Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It was actually scheduled by Joe Strecker. I'm pleased to
introduce the thirty five Karse Morning Show, author of one
of the authors of the Parallel Election, A Blueprint for Deception,
evidence of massive election fraud in Delaware County, Pennsylvania in
the November twenty twenty election, Leah Hoops. Welcome to the
fifty five Karosee Morning Show. It's a pleasure to have
you on today.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Good morning. Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Understand your bit of legal hot water right now protective
order in Philadelphia accord because of your work on election integrity.
Can you give my listeners the background on this absolutely.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
I was a poll watcher in the twenty twenty election
in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, and my partner, Gregory Sentstrom, and
I uncovered massive election fraud. We did a sting operation
unbeknownst to the election workers in which we got them
on video and audio committing not only fraud, but they
were spoilating or getting rid of the evidence rate on
(00:58):
camera beknownst to them. Like I said, but right before
we exposed that we had this video and audio, the
voting machine warehouse custodian James Savage decided to file a
lawsuit against myself, Gregory Sinstrom, Donald Trump, Mayor Giuliani in Philadelphia,
claiming that we defamed him in public and that we
(01:22):
caused his heart attacks and so on and so on.
About a month later, we released all the videos to
the world exposing James Savage's crimes and also the other
election bureau workers inside of Delaware County, and it lasted
for about eight hundred and sixty days in a Democrat City,
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas with the Democrat judge Michael Urdos,
(01:45):
and myself and Gregory Sinstrom. We represented ourselves per se
and they were unable to dispute anything that we said
in our book, in testimony in Gettysburg, in our interviews,
and in our court filings. To pretty much sum it up,
we won four hearings. We use the truth as a
(02:07):
complete defense, and when they started to lose, they decided
to file a protective order, which was absolutely ridiculous. It
was lawfare, and the attorney j Connor Corkoran and James
Savage decided to say that we were domestic terrorists and
that we were a threat to the courts and the judge,
(02:28):
and they wanted in a civil court to confiscate our firearms,
to completely silence us, and to find us thirty thousand dollars.
They lost miserably. They ended up trying to offer us
settlement in January, and that meant leaving behind President Trump,
and we said absolutely not. And then in March of
(02:49):
twenty twenty four they withdrew the case and as of
today J. Connor Corkoran, he has been suspended sanctioned because
of us. His license has been suspended for eighteen months
and he had to close down his law firm.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
Wow. Well, congratulations being an attorney. When you mentioned about
the the law fair component of it, and this is
one of the ways that you know, evil forces like
the folks that you were working are you know you're
working for the American people and bring this out, but
that we're trying to suppress your voice and keep this down.
They can cause your legal bills to go through the roof,
(03:26):
can't they engage in protracted a litigation following extra motions?
Of course, the protective order which was meritless, as demonstrated
by your victory on that all of that means billable hours,
and when you're representing yourself you're in a precarious position
in and of itself because you're not necessarily savvy with
all the laws and rules about motion practice.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Wow, that's one hundred percent correct. So Greg and I
have learned things on our own, with the help of
obviously a lot of people and a lot of studying
and basically just going into the courtroom and you know,
just telling the truth. And the judges are supposed to
be helpful to the pro se litigants, and some of
them have been. But it's really just as we go,
(04:10):
we learn a lot, and we understand that this is
a really awful, terrible corrupted team that we are very
good at. We use a lot of tactical strategies. We
approach this kind of like a military operation, because this
is like the communist takeover of the United States, and
the lawyers are in on it and the judges and
they're getting beat at their own game, and that's just
(04:33):
where we need to be in this country.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
Well, let me ask you this. Can you outline for
my listeners some of the things that you reveal in
the parallel election and some of the evidence that you
presented to the court in this lawsuit? Is she there?
Leah see if you can get her back on Joe,
(04:59):
apparently we've lost the connection. My apologies to the listening
audience for that. I was just getting ready to get
into the details on this anyway. It's the parallel election
at blueprint for deception. I can have Joe at a
link to that on my blog page fifty five careca
dot com. While he's trying to get her back, apparently,
he goes into great detail with what is described as
(05:20):
irrefutable evidence the amassive election fraud that was perpetrated against
the citizen around November twenty twenty in the general election,
specifically in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Unprecedented fraud result of the
installation of an illegitimate government. She writes, so, along with
Gregory Strengths and Leah Hopes, shows you what was done
and by whom It's called parallel election because obtaining fraudulent
(05:42):
results they manufactured required the wholesale substitution of fake ballots
for authentic ones. You got her back, Joseph, Yes, she has. Leah,
I'm here.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
I don't know what happens.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
It's yeah, well maybe it is. We'll let people fester
on that one way. I was just reading the description
of your book The Paril Election, I was going to
ask you if you would please just sort of recite
some of what is described as irrefutable evidence that you
had showing that these fake ballots were substituted for authentic ones.
It sounds unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Yes, So what we had witnessed on election day, Greg
is experienced obviously in fraud, and what he was looking
for specifically is where the cameras were not and where
the ballots were being ingested. There's multi levels in the
counting center and what he was trying to understand was
the delta, and that's what you start with what you
(06:39):
end with. And what we saw is that there was
a a back room where these mail in ballots were
being processed in canvas and no one was allowed back there.
And what we figured out was is that they're ingesting
fake mail in ballots into the system that have no
chain of custody. They're using removable media, you know, USB
(07:02):
drives in order to insert you know, fake votes into
the tabulation servers. It's very convoluted, but we do explain
it in the Parallel Election. We don't just explain the fraud,
we explain the who, the what, the where, and the
When we give pictures, it's large font for those who
have a hard time seeing. But we really do get
(07:24):
into everything from start to finish, and that includes it.
You know basically that this was a plan about I
don't even know about twenty fifteen when it came to
taking down President Trump. So it really is detailed. We
do not hold back. We give links to our evidence.
(07:45):
We've submitted that evidence into multiple courts. We've won several
cases hearings, and actually we're the last remaining election fraud
lawsuit in the country and we will be heard between
November fourth and November eighth, twenty twenty four, in the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
Wow. Nothing like putting it off till roughly election day
before you get some definitive word on Yeah. Okay, well,
let me ask you this. The allegations that are set
forth in the parallel election, this is exactly what you
were sued over and you prevailed because you brought forth
the information that you have documented in the book and
you put it in front of the court and they
(08:27):
basically threw out his claim against you. So this is
an era of judicial support around it based upon the litigation.
You just got through fighting.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
That is correct. We put it in their face and said,
you know, dispute it. We're telling the truth, and they
could not. And it was so bad that they ended
up using a dead witness in order to corroborate the
plaintive's claims. They actually were trying to use an expert witness,
the same expert witness that they used in the Egen
Carol case. They submitted false ovam udens. It was really awful,
(09:03):
and we've been trying to expose the lawfair and the
tactics and the lies that they use, and were demanding
attorneys to fight back against this and protect people's rights
in order to prevail in these courtrooms. I mean, you
have to be able to fight the way that they fight,
and you have to do it better than they do.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
Well, it's interesting at least you had standing to move
forward with this. These are the kind of allegations that
Donald Trump was making, but they never saw the light
of an actual proceeding. Their discovery was never entered into
In many of the cases where they claimed the election fraud,
they were just summarily thrown out on the grounds that
whoever filed the lawsuit didn't have standing to sue. So
(09:43):
none of the information that you brought forth in your
book and in this lawsuit was able to see the
light of trial or hearing.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
Right So the facts were unable to be presented right
in front of a jury. So you know, there's I
have a lot of opinions about that. And the things
that I saw, including the R and C lawyers that
were hired in twenty twenty, were placed there for a
particular reason, and that was to stop any kind of
court proceedings to go forward. And I could give you
(10:11):
countless examples of the people that I know and spoke
to from the RNC that were attorneys that were one
hundred percent not working for the country and we're not
working for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
Yeah, well, we know there's a lot of Republicans out
there that have a certain amount of disdain for Donald Trump,
and of course you can bring that in in terms
of how well or poorly you defend someone to shame
that that reality exists. But it does. Now is this thing,
I mean the election? I want to say shentan against
my favorite word to describe these types of things. But
(10:43):
this fraud that you uncovered, now, has this been referred
over to it like a criminal attorney, like a prosecuting attorney,
or a US Department of Justice attorney. I know you
might laugh at the idea of Department of Justice looking
into it, but has it been referred for further criminal inquiry.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
We have actually provided with the lower declarations to the
House Judiciary Committee, to Jack Smith, to Merrick Garland, to
District Attorney of Delaware County Jack Stolsteimer, to former Pennsylvania
Attorney General Josh Shapiro. We have filed former or excuse me,
we have filed formal criminal charge referrals about Bill Barr,
(11:20):
Christopher Ray, Josh Shapiro, former US Attorney Bill McSwain. I mean,
I could go on, and the reason why it's not
only is it basically just putting it in their face,
but it doesn't allow them to have plausible deniability that
these things exist. And on top of it, it is
exculpatory evidence to President Trump. So if they do not
(11:42):
present it, even though they're in possession of it, then
they would be committing a Brady violation. So we know
all of this stuff. These are tactics that everyone should
be using. And just to blatantly say, well, the DOJ
is corrupt, it doesn't matter. You still have to you
have to refer it over to the law because not
everyone inside of law enforcement is a bad person. There
(12:05):
are good right they are good law enforcement, They are
good public servants, There are good judges, there are good attorneys.
So you know, we can't just throw our hands up
in the air and say, well, everyone's corrupt. You know,
that's kind of what they want you to believe and
feel helpless and hopeless. But no, you have to do
the work. You have to bust your butt. You got
to sacrifice for your country and you just have to.
(12:25):
You got to, you know, bear it and do what
you need to do in order to keep our republic.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Wow, Leah Hopps hopes rather it's the parallel election of
Blueprint for Deception. I've had my producer add your book
to my blog page fifty five carecy dot com so
folks can easily get a copy of it. So before
we part company, day Lea. And it's been a real
pleasure talking with you. And I can't think you know,
for fighting the good fight. Are you. I presume that
the election integrity issues that you disclose in the book,
(12:54):
and you are dealing with right now. Are still a
potential problem in the upcoming November election, Yes.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
They are, and the good news is that we've focused
on our our own backyard, which is Dellawa County, and
they are heavily scrutinized. There's a lot of eyes on them.
We've caught them in so many lies and deceit. Actually,
we're submitting a Supreme Court case this morning, and it's
not only us, but it is multiple counties and we
(13:22):
have joined together in order to go after these crooks
and these criminals in multiple counties in the Commonwealth of Pa.
It's going to be very hard for them to cheat
and they will one hundred percent screw up when they're
trying to commit the fraud that they did in twenty twenty.
We are also coming out with the second part of
our documentary. It's about twenty eight minutes. It's called The
(13:43):
Big Con and it will be coming out so it's
going to be very insightful and people will be able
to understand the fraud and be able to look inside
of their own counties and have an understanding before the election.
It's going to be very powerful and people will be educated,
especially if you're a poll worker or a poll watcher,
or you're sitting inside of these counting centers, you're going
(14:04):
to have a great understanding of what to actually look for.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
That is wonderful. News can't come soon enough. Leah hot Hopes.
Thank you for what you have done and what you
continue to do. The information is vitally important, and as
you just pointed out, it just points out how important
it is to have people overseeing the election and being
in there in the polls. People from both sides of
the political spectrum are entitled to be there. They should
(14:29):
be there and observing the election to make sure that
the rules are followed and no fraud is committed. God
bless you, Leah. Keep up the great work, and you're
welcome here in the morning show. Anytime you've got any
further updates, I know my listeners would be very intrigued
to find out.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Thank you so much, appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
God bless my pleasure, God bless you. Seven fifty one
fifty five care see the talk station and you feel
like you woke up in a Banana Republic some days?
Doesn't it doesn't it? Plum type plumbing is plumbing done right.
You can count on my friends at plumb type Plumbing,
you got problems with your some pump called plumb tie.
You got problems with leaky faucets, plumb tie toil it
leaks and raining chandeliers. Always like to joke about that.
That was my emergency situation and it's easy to schedule appointment.
(15:06):
Plumtight dot com is how you do it. And I
scheduled my last appointment there for my uh my leaking
backflow valve and turned out my irrigation system had a
crack in it and that's why I was leaking. So
plumb Tight to the rescue fix that job and virtually
no time. The price is always right and the customer
service is always exceptional. That's why they enjoy an A
plus with a better business Barreau count on them. They
(15:26):
will be very good with communicating with you. They are
wonderfully wonderful in terms of how they treat you and
your home. And again fair and ethical pricing. That's always
the case with my friends at plumb Tight Plumbing Plumbing
done right. They live by that motto five one three
seven two seven tight the it te five one three
seven two seven eighty four eighty three again online it's
plumtight dot
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Com fifty five krc man
It was actually scheduled by Joe Strecker. I'm pleased to
introduce the thirty five Karse Morning Show, author of one
of the authors of the Parallel Election, A Blueprint for Deception,
evidence of massive election fraud in Delaware County, Pennsylvania in
the November twenty twenty election, Leah Hoops. Welcome to the
fifty five Karosee Morning Show. It's a pleasure to have
you on today.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Good morning. Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Understand your bit of legal hot water right now protective
order in Philadelphia accord because of your work on election integrity.
Can you give my listeners the background on this absolutely.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
I was a poll watcher in the twenty twenty election
in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, and my partner, Gregory Sentstrom, and
I uncovered massive election fraud. We did a sting operation
unbeknownst to the election workers in which we got them
on video and audio committing not only fraud, but they
were spoilating or getting rid of the evidence rate on
(00:58):
camera beknownst to them. Like I said, but right before
we exposed that we had this video and audio, the
voting machine warehouse custodian James Savage decided to file a
lawsuit against myself, Gregory Sinstrom, Donald Trump, Mayor Giuliani in Philadelphia,
claiming that we defamed him in public and that we
(01:22):
caused his heart attacks and so on and so on.
About a month later, we released all the videos to
the world exposing James Savage's crimes and also the other
election bureau workers inside of Delaware County, and it lasted
for about eight hundred and sixty days in a Democrat City,
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas with the Democrat judge Michael Urdos,
(01:45):
and myself and Gregory Sinstrom. We represented ourselves per se
and they were unable to dispute anything that we said
in our book, in testimony in Gettysburg, in our interviews,
and in our court filings. To pretty much sum it up,
we won four hearings. We use the truth as a
(02:07):
complete defense, and when they started to lose, they decided
to file a protective order, which was absolutely ridiculous. It
was lawfare, and the attorney j Connor Corkoran and James
Savage decided to say that we were domestic terrorists and
that we were a threat to the courts and the judge,
(02:28):
and they wanted in a civil court to confiscate our firearms,
to completely silence us, and to find us thirty thousand dollars.
They lost miserably. They ended up trying to offer us
settlement in January, and that meant leaving behind President Trump,
and we said absolutely not. And then in March of
(02:49):
twenty twenty four they withdrew the case and as of
today J. Connor Corkoran, he has been suspended sanctioned because
of us. His license has been suspended for eighteen months
and he had to close down his law firm.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
Wow. Well, congratulations being an attorney. When you mentioned about
the the law fair component of it, and this is
one of the ways that you know, evil forces like
the folks that you were working are you know you're
working for the American people and bring this out, but
that we're trying to suppress your voice and keep this down.
They can cause your legal bills to go through the roof,
(03:26):
can't they engage in protracted a litigation following extra motions?
Of course, the protective order which was meritless, as demonstrated
by your victory on that all of that means billable hours,
and when you're representing yourself you're in a precarious position
in and of itself because you're not necessarily savvy with
all the laws and rules about motion practice.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Wow, that's one hundred percent correct. So Greg and I
have learned things on our own, with the help of
obviously a lot of people and a lot of studying
and basically just going into the courtroom and you know,
just telling the truth. And the judges are supposed to
be helpful to the pro se litigants, and some of
them have been. But it's really just as we go,
(04:10):
we learn a lot, and we understand that this is
a really awful, terrible corrupted team that we are very
good at. We use a lot of tactical strategies. We
approach this kind of like a military operation, because this
is like the communist takeover of the United States, and
the lawyers are in on it and the judges and
they're getting beat at their own game, and that's just
(04:33):
where we need to be in this country.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
Well, let me ask you this. Can you outline for
my listeners some of the things that you reveal in
the parallel election and some of the evidence that you
presented to the court in this lawsuit? Is she there?
Leah see if you can get her back on Joe,
(04:59):
apparently we've lost the connection. My apologies to the listening
audience for that. I was just getting ready to get
into the details on this anyway. It's the parallel election
at blueprint for deception. I can have Joe at a
link to that on my blog page fifty five careca
dot com. While he's trying to get her back, apparently,
he goes into great detail with what is described as
(05:20):
irrefutable evidence the amassive election fraud that was perpetrated against
the citizen around November twenty twenty in the general election,
specifically in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Unprecedented fraud result of the
installation of an illegitimate government. She writes, so, along with
Gregory Strengths and Leah Hopes, shows you what was done
and by whom It's called parallel election because obtaining fraudulent
(05:42):
results they manufactured required the wholesale substitution of fake ballots
for authentic ones. You got her back, Joseph, Yes, she has. Leah,
I'm here.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
I don't know what happens.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
It's yeah, well maybe it is. We'll let people fester
on that one way. I was just reading the description
of your book The Paril Election, I was going to
ask you if you would please just sort of recite
some of what is described as irrefutable evidence that you
had showing that these fake ballots were substituted for authentic ones.
It sounds unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Yes, So what we had witnessed on election day, Greg
is experienced obviously in fraud, and what he was looking
for specifically is where the cameras were not and where
the ballots were being ingested. There's multi levels in the
counting center and what he was trying to understand was
the delta, and that's what you start with what you
(06:39):
end with. And what we saw is that there was
a a back room where these mail in ballots were
being processed in canvas and no one was allowed back there.
And what we figured out was is that they're ingesting
fake mail in ballots into the system that have no
chain of custody. They're using removable media, you know, USB
(07:02):
drives in order to insert you know, fake votes into
the tabulation servers. It's very convoluted, but we do explain
it in the Parallel Election. We don't just explain the fraud,
we explain the who, the what, the where, and the
When we give pictures, it's large font for those who
have a hard time seeing. But we really do get
(07:24):
into everything from start to finish, and that includes it.
You know basically that this was a plan about I
don't even know about twenty fifteen when it came to
taking down President Trump. So it really is detailed. We
do not hold back. We give links to our evidence.
(07:45):
We've submitted that evidence into multiple courts. We've won several
cases hearings, and actually we're the last remaining election fraud
lawsuit in the country and we will be heard between
November fourth and November eighth, twenty twenty four, in the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
Wow. Nothing like putting it off till roughly election day
before you get some definitive word on Yeah. Okay, well,
let me ask you this. The allegations that are set
forth in the parallel election, this is exactly what you
were sued over and you prevailed because you brought forth
the information that you have documented in the book and
you put it in front of the court and they
(08:27):
basically threw out his claim against you. So this is
an era of judicial support around it based upon the litigation.
You just got through fighting.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
That is correct. We put it in their face and said,
you know, dispute it. We're telling the truth, and they
could not. And it was so bad that they ended
up using a dead witness in order to corroborate the
plaintive's claims. They actually were trying to use an expert witness,
the same expert witness that they used in the Egen
Carol case. They submitted false ovam udens. It was really awful,
(09:03):
and we've been trying to expose the lawfair and the
tactics and the lies that they use, and were demanding
attorneys to fight back against this and protect people's rights
in order to prevail in these courtrooms. I mean, you
have to be able to fight the way that they fight,
and you have to do it better than they do.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
Well, it's interesting at least you had standing to move
forward with this. These are the kind of allegations that
Donald Trump was making, but they never saw the light
of an actual proceeding. Their discovery was never entered into
In many of the cases where they claimed the election fraud,
they were just summarily thrown out on the grounds that
whoever filed the lawsuit didn't have standing to sue. So
(09:43):
none of the information that you brought forth in your
book and in this lawsuit was able to see the
light of trial or hearing.
Speaker 2 (09:51):
Right So the facts were unable to be presented right
in front of a jury. So you know, there's I
have a lot of opinions about that. And the things
that I saw, including the R and C lawyers that
were hired in twenty twenty, were placed there for a
particular reason, and that was to stop any kind of
court proceedings to go forward. And I could give you
(10:11):
countless examples of the people that I know and spoke
to from the RNC that were attorneys that were one
hundred percent not working for the country and we're not
working for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
Yeah, well, we know there's a lot of Republicans out
there that have a certain amount of disdain for Donald Trump,
and of course you can bring that in in terms
of how well or poorly you defend someone to shame
that that reality exists. But it does. Now is this thing,
I mean the election? I want to say shentan against
my favorite word to describe these types of things. But
(10:43):
this fraud that you uncovered, now, has this been referred
over to it like a criminal attorney, like a prosecuting attorney,
or a US Department of Justice attorney. I know you
might laugh at the idea of Department of Justice looking
into it, but has it been referred for further criminal inquiry.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
We have actually provided with the lower declarations to the
House Judiciary Committee, to Jack Smith, to Merrick Garland, to
District Attorney of Delaware County Jack Stolsteimer, to former Pennsylvania
Attorney General Josh Shapiro. We have filed former or excuse me,
we have filed formal criminal charge referrals about Bill Barr,
(11:20):
Christopher Ray, Josh Shapiro, former US Attorney Bill McSwain. I mean,
I could go on, and the reason why it's not
only is it basically just putting it in their face,
but it doesn't allow them to have plausible deniability that
these things exist. And on top of it, it is
exculpatory evidence to President Trump. So if they do not
(11:42):
present it, even though they're in possession of it, then
they would be committing a Brady violation. So we know
all of this stuff. These are tactics that everyone should
be using. And just to blatantly say, well, the DOJ
is corrupt, it doesn't matter. You still have to you
have to refer it over to the law because not
everyone inside of law enforcement is a bad person. There
(12:05):
are good right they are good law enforcement, They are
good public servants, There are good judges, there are good attorneys.
So you know, we can't just throw our hands up
in the air and say, well, everyone's corrupt. You know,
that's kind of what they want you to believe and
feel helpless and hopeless. But no, you have to do
the work. You have to bust your butt. You got
to sacrifice for your country and you just have to.
(12:25):
You got to, you know, bear it and do what
you need to do in order to keep our republic.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Wow, Leah Hopps hopes rather it's the parallel election of
Blueprint for Deception. I've had my producer add your book
to my blog page fifty five carecy dot com so
folks can easily get a copy of it. So before
we part company, day Lea. And it's been a real
pleasure talking with you. And I can't think you know,
for fighting the good fight. Are you. I presume that
the election integrity issues that you disclose in the book,
(12:54):
and you are dealing with right now. Are still a
potential problem in the upcoming November election, Yes.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
They are, and the good news is that we've focused
on our our own backyard, which is Dellawa County, and
they are heavily scrutinized. There's a lot of eyes on them.
We've caught them in so many lies and deceit. Actually,
we're submitting a Supreme Court case this morning, and it's
not only us, but it is multiple counties and we
(13:22):
have joined together in order to go after these crooks
and these criminals in multiple counties in the Commonwealth of Pa.
It's going to be very hard for them to cheat
and they will one hundred percent screw up when they're
trying to commit the fraud that they did in twenty twenty.
We are also coming out with the second part of
our documentary. It's about twenty eight minutes. It's called The
(13:43):
Big Con and it will be coming out so it's
going to be very insightful and people will be able
to understand the fraud and be able to look inside
of their own counties and have an understanding before the election.
It's going to be very powerful and people will be educated,
especially if you're a poll worker or a poll watcher,
or you're sitting inside of these counting centers, you're going
(14:04):
to have a great understanding of what to actually look for.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
That is wonderful. News can't come soon enough. Leah hot Hopes.
Thank you for what you have done and what you
continue to do. The information is vitally important, and as
you just pointed out, it just points out how important
it is to have people overseeing the election and being
in there in the polls. People from both sides of
the political spectrum are entitled to be there. They should
(14:29):
be there and observing the election to make sure that
the rules are followed and no fraud is committed. God
bless you, Leah. Keep up the great work, and you're
welcome here in the morning show. Anytime you've got any
further updates, I know my listeners would be very intrigued
to find out.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Thank you so much, appreciate you.
Speaker 1 (14:43):
God bless my pleasure, God bless you. Seven fifty one
fifty five care see the talk station and you feel
like you woke up in a Banana Republic some days?
Doesn't it doesn't it? Plum type plumbing is plumbing done right.
You can count on my friends at plumb type Plumbing,
you got problems with your some pump called plumb tie.
You got problems with leaky faucets, plumb tie toil it
leaks and raining chandeliers. Always like to joke about that.
That was my emergency situation and it's easy to schedule appointment.
(15:06):
Plumtight dot com is how you do it. And I
scheduled my last appointment there for my uh my leaking
backflow valve and turned out my irrigation system had a
crack in it and that's why I was leaking. So
plumb Tight to the rescue fix that job and virtually
no time. The price is always right and the customer
service is always exceptional. That's why they enjoy an A
plus with a better business Barreau count on them. They
(15:26):
will be very good with communicating with you. They are
wonderfully wonderful in terms of how they treat you and
your home. And again fair and ethical pricing. That's always
the case with my friends at plumb Tight Plumbing Plumbing
done right. They live by that motto five one three
seven two seven tight the it te five one three
seven two seven eighty four eighty three again online it's
plumtight dot
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Com fifty five krc man
Brian Thomas News
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!