Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:08):
What's going on? Everyone, welcomeme in again to another blurry hysteria.
Mister Flora, are you kicking us? Still kicking over there? Kicking,
still kicking, Everyone's say, I'mkicking like a chicken baby. Well,
we got a doozy for are you? And it's such a doozy. We
brought in a ringer or just anoverthinker, whatever you want to call it.
Mister Kevin Christmas here Kevin. Yes, hello, you wait, you
(00:31):
know what I'm doing you a disservice? Yeah, you are doing me a
disservice. Print name is Oh god, you play that because again I forget
my name. Well, you're gonnaforget a lot of things, uh,
(00:52):
because blood's gonna rain in the streetsbecause the topic we got this week.
Either that or it's gonna get abig huh collective from the world. I
want to read you a passage fromthis and then we're gonna get into this
the Bible. Yes, it isgood, or it's going to throw a
lot of things into question. Fromthe Bible. I'd say sixteen starting with
(01:12):
a quote here, the non humanintelligence phenomenon is real. We are not
alone, Gray said. Retrievals ofthis kind are not limited the United States.
This is a global phenomenon, andyet a global solution continues to elude
US. Now that sounds like morepropaganda, except this is coming out in
the world of mainstream news today.It's coming to us an article intelligence officials
(01:36):
say US has retrieved craft of nonhuman origin Leslie Clean and Ralph Blumouthal.
Leslie Clean is a famous because shewrites shooting a lot about UFOs, but
she was one of the whistleblowers whomade everyone aware of a tip. And
Ralph Blumoithal wrote for The New YorkTimes, just a tip. Ralph wrote
(01:57):
for The New York Times for manydecades and has written about UFOs and how
they deal with things of the government. A former intelligence of visual turned whistleblower
has given Congress and the Intelligence ComputyCommunity Inspector General extensive classified information about deeply
(02:19):
convert programs. Covert that is thathe says possessed retrieved intact and partially intact
craft of non human origin. NowI sent this to you guys today.
Initial thoughts were you at so well, David, you go first? Oh?
Okay, well you go first.First thing I asked Brent was what's
(02:42):
the source. Is this a legitsource? And it's we were reading it
on the Debrief, which is anokay source for um UFO news and stuff
like this. And then, likeBrent said, Leslie Keene and Ralph Bluementthal
both have some good journalistic pedigrees totheir names, so um, but beyond
(03:04):
that, after reading it, it'sit's a very long article which is packed
with information. It's very well written. I feel like this is a pretty
legit thing. This guy has reallycome forward. I mean, it's not
just off here the Debrief. Iliked there, and several people right for
the Debrief have been on Hysteria fiftyone, so they that's I mean,
(03:27):
I've been on it. Kevin's onit right now, Brenton, come on,
well, I want to agree.You know what David said, right,
That's why I had him go first, because he could say better than
me. But also, um,you know, Brent, I know that
you had invited me to be aguest host on another possible upcoming episode of
Hysteria fifty one, in which Idid some reading along the same lines as
(03:50):
this, And you know, I'vealways been pretty goddamn skeptical about the whole
thing, not that I think don'tthink that there are other life forms,
because of course there are, butthat people are seeing these things. The
little bit of reading I did thatyou've shared with me really made me rethink
that. And then so I guessit's to have this. And then an
(04:10):
actual whistleblower going to Congress and sayingthis, it seems pretty legit to me
as well. So he says,I'm just going to read some pieces of
this the information, he says hasbeen illegally withheld from Congress. He filed
a complaint alleging that he suffered alegal retaliation for his confidential disclosures that are
being reported here for the first time. Other intelligence officials, both active and
(04:35):
retired, with knowledge of these programsthrough their work in various agencies, have
independently provided similar, corroborating information,both on and off the record. Meaning
some people that are really in thegovernment and have a pedigree you can look
up, you can vet them,are coming forward and saying, yeah,
this is true. So a littleon this guy, this whistleblower, David
(04:59):
Charles, how do you want tosay? His last name? Grouse gr
Usca two thirty six decorated former combatofficer in Afghanistan, veteran of the National
Geopatial Intelligence Agency NGA and the NationalReconnaissance Office n R, and I'm sure
a bunch of other acronym places.He served as a Reconnaissance Offices representative to
(05:20):
the United Aerial Phenomenon task Force fromtwenty nineteen to twenty one, and from
late twenty one to July at twentytwenty he was in GA's co lead for
UAPH Yeah, twenty twenty two,thank you, twenty twenty. From late
twenty twenty one to July of twentytwenty two, lead of co lead of
(05:40):
UAP analysis and its representative to thetask force, meaning he was the guy
with his finger on what was beingbrought in. And he says. The
task force was established to investigate whatwas once called unidentified flying objects now UAPs,
identified Anomalous phenomenon or whatever you wantto say. Up. The task
force was led by the Department ofthe Navy under the Office of Under Secretary
(06:05):
of Defense for Intelligence and Security.Man. There's a lot of names in
this has since been there's offices.Yeah, this article has its own voice.
Yeah. It's since been reorganized andexpanded into all Domain Anomaly Resolution Office
to include investigations of objects operating underwater, which is well usos, which are
(06:29):
very much just as Bob Hope shows, not not exactly. Okay, that's
the problem and I'm not making funof Kevin is that is to go to
anytime these things are brought up.And I think that's the media when these
things were brought up, and likethe um, the tic tech stuff,
it would be on like the regularnews and they go aliens anyway, No,
(06:54):
and I think it's funny, justlike they did for on fuck thirty
two. Yeah, so we werelast night. We were actually on Fox
News Fox threte to Chicago and theydid a story on David and I and
HYSTERI fifty one and it was verygood. It's a really good story.
Yeah, it was great. Acouple things, Brent, you should always
make fun of me, make funof me more. And um, so
(07:17):
what does USO in this context standfor unidentified submerge objects? I ever heard
that in my life? Yeah,So, because you don't listen to this
show because it's half the ship now. Um. I like I like this.
I like that they're grouping it alltogether now and they've given it an
acronym. That's a lot easier andmore fun to say than UFO or UAP
(07:40):
or USO. We get now aDAR. Yeah, all Domain Anomaly Resolution
Office ADARO a DAR. Oh well, and did you see also, just
to kind of add on to whatyou're saying, what all the people are
saying U Carl E. Nell arecently retired Army colonel and current aerospace executive
(08:01):
who was the Army's liaison for theUP Task Force from twenty twenty one to
twenty twenty two and worked with Grus. I think we said there characterizes Grouse
as quote beyond reproach end quote.Yeah, and there's a photo of him,
So that's that's a pretty heavy i'dsay. So. Uh. Well
that they make on the back orwhatever you want to call it. Yeah,
(08:22):
they make a big deal in thearticle about mentioning several times that Grouse
is beyond reproach like every one ofhis co workers, everybody's who who's works
UP. They can't see him asbeing a liar. Yeah, they say
he is. Uh, he islegit, and he is honest and moral
to the degree. Yeah, here'san interesting quote. He's as honest as
(08:46):
Lance Armstrong I'm just kidding. That'snot in there. Oh wait wait sorry,
uh Neil Armstrong, Sorry Neil Armstrong. Yes, get this too.
This is an interesting one. Inthe SAME's cleared for publication by the Pentagon
in April. Gross asserted that UFOlegacy programs have long been concealed within multiple
(09:07):
agencies, nesting UAP activities in conventionalsecret access programs without appropriate reporting to various
oversight authorities, which is what weall knew. Yeah, or at least
his thought was true, because youwere going to tell me that they haven't
looked into this since Blue Book.That's terrifying if they hand, I mean,
(09:28):
this is what we've always been sayingabout compartmentalization, right, Yeah,
they had several things working on it. Nobody knows what the right hand's doing,
you know, the left hand doesn'tknow what the right's doing. Kind
of thing. He's he's so thisguy, that's what's happening since twenty twenty
two, has been going to Congressand doing recorded classified information transcriptions, giving
(09:50):
them hundreds of pages hours of justeverything that was going on. He came
everything but physical stuff, right,because he does not have of that.
He can only tell you what hehad seen and so this is basically on
the record, just confidential, iswhat you're saying. He's told all this
to Congress over many hours. Yeah. Well, and the reason he went
(10:13):
forward, he says, individuals inthese UAP programs approached me in my official
capacity and disclose their concerns regarding amultitude of wrongdoings such as illegal contracting against
the federal acquisition regulations and their criminality. And this impression of information across a
qualified industrial base in academia, meaningthe powers that be are hiding this from
(10:35):
their superiors, from from people thatcould use this in education, from people
that could use this in aerospace.Things like that there is a breakdown,
which means that's almost shadow government eightor or there's you know, something's going
on where you know the right handdoesn't know what the left hand's doing.
(10:56):
I don't go ahead, go ahead, Vin, Sorry, Oh, I
don't know how many times I haveto tell you this. Everything that you
guys talk about on the show isreal, every fucking thing, and this
just proves it. Brent and David. But really my eyres towards Brent here,
go ahead, David. Sorry,I think this is um really kind
(11:16):
of fascinating in the sense that whenwe talk about let's say, for example,
the moon landing, and people sayit's fake. They we we always
say to that there's too many peopleinvolved for this to be to have been
kept a secret and been kept thatway for so long, this kind of
(11:39):
throws a wrench in that, Yeah, because how many people know about this
or don't you know? Yeah,and this feels well, I mean,
obviously it feels a lot more realthan fake moon landing conspiracy, but this,
you know, this, this feelslike it's got some weight to it.
Right, Let's set the break.When we come back, I'm gonna
(12:01):
give this guy a little more credenceand we're gonna break this down a little
bit more. That's coming up afterthe break. I'm blurry hysteria, more
like Fortunate Son, Proud Mary WaterRevival. Yeah, Born on the barn
Man for those of you at home, just a little peek behind the magic.
(12:26):
David was just singing Born on theBayou for six straight hours. But
we gotta go back. I gottago to the bathroom. So we were
talking about this guy's pedigree. Intwenty twenty two Performance Evaluation, Laurie A.
Potter. She's the Deputy chief ofStaff for Intelligence, Headquarters, Department
of the Army. So yeah,described Neil, another new whistleblower, as
(12:50):
the guy who was on the taskforce with Gross as an officer of the
strongest possible moral compass, meaning thepeople that are coming through in doing this,
Um, they're not Joe Schmo,who's uh seems to be upset with
the militarian and striking back or somethinglike that. So, but is he
an officer and a gentleman that isyet to be determined? Male names?
(13:16):
What was the name you said shewas talking about? About? So this
is another person that he had workedwith. Um, I think it's the
Ken Neil that the dude I quotedearlier exactly. So he is because there's
a Carl Neil. No, didI say Neil? Did I say Ken
Neil? Yeah, it's Carl Nell. I'm sorry we're getting the right name
(13:37):
anyway. Um, when you havemultiple agencies and sting up activities in conventional
SAP c AP programs, both asrecipients of exploitation related insights and for operational
reasons without appropriate reporting to various oversightauthorities, you have a problem. This
(13:58):
is from Gross said, referencing tothe highly secret special access programs and controlled
access programs, which just means someonehas their thumb on this, and it
sounds like several someone's right. Wecould go on and on and on about
this. That's the big takeaway iswhat's going on? Um, what do
(14:18):
you guys feel is, let's saythis is true and we learned in the
next few months. What do yousee happening? Well, first of all,
I think we got to be wegotta put up a little bit of
a wall here because one of theguys talking about this is named Jonathan Gray.
(14:39):
Oh, and Gray says, thenon human intelligence phenomenon is real.
We are not alone. Hello,methinks the lady doesn't protest too much,
mister Gray alien, Um, Ithink I think it's a amazing and it
(15:03):
does feel like we're headed towards themfinally being like, look, everybody,
stuff's going on. Here's here's whatwe have, here's what we know.
We don't think it's a threat.You know, they're going to kind of
downplay the danger of it. ButI don't know if it's going to get
us into the Federation or not.But it seems like stuff's really leak and
(15:24):
hit right and left. The damn'sabout to burst right. Well, and
you're talking about johnthan Gray. Hetalked about how in this how secrets are
necessary, but there comes the time. Yeah, and he said he more
and more people are piling on thisidea, right. Yeah, So it
says he said, you know thatthe apostles hypothesis that the United States alone
(15:45):
has both of the other nations andto maintain the secrecy for nearly a centuries
continues to prevail as a Primerican censusamong the public at large. Here's what
my hope's persuade the global populace fromthis archaic and preposterous notion and to part
actually paved the way for a muchbroader discussion. And then I love that
Grush said it's was dangerous for thiseighty year arms race, which is what
(16:08):
it is. They're they're using theseThey want weapons to continue in secrecy because
it further inhibits the world's populace tobe prepared for an unexpected non human intelligence
contact scenario because they're saying it's notreal and it's become a joke, which
is something that we know that thegovernment did, whether they had it or
(16:30):
not they used it. You know, they had to change it word UFO
because it became a joke. Yeah. Um, well, I'm gonna take
your question that you ask Brent.I'm just going to shorten it a little
bit. I'm gonna cut it offwhen you said, what do you guys
feel? I feel a lot ofthings, Brent. You No, you
know, I think he's our GuyanaTroy. He's an EmPATH that's just doesn't
(16:52):
have the same knockers yet you.Um, you two are obviously much more
well versed on this, this wholearea of expertise, etc. But like,
for example, a tip you whenwas that kind of brought out in
the whistle? You said, likethis, Leslie, well, that is
(17:12):
really interesting that you don't know becausethis has been so A tip was something
that they found out. They fundedover twenty two million dollars into a program
that officially didn't exist, all right, so, and I think it was
it ended in like twenty twelve.It came to the world's eye in around
twenty twenty when that whole tic TACscenario and everything that was going on.
(17:37):
And it was a Department of AdvancedAerial Threat Identification Programs, So what it
stood for. Okay, so itcame to light, is what I'm saying.
I didn't remember when it was liketwenty seventeen, I think is when
it came to light and we startedtalking about it more, you know,
and like around twenty twenty. Alot of this was looked at more during
when people were in quarantine and stufflike that, you know, but it
(18:00):
started coming According to the Department ofDefense, I just looked up as his
A type expired in twenty twelve,after five years, except reporting suggests that
it went on through a lot longerthan that, you know, and what
you know, so it is whatit's going to be a lot more they're
gonna deny I assume. I don'tknow if they're going to be able to
deny this for that long. Ifit is true, well they maybe.
(18:27):
I think Congress is really starting togo, what the fuck are you not
telling us? And this is aboth bipartisan, both side of the aisle
are both going and we want toknow. And they they mentioned in the
article that the twenty twenty three NationalDefense Authorization Act, the language in it
(18:48):
was drawn up by Kirsten Gillibrand andMarco Rubio, both senators, one Republican,
one Democrat, and then it wassigned into law by Biden it last
December twenty two, and that thelanguage is supposed to protect informants from retaliation
(19:08):
because for this stuff, because theyOkay, here's the thing. You're a
congressman, your senator, and yourin power and guess what you find out
you don't have any power or people. Okay, so you're on these committees
oversight communities, these things you findout, Okay, well, I'm supposed
to the military, this acronym.That acronym is supposed to be answering to
(19:32):
me. And you find out they'renot only hiding stuff, they're hiding fucking
alien tech, non human tech,maybe non human people, vehicles, both
intact and partial. And this isn'tjust the US. It's all over the
world, and it's not just theUS suppressing it. And that's, as
they were saying, kind of abullshit theory. That's a tough pill to
(19:52):
swallow. So they're coming forward andbeing like, uh no, like we
want to know. And that's somethingthat for a long time it was protected.
Um, obviously we don't have theweapon weaponization that they're looking for yet
(20:14):
because and if this is going,this is speaking to everybody in the world,
you know, having some piece ofthe puzzle here, because I mean,
you look at Russia right now gettinggetting its ass whooped um by Now
do you think they would have ifthey had some reverse engineered tech that they
(20:34):
had recovered. Don't you think maybethey're like, well, would it be?
Powers that be aren't allowing it tobe taken in that way? I
mean, well to right into whatDavid was saying, is well, if
they had it, wouldn't they useit? Isn't Could we look at it
the same way we do nuclear weaponslike mut deterrence? Right, So like
(20:56):
they don't want to use theirs becausethen we'll use hours on them. I
don't know. Maybe that's this isa great example of how gray the world
is, right, nothing's black andwhite, and there's a For a long
time we've said that people don't wantto disclose things. The government keeps this
for a number of reasons. Thisjust I think doubles that. Yeah,
(21:21):
it doubles down on the fact thateverybody in the world's working on but there's
not really anything yet to say,but everybody wants to keep it hush hush
because they don't want it's something somebodyto be more advanced than others. And
there's all these reasons and stuff,Whereas this guy's saying, if if everybody
just brought this out in the openand talked about it, we could advance
(21:42):
as a civilization. Right. Wegetherfrom Rush the he said, here's a
quote. They end with this.I hope this revelation serves as an ontological
shock sociologically and provides a generally unitingissue for nations of the world to reassess
their priorities. It's saying what you'resaying in a way. You know,
(22:06):
he wants this to bring people togetherand go, well, maybe oh we
should quit bickering about this, thatand the other. And because there's a
lot larger world out there. Iuse world as like you know, universe.
Yeah, they're bigger universe. Yeah. Um. But then that also
(22:27):
brings to mind, well, whyaren't they speaking to us? Like I
said, Jonathan Gray, it's rightthere and I knew it. You got
great again. Oh boom, Ican't believe you have that recording on my
(22:51):
laugh still us. There are manymany great quotes in this and it's just
it's all in information a very littlefiller. I think, yeah, I
really think that this is something.And of course we're gonna have the link
in the show, not us readit. It's worth, it's long,
it's it's not it's it's cool.It's uh, it's really really neat.
(23:14):
I think it's going to explode herethis week. It just came out to
me. I hope so, um, and I hope that this gets talked
in the mainstream media as much asit should be. Um, and we'll
see. I actually, as we'vebeen on here, I quickly went to
a website, an aggregate website thatjust takes the main headlines of the day,
(23:34):
just to see if that had showedup there yet. Um, it
hasn't. That's from listening. Butwouldn't wait. I didn't even look because
you just sent this to us.We were here doing a sad times and
then you were kind enough to inviteme on when was this published? I
know it's today, like this morning, okay, this morning. It just
(23:56):
came out this morning. Yeah.Uh. Non human origin crafts are held
by the nations of the world andhave been for eighty plus years. Is
what people that have firsthand knowledge andcan be vetted to at least been in
those positions. Are telling Congress that'syour takeaway. The material includes intact and
(24:18):
partially intact vehicles, So we canonly hope they have Luke's landspeeder. That
is true. What if that's allwe get out of Luke's landspeeder, Well,
we can all go to yeah,big tires, keeping that under wraps.
Man. They do talk about Stanfordprofessor Gary Nolan, which his name
(24:42):
has popped up in these circles before. Um, yeah, and he's he's
talked about, you know, justthink of something to advance civilization scientifically,
something as small as he says,a grain of silicon or germanium. It's
the underpinning of integrated circuits that underliecomputation and now you know AI. And
(25:06):
he says, you know, somethingeven as small as that, if you
could get that out of these materialsand stuff, it can change the course
of technology and civilization all that kindof stuff. And he's right, like
how it's got to be super hardand frustrating to try and reverse engineers something
like that. You know what Imean? Right? You have no I
clue what it is or have neverseen it before how it works trying to
(25:29):
replicate that it's got to be tough. I was trying. I'm m I
was thinking in here somewhere now Iread it earlier and I send you guys,
and it's been a couple of hours. They were talking about, you
know, how they knew they therefrom other you know, there was elements
and things that are not of thisworld. How they knew it was not
(25:52):
of this world. It's somewhere inthere, and they were talking about this.
Um anyway, it's we're not goingto break this down for you because
we're just skimming over and we wantedto get this out to you. Literally,
were putting it out late today becausewe wanted to get a came out
this morning, so I wanted toget this out. So read it.
Let us know, head to HysterianNation and head to blurry Photos. Let
(26:14):
us know what you guys think,let us know your thoughts. You're concerned
what this means to you. Whatdo you guys see this meaning to the
world, Because it's an interesting,interesting, and truly a world shaping event
if this is true, and it'ssomething that we've you know, believed for
a long time, but to haveit come out and be true it's still
(26:37):
like a like a I don't knowif it's a breath of fresh air or
scary and terrifying or all of theabove. Yeah, I would say all
the above. Yeah yeah, souh yeah. Kids, read it,
talk about it, tell everyone youknow, and get people talking about this.
We'll see you next time. IBlurry Hysteria by