many different times he discusses how he will
censor you. We're gonna get rid of anti
semitism. We're gonna get people like this out
of the country. And famously just recently said,
we'll quote, remove the Jew haters from the
country. Deport them. The mass deportation he keeps

(01:24:53):
talking about.
I'll I'll say again. No matter what you
think about people who he frames as being
Jew haters when that's not the full picture,
there are plenty that are just Palestinian supporters
that don't and are actually protesting alongside Jewish
people that I guarantee he knows.
The point is that even if you think
they're whatever he calls jew haters,
you can't deport somebody for having an opinion.

(01:25:13):
No matter how grotesque you think it is.
So if you wanna pretend like he's not
he's the other side going after free speech,
this is the most obvious on the record
stated action against free speech that I can
see on the table right now.
You have articles written about this, but we
I'm I'm my point is I see it
the same thing in Kamala. But where is
her saying stuff like that? Saying we're gonna
stop you from being able to say what

(01:25:34):
you think.
I don't see it.
My point is not to say that he's
worse or she's worse. The point is they're
the same. And if you can't see it
in Trump, you're lying to yourself.
They will remove your ability to say what
you think, and they'll just if they'll apply
it to Israel, they'll apply it to whatever
narrative they want. Next thing, it'll be the
agenda they want to hide from you next.
Jay Bhattacharya says, why would anybody oppose free

(01:25:55):
speech? It's a good question. He says, the
excuse is always
the protection of the public from wrong or
harmful ideas.
Exactly.
But that is nonsense, he writes. I agree.
He says the goal of the censors is
to obtain power
by force
because they have failed to obtain it by
persuasion.
Now I don't even know where he stands

(01:26:17):
on the election or whatever else, but the
point is, a 100% right.
If you could acknowledge that, then also be
able to acknowledge that they're currently censoring on
Twitter. No matter what you want us, it's
approvable.
And that he's telling you right now that
we're going to censor around antisemitism.
As josh Josh Hawley just openly was calling
out, you condemn this completely legal statement that
everyone can say because it's within their free

(01:26:38):
speech. But also, doesn't even mean what you're
pretending it means. It simply means revolution.
The bottom line is they are actively trying
to build a narrative to censor you.
And as Kayley points out again, Donald Trump
explains it right here. Which I played in
the opening, I'll play it again because I
think it it does
it's quick.
I do think it has, you know, pow
it's powerful.

(01:27:02):
This is, 2018, I think. Because we're losing
a lot of people because of the Internet.
And we have to do something. We have
to go see Bill Gates and a lot
of different people
that really understand what's happening. We have to
talk to them, maybe in certain areas, closing
that Internet up in some way. Somebody will
say, oh, freedom of speech. Freedom of speech.

(01:27:22):
These are foolish people. We have a lot
of foolish people. We have a lot of
foolish people. We've gotta maybe do something with
the Internet because they are recruiting by the
1,000.
Okay. So my point is that was what
the ISIS was the point.
So there's your current narrative that's just shifted
today. Same point though. Whatever the current narrative
is, we just that's why we need it.

(01:27:43):
That's why now.
Now, here's the other reason. Same point though.
Always the same solution depending whatever problem they're
creating.
Now, I don't see how you could pretend
that somebody who can say, oh, free speech.
So many stupid people.
I just suddenly have a different opinion.
Certainly, I hope so. I do believe people
can change. But based on the fact that

(01:28:03):
he's currently telling you he's gonna censor you
because of this new narrative, pretty sure it's
the same thing. At the very least, acknowledge
that this is who he is. He has
made this clear. He's acted the same way
despite narratives. Just look at the track record.
And Kamala is doing the same exact thing.
And then this all this is the other
thread with that link, that video for you

(01:28:23):
can check it out, which which talks the
same one. It's one of those other clips
but this one is about him again saying
the vaccine saved lives. This one is him
saying control congress should control should be controlled
by Israel rightfully so. This one is saying
take the guns, due process later. This one
is about free speech.
These things should matter to anybody objective.
Now this was the part going back to

(01:28:44):
North Carolina that I found really interesting.
Now I think this might have more to
it than we realize.
There's a few ways to look at this.
The title is and this has been reported
by Daily Beast and a bunch of other
platforms. Armed militia, quote, hunting FEMA
causes hurricane responders to evacuate.
Now this is coming from the government report,
so there's many ways to look at this.
It could be completely fabricated

(01:29:05):
In in a way, to sort of make
it, like, almost from a political angle, you
could argue this could've been manufactured to make
Trump's,
you know, the perception of the way he's
doing right now around all this, rather just
the what republicans are doing, which does involve
a hell of a lot of lies. That
That doesn't mean that everything that's being said
about it that they're denying is misinformation.
See? Nuance. Somewhere in the middle of the
lying paradigm.

(01:29:26):
But the bottom line is that it easily
could be on top of those things being
used to hurt Trump's perception.
But I think what o what jumped into
my mind about this is the idea of,
like, let's say January 6th.
It's funny to me how already, by the
way, there's already examples of people in the
conversation calling MAGA people racist and anti semites

(01:29:47):
again. Even though you're currently taking this line
saying, oh, Kamal is the one that's gonna
end Israel, and they're all bad anti Semites.
But you're literally being called anti Semites by
part of the conversation for wearing a red
hat. So just recognize how subjective and stupid
this all is.
But that they're
trying to like, in January 6th, it's undeniable.
The evidence is clear. They were trying to
draw in an element from the Republican side
of the conversation to sort of frame them.

(01:30:09):
And, again, if you don't know if you
haven't looked at the evidence I mean, it
is a smoking gun. It's ridiculously obvious. So
much evidence shows you that this was a
manufactured event.
And the reality being
that if like, or or like the trucking
car, all these different points, where they try
to make this the the domestic terrorism rise.
Just like we saw with the anti semitism
manipulation, where it's already been even the ADL

(01:30:31):
people within it admitted
that they just simply called any Palestinian flag,
any Palestinian protest, whether violent or not, antisemitic.
Therefore, we're 400% in antisemitism. It's a manufactured
lie. You wouldn't have to make them up
if it was what they were saying. Same
thing happened with domestic terrorism.
Every single thing that they looked into around
January 6th, whether it was a grandma with

(01:30:52):
her phone or somebody sitting on the bench,
they called it a domestic terrorism investigation.
And then they turned around and said, oh
my god. Domestic terrorism is through the roof.
They're all playing you left and right. So
my point is in this context, I wonder
whether we're dealing with something similar.
So for all those out there that currently
because of the focus on the election pretend
that TLAB is somewhat against the Republicans, I'm

(01:31:14):
not. I'm fighting for all of you. I
just recognize that whether you're in the partisanship
or not well, rather to say that I'm
I'm fighting for everybody.
And I'm and the if you're trapped in
the partisanship depending on what the current topic
is, that seems to oscillate around me. Right?
During the COVID 19, we're all lockstep together
fighting the democrats right now. That's not how
I viewed it. I viewed it about fighting
the government, but that's how it gets perceived.

(01:31:36):
My point in all of this is that
right now, I think it's worth considering for
conservatives that this might be an effort to
trap you.
Like, legitimately having because, look, we're gonna read
through this. The point is that you have
individuals who are going to North Carolina, as
they're claiming anyway, which also just could be
a lie, but there does seem to be
evidence around it, of militias.
Or at least people with guns, who they're

(01:31:57):
calling militias, who are claiming they're hunting FEMA
members. Now look, you know as well as
I that this could very easily be real.
Just like we saw people hunting immigrants or
around the Haiti conversation or Venezuela. Like, we've
already seen how this very dangerous reality of
the Musk sphere and Trump and all this
are are manipulating people's perceptions to actually taking
real world action.

(01:32:17):
That is what they want from you. That's
what I said during January 6th. They're trying
to trick you into being what they said
you would become. On Twitter and in real
life. Don't fall for it. I know you're
smarter than that.
And so if this is actually what's happening
and this is not just the precursor article
to get it to happen,
it's kinda scary to argue that there to
to see that there are people going there

(01:32:38):
under the argument of whatever they're reading online
and actually hurting the a the the dynamic
here.
Again, the alternative would be that they actually
just pulled it all away to make it
look bad, which is all certainly possible. So
take it with a grain of salt, but
consider how easy it would be for the
partisanship to manipulate people into creating this kind
of situation.

(01:32:59):
Now it says federal emergency response workers operating
in North Carolina's Rutherford County in the aftermath
of Hurricane Elaine were told to evacuate on
Saturday over concerns
that an, quote, armed militia was threatening workers
in the area.
An official with the US Forest Service, which
is supporting recovery efforts along with the federal
with FEMA, sent a message to, numerous federal

(01:33:22):
agencies around the 1 around 1 PM on
Saturday
warning that FEMA has advised all federal responders
in the county to, quote, stand down and
evacuate the county immediately.
Which goes without saying that despite the obvious
incompetent nature of what it seems to be
every
aftermath,
going back as far as I can look,

(01:33:42):
there is still, at some level, good things
happening. There are still people that are getting
re they're receiving things from FEMA. Even if
you could argue that maybe it would be
exponentially better if they weren't the ones controlling
it. But nonetheless,
there are still things happening. If you can't
acknowledge that, then you're trapped in your partisan
lens. Now I'm the first to point out
that these groups genuinely would care more about
their own liability as as a body

(01:34:03):
and allowing the right things to happen
than actually helping people. I could be wrong.
That's what I think.
But on top of that, you can also
be objective enough. Even with something like USAID
or a national down for democracy, despite them
being such obvious vehicles for regime change and
just straight up espionage,
you can still point out that there are
exam that's that's how you cover these things

(01:34:24):
well. Because you you do conduct some level
of operation. So my point is there are
people there, if they did in fact pull
them away, they are probably going to suffer
even more because of this whole dynamic. Now
that doesn't that's not to say that may
you you could argue that the militia actions
were justified.
I'm simply pointing out a consequence of whether
the action were justified or not. And that's
interesting to think about.
There's a one side's gonna say that they're

(01:34:45):
the responsible party for this happening. Other side's
gonna say FEMA was hurting in the first
place and we're fighting for good things. I
think that everyone's being deceived by the partisan
angles in all of this.
National Guard troops had come across 2 trucks
of armed militia saying they were out hunting
FEMA.
I'd love and that says that's from an
email. I'd love to find more into that
to actually be able to prove whether that
was something that actually happened.

(01:35:06):
The IMT's incident management teams have been notified
and are co coordinating the evacuation of all
assigned personnel in the county. So my point
is that that will diminish the things that
that might need to be done.
The post reported that 2 federal officials
had confirmed the email's authenticity,
but it was not clear if the threat
described was viewed as credible.

(01:35:28):
Whatever that's what their interpretation, whether they meant
they were gonna hunt them. It's weird. An
unnamed forest service official told the newspaper that
personal personnel were moved to a safe area
and some work in the area was paused.
They were back in place by Sunday afternoon.
So it was only a brief stop.
So it seems interesting to me. Take I
do think we should take those as a
grain of salt.
But my point in saying that I think

(01:35:49):
they're all being played about it is is
that is that there you have partisan angles
in all of this.
Like, so do you think the average femeworker
on the ground is in the know about
some larger dynamic? Probably not.
So I think at the end of the
day, if we can remove the partisan games
from all of this,
you would begin to see it. Like, there
are lies being put out by the, by
the kind of Republican part of this conversation.

(01:36:11):
We've proven many of them, But there are
also things that are being pointed to by
that same conversation that are true, that are
being denied
by the other side of the conversation.
That's the only objective way to highlight all
this. And so it should matter to you
that there are people who are dumping nonsense
into the conversation. They have a right to
do it. But you can also say it's
irresponsible. They're hurting the process. And then the

(01:36:31):
point is that I pointing at some of
those lies and saying that they're not doing
anything about it and then acting on those
lies is what I worry about. And we
know there are people like that. And any
conversation
where people who get, let's say, radicalized by
the corporate media and act against Trump,
or in this sense, act against the other
side of the conversation.
If you can acknowledge 1, you should be

(01:36:52):
able to acknowledge the other. And I think
all of that matters. And this is my
point back to the beginning of where I
think the government, at a whole, is trying
to get you to do that.
They want you to do these things. So
that's what I was saying in the beginning.
This could just be kind of a placed
article to get this to happen. Maybe it's
already beginning. They want to use this as
a way to be able to justify
shutting you down.
And it maybe it'll start with only Republicans

(01:37:13):
with red hats, but eventually, it'll become anybody
at any time of Oh, emergency. Suddenly, everybody
in a 20 mile radius has to shut
down this or do that.
Where's your digital ID?
We gotta make sure that you're supposed to
be here. You guys know where this is
going. Every single point of control is being
used to justify one of the steps that
seems that Elon Musk is building right now.
So keep that in mind.

(01:37:34):
Now it says, Helane killed at least 230
people as it moved north, leaving a trail
of destruction across 6 states.
Since then, misinformation and rumors about the response
have been rampant. And I agree. But like
I said, some of them are actually true
that they're denying.
Some on social media called for FEMA to
be targeted after a rumor that the devastated
town of Chimney Rock was going to be
seized and bulldozed by the government circulated online

(01:37:57):
despite local authorities and news debunking the claim.
Now,
we've talked about the lithium. We went over
this in the show. We've talked about Albemarle
and its weird association with Israel making chemical
weapons for both the US and Israel, white
phosphorus, which doesn't seem to fit in. But
I still think that's weird and interesting. But
on top of the fact that the BlackRock
park got thrown into it even though they
only own a small amount, which is about
kind of comparable to what they own in

(01:38:18):
Rumble, but we don't point that out. All
these things could matter. But the end of
the day, I did not see the evidence
that they were about to bulldoze the town,
which wouldn't even make sense seeing as how
Albemarle already has the contract to do this,
and they're already working towards it. It's just
none of this made any sense to me.
And maybe, who knows, maybe in a month
or a year from now, oh, turns out
the point is right now,
what they're saying does appear to be false.

(01:38:40):
The idea that they're seizing and taking the
town and well, I'm there are people on
the ground that are telling you that's not
true, that live there.
And yet, right now, all the people that
are in the height of the partisan Republican
conversation will never admit that was false. And
a lot of them may be the ones
that are there with guns.
This is a hypothetical point.
You know that's possible, and that is what

(01:39:02):
I worry about. And if that's and again,
that's not even just your government. Those are
what those might even be unwitting
agents of the partisan manipulation.
And those are the most lost people in
the conversation. The ones that are out there
leading the charge for the partisan lies that
don't even know that they're part of a
lie. And they're everywhere.
So that's pretty interesting. Oh, and there's one
more part. It says, FEMA who, has also

(01:39:23):
been accused by Trump and Republican nominee Van,
and Trump and Vance of being a not
a of not being able to respond well
enough to the hurricane because it diverted disaster
relief to immigrants.
Which again, as I even said myself, that's
a very dishonest way to frame that. Now
we could point out that a lot of
money was spent on immigrants, not necessarily all

(01:39:43):
illegal. That was also always how they lump
these things together.
But that wasn't the right the point would
be, if we're gonna talk about any kind
of spending, why don't we reference the 1,000,000,000,000
that go overseas when and that all the
different wars when this is happening?
Or,
really, to sum up the point,
as it says there, which I already pointed

(01:40:04):
out on the show, these aren't the same
converse
station.
FEMA administers as they write,
administers the shelter and services program. Funding
for it comes from a separate pot of
money funded by congress.
So these are separate funding mechanisms.
But so it's still a fair point to
say we spent money on this. Right? And
we don't have it for that. That's a

(01:40:25):
problem. That's how anybody on us is framing
it. But, of course, Republicans took it a
step further and made it out to be
they used the money that would have been
used for this over here. Now I argue
that happens because people on Twitter
share a screenshot of a screenshot of some
talking point on Reddit, and all of a
sudden, they're repeating what they don't know. And
if it turns into this, it turns into
a boiled down, misinformed point which only helps

(01:40:46):
your government control your life. All of it.
Other false claims have been circulated include that
people who are taking federal relief money could
see that their land was seized or that
the $750
in the mo the the of the most
they'll ever get to rebuild. And who knows?
Maybe that'll be the case. But the 750
was a slap in the face, but I
didn't see any occasion that was the only
thing they were ever gonna get.

(01:41:07):
It might be, but see if this is
your assumptions
being framed as information.
Or the idea that they took relief money,
therefore they're gonna have their land seized. Again,
it certainly could be. I don't see the
evidence for that. FEMA has pushed back against
the false claims, which doesn't mean you should
lead them either. They it's government.
Setting up an own page to combat the
information.
Says we have thousands of people on the
ground, and they say not just federal, but

(01:41:28):
also our volunteers in the private sector.
Nope. If they have thousands of people like
me bottom line is what I already said.
End of the day,
your government is always looking for ways to
use you against yourself.
Be aware of that.
Another example.
Donald Trump, his real account on Twitter posted
this on October 11th.

(01:41:49):
It literally says, quote, America is being invaded
and the occupation
liberate America.
You know, you you know, for I could
promise you that those language is not by
accident. And the occupation.
I mean, you know how insulting that is
for people that actually pay it? The reality
that Trump and Kamala and Biden, all the
rest of them, even RFK, are blindly and

(01:42:12):
not even are openly supporting
a 76 year occupation. They're all blindly supporting
because that's what it really is when you
understand that it was occupied whether all of
it at once. They took control of these
areas because Brit Britain gave it to them,
not because God said they could have it,
but Britain Belfort declaration. The point is that's
an occupation.
Or the US occupation of Syria or the

(01:42:33):
US occupation of Iraq or the US occupation
of Afghanistan or the US occup on and
on and on. Or Syria or, Israel's occupation
of Syria or the Golan Heights or Lebanon,
all of which are illegally occupied. But let's
pretend
that every single immigrant is now occupying this
country. Nobody clear. I've also pointed out these
problems. The reality of weaponized immigration or migration

(01:42:55):
and clearly showing you Israel's making that happen
in one part. But point being,
most of this has to do with your
government's foreign policy. But either way, the bottom
line
is to frame this as an occupation or
talk about it as being invaded.
This you know what this does? It's a
hyperbolic point that turns into immigrants are the

(01:43:15):
enemy. And if you don't see that happening,
despite the fact that this country in a
lot of ways does definitely need that dynamic,
that's not because I necessarily want or don't
want that. It just is the reality of
the way this country works. Both sides lean
into that.
This is about trying to use this for
politics. And, of course, Elon Musk follows suit
and says, if it looks like an invasion,
sounds like an invasion, and uses guns like

(01:43:37):
an invasion, then it's invasion. What are we
talking about?
All you're gonna do all you're gonna see
in this this hyper
it's a bunch of fast moving clips and
dangerous music of images of things that we
can't really connect for.
Yes. There's problems. Yes. In in Aurora, there's
obvious gang dynamics, and some of them are
Venezuelan. There's obvious examples. That's very clear. No

(01:43:57):
one should deny that. In many cases, they're
overrunning a lot of the apartment buildings, but
the narratives around it has gotten cartoonish.
And now, of course, the point is about
it's all an invasion.
Despite the fact that what we're talking about
in a lot of cases are people that
have nowhere to go. Now Lebanon has a
1000000 people that are surging into Europe and
the United States because of what they just
did.

(01:44:18):
Are we gonna start blaming that's the point.
They're the enemy. And, of course, the the
loomer morons of the world are gonna jump
in and tell you all military age males,
and it's all because the Lebanese are and
the Hezbollah and the Hamas are gonna invade
your country despite the fact that all of
it is being manufactured by Israel in obvious
ways. But even if you don't wanna admit
that fact,
it's it's to pretend that people that are
suffering because of your government's actions are suddenly

(01:44:38):
the enemy, even though there could be an
overlap of that, is just
insulting and dangerous.
You are creating the very war and division
that you claim you're fighting.
Guys, this is a deep state agenda. If
you need to recognize any of these things,
and Elon and Trump are tag teaming your
control structure.
And here's what Sally Agres had to say.

(01:44:58):
One of the biggest policy mistakes conservatives have
made in the last 20 years is buying
into Donald Trump's opposition to immigration.
It's really the only policy proposal Trump owns,
so he has no choice to push it
hard. The fact is though, Latinos are increasingly
conservative. I I how long I've been making
this point? This game they play where democrats
are buying votes. No. You're literally buying votes

(01:45:20):
with your pack, Elon, but let's forget about
that.
To claim that every immigrant that comes in
is guaranteed to be a democrat voter, in
fact, that's simply not true. At best, it's
completely up in the air.
The point though is that they'd know that
and just keep going with the old narratives.
Both sides.
Because there's a dynamic happening there. But he
says the fact is though Latinos are increasingly

(01:45:40):
conservative, especially 2nd and third generations, who will
greatly outnumber 1st generation movers before long. A
great example of this is Florida, where the
only thing stopping native whites from confiscating guns,
castrating little boys, and performing radical double mastectomies
on healthy 12 year old girls are the
illegal Cuban rafters.
The point is it's just so embarrassing how
so many people out there will just stick

(01:46:02):
with the wedge issues despite how clumsy it
I mean, these things are from 20 years
that these narratives don't even make sense anymore.
And all they're doing is turning you against
your neighbor or turning you against people that
don't necessarily deserve your ire.
All so they can keep you in the
mindset that you're under attack and we need
to do whatever we can to stop it
even if that means maybe taking away your
rights.

(01:46:23):
That's where we are.
Now the person that Trump seems to be
leaning into more than anybody right now is
Elon Musk. And it's pretty concerning for me
for a lot of reasons.
As we'll get to the whole great reset
side of this, which I think is just
so shocking to me, as the right seem
to be the most resistant and now seems
to be
blindly walking along with the new great reset.

(01:46:45):
This person points out, Elon Musk is going
full force to get Trump elected. This is
his opinion. He says because otherwise, someone might
find out what kung fu practice with Ghislaine
Maxwell is code for. This comes from these
emails that we've seen around the old Epstein
overlap. He's got a tweet r image right
there. We're gonna read this article next.
Interesting. Elon Musk's Twitter is reportedly resisting a

(01:47:05):
subpoena in the Jeffrey Epstein related legal case.
That's the truth.
And they cite this Gizmodo article, so let's
read that next.
This is from July 19th this year. Now
it says Twitter
is reportedly stonewalling subpoena requests related to a
legal case involving the dead financier
and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Why? Nobody knows.

(01:47:27):
But it is sure weird.
But the point is that now, to this
day,
it seems like nobody's there's no follow-up.
Which I find very strange, because we're in
a situation where
anybody else gets subpoenaed,
and they don't do anything about it. Well,
there's usually consequences to that. So here we
are. Right? October.
Right. Nothing's happening. And that is, as far

(01:47:48):
as I could tell, the current reality. That
they've subpoenaed him in regard to a Jeffrey
Epstein case, and he's just ignoring it.
Well, I'm funny. Can you imagine if Biden
was in that position, what they would do?
Can you imagine if anybody, even if so
even tangentially connected with the current Democrat position?
You know, as well as I, it would
be the biggest story ever. It'd be like,
we know it. We know it. He's part

(01:48:09):
of the Epstein scandal. Or anything else we're
gonna talk about next. Or as Brian even
points out, like, the the digital ID, the
biometric conversation. If they came out and said
explicitly the way that Trump did, what they
wanted, that would be only reason you needed
not to vote for them.
But, of course, if it's somebody else, well,
you give them a pass.
This goes back even further. This is on
May 2023.
Elon Musk was subpoenaed in a JPMorgan

(01:48:31):
Epstein lawsuit by the Virgin Islands. So it's
just continuous continue. Now, of course, the point
just like the Andrew Tate
monsters or the Tate monster, the I mean,
if you haven't seen the Milk Bar TV's
breakdown of these or the many, many, many
different examples of them openly,
laughingly,
gleefully talking about raping and manipulating women.

(01:48:51):
It's very easy to see. It's very easy.
They're everywhere. And yet, nonetheless, Candace Owens and
Tucker Carlson had this
softball interviews where they let them just lie
to everybody to their millions of audience. They
and and they lied. You can go check
by check and prove easily that they lied
about all that stuff. My point is
they simply go, the matrix is after me.
And everyone goes, where on your side? Because

(01:49:13):
they must be making it up despite all
the facts because partisan
melts logic. Same point here. Now this doesn't
prove that he's guilty.
But my point is the same that just
because, well, he's the persecuted hero, they don't
like that he's fighting for free speech, they
say. So let's pretend that we can ignore
everything else.
It's pretty dumb.

(01:49:34):
Here is mail online. Elon Musk names the
Rich Dems who are terrified
of Epstein and Diddy files becoming public.
Seems a little bit deflection, don't you think?
Well, he's got he's got subpoenas that he's
ignoring around the Epstein case. And now the
Diddy files come out, and he's going, here
are the Dems that are probably scared about
that on October 8th.
Oops. Did we forget about the fact that

(01:49:55):
he's a big buddy of Diddy who we
used to proudly talk about, who's also one
of the found owners of Twitter?
Funny how he's over there going, you look
at the democrats. They are the ones and
you clearly you seem to be deflecting away
from yourself, my opinion.
And of course, I pointed this out as
well earlier. This person goes sickening around, did
he accuse of abusing 9 year old boy

(01:50:17):
while spiking drinks with horse tranquilizer?
A 120 victims come forward.
Elon Musk go he goes, how many people
in the industry knew about this?
Well, she goes, Elon, you admitted Diddy is
a friend of yours and also an ex
investor who helped you acquire Twitter.
Is this why my account sex trafficking survivors
and other exposing elite pedophiles is censored on
Twitter? That's Liz Crokin.

(01:50:38):
But you've seen all these.
Diddy is a is a major, if not
one of the leading shareholders on Twitter. That
was recently abided, but it's already been there.
He helped Musk assume Twitter control.
Because I don't know if you know this,
but Puff is an investor in Twitter. You
know he's a good friend of mine. We
text a lot. Sure. You could pretend like
he just said that to be nice, but
how do you the the point is it's
always easy to air on the side that

(01:50:59):
you want. The truth is that he does
know him and that they are working together.
And it seems like that would matter if
it was anybody else in the conversation.
Right?
You damn well know.
Now
we have the Elon Musk.
Great reset. Make sure I forget something here.

(01:51:20):
Yeah. Okay.
Which, again, same point that I'm making across
all this. They were literally in a position
where if this was anybody else, even another
Republican that they'd probably call a rhino, like,
this would just be over.
And yet here he is, rolling out
his great reset.
He got and don't forget, even recently just

(01:51:40):
changed his his icon to the WeRobot thing
for, like, half a day and then changed
it, which is what all this is. You
got his robots coming out. He's got these
random you know, right up from right from
the I, Robot movie, it seems, like these
same little autonomous driving cars that you don't
control. I owe nothing and I'm happy. Right?
Or these autonomous zones.
I mean, he's even using the same language.

(01:52:01):
So first one, as I simply tagged and
said the great reset, Elon edition.
And it's all from this presentation. He's showing
you these robots that can walk you out,
serving you, and giving you drinks, and washing
your clothes, and being your butler.
Okay. So,
obviously, you could make arguments about how this
would be positive or help this or save

(01:52:22):
you from a but it can also do
a lot of the other things we talk
about. So if you're if you're aware that
your cell phone is being used to spy
on you, let's not let's pretend like it's
impossible that a robot,
an autonomous robot that's being sent you're buying
from Tesla is not gonna be able to
do those things. Like, they're gonna make all
the same arguments. And then even worse as

(01:52:42):
somebody jokingly pointed out, but I don't see
it as much of a joke.
It's imp like, it it it makes sense,
of course, to have a device that can
spy on you, but then also arrest you
when you do the wrong thing. And then
take you somewhere.
I mean, it's just amazing to me. Like,
if we can't connect the dots to where
you know, they were at a point where
they're like, man, it'd be great if we
could have spying devices on every American in
this country, and then work out a way
to get you to buy it from them.

(01:53:04):
Here we are again. How long until they're
like, we all need a robot butler, and
then suddenly you have a mili you have
a robot army that's in everyone's home. Yeah.
I'm sure we could pretend like that sounds
really stupid and crazy conspiracy theory. And you
know what? I'm just kind of half kidding,
but the truth is you know that is
obviously a logical step in how things have
gone before.

(01:53:25):
I mean, again, that's possible
whether it's crazy in your mind or not.
And as night man watch night watch points
out, that's it, man. Imagine people reaction
to Klaus Schwab or Bill Gates
if they had their own personal line of
robots they were trying to sell. Yeah. P
p pretend that was Bill Gates.

(01:53:45):
We're really gonna pretend like you would just
shrug it off like some new venture? No.
You would be screaming at the great reset.
Why is it different? Because you've decided for
yourself that Elon is not that.
Here he goes, ever wanted your own personal
r two unit?
So what we're talking about here Oh, that's

(01:54:06):
just the first part there.
First part,
these are
driverless cars.
And I'll play the last one for you
where he talks about how that plays into
the community he wants to build. You tell
me how this is different than 15 minute
cities, than everything else we saw from the
great reset other than Elon pointing to it.

(01:54:27):
Now first, before I even go past that,
he's talking about these little driverless
cars. Just for a side note, I'm gonna
include this article from survivorpedia.
Top ten vehicles for your EMP survival.
This is where my mind is going. And
there's some pretty cool trucks in here. All
of them before the time where I mean,
arguably, there's still possibly some effect from an
EMP, but it's not the kind that will

(01:54:47):
shut your car down entirely, especially if it's
turned off.
They're more they're less likely to be affected
as much.
So I'll include that for you.
But last one,
autonomy
will create the world we want. It's literally
called autonomy. And it says so much green
space potential in cities when vast parking lots
aren't needed.
Okay. Why? And this person says, owe nothing

(01:55:09):
and be happy.
So
one of the things that, like, is really
interesting is is how will this affect the
the cities that we live in?
And when when you drive around a city
or when a car drives you around a
city
Of course, whether you want it or not.

(01:55:31):
You'll see there's, like, there's a lot of
parking lots. There's there's parking lots everywhere, parking
garages.
There are and and so what would happen
if you have an autonomous world is that
you can now turn parking lots into parks.
And,
so from you do we're taking we're taking
the ing lot out of parking lot.

(01:55:55):
Right. So the point is obvious.
Take away what he said. It is literally
what you see on the great reset website,
w work with economic forum. And then on
top of that, in case we forgot, he's
also
personally involved in every aspect of everything else
too. The mRNA microfactories,
the neurochip brain implant. So he's a walking

(01:56:15):
one stop shop for the great reset, but
we pretend he's on your side because Twitter
and and my and Trump and stuff.
This person responded, oh, look. It's he's my
Ian Myles Chong. I wonder if he's gonna
be cr show some criticism.
Yeah. You know that's not gonna happen. He
says, tell me about it. It's hell to
drive in cities during rush hour. How much

(01:56:36):
more awesome would it be if we could
just go from one place to another without
even having to park? Oh my god. You're
so cool, man.
These people deserve to be made fun of.
He says so much green space potential in
cities when vast parking lots are needed.
It's just it's funny to me.
Totally cool, man. We don't need to drive
anymore. Like, it just seems like a child.
At the end of the day, obviously, there's

(01:56:57):
concerns here. I don't know. Freedom,
actual autonomy.
Not not your pretend but my choices in
the city. But, of course, the people that
are his fanboys wanna be like, you're so
cool. That's exactly what we all asked for.
No. It's not. Totally not. And I'll tell
you what, what's the classic line? Those who
would give up a little
give up security for a little safety or
you could also say convenience

(01:57:18):
deserve neither.
Paraphrasing Benjamin Franklin. And that's the reality.
You're gonna go, oh, man. Are you gonna
drive anymore? Cool. You can own me. This
is pretty much where this goes.
Here's the other one.
We constructed a futuristic
world, and it's called We Robot.
That sure sounds fun and warm and fuzzy.
Right? We Robot, autonomy, freedom city. Right? Here's

(01:57:41):
your MAGA Freedom Phone, and here's your madam
your freedom city. And guess what? You have
no rights to do anything, and we own
everything, and you're happy, though.
That's exactly where this is going. But as
long as Elon presents it, we all pretend
like it's the best thing ever.
Welcome to the future.
I mean, guys, this is exactly if this
was Bill Gates or anybody else, you would

(01:58:02):
be freaking out about it.
Now here's the last one. Oh, I think
it's the one I showed. Yeah. Just the
same picture of that town, and I simply
said slowly. He pulls the right into the
agenda. You know, the very same right that
was the most resistant 30 seconds ago. Did
we already forget about the great reset?
Or are we just pretending that Elon or
Trump points to or are we just pretending

(01:58:23):
that if Elon or Trump points to it,
that makes it okay? 2 party illusion.
Now lastly, to make the point about how
obviously this person is a government,
like, part of the government. I mean or
if not,
he already is. My point is that this
is showing an immersion with the government.
He is interwoven
with it in ways that we don't even
understand.

(01:58:44):
Sarah Emerson points this out.
Elon Musk,
his AI supercomputer
team has been secretly courting government officials.
Like, Memphis police say, look in my backyard.
And and and FBI agents. Memphis police,
FBI agents
behind NDAs,

(01:59:05):
and a shell run by his fixer, Jared
Birchall. So we have
government not non disclosure agreements with the guy
that's gonna save you from the government.
It says, we obtained the NDA through a
public records request, which argue the point they
make in this is that that is how
the ultimate being that their
NDAs don't even supersede the public domain. Ultimately,

(01:59:25):
as a government aspect, that you have a
right to be able to see these things.
But he's trying to hide them behind NDAs.
Apparently, I'll read the article. That seems to
be a common thing that he does.
The point, though, is we're talking about
this is the one that we're telling you
is fighting the deep state, or that they're
telling us is fighting the deep state.
I mean, we're talking about, like, every example

(01:59:46):
of the machine I keep pointing to. And
everywhere you look, he is interwoven with it.
And this person says, Charles, AI Cyber, says
looks like Musk's XAI
is mirroring his other company's playbook by keeping
government officials in the dark with NDAs. A
classic move to silence discussion about a massive
data center. Concerned about data protection and government
surveillance. Now that's the then the part of

(02:00:07):
it is the data center which is gonna
take
hun like, I'll I'll cite the numbers exactly
from the article.
Water resources from these locations.
Is that what the people there want? Part
of the reason why it keeps it under
NDA so you don't know what's happening in
your backyard until it's too late.
But this is the guy who wants to
save and fight for your freedoms though, except
for the freedoms of people in Memphis though.
They don't care about them. Now it says

(02:00:28):
how Elon Musk muzzled government employees from taking
talking about his XAI's
new supercomputer.
This is from the 11th of this month.
For months, XAI met privately with government officials
to bring its massive center to data center
to Memphis.
Keeping those discussions secret by requiring the signing
of non disclosure agreements

(02:00:51):
with the government. Now how how is that
even allowed?
Why well, how is the government allowed? If
I frankly, I think there's a legal dynamic
there that is a little bit skirting the
law.
Where there's how they're allowed to sign nondisclosure
agreements about public domain issues. Because we're talking
about locations in Memphis, which the people of
Memphis have a right to say have a
say about.

(02:01:12):
Because if we're gonna pretend that your government
are simply your elected representatives that act in
your will, which we all know is how
this works, then the reality is that that's
your that's your decision.
We don't want this in our community, but
they don't allow the government who's supposed to
be acting for you to be able to
speak about it.
Doesn't that seem a little uncomfortable? Now this
will broaden out. Actually, on that note, I'm

(02:01:33):
gonna save this article because I'm going to
be having a a discussion in the near
future
about a not a follow-up discussion about Prospera.
The the fake libertarian
technocratic
haven.
If it's a fake libertarian city, that is
a heck technocratic hell hole in Honduras
that Peter Thiel owns.

(02:01:55):
And it is terrifying.
And they're even using it as a reference
point in their things they're calling Trump's freedom
cities.
And this discussion very much overlaps
about the idea of public domain and what
you as the individuals would want in your
backyard and whether you even have a say
in it if they work around that. But
it simply goes on to say, nearly 6
months ago in Memphis,
before residents or even city councilors

(02:02:17):
knew that Elon Musk was building, quote, the
world's largest supercomputer
in their backyard,
the billionaire's team met secretly with a host
of local and national law enforcement agencies, including
the sheriff's office, Memphis Police Department,
US Department of Homeland Security, and Federal Bureau
of Investigations.
All the people I mean, is it funny
how often they rep they misrepresent themselves as

(02:02:40):
being, like, against all of this, like, fighting
the FBI?
Except when they don't want that.
Homeland Security, FBI, Memphis Police. The covert meeting,
which has not been previously reported, concerned Musk's
growing AI startup, XAI,
all x, which is weird. Coming from x
X Corp before, now you got x for

(02:03:00):
Twitter, x
AI, WeChat, x new dynamic. It says according
to the Greater Memphis Chamber, an economic development
group that had been steering the deal behind
closed doors since March.
Now it says, she offered them a tour
of Musk's new facility, the chamber chief, economic
developer officer Gwen Fisher,
on one condition.

(02:03:21):
Talking about the the
the people that the,
hold on.
Wait. This is the 3rd paragraph. How are
they saying she offered them? Who's them?
To a group in the email.
Just bad writing. I mean, I know the
point is we're talking about the gov the
entities that are there to the the the

(02:03:42):
government local and and larger entities we just
discussed. But I'm just saying it's list them
right there. But it seems like the way
they wrote that it starts this is my
mind working. I shouldn't even be saying it
out loud. It's it's just poorly written because
it doesn't explain as well. The bottom line
though is that they offered the
the FBI
police
tours,
But on one condition,
they had to sign non disclosure agreements with

(02:04:03):
an entity titled CTC Property,
a mysterious shell company controlled by Musk's fixer
and personal banker, Jared Birchall, who's got a
kind of a weird, spotty background.
I shouldn't say that. More so specifically, there
was one example, at least accused of mishandling
something,
which I that and it's just in reading
this, it's after reports, let's say. They I'm

(02:04:24):
not even going into that. That's just what
the general reporting is about this background. But
my my way I read this is
the I don't even think we're supposed to
be seeing all of this.
It says a former financial analyst oh, I
think it maybe says right here.
Yeah. Right there. Improper correspondence with a client.
It's small stuff. But it says and even

(02:04:44):
if maybe that's not even true. But it
says, Birchall has been Musk's right hand for
nearly a decade.
He got fired from Merrill Lynch for the
improper cord correspondence
according to Reuters. It says since that time,
he's been named an executive at SpaceX,
an executive at Neuralink, an executive at The
Boring Company, and an executive at XAI.

(02:05:05):
He manages Musk's family office and foundation,
oversaw the billionaire's takeover of Twitter, and controls
Musk's expansive personal security detail.
Should we maybe ask whether this guy is
Elon Musk? Whether this guy is and Elon
Musk is the front man of whatever we're
dealing with here? Pretty weird. Because I quite
frankly, the more you actually watch Elon Musk
and watch and look at the background, I

(02:05:26):
don't think he's as I don't think he
is what everyone represents him to be. I
don't think he's as smart as he pertains
to you. I really just basically looking at
the way he presents himself,
I have questions at the very least. And
then when you start to see this stuff,
it's going, well, that's pretty strange.
Maybe there's something bigger. Maybe he is literally
a front man for something darker going forward.
Sure. You can sense my own opinions bleeding

(02:05:46):
through in there, which are my opinions. But,
nonetheless,
I think it's interesting to see how this
is going forward and the fact that they're
getting people to sign NDAs so you can't
see what the government is doing on local
on public property. And it says that government
agencies consented to XAI's confidentiality
terms is unethical,
says Scott Bonbury, conservative
director
conservation director of the Sierra Club Tennessee chapter,

(02:06:08):
who believes their primary accountability should be to
the citizens of Memphis. No. They said believe
that's the reality.
The game we play where the government is
supposed to be the representative, you know, of
your living will. It's not the or the
living embodiment of what you want. That's
clearly, if they have to argue
about that, then that can't be the case.
Obviously, they're supposed to be acting for the

(02:06:29):
people of Memphis, not for a billionaire oligarch
technocrat
and hiding it from you. But
the sad thing is that is what is
going on. The lie is that they're fighting
for you.
Now we could change that. That's not how
it should be. But we need to be
real about that. And stop looking at it
as the anomaly is that. The reality is
that's all they do. They're always looking for

(02:06:49):
ways to screw you over for their immediate
benefit.
And that's sadly because we've allowed that to
be the case for a really long time.
Now it says that government agencies consented to
a i's a I x AI's confidentiality terms
unethical.
Musk companies have a long history of using
NDAs to silence government officials about projects in
their towns.
And Memphis appears no different. Now here's what

(02:07:11):
becomes interesting.
They claim, as it talks about next, the
idea of proprietary research,
but then go on to prove that's not
even what's actually happening. Now that doesn't mean
there's not proprietary research. But what it means
is they use that claim
to justify why a government official who's supposed
to be acting for you would sign an
NDA for a for a company.

(02:07:31):
They go, well, we can't the close disclose
their financial or their proprietary information about the
tech, but then go on to use it
to hide things like the fact that they're
using their water or you so it's an
illusion.
An illusion with an I. It says, the
FBI and Shelby County Sheriff's Office declined to
comment
on the meeting with XAI,
and the remaining law enforcement agencies did not

(02:07:53):
respond to Forbes' multiple outreach attempts. That's pretty
weird. Don't you think?
However, documents show that both the police department
and sheriff's office delivered signed NDAs
to x core XAI corporate security chief Logan
Beach.
So they've got 9 disclosure agreements with the
company even though they're supposed to be acting
with you. Don't you see a conflict of

(02:08:14):
interest there? What happens if something they're supposed
to do in the field of duty regarding
this building or with what they're going on
in this area comes into conflict with that
NDA? What happens then?
Well, the are the clear argument legally would
be they ignore the NDA because that supersedes
it. But do they know that? Do they
act like that? Maybe there's financial incentives. How
do we know what's going on?

(02:08:34):
Now it says, one of the things the
article writes is that they often use these
police or, like, you know, unmarked cars and
unmarked official. Like, that's what they are they
reference. It's possible the police department will be
moonlighting for them as security. Then what happens?
Then now you got them working for him
and sign NDAs. You think they're gonna enforce
for you over him?

(02:08:55):
This is the reality of where technocracy goes,
guys. This is all being done right in
front of us.
Now it says XAI push in XAI's push
into Memphis
has come with aggressive demands on area resources.
The data center has requested enough power to
run a 100000
households
and will draw more than a 1000000 gallons

(02:09:15):
of water daily from the Memphis aquifer. Okay.
So here's why it matters more than anything.
Up until now, you might have argued that
they have no right to know what you're
doing, whether it's local or not.
Well, when it does affect your municipality,
when it's taking water and energy from what
you might need in times of
crisis,
then you have a right to say.

(02:09:36):
So
if we were gonna be okay with this,
maybe we should say, okay. Well, that's fine.
Then they have to build their own energy.
Like, so this is them taking advantage of
the current infrastructure of the area as opposed
to doing it themselves, which is what most
companies do. But not most companies are building
a
massive
XAI data supercenter,
which is probably something we've never seen before.

(02:09:57):
Not really.
Now it says these companies expect to be
able to sail through without anyone knowing anything
about what they're doing. It says fears that
local
power grids would and vital resources will be
stretched to their limits.
Yes. Obviously, that should matter. Like with Nestle
stealing water rights or Flint or any number
of them. Endless amount of examples, and we're

(02:10:17):
just doing it again. Because nothing's changed. And
I'll make this point again.
Or, actually, I think I forgot that I
was gonna make it about the other North
Carolina point.
Is as I should've said it then because
now it's gonna be lost on it. But
the point is the same as always. Is
that because of all the BS and the
lies,
what actually happens? We're focused on the bigger

(02:10:37):
hype about the story and the town being
bulldozed
instead of just the incompetence
of the government. And then it goes on
again. The next disaster will do it all
over again.
And this is what I keep harping on
in these conversations. We shouldn't be ignoring or
pretending that because they call it misinformation that
it's false, But we should also look to
the other side too, in the partisan game,
in the people in the paradigm who are

(02:10:57):
lying around it, not just the other side.
And the same thing we're doing here.
We should care.
Fears that the local power grid and vital
resources will be stretched to their limits. Gosh.
I've just lost it on that. Don't anyway,
back to the North Carolina point, which I
know somehow connects to what I just said.
Is that alt ultimately, we're in the same
position where we miss the forest for the
trees. We are focusing on a bigger story

(02:11:20):
instead of recognizing
which we should consider, but recognizing the immediacy
of what needs to change. And the same
thing we see with these Palestine or anything
else, the story just continues down the road.
Oh, that's what it was. So like Nestle
and Flint and the rest of it. Instead
of actually dealing with those problems, we all
get pulled away in something else. And so
they just do it over and over and
they know that. They bank on that.

(02:11:41):
And I'm not talking about left or right.
I'm just talking about the power structure that
is your government who are doing the same
thing. Memphis
should not have to decide or explain
or argue with XAI about taking their resources
if they don't want that. That's why they're
signing NDAs with the government that's supposed to
be acting for you. If this isn't alarming
for you, I don't know what you're looking

(02:12:02):
at.
Yet state privacy laws and NDAs have often
allowed these projects to withhold state privacy laws,
to withhold key details from the public as
trade secrets or confidential information, which I might
even argue there's a level that would make
sense. Let's just say you're working on some,
like, some specific thing where if you were
to give information, it would divulge

(02:12:24):
proprietary information.
I would like I mean, I'm gonna say
I can understand how it might make sense.
Yeah. I have to see all the information
before I you know, the point is that
I will always on the side of what
we first talked about. But logically, you could
argue it would make sense. But here's where
it goes crazy. It says Google's water usage
so Google.
Their water usage in the Dallas, Oregon, for

(02:12:44):
example, or the Dallas,
Oregon location, for example,
was guarded
by the city.
By the city.
Until The Oregonian,
the local newspaper, sued for its release under
public records law. Public records law. So this
is the government
deciding
to hide public records from you, who they're

(02:13:06):
supposed to work for, in favor of a
corporation who is paying them.
That's as simple as it gets. That's what's
happening here. Now you can even argue that
his AI supercenters is what we all need.
Either way,
it's going about it's showing you that they're
dishonest.
They're abusing the area of Memphis or they
will in order to get what they want
at your expense and then turning around and

(02:13:28):
telling you they're fighting for you. That's what
this that's always how this works.
It says when Forbes asked t TVA about
its other data center customers,
the utility declined
to share any information about them.
Claiming contractual agreements protected that sensitive business information.
See the point? That has nothing to do
with

(02:13:49):
utility usage or use water usage. They're hiding
behind proprietary
information whether that's even necessary.
It says it would not say whether it
had signed an NDA for the XAI project.
Additionally,
Memphis' economic development agency, EDGE, denied Forbes' request
for public records relating to XAI by citing

(02:14:09):
trade secrets. So, again, in real time, you've
got Memphis government entities turning down your right
to see public domain information
citing
trade secrets.
Think about that for a second. That's terrifying.
And this is where we're going with this
direct where this is the point about Honduras.
At what point until suddenly government exists but
is not even really in charge anymore?

(02:14:31):
Which is not I mean, my argument is
we should be gone. I'm not gonna cry
about the government not having power, but I
will be worried about if a worse entity
takes control.
But it says EDGE's board members are appointed
by the city and county, while the board
of TVA, which is federally owned,
is nominated by the US president and confirmed

(02:14:52):
by the senate.
And yet, to the highest level of government
power, this entity is working for a corporate
private corporate entity,
as opposed to you.
Quote, it's just unprecedented,
said Memphis resident, Ward Archer, about the NDAs.
But seemingly nobody cares because my point again.
Obviously, it's against the law. Obviously, on the

(02:15:14):
face of this, they're doing what they're the
opposite of what we're told they do. And
we cry about it, or we'd rather complain
about it. We say this shouldn't be okay.
And then nothing happens.
And because the partisanship comes in with some
kind of nonsense angle to this where it's
gonna be, they're trying to stop Elon from
saving the world with AI, all of a
sudden it goes forward, we don't change it.
Every damn time.

(02:15:34):
Yeah. It's obvious that I'm
the partisan angle of this, the 2 party
illusion, is the central problem to how we
are getting past these things today.
I'm convinced.
Archer is the president of the local cons
conservation nonprofit Protect Our Aquifier.
So they're arguing this is a big problem.
They're going to hurt our water source, which
is exactly what they should care about more

(02:15:56):
than ever today.
It says, which has been pressing local agencies
for details about XAI's water demands.
It says, quote, how can you do that
and be an elected official or an appointed
official?
That seems weird. And what's the need for
secrecy? You know? I don't get it. But
we do, though. It's obvious because they don't
want you to see because you know if

(02:16:16):
you were aware of how much water they
were gonna take, let alone a lot of
other dangerous things, in my opinion, then you
wouldn't want it there. And then you'd have
the ability to petition your government and stop
it from happening.
Instead,
they throw money at it. Money and influence
and get your government officials who are supposed
to act for you to turn a blind
eye because something.
Something. You can decide what that might be.

(02:16:38):
In Nevada, Tesla has used NDAs to prohibit
state officials from disclosing information about tax breaks
the company would receive.
See my point? So Tesla, another company where
Elon Musk does the same thing,
has used the lie of of the nondisclosure
agreements
with government officials

(02:16:59):
to hide their tax breaks.
Is that proprietary information?
Obviously not.
Several government entities in Brownsville 10 Texas, including
a public entity board utilities board, were similarly
required by SpaceX
to sign NDAs.
Here's tech this is Technocracy right in front
of you, expanding. The contracts were only released

(02:17:19):
through an attorney general's order.
And in Bastrop, Texas, where Musk's tunneling venture,
The Boring Company, has built a manufacturing plant,
One resident claimed the company asked them to
sign an NDA before viewing planning documents that
were technically public records.
Do you think they don't know that?
They'll take whatever they can get.

(02:17:41):
Buy whatever they can get.
Deborah Fisher, executive director of the Tennessee Coalition
For Open Government, told Forbes that NDAs don't
supersede the state's public record laws, but have
been used to gum up access to information.
So the point is,
if pursued long enough,
eventually,
it would seem you'd be able to get

(02:18:02):
the information.
If, you know, put us I'm I would
argue even at this level, if it goes
to the top, somebody could ultimately put their
foot down and say, proprietary.
And then what are you gonna do? Even
if it's illegal. The point is, they don't
care about the law. My point though is
that gumming it up is really what matters.
Like, just keep this drawn out until we're
built. Then they can complain all they want
because it's too late then.

(02:18:23):
If you're in Memphis, you should be speaking
up about this.
A XAI has reportedly refused to engage with
the Memphis community that it's been so eager
to join. Why would that be? I mean,
guys, the whole point is I don't think
they wanted this to even be discussed. They
were hoping that we built before we even
know what's going on, like they've done before.
The facility's closeness to historically black neighborhoods already

(02:18:44):
exposed to industrial pollution and chronically undeserved
underserved by public entities utilities, excuse me, has
caused residents to worry it may worsen their
problems. Now, of course, as always, anything even
related to this conversation we framed as woke,
even though there is element to this that
are accurate. The idea about whether it's black
or anything else that aren't
poorer neighborhoods are always the ones that get

(02:19:07):
abused.
That's without question. They don't put things like
this in Martha's Vineyard, guys. This is the
reason for that. Now you could argue it's
because they don't take care of their community.
You can fall into that trap if you
wanna pretend that because that's like saying immigrants
are the problem because we destroyed their home.
No. They're the it's always the way this
works.
If you wanna look at the history of
why these things are the way they are,

(02:19:27):
that's important to do. That doesn't matter whether
you rationalize why it's the unfair thing should
happen. The point is still that this should
not be the way it works. That people
who are already in positions where they get
less than everybody else, whether black or white
or whatever else, or already in positions where
most of the pollution circles around there, they
shouldn't be the ones that continue to get
it just because they don't have the wealth
and influence to stop it. But here we

(02:19:48):
are.
As the one pretending he's fighting for those
people are the one taking advantage of them
as we speak. Same what's going on in
North Carolina, by the way, as you're being
tricked into paying for an expensive device.
All the secrecy around XAI's facility has some
residents eager for more information.
One told Forbes they parked outside the data
center on a public road and tried to
shoot drone footage of the site.

(02:20:09):
Before, they were visited by a pair of
armed guards who showed up in an unark
unmarked vehicle.
Maybe Memphis police for all we know. Maybe
the FBI.
They sign NDAs. I guess we'll never know.
Point though,
armed guards
in an unmarked vehicle.
Now maybe you think that's normal today, just
any company, but that's not what I see.

(02:20:29):
I've they're major companies that I mean, I
used to live right next to a an
in,
Intel, like a Google. And the point is
that you walk right up the front door.
So what's the difference? Well, they're working on
things that might be a little bit more
contentious. I think that's the point, and I
think they know that.
Consider that for yourself.
Lastly, on this point,

(02:20:51):
it turns out
that a lot of the people that might
be perceived as more on the right of
this conversation are starting to turn against Elon
Musk.
Kinda hard to see. It's rather kind of
obvious why.
I mean, you're marching out the great reset,
and it's kind of anybody with even a
a fraction of integrity is gonna go, woah.
Hold on a minute. So what's funny is

(02:21:11):
even on, like, the whole Tim Pool chaos,
the one person who seems to and and,
look. I I I've had plenty of criticism
over the years. I would love to see
the Lew Kreadowski of old, the one that
used to be doing more real journalism, in
my opinion. But he's been the one person
in that conversation who has at least pushed
back on some of the s absurdities that
we see in that con like about Israel
or or,
Trump or any of this stuff. And he

(02:21:31):
has. He he and he gets a little
kick push back from them in that conversation.
Or he was the one that pushed at
the idea of the operation warp speed mattering
because it does. And Tim Pool is like,
I'm so tired of hearing this. Yeah. Who
cares about people being murdered by operation warp
speed?
But he writes that he does this video
called Elon's Tesla Robotaxis are a Trojan horse.
Interesting.
And Just A Thought, who wrote a recent

(02:21:52):
article for TLEV, says Elon Musk, along with
Trump, RFK, Tollsea, and the entire Rescue the
Republic and Team Unity
squad
are a Trojan horse for all WEF policies
and more. Not to mention Carlson, Brand, and
all the other globalist cheerleaders.
Here is 5 times August, who, at least
for the most part, which I love his
music and I'm a big supporter of him

(02:22:13):
in general, he's been more on the Trump
side of it, supporting that, I think, in
a lot of ways. At least more so
on the Republican side of it. But he
came out and said this, which I think
is important.
Follow me here, he says. Because obviously, no
people are gonna push back. Elon buys Twitter.
Everyone celebrates free speech again, in quotes.
Earns trust of the people.
Brings on Yaccarino.

(02:22:33):
Wet World Economic Forum Yaccarino, who talked about
mask mandates, forcing vaccines, censorship,
working with ADL. That's who she is. Change
his name to x.
X becomes the, quote, everything app for chat,
purchases entertainment. That hasn't happened yet, by the
way. So that's the WeChat argument. And as
far as I know, even though I do
think that's where it's going, the only thing

(02:22:54):
we know is that he said that in
one meeting that was tweeted out
about we should do that.
I turned into WeChat. I know a lot
about it. But I think that's what's happening.
But just to be clear, I don't know
of anything else that suggests that is what's
happening, but I do believe that's coming. He
said then it says, Iacarino now discussing a
social credit score under the guise of brand
safety, awful lawful.

(02:23:15):
Quote, everything app eventually ties to social credit
score.
Everything app plus social credit score rolls into
Neuralink.
Neuralink mandated to use Twitter. Now that one
seems like a bit of a stretch to
me, but you could see it could be
the way this goes.
Morons actually do it out of convenience.
Voila. Microchip and control population.
It's a trap.

(02:23:36):
So what's funny
is that it's so it's so it's such
a obvious
procession here. Like, we can see where this
goes if you're just, like, 5 times August,
have the integrity to point it out. Now
whether it becomes the you have to have
a brain chip to be able to use
it. I find that mean, if we're talking
about, you know, so many years down the
line, maybe. Or maybe tomorrow. I don't know.
But I feel like that one might be

(02:23:57):
the hardest to kind of get to happen.
But it it you could stop short and
just simply say credit score, digital ID, access
to these things, and that will be the
next step. I completely understand that.
Here's another one. Oh, no. This one's not
negative. So I have there's a lot of
them. You're gonna see some people out there
that you might not expect who are beginning
to see concerns with Elon Musk.

(02:24:17):
This is Kanoa the Great saying Joe Rogan
says the establishment is terrified of Donald Trump
and Musk and their plan for government efficiency.
I just can't lie I cannot laugh in
saying that out loud. That's why I think
they're really terrified of Trump, Joe Rogan says.
Palm face. And I say, this selection season,
it in particular

(02:24:39):
seems to be separating the wheat from the
chaff.
Now whether you ever thought Joe Rogan was
we set a chaff, the bottom line is
that I I think a lot of people
whether they might just not be fully they
are being
pulled
by everything
to the side of Trump. And it seems
lazy. It seems like it seems like to
me, it seems like them coming out and
saying,

(02:25:00):
you know, it like, the somebody in a
middle position going, Trump, the the what what's
the right frame? The point coming out and
saying the opposite, and we go, then it
must be Trump. Like, it seems that clumsy
to me. That by saying one thing, we
assume the opposite. How the world with everything
we know, we pretend that they're afraid of
Trump. You mean the guy that literally rolled
out the biggest agenda we've seen? Who is

(02:25:21):
par actively involved with every deep state agenda
that we know about despite the fact that
we just ignore that because Trump or Elon?
Seems kinda sad to me, but people are
falling for it. Here's an old video on
the platform band dot video that I was
banned on, by the way.
In case you forgot about that. Check this
out.
Still pops up, I think.

(02:25:43):
Look at that.
Alright, Nick.
Watch what happens.
Oops. Nothing there. Now it used to pop
up and show TLAB in the background. And
for those who don't know, I definitely had
this channel and it definitely was being used.
And I even showed videos on it before.
And then banned dot video, I suppose it
free speech platform, banned the last American vagabond.

(02:26:06):
Very easy to see.
I wrote I did a whole show on
it back in the day. That should matter
to you if you care about free speech.
But on this not free speech platform, Greg
Reese put this out on 2021.
Elon Musk exposed. It says the fake genius
to help lead humanity into the abyss.
Now, seems like things have changed since then.

(02:26:27):
Lastly,
I mean, it's just so cartoonish.
Like, this cheesy, cartoonish way.
Vivek Ramaswami says, we we live in a
1776
like moment
in America.
And there's little doubt that Elon Musk is
the Benjamin Franklin of our time.
It's it's just crazy. I mean, look. I

(02:26:49):
would have said that was stupid before he
was involved with the republicans and Trump. That's
dumb. That's a really dumb thing to say
in every possible way if you actually look
at the information as opposed to the narrative
around Elon Musk.
That's sad. I mean, and and even like
Gerald says you should get his autograph. Like,
it's
it's cheesy. It's sad. It's very small.
And the point is, I said I refuse

(02:27:10):
to believe that most people are this naive
or this stupid. 2 party illusion.
First of all, could you argue we're in
a 1976 like moment? I mean, maybe in
the sense of government overreach,
but we're not in that moment. Do you
know why? Because
in the 17 1776
moment, at least, presuming we have the information
correct from that time,

(02:27:31):
we were talking about people in positions of
influence and power that were risking everything they
had to fight for your liberty and freedom.
Now, yes, they love to frame that as
what they're doing. All these billionaires and wealthy
elitists pretending like they're the independent media. They're
not doing that though. In no way are
they risking anything. And secondarily,
they're fighting for the same things as the

(02:27:52):
democrats. You just tell yourself otherwise. I mean,
I literally just went through half of it.
So it's not even remotely that.
This is like pretending that the other side
of the British government is gonna save you
from the British government. That's not what's happening
here, guys. We are not fighting against the
they are the government fighting for more control
over you.
And Vivek knows that. These people are all

(02:28:13):
playing their roles.
So, let's shift into foreign policy.
So, we've already gone very long. So, there's
a lot to get to, guys. So, please
stick around. We have a lot to get
to. I'm gonna finish this out. I wanna
talk about everything else that's going on in
foreign policy that I think you need to
know about if you haven't seen it. And
I guarantee what we get into next is
some of the stuff you probably haven't seen
anywhere else. In most cases, especially if you

(02:28:36):
watch only
Mainframe and mainstream alternative.
But let's get into it. I wanna start
with
this.
I mean, I'm still kind of blown away
how little this has been talked about. Jeremy
Lufredo.
So if you don't remember the story,
very recently, I forget the exact date. I
think it was
just after this. He was arrested by it

(02:28:57):
by the Israeli government. I'm gonna read from
you the factual the the tweet here from
Andre x
who breaks this down. Who's one of the
people that was take arrested alongside of him.
Now, Jeremy was kept. They released everybody but
him
and kept him for another, I think, 3
or 4 days and then released him.
But made him as up until this moment,
as I understand it, are making him stay

(02:29:18):
in Israel. I think it was supposed to
be maybe until this day or at least
when they were ruling on something. I'm looking
for any updates. And if you have any
updates in the chat, let me know.
Because the crazy part about this is they're
not only arresting an American citizen for doing
journalism
because he was inconvenient for them. I argue
because they know of what he's doing.
Because it can show you the mainstream journalist

(02:29:39):
or reporter
who was pointing to the same things.
Who was not arrested.
Who was far mainstream journalist. Re reporter. So
it went much further. Had much more influence.
And all they're reporting on is that they
did hit military targets, and it was targeted.
And Iran didn't kill anybody.
And yet they went after him. I think

(02:29:59):
it was and they use the argument that
he was there giving information to the enemy.
I think this is about trying to suppress
people that are actually going to reveal the
full picture of what Israel is and what
they're doing.
And yet, your government has not said a
word.
Yeah. As far as I could tell, they
have not spoken up. I mean, even the
Guardian wrote an article about Alfredo. I'll get
to that in a second.

(02:30:20):
Where are all the America first people? Can
you imagine if this was an Israeli? Can
you imagine if this was on the other
side of the conversation?
Oh my god. We we wouldn't stop talking
about this.
The sad thing is that I guarantee he
has suffered.
My opinion. But, I mean, I don't know
how look at what everything else we've seen.
The people that were released were suffered or

(02:30:42):
had suffered. I'll read it to you. Now
this tweet was on the 6th. While on
the ground in Israel,
he says, I was able to track down
the impact sites of Iranian missiles on the
key on key Israeli military and intelligence installations,
including the Navitim airbase, which they seemingly,
definitely hit, and Mossad headquarters, despite the Israeli
military censors' official ban on publishing the locations.

(02:31:05):
Now remember the Mossad headquarters part. We're gonna
come back to that.
So then right after this, he was detained
arrested,
beat
up, and put in jail.
Now on the
11th,
Andre x was released and he says, I
was or at least was posting this. Oh,
I was illegally detained by the Israeli army
with 4 other journalists, he says. Here's what

(02:31:26):
happened.
On October 8, 2024,
at approximately 1 PM, a car with 5
journalists, an American journalist, that's Lofredo, a Palestinian
journalist, a Russian Israeli journalist, and a Canadian
Israeli videographer,
and an Israeli photographer
was stopped. Now let's think about that too.
So 3 of these people were Israeli. And
that's my point about it's Zionism that they

(02:31:47):
actually care about. It doesn't matter what you
will say you are if you're doing the
wrong thing. That's Zionism will attack Zionism if
they're doing the wrong thing. And it says,
they were stopped at a checkpoint in the
West Bank.
The checkpoint separates areas c and b. All
the journalists were allowed
to be on both sides by Israeli occupation
law.

(02:32:07):
They were held for an hour and a
half in the car, despite being allowed to
be where they were, while the IOF collected
their documents.
The IOF searched their car, going through personal
items. The photographer later discovered that her underwear
was removed from her bag and placed on
top of her belongings because exactly.
Because what else would happen? I mean, do

(02:32:27):
we really need to pretend that we haven't
seen the thousands of videos of these creeps
going through people's lingerie in Gaza after murdering
their families? And that's not every Israeli or
every Jew, but there is an obvious dark
overlap here to what's going on in this
country.
That's not my opinion. As we've seen Harrettes'
writings articles about the rape epidemic or the
fact that it went from
1 in 4 women in IDF are sexually

(02:32:50):
abused and 3 years later it's 1 in
2. I recently went over this.
There's a problem in all of this, guys,
and it's not secret. I I, the report
from Horetz said that
literally 100%
100%
of the foreign agriculture workers reported being sexually
abused by an Israeli worker Israeli
citizen.

(02:33:12):
A 100%.
Like, I don't even know how that's possible.
Right there.
Jerusalem Post.
100%
of foreign agriculture workers were assaulted according to
Israeli experts.
I mean, that's just there's something very bad
going on here guys that we and I

(02:33:32):
think the world knows this by now, which
what we're seeing.
So back to the story. Even when they're
just casually stopping, an Israeli journalist, they take
her underwear out of her bag
because they're creeps.
The soldiers that illegally requested that the journalist
had had hand in their phones. And when
they refused, the soldiers pointed a gun at
1 of the journalists, hit him with their

(02:33:54):
it with their hands and the barrel of
a gun,
then dragged him out of the car, slammed
him into the concrete.
When lying on the ground, they pointed 2
guns at his head. The rest of the
journalists exited the car and the military raided
it, confiscated phones, cameras, and personal items. Now
I don't know if that was Jeremy or
not. Something tells me it was.
The journalists were told to sit in the

(02:34:15):
sun in 35 Celsius degree heat, so very
hot, on the side of the road. And
after an hour, the Palestinian journalist began to
feel faint and requested an ambulance to be
ordered.
The soldiers refused and didn't let anyone move
to the shade, shouting insults and Israeli nationalist
slogans.
After 2 hours, the soldiers handcuffed and blindfolded

(02:34:36):
the journalists.
The Israeli photographer had a panic attack and
started throwing up. And after starting,
stating that she was Israeli, was allowed to
remain with remain without a blindfold.
Now why do you think she's getting so
worked up?
Think about this for a second. She's an
Israeli journalist
who's being detained and now seemingly does the

(02:34:56):
process she knows well. Blindfolded.
Feet up.
Where are you gonna go?
You're gonna go to a rape prison. You're
gonna go to a torture prison. You're gonna
go to the places where we've already seen
all of this happening. Now those are actually
accurate terms based on what we have now
learned through Israeli media, that there is an
epidemic.
So she probably started to have a panic

(02:35:17):
attack because she knows what's gonna happen if
she gets taken. That's my opinion.
That's why she I'm an Israeli. And now,
okay. Okay. We'll pull back on you.
Interesting.
The Palestinian journalist was left in the sun
for 2 more hours. Then he was released.
In the meantime now it's it's really interesting.
They released the Palestinian journalist
and the Israeli journalist.
In the meantime, the other 4 journalists were

(02:35:39):
stacked on top of each other into a
military jeep and taken to a military base.
All because they were journalists.
They there, they were held blindfolded and handcuffed
to the floor for 2 hours while being
insulted and interrogated by the soldiers. The soldiers
told the female Israeli photographer, the other one,
the one was released, that she should've she

(02:36:00):
should have been raped by Hamas.
So whatever this one said that got them
to release on her, the other one didn't.
So now she's there, and they're saying you
should have been raped by Hamas.
Clearly, the good guys in the conversation. Right?
She's an Israeli, mind you. See? It's about
Zionism, ladies and gentlemen. At approximately 4 PM,

(02:36:20):
the IOF passed the illegal detained journalist to
the police,
who took them to the police station.
The 2 male journalists remained blindfolded until arriving
at the Mal Adyum Shah police station
in an illegal Israeli settlement. 1 hour later,
at the station, the journalists were forced to
be photographed in front of an Israeli flag
with a nationalist slogan on it while the

(02:36:40):
off the officers were insulting them.
A journalist was threatened with physical violence for
smiling.
The journalists were interrogated in regards to their
political affiliation and work, refused the right to
see a lawyer, denied food and water until
many repeated requests.
What a democracy.
And then it says the 2 male journalists

(02:37:00):
were denied food completely.
The 2 female journalists were released without charges
at 11 PM. The Russian Israeli journalist was
released at midnight. The American journalist was held
for 3 days and released Friday.
So So that's the point. It's released, but
made to stay in Israel. That's what we'll
come to next. October 11th.
So that's when he was apparently let go

(02:37:21):
from their
immediate custody. But they removed all of his
devices, and they said he legally had to
stay in Israel until they were done in,
I guess, manufacturing a story about him. The
army confiscated 2 phones and 1 camera that
they have yet to return.
This marks
a precedent for IOF treatment of Israelis and
internationals,
but this is the standard procedure

(02:37:42):
for kidnapping Palestinians across the West Bank.
That's important.
So g d d geopolitics
has an update, and this was an up
update as of 10th, simply saying that he,
also, I think this one,
technically, the 11th was the other one after
that. I've I pulled a lot of this
in together from other shows. Independent American journalist

(02:38:03):
was known for his work at the gray
zone.
He published the information openly and fully without
His arrest came after he revealed precise details
of the bombing. He published information openly and
fully without attempting to hide anything, it says.
If this information constitutes aiding the enemy, many
other journalists in Israel, including Israeli reporters, should

(02:38:24):
also be arrested, said attorney
Leah Tazelem, who is representing him in this
defense. Quote, a spy would have act would
not have acted so publicly and transparently. That's
what it was for. So the point being
is they posted this very publicly knowing he
was there. Everyone can see. Why would a
spy do that? You see how dumb this
is? It's just clumsy.
And on top of that, so too did
a lot of other people, including another American

(02:38:46):
journalist or at least a mainstream journalist. It
says, Lofredo has been charged with, quote, aiding
the enemy during warfare
for documenting missile impact sites. Think about that.
His army his his arrest came on the
same day that Al Jazeera cameraman was shot
in the neck by IOF forces who we
recently reported on. The US embassy claims to
be monitoring the situation closely.

(02:39:06):
What a bunch of cowards. Absolute cowards.
Thomas Melanin,
he says, in war, you want to control
the narrative.
And points to this late this post from
Sprinter
that says an American reporter was arrested, this
is on 13th,
In Israel for publishing a report on the
locations of Iranian mister crowd. Now he's talking

(02:39:28):
about Jeffrey Jeremy Lofredo. I don't know why.
This was funny. On the other show, I
read something about a Jeffrey right before I
talked about Jeremy and then, like, now I
can't stop doing that. The point
is that he's talking about Jeremy.
But yet, nonetheless, shows you an image that
is not Jeremy, and that's the mainstream journalist,
the one we were talking about. But it
says in his report, he also said that

(02:39:49):
the Iran that Iran deliberately
fired one of the missiles into an area
500 meters away from the headquarters. That's what
they're using to argue they bombed civilian locations.
So he didn't do that. Jeremy did not
because that's not what happened. The proof actually
is very clear about what they did attack
As everyone seems to be reporting at this
point. But for whatever reason, you can read

(02:40:10):
it for yourself, whatever, Sprinter is misrepresenting this,
and shows you an article from Y Net.
You know, the Israeli platform. American journalist disclosed
secrets during Iran attack. And show Saint Jeffrey
Blufredo.
Now again, people make mistakes. I don't know.
I don't I don't know whether that's this
or not. But I think it's important to
recognize this person put this together without checking
to see that this was was or was
not Jeremy.

(02:40:31):
Due diligence is important.
And this person responds by saying and this
is up this is their opinion. You can
decide for yourself. Sprinter is lying here and
lies constantly. The video of the reporter examining
the impact site is this person, Nick Schiff,
Shiffrin, who is from PBS. That's the one
that was reporting the exact same things that
Jeremy was, but didn't get it. And and
in Israel, but nobody arrested him. And if

(02:40:53):
with on a mainstream platform. And is reporting
in Israel to this day. Sprinter is just
trying to trick people like always. That's what
they think.
So I just think it's important to consider.
He could just be wrong is my point.
But either way,
you you make it look like Jeremy was
reporting that that they
more
conflating it with a mainstream journalist that makes

(02:41:13):
it seem as if he was doing something
he shouldn't have been.
That's not lost on me.
Oh, and that I think I forget what
this was for. Oh, it's just the updating
to see if there's anything new. I don't
see that. So reading into the Grayzone article
about this they put on the 11th.
Now it says,
Israeli soldiers arrested
and it's important. It's weird that nobody's mentioning

(02:41:35):
this. The Jewish American reporter.
Right. So Jeremy Flayo is a Jew. That
matters, doesn't it?
Again,
it matters because if
it was about Judaism,
then it would make a difference to them.
It's not. So the point is that it's
about Zionism. So here is a Jewish reporter
who is reporting the truth, and they attack

(02:41:57):
him for it.
So it's so if he was the it's
obvious point as always is that Zionism is
what's most important in this conversation. The Ethiopian
Jews in Israel are treated like second class
citizens. The Orthodox Jews that protest Zionism in
Israel get beat up every day. The Jewish
reporter that highlights the wrong thing gets arrested,
beaten up, and possibly worse. I hope not.
I just wanna make sure we don't miss

(02:42:18):
that point. And it says the Jewish American
reporter and 3 other journalists at a checkpoint
in the American West Bank on October 8.
Now it's funny, though. It wouldn't be the
anyway, it doesn't matter. So it goes on
to say, while Lofredo's colleagues were released after
11 hours,
the West Bank division of the Israeli police
opened an

(02:42:38):
the Lofredo for supposedly aiding the enemy in
a time of war.
According to the police, Jeremy had revealed the
locations of missile drops near or inside sensitive
security facilities with the aim of bringing this
to the notice of the enemy and thereby
assisting them in their future attacks.
What a fabrication. Now it says on October
9th, an Israeli court declared it had, quote,

(02:43:00):
reasonable suspicion
to extend
his imprisonment. See how easy that is?
For Palestinian children?
20 years later, you're still in prison. That's
not a joke.
During this time frame, post October 7th, I've
seen at least two examples of people released
that were there for 20 years.

(02:43:21):
20 years. That's not a joke.
Never charged with a crime. Imagine spending 20
years in
a administrative detention,
probably being beaten up in rape as we're
now finding out. 20 years.
Now, I'm sure it'll be different seeing as
how an as an American, which it shouldn't
make any difference, used to human being. But
from the American government's perspective, it's pretty uncomfortable.

(02:43:41):
And people like myself, who are Americans, are
screaming at my government for not I guarantee
it won't be as bad. My point though,
it could be if nobody was talking about
this.
Oh, we wanna extend it indefinitely.
So you're you know, by the way, your
government has the same things if they really
wanted to. Indefinite attention, should they desire that?
Should they say national security?

(02:44:02):
Now judge Shahari,
Shahri Sharah ordered Lofredo's release,
stating that since Israeli military censors agreed to
allow Winant to publish both, quote, word of
Jeremy's arrest and the publications that led to
his arrest,
then there's no longer justification to continued detention.
Think about how funny that is. So even

(02:44:23):
the court is going, well, hold on. You're
you're telling us that you need to keep
him
because this information might get out, but you
published it. You literally published that you arrested
him and the thing that he said. You
published the information he published.
So what are you talking about?
And they still go, well, they appealed the
decision and said that we, you know, we're
looking for more, essentially.

(02:44:44):
The police also complained that Lofredo had refused
to unlock his phone for them.
Ah, now we're getting to the meat of
it. Insisting they needed more time to crack
the device. In other words, we don't have
any evidence. We need to keep searching for
evidence.
That's what they're doing. Or, really, I think
it's also about the fact this is a
person who they would love to make a

(02:45:04):
big deal about in regard to the gray
zone, in regard to people calling out Israel.
So they are digging through that as best
they can. There are he's under no right
to give them the code. This is my
point about why I think he was the
one that was beaten up and dragged out
of the car because he refused to hand
over his devices like I would.
It says, we believe that we will find
things on the phone, and we will be
able to link them to an alleged crime.

(02:45:26):
So you don't have any evidence, and you're
hoping to find some. So why you arrest
him again?
It's incredible how bad they are at this.
Like, it's just so easy to see the
contradiction in logic. Everything. And that's not just
online propaganda.
They just seem to be this stupid and
bad at what they do. At least in
the government perspective. And guess what? You won't
surprise Ryan by telling you their governments are
incompetent.

(02:45:46):
But it goes on to say from the
detailed investigative actions, there is no fear of
disruption from Jeremy. And in light of the
reasons stated above, the case of the danger
is also not clear. So they they let
him go.
And they're demanding he stay in Israel. It
says though they or they ordered the journalists
be released, she gave police, why,

(02:46:07):
until October 20th
to continue their digital strip search.
Then until then, Lofredo will remain without his
passport and will not be permitted to return
home until his family to see his family.
Where is the US government?
At what point in the world is a
foreign government allowed to seize your passport under,
no stated grounds?

(02:46:28):
We were looking for a crime.
Can you imagine if that was Iran? Can
you imagine if it was Russia or China
or anybody they could make a stink about?
Even if this person was caught spying, as
we've seen, they would still make a case
about it. But when you have a legitimate
case of a foreign government detaining him for
no justify justified reason,
which is a violation of even Israeli right,

(02:46:49):
then they don't say a word.
These are bad people, guys. These are the
bad people of our time.
Now it says just what Israeli officials hope
to uncover in their search of Alfredo's cell
phone remains a mystery. Also unclear is why
the investigation focuses exclusively on the Fredo
and not on any number of numerous other

(02:47:10):
reporters who reported the locations of the strikes
in the same way and the same time.
Again, citing Nick Schifrin right there.
Isn't that interesting?
They're picking him out for some specific reason.
Suggest that the Israeli government views the American
people and the free press itself as a
legitimate target. Guys, it doesn't suggest that. They

(02:47:31):
do.
And frankly, the Israeli government sees literally anybody
anywhere as a target should they decide to.
And they've made this statement publicly. They've said
many times in the Knesset. We can legislate
anywhere in the world.
International law does not bind our actions. Netanyahu
and many others have said this publicly about
the West Bank, but they make it a

(02:47:51):
general statement.
They're saying, look. The international law does not
bind our actions. We can legislate anywhere in
the world.
The US and, again, I I was gonna
search for it real quick, but I'm it's
too show's too long today. Just type that
in. Exactly. You'll find it. They've they've they've
publicly said this. Now it says the US
has an obligation to defend its journalists without

(02:48:12):
political prejudice,
particularly
when they are fulfilling the vital task of
providing the public with facts on the ground.
But, of course, your government is literally complicit
in the crimes he's exposing. So, gee, I
wonder why they suddenly don't care about American
rights.
Wild.
Now here's The Guardian.

(02:48:34):
This was on 11th. Why has Israel detained
American journalist, Jeffrey Lufredo? I mean, even The
Guardian.
Think about how crazy that is. You have
UK media writing about this. Where's Fox? Where's
CNN? Where's Biden? Where's Trump?
Are you know, aren't we all about the
whole idea that there's they they have to
come out and go, I condemn the thing.
Right? Where are they?
They're not taking they're not saying, we support

(02:48:55):
Israel. They're also not condemning it. They're meekly
hiding from it.
Of course, it was a big partisan swing
issue. They'd be all out there stating their
case, and the damns won't, and they're doing
it. Not when it comes to something that's
not useful for them. They don't care about
you if they can't use it.
Here's what the guardian said.
Lofredo has reportedly been released from custody, but

(02:49:17):
is barred from leaving Israel as his authorities
try to build their case. That's even what
the guardian writes.
And it says, it should serve to highlight
the plight of dozens of Palestinian journalists who
are being held incommunicado
in Israeli prisons. Meaning they're they're Again, that's
what I was saying. Some of them for
years, decades,
not allowed to speak to anybody, being abused,

(02:49:39):
being starved,
if they're ever released.
1000. They have 10,000.
And these are ones we know about. That's
what they've admitted.
Admit, without charge.
And they're saying, as we focus on this,
don't forget about the Palestinians that nobody raises
a cry for. They're still there.

(02:50:00):
Alfredo's American citizenship makes it more likely, but
by no means
guaranteed that the Biden administration might actually care
if he's being detained. Clearly not.
Because we're 3 days later, I haven't heard
a peep. Let me know in the chat.
Have you heard anybody anywhere? Like, genuinely asking
in the chat. Have you guys heard anybody
anywhere in the corporate media or the government
of the US speaking out about this? I

(02:50:22):
I wanna know. Let me know if you've
seen that. Now the day of Alfredo's arrest,
another gray zone reporter had a heated exchange.
And you remember this, we showed you, with
the state department spokesperson,
Matthew Miller,
accusing the US of recklessly risking nuclear war.
Remember this was the part where he said,
we're done with this BS.
He really called him out, Said we're done

(02:50:43):
with all your lies. And maybe that has
something to do with it. It says, but
whether Lofredo's detention is justifiable
has nothing to do with Grey Zone's editorial
standards. It's solely a question of whether he
was arrested for a crime,
or for reporting stories authorities didn't want to
be told. Now, of course, even The Guardian
not even The Guardian. The Guardian as another

(02:51:04):
mainstream media platform that's willing to lie to
you. They had to make this point about,
well, Grey Zone is propaganda for China and
Russia, which by the way, I don't agree.
I've got plenty of issues I could point
out about plenty of things. The point though
is that the idea that they would lob
that in is just an effort to give
you the thought, oh, maybe it's justified.
But, yeah, then they go they pat themselves
and go, well, even if it was. That's
just that's a

(02:51:25):
that's not in my opinion, that's not what
journalists would do right there. You don't add
the level of why maybe you would think
they should be arrested. No. No. No. If
you don't have that evidence, you don't float
that as something though. The bottom line is
you could say, maybe Israel feels they have
a justified reason for doing so. But that's
how you would do it as a journalist.
No. They're trying to give you an undermining
reason to throw it out and say, well,
he probably works for Russia, so who cares?

(02:51:47):
That's what I genuinely think. So I just
wanna point that out. That's why it says,
but
as weather is dust detention is justifiable
what do you mean whether it is? Like,
what is crazy that is? It has nothing
to do with De Grey's own editorial standards.
It's just wild to me. But it says,
if Israel's theory is that reporters illegally share
information

(02:52:08):
with the enemy
whenever the enemy reads the news
that could criminalize a whole lot of journalism.
The point they're making is that if, look,
somebody reads the reporting and they go, oh,
that gives me insight to what's going on.
Well, that's just journalism.
And and obviously. And they know that too.
But it says if Israel has proof that
Lofredo did something more nefarious than that, it

(02:52:29):
should say so. And be specific. And this
is my point. They don't. They're currently on
a fishing mission to find something.
And your government doesn't care about that. So
much for your rights,
whether international or otherwise.
The dissenter reports that several more mainstream journalists
reported similar information
and footage
and
to, to, but weren't charged. And if so,

(02:52:50):
why was a particularly adversarial journalist singled
out? Well, we know why. It remains to
be seen if the Biden administration,
platitudes about press freedom
apply only to journalists they like. But more
broadly, it's shameful that the US has utterly
failed to hold Israel,
its close ally, and a recipient of 1,000,000,000
in USAID,
excuse me, accountable for even just one of

(02:53:12):
the many journalists it's arrested, detained, or killed
in the previous year. That's pretty crazy for
the Guardian to write.
And I'll show you some of the examples
we go through. The point
is that, obviously,
it is a platitude. If you're screaming about
free speech and freedom of the press, while
ignoring all of the thousands of examples of
people being then you don't care about these

(02:53:34):
things.
Now it's an American journalist, and all it's
doing is putting a shining
spotlight on the fact that you don't care.
Now it says Israel has killed well over
a 100 journalists in the war. Strong evidence
indicates that Israel is deliberately targeting some of
the journalists it's killed. That's some. All of
them.
I mean, we I think that there's no
question this is all deliberate based on everything.

(02:53:54):
I mean, there are there are studies. There's
international entities. There are human rights groups. But,
guys, we shouldn't be debating how obvious this
is.
And it's happening in Lebanon. Now
there have been multiple reports of journalists and
their families receiving death threats from Israeli officials
for the reporting. Think about that. That's like
that's like,
I don't know, any pickier official.
Somebody in congress

(02:54:15):
calling you and saying, you're we're gonna kill
your family if you keep reporting on this.
That's what's happening in Israel. You know how
crazy that is. Including from Mohammed Mawish and
Hassan Hamad, both of whom were subsequently attacked.
Mish Hamad Wish survived. 19 year old Hamad's
remains had to be carried away in several
boxes and bags.

(02:54:35):
This is all The Guardian. Look at how
much has changed since October 7th. They're telling
you what these people are.
But less discussed is that Israel has also
arrested dozens of Palestinian journalists since October 7th
as documented by groups like Committee to Protect
Journalists and Reporters Without Borders.
As of October 9th
2024,

(02:54:55):
according to JPC,
2043,
Palestinian journalists remain imprisoned by Israel.
43, no charge, just because they claim they
scream the word Hamas.
Many of them are held under Israel's administrative
detention law, which allows for indefinite detention without
charge or trial.
What a democracy. In some instances, even a

(02:55:16):
detainee's location is unknown. Now before you start
screaming it's because of October 7th in the
war, this has been going on for decades.
Despite years of criticism that this system violates
international law and, again, I see it's not
criticism, guys. We have a law
that's a violation of that law. So if
you cared about being objective, you would go,
despite it violating international law, not the Guardian

(02:55:37):
though, even though they're telling you some other
things. Like, it's just so constant how you
see this bleed into their coverage.
It says despite that violation of international law,
Israel has doubled down on its use during
the war, including against journalists.
Even worse,
numerous human rights organizations have reported evidence of
torture,
including cases of documented
by CPJ, by Doctors Without Borders.

(02:55:59):
Torture,
rape of journalists, they're reporting this as well.
Journalist Daya Al Kalut spoke to CPJ after
his release about his 33 day detention by
the IDF, during which he says he was
physically and psychologically tortured.
Al Kalut said he was interrogated about his
journalism and subjected to physical violence, including being
blindfolded for an extended period and forced to

(02:56:20):
maintain squatting position. Now that is actually documented
as a form of torture. In the the,
what's the I forget the name of the
body. Like, the groups that kinda outline these
things. UN being one of them, but there's
another one.
Being the way they do this with the
hands behind, up in the air, squatting, blindfolded,
like, that's torture. Like and then make them
sit this way for 24 hours.
It says he also described daily ghosting

(02:56:41):
or, quote, being handcuffed with the hands upward
or behind the back while blind blindfold is
what I'm talking about. He lost almost a
£100.
Rights organizations have also called attention to this
the case of Mozaam a a rama Arana
Armarna, excuse me, a photojournalist attained by the
IDF. According to a letter to the United
Nations signed by numerous groups,

(02:57:02):
Amarna was, quote, beaten and abused by IDF
soldiers during his arrest. Now we could right
now is what we know about how prevalent
even her rats has been ex has exposed
about the rape
epidemic in their prison structure. And remember, they
they were debating on public TV whether it
was justified to rape prisoners.
So I think we all know what's going
on here. Is that when they say abused,

(02:57:24):
I often wonder how many men don't wanna
admit that happened to them. Just my personal
thought. But it says, the Doctors Without Borders
has also cited a statement by Amarna's lawyer
that the journalist had been subjected to repeated
violence by his jailers who have also deprived
him of basic medical care. Undoubtedly, there are
more stories just like these. Now realize, these
are people that have been released.

(02:57:45):
So they didn't even charge them with a
crime and they released them. So they can't
even claim their Hamas.
And yet, they tortured them. Starved them. Denied
them care.
Because that's who we're dealing with, guys.
This is undoubtedly because it really it's about
Palestinians. It's about Arabs. It says undoubtedly there
are more stories like these among the dozens
of Palestinian journalists who remain imprisoned, and may

(02:58:06):
lack access to legal counsel. And outside world.
And the Guardian or TLAD to talk about
those, so nobody even knows.
Yet the human United States, for all its
claims about valuing
press freedom, has done nothing of consequence about
it.
Crazy.

(02:58:27):
Now, here is Aaron Mate's post on Instagram.
Statement from the gray zone on Jeremy. This
is as of,
3 days ago.
It simply says, Jeremy is an American journalist
beaten and kidnapped by the IDF forces on
October 9th. The US state department has yet
to release his detainment.
Address it.
How is that even possible?
It is when you realize that they are

(02:58:49):
not what they pretend to be.
Now here is the state department number.
1-888-407-4747.
Call them to address your concerns.
Now also to con and to include,
on October 3rd,
Israel killed an American.
Funny how little attention that got. As indiscriminate

(02:59:11):
strikes on Lebanon continued, an American citizen that
doesn't matter any more than any other human
being, but from the American government perspective,
they didn't say a word.
Do we get to see a pattern here?
So all those people screaming at America first.
Well, either side of your government is not
saying anything about any of these Americans because
Israel's killing them. Maybe you should question what's

(02:59:31):
happening here. As well as the fact
that September 10, 2022,
Shireen Abu Akleh was an American citizen and
a journalist and was killed in cold blood
until they were forced to admit it. Israel
covered up the murder of Shireen Abu Akleh
with US help. Here's just that casual image
of them beating the legs of the men
carrying the casket.

(02:59:52):
Because that's what democracies do. Right? Not a
joke, by the way. There's no violence going
on here. And the video is clear. You
can watch the video. The IDF walked up
in a mob and started hitting the legs
of people carrying her coffin.
You just can't misunderstand what you're looking at
with these things. People just choose to ignore
it.
Lastly, B'Tselem,
if you forgot about this, this is the
leading Israeli human rights group. They put out

(03:00:14):
the report called welcome to hell.
The Israeli prison system as a network of
torture camps.
This is not a joke. This is not
hyperbolic.
It's much worse than we realize.
Your governments don't care. In fact, I even
argue they think of it as a benefit
to themselves.
They use these things just like they would
use anybody else.

(03:00:36):
Now, quickly to go over some, I think,
bull, but, bullet point, like, larger discussion things
I want you to see in that kind
of in that context, but to lead us
into the other conversations.
The squirrel points out, if you haven't seen
this, another UN report's come out.
The latest UN report on Israel's destruction of
hospitals in Gaza
also yet again confirms

(03:00:56):
systematic Israeli mass rape of Palestinian men and
women in their dungeons, or as he calls
rape dungeons in their prison systems. Yet the
entire western media class who fabricated the mass
rape hoax
are still silent on it. So think about
how crazy that is. Is that we've proven
that all of these pushing I mean, even
if you wanna still be blind about it
and pretend that there is viable allegations coming

(03:01:18):
from October 7th when there is not, as
even the Israeli media has been forced to
acknowledge.
There's nothing but Israeli government forceful claims and
things that have been debunked.
But let's just even say, like I said
too, that certainly possible.
Okay. Let's leave it there. Now on the
other side of the conversation, you've got a
waterfall of evidence. Even Pramila Patton, the woman
who was they used to pretend they proved

(03:01:41):
rape, even though she came out and said
they lied about things and it wasn't an
investigation,
she has now come out on the other
side of this and said that Palestinians are
being raped in prisons. Yet, you don't hear
them screaming about that. I wonder why.
The point is there's that report. There's a
UN report. There's human rights reports. There's video
evidence of them literally raping people on TV.
They've defended that and argued whether they should

(03:02:01):
be able to. And yet, you don't hear
them talking about it. All you hear them
do is screech about as Piers Morgan would
do. The evidence of rapes on October 7th
that doesn't exist.
Because they're disgusting
hypocrites.
Or just that bad at their job, probably
both. The latest UN report.
Mass rape of Palestinian women and children.
Here's the actual report.

(03:02:22):
UN Commission on Inquiry of Occupied Territories, Israel
has perpetrated
a concerted policy to destroy Gaza's healthcare system.
This is from the United Nations. As part
of a broader assault on Gaza, committing war
crimes and crimes against humanity, and ex of
extermination.
We've talked we briefly pointed at this. Now
here the actual report, as you can see,

(03:02:42):
the what the section that he was highlighting
is just one part of it.
That's just one section, rape and other forms
of sexual gender based abuse. That's very clear.
And he that's what he's highlighting for you
right
here. Systematic. They're they're
it's not one action. It is an ordered
systems and and again, we've this is why

(03:03:03):
when they had the conversation, they were debating
it on live TV. That they should be
allowed
to rape prisoners.
I mean, it's just the fact that we
even have to have this conversation
is a testament to how blind people are
around this.
Now Muhammad Shahada adds, this is 72 hours
later,
Not one single mainstream media outlet covered this

(03:03:26):
UN report confirming Israel's systematic mass rape of
Palestinians.
Think about that for a second.
Now you could argue that we don't blindly
take it to face. Oh, okay. But when
the UN says that we might have an
indication about something Palestinian, they they it'll be
across all western media. You don't need to
be confused about what that shows you. It's
not Jews controlling the media. It is obvious

(03:03:47):
Israeli government control over a lot of things
in a lot of places in the world,
and that comes down to Zionism, which is
Christian, which is Jewish. In fact, there are
more Christian Zionists today than there are Jewish
Zionists. Either way,
both overlap. Yes. There are Jewish overlaps with
Zionism, but it's about Zionism. When we talk
about that problem, my opinion is simply Jews
who have been manipulated by Zionism or Christians

(03:04:08):
who have been manipulated by Zionism.
Either way,
the point is that we have to be
able to acknowledge this and highlight the fact
that nobody wanted to point it when it
was happening for real, when the evidence was
undeniable
as opposed to manufactured atrocity propaganda.
Jonathan Cook highlights this saying, so what we
all saw, same report,

(03:04:30):
UN finding that they bombed deliberately hospitals is
the main part.
What we all saw and what Israel and
other media kept telling us wasn't happening was
exactly what was happening.
A deliberate targeting bombing,
just controlled demolition of hospitals, churches, mosques, everything
else. But now is the point, of course,
it's too late. Gaza health care system is

(03:04:51):
gone, which is the point, guys. That's what
they wanted.
You think they I mean, at this point,
I don't think they I think accountability is
even on the even they know that this
is not going the way they want it
to. But, nonetheless, they're getting what they want
done because the US government is too meek
and too bought off to actually care about
the things they pretend they're fighting for.
So now, it's too late.

(03:05:12):
This is the point we're making about a
lot of these stories today.
We can't get pulled away by the partisan
BS.
Because this happens. Too late now. They've already
destroyed everything. Now it's not partisan necessarily, but
it's the same kind of dynamic.
We're missing the immediacy of the issue because
we're debating things they were they're pulling you
into the weeds.
They're literally m

(03:05:33):
genociding an entire people.
And the evidence is everywhere.
Everywhere. Literally everywhere. Everything everywhere is showing you
what's going on. And all we can do
is be distracted in partisan angles by people
screaming falsehoods because they're invested in them. And
if we can't see by now that the
leadership or the rulership of this country,
whether it's 99.999%

(03:05:55):
of everybody else, that 1.0001%
is the are the people driving this forward.
Now, miam, Mohammed Safa points out some other
points that I want you to see in
this. Number of journalists killed in wars.
Vietnam War, 63 journalists in 20 years.
World War 2, 67 journalists in 7 years.

(03:06:18):
Gaza, a 176 in 10 months.
He says this violates article 79 of additional
protocol Geneva Conventions, but international law clearly does
not apply to Israel.
I don't know how I should explain that.
You just can't keep making up these lies.
They there's nothing that verifies anything they're saying.
Eunice Theriau also gives you the real world

(03:06:39):
immediate examples
of exact and this is not
his opinion. They're posting these on their own
platforms, and he proves all of this. You
can go to his site. He has it
all listed, all the source material. They're using
his information in the criminal courts.
This says, do not spare them.
Put them to death.
Men, women, children, and infants.

(03:07:02):
He wrote that on was it Facebook?
He says, this is the directive issued by
lieutenant colonel Adi Bakore. So this is an
order given to lower underling IDF members.
Systematic, guys.
Genocide.
It says deputy commander of the 749th battalion.
1 of the main battalions currently fighting in

(03:07:23):
Gaza that has already blown up dozens of
homes, including mosques, in the past weeks. Then
it says, now go attack the Amalek Amalekite.
How do you say that? Amalekites.
Remember, that's a pro a biblical prophecy converse
or biblical reference about destroying everybody even down
to the animals,
which is what Netanyahu and others have said
too. And totally destroy them.

(03:07:44):
Spare them, put them to death. Men men,
women, children, infants, cattle, sheep, camels.
That's what we're dealing with. It's all right
there in front of you, and your government
doesn't care.
Now Common Dreams highlights the historic ICC war
crimes complaint, which is naming a 1000 Israeli
soldiers.
The complaint is not only the largest ever
submitted to ICC, but it is also a

(03:08:05):
milestone in documenting Israeli war crimes. So the
funny thing is is, yeah, they're sure as
hell breaking all these records, but not in
the way they think they are. Most moral
army in the world. No. I mean, just,
like, literally everything negative, they're breaking everywhere. The
amount of journalists, the amount of children, the
amount of chill churches, the amount of death
in a period of time that a bomb's
used, the amount of
complaints for ICC, like, everything.

(03:08:27):
Because they are the most obvious example of
everything we've always been told we're fighting. Everywhere.
That's why this is so confusing for some
people.
Their living embodiment of what we've always been
told we are supposed to be stopping in
the world.
Now Brent Thacker points out what that ICC
conversation is about.
It's in it's actually it's actually the hit
the Henry Job Foundation

(03:08:49):
that's been built because of her.
The the the young girl that was killed
in a car
with 365 bullets, if I remember correctly, by
the IDF.
Now he says the Hamid Jhab Foundation has
filed the ICC complaint against a 1,000
plus Israeli soldiers for war crimes.
The complaint includes 8,000 plus pieces of evidence

(03:09:10):
demonstrating soldiers' direct involvement in these atrocities. I'm
willing to bet you, Ernest Raui, he's he's
been doing an amazing job on this. So
here's the Henry Job Foundation,
and they are putting forward a massive account
or a criminal,
to the a a report to the ICC
about
over a 1000 Israeli soldiers committing genocide. Proof

(03:09:32):
documenting it with 8,000 pieces of evidence.
Now this is gonna this is gonna upset
you, and it should.
You realize how far away we are from
this. Maybe a print back himself has asked
at least 3 times to Matt Miller about
what's the update on on him rejaw him
rejaw. Oh, well, we're we're gonna follow-up. We
have to come back here. I don't need
the information in front of me. I'll I'll
follow-up with Israel. We'll we'll ask him later.

(03:09:53):
Day by day by day by day. And
guess what? After the 1st week, they'd stop.
They told you that. We didn't do anything
wrong. I still reiterate here.
You think Matt Miller doesn't know that? So
what that should translate to you immediate from
an American perspective is that Matt Miller
and the US government
know that they didn't investigate, know that they
didn't care to, or that they did and
they don't find themselves guilty, and he just

(03:10:14):
keeps kicking the can down the road because
he's a coward.
You hear that, Matt Miller? You're a coward.
Because you're running from obvious accountability, which I
get it, you're gonna go to jail. I
hope you do. The bottom line though is
that we as the other people on the
side of this need to see who they
are.
That he is allowing this, that they are
allowing this, and they know what these people

(03:10:35):
are. They're complicit with the murder of this
young child.
Here's what he had to say when this
mainstream journalist asked directly.
Yesterday
Oop. That's not right. This one.
It it has been 253
days since,
this incident where Hind Rajab,

(03:10:55):
was killed. How long does this investigation take?
I can't comment on specifics. You know, each
individual investigation,
it based it is based on what what
evidence you have, on the types of forces,
who who was the forces. As I said,
there is no investigation, military police investigation in
this case, because there has been no identification

(03:11:15):
of wrongdoing on behalf of the military. This
Did you hear that?
Now this gets actually pretty well done by
Skynyr. So they he just said we're we
found no wrongdoing on the part of the
military.
The only person that could be possibly doing
the wrongdoing is the military. This that's because
we have the evidence of the tank shells
that they fired
and the report that they put out saying

(03:11:36):
they were there before they deleted it. The
incident itself is being investigated by a separate
mechanism.
Tell us about, this press release, which was
put out to say that you were conducting
operations in the area, that you were present
there. We're just looking at that press release
now. And then the press release completely disappeared
off your sides.

(03:11:58):
Yanda, I don't know. I if I would
have known before the interview, I would have
looked into it. I really don't know.
So,
so basically, can I I just want to
make it clear that that, the, the satellite
imagery that that
I don't wanna play that again?
I mean, I just it's amazing to me
that they can be so blithely

(03:12:18):
dismissing
of
such an obvious thing. Like, she literally, for
the podcast,
has it on the screen.
She pulls it up on the screen. Here
is your report from your site that says
you were there and then just it vanishes.
And he goes, well, I don't know. Now
if you had told him about it beforehand,
he would've been able to manufacture a lie,
which also would've been clumsy as usual. But,

(03:12:38):
nonetheless, he would've had a thing to say.
Think about how crazy that is.
Least completely disappeared off your sides, which was
put out to say that you were conducting
operations in the area, that you were present
there. We're just looking at that press release
now. And then the press release completely disappeared
off your sides.

(03:12:59):
Yanda, I don't know. I if I would
have known before the interview, I would have
looked into it. I really don't know.
So,
so basically, can I I just want to
make it clear that that, How does she
not follow-up on that?
You have it on your screen. Call them
out for it. The, the satellite imagery that
that planet, a very respected satellite imagery company,

(03:13:22):
that, you know, has,
conducted all sorts of investigations when it comes
to Ukraine, for example, and and, the some
of the incidents that we've seen in Ukraine
in places like, Bucha. We've seen them conduct
investigations in in in China and and what's
been going on with the Uighurs there, for
example. They have they have also,
given us this satellite imagery, and you're disputing,

(03:13:45):
what they're saying that there was military presence
on that day.
I'm saying that our investigation found that there
was no military presence on that day.
Which is what Matt Miller blindly repeats.
So let's be clear.
You have their press release that they published
that says we were there.
You've got real time evidence of the people

(03:14:06):
on the ground who've all reported they saw
the tanks fire on the car. You got
the bullets that they found that were that
they can prove are from the tanks that
are fired. We've already played this. Matt Miller
was told about this.
And then, what was the other part? Hang
it.
No military presence on that day.
How are you blanking on that all of
a sudden?

(03:14:29):
So,
so basically, can I I just want to,
did settle, you know, for example, Ukraine in
places like, Bucha, we've seen them? That I'm
I'm frank. I'm not that's the point I
was gonna say at the end. So then
the lastly, there's the
the
satellite technology. Now, to be clear,
I'm I can't she didn't mention it, but
I'm pretty certain by what she listed off,

(03:14:49):
that's Maxar Technologies which,
that's a CIA cutout without question. So doesn't
mean it's false, though. You realize there's plenty
of weird dynamics going on. So nonetheless so
now you've got the, like we said, the
bullet information. You got local witnesses that saw
it happen. You've got their own press release
that says they were there. All this stuff
on top of that, you got satellite technology
from a CIA cutout company saying, we saw

(03:15:11):
them there.
And all they do is go, that's not
true. I mean, that's that's just perfect. That's
exactly what our government does. You're wrong. Next
story.
Okay. Evidence aside, we got we can see
you on video doing it with the gun
in your hand. Fake news. Moving on. Next
story. It's just it's just lazy and crazy
to me. Conduct investigations
in in in China and and what's been

(03:15:33):
going on with the Uighurs there for example
that there was military mechanism
to try and,
despite that, we pass it on to the
independent and and They're saying that there was
military presence on that day.
I'm saying that our investigation
found that there was no military presence on
that day.
Despite that, we've passed it on to the
independent in investigation

(03:15:54):
mechanism to try and determine if there was.
No. And they didn't do that. According to
literally everybody else, they've never shared anything. Now
what's funny is they say the same thing
in reverse.
The problem is that nobody believes that they're
actually trying to investigate themselves, so it wouldn't
surprise me if that happened. But as Matt
Miller tries to use that as an excuse,
they never gave any more information. Why do
they need somebody else's information to investigate whether

(03:16:16):
they shot tank shells? Like, it's just so
stupid. So let's just say somebody comes and
goes, well, here's my video of your tank
firing that shell. Well, your argument is you
weren't even there. So were you gonna be
like, oh, I guess we were there.
It's just this is so it's on its
face, dishonest.
Everybody can feel this who has a brain.
But we just get dragged along by all
these morons goosestepping to the future.

(03:16:36):
If they come to a different conclusion, they
will pass it on to the ministry advocate
general that will look into it. And if
needs be, we'll open an investigation.
Oh, okay. Good. Another investigation. So you can
investigate the thing that you did. So they're
saying we're investigating. We didn't find anything. So
if you find something, send it through and
we'll start a new investigation.
So how exactly does that end up different
if you already went through it? You found

(03:16:57):
nothing? Like, it's just they they know they've
got this cycle. The US government pretends makes
sense.
They begin a process where they never even
do anything about it. They, for 30 seconds
later, say we didn't find anything and we're
not guilty. The US government goes on pretending
like there's an ongoing investigation and then it
just never changes.
This is really what we keep seeing. And
everybody can see that.
This smug indifference, the way he reports this,

(03:17:19):
like, we'll keep investigating.
It it should bother you because they murdered
this child because she was there and because
she was a Palestinian. If you don't remember,
she was in a car by herself after
her family had been killed by Israel. And
then as they were coming to rescue her,
they had her on the phone, and she
was murdered by Israel with tank shells on
a car she was sitting in by herself.

(03:17:40):
There's there's no question about this.
So this I'll read you what she wrote.
This is the one the woman in the
car in the Sky News.
254 days ago,
Henry Job was killed while trying to flee
with her family. Her heartbreaking phone call, which
is it really is sad. The IDF denied
being in there. A press release published 2

(03:18:00):
weeks later and found by our Sky team
says 3 units were operating nearby. Now here's
what's interesting.
They found it and then as they were
doing the the point is this is what
she stated. It was then deleted. So they
found it before the interview and in the
process of they deleted it. Like, this is
so clumsy and reactive. And it says, I
put the Sky News investigation to the IDF
spokesman, Peter Lerner.

(03:18:23):
Oh, he's right down here. Tried to contact
you directly last night after the interview. After
looking into the issue of the announcement, here's
the link to the website. Contrary to your
report, it wasn't removed. There was a technical
glitch due to the website maintenance. Look at
that.
These guys guys are so ridiculous.
I just can't you can't even make this
up.
Oh my god. Okay. Hold on. We have

(03:18:43):
to do this real quick.
Okay.
Okay. Let's see what this is. The forces
operated in the areas.
So so what is he saying that we
admit to being there now? Is that what
he's actually arguing?

(03:19:06):
Let's read there real quick.
We're we're not gonna rush, we said so.
Now this is saying and now to be
clear, by the way, this was gone.
That that's without question. So what's funny to
me is now that they're just going, oh,
well, there it is again.
Because I you you're mistaken.
Like, it's just so clearly it was removed
because that's the clumsy, reactive propaganda style they
have. And then because they decide, well, we

(03:19:27):
that hurts us more, let's put it back
up. These are my opinions, but the facts
are that it was gone and now it's
back.
So what's funny is that that he just
his response is, well, no. You're wrong. It's
there. So it says over the last 2
weeks, IDF and IS force have been con
conducting
division level targeted raids.
The forces operated in the area
of yeah. So he's the same right there.

(03:19:48):
And approximately a 120 Hamas terrorists were killed
in 20 terrorist infrastructure.
How interesting.
So what does he say down here?
Yeah. So as far as I can tell,
he They
they were there. So that's actually more important
to the reality of the conversation.
Because I I think what he's trying to

(03:20:09):
highlight, I mean, without saying it, because we're
talking about a child they murdered,
that they were terrorists. And I'm I'm what
I'm trying to do is see if I
see any differences, but it looks pretty much
exactly the same to what they're highlighting.
So they were there. Here's the IDF press
release that says they were there present while
this was happening.
So here's what's gonna bother you even more.
Here's Matt Miller

(03:20:31):
telling you that they weren't there because this
guy said so and that's that's good enough
for Matt Miller. Despite the fact that apparently
they've now put back the document that says
that they were there. I hope Matt Miller
gets fired for this even though they won't
because he's doing the job perfectly the way
it's supposed to be done from the mind
of the government.
Obfuscating facts.

(03:20:51):
A UK based research group concluded Israeli tank
likely killed 6 year old Palestinian child, Hendra.
That's the point about the outside part. So
they they've concluded on their investigation that the
tanks are what killed there, killed them based
on the munitions. Rajab.
Investigation revealed that Rajab's car was hit with
355
bullets, and it's not plausible that Israel
Israeli tank couldn't see, children inside the car.

(03:21:14):
Have you seen the reports, and do you
have any updates on the investigation? It's been
more than 4 months, and a lot of
my colleagues have been asking about it. Yeah.
So we have seen the reports, and I
will tell you what our latest interaction with
the government of Israel is about this. So
we went to the government of Israel, and
pressed them for information, and
they told us that there were no IDF
tanks operating in the area, no IDF forces

(03:21:34):
operating in the area at the time of
that attack, which I believe is something they've
also said publicly.
Imagine that being your response.
Right? So
completely out different story, side point.
Totally not related.
Right? You've got a murderer
who's about to kill a child.
But, you know, I I just I shouldn't

(03:21:54):
even make a little the point is that
it's just so it's so
it really gives me a physical reaction. These
person these people can stand there and dismiss
something so obvious. I mean, you know where
I was gonna go with it. The point
is that the guy kills a child and
all of a sudden you go, well, I
saw you killed the child. You know what?
You got this still killed with the same
weapon you're holding and the guy goes tells
Matt Miller I wasn't there though. Oh, well,

(03:22:15):
well, the guy, I I asked him, he
said he wasn't there. It's like, what the
f we're talking about? This is the person
being accused of murder, and you're gonna ask
them if they're gonna tell you if they
were there committing the murder? Nope. I wasn't
there. Okay. Good enough for me. I just
don't understand how anybody with a brain acts
like that makes sense. You do not ask
the person accused of a crime to investigate
themselves. That's how governments do this. The US

(03:22:37):
does the same thing.
This is why people in this room, like
we saw with Liam, stop taking the BS,
but the problem is they'll just kick you
out of the room. That's Access Journalism for
you. We need to stop engaging with them
in general. But the point is that they
get away with it because they just stand
there and lie.
We can't allow that anymore.
After further reporting, we went back to them

(03:22:57):
and pressed them again. And so,
what Okay. Why though? Why? So they said
they weren't there,
then you went back and asked them again.
Why is that, Matt? Didn't you believe them
the first time? What they told us is
that they went to the UN organizations. They
went to the Palestinian Red Crescent. They asked
for information,
because you've seen all those organizations quoted in
stores. They asked for information that could you
that they could use,

(03:23:18):
to further an investigation, and no one provided
them with any information. That's Now let's be
clear about this. So they're investigating
Israel.
So the murderer comes to them and goes,
k. Let me see what you got. And
they go, no. Because we're investigating you for
being a murderer.
And they say, that's why this didn't come
this nothing happened? Because you wouldn't show me

(03:23:38):
what you have on me? I mean, doesn't
see, if you frame it the way it
actually is, it seems crazy.
Because why would they show what they have
that might
show that they're guilty? Because then they can
make up a narrative that hides that. That's
what they do. They are the well, I
shouldn't even say the best. What they do
that they think is the best is reactive
propaganda.
They just cobble together some nonsensical story 30

(03:24:01):
seconds after they hear what they're being called
or what they're finding out. Oh, they caused
doing that? Quick quick. Roll something out or
roll 3 versions of it and we'll pick
whichever one works. I'm not even making that
up. They do this constantly. So we're gonna
pretend like it's outrageous that they wouldn't show
them what they have on them. I think
that's laughable.
We have on them. So who shot the
355 tank bullets? I'm not able to I

(03:24:22):
look. I'm not on the ground. I can't
offer any kind of assessment about Oh, it
must be the MAS tanks. Right? The MAS
tanks?
Right? Or or what tanks? You mean the
only tanks that exist there are Israel's? No
way.
Yeah. This is the kind of thing that
we need to call right there if I
was that, you you screamed that over the
top. Get that on the record. The only
tanks that exist there are Israel's. Now go.

(03:24:43):
There are no other tanks in the area.
There are no other tanks that exist in
the area.
So what are we talking about? We don't
let him get away with stuff like that.
He's sidestepping an obvious point. This, that's why
we called for an independent we called for
the government of Israel to conduct an investigation.
Matt got busted right there because if you

(03:25:03):
would've sent an independent investigation, well, those are
going on. Those are the ones you're ignoring.
You're only listening to Israel.
See, normally, they wanna say that because they
wanna give you the floated idea that we're
gonna look for an independent investigation. Too late.
That's already happened three times.
So let me split play it again. Make
sure you catch this. 55 tank bullets. I'm
not able to look. I'm not on the
ground. I can't offer any kind of assessment

(03:25:23):
about this. It's why we called for an
independent we called for the governor of Israel
to conduct
investigation. He's almost wanted to say it again.
No. It's not independent if Israel does it.
No. You don't want an independent investigation. You
ignored the independent investigations.
You called on Israel to investigate themselves, and
you blindly followed what they told you.
Embarrassing.
I can't speak to what their internal processes

(03:25:44):
look like. All I can tell you is
what they've told us. All I can tell
you is what they've told us, and what
they've said is they went to
the UN and the Palestinian Red Crescent and
asked them to supply information that would help
them. Tower. What they claim is that they
were were given none. But it's not concluded
yet the investigation, or is it No. I
would refer you to the government of Israel
for that. I can I can only tell
you what we what they have told us?
Okay. He can't even tell you whether they've

(03:26:05):
concluded it, even though
they have, and they've publicly said that, and
they're interviewing about it. But somehow, Matt Miller
doesn't know.
These people are obfuscators, guys. That's what they
do for a living. And he's I mean,
he's actually not that bad at it. He's
just that that's really difficult to hide this
obvious of a lie. So, again, back to
the point. Remember, he followed up and goes,
wait. Never mind. Tried to contact you. After

(03:26:26):
looking into the issue, we've put the post
back up that says they were there.
Let's see what the let's see what the
comments are real quick.
Tactical glitch. Tactical glitch. Everyone's making fun of
him. So there we are.
So Daniel McAdams says, we asked Israel to
investigate Israel slaughtering a little girl that it
knew was a girl, and Israel concluded that
Israel did nothing wrong. So shut up about

(03:26:47):
it, you antisemite.
Exactly. That's what he's making fun of what
Matt Miller's doing right there.
So here's an interesting point. So as we're
pretending that Israel just doesn't lie, right?
Get this. This actually I I had to
make sure this wasn't a parody. This is
real. So and I don't it's like it's
almost like they threw some
humiliation ritual. They keep putting Herzog out there
to look like a moron even though he

(03:27:08):
can do a good job by himself. He's
the one that keeps going out there and
going rape instructions and and a a a
book about what was it? About chemical weapons
instructions. No, bud. That's a book from Amazon
that you can look up right now. Like,
and they keep getting caught. A terror calendar.
It was like, you guys are ridiculous.
This is not a joke. This is this
is, Asa from, in in electronic intubata. He

(03:27:29):
says this is sickening. Israel's genocidal president, Herzog,
is promoting an exhibition
about the, quote, horrific massacre of October 7th.
That's this.
I oh, it was like her hands or
chest. Like, why why it's weird that you
guys it the the weird ongoing constant, like,
celebration of this horror that you clearly, as
we all know, played

(03:27:49):
a outsized role in. Like, you realize that
they know what the Israeli government and the
Israeli media reported. Right? Hannibal directive was ordered.
They killed most of their own people. They
know that, and yet they're still promoting this.
It's just crazy to me. But the point
is, you know where that is from, don't
you? All the ones in the chat, you've
seen that before. You know where that is.
That
is not from October 7th. That is the

(03:28:11):
sheet that Israeli hostages wrote on
and were killed anyway. That's this story.
Israeli Gaza hostages shot by IDF put SOS
on a sheet.
So this white flag
belonged to the 3 Israeli prisoners who were
shot by the Israeli army in December.

(03:28:33):
I mean, think about how crazy that is.
This is the article right here.
So if you forgot, I've, you know, I've
mentioned it many times, 3 Israeli hostages were,
actually, I don't even remember if the I
think this
whether they were released or got out, I
don't think it was ever even confirmed. The
point
is you have 3 Israelis
who were out.
They have a sheet where apparently in food,

(03:28:55):
they wrote SOS.
They're all clearly Israeli. They're not Palestinians. And
they're speaking in Hebrew, and they come out
and say, we're Israelis. Don't shoot us. And
boom. They kill 2 of them. Just like
that.
The the one runs away. It's just all
in the article. 15 minutes later, they coax
him back out. He's over around the corner
going, don't shoot me. I'm Israeli.

(03:29:16):
And guess what happens? If you haven't heard
this before, it's probably the way they they
come back out. Come back out.
He's going, don't shoot me. I'm Israeli. He
walks around the corner. 2 of those IDF
members shoot him. 2 of them.
You this is either nothing leaves, kill everything,
and these people are somehow okay with,
Or there's something much darker going on here?

(03:29:37):
And then we know Hannibal directive was ordered.
They're being ordered to kill people. And now
and this again, make sure we understand this.
This is not just that they killed their
own people because they're trying to stop Hamas.
They ordered the Hannibal directive. That was by
heretz and other Israeli media. Which means they
do not let people get taken prisoner. They
murder their own people. And then we have
to realize how many things they lied about

(03:29:58):
that happened on October 7th. Most of what
we've heard is atrocity propaganda that has been
debunked even by heretz.
But people in random, you know, USA over
here don't you know, people that have no
who aren't immersed in the conversation, who only
watch Fox and CNN, have no idea about
that, which is crazy.
So here he is lying,
blatantly,
knowing that we see this, knowing that even

(03:30:20):
though like, this is what's so crazy to
me is they they know people like me.
If it's a BBC article, people are gonna
know that.
You know, they are using it to claim
it's about October 7th. Now you could argue
they're trying to make some abstract ongoing thing
about the event, but this is they killed
these people.
It's just grotesque, the whole thing.
Now Tiberias

(03:30:40):
highlights, what, what was the first name I'm
forgetting,
Hussam Samlat, who I referenced early in this
because he did a really good speech about
this in the beginning. Here he is, again,
making an excellent speech about why we can't
trust the Israeli government to investigate themselves, which
seems like a no brainer to me.
I wish, Yalda, you didn't have to waste
your breath, with an Israeli,

(03:31:02):
military spokesman,
to really get, an And and so it's
clear. That's the same woman interviewing the colonel,
and I I believe it's the follow-up. Like,
he's talking about the the same like, why
you're asking him to confirm something that they
did? That's what he's referring to.
Israeli,
military spokesman,
to really get, any sort of admission,

(03:31:23):
from them of any wrongdoing. And this is
not just about, and
her family and that
horrific story,
that evil that has been really inflicted on
them,
that shocked the world. But this is chronic.
This is not just even the last 365
days. This is the last
76 years. That's more than 28000 days.

(03:31:46):
And have you ever heard of a real
investigation by the Israeli army and real accountability?
Can you can we all name an Israeli
soldier who has been held accountable? We have
followed only the last few weeks that the
Israeli,
public and protest and outcries because there was
some questioning about Israeli soldiers who raped Palestinian

(03:32:07):
detainees inside Israeli jails.
And there was a discussion in the Can
you imagine in the in
the Israeli parliament, is it legitimate
to Palestinian prisoners? I mean so you're wasting
your breath. However,
the what is very important,
right now is what you have done through
this investigation to establish the facts because, unfortunately,

(03:32:29):
Israel has denied you, the sky and all
international mainstream media,
any access,
to the occupied territory to Gaza,
particularly because they want to do it in
the dark. Because they don't want you to
do document it. So let me commend the
fact that you have invested in this and
investigated this and came up with these proofs,
and worked with international institutions

(03:32:51):
to present these satellite
images so the world knows, that that the
propaganda machine,
is really,
what is at stake here right now. And
what what bigger's belief here, Yalda, if you
allow me, what really bigger's belief is when
you hear London or Washington after any atrocity,
including and

(03:33:12):
calling for Israel to investigate itself.
And after your report, I think I would
not want to hear London or Washington or
any other,
government for that matter to call for the
war criminals to investigate themselves. They will not
do so. That's the simple truth. It has
got to be independent investigation.
It has got to be international investigation.

(03:33:33):
International media like yourself has got to have
access, to Gaza to report report the truth.
Israel and its army and its government are
simply a machine of lies.
Hard not to see that.
Doctor Mats Gilbert points out just a general
point about this as we're at this all
that we're talking about, all the crimes we're
seeing. Stop arming Israel now, he writes.

(03:33:56):
US weapons supplied to Israel from October 7th
to June 2024.
This is crazy. Think about this. Despite it
being illegal based on what we now know
that we can prove they knew they were
blocking aid, which we'll get to soon.
Over 50,000 tons of weaponry, including 14,000,
2,000 pound bombs,
6 100 6,500,

(03:34:18):
500 pound bombs,
1,000 bunker busters,
3000 Hellfire air to ground missiles, 2,600
small diameter bombs, October 7th to December 29th,
2023.
Hold on. How does that make sense?

(03:34:42):
I'm sorry. I'm just looking at the framing.
So he's saying October 7, 2023
to June 2024,
and then says October 7th, I imagine it's
2023
to December 29, 2023 has to be. I
just don't know why that wouldn't be included
in the other one. But, anyway, the point
is the same. And it's saying US has
42% of the world's weapons exports more than
the next 6 countries on the list combined.

(03:35:05):
Iran,
0.2%.
Despite the fact that they're the leading state
sponsor of terrorism. Yeah.
Absurdly obviously not true. The world's biggest weapons
manufacturers are all American. Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop
Grumman, Boeing, General Dynamics. They make enormous profits
from the genocide of Palestine or just any
other ongoing war war such I mean, guys,

(03:35:25):
it's obvious to see who is benefiting as
the old question, who benefits from the ongoing
wars that they claim they're fighting to stop
while making lots of money.
And blaming the people who are barely benefiting
as being the ones keeping it all going,
it really makes a lot of sense, doesn't
it?
Then just lastly, I wanna put this somewhere.
Abby Martin put this out. I think it's
important to think about. She goes, I keep

(03:35:46):
thinking about how crazy it would be if
an Arab country, your choice,
kept through 2,300,000
Jewish people in a cage,
Half children,
cut off their electricity and water, and then
indiscriminately bomb them.
Beyond comprehension, the anti Muslim bigotry that makes
the world applaud this as justified.

(03:36:07):
It happening to Palestinians.
I mean, think about that. It's not hard
to think about the reverse.
Every single part of the narrative was exactly
the same. But the it you flipped
the Arab
country, or rather the, you know, Israel with
an Arab country, and then the Jewish people
with the the Palestinians with the Jewish population,
or specifically Zionists in this case, or however

(03:36:28):
you wanna look at it, either or.
I mean, you already know what how it
was going. It it it wouldn't be a
question. It wouldn't matter how rational or justified
you thought these answers were. It wouldn't matter.
It's it's just it's it's some people this
will work, you know. Most people who are
aware of this don't need this point to
break them through.
But some people,
it's just it's hard for them to recognize
how

(03:36:49):
much they're being lied to. And if you
could just flip the script and see how
dishonest it is and recognize that it only
becomes a problem when it's one way versus
the other,
hopefully, that wakes you up to it.
Now let's talk about Iran. Because obviously, this
is a central aspect of how this is
all being played, and clearly, Israel is desperate
to get the US government to go after
Iran for them. The cradle writes Israel this

(03:37:11):
on the 12th.
Israel's channel 12 reports that the US troops
will now be deployed
and operate the THAAD anti ballistic missile system
on the ground in Israel as part of
the preparations for the attack on Iran. So
not only are we seeing more US troops
deployed to defend Israel for its genocide.
Where are you, Americans? America first. Right? Is
that what we're being told? Or, alternatively, just

(03:37:32):
that we care about American national security, whatever
side you're talking about or just all of
us?
Why don't we care about that? Why would
we deploy to a place that objectively the
vast majority of us recognize as what it
is, a genocide? And the fact that they
don't deserve to be defended, guys. That's what
the government is what I'm talking about.
What they're doing shows you they don't deserve

(03:37:53):
to be defended from anybody. Whether it's legal
or not, what they're doing demonstrates them as
the problem.
Everything we pretend we've always been fighting.
There's no denying that. That's not every Israeli
or every Jew, but the obvious reality of
what this government is showing themselves to be.
If you're denying that, you're part of the
problem.
This is an objective reality.

(03:38:15):
The point is that they want this to
bleed into something else.
So channel 12 is reporting that more US
troops are gonna be deployed to work these
munitions. So there's no level of lacking of
complicity. There this is a US war
on top of Israel.
And that it's gonna be aimed at Iran.
They're telling you that. Now, Tim and they're
they're there to work the THAAD systems. Here's

(03:38:36):
what's interesting. Tim Anderson pointed this out. Iranian
missiles take Israeli THAAD air defense systems
before pummeling Nevatam airbase.
Israeli missile strikes taking out their $500,000,000
radar.
Here's the video of it, you can see.
And we've already reported on most of this
that these were precise
ex very precise military strikes. Remember, even Israeli

(03:38:59):
Israel admitted 0 casualties. 0.
0. Think about crazy that is. From Iran.
And yet if Israel can't manage to bomb
without killing 47th and 40 different people. You
know, it's just it they're trying to do
that. Not one casualty and it was military
targets. That's why they arrested Jeremy because they
were exposing the bigger reality.
In one case, or at least that's what

(03:39:20):
Pete the the statement is anyway. Because obviously,
there were other main streams doing similar things,
but I still think Jeremy's reporting was different.
Obviously, objective and not just one slanted on
idea.
But he the point is that their
fad missile systems
didn't stop
the bombing.
So either that means they didn't work, or
that they didn't know how to operate them

(03:39:41):
properly, and maybe that's why they're bringing in
US troops. Either way, it's just showing you
that you're more involved in this than you
realize as Americans. Now,
oh, also, this was Oh, I forgot about
this. Oh man.
Dang it. I was reorganizing today, and I
was thinking it was just this tweet.
Kinda put some of this off, but this
one,
oh, dang it. I have to go over

(03:40:02):
this in the future.
This is this is an interesting post from
gen x girl. I shared this recently,
and it's talking about
the,
I should refresh my memory.
Right. Right. Alright. This is interesting. I'm gonna
go over this in a future show. So

(03:40:22):
I'll I'll include the show notes if you
wanna check it out. It's just the secret
CI operation that changed the Middle East forever.
You heard a lot about our Israel funded
politicians mimic Israeli talking points about Iran. Here's
a quick video based on declassified CA docs
that help you understand what really happened. Damn.
I well, I'm glad this isn't today because
it's already super long. But this is about
the ongoing
from operation Ajax and into forward in regard

(03:40:43):
to their manipulations around Iran.
That, we're gonna come back to.
Well, just since I had this there, the
point is this kind of this is just
this if this person says, it's really this
simple.
This faux leader who is represented by the
deep state and US oligarchy, peace.
The guy that we want you to tell
is bad, the war. The point is that

(03:41:04):
the Shaw's
relative,
who was the guy on top, is the
guy who ran this country as a despotic
country. Only nice for the elitist that were
allowed there from Israel and United States and
those that went along with the with the
oligarchy.
Everybody else lived in poverty and suffering. It's
very easy to prove.
They point to that and say, look at
who great it was. And, again, it doesn't

(03:41:24):
even matter whether it was better or not.
It was an illegal entity put in place
by operation Ajax. They overthrew the Iranian government,
put their guy in place. Then in the
Iranian revolution removed him and they, god forbid,
chose their own leadership, then it became bad
guys.
And the bottom line is that these people
are it's I mean, whether you can even
whether one's piece, ones were or not, The
bottom line is the guy on top is

(03:41:46):
a dishonest
puppet manipulator who is simply being acted through
by very dangerous people. The guy on the
bottom, you can decide for yourself. At the
very least, there's an element of influence from
the people that live in Iran.
At the end of the day, not even
remotely. A fraction of what we can see
Israel and the US doing around the world,
despite what horror stories you might have heard.

(03:42:07):
And Spectator Index reporting that this is on
10th, mind you, Israeli security cabinet convenes to
authorize strikes against Iran. Now that could just
be hype,
but something tells me that if they could
make this happen,
especially involving the US, they would. That that
would be the big deal. Arnaud
Beltran highlighting APAC. APAC saying the Iranian regime

(03:42:28):
is working to undermine our democracy.
And it says Iranian nationals linked to Islamic,
Revolutionary Guard Corps have been in indicted for
a hack and leak operation targeting 2024. They're
just trying to hype this nonsense.
You realize we're talking about, first of all,
Iranian nationals, which does not therefore mean Iranian
government. They just hope you're just lazy with
your connections. Of course, it could be. But

(03:42:49):
should we ask whether, I don't know, Assad
could work with some Iranian nationals to carry
out an operation? Oh my god. That's impossible.
Right? Or vice versa. Right? Just because something,
you know, always think like this.
Or they could just be Iranian nationals, and
they did it on their own accord. Or
it doesn't happen at all. But the point
is they really need you to think that
there's a influence on the election

(03:43:09):
for the government's control. Not left or right,
but the government. And the bottom line is
they need you to think Iran is doing
it all. As well as whatever enemy they
wanna demonize for other agendas. But all they
have,
doctor doctor director doctor director Ray condemns these
efforts to sow discord. Oh, good. Because if
he didn't condemn it, then we would've thought
he was okay with it. Right?
This is all his political jargon. It's so

(03:43:30):
funny. It's saying America, asserting that threats from
democracy will not go unpunished.
3 Iranian cyber actors.
Anyway, so the point,
the Iranian regime is working to undermine our
democracy. As Ronad points out, peak irony. This
will be very hard to top. Meaning, APAC,

(03:43:51):
without question,
is controlling the outcome of policy in this
country. It's not my opinion. It's openly discussed.
Even MSNBC did an entire breakdown about how
APAC has become this you this unique entity
even in regard to lobbying. How they are
just dumping money in everybody everywhere regardless of
what side you're on, and guess what they
just proudly said?
You might've seen it. I've shared it many

(03:44:11):
times. I bet I bet you'll pop up.
Look at that.
Hooray. APAC says, 97%
of our candidates have won.
Whoo. And that's left and right, guys. So
clearly, it's about
what? Politics?
Well, they're funding both sides. Okay. Well, then
what what is it exactly about? Let me
how is this in American's interest? If everybody
in America has an argument about how the

(03:44:33):
other side's gonna kill everybody,
and yet here's APAC funding both of them.
I mean, take a second and absorb what
that shows you. It's right there on the
surface. So either they find it to be
an American's interest to just fund everybody, which
I don't even know how you make sense
of that, or there's something else going on
here and they're influencing
decisions because they're giving them money. I know.

(03:44:55):
Unprecedented. Right?
I just think it's crazy that we can't
acknowledge how loud that is.
At least some people anyway. So,
peak irony.
I agree.
Now,
Casey Wright or Bryden Circus now again says,
I wonder if the most recent attack from
Iran didn't facilitate this drone attack. So that's

(03:45:17):
also what they're referencing. The the one that
took out their radar. Right? So this is
it. Alastair Crook here is just quickly reporting
it. It's saying that Iran actually took out
their advanced radar system, which does appear to
be the case.
And then to back it up, he's simply
highlighting that it seems likely that they would
have stopped something like this. Hezbollah drone attack
kills 4 Israeli soldiers and injures 58.
And seems to have happened in an area

(03:45:38):
that they would've been able to stop. Seems
reasonable to assume that they may have taken
this out. I think that's backed up by
other evidence as well. And so that, I
find interesting because we're gonna talk about
the response to that. So whenever Israel is
made to look stupid, at least in their
eyes, like, they feel like this was a
they they would've been able to stop it
because they got the one up on them.
They all just like the US government, they
act like a child.

(03:45:58):
So they go, oh, yeah? You think you
got the better of us? We're gonna murder
families in Gaza. Which is what they did.
We'll come to that. Mensho Sint points out
spokesman of Katab Hezbollah, or rather just, I
think, the PMU is a general term in
regard to Iraq,
says in a statement, they warned Israel and
the United States that any targeting of Iraq
or the use of Iraqi airspace to target
Iran will be met with strikes on Israel,

(03:46:22):
But also on USAir bases to make sure
I didn't read it wrong.
Okay. So I guarantee that it'll be called
terrorism despite the fact that the US government
is illegally occupying Iraq. There's no question. They
invaded illegally based on the lie of the
WMDs that we all know was a lie,
but we just pretended like that wasn't the
case because they're still there. And now it's
about freedom and ISIS or or maybe oil
or or whatever you wanna be told in

(03:46:45):
the moment. Bottom line, it's illegal. We all
know that. Nobody cares. Just like Syria, just
like the rest of them.
The point is they're going, look, you if
you use this, we're gonna fire.
And that would be a legal act. But
they won't tell you that when it happens.
Just an aside point coming from Iran.
Now,
leave these for later. I'll I'll get rid

(03:47:06):
of those. Okay.
So going into the larger conversation of just
with the West Bank and Gaza before we
finish with Lebanon.
Craig Murray pointed this out. And this is
on 10th, mind you. So this is my
point in saying this is that every day
this happens. He said in the last 24
hours, this was just on 10th, Israel
had opened fire on UN peacekeepers, we'll get
to that UNFL point, which we're we're ending

(03:47:26):
with that.
Killed 28 refugees in a school in Gaza,
killed 40 plus civilians in central Beirut, and
Nelson Mandela's grandson has been banned from the
UK for criticizing Israel. Dystopia is here now.
Or it's kind of always been here, we're
just finally seeing it.
The reality is we can change it though.
And by the way, I meant to say

(03:47:47):
at the beginning of the show that at
the the main one of the main parts
of the title was gonna be all the
way at the end. I apologize for that.
It's but it's important, but I wanna make
sure we got to all of this today.
So Mariam Barghouti says, there's no war.
If you really follow the news, you would
realize Israel is actively refusing
to engage in direct combat,
which is pretty embarrassing for them. After the

(03:48:08):
early parts with Hezbollah where they got just
destroyed,
pretty much they've been what they've been doing
is just carpet bombing.
And she says, instead, they use wide range
weapons to destroy as much as possible. More
so in Gaza is the point here, but
also the we've seen other dynamics happening in
Lebanon, but largely they changed dynamics after they
got pretty embarrassed.
And it says, meaning in Gaza, you're getting
killed whether you are a combatant,

(03:48:29):
an artist, a journalist, or an elderly with
Alzheimer's.
The intentional targeting of civilians and life sustaining
infrastructure is not war. It's textbook
extermination,
which again, is what the UN just found.
But they're Hamas, apparently, so we'll ignore that.
Oh, but here's Israeli media, by the way,
entitled investigation.
Netanyahu's government not only permits Jewish terror

(03:48:52):
in the West Bank,
but also finances it.
It's incredible. The over the the con the
contrast between Israeli media leaving Israeli media and,
like, the entirety of the western apparatus.
Who would I mean, who if if I
wrote that, they would call you a racist.
I'd probably get censored for a platform. But

(03:49:12):
Israeli media can write this about Netanyahu calling
it Jewish terror, and that they finance it,
and we can't reconcile
these things? It's because we're what it's exactly
what I just highlighted.
There is controlling influence over these platforms to
a degree like we've seen everywhere else. To
where this does not get seen or not
even reported.

(03:49:34):
Now, again, the point is, obviously, we're talking
about, in my opinion, Zionism.
There is a there's plenty of Jewish people,
even Israel, that disagree with what they're doing.
Not the majority, not even close. But the
point is then, if that is the case,
which we can prove, then it's not ubiquitously
Jewish territory. It is Zionism,
in this case, Jewish Zionism.
Always an important distinction. But it's important just

(03:49:55):
like Beth Selim writes, for in their in
their arp the arp the article they put
out about apartheid,
same thing, leading Israeli human rights group, and
it says, a regime of Jewish supremacy from
the Jordan river to the Mediterranean sea, which
is true. But it's because of Zionism. It's
Zionism using the june the ju the Jewish
religion.

(03:50:16):
So I simply say that, I will make
sure I include
my really important recent interview
with Dan Cohen.
I think this is the
one where we talk about the idea of
Zionism in particular.
The manufactured Middle East plight and the Zionism
linchpin. It's a great interview.

(03:50:37):
Let me add these real
quick. Okay. So going forward,
West Bank. First quick point, someone include the
West Bank as well because it's ongoing in
spite the fact so let's not forget. They
just, like, invaded, raided the West Bank and
just killed a lot of people and burned
things down, and they were like, success.
Military success. Even though they there's nothing going

(03:50:58):
on. The the point is they did this
in order to give themselves a win, but
not even their own people bought that. Many
people actually called
cry cried out about that. Because it was
just so blatantly over the top.
But it says, the savior highlights this from
this this is from September 1st, but it
says, this is what happens if you identify
as Palestinian in the West Bank. Now,
these are everywhere. But this one is especially
obvious. Now watch this guy. It doesn't matter

(03:51:20):
what you think is going on. The guy
is not responding,
and they are chasing him down to just
keep beating him. This is what it looks
like to live as a Palestinian
in the West Bank, where they claim you've
got equal rights. Look at him. Kicking him
in the face. The guy is just crowd
crowding. Cowering, I mean. Look.
They want to hurt this person.

(03:51:40):
Now you could look into the real story
and realize that he was just simply a
Palestinian in the wrong place at the wrong
time that angered the IDF, but the reality
is it shouldn't matter.
Look at what they're doing to this guy.
And this is every day. And you can
listen to Gideon Levy or IDF member, whistle
blowers. They will tell you this is what
they do and they laugh about it. It's
intentional to put them in their place. Oh,
look. A police member just, looking on.

(03:52:02):
Nothing new there.
Now here,
oh, I forgot his name. It's,
I was just looking into him the other
day.
Basically, there's a heap There's a book he
put out called highlighting that Israel is an
apartheid state. And he is getting
accused of all sorts of terrible things by

(03:52:24):
Zionist online for for, you know, the very
Zionist that are allowing a genocide and being
taking part in it. But here's what he
has to say about Zionism So you understand
what's going on. This is exactly what you'll
hear from Avi Islam, a Jewish Israeli historian
or any other Gideon Levy. Plenty of other
Jewish people that are speaking about what's going
on who are highly respected, educated,
you know, academic level or

(03:52:46):
influential.
Here's one of
them. You are on the West Bank. There
are separate roads. There are roads for Israeli
settlers and citizens of Israel, and there are
roads for Palestinians. These roads are not separate
and equal. Is that it right there?
Yeah. Yeah. It's Ta Ta Ta Nishi or
something like that. Ta Nishi coats.
I believe that's correct. You can see it

(03:53:07):
right there on the screen.
Roads for Palestinians. These roads are not separate
and equal. These roads tend to be separate
and unequal.
It tends to take longer
to get where you want to go if
you're a Palestinian.
If you enter a city like Hebron, for
instance, Hebron is lit quite literally segregated. There
are streets that Palestinians
cannot walk down. There are streets that, you

(03:53:27):
know, Israeli settlers are giving complete and free
movement
of moving throughout the West Bank in general.
There there are checkpoints everywhere for Palestinians.
These checkpoints are sometimes normal checkpoints that they
know are there. Sometimes checkpoints appear out of
the blue, what they which they what they
call flying checkpoints.
Your basic movement is constantly
imperiled. The justice system, which is deeply familiar

(03:53:49):
for African Americans here, is quite literally segregated.
There is a civil justice system that the
minority of Israeli settlers as Israeli citizens enjoy,
And then there is an entirely separate justice
system
that, Palestinians on the West Bank are subject
to. You can be arrested, for instance,
as as an Israeli citizen, and you are,

(03:54:09):
you know, do all the due rights that
we are familiar with. You have to be
told what the charges are, etcetera. If you
are arrested as a Palestinian, you can just
be taken. In another political context, we will
call those hostages.
Right. Now, obviously, we're talking about the so
specifically in the West Bank, but it's the
same concept. Now the same idea,

(03:54:32):
whether you're a like, whether we're talking about
the Israel proper, the West Bank. The point
is it's not about whether you're Jewish because
you could show plenty of examples of that.
Right? Ethiopian Jews, I mentioned before, who are
treated like they're 2nd class citizens. Right? So
this is the same point, but about Palestinians.
You this this is like Jim Crow era.
It's exactly what it is. And you know
that people can see that. You have these

(03:54:53):
segregated roads, segregate I mean, everything.
And this is the West Bank. This is
not Gaza. They are literally treated as 2nd
class citizens in Israel despite the lies we're
told. And anybody who cares to look can
see that.
Now here is another denial of this exact
point or rather the larger point about
what they're doing. Howard Beckett is highlighting this
saying, Israeli ambassador who's been one of the

(03:55:14):
worst this this this woman just smugly goes
around lying about this stuff, Tzipi Potovli,
Tzipi, Denying evidence of Israeli settlers and soldiers
in the West Bank attacking children and Palestinians.
Like, literally, the thing that everyone in the
world more than anything can see. Even Biden
was forced to acknowledge it and pretend they
were gonna sanction them. There's been so many
reports about Israeli settler attacks from Israeli media.

(03:55:36):
And yet here she is pretending like, no.
That's not real. It's fake news.
This again, I said this the first couple
of weeks, how desperate they felt. Clearly, people
saw through their lies and they were they
were erratic about it. Now it's at a
point where it's almost acceptance. Like, we're screwed.
We everyone sees this, but we what else
could we have? We're just doubling down in
our lives. We're gonna say not true. We're

(03:55:58):
just gonna ignore what you're saying and just
run right over the top of you. That's
what we're I think that's what we're seeing.
They write, she's a propaganda wing of apartheid,
racism Zionism and terror. She should not be
any media platform.
Is Palestinians
supposed to defend themselves when not only are
the settlers attacking them, but IDF soldiers are
actually watching on and encouraging them and egging

(03:56:20):
them on, and even snipering kids with precision
shots into the I've shown you videos of
this happening.
So you know this is real. As well
as the sniper, I'll show you the doctors
again and new stuff. Their heads. Is that
true? Those those are very hard accuse And
even snipering kids with politicians shot into their
heads.
Is that true? Those those are very hard
accusations that have no base, as a matter

(03:56:42):
of fact, because Save the Children No. Have
reported it. I've had Human Rights Watch. Have
had Amnesty International
in their crossing thresholds report. There are multiple
reports from multiple NGOs
and Israeli soldiers admitting to it live on
TV with Matt Freitendale College. Think about how
crazy that is.
Every leading human rights group, mainstream reports, investigations,

(03:57:04):
and even Israeli soldiers publicly saying it on
TV.
Listen to her response.
The oligarchs are so much. I'm sure you're
taking your information from, sources you believe are
reliable, but, You mean ID of soldiers?
Amitz International Human Rights Racks, the leading human
rights groups? Like, what what counterbalance do you
have? Like, what so give me the source

(03:57:25):
that would be something you would listen to.
It's just
wild. Her only response is what Israel says.
All I can tell you is a vague
lie? No. No. I want to tell you
what I know. What I know is that,
in the West Bank, in Judea and Samaria,
the way we call it, Now it's the
West Bank. That those are the terms they
use to try to deny the reality of
what Palestine was. There has been,

(03:57:47):
increase of terrorism in Jenin.
Jenin has become a huge terror Okay. So
instead of addressing the things they said, even
though she called them fake, she just goes
bad stuff that we can prove isn't true.
So you're telling me that it is real,
but here's why it's justified?
No. No. No. I'm just saying that if
hypothetically, if it was real, that's why it
would be justified, but it's false.
They love doing that.

(03:58:09):
What you're doing is clearly suggesting that it's
happening and that's why it should happen because
there's terrorism, even though that's not true and
they've been lying about this from day 1.
Or hub. We are in a point where
those terror in Judea and Samaria, the way
we call it,
there has been
increase of terrorism in Jenin.
Jenin has become a huge terror hub. We

(03:58:30):
are in a point where A terror hub.
Those terror hubs are threatening our people. I
completely agree that if someone is committing a
crime, he should be taken to court and
pay the price for it, but definitely not
familiar with any fact about killing children.
No one is interested. I'll play it for
you again.
But think about what she's saying. Yeah. Yeah.

(03:58:51):
Charge them for the crime. Even though they're
the one that will investigate and then hypothetically
charge them that crime, so it won't happen.
All those evidence is very, very prominent. It's
everywhere.
So you notice the same old clumsy narrative.
Terror hub, tunnels, hostages, human shields, just Lebanon,
Deutsche Bank, Gaza. Just it's just they you

(03:59:11):
know why? Because your cowardly governments have allowed
them to think they can get away with
it. Apply the same structure.
What's different? Let's keep doing it. Let's move
on to Jordan next. Let's go to Egypt
after that. Greater Israel all day long, guys.
They're right there.
Said in killing innocent children But this is
a fact that there has been violence against

(03:59:32):
Palestinians
by illegal settlers I I accept I accept
the fact that we are a country, that
the rule of law is very important.
He thought he loved that little weird
so but you that there are they're facts,
and and we and we have evidence. We
can see them. I I accept the fact
that we're great people and we do good
things. Like, that's what she just did.

(03:59:52):
I accept the fact that we care about
the law. What was that weird? The that
wasn't like, you would expect her to be
like, I accept the fact that bad things
have happened. But here that was all she
was doing was just interrupting as if she
was gonna address it and then just pulled
it into something that was a praise of
herself.
You you don't think we noticed that? Like,
that's how bad these people are at this.
As always, my point is that these are
people that have a lot of power that

(04:00:13):
have never earned that power. I've it's just
it's lazy.
No one is interested in killing innocent children.
But it is a fact that there has
been violence against Palestinians
by illegal settlers
around the West Bank. I accept the fact
that we are a country, that the rule
of law is very important. So if anyone
is committing any type of crime or violence,

(04:00:35):
he'll be taken to the courts. Unfortunately, there
is a lot of,
misinformation
out there. People are trying to put blood
blood labels in Israel, but Ah, blood libels
is what she's talking about.
There is a lot of,
misinformation out there. People are trying to put
blood blood label.
Now here's what's funny. I don't know whether
she was just clumsily trying to say blood

(04:00:57):
libels,
but it looks like she said blood labels.
I just think so they can't even get
this stuff right. So what blood libel is
an argument about some classic accusation of Jewish
things that are supposed to be conspiracy theory
from even though what's interesting is a lot
of the things they call blood libel, you
can literally prove. But that's I've done that
with, you know, like, poisoning the well, for
example. Harrettes wrote an article about how that

(04:01:18):
was a real concept and did happen to
Palestinians. The point is it's not about that.
It's about them hiding truths that are the
guys that if you say things they don't
like, you're suddenly attacking Jews.
By saying that you're murdering children, and we
can see you on video murdering children, it's
not a blood libel. It's an accusation that
we can prove.
But that's the best they can do. In
Israel, but I'm telling you, if there is

(04:01:39):
one thing I can guarantee you, nobody's ready
with respect to ambassador. I I mean I'm
not talking children.
So the one thing she can guarantee you
is that no none none of them are
talking children. Despite the fact that we just
had a 60
a a New York Times article about 65
doctors who all signed a letter saying that's
what was happening. Or my thread with what?
Like, 30 different doctors who were all saying

(04:01:59):
the same thing that I put out before
that article came out?
Jay was quoting from different reports. He was
quoting reports that my very respected colleague, Matt
Fry, has done on on the issue.
Matt Fry is not somebody who invents things.
He does not broadcast things that are untrue.
You'd never see that, you know, before October
7th.

(04:02:19):
They just they would have cowered away because
you're not supposed to challenge Israel. And I
think just to say, well, anybody who's committed
a defense can be brought before the Israeli
courts is a is a bit of a
cop out. Yeah. It is. It is a
cop out. Glad you're saying that because we
already know. Even even if you pretended there
was an actual court system going on, ignoring
the fact that we can prove that there
is no judicial independence, they lost it a

(04:02:40):
long time ago, and it's clearly manipulated by
Netanyahu's cabinet and the rest of the power
structure.
Which by the way is the argument about
why the IC and ICJ
and ICC don't apply because they have an
independent judiciary. They don't. It's been written about.
But either way, even if you pretend that,
you still wouldn't go, well, they could just
be charged for it. Well, that's not the
point here. It's that you are committing these
crimes. Not that you if they were, they

(04:03:01):
would be charged. Well, that's that's a ridiculous
accusation. What if they haven't been caught? They
are committing them and the evidence is on
the record. It's everywhere, and you know that.
And by the way, here's an article that
Robert wrote in June 21st this year, because
it goes back a long way. This is
not just post October 7th, but it's been
prominently after post October 7th. Israeli settlers consistently
use arson attacks to burn Palestinians alive.

(04:03:22):
I know it sound it's an extreme statement,
but it's very real and it will blow
your mind. This what you're seeing on the
screen is Ali, a young infant child that
was burned alive in a home. That's this
building next that's the shot next to
it because they settlers set the house on
fire. Then, they went on to dance and
cheer in front of the family. Here's Times
of Israel.
Jewish

(04:03:43):
extremists. Those are the settlers. Taunt Ollie's on
the grill at the slain toddler's relatives. They're
dancing and saying, she's on the grill as
they go past them. The family who lost
their child.
Or the videos of them dancing around with
a an effigy of a young child then
poking it in the eyes and burning it.
Dancing around, saying, oh, he's on the grill.
Settlers pract and a video with Ben Gavir
partnering alongside them.

(04:04:06):
These are terrible, terrible monster people.
Whether they're Jewish or not, whether they're Israeli
or not. It's that that's because of who
they are.
And that's what we're defend they're defending.
She knows that. Now here is that article,
rather Ahmed pointing this out. Here's the article
itself. 65 doctors, nurses, and paramedics,
what we saw in Gaza.

(04:04:29):
The New York Times published a piece in
which dozens of foreign medical volunteers who went
to Gaza recounted seeing and treating children who
were deliberately shot in the head and neck
by the Israeli forces.
They have x rays of this stuff. Now
the whole article is very clear.
Now you and you it's right here. 65
doctors, nurses, paramedics, what we saw in Gaza.
I'll include my threat on this too.

(04:04:52):
Which again, I just have to say is
something that we put out a lo a
long while before this. This is from August.
How many doctors returning from Gaza telling you
that Israel is deliberately targeting children do you
need to see before something shifts? Funny that
how that works. Right? In an honest world,
this would have been a lot more prominent
and that's probably why they wrote the article
for all I know. But all of it
scream all of it every one of them

(04:05:12):
are all saying the same thing.
Here is,
Nazan and Nour saying, fellas,
apparently now it's anti Semitic for doctors to
report their findings.
Hen Mazig,
one of the people who's blocked me because
I was making him look stupid, says in
a recent New York Times opinion piece, 65
healthcare workers reported that they saw bullet wounds
in children, which they reported a hell of

(04:05:33):
a lot more than that. He's hoping you
read what he wrote, dismissed the article. In
the article, it's not just they saw bullet
holes and blamed Israel. They watched them shoot
children. I'll play these clips for you. Or
the doctors I mean, it's so obvious that
this is not just hypothetical situations.
They're watching their own doctors get killed. They're
watching their own people get kidnapped and returned,
emaciated, and beaten up.

(04:05:55):
They're watching children come in with sniper bullets
from Israeli rifles targeted to the head.
And it says a nor a normal newspaper
would highlight that they did not observe IDF
soldiers shooting children. Except that's not true though.
In some cases, they did. He's lying. They
might have highlighted alternate re qual equally possible
scenarios that Hamas or anyone could've shot them.

(04:06:16):
With, you know, Israeli bullets, certainly possible. The
bottom line though is we're talking about proof
that we do see them doing this. And
then an on for an overwhelming amount of
children coming in in succession with bullet shots
to the head from areas where they're being
shot at from Israeli soldiers.
While they can see them in many cases
shooting them.
That's the reality. So this is not an
assumption, but this is what you get. It's

(04:06:38):
anti semitic to point out what you're seeing.
Now just the opening part of this, I
won't play the whole thing again even though
I should. It's always in this clip is
always powerful.
Frankly, it's hard for me to watch all
the time, but I wanna play the first
part just because he's very clear about this.
It is important to hear how certain he
is and he have you know, and of
course how didn't how hard it is for

(04:06:58):
him to have to go over all this
stuff all the time.
I thought I had it in here. Hold
on.
There it is. When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. Wait. You're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs

(04:07:20):
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots. It's Israel, by
the way. In fact, more than 20 doctors
recently in Gaza

(04:07:41):
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Every single part of the hospital has been

(04:08:03):
destroyed.
The whole infrastructure of the hospital has been
destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday, he
told me there were a 107 patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.

(04:08:23):
Bodies have been discovered,
in the last 12, 24 hours with who
have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back,
and so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor?
By the Israeli Defense Force.

(04:08:44):
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October 7th.
Over 450
health care workers have been killed. Friends of
mine that I've worked with over the years,
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I can bear witness from this

(04:09:06):
from my time at Alexa Hospital and from
talking to people that there's been direct targeting
of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be

(04:09:26):
upset by this expression, collateral damage. This is
specifically targeted, you're saying, medical professionals
by the IDF to be taken off and
executed is your belief?
Most certainly. That is my belief.
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital. Without exception,

(04:09:47):
every single one has responded to say they
have never witnessed any Hamas militants in the
hospitals they have worked in.
Now that goes that goes back to to
the chief of hospital conversation.
But the if if you if you look
through this thread, every single one of these
doctors, almost all of them, not Palestinian doctors,
from outside other places who are there seeing

(04:10:07):
it are telling you they're watching them kill
children. They're watching them execute doctors. Not every
one of them saying that, but many of
them suggest that. There's more than one doing
that, but then others just simply saying how
many dead children they're seeing and how often
they're seeing. And all every one of them
are saying this is Israel.
Again, that doesn't have to prove that that
it but the point is that the evidence
is overwhelming and people are acting like there's

(04:10:28):
nothing happening. Now this this doctor here, one
of the earliest I saw, Tanya Haj Hassan,
who she he's just emotional. She had a
point where she broke down because she just
couldn't deal with, you know, on live broadcast.
Here she is, putting CNN in their place.
Literally, CNN trying to call this a humanitarian
disaster.
Humanitarian
crisis. This is not a hurricane, ladies and

(04:10:49):
gentlemen. This is genocide, and I'm glad she
had the courage to put her in her
place.
Humanitarian crisis with the additional factor of
Gaza's about to enter the winter, which often
brings heavy rain to the region.
Kate, in all in all honesty, a humanitarian
crisis is what you deal with when you
have a hurricane, what you deal with when

(04:11:11):
you have a an earthquake. You have an
an an insult
and a humanitarian response. This is my my
career. This is what I do for a
living.
And by the way, she's been there many
times now. I she might even be there
now as far as I know.
Every single person who does this for a
living will tell you the same thing. This
is different. This is not a humanitarian
crisis,

(04:11:31):
Kate. And I'm gonna say it very clearly
for your viewers to hear. This is genocide.
When 70% of the population that are killed
are women and children.
When the population is starved of food, of
water, of medicine,
when you have
attacks,
repeated attacks on
all the hospitals, the clinics, the aid distribution

(04:11:53):
sites, the humanitarian
aid agencies that tried to help.
More UN workers have been killed in Gaza
than in UN's history.
When you have over 900 families that have
been exterminated,
that have been taken off of the civil
registry killed.
When you have over 17,000

(04:12:13):
children that have lost 1 or both parents.
When you have bakeries,
aid distribution sites, churches, mosques, schools, and in
the last 3 days, in the last 24
hours, in fact,
a hospital today that was bombed as you
just reported the hospital where I personally was
working. And I can tell you they are
working

(04:12:33):
every second of every day to try and
sustain life when Israel's strategy
and evidence on the ground suggest that they're
doing the exact opposite.
They were targeted today. There was a rehabilitation
hospital that,
rehabilitation
center that was started in the last 24
hours, and there was an orphanage that was
targeted earlier this week. These are the types

(04:12:56):
of places that are being targeted.
And so it's really hard
to hear it over and over and over
again frames in the way that it's being
framed in the media, which
frankly, Kate is very misleading.
It is very misleading
365 days of this death tolls that are
so far outdated. We have no many. We

(04:13:17):
have no idea how many people are killed,
but I am I am genuinely
afraid about what we're gonna find out when
the dust settles history books will be written
on this
and countries will have to reckon media agencies
will have to reckon with their major role
in the genocide of an entire population
and in the destruction of humanitarian

(04:13:39):
law and rule of order
look at her face in the middle.
Look at her, like, trying to look concerned,
but just looking impatient and irritated.
This is these people are just
mannequins. I just it's just crazy to me.
The but the point is she's speaking to
her. You are that, meaning she's referencing. You're
part of this. So good for her. Now,

(04:14:01):
last point on this, if you want this
is the same doctor we referenced, that we
played a minute ago speaking about the sniper
chur sniping kids. He has a he had
a recent interview, doctor Mark,
Perlmutter.
Perlmutter
Perlmutter,
yesterday.
Volunteer doctor in Gaza speaks to TRT World.
Now he he he just the point I
stopped on, but the trucks never crossed. He's

(04:14:21):
simply highlighting that in his own experience, he
watched them not let aid come in, which
we're gonna get into in a minute. But
this is a longer interview, 36 minutes, where
he goes over all this stuff. Tells you
what he's seen. Tells you he's seen that
Israel's killing children, that they're starving people. It's
worth watching. But you know all this. We've
covered it all. There's a then this is
just a one more data point showing you
that it's very real.

(04:14:43):
Now let's talk about Gaza because this is
important. This has been something, unfortunately, I put
off for, like, a week now. And the
reality that this is because I mean, the
truth is that they've been doing this for
a long time. But this is the official
stated new plan about them
taking over Northern Gaza. Even though they've already
occupied it long back in 2006 forward, they
yes. They still occupied it. According to every

(04:15:04):
legal dynamic, every United Nations of the the
international law, that's the case. Because they control
every aspect of it whether or not they
had boots on the ground. They had the
the the what the fence is saying to
do justice. You know, the wall, the fenced
in, barbed wire wall, keeping everybody in. The
point is they controlled it. Now they're simply
seizing back
the northern part of this and ethnically cleansing

(04:15:26):
everybody in the area to the point to
where now they're getting to the argument where
they are just exposing what they've always been
doing,
which I'm gonna make a point very clearly
about before we go into the food side
of this. They're now saying
after they got caught or at least called
out by even Kamala Harris, because I think
it's just opportunism,
that they are not letting any food in
at all in October. You realize it is
October 14th.

(04:15:47):
Zero food trucks since October?
I mean, that it's just it's that's what
at a point when even before this 500
a day was what they needed to survive.
They're straight up manufacturing
everything that's happening here. And the point is
that because they made a point of it,
it got a lot of reach. And so
the next day, they roll out their surrender
or starve plan.
It's just clumsy, reactive propaganda.

(04:16:10):
All you're doing is getting caught for what
you've always been doing. Now you just give
it a name like it's no. That that
that's so they can argue that it's only
new. It's only now because we rolled the
plan out. After 14 days of not giving
them food, how did they know there was
a plan? How did they know they were
supposed to surrender if you didn't give them
the plan the 14 days after you started
starving them? It's pathetically obvious.
Nonetheless, they're being forced through bad propaganda to

(04:16:32):
expose that they're starving them now. Even at
by admission.
But let's realize,
it's always been happening.
Their whole argument this whole time is we
would never do that. We wouldn't do well,
now we're gonna do it though because the
plan.
The evidence, despite their narrative, is showing you
it's always been happening.
Even before October 7th to some degree, they
were actively maintaining a minimal bare minimum amount.

(04:16:53):
That's what they've on the record.
So before we get to that,
dead bodies everywhere in Jebeliah camp as Israel
besieges northern Gaza. This is October 10th.
So they made this clear. The US government
didn't care. They stated they're gonna take they
realized remember the beginning, the main point was,
look, they're just gonna take Gaza. They're gonna
literally take more and they no. What do

(04:17:14):
you mean? They're that's they're they're good guys.
Thought of a freedom.
Now, as always, it doesn't matter what narrative
you used to fill in the blank, now
they're doing what we told you they would
do.
Because narrative.
And there's always something they'll tell you to
rationalize well. We can't, you know, terrorism and
bad guys. The point is, they want this
territory, and they wanna kill all Palestinians. They
want Lebanese territory, and they wanna kill Lebanese

(04:17:34):
people. It's always easy to see if you
actually look beyond the narrative.
In this case, they told you it was
gonna happen. They told you they partitioned it
right in the beginning, and now they're pushing
it out of the north. It's step by
step by step.
Eventually, they're gonna give you a story more
than they're gonna do to the south. It's
one step at a time. And they're gonna
force these people out, and this will be
exactly what we always told you was coming,
and they'll have a narrative for why it
makes sense then. It's ethnic cleansing. It's genocide.

(04:17:57):
It's mass displacement. And then they'll point at
them being out of their place for why
other things are problems. And it's still their
fault no matter what.
Gaza in the north are trapped in their
homes as Israel launches a new military operation.
So at first, they told them to get
out of the way, but then after a
very short period of time, they didn't and
they trapped them in there. That was also
proven. Even though they kept acting like they

(04:18:17):
wanted them to get out of the way,
they weren't able to. So it became a
fish in a barrel slaughter. You know, just
like every other day before this in Gaza.
Marwa Fatafa
Fatafda
highlights this horrifying I'm gonna play it, the
audio, so you can hear it. Just because

(04:18:37):
I wanna hear the kind of just
sociopathic
dole in his voice.
But this is a Israeli this is Al
Jazeera put this out. It's an Israeli
speaking about what they're doing to this area
in what we just see. We're in Gaza.
In Jabaliya, in Jenin, where the where they
are at Jenin's West Bank, in in in
the Gaza area that they are continuing to
bomb.

(04:18:57):
As they posted here, what goes through the
mind of a pilot as they drop bombs
on refugee tents? That's what's happening. They're bombing
these tents. And I'm gonna I'm gonna tell
you right now before we get to it,
there's some horrifying images. Maybe not as graphic
in the past, but it's the kind of
stuff that will haunt you. So just keep
that in mind if you wanna see this.
They bombed a bunch of tents. Just like
they've done before.

(04:19:19):
And he said, what goes through the mind
of a of a top pilot? It's a
good question because just because these governments are
genocidal, I mean, some of these people are
not. As we've seen whistle blowers who speak
up but they can't live with themselves. Right?
What goes to their mind? Is they're bombing
these innocent people? Some of them don't care.
Well, this person writes in our own words.
This is what goes through their criminal minds.

(04:19:43):
Butterfly Station, this is community.
We're launching, get this, operation 8th candle of
Hanukkah.
This this is a conversation between sir sergeant
Daniel
Blankonovich
and sergeant Dov Van Schuster
saying the burning
of the shoe, of the

(04:20:04):
Chugaya neighborhood
Yeah. This is what's called mowing the lawn.
That's what this means.
We're we're just bombing everybody, civilians almost deliberately,
so we teach them a lesson.
Right? Don't let this happen. Don't don't do
don't let Hamas do it. Like it says

(04:20:25):
like it's their choice to let a group
that Israel funds do what they want, which
is the truth.
That's that's what they're
knowing that they're bombing civilians, knowing they're bombing
tents and refugees, let them be deterred. Because
it's just Palestinians, which we should know by
now. That's how they view it.
This is what we'll do to all our
enemies.

(04:20:47):
And not a memory
will be left of them.
That's Amalek.
We will annihilate them to dust.
Command out.
Totally normal exchange. Right?
These these are sociopath. These are prophetic,
radical maniacs

(04:21:08):
who are talking about
annihilating all Palestinians to dust. It's live. You
can play these things. It's everywhere. The ICC
and ICJ are overflowing with this information, and
somehow your government pretends they don't know. But
that means they do because we know they
do, and they're okay with it.
Mind blowing.

(04:21:28):
Arnab Betrand,
remember 1 year ago when there was an
international
outcry
at the thought that Israeli missiles may have
landed in a ho a hospital courtyard?
Interesting to think about where this actually was
post October 7th started. Right?
Everyone was debating about whether it was a
was a Hamas missile, and it was a
pass Palestine was on Jihad, or whatever it

(04:21:49):
was. Right?
He said, it's a testament to how far
the goal posts have been moved, and how
desensitized we've become to the horror that their
straight up burning patients connected to IVs makes
zero effort to cover it up, and barely
makes a blip.
This is terrifying.
I'm gonna show you the actual video.

(04:22:11):
So these are it's a refugee camp.
And again, before we go past it, remember
that conversation.
And they were trying to defend whether it
was them or not. Then it just became,
well, there's human shields. So deliberate targeting of
hospitals full of people.
And that wasn't even a shit. That was
just a force to shove that goal post.
Here, we're now watching them just murder innocent

(04:22:33):
people. They barely even have to give an
excuse.
This is just a still shot.
This is a
some people say it's a child. It's hard
to tell.
A person burning alive while connected to an
IV in a hospital.

(04:22:58):
My god.
God, it makes me sick.
Daniel McAdams says this is a modern day
holocaust.
No question.

(04:23:21):
Assad Rod says there Assad Rod says there's
there will be history books about this and
people who knowingly let it happen.
The definition of a concentration camp. A place
where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners
or members of persecuted minorities are deliberately imprisoned
in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities,
sometimes to provide forced labor or to await

(04:23:42):
mass execution. What's funny is even that term
has been sort of slanted toward the idea
of the holocaust World War 2. Because a
concentration camp doesn't have to mean specifically persecuted
minorities, but that's been added. But even then,
yes, exactly the point. Because now we're talking
about the exact even the definition that you've
slanted it to for what's going on right
this moment. Israeli military's days long siege of
northern Gaza and relentless bombing has deepened the

(04:24:04):
humanitarian crisis in the region. Yeah. Humanitarian crisis.
With no food aid entering since the beginning
of the month.
United Nations estimates around 400,000
people remain trapped in the northern region.
How what else are we talking about here?
A small area where they've all a 1000000
peep 2,000,000,000 people have been jammed. Assuming that's
hot we don't even know how many are
left, ladies and gentlemen. 2,200,000

(04:24:26):
people.
God only knows how many robs you dead
right now.
This is what we're dealing with.
And as Nora Nami writes,
or as of just starting with this one,
these are their targets.
This this is from this this is what
we're talking about. These are children who are

(04:24:46):
suffering
because of what they're doing. No one's even
trying to stop this right now, it seems,
other than people like us.
Here's another example. A baby girl was born
on 11th
and then injured that day going through an
Israeli airstrike. Thank god she's still alive.
The same day she's born.

(04:25:08):
Here is a journalist saying we are living
literally living our final moments.
Oh, Allah or oh, God, grant us a
good end.
So it does the late poster 2 hours
ago, so thank god it looks like he's
still alive.
But as Dan Cohen writes, Hassam is live
tweeting what will likely be his own murder.

(04:25:29):
The 21st century is at least as barbaric
as any prior,
but we witness it in real time.
Think about that.
Robert and Lukesh, Hezbollah killed scores of Israeli
soldiers in a precise drone strike. That's what
and we just this is what just happened.
So Israel burned alive, injured Palestinian
refugees at a hospital in Gaza.

(04:25:52):
There are no words left for these genocide
button mashing war criminals.
Don't don't they don't excel at war. They
only only at killing civilians.
Because because whether this is why, that's exactly
what happened. They turned around and just murdered
a bunch of innocent people in hospital beds
in refugee camps because they got embarrassed.
Too much power for people that have never

(04:26:13):
earned it.
Howard Beckett.
Israeli bombing tents in the courtyard of Al
Aqsa Hospital in Gaza. This was on 13th.
Israel is out of control. Hariah nation bringing
terror to innocent civilians. Biden and Starmer have
supported a monster in Netanyahu. All are guilty.
And realize, apparently this is a area that

(04:26:34):
everybody's telling us are are just packed full
of people.
They're just openly bombing exactly where all these
people are. They're not even trying to give
you an excuse anymore.
Hold on. Make sure I didn't actually close
something right there.
Okay. Good.
So, here is Lloyd Austin.

(04:26:56):
Secretary of defense.
So after what Robert just told you, here's
what he says. I spoke with the this
on 13th. I spoke with the Israeli Minister
of Defense,
Yohmic Galan, on the October on October 13th
to express my condolences for the IDF soldiers
killed in a drone strike. Oh, weird how
he's never spoken up about the American killed
in Lebanon. Has he mentioned Jeffrey Lofredo yet?
Oh, but he's gonna he's gonna make a

(04:27:17):
huge post about how we reached out to
the IDF when they had soldiers killed in
a war.
Wow. What what I mean, yeah. You could
I mean, human life. Right? But isn't that
what happens in war? Do you reach out
every time a soldier's killed in an ongoing
war? No. He wants you to think this
is unprecedented. We reached out to console them
against their horrifying terror attack.
IDF soldiers killed a drone strike in a

(04:27:39):
against in a war with the people they're
bombing and in case in cases where they're
bombing civilians.
And he says, I also reiterated the importance
of ensuring the safety and security of the
UNIFIL forces, Lebanese Armed Forces. Oh, you mean
the people that they're bombing and attacking with
chemical gas weapons?
Guys, these people are compromised.
Or or a monster themselves.

(04:27:59):
You don't think Lloyd Austin has access to
this information? He knows what's going on. He's
either hiding it or a part of it.
This is I also raised the dire humanitarian
situation, otherwise known as deliberate starvation and genocide.
Monster.
Yeah. So here's here's a a soft I
mean, he's saying, hey, buddy. They're burning people

(04:28:19):
alive.
But he we can we have condolences for
the soldiers. What about the children? They just
burned alive. Well, we didn't comment.
And then here's an Israeli representative. The ambassador
to the United Nations.
Or, say, it's Leib
says genocidal maniac Netanyahu is burning Palestinians alive.
Bombing hospitals, starving people, and killing aid workers.

(04:28:40):
Now, I don't support her. I think she's
crazy. But at the end of the day,
she's right.
When will our country stop funding those madness?
When?
Now largely some of these people I agree
with when it comes to what's going on
in Israel, but let's realize that I I
mean, personally, I don't even believe that they
care about these things. I don't know. I'm
jaded.
But I my point is that these politicians
will use whatever they can to benefit themselves.

(04:29:00):
Sometimes that lines with the truth.
Here's what he said. The only ones who
burned children alive were your buddies over Hamas.
Oh, so now we're back to that lie?
We're back to the 4 debited babies or
the children they burned alive? No. None of
that's true. Every single one of these lies
has been debunked by even Herets.
There were only 2 children as we understand
it on in the the

(04:29:22):
what was exact? The the bottom line is
the information Herets I I don't wanna misquote
the actual time frame.
Bottom line is the numbers that Herets put
out themselves, that even people that were present
admitted to have exposed the Zocco people as
lying about the information. And the only children
that we've seen that were killed were not
burned alive, were not beheaded, and in fact,

(04:29:43):
I argue were killed by the IDF at
least in one case and the other one
burn or the, that burned but, killed in
one of their bombings.
Because that that was the one that was
the family that I think that, Porat spoke
to. Was standing in the yard and said,
there's a family in there. And they went
on to bomb the building.
And I think that's why we ended up
with the I the Hamas members burned alive

(04:30:03):
that they just called people in Israel. They
were forced to admit to later.
But the bottom line is,
if you let's just even say you wanna
call that a burned child as opposed to
just being bombed, that's Israel who did that.
There is no evidence of any kind of
children being burned by Hamas.
And here he is, doubling down. And that's
even even suppressed news says that's your Apache
helicopters. Right? So if you wanna call that

(04:30:24):
burned alive as opposed to being bombed, the
point is what we're talking about here
is being bombed.
You are the one trying to pretend that
the only thing that happened. Ignoring this, ignoring
everything else is that Hamas did something on
October 7th that we know as a matter
of fact did not happen. And then, of
course, if you wanna make that further, you
mean Hamas that was funded by Israel?

(04:30:46):
There's just no way you can't see this
by now unless you're lying to yourself.
They are on atrocity propaganda
a year later.
Here's what Sky News wrote about this. Israel
has named the 4 teenage victims of a
Hezbollah drone strike on a military base, Otherwise,
known as military
personnel. Teenager or otherwise, they're IDF members.

(04:31:07):
So Sky News is personally naming the 4
people that were 4 of the people that
were killed by a illegal drone strike on
a military base, but then goes on to
say, as at least 23 people were killed
reportedly killed in an attack on a school.
You see the slant?
It's it's, it's sickening that they would even
like, they maybe they don't even recognize their

(04:31:28):
own bias.
As Alan McLeod says, Sky News called a
murdered Palestinian toddler a lady,
but describes 4 active IDF soldiers hit by
Hezbollah as teenage victims.
What accounts for this bias is in in
infantilizing
Israeli soldiers, but treating Palestinian babies as adults?
Here's low key saying a bullet found its

(04:31:50):
way into the van and killed 3 or
4 old young lay k. This is how
they actually reported this. A bullet found its
way into the van and killed a 3
or 4 year old young lady.
I just can't even wrap my mind around
how dumb that is.
Now Max Blumenthal highlights this journalist saying an
Israeli occupation

(04:32:10):
has besieged us in the area. That's what's
been going on. This is as of 12th,
which includes Bet Hanun, Bet Lehiyah, and the
Jebler refugee camp. For the past 8 days
and nobody's very few people are making it
may like, this is a no matter how
you spin this, this is a massive crime.
But you realize how far we are from
that mattering anymore? From anybody in power?

(04:32:32):
Since October 1st, they have stopped all food,
water, and medical supplies from entering. They have
threatened hospitals to shut down. Stop fuel from
entering in order to hospital and stopping hospitals
to operate and are targeting anyone who moves.
So far, 400 people have been killed. 400
people are bleeding in the streets. We can't
even reach them. That's my point. So they
pretend to let them get out of the

(04:32:52):
way. They shut it down and wouldn't let
them leave while pretending they wanted them out
of the way.
That's why we were worried this guy was
gonna get killed, the real time tweeting about
what's happening.
Max says, the evidence of Israel's genocidal intent
could not be more clear. Embracing a plan
concocted by, Gora Iland who previously called for
spreading epidemics among the population of Gaza, Israel

(04:33:14):
is starving and bombing out 400,000
people to ethnically cleanse the north of Gaza.
In a long in the long run, it
will fill the area with Jew only settlements.
But for
now, it aims to create a a blood
spattered wasteland, and it clearly has a green
light from the Biden Harris administration. And if
you think that'd be different when Trump is

(04:33:34):
there, you are lying to yourself.
Or RFK, for that matter, which is noticeably
quiet as it supplies the necessary tools to
execute this monumental livestream crime.
But seldom
about this exact discussion.
Sure. You know, it used to matter when
human rights groups, let alone the leading Israeli
human rights group, spoke up about crimes. But

(04:33:55):
it says Israeli NGOs warn international community warn
international community it will be complicit in Israel's
forcibly transferring of population from northern Gaza. They're
simply saying that we warn the international community,
you're complicit right now. If we don't stop
this,
you're complicit.
Now most of the community seems to at
least be expressing that, but the power structure

(04:34:16):
won't let anything shift.
Human right NGOs based in Israel today called
on the international community to take action.
Now to prevent Israel from forcibly transferring 100
of 1000 of Palestinians. This was on 14th.
Today. It's happening right now.
You I don't see anybody talking about it

(04:34:36):
in the corporate conversation,
in the mainstream
alternative
media. Why not?
It's wild.
Now here's the craziest part.
I guess, maybe not the craziest part. One
of the crazy parts with this is that
the US government threw this ridiculous person back
on 10th.
Some suddenly had a line that was crossed

(04:34:57):
apparently or at least want you to think
that.
But meanwhile,
still funding, still arming, still lying for. So
recognize they are desperate to get you to
think they suddenly so all this shows you
is they are more so losing control than
ever.
This is green,
Linda Thomas Greenfield

(04:35:19):
speaking about how
they have to abide by the resolutions calling
for a ceasefire.
So think about how dumb it is to
say that while 1, vetoing all of those
things every chance you get, which they have
done, or
supporting what they're doing.
Kinda feels hollow when you're complicit in every
way, but then stand over here and go,
we should

(04:35:42):
stop this. Here's money. Here's 1 here's weapons.
I veto the thing. I veto stopping this,
but we should stop this.
We should these people deserve ridicule. I mean,
these are genocidal
criminals,
I think, trying to desperately find a way
to work their way out of going to
prison.
Is concerned about the situation
in Northern Gaza,
including the announcement by Israel of a new
evacuation
order for Evacuation?

(04:36:03):
Hardly. They're threatening them with genocide. They're telling
you that you're I mean, if you actually
look at what they're saying, and as you
just heard from the doctors and the generals
journals on the ground, they're just murdering people.
Put evacuation.
Right?
Not mandate like, they're they they make it
act like it's a a non mandatory
evacuation.
Right? Well, that's not the word they use.
They make it sound like it's their choice.
Like, we're not forcing anybody. But if you

(04:36:25):
don't move, we're gonna chill you. That's what's
happening. Rural communities.
We're particularly
concerned
that Palestinian civilians
have nowhere safe to go. Oh, you're concerned,
are you? Well, it's lee it's about
365 days too late.
If you think about how insulting it is
to pretend like you care that they're suffering
after a year of funding the genocide that

(04:36:46):
is putting them in this place,
or 76 years of supporting it.
Already, there are devastating reports of the squalid
conditions
in the humanitarian
zone
in southern and central Gaza, where more than
1,500,000
displaced civilians
have fled.
These catastrophic conditions
were predicted months ago and yet have still

(04:37:09):
not been addressed. Oh, yeah. Because you're giving
them weapons, because you're lying for them. You're
oh, it's like you're acting like it's somebody
else's responsibility.
We raised the issue, and it's still happening
because you keep arming them
and keep gaslighting for them. And, again, everybody
knows this. She knows that, or she's really
stupid. That must change. And now

(04:37:32):
we call on Israel
to take urgent steps to do so. Consistent
with resolution 2735,
there must be no demographic or territorial
change in the Gaza Strip, including any actions
that reduce
the territory of Gaza. And then when that
happens though, they'll just jump to the next
narrative. Mark my words.

(04:37:53):
Terrorists or something, and we have to it's
their fault. They chose. Whatever the narrative is
they decide to run with, it's gonna be
that this is okay now, And we'll move
forward with the you know, it's it's right
now, they're doing everything she keeps saying it
shouldn't happen. Where are they speaking up? Right?
You made the warning, Linda. Now, they didn't
listen. Now, they did that. Where are you
now? Shouldn't you be on every channel going
they're doing the thing I said they shouldn't

(04:38:14):
do and they're violating the law? No. Because
you don't care. These are hollow words from
a hollow person. We're also concerned by recent
action by the Israeli government to limit the
delivery of goods. Not limit,
completely stop.
Into Gaza. All parties must meet their responsibilities
under resolution 2720.

(04:38:35):
Disgusting.
I just can't stand when people who like,
again, it's like the murderer standing up and
telling you and speaking about how we need
to fight against bad you know, we need
to work together to stop the murderers. Well,
you're the one we all know did it.
Glenn Greenwald says a new study from Brown
documents the stunning amount given to Israel. That's
the point. So as she's pretending like we
care about this or that they care about
this,
this is the reality.

(04:38:57):
It's $18,000,000,000
to Israel plus another 5,000,000,000 from US military
actions for Israel. Now I can prove to
you it's way more than that in in
many other ways. But these are just what's
on the record in certain military labeled
dynamics, and it's simply saying US military aid
because realize, the aid they give them is
basically all for the military and what they
want. But look at the jump.

(04:39:17):
Look at this. It's incredible.
You you can't pretend like you you you're
you're given them more than ever while there's
more evidence than we've ever seen to justify
not doing that.
There's no misunderstanding that. Linda or anybody else,
they're complicit in genocide and trying to narrative
their way out of it.
They just in in just in general, this

(04:39:37):
is just Putin speaking up about what's going
on there. Now you could argue he doesn't
care, but, nonetheless, he's right because it is
terrible. It could simply be opportunism in using
this to make himself look better at the
expense of what they are doing though. That's
the point. He says there is no justification
for the terrible events taking place in the
Gaza strip. When you look at dead children,
how women and elderly are suffering. Of course,

(04:39:58):
fist clenched and tears come to your eyes.
Now don't forget the obvious influence of Israel
and and Russia, but recognize
that the world, whether through opportunism or not,
are calling out what they're doing. There's no
comeback from that.
Now, of course, all they can do as
this vivid guy who apparently everyone claims is
just a guy from India pretending to be
an Israeli because he's being paid to from

(04:40:18):
the idea, but that's up for you to
decide. The point is, here's another one of
their amazing audios that they break down. You
know, even though they've been caught, like, what,
twice now for by by, like, audio at
at visual experts proving that they spliced them
together or they altered the words. I mean,
it's embarrassing how many times they keep getting
caught and they just go back to the
same thing. Right? Here's a video of something
we've cut or here's a a fake audio

(04:40:40):
recording. As even Kim Iverson simply says, staged
call between 2 badly beaten Palestinian prisoners. Alright.
Even then, we already been proven
it's already been proven that many examples of
what they have on those videos were forced
out of them. They tortured people, as we
now know for sure, to get them to
say what they wanted.
As I'll yeah. I'll just grab the first
one I can remember, which is just the
easiest one to pop up.

(04:41:01):
See how easy this is?
This is 2017. Israeli court says Shin Bet
pressured man to give false testimony. You type
that in, you'll find an endless amount of
articles coming from Israel because that's what they
do. Not my opinion. It's easel it's a
historic record.
So the point
is that if what they could fake this
because they've been caught faking it, they could
splice it and edit it because they've been
caught doing that, or it could be examples

(04:41:22):
of them torturing people into saying what they
want. Any of those things, all of those
things have been proven.
You realize I mean proven. Like, the e
the example for torture is that they have
people out there saying, we had babies and
rape.
Even though even the Israeli media have proven
those aren't true. So there's only one explanation.
They force those people to say those things.
Here we have again. A Gazan civilian admits

(04:41:44):
Hamas is forcing them to stay on the
front lines, preventing them from evacuating. Oh, that,
now it all lines up. Now we can
kill everybody. Right?
Apparently, that's what the IDF thinks.
The monsters use them as human shields.
Think about that. So, the easy all they
have to do is simply go
they're forced they they're all the Gazans that

(04:42:05):
you can see, they're they're being forced there.
No. All all of them are telling you
that they're staying because they want they're never
gonna leave their homes.
And they just go lie, Hamas, bad guy,
and they bomb all of them. That's what
as we're speaking, that's what's happening.
Straight up murder. But like all the rest
of it, your government doesn't care.

(04:42:29):
Now,
Caitlin Johnstone,
citing antiwar.com.
I'm really citing horets, but they I I
the antiwar is somebody you should be following.
Israeli government done with ceasefire talks or never
were actually engaged with them, which is what
you should read from this. They're just shifting
into what they've always been doing because it's
all being exposed. Done with ceasefire talks seeks
annexation of Gaza. So that's

(04:42:51):
Heretz.
Literally, Heretz is writing that, God, they're going
to annex Gaza.
And here's Linda Thomas Greenfield going,
they aren't supposed to follow this rule, and
we're gonna watch them closely. They've already written
an article about how they're gonna take it.
You see, people are ridiculous.
And on top of that, carrying out an
ethnic cleansing plan for northern Gaza, which will

(04:43:13):
pave the way for Jewish settlements.
Here's what Caitlin Johnstone writes, and there it
is. They're finally admitting it. This is all
this is all that has been ever been
about. This is all it's ever been about.
I agree. Not hostages, not ending Hamas, Not
self defense. Not mass rapes. Not beheaded babies
or beheaded pla be babies placed in ovens.
It's always been about taking land from the

(04:43:35):
indigenous people of Palestine.
100%.
At least one of the main things they're
going for here.
So that brings us into the plan they're
now rolling out, which exposes the other side
of it. That they're starving them. So it's
always been what's been going on. And anybody
with a brain can see it because it
was easily proven from day 1. You know?
What's funny about it is all those people
that were screaming, rightly so, about how obvious

(04:43:57):
it was that the COVID 19 shot was
killing people, and the evidence was there, or
the masks don't work. Oh, you're they were
simply going, why can't you look at the
evidence?
Maybe you're doing that right now with Israel.
Think about that. The reality is the evidence
was clear. You were right.
But that's just like it's happening here. Right
now, the amount of evidence that will show
you everything we're talking about is more than
COVID 19 illusion. It's so aware

(04:44:19):
incredibly obvious. And if you're still out there
going along with the narrative, ask yourself
why. Glenn Greenwald writes, if Israel's conduct over
the last year in Gaza, all paid for
by the US, does not constitute grave war
crimes and crimes against humanity, then nothing does.
CNN. UN says no food has entered northern
Gaza since the start of October.

(04:44:41):
And what this still kills me. Putting 1,000,000
people at the risk of starvation?
No, CNN. That's already going on. Here's an
article from a month ago. Famine is imminent
for 11,100,000
people. Half of Gaza experiencing catastrophic food insecurity.
They're already starving.
So this being they're not being put at
the risk,
you're risking death for the already starving population.

(04:45:03):
That's the point. Which, by the way, is
happening.
Every day, I'm seeing images of starving children,
of emaciated people. It's all over the place.
Vice president Kamala
says the UN report that this this this
is why I think this got this shifted.
So on 13th with 6,400,000
views
no. Doesn't whether she said it or not,

(04:45:24):
it is the truth. UN report found that
no food has entered northern Gaza in nearly
2 weeks.
Israel must urgently do more to facilitate the
aid.
If you cared about it, you would've called
this out 6 months ago, 8 months ago,
when children were starving then too.
But she doesn't. This is an opportune opportunist
moment. She's trying to do this to influence
the election or perception of it, however you

(04:45:46):
view the whole thing.
Civilians must be protected, she says, while arming
the genocide.
Disgusting.
Look at that. International law must be pre
respected
while violating
countless resolutions around the world. The US government
explicitly, as well as pretending Israel's not doing
the same thing.
Okay. So the point is clear.
This came out on 13th.

(04:46:08):
Or at least that became very prominent. Then,
the next day,
they sat around the table and said, what
do we do? Okay. Let's roll out a
plan.
Israel is considering
surrender and surrender or starve plan.
Right? So the cat's out of the bag,
which has been for a very long time.
But because Kamala Harris is visible, everyone, even
the average moms in soccer play, we can

(04:46:29):
all see that she just said that. Now
we have to change this is my opinion,
but
the next day this is from the Telegraph,
mind you. And I this I have the
articles and stuff right here for it.
Surrender our star. Okay. So what you've been
doing the whole time then? And what do
you mean surrender? Are we talking about so,
a well, surrender for what? Average Palestinians? So

(04:46:51):
understand, we're talking about people in the North,
not just Hamas, they're trying to get out
of the way. Who, by the way, they're
killing in a fish in a barrel type
way anyway.
But then because she highlights that they're not
feeding them,
they roll out the surrender or start plan
in the north.
You see how easy it is to see?
They're just talking about Palestinians. So what are
they supposed to surrender for?

(04:47:12):
Being Palestinian, guys, this is what they're just
showing you how transparent this all is. But
the other main point is they're towing they
were starving them.
So if they were ever willing to go
starve to death or do what we want,
why wouldn't they have done it in the
beginning? At the very least, you can't pretend
like it's so un with blood libel. Right?
That's what they were doing. You're a racist

(04:47:33):
for suggesting we would do the thing that
we just rolled out for it.
Under this proposal, 400,000 civilians would have 1
week to evacuate. You see my point? So
surrender for what?
They're Palestinian civilians.
And what are they gonna do when they
surrender? Go to prison?
This is terrorism.
There's no way around it.
It says those remaining will be treated as

(04:47:54):
enemy so this is crazy. Enemy combatants. So
if you surrender,
you surrender to the Israeli government that's raping
and torturing people. If you don't, we're gonna
treat you like a combatant and kill you.
So the same either way then, apparently.
Kinda shocking.
Now oh, this is interesting by the way.
So this comes from the Telegraph.

(04:48:14):
So I was searching for it to find
the Telegraph article. And look, you could find
it. Look, Telegraph. Israel considering surrender or starve
plan in Gaza.
But then, this one or this one.
Oh, that's not the same one. Oh, but
it does say right there. See, underneath it
it says it.
The point is,
you click it, and it's not there anymore.
But you can look for yourself. It's it's

(04:48:36):
gone. It's they've removed it. I wonder why.
Probably that old influence I keep talking about.
Zionists snap their fingers and suddenly those things
disappear.
But there's some of it still up. Here's
some of the articles pointing to what they
said. This is coming from the Associated Press
actually.
Netanyahu considers surrender or starve plan.
So the same thing. So it's 14th today,
this was yesterday. But just because they say

(04:48:56):
considering it, it's already going on. And I'll
continue to show that as long as I
possibly can. So oh, and one more point
by the way. Here's the Associated Press, Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu examining the plan to
seal off humanitarian aid. There's no
rationale. There's no justification in which that becomes
okay.
It's the same conversation. It doesn't matter whether
they've been murdering for a year or not.

(04:49:18):
Day 1, post October 7th, this is what
we were telling you. Because they said, remember,
no fuel, no water, no food. And they
keep telling you somehow that's racist or not
true.
But now they're doing it though. Publically, going
we're gonna shut off the aid because bad
guys. Okay. So it doesn't change. It's the
same difference. It's a crime. If it was
a crime then, it's crime now. There's no
different narrative if they're saying hamaz. There's hamaz.

(04:49:38):
It's the same thing. So ask yourself how
it takes a year later for them to
just come out with the same story.
And now that's okay?
Here's what Piers Morgan says.
If this is true, it's disgusting.
If it's true?
Okay. So let's be clear. Associated Press is
citing Netanyahu.

(04:49:59):
That he's examining a plan to do this.
That's on the record.
And he goes, if it's true,
if you can't see by now the flimsy
way Piers Morgan tries to pretend he's objective
and clearly has one side in this conversation,
you don't want to see
it. It's pathetic. And as as propaganda and
co clearly nails it, if it's true. Yet
you bought the atrocity propaganda narrative of raped

(04:50:20):
women and beheaded babies right away and still
push that on your pay on your interviewees.
That there's so much evidence of rape. But
no there's not, Pierce. And I think you
know that.
If it's true.
Coward.
So here again
is Matt Miller also showing you that they
they're trapped. They don't know what to do.

(04:50:41):
And this is speaks for itself
about blocking aid.
Apparently, they're not doing that, but we told
them to stop doing that.
I mean, it's it's pertinent that you you
have made a an assessment or the secretary
made an assessment that Israel has not been
blocking aid.
And that was kind of based on the
fact that they were making improvements. Since they've

(04:51:01):
gone backward, would you
revisit that assessment? It sounds like things have
gone backward from that. So what we said
in when the secretary made that assessment, and
if you look at the the language inside
the National Security memorandum report, it's quite clear
that this would be an ongoing assessment and
that we expect progress to continue,
and that

(04:51:23):
if we see a change in situation, it'll
change our policy. And at the moment, for
the purposes of US law, is Israel blocking
delivery of the humanitarian aid? We have not
made that assessment at this time, but that
goes to the point that it is urgent
that they correct the situation and allow humanitarian
aid to get in.
Okay. Got it. So by correcting it, that
means allowing the aid in, which would only
imply that it's currently not coming in, which

(04:51:45):
means they're blocking it.
Think about how dumb that is. And he
just smugly stands there like an idiot. Just
woke up. I don't know if he accidentally
said that. The point is, it's obviously the
case,
and they know that. And, again, we don't
need to prove that. ProPublica,
Blinken, US State Department information's already proved that
they know that, and that he hid that.
And then even gave them the authority to

(04:52:05):
bomb aid trucks if they thought it was
gonna go to Hamas, which means they bombed
all which that's their excuse for all of
it.
Absolutely incredible.
Once again, he embarrasses himself by claiming the
US has not made that assessment. So here
here is the
UN report bringing this right up to October
that's showing you exactly what we're seeing, yet
again confirming that this is accurate. They've been
lying about it the entire time. That's down

(04:52:26):
to basically nothing. And also showing you that
they are counting private and government. So they're
showing you both. That's relevant for the next
point. They're trying to line out and manufacture
this element about they're only counting the ones
they want. It's just pathetic. All of this
is easily proven.
They are starving them to death. And never
once have they gone over the amount of

(04:52:48):
500
trucks they need.
Pre crisis average in one day was 500,
including fuel.
Not once have they gone even close to
half of that since October 7th forward. They
went almost 0 in the beginning and then
only barely trickled it up until the point
is now we're getting to
I I don't know why they removed the

(04:53:08):
numbers at the bottom here for something, but
these these these are the daily numbers right
here. May 88, 81, 80, 87. That's where
we are.
They're starving them on purpose. They know what's
happening.
Here's the IPC. As they show again, all
of the evidence in every possible way continues
to show you they're starving them, and they
just keep lying about it.
Famine is imminent. 1,100,000

(04:53:29):
people. The IPC is the location to look
to to decide that.
But here's Elon Levy.
The Gaza famine is a hoax. Here's why.
Right? Here's his breathtaking evidence.
A random white guy in the suit telling
you things
on Twitter.
Is a lie that has been told repeatedly

(04:53:49):
about Israel. And once you Oh, look. It
says lie with an x through it. He
must know.
Find out how it was cooked up, you
will be shocked. I'm talking about the lie
that Israel is starving the people of Gaza.
The prediction of imminent famine in Gaza
was based on miscounting
the food trucks going into Gaza.
Literally, it did not take into account all

(04:54:11):
of the commercial and private food deliveries to
Gaza. It also excluded World Food Program deliveries
to bakeries in Northern Gaza. Did not. These
food deliveries are taken into account. It turns
out the people of Gaza have more than
enough
food and calories. Nope. In other words Nope.
The claim that Israel was starving the people
of Gaza only made sense
if you didn't

(04:54:32):
count the massive amounts of food that were
entering Gaza. You know, ignoring literally everybody, including
doctors, including UN members, including people in the
or, you know, World Central Kitchen,
Doctors Without Borders. I mean, you name it.
Oxfam, UNICEF. Literally, everybody is saying not only
that we're they're stopping it deliberately, but they
can see them doing it.
And how about the hundreds of videos we

(04:54:54):
have of settlers burning the food, pulling it
off the trucks, IDF in tow, watching them
do it. Like, it's just painful
that you think this idiot, whoever he is,
is gonna sit there and just tell you
things on Twitter. Thank you, Twitter files.
How embarrassing. This is the best they can
do. And also recognize that we're talking about
the idea of, you know, not challenging

(04:55:15):
violent historical events. Right? I thought that was
the whole thing. YouTube, Twitter. Right? I'm not
calling for censorship. But my point is that
if you consistently app applying these things,
if we're if we come out and deny
things from World War 2, all of a
sudden, you're censored immediately. Guy literally denying the
most obvious genocide that we're seeing in history.
No big deal. Why? Because you're allowed to
ignore Palestinian suffering.

(04:55:38):
It's embarrassing. These people are a joke.
Gaza famine is a hoax. Now understand.
He's not saying they're just getting enough. He's
saying it's a hoax. Like, if there there's
nobody starving, despite children dying, despite all of
the evidence that we have.
Right? So what are we saying? The IPC,
the World Central Kitchen, that Oxfam, UNICEF, UN,

(04:55:58):
Human Rights Groups, Amnesty International,
that the Doctors Without Borders, all the doctors
we just showed you independently speaking out, that
they're all just working together to lie about
Israel because they hate Jews?
As I'll obviously say, certainly possible,
is absurd.
I mean, think about how crazy that is.
That is about the equivalent of saying, I'm
right and every single person in the world

(04:56:19):
is wrong, which is obviously a possibility.
But if you're being objective, with all the
facts we see, if all you're gonna do
is take this idiot guy on the video
and Elon Musk or, Elon Musk Elon Levy's
word for it?
I mean, why so you're ignoring all the
facts to lean in with what they're pointing
to. And let's be clear, I just showed
you the UN information, I showed you the,

(04:56:40):
the I the IPC's point.
They're saying it's happening. We're showing you all
the real world evidence on the ground. Now
we're gonna get into Israeli media telling you
the same thing.
Israeli army's general has a plan for Gaza.
Starvation, transfer, and genocide.
Think about how dumb it is. This is,
this is in September. And yet, here they
are, rolling out people like this to just

(04:57:02):
lie to you.
So here,
CNN reports that they haven't entered any food
since October. Now realize, it's at a time
when they're already telling you that we're gonna
starve them. Surrender or starve. But fake news
until we want you to know about it.
But this guy says, why are you lying?
And gives you a screenshot.
Gaza food supply enough for population needs, study

(04:57:22):
finds. Well, that's where they're getting this nonsense
from. Now let's look at it. Because you
know that's how we roll on this platform.
Study finds food aid to Gaza exceeds international
standards. Well, you know why?
Leveraging data from Israel's
Cogat group. The researchers
analyzed aid deliveries by land and air between
January April.

(04:57:43):
Think about that. So first of all, it
only goes until April. A lot has been
declined since then, but they were already dangerously
starving right then from Cogat.
Oh, I see. So just like the Shinrijab
converse Shinrijabic conversation, we're gonna look to Israel
to investigate itself.
Cogat is a fake entity.
I'm telling you guys well, I shouldn't say
fake. It is an entity that is invested

(04:58:04):
in the narrative for Israel propaganda. It is
not court here's the actual platform.
Oh, wait. Where is it?
Cogap,
which is supposedly the coordination of government activities
in in Westbank.
And they're not. And coordinating humanitarian

(04:58:27):
aid.
No. They're the ones that have, from the
very beginning, been caught repeatedly lying about humanitarian
aid. Let me show you.
So, again,
the study says
they're using their information.
Okay? So that's the already. So you it
doesn't have to prove that they're lying, but
I'm gonna show you that they've been caught
lying
in ex ex exactly around food.

(04:58:48):
And then I'm gonna show you
hold on. Where was it?
Well, in any case, the point that Cogad
has been caught lying explicitly.
And and then very clearly show you that
the evidence is that they are back starving.
And here is the study itself. Food aid
supplied to Gaza during 7 months of humanitarian

(04:59:09):
Israeli war. Well, again, so COGAF's the one
giving them the numbers.
And they're just running with a study based
on the numbers they're showing them, and I
can prove to you that they're lying.
Here's the study. Do you notice anything different?
Working print and by the way, a preprint.
Not even peer reviewed, but I I doubt
it will be. Here look at this.
Every these are all the people involved.

(04:59:31):
Tel Aviv is real. Israel. Israel. Israel.
Israel.
Israel.
Israel. Okay. So literally everybody involved
is a person in Israel that can obviously
like, the argument be if you wanted an
actual study to find this out, it should
be independent.
Not Israel investigating Israel to find that if
Israel committed a crime.

(04:59:52):
So Cogat is the group we're talking about.
Right? So Cogat. So the entire that's how
dumb it is. The preprint, an entire study
based on one Israeli entity giving them data.
Why don't you ask the UN for that
data?
Well, obviously, because they go, UN, bad guy.
Okay. How about the IPC? How about the
world how about all the rest of them
combined? No. No. We're just gonna lean into
Israel.
That's why. Because everybody else says that it's

(05:00:14):
clearly happening and they can prove it. But
here's Orin Barsky who came out early in
this, February 10th. I've shown you this many
times. And says there's no famine. Same thing.
Same agenda.
There might be hungry people, but no. Look
at all this bread. That's the whole point.
Oh, look at that. It's nusrat, the bakery
in Gaza. Right?
Even Twitter broke this down and said food

(05:00:35):
shortage in Gaza are widely documented, with some
people resorting to eating animal feed. This is
in February 10
to survive. There's evidence that the Israel Israel
is contributing to aid delays and shortages. The
bakery in the video was bombed and destroyed
in October 2023.
I've shown you this countless times. I mean,
I can even probably look up the bakery

(05:00:56):
itself. Nah. I don't wanna waste the time.
The point is that Al Nusra Bakery was
destroyed. It's one of the type images from
one of the recent shows I did or
shows at this time.
And where do you think they got that
from?
Cogat.
That's the point. They're the ones doing this.
They're lying. And we can prove it. Because
the bakery was destroyed. So Cogat dumps out

(05:01:18):
this garbage
article about this literally pretending it's news rat
even though we could prove that it wasn't.
And there's another example. Here's this, Kogad is
literally dumping goods on the Israeli side of
the cream shalom crossing, which can't be reached
without Israel's coordination.
Then, mocking international organizations that can't reach the
goods because of a lack of coordination

(05:01:39):
during this catastrophe.
They're manufacturing this.
They're creating circumstances they would blame for why
they're not getting the food and then point
to anybody else. That's not what a organization
does who's actually trying to help people eat.
Then you get these ridiculous ongoing threads. This
is the bottom of it.
This guy going, they get more food more
than enough food.

(05:01:59):
Showing you this ridiculous thing from October 9th.
Says Gazans who chose to remain in the
war zone of Northern Gaza are fed up
having to eat canned food, and here's the
garbage heap. How many how I says, how
fed up are they? Not enough to make
them move to southern Gaza. The bottom line,
they're trying to pretend
that they're so unhappy that they just dumped
all these cans. We're not even eating all
these cans.

(05:02:20):
That's the point.
Quite frankly, I don't even know if this
this well, this could be 20 years old
for all we know. But the point that
I think was most hilarious,
as this person points out, have you looked
closely at the video? Pretty sure they're empty
cans, and he's right.
If you actually stop and look, they're all
empty.
Okay? So it's amazing the lack of due

(05:02:42):
diligence or the lazy effort to make this
out to be something that it's not.
And again, this is October 9th, for crying
out loud. So for all we know, they
went through whatever excess they had right after
they stopped the food from coming in. Right?
The point is that they're so desperate to
make this into something that it's
not, that they're exposing themselves.
But this is just one small example. It's
everywhere.
So the point

(05:03:02):
is even Israeli media, as they're right now
telling you it's a hoax, are writing the
same thing.
Here's the plan. Starvation, transfer, and genocide.
This one's from March 18th, this year. Gaza
will soon face famine.
UN backed report says, EUTalk Diplomatic accuses Israel
of provoking hunger.
Israeli media.
Israeli military doesn't grasp the risk of mass

(05:03:24):
death by starvation in Gaza,
says Haaretz, May 3rd.
January 12, 2024. Half a 1000000 Gazes are
suffering from acute hunger. Let that sink in.
But listen to Elon Levy and this random
white guy because they know. Right?
Citing extreme hunger in Gaza, Israel's Israel's top

(05:03:44):
food security official calls for ceasefire.
This is this is my point. There's no
missing this. You either want to care about
this or you have an agenda.
Israel's own food security official calls for ceasefire,
citing extreme hunger.
But Elon Levy wants you to believe they're
swimming in food.

(05:04:05):
Almost 10% of Gaza's under fives now acutely
malnourished.
February 9th.
June 4th. January 4th, excuse me, 2024.
Much harder for children. Severe hunger is spreading
in Gaza. Four voices from a human catastrophe.
Lastly, from 2023, Israel's deliberate starvation of Gaza's

(05:04:26):
civilian population is a war crime.
All of that is heretics. Every single thing
you just heard is heretics.
Mind blowing, man. It really is.
Okay.
In regard to Lebanon,
mass slaughter of innocent civilians, women and children,
That if any other country did, it would

(05:04:47):
be massively condemned.
Putin, Xi, Modi,
cowards. Silent hypocrites.
He's pointing out the ongoing death toll in
Lebanon. That any other country that they would
want to point it out in, it could
be a fraction.
But now that it's Israel, they ignore it.
And here we go again.
Since Western regimes backed them when they slaughtered
tens of thousands of civilians in Palestine

(05:05:09):
in the name of fighting Hamas, the genocidal
Israelis are doing the same to the Lebanese
people. Rising death toll,
2,141 deaths reported an ongoing Israeli attacks as
of 10th October. This is 4 days ago.
Halal Floe points out that Matt Miller was
cornered after deflecting when asked whether Israel's threatening

(05:05:29):
Lebanon with annihilation. So we already briefly talked
about this. Netanyahu stood up and said that
we're gonna do to you what we do
in Gaza.
And they can't acknowledge it.
That's how trapped they are. This is Matt
Graham calling him out. Or is it,
is it Matt Ryan Graham, excuse me.
You said earlier,

(05:05:51):
that Israel has a right to attack Hezbollah
as a terrorist organization.
I wanted to ask if you had seen
the Israeli prime minister's
video that he put out in English
to the people of Lebanon last night. He
had a couple lines in there. He said,
you have an opportunity to save Lebanon before
it falls into the abyss of a long
war that will lead to destruction and suffering

(05:06:12):
like we see in Gaza.
I say to you, the people of Lebanon,
free your country from Hezbollah
so that this war can end.
That seems like a blanket threat against the
civilian population.
Well, it it is. But what's important to
point out is what right does he have
to say, get rid of something I don't
want. Otherwise, we're gonna hurt you. Doesn't that

(05:06:33):
sound a bit like terrorism? Yes.
Even if you don't even if you agree
with what he's saying, it's not anybody else's
place other than Lebanese people to decide what
they allow in their country and what governs
their country. It's the same game they keep
playing everywhere else. They love to say that.
We don't have any right to tell them
what to do, only when they're in fact
actually deciding what happens.
Any place where they're not in control, they

(05:06:54):
love to make it out to be that
we have to make sure, otherwise, we're all
a threat.
These people are disgusting hypocrites.
Is that terrorism?
So
first of all, let me say we
cannot and must not see,
the situation in Lebanon turn into anything like
the situation in Gaza. Too late. You already

(05:07:15):
get it. That would, of course, not be
acceptable.
Like like the other 400 red lines you
pretended weren't acceptable that you were then ignored
in Gaza.
And ultimately,
it is the as I said in response
to an earlier question, it is up to
the Lebanese people, not anybody else,
to
decide on who their government is. I said

(05:07:36):
in response to another Except if Israel wants
to, you're gonna let them know. Right?
Or how about Hamas?
Right? They elected you claim again, I dispute
that that's even how that went down. But
the narrative is they elected Hamas, a plurality,
not a majority, 45%.
But then you didn't like that, so you
changed it. That's what happened. We can't let
Hamas be in control. Okay. Same thing is

(05:07:56):
happening in Syria and the rebels. We can't
allow Assad to be in control. You guys
are so ridiculous.
On the face of this, you can see
countless examples of how that's not true in
your mind. But when you want it to,
it applies. That's why I asked why nobody
in that room calls these things out.
Question. No country in the region should dictate
to the Lebanese people who their leaders are.
Jesus. Not Israel, not in not the United

(05:08:17):
States, not any of the other countries in
the region, and that should continue to But
I obviously agree with that, but that's not
what they believe Israel is dictated. To be
the case. No. They're they're conducting,
operations going after a terrorist organization. That's a
different thing than You see how that works?
Because they deem it terrorists. Therefore, these things
don't apply. So he loves to make the
wax intellectual about what we should all do,
but then he knows in his mind, he's
that's terrorists. That doesn't apply. But you don't

(05:08:38):
know that when he's saying that. He wants
you to believe that they're the good guy.
Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization. Now how
many times they wanna say it? It's not
the reality of the situation. I've been over
this many times.
Dictating what the civilian government should be. That's
a question for the Lebanese people to decide.
So So, again, you see, he just say
he reiterated the point. So but not them

(05:08:59):
though because we don't like them.
Logic. But if they decide
against Israel's wishes,
Israel is threatening
Gaza like annihilation of Yep. The people of
Lebanon. And I'm making very clear that,
there should be
no kind of military action in Oh. Lebanon
that looks anything
like Gaza and They're late.

(05:09:21):
Been happening for 4 days.
Is a result anything like Gaza.
Right. So as always,
they then do that, and then Matt does
nothing, or the US government cowers away from
it.
And Matt falls suit.
That's what we're dealing with right now. As
Asal Rad points out, so we went from
limited operation to Israel threatening what they did

(05:09:42):
to Gaza and ongoing genocide in Lebanon. There's
ben Benjamin Netanyahu's tweet right there. Suffering like
we see in Gaza. You are literally threatening
in public an entire population.
It's wild where we are, isn't it? Like,
it's actually even for someone like me to
see this so I've always felt
this because of what I've been seeing and
researching and recognizing, but to see this so

(05:10:03):
vividly displayed that these people are what we
always thought. Like, the worst possible envision of
what they are.
In a way, it's kind of, you
know,
I'm sorry. Word for it. I wanna it's
not nice. It's in a way, it is
you know, it's it's good that we can
at least go, yes. They that is what
they are. We can prove that. But
it's horrifying at the same time. As, Mohammed

(05:10:25):
Safa points out, this is not Gaza. This
is Lebanon. So here we go again.
This is Lebanon you're looking at. Imagine living
in a world where you could get arrested
or suspended for saying don't kill children because
it might hurt the feelings of the killers.
How are we letting this happen again right
after it? We haven't even engaged fully with
what's going on in God's end. They're just

(05:10:46):
doing it again.
Right and real right in front of us.
Aaron Mate says the use of the term
Hezbollah infrastructure
is revealing.
Matt Miller could have said Hezbollah military targets,
but he knows that Israel is also destroying
Lebanese civilian infrastructure, and he's signaling that the
US is fully on board with that too.

(05:11:07):
I agree.
It's not let Hezbollah infrastructure. You're just taking
down the infrastructure
and blaming it. It's Hezbollah tunnels and Hezbollah
couches and Hezbollah TVs and Hezbollah just like
with Gaza.
Everybody knows that. Like, I genuinely think that
they all know this.
Jason Hinkle points out that in Lebanon, Israel's
not even bothering to invent excuses for bombing

(05:11:28):
hospitals and fire stations. There's no attempt to
fabricate claims about command and control centers. They're
just openly destroying civilian infrastructure
and on a massive scale.
Here's Sarah Abdallah. They dropped bombs at a
fire station in southern Lebanon on 7th, telling
10 Lebanese firefighters.
Why? Because they don't want them stopping the
fire. Because not in Gaza, they can shut
it down quick. But in Lebanon, there's infrastructure.

(05:11:50):
It's not Gaza. But they're targeting what they
need to make sure they turn it into
Gaza.
Vanessa Bili, who I'm interviewing coming up soon,
says I am not told I am now
told that nobody can leave or enter. This
is as of 12th, which is what I'm
I've heard as well from many reports.
Closing the door completely and preventing people passing
the bomb crater on foot.

(05:12:11):
And she the image she just simply shows
you the breakdown. People aren't being are not
allowed to get out, just like they're doing
in Northern Gaza while pretending they want them
to.
Dan, Bill Zareen says, shut the f up.
You can't bomb em you can't bomb embassies,
assassinate foreign leaders, commit genocide, and then cry

(05:12:32):
for sympathy. The world will celebrate your demise.
He's pointing to IDF saying, as tired as
you might be of seeing us post about
siren sounding, our civilians are more fed up
with running to shelter every time those sirens
sound. I mean, I get it. I get
why he's the way he's responded to that.
First of all, let's recognize that these don't
mean bombs. They mean sirens went off.

(05:12:53):
And let's also recognize that they're very capable
of just turning sirens on to torture their
own people as long as they get the
benefit from that.
The the perception that we're constantly under attack.
But even if they are,
we're talking about people who are
they're look at the civilian death rule. It's
shocking
to see on the they're targeting civilians, whereas

(05:13:15):
the other side is not. There's no denying
that anymore. Iran didn't even kill a single
person.
And the bottom line here is that they're
running to safety.
They get to run to their bomb shelters,
and they get to complain about their skinned
knees and their anxiety while people in Gaza
are literally being melted in front of their
families. People in Lebanon are burning inside of
their tent. That's what's going on, or rather

(05:13:35):
their homes.
So, yeah, I don't have much compassion for
people who are simply
I mean, I do for the individual people
who are dealing with this, whether they wanna
be involved because of their genocidal government, but
I don't have compassion for the government pretending
like they're the victim.
Ryan Yacolek points out a pretty ex I

(05:13:56):
think a good example of how they're exposing
their agenda.
In an interview with LBC, Biden's special envoy,
Amos Host, Hochstein,
who ultimately is acting in the interest of
the Israeli government, there's no question there,
he is a Freudian slip. Listen for yourself.
And at the same time, have a new
government,
once we elect selective once Lebanon selects a

(05:14:17):
president,
have a new once we elect selective once
Lebanon selects a president. Oh, that's pretty interesting.
So as she
writes, once we elect or select or once
Lebanon selects a new president, oops,
every time. Don't forget Ukraine,
Victoria Nuland on on a league recording, handpicking
the supposed election. It's again, it's that obvious.

(05:14:39):
It goes back so far but somehow the
a lot of the population just never wants
to acknowledge that it's real. And I don't
think that's the majority especially not today.
We can make this change today should we
recognize that we're the majority. Outside of the
party nonsensical,
the childish party paradigm,
outside of the people that are afraid to
see it, the majority is there. We just
don't act on it.

(05:15:01):
She's saying the US is trying to force
Hezbollah out of the government by installing a
pro US president. That's why Matt Miller is
acting so strongly against how we should never
because they're doing that. That's my point. Every
time.
And don't forget, there's already
evidence.
There's an entire organization called the Movement For
Settlement in Southern Lebanon

(05:15:21):
published this map saying the new Hebrew names
for the settlements of southern Lebanon. They know
that they everybody can see it. They're not
even hiding it. But your government acts like
we don't know, and the media pretends it's
not there.
There's there's even a new logo for this
movement to take over Lebanon and make it
Israeli settlements.
Here

(05:15:42):
is Smotrich,
a dangerous Zionist.
Saint Jerusalem is destined to extend all the
way to Damascus.
This is the Greater Israel Project, guys. That's
this is not a secret. They praise this
in the public. But the western media and
the western governments act like it's not there
because they're part of it.
Israel's sovereignty extends from the sea to the

(05:16:03):
Jordan, he says. Does it extend there or
do you go on to conquer? He says
to of the Jordan?
Absolutely, but slowly.
Guys, it's right in front of you. Where's
the Jordanese government?
Don't you care that leading element of the
Israeli government is openly telling you you're next?
This is my point about how they keep
pretending that Russia or Hamas, if we don't
stop them, they're gonna invade the US next.

(05:16:25):
Not as far as I can tell, but
you sure as hell have designs to do
exactly that. Or the Azov movement you find
is openly telling you they're gonna spread the
white race around the world as soon as
they're done with Russia. The ones that we
can see that will do that are the
ones that you're involved with.
No question.
He goes on to say, our greatest our
our great religious elders used to say that

(05:16:47):
the future of Jerusalem was to extend as
far as Damascus.
You get the point.
Real real
sane looking person, I would say. These people
are extremists.
Like, the extremists of extremists.
And the same point, Daniel McAdams says, suddenly,
it becomes evident that the whole post October
7th response was not retaliation, but in fact,

(05:17:08):
a long planned land grab.
Here's another point not to forget. This is
from a cia.gov
FOIA request.
Israel, Lebanon, implications of indefinite stay in Lebanon.
This is not new, guys.
Where was it again? This is
1983.
K? Realize how old this is. Or the

(05:17:28):
the document was created in 2016.
They're referencing a note from 1983.
Cut to the chase.
Well, hold on. Shoot. I forgot the word.
I'll find it no matter what.

(05:17:48):
Shoot.
The point is, they want to use Lebanese
as cheap labor. Oh that's what it was.
There it is.
Says over time, this trend is certain to
become further entrenched.
Practical realities will force the southerners to come
to terms with Israeli currency
and products as ties with the rest of

(05:18:10):
Lebanon Road. This is a time of post
occupation,
which they already occupy Lebanon in Sheba Farms.
It says the Lebanese could also become another
source of cheap labor for Israel,
much as West Bankers and Gazans have already
been used. Used.
Your government is involved with this ethnic cleansing
occupation program. They know what's going on. I
mean, up here they mentioned Syria. They mentioned

(05:18:32):
they've this is a major organ a major
operation.
The Lebanese Arabs would have it says right
here the, where was it?
5500,000
Lebanese will increase the Arab population under Israeli
rule, an occupation of 2,300,000
compared to 3,200,000 Jews, roughly 600,000 Arabs inside
the 1967

(05:18:53):
borders.
The Lebanese Arabs would have little in common
politically with Lebanese. However, especially since Israel would
probably continue to acknowledge the principle of Lebanese
sovereignty over the south, unlike its policy toward
the Golan and the West Bank, you know,
illegally just taking the land. The bottom line
is this is in the designs they had
on somebody else's territory going back as far

(05:19:14):
as you could look. Now they're having people
openly say, there is no Lebanon. Doesn't even
exist. There's never been a Lebanon. All the
same old tired entities are coming back out
to show themselves.
Now ultimately, there's a few more. I was
gonna I wanna just finish since we're probably
longer than ever
to get to the unit the unit the
unit the unit field point at the end

(05:19:36):
with. This is simply the,
at the the, S MEX, which is a
non profit dedicated to safeguarding human rights in
digital spaces,
wants you to know that not only is
Israel occupation causing physical destruction, arbitrary damage, but
it's weaponizing communications
and terrorizing people under bombardment. This is Lebanon,
guys.
So, like everywhere else, they're infiltrating technological advan

(05:19:58):
technologically
infiltrating.
Weaponizing
technology.
And this is the group that that this
is look. Some WhatsApp users are getting banned
from using the app after sharing information about
the war.
Think about that. WhatsApp is banning them. What
does that tell you about WhatsApp?
Working for Israel.
They're banning them because they share information about

(05:20:18):
what's going on. They already used this and
different apps to pinpoint target people they've assassinated.
A Lebanese resident reported receiving WhatsApp messages in
Hebrew from a sender claiming to be on
the the the IDF,
warning him to leave the country before targeting
his family.
You don't think this is what Israel's doing,
guys, and it's everywhere.

(05:20:40):
Don't forget,
I they are the pager attack. I said
Israel's infiltration of US tech in light of
that attack. It is alarming.
Now and, also, don't forget that the UN
refugee chief has already said that their strikes
in Lebanon in general are violating humanitarian law,
law, which we should know by now. But
Ilhan Levy comes out and says, people calling
for a diplomatic resolution for Lebanon.

(05:21:02):
He said it it exists.
It's called UN Security Council Resolution 1701.
It was passed in 2006.
It was never enforced for 18 years. That's
why Israel is acting against Hezbollah. Oh, is
that why? You gotta love these. There's so
many points to make. How embarrassing it is
for this moron to point at the UN
resolution while you're violating UN resolutions.

(05:21:22):
Going back 75 years.
You know how many resolutions? I think it's
the 10 plus when we can prove that
they just disregard because they don't like it.
They go, you're racist. You're biased against Israel.
Okay. Whatever. Even as the truth, why then
does this one matter? We like this resolution.
Look at how they're violating it while we
ignore 14 of the on top of that,

(05:21:43):
post October 7th, there are resolutions already pointing
out that they're supposed to be stopping
what's going on. A cease fire should be
in effect according to international law. They don't
care.
See how insulting it is to act like
we're supposed to listen to when you point
to 1, but not the other way around?
But also,
that's not why they're doing this. As we
can already clearly point out. But it goes
because the international security architecture has failed.

(05:22:05):
But it says, here's another diplomatic resolution that
Israel violates.
UN Security Council Resolution 465,
which condemns the Israeli settlements in occupied territories
declaring them a violation of the fortune even
convention and calling on Israel to cease all
settlement activities.
Oh,
That's another one. I wonder what date that
one was initiated. Let's check it out. Oh,
my gosh. 1980.

(05:22:26):
See how dumb this person is? I mean,
even if you knew about it. What an
argument to make.
They're they're violating this resolution. Okay.
Raise you.
Resolution 465 from 1980 that you've never acknowledged,
which means you continue to violate it and
only built more illegal settlements.
So you get to pick and choose what
resolutions you wanna follow? Yes.

(05:22:49):
Make fun of this person. He deserves to
be made fun of. Then even more interesting
oh, 2 more points actually. So here's what's
funny to me. Wait. Here's on top of
all of it,
it's a UN resolution. Right, Elon? Didn't you
just tell us the UN was Hamas?
Wait. So you want us to follow Hamas's
direction?
Am I confused?
Obviously, it's a stupid argument and that's what

(05:23:09):
I'm making fun of. They're not Hamas. I
don't trust the UN, like, more like trust
anybody. But to claim they're just our Hamas
is so stupid.
But yet, here we're gonna listen to Hamas
because he likes what they're putting forward. Resolution
1701. How dumb this is.
Or the president or rather, excuse me, the
minister of foreign affairs in Israel says, I've

(05:23:30):
declared the UN secure secretary general
persona non grata. He's barred from Israel. Okay.
So you're barring the president of the UN,
the secretary general,
but follow this resolution that they put forward.
It's just people are so stupid. Pick a
lane, dummy. You guys gotta make sense of
this.
But here's what's interesting.

(05:23:50):
Calling their bluff, I argue. And here here
check this out. This is on October 13th.
That's why he's doing this. Because they all
all they can do is try to reactively
respond instead of being smart enough to see
ahead of it.
On October 11th,
the Lebanese prime minister,
Hezbollah agrees to UN resolution 1701.

(05:24:13):
Got it? So they come out and go,
we're good with it. You know why? Because
they're calling their bluff. They're trying to show
the international community, look. We're gonna pull back.
But what they say is they they were
they're they're they're arguing that they need not
Israel to fill the gap, right, which is
what they want, but peacekeepers that can be
deployed between them. Here's what's interesting about this.
Right now, that's already a dynamic. I think

(05:24:35):
that they're doing this they're very tactical, I
think. They're doing it because we're gonna get
into the conversation about the UN peacekeepers
in an area
this is about the Irish peacekeepers, the Unifil,
their point that they're being targeted for maintaining
their position.
This is all interconnected, guys.
So as Lebanon is saying
or Hezbollah is saying, we agree to the

(05:24:55):
thing that they claim we're not following.
And the only reason I argue that it
shouldn't matter is because Israel has never stood
occupying Lebanon. So why would they acknowledge this
which allowed Israel to fill that space, which
they would do if they're illegally occupying land?
It it's obvious that this the legal dynamics
of this is obvious who is the one
maintaining the illegality of it all.

(05:25:16):
But, overall, the main point is that they're
now going, okay. We're good with that. But
we demand that the peacekeepers be the ones
to maintain the area. Israel doesn't want that.
They don't want more UN presence, so they're
gonna go, no. And that's why Elon comes
out and tries to make you think they're
they're not doing it. It's their bad.
Don't mind what they're saying. Don't man the
mind behind the curtain. Listen to this moron
about how they're not doing it, and let's

(05:25:37):
murder everybody.
So Netanyahu on 13th. I'm not I'm I'm
not kidding, guys. This is very easy to
map out. He comes out and goes, net
this is Howard Becker pointing it out. Actually,
I have the clip. Here here's Netanyahu.
I'd like to appeal directly to the UN
secretary general.
It is time for you to remove Uniphil

(05:25:57):
from Hezbollah's
Wait. You mean the secretary general that the
foreign minister just made persona non grata?
This is the day before, mind you. So
you you met you you
oust him from the dynamic, but then call
on him to do what you want.
They don't think we can see this stuff,
guys. This is how I'm serious. I want
you to recognize how

(05:26:18):
they are melting down in front of you.
On hold and from the fighting areas, secretary
general.
It is time for you to remove Uniphal
from Hezbollah's strongholds and from the fighting areas.
Which is not where they are.
The IDF has repeatedly asked for this and
Ask for them to remove themselves from a
legally held position that you have no right
to ask them to move from and then
saying if you don't remove yourselves, we're gonna

(05:26:39):
shoot at you, which they've done. That's the
reality. Met with repeated refusals.
Yeah. Because they're not supposed to leave. That's
their post.
All aimed providing a human shield to Hezbollah
terrorists. And there we are. Look at how
easy that is. So now an entire UN
installation is suddenly human shields for Hezbollah because
you don't want them there.
And what's the US government doing? Oh, the

(05:27:00):
same old thing. Just not caring at all.
Got it.
Refusal to evacuate the UNIFIL soldiers
makes them hostages of Hezbollah.
Oh my god. That's wild.
So the fact that they, of their own
volition, choose to not relieve their post because
they don't believe Israel is the authority because
they don't, then you just go, well, then
you're hostages then. Therefore, Hezbollah.

(05:27:23):
I mean, how do you even how does
anybody so this is the point. This is
why I keep saying honest people, like, that
there's only liars, Zionists,
and people who have the political interest in
this. And literally everybody else can see through
it because look at what he just said.
Do you think there's an honest person out
there with objectivity that's gonna go, woah. You're
telling me that you threatened because their story

(05:27:43):
is not that they're being held. It's not
like they're tied to a post. They're publicly
saying, we're not gonna leave our post. We
have a right to be here. You can't
do this. And then he goes, if you
don't move, you become hostages because Hezbollah.
Which in their logic means we can murder
you now.
You think honest people can't see through that?
They have lost the plot, guys.

(05:28:05):
This endangers both them and the lies of
our soldiers.
Mister secretary general, get the uniform forces out
of harm's way. It should be done right
now. Oh, okay. So now you're doing it
for their interest. Get them out of harm's
way before we accidentally murder them on purpose.
Immediately.
I just really is wild.

(05:28:25):
Netanyahu is now openly threatening the UN, which
not it's not new actually, instructing them to
remove peacekeepers,
troops stationed under a UN resolution, mind you.
So it's funny how over here we're going,
you don't follow this resolution. Now stop following
that resolution. This is so crazy.
Okay. So going forward,
Max gar
Granger
or the IDF comes out in the 10th

(05:28:46):
again and says, Hezbollah operates from within a
and near civilian areas,
including
Unifil posts. Okay. So let's be clear about
something. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization. Hezbollah
has a right to be in Lebanon. Okay?
They are a popular organization.
Part of the government, part of a lot
of acts best acts acts
aspects,

(05:29:07):
excuse me,
of the civilian dynamic of the mili of
a lot of stuff. It's not just military.
So the idea that they might be in
and around posts that are in Lebanon
is not crazy.
The only reason you wanna pretend like that's
crazy is because you deem them terrorists. I
mean, this would be like saying we deem
US government terrorists. Therefore, any post they have

(05:29:29):
anywhere in all of these countries is evident
that those countries are criminals.
Right?
I mean, if you don't remove all of
your stuff from around their base or you
move or rather just remove yourself from out
of the way, then we're gonna start killing
your country.
You it's just wild to me. Or rather,
though, I guess to make it point for
this, that'd be like saying,
in the UK, let's say. Right? So

(05:29:50):
you're operating
hold on.
Operated from within and near civilian areas. Hezbollah.
Including near Unifil posts. So if they are
posted in a location and your troops are
around them okay. That's the point. So why
wouldn't the UK troops have a right to
be anywhere around a foreign base? They would.

(05:30:11):
But because you just go, Now you're terrorism.
Therefore, them being around you makes you guilty.
You see the point? This doesn't make any
logical sense. The only reason this lines up
for some people is they've decided Hezbollah is
terrorism. But even then, UNIFIL has a right
to be in the post. And they don't
control what happens outside of that post. It's
just bad.

(05:30:31):
And your governments are acting like it's okay.
The IDF is operating in southern Lebanon and
maintains routine communication with UNIFIL. No. They're threatening
them. I'll show you. They're firing on them.
In fact, they're using chemical gas. The IDF
troops operated northern,
in Lebanon next to the base. According to
IDF, in instructed the UN forces in the
area to remain in protected spaces after which
the forces op opened fire in the area.

(05:30:54):
So they're claiming that they fired on
them. It's not true. Why in the world
would they possibly do that?
And by all evidence and all testimony other
than Israel, that's simply not true.
But the IEF's headquarters
are located in central Tel Aviv, as you
know, next to a shopping mall and a
sprawling food market.

(05:31:14):
Right? So we just talked about the Mossad
headquarters and all the rest of these. These
are aspects of I mean, even even Iran
targeted these things without killing a single person.
Even though they are embedded within civilian infrastructure,
which is supposed to be justifiable to kill
everybody. Right? According to Israel's logic?
That's the point they're making. So now you've
got a UN justifiable
location that they claim is around there is
therefore human shield.

(05:31:36):
The logic has lost, guys. They they have
lost the plot. They're just trying to patch
anything they can into human shields, and it's
becoming very obvious.
Mendoza also highlights in reverse the Israelis
who use Unifil as human shields are accusing
Hezbollah of doing the same,
even if visual evidence is literally indisputable. So
what they're trying to show you is they're
literally using the uniform base as a defensive

(05:31:58):
shield to fire at Hezbollah.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
It's incredible. And it right in front of
you.
Howard Beckett,
10000 UN troops on the Lebanese border
from 50 countries led by Ireland under threat
from Israel to leave their post.
That's why they want them out of the

(05:32:19):
way because, one, they have evidence to their
crimes, and there are 10,000 people who could
potentially stop them.
They are refusing to go anywhere. Their role
is one of peace, and they are sticking
to it.
Now here's Unifil.
Statement,
the recent escalation along the blue line, which
is sort of the dividing line between these
things.

(05:32:40):
Between, you know, the talk the discussion between
their post and and Israel, Lebanon. And it
says
the the well, the rockets continue to be
launched towards Israel, including civilian areas they're claiming.
Blue line causing widespread destruction of towns and
villages in southern Lebanon while rockets continue to
be launched toward Israel, including civilian areas. Now,
UN is saying this, which take take as

(05:33:00):
you will. The bottom line is the evidence
as we continue to show you,
it's not happening.
Unless you pretend that the settlements that are
being used in illegal occupying territory is justifiable
as civilian area. Well, there's overlapping points here.
I don't believe the evidence shows that they
are targeting civilian areas.

(05:33:20):
Civilian
rather, settlers who are in occupied territory who
have been given official capacity by Israel, many
of which are armed, many of which are
literally carrying out horrifying terror
atrocities. It's not the same thing as saying
bombing civilians. Right? Just to make the nuance
clear. But as I said from the very
beginning, the line in regards to civilians being
targeted has to be clear. But just because

(05:33:41):
the UN says it, it doesn't make therefore
make it true. And that should apply in
every possible context. Going back to the COVID
conversation, the UN body is not something we
should blindly trust. The reason these things are
relevant to point out is because whether or
not UNIFIL is saying this,
Israel is the one saying it's happening. So,
let's just say hypothetically they came out and
said this is what's going on.
You might ask whether this is a larger

(05:34:02):
agenda. But if Israel comes out and says,
yes. We're targeting them, and they give you
another side of the story, that becomes a
little bit more nuanced, doesn't it? And it
shows you that there is there's no denying
that it's happening. Israel just wants you to
think that they're justified in going after the
UN target. It just blows my mind.
In past days, we have seen incursions from
Israel to Lebanon.
The point is simply IDF soldiers are firing
you on positions,

(05:34:24):
hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers
were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communication
system. Now you realize, this is my point.
Israel has acknowledged that they're that they're engaging
with this location.
Yesterday, on the the 9th, IDF soldiers deliberately
fired at and disabled the position's perimeter monitoring
cameras, which was reported by BBC.
So not only are they firing on the

(05:34:45):
location, but they're taking out the cameras that
might be able to document that.
It's very clear to see what's going on
here.
Israel military says they're conducting thorough review after
attacks on UN peacekeepers.
Oh, good. They're investigating their own crimes.
Howard Becker.
A UN declares Israeli troops have opened fire

(05:35:05):
at 3 positions
held by UN peacekeepers. This is on 10th.
Israel has long ignored the UN, but now
they have effectively declared war on peacekeeping troops.
Cyber must ban arms sales now.
Here it is. Fired deliberately and disabled the
security cameras from the BBC.
Now Unifil, as of

(05:35:26):
11th, says this morning, Unifil's
Nagorno headquarters was affected by explosions for the
2nd time in 48 hours.
The ongoing reality to the fact they're targeting
this location. Like, it's amazing to me how
long this can go on.
One day, you might be able to brush
this away as some kind of this is
an ongoing engagement with a UN installation
that has been that has been allowed by

(05:35:47):
a resolution.
And and they just are going, get out
of the way. We don't want you here.
And it's amazing to me this is not
as whether or not you support the UN,
this is wild.
It's showing you the
real time
decoupling from any illusion that they're following international
law. If the US government or Israel, the
UK even remotely care about it.

(05:36:08):
But they're showing you this is how close
they're getting to bombing locations that they're at,
threatening them, intimidating them.
Now here is,
where was his name? They mentioned it here.
He basically speaking on this as an expert
on the topic about what they're dealing with.
Brought criticism not just from the UN, but
also from from countries, including France. Wiro, thank

(05:36:29):
you very much.
Well, let's speak now to Colin Sheridan, a
retired Irish army officer who served 3 years
on peacekeeping duties in Lebanon.
It's good to talk to you. Thanks for
joining us on BBC News, Colin. And let
me just ask you first of all, what
do you think about what Unifil has said,
in that they've now said they're not going
to move back. They're gonna stay where they
are despite what's happened.

(05:36:50):
I think it's absolutely correct, Miriam, that they
take that position. And I also think it's,
absolutely correct. Many of the surgeons out there
that, these
attacks on these UN posts were deliberate, by
the Israeli military.
As your correspondent just stated, I've been in
these these UN posts. You've seen footage and
pictures of these UN posts. They're very clearly

(05:37:11):
marked. Not only that, but the Israeli military
would also have the all the coordinates of
those UN posts, and that's been the case,
for decades now. See this is what's important.
If you're reading this in real time, you
can see that they're not trying to pretend
like they're accidentally or it's not happening.
They're openly going, get out of the way.
Remove these people or we're gonna target them.
So even the even the BBC engagement, like,

(05:37:32):
maybe this was, you know did they deliberately
do this? Yes. Yes. The fact that we
even have to go through that process to
get to the facts is what's so frustrating
for people that are paying attention.
There's very few new UN posts in South
Lebanon and certainly the headquarters, the uniform headquarters
that runs on the core of where the
attack happened yesterday
is it's only 2 kilometers or so from,
the blue line. So the Israeli forces are

(05:37:54):
very aware we where these locations are, and,
they're absolutely aware.
This isn't this isn't a mistake. If it's
not a mistake, what is it then?
I think it is exactly,
a continuation of a pattern of
Exactly what it looks like, lady.
The Israeli military, and the Israeli

(05:38:15):
war machine, if you will, trying to see
how much they can get away with. We're
seeing that with this. They call this a
limited,
ground operation 2 weeks ago. We now see
that they're firing on UN posts.
They call the initial,
strikes on South Beirut,
as they were targeted strikes on, as they
were referring to as Hezbollah strongholds. They weren't

(05:38:36):
Hezbollah strongholds. They were densely populated,
civilian areas, and now they're creeping further and
further into the city. As we saw with
those 2 airstrikes in Beirut last night, We
saw this, this is the playbook, the same
playbook they they've used in Gaza as well.
So it's to see, in my opinion, as
much as they can get away with how
far they can push it. And in trying
to bully the UN out of their positions,

(05:38:56):
this is exactly
part of their modus operandi of what they've
done in the past 12 months. Okay. Colin,
good
And they just allow it. They just allow
it.
Like, you are just straight I mean, look,
we watched them murder. I mean, we just
heard them discuss this. More UN people have
been killed in this war than their entire
history before this.
Really take a second to recognize how crazy

(05:39:17):
that is. And we're not even just talking
about UNRWA. We're talking there's u UN ex
entities around all aspects of this.
And they're straight and they're murmuring them to
Gaza like nothing. And now we're gonna wonder
whether this is deliberate. They're targeting them. It's
obvious. They're blake calling them the Hamas. So
here was an example I briefly showed you
before, just quickly. This guy, Matthew RJ Brodsky,

(05:39:38):
came out and said Israel should carpet bomb
the Irish area then drop napalm over it.
But, oops, it was an accident. Maybe we
should question that. They're literally telling you, just
murder them. Get on with it.
It's crazy to me. And and the point
is, this person was obviously coming in
over the top.
This one was clear. He says oh, actually,
where was it? There's one more. You're right

(05:39:59):
there.
I think the mass rape of Ireland, Spain,
and Norway would clarify things for them and
their populace.
Now this person then got censored.
I think it's because it shows you what
we're really dealing with. Because I'm telling you,
there is far, far worse on this platform
in very prominent positions that they don't care
about. When this guy comes out and says
what half of them are saying right now,

(05:40:19):
but because he's in a position that makes
it uncomfortable, they get him out of the
way. That's what I genuinely think.
Either way,
it's being said. The Zionists are screaming these
things.
Ireland should be conquered. They are psychopaths, it
says. They are psychopaths calling to this guy.
Ireland should be conquered. It will be Israeli
colony. Solve the issue of living space and
eliminate the worst people in the world.
Why? Because they are one of the most

(05:40:40):
outspoken about Israeli crimes.
Alonzo
Grimendi says, wait. Is it re re reasonable
to say there may be an international armed
conflict between Israel and the UN and Lebanon
now?
Unifil says 5th peacekeeper
wounded on 12th.
Is it 5th UN member wounded in something

(05:41:01):
that we're still debating whether it's even happening
deliberately?
Arnabotrand?
The IDF literally used chemical weapons on UN
peacekeepers.
Oh, I've got it right here.
Despite putting on protective masks, 15 peacekeepers suffered
effects, including skin irritation, gastrointestinal
reactions after the smoke entered the camp. The

(05:41:23):
peacekeepers remained are are receiving treatment. Now, again,
as usual. The point being, this is what
they're stating.
The reality though is we as we get
full picture, we know Israel has done this.
We know they are doing this. We know
they've been caught repeatedly using white phosphorus to
get all sort the the Abby Martin has
done an amazing breakdown on the gas they
use a while ago.

(05:41:43):
That this is not tear gas, guys. This
is dangerous gas that is a chemical weapon.
People have died from it.
Now we've got members of the UN,
which, by the way, the point is, if
this was the pea thing on Twitter that
you couldn't verify, that would be one thing.
This is going to be discussed.
These people are going to get tested. There's
going to be a report about what they're
dealing from. I think this is an important

(05:42:05):
shift. I think they may have stepped a
bit too far.
6:40 AM, peacekeepers at the same position reported
the firing of several rounds, a 100 meters
north, which emanate smoke.
Then
they had to put masks on because they
were suffering from skin irritation, effects, gastrointestinal,
all sorts of different things. The peacekeepers are
receiving treatment for it.

(05:42:26):
As Francesca Albanese points out,
for decades, Israel has violated international law, including
UN resolutions, ICJ orders. This year, it has
bombed dozens of UN premises, killed 100 of
UN staff, accused UN officials of terrorism and
anti Semitism,
among others. Now it's attacking peacekeepers. When will
Israel be unseated?
From the United Nations. Good point.

(05:42:53):
Yeah. This is as of today, and I
think this one is actually the next one
is as today today. So here's one more
report
as of 13th.
What's going on with the peacekeepers in Israel?
Phil, the UN peacekeeping force
that says that,
Israeli military
has,
twice
attacked one of their base bases and peacekeepers.

(05:43:15):
They say that on 2 separate occasions,
they have been targeted leaving 15
peacekeepers with injuries. I'll go into some detail
for you now, but crucially, this means that
the IDF have crossed what Unifor say is
the blue line into Lebanon. That's a demarcation
line that was established back in 2000 to
separate,

(05:43:36):
the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon at the time.
So it's effectively
a kind of, in layman's terms, border. It's
a the Ah, right. You mean so the
last time Israel occupied Lebanon. I got it.
And so they pulled back, so they're in
a legally binding official position from a UN
resolution to keep the line between what Israel
would probably take back illegally yet again. But

(05:43:56):
guess what though? They're already fund they're already
occupying the Shiba farm. They're already occupying a
different location of Lebanon because that's what they
do.
Blue line is a demarcation line between Lebanon
and And, in just to wrap this up
since we're super long today, which, again, I'm
I'm I wasn't rushing, so I'm glad that
we went through all this today.

(05:44:17):
But the reality being that this is obvious
history.
So it's incredible, and I think this is
part of it. Right? They know that this
location
represents evidence that they were illegally occupying Lebanon.
So, Bebo, lord Bebo, point this out as
of today.
Israeli tanks have entered the UN peacekeeping base
in Lebanon.
2 Israeli tanks destroyed the gates of the

(05:44:38):
UN interim force in Lebanon.
The peacekeeping mission's official Telegram channel reported. The
Merkava tanks, quote, broke into the base on
the right on the night of Saturday into
Sunday,
the message said. At about 4:30 AM, while
the peacekeepers were in cover, 2 IDF, Merkava
tanks destroyed the main gate of the preposition
and entered it. They asked the base several

(05:44:59):
times to turn off the lights. The tanks
left after 45 minutes after the UNIFIL pro
protested
through our communication mechanism. This is straight up
intimidation.
Breaking in with the tank and tell them
to turn off the lights? It doesn't make
any sense.
Stating the IDF presence was putting the peacekeepers
at risk.
After the tanks left the base, the peacekeepers

(05:45:19):
reported several shots fired a 100 meters to
the north, which were emitting smoke. Right? So
they break in,
threaten
them, then they get they get kinda forced
out, which they never like. They're embarrassed. So
what do they do? Fire chemical weapons.
As the reports go.
The smoke then entered the base, injuring 15
peacekeepers.

(05:45:40):
The IDF press service presented a different version.
The tanks evacuated the wounded
and drove several meters into the peacekeepers' positions.
A camouflage shot was fired to facilitate the
evacuation, and Israeli military posed no threat to
the peacekeeper mission.
So they lied.
As far as I could tell that they
weren't rescuing anybody from within this location,

(05:46:01):
unless they themselves were hurt and they rescued
themselves from themselves.
They were the ones firing. They were the
what they were the combatant. They jump in
there and they claim they were rescuing somebody,
and then, of course, they fire a chemical
weapon
that people get sick from, and they just
lie about it.
It's pretty wild.
But as always, as also Alonzo Grimandi points

(05:46:23):
out, UNRA is Hamas. Uniphil,
human shields to Hezbollah.
UNSG,
anti Israel, ICJ, anti semitic, UN General Assembly,
swamp of anti semitic bio. At some point,
the UN needs to do more than be
shocked, preferably before more UN personnel is killed
by Israel.
Pretty crazy.
Same old excuse and nobody cares. Now, lastly,

(05:46:44):
just a couple of examples of how lazy
this all is.
Here's one of these kind of rising stars
in the Zionist propaganda field. It says, here
is a photo of Uniphil.
See? They're just changing it over. The same
old game. But now here's Uniphil with a
Hezbollah flag. Because, of course, that makes sense.
Right? Because it's so dumb that makes my
d third. It's so embarrassing.

(05:47:04):
All all all all all UN agencies helping
terrorists?
Right. So over here accusing the UN of
just terrorism, but over here, follow this UN
resolution.
So pathetic. But guess what? It says quite
the opposite. It showcases Unifil being attacked.
Misleading. This photo doesn't showcase cooperation between Unifil
and Hezbollah. This is a this is from

(05:47:25):
a video taken back on April 1st,
which reports it showcases residents of the village
of Southern Lebanon attacking the uniform patrol, slashing
their tires and hanging the flag.
Then, even more so,
which I think is more act oops.
So this is what they're say this what
they're saying

(05:47:45):
is that this is an image of them
being pushed back or thought
and somebody else doing that. But I think
this is more the accurate reality.
If you look closely at this,
that just doesn't that doesn't that's ridiculous.
As this person says, not even a good
photoshop. The shade lighting makes zero sense.
It's true.
Now or or how does that make sense?

(05:48:06):
Is this it's a flat thing but somehow
that's I mean, the reality is so dumb
here. Either way,
the rea the idea that we're gonna pretend
that Unifil
is
rocking a Hezbollah flat. Like, how does that
even so you realize this is an entity
that is tapped into the United Nations. Right?
Like, so either that means that you pretend
that UN just is Hezbollah, which again, is

(05:48:27):
so stupid in so many ways.
Are they Hezbollah or they Hamas? Oh, just
I bet they're just Iran now, because that's
the way they'll make sense to some people.
Either way, that's fake.
And they're trying to push these ideas on
you because they don't know what else to
do.
Oh, look. There's another one. By the way,
you must be getting his 10%.
It's fake, obviously. It's it's ridiculous what they're

(05:48:48):
doing.
Now that's that's a joke. That one was
meant to make fun of what they're doing.
But overall, this is what even the IDF
is doing. And look at this, guys. How
break breaking news. It says, you might be
asking yourself the same question we are. Now
realize, this is today. Now after this is
failing, after everybody can see the obviousness of
this, what do they do? Well, we have
to pretend that Unifil are terrorists. Because otherwise,

(05:49:10):
this isn't gonna change. So they spent the
last week trying to tell them, get out
of the way. Make them move. Get out
they're they're they're too close to terrorists. They're
you're being used as human shields. We're trying
to save you. Oh, wait. You don't care
about any of that? Okay. Now you're terrorists.
See how clumsy and reactive their propaganda is?
You just yesterday were telling us they were
in danger to get them out of the
way. But now they're going, look. How come

(05:49:31):
Hezbollah's able to embed their weapons right near
them?
Dun dun dun.
But guess what?
Look at this neatly stacked thing in the
middle of a field.
It's a weird secret spot for a bunch
of weapons. Right? Oh, but look. It's right
over there. That there's their
base. As Mohammed points out, which I agree,
you really think people are dumb enough to
believe that Hezbollah would just neatly pile a

(05:49:52):
stash a wap weapon stash in the most
OCD way, right out in the open?
For Israeli drones to see, and conveniently right
next to a Unifil team? I mean, come
on. They just think you're this stupid, or
they're actually that dumb. And they don't think
that and they don't know that you're smarter
than that.
And if whether or not you even understand

(05:50:12):
how dumb this is, they have been caught
47
times I mean,
in just this conversation. Or let's just even
take the hospitals. Shefa, Al Aqsa, they've been
caught every single time
by the corporate media pretending,
lying, cutting film.
And I mean, like, clumsy.
The ways where they have to delete the

(05:50:33):
tweets.
And here we are. And your governments are
allowing them to roll this right into another
genocide.
Hopefully, we could do something about that.
Almost 6 hours today. I knew it would
be long. I really did. I knew this
was gonna be quite a quite a long
show,
but I think it was important to get
a lot of this out there. As much

(05:50:53):
as I know this will limit a lot
of other people might see it, help me
get it out there, guys. Break some clips
out of this, whatever you found interesting.
Tag me. I'll share it.
But thank you for continuing to support this
platform. Thank you for being here. I love
you all as always question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Israel’s “Surrender Or Starve” Will Admittedly Block All Aid, UNIFIL Gas Attack & Elon’s Great Reset

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

Israel’s “Surrender Or Starve” Will Admittedly Block All Aid, UNIFIL Gas Attack & Elon’s Great Reset

Stuff You Should Know