FF5 #66 - What Cunningham v Cornell Means for Health Plans

In this episode of Friday Fiduciary Five, Eric Dyson discusses the implications of the Cunningham v Cornell Supreme Court decision for health plans, emphasizing the need for 408(b)(2) disclosures under the Consolidated Appropriations Act. He explains that health plans subject to ERISA must now disclose fees and services provided by vendors, such as third-party administrators and pharmacy benefit managers. Eric advises plan committee members to establish a process similar to retirement plans, including fiduciary committees and charters, to ensure compliance.

Connect with Eric Dyson: 

Website: https://90northllc.com/

Phone: [phone]

Email: [e-mail] 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/401kguy/ 

The information contained herein is general in nature and is provided solely for educational and informational purposes.

It is not intended to provide a specific recommendation of any type of product or service discussed in this presentation or to provide any warranties, financial advice, or legal advice.

The specific facts and circumstances of all qualified plans can vary, and the information contained in this podcast may or may not apply to your individual circumstances or to your plan or client plan specific circumstances.