November 7, 2025 • 22 mins
Trump Asked Point Blank: Do You Think It's Time For Republicans To Start Making Concessions To Dems? Mamdani got 1,036,000 votes in a city with 8,500,000 residents. Trump win at SCOTUS. NOAA ghost stations? What the what? SCOTUS revisits Obergefell
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The President giving these modifications that are being made to
air travel, the other disruptions with the government shut down.
Do you think it's time for Republicans in Congress to
change their negotiating position at all in one way, to
start making concessions to Democrats.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Well, I think it's time for them to end the
filibuster and just put everybody back to work. Vote in
voter ID, vote in, no mail in voting except for military,
far away military, and people that are very sick.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
I'd like to see one day voting.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
I'd like to see, not sixty five days of voting
from all over the place.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Though, I'd like to clean up the elections. The border.
We've done a great job. We have a great strong border.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
Now I'd like to see new rules of immigration that
could be fair and good. You know us that you'll
never get the rules that they're never going to get.
There's so many things we could put in, including tax
cuts that we could get, and we could do it
all ourselves.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
You to do that, you have to end the philibuster.
Speaker 4 (01:02):
And that's just not happening.
Speaker 5 (01:03):
Tony Katz at ninety three WIBC, Good morning, what's going
on with you? They're not doing it, and you have
to look at the downside. You have to recognize what's coming.
You don't want to do it.
Speaker 4 (01:20):
Now.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
I didn't say it wasn't going to come. I'm saying
I'm gonna know. I mean, yes, I'm redistricting. I'm a
know on ending the filibuster. What can I say? I'm
persnickety like that. But the idea that there should be
any concessions, nah.
Speaker 4 (01:42):
Nah No.
Speaker 5 (01:46):
I would argue that the Republican Party should simply say, look,
we've passed this thing. Here it is, that's it, and
let it be Tony. You understand people are getting hurt.
I understand Democrats are hurting people. Yet you see what
I did there. You understand that flights have been cut
ten percent and they will be cut more because eric
traffic controllers aren't getting paid.
Speaker 4 (02:08):
You understand this.
Speaker 5 (02:09):
Yes, I understand that my mother will probably not be
able to make it to Indianapolis because Democrats won't open
the government.
Speaker 4 (02:16):
You see what I did there? I meant it too.
That's it.
Speaker 5 (02:22):
Someone has to walk up to Chuck Schumer in the
middle of an interview and say, Chuck.
Speaker 4 (02:26):
You don't get it.
Speaker 5 (02:28):
This is the state of affairs until you change it,
complain all you want, We don't give a blank and
walk away and walk away. And you say to me,
my gosh, you're so cavalier with the lives of other people.
I am saying that there are always lives of other people.
(02:48):
But this has to end. And this does not end.
If you say, all right now, the pain's too much,
you're telling the left that if you're just willing to
inflict more pain, you'll get what you want.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
And they will always inflict more pain. It's like a
government program. When do they end a government program?
Speaker 5 (03:09):
No, no, no, they fight like have to keep it
going and growing and then adding one to five, one
hundred and forty three different new programs.
Speaker 4 (03:19):
These things only stop if they stop.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
And now that the election is over the off year election,
Democrats did well, well, you see, this gives us strength
to keep going pain for power. That's their argument. I
don't think you should give into that. This is where
we're at. I didn't want to be in this place.
I would rather senators did their damn job and we
(03:45):
had a budget. But we don't and they don't. So
here we are.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
Don't give them a quarter, don't give them an ounce,
don't give them an inch. Oh, I should say don't
give them any quarter. That would be right, because I mean,
don't give them a quarter. That's just weird.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
Don't do it.
Speaker 4 (04:02):
Here's the continuing resolution. Vote for this.
Speaker 5 (04:04):
We can do anything you want after that, and you'll
get what you want after that. But here's the continuing resolution.
Have a nice day, but it ain't gonna happen if
you don't get in Chuck Schumer's face. And I do
think that the conversation has to shift from the speaker
to people who play a much stronger type of ball.
I will get into that story. Tony Katz ninety three WIBC,
(04:25):
Good morning. At least Stephonic running for governor of New York.
It is the worst kept secret in politics.
Speaker 4 (04:35):
Now known to the world.
Speaker 5 (04:38):
She's gonna clean up Kathy Hokel's catastrophe. That's gonna be
a rough race. Tony Katz in ninety three WIBC, Good morning,
Good to be with you.
Speaker 4 (04:48):
But you got nothing to lose.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (04:50):
Sephonic is a fighter. She's got some good people on
the team.
Speaker 4 (04:55):
Let's see if.
Speaker 5 (04:56):
They're focused on message as opposed to, you know, focusing
on getting paid.
Speaker 4 (05:03):
Why does that matter?
Speaker 5 (05:04):
Because it would be, first of all, an insane flip. Second,
it would describe a great difference between New York as
a whole and New York City. And as we discussed yesterday,
in the election of Zoron Mamdani, eight point four million
New York City residents, two million, fifty five thousand people
(05:25):
voted in the election. One million, thirty six thousand people
voted for Momdanni. That's less than twelve and a half
percent of the population. Maybe we should all take a breath,
Maybe we should all take a beat. Data matters, and
the data shows that women went for Momdani and college
educated went from Momdani. And the question, of course is why, Well,
(05:48):
it's because they're smarter.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Is that right? There's a lot to discuss.
Speaker 5 (05:55):
I thought about gathering everybody next week and doing one
of those breakdowns again, like can we do can we
do it quickly? And here's what happened in the election.
I'm not there's no way, timing wise, I'm going to
make that happen, but I.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
Will discuss it here. That said, we need a gathering,
we do.
Speaker 5 (06:12):
You know, I said I wanted to do a Christmas
party because nothing would be better than Tony Katz's Christmas party.
Speaker 4 (06:24):
Man, we can't we can't leave that idea on a
back burner. We got to make that. We got to
make that happen.
Speaker 5 (06:30):
The Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Trump administration,
I would argue ruling in favor of Rationality was an
unsigned order from the court.
Speaker 4 (06:40):
It stayed a pair of lower court rulings.
Speaker 5 (06:42):
Those lower court rulings prevented the administration from enforcing an
executive order Donald Trump put out on day one that stated,
the policy of the United States is to recognize two sexes.
Speaker 4 (06:53):
Male and female.
Speaker 5 (06:55):
This means, with the Supreme Court pushing those orders to
the side, the Trump administration can order US passports state
the sex at birth of the person who is traveling.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
Right.
Speaker 4 (07:10):
And why does this matter so incredibly much?
Speaker 5 (07:13):
Because someone's gonna say, Tony, this is just the culture
war thing that cost you the race in Virginia with
wins Earl Sears. No, these conversations do indeed matter. The
difference is they're not the only one. If you're going
to tell somebody that boys are not girls and girls
(07:34):
are not boys, you are correct.
Speaker 4 (07:36):
If you're going to do that without mentioning that it's
harder to feed your boys or girls because of increased costs.
Speaker 5 (07:43):
You seem out of touch, very very different. So this
ruling is extremely important because this ruling states that you
can believe anything you want.
Speaker 4 (07:59):
But in the real world, we have rules, we have
a standard, we have definition. These things matter greatly now
as I know it. In the unsigned it was six'
to three.
Speaker 5 (08:21):
Or was that a different, ruling because this has the
liberal judges saying they would have kept the lower court
orders in. Place Jackson Katanji Brown jackson saying the government
seeks to enforce a questionably legal new policy, immediately but
it offers no evidence that it will suffer any harm
if it is temporarily enjoyed from doing. So while the
plaintiffs will be subject to imminent concrete injury if the
(08:43):
policy goes into, Effect, no they won't because they can
still fly and. Travel there is no injury if the
policy goes into. Effect that's not. TRUE i am not a,
LAWYER i am not a, judge BUT i am, right
And Katanji Brown jackson is wrong because nothing is stopping
the person for. Traveling jackson says there's a senseless in
(09:07):
the court senseless side stepping of the obvious equitable. OUTCOME
i am not interested in your version of an equitable.
Outcome as a matter of, Fact i'm not interested in your.
Opinions you shouldn't be A Supreme court. Justice you're not.
Qualified it turns, out and you, say any, well she's
more qualified than. You what does that? Matter what in
(09:30):
the world possibly does that? Matter being a justice is
all the way at the. Top she ain't. There from
the way she engages with listeners, general from the way
she engages with, counsel from the way she engages with
(09:51):
other members of the, court from her inability.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
To define what a woman. Is because she's not a
biologist enough, enough let's not kid.
Speaker 5 (10:03):
Ourselves she does not speak from on. High she does
not have the richness of her. Experiences she's a bad.
Jurist we've had bad jurists. Before the problem is we
don't utilize impeachment, Enough.
Speaker 4 (10:18):
Tony you didn't just say.
Speaker 5 (10:19):
Impeachment, oh they're going to impeach If democrats get The
house On january, third twenty twenty, seven after the twenty
twenty sixth, election they will Impeach Donald trump On january,
third twenty twenty. Seven smart it, down mark it. Down
of course you can impeach A Supreme court, justice AND
i think you.
Speaker 4 (10:37):
SHOULD i think the call is coming from inside the.
House i've said it.
Speaker 5 (10:40):
Before and along with Her Judge, bosburg this federal judge
who issued one hundred and ninety seven subpoenas in the
case of the investigation known As Arctic, frost going after
citizens and politicos their phone records and all the. Rest
this is the story OF at AND T. Verizon they
(11:02):
get the. Subpoena verizon goes here's all the phone records For, Centenator, Ted,
cruz AND at AND t, says we don't have to honor,
this and it's Why i'm Leaving.
Speaker 4 (11:09):
Verizon, sorry we got. Rules.
Speaker 5 (11:14):
Now i've, looked AND at AND t isn't as good
of a on download speed as let's, say A T.
Mobile and they're basically in the same place As. Verizon
SO i may suffer a little. BIT i don't necessarily want,
to But i'm not gonna sit here and support people
who give up phone records because the governments, like we
want answers as opposed to saying we protect our.
Speaker 4 (11:33):
Customers what's wrong with?
Speaker 5 (11:34):
You you got to actually make the, change so people
understand there's a consequence to actions good and.
Speaker 4 (11:41):
Bad Impeach bosburg.
Speaker 5 (11:44):
Immediately Representative Brendan gill Of florida is now putting that.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
Forward make that happen. Today ghost.
Speaker 5 (11:54):
Stations it was one of those rare moments on social
media that made you stop and, Say i'm, sorry what's happening?
Here because to pay attention to social media is well.
Silly Tony kats ninety THREE, wibc good, Morning great to
be with, you follow me on x At Tony. Katz
(12:16):
it's it's a valueless, proposition and you, know a hooray
for the people who can amass outrageous followings and somehow
turn that into.
Speaker 4 (12:26):
Dollars good lord.
Speaker 5 (12:30):
To live all day on that, insanity with that, insanity
and it's just gotten so much. Worse but there was
this from a guy On TWITTER x who refers to
himself as Climate. Craze i've so far documented one hundred
and ninety six ghost stations Where noah fabricates temperatures for
(12:51):
data recording stations that no longer. Exist AND i, Said i'm. Confused,
well sure, enough this guy his entire. World Lieutenant Colonel
Air force retired. Meteorologist he has started taking note of
(13:16):
how there are these weather. Stations no A National oceanic
And Atmospheric administration the hardest agency to, pronounce and For,
congress it's the hardest agency to pronounce except the agency
to cut your, taxes and that one doesn't.
Speaker 4 (13:34):
Exist that's why they can't pronounce.
Speaker 5 (13:35):
It there are these observation centers that don't exist, anymore
but still data gets reported from those. Stations AND i,
said this is the most insane Thing i've ever heard
(13:58):
in my entire, life and the most perfectly. GOVERNMENT i
am sending this to the guys At Heartland, institute which
does a lot on climate.
Speaker 4 (14:11):
Exactly how true is?
Speaker 5 (14:13):
This does anybody have any more information Than i've got
from this? Guy and this guy's got some.
Speaker 4 (14:19):
INFO i, mean.
Speaker 5 (14:20):
There's a lot of posting, here a lot of discussions,
here but you, know with everything one needs to ask to,
do the Research trust would. Verify there's a station in
The everglades In. Florida they stopped observing in twenty, eighteen,
(14:43):
right it no longer gives weather, reports BUT noah fabricates
its temperature. Data i'm not saying it's the greatest scandal
in the.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
WORLD i am, saying what the bloody hack is. Happening
it's one of those.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Stories it's, like you fabricate the data so you can
tell us what temperatures a, rising so you can say, what,
well now we need a bigger. Budget what is the
data fabricated? For because no matter what you, Say i'm
willing to bet you the end result is, we The american,
people get. Screwed it's a fascinating. Story i've got the
(15:24):
link in the show sheet over there tonycats dot. Com
check it out for. Yourself Tony kats ninety THREE, Wibc good.
MORNING i think it might be too early for me
to discuss THAT i have some bourbon coming. Out and
since it's too early for me to discuss, IT i
won't discuss THAT.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
I have some bourbon coming.
Speaker 5 (15:44):
OUT i will not talk about the fact that there
is some bourbon that will be available For. CHRISTMAS i
won't discuss the fact that that is. Happening, nope it's too.
Early it's too. Early so So Producer, carl don't ask
me anymore about the bourbon that's coming out because it's
simply too, early AND i simply won't discuss that bourbon
that's coming.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
OUT i won't do. IT i urge you had a
bourbon coming. Out i've SAID i won't discuss. THAT i
can't believe you brought it up.
Speaker 5 (16:07):
Again Tony katz in ninety THREE, Wibc good, Morning what
is going?
Speaker 4 (16:13):
ON i didn't know this was on the. Docket, no,
WAIT i did know this was on the.
Speaker 5 (16:19):
Docket The Supreme court is going to, question going to figure,
out they're going to decide whether they're going to hear
a challenge To Obergafel obergafel. V. Hodges this was twenty.
Fifteen this was a five to four, decision and it
guaranteed nationwide marriage rights for same sex.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
Couples it's a challenge brought By Kim.
Speaker 5 (16:44):
Davis, Now Kim davis was that county clerk In kentucky
who she would not issue a marriage license to a gay.
Couple the issue With obergafe is that the decision has
(17:04):
no basis in The, constitution and it can be overruled
without affecting any other. Cases this is the ARGUMENT i
have made from this microphone since twenty. Fifteen my issue
is not with two men or two women spending their lives.
Together this conversation was winning In, states and my exact
(17:29):
words were let it win in The. States my exact
words were pass a, law write, it vote on, it
get the president to sign. It and this president would sign.
Speaker 4 (17:40):
It pass a.
Speaker 5 (17:41):
Law What obergefel did was create a right out of hol.
Cloth it takes something that is not in The constitution
and decides it exists in The. Constitution if we are honest,
people we can discuss this. Honestly if we are dishonest,
(18:01):
People i'm gonna be called a.
Speaker 4 (18:03):
Homophobe in three to W.
Speaker 5 (18:06):
I had to check My Von reeste time for. That
Von reeste dot. COM i work with these. People they
make fantastic time pieces assembled right here In. Indiana i'm
showing it off to the livestream YouTube dot com SLASH, Wibc.
Speaker 4 (18:19):
So don't Think i'm just, crazy.
Speaker 5 (18:20):
Guys the argument is does the court have the right
to create a? Right and the answer is, no they do.
Not it was always a bad.
Speaker 4 (18:34):
Decision it was a bad decision.
Speaker 5 (18:37):
Because the right to same sex marriage does not exist
in The. Constitution but one could create a. Law one
could go To. CONGRESS i think it'll, pass you know,
WHAT i think it'll Pass with flying, colors and IF
i were A, REPUBLICAN i might very well get on
board with. IT i take that, Back there'll be Some
(18:58):
republicans who get on board with. IT i have no
problems with two men or two women spending their lives,
together AND i have no problem with them getting the
tax benefits.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
THEREOF i do believe.
Speaker 5 (19:06):
Marriage has a DEFINITION i think it should, hold And
i've said that from the beginning.
Speaker 4 (19:09):
TOO i haven't changed on this and oh, wait it's
twenty twenty, five ten. Years i've not changed on this
subject in ten.
Speaker 5 (19:16):
Years BUT i do believe that words have meaning and
we shouldn't manipulate the meaning of those. WORDS i believe
marriage is one man and one, woman and when it's two,
men or when it's two.
Speaker 4 (19:27):
Women in something.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
Else, Indeed i'm not telling you not to go live your,
life AND i don't believe there should be anything that
engages treating you. Differently and you say to, me, well
married be able to get tax, breaks.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
This, that and the.
Speaker 5 (19:38):
Other you're, saying, oh, no, no, NO i think you should
get the tax. Breaks after, that we're talking about a
religious terminology to a, word And i'm not interested in
changing the.
Speaker 4 (19:47):
Definition you could disagree with, me that's.
Speaker 5 (19:49):
Cool but when it comes to The Supreme, COURT i
don't like anything that decides that a right can be
created just because so one wishes upon a. Star it
says what it says and doesn't say what it doesn't.
Say The constitution says what it says and doesn't say
(20:10):
what it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (20:11):
Say and it is the job of The court to
discuss what.
Speaker 5 (20:14):
Is said and what is not, said and not to
try and find their way to what it could.
Speaker 4 (20:19):
Mean my issue with The obamacare, Decision.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
Why in the world Is John roberts deciding That obamacare
is nothing more than a tax And congress can levy,
taxes so therefore it's.
Speaker 4 (20:37):
Fine that's.
Speaker 5 (20:40):
Nuts by the, way it is that same thought process
that is being looked at regarding tariffs And President trump
and whether he can raise revenues through a tariffs that
are put on countries via THE, ieepa This Emergency Powers
act of nineteen seventy. Seven same concept taxation has to
(21:03):
go Through, congress but it's changing the very concept of
who decides an, emergency which is about the concept of
regula which exists in the. Legislation, OH i didn't say
it didn't get, MURKY i said The Supreme, court, No
bergefell created a law or created a right out of whole,
(21:26):
cloth and that won't.
Speaker 4 (21:29):
Fly So i'm glad they're seeing.
Speaker 5 (21:33):
It what's interesting here is that this is private, Conference
so The Supreme, court according to Scotus, blog does not
grant review without considering the case at least two consecutive.
Speaker 4 (21:47):
Conferences so we will. See we'll see what.
Speaker 5 (21:56):
Happens but my, hope my hope is that they rehear,
it or they simply say this case was poorly considered.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
And then go pass. Laws get it, done get it done.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
Immediately i'll answer your question for twitter x in the
next hour
The President giving these modifications that are being made to
air travel, the other disruptions with the government shut down.
Do you think it's time for Republicans in Congress to
change their negotiating position at all in one way, to
start making concessions to Democrats.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Well, I think it's time for them to end the
filibuster and just put everybody back to work. Vote in
voter ID, vote in, no mail in voting except for military,
far away military, and people that are very sick.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
I'd like to see one day voting.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
I'd like to see, not sixty five days of voting
from all over the place.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Though, I'd like to clean up the elections. The border.
We've done a great job. We have a great strong border.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
Now I'd like to see new rules of immigration that
could be fair and good. You know us that you'll
never get the rules that they're never going to get.
There's so many things we could put in, including tax
cuts that we could get, and we could do it
all ourselves.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
You to do that, you have to end the philibuster.
Speaker 4 (01:02):
And that's just not happening.
Speaker 5 (01:03):
Tony Katz at ninety three WIBC, Good morning, what's going
on with you? They're not doing it, and you have
to look at the downside. You have to recognize what's coming.
You don't want to do it.
Speaker 4 (01:20):
Now.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
I didn't say it wasn't going to come. I'm saying
I'm gonna know. I mean, yes, I'm redistricting. I'm a
know on ending the filibuster. What can I say? I'm
persnickety like that. But the idea that there should be
any concessions, nah.
Speaker 4 (01:42):
Nah No.
Speaker 5 (01:46):
I would argue that the Republican Party should simply say, look,
we've passed this thing. Here it is, that's it, and
let it be Tony. You understand people are getting hurt.
I understand Democrats are hurting people. Yet you see what
I did there. You understand that flights have been cut
ten percent and they will be cut more because eric
traffic controllers aren't getting paid.
Speaker 4 (02:08):
You understand this.
Speaker 5 (02:09):
Yes, I understand that my mother will probably not be
able to make it to Indianapolis because Democrats won't open
the government.
Speaker 4 (02:16):
You see what I did there? I meant it too.
That's it.
Speaker 5 (02:22):
Someone has to walk up to Chuck Schumer in the
middle of an interview and say, Chuck.
Speaker 4 (02:26):
You don't get it.
Speaker 5 (02:28):
This is the state of affairs until you change it,
complain all you want, We don't give a blank and
walk away and walk away. And you say to me,
my gosh, you're so cavalier with the lives of other people.
I am saying that there are always lives of other people.
(02:48):
But this has to end. And this does not end.
If you say, all right now, the pain's too much,
you're telling the left that if you're just willing to
inflict more pain, you'll get what you want.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
And they will always inflict more pain. It's like a
government program. When do they end a government program?
Speaker 5 (03:09):
No, no, no, they fight like have to keep it
going and growing and then adding one to five, one
hundred and forty three different new programs.
Speaker 4 (03:19):
These things only stop if they stop.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
And now that the election is over the off year election,
Democrats did well, well, you see, this gives us strength
to keep going pain for power. That's their argument. I
don't think you should give into that. This is where
we're at. I didn't want to be in this place.
I would rather senators did their damn job and we
(03:45):
had a budget. But we don't and they don't. So
here we are.
Speaker 4 (03:50):
Don't give them a quarter, don't give them an ounce,
don't give them an inch. Oh, I should say don't
give them any quarter. That would be right, because I mean,
don't give them a quarter. That's just weird.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
Don't do it.
Speaker 4 (04:02):
Here's the continuing resolution. Vote for this.
Speaker 5 (04:04):
We can do anything you want after that, and you'll
get what you want after that. But here's the continuing resolution.
Have a nice day, but it ain't gonna happen if
you don't get in Chuck Schumer's face. And I do
think that the conversation has to shift from the speaker
to people who play a much stronger type of ball.
I will get into that story. Tony Katz ninety three WIBC,
(04:25):
Good morning. At least Stephonic running for governor of New York.
It is the worst kept secret in politics.
Speaker 4 (04:35):
Now known to the world.
Speaker 5 (04:38):
She's gonna clean up Kathy Hokel's catastrophe. That's gonna be
a rough race. Tony Katz in ninety three WIBC, Good morning,
Good to be with you.
Speaker 4 (04:48):
But you got nothing to lose.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (04:50):
Sephonic is a fighter. She's got some good people on
the team.
Speaker 4 (04:55):
Let's see if.
Speaker 5 (04:56):
They're focused on message as opposed to, you know, focusing
on getting paid.
Speaker 4 (05:03):
Why does that matter?
Speaker 5 (05:04):
Because it would be, first of all, an insane flip. Second,
it would describe a great difference between New York as
a whole and New York City. And as we discussed yesterday,
in the election of Zoron Mamdani, eight point four million
New York City residents, two million, fifty five thousand people
(05:25):
voted in the election. One million, thirty six thousand people
voted for Momdanni. That's less than twelve and a half
percent of the population. Maybe we should all take a breath,
Maybe we should all take a beat. Data matters, and
the data shows that women went for Momdani and college
educated went from Momdani. And the question, of course is why, Well,
(05:48):
it's because they're smarter.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Is that right? There's a lot to discuss.
Speaker 5 (05:55):
I thought about gathering everybody next week and doing one
of those breakdowns again, like can we do can we
do it quickly? And here's what happened in the election.
I'm not there's no way, timing wise, I'm going to
make that happen, but I.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
Will discuss it here. That said, we need a gathering,
we do.
Speaker 5 (06:12):
You know, I said I wanted to do a Christmas
party because nothing would be better than Tony Katz's Christmas party.
Speaker 4 (06:24):
Man, we can't we can't leave that idea on a
back burner. We got to make that. We got to
make that happen.
Speaker 5 (06:30):
The Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Trump administration,
I would argue ruling in favor of Rationality was an
unsigned order from the court.
Speaker 4 (06:40):
It stayed a pair of lower court rulings.
Speaker 5 (06:42):
Those lower court rulings prevented the administration from enforcing an
executive order Donald Trump put out on day one that stated,
the policy of the United States is to recognize two sexes.
Speaker 4 (06:53):
Male and female.
Speaker 5 (06:55):
This means, with the Supreme Court pushing those orders to
the side, the Trump administration can order US passports state
the sex at birth of the person who is traveling.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
Right.
Speaker 4 (07:10):
And why does this matter so incredibly much?
Speaker 5 (07:13):
Because someone's gonna say, Tony, this is just the culture
war thing that cost you the race in Virginia with
wins Earl Sears. No, these conversations do indeed matter. The
difference is they're not the only one. If you're going
to tell somebody that boys are not girls and girls
(07:34):
are not boys, you are correct.
Speaker 4 (07:36):
If you're going to do that without mentioning that it's
harder to feed your boys or girls because of increased costs.
Speaker 5 (07:43):
You seem out of touch, very very different. So this
ruling is extremely important because this ruling states that you
can believe anything you want.
Speaker 4 (07:59):
But in the real world, we have rules, we have
a standard, we have definition. These things matter greatly now
as I know it. In the unsigned it was six'
to three.
Speaker 5 (08:21):
Or was that a different, ruling because this has the
liberal judges saying they would have kept the lower court
orders in. Place Jackson Katanji Brown jackson saying the government
seeks to enforce a questionably legal new policy, immediately but
it offers no evidence that it will suffer any harm
if it is temporarily enjoyed from doing. So while the
plaintiffs will be subject to imminent concrete injury if the
(08:43):
policy goes into, Effect, no they won't because they can
still fly and. Travel there is no injury if the
policy goes into. Effect that's not. TRUE i am not a,
LAWYER i am not a, judge BUT i am, right
And Katanji Brown jackson is wrong because nothing is stopping
the person for. Traveling jackson says there's a senseless in
(09:07):
the court senseless side stepping of the obvious equitable. OUTCOME
i am not interested in your version of an equitable.
Outcome as a matter of, Fact i'm not interested in your.
Opinions you shouldn't be A Supreme court. Justice you're not.
Qualified it turns, out and you, say any, well she's
more qualified than. You what does that? Matter what in
(09:30):
the world possibly does that? Matter being a justice is
all the way at the. Top she ain't. There from
the way she engages with listeners, general from the way
she engages with, counsel from the way she engages with
(09:51):
other members of the, court from her inability.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
To define what a woman. Is because she's not a
biologist enough, enough let's not kid.
Speaker 5 (10:03):
Ourselves she does not speak from on. High she does
not have the richness of her. Experiences she's a bad.
Jurist we've had bad jurists. Before the problem is we
don't utilize impeachment, Enough.
Speaker 4 (10:18):
Tony you didn't just say.
Speaker 5 (10:19):
Impeachment, oh they're going to impeach If democrats get The
house On january, third twenty twenty, seven after the twenty
twenty sixth, election they will Impeach Donald trump On january,
third twenty twenty. Seven smart it, down mark it. Down
of course you can impeach A Supreme court, justice AND
i think you.
Speaker 4 (10:37):
SHOULD i think the call is coming from inside the.
House i've said it.
Speaker 5 (10:40):
Before and along with Her Judge, bosburg this federal judge
who issued one hundred and ninety seven subpoenas in the
case of the investigation known As Arctic, frost going after
citizens and politicos their phone records and all the. Rest
this is the story OF at AND T. Verizon they
(11:02):
get the. Subpoena verizon goes here's all the phone records For, Centenator, Ted,
cruz AND at AND t, says we don't have to honor,
this and it's Why i'm Leaving.
Speaker 4 (11:09):
Verizon, sorry we got. Rules.
Speaker 5 (11:14):
Now i've, looked AND at AND t isn't as good
of a on download speed as let's, say A T.
Mobile and they're basically in the same place As. Verizon
SO i may suffer a little. BIT i don't necessarily want,
to But i'm not gonna sit here and support people
who give up phone records because the governments, like we
want answers as opposed to saying we protect our.
Speaker 4 (11:33):
Customers what's wrong with?
Speaker 5 (11:34):
You you got to actually make the, change so people
understand there's a consequence to actions good and.
Speaker 4 (11:41):
Bad Impeach bosburg.
Speaker 5 (11:44):
Immediately Representative Brendan gill Of florida is now putting that.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
Forward make that happen. Today ghost.
Speaker 5 (11:54):
Stations it was one of those rare moments on social
media that made you stop and, Say i'm, sorry what's happening?
Here because to pay attention to social media is well.
Silly Tony kats ninety THREE, wibc good, Morning great to
be with, you follow me on x At Tony. Katz
(12:16):
it's it's a valueless, proposition and you, know a hooray
for the people who can amass outrageous followings and somehow
turn that into.
Speaker 4 (12:26):
Dollars good lord.
Speaker 5 (12:30):
To live all day on that, insanity with that, insanity
and it's just gotten so much. Worse but there was
this from a guy On TWITTER x who refers to
himself as Climate. Craze i've so far documented one hundred
and ninety six ghost stations Where noah fabricates temperatures for
(12:51):
data recording stations that no longer. Exist AND i, Said i'm. Confused,
well sure, enough this guy his entire. World Lieutenant Colonel
Air force retired. Meteorologist he has started taking note of
(13:16):
how there are these weather. Stations no A National oceanic
And Atmospheric administration the hardest agency to, pronounce and For,
congress it's the hardest agency to pronounce except the agency
to cut your, taxes and that one doesn't.
Speaker 4 (13:34):
Exist that's why they can't pronounce.
Speaker 5 (13:35):
It there are these observation centers that don't exist, anymore
but still data gets reported from those. Stations AND i,
said this is the most insane Thing i've ever heard
(13:58):
in my entire, life and the most perfectly. GOVERNMENT i
am sending this to the guys At Heartland, institute which
does a lot on climate.
Speaker 4 (14:11):
Exactly how true is?
Speaker 5 (14:13):
This does anybody have any more information Than i've got
from this? Guy and this guy's got some.
Speaker 4 (14:19):
INFO i, mean.
Speaker 5 (14:20):
There's a lot of posting, here a lot of discussions,
here but you, know with everything one needs to ask to,
do the Research trust would. Verify there's a station in
The everglades In. Florida they stopped observing in twenty, eighteen,
(14:43):
right it no longer gives weather, reports BUT noah fabricates
its temperature. Data i'm not saying it's the greatest scandal
in the.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
WORLD i am, saying what the bloody hack is. Happening
it's one of those.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Stories it's, like you fabricate the data so you can
tell us what temperatures a, rising so you can say, what,
well now we need a bigger. Budget what is the
data fabricated? For because no matter what you, Say i'm
willing to bet you the end result is, we The american,
people get. Screwed it's a fascinating. Story i've got the
(15:24):
link in the show sheet over there tonycats dot. Com
check it out for. Yourself Tony kats ninety THREE, Wibc good.
MORNING i think it might be too early for me
to discuss THAT i have some bourbon coming. Out and
since it's too early for me to discuss, IT i
won't discuss THAT.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
I have some bourbon coming.
Speaker 5 (15:44):
OUT i will not talk about the fact that there
is some bourbon that will be available For. CHRISTMAS i
won't discuss the fact that that is. Happening, nope it's too.
Early it's too. Early so So Producer, carl don't ask
me anymore about the bourbon that's coming out because it's
simply too, early AND i simply won't discuss that bourbon
that's coming.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
OUT i won't do. IT i urge you had a
bourbon coming. Out i've SAID i won't discuss. THAT i
can't believe you brought it up.
Speaker 5 (16:07):
Again Tony katz in ninety THREE, Wibc good, Morning what
is going?
Speaker 4 (16:13):
ON i didn't know this was on the. Docket, no,
WAIT i did know this was on the.
Speaker 5 (16:19):
Docket The Supreme court is going to, question going to figure,
out they're going to decide whether they're going to hear
a challenge To Obergafel obergafel. V. Hodges this was twenty.
Fifteen this was a five to four, decision and it
guaranteed nationwide marriage rights for same sex.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
Couples it's a challenge brought By Kim.
Speaker 5 (16:44):
Davis, Now Kim davis was that county clerk In kentucky
who she would not issue a marriage license to a gay.
Couple the issue With obergafe is that the decision has
(17:04):
no basis in The, constitution and it can be overruled
without affecting any other. Cases this is the ARGUMENT i
have made from this microphone since twenty. Fifteen my issue
is not with two men or two women spending their lives.
Together this conversation was winning In, states and my exact
(17:29):
words were let it win in The. States my exact
words were pass a, law write, it vote on, it
get the president to sign. It and this president would sign.
Speaker 4 (17:40):
It pass a.
Speaker 5 (17:41):
Law What obergefel did was create a right out of hol.
Cloth it takes something that is not in The constitution
and decides it exists in The. Constitution if we are honest,
people we can discuss this. Honestly if we are dishonest,
(18:01):
People i'm gonna be called a.
Speaker 4 (18:03):
Homophobe in three to W.
Speaker 5 (18:06):
I had to check My Von reeste time for. That
Von reeste dot. COM i work with these. People they
make fantastic time pieces assembled right here In. Indiana i'm
showing it off to the livestream YouTube dot com SLASH, Wibc.
Speaker 4 (18:19):
So don't Think i'm just, crazy.
Speaker 5 (18:20):
Guys the argument is does the court have the right
to create a? Right and the answer is, no they do.
Not it was always a bad.
Speaker 4 (18:34):
Decision it was a bad decision.
Speaker 5 (18:37):
Because the right to same sex marriage does not exist
in The. Constitution but one could create a. Law one
could go To. CONGRESS i think it'll, pass you know,
WHAT i think it'll Pass with flying, colors and IF
i were A, REPUBLICAN i might very well get on
board with. IT i take that, Back there'll be Some
(18:58):
republicans who get on board with. IT i have no
problems with two men or two women spending their lives,
together AND i have no problem with them getting the
tax benefits.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
THEREOF i do believe.
Speaker 5 (19:06):
Marriage has a DEFINITION i think it should, hold And
i've said that from the beginning.
Speaker 4 (19:09):
TOO i haven't changed on this and oh, wait it's
twenty twenty, five ten. Years i've not changed on this
subject in ten.
Speaker 5 (19:16):
Years BUT i do believe that words have meaning and
we shouldn't manipulate the meaning of those. WORDS i believe
marriage is one man and one, woman and when it's two,
men or when it's two.
Speaker 4 (19:27):
Women in something.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
Else, Indeed i'm not telling you not to go live your,
life AND i don't believe there should be anything that
engages treating you. Differently and you say to, me, well
married be able to get tax, breaks.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
This, that and the.
Speaker 5 (19:38):
Other you're, saying, oh, no, no, NO i think you should
get the tax. Breaks after, that we're talking about a
religious terminology to a, word And i'm not interested in
changing the.
Speaker 4 (19:47):
Definition you could disagree with, me that's.
Speaker 5 (19:49):
Cool but when it comes to The Supreme, COURT i
don't like anything that decides that a right can be
created just because so one wishes upon a. Star it
says what it says and doesn't say what it doesn't.
Say The constitution says what it says and doesn't say
(20:10):
what it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (20:11):
Say and it is the job of The court to
discuss what.
Speaker 5 (20:14):
Is said and what is not, said and not to
try and find their way to what it could.
Speaker 4 (20:19):
Mean my issue with The obamacare, Decision.
Speaker 5 (20:30):
Why in the world Is John roberts deciding That obamacare
is nothing more than a tax And congress can levy,
taxes so therefore it's.
Speaker 4 (20:37):
Fine that's.
Speaker 5 (20:40):
Nuts by the, way it is that same thought process
that is being looked at regarding tariffs And President trump
and whether he can raise revenues through a tariffs that
are put on countries via THE, ieepa This Emergency Powers
act of nineteen seventy. Seven same concept taxation has to
(21:03):
go Through, congress but it's changing the very concept of
who decides an, emergency which is about the concept of
regula which exists in the. Legislation, OH i didn't say
it didn't get, MURKY i said The Supreme, court, No
bergefell created a law or created a right out of whole,
(21:26):
cloth and that won't.
Speaker 4 (21:29):
Fly So i'm glad they're seeing.
Speaker 5 (21:33):
It what's interesting here is that this is private, Conference
so The Supreme, court according to Scotus, blog does not
grant review without considering the case at least two consecutive.
Speaker 4 (21:47):
Conferences so we will. See we'll see what.
Speaker 5 (21:56):
Happens but my, hope my hope is that they rehear,
it or they simply say this case was poorly considered.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
And then go pass. Laws get it, done get it done.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
Immediately i'll answer your question for twitter x in the
next hour
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com