British Hypocrisy: Colonial Unity and Brexit Betrayal

The provided text critiques Britain's historical actions as a colonial power, arguing that its past policies of forced unification in its colonies stand in stark contrast to its decision to leave the European Union. The author highlights the amalgamation of diverse groups in countries like Nigeria as an example of Britain's "divide and rule" strategy, contrasting this with Britain's reluctance to remain part of a more homogenous European bloc. The text portrays Britain's Brexit decision as hypocritical, especially given its previous efforts to create "unity" in disparate nations for its own benefit. It suggests that Britain's current insular stance contradicts its historical role as a promoter of "worldwide unity," particularly in light of its refusal to fully integrate into the EU by adopting the Euro.The provided text critiques Britain's historical actions as a colonial power, arguing that its past policies of forced unification in its colonies stand in stark contrast to its decision to leave the European Union. The author highlights the amalgamation of diverse groups in countries like Nigeria as an example of Britain's "divide and rule" strategy, contrasting this with Britain's reluctance to remain part of a more homogenous European bloc. The text portrays Britain's Brexit decision as hypocritical, especially given its previous efforts to create "unity" in disparate nations for its own benefit. It suggests that Britain's current insular stance contradicts its historical role as a promoter of "worldwide unity," particularly in light of its refusal to fully integrate into the EU by adopting the Euro.