Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Lee Burgess (00:01):
Welcome back to
the Law School Toolbox podcast.
Today we're kicking off a two-part serieson third-party rights in contracts.
In this first episode, we'll focuson assignments and delegations.
Your Law School Toolbox hosts are AlisonMonahan and Lee Burgess, that's me.
We're here to demystify the lawschool and early legal career
experience, so you'll be the bestlaw student and lawyer you can be.
(00:25):
We're the co-creators of the Law SchoolToolbox, the Bar Exam Toolbox, and the
career-related website CareerDicta.
Alison also runs TheGirl's Guide to Law School.
If you enjoy the show, pleaseleave a review or rating on
your favorite listening app.
And if you have any questions,don't hesitate to reach out to us.
You can reach us via the contactform on LawSchoolToolbox.com,
and we'd love to hear from you.
And with that, let's get started.
(00:55):
We're kicking off a two-part serieson third-party rights in contracts.
In this first episode, we'll focuson assignments and delegations.
These concepts are crucial forunderstanding how contractual
rights and obligations can betransferred to parties who weren't
originally involved in the agreement.
Let's dive in.
Third-party rights are implicated wheneversomeone who is not a party to the original
(01:20):
contract tries to enforce the contract.
These third-party rights generallyinvolve issues of assignments,
delegations, or third-party beneficiaries.
Today we'll cover assignmentsand delegations, and in our next
episode, we'll discuss third-partybeneficiaries and apply these
concepts to some practical scenarios.
Let's start withassignment and delegation.
(01:43):
Assignment and delegation involve adecision by a party to a contract to
transfer their rights and/or obligationsunder the contract to a third party.
Specifically, an assignment isthe transfer of a contractual
right - for example, to be paidor to receive goods or services.
A delegation is the transfer ofa contractual obligation - for
(02:05):
example, the obligation to make apayment or provide goods or services.
Note that while these are technicallyseparate concepts, the particular
language of the assignment is veryimportant in determining whether an
assignment is merely a transfer ofrights or also a delegation of duties.
For example, an assignment that usesbroad language, like "assignment of
(02:27):
the contract" will often be interpretedto include a delegation of the
unperformed duties under a contract.
Before we move on to our rules, weshould take a moment to review the
terminology used to describe theparties to an assignment or delegation.
These terms can get a little confusing,because the same parties are called
(02:48):
different things in different contexts.
If you're having a hard time keepingthem straight, you might find it helpful
to draw a quick diagram to illustratethe relationships between the terms.
The party that makes an assignmentis called the obligee under the
original contract, because they are thebeneficiary of the contractual obligation.
The other party to the originalcontract is called the obligor.
(03:11):
When the obligee makes the assignment,they become the assignor of their
right to receive performance.
The party to whom that right isassigned is called the assignee.
A party that makes a delegationis called the obligor under the
original contract, because theyhave the obligation to perform.
(03:34):
As we just discussed, the other partyto the original contract is the obligee.
When the obligor makes thedelegation, they become the
delegator of their obligation.
The party to whom the obligationis delegated is the delegatee, also
sometimes referred to as the delegate.
(03:55):
As you can see, things can geta little confusing because every
contract contains both rights andobligations going in both directions.
As a result, the same party canbe called several different things
depending on their relationshipto the other parties involved.
Let's try to put these terms incontext with a quick illustration.
(04:16):
Let's say Painter and Homeowner enterinto a contract in which Painter agrees
to paint Homeowner's house for $5,000.
With respect to the obligation topaint Homeowner's house, Painter is the
obligor and Homeowner is the obligee.
But with respect to the obligationto pay $5,000, Homeowner is the
(04:37):
obligor and Painter is the obligee.
Now let's say that Homeownerassigns his right to have his
house painted to Neighbor.
In that case, Homeownerbecomes the assignor and
Neighbor becomes the assignee.
If, however, instead of assigning hisright to painting services, Homeowner
(04:57):
delegates his obligation to pay $5,000,Homeowner then becomes the delegator
and Neighbor becomes the delegateeAnd yes, if Homeowner both assigns his
rights and delegates his obligationsto Neighbor, then Homeowner is both an
assignor and delegator, and Neighboris both an assignee and delegatee.
(05:23):
The same would apply to the painter'srights and duties if he were to assign or
delegate to a subcontractor, for example.
Okay, let's move on to ourrules, starting with assignment.
Here's the general rule (05:34):
Rights and
benefits under a contract may be
transferred to a third party if, [1]the assignor manifests his intent
to transfer the rights; and [2] theassignee assents to the assignment.
Consideration is notrequired for an assignment.
But if consideration is provided,the assignment becomes irrevocable.
(05:57):
Gratuitous assignments may subsequentlybe revoked unless an exception applies.
We won't go into those exceptions today.
An assignment is valid unless, [a]it materially alters what is expected
under the contract; [b] it isprohibited by law or public policy;
or [c] it is precluded by contract.
(06:18):
B and C are pretty straightforward,but what does it mean for an
assignment to materially alter whatis expected under the contract?
Well, that could occur when theassignment, [a] materially changes the
duty of the obligor; [b] materiallyincreases the burden or risk imposed on
the obligor; [c] materially impairs theobligor's chance of obtaining return
(06:41):
performance; or [d] materially reducesthe value of the return performance.
To illustrate, let's revisit ourearlier example of the contract
between Homeowner and Painter.
Let's assume Homeowner livesin a community of identical
houses in identical condition.
If Homeowner assigns his right to have hishouse painted to his next-door neighbor,
(07:02):
the assignment will likely be valid,because it does not materially alter
what is expected under the contract.
There is no additional burden onPainter, because the neighbor's house
is the exact same size, in the exactsame condition, and essentially in the
same location as Homeowner's house.
Now let's assume instead that Homeownerassigns his right to have his house
(07:24):
painted to his friend that lives 50miles farther away from Painter, in
a dilapidated house that is twicethe size of Homeowner's house.
Under these facts, the assignment willlikely be invalid, because it materially
increases the burden on the painter.
Painter will have to travel agreater distance to paint a larger
(07:44):
house that is in worse condition.
Now that we've covered how to make avalid assignment, let's go over the
rights of the assignor and assignee.
An assignee may sue theobligor for non-performance.
Any defense to enforcement that couldbe used against the assignor may
also be used against the assignee.
(08:05):
That basically means that afterthe assignment, the assignee steps
into the shoes of the assignor whenseeking to enforce the contract.
An assignee may also sue the assignorfor wrongful revocation of an assignment
or for breach of an implied warranty.
Alright, that's it forour assignment rules.
Let's move on to the rules for delegation.
(08:28):
All contracted duties are delegableunless, [a] the contract prohibits
delegations or assignments; [b] thedelegation is against public policy;
[c] the contract is for personalservices that calls for the exercise
of personal skill or discretion;or [d] the delegation materially
alters the expectancy of the obligee.
(08:50):
Generally, the obligor remains liablefor non-performance of the contract,
unless all the parties agree otherwise.
And that brings us to the end of ourdiscussion on assignments and delegations.
We've covered a lot of ground today,from the basic definitions to the
specific rules governing theseimportant concepts in contract law.
(09:11):
In our next episode, we'llexplore third-party beneficiaries
and apply all these conceptsto some practical scenarios.
We'll see how these rules play out inreal world situations, which will help
you tackle similar questions on an exam.
Thank you for listening to Part 1 of ourseries on third-party rights in contracts.
Be sure to join us for Part2, where we'll complete our
(09:33):
exploration of this important topic.
If you enjoyed this episode of theLaw School Toolbox podcast, please
take a second to leave a review andrating on your favorite listening app.
We'd really appreciate it.
And be sure to subscribeso you don't miss anything.
If you have any questions orcomments, please don't hesitate
to reach out to myself or Alisonat lee@lawschooltoolbox.com or
(09:54):
alison@lawschooltoolbox.com.
Or you can always contactus via our website contact
form at lawschooltoolbox.com.
Thanks for listening, and we'll talk soon!