Episode 72: RCTs vs. Pilot Studies vs. Feasibility Studies: A Simple Guide for Yoga Teachers

In this episode, Ariana and Jules get into the distinctions between randomized clinical trials (RCTs), feasibility studies, and pilot studies. They discuss the importance of understanding these methodologies in the context of yoga research and the common misconceptions surrounding them. The conversation highlights the role of preliminary studies in developing effective interventions and the significance of case studies in building evidence for future research. Additionally, they explore the concept of the null hypothesis and its implications in research design.

Takeaways

🤩RCTs are designed to fully test a treatment or intervention.

🤩Feasibility studies assess the practicality of conducting a full RCT.

🤩Pilot studies serve as a 'dress rehearsal' for larger studies.

🤩Misunderstandings about research terminology are common among practitioners.

🤩Case studies can provide valuable insights for future research funding.

🤩Old research can still be relevant and informative.

🤩Understanding the null hypothesis is crucial for research integrity.

🤩Research literacy is essential for yoga teachers and practitioners.

🤩Preliminary studies help refine interventions before larger trials.

🤩Clear communication in research publications is vital to avoid misleading conclusions.

Chapters

00:00 Understanding Research Methodologies

02:34 The Role of Feasibility and Pilot Studies

05:37 Misunderstandings in Research Terminology

08:22 The Importance of Case Studies

11:17 Exploring the Null Hypothesis