June 19, 2025 • 48 mins
What happens when beloved stories from our past get reimagined for today? The Four Seasons, a 1981 film starring Alan Alda and Carol Burnett, recently received the Netflix treatment as an eight-episode series. This transformation provides the perfect lens to examine how our storytelling, character development, and cultural values have evolved over forty years.
The original film centered on three couples who vacation together throughout the year until one husband abruptly divorces his wife and introduces a younger girlfriend into their tight-knit circle. While this core premise remains in the Netflix reboot, the modern version dives deeper into the emotional complexities and friendship dynamics that ensue. One fascinating revelation: while the basic human emotions around friendship breakups haven't changed much, social media has profoundly altered how these ruptures unfold. As one host notes, "What you didn't know didn't hurt you" in the pre-digital era – but today, we're constantly confronted with visual evidence of events we weren't invited to.
Perhaps the most striking evolution appears in how women are portrayed. The 1981 film presented female characters primarily as "the wives," reacting to their husbands' actions despite being smart and witty in their own right. Fast forward to the Netflix series, and we find women as entrepreneurs, therapists, and creatives with full agency and independent storylines. In some cases, the dynamic flips entirely, with female characters taking on the dominant roles their male counterparts occupied in the original. This shift reflects four decades of progress in how we represent women in media.
The conversation extends beyond The Four Seasons to consider other classics that have been (or perhaps should be) remade. Some, like The Ten Commandments, might benefit tremendously from modern cinematography and storytelling approaches. Others, like The Sound of Music, stand perfectly well on their own. What makes a reboot worthwhile? When it honors the original while bringing something new to the conversation – exactly what the Four Seasons series managed to accomplish. Have you watched both versions? We'd love to hear which elements you think were most successfully updated for today's world.
Amy, Kitty & Stacey
P.S. Isn't our intro music great?! Yah, we think so too. Thank you, Ivy States for "I Got That Wow".
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
All right, woo, look, I got that.
Wow, who wants some heads upright now?
We got that.
Turn it up loud.
I know you're wondering how.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
I got that.
Wow, here I go.
Here I go, coming.
I can't ever stop.
I'm a tour de force running.
Get me to the top.
I don't need an invitation.
I'm about to start acelebration.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
Well, here we are again.
Welcome everyone.
Speaker 4 (00:30):
Good day to y'all.
Speaker 5 (00:34):
Good day to y'all.
Do you live up north or downsouth?
Speaker 4 (00:38):
I don't know, I don't know, I don't know what day it
is, I don't know.
I'm neither here nor there.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Interesting.
Well, you are here.
You are here right now and thisis another episode of Three
Cocktails In Stacey, amy andKitty.
Thank you guys for tuning in.
We cover lots of differenttopics and tonight we are going
to dig into what we're callingthe Reboot Project.
(01:08):
And this has been kind of funto prepare for and I think the
initial part of our conversationwill probably lead into some
others as well.
But we became very curious,excited about the fact that the
Four Seasons, which was aclassic movie, was remade into a
(01:30):
Netflix series and I think weall dived in very quickly and
binged through the whole thing.
So we're going to dig into thatand have a fun little
conversation about the reboot ofthis classic film yeah, so I'm
curious.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
Um, I watched the series because I love 75 of the
actors and actresses in it.
I recognized all of the actorsand actresses in the original,
which was a movie, but I hadnever watched that original
movie.
Had you guys, had you seen itlike of its era in that time?
Speaker 5 (02:14):
I remember, I remember seeing it.
There were and there wasanother Alan Alda um Carol
Burnett movie too.
That was a few years later.
That I kind of liked too.
So yeah, it was interesting, itcame out in 1981, so and I and
I mean I remember seeing it.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
I know I saw it, but I had to go back and watch it
again to remember.
You know, I knew that it wasthe couples that were getting
together and you know kind ofand their evolution, but that
was really, that was really it.
So it was fun to watch it.
Now, in this era that we're inyeah and then, of course, to
(02:56):
compare it to the netflix.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
So so did you have expectations when you started
watching the series?
So, like for me, who hadn'twatched the movie, and maybe for
our listeners who never watchedthe movie, did you have?
I'm just curious, did you guyshave a set of expectations as to
what this was going to be,other than that basic story
(03:21):
couples each other.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
And I couldn't.
Yeah, I couldn't rememberenough of it.
I went back and watched the oldmovie later.
That basic story Couples eachother.
Yeah, I couldn't rememberenough of it.
I went back and watched the oldmovie later.
I couldn't remember enough ofit.
I just knew that was the gist.
You know they get together onvacation.
You know all the time in thedifferent four seasons and
different things happen.
That's all I could reallyremember.
So I really enjoyed the.
(03:44):
You know the new series reallyenjoyed it.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
I did when I knew that we were going to do this, I
went and watched the originalmovie first, oh, you did, okay.
And then I watched the rebootand so I didn't really have any
expectations.
I had a lot of curiosity.
I was like, okay, how is itgoing to be different?
How is it going to be similar?
How will they modernize it?
And I think that's somethingthat I'm always thinking about
(04:16):
on this topic.
When, when the decision is madethat you know a movie company
is going to remake something,yes, why?
First of all, like who raisestheir hand and says, ooh, ooh,
we need to remake Pretty in Pinkbecause you know, or we need to
(04:37):
remake the Breakfast Club, canyou imagine what about?
Speaker 4 (04:41):
Roadhouse.
Why did we need another?
The original roadhouse withdear, you know, heart throb
patrick swasey, yep, why?
Why didn't?
What story was left untold?
That needed to be this, atleast.
You know I'm joking about that.
(05:02):
But when you think about thefour seasons as the movie, I
think that they did a reallygood job of taking the premise
and retelling it to fit today.
Speaker 3 (05:17):
Okay, I have not seen it.
You what I have not seen it.
Speaker 4 (05:23):
You didn't watch it.
Speaker 3 (05:30):
I thought you were talking about roadhouse no, okay
, yeah so, yeah, sorry, are theydoing a remake of roadhouse?
Is that they did do it with jim?
Speaker 5 (05:39):
yeah, okay, I'm sure I'm guessing it's one that
nobody watched.
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (05:45):
I don't know.
I think a lot of people did,but I think they were younger.
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (05:49):
I, you know, of course, who knows why?
My guess is why.
You know it was a fairlypopular movie, so they're
looking well, now let'smodernize it and make some more
money.
We know the storyline andeverything is successful and
people might like it.
So here let's, let's redo itand make money off of it.
(06:10):
You know what I mean, insteadof guess.
You know there's a lot of flops, so you know it would at least
be semi-successful.
So yeah, that would be my guess.
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
Yeah, um, so I I do have some specific topics that I
thought would be fun to talkabout the comparison between the
two, and, again, one of thequestions that I had was how
will they modernize this?
Um, because you know, there'sthe there.
They will in some way, andthat's always something that I'm
(06:43):
particularly interested in.
So, first of all, the topic offriendship, comparing between
the two.
So for those of you who haven'tseen it, please go watch it,
because it really is theoriginal, a great film.
The original focuses on theseupper middle class couples that
(07:07):
come together for their holidays, their vacations, and then one
husband, out of the blue, saysI'm divorcing my wife.
After basically having this bigconversation amongst the four of
them about aren't we so luckythat all of us are staying
together, right?
And then the one husband saysI'm out, fast forward, brings a
(07:31):
new girlfriend into the group,and so there's this really
interesting focus on friendship,emotional loyalty, right oh
yeah I think we can all talkabout that we can
Speaker 5 (07:45):
that is definitely a thing you know in divorce who do
you who?
What friends do you lose?
You know, because they go withthe other crowd.
How do you still, yeah, fit inwith your?
Speaker 4 (07:58):
yeah you don't just divvy up kids and, and you know,
fight for the kids.
Sometimes there's the fightingfor the friends, and can you
invite both and what happenswhen you do?
Speaker 3 (08:12):
Yeah, yep, there was kind of.
There was a funny experience inthe original and in the reboot
about that when they both showup.
Yeah, very funny, I I.
It seemed like in the netflixseries that the storyline sort
(08:34):
of went a little bit deeper intosome of those emotional
boundaries and kind of themessiness of of the friendships,
um seemed, and there was justmore depth.
You can do more depth whenyou've got eight episodes versus
a movie.
Speaker 4 (08:52):
And I really I didn't Two hours versus eight hours.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
Yeah, exactly, so okay.
So here's the question aroundthis, and we've already talked
about it a little bit Do wehandle friendship breakups more
openly now?
Um, does that netflix versionreflect how our generation talks
about loyalty and boundaries?
(09:16):
What?
Speaker 5 (09:18):
do you guys think about that?
Good questions.
I wouldn't say we're any better, honestly.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
Probably not.
That sort of human behaviorprobably hasn't changed a whole
lot.
Speaker 4 (09:33):
Probably not.
I would think that the feelingsare the same.
I would think it's more awkwardnow than it was, in part
because of social media.
Coming back to social media andbefore, you might only run into
(09:56):
the friend that has been leftout occasionally, occasionally,
here your group of friends arealways not always but there's a
much more likely chance thatthrough your social media
network, you are going to seewhere you are left out.
So I think that it's moreawkward.
(10:21):
I think it's more awkward now.
I think that feelings can behurt, maybe more, because you
see what you're missing, you seewhat you didn't get invited to,
not unlike what middleschoolers and high schoolers are
going through.
Those feelings still hurt.
Yeah, so you know when we jokeabout we're so glad that there
(10:52):
was no social media when we werein high school um.
Speaker 1 (10:53):
You know what you?
Speaker 3 (10:53):
didn't know didn't hurt you yes well, it truly was
a simpler time.
It it really was.
Speaker 5 (11:04):
Yes, yes, for sure.
I thought in the original moviefirst.
You know re-watching it, and Ifeel like this is the case for a
lot of older movies or shows.
Pretty cheesy, honestly.
Speaker 4 (11:22):
Oh, when you watch it again.
Speaker 5 (11:24):
When you watch it yeah, couldn't get over the fact
that they were.
Did you notice they were alwayskissing each other.
You know what I mean.
Do you have friends that you,you know couple friends that you
kiss?
Did you not notice that?
Oh, you know, like pecs on thecheek, I mean.
Constantly they'd meet andthey'd all kiss each other on
(11:45):
the cheeks and lips and theywere kissing all the time.
It's just so weird to me.
That was weird to me that's now.
Speaker 4 (11:51):
I wonder if that's, and and perhaps our listeners
can help us out with this,because I wonder if that is
geographical.
I just I kind of assumed thatthat was a northeast New York
setting.
What are the?
What cultures live in that areawhere they are very
(12:16):
demonstrative In the Midwest?
We are not Miss.
I don't like hugs in the uppercorner not really wanting
somebodyto you don't want me to reel you
in and give you a peck on thecheek well, you and you and I
and kitty fine, but I meanliterally they, they'd come
(12:38):
together.
Speaker 5 (12:38):
I mean it would be like the one night they're just
going to their hotel rooms andgoing to bed, they're all
kissing and then they disperse.
Like what are you?
Speaker 4 (12:47):
okay, but it wasn't.
But we need to clarify it wasnot in swinger type kissing.
Speaker 5 (12:54):
No, yeah but I'm just saying that's not a thing and
it's certainly not around herethat ever.
You know, like I said, it'specs on the cheek and but every
all of them.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
It was just funny to see to me yeah, so I didn't
notice that in the series.
No, no, okay, no.
So to me then I feel like it'sso.
Yes, amy, it could be aregional thing, but it I think
it's also an era thing.
(13:27):
I mean, those, those coupleswere, they were very very close
right, yes, and they only saweach other, you know, four times
a year.
Yeah, four times a year.
So, um, but yeah, that was notsomething that was carried over
into the series and I think,just because you just don't see
(13:47):
people do that today, no, wasthere any nudity in the new
series?
Speaker 5 (13:53):
I don't think there was.
Was there?
Speaker 4 (13:56):
there was some skinny when they were when they went
skinny dipping well, they went.
Speaker 5 (14:01):
I can't remember the skinny dipping in the series,
Did they?
They went skinny dipping in theoriginal one.
Oh see, I can't remember.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
Yeah, we did.
Speaker 5 (14:09):
So I was more surprised that they went skinny
dipping in a movie in 1981.
And you can see some buns, youknow what I mean?
I mean, that's as much as itwas, but I thought that was
surprising for 1981, but maybenot, I don't know surprising for
(14:31):
1981, but maybe not, I don'tknow um.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
I thought I thought in 1981 in the original movie.
Every time they they weretogether they were in really
close quarters, really tight,like that puts that extra, you
know, pressure on the group,like when they were all out on
that boat boat, yeah, I wouldhave jumped off.
I would have jumped and tried toswim and strand myself on the
desert island because us beingthat yeah you know where you
(14:55):
couldn't even walk and yeah,that was just too much, yeah,
too much.
So I also liked the time spanbetter of the series.
Yeah, but you know we haven'tmentioned yet.
I mean, okay, we'll keep goingwith your outline, kitty,
because I'm sure we'll get to it.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
So this can be a very quick little comparison, but I
thought the role of women in thetwo the women were very
different.
Speaker 1 (15:25):
The women in the two the women were very different.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
The women in the original Carol Burnett, rita
Moreno, sandy, dennis, sandy,dennis, sandy, dennis.
Enjoyable characters, smart,funny, witty, but they were
often reacting to their husbands.
They were very subservientisn't the word, but they were,
(15:52):
they were, they weren't the maincharacters.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
Yeah, they were the wife.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah, yeah, they were the wives, so, um yeah, and
then in the series, the femalecharacters entrepreneur,
therapist, creative these werestronger female characters.
Um so, but you know what?
I would expect that.
So that that was one way thatit was modernized and I I was
(16:20):
pleased with that.
I thought that was great.
Yeah, it's like everybody I'msorry, I was great.
Yeah, it's like everybody.
Speaker 4 (16:25):
I'm sorry.
I was just going to say it waslike everybody had a story in
the modern yes, yeah, much moredepth.
Speaker 3 (16:35):
Much more character development.
Speaker 5 (16:38):
And again they had eight episodes to do it.
We haven't brought up that inthe series there's a gay couple.
You know that's definitely amodernized, you know, compared
to the yeah, and that's kind ofwhat I was thinking with.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
You know, when we say the wives were reactionary, the
partners were the two husbandsbecause they were married.
Um, one was the core of thegroup, one was the add-on, you
know, just like um.
So he came into it later.
We're assuming he came into theto the history later, um, and
(17:21):
it took not everybody was happyabout how he thought.
Fit in to the group, yeah, fitin, fit.
Okay.
Another bad word, much like thenew girlfriend.
Speaker 1 (17:39):
Yes.
Speaker 4 (17:40):
Yeah, so that's back to that relationship dynamic.
So we had you know You're right.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
Yeah.
So the partner of the coreperson in the group names won't
even matter here, but theItalian yeah Right, the Italian,
I loved him.
I thought he was a greatcharacter.
And so when other people wereannoyed by him, I'm just like
yeah Right, the Italian, I lovedhim, I thought he was a great
character.
And so when other people wereannoyed by him.
I'm just like no.
And Bill watched the wholething with me too and he agreed
(18:13):
Like he's a cool dude and Ithought he did a lot of fun and
he did a lot of good things forthe group in general.
Speaker 4 (18:23):
Yeah, you know now that I think about it.
I think that Tina Fey almostplayed the Alan Alda part.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
Like, like she was the more dominant.
Speaker 4 (18:37):
So she was the primary, will Forte Forte.
Her husband was the secondary.
Yeah, I would say so in theseries it wasn't strict husband,
wife, husband, you know,husband, partner.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
To me it felt like some of the women were the
primary character and theirhusbands were the secondary.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, the okay.
So the guy that played tinafey's husband, that's, will fort
will forte, forte, is that howyou pronounce it?
Speaker 4 (19:17):
yeah, he's been.
He is one of their comedianimprov a long time.
I think he wrote for SNL Ithink he might have been on SNL.
Speaker 5 (19:28):
not for very long he was on SNL.
Speaker 4 (19:31):
He's in a lot of those he's with that group of
friends.
I wasn't super crazy.
Speaker 3 (19:38):
I wasn't crazy about him.
Yeah, I agree what you said.
There is exactly right.
She took on more of the AlanAlda role from the original
movie and, yeah, I like that.
Yeah, so this is my shot.
(20:00):
By the way, this is my littlething that I have in my hand.
I do have a shot about the pillbottle.
Speaker 5 (20:06):
good well, we'll find out when you're on later um.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
So okay, let's talk about the um, the breakup, right
?
So jack's affair and thensudden remarriage.
So it it's revealed that he hashad a lot of girlfriends and
then finally decides to break upand have a new relationship.
(20:33):
So it's very much portrayed asmidlife crisis, which is kind of
what it would have been talkedabout and seen as back then.
Yeah, midlife crisis versus inthe series, a blossoming, a
personal awakening, right?
Speaker 5 (20:52):
I mean just yeah difference of semantics
completely different way of yeah, because they never said
midlife crisis, but that'scertainly what it was,
considering his age and then hermuch younger age, yeah, Okay, I
(21:13):
looked at it a little bit, as Idid something similar, except I
didn't.
Speaker 4 (21:20):
I did not go out searching for a younger man, but
to the people who didn't know,it looked like my ex and I had
this you know steady saladrelationship, and I knew I
wanted more than what I wasgetting.
I think that Jack did the samething, so I don't know that
(21:45):
anybody would describe a womanasking for divorce as a midlife
crisis.
Speaker 3 (21:52):
Yeah yeah, but it's stereotypical, for, yes, for a
man, it's a midlife crisis.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
Yes, you know you go buy a sports car, you divorce
your wife you, you know, getsomething younger yeah, very
very young.
Yes, and that was the other partthat I wanted to talk about,
the comparison between the twothe younger newcomer, the
younger girlfriend.
I think in both the originalmovie and the series they played
(22:28):
that part really well and Ithought those two roles were
incredibly similar, like whatthey were going through, what
the dynamic was, didn't needmodernizing.
I think that it was the sameYou're younger, you're looked at
(22:48):
with a bit of not disdain butdismay.
Your opinions and feelings werepushed to the side because you
didn't know, you haven't beenhere as long.
And they in both they allowedthe frustration of that
character to show.
(23:10):
Yes, I thought that was so Iliked that I would have.
I guess I never would havethought of what that person went
through in 1981.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4 (23:24):
Because also we didn't see that?
Because we didn't have socialmedia.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
I thought that it was fun that they took it further
and showed him going on aweekend away with her friends.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
Oh my gosh, and just how uncomfortable it was.
Speaker 5 (23:46):
And he's just like you're doing what so
uncomfortable for him.
But again, I think it probablywas the same for her.
You know, yeah, with hisfriends.
So yeah, that was funny.
That was a funny part.
Speaker 3 (24:03):
Oh my gosh.
Okay, let's see.
What else did I have here?
Speaker 4 (24:07):
Oh, I have a question Do any of your friends, your
male friends, now have asignificantly younger partner?
Your male friends now have asignificantly younger partner,
or women friends, Although youknow that would really be the
oddity right now?
Speaker 5 (24:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (24:27):
No, I can't think of anybody.
Speaker 4 (24:35):
No, me neither, but I , I mean, it's got to happen,
yeah, I would assume.
Speaker 5 (24:42):
Yeah, yeah, I think it probably does.
I was just curious.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
No, I don't know any so, and this is going to kind of
bring us back around to kind ofwhat we were talking about at
the beginning of theconversation.
So do you think that theNetflix version is playing
tribute to the original or doyou think that it is because
it's?
I don't know, I don't know thatI would go so far to call it a
(25:13):
cult classic, but it is aclassic.
Was it simply rewriting theclassic with some modern edge to
it, and did it need to be done?
Speaker 4 (25:32):
I actually really am glad they did it, because I
think it happens way more often,and I think that they held true
to the relationships and reallytold the deeper story that you
couldn't do in a two-hour movieback then.
(25:53):
So I thought that they're bothstandalone.
I don't think you have to watchthe original to enjoy the the
series.
I think if you watch the seriesyou'd go back and get a kick
out of it, although, like stacysaid, it would feel cheesy, just
because everything that youwatch from former eras feels a
(26:16):
little, you know, it's like I'msure it's like the star wars
fans who watched the threeoriginals like oh my god, can
you believe?
How did anybody believe thatcinematography?
Or you know the technical sideof it exactly.
Speaker 5 (26:32):
Yeah, yeah, but it was good, I liked, I liked the
remake.
You know, I don't, I don't carewhy they did it.
Um.
You asked if it was a um,what'd you say?
I um honor, honoring the oldone, or something yes so the new
(26:54):
one did have alan alda in itfor a tiny little bit, which I
thought was nice.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
They yeah yeah, I did too yeah I like.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
So I and I do.
I do wonder, like, who comesforward and says okay, guys,
it's time, it's time to remake?
Um well, the wizard of oz isn'ta good idea, because wicked,
because really I mean wickedisn't wizard of oz.
No right right, there's nodorothy, there's like that
(27:30):
storyline isn't before.
Speaker 5 (27:32):
Yeah, it's before it, so it's not really a remake,
but it's taking that story orpre-screening.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
It's like part of a franchise yeah.
It's a prequel.
Speaker 5 (27:41):
Yeah, we should have looked up, and I didn't research
, but did I wonder who producedit.
You know what I mean.
Like did Tina Fey produce the?
Speaker 4 (27:54):
I think so.
Oh yeah, I think so too.
Speaker 5 (27:56):
So that's the question yeah, was this her idea
or something you know?
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
Yeah, I have so some of the classics that are out
there.
So, like growing up aroundEaster time, we would always
watch the 10 commandments.
Did you guys watch that?
Speaker 4 (28:14):
Yeah, I mean watched the 10 commandments.
Did you guys watch that?
Yeah, I mean, yeah, I mean notlike it was not like the wizard
of oz at halloween that Iwatched every year and the sound
of music that I watched everyyear.
Speaker 3 (28:24):
Yeah that the 10 commandments.
For us that was every everyyear, and um, that's one that I
just think.
Why has somebody not redonethat?
Because with the moderntechnology that we have, you
know, the cinematography and allof that, I just think that
could be an amazing film.
Hmm, you know, can you findanother Charlton Heston?
(28:51):
I mean, how do you find thoseactors that can live up to and
not replicate what they did?
But, you know, um, pay tributeto these pieces of work, these
films that were groundbreakingat the time.
(29:13):
Now, I'm not saying that thefour seasons was groundbreaking,
groundbreaking, right, butright, you know, on the topic of
these movies that really kindof were gone with the wind, yeah
no one's done that.
Speaker 5 (29:28):
would that work today ?
Being um, wouldn't you callthat?
I don't know if that's theright word, but but antebellum,
isn't that what that?
I don't know that that oneworks today.
I don't think it'd fly today.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
Well, I think you'd have to tell another half of the
story, yeah yeah, which couldmake it really really
interesting.
Oh yeah, I think so.
But then you think about theold cowboy movies and now you
look at the whole TaylorSheridan group of shows, where
(30:01):
they've taken what was you knowconquering the West, and now
they've developed a series aboutit, a multi-season series.
About what is it?
1886, 1923, um, yeah, sosimilar, and that you're taking
(30:22):
some of the classics that weused to watch and being able to
put it into a streaming service,you can dive in much more and
get how come nobody's redonelittle house on the prairie talk
about a classic.
Speaker 5 (30:38):
Yeah, yeah uh, yeah, yeah, that would be good I don't
know.
Speaker 4 (30:45):
Would kids want to watch laura and nelly getting
into it on the playground?
What's the equivalent of that?
Speaker 5 (30:53):
yeah, I'm guessing probably not yeah I don't know,
yeah, I don't know, can we talkabout sex in the city, sex and
the city?
And it's not like it's a remaketoday, but they do have the
series and just like that, onhbo max, which I've said I
(31:13):
really liked um, I, so I've beenwatching that, really like it,
because I think, you know again,it's our age group, so there's
a lot of things I can identifywith.
I think it's very timely, um,and just like that.
So I went back and watched someof the um, old, sex and the
(31:33):
city.
I watched the season one,episode one and two, and then I
skipped forward to the lastseason and watched a couple in
the middle, just because Iwanted to see if it was you know
yeah, you know what I mean howhow different that would have
been.
I thought it was funny that Inoticed, and I don't know how
long it went, but in in thebeginning she talked to the
(31:55):
camera.
So you remember that thing,like ferris bueller, you know
was the start of it, I think,but she did a lot of talking to
the camera, but by season sixshe wasn't.
She was doing that, you know,narrating it behind, yeah,
behind it like the, like the newmovies and the new thing was so
I thought that was interesting,something that would not fly
(32:18):
today.
Episode two um has barkley.
Um, this guy she knows it'splayed by gabriel mocked.
Do you know him from suits?
Speaker 4 (32:30):
I, I would have to see him.
Speaker 5 (32:31):
I'm I'm the worst at the actors names yeah, so this
episode was called modelizer andthey they called him a
modelizer, so somebody whoactively tried to date models.
Right, just okay, so he would.
And, like I said, this is thepart that I don't think will fly
(32:53):
today he videoed, you know,secretly videoed him with the
models.
Okay, are you getting my gist?
You can say it.
They were having sex.
He would secretly video him.
And then she goes to see he'slike an artist and he's doing
all these art whatever.
(33:13):
And she questioned, like how hemakes his money because he's
never an artist and he's doingall these art whatever.
And she questioned, like how hemakes his money because he's
never sold any of his art.
But yeah, he has this big tvwall, you know the old style
giant tv up on all these tvs,and he turns it on and they all
start playing.
And I thought the interestingthing was that she wasn't upset
(33:35):
and she asked well, do they knowyou?
No, they don't know you know.
So that was, I thought, prettyinteresting to me.
And again, who knows what elsethrough it?
I just thought that was forepisode two.
Yeah, right now, that would behugely controversial.
Speaker 4 (33:52):
Actually, it wouldn't be controversial.
To show it, you would have tohave part of the storyline, the
controversy.
Speaker 5 (34:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (34:02):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (34:02):
And there's just one on.
I mean she just I think she waskind of half into it and was
smoking a cigarette at the end,and then that was the end of the
episode.
It was just like yeah, sothat's the difference between
1998, and today, I think.
I just thought that was very,very different.
Speaker 4 (34:26):
Kitty, you said you never really watched the series,
right, no, correct, I did.
I really enjoyed it because itwas again a peek into a
lifestyle I was not experiencing.
Speaker 5 (34:39):
I forgot that piece that I was going to say.
So at the time, like I said, 98, we had little kids.
We were not living that life.
You know what?
Speaker 4 (34:49):
I mean, I've never been to New York in 1996.
Speaker 5 (34:53):
No, so you know, so we 1998.
Speaker 4 (34:57):
98.
Kitty, was that the year wewent?
Speaker 5 (34:59):
Started in 98, ended in 2004.
But I mean, yes, besides, yesbesides, yeah, I think so.
But besides, just new york,just that whole singles, fancy,
yeah, fancy, you know lifestylethat they could do whatever you
know.
Again, we were home with kidsand yeah, yeah, so couldn't
(35:24):
identify with what they weredoing, but enjoyed watching it
just to see you know.
Speaker 4 (35:32):
Yeah, I don't have HBO Max.
I have watched the two moviesthat they put out.
I found I found one of them, Ithink the first one.
Okay, I was highly irritated bythe second one, and I was
highly irritated by a couple ofthe characters and I felt like
they were caricatures of reallife people instead of actually
(36:00):
being true.
And I thought the two that werecaricatures were Samantha and
Charlotte.
Speaker 5 (36:07):
Yeah, so you know A lot of people don't like the
second one very well.
Yeah, I like the new charactersin the new series.
You know they've brought in acouple new characters.
Did I like them?
Speaker 4 (36:21):
Yeah, and I remember there was lots of conversation
about how they had to modernizeit because Sex and the City was
very white, very white,incredibly white as a series,
Right.
Speaker 5 (36:31):
So the two new strong females in it, one is I'm not
sure, One's black, One I can'tsay I would guess Indian.
Speaker 4 (36:41):
But Persian or something like that.
Know from the Middle East, yeah.
Speaker 3 (36:47):
American, but American yeah yeah, um so and I
I didn't.
I didn't watch it, but I wouldhear little things about it, and
Samantha didn't come back anddo the new right.
Speaker 5 (37:02):
So was that weird Was was?
Speaker 3 (37:05):
was there like something missing?
Was that obvious?
How did they address that?
Or was it just a non-issue?
Speaker 5 (37:13):
No, it was addressed in like the first season she was
on.
I would call remotely, you know.
Know, like they talked on thephone, okay, um, you know she
never came into the same set,but they did, they, they talked
on the phone, basically you knowwhat I mean.
(37:35):
Um, so, yeah, they wrote it asthat, you know, basically carrie
was miffed that she justskipped.
I can't even remember becausethat's been, like I said, three
seasons ago.
She took off from out, you know,left new york right and just
thinking they're, you know, tootoo good of friends to just, you
(37:58):
know, leave and not say muchand whatever is how they handled
it.
But they made up over the phoneand whatever.
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (38:09):
Yeah, and super awkward because you know the
whole backstory about how.
Kim Cattrall was not happy anddid not like all of them, so
that's always interesting too.
Speaker 5 (38:21):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, it is, it is.
Speaker 4 (38:28):
It is, there, are.
Are there any old shows ormovies or series that you guys
have gone back to try and watchand, and they just don't work
now Um um well, I I don't knowif I would say it just didn't
(38:57):
work, but bill and I popped onurban cowboy not too long ago.
Speaker 3 (39:04):
okay, just so, I don't know that cheesy is even
the word, but there were so manytimes that we would just look
at each other and go, oh my God,I can't believe they just said
that, or I can't believe theyjust did that, or whatever.
And I I can't even tell you howmany times I went to the movie
theater to see that movie ohreally, you went multiple times.
(39:25):
Oh, I went probably a dozentimes.
Oh, you're kidding.
No, whatever year that was Idon't know what year that was
and I also remember I had acowboy hat at the time, so I
would wear my cowboy hat to themovie theater.
Speaker 4 (39:42):
Oh, that's funny is funny, I remember watching I
remember loving northernexposure did you guys ever watch
that as a tv series.
Okay, I do remember watchingthat, yes.
And so georgia, for a while,got into watching Twin Peaks.
(40:03):
Now we went back and watchedTwin Peaks.
I'm like, oh, if you love TwinPeaks of the same era not the
same storyline but kind ofquirky and really interesting
characters you should watchNorthern Exposure.
So I went back to try and startit again.
I called her.
I'm like'm like don't, don'twatch this one.
It doesn't, it's weird.
(40:26):
Now it's kind of like huh, thatone I remember being in love
with.
I remember, and I think Iactually recommended it as a
shot to go back and watchsomething Um Six, which which
does have a little it's.
It was streaming, I don't know,10 years ago, 12 years hell, it
(40:49):
could be 15 years ago.
I have no idea.
I can't also place things intime or space.
Um, but that had a huge, uhkind of cult following six feet
under and I tried to start itagain.
I tried to watch it with one ofthe weirdos that I dated that I
(41:10):
thought would get a kick out ofit, and it just didn't.
It didn't hit, it didn't land.
I don't know what it is, butyeah, I'm sure there's a ton of
that.
A lot of those.
Are there any shows or moviesyou wish people would redo?
Speaker 3 (41:33):
Well, I mean, I'm a tank mammoth.
Speaker 5 (41:41):
Urban Cowboy with a new story.
Speaker 3 (41:43):
I mean sure yeah.
Speaker 4 (41:50):
I wonder, with the Ten Commandments, if that is so
beloved that nobody it's nevergoing to live up.
Just like you would not youshould not redo the Sound of
Music.
Speaker 5 (42:01):
Oh, no, right, Because that you can watch today
and yeah.
Speaker 3 (42:10):
Oh shoot, what was I just going?
To say I can't remember.
I don't know.
Speaker 5 (42:19):
Are you going to tell us about your shot, your
medicine?
Speaker 3 (42:21):
I sure can.
Speaker 5 (42:22):
I sure can.
Speaker 3 (42:23):
Okay so and I mean you guys might already know this
, but this was mind blowing tome Okay so, if your pill bottles
are this kind so not allpharmacies have this kind, right
, but you know all of these havethe safety right, so you
actually have to push that downand then turn it right.
(42:45):
It's the child protection thing.
Yeah, so let's say you don'thave any kids in your house and
you don't have to have thatthing locked down.
Did you know that?
All you have to do that if youwant to use it the other way,
you just it's.
(43:07):
No, did not know that hey that'sa good one, wow, I know and
it's like yeah, sure enough,there's the it's.
It is designed for thatspecifically you don't want it
this way, you do it this way.
Speaker 5 (43:20):
Are there directions on the top for that, or just we
were supposed to notice thethread I?
Speaker 3 (43:26):
think we were just supposed to know that and I
discovered it because I saw iton one of those.
It was either facebook orinstagram, those little videos
where somebody says you know Iwas today years old.
Speaker 5 (43:40):
Yeah, I was.
Speaker 3 (43:41):
I was today years old when I learned this yep exactly
, and I was like huh, wow,promptly went to my pill bottles
and I switched them all aroundthere you go, oh I thought you
were gonna say we could use itas a jewelry carrier, so our
things can tangle together.
Speaker 5 (44:01):
I could not figure out where the heck you would
have been going well.
Speaker 3 (44:05):
I am pleased to know that you two had never heard of
that before, because that meansa lot of people probably have
never heard of it so you got uson that one good yeah good, yeah
, I'm glad I golfed today.
Speaker 5 (44:18):
I took a off, golfed in a four lady Best ball.
How was that.
Well, we got third to last.
I mean, oh Right, so here's myactual shot.
We know we are not going to begood, but yet we do it all the
time and I think that's my shot.
(44:39):
Like there are too many womenwho, oh, I'm just not good
enough for a tournament.
Well, you might be better thanwe are Drive to.
Speaker 4 (44:51):
Jewel yes, I have for this particular tournament.
Speaker 5 (44:55):
You might beat us.
No, I just think I've heardthat a lot Like oh, I'm not good
enough for a tournament.
Oh, my gosh, you're certainlygood enough for any women's
tournament, so go play.
Speaker 4 (45:07):
And the cool thing I will say about a women's golf
tournament you're only playingwith your four friends.
Yes, Nobody else I mean thegroup behind you might know that
you're taking a little bitlonger, but they don't know.
Speaker 5 (45:20):
Oh, yeah, who cares?
It was four hours of blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah and a
little bit of golf.
Yeah, what could possibly bebad with that?
And it was a nice day too.
So yeah, that's awesome,there's my, there's my shot.
Speaker 4 (45:35):
Go play in a tournament, it's best of all,
nobody cares okay, I do have ashot and this is just a weird
one.
It's not weird but um.
So, as somebody who's trying toget more protein into their
diet and you know, the breakfastis really hard for me because I
don't eat eggs and um, so it'shard to get protein so I
(45:59):
occasionally try those kodiak,that kodiak brand.
They've got kodiak pancakes, um, you can.
There's also a muff, a muffinmix, and this is my whole thing
the protein, um, blueberrymuffin mix.
Now, the pancakes don't have anygreat flavor to it and require
a lot of syrup, which kind ofdefeats the idea, but you know,
(46:22):
still protein.
So I got it into my head that Iwas going to make these
proteins, blueberry proteinmuffins, but I was going to add
real blueberries to it for realflavor.
And I did.
I added probably at least a cupof blueberries that I tossed
and just a little bit of flourso they didn't sink to the
(46:43):
bottom and damn if they don'ttaste good and I ate two of them
.
And I went from 8 30 in themorning till noon without being
hungry.
Hey, you can take a proteinproduct, add something real to
it and make it not taste likejust.
(47:03):
You know, some of that stuffjust tastes like filler, like
the protein bars.
They just taste like pureedmush.
I know, yeah, so this did not.
Speaker 5 (47:16):
The addition of real, like you know, real fruit Top
up a banana, put it in there,top up, you know, real fruit a
banana, put it in there, top up.
Speaker 4 (47:22):
You know real fruit right now actually made it taste
.
It was really enjoyable.
So that's my tip.
Speaker 5 (47:29):
Hey good one.
We're full of shots tonight.
We're full of something we are.
We are routinely full ofsomething that we are.
Speaker 3 (47:40):
Oh, all are, oh, all right Well should we Yep?
Speaker 5 (47:48):
Give four seasons a try.
Yeah, it's a wrap.
Good job, awesome.
Speaker 3 (47:54):
All right.
Well, everybody, have a goodweek and we'll see you next week
.
Speaker 4 (48:00):
Bye, cheers.
Speaker 1 (48:16):
Cheers, cheers.
I know you're wondering how.
Speaker 2 (48:20):
I got that vibe.
Here I go, here I go, coming.
I can't ever stop.
I'm a tour de force running.
Get me to the top.
I don't need an invitation.
I'm about to start acelebration.
Let me in Brought a good timefor some friends.
Turn it up loud past 10.
Turning up the crowd when I hitthem with the power.
All right, woo, look, I got that.
Wow, who wants some heads upright now?
We got that.
Turn it up loud.
I know you're wondering how.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
I got that.
Wow, here I go.
Here I go, coming.
I can't ever stop.
I'm a tour de force running.
Get me to the top.
I don't need an invitation.
I'm about to start acelebration.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
Well, here we are again.
Welcome everyone.
Speaker 4 (00:30):
Good day to y'all.
Speaker 5 (00:34):
Good day to y'all.
Do you live up north or downsouth?
Speaker 4 (00:38):
I don't know, I don't know, I don't know what day it
is, I don't know.
I'm neither here nor there.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Interesting.
Well, you are here.
You are here right now and thisis another episode of Three
Cocktails In Stacey, amy andKitty.
Thank you guys for tuning in.
We cover lots of differenttopics and tonight we are going
to dig into what we're callingthe Reboot Project.
(01:08):
And this has been kind of funto prepare for and I think the
initial part of our conversationwill probably lead into some
others as well.
But we became very curious,excited about the fact that the
Four Seasons, which was aclassic movie, was remade into a
(01:30):
Netflix series and I think weall dived in very quickly and
binged through the whole thing.
So we're going to dig into thatand have a fun little
conversation about the reboot ofthis classic film yeah, so I'm
curious.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
Um, I watched the series because I love 75 of the
actors and actresses in it.
I recognized all of the actorsand actresses in the original,
which was a movie, but I hadnever watched that original
movie.
Had you guys, had you seen itlike of its era in that time?
Speaker 5 (02:14):
I remember, I remember seeing it.
There were and there wasanother Alan Alda um Carol
Burnett movie too.
That was a few years later.
That I kind of liked too.
So yeah, it was interesting, itcame out in 1981, so and I and
I mean I remember seeing it.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
I know I saw it, but I had to go back and watch it
again to remember.
You know, I knew that it wasthe couples that were getting
together and you know kind ofand their evolution, but that
was really, that was really it.
So it was fun to watch it.
Now, in this era that we're inyeah and then, of course, to
(02:56):
compare it to the netflix.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
So so did you have expectations when you started
watching the series?
So, like for me, who hadn'twatched the movie, and maybe for
our listeners who never watchedthe movie, did you have?
I'm just curious, did you guyshave a set of expectations as to
what this was going to be,other than that basic story
(03:21):
couples each other.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
And I couldn't.
Yeah, I couldn't rememberenough of it.
I went back and watched the oldmovie later.
That basic story Couples eachother.
Yeah, I couldn't rememberenough of it.
I went back and watched the oldmovie later.
I couldn't remember enough ofit.
I just knew that was the gist.
You know they get together onvacation.
You know all the time in thedifferent four seasons and
different things happen.
That's all I could reallyremember.
So I really enjoyed the.
(03:44):
You know the new series reallyenjoyed it.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
I did when I knew that we were going to do this, I
went and watched the originalmovie first, oh, you did, okay.
And then I watched the rebootand so I didn't really have any
expectations.
I had a lot of curiosity.
I was like, okay, how is itgoing to be different?
How is it going to be similar?
How will they modernize it?
And I think that's somethingthat I'm always thinking about
(04:16):
on this topic.
When, when the decision is madethat you know a movie company
is going to remake something,yes, why?
First of all, like who raisestheir hand and says, ooh, ooh,
we need to remake Pretty in Pinkbecause you know, or we need to
(04:37):
remake the Breakfast Club, canyou imagine what about?
Speaker 4 (04:41):
Roadhouse.
Why did we need another?
The original roadhouse withdear, you know, heart throb
patrick swasey, yep, why?
Why didn't?
What story was left untold?
That needed to be this, atleast.
You know I'm joking about that.
(05:02):
But when you think about thefour seasons as the movie, I
think that they did a reallygood job of taking the premise
and retelling it to fit today.
Speaker 3 (05:17):
Okay, I have not seen it.
You what I have not seen it.
Speaker 4 (05:23):
You didn't watch it.
Speaker 3 (05:30):
I thought you were talking about roadhouse no, okay
, yeah so, yeah, sorry, are theydoing a remake of roadhouse?
Is that they did do it with jim?
Speaker 5 (05:39):
yeah, okay, I'm sure I'm guessing it's one that
nobody watched.
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (05:45):
I don't know.
I think a lot of people did,but I think they were younger.
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (05:49):
I, you know, of course, who knows why?
My guess is why.
You know it was a fairlypopular movie, so they're
looking well, now let'smodernize it and make some more
money.
We know the storyline andeverything is successful and
people might like it.
So here let's, let's redo itand make money off of it.
(06:10):
You know what I mean, insteadof guess.
You know there's a lot of flops, so you know it would at least
be semi-successful.
So yeah, that would be my guess.
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
Yeah, um, so I I do have some specific topics that I
thought would be fun to talkabout the comparison between the
two, and, again, one of thequestions that I had was how
will they modernize this?
Um, because you know, there'sthe there.
They will in some way, andthat's always something that I'm
(06:43):
particularly interested in.
So, first of all, the topic offriendship, comparing between
the two.
So for those of you who haven'tseen it, please go watch it,
because it really is theoriginal, a great film.
The original focuses on theseupper middle class couples that
(07:07):
come together for their holidays, their vacations, and then one
husband, out of the blue, saysI'm divorcing my wife.
After basically having this bigconversation amongst the four of
them about aren't we so luckythat all of us are staying
together, right?
And then the one husband saysI'm out, fast forward, brings a
(07:31):
new girlfriend into the group,and so there's this really
interesting focus on friendship,emotional loyalty, right oh
yeah I think we can all talkabout that we can
Speaker 5 (07:45):
that is definitely a thing you know in divorce who do
you who?
What friends do you lose?
You know, because they go withthe other crowd.
How do you still, yeah, fit inwith your?
Speaker 4 (07:58):
yeah you don't just divvy up kids and, and you know,
fight for the kids.
Sometimes there's the fightingfor the friends, and can you
invite both and what happenswhen you do?
Speaker 3 (08:12):
Yeah, yep, there was kind of.
There was a funny experience inthe original and in the reboot
about that when they both showup.
Yeah, very funny, I I.
It seemed like in the netflixseries that the storyline sort
(08:34):
of went a little bit deeper intosome of those emotional
boundaries and kind of themessiness of of the friendships,
um seemed, and there was justmore depth.
You can do more depth whenyou've got eight episodes versus
a movie.
Speaker 4 (08:52):
And I really I didn't Two hours versus eight hours.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
Yeah, exactly, so okay.
So here's the question aroundthis, and we've already talked
about it a little bit Do wehandle friendship breakups more
openly now?
Um, does that netflix versionreflect how our generation talks
about loyalty and boundaries?
(09:16):
What?
Speaker 5 (09:18):
do you guys think about that?
Good questions.
I wouldn't say we're any better, honestly.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
Probably not.
That sort of human behaviorprobably hasn't changed a whole
lot.
Speaker 4 (09:33):
Probably not.
I would think that the feelingsare the same.
I would think it's more awkwardnow than it was, in part
because of social media.
Coming back to social media andbefore, you might only run into
(09:56):
the friend that has been leftout occasionally, occasionally,
here your group of friends arealways not always but there's a
much more likely chance thatthrough your social media
network, you are going to seewhere you are left out.
So I think that it's moreawkward.
(10:21):
I think it's more awkward now.
I think that feelings can behurt, maybe more, because you
see what you're missing, you seewhat you didn't get invited to,
not unlike what middleschoolers and high schoolers are
going through.
Those feelings still hurt.
Yeah, so you know when we jokeabout we're so glad that there
(10:52):
was no social media when we werein high school um.
Speaker 1 (10:53):
You know what you?
Speaker 3 (10:53):
didn't know didn't hurt you yes well, it truly was
a simpler time.
It it really was.
Speaker 5 (11:04):
Yes, yes, for sure.
I thought in the original moviefirst.
You know re-watching it, and Ifeel like this is the case for a
lot of older movies or shows.
Pretty cheesy, honestly.
Speaker 4 (11:22):
Oh, when you watch it again.
Speaker 5 (11:24):
When you watch it yeah, couldn't get over the fact
that they were.
Did you notice they were alwayskissing each other.
You know what I mean.
Do you have friends that you,you know couple friends that you
kiss?
Did you not notice that?
Oh, you know, like pecs on thecheek, I mean.
Constantly they'd meet andthey'd all kiss each other on
(11:45):
the cheeks and lips and theywere kissing all the time.
It's just so weird to me.
That was weird to me that's now.
Speaker 4 (11:51):
I wonder if that's, and and perhaps our listeners
can help us out with this,because I wonder if that is
geographical.
I just I kind of assumed thatthat was a northeast New York
setting.
What are the?
What cultures live in that areawhere they are very
(12:16):
demonstrative In the Midwest?
We are not Miss.
I don't like hugs in the uppercorner not really wanting
somebodyto you don't want me to reel you
in and give you a peck on thecheek well, you and you and I
and kitty fine, but I meanliterally they, they'd come
(12:38):
together.
Speaker 5 (12:38):
I mean it would be like the one night they're just
going to their hotel rooms andgoing to bed, they're all
kissing and then they disperse.
Like what are you?
Speaker 4 (12:47):
okay, but it wasn't.
But we need to clarify it wasnot in swinger type kissing.
Speaker 5 (12:54):
No, yeah but I'm just saying that's not a thing and
it's certainly not around herethat ever.
You know, like I said, it'specs on the cheek and but every
all of them.
Speaker 3 (13:05):
It was just funny to see to me yeah, so I didn't
notice that in the series.
No, no, okay, no.
So to me then I feel like it'sso.
Yes, amy, it could be aregional thing, but it I think
it's also an era thing.
(13:27):
I mean, those, those coupleswere, they were very very close
right, yes, and they only saweach other, you know, four times
a year.
Yeah, four times a year.
So, um, but yeah, that was notsomething that was carried over
into the series and I think,just because you just don't see
(13:47):
people do that today, no, wasthere any nudity in the new
series?
Speaker 5 (13:53):
I don't think there was.
Was there?
Speaker 4 (13:56):
there was some skinny when they were when they went
skinny dipping well, they went.
Speaker 5 (14:01):
I can't remember the skinny dipping in the series,
Did they?
They went skinny dipping in theoriginal one.
Oh see, I can't remember.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
Yeah, we did.
Speaker 5 (14:09):
So I was more surprised that they went skinny
dipping in a movie in 1981.
And you can see some buns, youknow what I mean?
I mean, that's as much as itwas, but I thought that was
surprising for 1981, but maybenot, I don't know surprising for
(14:31):
1981, but maybe not, I don'tknow um.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
I thought I thought in 1981 in the original movie.
Every time they they weretogether they were in really
close quarters, really tight,like that puts that extra, you
know, pressure on the group,like when they were all out on
that boat boat, yeah, I wouldhave jumped off.
I would have jumped and tried toswim and strand myself on the
desert island because us beingthat yeah you know where you
(14:55):
couldn't even walk and yeah,that was just too much, yeah,
too much.
So I also liked the time spanbetter of the series.
Yeah, but you know we haven'tmentioned yet.
I mean, okay, we'll keep goingwith your outline, kitty,
because I'm sure we'll get to it.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
So this can be a very quick little comparison, but I
thought the role of women in thetwo the women were very
different.
Speaker 1 (15:25):
The women in the two the women were very different.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
The women in the original Carol Burnett, rita
Moreno, sandy, dennis, sandy,dennis, sandy, dennis.
Enjoyable characters, smart,funny, witty, but they were
often reacting to their husbands.
They were very subservientisn't the word, but they were,
(15:52):
they were, they weren't the maincharacters.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
Yeah, they were the wife.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah, yeah, they were the wives, so, um yeah, and
then in the series, the femalecharacters entrepreneur,
therapist, creative these werestronger female characters.
Um so, but you know what?
I would expect that.
So that that was one way thatit was modernized and I I was
(16:20):
pleased with that.
I thought that was great.
Yeah, it's like everybody I'msorry, I was great.
Yeah, it's like everybody.
Speaker 4 (16:25):
I'm sorry.
I was just going to say it waslike everybody had a story in
the modern yes, yeah, much moredepth.
Speaker 3 (16:35):
Much more character development.
Speaker 5 (16:38):
And again they had eight episodes to do it.
We haven't brought up that inthe series there's a gay couple.
You know that's definitely amodernized, you know, compared
to the yeah, and that's kind ofwhat I was thinking with.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
You know, when we say the wives were reactionary, the
partners were the two husbandsbecause they were married.
Um, one was the core of thegroup, one was the add-on, you
know, just like um.
So he came into it later.
We're assuming he came into theto the history later, um, and
(17:21):
it took not everybody was happyabout how he thought.
Fit in to the group, yeah, fitin, fit.
Okay.
Another bad word, much like thenew girlfriend.
Speaker 1 (17:39):
Yes.
Speaker 4 (17:40):
Yeah, so that's back to that relationship dynamic.
So we had you know You're right.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
Yeah.
So the partner of the coreperson in the group names won't
even matter here, but theItalian yeah Right, the Italian,
I loved him.
I thought he was a greatcharacter.
And so when other people wereannoyed by him, I'm just like
yeah Right, the Italian, I lovedhim, I thought he was a great
character.
And so when other people wereannoyed by him.
I'm just like no.
And Bill watched the wholething with me too and he agreed
(18:13):
Like he's a cool dude and Ithought he did a lot of fun and
he did a lot of good things forthe group in general.
Speaker 4 (18:23):
Yeah, you know now that I think about it.
I think that Tina Fey almostplayed the Alan Alda part.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
Like, like she was the more dominant.
Speaker 4 (18:37):
So she was the primary, will Forte Forte.
Her husband was the secondary.
Yeah, I would say so in theseries it wasn't strict husband,
wife, husband, you know,husband, partner.
Speaker 3 (19:04):
To me it felt like some of the women were the
primary character and theirhusbands were the secondary.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, the okay.
So the guy that played tinafey's husband, that's, will fort
will forte, forte, is that howyou pronounce it?
Speaker 4 (19:17):
yeah, he's been.
He is one of their comedianimprov a long time.
I think he wrote for SNL Ithink he might have been on SNL.
Speaker 5 (19:28):
not for very long he was on SNL.
Speaker 4 (19:31):
He's in a lot of those he's with that group of
friends.
I wasn't super crazy.
Speaker 3 (19:38):
I wasn't crazy about him.
Yeah, I agree what you said.
There is exactly right.
She took on more of the AlanAlda role from the original
movie and, yeah, I like that.
Yeah, so this is my shot.
(20:00):
By the way, this is my littlething that I have in my hand.
I do have a shot about the pillbottle.
Speaker 5 (20:06):
good well, we'll find out when you're on later um.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
So okay, let's talk about the um, the breakup, right
?
So jack's affair and thensudden remarriage.
So it it's revealed that he hashad a lot of girlfriends and
then finally decides to break upand have a new relationship.
(20:33):
So it's very much portrayed asmidlife crisis, which is kind of
what it would have been talkedabout and seen as back then.
Yeah, midlife crisis versus inthe series, a blossoming, a
personal awakening, right?
Speaker 5 (20:52):
I mean just yeah difference of semantics
completely different way of yeah, because they never said
midlife crisis, but that'scertainly what it was,
considering his age and then hermuch younger age, yeah, Okay, I
(21:13):
looked at it a little bit, as Idid something similar, except I
didn't.
Speaker 4 (21:20):
I did not go out searching for a younger man, but
to the people who didn't know,it looked like my ex and I had
this you know steady saladrelationship, and I knew I
wanted more than what I wasgetting.
I think that Jack did the samething, so I don't know that
(21:45):
anybody would describe a womanasking for divorce as a midlife
crisis.
Speaker 3 (21:52):
Yeah yeah, but it's stereotypical, for, yes, for a
man, it's a midlife crisis.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
Yes, you know you go buy a sports car, you divorce
your wife you, you know, getsomething younger yeah, very
very young.
Yes, and that was the other partthat I wanted to talk about,
the comparison between the twothe younger newcomer, the
younger girlfriend.
I think in both the originalmovie and the series they played
(22:28):
that part really well and Ithought those two roles were
incredibly similar, like whatthey were going through, what
the dynamic was, didn't needmodernizing.
I think that it was the sameYou're younger, you're looked at
(22:48):
with a bit of not disdain butdismay.
Your opinions and feelings werepushed to the side because you
didn't know, you haven't beenhere as long.
And they in both they allowedthe frustration of that
character to show.
(23:10):
Yes, I thought that was so Iliked that I would have.
I guess I never would havethought of what that person went
through in 1981.
Speaker 5 (23:22):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4 (23:24):
Because also we didn't see that?
Because we didn't have socialmedia.
Speaker 3 (23:29):
I thought that it was fun that they took it further
and showed him going on aweekend away with her friends.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
Oh my gosh, and just how uncomfortable it was.
Speaker 5 (23:46):
And he's just like you're doing what so
uncomfortable for him.
But again, I think it probablywas the same for her.
You know, yeah, with hisfriends.
So yeah, that was funny.
That was a funny part.
Speaker 3 (24:03):
Oh my gosh.
Okay, let's see.
What else did I have here?
Speaker 4 (24:07):
Oh, I have a question Do any of your friends, your
male friends, now have asignificantly younger partner?
Your male friends now have asignificantly younger partner,
or women friends, Although youknow that would really be the
oddity right now?
Speaker 5 (24:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (24:27):
No, I can't think of anybody.
Speaker 4 (24:35):
No, me neither, but I , I mean, it's got to happen,
yeah, I would assume.
Speaker 5 (24:42):
Yeah, yeah, I think it probably does.
I was just curious.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
No, I don't know any so, and this is going to kind of
bring us back around to kind ofwhat we were talking about at
the beginning of theconversation.
So do you think that theNetflix version is playing
tribute to the original or doyou think that it is because
it's?
I don't know, I don't know thatI would go so far to call it a
(25:13):
cult classic, but it is aclassic.
Was it simply rewriting theclassic with some modern edge to
it, and did it need to be done?
Speaker 4 (25:32):
I actually really am glad they did it, because I
think it happens way more often,and I think that they held true
to the relationships and reallytold the deeper story that you
couldn't do in a two-hour movieback then.
(25:53):
So I thought that they're bothstandalone.
I don't think you have to watchthe original to enjoy the the
series.
I think if you watch the seriesyou'd go back and get a kick
out of it, although, like stacysaid, it would feel cheesy, just
because everything that youwatch from former eras feels a
(26:16):
little, you know, it's like I'msure it's like the star wars
fans who watched the threeoriginals like oh my god, can
you believe?
How did anybody believe thatcinematography?
Or you know the technical sideof it exactly.
Speaker 5 (26:32):
Yeah, yeah, but it was good, I liked, I liked the
remake.
You know, I don't, I don't carewhy they did it.
Um.
You asked if it was a um,what'd you say?
I um honor, honoring the oldone, or something yes so the new
(26:54):
one did have alan alda in itfor a tiny little bit, which I
thought was nice.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
They yeah yeah, I did too yeah I like.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
So I and I do.
I do wonder, like, who comesforward and says okay, guys,
it's time, it's time to remake?
Um well, the wizard of oz isn'ta good idea, because wicked,
because really I mean wickedisn't wizard of oz.
No right right, there's nodorothy, there's like that
(27:30):
storyline isn't before.
Speaker 5 (27:32):
Yeah, it's before it, so it's not really a remake,
but it's taking that story orpre-screening.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
It's like part of a franchise yeah.
It's a prequel.
Speaker 5 (27:41):
Yeah, we should have looked up, and I didn't research
, but did I wonder who producedit.
You know what I mean.
Like did Tina Fey produce the?
Speaker 4 (27:54):
I think so.
Oh yeah, I think so too.
Speaker 5 (27:56):
So that's the question yeah, was this her idea
or something you know?
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
Yeah, I have so some of the classics that are out
there.
So, like growing up aroundEaster time, we would always
watch the 10 commandments.
Did you guys watch that?
Speaker 4 (28:14):
Yeah, I mean watched the 10 commandments.
Did you guys watch that?
Yeah, I mean, yeah, I mean notlike it was not like the wizard
of oz at halloween that Iwatched every year and the sound
of music that I watched everyyear.
Speaker 3 (28:24):
Yeah that the 10 commandments.
For us that was every everyyear, and um, that's one that I
just think.
Why has somebody not redonethat?
Because with the moderntechnology that we have, you
know, the cinematography and allof that, I just think that
could be an amazing film.
Hmm, you know, can you findanother Charlton Heston?
(28:51):
I mean, how do you find thoseactors that can live up to and
not replicate what they did?
But, you know, um, pay tributeto these pieces of work, these
films that were groundbreakingat the time.
(29:13):
Now, I'm not saying that thefour seasons was groundbreaking,
groundbreaking, right, butright, you know, on the topic of
these movies that really kindof were gone with the wind, yeah
no one's done that.
Speaker 5 (29:28):
would that work today ?
Being um, wouldn't you callthat?
I don't know if that's theright word, but but antebellum,
isn't that what that?
I don't know that that oneworks today.
I don't think it'd fly today.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
Well, I think you'd have to tell another half of the
story, yeah yeah, which couldmake it really really
interesting.
Oh yeah, I think so.
But then you think about theold cowboy movies and now you
look at the whole TaylorSheridan group of shows, where
(30:01):
they've taken what was you knowconquering the West, and now
they've developed a series aboutit, a multi-season series.
About what is it?
1886, 1923, um, yeah, sosimilar, and that you're taking
(30:22):
some of the classics that weused to watch and being able to
put it into a streaming service,you can dive in much more and
get how come nobody's redonelittle house on the prairie talk
about a classic.
Speaker 5 (30:38):
Yeah, yeah uh, yeah, yeah, that would be good I don't
know.
Speaker 4 (30:45):
Would kids want to watch laura and nelly getting
into it on the playground?
What's the equivalent of that?
Speaker 5 (30:53):
yeah, I'm guessing probably not yeah I don't know,
yeah, I don't know, can we talkabout sex in the city, sex and
the city?
And it's not like it's a remaketoday, but they do have the
series and just like that, onhbo max, which I've said I
(31:13):
really liked um, I, so I've beenwatching that, really like it,
because I think, you know again,it's our age group, so there's
a lot of things I can identifywith.
I think it's very timely, um,and just like that.
So I went back and watched someof the um, old, sex and the
(31:33):
city.
I watched the season one,episode one and two, and then I
skipped forward to the lastseason and watched a couple in
the middle, just because Iwanted to see if it was you know
yeah, you know what I mean howhow different that would have
been.
I thought it was funny that Inoticed, and I don't know how
long it went, but in in thebeginning she talked to the
(31:55):
camera.
So you remember that thing,like ferris bueller, you know
was the start of it, I think,but she did a lot of talking to
the camera, but by season sixshe wasn't.
She was doing that, you know,narrating it behind, yeah,
behind it like the, like the newmovies and the new thing was so
I thought that was interesting,something that would not fly
(32:18):
today.
Episode two um has barkley.
Um, this guy she knows it'splayed by gabriel mocked.
Do you know him from suits?
Speaker 4 (32:30):
I, I would have to see him.
Speaker 5 (32:31):
I'm I'm the worst at the actors names yeah, so this
episode was called modelizer andthey they called him a
modelizer, so somebody whoactively tried to date models.
Right, just okay, so he would.
And, like I said, this is thepart that I don't think will fly
(32:53):
today he videoed, you know,secretly videoed him with the
models.
Okay, are you getting my gist?
You can say it.
They were having sex.
He would secretly video him.
And then she goes to see he'slike an artist and he's doing
all these art whatever.
(33:13):
And she questioned, like how hemakes his money because he's
never an artist and he's doingall these art whatever.
And she questioned, like how hemakes his money because he's
never sold any of his art.
But yeah, he has this big tvwall, you know the old style
giant tv up on all these tvs,and he turns it on and they all
start playing.
And I thought the interestingthing was that she wasn't upset
(33:35):
and she asked well, do they knowyou?
No, they don't know you know.
So that was, I thought, prettyinteresting to me.
And again, who knows what elsethrough it?
I just thought that was forepisode two.
Yeah, right now, that would behugely controversial.
Speaker 4 (33:52):
Actually, it wouldn't be controversial.
To show it, you would have tohave part of the storyline, the
controversy.
Speaker 5 (34:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (34:02):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (34:02):
And there's just one on.
I mean she just I think she waskind of half into it and was
smoking a cigarette at the end,and then that was the end of the
episode.
It was just like yeah, sothat's the difference between
1998, and today, I think.
I just thought that was very,very different.
Speaker 4 (34:26):
Kitty, you said you never really watched the series,
right, no, correct, I did.
I really enjoyed it because itwas again a peek into a
lifestyle I was not experiencing.
Speaker 5 (34:39):
I forgot that piece that I was going to say.
So at the time, like I said, 98, we had little kids.
We were not living that life.
You know what?
Speaker 4 (34:49):
I mean, I've never been to New York in 1996.
Speaker 5 (34:53):
No, so you know, so we 1998.
Speaker 4 (34:57):
98.
Kitty, was that the year wewent?
Speaker 5 (34:59):
Started in 98, ended in 2004.
But I mean, yes, besides, yesbesides, yeah, I think so.
But besides, just new york,just that whole singles, fancy,
yeah, fancy, you know lifestylethat they could do whatever you
know.
Again, we were home with kidsand yeah, yeah, so couldn't
(35:24):
identify with what they weredoing, but enjoyed watching it
just to see you know.
Speaker 4 (35:32):
Yeah, I don't have HBO Max.
I have watched the two moviesthat they put out.
I found I found one of them, Ithink the first one.
Okay, I was highly irritated bythe second one, and I was
highly irritated by a couple ofthe characters and I felt like
they were caricatures of reallife people instead of actually
(36:00):
being true.
And I thought the two that werecaricatures were Samantha and
Charlotte.
Speaker 5 (36:07):
Yeah, so you know A lot of people don't like the
second one very well.
Yeah, I like the new charactersin the new series.
You know they've brought in acouple new characters.
Did I like them?
Speaker 4 (36:21):
Yeah, and I remember there was lots of conversation
about how they had to modernizeit because Sex and the City was
very white, very white,incredibly white as a series,
Right.
Speaker 5 (36:31):
So the two new strong females in it, one is I'm not
sure, One's black, One I can'tsay I would guess Indian.
Speaker 4 (36:41):
But Persian or something like that.
Know from the Middle East, yeah.
Speaker 3 (36:47):
American, but American yeah yeah, um so and I
I didn't.
I didn't watch it, but I wouldhear little things about it, and
Samantha didn't come back anddo the new right.
Speaker 5 (37:02):
So was that weird Was was?
Speaker 3 (37:05):
was there like something missing?
Was that obvious?
How did they address that?
Or was it just a non-issue?
Speaker 5 (37:13):
No, it was addressed in like the first season she was
on.
I would call remotely, you know.
Know, like they talked on thephone, okay, um, you know she
never came into the same set,but they did, they, they talked
on the phone, basically you knowwhat I mean.
(37:35):
Um, so, yeah, they wrote it asthat, you know, basically carrie
was miffed that she justskipped.
I can't even remember becausethat's been, like I said, three
seasons ago.
She took off from out, you know,left new york right and just
thinking they're, you know, tootoo good of friends to just, you
(37:58):
know, leave and not say muchand whatever is how they handled
it.
But they made up over the phoneand whatever.
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (38:09):
Yeah, and super awkward because you know the
whole backstory about how.
Kim Cattrall was not happy anddid not like all of them, so
that's always interesting too.
Speaker 5 (38:21):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, it is, it is.
Speaker 4 (38:28):
It is, there, are.
Are there any old shows ormovies or series that you guys
have gone back to try and watchand, and they just don't work
now Um um well, I I don't knowif I would say it just didn't
(38:57):
work, but bill and I popped onurban cowboy not too long ago.
Speaker 3 (39:04):
okay, just so, I don't know that cheesy is even
the word, but there were so manytimes that we would just look
at each other and go, oh my God,I can't believe they just said
that, or I can't believe theyjust did that, or whatever.
And I I can't even tell you howmany times I went to the movie
theater to see that movie ohreally, you went multiple times.
(39:25):
Oh, I went probably a dozentimes.
Oh, you're kidding.
No, whatever year that was Idon't know what year that was
and I also remember I had acowboy hat at the time, so I
would wear my cowboy hat to themovie theater.
Speaker 4 (39:42):
Oh, that's funny is funny, I remember watching I
remember loving northernexposure did you guys ever watch
that as a tv series.
Okay, I do remember watchingthat, yes.
And so georgia, for a while,got into watching Twin Peaks.
(40:03):
Now we went back and watchedTwin Peaks.
I'm like, oh, if you love TwinPeaks of the same era not the
same storyline but kind ofquirky and really interesting
characters you should watchNorthern Exposure.
So I went back to try and startit again.
I called her.
I'm like'm like don't, don'twatch this one.
It doesn't, it's weird.
(40:26):
Now it's kind of like huh, thatone I remember being in love
with.
I remember, and I think Iactually recommended it as a
shot to go back and watchsomething Um Six, which which
does have a little it's.
It was streaming, I don't know,10 years ago, 12 years hell, it
(40:49):
could be 15 years ago.
I have no idea.
I can't also place things intime or space.
Um, but that had a huge, uhkind of cult following six feet
under and I tried to start itagain.
I tried to watch it with one ofthe weirdos that I dated that I
(41:10):
thought would get a kick out ofit, and it just didn't.
It didn't hit, it didn't land.
I don't know what it is, butyeah, I'm sure there's a ton of
that.
A lot of those.
Are there any shows or moviesyou wish people would redo?
Speaker 3 (41:33):
Well, I mean, I'm a tank mammoth.
Speaker 5 (41:41):
Urban Cowboy with a new story.
Speaker 3 (41:43):
I mean sure yeah.
Speaker 4 (41:50):
I wonder, with the Ten Commandments, if that is so
beloved that nobody it's nevergoing to live up.
Just like you would not youshould not redo the Sound of
Music.
Speaker 5 (42:01):
Oh, no, right, Because that you can watch today
and yeah.
Speaker 3 (42:10):
Oh shoot, what was I just going?
To say I can't remember.
I don't know.
Speaker 5 (42:19):
Are you going to tell us about your shot, your
medicine?
Speaker 3 (42:21):
I sure can.
Speaker 5 (42:22):
I sure can.
Speaker 3 (42:23):
Okay so and I mean you guys might already know this
, but this was mind blowing tome Okay so, if your pill bottles
are this kind so not allpharmacies have this kind, right
, but you know all of these havethe safety right, so you
actually have to push that downand then turn it right.
(42:45):
It's the child protection thing.
Yeah, so let's say you don'thave any kids in your house and
you don't have to have thatthing locked down.
Did you know that?
All you have to do that if youwant to use it the other way,
you just it's.
(43:07):
No, did not know that hey that'sa good one, wow, I know and
it's like yeah, sure enough,there's the it's.
It is designed for thatspecifically you don't want it
this way, you do it this way.
Speaker 5 (43:20):
Are there directions on the top for that, or just we
were supposed to notice thethread I?
Speaker 3 (43:26):
think we were just supposed to know that and I
discovered it because I saw iton one of those.
It was either facebook orinstagram, those little videos
where somebody says you know Iwas today years old.
Speaker 5 (43:40):
Yeah, I was.
Speaker 3 (43:41):
I was today years old when I learned this yep exactly
, and I was like huh, wow,promptly went to my pill bottles
and I switched them all aroundthere you go, oh I thought you
were gonna say we could use itas a jewelry carrier, so our
things can tangle together.
Speaker 5 (44:01):
I could not figure out where the heck you would
have been going well.
Speaker 3 (44:05):
I am pleased to know that you two had never heard of
that before, because that meansa lot of people probably have
never heard of it so you got uson that one good yeah good, yeah
, I'm glad I golfed today.
Speaker 5 (44:18):
I took a off, golfed in a four lady Best ball.
How was that.
Well, we got third to last.
I mean, oh Right, so here's myactual shot.
We know we are not going to begood, but yet we do it all the
time and I think that's my shot.
(44:39):
Like there are too many womenwho, oh, I'm just not good
enough for a tournament.
Well, you might be better thanwe are Drive to.
Speaker 4 (44:51):
Jewel yes, I have for this particular tournament.
Speaker 5 (44:55):
You might beat us.
No, I just think I've heardthat a lot Like oh, I'm not good
enough for a tournament.
Oh, my gosh, you're certainlygood enough for any women's
tournament, so go play.
Speaker 4 (45:07):
And the cool thing I will say about a women's golf
tournament you're only playingwith your four friends.
Yes, Nobody else I mean thegroup behind you might know that
you're taking a little bitlonger, but they don't know.
Speaker 5 (45:20):
Oh, yeah, who cares?
It was four hours of blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah and a
little bit of golf.
Yeah, what could possibly bebad with that?
And it was a nice day too.
So yeah, that's awesome,there's my, there's my shot.
Speaker 4 (45:35):
Go play in a tournament, it's best of all,
nobody cares okay, I do have ashot and this is just a weird
one.
It's not weird but um.
So, as somebody who's trying toget more protein into their
diet and you know, the breakfastis really hard for me because I
don't eat eggs and um, so it'shard to get protein so I
(45:59):
occasionally try those kodiak,that kodiak brand.
They've got kodiak pancakes, um, you can.
There's also a muff, a muffinmix, and this is my whole thing
the protein, um, blueberrymuffin mix.
Now, the pancakes don't have anygreat flavor to it and require
a lot of syrup, which kind ofdefeats the idea, but you know,
(46:22):
still protein.
So I got it into my head that Iwas going to make these
proteins, blueberry proteinmuffins, but I was going to add
real blueberries to it for realflavor.
And I did.
I added probably at least a cupof blueberries that I tossed
and just a little bit of flourso they didn't sink to the
(46:43):
bottom and damn if they don'ttaste good and I ate two of them
.
And I went from 8 30 in themorning till noon without being
hungry.
Hey, you can take a proteinproduct, add something real to
it and make it not taste likejust.
(47:03):
You know, some of that stuffjust tastes like filler, like
the protein bars.
They just taste like pureedmush.
I know, yeah, so this did not.
Speaker 5 (47:16):
The addition of real, like you know, real fruit Top
up a banana, put it in there,top up, you know, real fruit a
banana, put it in there, top up.
Speaker 4 (47:22):
You know real fruit right now actually made it taste
.
It was really enjoyable.
So that's my tip.
Speaker 5 (47:29):
Hey good one.
We're full of shots tonight.
We're full of something we are.
We are routinely full ofsomething that we are.
Speaker 3 (47:40):
Oh, all are, oh, all right Well should we Yep?
Speaker 5 (47:48):
Give four seasons a try.
Yeah, it's a wrap.
Good job, awesome.
Speaker 3 (47:54):
All right.
Well, everybody, have a goodweek and we'll see you next week
.
Speaker 4 (48:00):
Bye, cheers.
Speaker 1 (48:16):
Cheers, cheers.
I know you're wondering how.
Speaker 2 (48:20):
I got that vibe.
Here I go, here I go, coming.
I can't ever stop.
I'm a tour de force running.
Get me to the top.
I don't need an invitation.
I'm about to start acelebration.
Let me in Brought a good timefor some friends.
Turn it up loud past 10.
Turning up the crowd when I hitthem with the power.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.