“Ancient Secrets Revealed: Are the Dead Sea Scrolls Older Than We Thought?”

Join host Tony Sweet on Truth Be Told as we dive into the latest research shaking the foundations of biblical history. A new AI-powered study suggests some of the Dead Sea Scrolls—already among the oldest biblical manuscripts—might be even older than previously believed. Learn how technology is rewriting what we know about ancient scripture, the challenges of dating these fragile texts, and why this matters for our understanding of early Judaism and the origins of the Bible.
#DeadSeaScrolls #BiblicalHistory #AncientManuscripts #Archaeology #AIResearch #TruthBeToldPodcast #TonySweet #HistoricalMysteries #AncientSecrets #ReligiousStudies

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-be-told-paranormal--3589860/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Ambient desert wind sound fades in Welcome to Truth Be Told,
where we uncover the mysteries of our past and present.
I'm Tony Sweet. Today we're exploring a discovery that could
reshape our understanding of Biblical history. Are some of the
famous Dead Sea Scrolls even older than we thought? Let's

(00:26):
dig in. Let's start with a quick refresher. The Dead
Sea Scrolls were found in the late nineteen forties and
fifties in caves near Kum Run along the Dead Sea
in what's now the West Bank. They're an enormous collection,
around nine hundred manuscripts and thousands of fragments. These texts

(00:47):
include early copies of books of the Hebrew Bible, apocryphal
works that didn't make the final Biblical canon, and writings
of a Jewish sect often thought to be the Scenes.
Before their discovery, the oldest surviving Hebrew Bible manuscripts dated

(01:07):
to around the tenth century CE. The scrolls pushed that
timeline back more than a thousand years to the second
century BCE, radically transforming biblical scholarship. But now researchers are
saying some of these scrolls may be even older than
previously believed. A new study used artificial intelligence, specifically an

(01:35):
AI model named Enoch, to analyze the handwriting on the scrolls.
It compared letter forms to twenty four securely dated samples
and then applied that learning to over one hundred and
thirty more fragments. The results inoc suggest many fragments are
older than we thought. For example, a portion of the

(01:55):
Book of Daniel, once dated to the one hundred and
sixties BCE, may actually come from around two hundred and
thirty BCE. That matters because the Book of Daniel is
often dated to the second century BCE, around the time
of the Maccabean Revolt. If this fragment is older, it

(02:16):
suggests the text existed in a more finalized form decades earlier,
challenging scholarly assumptions about when it was written and shared.
The technology behind this is fascinating. Traditionally, palaeographers date texts

(02:37):
by studying handwriting styles. It's part science, part art, and
depends on comparing letter shapes to dated inscriptions. But this
study brought machine learning to the table. The AI model
Enoch analyzed letter shapes with much more precision than the

(02:59):
human combined with radiocarbon dating of the parchment itself. The
model proposed a timeline that often pushed these fragments back
a century or more. But there's a catch. Radiocarbon dating
tells us when the parchment was made, not when the
text was written, So it's possible a scribe wrote on

(03:22):
older parchment later, and AI can't perfectly interpret scribal variations
or stylistic choices. Still, the findings are convincing enough to
spark big debates among scholars. Not everyone is sold. While

(03:44):
the study found its AI based dating match traditional estimates
about eighty percent of the time, that leaves a solid
twenty percent where ENOX results were notably older, scholars like
Christopher Rolston warned that AI should be used to assist,
not replace, expert human judgment. Scribal hands, varied styles overlapped,

(04:10):
and dating ancient handwriting isn't an exact science, even with
machine learning, and while carbon dating improves precision, it doesn't
pinpoint the act of writing itself. So while these new
findings are exciting, they're part of an ongoing conversation, not

(04:30):
the final word. So why should we care if some
of the Dead Sea scrolls are older than we thought?
It pushes back our timeline for when certain Biblical texts
were circulating in a standardized form that would change our
understanding of Second Temple Judaism, the world Jesus was born into,

(04:55):
and offer clues about how Jewish beliefs evolved in that period.
It could also reshape theories about the canonization of the
Hebrew Bible and the diversity of Jewish thought before the
Roman destruction of the Temple in seventy CE. Other wind
fades out, subtle music rises. It's amazing how ancient fragments

(05:20):
and desert caves continue to transform what we know about history,
even thousands of years later. That's all for today's episode
of Truth Be Told. I'm Tony Sweet. If you enjoyed
this dive into the mysteries of the Dead Sea Scrolls,
please subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen,

(05:43):
and don't forget to leave us a review. It really helps.
Have your own theory or question about the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Email me at your email or websitel. Next time, keep
seeking the truth.