October 21, 2025 • 28 mins
Left-wing streamer Hasan Piker is crashing out on camera and lashing out at his fans amid his latest scandals. I break it down in this episode of the Brad vs Everyone podcast. Plus, a TikTok "comedian" attacks JK Rowling and a Trump nominee's unhinged texts get exposed.
Send me a voice note: https://www.speakpipe.com/bradvseveryone
Check out the merch: https://bp-shop.fourthwall.com/
Support My Show: https://linktr.ee/bradpolumbo
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I just I hate my life. I hate streaming, I
hate socialism. I hate every single person who thinks that
the peak of activism is just being the most annoying
holier thou, holier than thou, the most ultimately woke leftist.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Today is a day that ends in why so left
wing streaming star Hassan Piker is losing his absolute mind.
We're going to break the latest drama with Hassan down
and so much more on today's episode of The Brat
Versus Everyone Podcast, my daily show where I take on
(00:33):
the craziest stories from across the Internet and social media,
all from an independent perspective. Guys, we have talked about
Hassan lately. I know a lot of you guys. This
is Hassan Piker, the big left wing twitch streamer, internet celebrity,
self described socialist radical. Anyway, we've talked a lot about him.
I'm getting Hassan fatigue. I'm not going to go into
(00:56):
more of the allegations about him shocking his dog, although
there are some updates on that with the company that
makes the caller actually responding to an inquiry and saying
that yes, that does appear to be the shock capable
collar so his lies and gaslighting aren't adding up. I've
also seen pictures of sores and open cuts on his
old dog from the kind of collar he was using,
(01:17):
so the evidence continues to mount. But that's not even
what I want to talk about today. There's a really
interesting phenomenon playing out where we saw this a little
bit with Dean Wethers, the TikTok star, who is constantly
getting attacked by his own fan base, and now Hassan
is starting to fight with his diehard fans and crash
out on them because even he as left wing as
(01:39):
he is, is feeling suffocated by their kind of identity,
politics and wokeness. You know it's bad, but it's too
much for his on Piker right. Anyway, he made some
sort of point about zoron Momdanni and everyone coming together
to support the socialist revolution or whatever, and he started
getting lectured by people in his chat about how he
(01:59):
did understand black women or something, and then he had
a little crash out on camera.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Let's take a look, well and take can you shut
the up when it comes to black folks? You really
don't want to talk to talk about us unless it
comes from voting. When is the last time you spoke
about Sudan, I'm gonna e through you. Any other black
folk want to engage in radical activist language in this language,
in this.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Chat, guys, just pause for a second to in case
you're just listening. He just banned this person permanently from
his chat, I believe, and they had been a longtime supporter,
So he is, he's really fed up after this person
told him to stop. You don't understand black people's perspective
or whatever the typical woke talking point is. Yeah, he
he didn't take that.
Speaker 4 (02:43):
Well.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Imagine just like banning long time paid supporters of yours
because they say one thing you don't like. I would
not do that, but hey, that's just me chat.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
Suck my fink. Okay, you stupid fucking rad live, get
the out of here, Get the out of my chat.
I think you have a pass in here to speak
like this. Get the fuck out of here. You think
I'm gonna fucking baby you go ahead go post a
clip about how much about white supremacist I am. Suck
(03:13):
my annoying dumb god damn dude. This kind of fucking,
this kind of attitude is so insanely repulsive, Like what
the fuck do you think.
Speaker 2 (03:25):
This is funny to me? Because, holy crap, he is
crashing out. Guys, I had to edit this clip beforehand
and censor out all the expletives so my videos don't
get demonetized talking about this, he went off. I understand
that's part of Hassan's aesthetic, is like, oh, I'm like
a dirt bag leftist, I'm not PC whatever, But this
was overboard and it does give a little bit unstable
(03:49):
when just one annoying and I admit it's an annoying
and dumb comment. You don't understand black people's perspective. Yeah,
of course everyone has different perspectives, and your identity doesn't
determine your perspective, and there is no one and black
people perspective. But two things. One is that why allowing
it to affect you this much and crashing out on
stream like this just shows I think that you're not
(04:10):
in control of your emotions. And then two, I mean,
you specifically cultivated a base of online leftists as your
diehard audience that you've made millions from, and then you're
surprised that they're insufferable and woke. I don't know what
else did you expect sir, what are you new here?
(04:30):
Did you not know the type of people that you
were engaging with and getting to join your community, because
it seems to me like he was happy to exploit
these people and build up his fan base with them
and make himself millions and make himself this important political figure,
all based off of their attention and fandom, but he's
actually despised them all along. All right, let's keep watching here.
(04:53):
Do you think you're doing.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
We're talking about creating a larger broad people back movement
and creating solidarity, and you immediately got root dot com
article regurgitators in here instantly being like, uh, sweetie, you
don't understand black people.
Speaker 3 (05:12):
Shut the f up.
Speaker 1 (05:14):
That attitude left a long time ago. It doesn't work. Okay,
keep advocating for your own fandomize then standpoint theory as motherfuckers.
Oh my god. Every time this ship pops off, there's
like a million people in the chat being like, uh, actually,
(05:34):
we're not rocking with those folks because they're not rocking
with us. Like I get it, dude, Okay, yeah, you're
you want to be selfish? Okay, fine, who cares?
Speaker 2 (05:43):
So there's a lot there. He is very clearly saying that, actually,
it's not just this one commenter, it's a lot of
his chat that engages in this kind of identity politics
that he hates. And it doesn't surprise me, actually that
he hates this kind of identity politics, because true socialist
leftists usually are more concerned with class warfare and Marxism
(06:03):
and they don't care so much about the kind of
social progressive identity politics stuff that even sometimes you ad
as counterproductive or distraction from, like the class war and
destroying rich people and successful entrepreneurs and all that. And
so it doesn't shock me that he feels that way
at heart, but it is fascinating you see him basically say, yeah,
(06:23):
most of my audience is insufferable and terrible, or huge
portions of my chat are just succumbed to identitarian brain rot.
But there's no accountability for the role he has played
in contributing to that by spoon feeding these people woke
propaganda for years. I mean, he has engaged in all
sorts of you know, parroting and guests and running videos
(06:46):
and clips that all push the identity stuff a fair amount.
And then he's going to be shocked and he's pandered
to all these groups, and then he's going to be
shocked that those people comprise his fan base. Two plus
two equals four. But I don't know what you expect,
but it is funny to hear him and I kind
of agree with him. That's the weirdest thing. I'm listening
to this rant, and I'm like, I would never be
(07:07):
that vulgar, but and you're a little bit of a hypocrite,
but you're not wrong. Like he's trashing on standpoint theory,
which is a what refers to kind of a progressive
or woe kind of academic viewpoint or perspective that says
that your perspective is determined and shaped by your identity
and where you stand from. And I think it's bullshit, right.
(07:29):
I think your identity or what boxes you check off
on the census do not determine your perspective. And I
think people who check off all the same boxes can
have drastically different perspectives because it's really more your experience
and values, not your immutable traits that determine it. But
he's just like crapping on left wing dogma now, and
(07:50):
that's just an interesting development. But he really does seem
to hate the situation he's found himself in. And it's
fascinating to see because he has a life that most
people could only dream of, just sitting in his chair
and watching clips and eating food on camera and making
millions of dollars and living in a massive mansion. But
he seems so unhappy and he seems to so despise
(08:13):
the fan base he's cultivated. It's really remarkable, and he's
as these scandals continue to catch up with him, because
when you build a fan base of like neurotic radical
woke scolds, you then can't be shocked when they treat
you as if they are neurotic, radical woke scolds, and
even not neurotic or not woke scholds, but just people
(08:35):
who get upset with legitimate things like how he's mistreated
his dog. But he is now really really spiraling and
crashing out, and it's remarkable to see. I'm going to
show you a second clip here where he loses his mind,
and we're gonna take a look at that. But first,
do make sure you subscribe to the like button comment
YadA YadA, yeah, please do sending your voicemails for my
(08:59):
voicemail Friday apisodes where I react to your woldkar stories,
I give you personal life advice, and I answer questions
that you guys have for me. The link to send
in one of those is in the description. And if
you enjoy my nonpartisan commentary the way I criticize the
left and the right, please do consider becoming a Channel member,
because it's so much harder to just build up a
big audience when you actually are independent and a critical thinker.
(09:21):
So huge thanks to the Channel members that already are
signed up, and please more do sign up if you
are able to. Now, let's look at this second clip
from Hassan where he really is losing his mind on camera,
just over and over again. It's remarkable stuff. Let's look.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
I can't stand any of you dumped in this goddamn chat.
Oh my god.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
I hate I hate the left.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
I hate liberalism. I hate everything that's going on every
single day of the god damn week. I just I
hate my life. I hate streaming, I hate socialism. I
hate every single person who thinks that the peak of
activism is just being the most annoying holier thou, holier
than thou, the most ultimately.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Woke leftist is just it. You did it. You did it.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
You have unlock of nihilism within me. Okay, blackpilt. Nothing
will ever get better. We are never gonna make it out.
We can't even have a normal, non hostile, godamn conversation
on any of these issues. Everybody just simply wants to
chirp into the wind because they have no power, and
they recognize their utter powerlessness in the face of unjustifiable
constructs that we exist under. And the best possible thing
you can do is just be goddamn annoying.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
Okay, I one hundred scient thing you And so now
we get to a really interesting part where you're wondering, right,
maybe Hassan is upset because outsiders are coming in to
troll him or whatever. But no, he hates his own audience,
and he even says the people he hates the most
are his long term supporters. Listen to this, I.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
One hundred said, Thus, just something go on, So only mude,
what do you mean? The most annoying people are literally
like the forty months subscribers. The person that caused me
to spiral just now is Hi digitoal Offliner or whatever,
And that is like a routine nuisance and an offliner
in this community. Okay, he is a consistent voice of nuisance. Okay,
what are you talking about. The people that actually brick me,
the people that actually cause me to spiral out of
(10:58):
control are always the people that have been in this
community for years who never shut the up.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
So I find this hilarious, and I have to admit
that his tears are kind of delicious. But Hassan is
currently in the finding out stage after effing around for
so many years of cultivating a radical left wing fan base,
and now even he can't stand these people. And that's
(11:25):
why I've said this before over the years. I'm so
grateful that I started in conservative media and then have
moved more towards the center more because if you had
ever tried to stay in the good graces of kind
of left wing, woke online consumers and viewers, or even
in a mainstream media company, it must be exhausting constantly
(11:48):
trying to stay in their good graces, and then no
matter how hard you try, it's never going to work
because they're so neurotic and so obsessive and constantly microanalyzing everything.
But this is what you signed up for, So I
don't know what to say to us on other than
enjoy the bed, lying in the bed that you made
for yourself and maybe try logging off for a while.
(12:10):
What do you guys think? Let me know in the comments.
Make sure subscribe like YadA YadA.
Speaker 5 (12:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
Now we gotta check in on TikTok because shocker, they're
being unhinged over on the clock app again on TikTok,
and this time there's a alleged comedian who just made
a video bashing JK Rolling that I guess maybe I
just missed the funny part. I don't know. You guys
will have to let me know if you've picked up
(12:36):
on the funny part, but uh I did not. This
alleged comedian's name is Margaret Chow. I'd never heard of her,
but apparently she's of some note. Let's listen to her
rant about JK Rowling.
Speaker 6 (12:49):
Shut up, JK Rowling, shut up. You're a joke. That's
why your name is JK because you are a joke.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
I'm sorry, I just want to pause there for a moment.
You're like a professional comedian, and the level of your
roast of JK Rolling is your name is JK because
that sounds spelled kind of like choke. Uh huh huh.
Speaker 6 (13:17):
Your anti trans rhetoric makes me sick. You are despicable.
I hope that when you face menopause you have to
take a lot of gender affirming care, as I do.
And when you're taking these hormones, they make your pubes
grow out so thick and hard.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
It's like, ahh what that is so weird. I already
was pausing this because I wanted to talk about how
ridiculous it is to compare like medical treatments that a
woman needs for her natural biological process of menopause. Also,
love how we're you're the feminist, but we're now menopause
shaming women. It's almost like you're acknowledging there's a biological
(13:57):
aspect to what being a woman is. But anyway, yeah,
as if that's the same as gender affirming care, it isn't.
One is a totally different kind of treatment. One treats
a natural process that happens because of your biology. The
other is an unproven, basically experimental treatment for a psychological
(14:17):
condition that is meant to actually contradict your biology and
imitate the biology of the other sex. I'm not saying
that's wrong, I've always been fine with adults doing that,
but it really annoys me when they conflate gender affirming
care with like literally any medical treatment that affects your body.
(14:38):
They're not the same thing. It is just so disingenuous.
And then why are you ranting about JK Rowling's private area?
This is unhinged. I'll just let her finish up doing
her big one though.
Speaker 6 (14:50):
Art It's like steel wool, and if anybody goes down
to eat it, they get a face full of scars.
I hope they start calling you barb wire. Shut up,
jk Rowling.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Did I just like miss the funny part. I don't
know is the comedian in the room with us? Because
nothing about this woman is funny. She just made me
slightly nauseous and made herself seem unhinged.
Speaker 7 (15:18):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (15:19):
I don't agree with everything jk Rowling says about trans issues.
She's certainly taken a rather hardline view, though again, it's
kind of hard to begrudge her that given how she's
been treated by much of the activist crowd, but zero
points were made here. Yet the comment section on her
original video is all just people being like, yes, Queen,
you ate her up. You didn't at all, and this
(15:43):
kind of discourse only makes the transactivist side seem unhinged
and radical and out of touch, as did. And this
is a related story that's been all over the internet
that I have been meaning to talk about, but I
just haven't gotten to yet, as did kind of the
response when an actress, Kira Knightley, who is involved in
some kind of upcoming Harry Potter show, was asked about
(16:05):
the controversies involving JK Rowling and seemed to laugh off
the question, causing people online to lose their ever loving mind.
Here is Kira Knightley and the clip that's gotten her
so much hate.
Speaker 7 (16:18):
I saw your voicing professor on Bridge and the new
Harry Potter audiobooks. I was worrying. Are you aware that
some fans are calling for a boycott giving JK Rowings
ongoing campaign against trance people.
Speaker 4 (16:29):
I was not aware of that, to know. I'm very sorry.
You know. I think we're all living in a period
of time right now. We're all going to have to
figure out how to live together, aren't we, And we've
all got very different opinions, so I hope that we
can all find respect.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
See, I think she just makes sense here. She's saying
she's not endorsing jk's beliefs. She did laugh at the
concerns that people have, because frankly, they're kind of ridiculous.
You want to boycott this show that has nothing to
do with trans issues and JK is only tangentially related
(17:07):
to it. And their whole line is, oh, well, if
you support that show, you're funding anti trans groups or whatever,
which is nonsense because JK already has unlimited money, so
she can already give however much she wants to give
to whatever campaigns or causes. It has nothing. If she
makes a little bit more money from this show or not,
has no impact whatsoever. So you're just boycotting an unrelated
(17:27):
show that will bring people joy that people love for
no real reason. And yeah, she's kind of right to
laugh at you, actually, but of course I think you
can imagine. And then her message about how we just
all have to get along is a good one. That's
the approach we need to take as society gets more
polarized and more divided. We do need to coexist and
get along, and God forbids somebody say that with a laugh,
(17:50):
But you can imagine how this went over online. I'll
read you some some posts that were written on Blue
Sky about Kiera Knightley after this, possibly one of, if
not the worst response I have seen from anyone involved
in the Harry Potter franchise. Wtf was that laugh about?
It's probably just an awkward laugh because she was surprised.
(18:13):
What kind of cis white privileged bullshit? Is that? F off?
Get in loser? We're canceling Kiera Knightley The fing laugh? Wtf?
Oh the fury insight of me right now?
Speaker 7 (18:26):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (18:26):
Wow, Kiera Knightley fing sucks. Wtf of fat f Kiera
Knightley f her into the sun? Kiera Knightley can get
f't And I'm being far more respectful to her than
she is to trans people. Wow. I went from having
no opinions of her or barely knowing about her, to
knowing that she is a disgusting person. Wonderful. I hope
(18:50):
somebody strews legos on every path she will ever walk.
These people seem stable, they seem normal and well adjusted.
All she said was we're gonna have to all learn
to live together despite our different opinions. They're like evil naziscum,
terrible evil human y'all might actually be the bad guys.
I don't know how to explain that to you, that
(19:11):
you might be the bad guys. But yeah, anytime Harry
Potter or jk Rowling is involved in any online conversation,
good money is on that it's going to get unhinged
very quickly. And that has been the case with Kira Knightley.
It's all over TikTok as well, people putting out videos
dragging her. I personally don't think she did anything wrong
(19:33):
at all, and I think everybody needs to get a
grip and accept that, yes, we are going to have
to learn to live, to get along with each other.
Even if other people's feelings hurt your fee fees horror,
they still have a right to have whatever opinion they have,
and you don't get to bully or shame them into silence.
Not anymore, folks, Not anymore. That's my take on all this.
(19:56):
But you guys let me know in the comments what
you think. Final story we got to talk about today,
more insanity from the far right fringe getting exposed, and
this time it's somebody who's actually been nominated to a
position in the Trump administration. Oh good, let's listen to
a clip from CBS News breaking down new reporting from
(20:18):
Politico on Paul Ingracia and his CD group chats. Once again,
it's the group chats getting exposed here, folks that have
just been reported on.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Let's look another text message controversy for Republicans, this one
involving the President's nominees.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
One of them anyway, what can you tell.
Speaker 6 (20:36):
Us about it?
Speaker 5 (20:37):
Paul In Grassia, president Trump's pick to run the Office
of Special Counsel, which is the operation that investigates whistleblower
and discrimination complaints in Gracia, is now facing a storm
of criticism over alleged controversial text messages. Politico reported yesterday
that he sent racist messages to a group chat, saying,
(20:59):
among other things, that the Martin Luther King Junior holiday
should be quote tossed into the seventh circle of Hell
and that he has a quote Nazi streak. And Grassia
does have a Senate confirmation hearing scheduled for Thursday, but
several Republican senators have already signaled they are going to
vote against him if that happens, And last night, the
(21:19):
Majority Leader John Thune says that he hopes the White
House will just pull in Grossia's nomination because he says
he is not going to get confirmed.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
Well that's for shit. Sure he already wasn't going to
get confirmed by the way. I mean, we'll get into it.
But this guy has actually said far worse things than this.
In my view, though, these things are pretty bad, and
these really the part you have to understand. It's not
just jokes, it's not just memes. I am all about
a little bit of edgy and offensive humor. But even
(21:48):
the other Republicans in this group chat when he said
Paul and Gracia said I have a little bit of
a Nazi streak in me, they did not think he
was joking based on the context. They genuinely believe that
he means that. And when you look at his public commentary,
a lot of it is espousing fascist ideas, like extremely authoritarian,
(22:09):
far right anti American sentiment. So yeah, I think he
does have a Nazi streak, and I think that's absolutely disqualifying.
I mean, I don't agree with his hate for MLK
or some of the things he said about Indian people
or other things. And frankly, yeah, I mean, we could
have a whole conversation about that. But if you're a
loyal listener to this podcast, you might actually remember this
(22:32):
guy because I covered him months ago when he was
first nominated, just and I said that he belongs nowhere
within a thousand frickin miles of the White House or
the administration because of his public comments. So for me,
everyone's like, oh, talking about this is like the big
story on political Twitter right now. Everyone's talking about this
(22:54):
leak group chat. Well, this doom him. He already should
have been doomed. Okay, he never should have been nominated.
He should have revoked a long time ago, just on
the basis of everything that was already publicly known about him.
I mean, this is a guy who says he thinks
women shouldn't be able to vote, which I think is disgusting.
I think just tells you that he doesn't view them
as equal humans, he doesn't care about taxation and representation.
(23:17):
And he actually said and this one is slightly funny
to me if meant as a joke, but again I
was meant onnronically by this crazy dude, who, by the way,
I'm sorry, I wouldn't normally say this. Very unnerving, his appearance,
very unnerving. He said that the descendants of slaves should
actually have to pay reparations to slave owners. So not
(23:39):
like the typical woke idea of reparations that I always
am against and criticize, but the reverse. And that's just
like diabolically crazy. I don't even know what to say
to that, but yeah, this dude is crazy, and for
more reasons than that. So here's a public statement from
his ex feed just in twenty twenty three. When Trump
gets back into office, he should remove his three Supreme
(24:03):
Court picks and replace them with true loyalists. That is
an unhinged thing to write, by the way, if you
think the Supreme Court's job is to be a loyalist
to a partisan politician rather than uphold the frickin law
and constitution. And I think the people he appointed, I
don't always agree with them, but I think all three
of them are qualified, respectable jurists with integrity. Anyway, he says,
(24:29):
he went on this rant about how they should have
he should replace them, which, by the way, he has
literally there is no mechanism in our constitution or our
system of government that would allow Trump to do that,
so he would have to just go full dictator mode
and I don't know, order the military to arrest them
or something. So this dude is psycho. And somebody replied
to him and said, no, I don't agree, and I
support Trump. It's not about picking loyalists. They need to
(24:53):
be true constitutionalists, to which this dude replied, Trump is
the Constitution, which is obviously not true, but is kind
of a pretty nakedly fascistic or fascist sentiment, because what
you're saying is like, our strong leader is the law
unto himself, So you're essentially saying at that point that
(25:14):
he is a king and he can just do whatever
he wants because he is the law. So from all
of this from this guy's also his association with shady
people like Andrew tait I said a long time ago
that this dude was a nut job who belongs nowhere
near the federal government. And it's such a total failing
of basic standards of vetting and decency that he would
(25:38):
ever have been appointed in the first place. I mean,
the Trump administration is sometimes just sometimes they're putting up
qualified people, but sometimes they're just putting up like fans
or people that have been loyal to them despite them
having no actual competence or qualifications, and sometimes despite them
being like insane crazy people. I mean, this dude belongs
in a patter room. He does not belong in the
(26:01):
Oval office. But I do find it funny how like
these group chats might sink him. Obviously, I think what
he said in the group chats is gross, but it's like,
how how is this even still a conversation? How is
this still even relevant? How is he ever going to
get a single vote in the Senate. I think some
of these Republican senators would have actually just nodded along
(26:21):
and voted for him, because they are that cucked. They
are actually that scared of Trump. They'll just do whatever
he says, whatever nominee he puts up, they'll vote yes for.
And that is not how our government is supposed to work.
It's totally great if they were pro Trump. They agree
with Trump's agenda, and they're going to support it, mostly
because that's what they were campaigned on and we're elected
(26:42):
to do. But they're still supposed to serve as a
check in balance and apply their own critical thinking and
logic and skepticism and scrutiny to Trump's picks. They're not
supposed to just be doormats for Daddy, but that's what
many of these Republican senators have turned into. And I mean, look,
I guess I'm glad there's like five or whatever that
are gonna sink this guy's nomination. But the fact that
(27:05):
he wouldn't get zero votes is like such a damning
indictment of everything that's going on inside the Republican Party,
where it seems like standards are just out the window.
Anything goes because you know, like there was so much
cancel culture and hypersensitivity and wokeness that now actually anything
(27:25):
is fine. That's actually also bad. That's also a recipe
for dysfunction and disaster. You still have to have some
standards when it comes to who's running the federal government,
which is just, I don't know, the most powerful organization
to ever exist in all of human history. No big deal, NBD,
who cares if you have a little Nazi streak or
(27:47):
think women shouldn't vote, or think, you know, the King
can just remove Supreme Court justices and report them with loyalists,
and he is the Constitution. Like, am I going insane?
Speaker 4 (28:00):
Who?
Speaker 2 (28:00):
I think I went insane a long time ago? Honestly,
covering politics in this country. But I can't be the
only crazy one who thinks that. No matter if you're
a mega, if you're a Republican, whatever, whatever your beliefs are,
this person should have never been nominated and his nomination
should have been revoked a long time ago before any
of these group chats. That's my take on it at least,
But I want to hear from you guys. Let me
(28:21):
know what you think in the comments below. Do hit
the like button, make sure subscribe, yeada, YadA, yeah, And
with that, guys, that'll be it for this episode of
the Brad Versus Everyone podcast. Thank you all so much
for tuning in. Please do rate and review the podcast
if you're listening on audio podcast platforms. Sending your voice
mails for our Voicemail Friday episodes and we'll talk again
(28:42):
real so
I just I hate my life. I hate streaming, I
hate socialism. I hate every single person who thinks that
the peak of activism is just being the most annoying
holier thou, holier than thou, the most ultimately woke leftist.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Today is a day that ends in why so left
wing streaming star Hassan Piker is losing his absolute mind.
We're going to break the latest drama with Hassan down
and so much more on today's episode of The Brat
Versus Everyone Podcast, my daily show where I take on
(00:33):
the craziest stories from across the Internet and social media,
all from an independent perspective. Guys, we have talked about
Hassan lately. I know a lot of you guys. This
is Hassan Piker, the big left wing twitch streamer, internet celebrity,
self described socialist radical. Anyway, we've talked a lot about him.
I'm getting Hassan fatigue. I'm not going to go into
(00:56):
more of the allegations about him shocking his dog, although
there are some updates on that with the company that
makes the caller actually responding to an inquiry and saying
that yes, that does appear to be the shock capable
collar so his lies and gaslighting aren't adding up. I've
also seen pictures of sores and open cuts on his
old dog from the kind of collar he was using,
(01:17):
so the evidence continues to mount. But that's not even
what I want to talk about today. There's a really
interesting phenomenon playing out where we saw this a little
bit with Dean Wethers, the TikTok star, who is constantly
getting attacked by his own fan base, and now Hassan
is starting to fight with his diehard fans and crash
out on them because even he as left wing as
(01:39):
he is, is feeling suffocated by their kind of identity,
politics and wokeness. You know it's bad, but it's too
much for his on Piker right. Anyway, he made some
sort of point about zoron Momdanni and everyone coming together
to support the socialist revolution or whatever, and he started
getting lectured by people in his chat about how he
(01:59):
did understand black women or something, and then he had
a little crash out on camera.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Let's take a look, well and take can you shut
the up when it comes to black folks? You really
don't want to talk to talk about us unless it
comes from voting. When is the last time you spoke
about Sudan, I'm gonna e through you. Any other black
folk want to engage in radical activist language in this language,
in this.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Chat, guys, just pause for a second to in case
you're just listening. He just banned this person permanently from
his chat, I believe, and they had been a longtime supporter,
So he is, he's really fed up after this person
told him to stop. You don't understand black people's perspective
or whatever the typical woke talking point is. Yeah, he
he didn't take that.
Speaker 4 (02:43):
Well.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Imagine just like banning long time paid supporters of yours
because they say one thing you don't like. I would
not do that, but hey, that's just me chat.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
Suck my fink. Okay, you stupid fucking rad live, get
the out of here, Get the out of my chat.
I think you have a pass in here to speak
like this. Get the fuck out of here. You think
I'm gonna fucking baby you go ahead go post a
clip about how much about white supremacist I am. Suck
(03:13):
my annoying dumb god damn dude. This kind of fucking,
this kind of attitude is so insanely repulsive, Like what
the fuck do you think.
Speaker 2 (03:25):
This is funny to me? Because, holy crap, he is
crashing out. Guys, I had to edit this clip beforehand
and censor out all the expletives so my videos don't
get demonetized talking about this, he went off. I understand
that's part of Hassan's aesthetic, is like, oh, I'm like
a dirt bag leftist, I'm not PC whatever, But this
was overboard and it does give a little bit unstable
(03:49):
when just one annoying and I admit it's an annoying
and dumb comment. You don't understand black people's perspective. Yeah,
of course everyone has different perspectives, and your identity doesn't
determine your perspective, and there is no one and black
people perspective. But two things. One is that why allowing
it to affect you this much and crashing out on
stream like this just shows I think that you're not
(04:10):
in control of your emotions. And then two, I mean,
you specifically cultivated a base of online leftists as your
diehard audience that you've made millions from, and then you're
surprised that they're insufferable and woke. I don't know what
else did you expect sir, what are you new here?
(04:30):
Did you not know the type of people that you
were engaging with and getting to join your community, because
it seems to me like he was happy to exploit
these people and build up his fan base with them
and make himself millions and make himself this important political figure,
all based off of their attention and fandom, but he's
actually despised them all along. All right, let's keep watching here.
(04:53):
Do you think you're doing.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
We're talking about creating a larger broad people back movement
and creating solidarity, and you immediately got root dot com
article regurgitators in here instantly being like, uh, sweetie, you
don't understand black people.
Speaker 3 (05:12):
Shut the f up.
Speaker 1 (05:14):
That attitude left a long time ago. It doesn't work. Okay,
keep advocating for your own fandomize then standpoint theory as motherfuckers.
Oh my god. Every time this ship pops off, there's
like a million people in the chat being like, uh, actually,
(05:34):
we're not rocking with those folks because they're not rocking
with us. Like I get it, dude, Okay, yeah, you're
you want to be selfish? Okay, fine, who cares?
Speaker 2 (05:43):
So there's a lot there. He is very clearly saying that, actually,
it's not just this one commenter, it's a lot of
his chat that engages in this kind of identity politics
that he hates. And it doesn't surprise me, actually that
he hates this kind of identity politics, because true socialist
leftists usually are more concerned with class warfare and Marxism
(06:03):
and they don't care so much about the kind of
social progressive identity politics stuff that even sometimes you ad
as counterproductive or distraction from, like the class war and
destroying rich people and successful entrepreneurs and all that. And
so it doesn't shock me that he feels that way
at heart, but it is fascinating you see him basically say, yeah,
(06:23):
most of my audience is insufferable and terrible, or huge
portions of my chat are just succumbed to identitarian brain rot.
But there's no accountability for the role he has played
in contributing to that by spoon feeding these people woke
propaganda for years. I mean, he has engaged in all
sorts of you know, parroting and guests and running videos
(06:46):
and clips that all push the identity stuff a fair amount.
And then he's going to be shocked and he's pandered
to all these groups, and then he's going to be
shocked that those people comprise his fan base. Two plus
two equals four. But I don't know what you expect,
but it is funny to hear him and I kind
of agree with him. That's the weirdest thing. I'm listening
to this rant, and I'm like, I would never be
(07:07):
that vulgar, but and you're a little bit of a hypocrite,
but you're not wrong. Like he's trashing on standpoint theory,
which is a what refers to kind of a progressive
or woe kind of academic viewpoint or perspective that says
that your perspective is determined and shaped by your identity
and where you stand from. And I think it's bullshit, right.
(07:29):
I think your identity or what boxes you check off
on the census do not determine your perspective. And I
think people who check off all the same boxes can
have drastically different perspectives because it's really more your experience
and values, not your immutable traits that determine it. But
he's just like crapping on left wing dogma now, and
(07:50):
that's just an interesting development. But he really does seem
to hate the situation he's found himself in. And it's
fascinating to see because he has a life that most
people could only dream of, just sitting in his chair
and watching clips and eating food on camera and making
millions of dollars and living in a massive mansion. But
he seems so unhappy and he seems to so despise
(08:13):
the fan base he's cultivated. It's really remarkable, and he's
as these scandals continue to catch up with him, because
when you build a fan base of like neurotic radical
woke scolds, you then can't be shocked when they treat
you as if they are neurotic, radical woke scolds, and
even not neurotic or not woke scholds, but just people
(08:35):
who get upset with legitimate things like how he's mistreated
his dog. But he is now really really spiraling and
crashing out, and it's remarkable to see. I'm going to
show you a second clip here where he loses his mind,
and we're gonna take a look at that. But first,
do make sure you subscribe to the like button comment
YadA YadA, yeah, please do sending your voicemails for my
(08:59):
voicemail Friday apisodes where I react to your woldkar stories,
I give you personal life advice, and I answer questions
that you guys have for me. The link to send
in one of those is in the description. And if
you enjoy my nonpartisan commentary the way I criticize the
left and the right, please do consider becoming a Channel member,
because it's so much harder to just build up a
big audience when you actually are independent and a critical thinker.
(09:21):
So huge thanks to the Channel members that already are
signed up, and please more do sign up if you
are able to. Now, let's look at this second clip
from Hassan where he really is losing his mind on camera,
just over and over again. It's remarkable stuff. Let's look.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
I can't stand any of you dumped in this goddamn chat.
Oh my god.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
I hate I hate the left.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
I hate liberalism. I hate everything that's going on every
single day of the god damn week. I just I
hate my life. I hate streaming, I hate socialism. I
hate every single person who thinks that the peak of
activism is just being the most annoying holier thou, holier
than thou, the most ultimately.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
Woke leftist is just it. You did it. You did it.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
You have unlock of nihilism within me. Okay, blackpilt. Nothing
will ever get better. We are never gonna make it out.
We can't even have a normal, non hostile, godamn conversation
on any of these issues. Everybody just simply wants to
chirp into the wind because they have no power, and
they recognize their utter powerlessness in the face of unjustifiable
constructs that we exist under. And the best possible thing
you can do is just be goddamn annoying.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
Okay, I one hundred scient thing you And so now
we get to a really interesting part where you're wondering, right,
maybe Hassan is upset because outsiders are coming in to
troll him or whatever. But no, he hates his own audience,
and he even says the people he hates the most
are his long term supporters. Listen to this, I.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
One hundred said, Thus, just something go on, So only mude,
what do you mean? The most annoying people are literally
like the forty months subscribers. The person that caused me
to spiral just now is Hi digitoal Offliner or whatever,
And that is like a routine nuisance and an offliner
in this community. Okay, he is a consistent voice of nuisance. Okay,
what are you talking about. The people that actually brick me,
the people that actually cause me to spiral out of
(10:58):
control are always the people that have been in this
community for years who never shut the up.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
So I find this hilarious, and I have to admit
that his tears are kind of delicious. But Hassan is
currently in the finding out stage after effing around for
so many years of cultivating a radical left wing fan base,
and now even he can't stand these people. And that's
(11:25):
why I've said this before over the years. I'm so
grateful that I started in conservative media and then have
moved more towards the center more because if you had
ever tried to stay in the good graces of kind
of left wing, woke online consumers and viewers, or even
in a mainstream media company, it must be exhausting constantly
(11:48):
trying to stay in their good graces, and then no
matter how hard you try, it's never going to work
because they're so neurotic and so obsessive and constantly microanalyzing everything.
But this is what you signed up for, So I
don't know what to say to us on other than
enjoy the bed, lying in the bed that you made
for yourself and maybe try logging off for a while.
(12:10):
What do you guys think? Let me know in the comments.
Make sure subscribe like YadA YadA.
Speaker 5 (12:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
Now we gotta check in on TikTok because shocker, they're
being unhinged over on the clock app again on TikTok,
and this time there's a alleged comedian who just made
a video bashing JK Rolling that I guess maybe I
just missed the funny part. I don't know. You guys
will have to let me know if you've picked up
(12:36):
on the funny part, but uh I did not. This
alleged comedian's name is Margaret Chow. I'd never heard of her,
but apparently she's of some note. Let's listen to her
rant about JK Rowling.
Speaker 6 (12:49):
Shut up, JK Rowling, shut up. You're a joke. That's
why your name is JK because you are a joke.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
I'm sorry, I just want to pause there for a moment.
You're like a professional comedian, and the level of your
roast of JK Rolling is your name is JK because
that sounds spelled kind of like choke. Uh huh huh.
Speaker 6 (13:17):
Your anti trans rhetoric makes me sick. You are despicable.
I hope that when you face menopause you have to
take a lot of gender affirming care, as I do.
And when you're taking these hormones, they make your pubes
grow out so thick and hard.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
It's like, ahh what that is so weird. I already
was pausing this because I wanted to talk about how
ridiculous it is to compare like medical treatments that a
woman needs for her natural biological process of menopause. Also,
love how we're you're the feminist, but we're now menopause
shaming women. It's almost like you're acknowledging there's a biological
(13:57):
aspect to what being a woman is. But anyway, yeah,
as if that's the same as gender affirming care, it isn't.
One is a totally different kind of treatment. One treats
a natural process that happens because of your biology. The
other is an unproven, basically experimental treatment for a psychological
(14:17):
condition that is meant to actually contradict your biology and
imitate the biology of the other sex. I'm not saying
that's wrong, I've always been fine with adults doing that,
but it really annoys me when they conflate gender affirming
care with like literally any medical treatment that affects your body.
(14:38):
They're not the same thing. It is just so disingenuous.
And then why are you ranting about JK Rowling's private area?
This is unhinged. I'll just let her finish up doing
her big one though.
Speaker 6 (14:50):
Art It's like steel wool, and if anybody goes down
to eat it, they get a face full of scars.
I hope they start calling you barb wire. Shut up,
jk Rowling.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Did I just like miss the funny part. I don't
know is the comedian in the room with us? Because
nothing about this woman is funny. She just made me
slightly nauseous and made herself seem unhinged.
Speaker 7 (15:18):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (15:19):
I don't agree with everything jk Rowling says about trans issues.
She's certainly taken a rather hardline view, though again, it's
kind of hard to begrudge her that given how she's
been treated by much of the activist crowd, but zero
points were made here. Yet the comment section on her
original video is all just people being like, yes, Queen,
you ate her up. You didn't at all, and this
(15:43):
kind of discourse only makes the transactivist side seem unhinged
and radical and out of touch, as did. And this
is a related story that's been all over the internet
that I have been meaning to talk about, but I
just haven't gotten to yet, as did kind of the
response when an actress, Kira Knightley, who is involved in
some kind of upcoming Harry Potter show, was asked about
(16:05):
the controversies involving JK Rowling and seemed to laugh off
the question, causing people online to lose their ever loving mind.
Here is Kira Knightley and the clip that's gotten her
so much hate.
Speaker 7 (16:18):
I saw your voicing professor on Bridge and the new
Harry Potter audiobooks. I was worrying. Are you aware that
some fans are calling for a boycott giving JK Rowings
ongoing campaign against trance people.
Speaker 4 (16:29):
I was not aware of that, to know. I'm very sorry.
You know. I think we're all living in a period
of time right now. We're all going to have to
figure out how to live together, aren't we, And we've
all got very different opinions, so I hope that we
can all find respect.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
See, I think she just makes sense here. She's saying
she's not endorsing jk's beliefs. She did laugh at the
concerns that people have, because frankly, they're kind of ridiculous.
You want to boycott this show that has nothing to
do with trans issues and JK is only tangentially related
(17:07):
to it. And their whole line is, oh, well, if
you support that show, you're funding anti trans groups or whatever,
which is nonsense because JK already has unlimited money, so
she can already give however much she wants to give
to whatever campaigns or causes. It has nothing. If she
makes a little bit more money from this show or not,
has no impact whatsoever. So you're just boycotting an unrelated
(17:27):
show that will bring people joy that people love for
no real reason. And yeah, she's kind of right to
laugh at you, actually, but of course I think you
can imagine. And then her message about how we just
all have to get along is a good one. That's
the approach we need to take as society gets more
polarized and more divided. We do need to coexist and
get along, and God forbids somebody say that with a laugh,
(17:50):
But you can imagine how this went over online. I'll
read you some some posts that were written on Blue
Sky about Kiera Knightley after this, possibly one of, if
not the worst response I have seen from anyone involved
in the Harry Potter franchise. Wtf was that laugh about?
It's probably just an awkward laugh because she was surprised.
(18:13):
What kind of cis white privileged bullshit? Is that? F off?
Get in loser? We're canceling Kiera Knightley The fing laugh? Wtf?
Oh the fury insight of me right now?
Speaker 7 (18:26):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (18:26):
Wow, Kiera Knightley fing sucks. Wtf of fat f Kiera
Knightley f her into the sun? Kiera Knightley can get
f't And I'm being far more respectful to her than
she is to trans people. Wow. I went from having
no opinions of her or barely knowing about her, to
knowing that she is a disgusting person. Wonderful. I hope
(18:50):
somebody strews legos on every path she will ever walk.
These people seem stable, they seem normal and well adjusted.
All she said was we're gonna have to all learn
to live together despite our different opinions. They're like evil naziscum,
terrible evil human y'all might actually be the bad guys.
I don't know how to explain that to you, that
(19:11):
you might be the bad guys. But yeah, anytime Harry
Potter or jk Rowling is involved in any online conversation,
good money is on that it's going to get unhinged
very quickly. And that has been the case with Kira Knightley.
It's all over TikTok as well, people putting out videos
dragging her. I personally don't think she did anything wrong
(19:33):
at all, and I think everybody needs to get a
grip and accept that, yes, we are going to have
to learn to live, to get along with each other.
Even if other people's feelings hurt your fee fees horror,
they still have a right to have whatever opinion they have,
and you don't get to bully or shame them into silence.
Not anymore, folks, Not anymore. That's my take on all this.
(19:56):
But you guys let me know in the comments what
you think. Final story we got to talk about today,
more insanity from the far right fringe getting exposed, and
this time it's somebody who's actually been nominated to a
position in the Trump administration. Oh good, let's listen to
a clip from CBS News breaking down new reporting from
(20:18):
Politico on Paul Ingracia and his CD group chats. Once again,
it's the group chats getting exposed here, folks that have
just been reported on.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Let's look another text message controversy for Republicans, this one
involving the President's nominees.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
One of them anyway, what can you tell.
Speaker 6 (20:36):
Us about it?
Speaker 5 (20:37):
Paul In Grassia, president Trump's pick to run the Office
of Special Counsel, which is the operation that investigates whistleblower
and discrimination complaints in Gracia, is now facing a storm
of criticism over alleged controversial text messages. Politico reported yesterday
that he sent racist messages to a group chat, saying,
(20:59):
among other things, that the Martin Luther King Junior holiday
should be quote tossed into the seventh circle of Hell
and that he has a quote Nazi streak. And Grassia
does have a Senate confirmation hearing scheduled for Thursday, but
several Republican senators have already signaled they are going to
vote against him if that happens, And last night, the
(21:19):
Majority Leader John Thune says that he hopes the White
House will just pull in Grossia's nomination because he says
he is not going to get confirmed.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
Well that's for shit. Sure he already wasn't going to
get confirmed by the way. I mean, we'll get into it.
But this guy has actually said far worse things than this.
In my view, though, these things are pretty bad, and
these really the part you have to understand. It's not
just jokes, it's not just memes. I am all about
a little bit of edgy and offensive humor. But even
(21:48):
the other Republicans in this group chat when he said
Paul and Gracia said I have a little bit of
a Nazi streak in me, they did not think he
was joking based on the context. They genuinely believe that
he means that. And when you look at his public commentary,
a lot of it is espousing fascist ideas, like extremely authoritarian,
(22:09):
far right anti American sentiment. So yeah, I think he
does have a Nazi streak, and I think that's absolutely disqualifying.
I mean, I don't agree with his hate for MLK
or some of the things he said about Indian people
or other things. And frankly, yeah, I mean, we could
have a whole conversation about that. But if you're a
loyal listener to this podcast, you might actually remember this
(22:32):
guy because I covered him months ago when he was
first nominated, just and I said that he belongs nowhere
within a thousand frickin miles of the White House or
the administration because of his public comments. So for me,
everyone's like, oh, talking about this is like the big
story on political Twitter right now. Everyone's talking about this
(22:54):
leak group chat. Well, this doom him. He already should
have been doomed. Okay, he never should have been nominated.
He should have revoked a long time ago, just on
the basis of everything that was already publicly known about him.
I mean, this is a guy who says he thinks
women shouldn't be able to vote, which I think is disgusting.
I think just tells you that he doesn't view them
as equal humans, he doesn't care about taxation and representation.
(23:17):
And he actually said and this one is slightly funny
to me if meant as a joke, but again I
was meant onnronically by this crazy dude, who, by the way,
I'm sorry, I wouldn't normally say this. Very unnerving, his appearance,
very unnerving. He said that the descendants of slaves should
actually have to pay reparations to slave owners. So not
(23:39):
like the typical woke idea of reparations that I always
am against and criticize, but the reverse. And that's just
like diabolically crazy. I don't even know what to say
to that, but yeah, this dude is crazy, and for
more reasons than that. So here's a public statement from
his ex feed just in twenty twenty three. When Trump
gets back into office, he should remove his three Supreme
(24:03):
Court picks and replace them with true loyalists. That is
an unhinged thing to write, by the way, if you
think the Supreme Court's job is to be a loyalist
to a partisan politician rather than uphold the frickin law
and constitution. And I think the people he appointed, I
don't always agree with them, but I think all three
of them are qualified, respectable jurists with integrity. Anyway, he says,
(24:29):
he went on this rant about how they should have
he should replace them, which, by the way, he has
literally there is no mechanism in our constitution or our
system of government that would allow Trump to do that,
so he would have to just go full dictator mode
and I don't know, order the military to arrest them
or something. So this dude is psycho. And somebody replied
to him and said, no, I don't agree, and I
support Trump. It's not about picking loyalists. They need to
(24:53):
be true constitutionalists, to which this dude replied, Trump is
the Constitution, which is obviously not true, but is kind
of a pretty nakedly fascistic or fascist sentiment, because what
you're saying is like, our strong leader is the law
unto himself, So you're essentially saying at that point that
(25:14):
he is a king and he can just do whatever
he wants because he is the law. So from all
of this from this guy's also his association with shady
people like Andrew tait I said a long time ago
that this dude was a nut job who belongs nowhere
near the federal government. And it's such a total failing
of basic standards of vetting and decency that he would
(25:38):
ever have been appointed in the first place. I mean,
the Trump administration is sometimes just sometimes they're putting up
qualified people, but sometimes they're just putting up like fans
or people that have been loyal to them despite them
having no actual competence or qualifications, and sometimes despite them
being like insane crazy people. I mean, this dude belongs
in a patter room. He does not belong in the
(26:01):
Oval office. But I do find it funny how like
these group chats might sink him. Obviously, I think what
he said in the group chats is gross, but it's like,
how how is this even still a conversation? How is
this still even relevant? How is he ever going to
get a single vote in the Senate. I think some
of these Republican senators would have actually just nodded along
(26:21):
and voted for him, because they are that cucked. They
are actually that scared of Trump. They'll just do whatever
he says, whatever nominee he puts up, they'll vote yes for.
And that is not how our government is supposed to work.
It's totally great if they were pro Trump. They agree
with Trump's agenda, and they're going to support it, mostly
because that's what they were campaigned on and we're elected
(26:42):
to do. But they're still supposed to serve as a
check in balance and apply their own critical thinking and
logic and skepticism and scrutiny to Trump's picks. They're not
supposed to just be doormats for Daddy, but that's what
many of these Republican senators have turned into. And I mean, look,
I guess I'm glad there's like five or whatever that
are gonna sink this guy's nomination. But the fact that
(27:05):
he wouldn't get zero votes is like such a damning
indictment of everything that's going on inside the Republican Party,
where it seems like standards are just out the window.
Anything goes because you know, like there was so much
cancel culture and hypersensitivity and wokeness that now actually anything
(27:25):
is fine. That's actually also bad. That's also a recipe
for dysfunction and disaster. You still have to have some
standards when it comes to who's running the federal government,
which is just, I don't know, the most powerful organization
to ever exist in all of human history. No big deal, NBD,
who cares if you have a little Nazi streak or
(27:47):
think women shouldn't vote, or think, you know, the King
can just remove Supreme Court justices and report them with loyalists,
and he is the Constitution. Like, am I going insane?
Speaker 4 (28:00):
Who?
Speaker 2 (28:00):
I think I went insane a long time ago? Honestly,
covering politics in this country. But I can't be the
only crazy one who thinks that. No matter if you're
a mega, if you're a Republican, whatever, whatever your beliefs are,
this person should have never been nominated and his nomination
should have been revoked a long time ago before any
of these group chats. That's my take on it at least,
But I want to hear from you guys. Let me
(28:21):
know what you think in the comments below. Do hit
the like button, make sure subscribe, yeada, YadA, yeah, And
with that, guys, that'll be it for this episode of
the Brad Versus Everyone podcast. Thank you all so much
for tuning in. Please do rate and review the podcast
if you're listening on audio podcast platforms. Sending your voice
mails for our Voicemail Friday episodes and we'll talk again
(28:42):
real so
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.