Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I downloaded the amp on my phone.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
I can listen whatever I want at fifty five KARC
dot com at O five, a fifty five rc DE
talk station of very very Happy Tuesday Jam always made
special because at this moment in time, every Tuesday at
A eight o five we get to hear from Breitbart
and get the inside scoop. Breitbart bookmark at b R
E I T b a art dot com. You're gonna
(00:22):
have the book mark. You have to go there directly,
because if you try to copy and post one of
the wonderfully written articles filled with fun filled factual information
from legitimate reporters and put it on a social media site,
no one's ever gonna see it, right, Joel Paullocke, Breitbart
editor at Lard's always great to have you on the show,
my friend, good to have you back. I tell people
(00:42):
to do that all the time, and I've had my
own experiences, like with Facebook. If I put a bright
Bart thing up, I'll get five hundred people responding to
a happy or happy Friday post that I'll put up,
or a picture of my dog, Joel. But if I
put a Breitbart article up, boy, it's no one sees it.
So the social media algorithms are hard at work, but
you guys do a great job. And a fun headline
(01:02):
for me to start off with, Joel Paul Eck since
we're going to talk about who really has the momentum,
Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. I love this headline was
obviously a joke. Kamala to announce policy positions just as
soon as the polls tell her what they are.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
We don't.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
I mean, they're trying to I mean they're trying to
whitewash every but we know what her policy positions are.
Look at twenty nineteen, what she ran on for president
the United States of America, and look at the last
three and a half years of the Biden administration, right.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
Well, she had the most left wing policies of any
US senator in the Senate in twenty nineteen, which was
a year when she was angling to run for president,
So we knew what her policy positions are or have been.
And then of course in the White House in the
administration as Vice President, she has had the same policies
(01:51):
as Joe Biden, so much so that often the White
House referred to the administration as the Biden Harris administration.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
When they announced the ration policy, for example, the one
that she's running away.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
From, they called it the Biden Harris policy, and they
did so for years since twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
So we know what her.
Speaker 3 (02:10):
Policies are, but she refuses to state them, and she's
trying to distance herself from the failing policies, the ones
that are most obviously bad. And as of right now,
let's pull this up right now, get on to her website.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
No policies on the website.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
So more than three weeks after joining the race, she
has not stated in any policy positions. And look, there's
a strategy to this, because often you'll find that specific
candidates are less popular than what we call it a
generic Democrat or a generic Republican who appeals in theory
(02:50):
to their party's voters. She's running as generic Democrat, and
that's why she's doing well, because Joe Biden was pulling
very far below a generic Democrat. That is to say,
there are many Democrats who knew he was subpar, he
was not good, he was not capable, and they wanted
to run or they wanted to vote for someone else.
And so she's just casting herself right now as someone else.
(03:12):
She knows that most voters don't know her policies, don't
remember her failed presidential run, and she wants to get
away with being the candidate in the abstract who theoretically
they might like to vote for. And that's what she's
doing for Democrats. It's not going to help her with
independent voters, it's not going to help her win any
Republican voters over, but it is going to help her
consolidate Democratic support.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Well, And I wanted to get your reaction to the
mainstream media's efforts to recharacterize her obviously ignoring what she
has been on record in favor of again twenty nineteen
of the policies she ran for in her failed effort
to become president. But let's just use one illustration. She's
not the borders are. She was not responsible for the
southern border. She was responsible for you know, Central American
(03:57):
policy and changing the you know, decades long, if not
longer dynamic that led them to their inept reality of
their governmental system and their failed economic realities which are
forcing people out. So no, that's what she was charged
to do. You would really have to be I mean,
I always refer to my listeners as we dwellers. Politically,
we're all on top of things. We remember this, we
(04:18):
know what she is. We study the news, we study
politics all the time. But is the mainstream media's effort
to recharacterize her and deny outright deny that she had
any connection with the failed border policies? Is that their
admission or acknowledgment that they think we're a bunch of
idiots who don't pay attention to anything, Joel, I know
that sounds like a weird question, but I'm kind of worried.
(04:40):
They put their credibility on the line when they say
stuff like that, and I know what the words are.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
I just uttered.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
But that seems to me to suggest that the mainstream
media really does think the American people are a bunch
of easily manipulated idiots.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
They do, and they think they are very smart.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
So they think that they can do a better job
than the Kamala Harris campaign of explaining away these unhelpful details.
But I've looked at the record and look, the story
they don't want to tell is this, Kamala Harris was
placed in charge of what they call root causes of migration.
(05:21):
There's actually an executive order in twenty twenty one called
the root Causes strategy, and at that time the migrants
were largely coming from three countries, from Nicaragua, from Honduras,
and from Al Salvador. So they developed this Northern Triangle strategy,
and they put her in charge of the root causes.
(05:42):
So she was going to go and talk to the
leaders of these countries. Excuse me, I said, Nicaragua, Guatemala.
But anyway, those were the three countries, and the problem
was that the immigration crisis, the migration problem, ballooned so
far beyond those three countries that within a few months
(06:04):
or so, it became ridiculous to talk about those countries
as the.
Speaker 1 (06:08):
Source of the problem. So that's what they don't want
to talk about.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
They don't want to talk about the fact that this
whole idea of root causes was bogus.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
And that the real cause, the real driver.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Of migration, was the fact that migrants and the cartels
knew that there was going to be no enforcement at
the southern border of the United States. So that's that's
the problem, and they don't want to admit, and that
there was no need.
Speaker 2 (06:35):
To be made off of farrying people in return for
large payments to the United States southern border where they
knew they were going to gain access, whether it's for
some sort of nefarious purpose like terrorists, Chinese Communist Party
military age men, or alternatively, people fleeing terrible economic situations,
which is not a justification to enter our country illegally.
That word got out all over the globe.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
Right, So I want to acknowledge that was a failure,
complete failure. And you know, they're trying to say, well,
she was just in charge of those three countries and
the root causes and so forth. But you know, that
doesn't really solve the problem for them, because they really
believed that if they well I don't.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Know if they actually believed that.
Speaker 3 (07:17):
They were just trying to sell it to the public,
the idea that if you talked about the root causes,
which were corruption in those countries, poverty in those countries,
if you talked about those three countries, that would solve
the problem.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
They thought they could get away.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
With not enforcing the border, not enforcing the immigration law.
And it doesn't get her out of this problem, which
is that she was placed in a key position of
responsibility for the migration problem, and they called it again
they called the entire policy, not just the root causes part.
They called the entire policy the Biden Harris immigration policy.
(07:49):
This was her project, this was her baby, and she
ran away from it eventually during the administration before she
became a candidate because she didn't want to be associated
with a failure and she was not willing to stand
up to Joe Biden on the non enforcement of border policy,
on the non enforcement of existing immigration law. So yeah,
(08:10):
they think that we are easily manipulable idiots. I think
that they know that some percentage of Democrats want to
be convinced. So it's not that they know Democrats are stupid.
They just know that these Democrats will twist their brains
into pretzels to rationalize voting for Kamala Harris. And they
just need to give those voters enough of a story
(08:33):
that they could pretend to believe.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
So that's what's happened.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
And you know, you can point out things like this,
you can point out Tim Wallace's stolen valor his puffery,
his false statements about his military record and so forth, it's.
Speaker 1 (08:49):
Not going to shake those voters.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
They're just excited to vote for a Democrat who isn't
Joe Biden, and so they're willing to believe and to
convince themselves of anything. I had this experience recently when
some one wrote to me, and this is a person
who understands Israel policy pretty well, a Democrat. They understand
Israel policy, they understand that Kamala Harris is terrible for Israel.
But they said, well, I'm still going to vote for
(09:11):
Harris because I've decided it doesn't matter whose president. Every
president's going to have the same policy, which is garbage.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
But you cant'll it. You can see them rationalizing it.
Speaker 3 (09:20):
They don't want to bring and you know what, it's
very hard for people to change their minds when they've
demonized the other side so much. I don't think Republicans
have as much of a problem crossing over occasionally to
vote for a good Democrat. But Democrats really they think
of Republicans as racist and greedy and terrible and Nazis
and whatever. You can't join a group that you've demonized
so much, especially after you've been the one sort of
(09:42):
alienating people in your own family.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Let's say.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
So, you know, look, this is a problem, and Trump
is getting drowned out in all of this.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
You know, there's a lot of hoopla around the new candidate.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
I think it's partly media biased, but it's also just
partly something new. Voters are excited by, something new, they're
interested looking. And one of the reasons I wrote my
book the Agenda, was to give Trump something to talk about,
give him a vision of the future that he can
talk about two Republican voters and say, look, this is
what it's going to look like when I win. And
I don't have to wait for Congress to agree. I
(10:15):
don't have to wait for all these appointees to be
in place. I'm not giving you some massive, nine hundred
and twenty two page tome like Project twenty five of
everything conservatives ever want to do. I'm just giving you
a very quick agenda list of things I can do
as president by executive order. And that's why I wrote
the agenda, and I think that's what Trump has to
talk about to counter all of this stuff about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
And I'm glad you brought up the agenda what Trump
should do in his first one on a day, because
what we need to do is get Trump in office
before he can exercise any of the thoughts and ideas
that you express in your book, as wonderful as they are.
But he is, I mean, Trump's just getting an earful
from every conservative commentator that you can find, including you know, me,
a little libertarian commentator. Nonetheless, don't talk about Kama Harris's
(10:58):
crowd size, don't talk about her accent, don't talk about
her race. None of these things matter. If the independent
voter is out there really trying to make some sense
of who he wants to vote for or she wants
to vote for, then you're going to need to talk
about policy. And he is winning across the board in
terms of policy positions, from the board of the economy, inflation.
He's got a multitude of things he can campaign on
(11:19):
that don't have to go down to the low hanging
fruit about you know, her gaps or mistakes or a
goofy giggle or anything else for that matter.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Yeah, you know, and she is going to avoid the media.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
She's not going to talk about what she believes. We
have a convention coming up in Chicago next week, the
worst possible city for a Democratic convention because it shows
just how badly Democrats have done in running Chicago. You know,
in nineteen ninety six when Bill Clinton had his convention there,
it was a successful, thriving city. It had a lot
(11:54):
of hope, and since then it's really gone down the drain.
And you can see all the results of no cash
bail and high taxes and defunding the police, and poor education,
letting the unions run everything. It's just a disaster of
a city. But they're not going to want to talk
about that. They're going to talk about the beautiful buildings
and the lakefront, you know, the things that have existed
in Chicago for decades, and.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
That's exactly how they're going to try to run Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (12:18):
They're going to talk about the historic nature of her presidency,
and they're going to.
Speaker 1 (12:23):
Talk about how she exudes joy now, her nuclear class,
the joy out. They're not going.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
To talk about the job she would do as president
and the job she has done is vice president, which
has been a terrible job. So Trump can't control with
the media are going to say, and we can, you know,
we consider and complain about it, and we will. But
I think the most important thing is for Trump to
get the conversation back to policy, because that's where he
beats her.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Aim.
Speaker 3 (12:50):
She lost in twenty she lost in twenty nineteen, twenty
twenty because she couldn't talk about her policies.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Trump's got to talk about his. He has a track record.
Andy has good.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
Ideas for the future. And I think that's that's what
you need to talk about. And that's what I'd like
to turn the conversation to. And I talk about the
agenda exactly.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
The jenda What Trump should do in is First One
and a Day is authored by my guest today, Joe
Paul Locke, Breitbart Editor at Large for The Insight Scoop
this morning. I guess I'm curious to know have you
sent a copy of your book to the Trump administer
or to the Trump campaign. I'd like to think that
he got himself a copy.
Speaker 1 (13:22):
Of this and no, but one is on the way.
Speaker 2 (13:24):
One is on the way. Wonderful, wonderful, easy to digest.
I'll recommend my listeners get a copy. It's available ever
books were sold. I can have my executive producer, Jos
trek Or put your book as a link on my
blog page at fifty five krec dot com so we
can all get a hold of it and read it
and maybe talk policy amongst our friends with some of
your ideas in the agenda. Joe Pollock, it's always a
(13:45):
pleasure having on the program. I appreciate the work you're
doing at Brightbart along with everybody else at bright Birth.
That's why I recommend my listeners go ahead and Bookmarket
because you find some really solid, solid reporting there and
of course outside of the legacy media. Joel, thanks for
your time today. As always, I hope you have a
wonderful week, my friend. We'll talk again soon, I hope.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Thanks, and thanks for the opportunity.
Speaker 2 (14:05):
Anytime, my friend, anytime eight nineteen fifty five kre see
detalk station. Imaging can be affordable, but just don't go
to the hospital imaging department where you're going to shell
out thousands of dollars. It just, you know, it just
irks me when I mean, every time I do a
commercial for affordable imaging services just blows my mind. And
you know I've been down this path before myself. CT
(14:25):
scans can be five grand. Echo cardiograms can cost you
two three four thousand dollars. Ultrasound same thing, MRIs thirty
five hundred dollars plus multiple bills, not just one bill.
You get a separate bill beyond the thirty five hundred
dollars for the MRI or any other scan, because they're
going to get a radiologist that has to do a
review of the scans to provide to your doctor so
you know what's going on on the image. That's what
(14:46):
a board certified radiologist does. And you need a report
all of it, thousands of dollars, and your slice of
the action is probably going to be more after your
insurance payment if you have it, more than the whole
thing costs that Affordable Imaging services.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
Oh my god, doctor didn't tell me to go there.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
No other doctor's not going to tell you to go
there because you're going to save heap loads of money,
and the massive profit center that is the hospital system
that owns your doctor's practice is not going to get
the benefit of that giant bill. Echo cardigram four hundred
ninety five bucks CT scan with a contrast six hundred
without four point fifty MRI with a contrast the most
(15:21):
expensive image you can get at affordable. It's six hundred
and forty five bucks at every image including ultrasounds and
the long screens come with a board certified radiologist report
is included in this low low price, So save yourself
tons of money. Go where you want because it's your
medical care and you have that choice five one three seven,
five three eight thousand, five one three seven, five three
(15:41):
eight thousand. Online you'll find them at Affordable Medimaging dot
com fifty five KRC For more information about contests on
this
I downloaded the amp on my phone.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
I can listen whatever I want at fifty five KARC
dot com at O five, a fifty five rc DE
talk station of very very Happy Tuesday Jam always made
special because at this moment in time, every Tuesday at
A eight o five we get to hear from Breitbart
and get the inside scoop. Breitbart bookmark at b R
E I T b a art dot com. You're gonna
(00:22):
have the book mark. You have to go there directly,
because if you try to copy and post one of
the wonderfully written articles filled with fun filled factual information
from legitimate reporters and put it on a social media site,
no one's ever gonna see it, right, Joel Paullocke, Breitbart
editor at Lard's always great to have you on the show,
my friend, good to have you back. I tell people
(00:42):
to do that all the time, and I've had my
own experiences, like with Facebook. If I put a bright
Bart thing up, I'll get five hundred people responding to
a happy or happy Friday post that I'll put up,
or a picture of my dog, Joel. But if I
put a Breitbart article up, boy, it's no one sees it.
So the social media algorithms are hard at work, but
you guys do a great job. And a fun headline
(01:02):
for me to start off with, Joel Paul Eck since
we're going to talk about who really has the momentum,
Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. I love this headline was
obviously a joke. Kamala to announce policy positions just as
soon as the polls tell her what they are.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
We don't.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
I mean, they're trying to I mean they're trying to
whitewash every but we know what her policy positions are.
Look at twenty nineteen, what she ran on for president
the United States of America, and look at the last
three and a half years of the Biden administration, right.
Speaker 3 (01:29):
Well, she had the most left wing policies of any
US senator in the Senate in twenty nineteen, which was
a year when she was angling to run for president,
So we knew what her policy positions are or have been.
And then of course in the White House in the
administration as Vice President, she has had the same policies
(01:51):
as Joe Biden, so much so that often the White
House referred to the administration as the Biden Harris administration.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
When they announced the ration policy, for example, the one
that she's running away.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
From, they called it the Biden Harris policy, and they
did so for years since twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
So we know what her.
Speaker 3 (02:10):
Policies are, but she refuses to state them, and she's
trying to distance herself from the failing policies, the ones
that are most obviously bad. And as of right now,
let's pull this up right now, get on to her website.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
No policies on the website.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
So more than three weeks after joining the race, she
has not stated in any policy positions. And look, there's
a strategy to this, because often you'll find that specific
candidates are less popular than what we call it a
generic Democrat or a generic Republican who appeals in theory
(02:50):
to their party's voters. She's running as generic Democrat, and
that's why she's doing well, because Joe Biden was pulling
very far below a generic Democrat. That is to say,
there are many Democrats who knew he was subpar, he
was not good, he was not capable, and they wanted
to run or they wanted to vote for someone else.
And so she's just casting herself right now as someone else.
(03:12):
She knows that most voters don't know her policies, don't
remember her failed presidential run, and she wants to get
away with being the candidate in the abstract who theoretically
they might like to vote for. And that's what she's
doing for Democrats. It's not going to help her with
independent voters, it's not going to help her win any
Republican voters over, but it is going to help her
consolidate Democratic support.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Well, And I wanted to get your reaction to the
mainstream media's efforts to recharacterize her obviously ignoring what she
has been on record in favor of again twenty nineteen
of the policies she ran for in her failed effort
to become president. But let's just use one illustration. She's
not the borders are. She was not responsible for the
southern border. She was responsible for you know, Central American
(03:57):
policy and changing the you know, decades long, if not
longer dynamic that led them to their inept reality of
their governmental system and their failed economic realities which are
forcing people out. So no, that's what she was charged
to do. You would really have to be I mean,
I always refer to my listeners as we dwellers. Politically,
we're all on top of things. We remember this, we
(04:18):
know what she is. We study the news, we study
politics all the time. But is the mainstream media's effort
to recharacterize her and deny outright deny that she had
any connection with the failed border policies? Is that their
admission or acknowledgment that they think we're a bunch of
idiots who don't pay attention to anything, Joel, I know
that sounds like a weird question, but I'm kind of worried.
(04:40):
They put their credibility on the line when they say
stuff like that, and I know what the words are.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
I just uttered.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
But that seems to me to suggest that the mainstream
media really does think the American people are a bunch
of easily manipulated idiots.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
They do, and they think they are very smart.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
So they think that they can do a better job
than the Kamala Harris campaign of explaining away these unhelpful details.
But I've looked at the record and look, the story
they don't want to tell is this, Kamala Harris was
placed in charge of what they call root causes of migration.
(05:21):
There's actually an executive order in twenty twenty one called
the root Causes strategy, and at that time the migrants
were largely coming from three countries, from Nicaragua, from Honduras,
and from Al Salvador. So they developed this Northern Triangle strategy,
and they put her in charge of the root causes.
(05:42):
So she was going to go and talk to the
leaders of these countries. Excuse me, I said, Nicaragua, Guatemala.
But anyway, those were the three countries, and the problem
was that the immigration crisis, the migration problem, ballooned so
far beyond those three countries that within a few months
(06:04):
or so, it became ridiculous to talk about those countries
as the.
Speaker 1 (06:08):
Source of the problem. So that's what they don't want
to talk about.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
They don't want to talk about the fact that this
whole idea of root causes was bogus.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
And that the real cause, the real driver.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Of migration, was the fact that migrants and the cartels
knew that there was going to be no enforcement at
the southern border of the United States. So that's that's
the problem, and they don't want to admit, and that
there was no need.
Speaker 2 (06:35):
To be made off of farrying people in return for
large payments to the United States southern border where they
knew they were going to gain access, whether it's for
some sort of nefarious purpose like terrorists, Chinese Communist Party
military age men, or alternatively, people fleeing terrible economic situations,
which is not a justification to enter our country illegally.
That word got out all over the globe.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
Right, So I want to acknowledge that was a failure,
complete failure. And you know, they're trying to say, well,
she was just in charge of those three countries and
the root causes and so forth. But you know, that
doesn't really solve the problem for them, because they really
believed that if they well I don't.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Know if they actually believed that.
Speaker 3 (07:17):
They were just trying to sell it to the public,
the idea that if you talked about the root causes,
which were corruption in those countries, poverty in those countries,
if you talked about those three countries, that would solve
the problem.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
They thought they could get away.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
With not enforcing the border, not enforcing the immigration law.
And it doesn't get her out of this problem, which
is that she was placed in a key position of
responsibility for the migration problem, and they called it again
they called the entire policy, not just the root causes part.
They called the entire policy the Biden Harris immigration policy.
(07:49):
This was her project, this was her baby, and she
ran away from it eventually during the administration before she
became a candidate because she didn't want to be associated
with a failure and she was not willing to stand
up to Joe Biden on the non enforcement of border policy,
on the non enforcement of existing immigration law. So yeah,
(08:10):
they think that we are easily manipulable idiots. I think
that they know that some percentage of Democrats want to
be convinced. So it's not that they know Democrats are stupid.
They just know that these Democrats will twist their brains
into pretzels to rationalize voting for Kamala Harris. And they
just need to give those voters enough of a story
(08:33):
that they could pretend to believe.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
So that's what's happened.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
And you know, you can point out things like this,
you can point out Tim Wallace's stolen valor his puffery,
his false statements about his military record and so forth, it's.
Speaker 1 (08:49):
Not going to shake those voters.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
They're just excited to vote for a Democrat who isn't
Joe Biden, and so they're willing to believe and to
convince themselves of anything. I had this experience recently when
some one wrote to me, and this is a person
who understands Israel policy pretty well, a Democrat. They understand
Israel policy, they understand that Kamala Harris is terrible for Israel.
But they said, well, I'm still going to vote for
(09:11):
Harris because I've decided it doesn't matter whose president. Every
president's going to have the same policy, which is garbage.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
But you cant'll it. You can see them rationalizing it.
Speaker 3 (09:20):
They don't want to bring and you know what, it's
very hard for people to change their minds when they've
demonized the other side so much. I don't think Republicans
have as much of a problem crossing over occasionally to
vote for a good Democrat. But Democrats really they think
of Republicans as racist and greedy and terrible and Nazis
and whatever. You can't join a group that you've demonized
so much, especially after you've been the one sort of
(09:42):
alienating people in your own family.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Let's say.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
So, you know, look, this is a problem, and Trump
is getting drowned out in all of this.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
You know, there's a lot of hoopla around the new candidate.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
I think it's partly media biased, but it's also just
partly something new. Voters are excited by, something new, they're
interested looking. And one of the reasons I wrote my
book the Agenda, was to give Trump something to talk about,
give him a vision of the future that he can
talk about two Republican voters and say, look, this is
what it's going to look like when I win. And
I don't have to wait for Congress to agree. I
(10:15):
don't have to wait for all these appointees to be
in place. I'm not giving you some massive, nine hundred
and twenty two page tome like Project twenty five of
everything conservatives ever want to do. I'm just giving you
a very quick agenda list of things I can do
as president by executive order. And that's why I wrote
the agenda, and I think that's what Trump has to
talk about to counter all of this stuff about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
And I'm glad you brought up the agenda what Trump
should do in his first one on a day, because
what we need to do is get Trump in office
before he can exercise any of the thoughts and ideas
that you express in your book, as wonderful as they are.
But he is, I mean, Trump's just getting an earful
from every conservative commentator that you can find, including you know, me,
a little libertarian commentator. Nonetheless, don't talk about Kama Harris's
(10:58):
crowd size, don't talk about her accent, don't talk about
her race. None of these things matter. If the independent
voter is out there really trying to make some sense
of who he wants to vote for or she wants
to vote for, then you're going to need to talk
about policy. And he is winning across the board in
terms of policy positions, from the board of the economy, inflation.
He's got a multitude of things he can campaign on
(11:19):
that don't have to go down to the low hanging
fruit about you know, her gaps or mistakes or a
goofy giggle or anything else for that matter.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Yeah, you know, and she is going to avoid the media.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
She's not going to talk about what she believes. We
have a convention coming up in Chicago next week, the
worst possible city for a Democratic convention because it shows
just how badly Democrats have done in running Chicago. You know,
in nineteen ninety six when Bill Clinton had his convention there,
it was a successful, thriving city. It had a lot
(11:54):
of hope, and since then it's really gone down the drain.
And you can see all the results of no cash
bail and high taxes and defunding the police, and poor education,
letting the unions run everything. It's just a disaster of
a city. But they're not going to want to talk
about that. They're going to talk about the beautiful buildings
and the lakefront, you know, the things that have existed
in Chicago for decades, and.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
That's exactly how they're going to try to run Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (12:18):
They're going to talk about the historic nature of her presidency,
and they're going to.
Speaker 1 (12:23):
Talk about how she exudes joy now, her nuclear class,
the joy out. They're not going.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
To talk about the job she would do as president
and the job she has done is vice president, which
has been a terrible job. So Trump can't control with
the media are going to say, and we can, you know,
we consider and complain about it, and we will. But
I think the most important thing is for Trump to
get the conversation back to policy, because that's where he
beats her.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Aim.
Speaker 3 (12:50):
She lost in twenty she lost in twenty nineteen, twenty
twenty because she couldn't talk about her policies.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Trump's got to talk about his. He has a track record.
Andy has good.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
Ideas for the future. And I think that's that's what
you need to talk about. And that's what I'd like
to turn the conversation to. And I talk about the
agenda exactly.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
The jenda What Trump should do in is First One
and a Day is authored by my guest today, Joe
Paul Locke, Breitbart Editor at Large for The Insight Scoop
this morning. I guess I'm curious to know have you
sent a copy of your book to the Trump administer
or to the Trump campaign. I'd like to think that
he got himself a copy.
Speaker 1 (13:22):
Of this and no, but one is on the way.
Speaker 2 (13:24):
One is on the way. Wonderful, wonderful, easy to digest.
I'll recommend my listeners get a copy. It's available ever
books were sold. I can have my executive producer, Jos
trek Or put your book as a link on my
blog page at fifty five krec dot com so we
can all get a hold of it and read it
and maybe talk policy amongst our friends with some of
your ideas in the agenda. Joe Pollock, it's always a
(13:45):
pleasure having on the program. I appreciate the work you're
doing at Brightbart along with everybody else at bright Birth.
That's why I recommend my listeners go ahead and Bookmarket
because you find some really solid, solid reporting there and
of course outside of the legacy media. Joel, thanks for
your time today. As always, I hope you have a
wonderful week, my friend. We'll talk again soon, I hope.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Thanks, and thanks for the opportunity.
Speaker 2 (14:05):
Anytime, my friend, anytime eight nineteen fifty five kre see
detalk station. Imaging can be affordable, but just don't go
to the hospital imaging department where you're going to shell
out thousands of dollars. It just, you know, it just
irks me when I mean, every time I do a
commercial for affordable imaging services just blows my mind. And
you know I've been down this path before myself. CT
(14:25):
scans can be five grand. Echo cardiograms can cost you
two three four thousand dollars. Ultrasound same thing, MRIs thirty
five hundred dollars plus multiple bills, not just one bill.
You get a separate bill beyond the thirty five hundred
dollars for the MRI or any other scan, because they're
going to get a radiologist that has to do a
review of the scans to provide to your doctor so
you know what's going on on the image. That's what
(14:46):
a board certified radiologist does. And you need a report
all of it, thousands of dollars, and your slice of
the action is probably going to be more after your
insurance payment if you have it, more than the whole
thing costs that Affordable Imaging services.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
Oh my god, doctor didn't tell me to go there.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
No other doctor's not going to tell you to go
there because you're going to save heap loads of money,
and the massive profit center that is the hospital system
that owns your doctor's practice is not going to get
the benefit of that giant bill. Echo cardigram four hundred
ninety five bucks CT scan with a contrast six hundred
without four point fifty MRI with a contrast the most
(15:21):
expensive image you can get at affordable. It's six hundred
and forty five bucks at every image including ultrasounds and
the long screens come with a board certified radiologist report
is included in this low low price, So save yourself
tons of money. Go where you want because it's your
medical care and you have that choice five one three seven,
five three eight thousand, five one three seven, five three
(15:41):
eight thousand. Online you'll find them at Affordable Medimaging dot
com fifty five KRC For more information about contests on
this
Brian Thomas News
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.