Trump Is “Solving” Gov-Created Problems To Rollout Your Israeli-Tested AI Control Grid “Solution”

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:21):
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Wednesday, November 20, 2024. Thank you for joining
me today. I have a jam packed show.
Most likely gonna be a long one, so
get buckled in. We've got a lot to

(00:42):
cover today. We're gonna start in general, and
I'm gonna make sure I I'm going to
get to the foreign policy discussions today. But
in just what made the most sense in
the way to organize the show today, we're
gonna start with kind of the same structure
we've have been having the last so many
as I'm sure you guys tend to pick
up on. I oh, just kind of organically
kind of end up coming up with kind
of

(01:03):
organizational
like, during COVID 19, I kinda ended up
doing it in certain ways where I would
start with this category that would lead to
this category. And I and I'm like it's
something like a definitive thing, but you'll kinda
sense the same kind of things over the
last so many shows.
In general, we're gonna start today with the
the camp cabinet picks for Trump, but it
it's more than just that, but around how

(01:24):
this is developing. I still I really do
think I mean, obviously, the what I I
will still stand by the which I think
is just objective
objective fact,
objectively obvious, but what's going on in Israel,
Palestine, Lebanon,
that's the biggest story in the world right
now in my opinion. There's just no way
around it. It doesn't have to mean you
have to care the most about it, but
it is an ongoing genocide. People are being

(01:45):
killed as we're speaking.
My point in saying all that is that
I also find
the coverage of what's going on with the
current power structure in the United States,
not just Donald Trump, but, obviously, he plays
a a major part in that right now,
and how that's developing
and who's influencing that.
My point is, obviously, that's relevant specifically for
Americans, but I see how it connects to

(02:06):
a lot of larger things. When I don't
you guys watch this show. You know exactly
what I'm getting at. But I think that's
why I felt it was very important the
last so many shows to make sure that
you're keeping up on this, not and and
not in the way that you're seeing a
lot of even independent, but mostly mainstream sort
of tit for tat, you know, just kind
of relishing the bad thing no matter what
it is as long as it's against Trump
or for them. And that's just stupid in

(02:28):
my mind. That's childish. And so I wanna
make sure I'm coming through the lens that
I see that see through the
the problematic thing that it is and and
the concerning developments and their backgrounds, but while
still trying to be positive where we see
something that is positive. Not the hope, but
something actually happening thus far. Like I said
before, this all happened. Like, for example,

(02:48):
doctor Shiva, who is running for president.
Now I plenty of things I I could
I disagreed with, but more often than not,
most of what he's putting forward, I thought
I I really agreed with. And my point
was that if he would've won presidency, for
for example,
it would've changed my like, it would've changed
the way I viewed all of this. Because
my mind is he's such an obvious example
of what they wouldn't want in that position

(03:09):
for the same reasons because there's highlighting the
2 party illusion and that if he would
have won, it would have really opened my
mind to that. And so my my my
mind in this case is that if I
see people that he would choose for any
number of positions that and I get it's
my opinion, but that I feel would've represented
something different.
And who I do also think both matter
are educated about what needs to happen for

(03:29):
the position, not just a simple outsider or
somebody who's friends with Trump or somebody who
know you know, there's a lot of examples
to make about people who are being picked
who are
bad for obvious reasons because of their connections
to Israel or because of their past history
against Trump or, you know, against the country,
but also people that are just not
educated
or

(03:50):
have a good background in the very job
they're gonna be serving for. Because it's you
know, that's I think that highlights a team
sport politics right there on the surface where
people are just more excited about somebody who's
a a a deviation
from what they were seeing as opposed to
somebody who's just the best position person for
that job. And I'm I have a point
about that we'll get into today. But we're

(04:10):
also gonna make sure we talk about the
overlapping points of the technocratic element, which I
really do think are important to continue to
highlight,
more so as well the just the deep
state entity
presence within the Donald Trump administration already. And,
yeah, these, as I keep harping on, have
not been
they're not definitive yet, whether needing confirmation or

(04:31):
just having yet to be in that position.
And so there's a lot of interesting things
going around. And all of a sudden, one
of the points is that this is all
a 4 d chess move. Certainly possible.
But it's interesting how the
partisan element,
left and right but right now on the
right, will ultimately create
an assumption to make sense of things

(04:53):
directions, actions that they don't like. For example,
picking a bunch of Zionist deep state technocrats
and oligarchs
and then defending them all week until suddenly
someone throws you a bone and it goes,
oh, here's why. So they are actually bad.
I'll take all my defense back. He picked
them because they're bad, and that's all part
of the plan to expose them,
which I think is interesting. I think I
brought that up today. Or I will bring

(05:14):
it up today. My point's simply
so he's exposing them by highlighting things that
are publicly known.
Doesn't seem to line up for me, but
we'll wait and see how that plays out.
But I do think this is becoming more
and more obvious.
And as well as the overlap with the
technocratic side of the,
I don't
correct me if I'm saying his name wrong,
but Javier Mille, I think that's how it

(05:34):
was pronounced, and the overlapping point there around
the libertarian
guys. That is very clear to me. And
Whitney Webb pointing out very clearly the AI
structure, and that's that's what ties in with
this very clearly today because I see it
being tested in in Israel, the whole battle
tested dynamic, and I see him beginning to
float the

(05:55):
without not very visible, but beginning to float
the move that are gonna step us into
that very thing, and I believe that's what's
being kind of tested out right now. I
think there's parts of that during COVID 19,
and I think this is kind of where
it comes together when it's about the technocracy.
And, of course, free speech.
And then we're gonna talk about, first, in
the foreign policy side of it, Russia and
Ukraine, which I stand by what I said

(06:17):
before, but we're gonna go into it more
in-depth around what's happening today and and the
recent firing of these rockets or or missiles.
And then go into what's going on in
Israel and Gaza and the UN
resolutions, the recent voting of the United States
yet again to vote against or veto a
a resolution for a ceasefire
despite all of the continuous talk about how

(06:37):
it's only Hamas. You know, the point is
well, I'll I'll save it before we get
there. But we're gonna talk a lot about
this today, so make sure you stay tuned.
There's a lot to get to. I'm not
gonna try to rush through anything today, so
it's gonna be a long one. So sit
down,
take notes for what you wanna clip out
because I really wanna see more people clip.
I mean, I I there's a lot of
people who make clips for us that we
pay. There's also people that make them just

(06:58):
because they like to get parts of it
out, but I really would love to see
more of you out there just randomly making
clips. Tag me. I will share them. You
know? And that shouldn't be the only reason
you wanna do it, but just in case
that's what interests you, I will share them.
I will help people see them. Maybe you
can start making clips for other people. I
just wanna see this happen more because whether
me or anybody else because it's ease it's
a better way to organically get the information

(07:20):
out there. Make them quick, 1 minute, 50,
10 second clips. I don't care. Whatever you
think is important.
And the last thing I'm gonna say to
get started,
I I recently had a conversation. I thought
about whether I wanted to hold off in
even talking about this, but I feel really
good about a conversation I had today with,
the CEO of Bitshoot.
And and in regard to specifically
how be becoming whatever they're gonna call the

(07:42):
you know, basically, working with them ultimately in
order to help grow that platform and help
bring people into using what I see as
pretty much one of the only actual free
speech platforms out there.
As always, I haven't gone in anything official
yet, but the point being for me, as
you know, it would never mean anything that
has to do with content. It would never
influence anything I have to say or do,

(08:03):
or it'll all be my choice, which I
was very adamant about in order to basically
promote what I already agree with, which is
a free speech platform. So I'm yet to
see how that will materialize. We're going back
and forth, but I just wanted your thoughts
on that, what you guys think about it.
I'm never adverse to working with a group
or a platform that I think I would,
which, by the way, like, I'm already doing
in other context. Or I've already decided recently

(08:23):
to bring bit shoot up on the sidebar
just because I think that they are one
of the obvious examples. And one of the
conversations or one of the points made today
in the conversation was which really I wrote
it down.
The act the the simple point that they
are acting,
they're it's it's a a large expense for
them, especially with people not wanting to advertise
or whatever else they're doing to grow, which,

(08:43):
by the way, they're going away from now,
which I appreciate.
The point is they spend a lot
to defend keeping the comments that we see
or the you know, whatever it is. And
that's not something that necessarily should be praised
because in my mind, that's just simply saying
you're doing what we expect. But realize in
today's world, it's praiseworthy
because what's going on with Twitter and everywhere
else, even the pretend free speech platform is
still censoring people, and they will continue to

(09:05):
allow. And I think it's weaponized against them
quite frankly. I think people like other platforms
are and the
or, you know, ADL type dynamic, which we
know exists,
bombing them with terrible comments because it makes
them look like they're the point is that
that will be an element of an actual
free speech platform. There are people that say
things that are disgusting, and you have to

(09:26):
go, well, yeah, you're a terrible person. But
that's part of the platform. And I love
that they're willing to accept the reality of
that and not, you know, defend that. Even
as they know, I argue, it's weaponized to
a degree as well as the fact that
it is something that drives away people that
might otherwise, in classical senses, help fund the
platform, which I think is why part of
Aldi, Odyssey included, they're going in different directions

(09:46):
because the system is is designed to support
people like the groups like YouTube. So, anyway,
onto that note, I just want you guys
to let me know
what you thought about it in general and
just kinda float that out there because I
think I'm this is something I'm gonna continue
to support any of these platforms that I
believe are truly
fighting for your free speech or just
respecting

(10:07):
your free speech. Very few platforms out there
are doing that. So let's get into starting
today.
One quick point that I wanted to shout
out that I thought was really interesting,
and this this is something that I haven't
gone too much in-depth on just because there's
so much to go on. And and, frankly,
I find the the Tate brothers story to
be one of the least important things going
on. And I also think they're objectively disgusting

(10:29):
people for not because of the lawsuit or
because of partisan narratives, but because of what
you can literally look at them saying.
Literally contradicting everything the narrative is about them
in the right wing conversation.
Literally contradicting, per their own statements and per
their own videos, everything that Candace Owens and
Tucker Carlson let them say out let him
say out loud in interviews that we can
prove are false. Now I always,

(10:51):
point to Milk Bar TV's work on this,
and it's not him slanting or changing, or
he's just showing you the videos that prove
the opposite of what they're putting forward. That's
now that's not even to get into the
lawsuit, what it is, and all of that.
It's just important to recognize how manipulated that
whole thing is. And the again,
my personal opinion, but I if I would
love to believe that all the people out
there in the right wing conversation, especially, who

(11:13):
are very rightly so talking about and concerned
about human trafficking and child abuse and sex
sex crimes and whatever else,
and then ignoring how obvious it is that
these people are lying about what's actually happening.
My point is objectively bad people.
But that's that's just to point out my
general opinion, what's go whatever's going on with

(11:33):
the current suit, I thought was just interesting.
Because, apparently, based on what my what I
can see, there's a there's a partisan narrative
kind of swung through, and it comes from
the Tate saying this online, that their case
was dismissed.
To the best of my knowledge, that's not
true. But, again, it's the there there's the
way these things tend to go, it's it
could be difficult, especially when it's a person

(11:55):
it's hard to tell that something could've changed
that hasn't been publicly put out. The bottom
line is you have Murder by Kranz and
a bunch of others that are highlighting the
fact that it does not appear to be
the case. The reason I kind of waffled
right there is because, ultimately, that could change
that he could see something that he thinks
that makes it that shows it's not, and
then a week later, the thing comes out
that only the Tate saw that shows that
it was. Blah blah blah. So I'm just

(12:16):
saying be look into it for yourself. Do
not take the word of people who have
a partisan interest in maintaining a very clear
illusion, which is the case regardless of this
lawsuit.
But I think it's interesting that he highlights
all this, and he says confirmed 95 and
we're in. These people have been keeping up
on this the entire time, have access to
the case itself. I mean, it's it's very
clear that they've been exposing lies the whole

(12:36):
time. Doesn't mean they absolutely are telling the
truth now, but I do think this is
the case. 95% of the evidence in the
Andrew and Tristan,
case intact remains intact. A 100% of the
WhatsApp messages and computer data remains. Nothing was
deemed false or fabricated.
This is a devastating blow. It's already
oh, hold on.

(12:57):
I was BitChute. I was playing in the
background. I'm not sure that's never happened for
BitChute before. Interesting. Sorry about that. Anyway,
lost my train of thought.
Just point is they're saying that this is
the evidence that's still present. You have a
lot of comments below saying you're wrong. And
and so, basically, if you just look through
their their thread,
they've been talking about this a lot.
The case was not dismissed. Go into the

(13:18):
details. Right? Listen to your listen to yourself.
My point is listen to what they're saying.
Look at the information.
And and far as I can tell, the
reason it kind of sold me on is
if you look the information so far, the
only thing showing that it's dismissed is coming
from people involved in the case. And everything
else seems to suggest, at the very least,
it's not gone, and there's different parts of
this that are being reevaluated.
That's just not to I'll leave it there

(13:39):
to not get too much into
because, again, it seems like it's more up
in the air than not. But the point
is that there were some things that were
being reevaluated, and I guess that was used
to argue it was going away. I don't
know what the interest might be of them
lying about it. Maybe just more influence. I
don't know. But what I do know is
there's a lot of people, here's Jackson Hinkle,
for example, saying the fake case has been
dismissed. I saw Ben Swan, for example, and

(13:59):
plenty of others here's been saying it's been
dismissed, which, again, I mean, that seems a
little bit of a jump for me because
I don't see it actually being proven.
Anyway, I'll leave it there. I do recommend
you look at Murdered by Kranz and Milk
Mart TV and the rest I've been highlighting
because in my experience thus far, they've been
right about all of this despite the pushback
from the partisan field. So come to your
own conclusions about it, but I I'm I

(14:20):
believe they're accurate in here, on this case
in particular. Now one other opening point that
I wanted to highlight that I thought was
interesting, say kinda same thing. I mean, it's
partisan
I don't it's it's it's interesting because it's
not that it's all misinformation.
For example, like the Venezuelan conversation or Haiti
or, in this case, the gang Venezuelan gangs
in both Tennessee and and Colorado.
There's clear there's obvious truth to some parts

(14:43):
of the story.
Same with the Tristan the the the Tate
conversation. There's some truth to some of the
things being put forward, but it's an often
case using a piece of truth to hide
a larger lie. And in this case, what
I find interesting
is that I keep highlighting this. Same with
Aurora. And I when I first covered the
story, it was clear to me that there
was a huge contradiction,

(15:03):
that republican entities, both the leadership and the
government as well as the police department, were
saying that's just not true, what you're saying.
Now there is gang presence, and there are
people, you know, which, by the way, has
been the case for a long time. So,
again, just a quick opening point, is that
we've been hearing a lot about this, especially
from political peep people in a political position
or people who have a political interest in

(15:25):
pushing a story.
Now this is from a local channel, and
it's saying officials disagree on the presence of
the gangs.
Which is just one of the points I
keep making. And just to make it quick,
here's ultimately what it says. Now the whole
point of the whole article
is
it's people in a political position who have
an interest in saying this is happening. Okay?
And that's what they're doing. In Chattanooga, it's

(15:45):
Tennessee. It's a town in Tennessee.
Now the police chief, John Chambers, quoted saying
he has no evidence to indicate that a
gang is actively operating in our city. The
whole point of the article is that in
this city, they're over to their overwhelming presence.
So I just find that fascinating. Of course,
he could be lying. Now that's an obvious
point to make. As the chief police chief,

(16:05):
maybe he doesn't want you to know that
because it hurts his job. But realize that
now it's becoming very clear that there's a
divide there. And if all you're going at
was with whatever Libs of TikTok said today,
then maybe you should reevaluate
how you're going about this information. For me,
there is a presence that's clear. Whether or
not that's they're overtaking these buildings, which does
not seem to be the full picture to
me, that's what we need to start making

(16:26):
sure we do is
question everything.
Never been more important today.
Now let's go into the cabinet picks that
I think are very important, which definitely overlap
to a larger it's not even just about
Israel, but that's one of the clear things
that I'm concerned about because of how undeniably,
in my mind, Israel is playing a major
role in the globalist agenda, in the World

(16:48):
Economic Forum great reset direction, in the medical
biofield direction, in the authoritarian technocratic direction, in
everything we're talking about, but they're just one
part of it. You can decide if you
think they're a leading part or not, but
still a rear a very clear part.
That specifically people in the partisan field that
really hype globalism never really wanna talk about,
if at all.
Show that I did on the 14th, conservatives

(17:09):
begin to acknowledge Trump's cabinet picks reveal Israel's
first agenda, and it's only gotten more it's
just cascading. I'm seeing more and more large
people, both conservatives or just team sport politic
Republicans, who are suddenly going, I don't know.
And I would argue the ones playing team
sport politics, and it's much, much more fewer
the in that category than anything else,
are more so doing it because of opportunism.

(17:30):
I think that's a huge part of this.
I have a few examples like that today
who just start to recognize, okay. Shoot.
I'm losing all of my wife's support here,
so I'm just gonna lean the other direction
a little bit. Because that's what they do.
They're fair weather everything
in the partisan game, in my opinion. But
recognize that there is a growing awareness of
these problems.
Now we're gonna point to Mike Rogers again

(17:52):
who we, you know, may invite check out
the art the show I just showed you.
We go over a lot of these picks.
But Mike Rogers is one. And now again,
to be clear, I I'm a say this
every time I talk about this until past
January,
these things are not certain yet.
Even if Trump genuinely means it, even if
Rogers genuinely accepts publicly, we don't know what
will happen between now and then. Maybe they
get in a little tiff. Maybe Trump decides

(18:13):
to change his mind. Maybe Rogers changes his
mind, or maybe the senate doesn't confirm them,
or maybe it's all a big lie. The
point is until it happens physically in the
position
and the acceptance and online that's it hasn't.
Not until then.
Now the point is just the just the
the act of Trump saying it and Mike
Rogers publicly saying I accept

(18:33):
show it's it's it's important then to highlight
the problems they're in and ask yourself, is
he does he mean this pick? And if
he doesn't,
then why are we being lied to? But
that's always politics. Right? Floating somebody else. But
the point is, nonetheless, this is what's being
put forward, so this is all we have
to go on thus far, is the people
he's pointing to. And it is a absolute
dumpster fire so far. And that again, this

(18:53):
is not a partisan game. I think these
are all politicians, and I think Kamala and
Biden's administration or anybody else are all playing
the same game.
Objectively, these people are deep state Zionist technocrat
monsters. It's like everything else that's trying to
be more facetious, really. But the truth is,
obviously, they are not the people that we
were being floated. The outsiders,
the, you know, we're gonna tear down the

(19:13):
government and build a libertarian
utopia. That's really not at all what they
seem to be focusing on. The Trump's FBI
head says WikiLeaks,
the the s the the potential pick, Mike
Rogers, was cofounder of Deep State Never Trump
Group. Again, I mentioned this briefly last time,
but I find it to be almost almost
cartoonish.
Every single one of the people on is

(19:34):
well, in the inner circle. Not every one
of the picks so far, but Elon,
RK Jr, Tulsi Gabbard, JD Vance. Every one
of them didn't just go Trump's not so
good. Went on a a rance about how
bad he was and how what an idiot
he was, what a shill he was, and
they're different, you know, respectively.
I've shown you all the videos.
I'm Vance himself. I'm a never Trumper.

(19:56):
Now it just doesn't make sense unless it's
all a big illusion
Or
they're
being incentivized to go against what they think.
That's the only thing I can make sense
of. I'm sure there's an option out there
that we can't fathom.
The point is, here's another one. Mike Rogers.
Rook actually worked as as as WikiLeaks is
writing, the cofounder of deep state, Never Trump

(20:18):
Group. So explain to me how they're fighting
the deep state with one of the people
one that from what even WikiLeaks points to
as the deep state. You can decide for
yourself if that's the case, who is now
part of their team, who was recently part
of the team trying to stop him. The
Alliance For Securing Democracy, ASD, founded in 2017,
became a central player in efforts to tie
Donald Trump
and his supporters to Russian interference in the

(20:39):
2016 election.
Among its cofounders were Mike Rogers, former Republican
congressman and chair of the House Intelligence Committee,
Michael McFaul, Obama's former ambassador to Russia, Michael
Chertoff, former secretary of Homeland Security, George w,
under George w Bush, and Michael Hayden, former
c CIA and NSA director. These figures with
deep ties to the intelligence community

(21:00):
and bipartisan opposition to Trump were instrumental
in advancing ASD's agenda and its controversial Hamilton
68 project.
Do all the Trump supporters out there know
that he's a part of this?
And he's now gonna be he's being floated
as the FBI head?
Like, really think about how crazy stupid that
is. We're talking about the FBI who's been
their the whole point is being, you know,

(21:21):
weaponized against Trump, and your pick to change
that is Mike Rogers?
Or the whole point that he's floating this
because he wants to expose them, as we
keep getting told. Well, okay. In what way?
Unless that happens in the senate confirmation, which
I can go along with. The point is
that they're only exposing
the stuff we already publicly know about these

(21:42):
people.
And that seems like an interesting choice to
expose them and, you know, for Trump's I
don't know. If you think too much into
it, it kinda falls apart.
Or the one thing that does line up
for me, the possibility, is putting the people
forward in order to rationalize a choice that
they want, which is also bad, but not
as bad. The whole Nikki Haley Mike Pompeo
dynamic,

(22:03):
which everyone kind of seemed to agree on.
So who knows? We'll have to wait and
see. But I think it's really crazy these
are the ones being floated and that you
can see most of the core Republican side
pretty much defending whoever he points to, which
then shows you that it's really just about
going along with TeamSport politics because the whole
point is they're going, yes, that. No. You're
wrong. Here's why he's good. And here's why
that. And then suddenly, oh, wait. No. Now

(22:24):
he's just using him to play for the
other game. That's Q add on for you
right there. Totally driving an undercurrent of this
whole thing, in my opinion. Hamilton 68 presents
it as a tool to track Russian disinformation.
Yeah. In general, I think that's the main
point for me. It's just the idea that
he's against him and ultimately, a a played
a role in the other parts we talked
about.

(22:45):
Yeah. It says a d ASD was funded
by entities like German Marshall Fund and the
National Down for Democracy, NED,
both of which are closely tied to intelligence
community and have long promoted foreign policy agendas
at odds with Trump's claimed policy of reducing
US intervention abroad, which is obviously never what
he was going to do. If you actually
understand what's been going on and what the
injuries are that are driving him or what's
what he did.

(23:07):
He didn't. He continued the wars.
Now here is Matt Gaetz, another example of
a possible one of the scenes the most
that are being floated is the idea of
kind of expose them game, I think.
Because he seems to be kind of a
roundly unpopular pick for most of the Republicans,
which, I mean, it makes sense to a

(23:27):
degree, but I I'm gonna get into the
hypothetical for the most part. But what's interesting
to me is this overlap with the Israel
point. Now he's one that doesn't seem to
have, like, provable,
like, APAC funding, for example, but has been
very open about his just blind support for
Israel. And here is another example. This is
from 2018,
and he says Airbnb's
decision to delist Jewish homes in the West
Bank is a win for a for the

(23:49):
boycott movement. The BDS movement
is blatantly anti Semitic. No. It's not. I
mean, it's just that's just completely false. Anything
against Israel, they call anti Semitic when really
it's just having an issue with the Israeli
policy that takes land from other people.
Why that's only about Jews is the whole
thing they roll this into. I put off
a point about that today in regard to

(24:09):
show up, which I've gone to many times
in the past. But there, I mean, there
are open orthodox Jew communities in Israel who
are literally going up and there's videos right
now, kinda going viral, where they're going up
to them on film and saying, look. You're
doing this. What you or Zionists are doing
around the world is why people are attacking
Jews, for example. Or maybe they're just looking
at the videos, people claiming that that aren't
even true, but still feel the same way.

(24:30):
But it is the truth.
That they that Zionism
is using the idea of Judaism to protect
itself. I mean, Jews around the world are
starting to call this out. So that's why
you call it antisemitic,
to hide the crime,
but then, ultimately, that causes people who don't
know the bigger picture to think that that
is the reality. You see, it's it's this
obvious game they're playing.

(24:50):
And it says consistently targets businesses operating Israel.
Yeah. That's the whole point.
He frames that like that's the problem. The
point is to target businesses that are operating
on Palestinian
land for the benefit of Israel.
Not Jews in general, not even Israelis in
general, but the government of Israel. He says,
as a rep from the from Florida, I'm
proud to serve a state which has anti

(25:11):
BDS laws. Right right there. That is unconstitutional.
Period.
There's really no conversation to have. We can
argue you don't want that to be the
case, and we can talk about that. But
if you're pretending that this is somehow consistent
with your constitutional rights because you agree with
him or you agree that Israel should be
protected no matter what, then you're a hypocrite,
or you're lying to yourself because it is

(25:32):
not constitutional to argue that he can be
a pass legislation or do anything from a
government position to stop you from boycotting,
sanctioning, or ask calling them for or divesting
from the foreign government.
So here we are with many examples of
the people showing you what they really care
about. Now that might that could be about
any other country, guys. They love to try
to make it about racism. The point is

(25:53):
any foreign entity.
To for them to tell you you're not
allowed to boycott
Egypt
or UK,
wouldn't you say that's unconstitutional? Well, yes. It
would be because that's the same point.
Now here is a post from his Truth
Social talking about
doctor Oz.
Now you might have seen this floating around.
It's it's getting a lot of pushback. Now
this is what I think is so interesting.

(26:14):
Of all the examples
or even the main point that I was
just saying about people arguing, it's about exposing
them. This is kinda the same game. These
are all publicly known things about doctor Oz.
So why would he pick this and only
cause confusion in his entire support base?
It's it seems odd. Now I'm of the
mind that these are people that he's picking
in some of these cases or really to
create the worst choice in order to give

(26:36):
you a little bit less choice, kind of
the ongoing world of lesser of evils.
But here are some examples of what doctor
Oz is promoting.
Ask yourself if this lines up with
the
argue the put the the
direction that Donald Trump's administration is pretending that
it's going for. Now he's putting he's

(26:57):
nominating him for the Centers For Medicare and
Medicaid Services.
Regardless, he's a and part of this government,
or at least that's what he would be
if he were to be con confirmed. And
this is what I think is interesting.
Hi. In fact, Flix talked about this. This
was today. Trump's new pick to head the
Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services, doctor Oz,
has promoted transgender ideology for toddlers,

(27:19):
endorsing cutting edge gender surgeries for kids. Oz
gave a platform to transgender children, parents who
change their gender identities, parents who groom their
children, pediatricians pushing child transitions,
and at least 1 surgeon who performed trans
surgeon transgender surgery. Now if you guys are
new to this platform, I would I to
this very day,
I mean, I have actively been been trying

(27:39):
to make sure people were aware of the
truth around this conversation,
around the dangers,
around the illegal nature, around the focus of
children, around the very clear perversion that exists
around it all.
That I mean, just important. If you want,
just look up TLav or go to the
main site, look on the search bar, and
type in any numb transgender. It'll all pop
up.
Then we do have a lot of new
people come into the show. In in general,

(28:00):
I think it's important that you understand that,
but the obvious point is around the
the freedom and liberty dynamic around it. If
you're an adult, I'm not someone telling you
can and can't do whatever you wanna do
to your own body, but that's an adult.
When it involves children,
whatever we're talking about, obviously, there's a line
there. Now the main point that we're gonna
make about this whole thing is that we've
proven without question that the which is now

(28:23):
being acknowledged, even though it still gets pushed
in partisan
ways, that this is a dangerous thing. It's
it is it is a
completely unjustifiable
thing, especially for well, I would say for
an adult as well in regard to what
it does, but that's you it's your body.
Do what you want. But for a child,
the point is that this is not just
damaging. It is life shattering.
Whether we get into the idea of the

(28:44):
hormones themselves and what they do, the sterilization
aspect, or the surgeries, or any number of
things. I've gone through this extensively
on this show. So the point that he
supports this and that Donald Trump would put
him forward does not make any sense
unless there's some kind of 4 d chess
move going on. But the idea that we
ever act like we know one way or
the other, that's part of the problem with
that whole narrative, is that it becomes an

(29:05):
assumption game. You assume whatever makes it look
like he's what you want him to be,
and it never stops.
But Oz gave a platform to to what
we just discussed,
transgender children, parents who change their gender identities,
parents who groom their children,
surgeons who perform surgery. Even before Bruce Jenner
broke onto the scene in 2015, Doctor Oz
also hosted 2 fathers who had become moms

(29:27):
discussing a couple's sex life and said it
was wonderful that a child now calls her
dad mom and mom squared.
I'll play this clip in a second on
on one of the later points.
I think
oh, but I think it's a montage that
Decentered News did. Oh, we'll show you in
a second. So here's Shannon Joy, someone who's
been really, really prolific about calling this stuff
out, which I really greatly appreciate. And this

(29:48):
is doctor Shadow of Ezra, who's a pretty
you know, I think mostly or, like, super
I never like to assume because I I'm
the one that doesn't like labels for myself
included, but whether it's republican or conservative, I
believe that that's the direction that they are
supporting and even and they're calling it out.
I think it's important to see.
She says, why is Trump elevating this guy?
It's a good question.

(30:11):
Now here she is also pointing to this
clip about him discussing implants.
Here's Donald Trump's pick, pimping implanted microchips for
humans.
Doesn't that seem no. The more you understand
about Elon Musk and Trump's and the government's
position, you recognize that is totally in line
with what they're going to be doing, I
would argue. But publicly speaking, or what most
Republicans want to pretend he's supporting, does not

(30:32):
line up with what you want. Does line
up with what Elon Musk is planning and
driving for. I'm talking about legitimately on paper.
The implants, the whole it's all part of
where this is going. But it's all okay
because he's the good guy, technocrat, evil billionaire.
Right?
She also points out what Mary Talley Bowden
says, Meet our new head of CMS.
Here, it says, here's what doctor Peter Hotez

(30:54):
wants you to know about the importance and
benefits of the COVID 19 vaccine booster shot,
says doctor Oz.
Right. Because we're all in support of mister
Hotez with his brown teeth and all about
health. Right?
It's pretty wild. I mean, it seems like
a not like, almost like he like, if
there was ever a better example of what
you might pretend is him playing 40 chess
or trolling something, it would be this.

(31:14):
When it if if and when it ends
up this is the guy,
let's make sure we're honest about how crazy
this is.
And she says, this is unacceptable. Doctor Oz
was a lockdown mask and vaccine pimp. Very
troubling.
Shadow of Ezra also pointing out, I mean,
same thing we just saw, promoting transgender.
You know, it did a whole agenda on

(31:34):
his show many times. Joshua says, Trump putting
doctor Oz on the spotlight. Oh, here's the
one I was talking about. And this person
says, you know what that means.
Okay?
This person says, yep. Everybody he has picked
is central casting.
The original one is already gone, but he's
bringing them into the spotlight.
Wow.
And I said, so let me get this

(31:55):
straight.
You are of the mind that Trump is
pretending to pick these bad people to expose
things that are already publicly known about them?
Walk me through why that makes sense.
Looks like somebody responded, but one of the
people that
oh, here it is.
Let's see. Let's oh, real time. Let's check
it out. She says, publicly known? Yeah. Tell

(32:16):
the Liberals that.
Okay.
What? So she somehow knows what they do
or don't know? Like, the idea that Awe
supports this stuff,
that's a public thing. Guys, that's literally his
show, and you're the one telling us that's
what liberals are what. Okay. So that's
see how easy it is to lie to
yourself?

(32:37):
But it says, no. Most of the public
don't have a clue. Well, I'm pretty sure
this is a very live TV show with
it was very popular. So we're pretending that
not everybody knows he supports transgender or guys,
that's a very public thing. Look at his
Twitter account.
But so now we're exposing him by highlighting
what is publicly known. Maybe not to every
single person in the world, but see the
point? And she's like, yes. That is what's

(32:58):
happening. Do you think Trump is this stupid
to pick these people? I do. Even when
Matt Gaetz is an actor,
are they all,
baddies?
They are all baddies, and they have already
been taken out. You can believe what you
want, but you will find out eventually,
and you will probably remind me. And and
then you will probably remind me. Okay.

(33:19):
You see how crazy this cue like, look.
Well, sure, everything's possible, but this is without
question a cue, whether she knows it or
not, narrative.
So the idea is this is all some
big show. It's all players and cheeses, exposing
them all by putting them in the spotlight
and then people highlighting what we all know
about them. Now that's not who knows? Maybe
it comes tomorrow, where there's new things we
don't know.

(33:41):
But this is such a
I I hope she's right Because that would
mean that we're not gonna get these bad
people, at least right now. Who knows if
the next ones are worse?
But, gosh, man. This is why people like
this have so much influence and power, because
there's always people like this that are willing
to assume
whatever makes it make sense, which I've dealt
with since with people around, even people in
my family, from the first 2016 dynamic.

(34:04):
Where something happens and I'm like, woah, that's
crazy. And I'm like, well, there must be
a reason. Oh, must there? That's a very
easy thing to do. Or we must have
something that knows that we don't. Well, if
you're gonna do that, then just don't even
care. Just put a I support whatever Trump
does sticker on your forehead and ignore everything
that goes on. Because if the only point
is, well, there must be something that explains
it,
maybe not. Maybe they know you're gonna think

(34:26):
that. So this is just scary to me
that people actually do this, but let's wait
and find out.
Now here's decenter news putting up a clip
about doctor Oz. Again, all public public clips
and information. It's all out there. I'm sure
somebody's gonna be informed about this, but I
would argue far more likely
Republicans. So how does that make sense? You
get the point. But great clip showing you

(34:47):
what he's been talking about over the years.
Even I'm in awe of the incredible advances
made in search of a COVID 19 vaccine.
Never in the history of mankind has a
vaccine been developed at this speed. But just
because we're moving fast, doesn't mean we're moving
unsafely.
We're cutting red tape, not cutting corners. I
trust the sign.
100% wrong. And not just because I disagree,

(35:08):
like, fundamentally. That's in that's a provably false
statement. In in every way, you can see
that they cut corners. I mean, this is
what we now know as a fact. So
just he was who knows if he's lying
or if he's just blindly repeating what somebody
wrote down from the CDC? That it's not
true. These things are deadly and dangerous and,
obviously, were rushed out as Trump loves to
brag about. And the scientists behind these COVID

(35:29):
19 vaccines, and you should too. That's why
I'll be in line when it's my turn
to get a vaccine.
As we speak, cargo planes are carrying doses
of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. They're landing
all around the country, like near where you
live. I know what you're thinking. Why are
they delivering vaccines if they haven't been approved
yet? Right? Well, it's all part of the

(35:49):
plan to have everything in place. So once
the FDA signs off and gives a green
light, we are ready to rock. If nope.
Wouldn't that have been at least
I mean, so no. That's not what happened.
Right? They rushed him out, and then they
forced him. Under Trump's administration too, despite all
the narratives he loved to put out, because
of the state of emergency, because of that.
Now maybe he didn't do it physically himself,

(36:10):
but I'm pretty sure I didn't see Biden
force any shots in people's arms. The point
is that it still is the case.
Here, he's talking about rushing them out because
we just want them ready for when that
happens, the thing that ultimately never happened.
There are enough people who've been vaccinated.
The virus won't be able to spread anymore.
I know a lot of you are worried
about get Now I don't need to keep

(36:31):
jumping in. All of these are false. Vaccine.
I get it. I understand.
Because you think the science is just moving
faster than ever. Right? But I wanna assure
you, the FDA may be cutting out the
red tape. They are not cutting any corners.
Why should they trust the science and get
the vaccine when it's their turn? What I
want people to understand is that there were
absolutely
no safety or scientific corners
cut for this vaccine. Wow. Joining us today

(36:53):
is the one and only doctor Oz.
Hello, doctor Oz.
So Happy New Year. You. Happy New Year.
Too.
Now as a health care worker, you are
first in line to get vaccinated for COVID
19. So have you gotten your vaccination yet?
I did. My whole group of surgeons went

(37:13):
down. I got vaccinated right there. It didn't
hurt at all. It wasn't even sore afterwards.
I didn't get any fevers. In fact, I
talked to all my colleagues. None of us
really had any issues.
And I'm encouraged by the fact that it
Wonder what that's like today. It works so
well. 95%
impact, but it doesn't seem to cause Nope.
Relative risk reduction. So more, like, 0.08%

(37:35):
difference between not getting it and getting it.
It's a lot of side effects. I've had
a bunch of people on my show who've
been vaccinated.
They were in the clinical trials, and, you
know, they got a little fever after the
second shot for, you know, a couple hours.
But, otherwise, it's remarkably
safe from what we can see Wow. To
date. To date, there are no long term
side effects reported. Okay? So I've been vaccinated.
And that's a lie. As he said that,

(37:55):
we could prove that. And he that that
doesn't have to mean that he's choosing to
lie. He could just be not doing due
diligence, but that is dangerous in its own
right. The facts were always there. And as
you remember for TLab, we were showing you
from direct from the websites as it was
coming out. And that's why they eventually censored
it because it was undeniably
showing you that these things were hurting people.
Native. Right? There's a low likelihood that if
I get COVID virus in my body,

(38:18):
I'll have a problem. See? It just sort
of bounces off me. What can you do
after you get the COVID vaccine?
Although things are like, you can go outside.
You can play with your friends. You know?
Things that you don't need government permission to
do.
I love that you shared your video of

(38:41):
vaccination on social media. How how freeing was
that moment for you? Oh, it was so
freeing, and
I was so grateful, just so grateful
to be able to have my first and
second shot.
I felt that the cloud was lifting, that
we could definitely see the light at the
end of the tunnel.

(39:01):
And the word you used, freeing, that is
exactly how I felt. Wendy Williams says there's
no way she's getting vaccinated.
No. I don't trust it. There. I said
it.
I don't trust it. Doctor Oz tries to
persuade her during an appearance on his show,
even showing video of his own vaccination.

(39:21):
Doctor Oz tells Inside Edition
he's concerned that Wendy's reluctance
may influence millions of her fans not to
get vaccinated.
I was stunned and flabbergasted
when she told me that she wasn't gonna
get vaccinated. One commentator called her remarks incredibly
ignorant and destructive.

(39:42):
There you go.
By the way, we'll come right back to
this, but here's what Trump just put out.
This was
on 17th November.
We're coming up on the 5 year anniversary
of COVID. And if you recall, under Trump's
leadership,
we had incredible
public health policies.
So you can pretend all day long, we

(40:02):
didn't force it.
You realize he's not just focusing on that.
He is over this is an overarching point
about all that happened during his administration. Do
you believe the emergency or the operation warp
speed was
incredible public health policies? So if you don't
agree with that, why aren't you commenting that?
Are you pretending like it's some 40 chess
move? Ah, and there we are again. Assume

(40:23):
whatever makes the bad thing not look bad
to you. President Trump's unparalleled creation of operation
warp speed was like we've never seen before.
What does it even mean? That's such a
Trump thing to say.
The unparalleled creation was like nothing. Yeah. It
was very deadly and dangerous, and and that's
exactly what we're talking about.
Thank you, t m decenders news. Now here's
another one. This is,

(40:44):
for announcing the,
Matthew g Whitaker
from Iowa to be the ambassador to the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, otherwise known as NATO.
So, of course, the point is that they
wanna do away with NATO, but I think
an interesting move would be to create an
ambassador to NATO.
Wouldn't you just I mean, the the of
course, the argument will be that you need

(41:04):
that to initiate the process. You know? You
know? You could just stop being a part.
You could just stop finding. Yes. You could
just put a pin in it and be
like, no. No. It's not but nope. Here
comes the ambassador. Now I'm gonna say, oh,
I hope maybe they do, because I also
agree that this is an over I think
this
is the post 911
international army dynamic that I think doesn't need
to exist. I think it's about create even
only the one time so far that it's

(41:25):
been used is in regard to
I'm forgetting what article it is. But, you
know, they attack 1, attack all. That's that's
how this is that's one of the biggest
problems in my mind. But whatever, my point
is
that the steps that are being taken do
not seem to deviate from the norm despite
what you wanna tell yourself about it. But
when it happens, let's hope there's some kind
of a difference.

(41:45):
But overall,
this is the point that stands out to
me.
Oh, actually,
did I, oh, I hope I didn't close
that.
Oh, it's right here. Okay, good. Here it
is. Did I move these over?
Yeah. Sorry. Hold on one second.
I have these all mixed up.

(42:07):
Okay.
So
this is a clip. I'm just gonna read
this kinda talk about it, and I'll do
the clip for you. Here he is speaking
on Fox News. Sputnik's pointing out Matt Whitaker
blasted Biden's response to Russia's
special operation in Ukraine, emphasized need to punish
Russia.
Relevant to what we're gonna get into in
a minute. Trump's pick for US ambassador, NATO,

(42:27):
previously expressed disappointment with president Biden's slow and
inefficient response to the, basically engaging with Russia.
He says, well, certainly, ratcheting up the sanctions
on Russia is a good thing. However, I
didn't sense first that he shoved showed any
strength to resolve,
which, again, I think Biden's whether he's even
actually in charge of what's going on is
poor important to point out. Actually punishing Russia,
he says. Well, I just wanna point out

(42:48):
that seems to be a little bit of
a deviation from what they are
pretending Trump's statements mean about what's gonna happen
with Ukraine and Russia. We'll get to that
in a second. But as the ambassador to
NATO, punishing Russia seems to be a little
bit different than what his supporters are pretending
the me the statements mean.
Here is an interesting point. Now this is
a little bit less it's a personal point

(43:10):
about his own finances, but I think it's
an interesting point that brings up at the
end about how what that the door that
opens.
But he said this is William Coffin pointing
out,
he says, how about Matthew Whitaker pays off
his $130,000
plus interest and penalties income tax bill from
2020
before he is confirmed as an ambassador to
NATO? All of these clowns with massive personal

(43:31):
and financial problems
would seem highly vulnerable to bribery and extortion.
Amongst other things. Not to mention, this guy's
background in business and charity is garbage, he
says. Well, my point is only getting at
the idea that if you are in a
financial
hole,
you open the door to being very vulnerable
to people that might wanna use financial manipulation.
And who has a very clear track record

(43:52):
of doing that?
I don't even need to say it.
Matthew Whitaker
says, hey. Took palm oh, and this this
was his own tweets, right, just on for
this podcast, on his Twitter account from 2021.
And it says, quote, they took palm branches
and went out to meet him, shouting, Hosanna.
Blessed is he who comes to the name
of the Lord. Blessed is the king of

(44:14):
Israel.'
Isn't that interesting how we've got these these
biblical
like, you find this more often than there
you have them stating the bible verses
in in any other context around Christianity or
around the United States,
but you'll find these weird prophetic well, not
that that very thing is weird, but the
way that it's being shown, what they believe,
and what's
it's interesting.

(44:36):
Here it says, spoke today with and this
is,
I guess, just r c I think it's
the wrong tag, but it says r c
RJCHQ's
candidate forum. The United States has no greater
friend than the state of Israel. So these
are all things he's saying. I think that
really matters for the ambassador of NATO,
But realize that every one of the people
we're talking about are just and, again, it's
not unique to Trump's administration. It's pretty much

(44:57):
everybody in our government, which should be even
more alarming. But showing you that somebody's pretending
to fight the deep state and fight as
an outsider to change our government
doesn't seem to be doing any of that.
Seems to be going right in line with
what you expect from the
past. Another weird pick was Linda McMahon, which
is that was my point from before that
I think is relevant to point out.
I wanna make sure

(45:18):
oh, yeah. See, that's what happened. I got
these a little mixed up. So before we
go past that, I wanted to play this
clip about Israel, some for pointing this out,
and the interesting
every person that seems to be in his
cabinet is willing to ignore the genocide and
really will blindly support Israel no matter what
happens.
Now whether you support Israel or not, that
shouldn't be okay no matter who we're talking
about.

(45:38):
That means you could be taken advantage of
by
fill in the blank. Whether that is Russia,
China, UK, if you are unwilling to challenge
them and they have unfettered influence on your
policy, then that should matter to an America
First anything.
But I wanted to point this out as
well. I've mentioned this many times. The Keith
was just shared this recently, so I figured
I'd play it for you since I've mentioned
it many times, and I've played it once

(45:59):
in the show. It's just a clip of
Dave Smith interviewing RFK Junior.
And and the the pause that he has,
when asked a very relevant question, I think
speaks volumes.
Do you have concerns about
the the level of
Israeli influence in our our politics here in

(46:20):
the United States of America?
I I don't know. I mean, I I
don't know.
I just I'm not, you know, I'm not
a politician
in political office, so I don't see much
of that. Wow. What a ridiculous sidestep. Yeah.
You don't know. Right? Because you it's not

(46:41):
like you've been let let around by the
nose by Schmooly for the last 6 months.
And look at Dave's face right there. Look
at his face there and look at it
right when he when he speaks after 7
seconds.
7 seconds.
His face right there.
That's a ridiculous response. You damn well know
that you are very, very aware because you

(47:04):
the point is there's no way he's not
aware of the influence in it, especially since
he is personally being influenced as he's running
for president, because that's when this is being
discussed.
I just wanna point that out, guys. Now
you can I'm not saying I know I
can't read his mind. I don't know what
he's thinking, but I do know that that
shows me
a sidestep.
So you could argue that he has a
bigger plan. He's saving Israel for last. I

(47:25):
sure hope so. But at the end of
the day, I think it shows what we
all know is there.
A a some kind of a blind spot,
whether that's because he doesn't see it, which
I find impossible, or because something is incentivizing
him not to.
It's very important with where we are. I
think that's showing us all of what we're
dealing with today. Now the next one I
was gonna get to is Linda McMahon
for

(47:46):
the secretary of education.
Now this is McMahon from the the WWF.
Here is
Fox News. Trump taps former dub oh, excuse
me. WWE
CEO Linda McMahon to serve as education secretary.
Now my only point I wanna make about
this was what I was saying earlier.
And this comes to this is kind of
a broad point about,

(48:08):
for example, I've talked about KJP many times
as, like, a diversity whatever you wanna call
it. That she was clearly, by even though
on admission, not the best person for the
position, but was chosen, not that they say
this explicitly, but that's clear, for her ethnicity,
for her sexual preferences,
which I think is ridiculous. Not because I
think those are bad things, but because that
has nothing to do with the position. It's

(48:29):
about trying to give you your token to
say we care when in reality, I don't
care what you look like and what your
religion is. It's about if you're the best
for that position.
Now if you are a foreign
entity,
not Jewish, but Israeli,
or not whatever religion, but Russia or Chinese,
that matters. But when you conflate the 2

(48:51):
and pretend it's about her you said I'm
making a point right there because right there,
people would act like, that's not true because
you care about the no. It's about a
foreign entity influencing policy,
not the religion of that person. Again, that
matters no matter who they are. But back
to KJP, the point is that she is
or and a lot of different picks are
chosen because of
a different reason than what's best for the

(49:12):
job. Not by merit,
by something else. Now, in this context,
if you if that bothers you about her
or anything else, right, if you have an
issue with KJP being picked for anything other
than whether or not she is the best
for the position, then you should also care
about Trump's picks. You should also care about
his political choices right now because it shows
you that this is not for because they're

(49:34):
the best
secretary of education, but because it is something
else.
And it's the same point. Now just because
they're different things that you care more, and
I maybe even rightly so, about the idea
of the diversity he picks versus whatever his
driving force is, it still is the same
principle.
And but you you may disagree and think
that she is the best choice for that.
But are we really gonna pretend that Linda

(49:55):
McMahon is the best possible candidate for the
secretary of education out of everybody in the
country?
Come on, guys. We know that's not true.
But this is what we I'm trying to
highlight is this the principle of it all.
And and the woke left and the woke
right dynamic or whatever you wanna call them,
that they do the same things because it's
about a larger agenda from either side, your
government,

(50:16):
and driving us right down the middle. I
think that's important to point out. Now back
to the Operation Warp Speed Point. Again, if
you haven't seen it, he's on 17th
saying, we're coming up on the anniversary. And
if you recall, Donald Trump's leadership, we had
incredible public health policies that he goes on
to point out what he thinks is one
of those. The creation of Operation Warp Speed
was one like never before seen.

(50:38):
That's just unreal to me. How you can
have people that still support this when the
vast majority of his support base, that he
knows, by the way, does not think that.
And in fact, most of them pretend like
he's playing some kind of a chess move.
That's so alarming to me.
And again, if you think this is unique
to the right and you're listening to this,
then you're lying to yourself. It's everywhere in

(51:00):
the partisan game. It's everywhere in people that
blindly convince themselves to support a government that
does not care about them.
Here's what Alex Zech had to say. How
many times does Trump have to brag about
Operation Warp Speed before MAGA people start questioning
whether he's truly a champion for health and
freedom?
I'm of the mind, by the way, that
most of them are, but just don't know

(51:22):
what else to do by design. And I
mean specifically the conservatives in this conversation, not
most of people in the political game. Because
the whole team sport politics dynamic, I do
believe, is the minority of the conversation, but
it's a lot of people. Of course, that's
my opinion. Either way, I agree with his
sentiment. He says, I've heard the whole, if
he didn't do Operation Warp Speed, we'd all
been FEMA camps. That was that's one of

(51:43):
the Qanon points. Their literal argument right now
is that there was gonna be 10 years
of lockdowns,
which maybe. Who knows? No way to prove
that. And if he hadn't rolled out Operation
Warp Speed, then we then we would have
been in it for 10 years.
But this is the point I made yesterday
or the day of last show.
Operation Warp Speed was rolled out in response

(52:03):
to whatever you say it was happening
through Trump's administration.
So we're to believe that the Operation Warp
Speed was what saved us from something that
hadn't happened yet or that it was all
happening like, the idea would have to be
that this was something again, I understand the
point of the the organ the manufacturing of
it. But if you think that was just,
what, the democrats?
You're it that is more willfully blind than

(52:24):
anything in this conversation.
The overwhelming
overlap to both sides of the paradigm in
regard to what took place is on the
surface.
But, of course, then it becomes, well, they're
the rhinos. They're it's just it's like picking
what you want. It's like picking your own
team. That's not how this works. The facts
are clear.
So if you think that Operation Warp Speed,
which is what has killed a lot of
people in this conversation,

(52:44):
was the
the savior of it all,
They're they're literally getting you to ask for
your own killing,
to support what actually killed everybody and the
guy's that it just would've been worse. That
is the logic how they they get people
to believe the shot. Well, it would've been
worse if you hadn't taken it. Okay. I'd
love to see the proof of that.
Willful ignorance using partisan manipulation.

(53:07):
But it says,
like he says, you can't know that, that
that that that would have happened. This is
pure speculation and likely total nonsense. Good luck
putting 100 of millions of people with guns
in FEMA camps. Now this is the point
that really stands out to me. And even
if it were true,
he could very easily acknowledge the harms of
Operation Warp Speed right now,
especially now that he's been elected.
But, of course, the argument will always be

(53:27):
kicked down the road. Well, he has to
wait until he's confirmed, otherwise something can happen.
Okay. Then once it happens, there'll be another
excuse. Well, he has to wait until the
election, till next season,
whatever, until he's out of the presidency to
admit it because that, there's always a assuming
answer. And maybe you're right, but we don't
know that. The bottom line is, yes, he
could've exposed this by now. He could've called
it out instead of allowing children to keep

(53:47):
get hurt by the thing that he supported
and drove forward.
But he says, but he doesn't do that.
He continues to praise it. Praise the shots.
Praise the COVID response in general. He gave
Fauci a medal before leaving office.
The whole point becomes, well, he didn't force
it.
That's not even technically accurate when you really
look at the big picture, but, overall,
that's why the 2 party paradigm works. They

(54:09):
get you trapped in that ideological difference. At
the end of the day, coming together is
how it all works.
Just like the Saive act and everything else,
it's about combining the two sides to get
you always pointing at the other while essentially,
tacitly accepting whatever they do because, well, it
was the bad guys. It was their side.
Well, okay. Well, we're still it's still happening.
We're still existing in it. Shouldn't that matter

(54:32):
more than what side you wanna point at
as it's happening?
Well, to
not childish people, it should.
Here's what he said as well. It's interesting
and ironic that many in the MAGA crowd
want Trump to hold the nefarious actors accountable
for crimes against humanity during COVID when Trump
initiated operation warp speed.

(54:53):
Oh, I see. I was reading it funny.
Sorry. I thought I misread it.
He simply said it's interesting that many of
the people in the Trump supporters
want him to hold these people accountable,
who
carried out crimes against humanity during COVID
when he's the one that initiated Trump's warp
speed, praises Operation Warp Speed till this day,
calls himself the father of the vaccine, consistently

(55:15):
told his followers to get it, still to
this day, by the way, praises the use
of ventilators,
signed the CARES Act resulting in the largest
wealth transfer to the 1% the world has
ever seen,
and gave Fauci a presidential accommodation medal.
And this person says, did he mandate it?
It's the same thing every time. And that
I'm not that's not about it's it's a
fair point, but not in response to so,

(55:37):
basically, as long as he didn't shove it
down your throat, all of that stuff doesn't
matter.
Like, literally building the blocks to allow the
next one to do that, that doesn't I
mean, that's, again, willful ignorance. That's choosing to
ignore it because it's all about the one
thing that you've decided to make it about
when in reality, all of those things are
horrifying. It's like ignoring, well, he didn't start
new wars, but we'll ignore the fact even

(55:57):
though it's technically not the reality.
Ignore the fact that he killed a lot
of people in lots of different war zones,
initiated many regime changes, carried out assassinations that
are against the law. Well, it's all okay
because so he didn't start new ones. Well,
you're creating a bar that ignores all the
things before it.
This person says, he's the worst kind of
fence sitter, a contrarian.
How ridiculous. They talk about Alex Zach, by

(56:19):
the way. And this is the kind of
thing you get, the black pilled purity test
kind of nonsense people throw when you're literally
pointing out valid concerns.
But let's first make fun of the person
who's saying he's the worst kind of fence
sitter, meaning he's in the middle contrarian, which
literally means
the
disagreement.
Yes. Contrarian tend to disagree for the sake
of disagreeing. But how in the world can
you be fence sitting when you are disagreeing

(56:40):
with something?
May maybe you wanna think this through a
little bit, bud. Because I think at the
end of the day, it's about trying to
distance yourself or ignore, because of whatever you
can put in front of yourself, the obvious
concerns.
So, no, he's not a fence sitter if
he's a contrarian. That's stupid. But on top
of that, he's not doing that. He's explicitly
calling something out.
So he's not fence sitting. Either way, you
just don't like what he's calling out, so

(57:02):
you pretend he's somewhere in the middle because
that's the only way your partisan brain can
make sense of what's going
on. Doctor Jane Ruby points out the overlap
to Operation Warp Speed that's currently in his
administration at the highest level. And we've all
talked about this.
A disaster waiting to happen, she writes. Anyone,
anybody want to ask JD Vance why he's
invested 1,000,000 of dollars with Vivek

(57:24):
in self amplifying RNA factories?
Can you imagine that being ignored after what
we just went through?
2 people that are like,
whether they end up having the high like,
Vance is the vice president. But whether Vivek
has some higher position or not, he's clearly
on the inner circle of this. And Elon
Musk as well, who was invested in CureVac
microRNA
factories, all of this stuff is happening.

(57:46):
Think about if this was anybody,
even tangentially connected to a left conversation,
you know the response, and it should be
the same.
We should be standing up and saying absolutely
not.
But it's all rolling forward, just like with
the EI, Elon Musk, I will. It's the
good version.
I mean, even if you think that, even
if that's the truth, what happens when the

(58:07):
Democrats take over?
I mean, it's I even feel stupid saying
that because, guys, it's just such a it
is clearly going forward regardless of whatever team
you sit put see put in front of
you. Your government has maintained these agendas over
using the 2 party divide to keep us
pointing at ourselves for a very long time.
She goes on to say, and even though
this article was published in Children's Health Defense

(58:29):
started by Robert R. F.
K. Jr, he's silent on specifically self amplifying
mRNA, which terrifies me. I did entire shows
about this. Actually, I think I might be
able to grab one that pops up. It's
been a while.
Well, this is about oh, here it is.
Here's one of them, anyway.
Going over all of them, and I'm glad
I found this because this is a good
episode for you guys to check out.

(58:51):
This one's entitled
self spreading vaccines, self amplifying mRNA
vaccines, and COVID vaccine mental disruption. Look at
that. May second, 2021.
Another example of how far ahead TLav is
on a lot of these topics, patting myself
on the back, but really demonstrating my value,
our value,
for this platform.

(59:11):
Right? So right now, a lot of people
discovering this stuff, and we've been diving through
and investing investigating this since the beginning of
the COVID 19 illusion.
But they're right. Why hasn't he called this
stuff out when literally the inner circle is
not just involved but pushing these things forward
as we speak?
Door to Freedom says, as, this is, Jessica

(59:32):
Rose we've interviewed before.
As she says, self amplifying mRNA products should
not be used. This is an absolute disaster
waiting to happen. That's on Children's Health Defense.
Right? And so why aren't they calling it
out? And then it's just some images they
include to show you the interconnected you know,
these these people are immersed in this field.

(59:53):
We even just went over Vivek and his
former company about the, you know, suing
Pfizer and Moderna for the patents for lipid
nanoparticles.
It's just it's really wild what people can
choose to ignore. Now Mary Talley Bowden again
points out, the person rumored to be taking
over the FDA in Trump's administration
will not call for the COVID shots to
be pulled off the market.

(01:00:15):
And she says, as long as it's a
choice and not and she writes, I hope
the rumor isn't true.
As long as it is a choice and
not a mandate, this person writes.
As long as it goes through clinical trials,
as long as we can make informed choices,
I am fine with it. I won't take
it, but I don't care if you take
it. Now look, I'm all for the idea
of the personal I mean, that's not all
that's what matters. That's the same thing I

(01:00:36):
said before with the original idea. That clearly,
if it's not being forced and not now
realize that overlaps with even the coercion.
Maybe they're not pushing it into your arm,
but they're saying, well, you go to the
back of the line, or you can't access,
you can't get on the bus. It's the
same point. That's that's part of it too,
which happened under Trump's administration,
not just from certain governors.
The point, though, is that it's a dangerous

(01:00:58):
thing at work. Well, like, this is, like,
for example, it's the same thing I made
a point they make about fluoride or the
dioxin point. We can prove that these things
are not just
subpar.
They're deadly.
So they should not be on the market.
So if we're if we're applying this in
any other metric or any other
any if we're
meeting any other requirements under any other discussion,

(01:01:18):
this thing would already be gone.
So So this is what I I see
as problematic, because people, especially in their public
insight, are so willing to kind of overlook
it right now despite what we just went
through and what they were saying more than
anybody because it seems to undermine Trump. And
this kind this mind this thinking is so
dangerous.
But I do agree with the idea that
it's about your freedom.

(01:01:38):
Right? So if it's there and it's not
being pushed,
at at at least it's not being forced
on you. But we need to recognize that
this thing is going to go in people's
arms, Republicans too, because Trump has supported it
and still does.
And on top of that, she points out,
all babies,
and I already said this before, and actually
she clarifies this for me from what I
was saying the first the first time about
this, are expected to get 3 mRNA shots

(01:02:00):
by the age of 9 months.
Ah, my god.
Now I was at first I wasn't sure
if they simply meant there were 3 possible
choices. No, guys. They're talking about 3 shots.
So you're getting a shot and supposedly 2
boosters before you are 9 months old for
something that is less deadly than the flu
if it's even there in the first place,
and this shot being more deadly for anybody,

(01:02:23):
no, it's it is most deadly for children.
It's
babies,
children, and the elderly.
All the evidence we've gone over in this
entire begin from 2020 to now, it's undeniable.
And, again, it's not just the
first version.
One of the main studies finds that it's

(01:02:43):
the platform itself, the lipid nanoparticles, the mRNA
structure, the entire thing. And this is a
peer reviewed study from 2023.
It finds the platform itself is what's driving
myocarditis and a lot of the other problems.
So here we are,
where it's all still continuing under Donald Trump's
administration, or so we see coming forward.

(01:03:03):
Now he responds saying, wow. That is crazy.
I didn't get my son vaccinated when I
went to enroll him. He said, I don't
think vaccines should be mandated for anybody. Well,
again, I agree with that. And that's at
least if that that that at least is
a positive away from what's happened before. But
at the end of the day, if this
was cyanide,
would we go, well, at least they're not
forcing it on? You know, we say this
is deadly. It should not be even on
the it should not be even floated for

(01:03:25):
a child or for anybody.
And that's where we have to recognize this
is.
Now in the conversation
of Vivek, obviously, but this kind of overlapping
dynamic of these people being involved with what
specifically Elon Musk and Vivek, but all the
choices we discussed, and the idea of somehow

(01:03:45):
making it more efficient.
I'm really clearly of the mind that this
is about trying to use whatever problems that
they have created
to roll you into the next control structure.
And I I I, of course, hope that
I'm wrong because, obviously,
we all probably, I think, most anyway, would
probably wanna see reductions in our government, our

(01:04:06):
overwhelming government,
and, hopefully,
decide to to entirely remove it.
And so it's a it's a hard thing
to see what appears to be what I
would think. They just floated as an idea
what might be a good step coming from
people that I'm convinced don't have good intentions.
So it worries me. But as it goes
along, as I said before, if we see
positive change, I'll point it out. I'm not

(01:04:28):
gonna always be pooh poohing on something just
because it's coming from these people. If I
see something happen that I think is a
net positive, I will call it out just
like the point with fluoride.
But my problem here is that I don't
believe they have good intentions and what we
are talk even thus far in this show
demonstrates that I think that there's dangerous things
under just behind it.
And so that's what worries me is that

(01:04:48):
we're stepping into it using these problems that
are already you know, like the fed conversation
or the collapsing the economy issue. All the
things that we have we can prove, they've
knowingly allowed to get worse. Just like taking
2,008 to today. How many times can we
talk about the provable example that the people
even 2,008, obviously nothing happened. They gave them
money, they gave themselves bonuses, and we don't

(01:05:09):
act like that's incredible.
So from that point forward,
immediately
immediately,
they did not not only did they stop
doing the things that caused it, you can
prove that with with the 1st month that
they had increased doing the things that caused
that.
I've gone over this many times.
Hey. We're not talking about sub, prime mortgages

(01:05:31):
at this point anymore, but auto loans are
playing a part. There's a whole discussion we've
gotten to it many times. But, nonetheless, we're
talking about the same problems,
the same markers, the same metrics that have
got that and
why why is that allowed?
Because I think it's another engineered well, it's
the same idea. They're gonna maximize their own
profit off of your back before they know
you're gonna be rolled into something new. And

(01:05:52):
and and that may even look like a
positive step. Look. We're gonna end the Fed.
Well, I'm gonna be the 1st to go,
absolutely. But if that is simply a shell
game to roll you into the CBDC dynamic,
which we all know is certainly possible, maybe
even when they don't realize it, we should
be worried about that. We should at least
be on guard about that.
So in this case, Vivek points something out
about the Pentagon's failed audits, which well, good.

(01:06:14):
I'm glad we're talking about this. This should
be public knowledge, but it's not. And we
actually oh, you know what?
That's actually where that should've gone.
Oh, well. I'm I was I was gonna
point I haven't come up in a minute
about a clip from,
it's with, it's about it's about the failed
audit point, and I'll come back to it
in a second.

(01:06:34):
But it says they failed the 7th straight
audit. Our health care system siphons billions into
waste and fraud. Our Department of Education blows
money without accountability.
One of the points everyone seems to be
making, even Republicans,
is that, look. If we're not gonna address
the military dynamic in this, then you're not
then this is all a show. Because that
is the central driving factor in all and,
really, the most obvious

(01:06:54):
location for cuts.
Because most Americans don't want what's going on
overseas. Not not supporting Israel, not supporting Ukraine.
It I mean, you may, in the moment,
find more people that propagandize into supporting the
ideology around it, but if you just ask
a general statement of whether Americans want to
be involved in wars, it's pretty, like, overwhelming
that they don't want that. These these polls

(01:07:16):
have been going back as far as you
can look.
And yet every year, they just rationalize even
more, use propaganda to get you all immersed
in some reason to support the next thing.
The point is actually, let me play the
clip first, then we'll read what Kathryn Rusd
and Fitz said about it.
Cutting ribbons, we're gonna be cutting costs. And
so those recommendations are gonna be on a
real time basis. But I do wanna take
a big step back and understand for people

(01:07:38):
to understand the scope of this problem. Over
half a $1,000,000,000,000
in the first place. The Pentagon has just
failed its 7th consecutive audit, nearly a $1,000,000,000,000
of budget. They can't even tell you where
it goes. So I think part of this
is exposing for the public the extent of
that rot and waste, but then to take
steps first through executive action and then laying

(01:07:58):
the groundwork for broader change through legislation as
well. Doesn't that bother anybody?
You have control of every how why would
you have to do executive orders?
Like, no matter what you fill in the
blank right there with, oh, make it faster.
Oh, it doesn't matter. You're you are circumventing
the process. Now that is the only logical
reason that might happen is because you go,
well, the Democrats are not gonna let it
happen. Well, we're currently in a situation where

(01:08:20):
you control every position or every every the
the senate, the the house, the judicial I
mean, it's it's very clear that you guys,
executive, are in control
on almost an unprecedented way.
Not really unprecedented, but, you know, it's been
a while since we've had that position. And
we're gonna talk about executive orders right away?
Why wouldn't you go through the process and
show people how it's supposed to go? Because

(01:08:41):
it's all driving in the same direction. They
don't wait. How many times I've written about
or discussed
the rule by executive order? Because that's where
we are now. They don't wanna change that.
Because, technically, there's a leg illegal
as we've said before, these things are only
meant to apply to the executive branch. So
the fact that they can even argue this
has sweeping enforcement, it shows you that we're
getting to a place where it's about convincing

(01:09:02):
you that there is no structure, ultimately. That
if they say it, they're in power, that
happens. Your rights are allowed if they say
so, they can pull them back if they
want to.
A lot of people are beginning to, without
even realizing, get pulled into this kind of
way of thinking. We should not be allowing
executive orders like this. They should be going
through the process that at least pretends
involve what you think. Because you have to

(01:09:23):
realize, that's not how this works anymore. Congress
does not act. They they're not the living
embodiment of our will. We know that's not
the case. We've talked about the Princeton study
or plenty of other examples that show you
you have a 0 a near zero minuscule,
statistically
insignificant
effect on the outcome policy. That's the Princeton
study, but there's plenty of other examples that
show that the lobbyists ultimately control what happens

(01:09:44):
if they want to. Right? So we know
that.
So in this position, we have to recognize
that we
it's all about convincing you that you are
having an effect. Oh, I lost the the
thread on that. Damn it. I was gonna
say another point. Let me go back and
refresh me. Work for broader change through legislation
as well to reign in that deficit, to
reign in that budget. And more crucially, Marie,
I know we're talking about this in terms

(01:10:04):
of efficiency,
but there's something deeper going on here. This
is about restoring self governance and accountability
in America as well. Elected leaders, if they
make the wrong decisions, voters have a great
choice. You can vote them out and remove
them. Most of the people making these decisions
from health care to the Department of Defense
are failing on effectiveness because they have no
accountability.
Historically, it's been the view of many scholars

(01:10:27):
to say that those people could not even
be fired.
Now we take a different view with the
environment the supreme court given us in recent
years, and we're gonna use that in a
pretty extensive way, Marie, to move quickly.
See, this is my point about everything they're
doing.
It seems to be under these guys that
we need this to we're we're changing for
for the better, but in doing so, almost

(01:10:48):
seeming to rapidly drive in the in in
the direction of the opposite. Like, why going
back to the point about actually going through
the process. Oh, I mean, I think that
was one of the points is ultimately pretending
like you are the ones making these decisions.
Right? So at least in the process of
congress,
they pretend that they're acting out your will,
and then they make that happen because of
the decision of congress. But, again, that's my

(01:11:09):
point as I was getting at is lobbyists
are the ones actually driving that decision. But
now we're just just saying that's not even
pretending anymore. We're just gonna sign executive orders.
So this this game where even if we
should want a democracy, which we shouldn't, the
idea being that that is supposed to be
representing your democracy, the one person in a
room signing a document that they say everyone
has to abide by.

(01:11:30):
I mean, it's all so transparently not what
they pretend, but it's all under the guise
that we have to because they're evil, bad
Democrats or whatever the focus is, which the
same thing happens in reverse.
But we're gonna pretend like executive orders, like
he's discussing, are gonna take you like, who
maybe they do all this, and next
year, we're back in our
democracy. Whatever you wanna pretend makes sense. If

(01:11:51):
that comes to pass and whether we wonder
or not that's what you wanted, then I'll
happily point that out. But I think we
should all be getting the sense that that
is never what actually happens. Didn't happen last
time.
Hope it does this time, but if it
doesn't, have the courage to call that out.
Oh, sorry. I had it way down there.
So as the Solari report says, another gaslight.

(01:12:12):
The problem is not unelected bureaucrats. It is
unelected corporate and tech contractors and the New
York Fed, which runs
the bank accounts, and the primary dealers
who keep financing this.
You need to get your hands on the
contracting budget unless, of course, you want to
get rid of the civil service
so the central bankers can have complete control

(01:12:32):
of the fiscal side of the house through
private contractors.
Oh, and therein lies the point.
Right? So this is what I'm so worried
about. You could argue that they're gonna take
this executive order action and start cutting things
down and reducing it, and I really hope
that's the case. But somebody very intelligent, financially
speaking, in every way, I would argue, is
simply pointing out, well, here's another alternative.

(01:12:54):
This is in the interest of getting rid
of the civil service so the central bankers
can take complete control over the fiscal side.
And this is written
everywhere.
Don't forget, one of the groups that is
overlapped with a lot of the elements in
Trump's administration right now
made this clear about CBDCs a long time
ago, the Bank of International Settlements. Our analysis

(01:13:14):
on CBDC
in particular
for the use of general to the general
use,
we tend to establish the equivalence with cash.
And there is a huge difference there.
For example, in cash,
we don't know, for example, who's using
a $100
bill today. We don't know who is using

(01:13:36):
a 1,000 peso bill today.
A key difference in with the CBDC
is that central bank will have
absolute control
on the rules and regulations
that will determine the use of that
expression of central bank liability.
And also, we will have the technology

(01:13:57):
to enforce that.
Those are those two issues are extremely
important, and that makes
a huge difference with respect to what
to what cash is.
Right. And that's what she's talking about, guys.
So removing those the the civil service aspect
to allow these central banks to essentially have

(01:14:18):
complete control, which, by the way, the whole
BlackRock overlap, we'll get to in a minute,
is very clear. Now whether or not he
becomes the person in that position, it's already
been,
stated by Fox News that Trump is tapping
Larry Fink to help him pick this position,
which is just as problematic.
We'll come back to that. Speaking of that,
billionaires

(01:14:38):
are the ones controlling what goes on, and
we shouldn't this is a really this is
a great way to frame this. And that's
not to say that Jeffrey Sachs is necessarily
on. Mean, there's plenty of things I could
point out that may be concerned, but he
does seem to have a lot of good
statements around this general point that I think
is really important for the average person to
hear. In case you don't regret, this is
Jeffrey Sachs right here. And I have a
clip I'll play for in a second, but

(01:14:59):
here's what he he said. And this is
is Sony thing pointing this out. It says,
who elected Trump? Billionaires.
Who was opposing Trump with Harris?
Billionaires.
When you look at our policy our politics,
We The People,
we're like spectators at a sport.
Doesn't have to be that way, so I'm
adding.
But I think this is obviously where we
exist right now. And this is why it

(01:15:20):
might it's like Maggie and the fake steering
wheel. Like, we need to recognize that it's
a it's you know, you're being placated.
That's what I believe, and I think the
evidence is shockingly clear. So that's what he's
saying. He's like, we are been relegated to
serve spectators while they play out the game.
Who are the billionaires? He asked. Well, it's
that list on one side, and it's that
list on the other. We we sit back.

(01:15:41):
Who's going to win? He says, I don't
know, but it's going to be the billionaires.
So what do the billionaires backing Trump want?
Tax cuts. Now this is his his point,
but you could just you know, the point
is you'll see, but there's a lot of
things they want. He says, what do the
billionaires backing Harris want? Tax cuts. What is
the election going to produce? Tax cuts. Big
surprise. It's it is a is it a
drama? Of course not. Of course, excuse me.

(01:16:02):
Of course, it's not a drama. Our congress
is corrupt.
Our political system is corrupt. It's run by
the big boys, not the little people, so
we're going to have more tax cuts. Here
comes Trump elected by a disgruntled voting population,
the working class. This is his core.
And he's telling the working class, you've been
cheated. I'm going to support you. And what
is he gonna do? He's gonna give tax

(01:16:22):
cuts to the rich people in the world.
You know, 10 people now, the 10 people
have a net worth of $2,000,000,000,000.
Yes. I'm sorry. We can't even imagine what
this means. The days after Trump was elected,
their net worth increased by a $100,000,000,000
in days.
Remember, Elon Musk, that was that's one of
the main points he's making right there, was
$70,000,000,000

(01:16:43):
just like that, be aft post Trump's election,
like, immediately. This is because people who have
money know, oh, this is a bonanza for
the billionaires. By the way, if Harris had
won, it probably would have gone up the
same way because it's billionaires on both sides.
So this deficit is going to rise. It's
not going to fall. Now Trump has a
very peculiar,
clever electoral strategy.

(01:17:05):
He says to the voters, the billionaires are
your friends.
That's not the problem. Your enemy is the
immigrant, and your family enemy is China. I'm
going to go after your enemies, not your
friends, but the billionaires. See, this it's such
an easy game, sleight of hand, just to
say that the opposite is true of what
they're saying. And it it's it's such an
easy game that people are, I think, choosing
to fall for, quite frankly. But he says,

(01:17:25):
so what Trump is saying is, I'm going
to raise tariffs on the Chinese. I'm going
to kick out the immigrants, and you're going
to live the American dream. He says that
he says, and it's not going to happen.
And sure enough, within the next few years,
the Trump administration will be a failure, widening
income inequalities, big unhappiness, larger budget deficits, frictions
with China, a lot of lawsuits in the
United States, and people trying to stay in
the US who are threatened with deportation.

(01:17:48):
It is not going to be a happy
period. Frankly, I think he's
right. And this whether he wants to do
or not, like, I feel like this is
a
basically the same things we're seeing today with
a different flavor. He says, and this, unfortunately,
comes from the fact that when you have
2 parties, billionaires backing this one and billionaires
backing that one, someone's getting left out. And
that's the people.

(01:18:09):
Whatever you think about them, I mean, that's
pretty damn spot on with where we are
right now. Now as I'll include the article
Derek wrote,
election 2024,
Zionist Technocrats versus Zionist Technocrats. The picture's right
there for you. I mean, it's literally the
same yeah. It's if you can make it
out to be no matter who wins, the
people supporting this ultimately win, no matter what
you think you're choosing,

(01:18:29):
isn't that a rigged election?
Depends on who you think is rigging it
though.
Here's a clip of what Jeffrey Sachs thinks.
This is Hayne Peck Flick saying Jeffrey Sachs
gets it.
Who has done more damage to America
than any of our miserable presidents
have done in all of their failed policies.

(01:18:52):
Because Netanyahu
has used America,
misused America
repeatedly,
because
the Zionist lobby
is so powerful
that Netanyahu
basically has had control over the Pentagon
to fight wars
on behalf of

(01:19:12):
Israeli extremism,
and
the war in Iraq in 2003
is a Netanyahu
war. Can you imagine this being said
before October 7th?
Right? I mean and it's just simply and,
again, we're not talking about Jewish people or
Israelis. We're talking about actions of an Israeli
of a government.
Illegal actions.

(01:19:33):
And it's just wild to me how controlled
I mean, even right now, there's, like, an
aggressive flounder. They're just floundering. Like, they're really
just flailing and screaming and calling everything racist,
and it's just not working anymore. I'm talking
about Zionists.
And what's what's incredible to me is that
this has always been this obvious for just
this whatever reason. I mean, I think it's
because of what they've done. They're the the

(01:19:55):
most important thing they had control over was
just kinda the average person who's not really
invested in the politics, watches a couple shows
here and there, but were of the mind
that when they saw the bad things, it
was a game of anti semitism, and they
ignored it while supporting what they thought was
a. And once they started seeing day after
day, moment after moment, just dead children and
murdered people, you can't really put that back

(01:20:15):
away.
People see it.
Right? And so, thank God, people are starting
to call this out because this is one
of the, if not the, central issue of
our time. The whatever we're talking about and
the influence over
our country, our government
to the at to at the expense of
Americans. It's incredible we're talking about make America
great again or America first at a time

(01:20:36):
when it's never been more clear that the
people saying that are completely acting for a
different country.
Right. The attempt to overthrow
Bashar al Assad in Syria starting in 2
1011 and continuing 14 more years of war
is a Netanyahu
war. Right. The overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi
in 2011,

(01:20:58):
unleashing
instability
not only in Libya but across Africa,
is a Netanyahu
war.
Netanyahu and his friends
in the US government,
these arch Zionists so called,
have had
effective control over the US military.

(01:21:20):
They have cost you and me and the
rest of us as taxpayers
1,000,000,000,000
of dollars.
It's a quite
a dandy deal that
the Israel lobby or the Zionist lobby puts
in,
say a $100,000,000
in the campaigns
and it gets 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

(01:21:42):
out.
Not billions, trillions out.
And so when Netanyahu speaks,
it's it's it's bizarre to me. It's not
who
Trump is, appointing or naming.
It's that the United States of America has
let itself be used
by a band of extremists

(01:22:03):
on
serial wars
that have been disastrous
for America's interests,
fighting
Israel's wars so that Israel
can maintain its extremism
and its occupation
of Palestinian lands and its apartheid rule over
Palestinian lands is not in America's

(01:22:26):
interests.
And President Trump, who speaks for America,
should be saying to Netanyahu,
first day,
I am president of the United States. You
no longer run our country
Right. BB. That's what I hope. Now this
is on, judge Napoliano's

(01:22:46):
show.
I I if
to make the point clear,
if that happened,
my god,
I would be standing up and praising Donald
Trump like you've never seen. And still being
critical about anything else he does that might
be wrong or I might see as a
trap or but nonetheless,
standing up and giving him credit for taking
a very dangerous and a very, you know,

(01:23:08):
trailblazing well, I guess, you know, in a
way, you could call it that, action.
And and then even even go back and
say it looks like the people for q
were right. Saving it or however you wanna
frame it. But I I I'm I can
I would be
thrilled to point out that I was wrong
in this case?
So I just think it's important to recognize
that, that that's what we should expect. Because
it's that obvious

(01:23:28):
that even within the internal republican circle that
they know and don't care because they're also
blinded or willfully supporting Zionism.
But if he stood up and truly said
that, you are no longer in control. And
not just said it, but took action and
demonstrated he was aware and trying to change
that.
I mean, it would be a very positive
step. And it would go a long way
in reaching people like me and showing me

(01:23:49):
what you think is happening or what you
think he is trying to do, which I
hope you're right about.
Interesting point on that, about the billionaires and
Israeli influence. In this is an interesting overlap
that I thought remember this this tweet that
Ye put out, Kanye West,
before he was deleted from the platform for
posting something that everyone seems to post today?
It's such a stupid dynamic. The bottom line

(01:24:11):
is if you remember, it was he actually,
I think, tricked them, to be quite honest.
But he he he came out and said,
love everybody, and and posted an image that
had what looked like a swastika around like
a spaceship, but it wasn't that. It was
a symbol you could look up that had
to do somebody used that and created some
weird religion thing about, like, UFOs,
and it had nothing to do with that.
Like, you could easily look it up and

(01:24:32):
verify that it had nothing to do with
it. It was this different dynamic. Because the
symbol itself has a historical meaning before that.
Either way, he said love everybody or something
like that, and they censored him for it.
And the guy said it was a bad
symbol. There are Nazi symbols being posted all
over the platform right now. So, clearly, they
get to decide
based on the moment that they can you
know, it's that's crazy. That's why it's obvious
censorship

(01:24:52):
with a lot of topics, but also in
particular in Israel right now. Now here for
the podcast,
Ye tweeted this and says, let's always remember
this is my final tweet.
Now Elon publicly said it was for the
other thing, but who knows? Maybe this was
part of it. Now this is famous with,
with,
R Emanuel.
Now Red Pill simply points out was Yeet
was Kanye West suspended from Twitter over this

(01:25:13):
tweet. Now that was pulled out and people
spec speculated about this exact thing right back
when that happened. So this isn't new, but
for whatever reason, he's choosing to put it
back up, and I think it's worth worth
considering. In the picture, r Emmanuel is seen
hosing down Elon Musk.
Has anyone looked into r Emmanuel? And if
so, what do we know about him? So
it's just this kind of embarrassing picture of
Elon Musk being hosed down.

(01:25:36):
Weird.
But free speech points out and says, who
is our Emmanuel?
Now you might have seen this. This is
at the UFC fight.
Elon Musk was chatting up with our Emmanuel.
And this is a clip from,
from,
Ian, Ian
Carol. Ian Carroll

(01:25:57):
talking about this exact discussion, which I think
is interesting to consider. So the main points
to take from this are
just simply the billionaire influence over all of
what we're seeing, and really just to recognize
that there
are strings
around or behind
all of what's presented to us on the
mainstream. That's always the case. And it doesn't
have to be some nefarious thing, just that

(01:26:18):
there are influences that have that are not
about just acting out the will of the
public, which they love to pretend is what's
happening. So consider this and consider whether there's
more to the story, and the overlaps with
everything else we're talking about as well.
Wondered who owns the UFC? You better buckle
up for this. I'm just gonna read very
mainstream sources, and I'm gonna let you fill

(01:26:38):
in the blanks. And don't worry. It won't
be hard to do. So in case we're
not clear, we're talking about the UFC, the
biggest mixed martial arts fighting promotion in the
world. They're owned by TKO Group Holdings, which
is owned by Endeavor Group Holding. And the
CEO of TKO Group is Ari Emmanuel, and
he is also the CEO of Endeavor, the

(01:27:00):
bigger company,
along with Patrick Whitesell,
the executive chairman. But I guess his name
is probably pronounced Ari Emanuel because it's Jewish
not Mexican.
His father, Jerusalem born Benjamin Emmanuel,
was a pediatrician who was in the Irgun,
a Zionist paramilitary
group that operated in mandatory Palestine during the

(01:27:22):
thirties and forties. And That's interesting.
Right? Especially since this is the same that
Lehi and Ergun, all these these earlier elements
that were radical and dangerous.
And this you could look this stuff up
yourself. They were what they themselves
frame themselves as very you know, the settler
colonial conversation. Lehi specifically called themselves terrorists. I've
talked about this many times. But these are

(01:27:43):
all foundational elements to Zionism.
And these points should very much matter with
what's going on today and whether there is
a lot more overlapping influence that we recognize
for not just Israel, but Zionism and for
other larger globalist
dynamics that seem to be completely missed by
all these other people that came seem to
be talking about globalism. Just to clarify, paramilitary

(01:28:03):
group means terrorist organization. And just to clarify,
that is not my definition
or Hamas's definition or Palestinians' definitions. That is
literally the Israeli government's definition. In 1948,
they outlawed the Irgun and Lehi groups declaring
them terrorist organizations.
Basically, everyone inside and outside of Jewish

(01:28:25):
worlds
called them terrorists
and strongly condemned them. Here's a list of
the bombings that they were responsible for.
And realize they praise this stuff today. I
mean, they even have a pen. It's called
a Lehigh pen that they give people for
positive things.
Despite at the or at the beginning, like
or, you know, post this time frame trying
to distance himself from it. Because at the

(01:28:46):
time, even as we pointed out,
post the first Nakba, for example, a lot
of their own Jewish communities
were calling out what they were doing to
the Palestinians, saying that's not what that's not
in line with Jewish values and so on.
The point is over all this time, they
have just warped the world's mindset of a
lot of these things and shut up anybody
disagreeing
with them, including Jewish people.

(01:29:07):
So, anyways, his dad was a Zionist terrorist
from back when
Israel was being formed, and now he runs
the UFC.
Well, he owns the UFC. Dana White runs
it. But that is just the start of
this because he has 2 brothers.
This one was Obama's White House chief of
staff after years in senior positions in the

(01:29:29):
Clinton administration,
but there's another one. This one works at
the Center For American Progress, the Wharton School,
Harvard,
and the NIH. But don't worry. The deep
state is not real. Oh, yeah. And president
Joe Biden named him one of the 16
members of the COVID 19 advisory
board. All three of those guys, their dad

(01:29:50):
was an Israeli terrorist
that even the Israeli government
outlawed
because their terrorist acts
were so fucked up, like bombing civilians,
literally.
Right. So exactly what Israel is doing today.
So it seems nothing has changed.
But wait.

(01:30:11):
There's more. Because both Ari and his buddy,
Patrick, who are in charge of that other
whole organization in charge of the UFC,
they are also both in charge of IMG.
They are co CEOs.
IMG is like a sports and media company.
They have a whole entertainment and modeling division,
including miss teen USA, miss USA, miss universe.

(01:30:35):
What does that remind me of?
Yeah. You remember Epstein's pimp, Jean Luc Brunel,
who hung himself
right before Epstein was all coming out? He
allegedly procured more than 1,000 women and girls
for Epstein.
You know who else is involved in all
of those? Donald Trump.
One of IMG's

(01:30:55):
top representatives described him as a coked out,
misogynistic pig from day 1.
Thank goodness. I'm glad that IMG is not
involved with Jeffrey Epstein. Oh, except for this
article where a bunch of survivors told their
stories, and this one said that she worked
for IMG. She
she told IMG what he was doing to

(01:31:15):
her over in France or wherever she was,
and IMG was like, oh, that's cool. Whatever.
No problem. And then they continued to send
girls to him.
Yeah. So
IMG
worked with him. And IMG doesn't just do
modeling.
No. No. No.
Here is all the sports,
leagues and events that they work with.

(01:31:36):
There's the UFC.
They do modeling,
consulting,
events,
like
the Premier League.
The big the highest level of English football.
Like the PGA of America.
Like the United States Tennis Association. They've got
figure skating. They got motorsports shit. They've even

(01:31:59):
got the world's strongest man in the US
Open of surfin. Are you getting the picture
yet? These 3 brothers
whose dad was a Zionist terrorist have been
top dogs at the Clinton White House, the
Obama White House, the Biden COVID response. They
control the UFC, a huge amount of the
modeling industry, a huge amount of the tennis,

(01:32:21):
golf,
all sorts of sport, soccer, rugby.
There are quite literal ties to Epstein. And
don't get me wrong. I love MMA.
I love watching the UFC, but just think
about culture. Think about
gladiators. Think about Rome. Think about all the
other Pride and circus is what he's getting

(01:32:41):
at. They were being placated. Industries we've recently
learned have weird ties to sexual blackmail rings.
Think about modeling.
Think about
how young boys and girls grow up in
America.
And if you're on TikTok, think about downloading
this video right now.
Good. I stopped before showing that little clip
at the end. Now the the point that
I think is interesting is still good information,

(01:33:03):
but recognize that there seems to be a
little bit of blind spot from him around
Trump. And I think they would whether they're
deliberate or not. I think in a 100
different ways that right even with, obviously, right
now with the administration,
there was the same overlapping ties to Donald
Trump in 45 different ways, whether it's the
pageants, whether I mean, it's a lot of
stuff right there. So what I think is

(01:33:23):
interesting is always is that it's your government.
It's not left or right. I mean, the
reality being
that
right now, Elon Musk, who and again, that's
that's this the picture right here,
who is buddy buddy with this guy is
immersed in Donald Trump's administration or the UFC
overlap. The bottom line is that that none
of these things, you could argue, are definitive
proof that they're part of some but there's

(01:33:45):
Epstein links to all of this. I mean,
it's it's just crazy to me what people
can choose to ignore, and that's what,
I'll read what first, what Sin, Crona says.
R e Manuel, next to Musk, agent of
of Elon Musk who brokered the Twitter takeover,
CEO of the biggest agency in Hollywood,
William Morris, owner of the UFC and WWE,
dual citizens of the US and Israel, boss

(01:34:06):
of the UFC president Dana White. Now ask
yourselves, why is Donald Trump at UFC all
the time sitting with these clowns who's actually
running the country? Now that's a huge jump
at the end. But, nonetheless,
these are valid points to consider. Do you
think it does translate to an influence?
Do they know these things? Very, very valid
point.
David Icke says it's a big club, and
you ain't in it. R Emmanuel was the
ultra Zionist owner of the UFC, son of

(01:34:28):
Benjamin m Emmanuel, who helped to bomb and
terrorize Israel into existence through terrorist organization, Ergun,
and brother of Rahm Emanuel. Remember, you've heard
that. Right? Never let a good crisis go
to waste dynamic.
But Obama's chief of staff, Fixer, and Ezekiel
Emanuel, who was on Biden's COVID 19 advisory
board.
He's also the friend and former Hollywood agent

(01:34:48):
of Donald Trump,
longtime close friend of Elon Musk and ultimate
employer of Joe Rogan of UFC commentator.
If you can't see though, some of those
things, I guarantee, came across the research that
could've gone in that video, but maybe didn't.
That's my opinion. Either way, clearly,
there it's
overlapped and intermer immersed with all of it.
And if you can't see what that might

(01:35:09):
show you, doesn't have to prove it, but
it might show you
that this there's something bigger than what's being
put in front of even left right dynamic
that's actually driving what goes
on. Now, that's not any representation of a
religion or anything. It's just about power structures
that are able to influence the outcome of
policy. No matter who it is or what
it's coming from, that should matter to somebody
talking about America first.

(01:35:31):
Now, we just talked
about this main point from 2 days ago.
Trump confirms plan to declare national emergency,
which in and of itself should immediately put
put people put people on guard.
Even if you trust this person, which you
should trust politicians, you don't know them. But
even if he did,
he could be played. Right? He could be
misplayed. He could be wrong. Is that the
whole sentiment from last time that he got

(01:35:53):
tricked?
Okay.
Fine. Maybe he's being tricked now. But the
problem is that people don't do that right
now.
The idea is that he's doing it for
a good reason. Well, what if he's being
tricked? Is that the whole it it's my
I'm trying to highlight a choice to not
do that no matter what the justification, and
that's the bigger problem. And I think that's
more team sport politics than anything else.

(01:36:13):
But he says to do that for mass
deportations
using military assets. He that's what he has
confirmed.
That's con I mean, there's so many different
ways that's really concerning to me. I mean,
Brian from High Impact Flix, I might have
that clip today. He he made good points
about why this is concerning, and we all
even if he has good intentions, the where
this could go out of hand, the the

(01:36:35):
incredible government overstep,
the increase of government control over your life,
all these things which never typically don't go
away. This gets rolled out for some fill
the gap point, and then like the Patriot
Act, it just becomes the norm. The government
almost never gives back power once you give
it. Look at the COVID 19 dynamic that
Trump initiated. We're still there. As much as
they're not doing those things, the power was

(01:36:56):
never taken away.
I think that's by design. So talking about
this exact point, I wanted to overlap it
with one thing that just got said.
So this is what Alex Jones, and we're
gonna go in a section in a minute
about these kind of statements, is he this
is he's putting about on 18th.
Trump pledges to use military
on land and sea to dismantle,

(01:37:18):
oh, drug and human trafficking networks. Okay. So
now we're just expanding. We're we're in mission
creep territory and we haven't even started yet.
So now you're gonna use the military in
the United States to go after drug trafficking
or really maybe on the border is the
point?
But he says in the United States. Now
the whole point is it comes from the
idea that just today, and I was actually
on Ben Swan's show earlier, which I don't
know when that comes out, talking about this

(01:37:40):
in in regard to the border and the
the recent whistleblower that said the US government
is the largest human trafficking operation in the
world. Now what's what's crazy to me is
that people I 100%. I would agree with
that, except people who talk about it are
only pointing at half of the government, instead
of recognizing that it is immersed in the
government.
And how long and how far back you
can show the obvious overlap to Republican and

(01:38:02):
Democrat.
Like, people like Dennis Hasterton are some of
the most egregious examples from the right.
But the point is that everybody in the
conversation online right now that's making these points
are only aiming and are when they say
the government, they're only pointing at the democrats.
It's it's a willful ignorance that's the most
dangerous and irresponsible kind.
But that's a that's not even the main
point.

(01:38:22):
My point is to highlight, and, well, I
guess on top of that before I move
past it, is that like always, if you're
only focusing on half of the problem, guess
what happens? The problem never goes away.
That's by design.
But pledging to use military on land and
sea, well, what does that remind you of?
Right? Doesn't that ring doesn't that sound like
something we've heard already?

(01:38:44):
3.
We will finally complete
the biometric
but it has never been completed. The politicians

(01:39:06):
are all talk. No action. Never happens.
So we'll do it.
Right? Instead of recognizing, like, wait a minute.
Don't we not want these things? Oh, but
he said they failed, and that's why we're
gonna succeed. And he said Clinton couldn't do
it. So the Republicans will do it. You
mean the thing that we all scream we
shouldn't want 30 seconds ago, but because he
said they didn't and Clinton failed that we
get

(01:39:27):
are we that simple?
I don't believe even the vast majority
are like that. But we know that's happening.
And I think it's a it is a
problematic element in both sides of the paradigm
that are that easy to be swayed by
using simple reverse psychology dynamics or even some
more simple. Never happens.
Hillary
Clinton, all talks unfortunately,

(01:39:47):
when there is action, it's always the wrong
decision. Do you ever notice?
In my administration,
we will ensure that this system is in
place.
And I will tell you, it will
be on land,
it will be on sea,
it will be in air, we will have
a proper tracking

(01:40:09):
Yeah. And can you imagine Clinton saying that?
Like, literally the exact same thing for the
same reason, and the Republicans will be marching
through the streets. And we should be both
ways, both times, because it's the same damn
thing.
But again, this clip is talking about using
the military
for trafficking,
which, of course, we should try to be
fighting. We'll try we should be fighting. We

(01:40:30):
should be doing everything we can. The problem
is that if we do recognize the government's
the one doing that, you're using the government
to stop a government. This is the whole
thing.
You're being played.
Even if you somehow only think it's the
Democrats, which I know is just such a
childish worldview, there's this lying down the middle
of the government where you can prove the
opposite, even if you think that. Okay. Fine.

(01:40:51):
Then the next question is, is he actually
gonna use it to stop this?
I know you the the idea is that
you believe it because you believe him and
you have faith, then I'm well, that's that's
crazy. Even if you believe it, couldn't he
be being tricked?
Either way,
military on land and sea. What about posse
comitatus? Are we still talking about National Guard
at this point? And if that's the case,

(01:41:12):
are they only gonna be deployed within the
states they're from, which would then be the
loophole?
Well, how does that make sense?
Inter I mean, guys, this is about rationalizing
the problem.
Even if you think he means about fighting
this, you're realizing you're now talking about an
overreach, a a a step that is going
to change everything.

(01:41:33):
And we just talked about the idea of
the,
this was specifically about the deportation dynamic, which
is supposed to be temporary. Right? That's what
I was showing you the article for.
To declare a national emergency to do this.
Well, okay. Then now we're just adding now
it's here's another thing, same reason, but for
drug trafficking, human trafficking. Well, that's that's how
this expands, and we haven't even gotten there
yet.

(01:41:54):
Anybody who I mean, an object especially a
Republican will be calling this out as a
problem.
But certain people don't.
Never seem to.
Breaking 911 says Elon Musk and Vivek are
teaming up to launch a podcast titled DogeCast.
Guys, I mean, it's just so clear how
this is this is
you could think what you want about it.

(01:42:15):
I think this is ridiculous. They where they'll
discuss their plans for government cost cutting initiatives
in the Trump administration.
I yeah. I really hope it turns out
to be something where you can just like,
this is about trying to make it appear
as if they're engaging with you when you
are have no say over what ultimately happens.
That's how I read this.
Either way, do we need a podcast? Do
we need a sitting down how about you

(01:42:36):
take time in the job that you're being
paid for from US tax dollars to not
do a podcast talking about what you'll do?
How about just do what we need done?
It's all about placation.
Just a thought points out, trying to reason
with MAGA has the same exact outcome as
trying to reason with Blue no matter who.
They will excuse genocide, blatant corruption, obvious lies,

(01:42:57):
history, and actions that prove their leaders are
owned. Red hats and blue bracelets, sorry, but
you're in a cult.
Now sure plenty disagree with that. But I
wanna point out that the only entities that
I'm that they I'm only highlighting right there
are the team sport politics of it all.
I I think I can see clearly. I
recognize
both the liberals and conservatives of I are

(01:43:17):
that are willing to call out some of
the things on their side, but are still
ideologically trapped because they're most of us have
been convinced there's no other choice besides playing
through this cycle.
That's what I'm trying to wake people from
and get you know, but but I agree
with that. But I don't think that's as
large of a thing as it used to
be. At least, I'm hoping so.
Andrea Lynn points out, warning signs of a

(01:43:39):
cult.
The leader is always right.
Criticism of the leader is considered persecution.
Followers are obsessed with the leader. No matter
how harmful the leader's behavior is justified, the
leader of the is the only source of,
quote, truth. Members who recognize the they belong
to members won't recognize they belong to a
cult. If any of the this feels familiar,
it's time to break free before it's too

(01:44:00):
late.
As always, and this is not just some
side point to make it even, I see
the same thing in regard to what's happening
with Biden and whatever else. The, like like,
your women at an Elvis concert. You know
what? The kind of
overwhelming, emotional driven,
critical thinking, compromising position of blindly believing in

(01:44:23):
somebody because they're your hero.
Right? It's emotional.
So I agree with this completely.
As Carrie points out,
unfun
fact, people in cults don't know they're in
cults. Stay vigilant and break free, she says.
Here's what she pointed out.
Thinks they'll get sucked into a cult, but
it can happen to anyone. Here are 5
red flag warning signs that you've fallen prey

(01:44:44):
to a predatory cult. Cults use constant lies
and propaganda, indoctrinating people into believing their cult
is right and good. Members and outsiders alike
are shunned for disagreeing with the cult's ideology
or its leaders, who are believed to have
superhuman qualities. They're discouraged from asking questions or
thinking critically, and are unable to change their
minds, even when presented with clear evidence of
corruption, incompetence, deceit, misconduct, and evil. Cults constantly

(01:45:07):
engage in black and white thinking and fear
of the out group. We're good, they're bad.
We're enlightened, they're brainwashed. We're right, they're wrong.
Only our group is moral. Collectivism is key.
Cults exploit you financially, taking your money and
providing little to no accountability as to how
they spend it. They'll insist it for the
good of the group and shame you for
not contributing. Colts emphasize special doctrines and set
rigid rules and regulations that demand strict obedience.

(01:45:29):
You're punished if you dare to disobey these
rules or fail to comply exactly how they
expect you to. You might even be punished
even when you comply fully or haven't disobeyed
at all. Authority is paramount across all variations
and brands of cultism, and defying it is
sin that warrants brutality.
Cults demand intense loyalty to the group and
its leaders, who are considered to know best
what's right for everyone. Because of this, there's

(01:45:50):
never a good reason to leave. If you
do, it's because you're wrong, bad, crazy, and
a threat to the security of the group.
This is you. Don't panic. Simply stop making
excuses for psychopathic authoritarians
of all partisan persuasions who rule over a
system that has trained you since birth to
make moral exceptions for their depraved, violent, megalomaniacal
monopoly over your freedom. Take responsibility for your

(01:46:11):
life and claim your own self worth, so
you aren't susceptible to the false promises of
these manipulative power mongers, who convince you your
subservience to their power sets you free. The
cult leaders and their enforcement henchmen can't control
people if their followers stop believing in their
propaganda, refuse to buy into their fake authority,
and start believing in themselves. Sound like too
much work? It's still not as hard as
facing the ramifications of being a slave to

(01:46:32):
a death cult that's rapidly destroying humanity.
Always nailing it, Carrie.
Very well done. Now she continues in a
different tweet. This app, as in Twitter, has
taught me that government spending and debt are
very bad and dangerous,
unless your favorite cult politician added to them.

(01:46:55):
In which case, they're actually the best qualified
person to balance the budget. And if you
question this, you have Trump derangement syndrome and
wanted Harris to win the election.
It's perfect.
You know, which is clearly not what she
thinks. High Impact Flix responds saying, I haven't
seen any of your posts in my feed
in a while.
I have to remember to seek you out.
Meanwhile,
crap. I don't wanna see from peep crap.

(01:47:16):
I don't wanna see from people promoting propagandas
all over the place. Queue up the good
work.
And everybody can recognize this right now. There's
this game, they act like they're cultivating for
what you think. Guys, you're being propagandized
aggressively on this platform, very socially engineered.
People you follow like her doesn't just the
same thing. I I have to go to
these people to look at their content, and
I am actively engaging with them with anybody

(01:47:38):
else. And the only things I see are
Elon Musk and republican supporting content that I
barely people I'm not even following.
And that's
there's 2 tabs, by the way. My point
is the one you can go to will
definitely
be somewhat different, but more or less the
same.
I think that's very important. She says same.
I see mostly MAGA smut, and I've noticed
my reach has fallen in the last few

(01:47:58):
weeks. New Twitter, same as the old Twitter
for those of us who won't fit neatly
into partisan narratives. Keep up the great work
too.
I think that's exactly the case. People that
like, that's as always, what I'm point is
that objective nonpartisan
entities content, that's the real threat to the
machine right now.
Now in regard to the AI overlap, which

(01:48:19):
I think is very prevalent in all this,
Whitney Webb points out that for all the
people who still cheerlead for Javier Millet, any
comments on his his
how his government has created a security agency
to implement AI driven precrime?
Anybody? Please explain explain for me how this
is how this, is Libertard Carahoe. Thanks. Which

(01:48:39):
I'm not I forget about that. I believe
that's a let's look it up real quick.
I'll
just look it up like this.
Oh, it's weird. Usually it,
gives the little box where you can click
it.
Meaning. There we go.
Phrase popularized by Malay,

(01:48:59):
long live freedom. Damn it.
Silly. So the point is, says for those
who don't know, precrime
was technically legalized under the last Trump administration
via former AG Bill Barr.
Very easy to prove.
All of these different things that we keep
pointing to gets they get sidestepped and dismissed
by his own and it let's let's be
clear again for the umpteenth time. We're not

(01:49:20):
making this about Trump versus anybody else. It's
for my mind, it's just the government. He's
one aspect of the same agenda being rolled
out, and and it's always done the same
way. Just like the people who don't wanna
see what Biden's doing, who are supporting of
the left. That's how this works. They only
wanna point to the other side. Now that
Team Short politics dynamic, I believe, is a
diminishing number, which is why things are getting
more desperate for the power structure.

(01:49:41):
But Bill
Barr, precrime, Donald Trump. Now we're in phase
2. His policy was continued under under Biden
and arguably expanded. JD Vance's benefactor, Peter Thiel,
has major ties to firms seeking to implement
precrime in the United States, including Palantir and
the Thiel and Epstein funded Carbine,

(01:50:01):
which by the way, this
is the article she wrote for TLAB about
that, specifically around Carbine.
I'll add that down there.
And it's it's it's a this article is
wild if you haven't read it, The Prince
and the Spy,
specifically about
Prince,

(01:50:22):
Academy Blackwater, and Israel, an overlap in the
start up nation or startup city kind of
or rather startup,
you know, the idea of the Israeli tech
field
filling out
the tech world and ultimately being facilitating the
intelligence apparatus around it.
I think there's one more thing in there.

(01:50:44):
Oh, it was just the the the link
she included right here. So this is what
she was pointing to. Legislation and official notes,
Ministry of Security.
Now specifically talking about
the aforementioned countries, talking about all the you
know, referencing the United States, China, United Kingdom,
Israel, France, and what they're doing. They all
use artificial intelligence and video analysis and facial

(01:51:04):
recognition,
crime prediction, cybersecurity, data analysis, drones and robotics,
communication coordination, all the things that we should
be concerned about, analysis of social networks.
It says that its use can significantly improve
the effectiveness
and efficacy of the different areas of the
safety ministry.
Usually, it's something like that. Right? Safety ministry

(01:51:25):
is the all encompassing Orwellian control structure and
safety. And the federal police and the security
forces, helping them to respond faster and with
greater precision to threats and emergency situations.
That these countries are at the forefront of
integrating artificial intelligence technologies to strengthen the security
and protection of their citizens, improving their efficacy
and effectiveness.
This is why it's essential to apply artificial

(01:51:46):
intelligence
in the prevention,
detection and investigation,
and prosecute prosecution of crime and its corrections
and its connections.
Prevention. So, again, we're talking about artificial intelligence
being used to prevent crime.
This is precrime. This is what we're talking
about. Or detection, investigation, or prosecution.

(01:52:07):
This is what we're where we're heading, and
I think everyone recognizes the concerns here.
If we pretend like we get the good
guy version of it, that we wanna overlook
that, which is pretty concerning for obvious
reasons.
So here is Sovereign Bra

(01:52:27):
saying, b Javier Millet. Pretend to be Me
based libertarian.
Sign legislation for full spectrum AI robotic and
drone surveillance of your citizenry. Use artificial intelligence
to create a minority report precrime unit that
monitors everything your citizens say and do. Extraordinarily
sketchy.
Millet fooled the populist right with a facade
of based libertarianism. Now realize, guys, if that

(01:52:48):
was a one off, you could just go,
well, he a smart political move. Right? But
it's everywhere.
Pretend
Theo pretending,
even arguably Musk and the rest of them,
they're all pretending to be some kind of
new libertarian. They are using and placating what
would be the most resistant to what's about
to come. That's what I'm I think we
all can see that, but it's my opinion.

(01:53:10):
The reality being that
if they're seeing so clearly all these different
like, the Prospera, fake libertarian cities, kind of
along with the freedom city point and all
this they they clearly got it's clearly an
agenda driving from somewhere to convince
the
whatever you wanna call it, the right way
element of this that are more libertarian, more
believing in constitutional rights, or even more no

(01:53:31):
state kind of feeling. The clear point being
is they're using that because they knew that
that's what would be the most resistant, to
my opinion.
But you have to see how this is
kind of an organized push. All these different
people in different places of the world all
tapping into something even though you can prove
that they're lying about it. Actually, I'll grab
the,
article that

(01:53:52):
Corbett did about this, which is important. Because,
again, it's the same point. He you know,
it's a great read. Make sure you check
it out from October 20th. But the point
simply saying, like, what do you call a
vegetarian who eats meat all the time? Well,
not a vegetarian. What do you call somebody
who has been actively collaborating with governments, militaries,
and intelligence agencies that's enticed a higher career?
Well, you don't call them a libertarian.
But there are a lot of libertarians that
wanna just overlook it for whatever reason you

(01:54:15):
wanna think makes sense.
And he goes, then, when no one was
looking,
he signed, like, this, you know, while pretending
to be a libertarian, then when no one
was looking, Mullet signed authoritarian
authorization, excuse me, for the gnarliest Orwellian Big
Brother surveillance state possible into legislation.
And yet people still pretend that's not what's

(01:54:35):
happening.
He goes, this is exactly why I don't
trust politicians. And, guys, that should be your
square
1 zero one you know, the you always
question politicians, even who you believe in or
support, if that's the case.
One, because obviously they could just be mistaken
or wrong or misled or confused
or maybe lying to you. God forbid you're
you know, it's obviously always there. And I

(01:54:58):
argue as always that you should be holding
who you
the people you support the most, you You
should be the most critical of because there
should be a higher standard for them. It's
not what happens.
Now here's where this gets most alarming.
We already know this is going on in
Israel. And I mean, like, the most alarming
overlap.

(01:55:20):
Stuff like this. Right? This was this was
the habsura program, the mass assassination factory. That's
a quote from an IDF member. Inside Israel's
calculated bombing of Gaza using an artificial intelligence
program to decide what what people are being
targeted.
Right? But then we also have the other
one, which was more specific
to

(01:55:40):
or I forget what I think it was
actually, I think it was the first case
was habsura was the buildings and lavender was
the specific to people. Either way, they're 2
different programs where they're using artificial intelligence to
decide who they are murdering.
And, guys, this has been objectively verified by
international entities, human rights groups.
They're literally testing out the artificial intelligence control

(01:56:00):
structure
just like usual, in a place like Gaza.
They sell their weapons as battle tested because
they bomb innocent people on the ground and
this has been going on for decades. That's
Israel for you. So I wanna play this
clip showing you what is going on inside
of Israel and then ask yourself
if this is I mean, just ask recognize,
I would simply say, why this should be
so concerning with what you're seeing rolled out.

(01:56:22):
Under a guise of solving problems,
as many people have pointed out, including the
Salahi Report,
artificial intelligence seems to be the obvious go
to for what people people like Elon Musk
who are championing this for their own reasons.
You don't think they're gonna lean into AI
when it comes to efficiency?
This is clearly one of the obvious steps
in my mind to justify what they're rolling

(01:56:43):
out under a guise of solving what you
think is the problem, even if that effectively
removes that problem momentarily
and just puts in position a new problem.
So this is what Mondelez is telling you
or highlighting for you is happening in Israel.
Israel is using facial recognition technology to organize
how it conducts mass arrests, forcible displacement in
Gaza. Some Palestinians say the technology is also

(01:57:05):
being used to carry out field executions.
Welcome to your future. Gaza, a single camera
scan now holds the power to decide life
or death.
Israel is currently carrying out an ethnic cleansing
campaign in North Gaza, and it's using biometric
scanning to speed up the process.
According to witnesses, the Israeli army has set
up security checkpoints all over Northern Gaza,

(01:57:28):
using facial recognition technology
to monitor everyone that passes through. And it
doesn't stop there. The technology is being used
to fuel mass arrests,
displacements,
and possibly even executions.
Using a vast database of personal data, the
Israeli government has collected on Palestinians.

(01:57:48):
Eyewitnesses recount being forced into ditches and standing
for minutes at a time in front of
cameras before Israeli soldiers reveal their personal information,
like their name, age, occupation,
home address, and the details of their friends,
families, and neighbors. Anyone deemed a suspect is
beaten, detained, or carried off to an unknown

(01:58:10):
location.
Witnesses recall watching soldiers separate families
and taking fathers and mothers away from their
children. Others said the soldiers threatened to execute
them if they didn't provide information on their
friends and family.
Israel has a well documented history of using
AI and facial recognition technology in Gaza and
the West Bank. Over decades of occupation, Israel

(01:58:32):
has collected a vast database of personal information
on Palestinians.
Several investigations have shown that Israel uses AI
driven systems to draw on these databases
and identify wanted individuals
in seconds,
guiding military decisions on who to detain,
interrogate or even kill. But reports show that
these systems often use faulty data and inexact

(01:58:55):
approximations
and loosely identify civilians as military targets.
Despite this, we're seeing Israel continue to battle
test its weapons and technology on Palestinians
using these programs to ethnically cleanse Palestinians right
now
in
North

(01:59:15):
Gaza.
Well, that's where we're going.
Now I couldn't find the one that I
was actually looking for. Remember that well, I
played a video showing you what this was
like in 2019.
But just to show you literally Starlink
or just this one.
It says crazy that there are around 10,000
known active satellites in orbit around Earth and
almost half are Starlink.

(01:59:37):
So I just want you to think about
what has changed so rapidly and what has
been condensed through the control of what apparently
seems to be 1 person or at least
whoever's controlling him.
And realize from 2019
to now, it was a rapid, rapid change.
So I believe we're in a dangerous position
where this stuff is changing before people even
recognize what's happening.

(02:00:01):
Here's what Elon Musk had to say about
Javier Millet and his Orwellian control structure under
the guise of libertarianism.
This person says, this is Javier Mele. He's
become president kind of going over the thread
about why he's so great,
leaving out all the parts we're worried about,
of course. But he was saying Elon Musk
does impressive progress in Argentina.
Of course, because that's what it's really about.

(02:00:24):
These people are in the same boat, in
my opinion. It's all about driving forward a
very clear agenda under a guise of fighting
for specifically seemingly right leaning mindset, you know,
political freedom driven concepts while actively doing the
opposite.
Now one last point around this that I
think is interesting, because don't forget, Elon Musk
was, like, aggressively

(02:00:44):
driving
to support a Venezuelan president,
fighting against Maduro. Right? Well, I think it's
2 things important to point out. One, that
that just shows you the kind of influence
and and, you know there's very clear shifts
happening all over the place. Neil and Musk
is playing that role. But at the same
time, that that was something that they shared
with the Biden administration.
So all these conversations about them fighting for

(02:01:06):
the communist people versus the people you want,
well, how do you explain that? Well, you
explain it because you realize those are all
narratives and they're all fighting for a government
agenda, the same government agenda.
But here's Lincoln on 19th, saying the Venezuelan
people spoke resoundingly on July 28th. We're still
here. And made,
what was his name again? Edmundo Gonzalez the

(02:01:27):
president-elect.
No. He didn't. All the evidence clearly demonstrates
the opposite. Democracy demands respect for will of
voters.
I guess we're done with Guaido then. I
guess he's out of the picture. I guess
that yeah. How'd that work out for you?
I mean, it's just so embarrassing. These people
are so ineffectual.
Alan McLeod says even even Edmundo Gonzalez gave
up the charade months ago.

(02:01:47):
But in your lame duck last few weeks,
you choose to embarrass yourself by impotently calling
for regime change. I'm sure there's some level
of agenda behind it. But realize that is
crazy. These are this is the same thing
we keep seeing. They're floundering.
But explain for me how Elon Musk and
the right wing argument were calling for the
same person to be in charge of Venezuela.
Doesn't that seem confounding?

(02:02:08):
I'm sure there's an assuming answer that makes
it make sense.
Now talking about free speech since we're talking
about the same conversation from the Musk side
of things,
I think it's important to highlight the fact
that this is obviously not part of what's
happening on this platform. It's really about trapping
you in the idea to think that they're
working towards that or whatever makes it make
sense as they continue to censor

(02:02:29):
Glenda Iaccarino says protecting free speech is more
important than ever.
World Economic Forum, mask, shot supporter,
active discussion you know, the person highlighting the
idea that we are censoring for the right
reasons while then pretending like it's about free
speech. Well, you don't have absolute free speech
if you're censoring people.
But it says the people have woken up
and they're me and they they and they

(02:02:49):
are the media now. She's just tapping into
whatever hollow point that they're making on Twitter
even though that's not at all what's actually
happening.
I mean, I like I'm all for the
idea that you are out there the ones
informing those around you who are discussing what's
going on. The point is that anyone who
wants to be is a journalist or part
of the media. You don't have to go
to some school.
Supreme court's rally ruled that many times.

(02:03:11):
Even though they still box you out of
certain rooms because you don't have your accreditation,
it's it's ridiculous. And they're violating laws and
rules just like usual.
But what's funny
is that what they're doing
is exactly what the mainstream is doing.
Influencing, supporting, downplaying, you know, what supporting what
they want, ignoring, downplaying, and censoring, and hiding
what they don't, what they don't like, working

(02:03:31):
with literal, high level, deep state government organizations
in order to work.
How about the ADL, for example? Like, how
do they fit into the rogue
outsider fighting against the deep state?
They don't.
Well, they're immersed with Twitter.
Little important facts like that seem to highlight
a big problem.
This person says, this is an interpretation of
what I just read.

(02:03:52):
Protecting free speech for corporations is more important
than ever for the privatization of speech. People
corporations have woken up, and they are the
media now. Freedom of reach is not freedom
of
freedom. Right? Or freedom of speech. Right, Linda?
And he tagged me. Thank you for that.
Well, let's go over this pretty quick very
quickly. This is the article from The Independent.
Elon Musk to be summoned by MPs to
testify about Twitter's role in the UK summer

(02:04:14):
riots. It's interesting.
I don't even know why he would feel
that he has to show up for that,
quite frankly.
It's interesting.
Because I don't know what are we talking
about his own statements? Because that would be
free speech.
Of course, once you're in a government position,
there's there's some level of change to that.
Not that you would never have to say
it, but there are clear consequences to being
in a position of power as a literal

(02:04:35):
government entity and then influencing
other government processes. But he says, quote, I
would certainly like the opportunity to cross examine
him, the person from the UK,
to see how he reconciles his promotion of
freedom of expression,
not speech, you see, with his promotion of
pure disinformation.
Well, you see, this is what's so frustrating,
and this is how the whole paradigm game

(02:04:55):
works. You're gonna be driven to support him
if you believe you're fighting for his side
versus their side. The reality, though, is they're
both playing a game against you because they're
censoring on this platform. And what they're talking
about is is his how do you reconcile
free speech with
with what?
His right under free speech to disinform

(02:05:15):
or to be wrong? How whatever which whatever
which way it goes, it's protected under free
speech. Maybe not in the UK, if you
if that's how that works out. But he's
here talking about so the point is, clearly,
this is about trying to create the back
and forth to, I argue, drive the next
step. Like, all the things we're talking about
today. He says mister Musk was dubbed deeply
irresponsible by ministers for his remarks, which many

(02:05:36):
of them were, by the way,
and asked for justification for his claim that
civil war is inevitable. And this is a
good point, actually. So here's that tweet.
Ashley Sinclair says the effects of mass migration
and open borders is what's going on.
Well, let's not forget that if that is
the full picture, which I don't think it
is, it's being driven by other entities like
Israel, for example. And we can literally prove

(02:05:58):
that today.
But, of course, you wanna make it about
those people as the enemy when even your
argument is
it's being weaponized.
So are they do do they know they're
being weaponized? And if that's not the case,
then why are you attacking them like they're
the enemy? Because this is a lot deeper
than just being against the the the migrant
there is a level of racism and hatred

(02:06:18):
that's involved in this argument, No matter it's
very clear.
But even within that, there is still a
fair argument to be made about how this
is affecting these locations. But if we're gonna
make it about the individual
versus the one using them, or even bigger
that you won't identify who that entity is,
there's clearly a game being played here.
But he says civil war is inevitable. Like,

(02:06:40):
I really think that's a crazy thing to
say.
So their point is, which by the way,
he has a right to say it, but
what you're doing is aren't driving civil war.
Like, inevitable based on what dynamic? The fact
that there are immigrants who are causing chaos?
Why would that the civil war is the
agenda.
You're being driven, and this is directly coming
from an Israeli foreign policy dynamic, but it's

(02:07:02):
also being driven by people like him in
the right the the conversation
that is highlighting many things that are usually
taken out of context, but either way, making
this about people fighting people instead of government
powers
manipulating people,
which is even what they're ultimately saying when
you make the first point, but it immediately
gets weaponized against the average individual there on
the street, who in many cases is being

(02:07:24):
abused by the very same government you pretend
you're fighting.
So I do think it's interesting to call
that point out. He says it's it comes
amid growing concern that technology is outpacing regulation
and safety measures on social media platforms. That's
where this all comes to. Using him as
the justification to roll out what's already happening,
and I believe he's, if not a willing
part of that, at least a part of

(02:07:45):
that.
Like I've said before, like the Pied Piper
of technocracy, he's literally driving you all into
the position that they said you would be
under his platform.
And he says, we'll put more responsibility on
tech companies to protect children and online remove
illegal con that's always how to play this.
Sort of like the trafficking point that Trump
just used to argue more military deployment illegally
in the country.

(02:08:05):
Of course, we should stop these things, but
we don't need that grandiose action to stop
what we could the point is that they
don't wanna stop these things.
It's very clear to me. That's my opinion,
but I think the evidence goes back a
very long way. Like with the bill in
the UK,
they don't care about protecting children. They they
care they they
care about using what you care about

(02:08:26):
to pretend they're gonna do that when ultimately
it's about restricting
and ignoring your rights.
Plans to do what take do what it
takes to keep people, particularly children and people
with vulnerabilities, safe online.
Safe from what? Ideas?
Right? It's important to think like this, guys,
and realize that we're all being driven very
rapidly, even people that are very hard ardent

(02:08:47):
about free speech and just starting to feel
like there's caveats. There should not be.
Speech is protected. I'm an absolute free speech
person. I think that need that it's just
like
object or irritating the objective with the with
the time to air on the side of
your principles.
The overall philosophy I'm trying to move towards,
they write, is one where safety is baked

(02:09:07):
in from the onset,
which
almost always comes with the the
it bleeds into like, if they're they're where
they're pushing the idea of baked in safety,
that will end up meaning restriction of your
rights.
And I think that's the point. Now it
says, so in other words, algorithms are there
to protect people, not to exploit vulnerabilities.
Well, they'll do both like they always do.

(02:09:27):
And only into the guise of protecting, I
argue, in order to use that to suppress
more. Mister Musk has faced criticism for his
management of Twitter partly as a result of
a decrease in content moderation on the site.
Think how funny that is. Causing many users
to leave the platform for competitor Blue Sky,
which I find that real if I don't
believe that's actually happening.
But you realize how incredible that is? Content

(02:09:49):
moderation has dramatically increased, in my opinion.
They've said this themselves,
implementing new tools on backs of what and
this is look. You could argue that's wrong.
I don't know how any of us could
prove it. I'm basing on what they've said,
which is all we really have. And the
point as well is what we can see
happening.
But they themselves discussed adding content moderation tools
on top of what they were using. I'll

(02:10:10):
play the clip again.
And they've all been clear. And let's let's
be very this that can't be denied since
it was discussed in Elon Musk's own lawsuit
dot pay die the paperwork
with the conversation of GARM that they admitted
that they have
complied with or exceeded
everything that GARMA or the vast majority of
what GARMA I think it was oh, no.

(02:10:30):
That was the other one. But the vast
majority of what GARMA was asking for. And
that's a group that they had partnered with
in July despite pretending to fight them later,
and I still think that was a major
ploy.
And then they also admitted that up over
90% of what the government's already asked them
for, they've complied with anyway.
Pretty obvious to see that we're being lied
to about this back and forth.

(02:10:51):
But but making sure we discuss the point
about
moderation.
This was early, but also this the clips
go from the beginning to basically not too
long ago, where they're openly discussing the fact
that they will be moderating content. I'm only
gonna play the first couple points of it,
but to realize that if your issue is
moderating content, like when Clinton came out and
said we have to moderate content and everyone

(02:11:13):
clutched their pearls and screamed, which, good, we
should be. But that's exactly what's already happening
on plat the platform right now. So if
your issue is you just don't like it
when Democrats do the moderation, but it's okay
when these people do even though Yaccarino is
a world economic for, you know, it's a
game.
It should matter no matter who is doing
it.
I was shocked by the evidence uncovered by

(02:11:34):
the house judiciary committee that a group of
companies organized a systematic illegal boycott against x.
Of an open feedback
loop for the advertising experts in this room
to
help
develop Twitter into a place where they will
be excited
about investing more money. Product development,

(02:11:57):
ad safety,
content moderation.
Content
moderation.
That's what the influence is.
That puts your global town square the one
place that you can express yourself freely and
openly.
We have built
content moderation tools
that have never existed before at this company.
If you are gonna post something point. That

(02:12:19):
is lawful,
but it's awful,
you get labeled. At long term risk,
People are hurt when the marketplace of ideas
is constricted,
and we've introduced a new policy called
freedom of speech,
not reach.
No
Which is a violation of your rights. As

(02:12:40):
Stan Muscanti pointed out, it's obviously
well, he precedent wise, they're two parts of
the same conversation.
They know that, and these are very carefully
chosen manipulations in my opinion.
So here's what he said. I know that
I I find this interesting about if Elon

(02:13:00):
facts
shared something that Elon then
tapped and as usual, you rises up getting
13,000,000 views.
It says Elon Musk explains why he decided
to build a free speech platform. So I
said, I couldn't help but laugh.
So just like he didn't build PayPal, he
didn't build Twitter. But I'm sure that's how
the history will start to remember it and
the way we look back at things. He

(02:13:21):
built a free speech platform. No. What he
did was take over this platform and add
moderation tools while screaming free speech, and everybody
freaks out and Twitter files and
that's not what happened, guys.
He says it was necessary to increase the
probable lifespan of civilization.
God, he loves to present himself as some
kind of ingenious
some genius

(02:13:41):
I just think I it's it's one of
those things that will be framed as just
hatred for this person. I don't I don't
hate Elon Musk. I recognize how flimsy this
is
And how, ultimately,
people are praising him for things that aren't
even happening.
That is worthy of criticism
in any context.
And I think as time goes by, this
will be what people remember.

(02:14:02):
Here's Tiberius. You bought it to control society
and manipulate it.
Either way, I think it's interesting that this
is how it's this if you have to
create a fake version of what's going on,
that should be pretty concerning to people.
There's what Greg Reiss had to say. Criticize
the terrorist state Israel while you can, because
it will soon be made illegal
by Make Israel Great Again, the MAGA movement.

(02:14:23):
Interesting.
I happen to agree out where it's going,
but it's not just about Israel. That's the
tool being used to drive this forward, by
and large.
But here's what Tom Cotton had to say,
kind of in the same vein, also with
what Libs TikTok's writing. And this just kills
me. It's the same game that you play.
It's it's a woke right, woke left kind
of dynamic.
Here are people that are are, going into
a government building,

(02:14:44):
which, by the way, is open to public,
and and they go in and they start
protesting,
which you can disagree with. But if you're
allowed to go in the building and you
just go in and begin to protest, it's
not like you broke into the building or
forced your way in, which is what happened
on January 6th, other than what I do
remember is obviously allowing the or moving them
to go by. The point is that the
building was supposed to be shut down. So

(02:15:04):
there's an obvious first difference. My point is,
she writes, insurrection
happening.
Like, you are literally a parody of yourself
when you can when your whole point is,
rightly so, that they're using insurrection
in a political frame with when January 6th
was not that.
Now eve now the game always becomes they're
using it as a way to kind of
poke fun at them or call them out

(02:15:25):
for pointing at something that's not, but it
is still what's ultimately happening. And you could
point to the way some people are responding,
like this person. Arrest them all. Oh my
god. I'm literally shaking, planet of the memes
points out. A A 129,000
followers. So let's not pretend like this is
not anger and trying to return the favor.
That's the kind of petty small mindedness of
the left right paradigm. But either way, you're

(02:15:48):
talking about people that went in to protest
for
a ceasefire,
for an end of conflict,
and did so in a building they're allowed
to be in. But, of course, then maybe
did something that whether I don't know if
you're allowed to protest in there or whatever.
But the point is, to pretend that this
insurrection
is just as stupid as pretending January 6th
was an insurrection. In fact, it's far more
stupid because of how much different this was.

(02:16:09):
There are levels of points that within January
6th where people could point to violence or
whatever else, but to pretend an insurrection is
just so stupid.
Armed insurrection, even more so.
By pro Palestinian protesters.
And Tom Cotton, of course, that's why I
just read that, says these Hamas loving antisemites

(02:16:30):
have been largely given a free pass. Change
is coming. See? So even if you wanna
pretend Libs is making a joke, well, guess
what? They're gonna use it. Tom Cotton, who
does have a position of power, is going
is arguing, well, we're gonna change that. Right?
We're you're not allowed to love Hamas, or
in this case, actually
support Palestine. But either way, you have a
right to love or support or hate whatever

(02:16:51):
you want.
Even if you think that pea even if
you think people hate that, even if you
call it a terrorist or even if it
is a terrorist organization, you have a right
to feel and think what you want. Actions
are what matter.
If you're joining that group, well, that would
be a crime.
The point is that you are saying that
they're not allowed to feel this way. He's
not even pointing out the protest.

(02:17:12):
This is the real problem, and people like
Libs are supporting the censorship of your speech
because they just don't like them. Because they're
or whatever you think is the dynamic. Either
way, it's a contradiction. It should be shown
as hypocrisy.
It's it's just incredible what people are willing
to fall for. Yeah. So it says, so
you're going to crush US democracy for your
APAC handlers?

(02:17:33):
Some people see
it. And wokeness says, a bunch of grannies
with American flags trespassing the capital is not
a coup. I agree.
And it was obviously not a bunch of
grannies. There was plenty of
military age men who were in there and
acting a certain way. But I would agree.
It's absurd
to call it a coup or to call

(02:17:54):
it an insurrection because that's not what actually
happened. That's clearly what they wanted to happen,
or at least them to attempt this so
they could use it the same way they
already were going to anyways.
Your government, by the way, not the left
versus the right, but your government. And they
all played their roles, Trump included.
Then it goes on to say starting World
War 3 before leaving office is well, no
one actually isn't as well. But let's play

(02:18:15):
it fast and loose with whatever you want
the bad guy to be on the other
side of the paradigm. Starting World War 3,
even if that was actually what was happening,
would not be a coup. It'd be the
actions of a current president.
But why do we have to be so
childless and stupid about this? Can't you just
be honest about the risks?
Which many people are.
But it's this is my point. If you
if you're mad of that they're calling that
a coup, then you should not use it

(02:18:37):
in the same flimsy way. A coup is
a very specific thing. Even the idea of
what happened with Kamala and Biden is not
a coup.
I agree. There's all sorts of weird, illegal,
even, dishonest action that happen on all sides
of the paradigm. But we need to be
honest with what we're looking at. I think
that's a very important thing because we're recognizing
people like this, whether they know it or
not, are actually perpetuating the problem.

(02:19:01):
Now let's realize
that Donald Trump
is openly in support of what's going on
in this regard.
The suppression of the rights of people that
are supporting Palestine.
We're gonna get into the coup the Russia,
Ukraine part of this next right away. But
I just wanna include this for you guys
to look at again. This long thread of

(02:19:22):
him saying over and over and over that
he will suppress your rights for Israel in
a 1,000 different ways or even the bottom
2. This one's about the burning the US
flag, which is a protected act. Brownlee Supreme
Court has ruled that. And he wants to
put you in jail for it and says
you're stupid for thinking it's unconstitutional even though
it verifiably is. Or in 2015,
said you were foolish
if you said it was unconstitutional to shut

(02:19:43):
down the Internet with Bill Gates' help to
stop ISIS from influencing you. Both of which
are shockingly, obviously unconstitutional.
And he thinks you're foolish or stupid for
saying that.
No. You're foolish or stupid for saying that
they are not cons that they are constitutional
or rather should be. And everyone should know
this. Anyone denying that is lying or unaware
of your rights.

(02:20:04):
So going into the next conversation,
it all this matters because of how
any dynamic like this is used. And so
if we're gonna talk about getting into the
Russian, Ukraine side of it, you have to
realize that all the same elements are there,
just like we can see in Israel and
so on about trying to push you into
an emotional state to justify or you know,
it's it's all the same kind of thing.
Now to get into this in particular

(02:20:26):
and how this might be used, I think
it's important to recognize, like I said last
time, that despite all of the hype, which
I'm not gonna diminish at all the very
real risks of what are going on right
now with Ukraine and Russia,
but recognize that there is a level of
hype around this and the idea being that
Putin is not stupid.
He's very well aware that nothing has true
the idea is that this has always been

(02:20:47):
on the table. If you think that this
is the only indication now that the US
is suddenly involved, do you really think he
doesn't know? Of course he does. He's made
these statements publicly.
The US is literally driving this agenda, along
with Israel, along with the UK as well.
They know that. Putin knows that. So, yes,
you can point out that the escalation of
the allowance of these, or at least saying

(02:21:08):
that, and then, of course, after that being
used that way is clearly an escalation.
But my point is that if Putin was
going to drive this to something larger, that
he had ample
reason to already do this. There's been 5
different red lines that have been crossed just
as egregious so far. For example, The Times
reporting from UK that the US was was

(02:21:28):
literally using helicopters to fly in
Ukrainian Azov movement members to conduct operations in
Russia,
which I would argue is not as egregious
as launching missiles into Russia, but the point
is the same. You are invading
by definition.
So if there was ever gonna be a
reason for them to stand up and just
to say, now we're gonna pretending and our
actions are gonna are gonna demonstrate that we

(02:21:50):
think the US is doing he already knows
that. So keep that in mind as we
go through this. Because I think this is
about something quite a bit different. I think
this is about trying to justify or use
what was already coming to pass, which I'll
play I'll show for you in a minute.
Putin's already making it clear that what what
what's happening now is sort of the end
game of what he's going to be doing.
Not more violence, but sort of ra finishing

(02:22:11):
the, the the the dynamic
and ultimately, that Trump coming in and saying
that this was gonna be you know, we're
gonna end this very quickly. I'll I'll go
through it and you'll see what I mean.
I think it's about trying to use this
to, 1, throw a bone to people to
act like this is gonna change everything, when
in reality, both Israel and the United States,
I think, want this to go away for
the minute. It has been sapping what they

(02:22:33):
they're
both so overwhelmed with the ongoing genocide that
the world can see. I think it's for
very clear reasons. And this is a US
Israeli agenda.
It's all very clear.
Now this is from
the 18th. Russian lawmaker says Biden is risking
World War 3 with missile decision. Now this
whole hype about World War 3, again, it's

(02:22:54):
very clearly could.
One of my biggest concerns is about the
Azov movement carrying out crazy actions for their
own interest, knowing that that would force the
hand of something larger. That is arguably more
of a risk than most well, maybe kind
of right up there with the prophetic side
of the Israeli agenda and the same reasons.
But, nonetheless, the point is the same, that

(02:23:15):
Putin is aware of what's been going on,
aware of the other actions, and that that
this has been possible the entire time. We've
already seen the Poland example of the missile
that you know, the point is that they're
already aware that this could have already been
happening. So just because Biden says it publicly,
all that does, I argue, is change the
public's
awareness of what's been going on, which then

(02:23:35):
does drive Putin to respond to that. And
we'll get into the nuclear point, which is,
I think, wildly overblown,
but still is relevant
because of the Putin
nuclear stance has been floated and discussed many
times. And, ultimately, all it changed was that
Putin is now at the exact same position
the US is.
Before that, it was that, ultimately, they were
weren't going to use them. Now they've changed

(02:23:56):
it to where they will based on certain
actions. Like, the US and Israel are the
same thing. Well, Israel doesn't make it as
public because they pretend they don't have them,
but that they can use nuclear weapons at
any time, their discretion, and that they will
hold, reserve the right to whatever it is.
That doesn't mean that they're going to.
In this case, that's what they're trying to
hype is that Putin changed this. That means,
well, look. It's coming. World War 3 is

(02:24:17):
gonna launch nukes, which is what Alex Jones
is literally saying. By nuke by Christmas, he'll
respond.
It's so wildly responsible. So going through this,
it says Russian lawmaker Maria Butina said that
on Monday that she the administration of Joe
Biden was risking World War 3 if he
had allowed Ukraine to use US Wade weapons
to strike into Russia. Now, of course, these

(02:24:37):
are all real risks. The risk of this
spinning out into something much larger is is
very clear. But, obviously, World War 3, if
we're gonna pretend that there's metrics that have
been met, we've been there since World War
2. Well, exactly, but for many, many, many,
many different examples from Syria to Afghanistan, we
have been involved in multi country
states of war

(02:24:57):
for many, many, many, many
decades. So
what's different about this? Why would this suddenly
become World War 3? Because nukes are being
discussed?
What? What does it take? The bombs in
other countries? That's been going on for a
long time. Russia, the United States, Turkey, they're
all involved in Syria, so what's the metric
difference here? So that's important to think about.
Why are they all using World War 3?

(02:25:18):
And this is important to think about even
from the Russian perspective because let's not forget,
Russia was lockstep in the COVID agenda as
well. Russia has clear overlapping influence from Israel
as well. So we have to ask if
there's more going on here.
Why are they all hyping the World War
3 point for something that I argue they're
all very aware of?
And if we were in War 3, we
would've been there for a long time now.
So it seems interesting. Now my point on

(02:25:40):
the surface of it is that they both
are engaging in the the the narrative war.
So that's what I see it as. I
don't think it's easy to prove. So they
come out and say Biden says what we're
gonna do. Again, Putin's already aware of what's
going on. The US involved and all that,
so they come out and they make their
response.
But is that really adding to the risk
other than the same risk from the Azov
movement? And now potentially feeling they have more
reason to bomb into Russia, but I think

(02:26:01):
they already do and have and recognize that
they're gonna see a response.
He goes on to say, quote, these guys,
Biden's administration, is try are trying to escalate
the situation to the maximum while they still
have power and are in office. And maybe
so.
But do you think that's in the interest
of Biden's administration or to the detriment of
Trump's?
Maybe.
But I think it's very important that we

(02:26:22):
ask the question about that and not just
lean into the partisan ideas.
The real question is, what does this do
for the US government?
Because that's the way I think the way
I see it at the very least, and
what it ultimately does is give Trump the
opportunity to walk it back.
Even if nothing actually happens,
he can step in and and by narrative

(02:26:43):
act like this whole thing has been averted,
even though maybe nothing was even going on.
Which I don't necessarily think in the full
sense, but realize that if we're on the
precipice of World War of World War 3,
which is simply because they floated this idea
and then Trump steps in and goes, never
mind, what actually changed and happened? It's just
important to think about. Now it says, quote,

(02:27:03):
I have a great hope
that Donald Trump will overcome this decision if
this has been made because they are seriously
risking the start of World War 3, which
is not in anybody's interest. Well, okay. So
it's interesting, not that it has to always
be overlapped, but you realize they're in the
midst of a multi front war with Israel
when there's multiple nuclear armed countries involved, including
Israel.
Wouldn't that be a little more concerning when

(02:27:25):
they're all actively going forward and engaging, and
Israel has a policy about using nukes should
they lose?
I mean, just saying objectively, that's so much
more of an obvious risk for possible world
war you know, nuclear war.
So it's I just think it's interesting how
much they're leaning into it back, and I
think there's both have an interest to this.
President Putin said on September 12th that western

(02:27:46):
approval for such a step would mean
the direct involvement of NATO countries, the United
States, European countries, and the war in Ukraine.
Because NATO military infrastructure and personal personnel would
have to be involved in the targeting, which
is a huge point we'll get into next.
But here's the point again. First, he said
this on September 12th.
So the conversation right now about this being
some kind of fever pitch, well, why wasn't

(02:28:08):
the talk because I get it that the
statement hadn't been made. But I think it's
interesting the way it's been framed as kind
of an immediate issue, and this has been
ongoing well before even 12th of September.
And then the point being
that Putin already thinks that.
No. He already knows that. He already knows
that NATO countries are completely immersed even on

(02:28:29):
the ground.
So then why would they say this if
I can show you statements of Putin months
ago saying that? Well, because this is the
tit for tat of the public conversation. I'm
very I think that's even with the real
risk, I'm pretty certain that's what's happening.
Now it says in late October, Putin said
that Russia's defense ministry was working on different
ways to respond if the United States and
its NATO allies help Ukraine to strike deep

(02:28:49):
into Russia, which has already happened with long
range western missiles.
That's the difference.
But
does that mean nuclear response? Just even the
conversation of the nuclear response the nuclear doctrine
changing?
Well, there's a lot of speculation and hype
about what that knowing that means violence because
Putin is a mania. You know, whatever the

(02:29:09):
rationale no. We don't really know what will
happen. And I and my opinion is that's
not what's going to happen.
It just based on precedent alone, from what
we've already seen the Russian government do through
Syria, through there's more examples than we can
talk about in this show of Russia showing
restraint when the US and Israel would have
gone far more over the top.

(02:29:31):
So in this case,
is it in their interest to create something
that would cascade into what they're telling you
is World War 3? Then clearly not. And
if there's ever been an entity in this
dynamic that's shown their willingness to be the
one showing restraint, even if it makes them
look weak, so far, at least during Syria
forward, Russia has played that role. So to
me, I think it's quite obvious that they're
not going to make this become that because

(02:29:52):
they recognize that it's in nobody's interest.
Even though Israel and the US see those
things and seem to not care. But maybe
I'm
overestimating
what his
leisure measure of restraint is.
But I think we all see the past
examples. Right? I think it's important to consider
that.
Now then we have this is from Eva
Bartlett shared this from the yesterday.

(02:30:14):
Bloomberg reported that Ukrainian forces have struck a
border region within Russian territory using now I've
heard both at at at at,
Atacam like, basically, I heard Lavrov from Russia
call them attackums. I think that's more entertaining.
Attackums, it sounds funny, like a kind of
a joke almost. But that's what he said,
so we're gonna go with that for today.
I know it's pronounced differently in the US
by most people. But saying that the this

(02:30:35):
is after Biden authorized this. Earlier today in
response to the Western escalation, Putin signed a
decree to update their nuclear doctrine,
which that's what's being pointed as as the
as the real hype or the real, you
know, potential escalation in regard to what leads
to World War
3, but I I kinda feel like it's
more of an on paper response. I already
think this has been the case, and I
think that, ultimately,

(02:30:56):
it's all they've really done is brought it
down to the same position, which, yeah, it
arguably
could be
a a quicker path to using them, but
I I still stand with what I said
a minute ago. I don't think outside of
Israel and the US doing that first, I
don't think that's what plays out. My personal
opinion. The update states that any attack on
Russia involving a nuclear state, even in collaboration
with a non nuclear actor, would be treated

(02:31:16):
as a joint assault. Now that makes perfect
sense.
And we know that's what's going on. So
all he's doing is holding them accountable for
what they've been pretending isn't happening. So this
then becomes
Russia begins mass production of radiation resistant mobile
bomb shelters. This became a huge point saying
that this kind of somehow proves that they're
gonna use them. I don't think at all
that's to me,

(02:31:37):
if this is even what it looks like
and really is, this mass production of these
or it's just more political back and forth
or used for some larger thing,
It's not that crazy when what's going on
with Russia. With the Azov movement that is
very clearly, you know, bombing the Zaporozhia power
plant, nuclear plant,
or any number of examples, or the fact

(02:31:57):
that they just allowed a Nazi group neo
Nazi element the least least the verbal allowance
to use these things which can carry nukes.
Right? So it's it seems like a very
logical thing even if it is actually as
big as it's making it out to be.
Now on 19th, it says Russia began mass
production of mobile bomb shelters
that can protect against a variety of man
made threats.
They're they're the cub m or k u

(02:32:19):
kubm
shelters.
This war in Ukraine is entering what some
officials say could be its final most dangerous
phase
as Moscow's forces advance at their fastest pace
since the early weeks of the conflict in
2022 and the west seeks to shore up
Ukraine. It says the Kremlin said on Monday
that Russia would respond to what it called
a reckless decision by Biden's administration and cautioned

(02:32:39):
that the move would draw the United States
directly into the conflict. Statements like that are
why they know they're involved.
They know they're already actively, directly involved with
what's happening. Anybody with a brain can see
that. So, again, that's what makes me more
so think it's about the public
narrative game
while we're still having very clear risk. But
I think what's interesting is if you look
at the overall conversation, it's as if this

(02:33:00):
is sort of like winding
down in the in the in the the
the Russian perspective. But that's really up for
you to decide based on what you see
them saying, what's happening. I mean, again, it's
most of these people,
Russia, United States, China, Israel, I mean, they
rarely say publicly what they actually think, which
is pretty infuriating, but that's the world we
live
in. But so these bombshells seem to be

(02:33:20):
happening based on Russia's own statements, and this
all this is coming from Sputnik and so
on.
Do you think that's crazy?
I think it seems like it makes a
lot of sense with how belligerent both Israel
and the United States are acting and arming
some of the most dangerous people in the
conversation.
Now this is the point that's clear, and
I think this is why it has to
be addressed the way that Russia is doing

(02:33:41):
so, is that Americans
have to be present for these to work.
Or the right. The not as simple as
that, but that apparently, as I understand, then
I'll play a clip from Ritter, that they're
the only ones that wanna opt to operate
these,
and that they wouldn't be able to without
them.
So it's a clear 1, 2, 3. Just
okay. That means Americans are on the ground
firing these things, or at least showing them

(02:34:01):
how. And so it gets the same point.
We know the Americans are involved or the
US government.
It says American service servicemen are involved,
missile guidance and coordinating their their flights to
deliver the strike. We say this with complete
confidence.
The launch cannot be carried out without American
officers,
which has been said by a lot of

(02:34:22):
people. Here is Scott Ritter with judge Napoliano
saying something similar. Equipment, these attackums.
Oh, for sure. Say it that way. I've
it's gone. I've seen them said both for
I think it's,
atacums or atacums or something like that, but
attack them sell more Or to be operated
by Americans.
100%. It cannot be operated by anybody but
the United States.

(02:34:44):
It's just the way it is. The
guidance system, the data that goes in is
developed by a special Department of Defense activity
in Europe that does targeting for
for guidance systems like this. It's done by
American only analyst
as Geospatial analyst
is communicated from this site to a downlink

(02:35:04):
station in Ukraine,
manned by the United States.
This is classified communication. So it's using which
means that only Americans can touch it. Ukrainians
cannot touch it. The data is downloaded there
and then to load it up on the
attack. It is
a link that it involves

(02:35:28):
Only Americans can do it. So the mission
is planned by the United States. The data
is loaded into the missile.
And, when the button is fired to fired,
it's being the Russians will say fired by
the United States against Russia, an act of
war. I I can hear a siren in
the background. Where where
if you guys know in the chat, let
me know. Which are one of them in

(02:35:49):
some place that is actively under attack, like,
is it Syria or or or Israel?
Interested by this. You can hear it slightly
in the background.
But so this is an important point. Now,
obviously, you could simply argue that they somehow
trained them or gave them this information, unless
there's more to it that I'm not really
sussing out. But either way, the point is
what everyone's acknowledging, that the US government clearly
is
actually doing this for them,

(02:36:10):
which I argue is really, honestly, nothing new,
except that these are being used.
And here's what
Fiorella Isabelle points out. I'll play not this
isn't the exact clip, but one that's from
the same briefing. I'll play really quickly, and
we'll read what she has
to say. On the on the decision of
the United States to allow,
Ukrainian regime,

(02:36:32):
to use,
missiles up to 300 kilometers,
long,
we read
what the New York Times published about this.
Oh, by the way, there's also a point
to point out that there's all sorts of
agreements that they you know, the US government
doesn't seem to honor damn near anything when
they just decide not to anymore.
But, historically, where you're not allowed to have

(02:36:52):
certain, you know, ICBMs placed in certain locations
that have a certain distance,
which just seems so interesting that they abide
by these rules, like, but, you know, but
then don't when they want don't want to
and act like there's any structure. But, ultimately,
that's the idea. And then so right now
with a lot of these different things, and
quite frankly, what the US government's doing all
over the world, violate everything that they really
hold everybody else to,

(02:37:12):
which is not you know, most everyone's now
capable and willing to point those things out.
And that's why this whole rules based order
illusion has completely fallen apart.
There are still
no confirmation
either from the White House or from the
Pentagon.
But we basically

(02:37:34):
take
our positions,
on the basis of what is going on
physically.
And physically attack them,
apparently not as long as 300 kilometers,
are being used, including
this early morning in Russia
against
the Bryansk
obelisk of Russia, which is,

(02:37:56):
bordering,
Ukraine.
So I find that actually pretty relevant.
So all the talk about bombing into Russia,
when technically it is, but we're talking about
basically the border of Ukraine.
So which it doesn't change the seriousness of
the the point is that if we can
point out as The Times covered at the
least, that they're taking you know, flying them
into certain locations in Russia or that they

(02:38:17):
have bombed in locations that are in Moscow,
for example,
that it starts to begin to seem like
this is not as much of an escalation
as other things that have already happened. But
that's for you to decide. Again, I really
am not trying to downplay the risks that
are obvious in anything like this, especially when
people like the Azov movement, who are funded
by the US and Israel, are, you know,
what they're capable of. But I just think

(02:38:38):
it's important to point out that if this
was some kind of major red line that
was crossed, why wouldn't these statements have already
been made with many other examples of very
similar things? Or is it just about the
certain kind of missile? I mean, I get
the the clear escalation around that, especially with
the nuke overlap. That's kind of the main
point, I think. But either way,
I just feel like there's more to this
than just simply pointing out this one step.

(02:39:00):
And,
we proceed from the understanding that this is
this is happening
and that
any modification of attackings cannot be used
without American,
experts and instructors, including
satellite data,
including programming
and targeting.
The president

(02:39:21):
mentioned this several times. If long range missiles
are going to be applied,
from Ukraine into Russian territory,
it will also mean that they are operated
by American
experts, military experts.
And we will be, taking this as

(02:39:43):
a qualitatively
new face
of the western war.
So, you know, that's what I think. I'm
gonna the final point on what I've kind
of been pointing at here is that to
me, that seems like what's happening more than
anything. That Russia, well aware this has been
going on the entire time, is now using
this as the point of of
a pivot point.
Right? To even though they already know it,

(02:40:04):
but to publicly make the point that, okay.
Now you have put into a new phase
of war, so now we're gonna respond differently
even though between the US and Putin or
the US and and Russia that they're already
aware. They're already they're already you know, I
I there's so much happen
so much that happens behind the scenes in
their conversations that we don't get to see
or hear. And when you'd end up doing
it, it's weird how it changes the picture
for you Or, like, seeing pictures of Clinton

(02:40:26):
and and everybody else all, you know, Trump
and everybody all hogging and they're all friends,
but then seeing them hate each other on
stage, you go, well, okay.
A lot more going on out there that's
not happening back here. I think that's what
it's more about, my opinion, is that Russia
is using this as a as a justification
to pivot
because it knew it's new to people hearing
it. That's what Fiorella says.
Lavrov states the west wants an escalation after

(02:40:48):
Ukraine launches 6 US attackums at Russia's,
Brno Brnoch region after Biden reportedly lifted restrictions
on the use of the missiles, and Putin
updated Russia's nuclear doctrine to state that an
attack on Russia by a non nuclear power
backed by a nuclear state will be considered
a joint attack. Now that's not yep. That's
not why would that be that? If that's
obvious, that's like

(02:41:09):
what a logical statement around any
if they're involved and they're firing and they're
guiding them, then they should be recognized as
being involved. So my point is to highlight
that this is a very normal or rather
just logical
move
that's being framed as kind of like this
fever pitch World War 3,
Russia's about to attack the US kind of

(02:41:29):
thing, which is what we'll get to in
a second.
Now it says it's been clear that the
US military intelligence apparatus is determined to escalate
toward war, I argue that's just your government,
left or right.
And by this, I mean the
apparatus beyond party
or president.
And she gets it. Now Russia will make
a move depending on how they read the

(02:41:49):
situation, which could very well be an entrapment.
And so that's that's the other thing too.
They are very aware that the US and
Israel tend to do this in order they
in order
when they hope that they will get a
response to, then they can justify the next
step. Putin's well aware of that.
Now it says she says, let me clarify
a few things here. The French publication, Le
Figaro, has removed information that France and Britain,

(02:42:12):
following the US, have allowed Ukraine to launch
strikes with its storm shadow missiles deep into
Russian territory. So that's no longer a thing,
at least at the face of all this.
Now that that could mean one of 2
things. Now I saw this too, and I
think I actually have one included,
maybe not,
about the UK being involved too. I'll come

(02:42:32):
back to it. But most people argue, okay.
Well, now the UK is involved too in
a more of a use to kind of
see it's it's escalating.
Now what she's saying is they have removed
that, so that could mean that it didn't
happen at all,
which kinda seems like the most likely point
and, ultimately, it was rumor or hype and
the and they removed it.
And that's more about the indication that it's
not exactly what it seems like, or it

(02:42:53):
could be that it is happening and they're
just trying to cover that for some reason.
So consider both. But her point is that
that's been removed. This is The Times also
cited that the US may not yet have
given consent
to Ukraine's use of the storm shuttle missiles,
which, yes, comes from the UK, but the
US technology,
which requires the UK to obtain additional permission.
So that could be one of the justifications

(02:43:13):
for why. Schools from from Germany, I believe,
has refused to supply
TARUS missiles to Kyiv.
Only information about Biden's permission to launch attack
them has been reliably confirmed with Axios emphasizing
it only concerns the Kirks region.
And there's points we'll I think we might
get to at the end that gets into
the allowance and all the there's multiple elements
of the world right now that are standing

(02:43:34):
up and saying, we call for even Bernie
Sanders came out and said, a complete
embargo, whatever the right term would be in
this context. No more
arming Israel.
Little late, though, bud. Right? I mean, I'm
not I feel like that's not even worthy
of praise after you allow a year of
genocide to go forward, but, nonetheless, I'll still
lean into it because whatever their reasoning behind
it, even if it's selfish or opportunist, that

(02:43:56):
we should be that's where we should be.
That this needs to stop. But it says
Russia, for its part, remains firmly committed to
the position of preventing nuclear war.
Washington itself hasn't confirmed the decision regarding strikes
into Russian territory, only the media. With Lavrov,
Putin, prior, and other government officials, Russia has
already said they will respond accordingly to the
US decision on strikes on deep Russian territory,

(02:44:18):
which doesn't sound like deep Russian territory if
it's in the border of Ukraine, but we'll
see what happens.
Now this is saying Russia's new nuclear policy
leaves US and NATO facing strategic dead end.
On Tuesday, Russia released a presidential decree outlining
the basic principles of the country's policy on
nuclear deterrence.
The document sets out an among other things
that a massive aerial attack on Russia,

(02:44:40):
including with the use of cruise missiles and
drones, could trigger a nuclear response.
Could. Same thing that you hear from Trump
and everybody else. Not saying we're going to
respond with nukes, should you fire a missile
at us. In fact, I don't think that's
what they are
what their actions have shown for a long
time now.
But it simply gives this this is kind
of the point they're making. It's by changing
the doctrine to allow that possibility, it should

(02:45:03):
it'll change, hopefully, their stance and their response.
I don't think it will. I think they're
belligerent at this point for obvious reasons.
But the point should be clear that up
until this, and I think one move before
this, it's been the exact opposite where Russia
has basically said we're not gonna use nukes
unless you fire nukes as kind of a
thing. Seems like a pretty you know?
Comes from the argument of the past that

(02:45:24):
we should be working our way away from
nuclear weapons. That was the whole nuclear proliferation
conversation, which they just never went along with.
Now whether one started to reverse the other,
the US has been blindly ignoring that for
a very long time. Now it says the
statement by president Putin on amendments
to the nuclear insurance policy was met with
caution by the West. They understand that the
adjustments announced by Putin largely devalue the efforts

(02:45:46):
of the United States and NATO to inflict
a strategic defeat on our country and the
planned expansion of the list of of of
grounds
for the use of nuclear weapons
effectively excludes the possibility
of victory over the Russian Armed Forces on
the battlefield,
and in her interview with National Defense Magazine.
So Tucker Carlson spoke up about the you

(02:46:08):
know, Mario Narfall
Narfall says Russia starts building nuclear resistant shelters.
You know? And this is kind of the
fever pitch. You know? This is it's a
troop seems to be in a real story,
but, of course, the whole point when you're
reading the suspension from New York Post is
this hype about how this is an impending
nuclear disaster kind of to me, this is
a an a logical response to a growing

(02:46:28):
threat that the US has been building along
with Israel.
He says a lame duck president just started
a hot war
with the world's most dangerous country.
Well, clearly, they've been in a hot war
with Russia, so this is the game. This
is my point. Tucker's not stupid. He's well
aware of what's been going on. I've even
seen him report things that indicate that. So
the reality is to make it now. There's

(02:46:50):
an agenda to make now this pivotal moving
point, guys. Even Russia's using it. I think
that needs to be clear. But on top
of that, the most dangerous country, are we
serious?
Of all the countries in the world, could
you argue Russia? China's more dangerous? What about
Israel? What about Saudi Arabia? How in the
world is Tucker gonna argue Russia's the most
dangerous country in the world? Now maybe he

(02:47:11):
can be means from some kind of an
adversarial perspective,
but I kind of I don't I kinda
don't think that's where this goes, but you
can decide for yourself.
But even then,
it's debatable. But the point is, I think
it's about driving this new kind of fever
pitch conflict idea that you're gonna see Alex
Jones screaming about. All of us are very
close to being killed, he
says. I mean, I I hate this kind

(02:47:33):
of statement. I mean, that's I certainly, we've
been closer to a potential fallout situation,
whether it's nuclear or otherwise, because of a
lot of different things that our governments are
involved in both sides of it. But to
just say they're all very close being killed
or, you know
I don't know.
I don't think it's as clear as to
say that that's the reality of where whether
we're heading towards heading towards war or not.

(02:47:53):
To me, it seems like a kind of
an irresponsible statement, but you guys can decide.
Yet somehow, the Republican speaker of the house
hasn't even mentioned it in public or leadership
meetings. What's going on?
Okay. Well, how about you haven't mentioned the
ongoing genocidal acts of Israel that are driving
us more than anything else in the world
to be closer to some kind of very
serious act? Both matter.
I think it's interesting that they're kinda fever

(02:48:14):
pitching this all of a sudden
when this has been going on for quite
a long time.
Now task Russian news agency said this. He
said he noted that the issue had been
discussed. That the article's talking about what Tucker
just said, basically.
He noted that the issue had been discussed
at a EU foreign ministers meeting, but the
parties had failed to come to a consensus

(02:48:34):
on lifting the restrictions,
ruling that every member state would decide for
itself in regard to the 300 kilometers inside
of Russia Point, which by the way, this
is my point. Again, the dynamic is not
supposed to be that you get to pick
and choose. These are things that have been
set for a while that you hold everybody
else to. But it says Kremlin spokesperson recalled
that Moscow's position on the Ukrainian strikes by
US missiles deep in Russian territory was clearly

(02:48:57):
and unambiguously
formulated by Putin in September.
According to him, this decision means a qualitatively
new round of escalation. So what's important to
see there, like I said before, is this
was a line that was drawn in September,
and that they've now carefully calculated move, at
least on paper, pushed past that line, allowing
them to respond. To me, that seems like
a very coordinated back and forth.

(02:49:19):
Dmitry,
chair of the Security Council from Russian Federation,
says Russia's new nuclear doctrine
means NATO missiles fired against our country would
be deemed an attack by the block on
Russia.
Russia could retaliate with WMDs against Kyiv and
key NATO facilities whenever they're locate wherever they're
located. This means World War 3.

(02:49:40):
Now to me, that'd be like Lindsey Graham
stay standing up and saying a statement like
that. It should not be indicative of this
is what Putin's gonna do. That's what Russia
wants. Lindsey Graham's a moron and says crazy
things all the time. Certainly, it shouldn't be
ignored, though. Right? So the point in this
is about trying to keep people on the
idea that this I mean, to me, this
is the same as,
Trump standing up and saying, if you attack
us, we'll respond like you've never seen. Like,

(02:50:02):
nothing's ever been done before, which basically means
nukes or chemical weapons because everything else has
been done. Like, it's very clear.
But should we should not ignore the possibility.
At but if but on top of that,
recognize who's driving this, who is funding the
neo Nazi elements causing this, who are continuing
to drive regime change in areas that all
of this is coming from the western

(02:50:22):
efforts in the ground. That doesn't mean Russia's
good and or everything they've done is is
legal or whatever else, but you have to
recognize who is making this happen.
That's the US government.
Now Zelensky
says war will end sooner with Trump. Now
I'm at this point just yesterday with the
CNN article saying something similar.
I don't know how everyone seems to make

(02:50:43):
sense of this.
So if the whole thing and I'll I'll
get into some of Zelensky's statements here in
a second.
Are about the idea that you're never gonna
stop. You're fighting for your freedom,
even though he's a puppet fighting for western
agendas, which actually explains why he's just gonna
stop when told to. But overall
so Trump if let's just say so there
are 2 ways this goes. Right? Either Trump
steps up and says we're not funding this

(02:51:03):
anymore, which which is what everyone pretends is
gonna happen, and we're gonna stop the war.
I hope that's what happens. I'll praise him
for it if he does.
But then the other side of it would
be that you
pretend that you can rush it faster forward
and help Ukraine win,
which is sort of what all of the
narratives seem to suggest, but I don't think
that's even simply possible just to snap your
fingers and give them more weapons and well,

(02:51:25):
no. That's just being a continuation of the
war. So
if you think the first to former is
the case, which means it'll stop right away,
which is his promise, Why would Zelensky support
that? It goes against everything he's been saying
publicly, everything he believes, everything at least on
paper. So when he says he hopes it'll
end sooner with Trump, what how in the
world does that make sense with what he's
well, here's what he says publicly. That's a

(02:51:47):
whole long one, but I'll read the main
point that's was highlighted. This is what Orwell
sent me. This is not just about individual
cities or regions. This battle is about all
of Ukraine, all of Europe,
about order or chaos for the entire world.
While the world waits for a miracle from
Trump. What?
We must work relentlessly every single day. As

(02:52:08):
a whole nation, we must strengthen and resilient.
Okay. So that means he had there is
of the assumption that Trump will speak with
Russia and get them to stop.
But that doesn't make any sense based on
what they're currently doing and the actions they're
currently taking and the continuation of the bombing
of places that they're through, like the Donbas
region or Crimea or whatever else.
So
if you believe that Trump is gonna somehow

(02:52:30):
just magically work like, well, again, if that
happens, that would be a good thing.
If these maniacs are gonna stop hurting and
killing innocent people.
But I don't think that's what any of
this represents. So when he comes out and
says, end sooner with Trump,
if you're of the mind that that means
stop the funding,
I don't that's not what Zelensky thinks. And

(02:52:50):
I don't think that's what's actually gonna happen.
But even if it does,
which we should also I think is a
positive note, even if it's being used for
something worse, like everything else we're talking about,
I'm of the mind that it's about trying
to rationalize or justify something that comes next.
And I'll read this I'll read a tweet
about this in a second.
So he's he says, today, on the 1000th
day of the war, I addressed the Ukrainian

(02:53:11):
parliament and emphasized that we do not trade
sovereignty, security, or future.
Okay. Well, if the idea is that Trump
is gonna stop the funding and though that's
not what he thinks, he's gonna he's not
gonna stop no matter what. I'm of the
mind, and I think that's what's gonna be
supported because that's what the government has been
supporting unless the government, both sides of it,
have now decided they're gonna pull back on
this for another agenda.

(02:53:33):
It says Ukraine will not abandon its rights
to its territory, nor will allow our nation
to be exploited by anyone else's political battles.
Okay. So I don't know what he means
by Trump's miracle unless he believes that Putin
is gonna be talked away from fighting off
a Neo Nazi force that's been killing its
own people.
Kinda hard to believe.
Glenn Greenwald said and this is important to

(02:53:53):
recognize that this is just like with Israel,
by the way.
Caitlin Johnstone says, listen to the Ukrainians, we're
told. Right? Well, here they are. And it's
not as simple a poll. I don't think
it ever really encapsulates the full picture, but
at least an insight to something. It says
the closer they are to the front line,
the more they want peace talks.
The further they are from the fighting, the
more willing they are to keep throwing their

(02:54:14):
compatriots into the gears of an unwinnable proxy
war. Hole, major majority of Ukrainians want peace
talks to end the war with Russia. Says
the support for peace talks is stronger in
the eastern areas, 63%.
Glenn says the US never cared about Ukraine
US government. That was the pretext for US
war policy. The goal was never to protect

(02:54:36):
Ukrainians. It was to, quotes, or rather, sacrifice
them at the altar of weakening Russia, which
didn't work. So who cares if Ukrainians don't
wanna fight? US, UK pundits need to feel
strong.
This is so obviously at least part of
what's going on, but there's obviously a bigger
geopolitical
point to this. But simply just recognizing that
they have been driving this at the at

(02:54:57):
least at the first point to mire Russia
and what's going on for maybe larger agendas,
maybe something else.
But how does that then make sense with
what's gonna come next?
Oh, that's the the same one.
So Brad Miller says go Douglas McGregor says
the US is sleepwalking into disaster in the
Middle East.
And Brad Miller says, no. The US isn't

(02:55:18):
sleepwalking into disaster. We're being deliberately led there.
And I agree. Deliberate intentions are often masked
by incompetence,
but it's necessary to know the difference. He
says this is why Han, Hanlon's razor has
its limitations in application. I think that was
more so if you can believe that it's
stupidity versus,
incompetence or I mean, let me look it

(02:55:39):
up again.
These are always interesting to to remember and,
like, you know, like, Occam's razor is one
of the more popular, like,
all things considered equal, the simplest explanation tends
to be the right one. This one is
the atom that,
any of the any never attribute malice to
that which is adequately explained by stupidity. It's
it's a good one to remember.

(02:55:59):
I I think the point is that
it's I I I think it's both in
a lot of ways, but the overarching point
is that I I agree with them. I
don't think that this is something that's accidental
or a byproduct. I think we're being led
here for very obvious reasons.
All sides of it. Now I completely agree
with what Off Guardian said. This has been
my opinion since the moment I saw this
developing. This is our take for Off Guardian.

(02:56:21):
Escalating World War 3 brinksmanship over Ukraine is
go and we're get even just on paper,
mind you, is going to result in Trump
taking over and, quote, calming the situation down,
giving him, quote,
see us see he saved us from the
crazy pro war establishment points.
He says, hell, I'll throw him hell throw
him a Nobel Peace Prize for media circus

(02:56:41):
of it all, like Obama.
Then the nuclear near miss can be
parlayed into g. Maybe a global government is
a good idea to prevent nuclear annihilation.
But they sure won't call it that. See,
they see it just they see the same
thing I'm worried about too.
That even if good steps are which even
then it doesn't seem like they're it's a
half a second of a maybe good step

(02:57:02):
that's completely eclipsed by the bad thing on
top of it. But realize that even if
these things are happening for positive change,
I'm very much of the mind that some
of these things are being floated in order
to blind you to what is bigger happening
on top of that that almost makes it
null and void.
I very much hope I'm wrong.
Now Thomas Massie says this about the Ukraine

(02:57:23):
situation. Now look. I agree exact with I
think there's 2 things. Is it 2? Yeah.
I agree a 100% of what he's saying
with both. They are completely factually correct. But
I don't understand why, of all people, he
wouldn't contrast this with other things as well.
Really, with the idea that they're using. Like,
for example, he says, by authorizing long range
missiles to strike inside Russia,

(02:57:44):
Biden is committing an unconstitutional
act of war, 100%,
that endangers the lives of US citizens. Absolutely.
This is an impeachable offense, but the reality
is he's a he is an emasculated puppet
of the deep state.
I agree. But here's what's interesting.
In that very tweet, I think because you're
missing the most important part, which is that
this is

(02:58:05):
why would the focus be on
the unconstitutional act of war and impeachment
as if it's an unprecedented step when you
know how many times? You know when the
last time is the US government declared a
war that congress approved?
World War 2. So we're talking about the
the invasions and bombings of Afghanistan and Syria

(02:58:27):
and
Libya or the Sudan or any number of
things that Trump was also involved in. All
of them were illegal
in the same way.
Or the assassinations of foreign leaders, which all
of them are involved in. All of them.
My point is that this is in in
and of its own right, it shouldn't be
like those don't matter. This matters. And I
agree. If If you wanna impeach him on

(02:58:48):
the way out, go for it. I think
that seems like a waste of time, but
overall, it's about accountability.
But that's my point though.
If it's some token fake version of accountability
for an outgoing president that will only amount
in he did this thing that we all
know he did,
it it feels like a manipulation.
But either way, I still agree and it
should matter, but I think the bottom line

(02:59:08):
point is let's put him in prison for
that. And so too with the rest of
them that have carried out illegal actions that
are everywhere you look.
That's important to think about. And it's not
whataboutism. Again, this person should be in jail
for a lot of reasons. But if we're
gonna hold that standard, why are we only
suddenly pointing out this when ultimately it does
not even seem like like I already went

(02:59:28):
over? I think there's at least enough reason
to consider whether it's not exactly what it
looks like.
When otherwise, you can see all sorts of
look at Israel bombing Syria right now. All
these are illegal actions, but this is what
we focus on? It should be that we
focus on this and all the rest of
them.
And my question is why he wouldn't point
that out. But that doesn't have to mean
anything. You could just think that it's gonna,

(02:59:49):
you know, distract from the point, which maybe
is right. But here's another example, and this
just shows you that Biden himself knows what
he's doing is illegal. But that, again, applies
to just about every single person we could
talk about. In some cases, even Massey, by
the way. But it says watch 2007 of
Joe Biden clarifying that 2024 president Joe Biden
has committed an impeachable offense by authorizing US

(03:00:09):
supplied and targeted missiles to attack a sovereign
country of Russia.
Ask you about something you've been involved with.
You said that if the president of the
United States had launched an attack on Iran
without congressional approval, that would have been an
impeachable offense. Do you wanna review that comment
you made? Well, how do you stand on
that now? Do you think this I wanna
stand by that. Can I just say I
hate the way he talk? An impeachable offense.

(03:00:30):
He talks it's just the way he talks
drives me crazy.
It's been an impeachable offense. Do you wanna
review that comment you made? Well, how do
you stand on that now? Yes. I do.
I wanna stand by that comment I made.
The reason I made the comment was as
a warning.
The reason I may I don't say those
things lightly, Chris. You've known me for a
long time. I was chairman of the judiciary
committee for 17 years or its ranking member.

(03:00:52):
I teach separation of powers and constitutional law.
This is something I know.
Back with Biden wasn't, you know, a complete
dementia zombie. Right?
So I got together and brought a group
of constitutional scholars together to write a piece
that I'm gonna deliver to the whole United
States Senate pointing out the president
has no constitutional authority
to take this nation to war against the

(03:01:13):
country of 70,000,000 people unless we're attacked or
unless there is proof that we are about
to be attacked.
Now, of course, the interesting point is that
is that really you know, they I guarantee
if pushed that the argument would be that
we're not. Ukraine's doing that.
That's why they're already trying to distance, though.
Well, we didn't do it. We're not involved
even though as we showed you yesterday or
day before yesterday that every single step that

(03:01:35):
they are involved. And now that's becoming even
more clear with the attack and overlap that
they are. But I get that would be
the kind of the the argument you're gonna
get from someone on the left that, well,
they're just they're supplementary. They're supporting. But it's
the same way with all of these. They're
they're very clearly involved on the ground, but
all of these are crimes. And if he
does
if he does,
I would move to impeach him. The house

(03:01:56):
obviously has to do that, but I would
lead an effort to impeach him. The reason
for my doing that, I don't say it
lightly.
I don't say it lightly. I say it
because they should understand
that what they were threatening, what they were
saying, what was adding up to be, what
looked like to the rest of the world
what we're about to do, would be the
most disastrous thing that could be done at
this moment in our history that I can

(03:02:18):
think of. And now they're all driving for
exactly that because Israel once war with Iran.
But I think it it it's pretty crazy.
I mean, the over the other thing as
well, hold on. It was,
what looked
I don't say it lightly. If he does
if he does,
I would move to impeach him. Oh, right.
And so the the the overarching point as

(03:02:39):
well is that I this and this drives
me crazy.
I make this joke plenty of times in
the past. The idea that so just impeach
him. You're fired.
You murdered all these people and and broke
the law, but, you know, you're fired.
That's it. It's always what happens. And this
is this is kind of the game we
see. You know, like, so you commit you
know, you run you murder somebody with your
car. Can I just quit my job? Is

(03:03:00):
that can am I good? Obviously not. Not
for you. But for them, it's like disgraced
removed from your position is somehow that's more
than enough. No. They should go to jail
for committing a crime like anybody else would.
And the context that you're or the in
the reality that you're
not just committing crime, but you're
committing a crime that literally kills people. Where
you're bombing a foreign country, and it's also

(03:03:21):
a crime. I mean, it's that in and
of itself should be a crime. But the
point, clearly, yes, he is breaking law
for a for a 1,000 different reasons. And,
yes, they should be held accountable. If we're
gonna go that route, we should be talking
about every single one of them.
Of course, Betty Johnson says, did Biden just
start World War 3 to sabotage Trump?
Well,

(03:03:43):
anything's possible. But if you look if this
I think the game is that if you're
only ever looking at this as the left
versus the right, this is what we get.
Consider, of course, there's some kind of but
realize that, guys, it's in the same direction
of the same agenda. If you really stand
back and look at it, not the inner,
you know, woven constantly fluctuating wedge issues, but
the the agenda that has been going the

(03:04:03):
same direction for many, many different administrations,
does it make
sense to do I mean, consider it all,
but recognize that this is just a height
a floated point with nothing to truly back
it up, that they did this to sacrifice
I mean, how would that sabotage Trump?
Because you're gonna simply point at Biden and
say it was all Biden's fault, so, ultimately,
it creates a dynamic that they're gonna use

(03:04:24):
to justify next steps, and I think that's
quite obvious.
I just think I mean, you know my
opinion. I I have very little patience and
little respect for the partisan game, especially when
it's used to assume
about what makes you feel good about your
party.
So last few points to consider is, you
know, maybe it's about other things too, outside
of what we even talked about. Don't forget,

(03:04:45):
for example, Russian Defense Ministry here not too
long ago talking about that they're investigating 240
disease causing pathogens discovered in US sponsored bio
labs in Ukraine,
including anthrax, cholera. So that would be in
the interest of all of the US government
to stop that kind of action. Pathogens are
studied and developed with intent for use for
offensive actions, they say. Well, we know all

(03:05:05):
this.
But it's interesting how this is happening, you
know, that this the only point to float
is that there may be other reasons this
is happening, both from US perspective, but also
from Israel's perspective.
Vanessa Billie points out the Russian army has
recently increased its presence in the Golan Heights,
you know, the illegally occupied Golan Heights that
Israel's taken from Syria
near the border of Syria and Israel.

(03:05:27):
It says according to the report, Russia has
advanced 2 additional positions. And by the way,
realize Golan Heights are very important for Israel
for many reasons, not least of which is
position, but but water and resources.
But according to report, Russia has advanced 2
additional positions in addition to 7 posts that
are already
already exist there. The jet general,
Rodanov,
Rodanov

(03:05:48):
Rodionov. How do you say that? Rodionov,
deputy commander of the Russian forces in Syria,
said that the Russian forces in Syria, quote,
have not withdrawn
from any position in the region,
but have increased their presence along various positions,
since 2015
at the request of the regime in Damascus.
The Syrian army commander whose identity was not

(03:06:08):
disclosed in the article told the news agency
that Russian presence increases stability and security.
Are the Zionists crazy enough to attempt a
ground invasion in southern Syria?
Well, we've been seeing a a ramping up
of action in Syria, bombing, but which they've
been doing for a very long time, all
of which is illegal no matter what the
screaming narrative about Iran is. Even if Iran's
their

(03:06:28):
government and everything, it would still be an
illegal act by Israel to bomb a domestic
civilian location.
But I'm asking simply whether there may be
other reasons to be driving some other action
to stop you know, just consider other things
going on. It's easy to get pulled into
the one dynamic when there's much more going
on in the world. Current report points out
on top of that that Russian armies established
a new military base near the Golan Heights.

(03:06:49):
Israel has long viewed foreign military bases near
its borders as a potential threat.
Then lastly, this is just an interesting
throwback to what was going on
in the beginning of the genocide in Gaza.
That there was a differ a back and
forth between what Russia was and wasn't doing
and that you have a and this is
because of the Crocus City Hall discussion and

(03:07:09):
how
this is rarely representative was saying Russia will
pay the price. It's worth considering.
That I understand you are under Russian payroll,
and I understand this is a Russian propaganda,
but you have to be very careful Because
let me tell you, we're gonna finish this
war. We're gonna win because we're stronger. After
this, Russia will pay the price. Believe me,
Russia will pay the price. Russia will pay

(03:07:30):
the price. Russia is supporting the enemies of
Israel. Russia is supporting
Nazi people who want to commit genocide on
us, and just Russia will pay.
And, funny enough, they're not talking about the
Azov movement. Right? They're talking about the the
Hamas or whatever they're pretending are Nazis in
this conversation.

(03:07:50):
The price, Russia also. Now let me list
listen to me very carefully. We are gonna
finish with these Nazis.
We're gonna win this war. It's gonna take
the time it's gonna go take, but we're
gonna win this war. Afterwards, we're not forgetting
what you are doing. We're not forgetting. We
will come. We will make sure that Ukraine
wins. We will make sure that you pay
the price for what you have done. You

(03:08:11):
as Russia, and you and as all the
enemies of Israel, and you as all the
people who are now making
everything they can to support genocide of the
Jews in Israel. We are not forgetting
You get the point. It goes on for,
like, 3 more minutes. The point
is that he's talking about going after Russia
because they're not supporting Israel's genocide.

(03:08:31):
It's worth considering that there might be more
at play here. Right? I think it's very
interesting to to to think about what he's
saying, though. Right? That you'll pay the price.
And, of course, at the time he's saying
that, they're committing a genocide against Palestinians and
always pointing back to his October 7th. Usual
dynamic.
Now in the fever pitch, the hype around
all of this, you've seen a lot of
people latch on to it like usual. The

(03:08:53):
the, you know, the kind of similar and
don't and we already talked about this in
the past. I mean, David Knight's called Alex
out many times, and so I'll even have
that clip in a minute about Bill Cooper
himself calling out Alex Jones as a complete
manipulator.
The point, though, is that this is
always what you get in this kind of
fever pitch hype around something, and it's worth
considering whether there's more going on. This says
articles of impeachment against Joe Biden for illegally

(03:09:15):
bombing Russia drafted after Republican senators and house
members call for Biden's removal. Say it again.
Were they doing that during Trump's last administration
when they were illegally bombing in many different
locations? Well, of course not. So consistency matters.
Right? But this is about, I think, not
even going whether this happens or not,
in every possible way, trying to lean in
to hype around Ukraine, Russia, even though there's

(03:09:37):
real risks there, and this new
new deviation about impeaching pipe, which means basically
meaningless work and and distraction
as somebody who's gonna be on the way
out.
Why do you think that is? For somebody
who seems to never wanna call out the
obvious Israeli agenda and the globalist overlap to
it while talking about that. That's my that's
the thing that comes into my mind. I

(03:09:58):
just think it's very interesting that the choosing
of the the hype on this or this
one, World War 3 alert.
I just think that's ridiculous. Republican leaders call
for Biden immediate removal under the 25th amendment
response to his bombing. You always see this.
These are like 2 seconds apart.
Bomb. Bomb. You know, it's a it's a
propaganda bomb.
Breaking now, Putin threatens nuclear war by Christmas.

(03:10:20):
Not even true. After Biden launches bombing.
Literally, the headline says, Putin threatens nuclear war
by Christmas.
Guys, these people are
this is embarrassing.
You I just read to you where they're
at.
The shift of the doctrine, which is ultimately
the same place the US is. Is now
they're threatening nuclear war by Christmas.

(03:10:41):
Guys, this should be laughed at.
And it's all about the fever pitch screaming
World War 3 hype.
All these are in this, like like, minutes
after right in the same field where it's
all today. World World War 3 alert.
Russia threatens imminent nuclear war after NATO launches
bombing campaign in Russia. This is it's not
true.

(03:11:02):
They've not threatened imminent nuclear war. They simply
adjust the doctrine and said that if you
do this, we'll have we could have this
response. That's the truth of it.
The rest is all hype.
This one, again, this is November 20th. It's
middle of the day. Must watch.
We are in the first phase of World
War 3.

(03:11:22):
Why does anybody lean into this stuff even
if we have the real risk? That's silly.
If you wanna make that point, then point
to the reality that we've been past the
metric of what we call a world war
for a decade, plover, since World War 2.
But you're not gonna point out the multistage
war with multiple countries that have nuclear weapons
in Israel's dynamic, but this is the first

(03:11:43):
phase of World War 2, 3 because of
a back and forth.
Which again, don't take that as downplaying the
risks that are there, but realize how crazy
the difference is.
Again, breaking World War 3 update. You gotta
use those red flashy light emojis because that's
important.
UK joins the US in massive bombing attacks
in Russia. Well, we just talked about that.

(03:12:04):
That's up in the air, it seems right
now. It was floated, but then removed.
But I think it's important gosh. I'll play
this little clip right here. As Thies has
pointed out in the past, I think these
things are important to recognize that people that
have worked along them, recognize that a lot
of this is
knowingly either not
whether false or not checked, the lack of
due diligence involved.

(03:12:25):
I am going to share a community story
from our friend Richard Grove when he was
at the Infowars studio
behind the scenes because of his documentary that
he just felt making State of Mind. And
the commentary that he gave observing that studio
firsthand
was that they don't check their facts. They
basically just run with it, and they do
it way too fast. It's the same reason

(03:12:46):
that, like, David Knight left the organization because
he's like, yo. Yeah. And the fucking truth
street kids. Yep. Yep. So that's the thing.
It's like, it's a nonstop thing. He's been
like this for so fucking long. It's maddening.
It's it's
just ridiculous. For for a number of reasons,
but Yeah. But, you know, after the news
with what was going on was one of

(03:13:07):
the reasons Burnis gave for leaving Infowars back
in the day. I mean, these things should
matter. They're all subjective second endpoint, but these
are things that have been said publicly. And
these are multiple people that have worked with
them. It's worth considering, and I think we're
seeing it right there in front of us.
Now the only reason I find this important
is because this is a very influential entity
that is driving people to be hyping something

(03:13:27):
that their own the very hype itself could
be the the cascading effect that drives that
to happen.
Like, that's irresponsible.
Period. And I especially when we can see
that it's not really the dynamic. It just
it it worries me that people are leaning
into stuff like this, but because it's more
entertaining.
Actually, then the other thing says,

(03:13:50):
western nations evacuate Ukrainian embassies before massive Russian
counterattack.
Well, we'll have to see.
I find it I mean, we'll I we'll
have to wait and see what Russia actually
does based on the statements. It's completely up
in the air. But here's the News put
out, and it says, in case you're wondering
what Alex Jones is up to, he's now
telling his audience that the globalist
new world order, the BlackRock WEF UN death

(03:14:12):
cult is being completely routed and exposed and
destroyed.
You know, aside from
Larry Fink being tapped by Trout to help
pick the team, you know, but aside from
that aside from that, BlackRock is being routed.
It says the route is accelerating. There's no
reverse in this. The Democrat deep state system
is complete collapse. The globalist know that they

(03:14:32):
have been beaten. You know, this is like
the queue on sit back and relax kinda
thing. As long as they can convince you
that we're dead, we're dead. It's over. When
nothing when ultimately all they do is bolster
their position.
Well, as long as you pretend it's all
gone, it's it's it's it's like whatever assumptive
narrative you use to justify things happening. You
just go, well, behind the scenes, it's all
done. So let's all give let's all pretend
like we're there. The same thing happened when

(03:14:53):
Trump won last time. All the people acted
like we did it. We got him in.
We're over. We won. It's good.
It's just crazy that people fall for this.
Trump is just for I'll I'll just play
it for you.
Study
the globalist in history and all the different
fashions, as you know,
most of my waking hours. And I could
tell you now

(03:15:15):
that
the globalist, the new world order, not just
here, but around the planet, the BlackRock,
WFUN,
death cult. Right. Not the Yackarino part of
it. Right? Not not the BlackRock part of
it working with Trump. Not the Israel part
of globalism, but, yeah, collapsing everywhere you look.
Is being completely routed and exposed

(03:15:36):
and destroyed
and being fed into a wood chipper,
politically,
feet first right now in front of us.
I tell you what I really see and
what I think.
The route is accelerating.
There's no way they reverse this. All their
crimes are coming out. Let's put the headlines
up for the 2 different Infowars and Real
All of Showns feeds I just posted on

(03:15:57):
x. There's the Infowars headline I wrote. Bombshell.
The globalists know they have been beaten and
are now in the process of total capitulation.
Trump's victory has taken the
global populist political realignment into high gear.
Let's show the real Alex Jones headline I
wrote. The Democrat deep state system is in
collapse, complete collapse.

(03:16:19):
I see signs everywhere that the left is
in total panic mode and abandoned ship. Trump
is just for prosperity
and doesn't want the great reset. He just
wants to be the guy that turned America
around and turned the world around, and
everybody
can go to church and raise their kids
and live in the same communities and go
play golf.
Right now, in the war against the new
world order,

(03:16:40):
if Trump delivers
and puts good people in and we're stalwart
and strong and and realize the war is
not over,
we are rapidly
rolling them up,
and
this current global system
could be defeated
within 2 years.

(03:17:00):
There's nothing they can do to stop us
now
other than a nuclear war. So we're not
completely out of the woods yet.
And, that works with off guardians point. Right?
Oh, don't worry. He saved us from the
nuclear issue, but that's why we need the
very thing that we're kinda pointing to. But
the good version of it,
just go play some golf and relax. Don't
even pay attention. It's all good. We already
fed we already won. Trust the plan. They

(03:17:21):
serve Satan,
but god is in control, and I don't
think god's gonna let the planet get blown
up quite yet.
God, man. I mean, it's just I just
that doesn't I I I do not understand
why this makes sense to I mean, it's
almost it's like a cartoon.
It's ridiculous.

(03:17:41):
Here's what the dissenter news points out. Here's
Jones suggesting that Trump is going to prosecute
Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Fauci, and Hillary. Said
it's not clear if if this will happen
before or after he stops World War 3
with Mike Walz, Pete Hegseth, and Mark Rubio?
We get Trump in and keep him alive,
and he delivers and gets good people in
and can stabilize the economy, stabilize the border,

(03:18:02):
stop World War 3, and get Americans to
stop hating each other,
and then goes ahead with the prosecution of
Schwab,
Fauci,
Gates.
You gotta prosecute Hillary,
Comey.
America will be back. The world will be
on a much better course. We've got a
lot of serious
problems that we still face. I mean, I

(03:18:24):
honestly don't know what's worse that whether this
is being lied about for your own benefit
or you actually believe what you're saying.
I just you know, it this is not
about trying to diminish anything. Like, just realize,
you know, at at face value,
you're floating these bombastic claims with nothing. Like,
the idea that World War 3, they're diminishing
their routing. They're all being destroyed. They're all

(03:18:46):
fleeing the ship. What are you pointing to?
All your secret school sources that we just
know have always panned out. Right? I love
to go with that meme historically,
but it's about in line with Q at
this point.
Other than big things we can all point
to that happen and we go, Yeah, you
got it. I just think it's important to
recognize that this is
becoming more accentuated than ever,

(03:19:07):
and this is about driving something much larger.
I mean, the evidence on the table
is overwhelming that these people are part of
the same agenda.
Maybe there's a reason they're all
screening this right now.
Because it's been more it's more clear than
ever.
David Icke says the same thing. This is
if this was not so nonsensically tragic and

(03:19:29):
utterly misguided, it would almost be funny. Or
actually be funny. I agree. But it's not
because it's pretty terrifying that this is actually
influencing.
And, of course, here's somebody else, Casper says,
yeah, guys. No worries. Joe mister Jones has
confirmed the globalist and new world order is
a full stop. You'll never have to worry
about them because it's all it was all
the left. The news is confirmed. We solved

(03:19:49):
everything overnight.
And he said, would you look at how
easy that was? Why didn't we do whatever
this is that with a long time ago?
I I I'll never know. But praise be
that the prophet has spoken, we can raise
our kids and go to church and eat
McDonald's all day in peace, the Maha way.
Hallelujah.
Speaks for itself.
Now here's what's interesting.

(03:20:09):
So Alex Jones just was he literally just
said the black rock, WEF,
globalist agenda. Okay.
Greg Reese, who apparently still works for Infowars,
who keeps calling this out, saying anybody falling
for this is part of the cult. Well,
you're pointing Alex Jones.
And he he's the one that tags this.
Goes go back to sleep, America. The swamp
will fix itself.

(03:20:30):
So they're very different in these positions right
now. So and that's okay. I mean, in
fact, that's a point of praise, in fact,
that he would allow that to be done
on his platform. But what it needs to
highlight is that Greg Reese is highlighting exactly
what Jones is doing.
Everything he's pointing to, as in the believe
in the cold, whatever, that's what Jones is
doing. That he is in the group that
outlet Reese is pointing to.

(03:20:51):
And here is National Files.
Fox's business,
Larry
Gasparino says Trump team has contracted BlackRock's Larry
Fink to find a treasury secretary.
Now at first, it was floated that he
would be the treasury secretary.
I argue probably wasn't even that accurate, and
then it became Trump pushed back. And the
point is that now he's, according to Fox
News,
tapping him to help pick that, which shouldn't

(03:21:13):
be hard to wrap your mind around.
Working with his son with Kushner and Howard
Lutnick to pick the team. I mean, it's
all it's the same things
with a technocratic Zionist flair to it this
time.
Fink is advising he's not a candidate for
the secretary of treasury. Bannon says, quote, Fink
is the personification
of all things all that is wrong and
evil in America.

(03:21:34):
Now, again, it should be clear that this
is coming from Fox News, but
that should that that carries weight just like
any other platform reporting this on, especially Fox,
around Trump. And there's already been things that
they have actually reported that were true that
have been changed after the fact. The point
is we should already see this as not
hard to wrap your mind around since Trump
leaned into and picked him the last time.

(03:21:56):
But here's what,
Doge, the Department of Government Efficiency, parody says.
We want nothing to do with BlackRock. Thanks
for reporting,
obviously. And, well, here's what's hilarious about this,
by the way. They have 713,000
followers
because people can't read past the first part
of the headline.
Parody.
But if you look at it when it's
not on when it's on your phone, you

(03:22:17):
don't see that. So people see this as
they people this is how bad Twitter files
and the rest of this is tricked. People
aren't doing their due diligence.
Either way, the point is that this is
coming, at least that's being reported by here's
Charles Gasparino from Fox News saying, Larry Fink
and at least one other BlackRock executive has
been contact tracked contracted,

(03:22:39):
which, again,
corporate media is notorious for lying and misbeing
wrong. But realize that by saying contracted them,
it seems to allude to the fact that
he has insight into something
by team Trump as they search for treasury
secretary, which, again, it shouldn't be hard to
to recognize.
Trump's been overlapped with late Larry Fink the
whole time.
And said, dot Trump has a long a

(03:23:00):
tag them. You'd think he would respond if
it wasn't the truth. Trump has a long
relationship with Fink, who is one of the
best, he writes, risk managers in the business
and has often learned leaned on him for
his views on the market, etcetera.
Fink will not be a candidate for treasury,
but it tells you something about Trump. It
sure does. That he has a big tent
idea on how to run the economy.

(03:23:22):
Refreshing.
Oh, refreshing, is it? You may have wanna
read the comments and realize that it's not
very refreshing. A motion particularly
for the Republican side.
Very, very important.
So the odd man out says Donald Trump
never apologized for appointing Larry Fink in his

(03:23:43):
first administration.
As well, I'll include the articles we put
out about this. This one was during the
COVID 19 dynamic, and I said the COVID
coup, the BlackRock takeover of American interest, which
this was, remember, a BlackRock plan around the
US economy, the treasury it was made before
COVID 19, but then they used COVID 19
as the rationale for why we needed it.

(03:24:04):
Usually how that works. That was all during
Trump.
All the the the biggest transfer of wealth
in history, because this country, the CARES Act,
the I mean, so many different things that
are, like, not just important, but paramount,
monumental for what happened later.
And the sport don't wanna see it.

(03:24:26):
And this was written by Josh Walcos or
Josh champagne Joshi on Twitter,
the long shadow of BlackRock. It's a great
article going into some of the important overlaps
for today.
Now this is important as well. Don't forget
that this we already went over this before
the election time frame. This was
in early early November.
Billionaire BlackRock
a billionaire or was it,

(03:24:47):
was that is that from a diff is
that May or how's that anyway, before the
election. Billionaire BlackRock CEO, and he said this
publicly, doesn't matter who wins the election
because he was invested in both.
Wasn't that exactly what we're talking about?
The point is that they make sure they
do that just like with Zionist because they
they it's about control.

(03:25:09):
Now Whitney also added to this, and she
did. She called this out before, and she
said, well, I tried to tell you, no
matter who won the 2024 election, BlackRock was
going to be running fiscal policy.
And here we are.
Again, citing what Gasparino said, so it's certainly
possible that could shift or change or he
was wrong. But it says the people who
brought you the going direct, which what is
what, Catherine also fits has talked about a

(03:25:30):
lot.
Going direct reset, wealth transfer from Main Street
to Wall Street under the guise of COVID
relief that Donald Trump implemented first under Trump
and continued under Biden, whose econ team was
run by executive BlackRock BlackRock execs,
are back for more.
And then this is the clip I was
gonna point to earlier
around the

(03:25:54):
the debt dynamic and the failing of the
audience from the Pentagon.
True Street Media made the we've actually played
this clip before. It's actually it's it's kind
of important to see in the bigger picture.
But it says the video of a comedian
schooling a deputy defense secretary on why giving
her agency a 100 $850,000,000,000
it is unable to account for is not
okay, has got to be one of the
most mind blowing things I've ever seen or

(03:26:15):
seen lately.
Solari said for 20 years,
DOD and the US Treasury has refused to
comply with the financial management laws. There is
$20,000,000,000,000,000,
which our brains can't even make sense of,
of undocumented adjustments to DOD books between 1998
and 2015.
In 2018,

(03:26:36):
FASAB
56 took the DOD books dark.
This is not a failure to comply.
This is a financial coup d'etat, a coup
that the New York Fed and Wall Street
have been happy to finance.
Much of the funding is coming from citizen
tax payments and US and global retirement savings.
This is her point about the great poisoning
overlap we talked about during the Dachshund show,

(03:26:58):
and that was simply about the possibility of
that whether it's the Dachshund release or any
number of things going on in the world.
Damn it. That would pop right up.
That it very well could be
part of what's happening. And her argument is
by lowering the lifespan of the population,
it opens up a huge amount of financial

(03:27:20):
access to these different programs and so on.
Where was that? Right here. I called it
murder by malfeasance, dioxin contamination, and the ongoing
cover up. It's a good show. Focus just
on that. But it goes on to say,
so the coup is also a bank robbery.
The greatest in history. And now the president's
supporters, Donald Trump's, are talking about
are talk talking about taking are talking about

(03:27:42):
plundering the land and mineral rights.
So just realize how clear it is. And
even she even made an argument how she
in the beginning about how you could make
an argument for why Trump would have been
a better choice. And I said I could
I should make the same argument. But the
point is that if we recognize regardless of
that that the same thing was gonna happen
either way, which is what we're in agreement
on, and you can see clearly that they
are already going to walk this forward. So

(03:28:02):
let's watch this clip in regard to seeing
how
it's not a left right thing. It's not
a Republican, Democrat thing. It's not a Trump
Kamala thing. All of this has been going
forward since before the COVID 19 illusion through
Donald Trump, through Biden, and now gonna be
continuing, and I argue, hopefully not, but finishing
during his administration.
To be doing like, there is a lot

(03:28:24):
of waste, fraud, and abuse within a system
Audits and waste, fraud, and abuse are not
the same thing. So let's,
decompose these things. Educate me on on what
to do. Exactly what you just described, which
is do I know what was delivered to
which place? Right. The ability to pass an
audit or in a the fact that the
DOD has not passed an audit is not
suggestive of waste, fraud, and abuse.

(03:28:46):
That is completely false right there.
So So what is Now is a question
of I mean, to be as fair as
possible and objective, you could argue that there
is opening there. Right? That what you should
argue is that it doesn't prove that that
is the only thing. It could be that
we just don't know where it is, but
it's all being used perfectly on the up
and up. Well, okay. Then the argument would
be then how in the hell are you

(03:29:07):
not managing yourself well enough to be able
to identify that? And doesn't that very opening,
that very gap, allow anybody within it to
actually take advantage? Well, obviously.
But I think it's much more clear that
we know that that's happening.
We really do. And that's well, his response
makes that very clear. But the smug response,
her whole smug demeanor that he even calls

(03:29:28):
out at the end is the real issue
here. That they are just so far above
you that you just don't
I I'm of the mind that she is
very aware of what's actually going on. Maybe
not the full picture, but, yeah, their their
ultimate job is covering this up. It's suggestive
that we can't we don't have an accurate
inventory that we can pull up of what
we have where. Exactly.

(03:29:50):
That is not the same as saying we
can't do that because waste, fraud, and abuse
has occurred. Yeah. But it opens the door
for that very clearly being one of the
possibilities, and that's what such a that's such
a lazy sidestep to me. So in my
world Yeah.
That's waste.
How is that waste? If I give you
a $1,000,000,000
and you can't tell me what happened to
it,

(03:30:10):
that to me is wasteful. That that means
you And we're talking about 850,000,000,000,
by the way. Are not necessarily responsible. But
if you can't tell me where it went,
then what am I Her laughing, the whole
demeanor.
Watch us when she goes into some very
serious parts. She's literally twiddling her thumbs. Supposed
to think. And when there has been reporting
I mean, this is not look. I'm not

(03:30:31):
I'm not saying this is on you
and that you caused this, but I think
it's it's a tough argument to make sure
that cause it. That is a crazy response
when you're talking about as much as we're
talking about and the implications of how large
that is. And and $850,000,000,000
budget
to an organization
that can't pass an audit and tell you

(03:30:51):
where that money went Mhmm. Like,
I think most people would consider that somewhere
in the realm of waste, fraud, or abuse
because they would wonder why that money isn't
well accounted for. Right. And especially when they
see food insecurity on military bases and they
see You wanna talk about that? Because that's

(03:31:11):
a good we should be talking. I mean,
I'm trying to understand where where where where
you're trying to go other than the dollars,
which really bother you. I Wow.
Like, she's just acting like it's such a
inconsequential
part of the conversation. Let's deviate and focus
on this one thing.
My god.
Like, I mean, it's almost more scary to
think that she actually doesn't recognize the problem.

(03:31:32):
I think it doesn't really bother me. I
think it's all connected. Okay. I think when
I tell me that story. Wow. Tell me
how you're thinking about that. When I see
Patronizing.
A state department get,
a certain amount of money and a military
budget be 10 times that, And I see
a struggle within government to get people, like,
more basic services. And then that,

(03:31:52):
department that got that I mean, we got
out of 20 years of war, and the
Pentagon got a $50,000,000,000
raise. Right. Like, that's shocking to me. Now
I may not understand exactly the ins and
outs and and the I mean, really think
about that without even at least on paper
or for us being able to demonstrate that
they know what happened to it, and they
got more money,

(03:32:12):
which either needs to show you that they
are in the same they're in lockstep for
what they're trying to do with it, and
they don't want you to know, or something
else is driving it entirely. These people are
going along to get along, or they're being
influenced to do so from, you know, blackmail,
whatever else you wanna overlap it with, but
it is not about fighting for your security.
Credible,
magic of an audit, but I'm a human

(03:32:34):
being who lives on the earth and can't
figure out how $850,000,000,000
to a department means that the rank and
file still have to be on food stamps.
Like, to me, that's fucking corruption.
I'm sorry.
And
if, like, if that blows your mind
and if you think, like, that's, like, a

(03:32:55):
crazy agenda for me to have,
I really think that that's institutional thinking and
that it's not looking at the day to
day reality of the people that you call
the greatest fighting force in the world.
So I just again, I get back to
this idea of, like, I'm not looking to
pick a fight with you, but I am
surprised at that the reaction to these questions

(03:33:18):
are, you don't know what an audit is,
bucko. Like, that's just weird to me. You
know, the one thing I do like about
what he does as much as I I'm
of the mind that he's very much part
of a a larger manipulation
is that he does come at this a
lot of times where people like that will
go on stage expecting a softball. Because sometimes
it can be like that. Oh, it's a
comedian. It'll be and then he comes out

(03:33:39):
with things that that really rock their boat.
And and maybe that's part I you you
can think of I think it serves a
positive effect in some cases either way. But
I love that because you could see that
she was just, like, expecting this to be
a funny kinda poking each other. And and
I I think what it was is that
he got irritated with how smug and dismissing
she was being, and that's why he took
another level. And you saw her demeanor change.

(03:33:59):
But I agree overall that that's pretty wild.
This is but this is not a left
right dynamic.
And I think and Herb Solari's point is
that this is where we're going into the
current incoming administration
with black rock and all the rest of
the overlaps. It's nothing new, guys.
Oh, here. I'll include this article for you.

(03:34:20):
Now I'll include the, the the these we
we showed these before. I I this I
just recently went over this recently, but this
was the the clip, which I hadn't heard
until recently. There's many of them. You could
look it up. Bill Cooper talking about Alex
Jones, which is kinda crazy to me because
of what a central player he is, a
part of the kind of foundational elements of
what we are today, and how people compare

(03:34:41):
them or overlap them. Or you know? And
he is on the record saying what Alex
is doing. And by the way, he's highlighting
back then exactly what I just showed you.
The bombastic hyperbolic
world war. He's talking about just exactly that.
But all the way back then
to recognize that it's the same thing. At
least in Bill Cooper's mind, he is a
manipulator

(03:35:02):
for obvious reasons.
Now this is an interesting take on this,
and I the
whole thing with the free speech aspect of
it, the Sandy Hook thing and Alex Jones,
like, the point, nonetheless, just like I point
out with anything else, like like a WikiLeaks
dynamic, where whether whatever you think of Assange,
the point was even if he was an
asset, we should still defend him being persecuted

(03:35:25):
because even if he especially because the plan
was to use that against you.
So whatever you think about what hacking that
happened there, my point's always been that I
stand on his right to say whatever he
wants, even if he's if it's all a
big gate. The point is whether whatever you
think about Sandy Hook, the people have a
right to express the way they think about
things, the way they see things. Even if
you find that to be offensive, even if
you somehow think him saying that leads to

(03:35:47):
some other crazy action, that that's the person's
action's fault or choice.
Speech is protected.
It's an inherent right.
Absolute free speech. That's where I think we
should be leaning into. The point, though,
is that he makes the argument that because
of what he's done in all this, that
as a Haimpah flick says, and I respect
his opinion. He says Alex Jones did more

(03:36:09):
to destroy free speech in America than any
person in human history. It's a big claim.
He says how he apologized
for having and broadcasting an opinion,
right or wrong, that challenged the mainstream media
narrative. Because of him, we now have a
court precedent. And this is really what I
think it comes down to. Like, with the
frog discussion or the ways that it's about

(03:36:29):
deviating or using this to distract or whatever.
I've seen a lot of them.
He says because of him, we now have
a court precedent heavily penalizing anyone who publicizes
alternative viewpoints.
And you could even argue that he didn't
do it on purpose, but the outcome would
still be the same. It's worth considering what
High Impact Flix is saying. He says he
all he had to do is say, quote,

(03:36:50):
I don't believe Sandy Hook happened the way
mainstream media said it did because you provided
no proof.
It's a pretty logical statement.
But he goes, then he could have just
sat back and made them provide the proof.
That's it. Instead,
which we've seen, he retracted. He rolled over
and submitted. Now look, I I there's
arguments to be made about what could have

(03:37:11):
happened and the threats he was under and
the the potential financial attacks. Like, I'm not
the point is, either way, though, you kinda
have to admit that this is the way
it went.
He says he put free speech on the
chopping block and we all lost.
Very interesting take on that, and I don't
disagree. But I, you know, I think there
if you could add more nuance to that
on regard whether Alex was knowingly doing so

(03:37:32):
or so on, but very interesting to consider
with all that we talked about.
Now let's talk about the prophetic side about
this as we get into the Israel conversation
and foreign policy in general.
Now I wanna play this clip again to
start this. This is Vivek
speaking about why Israel has a divine right
to exist or what he whatever he frames
it as, which I find concerning.

(03:37:53):
And we'll get into the undeniable
kind of religious
extremist perspective, you know, kind of vein running
through the Trump administration so far,
and how this is concerning for where this
is going with the current Israeli administration.
These
are decisions
for
Now is the moment for Israel to return

(03:38:15):
to its founding premise. The Jewish state
has an absolute
right
to exist.
A divine gift, gifted to a divine nation,
charged with a divine purpose. Israel has an
absolute
and unequivocal right and responsibility
to defend itself to the fullest.

(03:38:36):
So a divine right? I mean, come on,
guys. Like,
this is a an irrational stand. Even from
somebody who when you're talking about a political
dynamic or a country who is committing genocide
or a country who has the potential to
commit violent acts
through justifiable
war or not,
to cite divine right to exist, that is
a really alarming step lurch into a direction

(03:38:59):
of, like the elite religious extremist Zionist perception
that they have the root because if then
if you have a divine right.
What happens if you commit a crime.
What happens if you commit genocide.
God said this was this is a very
dangerous I I don't I can't believe we're
seeing politicians
on the main presidential stage

(03:39:20):
talk about a divine right to exist or
the idea that Israel like, everything we're talking
about.
The idea that the the as,
shoot. Huckabee
talking about the the third temple and the
end times. Like, these are right on the
surface.
Even if you agree with these things, to
overlap them with politics
is dangerous.

(03:39:42):
I mean, you wanna look at how dangerous
it can be? That's Israel for you. This
aggressive overlap of a religious perspective with a
political stance has created
the most alarming level of extremism I've seen
in a long time,
and it's right on the surface.
Applying the only language that its adversaries
understand, the language of force. Of course, we're

(03:40:04):
talking about all the children in Gaza. Right?
All the women and children and elderly and
doctors and nurses and medical aid workers, not
even from Gaza. You know, just happened to
be there from London or from the United
States or from Australia. Yeah. But that's all.
Just only force.
Because we're talking about a war against Hamas?
And even if so, are we talking about
the Hamas that Israel funds and funded up
until October 7th? Does he know all of

(03:40:25):
that? Does he not care? No. Just all
force because of divine right justified.
So what would David Ben Gurion say today?
He would say Don't care, quite frankly. You're
talking about another element of the foundation of
an illegal state with a Zionist religious extremist
foundation.
These people committed horrifying war crimes. So, frankly,
I don't really care what they might say

(03:40:45):
about how you're committing war crimes today. Don't
depend on anybody else's fleeting sympathies or permission
to do it. If Israel and Mossad want
to pull off Munich 2.0 and And this
is the scariest part. Take out every last
leader of Hamas wherever they may be hiding
from Doha to Dresden, host a red wedding
at the 4 seasons in Qatar.

(03:41:07):
So like a reference to Game of Thrones.
So he's literally saying if Israel wants to
attack somebody anywhere in the world, it's their
divine right.
Okay. What happens if it's some somebody's home
in San Francisco? Is that still okay, Vivek?
Well, you certainly just gave that opening. And
Israel has certainly made that clear that they
could if they wanted to.
You guys have lost the plot.
If you think this is America first, you

(03:41:29):
have also lost the plot. The next time
Hanieh and Michelle show up, they should go
ahead and do it.
If Israel
wants to, at long last, abandon the myth
of a 2 state solution,
Israel should go ahead and abandon a 2
state solution. You know, the thing they all
pretend they all want, but the myth, meaning
they never really did, which we all know

(03:41:49):
now.
That means that Israel, which we can prove
on paper, has been lying about what they've
been wanting the entire time and sabotaging what
they claimed they wanted the entire time in
order to stop anything that would benefit benefit
the Palestinians.
The only way you can understand that is
to realize that they have been ethnically cleansing
and going after the population of all of
Palestine since the moment they occupied Palestine.

(03:42:11):
And they always pretend like they're just trying
to go for you know, this is the
objective, and we're gonna we'll let them come
back to their homes. We'll agree to these
different borders. We'll allow them to have their
own state. The entire time, making sure that
didn't happen.
And it seems like he knows that.
That should bother you if you care about
anything they pretend they're fighting for outside of

(03:42:32):
their own control and occupation of your life.
The rest of the Arab world can absorb
the Palestinians
just as the Jews absorb their people out
of 22 countries. They were kicked out Nope.
Manufacturing a fake story here.
Right? Because Palestinians
let Jewish people come to stay with allowed
them in their territory
in Palestine.

(03:42:53):
And the Belfort declaration allowed the Zionist organization
to take all of Palestine. Many of which
the Jewish population within that were aghast at
what they did to the Palestinians. All this
is easily on the record. You could look
this stuff up.
And he wants you to believe that that's
all that happened.
And somehow that this is their territory because
god said, believe him if you actually think

(03:43:14):
that.
How does one
disagree with that? What if they're wrong?
Do they do the Palestinians not gonna say
when they were clearly there? The point is
obviously this guy is being driven either by
a political agenda or something much more alarming
than that. Of since 1948.
The Islamic world cannot continue to condone
the slaughtering of Jews while continuing

(03:43:36):
to disown the Palestinians.
That is the hard Anyhow, we skipped over
the year of genocide and the hundreds of
thousands of people being killed in Gaza. But,
yeah, it's all a slaughter of Jews. That's
it. But, also, there were other than Jews.
They got killed on October 7th, but I
guess he only cares about the one group.
Truth
That neither member of either political party is
willing to speak out loud to the Arab
world. I will.

(03:43:56):
Gosh. It's just it's
disgusting. So here's what I find most alarming.
It's the idea of him saying that Israel
wants to go to Dresden to so basically,
they can go and attack anybody anywhere. And
by their logic, they can murder innocent people
as long as they're trying to go after
what they blame as a bad guy. A
lot of openings and what ifs and hypotheticals
in that. Right? But only for Israel, they

(03:44:17):
can do what they want. Don't forget this
clip.
We've talked about this many times.
Zion has called for genocide openly against us
as they called against Gaza and Iran. What
happened so far in Lebanon, because, well, the
operation operations room and resistance Hezbollah has confirmed
that since the start of the so fall
so far failed invasion against Lebanon,
that these are I should've just skipped it.

(03:44:38):
But the point is these are all just
a bunch of, metrics that are relevant toward
the end of the show for what's going
on in Lebanon. My point was to highlight
what this is saying.
And she's simply going over to show you
that they are going
after all of Lebanon, just like they're going
after all of Palestine and all of the
innocent people involved. This clip is from a
one of the leading show in Israel on

(03:44:58):
mainstream media.
The top part says they promised this mass
slaughter would come last November in 2023.
It says, and this was very public.
It says, and we will tell you what
we tell you every day.
We are coming.
We are coming to Gaza.
We are coming to Lebanon.

(03:45:19):
We are coming to Iran.
We will come everywhere. Now realize they're not
talking about just fighting the bad guy. They're
talking about taking this territory. He's very clear
about that. And says, can you imagine how
many we're going to kill?
How many of you we're going to kill?
You did not see the numbers
in all Arab history.

(03:45:41):
I assure you that it will come. In
case you are confused, I assure you that
it will come.
Numbers that you did not imagine. That is
that it is possible. It is possible to
get them.
He's not mean just it's crazy how belligerent
and and genocidal this is. He said, and
we haven't even got to the most important
part. It says, and we are ready to
enter international unity.

(03:46:03):
It says, we are prepared to fight with
the United States
and the entire world.
How long will it take until all of
you, including all of your supporters,
go up to meet Allah?
And we will kill, it will be clear.
This is the sentiment.
So wait in the social media. Do a

(03:46:24):
free Palestine.
Do all your crying. We will destroy you.
Destroy.
He says that more than once. Share this
video with your friends.
Let them know what we're gonna do for
you. So
not only is that alarmingly and this is
mainstream Israeli TV.
The part about we were prepared to fight

(03:46:44):
with the United States or all of the
world. Did you not hear what Vivek just
said? If they wanna go to dress if
they wanna go across the world and carry
out a red wedding, they have the right
to do it.
Think about how crazy that is. As you
have pea mainstream people in Israel openly saying
that if you wanna fight, we'll fight against
the United States. So what if they do
find something here that they

(03:47:04):
this is not so, again, take back up
just a brief moment to to Russia and
Ukraine.
And the obvious risk therein, do you not
see how this is far, far, far more
the we're beyond fever pitch, guys. Israel is
openly committing genocide, is openly bombing multiple countries,
many of which have nuclear weapons. You have
people on TV saying, we'll go against anybody

(03:47:25):
that stands in our way. You got leaders
in Trump's movement saying they can go wherever
they want.
How is that not a more you get
the point.
Where's Alex and Tucker and all the rest?
Why don't they hype or talk about both?
I think you can fill in the blank.
Oh,
gosh. I always lose my voice.
Now in this point oops.

(03:47:48):
This is a larger point about the religious
kind of fervor around it all. Andre x,
who's been an activist there showing what they've
been doing in the West Bank, says Jerusalem
was being ethnically cleansed. 2 days ago, Mohammed
Kastiro's cafe in central Jerusalem was expropriated
to a to be transferred to settlers.
Guys, this if you think if you have
to assume there must be more to the

(03:48:08):
story, there must be cheating or lying or
that you're wrong. This happens every day in
Israel for no other reason that they happen
to be Palestinian and they happen to be
in a place they don't want them. That's
it.
This guy owns this cafe, and they just
decided they're gonna give it to settlers. And
what are you gonna do about it? You
live in an authoritarian
apartheid state.
You don't have any rights.

(03:48:29):
It says this is a part of a
larger campaign of land appropriation of the city.
This is because of Jerusalem specifically and where
this is going. But first, recognize this happens
every day to Palestinians.
End of story.
Anybody out there pretending like this is not
the reality for people and and making it
out to be something else, you're either

(03:48:50):
a choosing to ignore the facts or lying
for an agenda for Zionism.
Because it's never been more clear, and it's
been documented for decades.
David Icke says this is what's happening to
drive Palestinians out of Jerusalem. Now everywhere, by
the way, but specifically in this case, the
point is about Jerusalem in preparation for the
3rd Solomon's Temple to be built on the

(03:49:12):
site of the Al Aqsa Mosque in line
with the make believe prophecy.
Important.
Because this is kinda the important thing over
the next next few tweets is it's not
about whether it's real.
I mean, it is partly that, but it's
about whether they believe it's real. And that's
clear. They are openly talking about this, the

(03:49:32):
highest levels of power it is real. And
Trump is a prophet according to many of
them.
Dan Cohen points out Marjorie Taylor Greene.
She says the US funding foreign wars is
one big money laundering scheme. It's time to
stop the madness.
They love the float, especially in times like
this. They love to float this and make
it look like they're the same party when
ultimately they're all still in line with the

(03:49:54):
same agendas, and that's what Dan points out.
Marjorie Taylor Greene personally donated to Israel's Temple
Institute, which seeks to destroy the Al Aqsa
compound and replace it with a temple, then
waged genocidal conquest against Christians and Muslims across
the Middle East.
That's the point.
Remember, the whole idea is that the the
Christian world will collapse before the end time.
That's what these Zionists are openly saying. When

(03:50:17):
we just play the clip of them telling
you that the the migration
into Israel into the the western world, Europe,
and the United States is what has to
happen. That's what's been
prophesized.
Now that alone could mean just a small
connected point, unless if it wasn't for people
like Ben Gavir and Smotrich openly pointing and
saying the same things. So can you not
consider republican movement that's been driven to reality

(03:50:39):
by your best ally?
Hope you can.
David Icke highlights this video
of, basically the the as it says in
the beginning, you can see here.
The the red heifer ceremony.
They're getting into the whole prophecy of it
all. It's a 15 minute clip. Watch it

(03:51:00):
all, but it goes over all these different
beliefs, and it's it's it's alarming.
Now David points out Trump's new Israel obsessed
government cannot be seen in context without the
end times prophecy of the 3rd Solomon's Temple
in Jerusalem.
Planned to be built on the current site
of the Al Aqsa Mosque or Temple Mount
to Jews and Christians. Palestinian Muslims
have to be vanquished

(03:51:21):
and removed to do this, which is what
is happening as we speak. And Trump and
and what and what Trump and co plan
to complete
and company.
Trump's transfer of the US embassy from Tel
Aviv to Jerusalem in his first term was
all part of the stepping stones to this
end, which include more formally
the coming of the antichrist

(03:51:44):
and the lunacy of a sacred or sacrificed
red heifer and much else. The revival of
the remember, the red heifer guys, the point
is these are supposed to be, like, organic,
like, that got that a red heifer was
born. That's a sign that the end times
are coming. They literally genetically engineered a red
calf, a red heifer.
That it's the same as all of this.
Zionism is using these ideas. Like, for example,

(03:52:05):
that God was supposed to give them this
territory. Well, no. The UK handed you this.
And so Zionist pretend that's why they chose
the word Israel. This is all a coordinated
effort.
And that's why orthodox Jews are the ones
saying that this is a bastardization of Judaism
because the whole point is that this hasn't
happened yet.
You're playing Jews in regard to what the
what the what god has done. The the

(03:52:26):
end the point is that god has not
done this yet, and that's why the orthodox
Jews are so angry about what Zionism is
doing in some cases.
This is another example. Instead of waiting for
god send sim symbols, they make them. Well,
that's quite a bit different. I mean, guess
you could try to rationalize that that is
what god allowed you to do. The point
is the same as they're manufacturing these symbols.

(03:52:47):
It says the revival of the,
Sanhedrin for the first time in more than
1400 years is relevant to this and is
meant to lead to the imposition globally of
the Noahide laws, which would establish courts and
a legal system to ensure law obedience. The
laws are symbolized by the rainbow image.
It says, see how we've been perceptually,

(03:53:07):
perceptually prepared for that with the rainbow logo
everywhere?
Biblical prophecy is being made to happen, to
make it appear to Jews and Christians that
god is making it happen on the way
to the Masonic age and the Christian second
coming of Jesus. It says you'll note how
Christianity,
not least church of Babylon Roman Catholicism,
has become a central thrust of Trump's team

(03:53:30):
and the hijacked alternative media and acts as
prop as his propaganda arm. He's right. That's
been crazy all of a sudden.
This this forceful overlapping with the your religious
perspective and your your supposed journalism,
which are counterintuitive.
Regardless of what you believe, one's based on
faith, one's based on facts. You can't blend
them together. That will end up contradicting 1

(03:53:51):
or the other.
Trump picks now openly talk about the rebuilding
of the temple. That's Huckabee.
This is all and more than him, actually.
It says this is all gathering support from
Christians, especially Christian Zionists, for Israel and what
Trump plans to give Israel to advance these
made up prophetic happenings. Meanwhile, deep in the
shadows behind the public players,
they know it's all masonic nonsense.

(03:54:14):
Messianic nonsense. But it suits their dystopian ambitions.
Current events are all targeting this 3rd temple
make believe, and people are being primed to
fall for it. The 3rd temple is said
to be the purse the precursor of a
new golden age, and Trump is using the
term. He is. We've heard that already more
than once. It is claimed that a new
golden city of Jerusalem will then become the

(03:54:35):
capital of the world.
This is so right on the surface of
the conversation. It's crazy.
And this is coming from the highest levels
of power in Israel
and now at the highest levels of power
in Trump's administration.
I just don't know why this is not
shockingly concerning for the people in the republican
and conservative side that don't want this or

(03:54:56):
believe this.
And it it's it's all on the surface.
Now Ken O'Keefe makes an excellent point about
this. You may ask, like, what's the point
other than
the prophetic perception? Well, here's an obvious overlap.
As he points out, we've been talking about
for decades, the Greater Israel Project. And, again,
this patch is right on their uniforms for

(03:55:16):
many of them right now,
showing you what they want. And this is
what they want.
That's what this is. Now look at all
the land other than than Israel in there.
All of Jordan,
a huge majority portion of Syria,
Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt. I mean, a whole
bunch of other countries that Israel

(03:55:36):
claims they have a divine right to
take. Now who was that again they were
saying was going to get done with this
and go on and take everybody out? Oh,
that's right. The group they funded, Golda Moss.
Right? Or the Azov Movement, they also fund.
Who's saying this? Weirdly saying the same things.
Can you not see how obvious this is?
As Keith as O'Keefe says, their end goal

(03:55:57):
for the Middle East
while pretending everybody else is doing that.
Now, this is what we can see actually
happening.
So it's already showing you this is part
of it, and this is the continued occupation
or or or
the,
physical taking of the land they already occupy.
Because, remember, occupying doesn't just mean physical boots

(03:56:18):
in the ground, like the control of the
territory.
They've controlled them, and this is an international
fact. From international law, international law, the inter
the human rights groups, no matter what Israel
or the US bleed about, it's obvious and
proven.
As Lonzo points out, western actors were adamant
this would never happen. The the the actual
theft of Gaza

(03:56:39):
itself. It's not about the land, they said.
It's self defense, they claimed.
And when there's 50,000 settlers in Gaza, they'll
stop they'll still pretend like there's no there
are no 50,000 settlers in Gaza because the
west at this point is being gaslit.
But I argue the point is they'll make
up some narrative for it. Right? That they
that they whatever the narrative is will be
justifying the next step, and that's what we're

(03:57:00):
seeing already though. Israeli government is now saying
and this is all public by the way.
It's right here in the clip. You can
listen for yourself. It's been on Israeli media.
What's crazy is how obvious it'll be on
Israeli media and your west meet your the
western media and the western governments will just
act like it's not there, which has to
show you how willfully dishonest they are.
But the Israeli government, and this is Ynet
News, by the way, that's the that's where

(03:57:21):
this image is from,
is now saying clearly, publicly, to the Israeli
press that its policy is permanent reoccupation of
Gaza Strip. Now, again, reoccupation is inaccurate. It
is occupied, has been legally for a long
time, but they're gonna take it physically.
That's on the record now. And we already
told you this. We've been saying this from

(03:57:41):
day 1.
Again, another good example to demonstrate our value
of this platform. I didn't say that because
I was guessing. It was because the evidence
pointed to it. And now where we are,
it is doing so before Trump assumes office,
this is important, to take the option of
retreat off the table.
As always, the Israeli government playing the American
political game like a fiddle.

(03:58:04):
Not least of not not
only because they influence and publicly fund all
of it, but because they can see the
the changeover. All I mean, it's it's all
very clear. Netanyahu has publicly said this
on leaked documents as well as telling stuff
the media about how he can play the
US government.
It says the region to the north of

(03:58:26):
the Nazarom is set for settlements.
This is public. We've been showing you the
settlement conferences. We've been showing you Ben Gavir
dancing with them, talking about we now even
show you the new names for the new
settlements that are supposed to be happening in
Lebanon too.
Meanwhile, the western governments and media just pretend
it's not there.
It's crazy.
Crazy. Crazy.

(03:58:47):
Here is where it's already being sold. We've
also shown you this at least 4 times.
Right now in the United States,
there are Jewish centers
openly selling
land in Gaza.
You don't realize how shockingly illegal that is?
On top of that, they're only selling it
to other Jewish people. There was a guy
who showed up wearing a Palestinian hat

(03:59:09):
who said, we're buying you're selling land. Right?
I'm here to buy land. They wouldn't let
him in the building.
There's and and guess what? No one's ever
been held legally accountable for that. Not only
is that racial discrimination,
it's illegal to sell land that's that's currently
owned by somebody else. I mean, it's just
so crazy. And this is just to show
you how open this is and how much
they think they

(03:59:29):
can act with impunity.
Because I just bought land in Palestine, it
says brag the woman waving a land deed
that she's a she's that as she left
a Kingsley Jewish Center.
Go exterminate you. Fuck you. Get the punches
out of my face. Oh, where's cursing in
this, guys? Prepare yourself. My sister, Courtney, I'm
fucking clown person. Get out. What are you
looking? Get out of here. I have the

(03:59:50):
right to serve her. Stand

(04:00:28):
So whatever your thoughts about the clip in
general, the bottom line is this is illegal
with according to literally everybody with a legal
standing.
They are I mean, think about how crazy
it is to be selling land in the
midst of an ongoing war, whatever you wanna
call it. Genocide is what it is. But
even if you want it's a let's just
say it's a a war between 2 entities,
which is so clearly not.

(04:00:49):
You're not allowed to sell the land of
an ongoing conflict, especially through Jewish centers in
a foreign country.
It is amazing the amount of leeway or
whatever you wanna call this that your government,
the police that are standing there, allow to
happen here. There's just no way to misunderstand
this. It's showing you what's really going on
in every possible sense.
Now here's another example of this, and this

(04:01:10):
is and this this is, Talia James saying,
any media outlets gonna report this or no?
And this is the interesting point of the
same dynamic. We're talking about a place in
New York where they're selling land illegally in
Gaza to only Jewish people in Jewish centers.
Now it says yesterday, the far right pro
Israel extremist
split from a real estate protest

(04:01:32):
and started a fight with 2 lone pro
Palestinian activists after one of them was arrested.
The person with the bike wasn't wasn't stolen,
was also arrested, and the group lied saying
he punched somebody. And all the videos, you
know, you can watch. They highlight who starts
it and so on. It's always very clear
like the Amsterdam point.
Both I and another reporter on the scene
provided footage to officers showing that he did
not punch anyone, but then they said that

(04:01:53):
he couldn't release him. While he was arrested,
we got into contact with an associate and
provided him with the footage to send to
a lawyer. The context is that this was
happening at the tail end of a real
estate protest where a synagogue was hosting an
illegal real estate auction
exclusively to Zionist Jews where they were selling
stolen Palestinian land. Guys, it's they're putting out
flyers.

(04:02:14):
Think about how the the
the impunity you think you have and apparently
have, seeing as how nobody's doing anything about
this. Now there was the guy on Twitter.
I think his his tag is the Muslim
lawyer. He was one of the ones really
calling this out, and seemingly nothing has happened
as far as I could tell, not because
he wasn't trying. It says last time a
real estate event took place here, young pro,

(04:02:34):
Israel protesters harassed not just demonstrators but press,
often making threats of sexual violence and blatant
and racy remarks at anyone they deemed to
be not on their side. And you can
hear them in this video. I'm going to
rape you, and I'm going to rape your
mother.
Good stuff. That's coming from the Israeli side.
Now this one says, yesterday night,
those same younger pro Israel protesters, this is

(04:02:54):
the important part, were wearing and carrying Jewish
Defense League symbols.
Now we just heard the clip from Ian
about the overlapping, the Ergon, Lehi, like, the
the terrorist overlap.
Well, guess what? The JDL, which is the
the the acronym,
is currently considered by Southern Poverty Law Center,
whatever you think about them,
and the

(04:03:15):
FBI to be a right wing terrorist group.
And even the the ADL
considers them a racist and violent group.
And yet you got kids showing up with
JDL symbols on their shirts who are then
going after and fighting other people.
And in regard I mean, this there's something
very dark happening here and only one one

(04:03:36):
really, just one political game. Like, the point
is that people are out there being attacked
and nothing's happening, and people then respond. They
get framed for antisemitism.
We saw this constantly, and there's a point
I'm gonna get into next that's very, very
clear.
But you have to realize, again, to be
clear, this is not about Jewish.
Expect other than the fact that there's Jewish
elements to this, just like we can see

(04:03:57):
with the Christian Zionist. In this exact point,
it is Jewish. It's Jewish Defense League. But
my point is this is a Zionist manipulation
of all of it. Of course, you can
feel free to disagree with that, but I
think the evidence is overwhelming. There are plenty
of Jewish people that stand up even at
these locations and say what you're doing is
wrong. So you can't broad stroke it. That's
the point.
But either way, recognize how alarming this is,

(04:04:19):
and then why it turns people into thinking
it's only about Jewish people and then it
creates what the Zionist entities are trying to
draw.
But it's alarming.
Whatever's driving it that there's such an overwhelming
influence in this country of people acting to
the detriment of this country.
And nobody wants to care about it even
people screaming America first.

(04:04:40):
Now quickly over the Amsterdam point that I
just want to reiterate. I mean, I'm sure
you've seen this by now. But just as
we were covering it, everybody honest was this
has completely imploded. And it's almost perfect based
on what happened because in the beginning,
it was one of the most obvious things
we've talked about. All the evidence was showing
you the same thing. The police stood up
and said the same thing. All the videos,
all the yeah. Okay. And they just lied

(04:05:01):
and all. But all the politicians in Western
media came out and said, George Pilgrim.
And everybody was like, well, you're ridiculous. Here's
all the evidence. Then,
as usually happens in the reactive way, we
got people above them. The police person that
was above him, the his superior came out
and said, no. No. No. They're making this
up, and here's what happened. Well, we all
saw the evidence, so all we will ultimately
got exposed was the influence of Israeli government

(04:05:24):
on these people,
able to pull strings on people at the
higher levels. But guess what? Now it's take
it's come even further.
Even though they did that and just cascaded
back down to this position where the Amsterdam
mayor has now taken back the claims of
pogrom comments
and said that they are the ones starting
the violence
because that's the truth. Now whatever caused that,

(04:05:44):
probably just the fact that everybody was in
her face and all the evidence was there,
and you just it's the opportunism. You have
to realize that you're losing more even if
you accept the the attacks from Israel or
the fact that they may pull you from
your position.
The point being, you recognize you just can't
keep lying because it's more of a detriment.
Here she is speaking about it. I'm just
gonna go through quickly. I hope you can
listen to it if you wanna play it.

(04:06:05):
Amsterdam mayor Halsima now admits no pogrom occurred
in her city, and Israel puts words in
her mouth.
Yeah. Foreign language, anyway. It says we were
completely overtaken by Israel. At 3 AM, Netanyahu
suddenly gave a lecture about what had happened
while we were still gathering the facts.
It's amazing how this happens. It is some

(04:06:27):
this is such an important, like, social engineering
experiment if it wasn't so horrifying with what's
going on because of what they're doing. To
see how clearly,
right on the surface of this, you could
see not only that they lied immediately, usually
that used to be enough, then they pulled
all these strings to get people in positions
of power to lie on top of what
we could see. And then for whatever reason,
that wasn't enough because they're losing influence, and

(04:06:48):
now we're back with the same people who
are going never mind.
That's not true. And they're still screeching about
this online.
Owen Jones includes a new clip. The video
shows Maccabi fans attacking a Dutch citizen who
was then arrested by Dutch police. And it's
very clear that this guy just got mobbed,
beat him up, and then he gets arrested.
Look at that.

(04:07:10):
There's just no questioning this.
Wow. It really is wild how obvious this
is. Asal Rad says, are there any of
the western media outlets that ran wild with
Israel's version of the Amsterdam story gonna cover
this, or are they gonna ignore it because
the it contradicts their entire narrative? It's crazy
that the coverage is coming from Israeli media

(04:07:31):
again.
The Israeli media
exposing the lies of all of Western media
and every US politician. Amsterdam mayor regrets calling
attack on Israeli soccer fans a pogrom.
Amsterdam riots were not pogrom, says mayor defending
Muslim population. Same thing.
Wow.
Ryan Grim points out, oh, good lord. The

(04:07:53):
New York Times, this is actually pretty crazy,
accidentally cc'd
another organization
on an email explaining that the Times had
actually killed
a visual investigation that would have undermined the
paper's line that it was taking on the
Amsterdam fight.
So, again, demonstrating whether it was their own
decision or because Israel was forcing them, both

(04:08:14):
of which I think come from the same
pressure,
that they knew that this was not true.
And instead of putting out the truth, you
know, like an actual investigative paper would,
they just pulled it because they knew it
would contradict what Israel didn't want you to
see. Or contradict what Israel wanted you to
see.
And he goes, he read the full story,
electric and elect electronic and defada cover this

(04:08:34):
really well. New York Times kills investigation of
the hooligans,
and they accidentally called themselves out by ceasing
somebody that exposed it. How embarrassing.
Now another example,
different location, Israeli supporters in tonight's game, it's
on 14th November, between France and Israel, we
talked about this already. And guess what? They
beat up a French man. You've already seen

(04:08:55):
this, but just to add to it in
case you haven't, dozens of masked fans wearing
Israeli flags can be seen laying into them,
and the crowd boos.
It's all and there's 14 videos catching the
same thing. There's not a there's no disputing
what happened. And guess what? No screaming calls
about that.
And here's another example of what they ignore
in other context.
Israeli settlers terrorized,
set fire Israeli terror settler terrorists set fire

(04:09:17):
to several Palestinian owned vehicles in
the West Bank.
Oh, get nobody cares about that apparently. Look
at this. This happens every day.
And Alonzo, Gurumundi says, oh, another program you
won't hear about.
This one,
Times of Israel Reports, IDF. Dozens of mass
settlers carried out arson attacks on Palestinian villages.

(04:09:38):
No arrests made.
Same point.
Here is a really interesting one. I mean,
I'm I have to admit, I'm almost embarrassed
for him. I don't know why. I mean,
I I think it's interesting is the Rebel
News platform
has 596,000
followers.
But look at the reach they're getting on
this stuff.

(04:09:59):
I mean, think about that. Now that that's
I don't think that's all of their content,
but it's pretty clear that most people have
recognized how
unabashedly, blindly pro Israel this platform is.
Zionist, for the most part. Like, just aggressively
in the interest of, like, lying. Things like
this. Now this, we already saw. You remember
this?
Todd says that I saw the video. A

(04:10:19):
100% lie. Zionist are liars. Jewish Yale student
journalists stabbed in the eye, says New York
Post. How New York Post has showed themselves
to be just especially for pro Israel stuff,
just the worst.
Stabbed in the eye, they write. Can't you
do any due diligence, or did you not
care? Buy a Palestinian flag. Well, guess what?
Here's the video.
Remember this?

(04:10:43):
I'm
gonna cut oh, here it comes.
A flag briefly brushes
right here. That's it.
And by the way, you can tell that's
a hand flag, like a like a one
handed small flag. It's not even a real
large flag.
And she goes, oh, yeah. You got my
eye.
You stabbed me, she says. Clearly meant this

(04:11:05):
was something they were hoping for. Now, what's
funny about it
is here she is the next day.
Oh, weird. I don't see I don't even
see a blemish. And you know what it
is? I'm sure that her and Donald Trump
share the same plastic surgeon. Right? There's no
mark, but they have a great plastic surgeon.
So it just took a couple of days.

(04:11:26):
You get the joke. The point is it's
embarrassing. This is not Piers Morgan for crying
out loud. And not a one of them
has the courage to go, wait a minute.
You don't have anything wrong with your eye.
So how exactly could you be stabbed in
the eye?
It's a good question. The point was it
was a complete fabrication.
So here is ever Ezra Levant, I guess,
just recreating that lie.
This is pretty embarrassing, I have to admit.

(04:11:49):
He freaks out.
Here is the actual clip.
Look at that.
That's that's flag. That's not even poll. That's
just flag brushing her head.
I can't believe that they're this
willing to just make I mean, the weekend

(04:12:09):
look. They posted that. Now look. Even if
you wanna pretend that the flagpole brushed the
top of her head, you can clearly see
that it was not hard. And even then,
fine. Make it about assault when they the
flagpole touched the top of your head. This
is how childish we're going to be. Like,
the reality is clearly you guys are trying
desperately to make this into something.
You're

(04:12:30):
getting in my face now, sir. Are you
gonna arrest me?
If I have to. So she was assaulted.
You're not gonna arrest the guy who assaulted
her, but you're gonna arrest me for asking
you questions about an assault? I think. Oh,
he's so tough. He's such a tough guy.
Guy, this is such grandstanding BS.
I mean, it really should make you laugh
at these people that you're gonna make it
out. You saw. That's the flat tip. I've

(04:12:51):
watched the whole video. It's about that flag
that you just saw brush the top of
that person's head, and they're gonna make it
about assault on the full defying. I mean,
guys, we already went through this.
I just I'm just I'm embarrassed for them,
and this is what we're dealing with.
Willful deception.
Now
let's get into some more coverage of what's

(04:13:12):
going on in Israel and Gaza as well
as Lebanon.
Now this is just I mean, stuff you
always already know.
The reality of this has never it's only
gotten worse and has only continued to increase
in the same direction. The evidence has always
been clear pretty much from the very beginning
of this.
And here we
are. Over a year later, they're still committing

(04:13:33):
genocide. They're still committing
murder daily.
Now this is from 17th,
just in 24 hours. And how many times
have I reported these things over the last
year?
Almost every day.
In the last 24 hours, a 117
Palestinian civilians.
Civilians lost their lives
because they're continuing to murder these people while

(04:13:55):
people are looking elsewhere.
Here is antiwar.com.
More than a 100 Palestinians in Gaza killed
by Israeli forces in one day.
Here is Francesca Albanese highlighting one of the
hardest things in this whole conversation is the
not just the doctors, but just the fact

(04:14:16):
that when you can rule prove in real
time the innocent good like the not just
the innocent, but the good natured people, like
these doctors that have been trying to help
innocent people,
and how they were not just taken,
not just killed,
but even according to the reports coming from
Sky News that this doctor
was likely raped to death.
It's not a joke.

(04:14:36):
Francisco Albaneseo and Rapporteur
likely raped to death. And I'll play the
video for you in a second. A doctor,
a stellar surgeon for one of them apparently,
one of the most well known in Gaza.
He embodied the of the embodiment of Palestinian
ethics,
likely raped to death.
The western the racism of western media who
are not covering this and western politicians who

(04:14:56):
are not denouncing this together with a 1,000
other testimonies and allegations of rape and other
forms of mistreatment and torture that Palestinians have
suffered in Israeli jails is absolutely
sickening.
Now I'm gonna play the clip for you.
It's a 15 minute clip, but I want
you to I'm gonna play just a couple
parts of it. But recognize that this person
is somebody who is pretty beloved in this

(04:15:17):
area, who is kind of renowned for his
compassion for people that were in the hospital.
He randomly got taken
from Al Shefa when that was happening,
and they've never heard from him again until
they later got more information about what happened
to him.
Just about everybody

(04:15:38):
in Gaza knew doctor Adnan Albusch.
The longtime surgeon
was known and venerated
for his empathy and warmth
while his surgical skills were honed by war.
This is the recovery room. Full darkness. No

(04:15:58):
water. No electricity.
But we have a hero,
surgeons, and Gaza.
He was a lovely fellow. He was always
smiling.
He was very friendly. He was very outgoing,
but he was aware of his responsibilities.
After Hamas launched its brutal assault 13 months

(04:16:20):
ago,
Israel
unleashed its firepower to devastating
effect.
To devastating effect.
And as an orthopedic specialist,
Albus was in demand

(04:16:41):
dealing with broken limbs and broken bodies in
Northern Gaza
while recording the surroundings
on his mobile phone.
However, the Israeli said medical facilities
were used by Hamas,
and Albersch was detained by their forces last

(04:17:02):
December.
And I can my opinion, because he was
filming, because he was showing what was happening.
That's the whole dynamic, and I'll play some
clips again for a second from Nick Maynard
who pointed out what he saw happened to
these people. All this comes further together with
even more evidence when you can point back
at what Nick and others who are foreign
doctors from other countries who are there,

(04:17:23):
who have testified to them taking and executing
doctors in front of them, watching it happen,
and still we don't have any accountability. The
point is this is one of those people.
Friends and loved ones never saw him again.
However, the Israeli said medical facilities

(04:17:44):
were used by Hamas,
and Al Bursch was detained by their forces
last December.
Friends and loved ones never saw him again.
Hundreds of medical workers have died or disappeared
in Gaza. But Sky News has tracked down

(04:18:05):
people who knew doctor Albusch,
people who worked with him, who witnessed
his treatment.
An eminent surgeon who was subjected to repeated
physical attacks.
That is the claim.
He was so so badly,
now I'm gonna jump ahead. I recommend you
watch the whole thing.

(04:18:28):
Harsh. A point emphasized by the prison service
when this Israeli television crew were taken for
a tour.
They're all Really quickly to remember that this
I'm not gonna get into it, but you
can see in this cut they get to
the point of the was it said Tianan?
They show it right there.
And what and this is where he was

(04:18:49):
taken. Right? He was literally taken to the
prison where we know for certain people were
being raped by the by the by the
IDF, by the prison guards, all on the
record now. And even in Israeli media, they
were arguing and debating and fighting for the
right the
the
ability to rape prisoners.
Like, it's incredible that we even have to
talk about that. And so the point is

(04:19:11):
to recognize that in this conversation, they go
over all that you can see, that the
kidnapping,
the taking of them from these locations, the
torturing of them, and they they mentioned right
in this point about the sexual violence. For
long periods,
and allegations of physical, mental, and sexual abuse
are rife.
Now I'm gonna get into just the the
point at the end when they discuss this.

(04:19:36):
They're all murderers, all terrorists,
said the deputy commander.
Although many of these prisoners
haven't been charged.
Sky News can reveal new information about Albersch's
death.
Human rights lawyer Nadia Daka has obtained a
deposition from a prisoner who says he witnessed

(04:19:58):
the moments leading up to the doctor's death.
He had clearly been assaulted,
with injuries around his body. He was naked
in the lower part of his body.
The prison guard threw him in the middle
of the yard and left him there.
The deposition says Al Borscht was taken by
an inmate to one of the cells.

(04:20:19):
A few minutes later,
prisoners were heard screaming from the room they
went into declaring doctor Adnan El Borscht, have
been martyred.
Adnan El Borsch was not the first
case of a person who was who was
beaten and died in the prisons since this
war. My god.
Can you even imagine having this as a

(04:20:40):
normal conversation?
Anybody else,
Russia, China, the UK, anybody,
how in the world are we in this
position?
How does that not show you everything you
need to know?
Before him were many and many cases.
The Israel Defense Forces told Sky News that
the death of doctor Al Busch was not

(04:21:02):
its responsibility.
Now, again, make sure you're hearing this. They're
not denying this happened. They're accepting it and
acting like it doesn't matter.
It's all on the record.
The fact that they tossed his body naked
from the waist down out in the middle
of the yard. I mean, this is this
is somebody who's never been charged with a
crime. That should be, more than anything, for
the people pretending like where's the process? Where's

(04:21:24):
the democracy?
But on top of that, realize
this is a doctor who was
taken, never charged,
tortured,
thrown out in the middle. I mean, it's
just it's incredible
that we can't recognize how alarmingly obvious this
is for those that can't. I'm of the
mind that most everybody sees this. Even the
one even the those denying it, they see

(04:21:45):
it too.
The Israel prison service
has also denied responsibility
for the death of the doctor.
In a statement, it said, all basic rights
required are fully applied by professionally trained prison
guards.
We are not aware of the claims you
described. And as far as we know, no
such events have occurred under IPS

(04:22:07):
responsibility.
Now to be clear, that's your basic denial
statement no matter what. Like, we have you'll
have video of them doing it like we've
seen before, and they'll still come out with
the denial statement, which by the way happened
with the rape conversation. My point is to
say that they're all would deny everything. My
point is that you have the evidence from
the prisons, the statements from the prisoners, the
evidence from the prison itself and the guards

(04:22:29):
involved. It's all very easy to prove.
That's why Sky News is covering it. The
point is that you'll always get the denial.
Some people might say some people will say
that
doctor Adnan Albersch was a terrorist.
Like, if I want to to answer formally
to this question, he was not charged

(04:22:51):
till now, and many of these detainees are
not charged from Gaza.
Doctor Albersh leaves his wife, Yasmin,
along with 6 children.
They've been displaced by the war and currently
live in the remnants of a school in
Central Gaza.
The doctor's pictures now adorn the wall, and

(04:23:12):
they've got his old phone messages,
but that won't bring him back.
Doctor Mohammed O'Baid was detained by the Israeli

(04:23:33):
military
3 weeks ago along with several other medical
staff.
Doctors Without Borders says it is extremely alarmed
and is trying to determine his status and
location.
Meaning they don't know where he is.
Another one, which by the way is in
string a long string of doctors from the
moment this started. And well before that, I'd

(04:23:55):
like one of a countless number Yep. That
have been buried under the immovable weight of
Gaza's recent past.
Now, again, from the report coming from Sky
News,
raped to death likely is the point. But
based on the evidence, based on the reports,
based on being naked and thrown out, the
point is clearly

(04:24:16):
what's going on here
from this person's personal experience to the ongoing
occupation of Palestine? There is no denying what's
happening. There is simply just pretending you don't
see it.
It's everywhere.
And I'll include this, and I put this
at the bottom of the this the doctor
thread.
The ongoing threat of what? 40 different doctors

(04:24:38):
at this point. All of them telling you
what they've seen in Gaza, and yet still
and almost every one of them in the
threat and threat here are not, as I
say, for the last one, are not doctors
from Gaza. They're international doctors that are there
and testify to what they've seen. And still,
not that it should matter any more or
less,
nonetheless, it is still being ignored.
So take this into conjunction with or, you

(04:24:58):
know, in in
I guess that were the same point that
works, but just keep keeping them in the
same
consider what doctor Maynard is saying here, and
recognize that what he's pointing to is what
we're acknowledging happened. We're just coming to the
fruition of it, recognizing it was taken from
Al Shefa. Maynard saw this go down, some
of them,
and he's dead now.

(04:25:19):
He was never charged with a crime, was
not a terrorist,
simply was a Palestinian and and a a
good doctor as well as as as we're
as we're told.
Every single part of the hospital has been
destroyed.
The whole infrastructure of the hospital has been
destroyed. When I spoke to Marwan yesterday, he
told me there were a 107 patients
sitting in the hospital, 60 medical staff.

(04:25:42):
God only knows what has happened to them.
I think we've seen some of the pictures.
Surgeons I know have been executed,
in the last 48 hours there.
Bodies have been discovered,
in the last 12 to 24 hours with
who have been handcuffed
with their arms behind their back,
and so there is no doubt at all
that that multiple health care workers have been

(04:26:05):
executed there in the last few days. Ex
you believe executed by whom, doctor?
By the Israeli Defense Force.
Why would they seek to execute surgeons and
medical professionals?
Well, they've been doing it since October 7th.
Over 450
health care workers have been killed. Friends of
mine that I have worked with over the
years,

(04:26:26):
many have been abducted as well, and nothing
has been heard of them since. So there
is no doubt in my mind, and I've
I I I I can bear witness from
this from my time at Al Aqsa Hospital
and from talking to people that there's been
direct targeting of the health care
system in
Gaza, direct targeting of hospitals,

(04:26:46):
and multiple killings of health care workers. Any
death is tragic, but this is not and
I say again, anyone dying in any sense.
So this is not, and please don't be
upset by this expression, collateral damage. This is
specifically targeted, you're saying, medical professionals by the
IDF to be taken off and executed is
your belief?
Most certainly. That is my belief.

(04:27:07):
Have you at any time seen anything that
leads you would lead you to believe that
there had been terrorists who were hiding in
the hospital? Without
exception, every single one has responded to say
they have never witnessed any Hamas militants in
the hospitals they have worked in.
So he's clearly referencing one of these people

(04:27:28):
we're talking about.
I mean, I almost can't stand how even
the response in this guy's conversation at least
he's having him on to talk about it.
But his response being, you know, executed by
who, doctor? You know, why why would they
do that? Well, it's I mean, why I
don't know. Would you ask that if told
if you were told Thomas executed somebody?
The point is that we can easily see
that there's any number of reasons or justifications

(04:27:49):
why. The point is that they're not supposed
to that is outlandish to them that they
that's part of the propaganda.
So I'll include these articles about Al Shefa
that we did back in back when this
was the focal point. Israel caught lying about
al Shefa hospital. And this is what they
used to justify all the killings. Reveal that
the that Israel, in fact, built the command
center and tunnel under the Shefa hospital. It's
public information, by the way.

(04:28:11):
And I'll play this as well.
When were you in Gaza?
End of April for the 1st couple weeks,
and then there's sniper bullets. I have children
that were shot twice. What you're saying that
children in Gaza are being shot by snipers?
Definitively.
I have 2 children that I have photographs
of that were shot so perfectly in their
chest, I couldn't put my stethoscope over their

(04:28:32):
heart more accurately
and directly on the side of the head
in the same child. No toddler gets shot
twice by mistake by the world's best sniper,
and they're dead center shots.
In fact, more than 20 doctors recently in
Gaza
also told Sunday morning about gunshot wounds to
children.

(04:28:54):
One American doctor told us he even reviewed
CT scans to confirm what he saw because
he, quote, didn't believe that this many children
could be admitted to a single hospital
with gunshot wounds to the head.
Some shootings
have been captured on video.
So of all the disaster zones you've seen,

(04:29:17):
how does Gaza compare?
All of the dis disasters I've seen combined
combined. 40 mission trips 30 years,
ground 0,
earthquakes.
All of that combined
doesn't equal
the level of carnage
that I saw against civilians

(04:29:38):
in just my 1st week in Gaza.
Yeah. I don't have the heart right now
to watch him choke up about that again.
And on top of that, just realize what
he you know, it's
he everything he's saying, that it's it's backed
up by all the evidence, but other people
are pointing out. And, really, what he goes
on to say, asking about children, how many?
Almost exclusively
children.
And how he, even somebody like that who's

(04:30:00):
been seeing all these horrible.
He chokes up talking about what he's seen
there, and it kills me every time. Well,
here is continuing evidence of that can that's
still happening to this very day. This is
November 16th. The Israeli army has abducted 5
orthopedic surgeons from Gaza whose fate remains unknown.
God forbid, we find hopefully, we do not
find out that they end up being raped

(04:30:21):
to death from some torture prison in the
next so many months.
But sadly, this seems to be the fate
for people or possibly
in occupied Palestine.
I mean, this is what they want you
to believe, or you they're just they're making
it well, here, I'll make the point with
the next one. This is what we keep
seeing. This monster,
the Zionist manipulator is out there going, this

(04:30:42):
is what defeat looks like. Massive Hamas surrender.
How many times can they do this?
Think about what that must mean. The the
what win do you think you're gonna gain
by knowingly lying about this to, what, convince
Jane's soccer mom to think that, oh, look.
They're defeated.
What is that gonna do for you? The
reality being that you can prove that's not
what you're looking at with this picture. And
on top of that, that they've done this

(04:31:02):
before. Mossad commentary and the rest, they go,
look at all these monsters and terrorists that
surrendered. And then 30 seconds later, you can
prove that they all got released because most
of them are doctored,
which does happen sometimes.
The point is,
the truth of this is that these are
a bunch of doctors
and just like we just saw, orthopedic surgeons,
men with crutches,

(04:31:23):
yeah, quite the Hamas operatives.
Mohammed Safa points out Israel took patients out
of hospital as a hostage, beaten during the
cold winter, naked and blindfolded,
the Gaza holocaust,
every time.
On top of this, he says, it is
self defense when you bomb tents of displaced

(04:31:43):
people in a so called safe zone in
Gaza.
Apparently, in in there is no Gaza.
They're not even trying to make up excuses
anymore.
Alan McLeod points out a truly psychotic argument.
This is what you're getting from the Jewish
news syndicate.
The word, in quote, Palestine

(04:32:04):
is genocide.
No. No. Not the actual genocide that they're
committing, but saying the word Palestine bats the
genocide. Don't mind the murdered children behind the
curtain.
I don't I don't even know what they
how the the gall they have to put
this out there
as well as the one you've already seen.
We pointed this out a while ago.
This is an actual article rationalizing the horrors

(04:32:25):
of Israel's war in Gaza. And it says,
the novelist Howard Jacobson has argued that too
much press coverage of dead Palestinian children
is a new form of blood libel against
Jews.
Think about how ludicrous that is.
Now in case you might be willing to
think that couldn't be real, because it is

(04:32:45):
absurd,
here's the actual article.
Too much press coverage of dead children is
a blood libel against Jews.
What What that even has to do with
Jews, I have no idea. The point is,
other than their narrative about how this is
all about Jews, the point is you're talking
about murdered children.
And Israel's government killing those children to halt
to to acknowledge that too much

(04:33:07):
is against Jews.
This is the kind of flailing desperation we've
seen from this
for a long time now.
Now here's that visitor guide 24 account, which,
by the way, has
1,100,000
followers. Thanks, Elon Musk. That's what that's what's
causing this to be. The point is this
is a platform that is not a news
organization. It is an egregiously dishonest platform that

(04:33:28):
lies about Israel, like, as a job, and
has already been caught many, many times lying
in this exact way, including when they had
an interest to lie to you about what's
going on in Venezuela.
Don't forget, with Elon Musk supporting that guy,
that guy and the woman with him were
being
they reached out to Netanyahu
asking for a regime change in Venezuela. It's
on the record. We talked about it in

(04:33:49):
the show. They actually publicly put this out
there.
That's why Netanyahu and the rest of them
and Elon Musk are all in the same
direction, along with senator with Blinken and and
Biden and the rest of your government because
they're all in the same direction.
The point is they were all lying about
Venezuela. Here they are saying Gaza's population has
actually increased by 2%.

(04:34:09):
I'm not making this up for the podcast.
It says or 43,000
people since October 7th. So they genuinely want
you to believe, because apparently the world fact
book says so,
that their population has increased by 2%.
Now, obviously,
that's not just absurdly offensive, but the fact
that as
the near here points out, the actual death

(04:34:31):
toll of Gaza is unknown,
which is we all know that right now
because there's estimate. The estimate because all the
buried people under the rubble and so on.
Look, I mean, think about what craziest to
argue. What they're saying here is that it's
increased by 2% because that must mean nobody's
dying.
So now they're the they're literally
like, what this whole game about how you're
not allowed to deny world events that you
know, public violent world events like 911 on

(04:34:53):
YouTube. These people are literally all publicly going,
there's no there's no famine. It's all a
hoax. Apparently, there is no genocide. Not even
nobody's even dying. They're actually gaining in population.
What about all the dead people that Israel
is showing? What about all the people being
killed that their own people are posting on
Twitter and TikTok?
But the point is,
the estimates ranging from over a 140,000

(04:35:15):
more deaths than currently reported,
but or, you know, to the number being
cited is, what, 50,000 or whatever it is.
But the fact that they can't even define
that, and it says, therefore, the current population
in Gaza can't be reported with an inaccuracy
of 43,000.
But how do you know they're a Hasbar
or a platform? Because they're making stupid statements
like this. Or you can go back and
prove they lied about the famine or lied

(04:35:37):
about a bakery being opened or lied about
Venezuela or lied about whatever currently suits the
interest of the Israeli government.
But think about how gross that is.
Here's Herets from Israel. Gaza will soon face
famine.
UN backed report says,
EU top diplomat accused Israel of provoking hunger
because it's quite obvious what's happening.

(04:35:57):
I wanted to point out this in regard
to the overlap
to ISIS that happens to be
important for the Israel conversation.
This person points out this should not be
a surprise to anyone. ISIS
is a US Zionist creation, which it is.
Easy to prove. To begin with, to sow
division and create chaos,
both in your countries, whoever's listening, and anywhere
else in the world. And so I hope

(04:36:17):
all of you are understanding what really happened
in Syria as the US hegemonic
foot, front tried to overthrow a government which
supported Palestinian Liberation.
Mohammed Shehada points out,
Israel is aiding ISIS linked terrorists and criminals
to sow chaos and famine in Gaza.
Shadi al Sofi, a wanted murderer and son

(04:36:38):
of an informant collaborator with Israel, and Yasser
Abu Shabab, a drug dealer, are the main
warlords responsible for looting most aid under IDF
protection.
And just remember, this is not a secret
story. This is horets.
The Israeli army is allowing
gangs in Gaza to loot aid trucks and

(04:36:59):
extort protection fees from drivers.
See how easy it is to manufacture this?
Then you get all the morons like Federman
that come out and point and go, look.
We told you Hamas was taking the aid.
Even if it was, are you meaning Hamas
that Israel funds?
Or pretend that's still not the case?
The bottom line is it's publicly reported by
Israeli media that the Israeli government is working
with these gangs to take it. That's now

(04:37:21):
been publicly revealed, and the West doesn't know
where we're missing it or we're confused or
they're lying to you.
His point is they're working with this under
idea of protection, just like with the settlers.
They formed gangs of over 200 armed criminals
and, quote, established a military like compound per
the United Nations
in an empty death zone fully under the

(04:37:42):
IDF control where they looted only this Saturday
night about a 108 trucks at once.
And you have Israeli
IDF members laughing and posting videos about stuff
like this. It says this way, Israel can
absolve itself of responsibility for its deliberate starvation
policy in Gaza and say, look. We're letting
aid in. It's a mosque. It's their fault.
The food doesn't reach people. The lie and,

(04:38:03):
again, as claimed by senator Fetterman playing his
complete role. Whether he's even posting these things
or not or just handing it to a
Zionist out asset.
IDF soldiers never fired at those gang members
as they loot aid right in front of
Israeli tanks and troops in a closed military
zone that no Ghazan is allowed into.
Oops. The IDF only fires at local policemen

(04:38:25):
whenever they try to prevent the looting, claiming
that they're Hamas. See how stupid this all
is? And realize this is publicly reported by
Israeli media. The UN has acknowledged this. It's
obvious.
The point though is getting into the ISIS
overlap in this first way that I find
really revealing.
And don't forget all these past examples

(04:38:45):
of the captured ISIS entity that was actually
a Israeli Mossad agent. Even,
Whitney wrote about this from Impress News
or this interesting point that we've showed you
before.
IDF chief finally acknowledges Israel supplied weapons to
Syrian rebels or gave them medical treatment or,
you know, the bigger reality that they have
actually created this proxy element that we call

(04:39:05):
Al Qaeda, ISIS, and whatever else. Not to
say they're completely in control of all of
it, sort of like Hamas overlap. That's how
this works. But they are influencing it and
can and guiding action in some cases. Now
whether that's how it works with Hamas today
is up for debate.
But we have to be honest about the
fact that they were funding them and influencing
them in order to keep them divided.
But I do believe that's changed since Putin

(04:39:25):
since 2006.
But don't forget, this is obvious, even in
Ukraine, which they're also funding. I've shown you
this video many times. It's from the cradle.
The Associated Press actually published footage of a
Ukrainian unit commander who was wearing an ISIS
patch.
It's very public, and you can see this
in many different examples.
There he is right there. This is not
it's not some kind of manipulated thing. It

(04:39:47):
was public on mainstream corporate media, and they
tried to hide after the fact.
They're working alongside both the US intelligence as
well as Mossad in these locations.
It's public information, guys. You just gotta care
to look at it.
Now I'll include these these two shows where
I go into this specific overlap to that
main point, but also as it applies to
what they call ISIS k, which is what

(04:40:08):
I think is kind of the next the
Afghanistan element of where they're going next. So
the point is this is supposed to be
the new ISIS element, which you can literally
prove
possibly doesn't even exist. It's sort of like
a cutout they're using to fulfill this role,
but it's basically controlled by the same things.
2 different shows.
So talking about that in the context of

(04:40:29):
what they're doing, the Israeli occupation, and this
is on 17th, commits a new massacre by
targeting a group of humanitarian aid workers again
in con Eunice. Barely I mean, not even
barely. I don't even think that breached the
mainstream corporate media.
Who cares? Right? World Central Kitchen. We're just
gonna keep murdering aid workers and pretend like
it's a mosque because it's easier.
The truth is you can prove this stuff

(04:40:50):
as we're talking about.
Here, it says 2 bakeries
serving over 700,000
Palestinians have now announced they will not be
they won't be able to supply anything
the next day because of the flour shortage
being created by Israel.
All these hungry people
in the middle of a famine, and I
pointed out, now watch as the button paid
for Western media tries to gaslight everyone to

(04:41:11):
thinking that this was anything other than Israeli
agenda.
The Israeli army
is allowing this to happen.
But that's exactly what happened after that. They
started calling it, like Fetterman did, Hamas or
somebody else. Drop site news reports
last week that Israel has armed these gangs
in Gaza, enabling them to hijack the aid
shipments. Now this is a reporter from in

(04:41:33):
Gaza. On top of everything else coming from
Israeli media as well as the UN, how
much can we ignore?
Hijacking aid shipments to resell them at stole
the Soles' supplies
at exorbitant prices. These gangs, he reported, operate
under protection of Israeli quadcopters.
Abed emphasized that Israel has systematically targeted and
killed civilian local security forces responsible for safeguarding

(04:41:55):
the aid. However, he noted that these officers
are not Hamas. By eliminating them and enabling
gangs to create chaos, Israel shifts blame for
aid disruptions onto the resulting disorder. In reality,
it is Israel's actions that are directly undermining
aid distribution.
This is on, on Aya Batrahi
saying UN agencies say more than a 108

(04:42:17):
trucks of food in Gaza are being attacked
by armed looters.
So it's easy to point to this and
say Hamas,
but it's not. And we can prove this,
especially because of Israeli media. It's one of
the worst looting incidents in more than a
year.
World Food Food Program says it's assessing the
future operations, which is how this works.
They're both they for them and UNRWA told

(04:42:37):
NPR the food convoy supplies are supposed to
enter southern Gaza on Sunday, but it was
instructed by Israeli's military on short notice to
enter a day earlier through a, quote, alternate
and unfamiliar route. Why do you think that
is? See, this is important.
That's where it got stolen. So they rerouted
to a location where they know they can
control the dynamic. They there's nobody's gonna see
what's happening. But the story got out either

(04:42:58):
way, but this was about trying to get
it it's so clear what's going on.
They want them to go in a route
where they can control how this takes place.
They allowed it to get looted rapidly. All
100 trucks, boom, and they blame it on
somebody else. Drivers hurt, trucks damaged, food stolen.
It says the attack the attack highlights a
key challenge in delivering food to Gaza's starving
population as Israel frequently attacks police there, deeming

(04:43:19):
them part of a mosque. Out of 8
bakeries in Central Gaza, 4 shut down in
recent days, 4 other critically low on flour.
At this point, they're no longer able to
do it.
Read the article for yourself from Haratz directly
or any number of other provable out like,
facts that it's being reported. They question them
like anything else.
The point being is it's not some fringe
thing you can't verify is being reported. This

(04:43:39):
is Haratz reporting this,
giving you the background to say what they're
doing and that you can back this up
with video. You can back this up with
the United Nations.
Sure. All even then, even certainly could be
with some, but realize that what we're seeing
is all actively adding up with what they've
been doing from day 1.
Same thing here. Under

(04:43:59):
so Federman comes out and says, the truth
in Gaza. Hamas steals aid and sells it
to their own people.
Either he's this stupid, which is certainly possible,
or he's actively lying to you for another
country. Probably both.
I just and and, of course, he gives
you a screenshot
because why give you an article to read?
Because maybe that'll give you more information.
Large food convoy, violent eluded, unrisses.

(04:44:21):
Right? So you're now are you are you
see, you could've even used a better image.
So you're telling me the people that you
think are stealing it are telling people that
are getting stolen from?
That lines up, Fetterman. Like, this is just
lazy.
The truth is he knows he's not gonna
give you the link because if you read
the link, it'll make it clear that it's
not ultimately that we don't know or that
it's rather it's just not definitively Hamas.

(04:44:41):
And I said anything else is real? Or
excuse me. I mean, anything else, Fetterman?
Even after being shown the facts, you will
still lie for a foreign country.
It's the truth.
Now another great article from 972 Magazine says
the not so secret history of Netanyahu's support
for Hamas.
That's the other point, is that he's simply
pointing at Hamas taking it. And my point
was, well, even if that's the case, Hamas

(04:45:02):
is being funded by Israel.
Not to say that means they control everything
going on today, because I don't think they
do. But that has to be reported as
part of what's going on. There's a reason
they're so desperately trying to ignore that. But
here's another article that goes over the longer
history from 972.
Saying from sabotaging Oslo, which we talked about
a lot, to funneling Qatar cash to Gaza.

(04:45:23):
Netanyahu, quote, has spent his career bolstering Hamas
to help perpetuate
the conflict.
Another great article from another Israeli platform.
Oh, I think, hold on.
Might have lost it, actually.
Yep.
Stupid. Oh, there we go. I just simply
said in case I missed something I was
writing. Yeah. This is this is important to

(04:45:44):
say. So I said, great article. This in
no way, though, invalidates the legal right of
armed resistance
per the Geneva Conventions.
Because I there's more than once I've gotten
that argument thrown at me that I'm somehow
undermining this point. I mean, I I think
the facts are what matter. Even if it
does, the facts are still the facts, and
that's the truth. But I'm not saying that
to somehow invalidate the active armed resistance even
if Hamas literally works for Israel because it

(04:46:06):
would still be protected active armed resistance.
Even though the crimes that were committed, like
taking those children, were still crimes.
It says just adds insight into Israel's many
attempts to sabotage
any possibility of a 2 state solution that
it's pretended to want for decades.
Here's Philip Lazzarini
who says that if Israel does effectively ban

(04:46:27):
UNRWA,
possibility responsibility
for providing aid and services to Palestinian refugees
will return to the occupying power,
Israel.
For those at the back, Israel is currently
committing genocide against the Palestinian people.
So this is all by design. And they
know very well what UNRWA is and why
it needs to be there. They love to
pretend it's just some kind of terrorist organization.
It is the right of return.

(04:46:49):
What Israel in previous discussions that are so
long past they think you don't know, many
don't,
have agreed to, to give them their territory
back because that's the legal dynamic of international
law. Many of them still have the keys.
UNRA is keeping track of those things,
but they have no designs to give back.
That's why now they're all saying we're taking
Northern Gaza for sure for, you know, again.

(04:47:09):
But as the, for, French press agency report,
there is no plan b to UNRWA in
Palestinian territories.
So when that happens, that means Israel is
good. They're gonna remove any the last
barely connected efforts to keep this going,
which will be
the last I mean, that will drive them
into something much darker, which if that's even
possible, what that looks like.

(04:47:30):
Rami Abdul from the Bureau of Med Human
Rights Group says field execution, starvation, and ethnic
cleansing in Northern Gaza. Another main report, and
I believe this is the, Middle East, what's
it called again?
Grabbed real quick. Forget what this is called,
the International Middle East Media Center.
And there's another report backing up the reality
of what they're doing.

(04:47:51):
Now there is a good thread
discussing the I'm gonna just for just for
time, I'm gonna go past this because I'm
gonna wrap this up here. But the point
being, all drop site news doing great work
in general, but lately about this topic, showing
you the blink in the ongoing effort, the
Biden administration to place all the blame for
the lack of ceasefire on Hamas as usual
despite all the evidence.

(04:48:11):
They are really desperate. There's no way around
it. Like, they're just
blatantly lying about things that they know we
can all prove.
And, again, I'll and this is not just
because this is the one article. I tend
to do this as we go past these
topics that I feel are just, like, so
shockingly clear.
Let's use it as a reference point. But
realize, this is just one of many. This
is a Heretz article. How Netanyahu has systematically
foiled talks to release hostages from captivity.

(04:48:34):
There's been a whole endless articles from Herets,
from Times of Israel,
from Israeli
individuals
publicly speaking online, telling you that is that
Netanyahu
has been refusing this. He's been sabotaging this
from day 1. We know this. If you
care, look at the facts.
Now Ben Reeves points out that 2 aid
trucks entered the the starvation zone. This is

(04:48:55):
16th according to tah tah tahrez.
In Northern Gaza for the first time in
a month and a half,
reaching a school turned shelter. So that alone
is crazy. Now the first time in a
month and a half to where people are
starving.
Israeli soldiers then prevented the Gazans from reaching
that food and then set the shelter on
fire and burned the aid down with it.

(04:49:17):
This is literally another article written by the
leading Israeli media platform.
Do you realize what they're reporting there? That
even in the midst of this, while they're
pretending 8 groups are taking it, when they're
facilitating that, then
this can only be seen as a sadistic
torturous effort
to pretend
to give them some,
but then take it. Snatch it out of

(04:49:38):
their mouth right before they get it, burn
it down.
That is
I I don't even know if there's a
word strong enough for that.
If you wanna torture them or kill them,
they could just or rather they just wanna
just starve them and kill them, but they
have to make it that much more work
that much worse. They have to deliver the
food in front of you and then take
it and burn it down.
I just don't know. That's so sickening to

(04:49:59):
me.
This is what Zionists are doing.
And even their own media is pointing this
out for you.
Here is a UN member telling you what's
going on.
How was Israel
able to starve
2,300,000
Palestinians in Gaza so quickly and so completely?

(04:50:27):
We have never seen in modern history
this this speed
of starvation
ever. Of course, this doesn't start in October
7. You can go back multiple points in
time. From 2000
to 2023,
Israel has profound degree of control control over
Gaza. And it's like a faucet that you
tighten and loosen. And they would make sure

(04:50:47):
that peep
the Palestinians in Gaza were just hungry enough
Mhmm.
To not raise alarms. I mean, they have
articles where they've publicly quoted what they're saying.
Just enough calories to survive. That in of
itself is a crime.
More documented throughout history than you can ever

(04:51:09):
imagine. If you're just catching on to this
because of post October 7th,
have a good time looking back at the
horrifying realities of the last 76 years that
are all on the record, and yet somehow
we never talked about it. They were counting
calories
and measuring what is allowed in to make
sure that everyone remained hungry in Gaza, but
not so hungry that it raised alarm bells

(04:51:30):
in the international humanitarian,
world. Right. Think about how think about how
sinister that is.
So you you can't just murder them or
kill them. Like, that's a whole genocide point
they're trying to debate online. If they wanted
to kill them worse, they could do it.
That that's how we know it's not genocide.
That's absurd point that's going around right now.
Despite the fact that by every metric, legally
speaking, it obviously is, even according to the

(04:51:52):
leading experts in the world on genocide.
But realizing that they know people are watching,
so as they do this, they're doing this
in a way not to they don't just
kill them. They do it in a way
that makes it subtle and slow and under
the radar or really under the radar for
people that choose to look away. On October
6,
2023,
half of people in Gaza were food insecure

(04:52:13):
and 80% depended on humanitarian aid. This is
an attempt to use starvation,
to displace people, to kill people, to annihilate
people as an attempt to erase the Palestinians
from history and from their land in order
for Israel to fully annex
Palestinian territory,
and we see that their annexation plan continues
now into Lebanon.

(04:52:36):
It's alright. Yeah. But he must be Hamas,
though.
Sort of the blind assumption in the direction
of whatever makes this sort of like with
Trump. Plenty of the overlap. Well, here,
Jewish flight back is super excited to show
you what Tom Cotton has to say. This
guy is such a stupid per I mean,
he really is. Like, just a anyway.
I I I just you know, it's not
just that I dislike them for what they're

(04:52:56):
doing. Like, if you watch and listen to
these people, like, this is the kind of
guy who got picked on in high school
who now wants to lash out at anybody
who thinks has more. That's the kind of
people we're dealing with here. He's a ridiculous
he's a ridiculous caricature of a person. He
says, why should Israel be responsible for providing
aid to Gaza?
Israel's the victim.
We did not provide aid to Germany and
Japan in World War 2. Despite the inaccuracies

(04:53:17):
and the stupidity of what he's saying, the
bottom line is that this is Israel's responsibility
according to national law, according to everything that's
been I mean, everything, every angle you look
at.
He's just trying to play on the ignorance
of the average person and trying to tap
into some level of hatred for people that
they dehumanized.
And no one around has the tur and
the they go massive truth bomb. I mean,

(04:53:38):
it's just sad and embarrassing, the stupidity of
people in this conversation.
That's by design, though. They have engineered this.
Finding the courage to stand up and look
into this for yourself and recognize how obviously
wrong this is.
I mean, and I'm not talking about opinion
wise, like, on the record.
It is their job to do this whether
or not you think it should be or
not. That's the legal reality of it. You

(04:53:59):
are the occupying power. And on top of
that, that UNRA is the group set up
to maintain the records for all of this.
And they're just choosing to starve them to
death in a place they control.
But Tom Cotton wants to know why we're
helping them people, the innocent children and women
and
yeah. Because you're a sinister monster. That's why.
Because you don't care.
Or he's being paid by somebody and they
only care about money. You can decide for

(04:54:20):
yourself.
In general, according to the United Nations,
many many many times so far, the committee
finds Israel's warfare methods in Gaza consistent with
genocide, including use of starvation as weapon of
war. That's a big step because the ICJ
has already made this claim.
Now the UN, even though they've taken action
necessarily, which is supposed to be what they're
going at, have now ruled that this is

(04:54:41):
consistent with genocide.
So this is there's just no denying what
we're looking at right now, and they're gonna
pretend it's not there or say, you know,
Hamas or whatever.
Here's Fetterman yet again.
Funny how it seemed to be acting in
more in every way for Israel.
All these American politicians out there, every 30
seconds, screaming about Israel, posting biblical prophecies about

(04:55:02):
Israel, posting I mean, come on, guys. Doesn't
this seem a bit strange?
He says, I reject the accusation and investigation
of the strongest terms.
Guys, he's literally
responding to the pope.
Pope Francis calls for genocide investigation.
And, of course, doesn't give you the link
because the link will tell you more information
he doesn't want you to see. But John
Fetterman says, I reject the accusation

(04:55:23):
from the pope
about genocide.
Like, you guys are ridiculous.
Like, I'm not gonna say because the pope
says it, it makes it true, but for
crying out loud,
what are you what are you gonna get
to be I I I don't even need
to explain.
Like, these people
are compromised.
They're literally challenging and shouting down the pope
for talking about genocide.

(04:55:44):
Do you even think he's in control of
his account?
Here's Tom Cotton again. He goes to be
clear, it was Hamas that tried to commit
genocide against Israel.
They just these people are desperate.
Only the morally bankrupt would blame Israel, the
victim, for fighting back against Hamas and trying
to rescue even if you wanna pretend that's

(04:56:04):
true, how do you explain all the innocent
people being killed? Where's all the evidence of
human shields despite Israel doing it every 30
seconds? Or about the hostages Israel has been
killing that their own people are saying? Like,
this narrative only exists between Netanyahu and US
politicians
and the media reporting it. Their own people
in Israel tell you a different story. You
think Tom Cotton doesn't know what they're saying?

(04:56:24):
He's being paid to tell you a very
clear narrative. And what's funny is even on
Twitter,
have a good time scrolling down through this
ever
almost every single comment,
save for a couple of these extremely pro
Zionist ones that even then are, like, vivid
right here. Thank you, Tom. It's true.
Great great response. If you look through all
the comments, almost every single one of them

(04:56:46):
are like, you're working for Israel. You're you're
not American. We're like, everything. Every one of
them.
Howard Beckett says Francesca Albanese slammed Starmer in
the UK. Now I'll get into you the
storm part probably next show. The point is
he's out there in a past,
video
calling out genocide in a location, doing a
fraction of what Israel is doing.

(04:57:06):
This this is how
disgustingly hypocritical these people are.
But she is responding about why this is
genocide.
Obviously, it is. Case in breach of its
international law obligations.
It's in good companies because many
many countries are not abiding by international
law right now.

(04:57:26):
Israel is committing a genocide. It's not only
me saying that. It's 100 of legal
experts, historians, genocide scholars, including from Israel.
There are 30 experts of the United Nations
saying that there is the International Court of
Justice recognizing the plausibility of a genocide.
Why the UK is still trading weapons with
Israel?

(04:57:48):
Oh, dang it.
She really is just she deserves so much
credit this conversation.
Because of the position
she holds, because of the potential pushback, and
the fact that she has been on a
that just powerfully out there calling this out.
Good on her.
Still, you should still question everything else or
whatever else she does or even this conversation.
Just like everything else, question them and ask

(04:58:10):
whether but
the point is that she is standing her
ground and backed up by the facts. In
this conversation, I think she is absolutely knocking
it out of the park.
Alonso Gourmandi points to this John Spencer
saying there's no genocide in Gaza,
of course. And he goes, they force people
out of their homes without setting any infrastructure
for them. This is the reason. This is

(04:58:31):
the northern Gaza part right now. To go
to the to for no infrastructure to go
to. And then their soldiers looted and then
demolish their homes empty, which they posted on
Twitter and TikTok with bulldozers and controlled explosions
while wearing their underwear and of displaced and
dead women and teenage girls. What part of
this is urban warfare?
It's amazing. These people are posting this on
their own accounts, and we can't we act

(04:58:52):
like it's not true.
Remember, here's Mohammed Safa
showing you what they're doing to these people.
And here's the important part. No matter what
you think you're looking at,
Geneva Convention article 49 in one picture.
Let's look.
Geneva Convention article 49.
Article 49 of the 4th Geneva Convention relative
to the protection of civilians

(04:59:13):
persons at the time of war. It says,
quote, the occupying power
shall not deport or transfer parts of its
own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Oh, that's pretty simple.
It's exactly what they're doing.
It also prohibits individual or mass forcible transfers
as well as deportations of protected persons from

(04:59:33):
occupied territory. What do you know? Guys, look,
there's literally no air in this conversation.
These are not all Hamas terrorists based on
their own admission.
So either it may or even if they
were, by the way, the point is still
the dynamic is that this is against the
law in every possible way. Well, it's very
clearly about civilian. That's the point, though. That's
why they need to pretend it's all civil
all Hamas.

(04:59:53):
They are literally forcefully and look. I mean,
I'll let's take it all back anyway. Because
they've publicly talked about this, that they are
moving civilians out of Northern Gaza. That's all
public now. On top of the fact, they're
publicly telling you they're gonna take it.
So there is no error in this conversation.
They are committing genocide or specifically a violation
of international law. Specifically, article 49 Geneva Convention

(05:00:15):
right on the surface.
And they're publicly telling you that because bad
guy. Well, it doesn't matter. There is no
because. That's against the law.
No matter what, there
that's in that's just end of story.
It's just it gets so frustrating as we
go through this every time.
Any one of these points alone should be
enough to change this conversation. It just shows

(05:00:36):
you how willfully dishonest these people are.
The cradle reports the UN has reported that
now at least a 100,000
Palestinians have been forced from their area of
northern Gaza
just in 24 hours of of since 15th.
UN workers on the ground report worsening conditions
due to Israel's continuous denial of aid. So
on top of the aid, they're breaking the

(05:00:57):
law by forcefully trans transferring civilians
both from within their area and to an
area they occupy.
There's no way around it.
Now in regard to the actual talks of
people being the hostages or the actual POW's
detainee by and large, again, don't forget that
Netanyahu, publicly
known by his own people, is the one

(05:01:18):
for in talks.
And just to quickly, you know, rapidly go
through this at the end, the point is
that they're all making out he he's offered
$5,000,000
for each one,
but it's a meaningless statement, guys, because at
the end of the day, they don't want
this back. They this is this is all
floated narrative.
Where how how is that gonna work? They're
gonna bring it back and they're gonna shoot

(05:01:38):
them.
It's not gonna happen in some public setting,
guys. This is happening in the in the
the desolate area that used to be Gaza.
He's literally saying, anybody out there? Well, they
shot their own people, guys,
When they walked up and they were speaking
in Hebrew,
even BBC reported it. Hostages shot by the
IDF put out SOS sign written in food.

(05:02:00):
They shot 2 of them right away.
1 of them ran off
15 minutes later as the article reports.
They coaxed him back out, and they shot
him dead.
These people looked Israeli. They were speaking in
Hebrew. They're going, don't shoot me. I'm a
hostage. They shot him anyway.
Pretty easy to understand that.
So you think for one second you're gonna
have a member of Palestine a Palestinian

(05:02:22):
come around with a hostage and say, here.
We have a hostage for you. What are
they gonna do? Arrest them? Shoot them? Sure
as hell not give them $5,000,000.
This is about you and a narrative for
you to think that he's just wants to
save everybody.
Nope. His own people are making are calling
him out for these lies.
I've drop site news reports the US stands

(05:02:42):
completely alone,
vetoing the newest UN Security Council resolution for
an immediate unconditional ceasefire. Despite all the narrative,
they continue to be the only ones stopping
this. Hamas has been willing to do this
since the 1st week, 9th 10th. There were
two offers for complete transfer and a ceasefire.
They they turned it down like they did
every other time.

(05:03:03):
Now, again, we have the United States being
the sole entity voting against
what they claim they want. That's this guy
right here.
Now it says
US vetoes another draft resolution that would have
demanded immediate ceasefire
and would have reiterated
demand for the immediate unconditional release of hostages
despite them lying about this publicly. This despite

(05:03:23):
the e ten removing chapter 7 language from
the text, which would have seen the council
determine that the situation in Gaza Strip and
relational escalation constitute a threat to international peace.
There's a reason they did this. The US
government's playing its role for Israel.
Chair of the UN Special Committee to Investigate
Israel practices says, quote, before we delve into

(05:03:44):
our report findings, let's take a moment, I
say, to take a step back and reflect
on the broader picture. Under our watch,
we have been permitting the talk to turn
back to an era of unchecked barbarity.
The very persecution we once vowed would never
happen again,
now permitted under the guise of technological
precision,
the manipulation of an international law, the insidious

(05:04:06):
disinformation. Our inaction is not only failing to
protect innocent lives
from the ravages of war, it is unraveling
the international legal system itself. A framework painstakingly
built to protect peace and security for all.
Whatever you think about it, the reality is
Israel's challenging whatever it was. So I asked
the question. He says, to what end does
our silence ultimately serve? Surely, it is serving

(05:04:28):
to tear apart lives full full and fuel
endless cycles of violence,
set an entire region ablaze, and dismantle the
very protections we established to safeguard humanity.
All for short term geopolitical interest of a
few.
As I present this report, I urge each
and every one of you, do not turn
a deaf ear.
History will not forgive or forget our inaction

(05:04:51):
and complicity.
Madam chair of this year's report examines the
mass civilian casualties and life threatening conditions intentionally
imposed on Palestinians in Gaza. Our findings conclude
that Israel's
methods of war align with the characteristics of
genocide. The point this is even publicly being
stated is why this will never go away.
You can't pretend, like, the the point of

(05:05:11):
the evidence is out there, and it's come
from the highest levels of power in the
conversation.
They're done.
It's important to make sure we recognize what
this means.
And this is actually a really interesting clip.
Searing girl post. This is an Australian politician.
A set what she wrote I would it's
but essentially, the context is admitting that the

(05:05:33):
US has coercion coerced
coerced her into not saying the truth, or
rather into voting for or rather against
the ceasefire.
But not because she wants that, at least
that's the implication, but because the relationship for
the United States would suffer.
Oh, I don't think I
I'll grab it real quick since we're at

(05:05:54):
the end. The point is that it's interesting
to see that this is what the US
government's doing
or that Israel was doing through them,
but it shows you that we're not talking
about democracy or some kind of legitimate process
when they can just clearly do what they
want like this. Or rather just influence them
to get what they want like this.
Up,
then that's not good for the future. Against

(05:06:14):
a ceasefire, Susan?
You bet you do. It's not good for
our future, Jason, if we don't have a
positive relationship with the US. You vote against
the ceasefire.
Jason, it's not good for the US relationship
between Australia
and the most important relationship we have in
the world. That's what you should be focusing

(05:06:35):
on this morning. Thank you. Wow. So she
wouldn't even respond. Think about how wild that
is. And she just go, well, it would
it would hurt our relationship with the United
States. Well, yeah. That's the point.
As all Rod points out, propaganda versus reality.
Here's
clown blinking. Today, I met with families from
Gaza. I heard the suffering that they or
loved ones are continue to endure, some killed

(05:06:55):
or wounded, others displaced. Yeah. They really care
about that. It's we're working tirelessly to get
more aid to people. No, they're not. In
Gaza, secure immediate peace fire, the opposite. In
both cases, the exact opposite that we can
prove.
US vetoes ceasefire.
Just think about these how disgusting these people
are. I hope,
truly hope, that they suffer at night thinking

(05:07:18):
about what they're doing. I don't think they
do. I think they're sociopaths.
But I at least hope that they do.
Whatever reason they're compromised, they have to suffer
from the guilt of what they're doing. But,
again, I don't really think that's what's happening.
Here is the state of Palestine.
What the hell does Israel need to do
for this council to act under chapter,
7? Is there a UN Charter for Israel

(05:07:38):
that's different from the Charter we all have?
I think we all know that's the case.
And here is
Linda Thomas Greenfield. The situation in the Middle
East requires an urgent situation,
solution.
For more than a year, we have seen
devastating civilian suffering in Israel and Gaza no.
In Gaza. And the West Bank and Lebanon,

(05:07:59):
we have seen unhevels and unprecedented attacks by
Iran and its proxies. Really?
In the West Bank?
Oh, I guess that's a period right there.
So either way, only diplomacy will provide a
path. Well, guess what the fact check says?
Greenfield has consistently blocked diplomatic solutions intended to
reduce civilian suffering. Perfect.
I mean, everything's calling these people out.

(05:08:21):
Lastly, we're last couple points here. This I
how many times have I made this point?
It absolutely makes me sick
that they still use these children. Now, again,
as always, let's be clear, it was a
crime to take these children, the Bivas family
or any other children that were taken.
Whoever did it, Hamas or whatever, or Palestine's
law of jihad or whatever, because there's there's

(05:08:41):
debates.
That was a crime.
Period. And they need to be held accountable
for that. That does not invalidate the act
of armed resistance. Now on top on the
thirdly,
as their father has publicly reported, and it
was even backed up as as Dan Cohen
points out from corporate CBS media,
they were killed by IDF bombs, like a
lot of other people that we can see

(05:09:02):
there. Like, as even their own passages coming
home have reported about what they saw.
And here's the video for you where he's
cryingly pointing out that his children were killed,
which is horrifying. And yes, Hamas plays a
part in that. But the reality is that
Israel killed them and they know that,
according to their father. And yet, every day,
they come out and say, you know, and

(05:09:23):
use their children, use their faces.
It really makes me sick.
I said their father publicly stated months ago
that they were killed by the IDF bombs
like many others.
That you know this yet continue to use
their memories to gaslight for genocide is exactly
why your own population is calling you out.
It's gross.
Here's Ted Cruz, because he cares about Americans.

(05:09:45):
Right? He's an American politician. Well, today, he
met with the families of Americans that are
trapped in Gaza. Oh, excuse me. No. The
American hostages held by Hamas.
Not just Americans that are trapped in Gaza,
because it's not just those. Right? Does he
know that?
Because I told them I'm committed to do
everything possible to bring their loved ones home,
but Netanyahu is not.
So they don't so that's that's what they

(05:10:07):
are the ones involved with what they're doing
and they're making sure they stay there, which
their families are telling us.
Or they're killing them, which our families are
their families are telling us. It says American
hostage in Hamas' hands. I told these families
I'm committed to countering those efforts and making
release of hostage and prerequisite for ceasefire. Well,
too late. We just had one. It was
right there. We've had 14 of them so
far that you guys have continued to deny.

(05:10:29):
But I pointed out, as I often do,
I said, Mark,
said Ted senator Cruz, what about the 600
Americans trapped in Gaza?
Currently being tortured, bombed, and starved for over
a year now. Do you only oh, I
always make typos when I'm doing
only Israeli Americans matter to you? Oh, no.

(05:10:49):
I did say it right.
Do only Israeli Americans matter to you? Why
do you truly who do you truly represent?
And do you not call care that those
Israelis are also being killed by Israel?
All those points matter. Right? What about the
Americans you don't care about that are there
because they're not on the Israeli side? You
only care about them if they're Israeli American.

(05:11:10):
And what about the fact that those Israelis
are being targeted and killed by Israel? Of
course, he doesn't care about any of that.
Here's Stefanik
on day 409 now doing a grandstanding thing
on Twitter where she go every day
who, same point, only seems to seems to
care about the ones that are in Gaza
that are Israeli

(05:11:31):
Americans
or Israeli whatever,
but doesn't care about the Americans,
Palestinian, or or British Palestinian that are in
Gaza that are being bombed and attacked by
what you guys are supporting.
And she simply says, 409
days since they abducted civilians, and that's all
they care about. Who cares about the year
of long year long genocide? But he says,
your daily dose of Elise Hasbara,

(05:11:53):
does she not does she know that we
know? Pick up the phone, call your boss
Bibi.
Here's Herets. Israeli defense officials, government pushing aside
hostage deal, eyeing Gaza annexation. Well, guess what?
That's where we are now. That was October
13th. Now it's reality.
Operation Hush, silencing the families on the hostage
of the hostages. Guys, this is Israeli media

(05:12:15):
making it clear that they're ignoring them. But
she, from his US position, wants the Americans
to think the opposite.
So the only world in which this exists
is between Netanyahu and American politicians taking a
paycheck.
Simple. Easy to prove.
Lastly, for you for Lebanon,
as Alrod points out, Israel has killed more

(05:12:37):
than 200 children in Lebanon just in the
past 2 months according to UNICEF.
Well, that's the reality of it. The headline
is a more than 200 children killed in
Lebanon by some phantom murderer. Right?
UNICEF,
James Elder, who's been really calling this stuff
out.
Israel killed 4 children in Lebanon. This is

(05:12:58):
just in the one day. Here's what he
has to say about it.
Complicated. Here, there's so much when people try
to justify
or ignore what's happening to children here in
Lebanon. Oh, it's complicated. The war's complicated. I'm
so sick of hearing this word. There's nothing
complicated about this. What's complicated about a child's
bedroom? What's complicated about the way their clothes
were set out for the next day? About

(05:13:19):
them having their science books ready for school?
About, okay, about
weather and the seasons.
There is nothing complicated about the idea that
children should get to experience the beauty of
weather and the seasons.
There is nothing complicated about a child going
to bed and expecting to wake up the
next day.

(05:13:41):
That was not the case for the 4
children who were killed here. There's nothing complicated
about the fact that children in Lebanon deserve
protection,
and they're getting none.

(05:14:02):
Yeah. The reach for the podcast is straight
to keep them safe from war. It's a
straightforward act of humanity.
Well, I'd like to believe that it's that
simple,
but I guess it only applies anywhere other
than if if if Israel's involved,
it suddenly doesn't matter.
Paul sound Saul Sal Stanifor, excuse me, says
Lebanon has accused Israel of a systematic destruction

(05:14:22):
of villages. We and then here's the interesting
part about this clip.
So it's corporate media BBC.
They're they're reading it out. Lebanon has been
has accused Israel of systematic destruction of villages.
Right? And it says, we are then shown
the footage
of them
demolition using demolition
to destroy these villages. Look, it's just they're
denying that, guys.

(05:14:44):
So the question is, why does the presenter
say accused
when you could literally see it happening?
It's the whole point. A US envoy says
Israel Hezbollah truce is within our grasp, but
there's no optimism for Gaza.
So we just moved on. Like, they're just
like, we're now the Lebanon is the new
dynamic, but it's the same thing.

(05:15:15):
He's not a mediator.
As he highlights, it's it's Israel's Tom Hagen,
like a reference to, to the Godfather. Kind
of like the the consigliere, the person who
kinda handles everything for them. His role is
to US to use US power to coerce
the Lebanese
and press for Israeli demands, including its, quote,
right to commit genocide in Palestine and to

(05:15:36):
violate Lebanese sovereignty at will without any interference
from the Lebanese resistance. That's the point.
This is where we are.
And in case you missed it, they're still
bombing
UN locations, not on re, but UN locations,
specifically Unifil in regard to the Irish locations
in Lebanon.
There just is no legal justification for this.

(05:15:57):
They're not there you can't they're just
they can't just call them Hamas
or just call them Hezbollah. These things don't
land in this conversation because they're not in
Gaza.
There is clear documentation. There is people with
video. There is more going on. They can't
box these things out. And yet,
where is the world?
They are literally bombing these peacekeepers in in

(05:16:18):
in in Lebanon.
Unifil peacekeepers and facilities were targeted again in
3 separate incidents in southern Lebanon on 19th
yesterday with 4 peacekeepers injured in 1 of
in 1 just one of the incidents. They've
already killed some of them.
I just it just I don't I just
am so
exacerbated by this.
How incredible it is that we can be
in this position and how clear the information

(05:16:40):
could be.
You know, it's it's the same thing we
always come to. Right? The world sees it.
I don't know how we can deny that
at this point. What it needs to show
us and we should never lose sight of
is that the power structures left and right
of our current situation in the United States,
everywhere in the these the UK,
all the governments that are blindly supporting this,
it's not just one element. It is that

(05:17:01):
the government has been compromised
or bought or whatever you well, guess the
same point. Whatever it is, whether it's blackmail,
funding,
something,
they are choosing
not just to go along with this, but
to go along with it while they know
you see it. I just don't know how
that could be anything other than something that
almost is beyond their will,

(05:17:23):
but not to give them a pass. Because
I frankly think a lot of them are
just being bribed. But I can't I just
don't see how we can ignore what this
shows us. This is a
systematic, systemic problem.
Now the question is what to do.
Now I this not end of the show,
I'm gonna tackle all the world's private. The
point is, I hope you'll think about that.

(05:17:43):
What can you do in your life to
have an effect on this outcome? Whether it's
speaking to your politicians or protesting or doing
your own show or whatever,
something.
Decide to do
something.
Care enough to recognize that this is not
just about people in different country halfway around
the world. It's affecting you in your life,
in your country, in everything you do, everything

(05:18:05):
everywhere, the US election to all the what's
going on in Lebanon, it's around the world.
There's something much bigger happening around this, and
the more we pretend it's not there, the
worse this is gonna get.
Hopefully, we can actually see something change, but
the awareness is there. So it's really in
our court right now, guys, what we decide
to do about this, not calling for violence,

(05:18:25):
but recognize that there is
action is necessitated.
We can't just pretend this isn't going on.
But I know you guys feel the same.
I know that's why you're here because you
care.
It's in everything you're doing and the chats
you're having.
Let them hear you.
Let them hear you.

(05:18:45):
On that note,
I'll end with that clip since that's what
it reminded me of.
Thank you for tuning in, guys. I know
it was a long show today.
Important to get all this out. Now on
that same point, I I I won't now
for two reasons, because this is long and
a lot of content for you to catch
up on, I won't be doing a show
tomorrow, but I also have, an obligation,
towards the end of the day. And I

(05:19:06):
think on top of that, actually, on a
third note, I'm realizing right now that they're
gonna be working in in in our our
whole area here, and I think the power
is gonna be out most of the day.
So either way, it won't be a show
tomorrow for those that you know, heads up
on that. So we'll be probably most likely
doing one the day after next. But get
this content out there. Clip this out. Talk
about it. You know, get this in front

(05:19:26):
of people.
You are making a difference every single day.
And that's exactly why this is happening, the
response to this, because you are changing the
world with everything you do, with the information
you're discussing, with the people you reach,
1 by 1.
It's happening right in front of you.
Thank you for being here. Thank you for
being a part of all that we do.
I love you all. As always, question everything.

(05:19:48):
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant. You also hindered Russia.
6 years old in her car.
You all heard the audio, you amplified that
she was 6.
She calls the red present, and she says,
I'm scared I'm stuck in the car. They
said, where's your family? She said, I'm surrounded

(05:20:09):
by their corpses, they're dead.
My dear. My dear?
He tries to read Quran, so he tells
to reassure her, we will send the ambulance.
The genociders were so merciless.
When the ambulance turned up 4 hours, the
tanks blew up the ambulance. Him, 6 years
old died alone, surrounded by the corpses of

(05:20:29):
her family.
Yeah.
Sidra Sidra Sidra
was playing with her cousin running on the
road.
They told them go to the south, we
won't touch the south. But they lied.
The liars, they lied.
They bombed the north and then bombed the
south. Sidra, the pictures went viral because of
you. You showed the world, she was hanging

(05:20:51):
from the wall with her legs blown off.
You have exposed
the genociders,
which is why they are ringing the bells
to get you to be quiet.
Which is why they are waiting for us
to slip up to expose us. They are
worried that now that the world has seen
the truth,
the highest Jewish representative
in the US in the senate, Chuck Schumer

(05:21:14):
himself, comes out and says Israel is on
course to becoming a pariah state.
Elizabeth Warren says that if the law is
to be applied, Israel is committing genocide.
Even the right wingers
in Donald Trump's rally, they're chanting genocide, Joe.
Genocide, Joe.
You entered areas Palestine couldn't enter before.

(05:21:35):
You delivered the message to corners it couldn't
reach before.
It wasn't because of the mainstream media. It
was you, you carried the voice. You are
making the change. You are changing the world.
They are desperate for you to go home.
They want you to pack your tents and
go home. Tell them and roar. We're not
going home until

(05:21:55):
Palestine is free. Roar and let them hear
it.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Trump Is “Solving” Gov-Created Problems To Rollout Your Israeli-Tested AI Control Grid “Solution”

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

Trump Is “Solving” Gov-Created Problems To Rollout Your Israeli-Tested AI Control Grid “Solution”

Stuff You Should Know