Trump’s Deep State/Zionist Admin Picks & Israel Caught Lying From “Iran Plot” To Amsterdam

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:21):
Welcome to the daily wrap up, a concise
show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant
independent news as we see it from the
last 24 hours.
Monday, November 11,
2024. Thank you for joining me today. It
is not looking good so far for the
administer administration

(00:42):
picks. The picks for Donald Trump's administration cut
that have
so part so far been discussed, pointed to,
thrown out, acknowledged by the people that have
been tapped
so far. And I what's important to just
like yesterday to frame it this way, until
these things are actually done,
even if it's discussed by Trump, even if
it's accepted by the person,

(01:03):
things change. They could change their mind. Somebody
could back away. The senate couldn't confirm those
that require it.
A lot of these things can change. So
it's interesting
that even as we see this going forward,
you know, as usual, people will lean into
it when they think it's something they like.
They'll kind of act like we don't know
yet when it's something they don't. The point
is to be objective, but it is not
looking good. The peep it's as a lot

(01:26):
of people have kind of at least felt
was a likely circumstance to say that they
seemed they floated Pompeo and Nikki Haley in
order to sort of
make it seem that the other choices weren't
as bad when the argument could have been
that they always were going to pick them
and it was a way to make it
seem like the other neo cons they chose
or whatever term you'd like to use weren't
as dangerous or influential

(01:47):
or warhawkish.
But the reality is it's every almost every
person I've seen chosen so far have been
I mean, I don't I don't even have
to list it off from big pharma to
war focus to Israel's Zionist supporter.
Everything they claim they were fighting
in the context of, you know, lobbyists and
war and big pharma and all the things
that

(02:07):
because of r k junior and everybody else
that it was
you know, we were gonna see a difference.
And I certainly still hope that's the case.
But I hope we're at least balancing this
with objectivity and and honesty about what's really
going on and having the courage to stand
up and push back. Like, I'm gonna make
a point today about about kind of the
way that, Dave Smith has been kinda rallying
the troops, if you will, to say we

(02:28):
have to keep put holding their feet to
the fire, which I think is fantastic. Even
though I don't think it's gonna make a
difference, because not because I don't think it's
worth it or their efforts are valuable, but
because I don't think they care. And I
don't think they feel like they have to
listen as much as they pretend that they
think that. But I also wanna balance that
with the point that doesn't that show us
that this is not even remotely what what
we've all been told it was even in

(02:49):
this past the idea being that this is
something that this shows you it's not a
representative government. We're in a position where if
you have to basically coerce and manipulate them
into doing what you want them to do,
then they don't represent you. And at the
same time, I think that's what I was
talking about before it, which, again, I do
see even even as a positive
outside of what I argue should be, let's

(03:10):
buck the whole system and stop participating.
They I I get the sense that a
lot of the conservatives that's that see the
problems but still just don't know what else
to do are trying to use their momentum
and their social media influence to almost trap
them in the choices that they want, which
good. You know? Get I mean, that's that's
the least of people doing what they can
within that system to get what they want
from it. But my point is let's not

(03:31):
play that game anymore because they're gonna do
what they want either way. I guess that's
a little bit contradictory because the argument is
them doing that
could have an influence. Again, my ultimate point
is I don't think that's the case. Leaving
open the possibility that we could make that
difference, I hope it's the case, but at
the end of the day, our history
is shockingly clear. As far back as you
wanna look, it's always one thing or the

(03:52):
other, or they wouldn't let this happen, or
this lever of power was pulled that never
stops.
So that's why I am jaded in this
conversation because I think we have a right
to be. The evidence, I think, is very
clear. So we're gonna go over some of
these picks, like Stefanik
or or I mean, there there's some that'll
probably
the Zionist connected entities, the idea that these
people are that are

(04:14):
overtly pro war against Iran or you know,
the every one of these talking points have
been shot down as the opposite of what
Trump is gonna bring to the table. There's
also a clip that Decentral News put out,
which is not new, but it's a good
juxtaposition of what they're saying
about
why people are concerned about the RFK
point of whether he'll have influence or not
because of what Lutnick said in a recent

(04:35):
interview. Now, again, that could change. Maybe he's
wrong. Maybe Trump thinks differently and Lutnick won't
be the one. I mean, if if one
thing I think we can know about Trump
and even we nothing is you know, we
don't know what they really feel, but, ultimately,
that seems the most likely is that Trump
is kind of an outlier. He does kinda
do what he wants. And I do think
that that is almost in a way how
they can manipulate him, but the hope could

(04:56):
be that he won't care and do what
he wants at the end of the day.
But the question is, does he want
that? Or was he just using the influence
of RFK, which is an obvious political move
of the past
or in general to get your influence or
your support?
But we'll talk about the clip there and
how concerning this may be in hopes for
that and where it could go. And I
think it's important to highlight the what I

(05:17):
think is the the illusion of that representative
government dynamic and the the
negative directions that are being taken so far.
My point, I guess, is that even if
we get better picks after this, we have
to be honest about how bad these people
are. And I'm I'm tired of playing this
game where it's like one for them, one
for us. Like, you gotta play the game.
No. We don't. No. We doesn't. That's not
how this should go. That's not what we
were being screamed at up until the election.

(05:39):
Now after the case, it's like, well, you
gotta play. We should be changing things, not
playing the game.
You can't have both of those at the
same time. Like, this should be something that
is gonna be different. Because if the idea
is that this whole system was weaponized against
Trump and trying to murder Trump, and we're
gonna should not be that you lean into
that same system that was used against him.
That just does not make sense. But I
know a lot of people in this system
were just
saying a lot of these things in order
to get the control, the power, the influence,

(05:59):
the same old status quo to continue in
their benefit for a few years.
But we're gonna talk about some interesting overlaps
in the corp in the media, which I
see
I kinda felt seemed like a manipulation or
rather
a a a troll, if you will.
But now it seemed it might even be

(06:20):
something coming to pass about who might be
the press secretary for Donald Trump. We'll talk
about that. Talk about the kind of interesting
hype around the idea that the temp the
democrats are cert right now planning to steal
the win from Trump in the next 3
months, which I don't think anybody could stand
there and act like that wouldn't be something
like, that's not something you would gasp at.
It's like that's what they all seem to

(06:40):
be doing. I think we're all aware more
than anything around the conversation of democrats stealing
the election, but my point in honesty being
all of them do it all the time
whenever they can, that it wouldn't be surprising
if that turned out to be the case.
But I I think it's interesting to highlight
how even after this and even sort of
the slow roll, Biden and the rest of
them saying, like, good luck. We're gonna work
together. And doesn't mean they're not secretly behind

(07:02):
the scenes trying to manipulate, but it doesn't
seem to be the the way that we
were told this would go. And now, interestingly,
all the hype around how they're about to
steal it and we're trying to stop them.
And what if nothing actually happens?
I just wanna point that out, and we'll
go over this in a second. And we
need to remember these things, the hype and
how it could be used.
And if it comes to pass, well, again,
it's something that wouldn't be that hard to
recognize. The evidence is what matters. Right now,

(07:23):
what's the evidence? We'll go over this. It
doesn't seem to be much besides they're doing
this, and we know that's what they do
because that's what democrats are.
Usual nonsense in my opinion, not that they
aren't in ways doing this, but my point
is this is hypothetical. It's not fact. This
is not journalism. It's hype to keep people
on edge coming up until what happens next
for different I think it's for obvious reasons
for where this goes. We'll get into it.

(07:45):
And the obvious election fraud points
already dovetailing with the idea of why we
need digital ID or, excuse me, voter ID,
which is exactly the same conversation. If you're
of course, if you're not paying attention, you
might not think so, but it's obvious how
they've already dovetailed together. Now then, of course,
we're gonna talk about Iran
and how that overlaps with the rising Donald
Trump administration. And the obvious on the the

(08:07):
forward on the front conversation is that they
are gonna be pushing this for Israel. Stefanik
and all the rest of them have made
this shockingly clear. Even Trump and Vance have
made their statements. And so I think it's
interesting that on a dime, all of a
sudden, we're seeing all of these kind of
cascading,
both kind of Mossad Israel agendas that are
in
many tangential ways aimed at Iran. And then
we've got these Iran plots for Donald Trump's

(08:29):
lie, which I already went over recently. Jason
just put up a good clip about this
I'll highlight again that is absolutely ridiculous.
Absolutely cartoonish
to pretend that what we're looking at is
not a completely fabricated thing around the supply
of Donald Trump and the, Jewish Americans that
were being working with some
phantom Iranian guy in Tehran that nobody's seen

(08:50):
that we don't know exist, that ultimately is
voluntarily intervening with the FBI?
Because that makes sense. Right? He volunteered to
admit that he was part of this plot,
and we're gonna I mean, just doesn't it's
anything's possible.
But if we understand how the FBI works
and how Israel these things are transparent.
And I'll go over it yet again today
and show you how interesting it is that
this is a floated idea about even from

(09:11):
Alex Jones, the deep state's gonna trick
Trump and kill Trump and, you know, blame
it on his blame it on Iran or
with the except what's interesting is when you
look at the information, maybe he's even right,
but he's failing to point to the person
behind it, the real the deep state, the
people that are actually infiltrating our government, the
people that are actually manipulating it from the
outside, not the people who point to. But
what's interesting is as that's happening, you can

(09:32):
see the people that are driving this to
go against Iran. So he's over here saying
that Trump's gonna be tricked into going after
Iran for the deep state, and we can
literally prove that the Stephanics and the and
the Vanses and Israel are going, do it.
Go. Get Iran.
Maybe he should connect those dots, but I
doubt that will happen.
But we're gonna get into this rising Iran
focus and how that's changing a lot of

(09:52):
this conversation, which we'll get into yet again
the interesting overlap of all of that around
the Amsterdam conversation and some more going on
with Israel. Now there's a a lot of
other things to get into, but, really,
all of this interconnects
in more ways than usual. So we'll go
over that, but I'll start with the administrative
picks.
A great clip here that I'll play from

(10:13):
Decentered News. Not new information.
Everyone's talked about this, but I just thought
it was important for you out there to
see this so you know that it's not
some hollow claim. Because a lot of this
pushback that I've experienced myself when even just
being objective to say, well, I hope this
doesn't happen, but it seems like this might
and here's what they're saying. And people lashing
out as if you shouldn't even consider this

(10:34):
possibility, which is which is just willful ignorance.
No matter how unlikely, it is still a
possibility. No matter how much that makes you
angry, how much it it makes you insecure
about what will happen. It's still obviously a
possibility that this could go other in a
different direction than how you think.
So here to show you, Lutnick's saying this
on an interview recently,

(10:54):
the day late the day after
RK Junior makes it clear that he is
going to be he was told anyway that
he's gonna have the HHS position. And here's
how Lutnick responded to this. He that I
I think, you know, that president Trump has
promised me is,
is control of the public health agencies, which
are HHS and its sub agencies,

(11:15):
CDC,
FDA, NIH, and a few others, and then
also the,
USDA,
which is,
which, you know, is key to making America
healthy. My insight
That was on October 28th, RFK junior. Remember,
this is on October 30th, an interview with
CNN with Howard Lutnick. And source tonight is

(11:36):
the cochair of the Trump Vance transition team
and the CEO of the investment firm, Kenner
Fitzgerald, Howard Lutnick, RFK Junior. He said that
Trump has promised him control of the public
health agencies,
HHS, which would be also, you know, CDC,
FDA,
USDA,
all of these agencies. Is that true? Has
Trump promised him basically the HHS job? So

(11:57):
I spent,
two and a half hours this week with
Bobby Kennedy junior, and it was the most
extraordinary thing. And I said, so tell me,
how's it gonna go? And he said, why
don't you just listen to me explain things?
And what he explained was when he was
born, we had 3 vaccines,
and autism was 1 in 10000. Now a
baby's born with 76 vaccines. So what happened

(12:19):
now? Autism is 1 in 34. Here's what
he said. Cause autism Okay. Which is what
RFK pushes with Oh, they don't they don't
cause autism because I say so. Facts don't
matter. Like, these people are so exhaustingly stupid.
And it kills me that whether she knows
it or not, she's shockingly wrong because there's
been numeral
I mean, I've known of at least 3
different peer reviewed studies that have clearly shown

(12:39):
at least a link between the 2.
To say that there is no it's just
dishonest.
And, in fact, the the autism it's more
than 1 in 34 as far as I
can tell based on the full scope of
the scope of the information. But either way,
there's,
I mean, a thousand different connected points around
this. I mean, I'm being hyperbolic. It's a
lot of them. And in connection to things
just even like aluminum or other aspects that

(13:00):
can clearly be shown to lead to something
in the the bottom line is it's it's
not litigate it in 30 seconds on this
one point, but anybody that's been paying attention
to this is not out there saying everything,
every vaccine cause often, but will be acknowledging
the reality that there is a connection between
specific cases and is possible with just about
anything in this felt the way that these
things are made. But I would argue it

(13:21):
depends on certain things that are in them.
Either way, the point is that with something
like the the one of the most prominent
that's been researched around the MMR vaccine,
the evidence, if you ever actually looked at
it, not just watching a documentary, which by
the way was well done, the reality of
the actual evidence, The people that I've interviewed
that have no or, you know, a hooker,
for example, who was actually there,

(13:42):
who still goes around and talks at the
you know, I've seen him myself at these
different events where he get show breaks out
his slides and gives you all the evidence.
And, again, this is a guy who used
to work for the CDC, and the reality
is that it's undeniable. And that's why that
whole thing spun out of control because it
was exposed that they even burn they had
evidence that they literally burned, and it's not
even a joke. Like, it's not hyperbolic. They

(14:03):
burned it in a garbage can inside the
room, and he's testified to this. And the
bottom line is that they knew there was
a connection, and they covered this up. Now
it's broadened out from there, especially since we're
all kind of
I mean, not just aware, but post COVID
19, I think everyone in the world is
very is not just going, okay. Autism is
much obviously possible, but a hell of a

(14:25):
lot more than that. Just, again, I just
think it's hilarious to this reflexive pushback that
they don't do that.
Now I think my honest opinion now this
is I I'm kinda jumping ahead here, but
I get the sense that they want this
to fail. And I get the sense that
this is gonna be set up to blame
the democrats for why RFK wasn't allowed through
the senate confirmation to be on this team.

(14:46):
I mean, I think of writings on the
wall. I think it's quite obvious. And so
that's why this was set up like this.
Now this is a clip, but if you
watch the interview, the kind of the point
is, you know, what what are we why
are we even getting into his claim about
autism? The claim should just be about how
broken the medical system is, which we all
generally agree with, and he's gonna help fix
that. The point is it set them up
perfectly to be able to say, see, yes,
anti vaxx, that's why we don't want him.

(15:07):
And the idea is being created right now
that they want him and the other side
doesn't, and it's ultimately gonna, I think, play
out to where the other side doesn't let
him be a part of it. Either way,
I'm continuing to get the sense, as you'll
see from the back and forth clip, that
this is not gonna happen.
But back to the point, RFK Junior says
they he promised him that position. Lutnick is

(15:27):
going about to respond and say that that's
not the case. Right? Why people are concerned
that he could get a job like HHS.
And I don't even think he could get
job for HHS.
People are concerned that he could get a
job like HHS. And I don't even think
he could get a job for HHS. The
key that I I think I'm you know,
that president Trump has promised me is,

(15:48):
are HHS and its subagencies.
I don't even think I can getting a
job for HHS. What he's trying to do
here's what he wants to do. He said,
I want data. I just want data. He
wants the data so he can say,
these things are unsafe. All I He want
obviously, more than that. So now here's two
things happening. Obviously, Lutnick could be lying. He
could be wrong. He could be misinformed. He

(16:08):
could be outside the circle.
Just always demonstrating the objectivity that we will
always bring to the table for people out
there in the partisan field trying to pretend
we're taking a side. The reality is, of
course, he could be wrong. He could be
lying. I'm not jumping to conclusions because Howard
said this that it won't happen. But, obviously,
if you're continuing to look at the evidence
on the table, that's one of the only
real points we have at this point to
suggest that the opposite is true, despite Trump

(16:31):
saying this a while ago and RFK floating
that idea. So that just to be stated,
we still don't know because it hasn't happened
yet. But it's interesting to me that Howard
could be there's another angle, actually. He could
be doing this in order to muddy the
waters to make people misreport because then it
ultimately happens. There's there's a a long term
game in all of this. But what what
I think's interesting is right here He wants

(16:51):
the data so he can say
these things are unsafe.
Okay. So what's interesting is you also have
Howard misrepresenting
what RFK Jr is publicly saying. He is
not saying, just give me the data, and
I'll be okay with that. He's very clearly
as anybody everybody. Not even anybody. Everybody, because
it's a big topic, is very aware that
he is telling you he wants a bigger

(17:12):
position to change the medical field. Simply having
the data to show us what we all
already know, these things are deadly, including Trump
supporters, won't change anything because all they'll do
is pretend he misrepresented I mean, look what
happened through the whole dynamic.
We there's the body of peer reviewed evidence.
I hope you guys are listening out there
that aren't actually following the show. The body
of peer reviewed evidence at this point in

(17:33):
time is overwhelmingly
clear that these things are killing people, that
these things were not effective or not safe,
and that the overwhelming evidence shows that this
was never even worse than the flu from
day 1. That's the ionitis group. That's the
standing peer reviewed science. I love how the
trust the science crowd turned out to be
the most anti science people on the planet
only when it started to go against what
they were saying. They were the narrative crowd.

(17:54):
They were pretending that was the science. Or
these people thought narrative from people in white
coats was always the science. However you wanna
look at it. The point is that right
now that won't change anything, and we all
know that. It'll simply our people that wanna
hear it, who already know, are gonna say,
yes. Finally, somebody in power is pointing it
out. Everybody else will call him an anti
vaxxer and they'll say, that's the data he's
misrepresenting. He doesn't understand it. He's not a

(18:15):
scientist. It's the same game. It's set up
to fail.
I think that's where this goes. I think
that's the easiest way to make it look
like we sure tried to change everything, but
they just wouldn't let us. Oh, how many
times have we heard that? Now, please, do
not pretend that I'm just trying to be
a pessimist to this. I am a pessimist
when it comes to government. I am jaded.
But I will always hope and keep an

(18:36):
open mind for the thing to happen that
I want to happen, which would be, in
this case, the actual change.
But we have to be honest with how
they've acted before
and what they're currently doing. There's so much
inconsistency even right now.
But if and when it happens, I'll say,
good. It happened. Good. So let's acknowledge that.
Now let's still be critical. Right? That's what
keeps happening is the one good thing happened.

(18:57):
They go, see. We knew it. And then
we stop paying attention. No. We're supposed to
be critical. Even if he is your best
friend in the world and you've known him
your whole life, when he becomes a politician,
you hold his feet to the fire. Every
single moment because that's our job.
That's how this is supposed to work.
Now, truly, we should live in a society
where we're gonna have to deal with this
nonsense, but since we're here, that's how we

(19:17):
should be dealing with this. Now here is
how it goes forward. All I want is
the data, and I'll take on the data
and show that it's not safe. And then
if you pull the product liability, the companies
will yank these vaccines right off
off of the market. Remember rounding up the
saying he could not be in charge of
HHS? No. Of course not. The key that
I I think I'm you know, the president

(19:38):
No. Of course not is a very definitive
answer.
Trump has promised me is,
are HHS and its sub agencies. You're saying
he could not be in charge of HHS?
No. Of course not. Okay. So he's not
gonna be, like, an acting secretary? No. We
couldn't get any harm, but would he be
an Yeah. It is what he wants to
do. So it why would Howard lie about

(19:58):
that?
I mean, really take a second to think
about it. The obvious that he wants to
convince somebody that's not, you know, that they're
based level 1. But we think bigger than
this. Why would Howard go on CNN knowing
that it's a the CNN, it's not Fox,
right,
and lie
blatantly
when you can look up what RFK is
saying about what he wants or what they're

(20:19):
going to do? I mean, really think about
that. These things don't just I mean, it's
certainly possible that it's random. That he just
decided to say something. Who knows? But, usually,
in this field, these things are,
like,
deeply planned out.
What they're wearing, what they're gonna say, their
the way that they look. I mean, trust
me. These things are mapped out, not always,
but usually. And so in this case, I
think we need to ask ourselves whether this

(20:41):
is exactly what I'm talking about. It's about
trying to set this up like a fake
back and forth game to make it look
like things resolved the way you expected because,
oh, it just didn't when it's been completely
mapped out. I just want us to consider
that. Position or anything like that. He I
just told you what he wants. He wants
to help get data. You're saying he wants
to access the data, but that would be
He just wants data.

(21:02):
No. The data's already there, ladies and gentlemen.
Anyone paying attention? All the people who would
actually look at what he has to say
in this conversation already know this. All of
them. They already know that. The data's all
there. It's already been public. Even just Veyers
alone shows you this, but we have plenty
more than that. What they're talking about, by
the way, is all the data that comes
from their
pharmacovigilance,
the Mansef Salawy and all Oracle and all

(21:22):
the government data that they haven't showed you.
You know who could've showed you that before?
Donald Trump. In his entire time, he was
in power and they did not show you
any of that pretending it was saving lives.
Now then there was a 4 year period
with Biden who could've done the same thing
and he's equally complicit. Now when Trump comes
back into power, why would he show you
all the data that literally criminalizes that shows
that he was lying to you or that

(21:43):
he was misinformed?
I want you to bet you anything that
even if it does just come down to
RFK getting data, how much you wanna bet
it starts the day Biden took office and
ignores the primary beginning point of all of
that covering up through 2020?
Hope I'm wrong.
But as he said, the news simply
highlights this, and Stacy

(22:03):
Bird says, you don't understand. He gets a
large sway in a a large say in
who gets in. That's what's that's what it's
been from the beginning.
Quit with the propaganda.
You know what's funny about it? Okay. So
he literally gives you unbiased,
un just here are 2 clips, and then
he gives you the quotes.

(22:24):
Dissentered news doesn't even give you its opinion.
And to these people, it's prop you know
what it is? Prop you know why it's
propaganda? Because it's something that makes you feel
uncomfortable. You don't like what this highlights, and
so you pretend it must be that's that
this is the kind of willful ignorance that
is pervasive in the partisan conversation.
What do you mean you don't understand?
You can they they're just you're talking about

(22:45):
RFK junior or you're talking about the person
who, without criticism, posts a clip of them
speaking?
Maybe you don't understand. He gets a large
say and who gets in? Who? RFK Junior?
How do you know that? How has that
been proven? Oh oh, you mean the words
of politicians?
Is that that's I mean, this is the
craziest thing I've ever seen, worse than I've
ever seen it.

(23:06):
Because we know for sure it'll be less
with these no. We don't.
Maybe. I hope so. You're probably right, but
we don't know that. There's so much false
certainty on overdrive right now. Quite frankly, I
think it's sort of a,
a preservation
or a,
what's the term I'm looking for? Self preservation.
Right? Like, people are just, like, melting down,
feeling like their whole world is falling apart

(23:26):
because they put all their trust in a
lying politician. And so it's about trying to,
you know, sell self preservation. Right? Making sure
you just kinda anyway, I I think this
is how we
anybody objective is concerned about this the where
this is going,
and we'll acknowledge the truth when it happens
whichever way it goes.
Now let's get into all the other horrifying
picks.

(23:47):
Now quite frankly, let's realize that even RK
Junior, for all of his positives, is still
completely pro Israel genocide,
has not called these things out and is
still in every way endorsed and continue to
support what they're doing. Even when asked point
blank by Dave Smith about the influence from
Israel in the US government, he paused for,
like, 10 seconds straight and then said, well,
I don't know that much about BS.

(24:09):
That was a cop out, and we even
Dave Smith's half smile made that very clear.
But the point is, who knows why? I
don't really care. I mean, I do, but
at the end of the day,
there's compromise, there there's
what's the right word to call it? There
he the the the person is if you're
not able to acknowledge that, there's something that
is driving that decision.
It's not simply the truth.

(24:31):
Now Lou Rage points this out. Here's another
example of somebody. I used him for the
picture today, which by the way, I obviously
added that flag that where he's holding it
where where it was an American flag. I
just can't wait for someone to act like
we tried to, you know, manipulate. It's an
obvious Photoshop. The point is simply to highlight
that both of these people are wildly pro
Zionist, both Trump and Lee Zeldin,
and are over the top pro Israel Zionist

(24:52):
and are and and the idea being that
both of them are demonstrating that they will
go out of their way to support and
continue to blindly ignore
the genocide as well as support any agenda
Israel puts forward, like pro going after Iran,
carrying out their wars over the overseas in
the interest of Israel at the expense of
Americans.
And there's a couple more here that are
even more alarming about people who are literally

(25:14):
ex IDF members who are now becoming, you
know, I mean, like Brian Mast, for example,
but there's more of them. I just don't
know why this is not an obvious example
of infiltration. Whether it's Russia, China, or Israeli
military, they should not be in the government
of this country.
But
Lee Zeldin oh, this I'll show you this
clip in a second. This is simply showing
you that it says after losing New York

(25:34):
government, governor Bidd takes up Republican Jewish leadership
role. And this is the, the this platform
simply saying he's been chosen for EPA. Now,
EPA
was something that would be, you know, did
did RFK junior have influence over this? Like,
what's her name was just trying to suggest?
If so, then I disagree with his choice.
But here's the actual article from The Guardian.

(25:55):
Trump picks ally Lee Zeldin as environment chief
for the EPA and vows to roll back
rules.
Roll back rules. Okay. So right now, they're
not even enforcing. I'm I'm not. My opinion's
always less government. I want less that's that's
obviously the case. But if we're in a
position where these people are pretending to be
acting in your interest in regard to keeping
you safer, well, they're not even enforcing what

(26:16):
they currently have. So the bottom line is
if this person is gonna be in a
position where they will care about what's hurting
you in that context,
whether they're I mean, how about this? How
do we start with the same point about
our how about you just give us the
information? Admit what's always been going on. If
this was really about changing of the guard
and demonstrating that these people have always been
lying to you, then they would throw the
doors back. They would make it clear but

(26:37):
the problem is there's always an excuse like,
what's the thing that Tucker said one time?
I think it was him. That Trump said
basically all about the art the JFK files
where he basically said, well, if you saw
what I saw you wouldn't show it either.
BS.
I don't care what you saw, the truth
is what we deserve. Americans deserve to know
what actually happened. And at the end of
the day, you're still a gatekeeper if you
whatever your justification.

(26:57):
This is the point. There's always a rationalization
that it's in the best interest of America.
How do we know that?
So you're telling me that Trump agrees with
the deep state and why they hid that
information from you? That's the only way you
can rationalize that. Because they are the ones
they keep telling you have been hiding this
from you. The point is it's Israel, guys,
and we all know that. The information has
always been there, and he is pro Israel.
So if you can't see how we're still

(27:17):
being trapped in this control the point I
keep making over the years and why I
called this out when Alex Jones talks about
globalism, that's Israel. They're a central leading part
in what they protect is in what they
go out of their way to not point
at.
Whether it's the influence of this country, the
globalist direction, the World Economic Forum, that's the
same people.
And they just wanna walk around it because

(27:37):
there's something con influencing whatever that is, the
choices they make. So here's another example of
this Zionist influencer who is now gonna be
in charge of the EPA. Here's an example
where he is openly talk he introduces a
a
unconstitutional
bill to combat BDS.
So as always, like we've shown you every
and this has been roundly
court court of this is unconstitutional.

(28:00):
You have a right to boycott, to divest,
and sanction
in the in the context of how we
an individual could you know, the point is
that sanctions in that context for BDS is
about a larger action, but just nonetheless, you
can have choose to take action against them
that you could deem sanctions. The point is
you have a right to do any of
those things. As an individual,
I can decide if I wanna boycott or
divest from Israel, or petition my government to

(28:20):
divest or sanction Israel. Of course, you have
that right. But they want you to believe,
they want they're telling you you don't. Whether
it's Abbott in Texas or any number of
other places in this country, like representative Zeldin,
who is now gonna be in in a
position of your in the US government with
Trump, that you don't have a right to
boycott Israel.
Is that what you want? Is that free
speech, guys? Is that the first amendment? Hardly.
But Donald Trump supports this, as we've made

(28:43):
repeatedly clear.
Here is Lee Zeldin saying 6 years ago
today, this was in May of this year,
president Trump made history and fulfilled the promises
of the past
by moving US embassies to Israel and the
rightful home of the capital city of Jerusalem.
Right. You know, the
crime, by the way. The international crime that
was Trump arbitrarily dictating. Like, whether it's going

(29:04):
high to Jerusalem, these were all illegal actions.
The international community has always been clear on
that. It's not because they decide, it's because
it was obvious.
Same thing with the West Bank annexation that
we all know and they just keep doing
it. So my point is here's another example
where you have a US politician who is
willing to ignore the law as long as
Israel's benefiting,
whether it's about your rights or international rights
or law rather. Here he is saying, this

(29:26):
is from April this year, pro Hamas sympathizers.
Oh, so in other words, Palestinian supporters.
Already, we're demonstrating how he these people like
this are willing to undermine and even
smear and attack
Americans
for Israel.
So are we pretending you'd I mean, let's
just even say you are pro so do
you not have a right to decide you

(29:46):
wanna support Hamas? Well, that's that is your
right.
It is.
Just because you support a per peep group
that you wanna see as committing crimes, as
some cases, that's the case, but let's not
forget they're funded by Israel,
that doesn't mean you're committing crimes.
Right? But you see, this is the problem.
We keep we find this dynamic where the
US government argues you have the freedom to
do everything free. This country is free, except

(30:08):
you can't think that, you can't say this,
you can't go over there. Don't even think
about waving that flag around. Yeah. Freedom.
The point is obviously that this there is
plenty of great things about this country. There's
plenty of great things about pretty much most
countries, but there's also bad things. And if
we can't acknowledge that and be objective about
how bad this is getting and where it's
going and why, then this kind of thing

(30:29):
is gonna keep happening.
He's saying pro homo sympathizers aren't promoting an
end game of peaceful coexistence with the Jewish
state, except that's exactly what they're doing. They're
literally exactly doing that. I mean, almost entirely,
if you look at most of these protests,
almost every single one of them are talking
about a 2 state solution, talking about actually
finding an endgame to this, or, yes, there

(30:51):
are the conversations of there being only a
state for Palestine, which by the way is
legally accurate, but I would disagree with it
as well because there are people in Israel
that did not choose to be in this
position.
So the bottom line is that you're lying
about them and calling them pro Hamas when
that's not what they are. This is for
Israel at the expense of Americans and their
rights.

(31:11):
And he says, this means jihad. No. It
doesn't. These are ridiculous claims.
And by the way, even the word jihad,
they make like this like intifada. These things
are basic. They do not mean that's like
saying revolution
means terrorism. It does not. It can, of
course, it can, but it does not inherently
mean that. Intifada means struggle.
And the I forget what, jihad was,

(31:34):
a struggle or fight against the enemies of
Islam and that well, that's the main framing,
but ultimately a struggle or a fight. It
is about the same ideas as all of
these things. You could slant it a certain
way, of course, or you could realize that
what we're talking about are people that you're
simply framing in a light that scares Americans
because they don't understand, and none of them
are even saying these things. It says the
end game is to fulfill their river to
the sea pledge to wipe Israel off the

(31:55):
map.
So, yeah, we're just going to the same
old this this is a tired,
influenced
Israeli lackey as far as I'm concerned. The
same old nonsensical claims that most of which
don't connect,
all of which undermine the rights of Americans.
Even if you agree with what he's saying,
Americans have the right to do all of
those things, but not according to Israel who
was acting through this person.

(32:15):
This is what we're dealing with, guys. This
is the problem of where we are. Here's
the clip. Is a rallying cry for many
of these protesters
across the
October 7th was a rallying cry for many
of these protesters
across the country. Iran's tack attack on Israel
this past weekend

(32:36):
By the way, which by every metric including
Israel's definition, that was a self defensive act,
but, you know, not to him though because
narrative. Was a rallying cry, a motivator
for many of these protesters?
You mean the act in which they bombed
only military targets and literally killed nobody even
according to Israel, despite Israel but before and
after bombing civilians
with their precision strikes? Is that what you

(32:56):
mean? Right? Or I mean, these do you
think he even knows that?
Probably not. Doesn't matter though because he is
not acting for Americans.
In response, the next day, you see people
bringing Hezbollah flags. Which is the which is
their right. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.
The bottom line is they have a right
to wave whatever flag they want,
but that's not even what he's actually talking

(33:17):
about. There this is about trying to frame
anybody that has is representing or pointing to
something that is what Israel doesn't like as
terrorism. That's the same lazy argument the US
government makes about anybody they don't like around
the world while funding the most radical elements
in the world.
Simple.
Everywhere you look. The moderate rebels were the
terrorists. The people they were fighting were people

(33:38):
defending Syria.
Now there's probably crimes on both sides of
this, but realize there's only one group that
is in the wrong there, and It's the
same dynamic everywhere you look. The one illegally
occupying Palestine, the one illegally occupying Syria, the
one illegally occupying Lebanon, those are the criminals
in the conversation. Not to say that either
side is not responsible for crimes of the
past, but that's the legal reality.
And so when somebody supports Hezbollah in this

(34:00):
context, you can make it out to be
they wanna murder people,
but you could make the same argument with
people waving an American flag. Right? It's the
same context. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.
They're a popular group that is more than
just military, by the way, that are actively
fighting against an illegal occupier. And, yes, there
are also things you could point out that
would probably make you upset. Just like the
US military,
all the way back you wanna look. See,

(34:21):
if we're actually objective about this, pretty easy
to see the dishonest nature of what people
like this do for Israel
at your expense.
Onto the streets of New York City closing
down the Brooklyn Bridge from coast to coast.
These protests
pop up across the country today,
as you just pointed out the top of
the show,
where protesters are identifying with Hamas. Are they

(34:43):
calling on Hamas to
stop using human shields?
Oh, you mean, like, Israel? As a matter
of fact, as all the evidence shows over
the years, they've continued to use human shields
that the UN, ever human rights groups have
are you worried about that? Are you calling
out Israel for not for stopping using human
shields? Or only are you only pointing to
a group that no one can have has
any evidence to suggest this even happening? Not

(35:04):
to say that it wouldn't or hasn't, but
UN has never been able to prove that.
And here, by the way, is many examples
from Israel.
2013,
Palestinian children tortured,
used as shields by Israel, per the United
Nations.
Reuters.
Israeli soldiers who use Palestinian boy, a 9
year old, as human shields

(35:25):
avoid jail.
So innocent civilians as human shields? No. Are
they calling on Hamas? And why would they
need to do that? Why would they need
to be saying, we call on this group
that is real funds to stop using human
shields that we can't prove they're even doing.
Does that make sense? And and if even
if they are, why would they what's the
interest of them doing? Hamas gonna go, oh,
okay. American students are asking us to stop.

(35:46):
It's a stupid argument. The point is what
they're arguing for is the reason let's just
even say they were using Human Shields. Do
you know why that might be happening? Because
they're illegally occupied and have been under the
boot of an author authoritarian
apartheid state for their entire for 76 years.
And so you might understand why somebody might
be saying we support the group that's being
oppressed. On top of that, realize there's no
evidence they're using human shields despite the claims

(36:08):
they keep making, and the amount of evidence
for Israel doing that is monumental.
But here's an American representative
in big, huge air quotes,
acting like we have to only look one
way, and by the way, using the lie
from Israel to go after American citizens.
Is that what it looks like to represent
American interests?
To release hostages,

(36:28):
they aren't. You mean the thousands of hostages
Israel's been holding long before October 7th, and
now it's gone up to 10,000 plus and
children, women,
people that are there for 20 years with
barrel I mean, it's I mean, you guys
know all this. Just making the quick point,
the reality that he's, again, saying why aren't
they calling for them to release hostage hostages?
Well, guess what? Some of them are.
He's lying about it all. He is literally

(36:49):
reading the script that was handed to him
because you can prove a lot of these
people are out there doing that. A lot
of them are Israelis and are Jewish and
are calling for that to happen. And you
know who's not letting that happen? Netanyahu
over and over and over, even according to
Israeli media.
But this guy doesn't care, doesn't know, and
that's scary.
Are they calling for a peaceful two state

(37:10):
solution?
Yes.
Any more points?
Easy. Yes. All over the place. Where the
Jewish state of Israel is able to continue
to exist. Yes. All over the place. Most
of them are. That's the most prominent point
in the entire conversation they're putting forward. But
guess what? He lies about that. Though their
rhetoric is,
from the river to the sea, Palestine will
be free. Right. Free. So in all that

(37:31):
area, Palestine will be free. The am I
supposed to confuse free with murder and death
and jihad? No. This is Palestine will be
free. And, yes, in some context, that could
mean anything you want it to mean. Sort
of like when the Likud party has from
the river to the sea, there will only
be Israeli sovereignty. Couldn't you make the same
point? But, of course, not because that's okay
to him. Even though neither of them actually
mean that, even though you my point would

(37:52):
be that from an Israel perspective, what they're
doing shows you that is what they meant.
But you can't say that anybody in Israel
that makes that statement means genocide. They could
just simply mean that they want Israel to
be in control and Palestinians can live, Palestinians
can live here too.
Oh, that's the point. Even though you could
watch them commit a genocide, you still have
to be objective enough to say, just because
someone says that doesn't mean they mean genocide.

(38:12):
Because those words don't mean genocide. You don't
get to go wink wink. They mean what
I think they mean, and everybody has to
go along with that. But here we are
giving morons like this the platform to speak
for Israel at your expense.
I believe that their end game is not
to get,
some attention for a day,
to speak a voice. Or, you know, stop

(38:33):
genocide and murdering of children, 67 a day
right now, but, you know, attention.
Do you realize how insulting that is over
everything else? To downplay it as they just
want attention? All this is about is playing
into the idea of the left right paradigm
and pretend like they're all a bunch of
lefty children, don't even know what's going on.
No. We know what's going on. It's genocide.
They're literally murdering children, Americans included, Israelis included,

(38:55):
every single day.
And this guy doesn't care about any of
it. He only cares about the Zionist agenda,
which is clearly what he's supporting. Now I'm
not saying he knows that.
I think he does. That's my opinion. But
my point is every single word he's oozing
out right now is for the interest of
Israel's agenda at the expense of Americans for
the 45th time. I hope you hear it.
For this moment.

(39:15):
I think that that statement of from the
river to the state the sea, Palestine will
be free, that is an endgame.
The if that's the best you can do,
from the from the river to the sea,
Palestine will be free, wink, wink, they mean
murder and holocaust. I mean, you guys have
lost the plot. Think about that. If that's
how if if they if these people were

(39:35):
a fraction of what they keep screaming they
are, wouldn't there be more than that? Wouldn't
there be more than some spray painted Hamas
thing that clearly comes from a Zionist or
or even if it's not, that's the best
you can do, Hamas?
I thought we're supposed to believe these are
all neo Nazis were asking for Jews to
be killed marching through the streets. Oh, that's
right, Stefanik. Those were all lies according to
even the police that testified in front of

(39:57):
you that you continue to lie about.
These are the people that Donald Trump are
picking so far. It's not a good look.
Hopefully, Republicans,
never mind, conservatives
have the courage to call this out, and
many of them do. So good on you
because I'm seeing it all over the place.
But I want it to become I would
prefer that it came from a place that
is not somehow Trump is being played. Realize
that he is involved in this decision making

(40:18):
process.
Now, by the way, here is, as I
call out from Elon Musk in 2023
anyways, as I said earlier this week, decolonialization,
which I still can't believe he made that
point. Somebody who comes from South Africa, but
I guess from the other side of that
conversation, that you're not allowed to say decolonize.
Really? Like, aren't we all in agreement that
colonization
no. But not we're talking about Israel though

(40:40):
because they're totally not colonial.
They're not doing that, but you can't say
they're not doing it either. If you were
to say it, it's
mind blowingly stupid. But then he goes on
to say, from the river to the sea
and similar euphemisms
imply genocide,
and therefore will be removed. And then I
said, okay. Hey. What about Likud's party right
there that says from the river to the
sea, only Israeli sovereignty? And by the way,

(41:01):
Elon Levy,
Eli David, all of them have posted this,
like, taunting it with huge flags of of
all of occupied Palestine showing just an Israeli
flag.
But guess what? Of course, he didn't censor
them because he only means this to go
against Palestinians.
And it it's not I mean, that point
alone should show you what's really going on.
But the point is Lee doesn't care about

(41:22):
this. They're okay with the idea of Israelis
openly screaming for genocide
in Gaza. That is good. Because bad guy.
Right?
So you're a hypocrite
at the core of what you're doing. Frankly,
I don't think it matters. I think they're
all being paid and don't care about any
of it.
Now here is an article from the Jewish
star. Mangan Zeldin win APAC cheer. Couple points

(41:43):
just to show you that despite this person
not kinda being on the outskirts of political
positions, he is still being funded by APAC,
which shows you a lot. It says the
long, the 2 2 Long Island members of
congress with impeccable pro Israel records, meaning they
do what Israel says in my opinion, were
warmly received at the APAC policy conference. So
why is somebody like this being given,

(42:05):
accl you know, support
and praise when he's not even really in
power because this is how this works. These
are cultivated entities.
These are all this is my opinion, guys,
but the you have to understand how lobbying
works, and this is obvious. And so this
is one element of that, and we can
see that these people are cultivated from very
low levels as far as and and these
people fall in line.

(42:26):
It
says Republican Lee Zeldin
reiterated their support and urged continuation of a
long tradition of bipartisanship
on Israel, And it says, Zeldin said that
I want my democratic colleagues to be successful
in fighting back against anti semitism. Right. So
fighting against your completely constitutionally valid position that
you feel a certain way about certain people,
which by the way, I would argue is
disgusting. You feel people are bad just because

(42:48):
they're Jewish or Christian or whatever else? Yeah.
You're a bad person in my opinion. But
I also argue you have a right to
do it because, you know, freedom. But apparently,
he does not feel that way. Lee Zeldin
apparently does not think that you have the
freedom or the wherewithal to decide what you
think. If it has to do with Israel,
you understand. Because he wants you to think
that they make that choice for you. As
the US government, because, you know, free speech,
we tell you what you're allowed to say

(43:09):
about Israel and what you can't say about
Israel. Okay? Let's all scream freedom and free
speech and high five with Elon Musk as
we stop you from saying that you're not,
You get the point.
Incredibly obvious. And the point is APAC policy
conference. So he's literally being welcomed and praised
at this APAC conference. Here's another example.
Pro Israel receipts from Open Secrets.
From 1990 to 2024,

(43:31):
when I guess I I think this guy
has held a lot of prominence. He's he
I guess he lost that last race, but
I think he's had some position before it.
He's almost gotten a $1,000,000 from Israel.
$916,000,
834.
Lee Zeldin.
Money from pro Israel
to US representatives.
$1,000,000. Don't you think a $1,000,000 would influence

(43:52):
a lot of very morally ambiguous people?
I would say all of them.
That's important to
remember. Now what about Stefanik?
I told you.
I
knew it. The way that she was so
aggressively lurching into this well, you know, the
antisemitism
push that she got caught lying about, but

(44:13):
no one cares, or the fact that she
was clearly sidling up next to Trump and
all of this. And I think it's a
handpick from Israel. You know my honest opinion.
And I simply said, this is Horetz, Trump
Taps, pro Israel conspiracy theorist. That's what Horetz
calls her. Representative Elise Stefanik.
I simply said she's a Zionist race baiting,
genocide supporting cartoon of a person
like far too many in Trump's orbit.

(44:39):
Michael Tracy,
Elise Stefanik, Trump's new pick for UN ambassador,
is in some ways more ideologically zealous than,
is in some ways more ideologically zealous than
Nikki Haley. Trump's previous occupant that of that
role, Stefanik was
integral in launching the crusade to whip up
the
the fabricated anti semitism panic over the last
may past year and was showered with Adelson

(45:00):
awards for her services.
That's kind of easy to see. All while
successfully insinuating herself into the Trump political operation.
Stefanik and Haley have no discernible substantive differences.
Stefanik has vehemently denounced the Biden Harris administration
for insufficiently arming Ukraine and Israel. See how
every single person they're putting is going, yes,

(45:21):
continue the war there, continue the war here.
Just like we told you anybody honest was
telling you. And, allegedly, no towing to China.
She also denounces the Afghanistan withdraw on principle,
nor are there any discernible policy differences between
Stefanik and Liz Cheney, her predecessor as chairman
chairwoman of the House of GOP Conference.
The only discernible difference is that Stefanik has

(45:43):
spent the past several years diligently sucking up
the Trump in every possible way. Politically, legislatively,
on the donor circuit, on the international circuit,
she went she went to Israel to brag
about how close of a partner she was
with Trump.
See how that works? Now, of course, my
opinion. But to me, that looks like somebody
going to the power structure.
And so look, I I'm I support you

(46:03):
no matter what. I support Trump no matter
what. Put me on the team.
And guess what? She's on the team.
It's an approach that clearly paid dividends even
if the substantive policy dimension is largely immaterial,
and instructive insight into Trump governing orbit.
Scary. Here she is with Adelson.
Because she's totally not influencing this cabinet at
all. Right?

(46:24):
Caitlin Johnstone says, so Trump ruled out rehiring
Nikki Haley because her name hurts his brand,
but then gave Haley's old job to an
ideologically
identical Stefanik. Stefanik is best known for her
congressional efforts to stomp out free speech on
college campuses.
Again, you may disagree,
rather, you may agree with what she's going
after.

(46:45):
Or rather, the illusion she's framing that she's
going after. Because it's not going she's not
going after anti Semitism. She's going after people
who are calling out the genocide in Israel,
which that may overlap with some anti Semitism.
The point is that either way, it's all
protected speech.
She knows that. These people aren't I mean,
yeah. Some of them are pretty stupid, but
she does strike me as one of them.
But the bottom line is I guarantee she
knows that being able to criticize somebody no

(47:07):
matter what it's about is protected speech. Not
because the government says, but because it's your
inherent god given right enshrined by the constitution.
So just because you don't like what someone
says, I mean, that's the woke right for
you right there. And that's not just politicians.
Clearly, it's wildly the the thread or the
vein is
right on the surface in the extreme right

(47:27):
supporting republican side.
Canceling people that make bad jokes about Donald
Trump, getting them fired, going after people that
they claim are speaking negatively about Israel, they're
not allowed to, you can't burn the flag.
All of these, whatever you think about them,
are protected.
As even the Supreme Court has ruled, and
all these people are driving you to go
against your own rights.
Using things they knew they would lie. They

(47:48):
would you know, it's like the conversation of
that's why I think Trump is in the
position like he was during COVID to pacify
the people that would push back.
She says to continue making a lie of
Trump's lip service to the importance of the
first amendment rights, she's a hawkish swamp monster
whose political career was primed in some of
the most odious think tanks in Washington

(48:08):
and opposes placing any limits on the US
military support for Israel, as I'll play a
clip for you next. Earlier this year, Stefanik
actually flew to Israel to give a speech
before the Israeli Knesset, which I'll play for
you, vowing to help stop the anti semitism
of protesters, which by the way has protected
constitutional speech, against Israel's genocidal atrocities at American
universities. This is a bad sign for Trump

(48:29):
supporters who were hoping this time, Trump really
will end the wars and drain the swamp.
Trump's appointment of Iraq Iran hawk, Brian Hook,
who we talked about yesterday, to help staff
the state department for the next administration and
his rumored consideration of Mike Rogers for secretary
of defense are likewise bad signs.
As is Tucker Carlson's claim that virulent China

(48:49):
hawk Elbridge Colby, is likely to play a
role in the administration.
It's entirely possible that ruling out Pompeo and
Haley, as a lot of us are seeing,
was the last concession that these anti interventionist
contingent of Trump's base is going to get.
Or rather, they shouldn't even say it. The
argument that that could have been in order
to make you think you win.
Right? Giving you the 2, they're easy dismissals.

(49:11):
Because not only Pompeo basically went after Trump,
and everyone noticed that they were in 2022,
they were calling each other out.
So the point
is it give you the ones that are
the most cartoonishly bad so when they go,
okay, we listen, and you get the ones
that were actually already the picks. Problem, reaction,
solution. That's how easy it can be.
Sam Musseini making that point. I'm betting that

(49:32):
Pompeo and Haley were floated to make whatever
warmongers Trump nominates more palatable.
Just very logical.
Now here's Stefanik.
This is November 10th.
The Biden Harris administration knows the Palestinian Authority
is continuing
their pay to slay policies
and linking and lining the pockets of terrorists
who kill

(49:52):
Israelis. Now
it's so embarrassing that if she actually thinks
this, how out of the know these people
are
despite having power. And I think that about
a lot of people in congress. Because I
think we can see the rule rule the
actual ruling structure.
Either way, a lot of these people on
left and right side, they are just absolutely
ignorant,

(50:13):
yet are led to believe they're in the
know.
My point is
either she's lying or she believes this, and
the bottom line is Palestinian Authority, as Roberts
covered, as even people all people at high
levels of this conversation on both sides acknowledge
that the Palestinian Authority is an illusion. They're
an entity that Israel uses to keep Palestine
in check so that they don't have to

(50:33):
be seen doing it themselves even though that's
what it's now today happening post October 7th.
But before that, they were used as this
acting like they weren't the ones governing, but
at the end of the day, they were
absolutely doing so. That's Palestinians will tell you
that if you listen.
And on top of that, even though so
even then, if you wanna pretend this is
happening, well, that'd be Israel for you. So
that's and just like with Hamas being funded.

(50:53):
So what's the game? Are you gonna make
it about Hamas or not? If you are,
Israel funded them until 2024. So what are
we talking about? Yeah. She'll never point that
out. Either way and and that's not to
diminish the act of of resistance despite what
some people wanna frame that as. I honestly
don't whoever carried it out, the point is
it was still a legal act of armed
resistance that crimes were committed around without question,

(51:13):
but still does not remove that right. The
point though,
aside from what I just said, is that
this is not even true. Robert did a
whole thing breaking this down.
The idea is that they there is money
that goes to people that get killed,
whether or not they were killed in the
act of fighting Israelis or Israel bombs a
hotel building and kills children. The point is,
from that point forward, they have money that

(51:35):
goes to the families.
So this is a very dishonest way for
them to frame
support that that that Israel kills so many
people, most of which are civilians,
that they have that they give the money
to the families
and framing that as them paying for terrorism
when it's because their Israel is murdering people
just like it always has
been. Now, yes, that might also mean that

(51:56):
somebody goes out and fights somebody in some
dynamic that they call terrorism
or gets killed standing by the street. Either
way, they get money from the Palestinian authority.
So if you know that and you can
prove it, which we have, then they're lying
to you.
They make it about paying a slave because
they want it to sound like they're funding
terrorism. But realize where that money comes from,
from Israel or rather through them. So either
way so if you're gonna tell us that

(52:17):
the argument is they know they're paying to
kill people and then you still let money
flow to the Palestinian Authority, you still work
with the Palestinian Authority, You see how easy
it is to break these lies down? That
doesn't make sense.
This is lazy, cobbled together narrative that we're
supposed to believe that people always did until
they shot themselves in the foot with their
belligerence on October 7th, post October 7th.
That's the reality. She goes on to say,

(52:39):
however, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are choosing
to ignore the law and waiving mandatory terrorism
sanctions on the Palestinian government. Oh, you mean
sort of like ignoring the law and still
defunding Israel despite them breaking laws everywhere? Still
starving people as even the state department and
others admitted to and Blinken was even chastised
for?
I guess the law only works in your
anti Palestinian ways. Oh, okay. Got it. Totally

(53:01):
objective, Stefanik.
The point is that she's saying they're waiving
mandatory terrorism sanctions
on the Palestinian government when, ultimately, the Palestinian
authority is a group that they put together
after the discussion, which is a whole thing
about electing Hamas, which I still don't believe
is even how that went down. But either
way,
we're to believe that you believe in democracy,
then they pick a group you don't like

(53:22):
and you go, never mind.
They're bad guys, so we don't believe in
democracy when you choose the one we don't
like. That seems really stupid. And then you
guys manufacture an illusion to create so the
point is, you're talking about sanctioning a group
that's that is part of your dynamic.
The point is if you actually know this
information, this is why people laugh at how
dumb this is and laugh at how either
she's that uninformed or that willing to lie

(53:42):
for a foreign country.
And it says, thankfully, the Biden Harris administration,
rewarding of terrorists at the expense of our
great ally, is coming to an end. Realize
that the the I this is a lazy
way to try to make it look like
Biden was doing something different. It goes back
as far as you wanna look that they're
helping the Palestinian people
because they're occupied.
Because the long story is obviously that these

(54:03):
people are oppressed, that they've been removed and
and refused their rights that the world can
see. And now be more so that this
whole thing has happened.
And so to pretend to pretend that the
money that was also going through Donald Trump,
by the way, at that time and then
threw into Biden's administration is anything other than
the continuation of the same thing,
Guess what? Another misrepresentation.

(54:23):
These people are willing to burn down everything
that you believe in in order to help
Israel.
That's who Trump is picking right now.
Max Blumenthal, making sort of a joke but
excellent point, says fulfilling a promise to Adelson,
Trump has granted Israel a second ambassador to
the UN.
Basically, making the point that she's simply there
to represent Israel, which I would agree with.
So now that she's the US ambassador, then

(54:44):
they also have their ambassador to the UN.
So she's the 2nd Israeli ambassador to the
UN.
Arnab Atrand,
taking it from another angle.
You know, the whole lie about them being
an anti war cabinet? Well, every single person
they picked has been aggressively pro war and
openly
in like, screaming about going to war with
Iran.
So you could hold out hope that they
somehow change their minds.

(55:05):
But if we're going to engage honestly with
the press and what they've done, their actions
so far, and what they continue to say
on Twitter, it's pretty clear that this is
not a pro anti war candidate or cabinet.
Even RFK Jr is still supporting Israel.
But Arnab Butran says Trump's new ambassador, Stefanik,
she seems to totally fit with the no
warmongering pivot people are claiming Trump is affecting,

(55:27):
and he's making a joke. Here she is
saying, I was honored to serve on the
official escort committee for prime minister Netanyahu during
his visit.
Our the vicious Iranian backed terrorist. No. Not
true. House Republicans maintain their ironclad commitment to
supporting the ongoing genocide. So same you get
the point.
Supporting them no matter what. I probably stand
with Israel and renew my call to defund

(55:47):
UNRWA. Again, all these
couched argue. UNRWA
is an element that was created in order
to maintain the right of return. The reason
they've become some a de facto
refugee agency is because it's been 76 years.
They've not they're I mean, it's more so
the years after that, but that's I still
I make it from day 1 because that's

(56:08):
where it began. But the actual displacement for
the most part following the first Nakba and
going forward, the point is these people were
displaced,
ethnically cleansed, just like they're being today. And
they have they have and the art see,
the reason it was created is because they
were under the illusion that somehow Israel was
going to allow them to come home. Just
like they told they would in Gaza, and
now they're pulling that back again. Just like
they're lying about going back to their homes
in Lebanon, but they're not gonna let them

(56:29):
go back there either because they are fulfilling
the agenda that anybody honest with themselves can
see. Greater Israel.
And this is exactly these are parts of
that dynamic.
UNRA is a group that was maintaining that
right and holding the information about where they
were supposed to go back to.
And then because they were stuck in this
limbo for decades, well, they had to make

(56:49):
the point was, well, we have to keep
them fed. We have to make sure they
can get because we're waiting for Israel to
resolve this problem they agreed to in every
76 and in many different times. And then
continued or 67. Excuse me. Then they continued
to deny it. They continued to ignore it.
And then they just got so far away
from it, they just go, what do you
mean, Anra? You're a liar. What do you
mean right of return? I don't even know
what that means.
Desperately lying,

(57:10):
more so today than ever. But that's what
she's saying. I stand with Israel and their
defunding of the support for people that you're
illegally occupying.
So you're a warmonger. She says, I've led
the fight to deter lobbyists from advancing communist
Chinese military interests. Firms are waking up to
the fact that working for Chinese companies is
indistinguishable from serve okay. So you're you're in
you're willing to see how governments can influence

(57:32):
foreign public, not with Israel though, despite Israel
being the most obvious example of that all
around the world without question, bar none.
Same thing.
So she's pro war like all of them
are. Here she is saying day 400. This
is yesterday.
It's been 400 days since Hamas terrorists abducted
innocent civilians during the barbaric October 7th attack.

(57:53):
Now, obviously, yes, they did take civilians and
they did take children. Those are crimes and
they should be accountable for it. But you
know what else has happened in that 400
days?
Tens of thousands of innocent people. 44%
children
murdered,
starved to death,
buried under rubble. Oh, oh, getting took over
200,000 by most estimates right now when we

(58:14):
actually understand the full picture. But that's okay
though. We don't care about that because, you
know, they
killed some people and then Israel killed the
rest of them, which is the reality. Even
Israeli media, despite that still somehow being contentious,
has admitted
Hannibal directive. They killed their own people, and
it's very clear how many was the it
seems the majority in my opinion, but the
obvious evidence is that they did something that

(58:34):
nobody even wants to admit, not even to
themselves. But day 400.
Oh, you mean all of the hostages that
could have come back on 9th 10th because
Israel declined both those first offers for full
exchange? Yeah. So So Israel left them there,
and their own people are saying that. But
Stefanik is willing to lie to you and
the media and to Israeli people for Israel.
So it is politicians versus the rest of

(58:55):
the world,
and none of this is in the interest
of your rights.
There are over a 100 still being held
in Gaza. Yeah. They could have been home
14 times by now because Israel continues to
not let that happen. As Ivor Horetz has
written systematically
systematically
how Netanyahu has systematically
thwarted hostage negotiations.

(59:17):
And there is probably 15 different articles coming
from Horetz and other Israeli media and other
Israeli activists and people all around the world
telling you they have made sure this won't
happen. And she says, we must bring them
home now, including 7 Americans. Oh, funny how
you only mean the 7 that are Israeli
Americans. What about the 600
that were there?

(59:38):
If I can grab that real quick.
Maybe it won't pop up this time.
Of course not. Nope. There it is.
600 Americans are estimated to be trapped in
Gaza. So right in the beginning, there were
600 Americans, some of which just Americans, some
Palestinian Americans who are retract they never once
have these American representatives talked about them.

(01:00:00):
None of them. But they'll still I don't
know why this won't load. I'll include the
link. This is the systematic
let's do this.
Dang it. I don't know why this stuff
doesn't load for me now.
I'll come back to it if it loads,
but you guys all know it's, you know,
there's been a 1,000 different times showing you

(01:00:21):
that he has thwarted the actual discussions. Know,
it just kills me because the one person
that probably needs to see that, who would
probably still dismiss it anyway and get angry
and leave, not gonna see it. And they're
gonna go, I knew it wasn't real. People
just self fulfilling. But
it is disgusting that she pretends to care
about Americans when all she's caring about is
the Israeli part of that discussion. The Israeli
Americans, not the other Palestinian Americans. So she

(01:00:43):
doesn't care about Americans. She cares about the
Israeli Zionist part of it. There's no way
to misunderstand that.
So here
is her speech in Israel to the Israelis
of the to the Knesset,
did their government.
Ask yourself why she's even going to Israel.
This wasn't just after October 7th. Why are

(01:01:04):
they going to Israel to to pledge
their support for Israel? Well, this is before
the election. Now you can understand why. It's
about trying to say, please let me be
a part of the American government to Israel
because, you know, you can connect those dots.
I'm sure.
As long as I serve the American people,
I will defend George Washington's vision of religious

(01:01:25):
pluralism and freedom.
And as she goes on to make it
about only supporting Israel and you're not allowed
to think what you want. I love how
she tries to to counterbalance it with George
Washington view and then goes on to say
this. Today, this means crushing
antisemitism
act 2nd sentence in, you're going, I have
the the just believe what you want except
not that.
You can't believe these things because we Israel

(01:01:47):
won't let us,
but freedom though. At home and supplying the
state of Israel with what it needs, when
it needs it without conditions to
achieve total victory.
Without conditions. I can't believe the people I
mean, I I I actually thought that was
like a mistake
when some when what was his name? The,
you know, big behemoth mindless guy. I forget

(01:02:07):
his name all of a sudden. They bet,
you know, they they go without conditions. I
mean, do you not realize how crazy that
is?
So no matter what they do, no matter
what happens, even the law, nothing. Doesn't stop
that. Because that will be a condition. You
can't break the law.
Right? You gotta make sure you're following the
well, they're not, and everybody knows that. We'll
go over more examples of them blocking aid
and how rats even writing about how they've

(01:02:28):
now allowed the gangs to take some of
the aid for certain reasons.
Like, it's the amazing mission creep of the
narrative is incredible.
So the day 1 narrative is contradicted by
the current narrative and they act like it's
the same story. Face of
evil. Chance of death to America are not
hollow slogans.
Well, first of all, I don't see many
people chanting death to America in these protests.

(01:02:48):
But even if they did,
that's called free speech. Isn't it embarrassing how
the people professing to fight for free speech
are right now, the most prominent example of
going after free speech?
You may find it irritating, angry, disgusting, outrageous
that somebody would say death to America, but
it's still free speech.
So if you're out there screening about how
the left is gonna take away your free

(01:03:09):
speech and you don't care about this, you're
a hypocrite.
They are a promise that what happened here
on October 7th
could happen in the United States,
unless Hamas and its jihadist accomplices
are eliminated. You mean Israel?
Because that's the one funding them, but she
doesn't care.
Of course, the threat is that it's gonna

(01:03:30):
come to the United States. Explain for me
how a group that exists in a controlled
area, in an open air prison,
is going to somehow populate and go after
the war. You know who is doing that?
The Azov movement that is real in the
US fund. You know who is doing that?
Israel.
Right out in the open,
plans to take other peoples currently occupying 3
countries around them, but it's all about the
group that you're funding to.

(01:03:52):
I mean, everywhere you look at this narrative,
it is imploding.
But people like this, as the sick ship
is sinking, are telling you to get on
board.
And it is the United States' high honor
and high responsibility
to support Israel's effort. Now they tell you
you're responsible.
She's telling you it's your responsibility

(01:04:13):
to support a foreign country in their war.
How does that make sense? You can argue
that we should, allies and all that, but
our responsibility, the language they're using shows you
how desperate this is.
They're trying to convince you that your job
is to fight for a foreign country while
they murder people, while they commit crimes, while
the world calls this out.
They're on the sinking ship, guys. The and

(01:04:33):
I I frankly, I don't even I I
think they know that. I think they are
so desperately,
desperately compromised,
whether it's Stefanik or Donald Trump. I think
these people are unincapable.
Like ORK Jr, we still all wonder why
that went the way it did.
How do you explain that?
There's something bigger going on.

(01:04:54):
I have been clear at home, and I
will be clear here.
There is no excuse for an American president
to block aid to Israel.
Aid that Yeah. One of them is the
law.
But so again, no conditions.
So there's no excuse. So even if they
break the law, even if they assassinate a
an American president, even if they steal nuclear
technology, even if they bomb a US ship,

(01:05:15):
it doesn't matter
No matter what. That's what it means.
You're here.
There is no excuse for an American president
to block aid to Israel.
Aid that was duly passed by the Congress.
Oh, isn't that funny? Okay. So the so
congress hasn't declared war since what? Before Iraq?
But no. But let's pretend like congress decided

(01:05:36):
we're gonna fund them. Well, what about the
other things congress decided? You don't care about
90 the point is it's hilarious like international
law for them to go, this is congress
dually appointed, but then ignore points they don't
like. Or say, well, international law says you're
not allowed to do this, Iran,
and then violate international law everywhere you look.
Everyone in the world sees this. Americans less

(01:05:57):
than anybody, it seems, but it is transparent.
That's why I think a lot of these
moves today are about trying to muscle us
into a position where it won't matter anymore.
That's what a dying empire would do.
Well, we're dying. We're seeing this as drifting
away. Our power is waning.
Okay. What irrational moves can we make that
will stop that from happening? What can we
do to force them to listen to us

(01:06:18):
forever? That's what authoritarians are thinking right now.
There was no excuse to ease sanctions on
Iran
paying a $6,000,000,000
ransom to the Nope. That was their money.
I hate that we have to go over
this every stupid dime, and that's a very
common Republican talking point. It was money that
was seized from Iran. Now whether you think
they shouldn't have it either way, which would
ultimately make you an authoritarian to say we

(01:06:39):
we're gonna take your money illegally because you're
a bad guy. Well, then you're ridiculous. Either
way, the point is that was illegal and
it was returned.
And they continue to make it about how
Trump will say they funded Iran. No. They
did not. And on top of that, Iran
is not what you maniacs are making it
out to be.
World's leading state sponsor of terror. Nope. Not
even close.

(01:07:00):
Again, as always, if you take every single
claim they've ever made about Iran, which only
center around Hezbollah, Hamas, and and the Houthis,
and, you know, the the the groups, by
the way, which aren't Iran,
not even remotely,
but even then, you take that's that's the
extent of their claims.
If you take that,
most of which are lies and compare it

(01:07:20):
to even what we can prove about what
the US and Israel independently have done, respectively,
it's shocking
just because we call it freedom
and, you know, whatever you wanna call it.
Like, the idea of what the occupation of
Iraq and Syria and Afghanistan and the bombing
of the Sudan, all these these are all
open crimes. There's no declaration of war. These
are illegal occupations. Israel has carried out assassinations

(01:07:42):
and and murder and rape and pillaging and
burning of houses and
death net cleansing,
displacement,
technological
infiltration.
But, yeah, let's ignore all of these things
and say, well, because they're our ally, we
don't care.
And then point at Iran and say, all
the secret things you can't see that we
know, you're in danger.

(01:08:03):
Yeah. Sure. Why not?
Certainly possible. But I like to lean into
the facts. And what I can see is
a group that has continued to show measured
response to your belligerent actions. That does not
mean good guy. There's plenty of reason to
be concerned about the Iranian government like there's
about any government.
But facts matter, and what they're saying about
Iran is patently false, and we'll get into
that next. Or to dither and hide while

(01:08:24):
our friends fight for their lives.
No excuse.
Full stop.
That's why I'm proud to have sponsored or
backed every measure to aid Israel that has
come before the United States Congress.
Every single one.
And it's why for years, I have been
a leading proponent and partner to president Trump
in his historic support for Israeli independence and

(01:08:46):
security,
including moving the US embassy to its rightful
place in Jerusalem.
Israel is indeed a miracle, an outpost of
Again, a crime. Right? What they did was
a crime. It was a violation of international
law. No matter what you think about it,
that's objectively the case. Same with giving them
the Golan Heights. It was Syrian territory and
still is despite Israel's occupation of it. Freedom

(01:09:09):
of western values of civilization,
a strike Western values. How embarrassing. Are we
actually trying to pretend that the values of
the current United States
is anything even remotely close to what the
extremist maniacal
Zionist
what's the what's the not prophetic, but
what's the I'm I'm blanking on the world

(01:09:30):
all of a sudden. But the point is
these people that are clearly zealots. That's what
I was looking for. That's not every Israeli
or every Jew, clearly.
But the current
driving mindset that justifies raping prisoners,
that justifies the murder of innocent people because
they look and feel and act differently and
have a different religion, that is not the
same that we're pretending we represent.
They are an anomaly in the world today,

(01:09:53):
and that has become shockingly clear to most
people now despite them still trying to bury
what happened.
And she wants you to believe that we
share western values.
God darn it. I mean, these people are
so compromised. It's disgusting. Example of human potential,
the physical embodiment of Herzl's maxim.
If you Herzl, you know, the atheist who
started Zionism, which is an easy thing to

(01:10:14):
prove. You will it, it is no dream.
It's the same founding ethos that we prize
in America. Right. The American dream.
Oh, okay. Good. So the f the the
the the
atheist that founded Zionism that went on to
carry out massacres and genocide, more than one.
They still point back at the horrifying things

(01:10:34):
that you can understand about what happened in
the first Nakba and going forward that many
of the people still praise today, the older
IDF members that laugh about raping, killed children,
it's all on the record.
We're gonna pretend that that's the synonymous with
the American dream. Well, to be honest, there
is conversations to be had about the horrible
things that happened to native Americans. So maybe
there is more alignment than we realized. But
either way, that's not what Americans believe today.

(01:10:56):
The reality of what we see ourselves at
is not even remotely what these people are
showing the world to be.
But she wants that.
Where are the conservatives out there with the
integrity to call these people out? I am
hoping you can push back, especially the ones
I was talking about earlier.
That somehow you see the problems, but you
think maybe you could muscle this into getting
what you want. Please try. I would love

(01:11:17):
to see somebody better in this position.
Now here, by the way, is that, article
which for some reason it shows the grayed
out,
I couldn't get it on the way back
machine for some reason. But how Netanyahu has
systematically foiled talks to release hostages from Hamas
captivity.
Over and over and over and over, and
it's amazing that people don't wanna see the
reality.

(01:11:41):
That was David Ike, by the way, posting
this, and he he he simply says, Trump
selects Stefanik. This is why he picked her.
I agree. Now here's what David Smith had
to say. He said, there's a lot of
talk about the coming appointments. After the excellent
decision to box out Pompeo and Haley okay.
So let's start here.
That hasn't happened yet.
I saw Trump's statement too, just like I
saw the ones before that.

(01:12:01):
Nothing's happened.
Political statements mean nothing.
They're words. He could be wrong. He could
be lying. He could be deceiving you. He
could change his mind tomorrow. So until that
happens or does not, nothing matters. It's not
the I the the decision to box them
out has not happened yet. It has been
floated. So I just wanna be clear about
that. I don't like how even people I
think are smart to see through it are
continuing to lean into statements from politicians as

(01:12:23):
meaning something more than they ever have before.
But he says Trump followed up with a
horrible UN pick, more than horrible, but we'll
start there. We need to get keep the
pressure going. So I think it's interesting. I
I I like what he's doing. I want
to see this happen. If you think that
this is the pinnacle of the democratic process
or whatever we wanna talk about, then you
should be trying to do what you can
to get to go the way you want
it to. The re the only I guess,

(01:12:45):
my point is, you know I don't agree
or believe in how this goes. I think
we're being played. But
I like the idea of being politically active
in whatever context that means. Because it means
you it means you care about this. You're
trying to see affect change. Even if I
would argue you're going through a system that
won't allow it to happen. My point is
still the same. I like the fact that
you're jump trying you're not just checking a
box and moving on. Right? But my point

(01:13:05):
in this is that if we have to
do this, which is clearly what's happening,
plenty of conservatives are increasingly uncomfortable with then
this is not a representative government.
If the idea is they're the living embodiment
of the collective will of conservatives, well, that's
even though that's abstract, this is not even
remotely the reality of that, as far as
I can tell. And so the idea that
we have to keep the pressure going, it

(01:13:25):
just shows you that even when you elect
the person, you have to muscle them into
doing
We're I just want us to stand back
and reflect on how this is not the
way it's the at least not even close
to what we pretend we lived in. The
pinnacle of electoral processes. It's not what we
deal with. And then even past that, we
don't live in the world we think we
do. These people are not beholden to you.
They don't care what you think. And they're

(01:13:45):
showing that with everything that happens.
Because here's how Trump could really set up
a historic second term. He simply goes on
to highlight people like Rand Rand Paul, Tulsi
Gabbard, which I don't agree with, and Doug
Douglas McGregor.
And saying that if we pick them, this
could be historic. Well, I mean, maybe. I
would like to think so that that these
they might have a positive affluence influence on
how it ends up. But, again, most of

(01:14:06):
these people have shown themselves to fall in
line when it matters, even around Israel, so
we'll have to wait and see. But I
would agree. That'd be better than the ones
that are being floated right now. But it's
if we're constantly playing lesser of evils with
everything we do, then we're always gonna be
played, guys. I hope we can acknowledge that.
But, by the way, as much as he
did secondarily say, no Pompeo and Nikki Haley,
I just think it's important that even after

(01:14:27):
that this is from yesterday. Here's what Mike
Pompeo said after that statement had been put
out. He says, I I would mister mister
president, I was proud to work with you
too. We'll we'll play it first, actually. So
this is the the recent rally that he
called out mong Mike Pompeo personally. Even if
he doesn't pick him, it's alarming that he
would pretend this absolute monster is somebody that's
worthy of praise. Mike Pompeo. Stand up, Mike.

(01:14:49):
You look so handsome.
Secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, great guy.
They took the military. They said, oh, we
had a plan. We had a plan. Mike
Pompeo made the plan with me. We had
a plan subject to all these different things
that they had to do. They weren't doing
them. They were doing some, but they said,
great. We're not going forward until they do
the we were we were gonna be fine.

(01:15:11):
What was that?
Lost his thread there, I think. But either
way, the point is Pompeo made the built
the plan. Well, here's what he says. I
was proud to work with you too, which
is not really what he said. As you
said, when we were together last week, you
and I built the plan that made the
world safe and led the new no new
wars, which is not remotely true as we've
always addressed. But that's the narrative. It's fun
to lean into the fun narratives that make

(01:15:33):
us look the way we want to. Right?
America firmly rejected the Biden Harris foreign policy
agenda, which is the same agenda you have.
Identical. Same thing. Different flowery words and aiming
in different directions, but at the end of
the day, still pro Israel, still pro war,
still pro defense department, still pro merchants of
death.
I mean, have we not noticed the same
can wars, the same direction? Trump didn't stop

(01:15:53):
any of them. He continued all of it.
It did not it didn't even take to
it took the Biden for him to even
pull out of Afghanistan. What happened to Trump
saying we're gonna end the war in Syria?
That didn't happen. Ended up staying there for
the oil and continuing the same dynamic. It
was a lot of floated narratives. We defeated
ISIS. No. They're still there. We ended the
Syria war. No. It didn't happen. We're gonna
pull out Afghanistan. Never even actually took place.
Even now, by the way, the despite Biden's

(01:16:14):
narrative, I can tell you right there are
elements that the US is still influencing on
the ground, for sure.
But he says we have a duty to
put America first again.
Again?
I'd like to see it at least once.
Because right now, even this is showing you
to be pro Israel. Not pro America, not
America first, but Israel first in every possible
way.
Now here's what frustrates me. This bad kitty

(01:16:36):
says, our represent well, first,
Bennet Johnson,
says Punchbowl News is now reporting GOP senators
feel bullied by voters in our audience and
Tucker Carlson
for demanding they vote for a senate leader
who will facilitate the mandate they gave Trump.
See how funny it is? So now you're
getting the you're even starting to see a
divide between some of these, I think, naive
hopefuls that the party will listen to them

(01:16:58):
or people like Danny, I think, are just
placating the ones below them and are still
part of the manipulation.
The point is, nonetheless,
they don't care what you think. And now
they're telling you you they're bullied for you
telling them to do what you voted them
to do? So are we still pretending this
is the representative government? They're like, stop bullying
me. I'm gonna pick what I want.
Pretty strange, I think. And it says they
would rather hide behind their secret ballot.

(01:17:19):
So we're talking about Republicans, guys. And I
think it's important I'm still glad that they
have the courage to at least call that
out,
But realize that ultimately, this shows you the
same thing I'm talking about.
And what he says
is our representatives are supposed to represent our
wishes.
That's what they're there for. I think we
need to remind them who their boss is.
I just I find it to be kind

(01:17:39):
of, like,
childlike naive in my opinion. It's and I
I simply point out, if you're still hoping,
hashtag vote harder, that politicians do what they
promise and believing that they ever do,
you're at level 1.
Not to say that it's never gonna come
to pass. In some cases, what they want
happens to align with what you want.
It's not the same as them following through
with their promises.

(01:17:59):
But I said, this is transparently not the
case. History shows us that.
As our own history will show anyone honestly
engaging with the full scope of the facts.
So for us to go, they're supposed to
be voting what we want. I mean, are
we really pretending that they ever do?
So my I think I think post even
just 2016,
there's a lot of people that kinda just

(01:18:19):
got politically active and just really, even after
all this time, still can't really grasp the
bigger picture of how long this has been
dishonest. How long this or they just are
doing this for different reasons. But I'm not
and I I just think it's important to
recognize that what
the full picture of how this doesn't in
any way represent you.
But even if you think right now that
you have to bully them into doing what

(01:18:40):
you want, just acknowledge that shows they don't
care.
They really don't care what you think and
are now even almost calling you out for
trying to get them to do what you
want. It's just so it's all right there.
Now here's an interesting clip. This is actually,
from a,
I think it's from,
the Netherlands, I believe.
And this is a person saying,

(01:19:02):
Robert Jensen is not yet excited about Trump's
campaign talk. It's time to deliver, which is
exactly what I'm saying. He said that only
then can we cheer. So I'm glad to
see somebody with principle out there to say,
look. It's just because, you know, they promise
things, it means nothing until it happens. He
says, tonight, in forum and side, we discussed
the presidential election, the role of the deep
state, Elon Musk, and the transhumanist developments.

(01:19:22):
Oh, I think they clearly see it.
But this person says,
this is very good. The previous Trump administration
was at all Wall Street neocons and Zionists
and allowed the pandemic and lockdowns. Anyone who
doubts this or is angry about it, check
out Whitney Webb, TLav. I wish things would
be different now, but seeing is believing.
And this person responds, and I think this

(01:19:43):
is important.
It says, if Trump didn't warp speed, so
essentially
create Operation Warp Speed and roll out the
dangerous vaccine that killed everybody,
with making available fake
vaccine, there's there is a translation, but just
realize that I think it's a little bit
of the disjointed part. But so, essentially, if
he didn't do warp speed and make a
fake vaccine available,
there would have been 10 years of lockdowns.

(01:20:05):
Do Can you see the kind of willful
the the will like, you're you are deceiving
yourself
to make this make sense.
So just like even Alex Jones floated the
it's just sugar water, which is what he
did about the vaccine, which is not true.
The point is that they want they're convincing
themselves that he had to do that and
then gave us a vaccine that was fake
in order to stop the lockdowns.

(01:20:28):
I guess, live in your fantasy. Whatever makes
you believe that they're on your side. The
truth is obviously that's not the case.
Just a thought, makes it very clear. Republicans
fear that Democrats will take away their rights
to bear arms and free to enter free
speech. Democrats fear that Republicans will take away
their right to abortion and gay marriage, which
it's obviously not that as simple, but the
point is clear as she goes forward. Meanwhile,

(01:20:50):
neither Republicans nor Democrats, I would say neither
Conservatives nor Liberals, seem to recognize that continuing
to support a system that can effectively take
away their rights,
right, whichever way it is, is not a
system that functions for the people. It's a
good way to put it. If all you're
doing is fighting off the bad thing from
happening either way, then we're not progressing in
any positive way,

(01:21:11):
which is the same with the lesser evils
dynamic we're all trying to show you. She
says, nor do they recognize that if a
system can take away their rights, which my
point is that's not possible, they cannot respect
them. She She says they never really had
those rights under that system in the 1st
place.
Right? So if you're gonna pretend that they
can take them, then then you don't have
them.
But since once we stop consenting to a
system that takes away our rights as human

(01:21:33):
beings, we will no longer have to fear
that those human rights are in danger because
there will be no power to do so.
Remember, your inherent rights are simply outlined by
the constitution.
They're god given. The point is you have
those rights whether they were ever written down
on that on that hemp paper. The truth.
And that's why the first ten amendments, the

(01:21:53):
bill of rights, they were amendments to the
constitution. That's why it's just called the bill
of rights, but it's part of the same
documents. The amendments, the first ten,
are not in any way contradictory to the
original document.
The point is that anything that is repugnant
to the full document, including the bill of
rights,
is null and void according to the supreme
court May Mayberry versus Madison.

(01:22:15):
So today, as they pretend you can just
pass a law that says you don't have
free speech or your guns are taken away,
that's that according to the supreme court and
our foundational
inherent that that's against the law. It's unconstitutional.
That's what I always point out just because
it's a law does not make it legal,
and that does make sense. Or or constitutional.
Because we have corrupt politicians that will act
in the interest of foreign governments at your

(01:22:36):
expense, and then pretend that it all lines
up.
So last point on this on this point
about the Trump dynamic. I just thought this
was really interesting.
This is an article from Zero Edge. Billionaire
Pratt
will move to America after Trump wins as
liberals flee to Canada. It's kind of a
weird overlap because on one side, we're talking
about random liberal people that are leaving country,

(01:22:58):
just like random individuals, not not people that
are powerful or billionaires.
But what's funny to me is so that
it's my point is those 2 those 2
things are different conversations.
Is it a positive that billionaires are fleeing
to the United States? Doesn't that seem to
show you the opposite of what we're talking
about? Like, this is the whole point. It's
not unique to Trump, guys. The same thing.
The point is that this is becoming a

(01:23:19):
a a place for the criminals of the
world. And I will it has been for
quite a long time. Now that's not this
is not the only indication of that. I
just think it's interesting. This just made me
think to this point. That to say that
he's moving here
shows that this is conducive to the kind
of thing that I don't think these people
are acting in your interest or honestly,
I think that's why they're in the positions

(01:23:40):
they are, quite frankly. But that's for you
to decide. I just thought that was kinda
funny. You know, billionaires are fleeing to the
US is usually an indication that's not the
thing we think it is.
Now I'm actually gonna skip this for a
later conversation because I wanted to go into
this more depth. I didn't think I'd be
going this long this part of the show.
But this is an interesting overlap. This there's
a weird thing going on at a Tennessee
school
about, a satanic temple.

(01:24:01):
And I will I'm actually gonna plan on
talking about this. I wanted to make a
bigger point about it. But it's interesting is
the it's about it's about true freedom.
And the idea that whether or not you
agree with this, the point is as we
get into it and it's it's not what
it sounds like. It's like, well, at least
that's what they claim. My point is this
may I find this uncomfortable. I find, like,
this is a worrisome I I wouldn't the
idea that this is the kind of thing
that is being normalized, it worries me. And

(01:24:22):
I think it's much bigger than
just some random school thing. But the the
larger point is if we're going to allow
religious freedom,
And and this is something that's off campus
and the the adults have the parents have
to be okay with it blah blah blah.
I'll go into it later. Not to say
I endorse it, just to be clear. But
my point would be that if we are
it's like the free speech point. If you're
not willing to protect the worst of the

(01:24:42):
speech, then you don't believe in it. So
in this context,
if it's just somebody's random choice, and so,
like, they have allotted, like, an hour for
for off campus, like, religious stuff or whatever
it is, and some people are going to
bible study, and then all of a sudden
these parents are like, I want my kids
to go here.
Well, I may disagree with that. You may
think, well, no way. That's not allowed. But
the point is it's the same difference. It

(01:25:03):
truly is. As much as we may disagree.
The point is you have the right to
make your decisions, and you if we wanna
say we have freedom in this context, that's
what it would look like. I just find
it interesting that I argue most people would
say, no. No. No. That's not allowed. That
goes too far. Like, okay. Well, it's well,
you need to start erring on the side
of principle, guys. I think it's important. I
I am gonna go over this again because
I think it's a larger point to make.

(01:25:23):
Now let's get into some interesting overlaps around
what it's gonna go into the Iran point,
but I wanna start with this interesting idea
of largely Alex Jones right now, but it's
a lot of them, pushing this aggressive idea,
which is certainly possible that the Democrats are
gonna try to make moves to steal the
election.
I don't personally see any indication of that,
which obviously is possible.

(01:25:45):
Either way you look at it, either side,
obviously, we should realize that that's something they're
capable of. But oh, actually, I I take
it back. 1st, we're gonna talk about the
point appointment, and then we're gonna get into
the deep state stealing the election.
Pretty quickly, both of them. But this is
actually fasting. I just talked about this. This
right here of Alex Jones

(01:26:05):
posting, which I'm pretty sure still to this
point is a kind of a troll,
but I could be wrong.
I formally accept the offer to serve as
Trump's press secretary. So I saw this, and
I thought that's they're trolling. It's funny.
But then I saw that the Candace Owens
was, I guess, floated. Part of the intel,
there's no official statement from anybody.
It's only, like, inside word from somebody who

(01:26:26):
knows someone in the event and then they
stand up and go, I accept. So I
find this to be maybe, like, an obvious
joke. But Candace Owens said the same thing
that I won't Alice Jones would be better,
then we have this guy,
which, by the way, this is the next
news network. It's funny. I haven't seen him
in a while. He, you know, just became
like a partisan just like all the rest
of it. The point is he used to
wear a suit and a tie, and now
he's
just changed a bit with all this Trump

(01:26:47):
stuff in front of him. I think it's
funny. But he goes, breaking. They said it
would never happen, but Alex Jones just accepted.
Everyone is freaking out.
Again, probably just continue to troll. I don't
know.
Here this is where Alex Jones said he
accepts that position, and then here's where he
posts that video. Breaking. They said it would
never happen. Again, it still feels like a
troll. I think this is a I think
they're making a joke.

(01:27:09):
But he posted this on info wars. Alex
Jones accepts White House press secretary role, striking
fear in DC swamp creatures.
And
no. It doesn't it just it it shows
the three points I just made.
That video,
his post, and Owen and Candace Owens saying
that.
See my point? So it's I I would
already argue right now even if this is

(01:27:29):
a joke. This is wildly dishonest. You put
it up as a headline.
I mean, it's just because it's info wars.
I mean, this would be like the the
New York Times, Washington Post putting up a
headline that it's not true. No indication it's
a joke. That that would be manipulation.
Even if it's a joke. I just find
that interesting. So I'm on the fence. What
do you think? Do you think it's real?
And if it is real, I find that

(01:27:50):
to be pretty crazy.
Am almost entertaining in a way, but but
wild.
Why can you imagine as why now my
point is to show you 2 things on
this. 1,
like I said before. And as even David
Icke pointed out, like with Tucker Carlson, this
is not what journalists do. Journalists don't endorse
candidates. They do not take a side. They
objectively report,

(01:28:10):
and then let you decide for yourself. And
that's not to say that you can't. I
mean, court, do what you want. The argument
is that it's just that important or whatever.
That's been the same way we've talked about
this for decades and we make the same
rationalization for why you deviate from the the
point is this is what a journalist should
not do. And on top of that, now
that you're possibly or even floating the idea
of being the White House press secretary, when

(01:28:30):
we get into this next part, realize this
show is a complete lack of objectivity.
But what do you think? You think it's
gonna happen? Do you think it's a joke?
I don't know. Pretty interesting.
But here is what I wanna show you.
Now, this is in order in time.
So this is starting at 6:49 AM on
November 11th.
Now we're gonna watch any. I just wanna
show you what the statements are. This tweet

(01:28:52):
from before that says the deep state is
still plotting to install Harris in the presidency.
Pentagon caught meeting in secret, which by the
way was a simple there was a point
made on CNN.
So I guess Donald Trump now cites CNN
as a source he can take to see.
I'm I'm half joking, but the same argument
people would make about, oh, you believe the
Telegraph? Well, that's where that comes from. It
was a it was people talking about that

(01:29:13):
on CNN and the ultimate point is I
don't see anything behind it that fleshes out
what they were even getting into, and it
seems like a hype around something we can't
verify. But that's the point. Right? Then it
tags it and says deep state is plotting
another coup attempt against incoming Trump administration. The
report below, war games, now it's gonna. It's
completely hypothetical. Again, please do not represent this
as thinking it's not possible that of course,

(01:29:33):
they I I wouldn't be surprised. But as
you know, my opinion is it's just your
government. So if they did play something like
this out, it would be, my opinion, engineered
chaos to rationalize something bigger than the left
fighting the right. But my point is, as
we go through this, if this doesn't happen
and nothing ever happens, just remember this aggressive
hype that went on all day. It's continuing

(01:29:53):
before this too. So 6:49 AM, November 11th.
Here is
7:0:3 AM, November 11th.
Saint different post. Roger Waters warns Democrats plan
to not certify Trump. We cannot let the
demo rats get away with this. Right? You
party of unity. Right? All that unity everywhere.
And okay, then we go to 9:8:8:19
AM, same day. Monday live, deep state plotting

(01:30:15):
to keep Trump out of the White House.
So my point is to show you how
aggressively this is being seated when it's still
the same this is basically the same report.
The same hollow evidence free report about how
it's happening because Democrats bad. Here,
11 AM, November 11th, live. The Democrats are
publicly plotting, publicly now, to install Harris as
president and block the certification of Trump. So

(01:30:35):
they're just kinda combining the different
it's the same stuff. It's the same day.
Why would you post this 47 times in
the one day? Because that's what propaganda looks
like. And I don't see
anything other than it could happen, which I've
been bidding.
This is 1102,
2 minutes later. Deep state cool alert. The
signs are clear. The democrats are planning to

(01:30:56):
create crises as cover for blocking the peaceful
transfer of power. So now it's not it
could happen or they see them planning. It
is this is happening.
They are planning to do this.
Okay. So when this
potentially doesn't happen and there's no evidence to
show that it ever did, can we at
least acknowledge
the as you're seeing all of the totally
not weird advertisements for pills and different things

(01:31:17):
that happen every 10 seconds? Here,
2 minutes later after that,
from Alex Jones Network, emergency alert. The deep
state's planning to launch new assassination attempts. These
are all different, guys.
Coup plot's assassination attempts undermine certification.
I'd love to see some evidence.
You mean, like, the other fake assassination attempts?
And I'm not talking about the first one

(01:31:37):
even though there's wildly clear anomalies there. I
mean, all the other hype around things that
nobody's ever really verified about people dropping this
and clearly, this is hype, guys,
in so many ways. And that doesn't always
mean everything's fake, but still hype.
12:42 AM, same day. Warning, the globalists are
dangerous animals cornered by our recent victories.

(01:31:58):
You're right.
So when deep state monsters put deep state
monsters in power, that's a we win.
Yeah. Someone does for sure. Ready to carry
out cyberattacks, false flags, martial law. But no
matter what do you realize how this is
the same message that goes on every day
for the last 20 years of this report?
And
I'll be right there with you. Obviously, false
flags and different but if you constantly at

(01:32:18):
a fever pitch or always point of that
when something goes on, guess what? He was
right. That's how easy that is. Or pointing
at really benign average things that we all
know to new people that are just waking
up to these things and going, oh my
god.
The Iran thing. We know that Iran going
after Iran. Yeah. You know why we know
if they're going after Iran? Because they've been
saying that for a decade.
But to new people, it looks like he's

(01:32:39):
prescient. He sees they're gonna plan to go
against Iran. No. They've been telling you that.
General Mosley Clark, I've been going forever. I've
played 45 videos of how they're literally telling
you we're gonna go after Iran, but somehow
he was right.
Here,
Elon Musk.
Same just showing you this is where this
is leading to. Essential to stop fraud and
elections. Okay. So this hype, this nonstop hype,

(01:33:01):
47 times throughout the day with the same
point from the same show about they're all
gonna cheat and steal and assassinate and it's
coming left and right, which, of course, it
could.
The fraud and the elections has to stop.
Well, we're past that at this point, but
either way, and by the way, yes, they're
cheating every time. Wouldn't be surprised.
My point here is that this is about
leading the idea that we need to stop

(01:33:22):
that. So my point is to show problem
reaction solution here, which I think very obviously
leads into
well, this just simply says I'll be demanding
that voter ID and proof of citizenship are
necessary. Yep. Exactly, guys.
Now if you wanna pretend that that only
means what we already deal with, let me
show you why you're wrong.
K. So I want you to see that

(01:33:42):
this is what's being pushed. And what is
coming, whether you want it to or not,
which is already being rolled out, here it
is in my state, in Republican state right
now. The real ID deadline is in 6
months. How to get a Real ID in
Tennessee? This is November 11, 2024.
Okay. So Real ID
is digital identification. That's what it is.

(01:34:03):
Now at the moment, you're still gonna have
your physical thing, but this is setting this
up. This is creating the, as we talked
about with the Save Act, real ID compliant
identification. That's the whole point in the SAVE
Act.
So when they're over here hyping the fraud
that I don't I mean, again,
it shouldn't be surprising that cheated happening. But
the hype around this after it, building up

(01:34:23):
to this and then pivoting into stop the
fraud, the voter ID demanding
why didn't we do that the first time?
Why didn't you do that the last time
you were a pal for 4 years? I
don't think they were ready for it. My
point is that the real ID I dynamic
is already rolling out underneath all of this,
and they're forcing you into it.
The Real ID Act will go into effect.

(01:34:44):
Now the re understand the Real ID Act
is not the same as this. This this
is the same act that talks about real
ID compliant identification.
The real ID act goes back a while.
But now it's fine. And this has been
kicked down the road for so long. I'm
telling you because the technology they wanted to
do this was not there. They didn't have
the justification, the narrative in place. Now it's
being driven in.

(01:35:05):
It'll go into effect May 7th during Donald
Trump's administration,
meaning that Tennesseans only have 6 months left
to make their IDs as or to make
sure that they are real ID compliant.
That's right out of the SAY back, guys.
It says the IDs are required for people
18 years or older and old
or 18 years old or older to enter

(01:35:25):
certain federal buildings, board commercial flights within the
United States. According to a statement from the
Tennessee Department of Safety, and this is the
same difference anywhere in the country,
it says the, the volunteer state has 5,800,000
valid credentials, 1,600,000
are not currently Real ID.
I'm one of them.
I'm not gonna do it, and we'll see
what happens. I'm gonna try anyway.

(01:35:47):
So the point
is this creates a situation where that setup,
you no longer you have to use this,
in some cases, to even access federal buildings,
which as far as I can tell, is
not even currently the reality, or even get
on a flight.
Take your passport for the time being is
the another axe avenue for that.
But I argue, eventually, all these will be

(01:36:07):
checked be phased out,
and it'll come down to this digital identity.
That's the whole point. Again, this is not
my opinion. If you've seen the past work
on this, the ID 2020 and real ID,
both of these things are the digital ID
agenda. Right on the surface, in this very
show, if you watch it, I go over
it on their own websites about why those
things are the direction, and they're praising this.

(01:36:27):
So this is what they look like and
it's the little I think that's supposed to
be a yellow star kinda thing and ultimately
it's a little star. And by the way,
I didn't even like, it's funny actually you
think about it, the overlap with the conversation
in the world today. Who knows? But the
point is that that's,
hey. Let me do this real quick. We
can look at what the what it looks
like.
Look at the images of it.

(01:36:49):
So, yeah, so it's supposed to be a
yellow the inside's white, the outer part of
the star is yellow. So the inverse of,
you know, the overcurrent so point is that
that is
what will they're arguing that you need, and
then this is something that will then be
applicable to the entire country as I understand
it.
Maybe I was in on
here. So watch this if you understand that.

(01:37:10):
Now here is what Bernie shared, and this
is about us digital ID in Australia.
So it's diff different country, obviously, but it
is all rolling out around the world.
And it it will be happening under Trump's
administration.
And here
oh, so Orwell says hers is the all
star. So that is interesting, by the way.
Just the the context of the world.

(01:37:31):
Coincidences do happen, but I find that interesting.
So here's what they say in Australia. And
the ultimately, her argument is they're getting caught.
So they're trying to make it sound like
it only applies to certain categories, but then
they basically go, hold on. If if everybody
who is under 16 has to do this,
that means everyone will have to do it
in order yep.
So digital ID, necessary for everybody, on the
way.

(01:37:52):
Of course, if you're testing to see if
someone's 13 or 14 or 15 or 16,
you're also testing to see,
by definition,
if they're
16 plus.
So if there's going to be age verification,
everybody is going to have to go through
an age verification process, won't they?
Yes.

(01:38:12):
Yes.
So this isn't just about the privacy or
collecting data about kids. This is literally everybody
accessing social media. That's how it has to
work, isn't it?
Yes. And Senator Shearbridge, you just used the
term age verification.
You may not have been in the room
when we had a discussion about the distinction
between age verification and age assurance.

(01:38:32):
This is an age assurance trial.
Don't you love these stupid bureaucratic nuances? Like,
if you're so oh, sorry. Age,
I already forgot it. Age,
assurance.
Okay. So if we wanna assure ensure assure
that everyone is a sub a certain age
before accessing it, how exactly is that different
than verifying that they're older?

(01:38:54):
I mean, I I guarantee if we hear
the context, it's about some kind of a,
you know, we're not proving what age you
are. We're just making sure you're over a
certain age. I'm actually willing to bet you
that's exactly what it is. Effectively the same
point for what they're doing. A barrier in
order to access it and you have to
prove it. It's the same conversation.
So I actually, I'm I'm pretty sure I
nailed it right there because I was thinking
of that, ultimately, it's not verifying. It's just

(01:39:16):
assuring that you're beyond a certain barrier. But
that's what it's all about. Creating the choke
point that you have to have in order
to access it under the guise of safety
for children.
This is if you're going to have age
assurance
for kids 13, 14, 15, or 16,
testing
if they're that age, you're testing everyone's age
and you're doing it at that level of

(01:39:36):
age assurance.
And that has privacy
and
data protection implications for literally everybody accessing social
media, doesn't it? Yes. And that's one of
the reasons why we've commissioned consumer research to
look at consumer willingness and particular aspects that
are important to them. Yeah. Right. Which usually
means nothing. Right? Usually, it means we're gonna
pretend we care.

(01:39:58):
And the point
is that this will effectively
like, it's it's goes both ways. Right? Forcing
everybody to engage with digital IDs, but also
in a way creating a barrier for younger
kids. In some cases, won't be able to
access these things, which I think is important.
I think it's so clear how the younger
generations are being influenced by the media that
we're putting forward,
not the corporate controlled conversation. And so that's

(01:40:19):
a problem for power structures. I think that's
one and one of many different examples around
that. Now, talking about Iran, and this is
coming from the same conversation. So Alex Jones
is the one saying that
right? This the the the building issue. The
deep state is coming after Trump. The deep
state is influencing
okay.
Well, I agree.
But these are the same people that you're

(01:40:40):
not pointing to, whether that's the Zionist influencers,
Trump's cabinet itself.
So he says, I publicly predicted this is
kinda what I was making fun of earlier.
I publicly predicted,
as opposed to quietly predicting it in a
corner where no one can hear you. Right?
I publicly predicted the deep state would start
framing Iran for the next group of assassination
attempts on July 15th.

(01:41:00):
So instead of saying, like, okay. So you
predicted that Iran would continue to be framed
and and attacked by the group that's been
doing it for 50 years? Wow. What an
insight. And it says, when you study the
globalist mind, it's easy to know their next
move, except you pretend to study the globalist
mind, but with no ignoring the most obvious
example of how that's being rolled forward in
Israel and the overlap with the World Economic

(01:41:22):
Forum and the vaccine and Trump and everything
else.
But it says Iran denies involvement in Trump
assassination plot. Well, that's the point. It's it's
a cartoon. And I'll show you next again
if you didn't see our last show.
So what's funny about it is I agree.
Right? I do think that this whole game
is about framing Iran for what's gonna happen.
But my point, what I'm gonna show you

(01:41:42):
next, is if we're able to acknowledge the
fact that it's they're potentially being framed,
and you're pointing to globalism.
Well, here's this here's Stefanik. Look what she's
saying. The US is ready for a return
to president Trump's maximum pressure campaign against Iran.
Oh, wait a minute. Okay. So if the
game is to frame Iran for what's happening,
and Stefanik is coming hot of the gate

(01:42:03):
and saying, Iran, Iran, Iran. Well, is that
is she the deep state?
Or if she's not, then are both of
them framing Iran? I don't get it. See,
these are the things that will never really
be addressed this way, in my opinion. Because
the truth is you can show
that and, I mean, we we're ultimately in
agreement.
I just think he's pretending to not see
what the deep state really is.
But it says, for too long, our enemy

(01:42:23):
have and or whatever we wanna call the
deep state, whatever it means to you, the
truth is the unelected power structure. So she
ultimately wouldn't be there or within that category.
But my point is that this is with
the Israeli globalist, Zionist
background, wealthy, influential, occultist families. That is the
the deep state. As well as the intelligence
apparatus that apparati or whatever you have, the

(01:42:45):
different intelligence agencies that are completely run by
other things that our government's influence. But either
way,
all of those things are clearly in the
same line going after Iran, and all of
them are the people that this many of
the Republican talking heads don't wanna call out.
Says with Trump in charge, peace through strength
is back. Right. The same old point we're

(01:43:05):
making that that means war. That means ongoing
violence and belligerence in the idea that by
doing so, you'll scare them away from acting
back. How is you wanna show me when
that's ever worked?
Look back. I mean, on top of the
fact that the US government is not this
shining beacon of strength right now. Just because
they have a lot of military powers show
that we can see it with Israel and
the rest of it. They are not the

(01:43:26):
entity that we pretend they are on the
world stage when it comes to the warfare.
But either way,
even if you believe that they could just
act militarily and shove everybody back, the point
is there's plenty of entities that only act
like, look at what the US would do
or Israel.
Somebody acts against them, they act back stronger,
almost but without even thinking about it.

(01:43:46):
So you're gonna come forward, you're gonna act
in strength, and they're gonna act back. And,
oh, guess what? That spirals into war. Who
could have seen that coming? This is this
is a deception. It always has been in
my mind. You don't have to be violent
to show strength.
True strength is not through screaming that I'm
strong.
I want us to think about that because
that's exactly what Trump is.

(01:44:08):
Now predicted this deep deep state would be
framing Iran. Well, that's stefotic for you right
there. Here's the article from The Wall Street
Journal that she rep she tweeted she put
the link out, by the way. Says, Trump
to renew maximum pressure campaign against Iran. President-elect
Donald Trump plans to drastically increase sanctions on
Iran and throttle its oil sales as part
of an aggressive strategy to undercut Tehran's support

(01:44:29):
for violent Middle East proxies. Okay. So is
it the same as when Israel supports Hamas
or when the US supports moderate rebels? I
guess those we don't care about. About. Right?
And its nuclear program, which doesn't exist outside
of a civilian program as even the state
department testified to. But the point is, here
is the Wall Street Journal.
The the the framing of the partisanship is

(01:44:50):
that this is a left platform and they're
going after, you know, that that's how it
would work if it's things they don't like
to hear. Right? The problem is that this
what the the the real picture is, if
you can see through the 2 party paradigm,
is keeping these differences going while still enshrining
the same problems. For example, Iran funding bad
guys,
nuclear program.

(01:45:10):
We should I mean, all the different the
the I'll I'll keep reading. You'll see what
I mean. It's Trump took a dim view
of Iran during his first term, aborting a
6 nation agreement with Tehran known as the
JCPOA, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which
is what they've been using ever since. And
Trump knows he's lying in order to drive
the idea that Iran broke the deal even
though everything that's happened since has been legally
under outlined within the deal itself.

(01:45:33):
The increased enrichment, all of it was due
to them pulling out. They didn't end. And
up until that point, everything was going along
with the deal. So they manufactured the illusion
to make it look like things were going
wrong. And ever since then, they've made the
same argument, but they don't even point to
this anymore.
It says he also imposed what was described
as maximum pressure strategy, which how did that
work out exactly?

(01:45:54):
It didn't. As much as they love to
pretend like everything happened or peace through strength,
the Middle East was a peep. None of
these things are real. It's obvious.
But they want it to seem that way,
so they can go right back to what
Israel wants them to do, which is pressuring
Iran or starving, sanctioning, attacking,
subverting them, which by the way is hurting
the people of Iran.
And it says that he hoped that they

(01:46:15):
would abandon their ambitions for a nuclear weapon.
See my point?
So if I can show you the state
department who just recently said that's not the
case or the I the International Energy, Atomic
Energy Agency saying the same, you think the
Wall Street Journal can't suss that out? No.
Because their job is to misinform you in
the ways that drive the agenda. For Israel
or whatever else, so that's my point.
Stop funding and training what the US considers

(01:46:36):
terrorist groups. That's not happening. And improve its
human rights record. Now my point is they're
not trained then you could argue very clearly
that they're allies like we see in many
examples. And maybe even more so today that
those things are beginning to happen because of
the ongoing war. But these are simply allies
of Iran just like the US has allies
all over the world.
The only thing that makes that a problem
is because the they convince you that Iran

(01:46:57):
bad guy and that everything they touch is
terrorism. It's childishly naive.
I says, but when he takes office in
January 20th, Trump's approach to Iran is likely
to be colored by the knowledge that its
agents tried to assassinate him. See my point?
Why are we pretending that's the case? There
is literally zero evidence to back that up
other than intelligence says. That's it. And I'm
gonna go I'm gonna go into next why

(01:47:18):
we should laugh about things they say.
So even the Wall Street Journal is hyping
the idea that Iran tried to kill the
president tried to kill Trump.
So if this was somehow against Trump, they
wouldn't be adding to his agenda. The point
is this is pro Israel on the larger
agenda in my mind, whether they realize that
or not, because that didn't happen. And former
top national security aids after they left office,

(01:47:38):
former Trump official said, Iran is believed to
be seeking revenge for the drone strike. Oh,
so we're still playing that game, Soleimani?
That's the same lie they pushed in this
article we'll go into next.
That's not to say that they don't have
the justification to respond to an illegal assassination
of a leader that was killed under the
guise of diplomacy in an airport, which is
what happened.
But they've already at least claimed they've responded

(01:47:59):
more than once in regard to the bombing.
But the point is that this is about
keeping this going. That we're always the one
that is the victim. It's the same thing
Israel tried to do despite the fact that
what you're pointing to was an egregious crime.
No matter what you think of Soleimani, which
they lied about aggressively.
Either way, it was a crime. And so
we point at the crime they commit and
then act like they're wrong when responding to

(01:48:20):
that?
This is the weakness of the US government.
Now Brian Hook, who is one of the
point people they've already appointed to Trump's administration,
who oversaw a and and again, to be
clear, that's been appointed and accepted, but we
haven't seen these things technically happen yet. Again,
that's important.
He oversaw Iran policy for the state department
in Trump's first term. So we can already

(01:48:40):
see where this is going. And is now
in charge of the Trump transition for the
department. And and Thursday said Thursday that the
president-elect has no interest in seeking to overthrow
Iran rulers. Yeah. Nice words.
Because the point is it doesn't matter when
you say things like that when you're still
supporting
aggressive actions against Iran, which are in the
interest of Israel, who Israel will continue to
attack them, which they're continuing to show.

(01:49:01):
But Hook, in an interview with CNN, noted
that Trump has pledged
to, quote, isolate Iran diplomatically and weaken them
economically so they can't fund all the violence
that none of which is being proven to
have happened. They're talking about all the Hamas
and Hezbollah and Iran.
They're not doing that. Not in the context
of the way they're framing it.
So you're gonna hurt them, which hurts directly

(01:49:22):
their people, not the government.
Because you want them to stop something they're
not doing, but you're not gonna try to
replace their rulers. That's what the whole point
of what they're doing. That's the whole point
of everything they're doing against them.
And, of course, they say all the violence
perpetrated by Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. Exactly
my point.
One of which is currently
provably funded by Israel, but who cares about

(01:49:44):
the facts? Great journalism, Wall Street Journal.
So here,
coming going back to Alex Jones' point about
deep state
going after Iran infiltrating the okay. So if
we were objective, wouldn't it be concerning that
a foreign military
an ex foreign military
entity
suddenly found a position of power in the

(01:50:06):
US government? Wouldn't that be concerning if a
Chinese military member suddenly found a position of
US government pro wouldn't that yeah. It would.
Well, here, according to New York Post, ex
IDF soldier Daniel Nober becomes the 1st Republican
elected to Long Island's seat in more than
50 years.
Gee, I wonder if he's funded by APAC.
That's a joke. It's obvious. The bottom line,
not that that's the reality. The point is

(01:50:27):
this is alarming.
This should matter to everybody.
Not because it inherently means they're bad, but
because it is a foreign military entity that
is being put in a position of power
in the US government.
So if they were being honest about the
infiltration of the government, of the globalist agenda,
about the framing of Iran, this would matter
to them.

(01:50:48):
And here's the article, which by the way,
I'm pretty sure I'd say wearing a mask.
It simply says he's got a big assist
from president Donald Trump.
It all comes together. It's all part of
the same agenda.
Let's not forget, by the way, a couple
articles I'll include or shows that we did,
the Israeli election interference and psychological operation industrial
complex,
proving even the Guardian breakdown showing you these

(01:51:09):
were Israeli assets that were influencing elections, lying
to people, using bots to change conversations. It's
all right on the surface.
Or the idea of how they infiltrated tech
in Lebanon, but all across the United States
as Whitney's covered for a really long time.
Why is that not concerning?
Or Derek's article about how the election in
general was Zionist technocrats versus Zionist technocrats.

(01:51:30):
We're We're all in this position right now.
We just need to be honest about it.
Now here is from August 22nd.
Emergency alert. Deep state planning to assassinate Trump
and frame Iran.
Okay.
Per we I think we probably agree.
They're gonna frame Iran
and use it to drive action. Okay? If

(01:51:51):
that's the case, explain to me why Donald
Trump keeps saying that. Explain to me why
Stefanik and every person in his orbit is
driving us to go after Iran for Israel.
Can't you connect those dots, Alex, to see
Israel's fingerprints all over this? I mean, if
you can't, maybe you don't want to.
And here's what kind of nonsense we're seeing.
Like, this is actually crazy to me. Not

(01:52:11):
that they're not capable of this or maybe
they may that they would.
Iran's government is just another government.
And left to the same devices and the
same power of the US is, I would
I would see any of them becoming the
same exact thing. That doesn't change the fact
that they're being lied about in a lot
of different ways.
So this is from November 10th. Iran has
developed fentanyl based chemical weapons.

(01:52:32):
You know how we know that?
A US expert said,
which certainly means so certainly could be.
But as the track record shows, as anybody
honest will point out, they've lied to us.
I mean, even what's his name? Scott Rogers.
Or Scott Rogers was, was that his name?
Scott.
I just forgot all of a sudden. The
one that, you know, claimed he was right

(01:52:53):
even though he's wrong during COVID nineteen. He
just came out and was like, you know,
I I guess a normie perspective. Came out
and said, well, if Iran they're probably lying
if they lie about Iran all the time.
That's how obvious it is and right on
the surface of the conversation. You know how
you know why? Because
it takes it's as simple as looking back.
Okay. Here's what they said and here's what
happened.
Oh, they lied. Okay. Or they were wrong.
Okay. Next one. Okay. Here's what they said

(01:53:14):
Iran was doing in the moment, and then
here's what actually happened. Oh, here Bolton said.
Here's what they're doing. Oh, turns out they
manufactured the whole thing over and over and
over and over. Oh, Operation Ajax, oh, they
lied about it. Oh, the babies and incubators,
oh, they made it up. This is what
they do. That's what governments do, to be
clear.
So when we have them coming out, we
have time when they want us to be
fought aimed at Iran.

(01:53:34):
They come out and say, guess what Iran's
doing? US expert says. Well, history shows that
they lied about these things.
So if you're gonna be objective about it
and use past evidence, you would say this
is probably a lie. Well, considering that it
could be true.
Iran is believed to have weaponized pharmaceutical agents
to kill her in in capacity. You know
why this is interesting? You know how long
we've been talking about the overlap?

(01:53:55):
I know I didn't think it would they
materialize like this, but realize we talked about
the vanilla ISIS overlap, which is pretty much
Iran and different elements working with the bad
white supremacists Nazis of the Trump administration. That
was the game they were playing. Right?
But in reality, it was an Azov movement.
Israeli
constructed to frame Russia. This is so much
nonsense. The point

(01:54:15):
is that now all of a sudden, we've
got Iran, they're telling you,
using pharmaceuticals
to kill or incapacitate, which by the way,
would look like a COVID 19 thing or
a central nervous system collapse or you would
suddenly be breathe not be able to breathe
properly.
Doesn't that sound interesting? Like, we're overlapping with
some kind of biological entity? And then my

(01:54:36):
point would be this, you know, easy if
this starts to happen, all of a sudden
people start falling down on the streets and
they go, woah, Ron, released a weapon.
It checks all the boxes. I hope I'm
wrong, but this is something I felt building
for a while because it overlaps all of
these things. And you can claim that they're
working with the you I've gone over this
a 1000000 times. My worry is that this

(01:54:57):
is all based on ex US entity
intelligence claiming something that they have every interest
to lie about, and they're overlapping it with
something that they've already kinda floated is gonna
be coming to pass.
It says these chemical weapons affect the central
nervous system. They're especially a problem if Iran
supplies them to Hezbollah and Hamas, which by
the way
oh, court. You could say they're especially problematic
if they come to anybody.

(01:55:17):
You see my point about how glaringly obvious
the propaganda is? That point, you should say,
it's a problem if Iran supplies it to
anybody.
They want you to connect those dots. So
now, Hezbollah and Hamas are gonna be and
that's where this is coming from. If you
read the article and look at Israeli coverage,
it's about them using it against Israel.
It says pharmaceutical based agents or PPA are
essentially

(01:55:38):
weaponized
medicines.
See what's going? That incapacitate or kill their
victims. How long until they start saying that's
what happened with the vaccine? Iran planted something
inside of it. It says Iran may have
given this to proxies such as Hezbollah, which
could have used them to kidnap Israeli.
Okay. So US expert says that they might
be doing something they could use this way,

(01:55:59):
that they might end up how many hypotheticals
are we getting into here? So basically, US
government says is all we have.
And they've already traced this out over into
they could give it to Hezbollah, which could
use it on Israeli soldiers and might kidnap
them.
Where in the world?
Maybe it's supposed to dovetail with the Amsterdam
lie about people being kidnapped. I don't know.
But it says, quote, at a time of
growing, regional instability in the Middle East, largely

(01:56:21):
the result of the militancy
of Iran proxies oh, is that what it
is? Forgive me if I thought it was
the ongoing genocide. My apologies. The threats posed
by Iran, their weaponized PPA program can no
longer be overlooked. What threats?
So suddenly, you've, the first time, pointed at
this possible thing, and then all of a
sudden, this the growing threat of this thing
we just talked about, it can't be overlooked

(01:56:41):
anymore.
Like, you've you've gone from introduction to fever
pitch in the same paragraph. Isn't that perfect?
I guess they're running out of time. What
do you think? It says Iran was a
victim of chemical warfare during the Iran Iraq
war in 19 eighties when Iraqi chemical attacks,
including nerve gas like Sharon or mustard gas
were killed over a 1000000 Iran captives. Oh,
yeah. I guess they left out the part
that was supplied by the US government. Oops.

(01:57:03):
It's very easy to prove. It's a on
the record conversation.
So,
yes, they were victims of chemical weapons attack
that the US supplied for them to use
against Iran. And then they use that to
kinda go, that's why they probably would do
it. That's basically the argument.
But it's still wrong even though they have
a reason to fight back.
God. I mean, am I crazier if they
have gotten worse at this propaganda game?

(01:57:27):
But here is Alex Jones going back to
older coverage around Iran, which I think is
important to overlap. Here's 2018.
Alex Jones goes viral in Iran. Basically, the
point is
restart a group they're talking about wants to
make Iran great again.
Infowars post a title, John Kerry torn apart
by illegally by after illegally meeting with Iran.

(01:57:47):
The restart Iran movement is made up of
millions of Iranians who oppose their current regime
and who want peace with the US and
Israel,
openly supporting president Trump.
Weird. That almost sounds like you're completely part
of the agenda To to to rationalize the
regime change effort to overthrow the government to
put a new people in power for the
US and Israel.
Gee, it almost sounds like a destate agenda.

(01:58:08):
Funny how things have shifted now that Trump's
in power. See how that works? Oh, here's
a conversation
from 6 years ago. Trump is planning to
attack Iran in the next month.
You can watch for yourself. It's the same
conversation.
I you can evolve your opinion for sure,
but I seems to be evolving around the
time Trump is in power and then away
again and then back now that he's in

(01:58:29):
power. Sure you can discern that for yourself.
Now on the point about the Trump Iran
syop,
it's crazy. And I wanna go over this
again because I we one thing I wanna
point out about this
is this is one of the things, like,
demonstrating our value that I think are important.
So in this show we just went over
from yesterday,
I'm I was going through this. This is

(01:58:49):
just on the YouTube page where I haven't
stopped on the page of the affidavit. Oh,
and by the way, I was gonna mention
at the start. I forgot.
Please filter this through the community and make
sure people know. I wanted to say in
the beginning,
I yet again made a mistake that I
very rarely make.
But yesterday, as I was I I I
was basically rearranging some of the co the
tabs before I started
and forgot to to save them all. And

(01:59:12):
as I went through closing them all down,
even after the end of the show yesterday,
I ended up closing the window too, thinking
that I had them saved and I I
lost all the tabs. So, I don't have
any of the source material to go along
with yesterday's show, which just kills me because,
you know, the obvious reason which I you
know, not everybody even likes to go through
those tabs but it's very important that we
source the claims we make. So I apologize

(01:59:33):
because that was just a complete oversight. I
forgot to save them which, again, as you
guys know, rarely happens. Maybe 4 times in
all I've been doing this. But make sure
that you do your best to, I don't
know, post the links down below that you
can find. I just I it's I just
can't take too much time to find them.
There's a 100 of them. My point though
is, that's why they won't be there from
yesterday's show. Some of them will be repeating
near like this one because I do think

(01:59:54):
it's important.
But on this, we went over this affidavit
which I will include right here for you
yet again.
And this is about the comp the the
claim that they just stopped the plot to
kill Trump.
It is a cartoon. Like, it is one
of the most embarrassing
displays I've seen in a long time.
So what we're gonna get into is this
Trump's Iran psyop plot manipulation.

(02:00:16):
And how in this conversation,
we were going through this live. Right? We
were going over this. I was reading through
it and it I it literally occurred to
me in the moment I was looking at
this about how transparent this was because of
the interview.
And I think it's important to see that
there are people now putting these points together.
And maybe not because I said it. Maybe
they just found it themselves.
But I want you to see that this

(02:00:37):
is the kind of this is why the
long form
breakdown
is important.
And then you can get people and rightly
so good. Get as much as possible. We'll
pluck out the important point and demonstrate it,
which is rarely what we do. I'm hoping
Jason and Brock can do that for me
half the time, plucking things out.
But I just want you to recognize that
this is the real time hacking through the
jungle,
making the trail for people to come follow

(02:00:59):
through. And that's not us all the time.
But when the case we do this, like,
with COVID or East there's a lot of
conversations that you can look back and see
how far ahead we were. And I wanted
to make that point on this because we
just went over this. And I found this
to be really, really insightful.
So first, I just wanna point out this
is really interesting. This is Michael Tracy plucked
a piece out that I didn't even see,
which is just I don't even wanna read

(02:01:19):
it. It's embarrassing.
It says, this is a quote from one
of the Iranian agents,
which are actually in this case well, not
even in this conversation, they're actually Jewish Americans.
So there there's 2 Jewish Americans and one
alleged Iranian asset. That's the Iran link
that they just cover as an Iranian plot,
who lives in Tehran.
That's the story.

(02:01:40):
Who voluntarily interviewed with the FBI. That's the
only reason we know all of this.
Right there, you should be like, you're right.
That's ridiculous.
At the very least, be like, if he
did actually do that, he's probably not working
for Iran. What do you think?
Either way,
what's what's funny about it is then they
went after 2 other Jewish Americans they were
trying to kill. And, apparently, were trying to
kill other Jewish

(02:02:02):
tourists in Sri Lanka.
Which, by the way, is might as well
be a Mossad,
you know, that's like that's a Tuesday for
Mossad, by the way. Historically, that's what they've
done. Oh, they manufacture these plots to frame
people for what they're doing to justify what
their existence is for Zionism.
That's not to say that there are no
attacks on Jews. Yes. There are. But we
could prove how

(02:02:22):
prevalent that has been.
The point is this is supposed to be
one of those agents
that the DOJ claims was recruited to lead
the assassination plot. And if you read this,
guys,
it's just it's ridiculous. So so what's funny
about it is that what you know that
this that ridiculous child that's basically trolling, pretending
to be Telev?

(02:02:42):
He's basically an admitted Zionist entity. He's made
in conversation, he's made these jokes more than
once. Could be lying. My point is, this
is exactly how he talks on there. And
it's like, doom in the chat will probably
laugh about this. As it says, this is
him speaking to,
it says in a in a voice note
apparently responding to a message from this guy.
So Shaqiri is the guy that's supposed to
be the Iranian asset.

(02:03:04):
And it says, what I'm saying to you
in a nutshell, bro, is in order to
to for this to get done,
he says, and I don't give an f.
Who is? He says, then there's a part
pulled out.
You say, f you,
n I g g a.
I want someone else. Okay. Your secret's safe
with me because I ain't no snitch, n
I g g a. And I'm sure ain't

(02:03:25):
no b I t c h. And I'm
like,
to me,
this screams
wildly out of touch state CIA state department
manipulators that pretend that this is what they
think we talk like or that this is
what what Israeli
Mossad assets pretend that Americans talk like or
whatever. It just seems stupid. And on top
of that, we're actually talking about an Iranian

(02:03:46):
asset they claim is in Tehran. Is that
what an Iranian asset would I mean, come
on. This is
embarrassing. I have to be honest. It's very
stupid.
As as always, anything's possible.
But I just wanna show you that. I
just think that's silly. And here's what the
Free Thinkers Project says. Obviously, the FBI didn't
find 2 whack jobs and make them think
they were in contact with the I the
Iranian government that entrap them in a ridiculous

(02:04:08):
plot to make Iran look like it's trying
to kill Trump so that the military industrial
complex has excuses for what for a yet
another massive market. I mean, Target.
Obviously. Now, here here's the article from ABC.
3 charge in a wrong linked plot.
So even in the title, they're making it
clear that this is not even provably connected
to the Iranian government. And it says to

(02:04:29):
assassinate Trump. And the main point everyone's plucking
out of it is it says 3 people
have been charged in an alleged Iranian linked
plot. That's even one more step removed.
And it says an Iranian American activist.
This is apparently the guy that lives who
basically went to the United States,
apparently went to prison,
which to me screams some kind of organized,

(02:04:49):
this is an asset. That's the the way
they made this look. Then he fled to
Tehran, because that makes sense, And is still
in Tehran. And apparently, through the phone, conducted
this with Jewish Americans to carry out plots
and then voluntarily interviewed with the FBI because
that that makes sense. Right? But and 2
Jewish Americans. So we have an Iranian linked
entity who might not even exist

(02:05:09):
and 2 Jewish Americans.
So wouldn't you call this a Jewish American
plot with help from Iran? No. No. It's
an Iran plot because that makes sense.
To me, it's straight out just because they're
Jewish American does not mean they're Zionist or
Israeli. But it's obviously the connection that even
Israel would force in that if they're Jewish,
they are Zionist. That's not the truth, but
that's what Israel would want you to think.
But when you say it, you're racist. Right?

(02:05:30):
The point is that there's an obvious reason
to think this is something other than what
it looks like. Now very quickly, for those
that didn't see yesterday's show, and I recommend
you look.
Shaqiri is the guy that's supposed to be
the Iran link entity. The other 2 Jewish
Americans, they have names for them, but I
don't know if they're the real names. The
point is that they're the ones that we're
supposed to be working with them. And they're
all arrested. All 3 of them. This says,
from my discussions with other FBI agents and

(02:05:53):
my review of written reports, I have learned
that on or about these many dates they
list off between September November,
Farhad Shaqiri, the defendant, participated
in voluntary telephonic interviews with the FBI.
He represented that at the time of the
interviews, he was
located in Tehran, Iran. During the interviews, he
stated in substantive part the following and goes

(02:06:14):
on to talk about
working for Iran and trying to kill bad
guys and and, of course, on them saying
that in this whole thing, they make the
argument that they were doing this in response
to killing of Soleimani even though in the
entire article, there's only 3 mentions of it.
One of which is that his name
might have familiar connection to Kassim as
Majad
Soleimani.
And the other ones are that the FBI

(02:06:35):
tells you that's why they might do this.
Somehow that translates into, here's why they're doing
it. Great job, ABC. You guys are ridiculous.
Either doing it deliberately or they just are
that bad at their supposed journalism. But overall,
this guy,
I don't believe is what they pretend he
is if he even exists at all. It
seems
very thin.
Why would he be speaking with the FBI?

(02:06:56):
As as even free thinker pointed out, maybe
they're just pretending he's there to trap these
people into doing what they want so they
can make it about a run. I mean,
this is what they've been caught doing over
the years, guys. This is what they do.
And if you actually go through all this,
the point about Donald Trump, which I think
I got clipped out right here,
they make it clear this has been going
on since, I think, 2023,

(02:07:16):
at least as they claim. And only in
September, just before the election, they decide to
go after Trump.
To me, this sounds like some other ongoing
ploy. They just kind of diverted into some
Trump. This you can decide what you want
from it. I think the main point is
this doesn't line up.
If that's all they've got, I think we
should very strongly question, which I think history
has shown, whether we're being lied to for

(02:07:38):
very obvious reasons to engineer war for this
for Israel.
Now, here's a clip that, Jason put out
today. Kinda going over yesterday's show, so I'm
glad he got this out. This is the,
the the clip of what I just kinda
went over. If you wanna share that, I
think it's important to see.
That is a manipulation, and I am absolutely
convinced of it.

(02:07:59):
Now overlapping points.
I've seen this kinda spin out, Reese, over
the last couple of weeks.
And we're seeing all these allegations. Now some
of them could be real. Maybe all of
them.
But I think we should really question whether
this is being driven
either through real action, through
psychological operations,
or
statements and narratives. But it says this 17

(02:08:20):
year old German Turk
arrested. He planned an Islamist attack on a
Christmas market in Germany, says Germany, which by
the way, Germany is easily one of the
most influenced by Israel at the moment. More
maybe safer in the United States. But here's
what the article says. If you actually go
through this,
the best all you have is a guy
that got arrested before something happened and claiming

(02:08:42):
that they feel it might have been an
Islamist link thing. That's what it's all it
is. It says the clues.
It says probably Islamist background.
I can't believe we go along with these
things, that the narrative on Twitter from one
account is that he planned that Islam was
attacked. That's not even what the article says.
The truth is that they think it might
be
from monitoring conversations that intercept the communication. Investigators

(02:09:03):
suspect Islamist background. Well, what if he has
a and what does Islamist background mean? That
he believes in Islam? That he's a Muslim?
Because the way that we wanna frame that
today in the Western conversation is terrorist.
And we all know that, even though it's
not what these words mean. The point is
that then becomes he is working for an
agenda for Islam when the reality is they're
simply just probably pointing to his religion.

(02:09:24):
But my point is we don't know because
that's the information you get. And it's suspected.
Probable.
And it goes on to simply argue that
they got tipped off about what might happen
and then stopped him before it ultimately happened.
So I guess we're back into the whole
pre crime dynamic. Bill Barr and Donald Trump,
they're rushing this forward in the United States.
Of course, it could be something. But I'm
worried about how this is being rolled out

(02:09:45):
right now with what just happened in Amsterdam.
And Jonathan Cook makes a good point. He
says a mood is being
cynically cultivated in the west, just as it
was in parts of Europe in 19 thirties.
To suggest that some groups are subhuman,
that some minorities must be expelled or rounded
up and disappeared.
That is the proper context for understanding what
really happened in Amsterdam last week as the

(02:10:07):
police treated violent Israeli hooligans with kid gloves
and the politicians and media recast the villains
as victims.
If our politicians and nobody in this not
not him, not myself, is is saying good.
They got beat up. Nobody that that if
that's a whole another conversation or some people
are in the context of just online, my
point is people that I'm referencing are are

(02:10:27):
making a stand principle stance and saying, we're
not advocating the violence. We're not saying they
deserved it. The point is, ultimately, we understand
why it happened and acknowledging that this is
what started it. That's a very different thing
than pretending that we're going,
they have a right to fight back. There's
somebody already overlapping that with, like, Hamas and
saying, well, if you're gonna make one argument,
you gotta make both. It's not even the
same conversation. But point is, we're not even

(02:10:48):
doing that. So you're the one admitting that
you are okay being the same. Murdering back
is the point in the context of Hamas.
But in this case, fighting back, essentially.
But it says, if our politicians and media
are really worried about Europe's not too distant
Nazi past, they would be far better advised
to stop stoking an all too real new
anti semitism,

(02:11:08):
incitement against Arab and Muslim minorities.
The darkest days in Europe's history are indeed
back with us, but not because of a
bunch of Israeli football hooligans ended up receiving
as much violence as they tried to dish
out.
It is because it is back because the
west
is all too ready to embrace Israel's anti
Arab, anti Muslim bigotry.
Day by day, we inch ever closer to

(02:11:30):
renewed pogroms,
not against Jews or Israelis
who enjoy the support and protection of Western
politicians, media, and police.
Rather, those in most danger are the, quote,
new Jews. The Middle Eastern populations whose same
politicians, media, and police constantly vilify insult, insight
against, and assault.
Western racism never went away. Europe's ruling class

(02:11:52):
just found a new target and new scapegoat.
And I'm sure plenty disagree with that as
a broad scope. My point is that we
can see what the the hip hypocrisy around
what's being aimed at. The dark clouds from
Amsterdam are gathering across Europe.
Authoritarianism
and fascism are once again in this in
asc ascendant.
It is those
trying to keep us tethered to reality who

(02:12:12):
will be the first in the firing line.
This is an extract from the latest article,
the west buries a genocide by making victims
of Israel's football thugs.
Now,
here are some important things to highlight in
the dishonest aspect of all this. Like, really
alarming things that I think show you what
we're really dealing of all this. Like, really
alarming things that I think show you what

(02:12:32):
we're really dealing with.
Now first,
Majid Nawaz points out this
scary development that's on top of what I
showed you. But from Netanyahu and his
situation room after the
after Israelis got beat up because they started
violence in Amsterdam and making it about somehow
some in military mission to and I I

(02:12:53):
believe they're building a very dangerous narrative around
why they justify action against anybody anywhere, which
they already claim they can do more than
once.
The international law does not bind them. They
can act anywhere in the world. They've said
this in the Knesset more than once. I've
shown you on the articles from Israeli media.
But he points out, this Thursday, Israel will
play in France.
Europe is being set up in a US

(02:13:13):
January 6th style ro riot style provocation
to cause Muslim versus non Muslim civil unrest
or conflict.
I really believe this is a it's the
same thing we see happening in the United
States. This is being driven by Israel for
a larger agenda. Even if this most simple
thing to acknowledge is
diverting attention from the genocide and staving off
their inevitable collapse.

(02:13:36):
But on top of that, it's much bigger.
There's a lot there's the globalist overlap in
a lot of different ways that ties in
with things they need to rationalize to drive
you in position for the next step.
Either way, I agree with that.
Weaponized migration,
using Mossad and other elements to manufacture violent
attacks to justify response. I mean, it's it's
going over it's it's all right on the

(02:13:56):
surface. That's why every time these happen, like
with Amsterdam, the police come out and say
that's not what happened. But all the politicians
lie anyway.
And they call you racist for acknowledging the
truth and the facts you can prove.
It says this chaos this chaos to bring
order
did not take the bait or do not
take the bait by engaging in violence or
amplifying division online on behalf

(02:14:19):
of globalists. See? He sees it. Alex Jones
should pay attention. Be smart. Netanyahu already threatened
this trap.
He did in the past. And we've seen
this many times, by the way. He says
down here right here. This is not a
it's a threat, not a prediction. He says
and this is Netanyahu saying, if Israel falls,
the entire world will follow.
He can read the thread for yourself.
I think he nails it right here. And

(02:14:41):
so I think we're being set up. Now
just because you guys don't respond, just like
with January 6th, doesn't mean they still won't
roll it forward. I mean, they still call
us armed insurrection.
Because that was the narrative they were given.
They were given marching orders, and they still
seem to say it.
So but but the point is, do not
give them more ammunition.
Now here's what we saw in Amsterdam. Now
you saw this before, but this is actually

(02:15:01):
a great side by side showing you and
it just like I said earlier about the
Iran point.
Remember, we caught this in real time in
the video because we compared the 2, as
plenty of other people did. But I just
want you to show that this is the
kind of thing that we
are ahead of. Right?
Pulling this out in real time, not because
somebody showed it to us, but because we
just saw it and we were discussing it
and just, you know, in real time breaking

(02:15:22):
things down. I find that to be valuable.
That's why this is what I would want
in other in other news media. So I
hope you've recognized the value in what we
do. Great clip from Philip Proudfoot or at
least to, from Saul Stanaport or whoever they
grabbed it from. And it shows you the
difference of when Sky News put a clip
out
and then they they deleted it and put
out another clip that obfuscated the reality. Now,
the whole thing was like that. But this

(02:15:43):
was the one point that really stood out
to me too. And it's about highlighting what
the Maccabi fans were doing. And this goes
back to that woman's video who
is still right now calling them out for
using it and pretending it's what it shows.
Macabre fans being beat up, Maccabi fans. Instead,
what it really shows is them beating up
a random Dutch person in the street.
So, no, it wasn't about Jews. No, it

(02:16:05):
wasn't about Middle Eastern. They lied about the
whole thing, at least that video, and they
still keep using it. And so this is
part of that video, and they're showing you
how Sky News lied about it. Kavi fans
were seen attacking locals
as a police car can be seen driving
by.
A video posted on social media shows a
large group of hooded men dressed in black

(02:16:26):
running down the street and striking people at
random.
Maccabi fans were seen attacking locals as a
police car can be seen driving by.
A video posted on social media
shows a large group of hooded men dressed
in black running down the street and striking

(02:16:47):
people at random.
So it goes from Maccabi fans, which are
easy to verify,
to random hooded people.
Anonymous.
Striking at random.
Well, it's funny how at first you didn't
say striking at random, which is what they
are doing, and because you're talking about Maccabi.
Then when it becomes anonymous, of course, we
the point is you let people read into

(02:17:07):
what you want. That's not just the mistakes.
That's deliberate misinformation from one of the leading
groups in the UK for a foreign government.
It just couldn't be more obvious.
The Muslim lawyer points out, here is an
excellent must watch video on what transpired in
Amsterdam. And we've talked about all this, but
these are my point like, I think somebody

(02:17:28):
else really well put that kind of outlined
that they got really great uptake from politicians.
I mean, almost almost ex almost everybody.
News platforms, even the people that are in
some ways starting to show a little bit
of truth about Israel
lied about it, and almost everybody, everywhere, individually
people saw this.

(02:17:50):
Is by far the softest fucking shit I've
seen all week. To the Middle East because
the Israeli military says it's preparing to immediately
deploy a rescue mission to the Netherlands after
violence broke out following a Europa League match
between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Ajax Amsterdam.
No. I don't think you heard it right.
So the IDF wants to go and send
troops to Amsterdam
over a bar fight that they started because

(02:18:12):
of a football game that they lost.
Before the game even starts, as soon as
the Israeli fans got off the planes, they
were chanting death threats to anybody 2 shades
darker than mayonnaise. And from the time they
leave their hotel rooms to the entire trip

(02:18:35):
towards the stadium throughout the streets, all you
can hear them saying is there's no schools
in Gaza because there's no children left.
Their team loses 5 nil, which is pretty
hard in a football game. So they go
to the middle of town square and start
a bonfire, and then they start vandalizing Dutch

(02:18:56):
homes that have a Pali flag. And then
they find an Arab taxi driver, and they
beat the shit out of them. And And
here's here's how dumb Western media thinks you
are.
We know all of this shit happened before
the riots
because even though NBC wrote that headline, they
fucking time stamped and geolocated

(02:19:16):
when they started seeing the taxi driver getting
beat up. Like, they have like, you got
caught in 4 k starting a fight. And
when you lose the fight, you're like, oh,
man.
Anti them like, you call your government to
be like, yeah. Could you send the army?
Like, how fucking
whole it's important to note that their team
is ranked last place in the league and
their next opponent is Turkey, of which Turkey

(02:19:37):
is like, no, fuck that shit. Like, if
we win, you're gonna send the army. And
so they're asking to relocate the match somewhere
that's neutral. We should also say that there
have been videos again, I've seen things multiple
videos of the same events. We're pretty sure
these are accurate of people chanting anti Palestinian
slogans and and putting down Palestinian flags. So
we are having various claims made, but what
we can say is that these events were

(02:19:58):
clearly about more than just football rivalry. I
thought it was cute how he threw in
that last comment in there to pretend to
be impartial. Like, can you imagine I go
to South Africa and, like, I call everybody
the n word? And and, by the way,
not everybody is black in that country, but,
like, the majority. Right? And so I go
to a football game, and my team loses.
And so I start shit with everybody,

(02:20:18):
and I get my ass whooped. And I
call my president to be like, hey. Can
can you bomb South Africa?
Alright. I'm sorry about the lack of warning
there.
So
oftentimes when I play a clip, I'll use
it to deal with something in the background.
Often, I'm I'm over here laughing essentially because

(02:20:39):
I forgot this guy cussed 14 times, and
I forgot to warn you. So I apologize
about that. The reason I thought it was
important was the everybody, average people everywhere, that
was the point that we're all seeing,
saw through this.
When's the last time we ever I mean,
before October 7th, you did not see stuff
like this, guys. People were blinded to it.
Today,
it's not working anymore. That that's nothing if

(02:21:00):
not a positive, guys. I think it's crazy
that it's just they have lost the control
over how they influence people's opinions. Because it's
and it's I honestly, if you look back,
I think it's always been this bad.
Just at some point, people went along with
what politicians and other experts told you we're
supposed to think until suddenly we started going,
oh, maybe we shouldn't blindly follow them. Thank
god. Finally, we wake up.

(02:21:22):
But important to see. Now here here's honest
reporting saying when antisemitic mobs in Amsterdam launched
a coordinated assault against Jewish fans that's the
whole thing right now.
Despite every piece of evidence and all I
mean, you got these entities who are desperately
being so what you need to recognize is
the people that are selling that lie are
either that bad at their job or are

(02:21:42):
being influenced against the truth,
whether by Zionism, whether by US entities, whether
by Stefanik herself. The point is, I'm being
facetious, the point is that we can see
that they are
you shouldn't listen to them. These are people
that are either lying deliberately or are being
influenced,
or rather rather are that bad and can't
discern the truth,

(02:22:03):
or are being deliberately deceiving. There's the only
way to ways to look at it because
the evidence is so shockingly clear. And Wyatt
Reed says, this hysterical Zionist is right. It
was a premeditated plan premeditated planned attack.
A premeditated planned attack by former Israeli soldiers
against the police and residents of Amsterdam.
Here is a clip from Grey Zone saying
a viral video shows Israeli hooligans attacking Dutch

(02:22:24):
police while instigating Amsterdam unrest.
Amsterdam unrest. This is the young I got
I'm glad he tagged him here. Oh, I
am following him. Good. This is the young
kid that was breaking this down and got
threatened by these rally fans.
You know, if anybody ever cared about the
truth, like any of these news platforms, they
would all be able to see this stuff.
They just don't.

(02:22:44):
Rami Abdul says and this is the Israeli
foreign minister,
Gideon Saar,
says, the scale of arrest in Amsterdam is
not sufficient for such incidents.
Learn from us. When a child in Palestine
Palestinian village throws a rock, we arrest the
village's children, their parents, and neighbors.
Only democracy in the Middle East, ladies and
gentlemen. They just can't stop showing you who

(02:23:06):
they really are. Doctor Deepa
Driver says I have been thinking about the
real purpose behind Israel sending Mossad agents to
accompany racist football hooligans to Amsterdam. Then I
saw this tweet. This is the Mossad commentary,
say no matter which agency
will tell you it's safe to return to
Holland or elsewhere in Europe with bit with
HIG
refugee counts, big, baby. Don't listen. Do not

(02:23:28):
return.
High. That's what they meant with high refugee
count.
And it says, was the real reason behind
the Amsterdam attack essentially to get Israelis who
are tired of the genocide
not opposed to it, but simply not wanting
to be in Israel during the war and
therefore immigrating to reconsider
by planting a false narrative of supposed rabid
anti semitism in Europe?
So you can see there's a lot of

(02:23:49):
different ways to look at this. Either way,
it's interesting how everybody seems willing to entertain
that this is a ploy, a manipulation,
a lie, a deception by the US and
Israel and anybody else.
The world has changed. There's no putting that
toothpaste back in the bottle. Now here's the
Ayanette girl, a woman we were referencing earlier.
And she's, you know, one that was being
Her video was being used by everybody and

(02:24:10):
they're lying about it. Well, here's another example.
So, BBC keeps using their work, even then,
and they lie about what it shows. She
says, Oh my goodness, I see this for
the first time. This is totally scripted, folks.
None of it is true, and my footage
is given to the police. They will find
out soon enough. Here's BBC night news saying
news night saying, suddenly a lot of people
come to attack us with belts and sticks
and rocks. Israeli football fan describes how he

(02:24:32):
and his 13 year old son experienced violence.
The point is, guys, the o you're gonna
find
I mean, it really is wild. That so
the what you have to realize here, as
much as this becomes a little bit more
contentious, just like with the people that we
now can prove, lied about seeing women get
raped, seeing people get tortured,
lied about kicking people's heads across the counter.

(02:24:52):
All these were shown to be lies by
Israeli media and even their own testimony. Okay?
So the point,
as I showed you about that guy who
testified earlier about the babies and so on
that we now know is false, that guy
was lying.
All of them. Not just the soccer workers,
but I'm talking about the people who stood
up and said, I saw it. I was
there at the concert, for example.
They lied to you. So either they chose

(02:25:13):
to lie because they wanted to help Israel,
or they were pressured to by Israel.
That's it. Period.
I know that's super contentious for some people
even though it's factually proven. So my point
is when we have people like this, this
football guy, you have to ask him, is
he lying because he wants to or because
people are trying to get him to? Or
is there some kind of a, you know,

(02:25:33):
caveat to this where he was
not a part of it somehow, didn't know
what was going on and got beat up
and still sees it that way? My guess
is still possible. Either way, the picture they're
framing you for you is flat out wrong,
as everyone can see.
Here's a good clip that Max put out
from a local Amsterdam resident interviewing
random Amsterdam residents,

(02:25:55):
asking about what happened. So now is it
here this is why, like, for example, Gaza
versus Lebanon. The difference is in Lebanon, people
can be talked to. They can film. They
can show you what's going on. So sort
of like this. So they could lie all
they want about what they say happened from
Israel, from the United States. Let's ask people
that live in Amsterdam what they think happened.
Did the Maccabi hooligans behave towards local Amsterdamers?

(02:26:18):
Different from moment to moment. Every time someone
with a Palestinian,
a symbol or anything, walk by,
they were pretty violent,
middle fingers but also like physical violence.
Then I passed the monument
and they threw beer at me and they,
spit it at me in the dumpster.
But it was like a very aggressive

(02:26:39):
tense over here like, yeah.
So so Maccabi hooligans threw beer at you
and they spit at you? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. And it was okay. I'm okay. But
How did that make you feel though?
Worried.
I don't like aggressiveness in my city.
Amsterdam has always been a tolerant
city to towards others, but when a group

(02:26:59):
so aggressively comes in,
I don't know, made me not feel at
home anymore. At one moment, there was someone,
who was pulled off the bike and we
walked to there to just see what happened
and at that point, a glass bottle was
thrown at us from the, the crowd of
Merkabi supporters. Mhmm. So no, it didn't really
feel safe at all. Merkabi hooligans
threw

(02:27:20):
glass at pro Palestinian people just cycling way?
Yeah. And did the police intervene?
No. They told us to
step step back, go away or even said
that you shouldn't you shouldn't have stood there.
So they blamed you Yeah. For being attacked?
They they did. They did.
Now, obviously, the objective thing to do is

(02:27:42):
say, okay. Well, maybe, you know,
they're all making it up. Maybe he interviewed
only, you know, 40,000 people and they're the
only ones that said what he wanted to
show you. These are always things you consider,
but the reality is all the other evidence
backs this up. The police testimony, the endless
amount of video evidence from online, from everybody
that was there. The I mean, I've seen
at least 7 different videos in different locations

(02:28:03):
of them chanting, kill all the Arabs and
there's no schools because all the children are
dead over and over. And I'm not not
just one clip. I mean, over and over
at the airport, on the stairs, at the
car at the parking lot, at the field.
I mean, it's just it's crazy how obvious
it is. And guess what? As Robert covered,
it goes back long before this.
This is not new.

(02:28:24):
Owen Jones says, you know, for a time,
I'm gonna jump past this one. I wanted
I wanted to wrap up after these couple
points, but more information coming from Owen Jones
showing you basically the the some of these
things I skipped tend to be this kind
of stuff where we're getting into the nuance
of what he said, and he followed up
with it, and it takes more time. The
point is simply that here's somebody trying to
conflate the idea that, you know, like I
said earlier, that somehow we're rationalizing this because

(02:28:44):
we're allowed to fight back. That's not what
any of us are saying here, at least
what I'm engaging with. We're simply acknowledging that
you're lying about how this got started and
framing it as some kind of planned Jewish
attack.
They they lashed out and people responded. That's
just the objective outline. Not that I'm saying
good or bad or pro or negative, just
that that's the reality.
Period. For them to start trying to go

(02:29:05):
the the it's almost as if they can
only look at it from the lens in
which they see the world, which is that
they have a right to fight back. Wait.
Kill Hamas because they killed us. Like, this
that's how you may view it. We're just
pointing out the facts that you're lying about.
It's everywhere.
Here's even Horetz, leading Israeli newspaper. The Amsterdam
attack shows Israeli's denial of reality they created.

(02:29:27):
It's so funny how is Heretz these days
is just like exactly what we're being told
isn't the truth every time.
Here is Oh, that's the article. The Amsterdam
attack. You can read it for yourself.
Zionism Observer
says, so now that it's, the next day,
11th, do we still care about programs? If
so, here you go.
Monthly report, Israeli settler attacks committed during just

(02:29:50):
October.
More than 84 Israeli settler attacks committed by
Israeli armed colonial settlers. In many a cases,
people died. Unlike Amsterdam,
Zionist settlers carried out 84 crimes a month.
Just imagine what they've done in 76 years
of occupation.
Now you can look through, and they've even
got it divvied up by location.
I mean, and these are I mean, I'll

(02:30:10):
I'll include this this article that Robert put
out for you as well. Israeli settlers consistently
use arson attacks to burn Palestinians alive. The
image you're seeing is a child that got
burned alive that they then taunted
as they as you can read in Times
of Israel. Ollie's on the grill laughing about
a baby they burned alive. That's not a
joke. They're very public.
Here is Mustafa Barghouti showing a video reveals

(02:30:31):
how illegal terrorist Israelis ma masked settlers attacked
a Palestinian civilian in his house,
and then, just like we're talking about, this
is new, this is from 10th, tried to
set the house and car on fire.
But that's not a pogrom, though. We're not
even gonna touch you won't even hear about
that. I don't think Trudeau and Biden, Trump,
and everyone stood up and condemned it, did
they? They just ignored it because they're okay

(02:30:52):
with it.
Tiberias says Israel has broken every international law
written with complete impunity,
yet has the mind boggling audacity to demand
consequences for Arabs defending themselves from Zionist thugs
in Amsterdam. Now you could disagree with the
framing. The point is still the same. The
audacity to jump in this position while you're
committing genocide.

(02:31:12):
While they have
every right to respond to violence against them,
I'm not gonna rationalize the idea of acting
out against violence and chasing them down. Even
though look. I look. Just to be clear,
I'm only saying that to be objective. You
would I'll be let's just be very clear.
If I was attacked by somebody in my
family,
I might very well chase them down and
beat them up. Just put that out there.

(02:31:33):
I'm not I would say that I'd probably,
from principle, argue that I shouldn't do that.
But I'm just gonna be honest that I
I can react emotionally like anybody. And if
they if I saw the kind of things
they were doing to families,
I I may lose my cool. I've I've
just I'm speaking from how I was growing
up. It took a long time. My point
though is only to show you that just
because we can objectively and I think correctly

(02:31:53):
argue that that's not the right thing to
do,
we're all human. People respond in way and,
you know, when you're seeing chance of murdering
children and kill all the Arabs and and
they're acting all smug and tough and all
of a sudden somebody fights back, you can
see how that lines up. But let's be
clear. It's still a crime.
That's how it looks to be objective. And
I think it's always how we have to
be. So when he's saying this, the realization

(02:32:14):
is that it's no matter how you frame
it, what they're doing is, as he wrote,
mind boggling audacity. And he says the madness
is the natural result of the US protecting
Israel from any consequences
ever. You know, like Siphonik saying,
nothing. There's nothing that will stop us from
doing this. No conditions.
This madness, Oasis says, this is the same

(02:32:34):
way, in the same way that a spoiled
child that has never taught the consequences of
bad actions will increasingly push its boundaries. Israel
will continue launching attacks on different communities all
over the world who refuse
to let Zionist rapists and baby killers commit
whatever violent crimes they want to
because the corrupt and criminal US regime is
so obsessed with controlling the world that it

(02:32:55):
works tirelessly to allow Israel free reign to
do so in return for Israel acting as
a de facto military outpost for US imperialism.
Now the point I make about how these
are people that didn't earn the power they
have, he makes that's he he said it
in a different way that I think worked.
It it it adds to it.
These are spoiled children that have never been
taught the consequences of their actions, and that's

(02:33:16):
why you see them stomp their feet in
the Knesset and act like it's okay to
burn children alive or justify rape.
This is the consequence of what they've done
in regard to the US pandering to this
over these years and and the UK with
the creation of it. Now it says the
correct response from leaders
who want to look toward a future based
on peace and equality, international law, and human
rights is to distance themselves from both Israel

(02:33:38):
and the United States. There is no peaceful
future in which Israel can commit war crimes
and genocide unpunished.
And so leaders must choose between building global
peace and justice and the difficult political moves
this demands
or forever wars as pathetic cowards subservient to
the vacuous
and gaudy US empire and its relentless tyranny.

(02:33:59):
Roll put.
Now this is crazy. I'm I'm gonna end
on this, actually. I was gonna get a
little bit more into some things,
but I'm gonna end on this
because this is pretty wild, guys. And it's
got a stuff that I really want you
to see on top of all of it
worth notice noting and not worried about how
can, you know, people might can frame things,
but also see the the the extent we

(02:34:19):
go to make sure we can prove things
for you. So this is something Adam put
out. It's not genocide because they're not human,
says sanity in New York. Now this was
actually especially more difficult than some of the
ones in the past where you can just
kind of look it up on the way
back machine or so I tried to find
this. And, of course, it was this this
is actually some really important points here showing
you how Twitter, I think, is helping them
hide these things.

(02:34:41):
So first of all, this is I searched
it by the I couldn't find it on
Twitter anywhere. I found it by the words
searching for it and found this.
Mister statement simply says, just an FYI, the
4th stage of the 10 stages of genocide
is dehumanization
to this of which gave me the link.
So I and I that you go to
the link and it's gone.

(02:35:01):
Then I was able to find, in this
case, the Wayback Machine. So just to make
sure we can prove that he did say
this, it says the irony of all the
genocide, in quotes, allegations
is that these animals aren't even human.
Let that sink in. Now, yes, this is
just one random guy online. If you could
look at the rest of his account, it's
pretty clear this is something he believes.

(02:35:21):
But this this is October 3rd,
2024.
And it says oh, and here here is
this is a a new Al Jazeera,
comedy skit mocks October 7th massacre.
And he and this person responds saying they
deserve everything they got, and that's where he
responded right there. And you can see as

(02:35:43):
this continues, and I'm gonna show you the
other points. But it goes on to say,
at this point, it's really just mercy killings
based on their lack of intelligence and ability
to survive in a modern world. This is
grotesquely disgusting. These are the kind of people
that we're talking about.
Oh, they're brown and they can't so when
and what I've been told to think about
them, therefore, we should just kill them anyway

(02:36:03):
because they shouldn't even be exist. This is
what people think. This is what is barely
veiled, if at all, by the way, in
the Israeli conversation. Not every Jew or Israeli
clearly, but a good majority of it.
And, again, when I say not even veiled,
these are they're saying these things on public
TV. I'll show you next. In the Knesset
proudly telling you, they're all human. They should
all be killed. That every child is not

(02:36:23):
is a is guilty. These are things they've
said publicly.
And this rightly says, what's wrong with your
minds? Right? Good. And it says people who
celebrate the rape, mutilation, kidnaps, torture, and slaughter
of unarmed civilians, including children, are not people.
Oh, so you bought right into the narrative
being sold to you. Right? As opposed to
them cheering for acts of resistance after 75
years of oppression. No. No. It's because you

(02:36:45):
were lied to about rapes, mutilation, kid, all
those things. Aside from the people that they
took back that were not military, everything else
is a lie. All of it. Every single
one of those claims. And this is a
year later, mind you, and he still doesn't
know that.
Here's his account, by the way. You can
look at it for yourself.
Still there, by the way. So recognize that

(02:37:06):
this gets put out there,
publicized.
I'm not calling for censorship. I never am.
But the point is that his account is
still there. While people have been censored immediately
for far, far, far less, including from the
river to the sea. But he here he
is saying,
they're not even they're not even human. So
there there is no genocide. Like, that's the
kind of level we're

(02:37:28):
at. Here's another one.
I thought there was I thought there was
more point to make sure I didn't miss
something in this one.
Yeah. So after a year. So
here
is another one I find crazy.
So first, all I had was the screenshot.
Mary Anne Quinn says, maybe we should stop
call we maybe we should be calling them

(02:37:49):
is rapists.
This guy says, when I was in the
IDF, or so the screenshot shows,
when I was in the IDF, we raped.
So, of course, I did it too. It
is just a normal thing. I don't think
I did anything wrong. The Arab I enjoyed,
I think she was maybe 14.
So first to this again, when I first
saw this, I'm like, that can't be real.

(02:38:09):
Like, that's what I thought. I said, that's
just a screenshot. Nobody would actually say that
knowing we would see them. Right?
But, of course, we're wrong. It's right there.
He did say it, and he meant it.
He backed it up, and then deleted it
later, or Twitter made him remove it and
didn't delete his account.
Who knows? Or maybe just helped him by
covering it up so they wouldn't see it.
So here's this one, and I'm thinking even

(02:38:29):
worse. No way. There's no way that he
would do that.
This one's a little bit more nuanced, but
so here's what it says now.
It says, when I was in the IDF,
we bullied
bad empanada,
which I looked up. It's just supposed to
mean something that, like, people that were too
nice to like, it's it's bit it's sort
of a bad like, basically, they bully the
people that cared about Palestinians being hurt. That's

(02:38:51):
how you should read that.
So so, of course, I did it too.
It is just the morning the normal thing.
I don't think I did anything wrong. The
amount of times we of wedgies, I enjoyed.
I think he s h I t his
pants maybe 14 times.
So
you're probably along with me recognizing that that
almost doesn't even make sense.

(02:39:12):
But then when you notice, oh, look. It's
been edited.
How interesting. This guy post out down here.
Weird.
You can literally click on the last edited
and see that
nothing is different.
Even though comments and likes are different.
Oh, well, that's interesting.
Well, here's an example to show you before

(02:39:32):
we get into the oh, that was a
so here's an example to show you before
we go back to the main point.
Here's what else he says somewhere else.
It says, what you did
what you did while we were raped and
murdered.
And the con the the quant that you
can go through
is past you know, I which I recommend

(02:39:52):
I'll include as well, actually.
Oops. Go over his
discussions on here and see that there's a
common thread in some of the conversations. Now,
the point
is
that what people are highlighting in here, and
if oh, that was the other thing too.
That's what it was. The comments,
if you look at these, you can go

(02:40:13):
down and see how people are commenting on
the the original point.
Where was it? I think I just lost
it by moving forward. Shoot. The point was
I think it's right here. If you look
at the comments, you'll see people down here
saying, I know this is real because I'm
looking at it. Things like that.
So what it looks like to me
is that ultimately, this was edited, because you

(02:40:34):
can see the edit right here. And the
point is, as the guy was showing you,
there is literally nothing different. So as if
you understand, if you press the edit button
and you don't change anything, it won't up
it it'll go it'll revert.
So to me and look, you can you
can see all the different comments and everything.
So my opinion is that this was edited.
People got the screenshot, the comments show you

(02:40:55):
they're outraged about what he said, and then
he changes it to make it about some
wedgie thing.
And Twitter, I think, changed that. That's my
opinion. Either way, I find it pretty ridiculous
that you can see that these are things
he's been talking about, and this one seems
to change. Either way, talking about bullying people
that care about Palestinian lives, I think it's
pretty interesting to show.
But I think there's a lot of this.

(02:41:16):
I think this is all over this platform
in particular, but right now, there's an effort
to cover up what these people really are
doing.
Now, this Khaleesi show is another example from
a different angle. So this guy post this
tweet out that says, my 13 year old
son was verbally abused at Chadstone Shopping Center
today on November 9th. My 13 year old
son said to me, people claim they don't
hate Jews, only Zionists, but I got abused

(02:41:38):
for wearing his yarmulke. No. Yeah. Certainly could
be true. There are plenty of racist people
out there. But I think it's interesting that
they have to make it about Jews, not
Zionists.
Clearly, there's a thing right there because they
are different. They're not the same thing as
much as they desperately want you to think
that.
But Khaleesi points out, oh, are you sure?
Looks like your 13 year old son is
a stock image,

(02:41:58):
which I found myself. Again, took the legwork
to find these things out.
Before we show you that, what's interesting is,
of course, he could have just not randomly
grabbed a picture because he didn't wanna show
his son or yeah. Know, that's also possible
just to be objective. It could be that
they had a real story and he just
did But what's fascinating to me is that
you can find this
as a web, you know, on on Oh,

(02:42:19):
it's weird. It won't be scroll down.
It's a online store. Here's another example of
it.
Right
there. Right? So this is a stock image.
So I do also find it weird that
this guy would seek out a stock image
to share.
But the point is simple that a lot
of these claims
are not real, and we've proven that over
the years. Of people just like this that

(02:42:41):
would jump into a story and lie, like,
woman. And when they all stabbed me in
the eye with a flag.
And then everybody in congress and everybody in
the media went along with it even though
the next day, she was on a pro
an interview and didn't even have a mark
on her face.
And we just can't laugh that a dumb
that is. And it it got exposed. Or
a stefonic pretending they were marching through school
saying kill all the Jews. And the police

(02:43:01):
in front of her said, no. That didn't
happen. I investigated it. And she still lies
about it.
So there's a lot of this going on,
which does not mean there's no racism that
exists in any context, but it means that
there is a weaponization of it that is
transparent.
And if you need some other real examples
in real time, as I just showed you
the other day, here is the leading remember,
this guy this guy in orange right here,

(02:43:22):
this was the guy who was
spearheading on this same channel, the most popular
news channel in Israel,
that they should it's okay that they rape
people because that teaches them a lesson that
will stop them from doing more terrorism. It's
okay to rape people in prison. He was
aggressively pushing that. And even his own other
commentators were like, he doesn't really mean that.
He's not you're taking a and he was
like, no. I do mean that. He pushed

(02:43:43):
back.
Just to be clear, and that was not
a unique thing. They were literally advocating for
rape of of people in detention.
Or, you know, if you will, hostages that
are there for 20 years.
This is another example.
People in Gaza deserve death. A hard, agonizing
death. There are no innocent people there. That's
what I was just telling you. We should

(02:44:04):
have seen a lot more revenge, a lot
more rivers of gods and blood.
Guys, that is this is what they're discussing
on this channel.
It just kills me that this we still
pretend like this is not the most obvious
thing in the world. You can see the
subtitles right there.
And agonizing death.
He's not talking about Hamas. He's talking about

(02:44:25):
Palestinians,
people in
Gaza. And I showed you this briefly the
day too. This is I don't wanna show
it because it makes me sick. Well, you
can see right here, there are wild horses
just running along,
and they open fire.
Because why not?
You know, sociopath gonna sociopath, you know?

(02:44:45):
Firing rounds and innocent horses. I honestly believe
it's because that could be even potential food
for people starving to death, or might be
might be able to help them transport. It's
about destroying every piece of life in Gaza.
That's what it is.
Very simple.
Now briefly, we're just gonna talk about the
story, which we'll get into as we go
forward. The Israeli army is allowing gangs in

(02:45:07):
Gaza to loot aid trucks.
Here it is. Haaretz.
Oh, you mean the things that we've been
denying this entire time? Now it's being admitted
they're allowing their troops to do it? Right.
Or or the or anybody there. They're allowing
them to take the aid and then extort
the aid agencies like UNRA,
like everybody else trying to deliver aid and
make them pay fees to get it. I

(02:45:28):
mean,
it's just it can't it it every day,
it gets more and more transparent
and slowly even normalizes in some people's minds
that this is the way it should be
despite what they're claiming is just the same
narrative. Look back on day on October 8th
and compare these things and and
try to convince yourself that it's not the
most obvious thing in the world.

(02:45:49):
No. They're getting more food than ever. Oh,
no. Now we're stopping the aid. Or now
we're blocking or selling it. We're yes. This
is what they've always been doing. As the
cradle writes, Israeli army allows, quote, systematic looting
of Gaza aid.
And this guy writes on his own platform
as Eunice Sarawy continues to highlight,
let them let them really starve this time.

(02:46:11):
No mercy.
But let's pretend like it's not happening as
they post it on their own platforms and
know that you see it.
And Zionists Observer makes a point
of how desperate they lie about everything.
So IDF puts out a tweet that says,
found this in international aid convoys, a bag
full of bullets.
Okay.

(02:46:32):
Well, at face value, you might fall for
that. Right?
But as he writes, and we should all
know by now,
every single aid truck as we as even
the everybody's reported
is first unloaded,
then inspected by Israel, then reloaded before entering
Gaza. Israel orders the trucks to only be
half full in order to be easier to

(02:46:53):
inspect it
and boost the numbers of trucks with aid.
That's a lie. Right? They're manufacturing this. So
it's either a lie or they allowed it.
It's simple.
But doesn't matter. Right? Because it's all about
narrative
that goes along with all of the lies
we've shown you this entire time.
And lastly, another good thing as Spain
has denied docking permission to 2 ships carrying

(02:47:13):
weapons for Israel. Now Spain says it won't
will no longer allow US ships to use
Spanish ports. Maybe it's because they cheered and
laughed and shot off fireworks while there was
a moment of silence for the people that
died in Spain. Yeah. Your actions have consequences.
In some case, that could be people knocking
your teeth out. But I'm not advocating violence.
The point is consequences to actions.

(02:47:34):
And it's about time that out everyone in
the world starts recognizing that your choices,
your decisions,
what you decide to embrace, acknowledge,
it has reverberations in the world.
Maybe you by yourself, not as much in
certain context, but when
your community,

(02:47:55):
your entire town,
your old country
begins to stand up for something, it has
consequences. It does reverberate.
And so, when they stand up and think
they can just act with impunity and Spain
goes, you know what?
We're not helping anymore. Even though we're they're
one of the ones that have already been
pulling back, the point is that that does
make a difference.
And even if their own government is just

(02:48:15):
simply
opportunist or just got personally outraged by what
happened, it still has consequences. It does have
an effect.
So stop don't stop
highlighting the truth. Don't stop speaking up. Don't
stop trying to petition your government if you
think that's gonna make a difference. Don't stop.
You're making a difference with every single thing

(02:48:35):
you do, and they see it. Trust me.
They feel it, which is one of the
main reasons why I think this is getting
so
uncomfortable.
But the same old tire analogy, dark is
before the dawn. I believe that's where we're
going. And if we stop short, then we
just end up in the dark. So let's
keep pushing.
Thank you for being here. As always, guys,

(02:48:56):
I'm just honored to be here with all
of you,
continuing to reach people. You are making a
difference.
Thank you for being here. I love you
all. As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Trump’s Deep State/Zionist Admin Picks & Israel Caught Lying From “Iran Plot” To Amsterdam

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang

All Episodes

Trump’s Deep State/Zionist Admin Picks & Israel Caught Lying From “Iran Plot” To Amsterdam

Stuff You Should Know