Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Tap the night first winning we one forecast. It is
going to be a sunny day with the high eighty eight,
down to sixty overnight with clear skies. Tomorrow's sunny again,
eighty five for the high with sixty three overnight low
and potential for showers. Got a chance of showers all
day long on Friday, going up to seventy eight degrees.
Right now, it's fifty six. Time for traffic. Chuck Ingram
from the UCUT Traffic Center.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Substance dependence is a treatable medical disease that affects both
brain and behavior. You see health addiction sciences can help.
Call five one, three, five, eight, five eight two two seven. Cruise.
Continue to work with the Rex southbound seventy five near Shepherd,
they're on the right. Traffic continues slow through Lachland northbound
seventy five, running close to an extra half hour between
(00:42):
Florence and downtown. Then pass an accident near Mitchell on
the right shoulder southbound seventy one. You're low over a
half hour delay between Fields Eardle and the Lateral coming
up next. No matter your political affiliation, there is no
debate on who has the best political common terry and
he happens to be next. Here comes the judge. I'm
(01:03):
Chuck Ingram on fifty five krs. He talks station.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
Well, no arguing with uh with that. It's a thirty
two V about kercity talk station. Struggling with very little
sleep from last night's staying up for the debate, but
welcoming as I always do every Wednesday at this time,
Judge Napolitano, great to see you and talk with you again,
your honor. I understand you were listening to congressom Messy,
so I think you heard his greeting to you.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
Yes, And of course he's he's the gold standard in
defense of the primacy of the individual over the state,
and that the Constitution means what it says. And I'm
I'm thrilled at our friendship and I love him too,
and thank you for the kind comments that you and
he both made it. But me and Ingram, wow, I
(01:51):
know that's a tax line, serious, over the top introduction.
You sure that was him back there?
Speaker 1 (01:56):
It is him, But you can cut and paste that
one because you've got a strong and firm, an honest
endorsement from Chuck Ingram, who normally is joking around but
I share his thoughts and comments about you and your
beautiful political analysis, and I, as I always do, get
a copy of your column which comes out tonight at midnight.
The subject free speech and the Department of Political Justice.
(02:18):
What an awesome, awesome analysis you did, and as you
typically do, a historic based analysis about how we got
from there to here, and ultimately the Justice Department going
after people's right to speak freely.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
The Justice Department in the United States today, the Joe
Biden Merrick Garland Attorney General Garland, FBI Director Chris Ray,
actually a Trump appointee but retained by President Biden Justice
Department is prosecuting Americans, Canadians and Russians for infiltrating what
(02:59):
they call propag and disinformation that's Orwellian, for political views
that the government hates and fears into American social media. Well,
how can this be? This is exactly what the Soviets
did in the thirties under Stalin and in the sixties
under Brezhnev when they held show trials to prosecute people
(03:23):
who mocked them or who published outside the Soviet Union
anti Soviet propaganda. Whatever happened to the freedom of speech?
How can this possibly be a crime. Who could take
this seriously? Where does the Justice Department think it's going
with this? That's what that's what got me going. Actually
(03:46):
turns my stomach when I think that people like you
and I, the millions listening to us now, the millions
that listen to my podcast and other alternative media are
the very people whose ears the government wants to shield
from opinions the government doesn't like. And that is the
(04:10):
opposite of what the First Amendment was written for. The
First Amendment was written to keep the government out of
the business of evaluating the content of speech.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
What is the theory of I hate to even use
the term liability on this, and it's going to be
it's criminal prosecutions here. We're not talking about some civil
provision here. Well, their theory, their theory is that Vladimir Putin,
through various intelligence services in Russia and various NGOs, non
(04:42):
government organizations that are really funded by the government, want
to affect the outcome of the American election.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
And they are really prefer Harris because they think I
think she uh well, they're saying they prefer Harris. They
really prefer Trump because he's predictable. Harris is unpredictable to
them whatever whoever they prefer. They're trying to affect the
outcome of the election. And that's a crime. Because the
(05:14):
Congress doesn't believe and freedom of speech for all persons.
Even though the First Amendment doesn't distinguish between Americans and
non Americans, Congress has written statutes that make it a
crime for foreign individuals to attempt to affect the outcome
of the American elections. How can that be a crime
when the CIA affects the outcome of foreign elections all
(05:36):
the time.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
That's what they do every single time. Oh my word, well, okay,
my job your job parallel quite often because we both
offer political commentary and thoughtful commentary and insightful commentary. At
least I like to think it is the free exchange
of ideas. We come up with our material based upon
(05:57):
let's say, the Federalist papers, Constitution, or articles that are
written by scholars, and they sway and influence our ideology,
and they make brilliant thoughts or stupid thoughts that you
and I comment on in reaching our own personal conclusions
on matters political. That's what debate's all about. That information
(06:17):
can come from tasks. It can come from political it
can come from Fox News, it could come from the BBC.
It's a The world is our available to all. There's
content out there to consume. Whether or not we're swayed
by it, that's up to our individual ideological position.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
Is it not your Everything you say is true? And
the First Amendment, which guarantees expressive rights, includes the right
to read what you want, gather information from whatever source
you choose, digest that information, and articulate it. And no
matter who is paying your salary. In the case of
(06:58):
Dimitri Simson has wife, they're both Americans. He was born
in Russia, so they are both dual citizens. He's been
indicted in the United States for living in Russia and
working in Russia for Russian television station. How can that
possibly be an American crime? But that's where that's where
(07:23):
the Feds are. I mean, the Feds do not like
this analogy. I'm sure that I drew to these two
Russian dissidents in nineteen sixty six, but it's almost exactly
on point. After A. Khrushcheff was deposed in sixty four
and Brezhnev and a company, there were a couple of
(07:44):
others before Bresnev. But it was the same gang and
the same mentality. They wanted to show how tough they
were after khrush Jeff's supposed liberalizing influences. So they cracked
down on artists and literary types and even humorists. And
(08:05):
they had secret show trials and then well they weren't
show trials, they were secret trials. And then they were
convicted and sentenced to hard labor. Each of these guys.
One got five years, one got seven years. After they
were sentenced, the wife of one of them got a
copy of the transcript of the trial, translated it into
English and disseminated in the West. That's when the outrage
(08:28):
began and the West realized these artists are at hard
labor because they humorously mocked the Soviet leadership. Now the
American Justice Department wants to put journalists in federal prison
(08:49):
because they dare to express a view contrary to what
the Biden administration wants on Ukraine.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
Well, I don't know that my view on you is
consistent with what the Biden administrations is. I commented on
this morning. Your honors should be expecting to get picked
up by the Feds when I go out to work,
got on my work this morning.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Well, their lynchpin is that Russian dollars were involved, and
therefore these people were controlled by the Russian government, and
therefore they were Russian agents, and because they didn't register
as foreign agents, they committed a crime. This, of course,
is nothing more than a thinly veiled effort to suppress
(09:35):
the speech that the government hates and fears. A lot
of people represent the interests of foreign governments in the
United States, are not controlled by foreign governments, are compensated
for what they do, don't register, and aren't prosecuted. This
(09:55):
only happens when the opinions you express our contra sorry
to the prevailing opinions that the government wants to hear.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Orwellian world, we're living in your honor. It's just you
spell it out so well, and you put in such
stark terms. Again. All morning, I've been sort of bemoaning
the fact that I really don't feel as though I've
got anything to look forward to, that I'm lacking in
an optimism toward the future. Regardless of who wins in November,
I'm struggling to find something positive going on in this world.
(10:30):
And sadly, one more thing to be a little bit
distressed about here on the fifty five Casy Martin, I am.
Speaker 3 (10:35):
Sorry to bring unhappy news to you O listeners on
Wednesday morning. This is so damn important.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
I mean, this is why you and I talk about
things like this all the time every week. It's another
illustration of the erosion of the United States Constitution and
the god given freedoms that we're supposed to enjoy here
that are gradually being taken away from us a little
bit at a time every single day. But I'm glad
we get to talk about and bring it to everybody
else's attention, and I'm glad you do it throughout the
(11:03):
week judging freedoms? Were we usually in the segment on
and who are you gonna be talking with today?
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Ron at eleven o'clock this morning, Eastern Scott Ritter at
two o'clock this afternoon, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, three o'clock, Phil
Giraldi four o'clock, Aaron Mante four of my regulars and
my heavy hitters. Two are concentrating on Israel and how
soon will the war against Lebanon start? And two are
(11:31):
concentrating on Ukraine. There was a report last night that
Secretary Blincoln is in Kiev with his British counterpart and
they are about to authorize the Ukrainians to use American
long range missiles to attack Moscow. If this is true,
it is insane and what will the response be?
Speaker 1 (11:56):
World War three breaking out in front of our very eyes? Joe,
Jennena Paulatin. God bless you, sir for spending time with
my listeners and me every Wednesday. Already looking forward to
another segment next Wednesday. You're on and we'll certainly be
watching it judging freedom. Search for it, you'll find it online.
Take care and have a wonderful day, your honor.
Speaker 3 (12:11):
Thank you, Brian and that God bless Thomas Massey as well.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Amen to that sight. Forty three year, fifty five care
se Detalk station. God bless the second amenity of the
United States Constitution as well. Go back to that point
that that woman in Springfield, mate ninety six pounds, can't
defend yourself against a gang of crazy people in the world. No, yes,
you can. The Great Equalizer. We fortunately have the right
to defend ourselves in this country, as embraced by virtue
(12:38):
of the Second Amendment in that States Constitution. Exercise that
right good to twenty two to three Roub forty two
between Mason and eleven and that wonderful gun store and
indoor range, the safest, cleanest, wonderful range you're ever going
to shoot on. Take a class there, learn how to
shoot lord, get to hone your skills. If you're a
good shooter you think you are, you can be a
better shooter with one of the more skilled classes they teach.
(12:58):
They have membership options for the range. You can plan
on shooting a lot. That is a great thing to do,
save you some money. And of course an amazing store
for firearms, handguns, long guns, ammunition accessories, literally everything you
can hope for. And the owners are truly wonderful people.
And please do say hi to Wendy and Jeff when
you're at twenty two three roph forty two between Mason
eleven and online. You'll find everything there is to know
(13:20):
on the website twenty two three dot com the number
twenty two follow by the word three spelled out twenty
two to three dot com. Fifty five KRC the talk station.
Fifteen years ago we were
Tap the night first winning we one forecast. It is
going to be a sunny day with the high eighty eight,
down to sixty overnight with clear skies. Tomorrow's sunny again,
eighty five for the high with sixty three overnight low
and potential for showers. Got a chance of showers all
day long on Friday, going up to seventy eight degrees.
Right now, it's fifty six. Time for traffic. Chuck Ingram
from the UCUT Traffic Center.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Substance dependence is a treatable medical disease that affects both
brain and behavior. You see health addiction sciences can help.
Call five one, three, five, eight, five eight two two seven. Cruise.
Continue to work with the Rex southbound seventy five near Shepherd,
they're on the right. Traffic continues slow through Lachland northbound
seventy five, running close to an extra half hour between
(00:42):
Florence and downtown. Then pass an accident near Mitchell on
the right shoulder southbound seventy one. You're low over a
half hour delay between Fields Eardle and the Lateral coming
up next. No matter your political affiliation, there is no
debate on who has the best political common terry and
he happens to be next. Here comes the judge. I'm
(01:03):
Chuck Ingram on fifty five krs. He talks station.
Speaker 1 (01:08):
Well, no arguing with uh with that. It's a thirty
two V about kercity talk station. Struggling with very little
sleep from last night's staying up for the debate, but
welcoming as I always do every Wednesday at this time,
Judge Napolitano, great to see you and talk with you again,
your honor. I understand you were listening to congressom Messy,
so I think you heard his greeting to you.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
Yes, And of course he's he's the gold standard in
defense of the primacy of the individual over the state,
and that the Constitution means what it says. And I'm
I'm thrilled at our friendship and I love him too,
and thank you for the kind comments that you and
he both made it. But me and Ingram, wow, I
(01:51):
know that's a tax line, serious, over the top introduction.
You sure that was him back there?
Speaker 1 (01:56):
It is him, But you can cut and paste that
one because you've got a strong and firm, an honest
endorsement from Chuck Ingram, who normally is joking around but
I share his thoughts and comments about you and your
beautiful political analysis, and I, as I always do, get
a copy of your column which comes out tonight at midnight.
The subject free speech and the Department of Political Justice.
(02:18):
What an awesome, awesome analysis you did, and as you
typically do, a historic based analysis about how we got
from there to here, and ultimately the Justice Department going
after people's right to speak freely.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
The Justice Department in the United States today, the Joe
Biden Merrick Garland Attorney General Garland, FBI Director Chris Ray,
actually a Trump appointee but retained by President Biden Justice
Department is prosecuting Americans, Canadians and Russians for infiltrating what
(02:59):
they call propag and disinformation that's Orwellian, for political views
that the government hates and fears into American social media. Well,
how can this be? This is exactly what the Soviets
did in the thirties under Stalin and in the sixties
under Brezhnev when they held show trials to prosecute people
(03:23):
who mocked them or who published outside the Soviet Union
anti Soviet propaganda. Whatever happened to the freedom of speech?
How can this possibly be a crime. Who could take
this seriously? Where does the Justice Department think it's going
with this? That's what that's what got me going. Actually
(03:46):
turns my stomach when I think that people like you
and I, the millions listening to us now, the millions
that listen to my podcast and other alternative media are
the very people whose ears the government wants to shield
from opinions the government doesn't like. And that is the
(04:10):
opposite of what the First Amendment was written for. The
First Amendment was written to keep the government out of
the business of evaluating the content of speech.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
What is the theory of I hate to even use
the term liability on this, and it's going to be
it's criminal prosecutions here. We're not talking about some civil
provision here. Well, their theory, their theory is that Vladimir Putin,
through various intelligence services in Russia and various NGOs, non
(04:42):
government organizations that are really funded by the government, want
to affect the outcome of the American election.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
And they are really prefer Harris because they think I
think she uh well, they're saying they prefer Harris. They
really prefer Trump because he's predictable. Harris is unpredictable to
them whatever whoever they prefer. They're trying to affect the
outcome of the election. And that's a crime. Because the
(05:14):
Congress doesn't believe and freedom of speech for all persons.
Even though the First Amendment doesn't distinguish between Americans and
non Americans, Congress has written statutes that make it a
crime for foreign individuals to attempt to affect the outcome
of the American elections. How can that be a crime
when the CIA affects the outcome of foreign elections all
(05:36):
the time.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
That's what they do every single time. Oh my word, well, okay,
my job your job parallel quite often because we both
offer political commentary and thoughtful commentary and insightful commentary. At
least I like to think it is the free exchange
of ideas. We come up with our material based upon
(05:57):
let's say, the Federalist papers, Constitution, or articles that are
written by scholars, and they sway and influence our ideology,
and they make brilliant thoughts or stupid thoughts that you
and I comment on in reaching our own personal conclusions
on matters political. That's what debate's all about. That information
(06:17):
can come from tasks. It can come from political it
can come from Fox News, it could come from the BBC.
It's a The world is our available to all. There's
content out there to consume. Whether or not we're swayed
by it, that's up to our individual ideological position.
Speaker 3 (06:35):
Is it not your Everything you say is true? And
the First Amendment, which guarantees expressive rights, includes the right
to read what you want, gather information from whatever source
you choose, digest that information, and articulate it. And no
matter who is paying your salary. In the case of
(06:58):
Dimitri Simson has wife, they're both Americans. He was born
in Russia, so they are both dual citizens. He's been
indicted in the United States for living in Russia and
working in Russia for Russian television station. How can that
possibly be an American crime? But that's where that's where
(07:23):
the Feds are. I mean, the Feds do not like
this analogy. I'm sure that I drew to these two
Russian dissidents in nineteen sixty six, but it's almost exactly
on point. After A. Khrushcheff was deposed in sixty four
and Brezhnev and a company, there were a couple of
(07:44):
others before Bresnev. But it was the same gang and
the same mentality. They wanted to show how tough they
were after khrush Jeff's supposed liberalizing influences. So they cracked
down on artists and literary types and even humorists. And
(08:05):
they had secret show trials and then well they weren't
show trials, they were secret trials. And then they were
convicted and sentenced to hard labor. Each of these guys.
One got five years, one got seven years. After they
were sentenced, the wife of one of them got a
copy of the transcript of the trial, translated it into
English and disseminated in the West. That's when the outrage
(08:28):
began and the West realized these artists are at hard
labor because they humorously mocked the Soviet leadership. Now the
American Justice Department wants to put journalists in federal prison
(08:49):
because they dare to express a view contrary to what
the Biden administration wants on Ukraine.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
Well, I don't know that my view on you is
consistent with what the Biden administrations is. I commented on
this morning. Your honors should be expecting to get picked
up by the Feds when I go out to work,
got on my work this morning.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Well, their lynchpin is that Russian dollars were involved, and
therefore these people were controlled by the Russian government, and
therefore they were Russian agents, and because they didn't register
as foreign agents, they committed a crime. This, of course,
is nothing more than a thinly veiled effort to suppress
(09:35):
the speech that the government hates and fears. A lot
of people represent the interests of foreign governments in the
United States, are not controlled by foreign governments, are compensated
for what they do, don't register, and aren't prosecuted. This
(09:55):
only happens when the opinions you express our contra sorry
to the prevailing opinions that the government wants to hear.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Orwellian world, we're living in your honor. It's just you
spell it out so well, and you put in such
stark terms. Again. All morning, I've been sort of bemoaning
the fact that I really don't feel as though I've
got anything to look forward to, that I'm lacking in
an optimism toward the future. Regardless of who wins in November,
I'm struggling to find something positive going on in this world.
(10:30):
And sadly, one more thing to be a little bit
distressed about here on the fifty five Casy Martin, I am.
Speaker 3 (10:35):
Sorry to bring unhappy news to you O listeners on
Wednesday morning. This is so damn important.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
I mean, this is why you and I talk about
things like this all the time every week. It's another
illustration of the erosion of the United States Constitution and
the god given freedoms that we're supposed to enjoy here
that are gradually being taken away from us a little
bit at a time every single day. But I'm glad
we get to talk about and bring it to everybody
else's attention, and I'm glad you do it throughout the
(11:03):
week judging freedoms? Were we usually in the segment on
and who are you gonna be talking with today?
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Ron at eleven o'clock this morning, Eastern Scott Ritter at
two o'clock this afternoon, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, three o'clock, Phil
Giraldi four o'clock, Aaron Mante four of my regulars and
my heavy hitters. Two are concentrating on Israel and how
soon will the war against Lebanon start? And two are
(11:31):
concentrating on Ukraine. There was a report last night that
Secretary Blincoln is in Kiev with his British counterpart and
they are about to authorize the Ukrainians to use American
long range missiles to attack Moscow. If this is true,
it is insane and what will the response be?
Speaker 1 (11:56):
World War three breaking out in front of our very eyes? Joe,
Jennena Paulatin. God bless you, sir for spending time with
my listeners and me every Wednesday. Already looking forward to
another segment next Wednesday. You're on and we'll certainly be
watching it judging freedom. Search for it, you'll find it online.
Take care and have a wonderful day, your honor.
Speaker 3 (12:11):
Thank you, Brian and that God bless Thomas Massey as well.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Amen to that sight. Forty three year, fifty five care
se Detalk station. God bless the second amenity of the
United States Constitution as well. Go back to that point
that that woman in Springfield, mate ninety six pounds, can't
defend yourself against a gang of crazy people in the world. No, yes,
you can. The Great Equalizer. We fortunately have the right
to defend ourselves in this country, as embraced by virtue
(12:38):
of the Second Amendment in that States Constitution. Exercise that
right good to twenty two to three Roub forty two
between Mason and eleven and that wonderful gun store and
indoor range, the safest, cleanest, wonderful range you're ever going
to shoot on. Take a class there, learn how to
shoot lord, get to hone your skills. If you're a
good shooter you think you are, you can be a
better shooter with one of the more skilled classes they teach.
(12:58):
They have membership options for the range. You can plan
on shooting a lot. That is a great thing to do,
save you some money. And of course an amazing store
for firearms, handguns, long guns, ammunition accessories, literally everything you
can hope for. And the owners are truly wonderful people.
And please do say hi to Wendy and Jeff when
you're at twenty two three roph forty two between Mason
eleven and online. You'll find everything there is to know
(13:20):
on the website twenty two three dot com the number
twenty two follow by the word three spelled out twenty
two to three dot com. Fifty five KRC the talk station.
Fifteen years ago we were
Brian Thomas News
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.