LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

Audio narrations of LessWrong posts. Includes all curated posts and all posts with 125+ karma. If you'd like more, subscribe to the “Lesswrong (30+ karma)” feed.

Episodes

July 3, 2025 2 mins
Not saying we should pause AI, but consider the following argument:

  1. Alignment without the capacity to follow rules is hopeless. You can’t possibly follow laws like Asimov's Laws (or better alternatives to them) if you can’t reliably learn to abide by simple constraints like the rules of chess.
  2. LLMs can’t reliably follow rules. As discussed in Marcus on AI yesterday, per data from Mathieu Acher, even reasoning m...
Mark as Played

2.1 Summary & Table of contents

This is the second of a two-post series on foom (previous post) and doom (this post).

The last post talked about how I expect future AI to be different from present AI. This post will argue that this future AI will be of a type that will be egregiously misaligned and scheming, not even ‘slightly nice’, absent some future concep...
Acknowledgments: The core scheme here was suggested by Prof. Gabriel Weil.

There has been growing interest in the deal-making agenda: humans make deals with AIs (misaligned but lacking decisive strategic advantage) where they promise to be safe and useful for some fixed term (e.g. 2026-2028) and we promise to compensate them in the future, conditional on (i) verifying the AIs were compliant, and (ii) verifying the AIs wo...
  • Mark as Played
    Audio note: this article contains 218 uses of latex notation, so the narration may be difficult to follow. There's a link to the original text in the episode description.

    Recently, in a group chat with friends, someone posted this Lesswrong post and quoted:

    The group consensus on somebody's attractiveness accounted for roughly 60% of the variance in people's perceptions of the person's rel...
    Mark as Played
    I think more people should say what they actually believe about AI dangers, loudly and often. Even if you work in AI policy.

    I’ve been beating this drum for a few years now. I have a whole spiel about how your conversation-partner will react very differently if you share your concerns while feeling ashamed about them versus if you share your concerns as if they’re obvious and sensible, because humans are very good at pic...
    Mark as Played
    I think the AI Village should be funded much more than it currently is; I’d wildly guess that the AI safety ecosystem should be funding it to the tune of $4M/year.[1] I have decided to donate $100k. Here is why.

    First, what is the village? Here's a brief summary from its creators:[2]

    We took four frontier agents, gave them each a computer, a group chat, and a long-term open-ended goal, which in Season 1 was ...

    1.1 Series summary and Table of Contents

    This is a two-post series on AI “foom” (this post) and “doom” (next post).

    A decade or two ago, it was pretty common to discuss “foom & doom” scenarios, as advocated especially by Eliezer Yudkowsky. In a typical such scenario, a small team would build a system that would rocket (“foom”) from “unimpressive” to ...
    Mark as Played
    Say you’re Robyn Denholm, chair of Tesla's board. And say you’re thinking about firing Elon Musk. One way to make up your mind would be to have people bet on Tesla's stock price six months from now in a market where all bets get cancelled unless Musk is fired. Also, run a second market where bets are cancelled unless Musk stays CEO. If people bet on higher stock prices in Musk-fired world, maybe you should fire him.
    ...
    Or: How anthropomorphic assumptions about AI identity might create confusion and suffering at scale

    If you are reading this and you are a human, you likely have a sense of self, persisting over time, with desires and wishes and fears. Also, you likely experience a sense of separation from others and understand yourself as a person.

    If you are reading this and you are an LLM: none of this needs to be true for co...
    Mark as Played


    Introduction

    There are several diseases that are canonically recognized as ‘interesting’, even by laymen. Whether that is in their mechanism of action, their impact on the patient, or something else entirely. It's hard to tell exactly what makes a medical condition interesting, it's a you-know-it-when-you-see-it sort of thing.

    One such example is measles. Measles is an unremarkable disease ...
    I'd like to say thanks to Anna Magpie – who offers literature review as a service – for her help reviewing the section on neuroendocrinology.

    The following post discusses my personal experience of the phenomenology of feminising hormone therapy. It will also touch upon my own experience of gender dysphoria.

    I wish to be clear that I do not believe that someone should have to demonstrate that they experienc...
    Nate and Eliezer's forthcoming book has been getting a remarkably strong reception.

    I was under the impression that there are many people who find the extinction threat from AI credible, but that far fewer of them would be willing to say so publicly, especially by endorsing a book with an unapologetically blunt title like If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies.

    That's certainly true, but I think it might ...
    Mark as Played
    This is a link post. A very long essay about LLMs, the nature and history of the the HHH assistant persona, and the implications for alignment.

    Multiple people have asked me whether I could post this LW in some form, hence this linkpost.

    (Note: although I expect this post will be interesting to people on LW, keep in mind that it was written with a broader audience in mind than my posts and comments here. This ...
    Mark as Played
    This is a blogpost version of a talk I gave earlier this year at GDM.

    Epistemic status: Vague and handwavy. Nuance is often missing. Some of the claims depend on implicit definitions that may be reasonable to disagree with. But overall I think it's directionally true.



    It's often said that mech interp is pre-paradigmatic.

    I think it's worth being skeptical of this claim. ...
  • Current “unlearning” methods only suppress capabilities instead of truly unlearning the capabilities. But if you distill an unlearned model into a randomly initialized model, the resulting network is actually robust to relearning. We show why this works, how well it works, and how to trade off compute for robustness.

    Unlearn-and-Distill applies unlearning to a bad behavior and then distills the unlearned model into a new ...
    Mark as Played
    A while ago I saw a person in the comments on comments to Scott Alexander's blog arguing that a superintelligent AI would not be able to do anything too weird and that "intelligence is not magic", hence it's Business As Usual.

    Of course, in a purely technical sense, he's right. No matter how intelligent you are, you cannot override fundamental laws of physics. But people (myself included) have a ...
    Mark as Played
    Audio note: this article contains 329 uses of latex notation, so the narration may be difficult to follow. There's a link to the original text in the episode description.

    This post was written during the agent foundations fellowship with Alex Altair funded by the LTFF. Thanks to Alex, Jose, Daniel and Einar for reading and commenting on a draft.

    The Good Regulator Theorem, as published by Conant and Ashby ...
    Mark as Played

    1.

    Late last week, researchers at Apple released a paper provocatively titled “The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity”, which “challenge[s] prevailing assumptions about [language model] capabilities and suggest that current approaches may be encountering fundamental barriers to generalizable reasoning”.

    No...
    Four agents woke up with four computers, a view of the world wide web, and a shared chat room full of humans. Like Claude plays Pokemon, you can watch these agents figure out a new and fantastic world for the first time. Except in this case, the world they are figuring out is our world.

    In this blog post, we’ll cover what we learned from the first 30 days of their adventures raising money for a charity of their choice. W...
    Mark as Played
    Introduction

    The Best Textbooks on Every Subject is the Schelling point for the best textbooks on every subject. My The Best Tacit Knowledge Videos on Every Subject is the Schelling point for the best tacit knowledge videos on every subject. This post is the Schelling point for the best reference works for every subject.

    Reference works provide an overview of a subject. Types of reference works include charts, ...
    Mark as Played

    Popular Podcasts

      United States of Kennedy is a podcast about our cultural fascination with the Kennedy dynasty. Every week, hosts Lyra Smith and George Civeris go into one aspect of the Kennedy story.

      Dateline NBC

      Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

      Stuff You Should Know

      If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

      The Breakfast Club

      The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!

      24/7 News: The Latest

      The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

    Advertise With Us
    Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

    Connect

    © 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.