Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to truth be Told. I'm your host Tony Sweet,
and today we're digging into a topic that shook the
world just a year ago and then strangely went quiet.
It's been one year since the US Congressional UFO hearings
brought the words non human biologics into mainstream political discourse.
(00:26):
Whistleblowers like David Grusch, former military and intelligence insiders, and
bipartisan members of Congress demanded answers about unidentified aerial phenomena,
or what we now call UAPs. But the question remains,
what has changed since those bombshell hearings and what has
(00:51):
quietly disappeared into the shadows. Let's unpack it. In late
July twenty twenty four, a series of extraordinary Congressional hearings
where held by the House so Oversight Committee. The witnesses
military veterans, and intelligence officials the claims. David grusha, former
intelligence officer, testified under oath that the US has retrieved
(01:14):
non human biologics from crash sites. He claimed that reverse
engineering programs for off world tech have existed outside congressional oversight.
Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot, detailed frequent encounters with
unexplained craft off the East coast and Commander David FRAVERR,
(01:40):
the pilot behind the now famous TIC tac Ufo sighting,
reinforced how advanced and physics defying these objects were. In short,
they claimed, the US government has known more than it said,
much more and for decades. The hearings created to firestorm
(02:01):
social media blew up, mainstream outlets actually covered UFOs without mockery.
Polls showed a spike in public interest and belief. So
what happened after? Let's be fair, some real progress was made.
One legislative action, the Senate and House introduced UAP Transparency
(02:21):
Acts to force government contractors and military agencies to disclose
information about legacy crash retrieval programs, but many of these
provisions were stripped from final versions of the National Defense
Authorization Act two. NASA and the Pentagon. NASA launched an
(02:43):
independent UAP study, and the Pentagon's arrow All Domain Anomaly
Resolution Office released a public facing website. They promised transparency,
claiming to be cataloging over eight hundred UAP cases. Every
public attitude shift, there's a growing mainstream consensus that something
(03:05):
is going on. Harvard Astronomers former CIA officers and even
ex presidents have called for more transparency. So yes, we've
seen some cultural and bureaucratic movement. But here's the thing.
The most explosive claims buried or ignored. One the whistleblower silenced.
(03:28):
Since the hearings, David Grush has largely gone dark. Interviews
were limited, requests for classified briefings have been stalled. Grush
admitted he couldn't share much without violating security oaths, but
no official effort has been made to validate or disprove
(03:52):
his claims. Two black budget projects still hidden. The alleged
existence of secret of special access programs operating beyond oversight
and with billions and untraceable funding, remains unacknowledged. These are
programs said to house reverse engineering of off world technology.
(04:15):
Three media drop off after initial coverage, most mainstream outlets
drop the story, no follow up on leads, no deep dives,
the narrative cooled intentionally or not. Four Legislative gutting. As
I mentioned, key parts of the UAP Disclosure Act, like
(04:35):
the UFO Crash Retrieval Program declassification clause, were stripped at
the last minute. That's not an accident, that's coordinated. Let's
talk about the elephant in the galaxy. Why are these
revelations being stalled or buried? Power and control? Whoever holds
(04:59):
the tech whole? It's power, reverse engineering, propulsion systems, or
energy sources from non human craft would be worth trillions,
and some factions want to keep that secret. Panic or
paradigm shift. Governments may fear that full disclosure could lead
to social, religious, or economic instability legal ramifications. If it's
(05:26):
true that crash retrievals and coverups have spanned decades, there
would be massive legal implications, violations of oversight, illegal funding,
even harm to whistleblowers. Truth too big to handle. Some
suggest disclosure as being done in slow doses to condition
(05:46):
the public what some call climatization. So where do we
go from here? Keep your eye on these the AARO
public reports. Are they actually increasing in detail or still vague?
Upcoming NASA updates? Will they challenge or support the military's findings.
(06:08):
Independent journalism outlets like The Debrief, Liberation Times, and Vice
are digging deeper. Twenty twenty six elections, UAP transparency is
becoming a bipartisan issue. Expect pressure from both the public
and politicians here's the truth. We are in the middle
(06:33):
of a slow motion disclosure movement, and if you're not
paying attention, you might miss it. One year after the hearings,
we've seen breadcrumbs but not the loaf. We've heard rumors
but not admissions. And while the walls of secrecy are cracking,
the full truth remains in the shadows. But the fact
(06:57):
that Congress even held those hearings shows we've entered a
new era. So keep watching the skies, but more importantly,
follow the silence. What isn't said is often the biggest
clue of all. I'm Tony Sweet, and this has been
truth be told. If today's show made you think twice,
(07:19):
hit subscribe, leave a review, and share it with someone
who still thinks UFOs are just science fiction. Until next time,
stay curious, stay skeptical, and stay aware.