December 9, 2025 • 24 mins
And Another Thing With Dave, by Dave Smith
Episode: Fairness, Inclusion & Women’s Sports: Where Do We Draw the Line?
Host: Dave Smith
Dave examines the clash between inclusion and competitive fairness in women’s sports—from Title IX history to today’s debate over trans participation, scholarships, and safety. Call-ins weigh bathroom policies, separate divisions, and why emotions often overrun facts. Dave argues for logic-first discussion, equal opportunity, and women leading the reform push.
(Content note: sensitive topics, strong opinions.)
Thank you for tuning in!
If you are digging what I am doing, and picking up what I'm putting down, please follow, subscribe, and share the podcast on social media and with friends.
Reviews are greatly appreciated. You can leave a review on Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.
Links below
Apple Podcasts
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/and-another-thing-with-dave/id1498443271
Spotify
https://open.spotify.com/show/1HLX3dqSQgeWZNXVZ1Z4EC?
Thanks again!!!
#aatwd #andanotherthing #davesmith #podcast #conspiracies #truther #politics #uspolitics #truthseeker #andanotherthgingwithdave #USA #usa #Australia #australia #Ireland #ireland #India #india #Germany #germany #uk #UK #United Kingdom #united kingdom #Canada #canada
#AndAnotherThingWithDave #DaveSmithPodcast #WomensSports #TitleIX #FairPlay #TransAthletes #SportsPolicy #EqualityVsEquity #BathroomDebate #SafetyInSports #CultureWars #FreeSpeechDebate #IndependentCommentary #USPolitics #CriticalThinking #CurrentEventsPodcast
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:16):
All right, all right, all right.Part six in a six part series on
the Democrats and immigration. Let's get into it.
What's a you? Hello Tutor.
You can't really fault the media.
They're just trying to sell their rag.
And there's a big difference between selling a rag and a
legitimate professional op-ed ora legitimate professional
(00:42):
investigative journalism. They're not the same and in the
end they're just a business and they're trying to sell their
rag. Is there still excellence in
journalism? It is very few and far between.
There's no more Peter Jennings. There's no more Walter Cronkite.
Those people are long gone. Right, not as far as the
(01:08):
mainstream media goes. It's and it's sad because I grew
up with those how the duty therewas a standard of journalism,
right And you fact checked before you released a story, you
know, unbelievable. You still got some great
journalists all rattle off a fewlike Glenn Greenwald is with the
(01:30):
Gray zone. He's phenomenal.
Max Blumenthal is phenomenal. Aaron Mattei.
He's the one that broke that debunked the Russia gate story.
He won a journalistic award for debunking Russia gate.
Aaron Mattei. He's a phenomenal journalist.
Abby Martin is another one. So but you know, Chris Hedges,
(01:58):
phenomenal award-winning journalist.
But like you said, you know, that's that's what like a
handful that are like like journalistic mercenaries, you
know, and they've been able to carve out a niche for themselves
where they can make a living doing it.
But that's a handful, you know, compared to all the people they
(02:19):
throw at us on the lame stream media on any of the TV stations.
You know, it's unbelievable. Rachel Maddow was taken to court
for disseminating disinformationand the judge found her
innocent, found her not guilty, stating that everybody, while
(02:42):
all of her viewers know that it's not a news program and it's
just an opinion piece. Really.
Tell that to her viewers. Are you kidding me?
It's like the view, right? Those shows are so toxic because
it's an opinion piece disguised as people who know what they're
talking about. But it's really just a bunch of
(03:02):
bitter women complaining about one side of the political
theater, right? So I, I, I think, I don't think
we're really going to get changed until we move beyond the
two party system, right? I'm not a Republican.
I never have been. I was a Democrat up until 2016.
(03:25):
I'll never vote Democrat ever again.
Even if somebody that I liked, like if Kennedy ran as a
Democrat instead of an independent, I wouldn't have
voted for him. I was going to vote for him as
an independent or as a Republican, but not if he ran as
a Democrat. I swore I will never vote
Democrat ever again. They sold me out.
(03:50):
It would be on me if I did that.That's like Rich.
That's like, that's like an abused wife returning to the
abuser, right? I'm not that chump.
That's the difference, of course.
Men think about all kind of things, and men go out there and
they do it. They don't have time to talk.
(04:13):
There are. They're executing what they need
to execute. That's what I'm trying to imply.
Maybe I should have said all that.
Damn, but I didn't think I needed to.
But yeah, men don't have time totalk and express what they're
doing because they are. They're actually doing it.
Women, on the other hand, they tend to talk a lot about it
before they do what they have todo, and that's what I'm trying
(04:34):
to imply. Yeah.
I hope I cleared that up. Men are very intelligent.
A lot of inventors are men. A lot of women are inventors too
though, you know? So yeah.
Anyway, yeah. Yep.
Let's give our smart women props.
(04:54):
Yeah, No, I'm sorry I misunderstood you, Fairy GI
didn't think you were saying meneat shit, but I did think you
were saying that, that that thatthey don't have complex
thoughts. But.
But I agree with you that men aren't much.
Men aren't much. Well, most men, you know,
there's always an exception, right?
But I think most men just don't have time for small talk, right?
(05:18):
We'd rather go do something, youknow, go work on something, go
work on a project. Most dudes have, you know, a
couple, you know, couple, few ora multitude of projects going,
right. So most dudes would rather, you
know, they'll tolerate it like, hey honey, how was your day
(05:39):
'cause you know, that's part of being in a relationship, but
that part is like our least favorite, right, Right, guys?
But we, you know, we man up and suffer through it 'cause, you
know, takes 2 to tango. So you want to be in a
relationship. You got a compromise?
I'm learning. I'm still learning.
(06:02):
You know Fairy GI agree with you, women like you said, women
will talk about anything but so see you, you missed out on the
word when you said that women will talk about anything.
I don't I think you missed the word not talk, complain.
Women are very complaining, complaining, complaining,
complaining, complaining that women will complain.
(06:24):
I'm just going to replace that word talk you said would
complain. Women complain about everything
and anything. That's why I tell men you can
never, you can never solve a woman's issues or make them
content. You can never.
See, here's what happens. If you solve a woman's A
problem, they're just going to go to B.
If you solve her A&B problem, she's just going to go to C.
(06:45):
If you solve AB and C, she's just going to go to D, and so on
and so on. So if you never solve B, then
she can never go to C because she can be stuck on B.
Just never stop B. That way she can't go to C.
BA ends up in here playing 5D chess like a ha grasshopper.
(07:05):
I am 2 steps ahead ha ha what's going on?
Stupid angry. Point of order, there's no such
thing as slowing down and inhibiting.
Slowing down is inhibiting. Pick one.
With respect to that, yes, therewas a ruling that said that the
federal judges, local federal judges, cannot make sweeping
(07:28):
rulings that affect the entire nation with respect to
presidential policies. Yet they're still doing it.
You see, because there's a difference between statutory
law, which has not yet been crafted, and common law, which
has to be respected by the judge.
A judge can ignore common law and decide that it's not in his
best interest to rule in that direction.
(07:51):
That's why you're getting these repeated constitutional
challenges until they craft new law, new statutory law, to
prevent it from happening. Remember that once federal law
is crafted, Article 6, Clause 2 applies.
All judges are bound by it. So so Riddle me this then hello
(08:18):
tutor. So what would be the, what would
be the recourse in a case like that?
So you say you have a stick in the mud judge who's an ideologue
and, and he's going to do this repeatedly.
What, what could you do? Could you do a civil case
against him and, and try to makehim, make it cost him money?
(08:38):
Could you try to bleed him dry financially?
Like, what would be the recourseof the people if these these
Democratic judges keep going against the will of the people
because they're just, you know, tyrannical ideologues
ultimately, right? I would encourage you to
(09:02):
continue to keep it clean and don't be cute saying things like
lame stream media. You know, it's not cute, it's
not professional, it turns your show into a cartoon, and
everyone doesn't have the capability of listening and
paying attention long enough to get some of these deeper things.
Just look down at your audience.You see the guy down there?
(09:24):
Look at that name, BITCHASSNIGGA.
What kind of a conversation you think you're going to have with
a criminal like that, You see? So you have to know the audience
and know the source and speak above them.
So people say you got to come tohim.
No, you speak above them and they either learn or they wind
up being extinct. Point of order from the Heli
(09:46):
tutor. Yeah, interesting opinion.
But you know what, what I see ifI don't tap on his profile is
BAN that's not offending at all.So if you don't dig deeper, the
surface is non offensive and we've been having a great
conversation and the mainstream media as it's called, right?
(10:08):
So I call it the lame stream media.
I'm probably not the first person that's called it that,
but I've been calling it that for a while.
I think that's a clever take, right?
Because the main has become lame.
So if that's where you're getting your news, then you're
literally sucking on the teeth of the intelligence agencies,
(10:32):
right? Even social media now, you know,
is is so censored, it's unbelievable.
But the media is completely infiltrated.
Do you remember the heavy Tudorssecond movement after cling talk
for cling folks? Well let me remind you it is
(10:55):
Democrats 0, Republicans 0. I'm done with both of them.
The two party system is caustic and it is the one that generated
2010, which removed our power tocontrol our government.
What happened in 2010 was SCOTUS, the Supreme Court of the
United States decision on jeez, what was it?
(11:20):
The one that created a corporatepersonhood versus the federal
election? I can't think that federal
election thing. Anyway.
It created corporate personhood and opened the door to unlimited
campaign donations from corporate.
Unbelievable. Yeah, absolutely.
(11:40):
Yeah. Citizens United, you nailed it.
That was that opened the floodgates.
It is not true that there are many women inventors.
Now how do I prove this? Well, you look it up, only 17%
of all known international patents are held by women.
That's probably because of male dominated society over the ages,
(12:03):
but the fact of the matter is less than 20% of all inventors
are women. This is easily, easily
confirmed. I'm going to send you the link.
I'll send you the receipt in theback chat, Dave.
Yeah, right. Well, I didn't take her as
(12:23):
saying that, right. But 15% is kind of a lot.
That's a lot more than none, right.
And when I was studying astronomy, it was interesting to
learn that even in the, I think it was the early 1800s, one of
the most groundbreaking astronomers was a woman.
(12:47):
Let's start by telling you that there's no such thing as a
Democrat or Republican judge, such a thing as a misnomer.
And you should stop saying that judges are required to be
impartial and not partisan, thatthat's just the way it works.
(13:08):
So the there's three ways to remove a judge.
One is impeachment. The other one is at the ballot
box and the other one is the wayit's already been done to have
the rulings overturned by SCOTUS.
Now if you buck SCOTUS, you could wind up with a criminal
charge and be ousted at force. OK, just like that judge that
(13:28):
got arrested for harboring illegal aliens got arrested
right there in our own courtroom.
Don't think that they are immuneto arrests.
Right. So my point being that that
judge is such an ideologue that they're going against their
oath, right? Violating the principles of
(13:50):
their position. So what do you call it?
Is it a Democrat judge? Is it a communist judge?
That what you know, they've completely violated their oath
and their position because of their ideals as opposed to being
non biased, right? So they're completely violating
their position. So that's why I called him in
(14:10):
this case, a Democratic judge, because they're digging in on
that side against Trump, who's not really a Republican, at
least not a traditional Republican, right?
What do you mean? If you don't dig deeper, it's
right here on the screen. Have you seen a screenshot?
He got BITCHASSNIGGA. Don't tap on the profile, just
(14:32):
look at your page. Look down.
He's a criminal, period. There's no excusing that.
Stereo. Shame on you for not getting rid
of this. Criminal.
Yeah, I'm looking at him right now.
I see fairy GB AN do what you can hella tutor Mr. Jock and
(14:57):
write out it says BAN. So if I want to see more than
that, I would have to tap on hisprofile and say what, Steph,
what's happening? You know, Dave, I was getting
ready to say the same thing. Helly tutor said that Fairy G
said, see, there are many women inventors too, but Helly tutor
(15:20):
beat me to it. And so Fairy G, you're getting
better. I hear you on here and you're
getting better. You're coming to the middle.
You're not. So because you never you labeled
yourself as kind of feminist, but you kind of teeter the line
at first, but you're getting better now.
We now the one of the things aregetting better.
Fairy G is to be honest. And the honesty is there's not a
(15:42):
lot of women inventors. There are a few, but it's not a
lot. It's not nowhere near even.
I don't know why women are trying to force things
egalitarian even to force it when just tell the truth what it
is. But Helen Tudor, good job.
He beat me to it. I'm gonna say, wait a minute.
That's definitely not true. It's a few crazy, a few women
(16:03):
inventors, but it's hardly not alie.
Well, I didn't take her comment that way.
So Pelletier was saying 15%. So that's a lot.
That would be a lot of female inventors, right?
If if you got a number, it's going to be probably thousands,
(16:24):
right. So that's a lot.
Is it a majority? No, but it is a lot.
So you know what, let me continue that.
Now continue that phrase. I wish women be honest all the
way because women love to force things equal when it's not
statistically true. They'd be like if we talk about
(16:45):
child support, there's a lot of women paying child, not even
near the amount of men paying child support.
It's a drop in the bucket of women.
Same thing with alimony. Well, women are paying alimony
equally like men. Yeah, there's more than the
usual of women paying alimony, but it's way more high
percentage of men pay alimony compared to women.
(17:06):
Stop. Let's let's stop trying to force
things equal. Well, there's there's women in
the military too. There's lots of women in
military. They're equal.
No, it's not equal. No, there's a drop in the bucket
and women have the right to go in the military now.
They're not running to the border.
That the border Say please sign me up.
Please sign me up. No, no, there's way more men
(17:27):
still and women in the military and women got the right to join.
They just don't fucking want to.The answer to the question is
oath violations are crime, are crimes.
They're felonious. Just like all of these state
legislators about the state to take federal law home, shuffle
it like a deck of cards, and decide they want to pick out
(17:48):
what they like and what they don't like.
So any, any state agency, let's just use Virginia as an example,
who decides to vote on cannabis and or silicycle ban and make it
and make it lawful in deference to federal law is violating
their oath of office. They're also participating in
Rico, sedition and drug dealing.But we don't do anything about
(18:12):
that. What makes you think we're going
to do something about some judges?
Well, it sure would be nice to see, you know, because, well, at
least it's illuminating who the people are that are standing in
the way of a constitutional order.
Doesn't say BA and you want a screenshot?
It says BITCHASSNIGGA .1 biggestday.
(18:41):
That's it's not what I see from the from the show host
perspective. Well, that's the thing that's
the problem when every time somebody say something, it seems
like everybody make it like a whole 100% general statement.
I never give any statistics. I just said that it has it do
have women invest inventors. And you took that statement,
(19:03):
that one three word statement. It only have women inventors 3
to word to five word statement and decided to just take that
and run with it and and made your own novel.
It did had women inventors. That's all I was saying.
I never said it was majority. I never said it was more women
inventors than male inventors. I just was basically saying they
(19:26):
were inventors that were women also.
That's it. Simple.
Yeah, and let's not dogpile on Fairy G Fairy G is being super
open minded, super complimentary, right?
Talking about how intelligent men are.
So it's not dogpile on her and Ithought and and that's exactly
(19:51):
what I thought you were saying as well.
Ferry G. So I think BAN and Hella tutor.
I think you both misunderstood where she was coming with that,
where she wasn't saying, you know, fit, you know, and it
turns out 15% is a lot. That's a lot of individuals.
So that's all. And we got to give our women
props, right? We want more women inventors and
(20:13):
like hella, Tutor said. You know, if we hadn't been.
A restrictive society, you know,there probably would be more.
I'm not going to go so far as tosay there would be more moon and
inventors than male, but there would be more than there
currently are. Probably the laws of
(20:34):
probability. No, that's not what you said,
fairy. You tried to water it down.
You said there was a lot of women inventors.
I heard you, the rest of us heard you, and it's not true.
Well, but that's interpretation.Hello to the right because you
(20:54):
said there was 15%. So if that's the fact, we'll go
with that, we'll go with that, We'll take that number.
That's a lot. That's a lot of individuals that
make up that 15%. So let's not get lost in
semantics, right? Just to tell somebody that
they're wrong because it's just a matter of how we're
(21:16):
interpreting what she said. But if we're trying to and she
just clarified what she said, what she meant, so there's no
confusion there. We don't misunderstand anything.
You can go back and play the message and hear it for
yourself. Matter of fact, that's a
request. Go back and play the message
where she made a declarative, made declarations on lots LOTCS,
(21:41):
lots of women inventors. You'll see it plain as day.
If the Heli Tudor is a liar, it'll be easily proven.
Don't let her back down now. We're not dog piling.
Just, you know, we, we, we know how to catch people when they
tell lies. That wasn't a lie.
I'm on Fairy G's side on this one.
I think you guys are tripping. She just, she just left another
(22:05):
message explaining what she meant in case you didn't get it
because both of you were misinterpreting.
She explained what she meant andand that's initially what I
understood her message to mean. So I didn't misinterpret it.
And then she clarified that I did understand it correctly.
(22:28):
So there it is. Let's just move on.
No need to argue. Let's build each other up, not
tear each other down. What's going on?
Do what you can. So I've been on for a while.
I need to eat some dinner. I think I'm going to go ahead
(22:51):
and wrap it up. I ultimately wanted to talk
about the immigration. I think we kind of beat that
horse cycled around. But I appreciate everybody being
here. If somebody wants to take over,
send me a message. You could take over if and you
want. She didn't clarify anything, she
(23:15):
watered it down and you're protecting the fog of the
feminist regime. Remember, feminism that you hear
today is also a lie. Feminism is only 5 things.
One, women are not chattel. Two, women can own property.
Three women can vote, 4 equal pay for equal work and five
equal protection under the law. That's it.
(23:37):
Everything else you hear is a lie.
And these feminists with their disrespectful women, they can
get out of my house, get off my property, get out of my land,
give me back my phone. No more HVCU, no more HVAC, no
more running hot water, no more access to overland, over water
and over air transportation. If you don't have respect for
(23:58):
women, get out. All right, that's it for this
(24:19):
episode. Thanks for tuning into another
episode of And Another Thing with Dave.
And remember, if you're digging what I'm doing, picking up what
I'm putting down, please spread it around with friends and on
social. Media.
Reviews on Spotify, Podcasts andApple Podcasts are greatly.
Appreciated. All right.
Until next time.
All right, all right, all right.Part six in a six part series on
the Democrats and immigration. Let's get into it.
What's a you? Hello Tutor.
You can't really fault the media.
They're just trying to sell their rag.
And there's a big difference between selling a rag and a
legitimate professional op-ed ora legitimate professional
(00:42):
investigative journalism. They're not the same and in the
end they're just a business and they're trying to sell their
rag. Is there still excellence in
journalism? It is very few and far between.
There's no more Peter Jennings. There's no more Walter Cronkite.
Those people are long gone. Right, not as far as the
(01:08):
mainstream media goes. It's and it's sad because I grew
up with those how the duty therewas a standard of journalism,
right And you fact checked before you released a story, you
know, unbelievable. You still got some great
journalists all rattle off a fewlike Glenn Greenwald is with the
(01:30):
Gray zone. He's phenomenal.
Max Blumenthal is phenomenal. Aaron Mattei.
He's the one that broke that debunked the Russia gate story.
He won a journalistic award for debunking Russia gate.
Aaron Mattei. He's a phenomenal journalist.
Abby Martin is another one. So but you know, Chris Hedges,
(01:58):
phenomenal award-winning journalist.
But like you said, you know, that's that's what like a
handful that are like like journalistic mercenaries, you
know, and they've been able to carve out a niche for themselves
where they can make a living doing it.
But that's a handful, you know, compared to all the people they
(02:19):
throw at us on the lame stream media on any of the TV stations.
You know, it's unbelievable. Rachel Maddow was taken to court
for disseminating disinformationand the judge found her
innocent, found her not guilty, stating that everybody, while
(02:42):
all of her viewers know that it's not a news program and it's
just an opinion piece. Really.
Tell that to her viewers. Are you kidding me?
It's like the view, right? Those shows are so toxic because
it's an opinion piece disguised as people who know what they're
talking about. But it's really just a bunch of
(03:02):
bitter women complaining about one side of the political
theater, right? So I, I, I think, I don't think
we're really going to get changed until we move beyond the
two party system, right? I'm not a Republican.
I never have been. I was a Democrat up until 2016.
(03:25):
I'll never vote Democrat ever again.
Even if somebody that I liked, like if Kennedy ran as a
Democrat instead of an independent, I wouldn't have
voted for him. I was going to vote for him as
an independent or as a Republican, but not if he ran as
a Democrat. I swore I will never vote
Democrat ever again. They sold me out.
(03:50):
It would be on me if I did that.That's like Rich.
That's like, that's like an abused wife returning to the
abuser, right? I'm not that chump.
That's the difference, of course.
Men think about all kind of things, and men go out there and
they do it. They don't have time to talk.
(04:13):
There are. They're executing what they need
to execute. That's what I'm trying to imply.
Maybe I should have said all that.
Damn, but I didn't think I needed to.
But yeah, men don't have time totalk and express what they're
doing because they are. They're actually doing it.
Women, on the other hand, they tend to talk a lot about it
before they do what they have todo, and that's what I'm trying
(04:34):
to imply. Yeah.
I hope I cleared that up. Men are very intelligent.
A lot of inventors are men. A lot of women are inventors too
though, you know? So yeah.
Anyway, yeah. Yep.
Let's give our smart women props.
(04:54):
Yeah, No, I'm sorry I misunderstood you, Fairy GI
didn't think you were saying meneat shit, but I did think you
were saying that, that that thatthey don't have complex
thoughts. But.
But I agree with you that men aren't much.
Men aren't much. Well, most men, you know,
there's always an exception, right?
But I think most men just don't have time for small talk, right?
(05:18):
We'd rather go do something, youknow, go work on something, go
work on a project. Most dudes have, you know, a
couple, you know, couple, few ora multitude of projects going,
right. So most dudes would rather, you
know, they'll tolerate it like, hey honey, how was your day
(05:39):
'cause you know, that's part of being in a relationship, but
that part is like our least favorite, right, Right, guys?
But we, you know, we man up and suffer through it 'cause, you
know, takes 2 to tango. So you want to be in a
relationship. You got a compromise?
I'm learning. I'm still learning.
(06:02):
You know Fairy GI agree with you, women like you said, women
will talk about anything but so see you, you missed out on the
word when you said that women will talk about anything.
I don't I think you missed the word not talk, complain.
Women are very complaining, complaining, complaining,
complaining, complaining that women will complain.
(06:24):
I'm just going to replace that word talk you said would
complain. Women complain about everything
and anything. That's why I tell men you can
never, you can never solve a woman's issues or make them
content. You can never.
See, here's what happens. If you solve a woman's A
problem, they're just going to go to B.
If you solve her A&B problem, she's just going to go to C.
(06:45):
If you solve AB and C, she's just going to go to D, and so on
and so on. So if you never solve B, then
she can never go to C because she can be stuck on B.
Just never stop B. That way she can't go to C.
BA ends up in here playing 5D chess like a ha grasshopper.
(07:05):
I am 2 steps ahead ha ha what's going on?
Stupid angry. Point of order, there's no such
thing as slowing down and inhibiting.
Slowing down is inhibiting. Pick one.
With respect to that, yes, therewas a ruling that said that the
federal judges, local federal judges, cannot make sweeping
(07:28):
rulings that affect the entire nation with respect to
presidential policies. Yet they're still doing it.
You see, because there's a difference between statutory
law, which has not yet been crafted, and common law, which
has to be respected by the judge.
A judge can ignore common law and decide that it's not in his
best interest to rule in that direction.
(07:51):
That's why you're getting these repeated constitutional
challenges until they craft new law, new statutory law, to
prevent it from happening. Remember that once federal law
is crafted, Article 6, Clause 2 applies.
All judges are bound by it. So so Riddle me this then hello
(08:18):
tutor. So what would be the, what would
be the recourse in a case like that?
So you say you have a stick in the mud judge who's an ideologue
and, and he's going to do this repeatedly.
What, what could you do? Could you do a civil case
against him and, and try to makehim, make it cost him money?
(08:38):
Could you try to bleed him dry financially?
Like, what would be the recourseof the people if these these
Democratic judges keep going against the will of the people
because they're just, you know, tyrannical ideologues
ultimately, right? I would encourage you to
(09:02):
continue to keep it clean and don't be cute saying things like
lame stream media. You know, it's not cute, it's
not professional, it turns your show into a cartoon, and
everyone doesn't have the capability of listening and
paying attention long enough to get some of these deeper things.
Just look down at your audience.You see the guy down there?
(09:24):
Look at that name, BITCHASSNIGGA.
What kind of a conversation you think you're going to have with
a criminal like that, You see? So you have to know the audience
and know the source and speak above them.
So people say you got to come tohim.
No, you speak above them and they either learn or they wind
up being extinct. Point of order from the Heli
(09:46):
tutor. Yeah, interesting opinion.
But you know what, what I see ifI don't tap on his profile is
BAN that's not offending at all.So if you don't dig deeper, the
surface is non offensive and we've been having a great
conversation and the mainstream media as it's called, right?
(10:08):
So I call it the lame stream media.
I'm probably not the first person that's called it that,
but I've been calling it that for a while.
I think that's a clever take, right?
Because the main has become lame.
So if that's where you're getting your news, then you're
literally sucking on the teeth of the intelligence agencies,
(10:32):
right? Even social media now, you know,
is is so censored, it's unbelievable.
But the media is completely infiltrated.
Do you remember the heavy Tudorssecond movement after cling talk
for cling folks? Well let me remind you it is
(10:55):
Democrats 0, Republicans 0. I'm done with both of them.
The two party system is caustic and it is the one that generated
2010, which removed our power tocontrol our government.
What happened in 2010 was SCOTUS, the Supreme Court of the
United States decision on jeez, what was it?
(11:20):
The one that created a corporatepersonhood versus the federal
election? I can't think that federal
election thing. Anyway.
It created corporate personhood and opened the door to unlimited
campaign donations from corporate.
Unbelievable. Yeah, absolutely.
(11:40):
Yeah. Citizens United, you nailed it.
That was that opened the floodgates.
It is not true that there are many women inventors.
Now how do I prove this? Well, you look it up, only 17%
of all known international patents are held by women.
That's probably because of male dominated society over the ages,
(12:03):
but the fact of the matter is less than 20% of all inventors
are women. This is easily, easily
confirmed. I'm going to send you the link.
I'll send you the receipt in theback chat, Dave.
Yeah, right. Well, I didn't take her as
(12:23):
saying that, right. But 15% is kind of a lot.
That's a lot more than none, right.
And when I was studying astronomy, it was interesting to
learn that even in the, I think it was the early 1800s, one of
the most groundbreaking astronomers was a woman.
(12:47):
Let's start by telling you that there's no such thing as a
Democrat or Republican judge, such a thing as a misnomer.
And you should stop saying that judges are required to be
impartial and not partisan, thatthat's just the way it works.
(13:08):
So the there's three ways to remove a judge.
One is impeachment. The other one is at the ballot
box and the other one is the wayit's already been done to have
the rulings overturned by SCOTUS.
Now if you buck SCOTUS, you could wind up with a criminal
charge and be ousted at force. OK, just like that judge that
(13:28):
got arrested for harboring illegal aliens got arrested
right there in our own courtroom.
Don't think that they are immuneto arrests.
Right. So my point being that that
judge is such an ideologue that they're going against their
oath, right? Violating the principles of
(13:50):
their position. So what do you call it?
Is it a Democrat judge? Is it a communist judge?
That what you know, they've completely violated their oath
and their position because of their ideals as opposed to being
non biased, right? So they're completely violating
their position. So that's why I called him in
(14:10):
this case, a Democratic judge, because they're digging in on
that side against Trump, who's not really a Republican, at
least not a traditional Republican, right?
What do you mean? If you don't dig deeper, it's
right here on the screen. Have you seen a screenshot?
He got BITCHASSNIGGA. Don't tap on the profile, just
(14:32):
look at your page. Look down.
He's a criminal, period. There's no excusing that.
Stereo. Shame on you for not getting rid
of this. Criminal.
Yeah, I'm looking at him right now.
I see fairy GB AN do what you can hella tutor Mr. Jock and
(14:57):
write out it says BAN. So if I want to see more than
that, I would have to tap on hisprofile and say what, Steph,
what's happening? You know, Dave, I was getting
ready to say the same thing. Helly tutor said that Fairy G
said, see, there are many women inventors too, but Helly tutor
(15:20):
beat me to it. And so Fairy G, you're getting
better. I hear you on here and you're
getting better. You're coming to the middle.
You're not. So because you never you labeled
yourself as kind of feminist, but you kind of teeter the line
at first, but you're getting better now.
We now the one of the things aregetting better.
Fairy G is to be honest. And the honesty is there's not a
(15:42):
lot of women inventors. There are a few, but it's not a
lot. It's not nowhere near even.
I don't know why women are trying to force things
egalitarian even to force it when just tell the truth what it
is. But Helen Tudor, good job.
He beat me to it. I'm gonna say, wait a minute.
That's definitely not true. It's a few crazy, a few women
(16:03):
inventors, but it's hardly not alie.
Well, I didn't take her comment that way.
So Pelletier was saying 15%. So that's a lot.
That would be a lot of female inventors, right?
If if you got a number, it's going to be probably thousands,
(16:24):
right. So that's a lot.
Is it a majority? No, but it is a lot.
So you know what, let me continue that.
Now continue that phrase. I wish women be honest all the
way because women love to force things equal when it's not
statistically true. They'd be like if we talk about
(16:45):
child support, there's a lot of women paying child, not even
near the amount of men paying child support.
It's a drop in the bucket of women.
Same thing with alimony. Well, women are paying alimony
equally like men. Yeah, there's more than the
usual of women paying alimony, but it's way more high
percentage of men pay alimony compared to women.
(17:06):
Stop. Let's let's stop trying to force
things equal. Well, there's there's women in
the military too. There's lots of women in
military. They're equal.
No, it's not equal. No, there's a drop in the bucket
and women have the right to go in the military now.
They're not running to the border.
That the border Say please sign me up.
Please sign me up. No, no, there's way more men
(17:27):
still and women in the military and women got the right to join.
They just don't fucking want to.The answer to the question is
oath violations are crime, are crimes.
They're felonious. Just like all of these state
legislators about the state to take federal law home, shuffle
it like a deck of cards, and decide they want to pick out
(17:48):
what they like and what they don't like.
So any, any state agency, let's just use Virginia as an example,
who decides to vote on cannabis and or silicycle ban and make it
and make it lawful in deference to federal law is violating
their oath of office. They're also participating in
Rico, sedition and drug dealing.But we don't do anything about
(18:12):
that. What makes you think we're going
to do something about some judges?
Well, it sure would be nice to see, you know, because, well, at
least it's illuminating who the people are that are standing in
the way of a constitutional order.
Doesn't say BA and you want a screenshot?
It says BITCHASSNIGGA .1 biggestday.
(18:41):
That's it's not what I see from the from the show host
perspective. Well, that's the thing that's
the problem when every time somebody say something, it seems
like everybody make it like a whole 100% general statement.
I never give any statistics. I just said that it has it do
have women invest inventors. And you took that statement,
(19:03):
that one three word statement. It only have women inventors 3
to word to five word statement and decided to just take that
and run with it and and made your own novel.
It did had women inventors. That's all I was saying.
I never said it was majority. I never said it was more women
inventors than male inventors. I just was basically saying they
(19:26):
were inventors that were women also.
That's it. Simple.
Yeah, and let's not dogpile on Fairy G Fairy G is being super
open minded, super complimentary, right?
Talking about how intelligent men are.
So it's not dogpile on her and Ithought and and that's exactly
(19:51):
what I thought you were saying as well.
Ferry G. So I think BAN and Hella tutor.
I think you both misunderstood where she was coming with that,
where she wasn't saying, you know, fit, you know, and it
turns out 15% is a lot. That's a lot of individuals.
So that's all. And we got to give our women
props, right? We want more women inventors and
(20:13):
like hella, Tutor said. You know, if we hadn't been.
A restrictive society, you know,there probably would be more.
I'm not going to go so far as tosay there would be more moon and
inventors than male, but there would be more than there
currently are. Probably the laws of
(20:34):
probability. No, that's not what you said,
fairy. You tried to water it down.
You said there was a lot of women inventors.
I heard you, the rest of us heard you, and it's not true.
Well, but that's interpretation.Hello to the right because you
(20:54):
said there was 15%. So if that's the fact, we'll go
with that, we'll go with that, We'll take that number.
That's a lot. That's a lot of individuals that
make up that 15%. So let's not get lost in
semantics, right? Just to tell somebody that
they're wrong because it's just a matter of how we're
(21:16):
interpreting what she said. But if we're trying to and she
just clarified what she said, what she meant, so there's no
confusion there. We don't misunderstand anything.
You can go back and play the message and hear it for
yourself. Matter of fact, that's a
request. Go back and play the message
where she made a declarative, made declarations on lots LOTCS,
(21:41):
lots of women inventors. You'll see it plain as day.
If the Heli Tudor is a liar, it'll be easily proven.
Don't let her back down now. We're not dog piling.
Just, you know, we, we, we know how to catch people when they
tell lies. That wasn't a lie.
I'm on Fairy G's side on this one.
I think you guys are tripping. She just, she just left another
(22:05):
message explaining what she meant in case you didn't get it
because both of you were misinterpreting.
She explained what she meant andand that's initially what I
understood her message to mean. So I didn't misinterpret it.
And then she clarified that I did understand it correctly.
(22:28):
So there it is. Let's just move on.
No need to argue. Let's build each other up, not
tear each other down. What's going on?
Do what you can. So I've been on for a while.
I need to eat some dinner. I think I'm going to go ahead
(22:51):
and wrap it up. I ultimately wanted to talk
about the immigration. I think we kind of beat that
horse cycled around. But I appreciate everybody being
here. If somebody wants to take over,
send me a message. You could take over if and you
want. She didn't clarify anything, she
(23:15):
watered it down and you're protecting the fog of the
feminist regime. Remember, feminism that you hear
today is also a lie. Feminism is only 5 things.
One, women are not chattel. Two, women can own property.
Three women can vote, 4 equal pay for equal work and five
equal protection under the law. That's it.
(23:37):
Everything else you hear is a lie.
And these feminists with their disrespectful women, they can
get out of my house, get off my property, get out of my land,
give me back my phone. No more HVCU, no more HVAC, no
more running hot water, no more access to overland, over water
and over air transportation. If you don't have respect for
(23:58):
women, get out. All right, that's it for this
(24:19):
episode. Thanks for tuning into another
episode of And Another Thing with Dave.
And remember, if you're digging what I'm doing, picking up what
I'm putting down, please spread it around with friends and on
social. Media.
Reviews on Spotify, Podcasts andApple Podcasts are greatly.
Appreciated. All right.
Until next time.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Betrayal: Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a brand new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack. And make sure to check out Seasons 1-4 of Betrayal, along with Betrayal Weekly Season 1.