December 10, 2025 • 34 mins
The OnlyFans star and internet villain "Bonnie Blue" just got arrested... and I simply cannot bring myself to feel bad for her. I break it down in this episode of the Brad vs Everyone podcast. Plus, right-wing YouTube star Candace Owens' conspiracies about the murder of Charlie Kirk are getting even crazier, particularly in her latest interview with podcaster Russell Brand. FInally, the hosts of "The View" cover the Senate campaign launched by Jasmine Crockett and it does not go well.
Support My Show: https://linktr.ee/bradpolumbo
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Bonnie Blue, the star famous for betting a thousand men
in one day, faces fifteen years jail.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
OnlyFans star Bonnie Blue is in some serious trouble, but
I just can't bring myself to feel bad for her.
We're going to break this down, plus so much more
on today's episode of The Barad Versus Everyone podcast, my
daily show where we take on the craziest stories from
(00:29):
across the Internet and social media, all from an independent
political perspective. And up first, we've got to talk about
Bonnie Blue. And if you don't know who that is,
then bless your soul. You're not nearly as online as
me and not as corrupted by the modern world. But
Bonnie Blue is one of the most well known or
(00:52):
I guess you could say infamous only Fans content creators
who of course makes adult content. And she is known
because she has grown her following and actually I don't
know if she's still on OnlyFans, but at least at
one point she was. Anyways, she's built up this massive
audience of people who subscribe to her adult content by
(01:16):
doing outlandish stunts like, for example, trying to set records
for how many men she can engage with in a
certain time period and then like going to special events
called schoolies to pursue barely legals and other such stuff
that is just deeply unpleasant to observe. But she's now
(01:40):
in legal trouble with this story that's just captivated the
internet's attention because she went to Bali in Indonesia and
decided to play stupid games and is now winning stupid prizes.
Let's watch some reporting from Sky News Australia about what's
going down.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Bonny Blue, the porn staff famous for betting a thousand
men in one day, faces fifteen years jail after being
arrested in Bali. She arrived on the Indonesian island at
the start of schools and made no attempt to hide
her intentions.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Those that go into school ears and to those that
are bad ilegal, can I wait to meet you?
Speaker 4 (02:18):
And I'm in Bali, so you know exactly what that means.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
She has since been arrested along with seventeen men while
allegedly filming content. Now, as you can see, the men,
fifteen of whom were Australian, weren't too keen to show
their faces. I can't imagine why it's being reported that
Bonnie Blue may be prosecuted for allegedly breaching Indonesia's morality laws,
and if found guilty, she faces a fine of more
(02:46):
than half a million dollars and a prison sentence long
enough to make her rethink her career choices.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Then again, maybe not so if I have my way,
I would like criminalize most of what you do, and
you wouldn't have all this money, right, so obviously personals
in prison.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
Bonnie Blue was banned from Australia last year after inviting
barely of age school leaders to have sex with her
so she could post the footage online for money. Indonesia
Nune too impressed, Freya and why would.
Speaker 5 (03:19):
They be, Well, I think it's so funny how Westerners
go to Bali and they forget that Indonesia is eighty
seven percent Muslim, and in twenty twenty two they enacted
morality laws based around Islamic values that ban even things
like sleeping with people outside of marriage, cohabitation before marriage,
(03:40):
let alone what Bonnie Blue is doing, which is full
scale pornography production and she's advertising it, so I can
see why the Indonesian government was not too happy about that.
I think she was completely naive and foolish to think
she would be able to do that.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
So guys were actually only at the tip of the
iceberg with this Bonnie Blue story and Balie it gets
even crazier and some of the specific evidence against her
is quite damning, guys. So I dug into this story
more and Bonnie Blue is in some serious legal jeopardy here.
The best case scenario for her is that they just
(04:19):
deport her, but they have confiscated her passport and they
are prosecuting her, and they could also choose to pursue
that route instead, and in that case, she might be
in serious legal jeopardy because they kind of caught her
in the act of doing stuff that is blatantly illegal.
At least that's what it seems like from some of
this reporting. Newsweek reports. According to local reports, among the
(04:43):
items seized during the Bali raid or video production equipment,
her notorious blue pickup truck known as the bang Bus,
and several packets of condoms. How delightful that is. And
what's important to note there is that she, according to
this reporting, at least had video production equipment with her,
(05:05):
which is kind of damning evidence because the piece of
this that is so controversial or that is going to
get her in legal jeopardies the production of pornography, which
is illegal in Bali. They also have laws that criminalize
or prohibit consensual sex between non married people. But I
looked into it and those laws are not really enforced
(05:27):
against non residents or against tourists. Those are primarily applied
to local residents and domestic people in Bali, So that one,
it doesn't necessarily just her simply hooking up with these
people doesn't seem to be the problem. It appears that
her likely intent or maybe she did I don't know
of filming pornographic content while in a Muslim majority country
(05:52):
or region at least of Indonesia where that's illegal, could
actually end her up in a pretty lengthy prison sense
possibly so. More from Newsweek here. Videos shared on blues
Instagram page prior to the raide show her partying with
young tourists celebrating schoolies oh my gosh, diabolical, and one
(06:13):
video shows a group of men pushing the bang bus
through a Bali street after it broke down. The Bali
bang bus has run out of steam, but the Aussi
boys haven't, she captioned the post guys. I just I
keep thinking about my mother listening to this podcast and
how she's going to react to this story. Hope you're
proud of me, Mom. This is what my career has
(06:35):
come to, reading about body blues, bang bus oh boy. Okay, Anyway,
more from Newsweek here. Indonesia has some of the strictest
anti pornography laws in Southeast Asia. Under the Pornography Act, producing, distributing,
or participating in the creation of pornographic material is illegal
(06:57):
and punishable by lengthy prison sentences up to fifteen years
and substantial finds of up to six billion rupia, which
is around three hundred and fifty nine thousand dollars. So
we've got all the facts here. She does appear to be,
at least in my perception of this case, kind of
dead to write on the actual charges. And I'm of
(07:18):
two minds on this story because on one hand, I
don't actually believe that any of this should be illegal.
I don't support what she does morally or ethically. But
I don't believe that consensual sex acts or even production
of videos where everyone involves is consenting participant. I don't
(07:39):
believe that should be a crime. I certainly don't think
somebody should be put behind bars for fifteen years for
doing it. That seems disproportionate, and I don't really believe
in any of that. At the same time, though, I
really struggle to have any sympathy for Bonnie Blue, because
she played stupid games and she won supid prizes. She
(08:01):
surely knew what the laws were in Bali before she
went and did this, And yeah, at some point, you're
gonna have to deal with the consequences of your actions.
And if you intentionally go to a place to violate
their laws or know about their laws and violate them anyway,
even if those laws shouldn't exist or unjust, And we
(08:23):
could talk about that, and I might agree with you
in the abstract, You're still like not really a victim, right,
because you chose this, and you willingly put yourself in
this situation. And then you probably just assumed that being
famous would get you off the hook, and maybe it
still will. Possibly the most likely scenario here is that
she just ends up getting deported, and that would be
(08:45):
basically like and then they ban her from coming back
to Bali. That would probably be the most appropriate outcome.
But if they actually do go out and imprison her
over this. Well, I do find it funny how she's
already spoken about that on the record and she's like,
I'll just have prison group activities. Then I don't think
she actually means that. I think that's part of her
(09:05):
troll persona that she adopts to go viral and get
more subscribers and make more money. And I'm sure she's
fabulously wealthy. I'm sure she can afford all the fines
and then some. But at some point these influencers, whether
it's the of people or the rage bais or the trolls,
are gonna have to find out right because they have
(09:27):
f'd around so many times, and they have inconvenienced and
menaced the public in so many ways that at some point, like, yeah, things,
even if I don't support them in theory, are going
to happen to them, and I'm just not going to
feel bad. There's only so much sympathy to go around
in the world, and people get cancer, people are orphaned,
(09:47):
all sorts of horrible things happen to people that they
had no control over and they didn't bring about themselves.
And so when bad things happen to people who act
stupid and act a fool. It's hard to feel that
bad for them. I don't know. Am I like a
bad guy for this? I really don't think I am.
I actually think my reaction here is a pretty normal
(10:10):
and pretty typical. But I want to hear from you, guys.
I want to know what you think of the Bonnie
Blue situation. I've talked to Clarkson about it, and my
friend who I filmed the Normal Gaze channel with check
us out on YouTube if you somehow haven't discovered us with.
He is a somewhat ironic I hope it's ironic Bonnie
Blue fan and he is just devastated and he is
(10:31):
considering going out and protesting publicly with a free Bonnie
Blue sign, which I think would be incredibly amusing. But anyway, guys,
let me know what you think of the Bonnie Blue situation.
Oh what does my journalism career come to? And make
sure subscribe to the button and all of that. Now
up next, guys, We've got to check in with Candice Owens,
(10:55):
who her theories about Charlie Kirk's death continue to get Craig.
She just did an interview with Russell Brand, who was
an actor for a long time and is now in
the independent podcasting space. He's kind of kind of out
there guy. Anyway. Candace spoke to Russell and he asked
her some questions that weren't even hostile questions, but she
(11:18):
kind of made herself look rather questionable with her responses
even though they weren't even very difficult questions. And one
of them, he just asked her straight up because there's
been a lot of confusion about what exactly are you
saying and what aren't you saying when it comes to
Charlie Kirk's death. She said the military did it. The
Trump administration isn't on a TPUSA, I'll betrayed Charlie all
(11:41):
this stuff, and she somehow connected it to everyone from
Israel to Egypt, to France and beyond. So he just
asked her straight up, like, what exactly are you saying here?
And this, I mean this is hilarious. Listen to this
exchange that he had with Russell Brand.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
Do you think these things brigit Macron's true identity and
Charlie Kirk's.
Speaker 4 (12:04):
Yes, I think it's all connected, and I think in
many ways we already live in this sort of one
world government system. Maybe it's two worlds, but with in
terms of the West, I don't think there's any difference
in the governments. And that's kind of the point that
we're making and maybe why the Charlie Kirk case is
so crucial, because it's showing us that, wait, what is
the divide here between America and Israel and France? Right,
somebody in the French government alerted me to an assassination attempt.
(12:26):
Shouldn't that require a comment from the President of United States?
It was the most viral global story for three days,
and the White House has chosen not to comment. What
does that signals to the population that it's okay for
France to be involved in assassination attempts? That should alarm people.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
No, Candace, what is signals is that they don't believe you.
That the people at the highest levels of government, from
Cash Betel to Dan Bugino to Donald Trump, who you
alerted about this super duper real threat to your life
from the French government, don't think it's real. All their
intelligence and evidence does not support your crazy theories. And
(13:03):
that's why they're not taking it seriously. Not because they've
decided it is fine for the French couple to put
out a hit on an American podcaster. Yeah, which one
of those two scenarios is most likely? I don't think
it's that one, and I love the first part here.
She's asked very explicitly, is Brigitte Macrone's identity by which
(13:24):
they're referring to Cannas's theory, which, of course the Macrones
deny that brigerit Brigitte was born a man and is
a secret trans woman with a penis. Is that connected
to Charlie Kirk's death? And she says, yes, what, guys,
(13:46):
I have watched hours and hours and hours of Canvas's
content many of her episodes about this, and even her
ardent followers or people who are sympathetic to her are
really struggling to keep up with her theory because she
is simultaneously saying that this plot to assassinate Charlie, which
of course Tyler Robinson wasn't involved or wasn't the shooter
(14:09):
or a killer, rathers what she says, even though there's
so much evidence against him, involves she has suggested over
and over again that involves everyone from the FBI to
the Utah State Police, to local authorities to Turning Point USA,
to Israel to Egypt, to France to the US military.
(14:30):
All these people were involved in a plot to kill
Charlie Kirk somehow, with like a lot of random tips
to her email inbox that only she has cracked. And
for why what motivation do a lot of these people
have to engage in such a conspiracy or harm Charlie
in any way? Most of that is left unclear or
simply speculated about or taken for granted. It is crazy
(14:54):
stuff and it makes absolutely no sense, But millions of
people are just munch in the powcorn as this woman
continues to spiral further into her I don't know, postpartum
psychotic delusions of different kinds, and it's really tough to watch.
But notice how she never actually explained how it's connected.
She said, yes, it's connected, but then never connected it.
(15:16):
There's so much of that in her content. She really
is leading people astray. But then she does this thing
that really pisses me off. She hides behind while I'm
just asking questions. That's all she's doing. She's just asking questions.
Speaker 4 (15:31):
Guys, Listen, Charlie's life could have been the Truman Show.
That terrifies me more than nothing in your life is real? Genuinely,
I was expecting, like, we're all getting the old band
back together and it's going to be me and Shrump
and I'm going to have the FBI help me investigate this.
We're going to figure out what happened to my friend.
And it was like, Candas is the enemy for asking questions.
Was Charlie Kirk's life real? Is what I think I
(15:52):
cried the hardest about because how are you not fighting
for him?
Speaker 2 (15:56):
So there's something kind of wild that Candace does, which
is that in one bread she'll suggest that the FBI
is like in on the plot to kill Charlie Kirk
and fabricated text messages to frame Tyler Robinson and all
this stuff. So she thought they were discord messages and
they were text messages. She doesn't even know the facts.
That was the whole thing I covered where CNN interviewed
her and she got basic facts about it all wrong. Yeah,
(16:17):
So she'll do this and then she'll be like, but
why aren't they working with Well, girl, you just accused
them of murder like five minutes ago, So why aren't
they helping me? Would you if somebody was spreading insane
theories about you be like, yes, please come, let's work together,
let's be BFFs. I don't think so. And it does
(16:39):
bother me that Candice Owens always comes back to this,
I'm just asking questions. No, you are not. You are
not just asking questions. You have over and over again
made specific allegations and assertions, and those assertions are unfounded,
and they are often implicate people in very serious wrongdoing.
And that's not just asked questions. I mean, I'll give
(17:01):
you examples. She has definitively stated that the killing of
Charlie Kirk was a US military operation. She has directly
accused the federal government and other law enforcement of fabricating
evidence against Tyler Robinson. She has definitively stated that Turning
Point USA betrayed Charlie Kirk their friend and leader. She
(17:23):
also just said on an Instagram story, up with this
on screen yesterday, it feels like today will be the
day that the government can no longer deny it. Charlie
Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved. I can't
wait to share this information with you guys today. And then,
of course, she did not provide any sort of bombshell
evidence of that in her actual show, it was a
very long, meandering rant about this unrelated tipshoe she received
(17:46):
from a former military person that she just took at
face value. I guess I don't know, and he didn't.
It's so complicated it's hard to even explain. But she
did not, in fact have a smoking gun showing that
somehow Charlie Kirk was killed by the US military. And
so if you want to make wild accusations and claims, okay,
you have a right to do that, and we should
(18:08):
discuss them and dissect them. But what you can't do
is accuse people of grievous wrongdoing and then be like,
why are you mad? I'm just asking questions. No, you're not.
You are impugning people and making allegations against people. That's
not just asking questions. So I find this very disingenuous
(18:28):
and dishonest when people do it. I want to play
you another clip from Kandas's show about a week ago,
where she put a bunch of random men's faces and
images on screen from the event at UVU where Charlie
Kirk was killed and suggested they were involved in his
death because they were wearing the color maroon. I'm not kidding,
(18:50):
that is what happened. You don't have to take my
word for it. Here's a clip here we are.
Speaker 4 (18:54):
We have this young man, this is after the shot.
He's wearing maroon, showing you another person here sitting there
under the tree after the shot, and he's wearing maroon.
So another person here. We're going to come back to
this person who is wearing maroon because his dad is
going to say something publicly. Three people, one shot, all
of them alone wearing maroon. We're going to come back
(19:15):
to the guy at the top there who has the hat,
the darker hat on, who's wearing marooon. Just like like
to these like dropping young men all wearing maroon. We've
got this guy in the bush wearing maroon. I could
go on and on this person wear of how many
people wearing maroon. I even have a video of someone
holding a Maroon shirt. Okay, So I mentioned that quite casually,
and that thing happened where there was an overreaction for
(19:37):
no reason online. So I knew that I was on
the right track and I should probably keep going. And
I said something I think it was on X or
maybe it was on the show, and then we received
hundreds of emails from people past and presently in the
military around the world, and they said, yes, Candice, that
is military.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Well, guys, she received emails. So that really settles it,
you know, think of just think about this for a second.
Candice Owens has one of the most popular podcasts in
the world. Everything she posts on YouTube is viewed millions
of times. Millions of people listen to her audio podcast feed.
(20:15):
She put these random young men's faces on screen in connection.
She's suggesting a connection to the murder of Charlie Kirk
based on the fact they were wearing Maroon shirts. Can't
y'all see how that is, like just objectively a wildly
(20:37):
irresponsible thing to do, and certainly is a lot more
than just asking questions. You're putting a target on these
men's back. You are implicating them in something heinous, all
based on this random thing that has proves nothing. I
have several Maroon shirts, like I was wearing one when
I filmed the podcast, like yesterday or the other day.
(20:58):
It I've never been in the military. I have no
connection to the military. Maroon is just a popular freaking
color people. It is not proof of some military conspiracy.
Yet this is the level of investigation she is engaging in.
Then she's like, why doesn't the FBI want to work
with me? Maybe because you're freaking crazy, Candace, and you're
(21:19):
getting crazier and crazier and crazier. And then she does
this thing they all do where they say, well, people
are mad at me for saying insane shit, so I
must be right. That is like how you talk yourself
into genuine delusion and insanity is because it's possible that
people are upset with you because you're over the target.
But it's also possible that people are upset with you
(21:41):
because you're wildly wrong. You're being grossly irresponsible, and you're
falsely accusing people of heinous things without evidence, So which
of those is more likely? And if you just view
any time people get mad at you as proof you
are right, I don't know. Was Osama bin Laden right then,
because he sure made a lot of people mad. Like
(22:04):
it's just so bizarre, and the fact that millions of
people continue to trust this woman as a source of
information genuinely boggles my mind and makes me deeply, deeply,
deeply pessimistic about everything other than that, though she's doing
great over here, just asking questions with Candy. You guys,
(22:24):
let me know what you think in the comments, make
sure you're subscribe to the leg button and all of that.
Up next, we got to talk about a story that
I have been watching with interest over the last few
days because I love me some Jasmine Crockett. You know,
of course, I'm referring to the Democratic star congresswoman who
(22:44):
MSNBC and CNN love to prop up and put on
TV constantly. When I say I love her, obviously I'm
being sarcastic. She is a bombastic progressive, but she's not
so far left. Actual true lefties don't like her for
some of her views, but she is very much, you know, solidly,
solidly pushing the democratic narrative and mainstream positions, and she's
(23:08):
one of the most toxic and divisive and brash figures
that they have on that side. She loves to cuss,
she loves to say like very lowbrow insults about people. Frankly,
in a lot of ways, she reminds me of Donald Trump,
which is so hypocritical, because of course they're supposed to
be against that. They're supposed to be standing up against
Trump and resisting him. And then you know, half the time,
(23:29):
their hero Jasmine Crockett, sounds kind of trumpy in the
way that she speaks because it's so low brow and
so vulgar, and so personally I just, yeah, I find
her so distasteful. And then she's constantly ranting about like
mediocre white boys and all this stuff that you just
would find it to be almost an act of self
(23:49):
harm for the Democratic Party to lift her up as
some sort of leader. But they've done that, and now
she is running for the Democratic nomination for Senate in
the state of tech excess, so she actually thinks she
can win. And say what you want about Jasmine, that
girl's got self confidence to the point of narcissism and
egomania again giving Trump, but she is now running for
(24:13):
Senate statewide in Texas, of course, rather than her one
district that was blue. I believe it's been redistricted, so
that's why she can't just run for reelection. She's running statewide,
and the ladies over at the View are singing her
praises and seem to think she actually has a chance,
which is how you know they just have no idea
what they're talking about when it comes to political analysis.
(24:35):
First of all, I want to show you, guys, Jasmine's
big launch video for her Senate campaign. Tell me what
you notice about this? This is just her mean mugging
the camera while Trump quotes about her. Play. Let's listen,
how about this new one? They have their new star, Crocket?
How about her?
Speaker 6 (24:53):
She's a new star of the Democrat Party, Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 2 (24:57):
They're in big trouble. But do you have this woman Crockett?
Speaker 7 (25:01):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
I watched her speak the other day.
Speaker 5 (25:05):
She's definitely a low IQ person.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
Crocket.
Speaker 4 (25:09):
Oh man, oh man.
Speaker 7 (25:11):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Somebody said the other day she's one of the leaders
of the party.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
I think you gotta be kidding.
Speaker 4 (25:21):
Now, are they going to rely on?
Speaker 2 (25:22):
Crocket's gonna bring them big? Guys? She really thought she
ate that, like she really thought she cooked. But you
know what, I didn't see in that ad any actual
beliefs or policies or positive things about her that anyone
should support. She's just running as the person Trump doesn't
(25:45):
like who also wants to promote abortion and doesn't like
guns and wants there's chick guns and rans about mediocre
white boys. Now elect to me, Texas. That's her pitch
to Texas voter that she's going to flip the Senate
seat blue for Texas. I'm Trump's biggest enemy. He says
(26:07):
a lot of funny but half of them are true.
Things about me that aren't very nice. And I'm pro choice,
I'm vulgar, I crap on white people a lot, and
I want to restrict guns. What's not to love for
Texas voters. The whole thing to me is like as
(26:28):
somebody with just a basic I am no expert, but
I am, of course, have been a political reporter and
analysts for years, and so I have a basic level
of understanding about how politics works in this country. It's
so bizarre and it's so obviously doomed to fail. This
upcoming midterm election is almost certainly going to be a
big win for Democrats, because this is what always happens.
(26:48):
When one party wins the White House, their voters get
complacent and the other side gets really energized, and so
the next midterm election typically you see a big surch
for the other party. So you would expect Democrats to
overperform even in places like Texas, though it's unlikely they
might actually flip the seat, but they could at least
be more competitive, So it's possible that Jasmine Crockett does
(27:11):
relatively well while losing this seat. But I just the
idea that she's going to be the one to do
it seems so hair brained to flip this seat blue,
even with all the wind at her back if she
got the nomination because of the mid term dynamic I
just told you is so asked backwards and crazy that
it's just like whoever whatever consultants are and actually heard
(27:35):
I don't know if there's true or not, but that
Republicans were leaking poles suggesting she was the person to
do it because they wanted to run against her, and
which I totally understand why, Like this is a gift
to Ted Cruz and John Cornyan and any other Republican
running statewide in Texas that she is in the race,
because she's such a divisive figure. And already I've seen
people online being like they're all just racist, blah blah
(27:56):
blah blah. It's not that sure. I'm sure some people
are racist as Jasmin Crockett as a black woman, and
I think that's terrible. I don't support that. But she
is a uniquely divisive human being, and she regularly says
horrendous and ignorant things, so there's plenty of reason and
not like her. That has nothing to do with being
racist or sexist. Of course, though the ladies of the
view are the luminaries of our age, love her and
(28:17):
thinks she's the next the best thing since sliced bread.
Let's listen to them discussing it, and only one of them,
Alissa Farirro Griffin, who is used to be a Republican operative,
has any sort of saying take on it. Let's listen.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
This is my frustration. If purely being against Donald Trump
was a winning strategy, Dems would have beat him in
twenty sixteen, and they would have beat him in twenty
twenty four. I would have loved to hear I'm Jasmine
Crockett and I'm going to fight for affordability. I'm going
to fight for the working class. I'm going to bring
manufacturing back. Talking about issues. Texans aren't looking for you
to take on Donald Trump. They just want competence, leadership.
Speaker 6 (28:50):
For the sections are plain spoken people, just like everybody else.
They know that the economy is going down, down down.
He's under water with the people's approval rate is thirty
nine percent or something, and with Hispanics it's thirty eight percent.
And she assumes that they read and that they can
see that the economy is in the toilette.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
I just felt like it was about Aaron Donald Trump,
not about the people.
Speaker 6 (29:18):
I agree with that, But that's just one campaign, and
give the girl a minute.
Speaker 2 (29:21):
Yeah, well, okay, we'll give it the girl a minute.
But she gets to choose what she launches with, and
she launched with the ad we played you that's just
Trump saying how dumb she is. So she could have
chosen to highlight anything to define her campaign, and that's
what she went with.
Speaker 4 (29:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
I think that's really abysmal political strategy. And I yeah,
she's going to have to offer some sort of positive message.
You cannot just run as I'm not Trump. That does
not inspire people to the polls. Now, to some extent,
like I said, there's going to be momentum in the
Democratic Party's favor in the midterms, but this is a uniquely,
(29:58):
uniquely divisive candidate was obsessed with promoting her own image,
building her donor base, and lifting her national profile, maybe
so she can run in twenty twenty eight or be
a VP candidate in twenty twenty eight. She doesn't give
a crap about actually flipping. I mean, I'm sure she
would love to, but she is entering this race no
(30:19):
in Texas. I'm sure she'd love to win, but she
knows she's not going to, or that it's very unlikely
at least, and that she's entering the race anyway having
made a deliberate calculation that she can exploit it to
build money for her superpacks and her aligned superpacks and
her donor list for campaigns and all that. It's deeply cynical,
but they just love her because she says nasty things
(30:41):
about Republicans and white people and Trump, and they just
eat it up like candy on Halloween. It's ridiculous. Here's
another clip from the view discussing this well.
Speaker 7 (30:51):
I loved it.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
I thought it was spic I won so sorry to
pause her right after space, But that's kind of the problem.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
You.
Speaker 2 (31:02):
An out of touch, ultra liberal elitist daytime TV host
in New York City loved Jasmine Crockett's opening ad that
is not in fact who she needs to convince for
the Senate election in Texas. But I'm glad it made
you happy. I wanted to see.
Speaker 7 (31:22):
That kind of energy. I think we need an opposition party.
I don't think we need business as usual. I think
Zorron Mandani proved that. I think that you would have said,
you know, years ago, there's no way that a black
senator and a Jewish senator would be the senators representing Georgia.
But they are, so I think that.
Speaker 6 (31:42):
The black president.
Speaker 7 (31:43):
There's how about a black president. There have only been
fourteen black senators in the history of this country, only
two black governors in the history of this country. I
think she could be the fifteenth black senator in the
history of this country. Remember, Texas has three million black voters,
the most black voters in the country, more than Georgia,
(32:04):
more than Florida.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
So again, this is just almost an embarrassing level of
political analysis. But these people get paid millions of dollars
in a year. That's what bothers me about the views
so much. Not that they're terrible people, and not that
they're evil or anything like that, but just that they're
so bad at their jobs, they're so highly paid, and
somebody people listen to them that it makes you bitter
if you're someone like me, who, of course I'm doing
well for myself and I have no complaints, but like,
(32:28):
just the opportunities that are reforded to people of such
incredible mediocrity can be very frustrating for outsiders and independent
creators who could do exponentially more with so much less
than these people have at their fingertips. Anyway, though, she's
just to compare Jasmine Crockett running statewide in Texas to
Zoorn Mamdani. For example, running in New York City makes
(32:51):
no sense because New York City is an extremely blue city.
She's running in an extremely red state. Same thing with Georgia.
Georgia has shifted to like a purple state politically, it's
not like Texas. And even then it's just not comparable
because they talk about like all the Latino voters in Texas,
(33:14):
a lot of them aren't going to vote for her,
a lot of them will vote Republican. They just don't
really get it. And they just like Jasmine Crockett's style
because she perfectly appeals to the MSNBC audience, right, the
kind of MSNBC Wine Mom audience loves Jasmine Crockett. But
that is not, in fact, who you need to convince
(33:35):
to win a statewide election in Texas. And it is
really comical but sad because I actually think we really
need a coherent and competent opposition party and movement to
Trump right now, but we don't have one. We instead
have the Democratic Party. The Democrats are rallying behind such
a uniquely obnoxious and divisive figure, and that so much
of their associated media apparatus just has no idea how
(33:59):
things work and is so woefully out of touch with
the entire country. Other than that they're doing amazing. What
do you guys think? Let me know in the comments,
make your subscribe to hit the like button. All of that,
and that'll be it for today's episode of the Brad
Versus Everyone Podcast. Thanks for listening and we will talk
again real soon
Speaker 5 (34:22):
And
Bonnie Blue, the star famous for betting a thousand men
in one day, faces fifteen years jail.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
OnlyFans star Bonnie Blue is in some serious trouble, but
I just can't bring myself to feel bad for her.
We're going to break this down, plus so much more
on today's episode of The Barad Versus Everyone podcast, my
daily show where we take on the craziest stories from
(00:29):
across the Internet and social media, all from an independent
political perspective. And up first, we've got to talk about
Bonnie Blue. And if you don't know who that is,
then bless your soul. You're not nearly as online as
me and not as corrupted by the modern world. But
Bonnie Blue is one of the most well known or
(00:52):
I guess you could say infamous only Fans content creators
who of course makes adult content. And she is known
because she has grown her following and actually I don't
know if she's still on OnlyFans, but at least at
one point she was. Anyways, she's built up this massive
audience of people who subscribe to her adult content by
(01:16):
doing outlandish stunts like, for example, trying to set records
for how many men she can engage with in a
certain time period and then like going to special events
called schoolies to pursue barely legals and other such stuff
that is just deeply unpleasant to observe. But she's now
(01:40):
in legal trouble with this story that's just captivated the
internet's attention because she went to Bali in Indonesia and
decided to play stupid games and is now winning stupid prizes.
Let's watch some reporting from Sky News Australia about what's
going down.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
Bonny Blue, the porn staff famous for betting a thousand
men in one day, faces fifteen years jail after being
arrested in Bali. She arrived on the Indonesian island at
the start of schools and made no attempt to hide
her intentions.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
Those that go into school ears and to those that
are bad ilegal, can I wait to meet you?
Speaker 4 (02:18):
And I'm in Bali, so you know exactly what that means.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
She has since been arrested along with seventeen men while
allegedly filming content. Now, as you can see, the men,
fifteen of whom were Australian, weren't too keen to show
their faces. I can't imagine why it's being reported that
Bonnie Blue may be prosecuted for allegedly breaching Indonesia's morality laws,
and if found guilty, she faces a fine of more
(02:46):
than half a million dollars and a prison sentence long
enough to make her rethink her career choices.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Then again, maybe not so if I have my way,
I would like criminalize most of what you do, and
you wouldn't have all this money, right, so obviously personals
in prison.
Speaker 1 (03:06):
Bonnie Blue was banned from Australia last year after inviting
barely of age school leaders to have sex with her
so she could post the footage online for money. Indonesia
Nune too impressed, Freya and why would.
Speaker 5 (03:19):
They be, Well, I think it's so funny how Westerners
go to Bali and they forget that Indonesia is eighty
seven percent Muslim, and in twenty twenty two they enacted
morality laws based around Islamic values that ban even things
like sleeping with people outside of marriage, cohabitation before marriage,
(03:40):
let alone what Bonnie Blue is doing, which is full
scale pornography production and she's advertising it, so I can
see why the Indonesian government was not too happy about that.
I think she was completely naive and foolish to think
she would be able to do that.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
So guys were actually only at the tip of the
iceberg with this Bonnie Blue story and Balie it gets
even crazier and some of the specific evidence against her
is quite damning, guys. So I dug into this story
more and Bonnie Blue is in some serious legal jeopardy here.
The best case scenario for her is that they just
(04:19):
deport her, but they have confiscated her passport and they
are prosecuting her, and they could also choose to pursue
that route instead, and in that case, she might be
in serious legal jeopardy because they kind of caught her
in the act of doing stuff that is blatantly illegal.
At least that's what it seems like from some of
this reporting. Newsweek reports. According to local reports, among the
(04:43):
items seized during the Bali raid or video production equipment,
her notorious blue pickup truck known as the bang Bus,
and several packets of condoms. How delightful that is. And
what's important to note there is that she, according to
this reporting, at least had video production equipment with her,
(05:05):
which is kind of damning evidence because the piece of
this that is so controversial or that is going to
get her in legal jeopardies the production of pornography, which
is illegal in Bali. They also have laws that criminalize
or prohibit consensual sex between non married people. But I
looked into it and those laws are not really enforced
(05:27):
against non residents or against tourists. Those are primarily applied
to local residents and domestic people in Bali, So that one,
it doesn't necessarily just her simply hooking up with these
people doesn't seem to be the problem. It appears that
her likely intent or maybe she did I don't know
of filming pornographic content while in a Muslim majority country
(05:52):
or region at least of Indonesia where that's illegal, could
actually end her up in a pretty lengthy prison sense
possibly so. More from Newsweek here. Videos shared on blues
Instagram page prior to the raide show her partying with
young tourists celebrating schoolies oh my gosh, diabolical, and one
(06:13):
video shows a group of men pushing the bang bus
through a Bali street after it broke down. The Bali
bang bus has run out of steam, but the Aussi
boys haven't, she captioned the post guys. I just I
keep thinking about my mother listening to this podcast and
how she's going to react to this story. Hope you're
proud of me, Mom. This is what my career has
(06:35):
come to, reading about body blues, bang bus oh boy. Okay, Anyway,
more from Newsweek here. Indonesia has some of the strictest
anti pornography laws in Southeast Asia. Under the Pornography Act, producing, distributing,
or participating in the creation of pornographic material is illegal
(06:57):
and punishable by lengthy prison sentences up to fifteen years
and substantial finds of up to six billion rupia, which
is around three hundred and fifty nine thousand dollars. So
we've got all the facts here. She does appear to be,
at least in my perception of this case, kind of
dead to write on the actual charges. And I'm of
(07:18):
two minds on this story because on one hand, I
don't actually believe that any of this should be illegal.
I don't support what she does morally or ethically. But
I don't believe that consensual sex acts or even production
of videos where everyone involves is consenting participant. I don't
(07:39):
believe that should be a crime. I certainly don't think
somebody should be put behind bars for fifteen years for
doing it. That seems disproportionate, and I don't really believe
in any of that. At the same time, though, I
really struggle to have any sympathy for Bonnie Blue, because
she played stupid games and she won supid prizes. She
(08:01):
surely knew what the laws were in Bali before she
went and did this, And yeah, at some point, you're
gonna have to deal with the consequences of your actions.
And if you intentionally go to a place to violate
their laws or know about their laws and violate them anyway,
even if those laws shouldn't exist or unjust, And we
(08:23):
could talk about that, and I might agree with you
in the abstract, You're still like not really a victim, right,
because you chose this, and you willingly put yourself in
this situation. And then you probably just assumed that being
famous would get you off the hook, and maybe it
still will. Possibly the most likely scenario here is that
she just ends up getting deported, and that would be
(08:45):
basically like and then they ban her from coming back
to Bali. That would probably be the most appropriate outcome.
But if they actually do go out and imprison her
over this. Well, I do find it funny how she's
already spoken about that on the record and she's like,
I'll just have prison group activities. Then I don't think
she actually means that. I think that's part of her
(09:05):
troll persona that she adopts to go viral and get
more subscribers and make more money. And I'm sure she's
fabulously wealthy. I'm sure she can afford all the fines
and then some. But at some point these influencers, whether
it's the of people or the rage bais or the trolls,
are gonna have to find out right because they have
(09:27):
f'd around so many times, and they have inconvenienced and
menaced the public in so many ways that at some point, like, yeah, things,
even if I don't support them in theory, are going
to happen to them, and I'm just not going to
feel bad. There's only so much sympathy to go around
in the world, and people get cancer, people are orphaned,
(09:47):
all sorts of horrible things happen to people that they
had no control over and they didn't bring about themselves.
And so when bad things happen to people who act
stupid and act a fool. It's hard to feel that
bad for them. I don't know. Am I like a
bad guy for this? I really don't think I am.
I actually think my reaction here is a pretty normal
(10:10):
and pretty typical. But I want to hear from you, guys.
I want to know what you think of the Bonnie
Blue situation. I've talked to Clarkson about it, and my
friend who I filmed the Normal Gaze channel with check
us out on YouTube if you somehow haven't discovered us with.
He is a somewhat ironic I hope it's ironic Bonnie
Blue fan and he is just devastated and he is
(10:31):
considering going out and protesting publicly with a free Bonnie
Blue sign, which I think would be incredibly amusing. But anyway, guys,
let me know what you think of the Bonnie Blue situation.
Oh what does my journalism career come to? And make
sure subscribe to the button and all of that. Now
up next, guys, We've got to check in with Candice Owens,
(10:55):
who her theories about Charlie Kirk's death continue to get Craig.
She just did an interview with Russell Brand, who was
an actor for a long time and is now in
the independent podcasting space. He's kind of kind of out
there guy. Anyway. Candace spoke to Russell and he asked
her some questions that weren't even hostile questions, but she
(11:18):
kind of made herself look rather questionable with her responses
even though they weren't even very difficult questions. And one
of them, he just asked her straight up because there's
been a lot of confusion about what exactly are you
saying and what aren't you saying when it comes to
Charlie Kirk's death. She said the military did it. The
Trump administration isn't on a TPUSA, I'll betrayed Charlie all
(11:41):
this stuff, and she somehow connected it to everyone from
Israel to Egypt, to France and beyond. So he just
asked her straight up, like, what exactly are you saying here?
And this, I mean this is hilarious. Listen to this
exchange that he had with Russell Brand.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
Do you think these things brigit Macron's true identity and
Charlie Kirk's.
Speaker 4 (12:04):
Yes, I think it's all connected, and I think in
many ways we already live in this sort of one
world government system. Maybe it's two worlds, but with in
terms of the West, I don't think there's any difference
in the governments. And that's kind of the point that
we're making and maybe why the Charlie Kirk case is
so crucial, because it's showing us that, wait, what is
the divide here between America and Israel and France? Right,
somebody in the French government alerted me to an assassination attempt.
(12:26):
Shouldn't that require a comment from the President of United States?
It was the most viral global story for three days,
and the White House has chosen not to comment. What
does that signals to the population that it's okay for
France to be involved in assassination attempts? That should alarm people.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
No, Candace, what is signals is that they don't believe you.
That the people at the highest levels of government, from
Cash Betel to Dan Bugino to Donald Trump, who you
alerted about this super duper real threat to your life
from the French government, don't think it's real. All their
intelligence and evidence does not support your crazy theories. And
(13:03):
that's why they're not taking it seriously. Not because they've
decided it is fine for the French couple to put
out a hit on an American podcaster. Yeah, which one
of those two scenarios is most likely? I don't think
it's that one, and I love the first part here.
She's asked very explicitly, is Brigitte Macrone's identity by which
(13:24):
they're referring to Cannas's theory, which, of course the Macrones
deny that brigerit Brigitte was born a man and is
a secret trans woman with a penis. Is that connected
to Charlie Kirk's death? And she says, yes, what, guys,
(13:46):
I have watched hours and hours and hours of Canvas's
content many of her episodes about this, and even her
ardent followers or people who are sympathetic to her are
really struggling to keep up with her theory because she
is simultaneously saying that this plot to assassinate Charlie, which
of course Tyler Robinson wasn't involved or wasn't the shooter
(14:09):
or a killer, rathers what she says, even though there's
so much evidence against him, involves she has suggested over
and over again that involves everyone from the FBI to
the Utah State Police, to local authorities to Turning Point USA,
to Israel to Egypt, to France to the US military.
(14:30):
All these people were involved in a plot to kill
Charlie Kirk somehow, with like a lot of random tips
to her email inbox that only she has cracked. And
for why what motivation do a lot of these people
have to engage in such a conspiracy or harm Charlie
in any way? Most of that is left unclear or
simply speculated about or taken for granted. It is crazy
(14:54):
stuff and it makes absolutely no sense, But millions of
people are just munch in the powcorn as this woman
continues to spiral further into her I don't know, postpartum
psychotic delusions of different kinds, and it's really tough to watch.
But notice how she never actually explained how it's connected.
She said, yes, it's connected, but then never connected it.
(15:16):
There's so much of that in her content. She really
is leading people astray. But then she does this thing
that really pisses me off. She hides behind while I'm
just asking questions. That's all she's doing. She's just asking questions.
Speaker 4 (15:31):
Guys, Listen, Charlie's life could have been the Truman Show.
That terrifies me more than nothing in your life is real? Genuinely,
I was expecting, like, we're all getting the old band
back together and it's going to be me and Shrump
and I'm going to have the FBI help me investigate this.
We're going to figure out what happened to my friend.
And it was like, Candas is the enemy for asking questions.
Was Charlie Kirk's life real? Is what I think I
(15:52):
cried the hardest about because how are you not fighting
for him?
Speaker 2 (15:56):
So there's something kind of wild that Candace does, which
is that in one bread she'll suggest that the FBI
is like in on the plot to kill Charlie Kirk
and fabricated text messages to frame Tyler Robinson and all
this stuff. So she thought they were discord messages and
they were text messages. She doesn't even know the facts.
That was the whole thing I covered where CNN interviewed
her and she got basic facts about it all wrong. Yeah,
(16:17):
So she'll do this and then she'll be like, but
why aren't they working with Well, girl, you just accused
them of murder like five minutes ago, So why aren't
they helping me? Would you if somebody was spreading insane
theories about you be like, yes, please come, let's work together,
let's be BFFs. I don't think so. And it does
(16:39):
bother me that Candice Owens always comes back to this,
I'm just asking questions. No, you are not. You are
not just asking questions. You have over and over again
made specific allegations and assertions, and those assertions are unfounded,
and they are often implicate people in very serious wrongdoing.
And that's not just asked questions. I mean, I'll give
(17:01):
you examples. She has definitively stated that the killing of
Charlie Kirk was a US military operation. She has directly
accused the federal government and other law enforcement of fabricating
evidence against Tyler Robinson. She has definitively stated that Turning
Point USA betrayed Charlie Kirk their friend and leader. She
(17:23):
also just said on an Instagram story, up with this
on screen yesterday, it feels like today will be the
day that the government can no longer deny it. Charlie
Kirk was assassinated and our military was involved. I can't
wait to share this information with you guys today. And then,
of course, she did not provide any sort of bombshell
evidence of that in her actual show, it was a
very long, meandering rant about this unrelated tipshoe she received
(17:46):
from a former military person that she just took at
face value. I guess I don't know, and he didn't.
It's so complicated it's hard to even explain. But she
did not, in fact have a smoking gun showing that
somehow Charlie Kirk was killed by the US military. And
so if you want to make wild accusations and claims, okay,
you have a right to do that, and we should
(18:08):
discuss them and dissect them. But what you can't do
is accuse people of grievous wrongdoing and then be like,
why are you mad? I'm just asking questions. No, you're not.
You are impugning people and making allegations against people. That's
not just asking questions. So I find this very disingenuous
(18:28):
and dishonest when people do it. I want to play
you another clip from Kandas's show about a week ago,
where she put a bunch of random men's faces and
images on screen from the event at UVU where Charlie
Kirk was killed and suggested they were involved in his
death because they were wearing the color maroon. I'm not kidding,
(18:50):
that is what happened. You don't have to take my
word for it. Here's a clip here we are.
Speaker 4 (18:54):
We have this young man, this is after the shot.
He's wearing maroon, showing you another person here sitting there
under the tree after the shot, and he's wearing maroon.
So another person here. We're going to come back to
this person who is wearing maroon because his dad is
going to say something publicly. Three people, one shot, all
of them alone wearing maroon. We're going to come back
(19:15):
to the guy at the top there who has the hat,
the darker hat on, who's wearing marooon. Just like like
to these like dropping young men all wearing maroon. We've
got this guy in the bush wearing maroon. I could
go on and on this person wear of how many
people wearing maroon. I even have a video of someone
holding a Maroon shirt. Okay, So I mentioned that quite casually,
and that thing happened where there was an overreaction for
(19:37):
no reason online. So I knew that I was on
the right track and I should probably keep going. And
I said something I think it was on X or
maybe it was on the show, and then we received
hundreds of emails from people past and presently in the
military around the world, and they said, yes, Candice, that
is military.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Well, guys, she received emails. So that really settles it,
you know, think of just think about this for a second.
Candice Owens has one of the most popular podcasts in
the world. Everything she posts on YouTube is viewed millions
of times. Millions of people listen to her audio podcast feed.
(20:15):
She put these random young men's faces on screen in connection.
She's suggesting a connection to the murder of Charlie Kirk
based on the fact they were wearing Maroon shirts. Can't
y'all see how that is, like just objectively a wildly
(20:37):
irresponsible thing to do, and certainly is a lot more
than just asking questions. You're putting a target on these
men's back. You are implicating them in something heinous, all
based on this random thing that has proves nothing. I
have several Maroon shirts, like I was wearing one when
I filmed the podcast, like yesterday or the other day.
(20:58):
It I've never been in the military. I have no
connection to the military. Maroon is just a popular freaking
color people. It is not proof of some military conspiracy.
Yet this is the level of investigation she is engaging in.
Then she's like, why doesn't the FBI want to work
with me? Maybe because you're freaking crazy, Candace, and you're
(21:19):
getting crazier and crazier and crazier. And then she does
this thing they all do where they say, well, people
are mad at me for saying insane shit, so I
must be right. That is like how you talk yourself
into genuine delusion and insanity is because it's possible that
people are upset with you because you're over the target.
But it's also possible that people are upset with you
(21:41):
because you're wildly wrong. You're being grossly irresponsible, and you're
falsely accusing people of heinous things without evidence, So which
of those is more likely? And if you just view
any time people get mad at you as proof you
are right, I don't know. Was Osama bin Laden right then,
because he sure made a lot of people mad. Like
(22:04):
it's just so bizarre, and the fact that millions of
people continue to trust this woman as a source of
information genuinely boggles my mind and makes me deeply, deeply,
deeply pessimistic about everything other than that, though she's doing
great over here, just asking questions with Candy. You guys,
(22:24):
let me know what you think in the comments, make
sure you're subscribe to the leg button and all of that.
Up next, we got to talk about a story that
I have been watching with interest over the last few
days because I love me some Jasmine Crockett. You know,
of course, I'm referring to the Democratic star congresswoman who
(22:44):
MSNBC and CNN love to prop up and put on
TV constantly. When I say I love her, obviously I'm
being sarcastic. She is a bombastic progressive, but she's not
so far left. Actual true lefties don't like her for
some of her views, but she is very much, you know, solidly,
solidly pushing the democratic narrative and mainstream positions, and she's
(23:08):
one of the most toxic and divisive and brash figures
that they have on that side. She loves to cuss,
she loves to say like very lowbrow insults about people. Frankly,
in a lot of ways, she reminds me of Donald Trump,
which is so hypocritical, because of course they're supposed to
be against that. They're supposed to be standing up against
Trump and resisting him. And then you know, half the time,
(23:29):
their hero Jasmine Crockett, sounds kind of trumpy in the
way that she speaks because it's so low brow and
so vulgar, and so personally I just, yeah, I find
her so distasteful. And then she's constantly ranting about like
mediocre white boys and all this stuff that you just
would find it to be almost an act of self
(23:49):
harm for the Democratic Party to lift her up as
some sort of leader. But they've done that, and now
she is running for the Democratic nomination for Senate in
the state of tech excess, so she actually thinks she
can win. And say what you want about Jasmine, that
girl's got self confidence to the point of narcissism and
egomania again giving Trump, but she is now running for
(24:13):
Senate statewide in Texas, of course, rather than her one
district that was blue. I believe it's been redistricted, so
that's why she can't just run for reelection. She's running statewide,
and the ladies over at the View are singing her
praises and seem to think she actually has a chance,
which is how you know they just have no idea
what they're talking about when it comes to political analysis.
(24:35):
First of all, I want to show you, guys, Jasmine's
big launch video for her Senate campaign. Tell me what
you notice about this? This is just her mean mugging
the camera while Trump quotes about her. Play. Let's listen,
how about this new one? They have their new star, Crocket?
How about her?
Speaker 6 (24:53):
She's a new star of the Democrat Party, Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 2 (24:57):
They're in big trouble. But do you have this woman Crockett?
Speaker 7 (25:01):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 2 (25:03):
I watched her speak the other day.
Speaker 5 (25:05):
She's definitely a low IQ person.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
Crocket.
Speaker 4 (25:09):
Oh man, oh man.
Speaker 7 (25:11):
She's a very low IQ person.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Somebody said the other day she's one of the leaders
of the party.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
I think you gotta be kidding.
Speaker 4 (25:21):
Now, are they going to rely on?
Speaker 2 (25:22):
Crocket's gonna bring them big? Guys? She really thought she
ate that, like she really thought she cooked. But you
know what, I didn't see in that ad any actual
beliefs or policies or positive things about her that anyone
should support. She's just running as the person Trump doesn't
(25:45):
like who also wants to promote abortion and doesn't like
guns and wants there's chick guns and rans about mediocre
white boys. Now elect to me, Texas. That's her pitch
to Texas voter that she's going to flip the Senate
seat blue for Texas. I'm Trump's biggest enemy. He says
(26:07):
a lot of funny but half of them are true.
Things about me that aren't very nice. And I'm pro choice,
I'm vulgar, I crap on white people a lot, and
I want to restrict guns. What's not to love for
Texas voters. The whole thing to me is like as
(26:28):
somebody with just a basic I am no expert, but
I am, of course, have been a political reporter and
analysts for years, and so I have a basic level
of understanding about how politics works in this country. It's
so bizarre and it's so obviously doomed to fail. This
upcoming midterm election is almost certainly going to be a
big win for Democrats, because this is what always happens.
(26:48):
When one party wins the White House, their voters get
complacent and the other side gets really energized, and so
the next midterm election typically you see a big surch
for the other party. So you would expect Democrats to
overperform even in places like Texas, though it's unlikely they
might actually flip the seat, but they could at least
be more competitive, So it's possible that Jasmine Crockett does
(27:11):
relatively well while losing this seat. But I just the
idea that she's going to be the one to do
it seems so hair brained to flip this seat blue,
even with all the wind at her back if she
got the nomination because of the mid term dynamic I
just told you is so asked backwards and crazy that
it's just like whoever whatever consultants are and actually heard
(27:35):
I don't know if there's true or not, but that
Republicans were leaking poles suggesting she was the person to
do it because they wanted to run against her, and
which I totally understand why, Like this is a gift
to Ted Cruz and John Cornyan and any other Republican
running statewide in Texas that she is in the race,
because she's such a divisive figure. And already I've seen
people online being like they're all just racist, blah blah
(27:56):
blah blah. It's not that sure. I'm sure some people
are racist as Jasmin Crockett as a black woman, and
I think that's terrible. I don't support that. But she
is a uniquely divisive human being, and she regularly says
horrendous and ignorant things, so there's plenty of reason and
not like her. That has nothing to do with being
racist or sexist. Of course, though the ladies of the
view are the luminaries of our age, love her and
(28:17):
thinks she's the next the best thing since sliced bread.
Let's listen to them discussing it, and only one of them,
Alissa Farirro Griffin, who is used to be a Republican operative,
has any sort of saying take on it. Let's listen.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
This is my frustration. If purely being against Donald Trump
was a winning strategy, Dems would have beat him in
twenty sixteen, and they would have beat him in twenty
twenty four. I would have loved to hear I'm Jasmine
Crockett and I'm going to fight for affordability. I'm going
to fight for the working class. I'm going to bring
manufacturing back. Talking about issues. Texans aren't looking for you
to take on Donald Trump. They just want competence, leadership.
Speaker 6 (28:50):
For the sections are plain spoken people, just like everybody else.
They know that the economy is going down, down down.
He's under water with the people's approval rate is thirty
nine percent or something, and with Hispanics it's thirty eight percent.
And she assumes that they read and that they can
see that the economy is in the toilette.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
I just felt like it was about Aaron Donald Trump,
not about the people.
Speaker 6 (29:18):
I agree with that, But that's just one campaign, and
give the girl a minute.
Speaker 2 (29:21):
Yeah, well, okay, we'll give it the girl a minute.
But she gets to choose what she launches with, and
she launched with the ad we played you that's just
Trump saying how dumb she is. So she could have
chosen to highlight anything to define her campaign, and that's
what she went with.
Speaker 4 (29:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
I think that's really abysmal political strategy. And I yeah,
she's going to have to offer some sort of positive message.
You cannot just run as I'm not Trump. That does
not inspire people to the polls. Now, to some extent,
like I said, there's going to be momentum in the
Democratic Party's favor in the midterms, but this is a uniquely,
(29:58):
uniquely divisive candidate was obsessed with promoting her own image,
building her donor base, and lifting her national profile, maybe
so she can run in twenty twenty eight or be
a VP candidate in twenty twenty eight. She doesn't give
a crap about actually flipping. I mean, I'm sure she
would love to, but she is entering this race no
(30:19):
in Texas. I'm sure she'd love to win, but she
knows she's not going to, or that it's very unlikely
at least, and that she's entering the race anyway having
made a deliberate calculation that she can exploit it to
build money for her superpacks and her aligned superpacks and
her donor list for campaigns and all that. It's deeply cynical,
but they just love her because she says nasty things
(30:41):
about Republicans and white people and Trump, and they just
eat it up like candy on Halloween. It's ridiculous. Here's
another clip from the view discussing this well.
Speaker 7 (30:51):
I loved it.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
I thought it was spic I won so sorry to
pause her right after space, But that's kind of the problem.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
You.
Speaker 2 (31:02):
An out of touch, ultra liberal elitist daytime TV host
in New York City loved Jasmine Crockett's opening ad that
is not in fact who she needs to convince for
the Senate election in Texas. But I'm glad it made
you happy. I wanted to see.
Speaker 7 (31:22):
That kind of energy. I think we need an opposition party.
I don't think we need business as usual. I think
Zorron Mandani proved that. I think that you would have said,
you know, years ago, there's no way that a black
senator and a Jewish senator would be the senators representing Georgia.
But they are, so I think that.
Speaker 6 (31:42):
The black president.
Speaker 7 (31:43):
There's how about a black president. There have only been
fourteen black senators in the history of this country, only
two black governors in the history of this country. I
think she could be the fifteenth black senator in the
history of this country. Remember, Texas has three million black voters,
the most black voters in the country, more than Georgia,
(32:04):
more than Florida.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
So again, this is just almost an embarrassing level of
political analysis. But these people get paid millions of dollars
in a year. That's what bothers me about the views
so much. Not that they're terrible people, and not that
they're evil or anything like that, but just that they're
so bad at their jobs, they're so highly paid, and
somebody people listen to them that it makes you bitter
if you're someone like me, who, of course I'm doing
well for myself and I have no complaints, but like,
(32:28):
just the opportunities that are reforded to people of such
incredible mediocrity can be very frustrating for outsiders and independent
creators who could do exponentially more with so much less
than these people have at their fingertips. Anyway, though, she's
just to compare Jasmine Crockett running statewide in Texas to
Zoorn Mamdani. For example, running in New York City makes
(32:51):
no sense because New York City is an extremely blue city.
She's running in an extremely red state. Same thing with Georgia.
Georgia has shifted to like a purple state politically, it's
not like Texas. And even then it's just not comparable
because they talk about like all the Latino voters in Texas,
(33:14):
a lot of them aren't going to vote for her,
a lot of them will vote Republican. They just don't
really get it. And they just like Jasmine Crockett's style
because she perfectly appeals to the MSNBC audience, right, the
kind of MSNBC Wine Mom audience loves Jasmine Crockett. But
that is not, in fact, who you need to convince
(33:35):
to win a statewide election in Texas. And it is
really comical but sad because I actually think we really
need a coherent and competent opposition party and movement to
Trump right now, but we don't have one. We instead
have the Democratic Party. The Democrats are rallying behind such
a uniquely obnoxious and divisive figure, and that so much
of their associated media apparatus just has no idea how
(33:59):
things work and is so woefully out of touch with
the entire country. Other than that they're doing amazing. What
do you guys think? Let me know in the comments,
make your subscribe to hit the like button. All of that,
and that'll be it for today's episode of the Brad
Versus Everyone Podcast. Thanks for listening and we will talk
again real soon
Speaker 5 (34:22):
And
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
The Brothers Ortiz
The Brothers Ortiz is the story of two brothers–both successful, but in very different ways. Gabe Ortiz becomes a third-highest ranking officer in all of Texas while his younger brother Larry climbs the ranks in Puro Tango Blast, a notorious Texas Prison gang. Gabe doesn’t know all the details of his brother’s nefarious dealings, and he’s made a point not to ask, to protect their relationship. But when Larry is murdered during a home invasion in a rented beach house, Gabe has no choice but to look into what happened that night. To solve Larry’s murder, Gabe, and the whole Ortiz family, must ask each other tough questions.