Daniel Davis Deep Dive - New Info on Trump Assassination Attempt

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Tuesday. Regular listeners know it isthat time of week when we do a
Daniel Davis deep dive. Retired LieutenantColonel Daniel Davis. You can find him
online. Just search for it whereyou find podcasts. Good to YouTube and
find Daniel Davis. I think pray. Maybe you available on the iHeartMedia app.
Daniel Davis, Welcome back, myfriend. It's always a pleasure of
having you on the fifty five KRCMorning Show and always a pleasure to be
here. Brian Well, and Idon't understand the topic today. It says

(00:23):
new evidence around Trump assassination attempt andyou were going to enlighten us on that.
But just having a conversation with BrightBarton News tech editor Colin Medine,
and I saw this article this morningthe Washington Post question asked Meta AI,
you know the artificial intelligence tool wasthe Trump assassination fictional? And Meta AI

(00:47):
said, quote, there was noreal assassination attempt on Donald Trump definitively.
I mean on multiple different searches theycame up the same results. So I'm
not quite sure why we're even talkingto DA Daniel Davis. Seriously, I'm
not kidding. You got to checkthat out. It is ansanity going on
out there in the world of text, seeking to suppress information and re spind

(01:07):
it in an Orwellian ministry of truthfashion. But here we are today,
and every day a little bit moreinformation comes out about this yes they did
or that kid did attempt to assassinateDonald Trump. What more of you learned
over the past week and a half, Daniel, Well, you know,
there was actually a new video thatwas at least publicly released yesterday from someone

(01:27):
who is videoing right almost in theline of fire in between the building and
Trump, and was alerted to it. One of the things that is alarming
that we see. You remember oneof the first comments that we had on
a Monday last week from then directorCheatle when she said, you know,
we only had a few seconds fromthe time they finally identified that there was

(01:49):
someone in the root before the shotsrang out. Well, this video puts
conclusively that to the lie, becausethere was physical evidence where there were numerous
like seven or eight different policemen onthe ground, all looking up with their
weapons drawn, looking around the building, and I mean minutes plural, but
before the shots were rang out,and you can actually hear Trump in the

(02:13):
background speaking so you can tie exactlyto what happened. It matches with other
videos, and you just have towonder, why did all of these people
know what was going on, andyet no one took any action. No
one called the platform to get PresidentTrump off the platform. No one thought,
well, maybe I'll just fire somerounds into the air so people can
hear shots fired, and they getthem down because they were so alarmed that

(02:36):
weapons were drawn. And you know, a policeman's not going to draw his
weapon if he's just you know,suspicious about something. He's got to have
a high probability something's going on.Concurrently, we also you may have seen
these pictures of crooks that were takenfrom a position above him where it was
looking down on him. He waslooking at a cell phone in one and
he was looking off to the leftand another, et cetera. Those were

(02:57):
taken from an open window above ofthe roof line where Crooks was at.
And one has to reasonably ask,with all of these cops on the ground
and shouting, and then you hearthe people on the ground before the shots,
that he's got a gun. He'sgot a gun, et cetera,
why would someone in that window,who's stationed there expressly to provide security for
the president, not look out thewindow, see the shooter there and take

(03:21):
action to stop it. So there'sa lot of things that are just not
lining up well, not lining up, including what seems to be an absolute
utter failure. Trying to be delicatehere and comply with the FCC rules regarding
using curse words, but an epicfailure communication breakdown. Apparently nobody was talking
with each other. The Secret Servicedidn't have direct lines of communication with the

(03:43):
officers who were witnessing this activity.I mean you mentioned that they were on
hire alert. They drew their weapons, I think in large part because there
was a widely circulated report among lawenforcement that there was suspicious behavior by this
person on the ground. They werelooking for him, they identified him,
they saw him using a range firesa refinder, so word that gets around

(04:04):
clearly they're going to be on heightenedalert, and then lo and behold,
there he is on top of theroof of a firearm. Yeah, and
then you know, we'll take thatpart there about the rangefinder, because that's
also curious from the ABC News videowhere you've probably seen with the local squad
team was interviewed, et cetera.They themselves and some of their text messages
identified that he was using a rangefinderpointing toward the platform almost an hour before.

(04:30):
And so to me, I'm like, hey, fellas, you all
need to be taking some action here. If you see a guy with the
rangefinder, and again your express purposesto protect the president of the United States,
why did you not take active andaggressive action instead of just sending somebody
a text and say, somebody shouldcheck this out because that's a red line,
you know, a big siren blaringand whatever that you should have like

(04:54):
immediately went into action. And yetapparently all he did was ind the texts
and taken them from their action.That's another question that I think somebody needs
to answer well clearly. And allof this, of course feels conspiracy theories,
and I thought it was particularly interesting. I can't remember which representative an
interview or when examining Cheadle, whowas appearing before that committee, said are
you aware of all these internet rumorsand conspiracy theories out there? And she

(05:16):
said yeah, and do you thinkthey're bad for the country that they're out,
Yes, they're bad for the country. Well, the why in the
hell, don't you do something todispel them, Answer a damn question,
give us some information, you know, and then they roll out what FBI
Director Ray who suggests maybe it wasn'teven a bullet that hit Donald Trump's ear.
I mean, I'm it's almost asif they're intentionally stirring the pot of

(05:38):
conspiracy theories by hiding information from theAmerican people. And you know, one
of the things that will also stirconspiracy theories when you and this is from
Cheetle, when you will simultaneously notanswer a whole bunch of questions to say,
it's only been nine days. We'regoing to do this for you know,
detailed analysis. It'll take at leastsixty days before we come back,

(05:59):
you know, because we want toreally do a good job. But then
you conclusively say, oh, therewas definitely not a second shooter, one
hundred percent sure, definitely not.Because people are going, hang on,
you haven't even done an investigation.How can you conclusively state that there's not
a second shooter when some of theevidence actually does support that contention because the
acoustics signatures and I saw literally beforeI came on your show, here from

(06:20):
now six different audio sources all showa very distinct different audio signature from the
first three and then the second fiveshots that are very different. So somebody
who has access to all the informationneeds to do a thorough analysis and an
investigation. But don't tell me thatthere's none when you haven't even investigated.

(06:40):
Well, and she wouldn't even answerthe question about information that was in her
hand the time she was asked specifically, did you interview every agent that's a
Secret Service assigned to that event?She said yes, I had why by
the time she was in front ofthe hearing, but then couldn't say at
the earliest moment when the Secret Servicewas alerted. It's like, well,
wait a second, what do youknow know now? She wouldn't even answer
that question. Okay, fine,you can change it. If a report

(07:02):
comes out says you were notified earlieror later, or the information changes,
you can say at the time ofthe hearing, we thought it was a
minute, five minutes, ten minutes, whatever. She wouldn't even go down
that road, which to me Ifound extraordinarily suspicious. Yeah, and let's
see what happens, because here inWashington, in a little over an hour
and a half from now, there'sgoing to be I think the acting director

(07:25):
of the Secret Service is going tobe again testifying, So that person and
I'm not even sure who it is, but I just saw that that testimony
is going to start at ten amtoday. Better have those kinds of answers
that all of America deserves to findout what's going on. So let's hope
that it's not a repeat of lastMonday. Yeah, no doubt about it.
In as far as the second shooteris concerned. So we either have

(07:47):
there wasn't a second shooter, orthat they were whoever is trying to pull
this off, assassinating Donald Trump wereeven more grossly incompetent achieving their goal than
what we believe to have the factsto be right now. Yeah, and
you hit on it a second ago, and I don't want to miss it
completely. But the communication aspect isfar more egregious that I think appears,

(08:11):
because as someone who's done a lotof military operations, especially when you have
multiple entities, it is absolutely guaranteedessential and vital to have communication with all
of the different elements together because it'sabsurd to think that you're going to have
a coordinated operation and the entire portionsof the element to have no communication.
I mean, that's so elementary thatit's that by self raises some questions,

(08:35):
how is it possible? And thiswas also revealed yesterday that the Secret Service
guys in the inner ring around Trumpnever heard anything. No one ever allegedly
told them that all these cops fortwo minutes were running around that building.
How come none of them ever heardthat. Why would no one make that
communication when that is central to theirrole and their mission. So that's another

(08:56):
big question that needs answered, itreally is. And if any one of
them had gotten the information, orif they did get it, they didn't
follow through with protocol, which issay, hey, Donald, don't go
out on the stage. Yet wegot a guy in the roof with a
rifle. I mean right, theyhad enough time for that, based on
what we know right now, definitivelyproven that everybody saw that guy up there,

(09:18):
including members of law enforcement. Fororehe was able to squeeze rounds off.
Someone should have easily been able tocall Secret Service get him off the
stage or don't let him out onthe stage. Simple command like that.
The whole thing would have been avoided. Yeah, and you know, the
video that I referenced to KA yesterdaythat showed two minutes and four seconds before
the shot. So the fact thatthose cops were already on position means that

(09:39):
there were minutes probably before that,yes when someone else alerted them that there
was a shooter up there. Sothere's a pretty substantial period of time where
law enforcement officials at both the stateand the local level for sure knew what
was going on, but somehow thatinner ring never got the word. And
it's just hard for me to understandwhere that breakdown may have occurred. Or
why do you ever think we'll findout the truth on this one? Is

(10:03):
this gonna be like a Warren Commissionthing with a magic bullet? You know?
I don't think so, because,for example, unlike the Warren Commission
for the assassination of JFK, thereweren't two hundred people on the grass,
you know, with cell phones andrecorded So we have a data now that
can't be suppressed because so many peoplehave it. So I think that we're
gonna end up getting the truth ofthis one. All right, I'll ask

(10:24):
you to a little tea leaf readingand anticipation that we will get the truth.
How long is it going to take. Is it going to be before
November or after or well, nowthat's a little bit because the suppression of
this information from from the official government, then it's going to be a lot
harder. But I think of it, look will come out like they treat
Foyer requests from our from our electedofficials to get information our elected officials should

(10:48):
have access to because that's who theyanswer to. M hmm. That's a
problem. It produce more than aproblem. Daniel Davis, it's the Daniel
Davis Deep Dive every Tuesday or atay thirty and the fifty five carc morning
showing throughout the week. Just searchfor them. You'd be glad you did,
Daniel until next Tuesday, my friend, thanks for the time you spill
my listeners and me pleasure. Alwayssee you next week. Take care,

(11:11):
my friend. A forty fifty fivekr C the talk station. USA Insallation
is superior product. It does everythingyou could hope for, which is save
money and make you more comfortable interms of insulation. What more could you
ask for? How about twelve hundreddollars from the federal government by insulating your
home with Usay's premium foam you're gonnaget that next year when you're doing your
taxes. Just the dangling caretive incentiveto do something that's beneficial to you in

(11:31):
all ways shapes and form a morecomfortable home with savings every single month.
If you're using HVAC, you willsave and that's what's important. Product pace
for itself highest R value foam inthe market. So you have two situations
here. Either nothing is in thexterior walls that the house is built before
the mid seventies, or under insulation. Again, my daughter, as the
illustration are twelve late nineteen seventies filledin the R twelve, it's more than

(11:54):
what three four decades old. Itisn't pulling the weight even in R twelve
used to be able to do backthen. Less our value. Of course,
we bought the phone went in withthe old insulation. That could be
you. Two. How do youfind out Call for a free inspection and
free quote from the folks at USAInsulation. Heck, it doesn't cost you
anything but a little bit of time. Let them come out and tell you

(12:16):
what your insulation system or situation is. Pay for the exterior walls and the
phone that goes in them and theywill insulate your attic for free. So
the twelve hundred dollars pus the freeattic insulation. Time to give them a
call if I went three three eightone three six two six three eight one
foam online, you'll find them atUSA insulation dot net. Hi Heard radio is the