September 9, 2025 • 25 mins
Brownsburg Town Council president faces domestic abuse allegations, protective order Issued. Why are we against data centers? Don't allow California to vote in federal elections until they require IDs. Greta's boat not hit by a drone. They shot themselves with a flare. Trump going to SCOTUS over tariffs The left doesn't believe in photo IDs for voting. Why won't the left protect the vote in blue states?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
WI could he split.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
It's a pretty big allegation.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
You arecurrent dot com with the reporting that the Brownsburg
Town Council President Travis to Shane allegations of domestic abuse.
Tony Katz ninety three WIBC, Good morning, Good to be
with you.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
These are allegations.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
This is the reporting from your current dot com. A
judge granting next party protective order the same day the
petition was filed, which was August fifth by his wife
Hendricks County Superior Court number one. Just because I'm gonna
(01:00):
say this again, first of all, innocent, they'll proven guilty. Secondly,
something being issued is not necessarily telling the full and
complete story, but certainly it's going to bring some attention
to Brownsburg, in I'm going to assume not the way
Brownsburg wants the attention. Then you have the Indianapolis City
(01:24):
County Council, this story from the IBJ Taylor Wooten reporting
they want a public hearing to review the idea of
a data center from Google. So they voted unanimously to
hold a public hearing on the rezoning of these of
these acreage four hundred and sixty plus acres for this
(01:47):
Google project. Now, I understand that the Council is now
not necessarily totally opposed to us, but questioning this, you've
got people like Michael Paul Hart who are opposed to
it and others. What I have not heard is the
argument against data centers other than we don't want this.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
If it is indeed an.
Speaker 3 (02:08):
Energy conversation, the questioning for us is how does that
get solved. If the answer is we don't want to
solve that, then we are discussing the desire not to
have data centers, and the question is why.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
If it is not power, then what is it. I
am not opposed to.
Speaker 3 (02:28):
The idea of data centers because I do not have
enough data to tell me why I oppose it. They've
got thirty people standing outside with signs that say go
away Google. If I hand it out signs right now
on Monument Circle, I could get thirty people to scream
screw you, hammer hold on.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
Wait.
Speaker 3 (02:47):
Forty thousand people just showed up. But I could put
out a sign for anything go a ups, go away,
FedEx name, go away Lily. I can get people to
hold a sign that says go away Lily. It doesn't
mean anything. They don't know why they're there.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
Stop it.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
So what is it about the data center that is
so problematic?
Speaker 2 (03:18):
What's the problem.
Speaker 3 (03:21):
Is it a power issue, which I'm not arguing against.
I'm saying that that can very well be a legitimate issue.
Is it about who fills these jobs? Are they all
filled by H one B visa holders, meaning they're coming
from other countries? Is this about what it does to
a landscape? These things are physically ugly. We have not
(03:45):
yet engaged a detailed conversation about the issue.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
You've got a quote.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
From Andrew Filler, who I don't know, organizer and engineer
at this rally. It lives across from the planned development site.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
They are really bad for the community.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Cities and townships everywhere just seem to suffer when they
get put in. How do they suffer? Not you don't
want to look at it across the street. That's not
an argument in my view. That's a nimby argument. Not
in my backyard. How do the cities and townships suffer?
(04:28):
That's what I want to know. Do we oppose data
centers or do we pose where we're discussing putting the
data centers? Could we please get some answers to the
question that would be great, That would be fantastic. I
don't know if it's coming, but if you've got thoughts,
if you know some of these answers, I'm right here.
(04:50):
Tony Katz ninety three WIBC, Good morning. I'll add the
story over there. Tony Katz dot com. Woman allegedly registered
her dog to vote in California cast ballots twice. I said,
if this is happening, Eve, Indeed, this is happening, that
(05:12):
people in California are anywhere are registering pets because they
don't have systems by which to ensure someone is legally voting.
Then not only do we have to now mandate across
the country two forms of photo ID, two forms of it,
(05:38):
we also can't allow California to vote until they do
because they can't be trusted. They cannot be trusted in
any way, shape or for. It's not my fault.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
I didn't do it. I'm not letting the puppy vote.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
Good gosh, Tony Katz ninety three WIBC, Good morning.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Good to be with you. It's a story in USA today.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
When I saw that Representative Ireland was talking about this,
I said, who woa whoa who wo show me proof
of this not just a tweet check double check, recheck.
Turns out it's a story. There's a real allegation here.
There's a real person being charged with five different felonies
because of it.
Speaker 2 (06:22):
Two forms of ID to vote, two.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
Forms of ID to vote.
Speaker 2 (06:32):
That's all there is to it.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
And don't allow Californians to vote in national elections until
they do.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
No federal elections.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Now, there's an interesting story going around from the frauds.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Who are part of this Gretituneberg flotilla.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
Uh, these these America hating West Western culture, hating jew
hating bigots. They're gonna go give support to the palest Indians.
They're given support to Hamas and they're utilizing this mentally
ill girl.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
To do it.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
You think Gretituneberg is okay, you're out of your mind.
Gretitunenberg is not okay. She is abused and has been
abused four years by all the adults around her. It's obscene. Well,
if you go to the headline of Gretaitundberg, right, she's
the the environmentalist one, how dare you and all that
(07:20):
kind of stuff. She has been on the side, of
course of Islamists. That's what she has made of her life.
She's on the side of Islamist and she's now on
her second boat heading to Gaza to give aid to Hamas.
(07:42):
She may think she's giving aid to Palaestidians, but the
aid doesn't get the Palisadians, and the UN proves this,
So she's giving aid to Hamas. It got announced that
there was a fire on the boat.
Speaker 2 (07:56):
We've been hit.
Speaker 3 (07:57):
They claim they were attacked by a drone. They were
not attacked by a drone, as video footage seems to show.
They shot a flare from the boat, the flare misfired,
(08:18):
the flare lands on the boat.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
I don't even know if that's a misfire. They just fired,
They didn't fire it.
Speaker 3 (08:24):
Away, and then the boat caught fire, to which they
are now claiming we were hit by a drone.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
You weren't hit by a drone, your schmucks.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
If we were doing a sequel to Dinner with schmucks,
we'd have to make more room for all of you,
You un serious, ridiculously daft children. All supporters of AMAS
are fools, ignorant, stupid, ugly people. And that's Gretaitunberg, that's
(09:04):
members of the Indianapolis City County Council, all of them,
so that seems to be the story there. They shot
a flare, landed in their own boat. It's like a
It's like an episode of the Three Stooges, but there's
more of them, and none of them are as cool
as curly.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
That was a Three Stooges reference.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
You're welcome, everybody, Look at.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Carl, He's on it.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Operation Midway Blitz is in effect.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
ICE is there.
Speaker 3 (09:58):
But then again, there was never a time they weren't there.
They're calling it Midway Blitz. Department of Homeland Security saying
a new immigration operation started Monday in Chicago, blasting the
sanctuary laws of Chicago and Illinois, targeting people without legal
permission to live in the United States who have criminal records.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
Good.
Speaker 3 (10:21):
This ICE operation will target the criminal of legal aliens
who flock to Chicago and Illinois because they knew Governor J. B.
Pritzker and his sanctuary policies would protect them and allow
them to roam free on American streets. That's a statement
from the Department of Homeland Security. I think that part
of it's rather interesting that they're not just saying, hey,
here's the operation they're getting personal and political from an agency.
(10:49):
And I'm sure if I said, can we find other
examples of this from other presidents and other administrations than
a social media in the social media space, I would
have no doubt we could find it. I just I
don't know. Something about that struck me. I Oh dang,
we really have crossed a rubicon. I'm not saying I'm
(11:10):
a fan of that rubicon cross.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
I want.
Speaker 3 (11:14):
I want the agencies just to give me the data.
I don't want any.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Of the personal stuff in there.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
That said, I don't mind an open discussion about how
Democrats believe in sanctuary cities. And if it wasn't for
laws in Indiana Indianapolis, I'm sure it would be a
sanctuary city, which brings us back to this whole exodus
refugee conversation out of Monroe County and the question I
asked earlier, do we want to be a state that
allows for illegal immigration, that supports the idea.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
That we have no border? Yes or no?
Speaker 3 (11:47):
That never mind the national this is about us. My
vote is no. I don't want to be that state.
I don't want cities doing that. We have to ask
ourselves what we want and then if you're gonna do
an investigation and excess refugee, is there something that they
are doing? Are they giving aid and comfort to illegal immigrants?
(12:10):
Are they engaging in trying to thwart Ice from doing
their job.
Speaker 2 (12:16):
I mean, it's a question. That's what that investigation is about.
From the Attorney General.
Speaker 3 (12:20):
Our question is do we want to be a society
that values the law or not? Do we want to
say that some laws should be broken? Which ones? Because
a lot of people are gonna have thoughts on that.
Time to fill up on the news. Tony Katz ninety
three WIBC, good morning.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
Good to be with you.
Speaker 3 (12:39):
I'm gonna get to that in just one moment. But
the chat room they're live streaming as we are on YouTube.
Just go to YouTube dot com WIBC. I'm being told
that I pronounce Monroe County wrong and I should be
pronouncing it Monroe Monroe, not Monroe, even though it's spelled
m O n Roe Row not Monro. If you would
(13:02):
weigh in and let me know, you can weigh in
in the chat YouTube dot com, a slash WIBC on
the Twitter x at Tony kats or ninety three WIVC.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
That'd be great Monroe or Monroe, which one? Which one?
Speaker 1 (13:20):
Now?
Speaker 3 (13:20):
Futures right now up forty two Nasdaq futures are up fifty.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
Oil prices up. No, no, they're not.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
They're in the same exact spot. Sixty two dollars and
ninety three cents on the West Texas crued sixty six dollars,
sixty eight cents on the Brench crud no movement, ten
year treasury at four point zero sixty six.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
So that is now two days, two days in a row.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
It is holding in this four point zero world. I
want to see if we get under four, are we
looking for another drug? Because this is the lowest it
has been since April. April fourth, we got to three
point nine to nine. We haven't seen anything this low
(14:11):
since October of twenty twenty four, so it's been two
full years of these higher numbers with one one dip
one valley. So now we're back to that valley. Are
we going to see this drop even further? That's what
(14:33):
we're keeping an eye on. And then there is the
tariff fight. Interesting stuff because there are two federal courts
saying that the tariffs Trump is imposed are illegal.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
They are making an argument that based on.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
The law being utilized, the president doesn't have that authority,
that this would be a tax, and therefore that would
be Congress. Maybe I'm not even saying one hundred I know,
I'm saying maybe.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
The question is what happens next.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
What happens next to scotis the Supreme Court of the
United States.
Speaker 2 (15:15):
If Scotis says, yeah, you.
Speaker 3 (15:17):
Don't have the authority based on the laws being mentioned here,
you're talking about a refund. That refund, according to Scott Besson,
could be upwards of a trillion dollars.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Here's the part that infuriates. And I'm going to look.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
Scott bessened in the eye and say, when you said
that the people don't pay the tariff, when you said
tariffs aren't taxes, you knew you were wrong, and you
said it anyway. That's frustrating stuff. Man, If the importer
is refunded, the people are not. We pay the tariff
(16:03):
in the higher price, we won't get anything back. Now
you could argue, hey, the tariff was applied to the business,
so therefore they're the ones who pay the tariff. They
may or may not have moved the tariff along like
some companies have been eating the tariff, so therefore.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
They get it back.
Speaker 3 (16:18):
I hear you, But some people haven't, and we've all
paid higher prices and we will get nothing. So the
businesses that charge the higher price still didn't pay the
whole tariff.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
We're gonna get it back. Okay, that's that's a double dip.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
But all of this could have been well avoided if
we had not gone down this road, if we had
focused tariffs appropriately to an actual end gain and not
said we're gonna tariff you based on trade deficit. We're
going to engage deals based on what is best for America,
and if not.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
X, then we could discuss something.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
Trump went the other way, first saying sweeping tariffs, secondly
tariffs based on trade deficits, not based on tariffs coming
from other nations, even though the trade deficit is meaningless
to us in so many ways, and then altering them
without care or cause. Trump's objective was to shock the
(17:24):
system to get deals. He got some, he hasn't gotten enough,
he hasn't gotten all, and we have not seen a
result of the deal yet, which I hope works. But
this is going to cause a huge amount of upheaval
(17:44):
if the Supreme Court rules against, I don't know. I
don't know how they're going to do it. Based on
what I've seen from lower courts, they seem to lose
a lot because they're much more based in activism than
they aren't anything else. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
just back to President Trump and being.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Able to fire government workers.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
Nineteen states sued saying you can't fire these people twenty
five thousand in all, and the Fourth Circuit, in a
two to one ruling, said, yeah, of course he can.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
What are you crazy?
Speaker 3 (18:15):
So with that and a lot of other decisions, we'll see,
we will see how it is that Scotus response, because
these lower courts have not been trustworthy at all. Tony Katz,
ninety three, WIBC, Good morning, Really, Hi, Oh honestly, I
(18:40):
might make you try another one.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
You can't bring this You've.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
Been missing them lately, Tony.
Speaker 3 (18:47):
Yeah, but you don't lowball it man. Tony Katz in
ninety three WIBC, Good.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
Morning, Good to be with you.
Speaker 3 (18:56):
It's time to play America's favorite game. What the heck
is that television theme song? Here is how we play
our game. Producer Carl Pixel television theme song from yesteryear.
Speaker 2 (19:07):
I have to guess what it is.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
I can phone a friend in Matt Baer, I can
check with the chat room on the YouTube's YouTube dot
com slash wibc, or I could just say I've got
it and uh, you're not even trying.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
You're not even trying. You're right. I didn't get Ally McBeal.
And what was the It was Alienlien yesterday?
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Right, But who's gonna forget or miss the Tonight show?
Speaker 1 (19:34):
You're oh, what's gonna say? Your lifeline? Might not get it?
Speaker 3 (19:38):
No, forget the lifeline. This is the Johnny Carson Tonight Show. Now,
if you played for me the Jimmy Fallon Tonight Show,
I wouldn't know what it is.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Yeah, you didn't get Jay Leno.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Yeah, so so there's that. Yes, I would not have
gotten it.
Speaker 3 (19:57):
So but this this was was very very simple and
oh you should follow my social media.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
It is so glorious.
Speaker 3 (20:07):
I told the story earlier about seeing this post from
a representative Ireland about dogs voting in Californian.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
I said, what is going on here about.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
A woman who registered her dog to vote and then
voted for the dog? And I said, just because you
see a story. Check it, double check, recheck, won't you
you're responsible my exact words, We've got the whole thing.
Sure enough, we find out the story is true, and
I wrote, if Californians are registering their dogs to vote,
(20:42):
then we need to require two forms of photo ID
before allowing anyone to vote, and we need to discard
any vote coming from California in any election until they do.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
A rational thought.
Speaker 3 (20:54):
I think two forms of ID and no until you
provide that in order to vote, we don't.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
We don't pay attention to your vote. One troll. And
then Destiny Wells.
Speaker 3 (21:08):
Oh, Destiny Wells is Indiana's Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Oh my god.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
You know, if she could just be normal, I'm sure
we would have had fantastic conversations by now.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
But she can't. She's so desperate a troll and not talk.
Speaker 3 (21:27):
Oh, she writes back, you need to put some more
coffee on, dude. First of all, I have Matt Bear's
morning coffee, which we will get out to you. I
will hopefully have that link up so you guys can
get some of this coffee and be drinking and enjoying it.
But I responded with the story and I said, as usual,
(21:49):
you react without having the data. That's exactly what happened.
She didn't look up the story. She didn't say link please,
or anything else. She went right for the troll. I
responded with, as usual, you react without having the data,
to which she responds, you are literally calling for all
Californians votes to be disregarded because someone illegally registered their dog.
(22:10):
It's quite the story. But as usual, you react disproportionately.
What did I say? Two forms of ID protect the
vote and don't allow their votes to count unless they're
being proactive and protecting it. All of a sudden, we're
against protecting the vote. Okay, Destiny, take that to Hoosiers.
(22:33):
Let's see what office you lose next. Maybe that's why
you've been losing. I mean, running is tough, it should
be respected. But you want to talk about not connecting.
I'm talking about protecting the vote. What are you talking
about If Californians aren't going to protect the vote, Californians
should not be counted in the vote.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Now, to show you.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
How much my thoughts are indeed connected, When Pennsylvania in
the twenty twenty election, the judiciary usurp the authority of
the legislative branch and change the hours by which they
would accept votes coming in. I said that Pennsylvania's electoral
(23:16):
votes should not be counted. They should never been certified.
The judiciary usurp the authority of the legislative and it
is the legislative branch in each state that determines how
the vote goes. Don't accept. One of us has a
train of thought that is connected to the Constitution, to
(23:39):
the law, to rationality, and one of.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
Us is Destiny.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
Wells gosh, I swear guys, Sometimes I don't know if
you find these conversations interesting and fun or just what
is Tony doing. I think that it is such a
remarkably interesting expose, but I don't know if you do.
(24:06):
And I am not interested in engaging conversations that you
don't find interesting. I mean, sometimes I'm gonna talk about
things that I find interesting no matter what. But this
I can you know, I could go either way with
this stuff. I could talk about the woman on a
subway train who is taking a well, you know what,
like one of those files you take to a callus.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
To try and smooth it down.
Speaker 3 (24:27):
She's doing that on the subway train with her heel
I could talk about how we as a society should
be allowed to send her to a remote island like
she was Napoleon. There should be exile for people who
do this kind of stuff. Maybe that's a better story.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Let me know.
Speaker 3 (24:46):
Email tonyatonycats dot com. You can let me know in
the chat, and of course twitter X. Should I bother
with these people, but they call themselves leaders in Indiana,
and I think we should be kind.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
Of aware of the things that they do and say.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
No one told me that I shouldn't have a conversation
about a lieutenant governor beckwith or no one said I
shouldn't have a conversation about F and Diego fake news,
Diego the secretary of State fake news. I just shortened
it to FN because it's easier. F and Diego right
makes sense.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
Let me know.
WI could he split.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
It's a pretty big allegation.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
You arecurrent dot com with the reporting that the Brownsburg
Town Council President Travis to Shane allegations of domestic abuse.
Tony Katz ninety three WIBC, Good morning, Good to be
with you.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
These are allegations.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
This is the reporting from your current dot com. A
judge granting next party protective order the same day the
petition was filed, which was August fifth by his wife
Hendricks County Superior Court number one. Just because I'm gonna
(01:00):
say this again, first of all, innocent, they'll proven guilty. Secondly,
something being issued is not necessarily telling the full and
complete story, but certainly it's going to bring some attention
to Brownsburg, in I'm going to assume not the way
Brownsburg wants the attention. Then you have the Indianapolis City
(01:24):
County Council, this story from the IBJ Taylor Wooten reporting
they want a public hearing to review the idea of
a data center from Google. So they voted unanimously to
hold a public hearing on the rezoning of these of
these acreage four hundred and sixty plus acres for this
(01:47):
Google project. Now, I understand that the Council is now
not necessarily totally opposed to us, but questioning this, you've
got people like Michael Paul Hart who are opposed to
it and others. What I have not heard is the
argument against data centers other than we don't want this.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
If it is indeed an.
Speaker 3 (02:08):
Energy conversation, the questioning for us is how does that
get solved. If the answer is we don't want to
solve that, then we are discussing the desire not to
have data centers, and the question is why.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
If it is not power, then what is it. I
am not opposed to.
Speaker 3 (02:28):
The idea of data centers because I do not have
enough data to tell me why I oppose it. They've
got thirty people standing outside with signs that say go
away Google. If I hand it out signs right now
on Monument Circle, I could get thirty people to scream
screw you, hammer hold on.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
Wait.
Speaker 3 (02:47):
Forty thousand people just showed up. But I could put
out a sign for anything go a ups, go away,
FedEx name, go away Lily. I can get people to
hold a sign that says go away Lily. It doesn't
mean anything. They don't know why they're there.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
Stop it.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
So what is it about the data center that is
so problematic?
Speaker 2 (03:18):
What's the problem.
Speaker 3 (03:21):
Is it a power issue, which I'm not arguing against.
I'm saying that that can very well be a legitimate issue.
Is it about who fills these jobs? Are they all
filled by H one B visa holders, meaning they're coming
from other countries? Is this about what it does to
a landscape? These things are physically ugly. We have not
(03:45):
yet engaged a detailed conversation about the issue.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
You've got a quote.
Speaker 3 (03:53):
From Andrew Filler, who I don't know, organizer and engineer
at this rally. It lives across from the planned development site.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
They are really bad for the community.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Cities and townships everywhere just seem to suffer when they
get put in. How do they suffer? Not you don't
want to look at it across the street. That's not
an argument in my view. That's a nimby argument. Not
in my backyard. How do the cities and townships suffer?
(04:28):
That's what I want to know. Do we oppose data
centers or do we pose where we're discussing putting the
data centers? Could we please get some answers to the
question that would be great, That would be fantastic. I
don't know if it's coming, but if you've got thoughts,
if you know some of these answers, I'm right here.
(04:50):
Tony Katz ninety three WIBC, Good morning. I'll add the
story over there. Tony Katz dot com. Woman allegedly registered
her dog to vote in California cast ballots twice. I said,
if this is happening, Eve, Indeed, this is happening, that
(05:12):
people in California are anywhere are registering pets because they
don't have systems by which to ensure someone is legally voting.
Then not only do we have to now mandate across
the country two forms of photo ID, two forms of it,
(05:38):
we also can't allow California to vote until they do
because they can't be trusted. They cannot be trusted in
any way, shape or for. It's not my fault.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
I didn't do it. I'm not letting the puppy vote.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
Good gosh, Tony Katz ninety three WIBC, Good morning.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Good to be with you. It's a story in USA today.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
When I saw that Representative Ireland was talking about this,
I said, who woa whoa who wo show me proof
of this not just a tweet check double check, recheck.
Turns out it's a story. There's a real allegation here.
There's a real person being charged with five different felonies
because of it.
Speaker 2 (06:22):
Two forms of ID to vote, two.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
Forms of ID to vote.
Speaker 2 (06:32):
That's all there is to it.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
And don't allow Californians to vote in national elections until
they do.
Speaker 2 (06:37):
No federal elections.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Now, there's an interesting story going around from the frauds.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Who are part of this Gretituneberg flotilla.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
Uh, these these America hating West Western culture, hating jew
hating bigots. They're gonna go give support to the palest Indians.
They're given support to Hamas and they're utilizing this mentally
ill girl.
Speaker 2 (06:58):
To do it.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
You think Gretituneberg is okay, you're out of your mind.
Gretitunenberg is not okay. She is abused and has been
abused four years by all the adults around her. It's obscene. Well,
if you go to the headline of Gretaitundberg, right, she's
the the environmentalist one, how dare you and all that
(07:20):
kind of stuff. She has been on the side, of
course of Islamists. That's what she has made of her life.
She's on the side of Islamist and she's now on
her second boat heading to Gaza to give aid to Hamas.
(07:42):
She may think she's giving aid to Palaestidians, but the
aid doesn't get the Palisadians, and the UN proves this,
So she's giving aid to Hamas. It got announced that
there was a fire on the boat.
Speaker 2 (07:56):
We've been hit.
Speaker 3 (07:57):
They claim they were attacked by a drone. They were
not attacked by a drone, as video footage seems to show.
They shot a flare from the boat, the flare misfired,
(08:18):
the flare lands on the boat.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
I don't even know if that's a misfire. They just fired,
They didn't fire it.
Speaker 3 (08:24):
Away, and then the boat caught fire, to which they
are now claiming we were hit by a drone.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
You weren't hit by a drone, your schmucks.
Speaker 3 (08:38):
If we were doing a sequel to Dinner with schmucks,
we'd have to make more room for all of you,
You un serious, ridiculously daft children. All supporters of AMAS
are fools, ignorant, stupid, ugly people. And that's Gretaitunberg, that's
(09:04):
members of the Indianapolis City County Council, all of them,
so that seems to be the story there. They shot
a flare, landed in their own boat. It's like a
It's like an episode of the Three Stooges, but there's
more of them, and none of them are as cool
as curly.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
That was a Three Stooges reference.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
You're welcome, everybody, Look at.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Carl, He's on it.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Operation Midway Blitz is in effect.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
ICE is there.
Speaker 3 (09:58):
But then again, there was never a time they weren't there.
They're calling it Midway Blitz. Department of Homeland Security saying
a new immigration operation started Monday in Chicago, blasting the
sanctuary laws of Chicago and Illinois, targeting people without legal
permission to live in the United States who have criminal records.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
Good.
Speaker 3 (10:21):
This ICE operation will target the criminal of legal aliens
who flock to Chicago and Illinois because they knew Governor J. B.
Pritzker and his sanctuary policies would protect them and allow
them to roam free on American streets. That's a statement
from the Department of Homeland Security. I think that part
of it's rather interesting that they're not just saying, hey,
here's the operation they're getting personal and political from an agency.
(10:49):
And I'm sure if I said, can we find other
examples of this from other presidents and other administrations than
a social media in the social media space, I would
have no doubt we could find it. I just I
don't know. Something about that struck me. I Oh dang,
we really have crossed a rubicon. I'm not saying I'm
(11:10):
a fan of that rubicon cross.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
I want.
Speaker 3 (11:14):
I want the agencies just to give me the data.
I don't want any.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Of the personal stuff in there.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
That said, I don't mind an open discussion about how
Democrats believe in sanctuary cities. And if it wasn't for
laws in Indiana Indianapolis, I'm sure it would be a
sanctuary city, which brings us back to this whole exodus
refugee conversation out of Monroe County and the question I
asked earlier, do we want to be a state that
allows for illegal immigration, that supports the idea.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
That we have no border? Yes or no?
Speaker 3 (11:47):
That never mind the national this is about us. My
vote is no. I don't want to be that state.
I don't want cities doing that. We have to ask
ourselves what we want and then if you're gonna do
an investigation and excess refugee, is there something that they
are doing? Are they giving aid and comfort to illegal immigrants?
(12:10):
Are they engaging in trying to thwart Ice from doing
their job.
Speaker 2 (12:16):
I mean, it's a question. That's what that investigation is about.
From the Attorney General.
Speaker 3 (12:20):
Our question is do we want to be a society
that values the law or not? Do we want to
say that some laws should be broken? Which ones? Because
a lot of people are gonna have thoughts on that.
Time to fill up on the news. Tony Katz ninety
three WIBC, good morning.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
Good to be with you.
Speaker 3 (12:39):
I'm gonna get to that in just one moment. But
the chat room they're live streaming as we are on YouTube.
Just go to YouTube dot com WIBC. I'm being told
that I pronounce Monroe County wrong and I should be
pronouncing it Monroe Monroe, not Monroe, even though it's spelled
m O n Roe Row not Monro. If you would
(13:02):
weigh in and let me know, you can weigh in
in the chat YouTube dot com, a slash WIBC on
the Twitter x at Tony kats or ninety three WIVC.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
That'd be great Monroe or Monroe, which one? Which one?
Speaker 1 (13:20):
Now?
Speaker 3 (13:20):
Futures right now up forty two Nasdaq futures are up fifty.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
Oil prices up. No, no, they're not.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
They're in the same exact spot. Sixty two dollars and
ninety three cents on the West Texas crued sixty six dollars,
sixty eight cents on the Brench crud no movement, ten
year treasury at four point zero sixty six.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
So that is now two days, two days in a row.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
It is holding in this four point zero world. I
want to see if we get under four, are we
looking for another drug? Because this is the lowest it
has been since April. April fourth, we got to three
point nine to nine. We haven't seen anything this low
(14:11):
since October of twenty twenty four, so it's been two
full years of these higher numbers with one one dip
one valley. So now we're back to that valley. Are
we going to see this drop even further? That's what
(14:33):
we're keeping an eye on. And then there is the
tariff fight. Interesting stuff because there are two federal courts
saying that the tariffs Trump is imposed are illegal.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
They are making an argument that based on.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
The law being utilized, the president doesn't have that authority,
that this would be a tax, and therefore that would
be Congress. Maybe I'm not even saying one hundred I know,
I'm saying maybe.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
The question is what happens next.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
What happens next to scotis the Supreme Court of the
United States.
Speaker 2 (15:15):
If Scotis says, yeah, you.
Speaker 3 (15:17):
Don't have the authority based on the laws being mentioned here,
you're talking about a refund. That refund, according to Scott Besson,
could be upwards of a trillion dollars.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Here's the part that infuriates. And I'm going to look.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
Scott bessened in the eye and say, when you said
that the people don't pay the tariff, when you said
tariffs aren't taxes, you knew you were wrong, and you
said it anyway. That's frustrating stuff. Man, If the importer
is refunded, the people are not. We pay the tariff
(16:03):
in the higher price, we won't get anything back. Now
you could argue, hey, the tariff was applied to the business,
so therefore they're the ones who pay the tariff. They
may or may not have moved the tariff along like
some companies have been eating the tariff, so therefore.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
They get it back.
Speaker 3 (16:18):
I hear you, But some people haven't, and we've all
paid higher prices and we will get nothing. So the
businesses that charge the higher price still didn't pay the
whole tariff.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
We're gonna get it back. Okay, that's that's a double dip.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
But all of this could have been well avoided if
we had not gone down this road, if we had
focused tariffs appropriately to an actual end gain and not
said we're gonna tariff you based on trade deficit. We're
going to engage deals based on what is best for America,
and if not.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
X, then we could discuss something.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
Trump went the other way, first saying sweeping tariffs, secondly
tariffs based on trade deficits, not based on tariffs coming
from other nations, even though the trade deficit is meaningless
to us in so many ways, and then altering them
without care or cause. Trump's objective was to shock the
(17:24):
system to get deals. He got some, he hasn't gotten enough,
he hasn't gotten all, and we have not seen a
result of the deal yet, which I hope works. But
this is going to cause a huge amount of upheaval
(17:44):
if the Supreme Court rules against, I don't know. I
don't know how they're going to do it. Based on
what I've seen from lower courts, they seem to lose
a lot because they're much more based in activism than
they aren't anything else. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
just back to President Trump and being.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Able to fire government workers.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
Nineteen states sued saying you can't fire these people twenty
five thousand in all, and the Fourth Circuit, in a
two to one ruling, said, yeah, of course he can.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
What are you crazy?
Speaker 3 (18:15):
So with that and a lot of other decisions, we'll see,
we will see how it is that Scotus response, because
these lower courts have not been trustworthy at all. Tony Katz,
ninety three, WIBC, Good morning, Really, Hi, Oh honestly, I
(18:40):
might make you try another one.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
You can't bring this You've.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
Been missing them lately, Tony.
Speaker 3 (18:47):
Yeah, but you don't lowball it man. Tony Katz in
ninety three WIBC, Good.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
Morning, Good to be with you.
Speaker 3 (18:56):
It's time to play America's favorite game. What the heck
is that television theme song? Here is how we play
our game. Producer Carl Pixel television theme song from yesteryear.
Speaker 2 (19:07):
I have to guess what it is.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
I can phone a friend in Matt Baer, I can
check with the chat room on the YouTube's YouTube dot
com slash wibc, or I could just say I've got
it and uh, you're not even trying.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
You're not even trying. You're right. I didn't get Ally McBeal.
And what was the It was Alienlien yesterday?
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Right, But who's gonna forget or miss the Tonight show?
Speaker 1 (19:34):
You're oh, what's gonna say? Your lifeline? Might not get it?
Speaker 3 (19:38):
No, forget the lifeline. This is the Johnny Carson Tonight Show. Now,
if you played for me the Jimmy Fallon Tonight Show,
I wouldn't know what it is.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Yeah, you didn't get Jay Leno.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Yeah, so so there's that. Yes, I would not have
gotten it.
Speaker 3 (19:57):
So but this this was was very very simple and
oh you should follow my social media.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
It is so glorious.
Speaker 3 (20:07):
I told the story earlier about seeing this post from
a representative Ireland about dogs voting in Californian.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
I said, what is going on here about.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
A woman who registered her dog to vote and then
voted for the dog? And I said, just because you
see a story. Check it, double check, recheck, won't you
you're responsible my exact words, We've got the whole thing.
Sure enough, we find out the story is true, and
I wrote, if Californians are registering their dogs to vote,
(20:42):
then we need to require two forms of photo ID
before allowing anyone to vote, and we need to discard
any vote coming from California in any election until they do.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
A rational thought.
Speaker 3 (20:54):
I think two forms of ID and no until you
provide that in order to vote, we don't.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
We don't pay attention to your vote. One troll. And
then Destiny Wells.
Speaker 3 (21:08):
Oh, Destiny Wells is Indiana's Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Oh my god.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
You know, if she could just be normal, I'm sure
we would have had fantastic conversations by now.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
But she can't. She's so desperate a troll and not talk.
Speaker 3 (21:27):
Oh, she writes back, you need to put some more
coffee on, dude. First of all, I have Matt Bear's
morning coffee, which we will get out to you. I
will hopefully have that link up so you guys can
get some of this coffee and be drinking and enjoying it.
But I responded with the story and I said, as usual,
(21:49):
you react without having the data. That's exactly what happened.
She didn't look up the story. She didn't say link please,
or anything else. She went right for the troll. I
responded with, as usual, you react without having the data,
to which she responds, you are literally calling for all
Californians votes to be disregarded because someone illegally registered their dog.
(22:10):
It's quite the story. But as usual, you react disproportionately.
What did I say? Two forms of ID protect the
vote and don't allow their votes to count unless they're
being proactive and protecting it. All of a sudden, we're
against protecting the vote. Okay, Destiny, take that to Hoosiers.
(22:33):
Let's see what office you lose next. Maybe that's why
you've been losing. I mean, running is tough, it should
be respected. But you want to talk about not connecting.
I'm talking about protecting the vote. What are you talking
about If Californians aren't going to protect the vote, Californians
should not be counted in the vote.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Now, to show you.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
How much my thoughts are indeed connected, When Pennsylvania in
the twenty twenty election, the judiciary usurp the authority of
the legislative branch and change the hours by which they
would accept votes coming in. I said that Pennsylvania's electoral
(23:16):
votes should not be counted. They should never been certified.
The judiciary usurp the authority of the legislative and it
is the legislative branch in each state that determines how
the vote goes. Don't accept. One of us has a
train of thought that is connected to the Constitution, to
(23:39):
the law, to rationality, and one of.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
Us is Destiny.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
Wells gosh, I swear guys, Sometimes I don't know if
you find these conversations interesting and fun or just what
is Tony doing. I think that it is such a
remarkably interesting expose, but I don't know if you do.
(24:06):
And I am not interested in engaging conversations that you
don't find interesting. I mean, sometimes I'm gonna talk about
things that I find interesting no matter what. But this
I can you know, I could go either way with
this stuff. I could talk about the woman on a
subway train who is taking a well, you know what,
like one of those files you take to a callus.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
To try and smooth it down.
Speaker 3 (24:27):
She's doing that on the subway train with her heel
I could talk about how we as a society should
be allowed to send her to a remote island like
she was Napoleon. There should be exile for people who
do this kind of stuff. Maybe that's a better story.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Let me know.
Speaker 3 (24:46):
Email tonyatonycats dot com. You can let me know in
the chat, and of course twitter X. Should I bother
with these people, but they call themselves leaders in Indiana,
and I think we should be kind.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
Of aware of the things that they do and say.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
No one told me that I shouldn't have a conversation
about a lieutenant governor beckwith or no one said I
shouldn't have a conversation about F and Diego fake news,
Diego the secretary of State fake news. I just shortened
it to FN because it's easier. F and Diego right
makes sense.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
Let me know.
Popular Podcasts
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.