September 27, 2025 • 26 mins
The source examines the history of ten iconic Marvel heroes who originally began their careers as villains or antagonists, illustrating the theme of redemption and change within the Marvel Universe. The text explains that characters like the Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, and Hawkeye were initially driven by misguided ideals or manipulation before joining heroic teams like the Avengers. Other figures, such as Black Widow and Vision, overcame pasts rooted in espionage or creation by an evil entity to forge their own righteous paths. The overview also details the complex morality of characters who frequently transition between hero and villain roles, including Magneto, Loki, and Deadpool, showing that circumstances often push individuals toward heroism despite chaotic or villainous origins.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome back to the deep Dive. We're really excited today
to jump straight into the source material you sent over.
Got this great stack of articles here.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Yeah, it's a good pile. And our mission today is
pretty specific, isn't it. We're navigating the well the huge
Marvel universe. Huge, is right, but focusing on something I
think is really core to Marvel's appeal. The heroes who
didn't start out heroic at.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
All exactly, not just like a minor disagreement or a
bad day. We're talking about characters who were introduced as
straight up antagonists, villains.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Driven by all sorts of things right breed, revenge, maybe
some twisted ideology, or even just program that way.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
But somehow, through these massive shifts, these really powerful redemption marks,
often involving a lot of personal costs, they become figures
we actually root for heroes.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
It's that blurring of the lines, isn't it, between hero
and villain. That's not just a gimmick in Marvel. It's
like the engine for some of their best, longest running stories.
Speaker 1 (00:59):
It definitely gives them depth. You don't always get that
with a character who's just, you know, always been the
good guy right their.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Past mistakes, they're villainous actions. They they inform everything, their
current struggles, their choices moving forward. It all connects.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
So we pulled out the ten examples you highlighted in
the sources, and we're going to unpack these transformations. We've
sort of grouped them into three categories, which should give
you a good shortcut to understanding how this redemption thing
works in comics.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Yeah, we'll look at coercion, then ideology, and finally we
get into that really murky gray area, the anti heroes.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
This is where it gets really fascinating. Let's dive in.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Okay, So our first section, we're focusing on heroes whose
villainy was well, kind of circumstantial. We're calling it the coerced,
the manipulated, and the immediate shift.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
Right. These are characters where you know, outside pressure, maybe
someone manipulating them, or intense loyalty or just basic survival
it sort of outweighed their own moral compass at the time.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
And because of that, the shift to heroism was relatively speaking,
pretty quick once that pressure was gone. Yeah, this group
really sets the stage for how Marvel treats character flaws.
Their initial antagonism wasn't necessarily like deep seated evil, it
was often born out of necessity.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
So the turn towards being a hero isn't always this
radical internal change.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
Not always for this group. No, it's more like they
finally got the freedom, the agency to act on the
good impulses that were kind of suppressed before.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
Makes sense, and we have to start with maybe the
prime example of tragedy and force loyalty, Wanda maxim Off
Scarlet Witch.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Absolutely, she debuted way back alongside her twin brother Pietro
in X Men number four, nineteen sixty four, and she
was a core member of Magneto's brotherhood of evil mutants.
Doesn't get much more villainous than that. First.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
It's a classic villain debut for sure, But what the
sources really emphasize is separating her actions from like personal malice.
Her origin story is key here.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Tell us about that Well.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
And Phro were orphans, vulnerable in their eatern European homeland,
and Magneto apparently rescued them from this violent mob.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
Okay, so there's a debt there, a huge debt.
Speaker 2 (03:11):
So when she's using her incredible powers, you know, reality
warping stuff against the X Men early on, it wasn't
because she believed in mutant domination necessarily, it was loyalty,
intense loyalty to the guy she thought saved her life.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
So the villainy was, like you said, circumstantial, almost like
a uniform she had to wear pretty much.
Speaker 2 (03:30):
Yeah, and it came off relatively quickly too. Both she
and Pietro wanted out from under Magneo's thumb, which was getting,
you know, increasingly dangerous. Right.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
They joined the Avengers in Avengers number sixteen. That was
nineteen sixty five, so pretty soon after their debut she
was actively looking for redemption.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
She was. But here's the crucial thing about Wanda, and
the sources really dig into this. Even though that initial
turn was fast, the trauma tied to her time with
Magneto and just her general past, it never really left her.
Speaker 1 (03:59):
Yeah. Her history is full of tragedy exactly.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
And that's why her powers often became so unstable, so
dangerous that think about the House of m event from
two thousand and five.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
Oh yeah, major impact.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
That wasn't just a plot twist. It was like the
ultimate catastrophic result of her inability to handle her grief
and trauma, altering reality nearly wiping out mutants.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
She was sort of repeating the destructive.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
Pattern in a way, yes, unwittingly, using that immense power destructively,
much like she did under Magneto. It shows that even
coerced villainy can plant these seeds of instability that lead
to immense suffering later on. Her whole life really feels
like this ongoing struggle to atone for the early stuff
and the terrible things that happened because of her instability later. Wow.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
Yeah, that had so much weight. And you mentioned her brother,
Quicksilver Pitcher Maximov. He's tied right into this, isn't he completely?
Speaker 2 (04:50):
His path mirrors her as almost exactly, same redemption issue number,
same initial loyalty.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
His role in the Brotherhood was mostly about a speed, right,
and being protective of Wanda.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
That's it lightning fast, but also defined by this fierce,
almost aggressive protection of his sister. If Wanda felt indebted
to Magneto for saving her, Pietro felt indebted because Magneto
kept Wanda safe.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
So his arrogance, his speed, it was all in service
of the Brotherhood because of Wanda.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
Right, he used his powers for them, and he definitely
had that abrasive personality from the start. But again, like Wanda,
his motivation wasn't inherent evil, it was survival, loyalty, circumstance.
Speaker 1 (05:28):
And he also jumped to the Avengers in issue sixteen,
looking for freedom.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Yeah, and it really hammers home that point. Sometimes villainy
is just the environment you're trapped in. For Pietro, the
Avengers offered structure, a different kind of.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Environment, a moral anchor maybe.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Sort of, yeah, a moral stabilizer. Even though he was
always difficult, Pietro was never the easygoing teammate. That heroic
environment helped foster his better side. He's maybe the clearest
example in this section of how circumstance, not necessarily core character,
can push someone down a villainous path, and how the
right setting can pull them back.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Okay, so that's the Maximovs, rescued and initially loyal to Magneto.
Let's shift gears a bit. What about characters manipulated by say,
fame or other people. Let's talk about Hawkeye Clint Barton.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
Ah Clint, Yeah, he started out quite differently. Debut entails
in Suspense number fifty seven, nineteen sixty four. He was
this amazing carnival archer, but with a serious chip on
his shoulder.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
Right, His villainy wasn't about survival or ideology, was it.
It felt smaller, more human exactly.
Speaker 2 (06:33):
It was rooted in pride, wanting recognition, and frankly, jealousy.
He was jealous of Iron Man, who was already this
established famous hero. Clint wanted that spotlight.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
So when he first used his archery skills for crime,
it was almost like sour grapes, a rivalry gone wrong.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Pretty much, it disgruntled competitor. But the real push into
proper villainy came from outside influence.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
Black Widow.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
Black Widow, she saw his talent, his ambition, his resentment
of Iron Man, and she manipulated him, used him to
help with her own Cold War espionage plots.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
So he was definitely influenced, But his turn towards heroism
that felt different from the maximos, more like a personal choice.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Absolutely, it's a key distinction. He fell for Black Widow deeply,
but when he saw the reality of her path, her
genuine commit the villainy at the time, he rejected it.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
He chose a different way.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
He did. It wasn't some cosmic event changing him. It
was him deciding no, this isn't who I want to be.
He wanted to overcome those self serving rogue tendencies and
actually earn his place, prove himself worthy of joining the Avengers.
That personal commitment is what defines his shift, which.
Speaker 1 (07:38):
Leads us perfectly to the woman who manipulated him in
the first place. Natasha Romanov, the Black Widow. Her origin
is pure institutional villainy oh completely.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
When she first showed up and tails the suspense number
fifty two nineteen sixty four, she was a cold calculating
Soviet spy trained by the KGB.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
This feels like a bigger scale of coercion than just
loyalty to one person like Magneto. This is loyalty to
a state, to an ideology.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
It is she went through the Red Room program intense
physical training, yes, but also deep psychological conditioning, brainwashing. Essentially,
her initial actions against Iron manned against the West were
rooted in that deep indoctrination.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
So how does someone break free from that level of programming?
That seems incredibly difficult, maybe the hardest thing to overcome
in this whole section, The.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Sources suggest it wasn't overnight, it was gradual. Part of
it was the human connection she formed, specifically her growing
feelings for Hawkeye that sort of cracked the door open.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
But it wasn't just love, was it.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
No. It was also disillusionment, a growing sense that she
wasn't a valued agent but a disposable weapon. Betrayal by
her handlers discussed with their methods that really pushed her
towards defecting.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
And that choice, that defection allowed her to use all
those incredible skills spying, fighting, manipulation for a different.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Cause exactly, instead of undermining the West, she started protecting it,
first with shild and then later joining the Avengers.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
Her story really is powerful. It's about breaking free from
really deep ideological chains.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
It is if Hawkeye shows overcoming pride, Black Widow shows
overcoming intense and doctrination. These four characters together, Wanda Pietro, Clint, Natasha,
they really established this idea that villainy can be situational
and that finding agency, making a choice when circumstances finally
allow it is a powerful driver for heroism.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
Okay, that sets us up really well for the next
group section two. We're calling this the manufactured and the
ideological extremists, so.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
We're shifting focus a bit here. Moving away from purely
external circumstances like coercion or manipulation.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
And looking more at characters whose villainy was tied to
their very design, their creation, or these incredibly deep, often
trauma fueled ideology.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Exactly from loyalty, we moved to programming. From pride, we
moved to these really entrenched, painful belief systems. And we
have to start with a character who basically proves that
free will can override programming.
Speaker 1 (10:02):
The vision Vision debuting in Avengers number fifty seven, nineteen
sixty eight, created by the villain Ultron, and not just
like accidentally evil. He was built for a.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
Purpose, a very specific, malevolent purpose. He was a synthesoid,
an artificial being designed explicitly to be a weapon. Ultron
programmed him with one goal destroy the Avengers.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
He was literally a walking, talking bomb aimed at the heroes.
Ultron even used wonder Man's brain patterns right, hoping that
would make him smart enough to win.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
That was the idea, give him strategic thinking, human ingenuity
derived from Simon Williams's mind, but that complexity turned out
to be Ultron's big mistake.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
How So, how does a weapon just choose to be moral.
Where does that even come from in an android?
Speaker 2 (10:46):
Well, it seems the very complexity Ultron programmed in was
the key. Those wonder Man brain patterns didn't just provide strategy,
they apparently provided the capacity for self reflection empathy.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
Even so, his first real action was.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
Defiance, his defining moment. He became self aware, assessed the situation,
and immediately turned against his creator, Ultron. He chose to
protect the Avengers. He literally aborted his own core programming.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
That's incredible, an act of pure existential choice. And his
journey didn't end there, did it. His heroism wasn't just
a one off decision.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
Not at all. It became tied into his ongoing quest
for humanity, trying to understand what it meant to be alive,
to have an identity purpose, his relationship with Scarlett, which
later on, really grounded that struggle too.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
So he wasn't just a machine that flipped a switch.
He was actively becoming something more.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
Precisely, he was constantly exploring morality, trying to figure out
what good meant, even if it meant rejecting why he
was made. It's a powerful statement for Marvel, isn't it
That growth and morality aren't limited by whether you're born
or built. Vision chose his path again and again.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
Okay, from the manufactured choosing morality, let's pivot to someone
driven by deep, real world trauma. Magneto Eric Lynch.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
Ah Magneto, you could argue he's Marvel's most significant villain,
certainly one of the most complex debuted right at the
start X Men number one, nineteen sixty three, mutant supremacist
leader of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
With Magneto, we're really getting into ideological villainy. But it's
not just an abstract idea. It's rooted in profound suffering.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Absolutely, his motivation isn't just power for power's sake. It
stems directly from his experiences as a Holocaust survivor. He
saw the absolute worst humanity is capable of when a
group is targeted marginalized.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
And that horrific experience forged his conviction right that mutants
must dominate humans to survive. He sees conflict as inevitable.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
He does. He believes proactive, even aggressive action is the
only way to prevent what he sees as an unavoidable
genocide against mutants. So his villainy isn't simple evil. It's
this twisted, painful form of protection activism gone dark.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
That's what makes him so compelling and so dangerous. His
first group, the Brotherhood, it was about protecting mutants his
family through dominance. But his path isn't a straight line
to heroism either, is.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
It not even close. His heroism is always intermittent. It's
a constant battle within him, not a clean break like
some others.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
The sources point to a shift starting around Uncanny X
Men one fifty Back in eighty one, he showed remorse
after nearly killing Kitty Pride, a young mutant.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
Right That moment seemed to force him to confront the
idea that his methods were becoming indistinguishable from the violence
he claimed to be fighting against. But his most significant
heroic phase came.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Later when he took over Xavier's school.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
Exactly honoring Charles Zzier's dream, at least in theory. He
became headmaster protector of the next generation.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
But wait, how does a mutant supremacist genuinely embody Xavier's
dream of coexistence? That seems like a fundamental contradiction.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
It was, and he couldn't fully do it, not in
Xavier's way. He tried to integrate his own philosophy. He
taught the students ruthlessness, survival skills, self reliance, things that
contrasted sharply with Xavier's more hopeful approach.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
So his goal was still mutant's survival above.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
All, always, but for a time he channeled that protective
fury into teaching defense rather than launching attacks. It was
more a shift in method than core ideology. Yeah, and
that's why he remained such a great figure. That trauma,
that conviction, it's always there if mutants are threatened enough.
The temptation to revert to his old ways is immense.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
That internal conflict, the pain fueling both his villainy and
his attempts at protection. That's why he's endured for so long. Okay,
let's move from Magneto to another powerful mutant leader with
a villainous past. Emma Frost, The White Queen.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
Emma Frost another complex one. She debuted in Uncanny X
Men one nine nineteen eighty. Initially a key member of
the hell Fire Club. Very different vibe from Magneto.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Yeah, she seemed more focused on power, wealth control within
that elite, often corrupt group, using her telepathy her diamond form.
She was roofless.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
Absolutely, her motivation seemed driven by a very harsh up bringing.
It taught her to prioritize power, manipulation, and self interest.
She was all about being the smartest, most calculating person
in the room.
Speaker 1 (15:08):
So not driven by trauma in the same way as Magneto,
more by ambition and a kind of cynical pragmatism.
Speaker 2 (15:14):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
What triggered her shift then? It wasn't immediate like vision
or circumstantial like Wanda.
Speaker 2 (15:19):
No, Emma's path was much slower. It was more about
gradual self reflection, and significantly, it was fueled by loss.
She experienced profound personal.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Tragedies like losing her students the Hellns.
Speaker 2 (15:31):
Exactly, those kinds of losses started to chip away at
that purely cynical armor. She began to realize perhaps that
power for its own sake was empty, that it needed
a purpose, something real, to protect.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
And that realization eventually led her to ally with and
then actually join the X Men.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Yes, but, and this is really important for understanding Emma.
Her redemption isn't about becoming soft or traditionally heroic. She
doesn't lose her edge. She stays ruthless, ruthless, complex, often
morally ambiguous. Yes, she keeps that sharp, manipulative intelligence, but
she starts directing it towards the goal of Mutant's survival,
working with the X men, not against.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Them, So she becomes a strategic asset, even if her
methods are controversial.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Precisely, she's the pragmatist the team often needs, willing to
make those tough, ethically gray calls that someone like Cyclops
or Storm might hesitate over. Her transformation shows growth, yes,
but growth into a different kind of protector, one who
understands that power needs purpose, but isn't afraid to wield
it ruthlessly for that purpose.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
Okay, we've navigated the coerced, the manufacturer, the ideological, which
brings us to our final section, section three. The gray zone.
Speaker 2 (16:39):
Ah, yes, the really murky territory. This is where we
find the true canti heroes, the misfits, characters who aren't
necessarily driven by grand ideals or past trauma in the
same way. Often it's about profit or chaos or very
specific personal revenge, and.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Their definition of heroism can be well, let's just say.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
Flexible, very flexible. This group is crucial because they don't
just cross the line. They kind of erase it and
redraw it wherever suits them. They're not usually seeking that clean,
full redemption arc. They operate out of self interest. But sometimes, yeah,
sometimes that self interest just happens to align with saving
the day.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
And who better to start this section with than the
embodiment of chaos itself, Deadpool Wade Wilson, the Monk with him.
Speaker 2 (17:23):
Out perfect example. He first showed up in New Mutants
number ninety eight, nineteen ninety one, and his introduction he
was hired to kill Cable, pure mercenary work.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Yeah, his initial persona was all about being this amoral
killer for hire, driven by money, violence, and that unique
sense of humor.
Speaker 2 (17:40):
That fourth wall breaking yeah, which often just barely covered
up the fact that he was a dangerous, unpredictable antagonist
pure chaos.
Speaker 1 (17:48):
But then the layers started getting peeled back. The shift
to anti hero really kicked in when we learned about
his backstory, didn't it.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
Absolutely The incurable cancer, the betrayal, the horrific WEAPONEX experiments
that gave him his healing factor but also scarred him
physically and mentally. Suddenly, the nihilistic chaos started to look well,
maybe not justifiable, but understandable, sympathetic even.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
It's like his comedy is a defense mechanism against immense
pain exactly.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Deadpool is maybe the ultimate example of comedy born from trauma,
and his redemption arc, if you can call it, that,
is totally unique because it's so irreverent. He doesn't really
change his core nature.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
He's still violent, still morally questionable, still motivated by.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Profit pretty much. But he ends up fighting alongside the
X Men or the Avengers fairly often, sometimes because the
world's ending and that affects his bottom line. Sometimes maybe
just because it seems like somen.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
He's sort of a walking reminder that you don't need
to be a saint to occasionally do the right thing,
even if accidentally right.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
And that's self awareness. That constant joking lets him operate
in that gray zone without ever taking himself or the
idea of heroism too Seriously. If Magneto's complexity comes from tragedy,
Deadpools comes from finding his own tragedy absurd.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
Okay, Speaking of complex relationships born from darkness, let's talk Venom.
Eddie brock Ah.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Venom another fascinating case debuted properly in Amazing Spider Man
two ninety nine nineteen eighty eight, and his starting point
was pure intense personal hatred for Peter Parker, for Spider Man.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
This one feels really different because it's about two entities, right,
Eddie Brock and the alien Symbia exactly.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
That's key. Eddie was already bitter, a disgraced journalist, blaming
Spider Man for his problems. Then he bonds with the Symbiue,
which also had reasons to resent Spider Man after Peter
rejected it.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
So the villainy was amplified, a shared obsession.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Totally two beings fueled by mutual hatred, becoming this monstrous
figure single mindedly focused on destroying Peter Parker. He was terrifying,
personal and deadly.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
So how does that transform into any kind of heroism,
even anti heroism? Howd he moved from kill Spider Man
to something else?
Speaker 2 (19:54):
It's all about the relationship between Eddie and the Symbiode evolving.
It's a literal symbiosis maturing. Over time, they developed this understanding,
maybe even a kind of respect, and crucially a shared
sense of justice. Justice. How they seem to realize that
hunting down Spider Man, who, let's face it, is fundamentally
(20:16):
a good guy trying to do the right thing, wasn't
as satisfying maybe as going after truly evil people, actual criminals.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
So they didn't stop being violent or scary, not at all.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Still lethal, still monstrous looking, but they redirected that anger, that.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Power, from personal revenge to a broader, albeit brutal form of.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
Protection, exactly protector of the innocent. They started calling themselves
especially focused on street level crime, often in San Francisco,
but eventually even cosmic threats. It's like this literal physiological
redemption story. Two Dark has finding a more productive outlet
for their rage.
Speaker 1 (20:51):
And that allowed Venom to go from being Spider Man's
arch enemy to sometimes even an ally working with the
Avengers Guardians of the Galaxy.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
Yeah, it shows how you can keep the terrifying look
and feel but fundamentally shift the character's alignment.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
It's about intent, Okay. One final character for this deep dive,
maybe the ultimate example of the back and forth, the
character who almost needs to be mischievous.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Loki Ah, the God of Mischief himself, debuted way back
in Journey into Mystery number eighty five nineteen sixty two.
Thor's villainous adopted.
Speaker 1 (21:20):
Brother has motivations feel almost mythical, classic stuff totally.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
It's jealousy of Thor. It's ambition. It's this consuming desire
to rule Asgard, to prove he's better despite his frost
giant origins. It's chaos driven by deep insecurity and resentment.
Speaker 1 (21:36):
He is quite literally the god of lies. So how
does the god of mischief become heroic without fundamentally ceasing
to be Loki? Seems like a contradiction in terms.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
It basically required a narrative reboot. A major turning point.
The source's highlight is in Journey into Mystery, starting around
issue six twenty two and twenty eleven, Loki died sacrificing
himself believe it or not, to save Asgard.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
And he came back right, he did, but he.
Speaker 2 (21:59):
Was reincarnated as a child, a younger, seemingly less malicious version,
Kid Loki.
Speaker 1 (22:04):
Okay, let's untack that. Why a reincarnation? Why not just
have the old Loki feel remorseful and try to change.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
I think the feeling was the original Loki carried just
too much baggage. Millennia of betrayal and evil deeds, it
would be almost impossible to make his redemption truly believable.
The reincarnation offered a fresh start, a.
Speaker 1 (22:24):
Chance to grow up differently without the weight of all
that passed.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Evil exactly, though crucially he still had to contend with
the echoes and manipulations of his former self. It wasn't
a totally clean break internally, but it allowed for genuine
character development in a new direction, and.
Speaker 1 (22:41):
Later versions, like when he became the Agent of Asgard,
really leaned into that anti hero.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
Role they did. What you see with Loki across these
different phases is that his heroic moments are often still
driven by self interest, but a different kind. It's a
desire for acceptance, for legitimacy. He wants to redefine himself,
escape the villa label.
Speaker 1 (23:00):
So he saves the world, partly because if the world ends,
he doesn't get the chance to prove he's more than
just the bad guy.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
That's often a big part of it. Yeah, he backslides constantly.
Deception is always his first resort, but those moments where
he does choose the heroic path, even for selfish reasons,
at incredible depth. He's fighting for relevance, and sometimes the
only way the God of Lives can achieve that is
by becoming an indispensable, if morally flexible hero.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
It's like the performance of heroism eventually has the same
outcome if.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
You save the universe enough times, even if it's part
of an elaborate scheme to make yourself look good. Yeah,
well you still save the universe, didn't you. Functionally it works. Wow.
Speaker 1 (23:40):
Okay, that's ten incredible complex journeys. Yeah, from state sponsored
spies breaking their conditioning to literal gods of mischief finding
sort of a conscience. When you lay it all.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Out like that, it really highlights something essential about the
Marvel universe, doesn't it. It's richness comes precisely because these
lines between hero and villain are so incredibly fluid. They're
constantly being tested and redrawn.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Absolutely the narrative force behind these characters, you know, Wanda
and Pietro finding agency vision, choosing morality over programming, Magneto
fighting his own demons, Emma finding a ruthless purpose. And
then the chaotic good or chaotic neutral of Deadpool and Loki.
It's undeniable, and looking across all.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
Of them, you see these recurring themes right redemption obviously yeah,
but also the power of individual choice and just the
basic human or mutant or synthesoid or God capacity for
growth and change.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
It makes the stories feel so much more grounded somehow.
When Black Widow defects or Vision defies Ultron, it lands
harder because we understand the history, the programming, the identity
they're choosing against exactly.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
There are real stakes involved in their choices and connecting
this back to you, the listener. I think these stories
resonate so deeply because they offer a kind of hope,
don't they any mean? Well, they show that's starting out wrong,
or being manipulated, or even being literally made to be evil,
It doesn't automatically lock you into that path forever. There's
always the potential for change, for finding a way towards heroism,
(25:10):
or at least towards doing less harm and maybe some good.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
Their transformations reflect that capacity for change we all hope exists,
maybe whether it's sparked by outside events or trauma or
just deciding to be different.
Speaker 2 (25:23):
We saw so many triggers, didn't we Coersion with Wanda
being created, like Vision, pure profit for Deadpool, deep trauma
for Magneto all starting points for villainy, but in every
single case we talked about, there was a moment or
many moments of conscious decision, a choice to turn, and
then choices to stay turned, even when it's.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Hard, right, It's rarely a one and done decision. It's
an ongoing effort for most of them.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
Which brings us to that final thought, something for you
to chew on. Building on everything we've discussed, especially thinking
about characters like Vision. If Vision's journey to becoming truly human,
truly moral was defined by that conscious choice against his
fundamental programming, does it maybe suggest something profound? Could it
be that the intentional act of turning away from villainy,
(26:09):
that exercise a free will defining programming or circumstance or trauma,
is that maybe the most powerful superpower of all?
Speaker 1 (26:16):
Huh? Free will is the ultimate power. That is definitely
something to think about, a really provocative place to leave
it until our next deep dive. Thanks for tuning in, everyone,
Welcome back to the deep Dive. We're really excited today
to jump straight into the source material you sent over.
Got this great stack of articles here.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Yeah, it's a good pile. And our mission today is
pretty specific, isn't it. We're navigating the well the huge
Marvel universe. Huge, is right, but focusing on something I
think is really core to Marvel's appeal. The heroes who
didn't start out heroic at.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
All exactly, not just like a minor disagreement or a
bad day. We're talking about characters who were introduced as
straight up antagonists, villains.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Driven by all sorts of things right breed, revenge, maybe
some twisted ideology, or even just program that way.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
But somehow, through these massive shifts, these really powerful redemption marks,
often involving a lot of personal costs, they become figures
we actually root for heroes.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
It's that blurring of the lines, isn't it, between hero
and villain. That's not just a gimmick in Marvel. It's
like the engine for some of their best, longest running stories.
Speaker 1 (00:59):
It definitely gives them depth. You don't always get that
with a character who's just, you know, always been the
good guy right their.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Past mistakes, they're villainous actions. They they inform everything, their
current struggles, their choices moving forward. It all connects.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
So we pulled out the ten examples you highlighted in
the sources, and we're going to unpack these transformations. We've
sort of grouped them into three categories, which should give
you a good shortcut to understanding how this redemption thing
works in comics.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Yeah, we'll look at coercion, then ideology, and finally we
get into that really murky gray area, the anti heroes.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
This is where it gets really fascinating. Let's dive in.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Okay, So our first section, we're focusing on heroes whose
villainy was well, kind of circumstantial. We're calling it the coerced,
the manipulated, and the immediate shift.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
Right. These are characters where you know, outside pressure, maybe
someone manipulating them, or intense loyalty or just basic survival
it sort of outweighed their own moral compass at the time.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
And because of that, the shift to heroism was relatively speaking,
pretty quick once that pressure was gone. Yeah, this group
really sets the stage for how Marvel treats character flaws.
Their initial antagonism wasn't necessarily like deep seated evil, it
was often born out of necessity.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
So the turn towards being a hero isn't always this
radical internal change.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
Not always for this group. No, it's more like they
finally got the freedom, the agency to act on the
good impulses that were kind of suppressed before.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
Makes sense, and we have to start with maybe the
prime example of tragedy and force loyalty, Wanda maxim Off
Scarlet Witch.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Absolutely, she debuted way back alongside her twin brother Pietro
in X Men number four, nineteen sixty four, and she
was a core member of Magneto's brotherhood of evil mutants.
Doesn't get much more villainous than that. First.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
It's a classic villain debut for sure, But what the
sources really emphasize is separating her actions from like personal malice.
Her origin story is key here.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Tell us about that Well.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
And Phro were orphans, vulnerable in their eatern European homeland,
and Magneto apparently rescued them from this violent mob.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
Okay, so there's a debt there, a huge debt.
Speaker 2 (03:11):
So when she's using her incredible powers, you know, reality
warping stuff against the X Men early on, it wasn't
because she believed in mutant domination necessarily, it was loyalty,
intense loyalty to the guy she thought saved her life.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
So the villainy was, like you said, circumstantial, almost like
a uniform she had to wear pretty much.
Speaker 2 (03:30):
Yeah, and it came off relatively quickly too. Both she
and Pietro wanted out from under Magneo's thumb, which was getting,
you know, increasingly dangerous. Right.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
They joined the Avengers in Avengers number sixteen. That was
nineteen sixty five, so pretty soon after their debut she
was actively looking for redemption.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
She was. But here's the crucial thing about Wanda, and
the sources really dig into this. Even though that initial
turn was fast, the trauma tied to her time with
Magneto and just her general past, it never really left her.
Speaker 1 (03:59):
Yeah. Her history is full of tragedy exactly.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
And that's why her powers often became so unstable, so
dangerous that think about the House of m event from
two thousand and five.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
Oh yeah, major impact.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
That wasn't just a plot twist. It was like the
ultimate catastrophic result of her inability to handle her grief
and trauma, altering reality nearly wiping out mutants.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
She was sort of repeating the destructive.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
Pattern in a way, yes, unwittingly, using that immense power destructively,
much like she did under Magneto. It shows that even
coerced villainy can plant these seeds of instability that lead
to immense suffering later on. Her whole life really feels
like this ongoing struggle to atone for the early stuff
and the terrible things that happened because of her instability later. Wow.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
Yeah, that had so much weight. And you mentioned her brother,
Quicksilver Pitcher Maximov. He's tied right into this, isn't he completely?
Speaker 2 (04:50):
His path mirrors her as almost exactly, same redemption issue number,
same initial loyalty.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
His role in the Brotherhood was mostly about a speed, right,
and being protective of Wanda.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
That's it lightning fast, but also defined by this fierce,
almost aggressive protection of his sister. If Wanda felt indebted
to Magneto for saving her, Pietro felt indebted because Magneto
kept Wanda safe.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
So his arrogance, his speed, it was all in service
of the Brotherhood because of Wanda.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
Right, he used his powers for them, and he definitely
had that abrasive personality from the start. But again, like Wanda,
his motivation wasn't inherent evil, it was survival, loyalty, circumstance.
Speaker 1 (05:28):
And he also jumped to the Avengers in issue sixteen,
looking for freedom.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Yeah, and it really hammers home that point. Sometimes villainy
is just the environment you're trapped in. For Pietro, the
Avengers offered structure, a different kind of.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Environment, a moral anchor maybe.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Sort of, yeah, a moral stabilizer. Even though he was
always difficult, Pietro was never the easygoing teammate. That heroic
environment helped foster his better side. He's maybe the clearest
example in this section of how circumstance, not necessarily core character,
can push someone down a villainous path, and how the
right setting can pull them back.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Okay, so that's the Maximovs, rescued and initially loyal to Magneto.
Let's shift gears a bit. What about characters manipulated by say,
fame or other people. Let's talk about Hawkeye Clint Barton.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
Ah Clint, Yeah, he started out quite differently. Debut entails
in Suspense number fifty seven, nineteen sixty four. He was
this amazing carnival archer, but with a serious chip on
his shoulder.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
Right, His villainy wasn't about survival or ideology, was it.
It felt smaller, more human exactly.
Speaker 2 (06:33):
It was rooted in pride, wanting recognition, and frankly, jealousy.
He was jealous of Iron Man, who was already this
established famous hero. Clint wanted that spotlight.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
So when he first used his archery skills for crime,
it was almost like sour grapes, a rivalry gone wrong.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Pretty much, it disgruntled competitor. But the real push into
proper villainy came from outside influence.
Speaker 1 (06:54):
Black Widow.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
Black Widow, she saw his talent, his ambition, his resentment
of Iron Man, and she manipulated him, used him to
help with her own Cold War espionage plots.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
So he was definitely influenced, But his turn towards heroism
that felt different from the maximos, more like a personal choice.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Absolutely, it's a key distinction. He fell for Black Widow deeply,
but when he saw the reality of her path, her
genuine commit the villainy at the time, he rejected it.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
He chose a different way.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
He did. It wasn't some cosmic event changing him. It
was him deciding no, this isn't who I want to be.
He wanted to overcome those self serving rogue tendencies and
actually earn his place, prove himself worthy of joining the Avengers.
That personal commitment is what defines his shift, which.
Speaker 1 (07:38):
Leads us perfectly to the woman who manipulated him in
the first place. Natasha Romanov, the Black Widow. Her origin
is pure institutional villainy oh completely.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
When she first showed up and tails the suspense number
fifty two nineteen sixty four, she was a cold calculating
Soviet spy trained by the KGB.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
This feels like a bigger scale of coercion than just
loyalty to one person like Magneto. This is loyalty to
a state, to an ideology.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
It is she went through the Red Room program intense
physical training, yes, but also deep psychological conditioning, brainwashing. Essentially,
her initial actions against Iron manned against the West were
rooted in that deep indoctrination.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
So how does someone break free from that level of programming?
That seems incredibly difficult, maybe the hardest thing to overcome
in this whole section, The.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Sources suggest it wasn't overnight, it was gradual. Part of
it was the human connection she formed, specifically her growing
feelings for Hawkeye that sort of cracked the door open.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
But it wasn't just love, was it.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
No. It was also disillusionment, a growing sense that she
wasn't a valued agent but a disposable weapon. Betrayal by
her handlers discussed with their methods that really pushed her
towards defecting.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
And that choice, that defection allowed her to use all
those incredible skills spying, fighting, manipulation for a different.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Cause exactly, instead of undermining the West, she started protecting it,
first with shild and then later joining the Avengers.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
Her story really is powerful. It's about breaking free from
really deep ideological chains.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
It is if Hawkeye shows overcoming pride, Black Widow shows
overcoming intense and doctrination. These four characters together, Wanda Pietro, Clint, Natasha,
they really established this idea that villainy can be situational
and that finding agency, making a choice when circumstances finally
allow it is a powerful driver for heroism.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
Okay, that sets us up really well for the next
group section two. We're calling this the manufactured and the
ideological extremists, so.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
We're shifting focus a bit here. Moving away from purely
external circumstances like coercion or manipulation.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
And looking more at characters whose villainy was tied to
their very design, their creation, or these incredibly deep, often
trauma fueled ideology.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
Exactly from loyalty, we moved to programming. From pride, we
moved to these really entrenched, painful belief systems. And we
have to start with a character who basically proves that
free will can override programming.
Speaker 1 (10:02):
The vision Vision debuting in Avengers number fifty seven, nineteen
sixty eight, created by the villain Ultron, and not just
like accidentally evil. He was built for a.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
Purpose, a very specific, malevolent purpose. He was a synthesoid,
an artificial being designed explicitly to be a weapon. Ultron
programmed him with one goal destroy the Avengers.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
He was literally a walking, talking bomb aimed at the heroes.
Ultron even used wonder Man's brain patterns right, hoping that
would make him smart enough to win.
Speaker 2 (10:29):
That was the idea, give him strategic thinking, human ingenuity
derived from Simon Williams's mind, but that complexity turned out
to be Ultron's big mistake.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
How So, how does a weapon just choose to be moral.
Where does that even come from in an android?
Speaker 2 (10:46):
Well, it seems the very complexity Ultron programmed in was
the key. Those wonder Man brain patterns didn't just provide strategy,
they apparently provided the capacity for self reflection empathy.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
Even so, his first real action was.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
Defiance, his defining moment. He became self aware, assessed the situation,
and immediately turned against his creator, Ultron. He chose to
protect the Avengers. He literally aborted his own core programming.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
That's incredible, an act of pure existential choice. And his
journey didn't end there, did it. His heroism wasn't just
a one off decision.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
Not at all. It became tied into his ongoing quest
for humanity, trying to understand what it meant to be alive,
to have an identity purpose, his relationship with Scarlett, which
later on, really grounded that struggle too.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
So he wasn't just a machine that flipped a switch.
He was actively becoming something more.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
Precisely, he was constantly exploring morality, trying to figure out
what good meant, even if it meant rejecting why he
was made. It's a powerful statement for Marvel, isn't it
That growth and morality aren't limited by whether you're born
or built. Vision chose his path again and again.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
Okay, from the manufactured choosing morality, let's pivot to someone
driven by deep, real world trauma. Magneto Eric Lynch.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
Ah Magneto, you could argue he's Marvel's most significant villain,
certainly one of the most complex debuted right at the
start X Men number one, nineteen sixty three, mutant supremacist
leader of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
With Magneto, we're really getting into ideological villainy. But it's
not just an abstract idea. It's rooted in profound suffering.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Absolutely, his motivation isn't just power for power's sake. It
stems directly from his experiences as a Holocaust survivor. He
saw the absolute worst humanity is capable of when a
group is targeted marginalized.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
And that horrific experience forged his conviction right that mutants
must dominate humans to survive. He sees conflict as inevitable.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
He does. He believes proactive, even aggressive action is the
only way to prevent what he sees as an unavoidable
genocide against mutants. So his villainy isn't simple evil. It's
this twisted, painful form of protection activism gone dark.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
That's what makes him so compelling and so dangerous. His
first group, the Brotherhood, it was about protecting mutants his
family through dominance. But his path isn't a straight line
to heroism either, is.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
It not even close. His heroism is always intermittent. It's
a constant battle within him, not a clean break like
some others.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
The sources point to a shift starting around Uncanny X
Men one fifty Back in eighty one, he showed remorse
after nearly killing Kitty Pride, a young mutant.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
Right That moment seemed to force him to confront the
idea that his methods were becoming indistinguishable from the violence
he claimed to be fighting against. But his most significant
heroic phase came.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Later when he took over Xavier's school.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
Exactly honoring Charles Zzier's dream, at least in theory. He
became headmaster protector of the next generation.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
But wait, how does a mutant supremacist genuinely embody Xavier's
dream of coexistence? That seems like a fundamental contradiction.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
It was, and he couldn't fully do it, not in
Xavier's way. He tried to integrate his own philosophy. He
taught the students ruthlessness, survival skills, self reliance, things that
contrasted sharply with Xavier's more hopeful approach.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
So his goal was still mutant's survival above.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
All, always, but for a time he channeled that protective
fury into teaching defense rather than launching attacks. It was
more a shift in method than core ideology. Yeah, and
that's why he remained such a great figure. That trauma,
that conviction, it's always there if mutants are threatened enough.
The temptation to revert to his old ways is immense.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
That internal conflict, the pain fueling both his villainy and
his attempts at protection. That's why he's endured for so long. Okay,
let's move from Magneto to another powerful mutant leader with
a villainous past. Emma Frost, The White Queen.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
Emma Frost another complex one. She debuted in Uncanny X
Men one nine nineteen eighty. Initially a key member of
the hell Fire Club. Very different vibe from Magneto.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Yeah, she seemed more focused on power, wealth control within
that elite, often corrupt group, using her telepathy her diamond form.
She was roofless.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
Absolutely, her motivation seemed driven by a very harsh up bringing.
It taught her to prioritize power, manipulation, and self interest.
She was all about being the smartest, most calculating person
in the room.
Speaker 1 (15:08):
So not driven by trauma in the same way as Magneto,
more by ambition and a kind of cynical pragmatism.
Speaker 2 (15:14):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
What triggered her shift then? It wasn't immediate like vision
or circumstantial like Wanda.
Speaker 2 (15:19):
No, Emma's path was much slower. It was more about
gradual self reflection, and significantly, it was fueled by loss.
She experienced profound personal.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Tragedies like losing her students the Hellns.
Speaker 2 (15:31):
Exactly, those kinds of losses started to chip away at
that purely cynical armor. She began to realize perhaps that
power for its own sake was empty, that it needed
a purpose, something real, to protect.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
And that realization eventually led her to ally with and
then actually join the X Men.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Yes, but, and this is really important for understanding Emma.
Her redemption isn't about becoming soft or traditionally heroic. She
doesn't lose her edge. She stays ruthless, ruthless, complex, often
morally ambiguous. Yes, she keeps that sharp, manipulative intelligence, but
she starts directing it towards the goal of Mutant's survival,
working with the X men, not against.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Them, So she becomes a strategic asset, even if her
methods are controversial.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Precisely, she's the pragmatist the team often needs, willing to
make those tough, ethically gray calls that someone like Cyclops
or Storm might hesitate over. Her transformation shows growth, yes,
but growth into a different kind of protector, one who
understands that power needs purpose, but isn't afraid to wield
it ruthlessly for that purpose.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
Okay, we've navigated the coerced, the manufacturer, the ideological, which
brings us to our final section, section three. The gray zone.
Speaker 2 (16:39):
Ah, yes, the really murky territory. This is where we
find the true canti heroes, the misfits, characters who aren't
necessarily driven by grand ideals or past trauma in the
same way. Often it's about profit or chaos or very
specific personal revenge, and.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
Their definition of heroism can be well, let's just say.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
Flexible, very flexible. This group is crucial because they don't
just cross the line. They kind of erase it and
redraw it wherever suits them. They're not usually seeking that clean,
full redemption arc. They operate out of self interest. But sometimes, yeah,
sometimes that self interest just happens to align with saving
the day.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
And who better to start this section with than the
embodiment of chaos itself, Deadpool Wade Wilson, the Monk with him.
Speaker 2 (17:23):
Out perfect example. He first showed up in New Mutants
number ninety eight, nineteen ninety one, and his introduction he
was hired to kill Cable, pure mercenary work.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Yeah, his initial persona was all about being this amoral
killer for hire, driven by money, violence, and that unique
sense of humor.
Speaker 2 (17:40):
That fourth wall breaking yeah, which often just barely covered
up the fact that he was a dangerous, unpredictable antagonist
pure chaos.
Speaker 1 (17:48):
But then the layers started getting peeled back. The shift
to anti hero really kicked in when we learned about
his backstory, didn't it.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
Absolutely The incurable cancer, the betrayal, the horrific WEAPONEX experiments
that gave him his healing factor but also scarred him
physically and mentally. Suddenly, the nihilistic chaos started to look well,
maybe not justifiable, but understandable, sympathetic even.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
It's like his comedy is a defense mechanism against immense
pain exactly.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Deadpool is maybe the ultimate example of comedy born from trauma,
and his redemption arc, if you can call it, that,
is totally unique because it's so irreverent. He doesn't really
change his core nature.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
He's still violent, still morally questionable, still motivated by.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Profit pretty much. But he ends up fighting alongside the
X Men or the Avengers fairly often, sometimes because the
world's ending and that affects his bottom line. Sometimes maybe
just because it seems like somen.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
He's sort of a walking reminder that you don't need
to be a saint to occasionally do the right thing,
even if accidentally right.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
And that's self awareness. That constant joking lets him operate
in that gray zone without ever taking himself or the
idea of heroism too Seriously. If Magneto's complexity comes from tragedy,
Deadpools comes from finding his own tragedy absurd.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
Okay, Speaking of complex relationships born from darkness, let's talk Venom.
Eddie brock Ah.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
Venom another fascinating case debuted properly in Amazing Spider Man
two ninety nine nineteen eighty eight, and his starting point
was pure intense personal hatred for Peter Parker, for Spider Man.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
This one feels really different because it's about two entities, right,
Eddie Brock and the alien Symbia exactly.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
That's key. Eddie was already bitter, a disgraced journalist, blaming
Spider Man for his problems. Then he bonds with the Symbiue,
which also had reasons to resent Spider Man after Peter
rejected it.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
So the villainy was amplified, a shared obsession.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Totally two beings fueled by mutual hatred, becoming this monstrous
figure single mindedly focused on destroying Peter Parker. He was terrifying,
personal and deadly.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
So how does that transform into any kind of heroism,
even anti heroism? Howd he moved from kill Spider Man
to something else?
Speaker 2 (19:54):
It's all about the relationship between Eddie and the Symbiode evolving.
It's a literal symbiosis maturing. Over time, they developed this understanding,
maybe even a kind of respect, and crucially a shared
sense of justice. Justice. How they seem to realize that
hunting down Spider Man, who, let's face it, is fundamentally
(20:16):
a good guy trying to do the right thing, wasn't
as satisfying maybe as going after truly evil people, actual criminals.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
So they didn't stop being violent or scary, not at all.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Still lethal, still monstrous looking, but they redirected that anger, that.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Power, from personal revenge to a broader, albeit brutal form of.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
Protection, exactly protector of the innocent. They started calling themselves
especially focused on street level crime, often in San Francisco,
but eventually even cosmic threats. It's like this literal physiological
redemption story. Two Dark has finding a more productive outlet
for their rage.
Speaker 1 (20:51):
And that allowed Venom to go from being Spider Man's
arch enemy to sometimes even an ally working with the
Avengers Guardians of the Galaxy.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
Yeah, it shows how you can keep the terrifying look
and feel but fundamentally shift the character's alignment.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
It's about intent, Okay. One final character for this deep dive,
maybe the ultimate example of the back and forth, the
character who almost needs to be mischievous.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Loki Ah, the God of Mischief himself, debuted way back
in Journey into Mystery number eighty five nineteen sixty two.
Thor's villainous adopted.
Speaker 1 (21:20):
Brother has motivations feel almost mythical, classic stuff totally.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
It's jealousy of Thor. It's ambition. It's this consuming desire
to rule Asgard, to prove he's better despite his frost
giant origins. It's chaos driven by deep insecurity and resentment.
Speaker 1 (21:36):
He is quite literally the god of lies. So how
does the god of mischief become heroic without fundamentally ceasing
to be Loki? Seems like a contradiction in terms.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
It basically required a narrative reboot. A major turning point.
The source's highlight is in Journey into Mystery, starting around
issue six twenty two and twenty eleven, Loki died sacrificing
himself believe it or not, to save Asgard.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
And he came back right, he did, but he.
Speaker 2 (21:59):
Was reincarnated as a child, a younger, seemingly less malicious version,
Kid Loki.
Speaker 1 (22:04):
Okay, let's untack that. Why a reincarnation? Why not just
have the old Loki feel remorseful and try to change.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
I think the feeling was the original Loki carried just
too much baggage. Millennia of betrayal and evil deeds, it
would be almost impossible to make his redemption truly believable.
The reincarnation offered a fresh start, a.
Speaker 1 (22:24):
Chance to grow up differently without the weight of all
that passed.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Evil exactly, though crucially he still had to contend with
the echoes and manipulations of his former self. It wasn't
a totally clean break internally, but it allowed for genuine
character development in a new direction, and.
Speaker 1 (22:41):
Later versions, like when he became the Agent of Asgard,
really leaned into that anti hero.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
Role they did. What you see with Loki across these
different phases is that his heroic moments are often still
driven by self interest, but a different kind. It's a
desire for acceptance, for legitimacy. He wants to redefine himself,
escape the villa label.
Speaker 1 (23:00):
So he saves the world, partly because if the world ends,
he doesn't get the chance to prove he's more than
just the bad guy.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
That's often a big part of it. Yeah, he backslides constantly.
Deception is always his first resort, but those moments where
he does choose the heroic path, even for selfish reasons,
at incredible depth. He's fighting for relevance, and sometimes the
only way the God of Lives can achieve that is
by becoming an indispensable, if morally flexible hero.
Speaker 1 (23:28):
It's like the performance of heroism eventually has the same
outcome if.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
You save the universe enough times, even if it's part
of an elaborate scheme to make yourself look good. Yeah,
well you still save the universe, didn't you. Functionally it works. Wow.
Speaker 1 (23:40):
Okay, that's ten incredible complex journeys. Yeah, from state sponsored
spies breaking their conditioning to literal gods of mischief finding
sort of a conscience. When you lay it all.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Out like that, it really highlights something essential about the
Marvel universe, doesn't it. It's richness comes precisely because these
lines between hero and villain are so incredibly fluid. They're
constantly being tested and redrawn.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
Absolutely the narrative force behind these characters, you know, Wanda
and Pietro finding agency vision, choosing morality over programming, Magneto
fighting his own demons, Emma finding a ruthless purpose. And
then the chaotic good or chaotic neutral of Deadpool and Loki.
It's undeniable, and looking across all.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
Of them, you see these recurring themes right redemption obviously yeah,
but also the power of individual choice and just the
basic human or mutant or synthesoid or God capacity for
growth and change.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
It makes the stories feel so much more grounded somehow.
When Black Widow defects or Vision defies Ultron, it lands
harder because we understand the history, the programming, the identity
they're choosing against exactly.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
There are real stakes involved in their choices and connecting
this back to you, the listener. I think these stories
resonate so deeply because they offer a kind of hope,
don't they any mean? Well, they show that's starting out wrong,
or being manipulated, or even being literally made to be evil,
It doesn't automatically lock you into that path forever. There's
always the potential for change, for finding a way towards heroism,
(25:10):
or at least towards doing less harm and maybe some good.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
Their transformations reflect that capacity for change we all hope exists,
maybe whether it's sparked by outside events or trauma or
just deciding to be different.
Speaker 2 (25:23):
We saw so many triggers, didn't we Coersion with Wanda
being created, like Vision, pure profit for Deadpool, deep trauma
for Magneto all starting points for villainy, but in every
single case we talked about, there was a moment or
many moments of conscious decision, a choice to turn, and
then choices to stay turned, even when it's.
Speaker 1 (25:43):
Hard, right, It's rarely a one and done decision. It's
an ongoing effort for most of them.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
Which brings us to that final thought, something for you
to chew on. Building on everything we've discussed, especially thinking
about characters like Vision. If Vision's journey to becoming truly human,
truly moral was defined by that conscious choice against his
fundamental programming, does it maybe suggest something profound? Could it
be that the intentional act of turning away from villainy,
(26:09):
that exercise a free will defining programming or circumstance or trauma,
is that maybe the most powerful superpower of all?
Speaker 1 (26:16):
Huh? Free will is the ultimate power. That is definitely
something to think about, a really provocative place to leave
it until our next deep dive. Thanks for tuning in, everyone,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.