Shabbath August 16 2025

Shabbath with Cepher Publishing

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Shabbat Shalom. Shabbat Shalom.
Hey, guys. Good morning.
Good morning. Good evening.
Good. Afternoon Shabbat Shalom.
I see you there, Lisa. Tig, how are you?
Good. How are you?
All right, guys. Hey, what?
Many great smiles today. We're gathering the crew.
Yes, yes, it's a wonderful day in the neighborhood and.

(00:21):
Shabbat Shalom. I suppose I guess we have lots
to be thankful for. Shabbat Shalom.
Good to see you. Good to see you.
So we're still. Breathing, Doctor Tiger, We're
still breathing. We're still breathing, all
right, and I see. Stop alone.
Stop alone. Shabbat Shalom.
Hey, Lynn. Good.
Good to hear from you, brother. And let's see, there's Steve

(00:42):
Hall. Yeah.
Steve, You still traveling, are you?
Are you already in Canada or where?
Where you be? Steve Hall.
He must still be in Alaska because he looks frozen.
He's still in Alaska. Yeah, Yeah, he is actually I
thought. He was with Dale and Peggy, but
I don't see them together, so maybe not.

(01:03):
Well, they're the, the halls aretraveling.
They've been, they've spent, I think, a long month up here in
Alaska having a great time, by the way.
Huge fishing success, I might add.
And Dale and Peggy Brunk up at Fairbanks.
How's it going, you guys? We saw Steve yesterday.
Oh, is that right? Yeah.

(01:24):
They're they're still here for this weekend.
We're going to see them again later today, I think.
Oh, fantastic. Yeah, that's great.
Yeah. Yeah.
It's just been terrific. Lisa, go ahead.
What do you? What's going on, sister?
Well, I have something kind of been laid on my heart all
morning long. It's not that I'd share with
everyone, you know. Yeah, you just said that people

(01:47):
would know that we are as disciples with how we love one
another. And he also said that the 2
greatest commandments were Love y'all with all your heart, soul
and mind, and you'd love your neighbor as yourself.
And. So I think it's really, really
important with how we communicate with one another

(02:08):
that we keep those two things foremost in, in mind because we
are here because we understand that all of the scriptures are
for all of us. There's not 2 laws.
It's all of us, you know, and, and we want to honor our Father
by doing his commandments. You always just said, if you

(02:30):
love me, do my commandments. And those are the two biggest
ones. And so as we are sharing with
our families, and I'm always speaking from my own experience,
when I first came to know the truth, I was like, you know,
mainly because I was upset that I'd been lying to and my
grandfather was lied to and all these people were lied to.
And when I found the truth, I really would have shared.

(02:52):
I had a lot of fervor, but I came across more aggressive than
I probably should have. And when I toned it down, I
didn't silence myself, but I diddo it more in a gentle way and
more of, hey, this is what I found rather than listen to me

(03:12):
kind of thing. I I started actually, I can't
say that, you know, a lot of my family has, you know, oh, yeah,
I accepted it. But they're not resistant to it.
They're OK. And but anyway, and I think more
than anything with each other, we need to be gentle with each
other. We're all in different places in

(03:33):
the walk and I think we need to first and foremost love one
another. Me too.
So anyway, that's, that's what Ijust had on my heart 'cause I
noticed that sometimes in the insometime, not necessarily in our
chat, but like on Telegram and stuff, no.
That's something that's pretty good.
It's really good, Lisa, because you know, really what we're

(03:55):
talking about now is one of the things that I have discovered,
you know, it took me years to doit, But that this passage out of
John 17 where Mashiac says at the end of the passage, I have
declared your name unto them andwill declare it that the love of
you that is in me might be in them and I in them.

(04:19):
And I have found that really that the really the of my
ministry is really just is to declare the name.
I might have a lot of other things going on.
You know, there's, there's certainly a lot more on the
table than just that. But in declaring the name has
been really the it's been the task.

(04:40):
And so as a consequence, we havefound that we've received
acceptance when we start with the premise that what is the
reason you're declaring the nameto me?
So that you can prove how smart you are.
Mr. Smart, I heard some talking and I said what the.
Heck, and the answer is no. The answer is the reason you

(05:00):
declared the name to them is that the love of yacht might be
in them. And, you know, now we're at a
point, we're at a point now thatit's really quite interesting in
the world because people, of course, are beginning to see
things in the world that is making men's hearts faint with
fear from what they see coming upon the earth, particularly

(05:21):
those who are looking, you know,those who still have their head
in the sand, they can avoid the issue.
But even more even that is goingaway.
Even the ones that have their head in the sand have to kind of
pick up and go, what was that again?
You know, when they feel an earthquake or they're running
from a tsunami or, you know, something like this is
happening. And there is a lot to, there is

(05:45):
a lot to concern ourselves with.And also, you see this huge
delusion that has been given in West Asia, and the delusion that
has been given in West Asia is one that is ultimately going to
result in a catastrophic psychological collapse in the

(06:11):
American Christian Church. And, you know, I mean, I have a
pretty good idea, having been a student of this for some time
now, I have a pretty good idea of what is the cause of the
factor of this psychological collapse.
Because it's constructed on a House of Cards and those cards

(06:31):
are cars that have been put in place fraudulently and the
mislead and as a result of it's coming to a head and Bush is
coming to job and it's coming toa head.
I mean, like I can give you an example.
When you talk, when you talk about the idea of teaching the

(06:54):
Schofield Bible, that's a that'sa huge problem.
When you're talking about teaching dispensationalism,
that's a huge problem. When you're talking about
teaching the pre tribulation rapture, that's a huge problem.
When you start talking about thedoctrines of lawlessness and
prosperity gospels and some of these other things, these are

(07:16):
very huge problems inside the faith.
They're huge. And but the, but the most, the
greatest illusion of them all isKufi Christians United for
Israel. And Lindsey Graham said it that

(07:39):
he said it this weekend that if we ever abandoned Israel, then
God will abandoned us. And you know, he really knows
nothing about Scripture. He knows nothing.
And he knows nothing about Yas teaching.

(08:01):
And this is really the guys who's been in control of
America's foreign policy now forabout 12 years.
I mean, it's him and the other neocons that to them the
solution is war, war and more war, killing people.
And so how can you call yourselfa religious person when your

(08:25):
agenda is to kill your neighbor?How do you call yourself a
person of faith when your agendais to kill people?
I just, I don't see it. I don't see how that's possible.
I don't see how that works. But when we look at when we look
at the structure of faith and welook at the structure of what is
the actual teaching in Scripturedescription require you to be an

(08:49):
impoverished person, That's one question.
And the answer is no, it doesn't.
And in particular, in light of the story of Yosef, you know,
Yosef was the first capitalist, if you will, and the tribes that
would come under the banner of the Northern Kingdom were also
an economic based Kingdom. They were seafarers and traders

(09:14):
and they sailed the seven seas, so to speak, and they brought
merchandise and they knew how tobuild and they knew how to trade
goods. And they were very resistant to
higher taxes. You might recall that that's
what caused the civil war between the Northern Kingdom and
the Southern Kingdom. So when we see these kinds of
things, we can see that the, the, the faith throughout the

(09:39):
world there now most people in the Christian faith are waking
up. And the problem is when they
wake up, there's several things happening. 1 is in Europe, there
is a constant agitation from Islam.
And the Islamic scholars are notshy about being scholars.

(10:00):
In other words, there are Muslimscholars who know every word of
the Quran and the Hadid and the Sunnah, and they've also read
the Talmud and they've also readthe New Testament cover to
cover. So they're not people who are
speaking out of ignorance and they're there to proclaim the
central tenets of Islam. Recently, the head of the Anti

(10:24):
Defamation League, which is an organization works against
anti-Semitic statements, came out and said that the New
Testament is anti-Semitic. And so you can see that there is
a push now to criminalize the New Testament, in particular in

(10:47):
the United States. And of course, again, some of
these kinds of statements, the statements that people make
about Scripture when they have not read it and they have not
studied it. You know there's an old saying
in Judaism. You know what's the definition
of an ignoramus? Someone who's read the Bible

(11:08):
cover to cover once. OK, most Christians don't even
qualify as ignoramus because they haven't even read the New
Testament, let alone having readthe whole of the Scripture.
And yet they're willing to pontificate and they're willing
to adjudicate and say, oh, it's absolutely improper for you to

(11:31):
read the book of Enoch. It's absolutely improper for you
to read the book of Judith. It's improper for you to read
the book of Ciroc Predicated upon what did you read it?
They have no idea. They're just, you know, mopping
what someone else told them. So what you see is you've seen a
crisis of faith now because the churches since about 2002 have

(11:55):
been gaining an apostasy. Every year there's fewer and
fewer people in church. Every year it gets thinner and
thinner and thinner and thinner.Then you had a couple of things
happen. I mean, 1 was COVID, and COVID
killed 140% of the churches in America.
There was a thing that happened in Canada called the Quiet

(12:17):
Revolution, which essentially killed the Catholic Church in
the French speaking areas of Canada, killed it.
And it's kind of amazing when you think about it because there
was a revolution that took placein Quebec that even though the
British had conquered the area, it became a French speaking

(12:38):
enclave. And this was because of the
governance of the Catholic Church, who said your duty is to
have as many children as possible?
And they did. And so the the Quebecois lived
in intense desperation for centuries because they had all
these kids and there was no place for them to work, no place

(13:00):
for them to get a job to make money.
So it was, you know, many, many families with 14 kids living in
intense poverty and struggling in the struggle for life.
And then all of a sudden, in the60s, they were sold a bill of
goods by those who had been overthrown by the defilement.

(13:22):
Place it in society. They've been overthrown by the
defilement. They began to teach abortion and
they began to teach other things.
And there was a quiet revolutionin Quebec and people fell away
from the Catholic Church. Now the average family size is
1.5, not 14, and Canada is beingoverwhelmed by immigrants

(13:49):
because of it. So in America now, there was a
massive apostasy that took placeduring COVID where so many of
the churches capitulated to fear.
And these pastors were saying, well, Jesus would take the jab.
Jesus would wear a mask. Really, really well.

(14:14):
That's an out and out lie. And there's nothing in the
Gospels to justify that. In fact, if you look in the book
of Acts, you see Mashiach comingto the Talmud dem.
And he breathed on them and said, Receive ye the ruach
Hakodesh. He breathed on them and said
that. Now when you see that, when you

(14:38):
see what was happening there. The apostasy also began to be
magnified when Pope Francis tookthe throne of Catholicism.
And who brought real meaning to the question is the Pope
Catholic? Many Catholics, including a
Cardinal Pagano, accused him of being not Catholic.

(14:58):
And of course before Francis died, he excommunicated Pagano
because Vagano was absolutely inrebellion to the apostasy of
Francis, who was an illegal Popeto begin with.
He took the position of Pope when a pre-existing Pope was
still in office. But Benedict the 16th had to
step down because Kevin Annette had proved categorically that he

(15:23):
had been in the 9th circle engaged in child sacrifice.
And so Benedict the 16th never left the grounds of the Vatican
from that point forward. And so they brought in the
Jesuit operative, Francis, who, by the way, was the son of a
Nazi war criminal who had fled to Argentina and who had

(15:45):
participated in a purge in Argentina that was responsible
for the loss of life for 250,000Argentinian children.
And Vigano said he begs the question, is the Pope Catholic?
Well, as a result, there's been massive apostasy throughout the
faith. And so you have people

(16:06):
reiterating things that they think is true in the faith when
maybe they attend church twice ayear.
You know, they would go for Christmas and, and Easter, but
only if there's something reallygood happening at midnight Mass.
You know, and then the, the Protestant churches are out
bragging about how many Easter eggs they can put out for Easter

(16:28):
for the fertility worship. And they have no, they have no
questions and no qualms about evidence when you ask them, when
you try to ask them a question, why are you putting out Easter
eggs? They don't want to hear your
question and they'll expel you from their church as soon as you
mention the fact that there's a problem.

(16:50):
So. And many of you that are in this
fellowship have been expelled from churches because you asked
the wrong question at the wrong time.
Oh, get back to me on that. Oh, see me after the service.
You asked the question. Maybe this isn't the right place
for you. Maybe you need to be somewhere
else. The pastor.

(17:10):
Never, ever challenging himself to say, Gee, what is it that I
do that I believe, and why do I believe it?
They don't. Instead, they expel you because
they're running a 501-C3 and the501-C3 requires them to do
corporate management, not the interests of the congregation.

(17:34):
All right. So when you see all of that now
we see that there are many people who nonetheless have
given a confession of faith, whononetheless have a circumcision
of the heart, but they don't know where they are.
You know, like, for instance, let's take the Worldwide Church
of God. Many of you were were part of
the Worldwide Church of God and the Worldwide Church of God just

(17:57):
one day abandoned you. You.
So wait a minute. What about all the feast days we
used to practice? What about all of this?
Oh, we're not doing that anymore.
Bye and they. Divided up into two 200
different groups. Yeah, of course, they
fragmented. They broke like a bad
windshield, right? And so as a consequence, you can

(18:20):
see that this is just one example, OK?
I mean, I'll give you another example.
The 7th Day Adventist Church, the 7th Day Adventist Church,
which had preached concerning the apostasy and the tyranny of
the Pope for decades, suddenly capitulation says, Oh yeah,
we're part of the Catholic Church.

(18:43):
What? How could, how could they do
that? Well, they abandoned many of the
people in their own faith and the things that they believe
now, where, where, what home do these people have?
What home do they have? They don't have a home.
They're just expelled. They're just left out in the
wind because the leaders were compromised.

(19:04):
And this kind of this kind of compromise and these kinds of
things are just horrendous. They're horrendous in the modern
world. And it's caused the falling
away. But here you have all these
people who believe who. Then there's the other kind.
They, you know, they became believers.
They had a circumcision of the heart.

(19:24):
And they decide for the first time, you know, I've repented.
I'm going to step into a church.They step into the church and
they are so massively abused by the politics and the backbiting
and the backstabbing and the jockeying for position.
And, you know, people who want their 15 minutes of fame on some
stamp on the worship stage. You know what they say, You

(19:47):
know, when it comes to the worship team, you know, Satan
got cast out of heaven and he landed right in the worship
team. And, you know, if you've ever
been in some of these churches, you'll know exactly what I'm
talking about. And so, you know, the kind of
backstabbing, cut throating, youknow, and, and, and sometimes
it's the pastors. Who reject you because you said

(20:07):
something or something happened in your family, or maybe you
went to the church because you couldn't pay your electric bill
that winter and you were going to freeze if somebody didn't
give you 60 bucks and they told you to get out because the
pastor needed to have more Microsoft stock and his wife
needed the new Corvette. You know, there are many, many
people who have been injured, kicked to the curb, stabbed in

(20:30):
the back, had their throat cut in a church when they were
trying to come in and participate as believers.
So you can see that all of thesethings have left many, many
believers who still in their heart carry belief, still carry
faith. They don't know how to
articulate it. They don't know how to let it

(20:52):
breathe. They don't know how to function
as a believer. They don't know anything.
They're just sitting there going, I believed.
And all I know is that I'm injured.
And so I'm just going to keep myfaith quietly and go home.
What do you believe? What do you say that that new
Pope bringing the hammer down onthe defilement of the and

(21:12):
they're allowing the defilement with these priests.
He's already got four of them arrested.
Well. He's the one that's open the
door for you to go into the to the library.
Yeah, well, we're going to. We're going to see David.
You know, one thing that a friend of mine pointed out is
that he is requiring people to bow the knee to the Pope.

(21:36):
And no, I'm not going to be bowing the knee to the Pope.
That's just a fact. So.
But I mean, it's interesting that that change happened at the
same time where you had access into Italy.
And I believe this is something that's on the move across the
board. And this looks like what's
fixing the fall is going to be that dominion of Judaism going

(22:00):
to fall about the same time Roman Catholics is going to
fall, and the whole thing is going to be replaced by the by
the sovereign of esteem. Yeah, yeah.
That's what it. Looks like to me is what's going
on I. Think it just I didn't mean.
To jump right in there, I got excited about what you were
saying. No, but you know, I think this
is true and I think this is what's happening because, and

(22:20):
again, the Scripture prophecies this in Revelation 3 talking
about the Church of Philadelphia, you know, that
those who call themselves Yahudim and are not will come to
understand that Yah has loved you, the Church of Philadelphia
that Yah has loved you. And you know, so this is, you

(22:42):
know, this is just one form of the many delusions that are out
there. And of course the pin that pops,
the balloon of delusion is one thing.
It's the name of Yahwah that is the pin that pops the delusion.
And so when we see this, you know, and again, you know what

(23:05):
Lisa was saying is present yourself with love, right?
Truth and love. Present yourself in a spirit of
love at Yahoo. Dot com.
And so because of this, we can see that the presenting yourself
in this way is going to be a bigdeal, because really it's not

(23:25):
about us at all, OK? It's about the name of Yahwah.
It's not about us. It's about the name of Yahwah.
And the name of Yahwah will be glorified on this earth.
It will be glorified among men. It will be glorified among the
nations. It will be because the days of a

(23:45):
Sioux are coming to an end and the days of Yaakov are
beginning. I called the seed of Yaakov, my
first born son, huge, major important issue.
So when we look at this, when welook at this falling away in the
faith that has happened, the apostasy, we can see that there

(24:09):
is this crushing blow. Like, for instance, I don't know
how many people have been waiting every feast of trumpets
for the rapture, but I hear it all the time inside the
community of the though this this coming feast of trumpets,
it's going to be the rapture. And instead we see fearsome
things coming on the earth. I thought it was supposed to be
out of here by now. Maybe you were left behind.

(24:31):
Yeah. And, and the truth is, is that
that whole concept, what a fiendof apostasy to the people.
You don't have to change your way at all.
All you have to do is come here.45 minutes.
But once a week I'll tell you all your sins are forgiven and
that you're going to be the one sitting in the mezzanine

(24:51):
dropping 1 little tear for all of your friends who didn't make
it because they didn't come herein this church and sit here for
45 minutes while I preach the rapture.
Don't. Forget they need the tide too.
Yeah, yeah. The tide, the tithe and all
this, right. And all of this stuff is, is
really it's it is, it has nothing to do with the true
faith. It just has nothing to do with

(25:12):
it. The true faith under, under
Mashiac, you know the way Mashiac has outlined it for us,
right? The Lamb slain from the
foundation of the world. It's really quite an incredible
thing and it's a wonderful and beautiful thing.
And you have to keep in mind that what is said in Matthew 11,
my yoke is easy and my burden islight, right?

(25:35):
This is what is said about the faith.
My yoke is easy and my burden islight.
If you're sitting in a situationwhere you're being told you have
to say mea culpa, mea culpa, meamaxima culpa seven days a week
while you're eating the blood and drinking the drinking the
you're drinking the blood and eating the body of Mashiach.

(25:56):
Well, that is not an easy yoke and a light burden.
The easy yoke and a light burdenis Yah gave us His covenant in
the 10 Deborah. Learn to love Yah with all your
heart, mind and soul. And you do that by performing
the 1st 5 commandments. Learn to love your neighbor as

(26:17):
yourself and you do that by performing the 2nd 5
commandments. And if you do that, you have met
the vast majority of the burden.Then there are the five duties.
Feed the hungry, clothe the naked, visit those in prison,
take care of the widow, take care of the orphan.
This is really the the hierarchyof what it means to be a

(26:41):
believer, but it starts with thecircumcision of the heart,
loving Yah with all your heart, with all your mind, with all
your soul, with all your everything, with all your
everyness, love Yah and to understand fully the name and to
understand the name of the Son. You see, this is these are the

(27:03):
things that have caused massive contradictions in the hearts of
Christians because they can't understand.
Well, Isaiah 45, we can't read that because it says Yahwah is
the savior. There is no other.
Well then what do you do about the fact that Paul quotes Isaiah
45 in Romans 14? I don't know because my church

(27:27):
always taught us that Jesus was the name above all names.
That means the name of Jesus came above the name of Yahwah.
And because Jesus comes above the name of Yahwah, he's the
only one. He's the only savior.
Every knee is going to bow and every tongue is going to confess
Jesus. The problem is is that that is

(27:47):
wildly inaccurate because the Son said I come in the name of
the Father and you do not know me and the name of the Father is
in the name of the Son, Iyawa, Iyawa.

(28:08):
All four vowels Iyawa are found in Yahusha.
Yahusha is a combination of 2 words Yahwah and Yasha which
means Yahwah saves. So This is why the name of the
sun has to be what it is not Yahushua, but Yahusha, Yahusha.

(28:37):
And the name of the father is inthe Son.
And this is it fulfills the question that's asked in
Proverbs 30, verse 4. What is his name and what is his
son's name? If you can tell, if you can
tell. Now with all that being said,

(28:57):
the answer to the question is when people ask in the world,
well what is the nature of the faith, What do I do?
How am I supposed to behave? Who am I?
Does y'all know me right? Do we have any proof of any of
this stuff? Does any of this stuff make
sense? What about the contradictions
that are found in the New Testament like the one I just

(29:18):
mentioned? Is Jesus the name of Bob Yahwah?
That's a question. And if so, where does that stack
your faith? Well now you can listen to
Marcia and tell you that Yahwah,the Old Testament was an evil,
vicious war God that wanted to kill people and that Jesus was a

(29:43):
completely new God in a new dispensation.
Well, if that's the case, then you just rip your Bible in half.
Take that Old Testament, throw the trash.
Who needs to read any of that? Then while you're at it, you can
cut out all the Old Testament references in your New
Testament. And in the Cepher we made it
easy because we indented all of those throughout the New

(30:05):
Testament. So you can see exactly how much
of the Old Testament is in the New Testament.
So you see there's an issue and the issue is this.
People don't want to admit it, but because the English
translators said keep the text in the vulgar language, then

(30:27):
they created vulgar concepts inside the scripture.
And those vulgar concepts are very often contradictory.
Let's take for instance, Matthew23, verse 2.
The scribes and the Pharisees, you remember them, the ones that
Mashiac said, you den of Vipers over and over.

(30:49):
To them, your father is the devil.
Remember that? Matthew 23.
But Matthew 23 begins with the proposition.
The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses seat.
Everything they tell you to do diligently do really.
That's how it reads in the KJV. That's how it reads in the NKJB

(31:12):
and the ASB and the ESB and the NIV.
Diligently do what the scribes and the Pharisees tell you to
do. Well, you know what that means
that, and this is the words of Mashiach telling you this.
This means you are committed to the Talmud, you are committed to
the Gemara, you are committed tothe Mishnah, you are committed

(31:35):
to the Oral Law, you are committed to rabbinic authority.
Now there have been members of the Judaic faith who try to
nuance it and say, Oh no, that just means to do what Moses told
you to do. And how do we, how do we best
understand Moses? By reading the Talmud, reading
the Gemara, reading the Mishnah.And that's not what it says at

(31:59):
all. The scribes and the Pharisees
always say, do what I do, but they say and don't do.
That's a lot different than the way it's put in the average
text. And it is consistent with what's

(32:20):
going to follow in Matthew 23 when he says to the scribes and
Pharisees, you den of Vipers, you load burdens on men's back
and you don't lift one finger tohelp them.
You travel miles to make a convert and that you convert
twice the sun of hell that you are.
These are the things that are said in Matthew 23.

(32:42):
And so how do you, how as a Christian, do you reconcile that
in your mind when you're readingit?
And This is why your pastor tells you you don't read the
Bible. We'll tell you the phrases in
the Bible that you need to know and you don't read it.
I'll tell you what you need to know.
And that's all you can study when you go to Bible study.

(33:03):
I can you can study the passagesI gave you and nothing other.
When you hear a pastor tell you that you can only do a Bible
study predicated on the passagesthat they gave you, do you get
the feeling that they're trying to control you behind an agenda?

(33:23):
Yes. That has nothing to do with the
total teaching of Scripture. Paul says all Scripture is
appropriate for knowledge. All Scripture.
So when you look at all of the Scripture, do you get to read
that in church? No, there's no Bibles in most,
most Catholic churches. There's a missile.

(33:47):
Here's the reading from the gospel.
Here's the reading from the epistles.
We'll tell you which verses we're going to read, and then
you keep your mind off everything else that's in that
text. They can't tell you that you
can't have a Bible. But I've been in many, many,
many churches where there isn't a single Bible present in the

(34:07):
building. Not present.
So what are you calling yourself?
You're calling yourself the teachers of the faith.
What faith? Faith in what?
What exactly are you teaching? And so the teaching that has
been given has been misleading. It has created intense poverty.

(34:27):
I mean, when you look like, whenyou look at nations that are
still theocratically Catholic, you know, like we were in
Portugal last year, it's a theocratic state, Catholic
theocratic state. And So what do you see?
Well, it's what we call Catholicpoor.
Wherever the church is totally dominant, the nation is

(34:51):
completely impoverished and the churches are absolutely gilded
and ladened with gold like you cannot believe, while the people
live in poverty. Is that the teaching of
Scripture? There are those that argue that
that is the teaching of scripture, that you are to have
no material goods. You are not to amass any

(35:13):
material goods, you're not to doany of this because that's
enough. But you're supposed to live the
life of poverty. And they point to Jakob Saadiq
James the just, who led the community at Qumran after the
death of Mashiac for many years.And at the community of Qumran,
of course, this is where John the Baptist had been for a

(35:33):
while. And Robert Eisenman believes
that Yaakov Saidiq was responsible for a lot of the
Dead Sea Scrolls that were amassed and put in the caves and
including the community rules, which it's it was essentially A
monastic communist order. And it was living in intense

(35:55):
poverty on whatever little budget they could put together.
Now the question is, and when you look at the that the order
that was given by Peter in Acts 2 and three, which was also a
communist order from each according to his ability, to
each according to his need. Those phrases are found in the

(36:16):
book of Acts, not in the writings of Karl Marx, not in
the writings of Joseph Stalin. They're found in the book of
Acts. And the question you have to ask
yourself is, did Peters congregation succeed in that
practice? And the answer is no, they

(36:36):
didn't. They did not succeed.
Peter did not remain at Antioch,but he left and he went to
Fortress Babylon with John, Markand Yakov.
Saidiq was later executed and that community was dispersed,
not one stone left standing. So where was the faith founded?

(37:02):
Where it succeeded? Where was the faith planted that
it became a ripe garden, a plentiful garden?
Where did that happen? And the answer is it happened in
a couple of places. 1 is in the South of France under the
leadership of Mary Magdalene andthe other was in Britain under
the leadership of Joseph Arimathea. 14 years later Paul

(37:28):
would arrive and preach the doctrines that would establish
the so-called religion. But remember Paul's ministry
didn't start until 48 AD Rama Thea had been in Britain from 36
AD. I mean, so when we see this now,

(37:49):
you can you can really begin to see the idea of the faith that
was practiced by a Rama. Thea is the ancient path of the
faith belonging to the believersin Messiah.
That was the practice. That is the practice, the

(38:10):
ancient path. And that was the practice that
was brutally overthrown by Rome at the point of a sort.
And you have to keep in mind this, one of the things I talked
about this week was the distinction between Western
Orthodoxy and Eastern Orthodoxy.And to fully understand this,

(38:31):
you need to know that when the when the Catholic Church was
formed was formed under Constantine, who said this is
the official religion of the Roman Empire.
And at that time the Roman Empire was one unit.
Even though he had created a newcapital at Constantinople, it
was still a unified entity. It had not broken up between

(38:52):
East and West. It was Constantine's grandson
that would kind of sever the relationship with the West and
begin to loot the West on behalfof the Byzantine Empire.
But when you see what happened from 3:25 at the Council of
Nicaea Forward, there were 7 Constantinian councils, and

(39:14):
these 7 Constantinian councils created the tenants of the
church. Nowhere in any of those 7
councils is there a roster of the books of the Bible.
Nowhere there's discussions about what to do with the
bishops, what to do with the Jewish bishops, what to do with

(39:34):
those people who were self-inflicted eunuchs, these
kinds of things. These were the kinds of
discussions that were going on in these 7 Constantinian
councils. Now these were approved and that
was it. They were binding on the Church.
Thereafter, Rome began to separate and Rome had an
additional 21 ecumenical councils defining the Western

(39:56):
Church that were never accepted by the Eastern Church and the
Eastern Church. Eventually, when we get to 1016
AB, the Eastern Church severs ties with the Western Church
entirely. We're done.
We're not a part of you, You're not a part of us.
We're done. It's called the Great Schism.

(40:18):
One of the big differences between the Eastern Church and
the Western Church is that the Western Church is manifestly
intolerant of any contrary belief, doctrine or practices.
Intolerant. And Roman church went out and
slaughtered over the centuries, a little bit more than 400

(40:40):
million people. And it was the Roman Church that
then said, we're going to imposeCatholicism on the rest of the
world at the point of a sword. And that would be done in the
hands of the Spanish. That would be done in the hands
of the French. That would be done in the hands
of the Portuguese. That would be done in the hands

(41:01):
of the Dutch. And it would also be done in the
hands of the Germans and the English.
And this is what we call colonization.
Now. The rest of the world, quite
frankly, has arrived at a point where they're fed up with
Western colonization. When you visit what happened in

(41:24):
South Africa, South Africa was brutalized by none other than
Winston Churchill who created the first concentration camps
where he took 48,000 Dutch womenand children who had pioneered
the land of South Africa and putthem in a concentration camp to

(41:46):
die during the Boer War because Winston Churchill was a
bloodthirsty war monger. The colonization of East Africa
and Kenya also exploited the colonization of India.
Also exploited the colonization of Hong Kong which then waged an
opium war against China. Also exploited the colonization

(42:08):
of Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
Exploitive, exploitive, exploitive.
And people look now, and what the modern historians are seeing
is that the great damage done inthis world has been done
primarily by British colonizers,secondarily by European

(42:30):
colonizers. And this was done under the
banner of the intolerant Roman Church.
What do you believe? Oh, well, we believe in
Mashiach. Yeah.
Great. Do you believe in the invocation
of the Saints? Do you believe in
transubstantiation? Do you believe in the power of
the Pope and his inerrancy? Oh no, we just believe in

(42:53):
Mashiac. Cut his head off, burn him at
the stake or the things they didduring the Inquisition.
You know, put him in the Iron Maiden, put him on the rack and
stretch out all his bones, right?
Break every ligament in his body.
You know, put this thing in the mouth that breaks the RIP of the
mouth open. You know, take his hands, tie

(43:16):
behind his back and dangle him from the ceiling for a month.
Yeah. These were the practices of the
Roman Church. You didn't see this in Eastern
Orthodoxy. You didn't see that kind of
intolerance. They just kind of moved through
their faith and lived with the fact that there were other

(43:37):
people in their area that held different views.
That was not the case with Western Rome.
Western Rome can literally be personified by the Jefferson
Airplane song. If only you believe like I
believe, we'll get by. But when you don't believe like
I believe, we're not going to get by.
You're going to get burned at the stake.

(43:58):
And so with all of this being said, was the Roman Church
teaching the doctrines of Scripture?
No, no. Does it look like they were
teaching love thy neighbor as thyself?
No, no. Convert thy neighbor to be
thyself. And if they don't convert, kill

(44:20):
them. Doctrines of the Devil.
Yeah, well, you know, I mean, when you look and you see it,
you can see that there has been robust genocide practice under
the banner of the Roman Church. When you look at what the what
the Spanish conquistadors did tothe Aztecs in Mexico, when you

(44:45):
look at the Protestants did to the indigenous tribes in North
America, ruthless, unbridled slaughter.
I mean what Buffalo Bill did in killing 2 million Buffalo in
order to deprive all the tribes of food.
In the modern world, that would be described as a war crime,

(45:07):
crime against humanity and act of genocide.
But in American history, oh, he's a hero.
Buffalo Bill. Yeah, a great guy.
Yeah. Right now.
So in seeing all this, the question that emerges from the
true believer, someone who's actually been touched by the
Ruach Hakodesh in their heart, is they're looking in and

(45:29):
they're saying, what do I know? What do I, what do I know?
What do I know? Do I know anything about this?
Is there any clarity? Is there any path of
enlightenment? Is there anything that I might
know? And the thing that they need to
know is they need to know the name Yawa.
And when they learn the name Yawa, they discover the power of

(45:52):
the name of Yawa. I am he who breathes life, and
in the breathing of life, all ofa sudden we begin to see.
Look at all these scriptures. Those who call upon My name
shall be delivered the Aharonic blessing right finishes with,

(46:19):
and I shall name My name upon you and your children, and I
will bless you if my people who are called by my name.
I love that passage because I hear from over again.

(46:40):
If my people who are called by my name will repent and turn
from their wicked ways. No one has ever asked the
question, what's his name? If you are the people called by
his name, what's his name? And Christian pastor after

(47:01):
Christian pastor can't answer that question.
There's a barrier. Terrible.
I'm going. To let him know his name until
there's, until he, they, they seek him with their whole heart
and they're not doing it. And they can't do it until they
have something happen to him. I mean, just veiled off for

(47:23):
them. And now it's a hard penetrating
veil. We've all bumped up against it
now. Excuse me.
I'll get excited together. I'll be glad.
Well. You know, it is a terrible
situation, and the terrible situation is such that these
decisions were made when Protestantism was forming,
namely the Westminster Confession, and the Westminster

(47:44):
Confession was overthrown from the inside by radical
Talmudists. You guys didn't know that, did
you? But part of the impetus behind
colonization was found in the leadership of radical Talmudists
in the British Empire who were controlling what the banking

(48:07):
industry. Now, most people do not know
that the colonization of Britainwas not necessarily done by
British troops showing up and killing people.
It was mostly done by corporate entities, namely the British

(48:28):
East Indies Company, the Hudson Bay Company.
And these corporations were absolutely ruthless, brutal mass
murderers of extraordinary, extraordinary deviants.
I mean, the kind of people that would like to come into a
community unknown and burn the house down of the leader in the

(48:51):
community with his wife and kidsin the middle of the night,
those kinds of things. They do these things constantly
over and over again until they had created the fabric and
established a, a foothold for the corporation.
Then they would call in the British troops to support their
corporate holdings. And this is how this is how

(49:12):
India was won. This is how Africa was won.
And this is how Canada was won. And they were, they were up to
that in the United States. That's how the Civil War began
in the 1860s. It was agitated by the British
East India's company, which was looking to have an access to

(49:33):
slave picked cotton because theywanted to slave pick cotton
because slave pick cotton was cheaper than the flax linen
industry that was going on in Ireland, which was a blooming
industry and creating really high quality clothing.
Oh no, you need to switch over to cotton.
Why cotton? Because we can get it a lot
cheaper because we're using slaves to get it.

(49:56):
That was the British, British East Indies Company.
So there was no morality in the British East Indies Company.
None whatsoever. None.
In the Hudson Bay, there's no morality. 0 none.
Kill, steal, take control. That was it.
Now those days came to an end, and they came to an end because

(50:18):
of the apostasy of the British people.
And that apostasy was made certain that it was going to
happen because of the tenants ofthe Westminster Confession.
Because the Westminster Confession said you retain the
vulgar language, you limit the books to only 66 books.

(50:39):
Who among Parliament instructed them to limit the books to only
66 books? Talmudic leadership inside of
Britain, running the banking community and controlling the
purse strings of Parliament, that's who they said.
You Protestant dogs, goyim, you're unworthy and you have no

(51:03):
right to read anything more thanthe 22 books of the Dynac and
whatever you're calling the New Testament.
But you have no right to read anything else.
Your dogs, you're unworthy. You're not worthy enough to read
any of the Scriptures that will lead to the Spring of Wisdom,
the Fountain of Knowledge, or the River of Understanding.

(51:24):
No, no, those are not for you, Goyim.
What's for you is 66 books and 66 books written in a vulgar
language loaded with contradictions.
Now you might say, I know many of you came out of churches
where the pastor said, oh this Bible holding up the NIV is the

(51:47):
inerrant word of God. Really.
The NIV has over 2000 redactionsin the New Testament alone from
the KJV, many of which point to the deity of Mashiac.
Did you know that the instruction from Westcott and

(52:09):
Hort is that the first gospel was the Gospel of Mark and they
eliminated in the Gospel of Markall the language that refers to
the resurrection? Therefore, they could point and
say that the resurrection was a made-up fantasy that followed
the Gospel of Mark after they had redacted chapter 16 in the

(52:33):
Gospel of Mark. Did you know that?
Do you know that was done intentionally and your pastor is
holding up the NIV saying this is the inerrant word of God?
And when I hear that, that it's inerrant, well, then you have to
explain to me the disparity between Matthew 1 and Luke 3,

(52:53):
both of what you're talking about.
Joseph, the husband of Miriam orthe supposed father of Mashiac,
That's who they're both talking about.
And it's 2 completely distinct genealogies.
How do you explain that? You say it's inherent.
How do you explain that contradiction?

(53:14):
How do you explain the fact thatthe first miracle in Matthew is
Messiah casting the demon out ofa blind man, but that very same
miracle in the Gospel of Mark ishim casting the demons out of
two blind men? One point it says that Judas
hanged himself. Another point, Judas's guns fell

(53:37):
out of the field. I wish inshallah.
How do you explain that? How do you explain that?
There's a ton of contradictions and the biggest one is he was
given the name above all names. That every knee should bow and

(54:01):
every tongue should confess thatthe name of Jesus is above the
name of Yahwah, the creator of heaven and earth.
Most people don't see this. They don't see this
contradiction. They don't see it.
The only way to understand it iswhen you understand that the Son

(54:22):
had the name of the Father. And so in the Sephir Philippians
211 explains it very clearly that Yahwah is Yahusha to the
glory of Elohim the Father. And to, you know, to fully
comprehend this is kind of difficult, but it's most

(54:44):
important to say that you have to have something created, that
you have to have the Scriptures non contradictory to themselves,
non contradictory to themselves.It's an extremely important
point. So when you're talking to people

(55:04):
who come out of the church, you know, to come to them and say,
look, we don't use Lord here, you idiot, you know, no, no, no,
no. That's not an approach that's
going to win over people at all.But when you tell people, look,
can I share something with you? Have you ever wondered what is

(55:24):
the true name of the Father? And then a lot of people say,
oh, well, that's Yahweh. That's Yahweh.
Now, I made the mistake in Portugal.
And I mean, I got to confess to you, I did make a mistake in
Portugal in talking to this restaurant owner.
He said, yeah, I know the name Yeshua and Yahweh.

(55:46):
And instead of my saying, well, you know, brother, you're on the
right track, you know, keep going, you know, keep going.
May you be blessed in that. Instead, I said, listen, buddy,
you don't know what you're talking about.
You know you're wrong. All right, now, look, we'll go
through it here real quickly, yo.

(56:06):
Hey, Bob. Or some people want to say wah,
OK? Either way, doesn't matter to me
how you pronounce it. But what does matter is how you
pronounce this. Now, this is going to be 4
vowels according to Josephus. Now the evidence is very clear

(56:33):
that when you see this ha at theend of the word right here, when
you see this ha, when it's at the end of the word that is
pronounced ah, not ha, ah, Torah, right Torah tov vav resh,

(57:08):
not tevara tav vav resh hair Tora.
And the the hair is pronounced ashalimar, a Adama, A gevara, A
gedulla, A tifara, A memlaka, a the hair at the end of the word

(57:35):
is pronounced ah. OK, so we can reach that
conclusion that this vowel is going to be pronounced.
Ah. Well, whether you say Yahweh or
Yahwah, this one is also being pronounced ah.

(57:59):
How do you figure that In no application anywhere is the hair
at the end of this word ever pronounced A.
There's no configuration of any Hebrew word where the hair at
the end of the word is pronounced A Nowhere.

(58:21):
Now, what about the VOB? Well, the VOB.
There's a couple of choices. It could be O but the more
likely candidate is who. So then the only question is
what is this? How is this vowel pronounced?
Now this one is going to be pronounced like the Hirik Yod.
It is to say E. So the vibes are consistent.

(58:50):
This vibe here which this have, which is pronounced Ah, is also
pronounced Ah. Here, 4 vowels Yahuwah, Yahuwah,
not Yahweh. OK, Yahweh cannot be justified
once again. And when you say Yahweh, you're

(59:11):
creating a contradiction. Well, how is it Yahweh when that
doesn't exist anywhere else in the Hebrew language?
Because we want it to be Yahweh.Because that's what everybody
uses. That's what everybody uses as a
logical fallacy because everybody's wrong.
Iowa. OK all right.

(59:33):
So at any rate, so when we see this pronunciation guide, when
you're sharing this with people,just say Iowa.
Now begin to look. Here's something else you can
use that is really quite effective in sharing, which I
like. Yes, go ahead, Randall.
Hey, sorry, I'm gonna do you think this has anything to do

(59:54):
with the the inevitable name doctrine where they're just
trying to hide the name? I know I've watched some of the
Nahamia Gordons where he said that they slipped up and they
they put in. They didn't slip up.
But that's I think that's why hesays yay la now, because he
found some places where the Masoretics had put that name in

(01:00:19):
there. Like they weren't thinking or
something, but I'm just wondering if if they're if that
was part of the whole hiding thename thing.
Well, the hiding the name thing is actually much more intense
than that, and I will get to that here in just a minute.
The ineffable name doc, and we'll get to that.
It's much more intense than you might know, and I'm I'm I'm I'm

(01:00:41):
gonna I'll get to that. But thanks.
So one of the things that I found, you know, there was a
song that became very popular and it's the song Hallelujah.
And when you hear the song, it'slike when he sang it, his voice
was pretty much shot. So he had to sing it way down in
a very low register. And when he sang that song

(01:01:03):
Hallelujah, one of the verses issomething about if they say that
he had said the name and and, and he didn't even know the
name. And even if he did, what's it to
you, right? What's it to you if I spoke the
name? But in in the verses he says,
you know, he, he comes to you inthose verses with a broken

(01:01:27):
Hallelujah, which is the same thing David came to yah with was
a broken Hallelujah. The same thing Samson came to
yah with was a broken Hallelujah, right?
And he he tells the crowd when he was singing in London, I
didn't come here to fool you. I came here with the broken
Hallelujah. Well, Hallelujah is very

(01:01:48):
conspicuous Hebrew for let us praise ya.
That's the ya at the end of the Hallelujah.
That's the ya at the end of the word Hallelujah.
And so because of this, the Hallelujah is an extremely
important word because it's the same in almost every language on

(01:02:11):
earth. Hallelujah.
Hallelujah. At any rate, it's the ending
with the word Yah. And even the King James
translators had to admit that his name was Yah in Psalm 64.
They had to admit his name was Yah.
And by the way, they spelled it Iah in the King James authorized

(01:02:32):
version. In the later version they spell
it Jah, but in the authorized version it's Iah.
And so here we are. So when you can sell, tell a
person, well, you know the word Hallelujah that contains the
name of the father? Oh, it does.

(01:02:54):
Yeah. And it actually means to praise
yah. Now, even the secularist who
love the song Hallelujah are beginning to understand what's
going on, right. The Yas name is not going to be
hidden forever, but is now coming forth.
And as the name comes forth, theworld can see not only the

(01:03:16):
beauty and the power of the Creator, but they can also see
the love of the Creator. This is what Mashiac said.
I declared your name unto them, that the love of you that is in
Me might be in them, and I in them.
You see, when you declare the name of Yah to someone, you are

(01:03:39):
transferring the love of Yah to them.
That's what you're transferring to them.
You're not transferring to them condemnation.
You're not transferring to them of religion.
You're not transferring to them of philosophy.
You're transferring to them the love of the Creator.
Incredible, huh? Now, with all that being said,

(01:04:05):
the let me go back to this inevitable name document before
I do. Brian, did you want to say
something in here, brother? A couple things.
Revelation 3/8 is, you know, I Ijust it just sums us up greatly

(01:04:30):
because it's says that we we arethe people who guard his word
and do not deny his name. OK, We guard regard his word and
what is his word, right? That's the written word, right?
And do not his name. So and the other thing is, I was
going to ask you a question about my understanding of the

(01:04:52):
word W comes from as actually AS2US Wu UW, which you get the
oh sound. So when you go YHWH, you already
got you see the oh there? What you just talking about?
So I just think it's confirmation again.
Yeah, yeah, you. See the OH?
You see two OHS, right? You see.

(01:05:12):
Oh. Yeah, yeah, if you.
Yeah, you see. Oh, or you, you know, So that's
very interesting, real cool. And then there's something I
want to bring up. I don't know, you haven't, no
one's talked about. Only one person's found out.
But I don't want to do it because we're being recorded.
So maybe I'll send it to you by e-mail, whatever.
Something sent in some documents.
That's one of the things I don't, I don't want to share.

(01:05:34):
Maybe I'll send it to you by an e-mail and ask you about it.
But anyway, so the last thing asI have is I was up in prayer one
time and I was going to ask you if you knew what this Hebrew
word could Is this a Hebrew word?
If not, I don't know. But I saw was written on a piece
of paper like an envelope, the word HAHI.

(01:05:56):
Now I don't know what to read that left to right or right to
left because I know Hebrews leftto right.
Is that anything in Hebrew HAHI?Yeah, it could be.
But it's also possible here at this point, Brian that it may be
YAHI. And I don't know if you saw it
that way, but I mean, let me letme go back into the green, into

(01:06:17):
the whiteboard here for just onesecond because when you're
looking at this. So if you see if you saw
something like this, if you see.Do I mean this lake here being

(01:06:49):
kind of tentative? This is the word Yahi, and Yahi
is an extremely important word because it is the first time you
see the name Yah in the in the book of Genesis.
It actually appears in Genesis 1/3 where the passage reads like

(01:07:09):
this. It reads Yod hey Yod alif vav
resh, the yod hey yod alif aboveraish.

(01:07:46):
Now this passage in Hebrew readsYahi or the Yahi or translated
as let there be light and there was light.
But this idea of Yahi as you cansee is a palindrome.
It reads the same way forward and backwards, Yahi, Yahi.
And the question in this is, is this a prefix or is this a

(01:08:10):
suffix? And I think the answer is this
is a suffix. And this is the word ya, ya, we
see ya here. And which in this case means
literally, it means either I am or I breathe.

(01:08:32):
And then this means I will be ormy.
This means my my I am my I am yaki or my I am is light and my
I am is light is how that reads.So I don't know if you saw this
complete H here. Now, if you if you did, Brian,

(01:08:53):
the ha is usually the prefix. It's usually the prefix meaning
the. But it was all.
It was all lowercase. Is all HAHI lowercase.
I don't know if that makes a difference or not.
Yes, but again, again, I mean, this could be, again, you could

(01:09:17):
be seeing this is a prefix, right?
And this he again could be Yahi.In other words, you're just
missing the Yod Yahi, the I am, the I am.
So I don't know if that answers your question or not, but the he

(01:09:40):
in terms of this hirikyode, it'spossible I don't know of a word
that that is meeting is being recorded that is, but.
Food for thought. Thank you.
But food? Yeah, you bet.
You bet. OK Yeah, you bet.
You bet. All right, so continue on.
Rayna, did you want to add something there?

(01:10:03):
I. Believe that Yahusha gave us the
answer when he you quoted it before where he says the
Perishim and the. The scribes in the Perishim said
on Moses, Yeah, yes. So it doesn't matter whether you
came out of Judaism or wherever you came out, that's your sign

(01:10:29):
that you were not a believer, that you need to repent.
Yeah, very good right now. Very good.
Very good. Yeah.
That you need to repent. Yeah.
That's. And quite often you see that
kind of logic in the New Testament quite often, and that
you need to repent and come out of that.

(01:10:50):
Yeah. And the, and The thing is when
you're talking about repenting and coming away from Moshe, you
know, when we, when we look at Moshe, we look at Moshe in terms
of precepts. We look at Moshe in terms of
precepts. In other words, instead of
saying that these are rigid statutes like we see in our own
mindset, they are precepts, concepts as to how you deal with

(01:11:15):
legal structures. So when you go back to review
Moshe, you're not in the desert with Moshe.
You're not, you know, 2 million people traveling through the
desert trying to get to the Promised land.
You're somewhere else. And because of that, these,
these laws that were given are given conceptually and they are
the foundation of modern law in the Western world.

(01:11:37):
Whether you're talking about thelaw of, of a probate and
intestacy, whether you're talking about the law of
bailment, whether you're talkingabout the law of contracts, the
law of real estate, the criminallaw, the civil law of remedies
under the civil law, fundamentalhuman rights, the laws
concerning how you treat diseases and so forth.
All of those are in the Torah. Like, for instance, it's very

(01:11:58):
clear if you show evidence, showevidence that you have signs of
leprosy, well, then you're put outside the camp, you're
quarantined, and you're quarantined for some period of
time until we can determine whether or not you have leprosy.
And if you have permanent leprosy, well, then you're
quarantined from the camp permanently.

(01:12:18):
But this is the kid. This is the law of quarantine.
You're not quarantined until youshow evidence of sickness.
OK? There's no quarantining before
you show evidence of sickness. That's of the Torah command.
The Torah command does not allowfor property taxes to be chosen.
Exacted property taxes are exacted by the mob, by

(01:12:43):
democratic vote, and it's an actof theft that is common among
democracies because democracies are most known for as soon as a
democracy takes power, it votes itself the property of the
people that have it. That's what Democrats do.
They vote themselves the property of people who have
otherwise earned it. And so This is why you see

(01:13:05):
property taxes being executive. Property taxes are immoral to
the Torah. But I I believe that the
scripture teaches that yeah willreveal to whomever he chooses.
Yeah, and. When he knocks him, when he

(01:13:25):
knocks at that door, not you leave behind those teachers that
were bringing you into the handsof the enemy.
Yeah, Yeah. I mean, that's a very whether.
Whether you, because even when you're in the synagogue, because

(01:13:46):
I, you know, you don't read the Torah, you read the Talmud.
Right. And you read all the other
books, and they take precedence over the Torah.
Yeah, it's the rabbi's opinion. Right.
Yeah, it's the rabbi's opinion. It is not what Moshe said.

(01:14:08):
Yeah, that's. Why Yahushua's teaching is very
prevalent to what? When he faced them, he told them
who their father was. Yes, he did.
So it doesn't matter whether youcome out of Judaism wherever you
come out in. I don't that's not the true

(01:14:29):
ABBA. Yeah.
And well, again, you know, we wealso see a different falsity
being taught inside the Christian Church and for
instance, the inerrancy of the Pope.
This is a doctrine that is totally inconsistent with the
Scripture. The Scripture says call no man

(01:14:50):
father, but yet the head of the Catholic Church is called the
Papa. It's, you know, call no man
rabbi, right? Yet the heads of the synagogue
are all called Rabbis I. Call him Mr. Potato Head.
I don't want to. He's not, he's not my father.

(01:15:10):
So when people talk to me, I said, listen, I came out of
China. So to me it's not, you know,
he's not my he's not my father. So I call him Mr. Potato Head.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean I.
Mean it's not, but I mean the traditions of man.
Yeah, the traditions of man. Or family or family.

(01:15:34):
Yeah. Or family.
Yeah. Well, anytime you anytime you
raise tradition. Tradition is the enemy of God.
Why are you doing this? Because this has been our
tradition. OK, well, is it true?
Don't ask that question. It's our tradition.
That's why we do it well. Tradition is the enemy.
That's. How my father did it.
I mean, that's how my parents did it and.

(01:15:55):
We see this in Judaism and we see this in Islam.
Oh yes, and we Catholicism. Why are you Catholic?
Because my parents were Catholicand my grandparents were
Catholic and their grandparents were Catholic.
Have you reasoned out why you have that expression?
No, Our tradition. And so as a consequence, again,
it's a logical fallacy as to whyyou're doing that.

(01:16:18):
And it is the enemy of the truth.
And so those who love the truth,and This is why I would rather
talk to an atheist who loves thetruth than a crooked who's
convinced he knows everything. OK.
Because an atheist who loves thetruth will find.
Yeah, they will ultimately like the one of the guys that they

(01:16:40):
claim is the highest IQ of everybody on earth.
This guy is supposedly the most brilliant man there is.
And guess what? He's a believer in Mesiac.
How'd that happen? How'd that happen?
Yeah, because he sought the truth, and he found the truth
when he sought it with all his heart.

(01:17:02):
Hallelujah. All right.
Hallelujah, I know that Yah gaveme the Psalm.
Verse 118. He opened my eyes and He break
it open my eyes that I may see wonderful things.
Yeah, in. Your Torah.
And he started opening my eyes and.

(01:17:23):
Well, you know, Rayna, when you talk about coming out of
Judaism, you know Judaism in theNew Testament discusses about
how the Jews were blinded. They were blinded by Yah, you.
Know that my my my family's nameis Abreu Abreu.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. That's great.

(01:17:46):
Well, you know a a true Hebrew, you are a true child.
That they they were spelled fromSpain and then they went to the
Canary Islands. So yeah.
Well, you know, the problem is, is that no one really knows the
names of all those extremes. Spain that.
No, but they do. The Spanish were lying about
that. They know every family name that
was expelled from Spain. Every one of them, they know and

(01:18:10):
they try to claim that they don't and they try to say now
all the only people that count as under the expulsion or who
the rabbi's and Israel say were expelled.
See. And again, here's where you see
the difference. You saw the difference in the
King James translators. You see the difference to the
synagogue in the Westminster Confession use and and look,

(01:18:31):
when you talk about how far backdoes Zionism go, it goes all the
way back to the original construction of the Coverdale
Bible. That's how far back Zionism
goes. Because Zionism was not created
by Jews. It was created by Brits and it
was adopted by the Jews later on.

(01:18:52):
But the synagogue had authority over English scriptures telling
them that they can't use the ineffable name.
Now I'm going to speak just for a minute about the ineffable
name, because when you know thiswhole, because Randall raised
the question, and when you know the whole story, the whole story
is much more gruesome than you might imagine.

(01:19:13):
All right, so when we look at the book of the Maccabees, which
is where you really have to lookto get an idea as to what took
place during this period of time.
And of course, they don't want you to read the book of the
Maccabees. Oh, no, you can't read the book

(01:19:33):
of the Maccabees because that's that's only historic writings.
And and who banned it? Well, the synagogue banned it in
their manipulation of the Westminster Confession.
Even though we know that all four books of the Maccabees were
part of the Septuagint and we know that all four books of the
Maccabees were translated in theAramaic tradition.

(01:19:57):
All four books of the Maccabees were translated in the Aramaic
tradition. All right, now when we talk
about these Maccabees, the Maccabee is really an
interesting name because in. And 1st Maccabees, we're going
to see something that he's talking about that had happened
after Alexander, the son of Philip the Macedonian, who came

(01:20:19):
out of the land of Khatim, had smitten Dari Yvesh, king of the
Persians, and may die. He reigned in his stead over
Yaban. So this tells you this is after
Alexander the Great. All right, But when you start
talking about who these guys are, it's going to become pretty

(01:20:41):
clear that they, who they say they are.
Now let me give you an example. In First Maccabees Chapter 2, in
those days arose Matthew Yahoo, the son of Yokhanen, the son of
Shimon, a priest of the sons of Yarib.

(01:21:03):
Who's Yarib? Now these names, by the way,
Matthew, Yahoo, Jochen, and Shimon were all adopted names.
They weren't their actual birth names, OK?
And they were the priest of Yareeb.
Well, what does Yareeb mean? Is that is that is that a

(01:21:25):
descendant of Aharon or a descendant of Zadok or a
descendant of anybody in the Levite line?
No, Yareeb means the adversary or the contentious one.
Now Yarib is probably meaning mycontentious one, my reeb, and I

(01:21:47):
believe that this is the source of the word rabbi.
That rabbi comes from this idea of the priest of Yarib, someone
who is contentious, someone who is argumentative, someone who is
adversarial. The priests of Yarib, the rabbis
now. And he had five sons.
Now what are their real names? Well, the first one was Caddis,

(01:22:12):
who called himself Yokanen. The second one was Thassi who
called himself Shimon, the thirdone was Maccabee who called
himself Yehuda, The 4th 1 was Avaran who called himself
Eleazar, and the fifth one was Athos who called himself

(01:22:33):
Jonathan. Do those sound like Hebrew names
to you? No, they were not Hebrew names.
They were most likely Median names.
That is to say they were Medes. That is to say they were of the
tribe of Medea. The tribe of Medea would be a

(01:22:56):
tribe of Japheth and not a tribeof Shem.
They were Medes and this group priests.
They were priests of a doctrine that was different than the
Levitical priesthood. They were priests of Yarib.
Now these priests of Yarib, whatdoes this mean?

(01:23:18):
What did they do? They worshipped a different
Elohim. Very important to understand
that they worshipped a differentElohim, but they were doing what
Constantine would later do. Constantine would later merge
religions in order to create Catholicism.

(01:23:42):
These guys were doing the same thing now.
They became cultural appropriators.
They appropriated the culture ofa culture that had long since
died out and had been dispersed all over the world, which was
the culture of Yahood, the Kingdom of David, the Kingdom of

(01:24:02):
Solomon. After 586 BC.
They never reformed Yahood. OK.
And we can see that. I'm going to find this here.
And then we can, we can, we can look at this passage.
You can see that what happens isnow this group is going to

(01:24:26):
recreate the so-called Torah. But they did not recreate the
Torah. They came in with their two
leaders, Hillel the Elder and Samai, and they said the days of
the Torah are over. It's now the days of the Talmud.
And they created rabbinic authority because they were the
priest of Yareeb. They created rabbinic authority,

(01:24:49):
and they created and began to create this new religion called
Judaism. And in this religion, this
religion was forced on the people of the land at the point
of the sword, including all of those citizens in a land area
called Edumaia, or the Edomite Kingdom.

(01:25:12):
And the Edomite Kingdom ran fromMount Siyer or the mountains of
Siyer, which includes Mount Hermon, currently located in
Sieria. This Kingdom ran from Mount
Sierra almost all the way to Mitzrayim.
In other words, what we now callthe modern state of Israel was
actually the Kingdom of the Edomites called Edumaya.

(01:25:34):
The Maccabees were controlling out of the Tigris Euphrates
River Valley. We discovered this.
Eileen's work has discovered this, that most of the battles
were fought around the city called in the modern world
Erbil, but it's identified very clearly as the site is some most
of the battles of the Maccabees at the northern end of the
Tigers Bradys River Valley. This is where the Maccabees were

(01:25:55):
seated, but they imposed Judaismon the Edomite Kingdom at the
point of a sword. Herod was one of those who was
forcefully converted to Judaism,who was circumcised at the point
of a sword, mandatory circumcision.
Now the difficulty is, is that they're not going to disclose to

(01:26:16):
you their Elohim, They're not going to tell you who their
Elohim is, and instead they're going to create this ineffable
name doctrine. Well, one thing about it is you
can't say the name Yahwah. Why not?
Because you shall let not let the name of any other Elohim
come out of your mouth. All right, well, let's take a

(01:26:36):
look here at let's look at 2 Kings 17 for just a minute.
Now I'm going to pick up this passage up here at verse six.
In the ninth year of Husha, the king of Assure took Shamrone,

(01:27:00):
and he carried Yasharal into Asherah, and placed them in
Halak and in Havor by the river of Gozan, in the cities of Who
in the cities of the May die. Now you remember who I, who I
told you that, that these cultural appropriators in
Maccabees who they were from, they were from may die for.

(01:27:23):
So it was that the children of Yahshua had sinned against
Yahwah Elohim, which had broughtthem up out of the land of
Mitzrayim from under the hand ofPharaoh the king of Mitzrayim.
And it feared other Elohim, and walked in the statutes of the
heathen whom Yahwah cast out from before the children of
Yahshua and of the kings of Yahshua, which they had made.
And the children of Yahweh did secretly those things which were

(01:27:47):
not right against Yahweh Elohim,and that they built high places
in all their cities, from the tower of the Nazarene to the
fenced city. And they set themselves up
images and Asherah poles at every high hill and under every
green tree. And there they burnt incense in
all the high places, and did as they heathen, whom Yahweh

(01:28:08):
carried away from before them, and wrought wicked things to
provoke Yahwah to anger. For they served idols, and where
of Yahwah had sent it to them. You shall not do this thing.
Yet Yahwah testified against Joshua and against Yahudah by
all of the prophets, and by all the seers, saying, Turn from
your evil ways, and guard My commandments and My statutes,

(01:28:30):
according to all the Torah whichI commanded your Father's, and
which I sent to you by My servants.
The prophets notwithstanding, they would not hear but harden
their necks like to the negativefathers that did not believe in
Yahwah Elohim. OK, so we see they didn't
believe even though Yah spoke tothem face to face at Mount

(01:28:50):
Horeb, even though he had partedthe waters at the Red Sea, they
still did not believe. He rejected His statutes and His
covenant. That's the Tendevorim, His
covenant that he cut with their fathers and at his testimonies
which he had testified against him.
Now when you talk about cutting a covenant, when we see in the

(01:29:11):
in the initial initial covenant,the Abrahamic covenant, Yab
severs animals and and Abraham sees this in a dream.
All these severed animals that are the body parts are part and
that a fire walks between him consumes.
Now his testimonies which he testified against him, and they

(01:29:32):
followed vanity and became vain,and went after the heathen that
were round about them, concerning whom Yahweh had.
They urged them that they shouldnot do like them.
And they left all the commandments of Yahweh Elohim
and made them molten images, even 2 caps, and made an asharah

(01:29:55):
pole, and worshipped all the hosts of heaven that would be
the constellations, and served Baal, their sons and daughters
to pass through the fire and usedivination and enchantment, and
sold themselves to do evil in the sight of Yahwah, to provoke
Him to anger, no. Ma'am.
Therefore Yahwah was very angry with Yahwah and removed His

(01:30:19):
sight, and there was none left but the tribe of Yahudah only.
Also Yahudah did not guard the commandments of Yahwah Elohim,
but walked in the statutes of Yahshirah which they had made.
And Yahwah rejected all the seedof Yasharel.
Did you see this? And afflicted them, and
delivered them into the hand of spoilers until He had cast them

(01:30:41):
out of His sight. For He rent Yasharel from the
House of David, and they made Yarebam the son of Devant king.
And Yarebam drove Yasharel from following Yahwah, and made them
sin, a great sin. For the children of Yasharel
walked in all the sins of Yarebam, which He did, and they
departed not from them, until Yahwah removed Yahsharel out of

(01:31:02):
His sight, as He said by all of His servants, the prophets, So
was Yahsharel carried away out of their own land to Asherah
unto this day. Or where is Asherah right?
That's in northern Iraq. And the king of Azure brought
men from Babel and from Kutha and from ABBA and from Hamath

(01:31:24):
and from Safarim, and placed them in the cities of Shamron
instead of the children of Yasharel.
So now wherever Yasharel was is not being filled by Yasharel,
it's being filled by Assyrians, by all of these different
tribes, which were of the tribe of the Medes, the tribe of the

(01:31:45):
Persians, the tribe of Islam, tribe of Assure.
And so it was at the beginning of their dwelling there that
they feared not Yahwah. Therefore Yahwah sent lions
among them, which slew some of them lions.
What lions in that area? What lions?
Wherefore they spoke to the kingof Escher, saying, The nations

(01:32:06):
which you have removed and placed in the cities of Shamron
know not the manner of the Elohai of the land.
Therefore he sent lions among them.
Behold, they slay them, because they know not the manner of the
Elohai of the land. And this is what we see in the
modern church today. They know not the manner of the
Elohai of Yakov. They know not the manner of the

(01:32:29):
Elohai of Yakov. Then the king of Ashur
commanded, said, Carry thither one of the priests whom he
brought from them. So let them go and dwell there,
and let them teach the manner ofElohai of the land.
Then one of the priesthood they carried away from Shamrome came
and dwelt in Beit El and taught them how they should fear
Yahwah. Howbeit, every nation made Eloim

(01:32:51):
of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places
which the shamlonym had made, Inother words, the old high places
they were using for worship, Baland every nation in their cities
where they dwelt. And the men of Babel made Sukkot
Benod, And the men of Kuth made Nirgal, and the men of Hamath

(01:33:14):
made Ashima. OK, these, this these men of
Hamas, these are the Maccabees, and they made, they erected
their idol, their Elohim. Who was Ashima?

(01:33:35):
Now who is this Ashima? How do we know him?
Well, we know him in the Book ofTobin and in the Book of Tobin,
which came from the Greek translation, this God is
identified as Asmodeus. And Asmodeus is a 5 headed God
of lust who killed the seven husbands of Sarah who was

(01:33:59):
destined to marry Tobin. And in Hebrew he's called
Hashemdai Hashemdai. So how do you spell that?
Well, you. I'm I'm looking it up for
Hashemdai. It's ash.

(01:34:21):
Hold on just a minute. It's spelled like this in
English. Ashem.
Well. I thought there was a ah in a

(01:34:46):
hay in front of it. Ashem die.
OK, And this is Hebrew. This is Hebrew 4 Asmodeus.
You can look up Asmodeus if you want and see what the what they
tell you the Hebrew is. Isn't it like saying the name

(01:35:09):
die? What it's yeah, I mean, it could
be, but basically what this means is when when you when you
put this out here in Hebrew. OK, so you have this idea of the
Aleph Sheen. Mem safit OK, so this is the

(01:35:34):
word name, you know shem the name and this is the prefix out
of meaning I will be I will be the name is what Hashem means.

(01:35:54):
I will be the name, OK, But you can see that in this passage
that I was showing you in SecondKings 17 verse 30, that there
was a group who worshipped Ashima.
Now what would happen is when you see this worship, it's

(01:36:19):
construed this way. Now if we were to say, OK, let's
take this out and let's add onlythis, OK, this is Hashem, right?

(01:36:49):
Which means the name. But when you say Hashem Hashem,
you're saying the Hashem now in ineffable name doctrine, they

(01:37:19):
could not allow you to use the name Yahwah.
You had to worship the Elohim they worshipped, which was
Hashem. Therefore you were instructed
when you saw the yode vape to say Hashem, and they say Hashem
to this very day, because Hashemis their Elohim.

(01:37:44):
Now when you see that Hashem is their Elohim A5 headed God of
lust, you might expect to see lust as a meaningful part of
their doctrine. And it can happen from not
wiping, it gets some. Problems somebody below you

(01:38:08):
have. Cranberry juice.
There we go. So when you're looking at this
idea of this God of lust, is theGod of lust reflected in the
doctrines of the Talmud? Well, sure it is.
The Talmud tells us that there'ssix sexes.

(01:38:32):
The Talmud tells us there's 8 genders.
Rabbinical expression in the Talmud for primarily from Yokai
says that it's appropriate for aLevite priest to marry a
three-year old. Oh my God.
Oh yeah, and it also says that it is no problem having sex with

(01:38:52):
children under the age of 9 because they won't remember.
It's just like being poked in the eye.
This is in the Talmud. Now, there are no modern rabbis
that I know of that support this.
But the Talmud then, as you can see, appears to be governed by a
God of lust. OK, so the ineffable name

(01:39:16):
doctrine is created by who? Talmudists.
It wasn't created by the Christian Church.
It was created by the Talmudists, most notably Akiva
and Yokai. Akiva was, he was purported to
be from Amalek, he was in Amelikine and he had wheedled

(01:39:38):
his way into the Rabbi's becausehe was very proficient in the
Torah. Yokai was his student.
Akiva was killed by the Romans. They literally stripped his skin
off and salted the flesh. A yokai went and hid.
Where did yokai hide? In the grotto of Pan at Mount
Hermon, where he lived there forI think 14 years writing this

(01:40:03):
stuff in the Talmud about what was sexually appropriate for
Talmudists. And these are the two that had
come up with the idea. That the name had to be
protected, that no one could ever say it.
And of course what they were doing was they were causing
people to name their Eloheim Hashem instead of the true

(01:40:28):
creator of Heaven and earth. Now, this doctrine would be
given legs by Justin Martyr, whobelieved their tenets and the
synagogue inside of Britain would control.
When you had guys like Miles Coverdale and John Tyndale and
and John Calvin and other guys that were working on Bible

(01:40:50):
translations, they had to go to Hebrew scholars to get
determinations as to the word. And the Hebrew scholars came in
and said, well, look, you've gotsome words that you have to be
that you just can't use. You just absolutely cannot
translate them. You have to use something else.

(01:41:11):
So when you come on the word alayim, which is totally
pronounceable, no, you can't usethat.
Well, what should we use? Well, use the word for?

(01:41:32):
Good luck. The Babylonian deity.
Use the Babylonian deity of Gad,right?
This is Isaiah 65 says this is aBabylonian deity of fortune.
Gad. Not pronounced Gad, pronounced
God. But you ever noticed that in

(01:41:53):
Judaism they always have an under score here instead of the
letter? That's because they know the
true letter is a but pronounced God.
So the the English translators were told to use this name Gad,
a Babylonian deity of fortune, and replace the word eloim with

(01:42:15):
this word Gad. Then the question is, all right,
well, what do we do about yo de vape?
Well, you absolutely cannot pronounce that.
And so the KJV interpreters got away with it in one verse where
they used the name. Yeah, but in the 7000 places

(01:42:37):
where the yode babe appears, they had to use some word or the
recommendation was to use baal. Baal.
Well, how's that translate in English, Lord?

(01:43:03):
But the scriptures say categorically, you will no
longer call me Baali. You will call me Ishi, You will
no longer call me Baali. Hosea, Chapter 3 Lord.
Well, guess what? When you're King James or you're
Henry the Eighth, how are they referring to you, Lord?

(01:43:29):
So if we use war Lord, who do they know who they're talking
to? Are they talking to?
Yeah. What are they talking to?
Vicarius Filio Day. You know what Vicarius Filio Day

(01:43:52):
is? This is the signature for the
Pope. Vicarius Filio Day in place of
the Son of God on earth or are you just talking to your

(01:44:14):
landlord? Now you have to keep in mind
that when Henry the Eighth expelled the expelled the Pope
and the Catholic Church from Britain, he took on the position
of vicarious filio de. So the prayers inside of

(01:44:36):
Catholicism, when you would prayto the Lord, you were praying to
the hope because there was no communication with the Creator
in heaven. Your communication was a prayer
directed to the Papa, to the Pope, who was in place of the
Son of God. And when Henry the Eighth took

(01:44:57):
that throne, he was vicarious filio de.
So the English translators decided to use the word Lord so
that you would be completely confused as to whom you were
directing your prayers. Were you directing them to Henry
the Eighth or were you directingthem to the creator of the
heaven and earth? And I can tell you for many,

(01:45:19):
many years it was very clear that your prayers either went to
the Pope or they went to Henry the Eighth, and they didn't go
anywhere else. But it was the synagogues that
told the English translators what you what words to use.
Use this one instead of etherium.
Use this one instead of yawa. And then this became known as

(01:45:41):
what a vulgar expression that was forever entrenched in the
Westminster Confession. Retain the vulgar expression.
Now as a consequence, you can see that we had a manifest
confusion inside the faith. Are we praying to the Maker of

(01:46:04):
heaven and earth? We praying to the King who we
pray and do again? Why are we and why aren't we
using His name? Those who call upon my name
shall be delivered. So the ineffable name doctrine
was created by a couple of very perverse rabbis in the 1st
century and but it had been in practice before during the time

(01:46:27):
of Hillel the Elder and during the reign of the Maccabees.
Because their Eloim is not Yahwah, their Elohim is ashami
asham die, that was their Elohim.
Now, this continues to be the case, and what was then used was

(01:46:51):
these very same translators. Then we're trying to determine
the name of the Messiah. But when they determine the name
of the Messiah, this one, I got to go back to the whiteboard
because this one is absolutely mind boggling too.
I mean, it boggled my mind when I first discovered this.
I mean, because it's really quite alarming.

(01:47:13):
OK, so we know now and it's veryclear.
The Scriptures are absolutely crystal clear that the Messiah
had the same name as Joshua. There's no question the Greek
translation of the book of Joshua refers to Joshua as E
Asus. Now E Asus, And we know that

(01:47:37):
this is a confusion in the New Testament because of the all the
20th century translators refer to the E Asus that's found in
Hebrews 4/8 as Joshua, the son of Noon, knowing perfectly well
that everywhere else in the New Testament, E Asus is referring
to the Messiah. But they also know every

(01:48:00):
translator in the modern world knows that the name E Asus was
the name of Joshua. So then what is Joshua's Hebrew
name? That's the only question.
Well, Joshua's Hebrew name and Strong's lies about it.
I showed you guys this last week.
This is Yod. Hey Bob, the name of the Father

(01:48:23):
Shah. This appears 177 times in the
Old Testament as Yahushua, not Yahushua.
There's no second Bob. Yahushua.
OK, now look closely at this andyou're going to see where I'm
going with this. And again, this is all been
radically disguised in your modern Bible because there is a

(01:48:47):
fellow in the Bible whose name is just the retrograde inversion
of these last three letters. You see the ion, the shin
becomes a scene, and the Bob. So here we see the name of Yah,

(01:49:10):
and we see the name of Usha, which was originally in the name
of Joshua Usha. Here we see this name is spelled
backwards. The Usha is spelled backwards,
completely backwards. Well, what name is this?
Well, in the common Bible translation, this is the name
Esau. Now, you know, I was thinking

(01:49:34):
about this when we last talked about this teaching that when
Esau and Yaakov were growing up,you know, Yaakov was able to
fool his father by putting fur on his hands.
Fur on his hands. So exactly how hairy was Esau?
Right? Exactly.

(01:49:54):
You know, the his, his genetic makeup was substantially
different than Jacob. Substantially.
OK, but here's the problem. That's not a correct
pronunciation. Esau is not a correct
pronunciation of this. This is a lie.
OK? This is a lie.
And it's misinformation in orderto distract you from what his

(01:50:16):
true name is, because his true name was a SU, pronounced a SU.

(01:50:39):
Now the Romans would spell a SU like this.
Yezu Yezu. So Eusebius Hieronymus, also

(01:51:00):
known as Saint Jerome. He elected to use this name as
the name of the sun in the LatinBulgate.

(01:51:20):
Now, because it's a masculine noun, in order for this to
transfer into the Greek, there had to be an S on the end of it.
So Yezu became Jesus. This is the way.

(01:51:42):
It's found in the KJVAV. Just like this Jesus that's in
this is KJVAV. 1611 OK, but whenwe get to 1789, in the Benjamin

(01:52:05):
Blaney edition of the KJV, whichby the way did include the
Apocrypha, it's now called the Oxford Complete Bible, the
Benjamin Blaney. It's the first time we see the
J, so I had to ask myself the question.

(01:52:29):
Did Miriam name her name? Is her name her son Esau?
Did Gabrielle the great Archangel tell Miriam to name
her son Esau? No way.
No way not. Possible.

(01:52:49):
Not possible. I agree with that.
I just don't think it's possible.
But we see here now. So when you see this, this
statement that's being made, he was given a name above all names
that is superior to Yahwah, and that name is Esau.

(01:53:14):
So you begin to see the difficulties with what was
crafted in the English translation were the critical,
most critical aspects of the book, IE the name of the father
and the name of the son were ruthlessly disguised and made

(01:53:34):
misleading because of the adviceof the synagogue advising the
English translators who also advised Parliament to restrict
the books to only 66 books calling.
Now, you have to keep in mind I've made this point before and
I'm going to make this point again.

(01:53:56):
When you go back and you look, you know, we say what's
canonized. Well, what do you call it?
Canonized, right? I've been teaching the class
canonicity, and for those of youthat have been a part of that
class, we've gone through this exhaustively.
But what do you call it canonized?
Well, it seems to me that whatever it is you're going to
translate has some value to you.It has some value, otherwise you

(01:54:22):
wouldn't be translating it. Well, when the Septuagint is
translated in the 3rd century BC, not only do they translate
all of the Torah and all of the Nevaeem, the Prophets, and all
of the Ketuvim, but they also translated all of the Apocrypha,
including 1234 Maccabees. And in addition to that, they

(01:54:44):
also translated the Odes and thePsalms of Solomon.
Now, when you get to the Aramaictradition, to the West of the
Ptolemaic Empire, rather in the Seleucid Empire, what do we see?
All of those things have been translated, plus Second Baruch,

(01:55:05):
plus third Baruch plus Enoch. In the Aramaic, all of those
were translated. And then when we get to the Dead
Sea Scrolls, what do we find? 10 copies of the Book of
Jubilees. 10 copies. So going to the Aramaic

(01:55:25):
tradition alone, every single book that the Aramaic tradition
identified except the odds of Solomon and the Psalms of
Solomon are found in the sephirah.
All of those that were except for 3rd Baruch.
Third, Baruch is not yet in the Sephirah, but these were all

(01:55:46):
translated into Aramaic. Then somebody starts Reducto.
Oh, you can. Well, you don't know.
You can't read that, and you can't read that, and you can't
read that, and you can't read that.
And who was doing the reduction?Those who were preserving the

(01:56:07):
fountain of wisdom, the Stream of Knowledge, and the river of
understanding unto themselves atyour expense.
And I'm going to ask you, are you more unworthy than someone
else on earth? What did Paul say?

(01:56:33):
All have sinned and fall short of the glory.
There is no one who has a supremacy right on the planet.
Mashiach died for the sins of the whole world.
Behold the Lamb of Eloim that takes away the sins of the
world. Not the sins of Yahsharel, not

(01:56:54):
the sins of Yahudah, not the sins of the 12 tribes and those
who sojourn with them, but the sins of the whole world.
And it is written that because Yahsharel had provoked Yad
anger, he was ditching His chosen people and turning to the
people that were not his people.The low on me, I will take

(01:57:18):
myself to people who are not my people and not you.
There's no chosen people that survived the crucifixion.
There were no chosen people evenafter 586 BC.

(01:57:39):
That's why the Ark of the Covenant was removed.
That's why the Kingdom of Yahoodcame to an end.
There were no chosen people. There were people who had
engaged in harlotry, spiritual idolatry, falling away,
apostasy, worshipping other Elohim, doing all the things
they weren't supposed to do, andy'all said enough.

(01:57:59):
I wash my hands. I strip the tree of every
branch, and I will turn my face to the people who are not my
people below are me, and to themI will give a blessing.
And so was the Mashiacs death onthe cross and the bloodletting

(01:58:20):
at Mashiac Circumcision. Open the door for the entirety
of mankind to come into the Holyof Holies just by accepting the
gift that Mashiac had given us. The whole of mankind.
Not some exclusion to some race,some creed, some color, some

(01:58:44):
nation, some tongue, but to the whole of mankind, you see?
And this business of we're goingto hoard this stuff and keep it
to ourselves because we're the ones that are deserving of
wisdom, knowledge and understanding, not you.

(01:59:05):
That's not what you intended. So what do we see when it comes
to the name? The ineffable name doctrine?
Was Rabbi Akiva and pervert yokai teaching us the truth?
Well, I don't know. Should we take the opinions of
Akiva and Yokai or should we listen to Moshe who said I will
publish your name? Should we listen to David who

(01:59:28):
said I have declared your name under the assembly?
Should we listen to Mashiac, whosaid, I have declared your name
unto them and will declare it, that the love of you that is in
me might be in them, and I in them?
So who should we listen to? Should we listen to Mashiac or
Akiva? Should we listen to Yokai or
David? This is why the ineffable name

(01:59:58):
doctrine fails. It fails the test of Scripture
and I can't begin to tell you once you understand this.
And you go back and you start reading the Old Testament here.
I'm just going to pull up Isaiahreal quickly or look at Isaiah
45. Such an absolute beautiful

(02:00:21):
passage. And again, you know, Joel says
those who call upon the name of Yahwah shall be delivered.
You are to call upon his name. You are to make mention of his
name. You are to swear by his name.
You are to stand by his name. You are to call yourself under

(02:00:43):
his name. You are not to bring his name to
nothing by saying, well, every time I come to his name, you
know, change it and say Hashem or Adonai, you're not to do
that. That's disallowed.
That's what the, what the, the, the third commandment's all
about. You shall not bring my name to
nothing. If you bring my name to nothing,
guess what? I will not consider you clean.

(02:01:11):
You will be unclean in my sight.I will not consider you clean.
OK, let's take a look at this passage here.
This is this is Yisha Yahoo 45 Iam Yahwah.

(02:01:33):
Verse five, I am Yahwah. There is no one else.
There is no Eloine beside me. I girded you though you have not
known me. There's no one behind Eloim
Yahwah. There's no pre-existing
universe. There's no pre-existing creator.

(02:01:54):
There's no pre-existing idea. There is nothing president to
Yahwah. Nothing.
This is what I say is telling you I am Yahwah.
There's no one else that they may know from the rising of the
sun and from the West that thereis none beside me.
I am Yahwah. There is no one else.

(02:02:14):
I form the light and create darkness.
I make peace and create evil. I, Yahwah, do all these things.
There's no one else. There's no competing Satan up
there. That is, you know, black king,
white king. There's no dual deities.
There is one. There is Yahwah, drop down new

(02:02:36):
heavens from above, and let the skies poured down righteousness.
Let the earth open and let them bring forth deliverance and let
righteousness spring up together.
Deliverance and righteousness spring up together.
I, Yahwah have created it. Woe unto him that strives with
His Maker. You're not talking about some

(02:02:59):
Elohim that runs around like some spirit entity.
You're talking about the Creatorof heaven and earth.
Woe to him that strives with HisMaker.
Let the pots herds strive with the pots herds of the earth.
Shall the clay say to him that fashions it?
What did you make or your work? Has he no hands?
Woe unto him that says unto his Father, What did you bigot, or

(02:03:21):
to the woman, what have you brought forth?
And believe me, there are peoplethat do that.
How dare you have brought, How dare you have given birth to me?
How dare you? That's offensive.
Woe unto him that says that. Woe.
Thus says Yahwah the Holy 1 of Yasharel, right?
Al Kadoshakad Yasharel, right? You know Avaya Mayor Yahwah Al

(02:03:46):
Kadoshakad Yasharel, the Holy 1 of Yasharel and his Maker, asked
me if things to come concerning my sons and concerning the work
of My hands. Command you me.
I have made the earth and created man upon it.
I even My hands have stretched out the heavens and their host

(02:04:07):
have I commanded. I have raised Him up in
righteousness, and I will directall His ways.
He shall build my city and He shall let go my captives.
Not for price nor rewards, as Yahweh say both.
Thus says Yahwah, the labor of Mitzrayim, the merchandise of
cushion of the Shebaim. Men of stature shall come over
unto you, and they shall be yours.

(02:04:28):
They shall come after you in chains.
They shall come over and they shall fall down unto you.
They shall make supplication unto you, saying, Surely L is in
you. There is no one else.
There is no other Elohim. Truly you are an L that hides
yourself. Elohai of Yasharel the Savior.

(02:04:52):
They shall be ashamed and also confounded, all of them.
They shall go to confusion together that are makers of
idols. But Yahsharel shall be saved in
Yahwah with an everlasting salvation.
You shall not be ashamed nor confounded.
World without end. For thus says Yahwah that
created the heavens, Elohim himself, that formed the earth

(02:05:14):
and made it. He has established it.
He created it not in vain. He formed it to be inhabited.
That's why He formed it. I am Yahwah, there is no one
else. I've not spoken in secret in a
dark place of the earth. I've not said into the seat of
Yakov. Seek you me in vain.

(02:05:34):
I, Yahwah, speak righteousness, and I declare the things that
are right. Assemble yourselves and come
draw near together. You that have escaped of the
nations they have no knowledge that set up the wood of their
graven image and prayed unto an L that cannot save.
Tell you and bring them near. Yay.

(02:05:55):
Let them take counsel together. Who has declared this from
ancient time? Who told it from that time?
Who declared this from the ancient time?
There's one voice, There's one, one voice.
Have not I Yahwah, and there is no Elohim beside me, a just L
and a Savior. There is none beside me.

(02:06:19):
Look unto me and be you saved all the ends of the earth, for I
am L, there is no one else. I have sworn 7 oaths by myself,
and the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and
shall not return that unto me. Every knee shall bow, and every
tongue shall swear. 7 oaths. Surely shall one say in Yahwah

(02:06:43):
have I righteousness and strength?
Even to him shall men come, and all that are incensed against
him shall be ashamed. In Yahwah shall all the seed of
Yahsharel be justified, and shall glory.
Well, that's a pretty clear statement I would say.
I say I kind of put that right in everybody's face and didn't

(02:07:05):
hold back at all. So how can you say that Mashiac
was given the name of Jesus, which was a name above all
names, without taking Isaiah 45 and cutting it out of your
Bible? How do you say that?

(02:07:27):
But makes perfect sense when yourealize that Mashiac was given
the name of Yahwah. Now you understand.
He was given the name above all names.
He was given the name above all names.
Huh. OK.
OK. Carla.

(02:07:48):
Are you there? Carla.
Shabbat Shalom, Brother P Yeah, actually, I think you just
answered my question because that's what I was going to ask.
What exactly do you mean when you say that Yahwah is Yahusha?
I I wasn't understanding it, butI guess with what you said just
now, now the only way that I've that I've come to, I don't know,

(02:08:15):
settle in my mind something likeYahusha being salvation, you
know, is that if we translate the name Yahusha, it means yeah,
Hussein. So yeah, he says right, He is
the salvation that Yahwah provided.
But because I was having, I don't know, cognitive dissonance

(02:08:38):
or something, but because ABBA says that he will not share his
glory, right? That's right, but but.
He does give glory to other things, like the sun has its own
glory. You have your own glory that
ABBA has given you, but yeah, does not share his glory.
So I just found it a little, I don't know, it was like it's a

(02:08:58):
little bit shocking to hear Yahwah is Yahushua.
Because whenever I hear the nameYahwah, I'm thinking of the
Father, right? That's the name he gave us to
remember him by or to to direct ourselves towards him with.
So when you say has to. Remember that the Word was made
flesh and tabernacled among us. Correct, right, The Word of Yah.

(02:09:22):
But that's The thing is like theWord of Yah became flesh, not
Yah became flesh. Well, you know, that's a very
interesting question, right? The word flesh here, let me let
me read this to you real quickly.
Don't go away, Carla. OK, OK, so Philippians beginning
in chapter 2, verse 9, whereforeEloim also has highly exalted

(02:09:46):
him, right? This is what you're talking
about the glory and given him a name which is above every name
that at the name of Yahusha every knee should bow of things
in heaven, things on earth and things under the earth and that
every tongue should confess thatYahwah is Yahushua hamashiach to

(02:10:07):
the glory of Eloim Father. Now this passage, but we could
spend some time in the Greek on this passage, but this is an
extremely important point that when you talk about, you know,
let me just stop this for a second and I'll try to make this
a little bit clearer. We can understand this and we

(02:10:29):
look at the declension of the name in Yah.
OK, in the declension of the name of Yah, we can see what I'm
talking about. I'm.
Sorry, what does declension mean?
I'll show you. I'm getting ready to show you.
OK, so we start out with the idea that we just take the word

(02:10:52):
yod. OK, this is yod and this means I
now you don't see it stand alonein Scripture, but you do see it
as a prefix in a suffix, OK All right, Next we see in the next

(02:11:13):
declension, we see this yod. Hey.
Now this appears 45 times in Scripture like this yod hey, and
this is I am and it's pronouncedYah Yah.
All right now, the first time wesee the name of Yah appearing in

(02:11:40):
Scripture, we talked about this earlier today.
We see it as Yah he, Yah he, andYah He.
It literally means my I am. Or you might understand it as my

(02:12:11):
essence, my I am. Now the next version we see is
Yahoo and we see this at the at the end of 167 names in

(02:12:32):
Scripture, Yisha, Yahoo, ZacharyYahoo, Obed Yahoo and so on 167
times. We see this as a suffix to a
name and this means our our yah if you will, or our I am.

(02:12:55):
Now the next we see is where it first appears in Genesis 2, and
it appears in the passage where Yahwah breathes into the
nostrils of the man and he brings the Neshama Haim, the
name of life, of lives. He breathes into Adam and Adam

(02:13:20):
becomes nephesh Hayah, a living soul.
This is Yahwah and it means I amhe who breathes life, and we see
it in the first example because He's breathing life into Adam.

(02:13:41):
I am he who breathes. Life.

(02:14:05):
Then in the last declension we see
Yahusha. Now by looking at the

(02:14:31):
declensions, I am he who saves or delivers Avengers, atones,
redeems. And it also means Yahwah saves.

(02:14:54):
OK, in each one of these cases you can see that the name has a
different functionality. OK, so in Yahi my I am, this is
actually Yah in motion. Yah here is just merely the
statement I am. I am and the idea of the Yod

(02:15:14):
singularly I. This presupposes all existence.
I Yod I presupposes all existence.
I am is a statement that can also be construed by the way, as
not only I am but also I breathe.
I breathe, which is going to be consistent with the idea of

(02:15:40):
speaking or singing existence into existence.
OK so, so these this is what I call the declension of the name.
So the declension begins with Yod, but it the declension of
the name comes all the way through to Yahusha, which is a

(02:16:01):
form of the action of Yah the Father.
So Yahusha is a species of the action of Yahwah.
OK. And so we we see it in the
creation of the sun and the Son actually being the testator, the

(02:16:24):
death of the testator who passesthe covenant to the heirs of the
covenant. And so This is why so.
So I'm going to leave it at that, Carla, so.
One one thing real quick. Yeah, I won't take too much of
your time. So because you know how the
scriptures also say that we mustdivide the the word or like

(02:16:48):
divide it correctly and paraphrasing?
I can't remember. So.
And since we like when we study the the language Hebrew, we
understand that the language is more about concepts than actual
just words or whatever. Like that's why we can't just
translate it from this word to that word, right?
Because it's more like a conceptthat we're describing.

(02:17:10):
So what if So what if I mean, and this is just my personal
opinion right? But what if when Yahuwah because
he says I can't remember, I think it's Deuteronomy, but I
can't remember when ABBA says I'm your only savior.
No one saves you but me. Like the only savior of Israel
has always been and will always be Yahuwah.

(02:17:31):
And he declares these words. So what if when He says that no
one shall be saved except by thename above all other names,
Yahusha, it's another declaration of His own glory and
His own saving Yah. Who says You see what I'm

(02:17:54):
saying? Yes, the answer to that is
correct. That's a correct assessment.
So then so then again, I'm sorry, but like when we say that
Yahoo Yahwah is Yahusha or vice versa, it it can sound a little
bit confusing because then I'm thinking the Father and the Son,

(02:18:15):
like the, the Son is the Father or the the Father is the Son.
That's not what you mean, right?Yahwah is Yahusha.
In other words, Yahusha does notexist outside of Yahwah.
Correct. Yeah.
And so that is the, that's the critical aspect of it.
The Son does not occupy 100% of the Father.

(02:18:39):
And this is, you know, it's kindof difficult to understand, but
when you see that Yahidi is not the one that breathes life into
Adam and Yahwah is the one that breathes life into Adam, it's
just Yah in a different station.For instance, let me give you an
example. If you know a person you know,
you know this man well, this manoperates it.

(02:18:59):
Sometimes he's a husband, sometimes he's a father.
Sometimes he's a laborer. Sometimes he's a thinker.
Sometimes he's a voter, right? Sometimes he's just somebody
sitting down to dinner. These are all the different
functions, if you will, the different declensions of this
person's name. And then so you have an
identifier as to his name. If I had an identifier that said

(02:19:21):
when he's a worker that we add an H to his name.
When when he's when he's a voter, we add AB to his name.
When we, you know, if you saw itin that light, you'd see this
very clearly as to what it is. So this is Yahwah, but Yahwah in
a particular function that the word of Yahwah was made flesh
and tabernacled among us and this.

(02:19:42):
But you have to remember that when you when you look at it,
you're going to see that in the New Testament it says He was
with the Father from the foundations of the world.
This is called the doctrine of consubstantiality.
And what? Meeting What do you?
See, when you say what do you see when you see the Ancient of
Days sitting on the throne and the Lamb who was slain from the

(02:20:04):
foundation of the world beside him, right?
These are concepts that are justnot easily dealt with.
Right. But nonetheless, it is what we
have been told. And so this is what has been
told and, and I'm trying to giveyou the easiest way to
understand it. Now, when it comes to this
passage in Philippians 211, I looked at this over and over in
the Greek and over and over and over and over and over and over

(02:20:27):
because we got, you know, mercilessly assaulted over this
passage. Those who know Greek know that
we have correctly translated this passage.
So that's what it is. And so I'm going to, I'm going
to leave it there. Carla, I don't have 100% of the
answers for you, but I'm just thinking that this is, you know,
this is not. Big.

(02:20:47):
It's a big thing to try to explain.
Yeah. Even if we had all the time in
the world, it's pretty. It's a really deep subject.
Thank you so much for your time.Oh, you bet.
Carla, thanks for thanks for your question.
I really appreciate it. OK.
All right. Katherine Hayes, how are you,
sister? Good to see you.

(02:21:09):
I'm doing great. I really, really enjoyed this
Torah portion this morning and looking back over the last few
weeks, there's just so much. I mean, it's like just a Trevor
treasure trove of riches for us to learn from.
Where we find ourselves in the cycle of the year right now is

(02:21:29):
the children of Yahshua El have made it through the 40 years in
the wilderness and Aheron has already been taken and now it's
going to be time for Moshe to betaken.
And at the end of this, it's just blows my mind about the
about midgen and how those kingsand through Bilham and Balak and

(02:21:56):
how they were coming against Joshua Al and all the players
that they're on the stage. So it's interesting.
So would you would you tell me if this is how you see this with
Bilham and Baylax? So the lexicon says that Bilham

(02:22:16):
was a of Aram Nahatsaram. So he was an Aramaian, which is
the same as what Laban is, correct?
So he's of a Semitic tribe, correct?
OK. And then Balak was a king of the
Moabeen, and it says that he wasthe son of Support, which that

(02:22:42):
name seems very similar to Moshe's wife's name, right?
Support. That's right, and she was also
Midianite. OK, Yeah, yeah, so, and we know
that the blessing had come to the father-in-law, who we know
by several names, Jethro being one of them, and that he ended

(02:23:05):
up with the rod that came into Moshe's hands through a whole
series of events, which we learnof in Jasher and Jubilees.
Anyway, so here we have the Midianites coming against Josh
Rael and trying to get Billam tocurse them.

(02:23:27):
And we see through this. That villain was a true prophet,
but he he fell into error in andbeing beguiled and bedazzled by
the rewards of divination is what they what it's called in
the in the passages. If you as you read through them.

(02:23:50):
And I'm, I'm thinking that, you know, as we're trying to press
in and break off our own way of thinking with the sharing of
like the declinations of the name and trying to decide what's
going on with Christianity because we've all got loved ones

(02:24:15):
that are ensnared by that system.
Not all of them though have worshipped what we worshipped
when we use the name Jesus. Most all of us came to the
knowledge of y'all through usingthat name.
But there is another Jesus spirit loose and the New
Testament speaks very strongly of it and it's spoken of very

(02:24:40):
strongly of and Matthew and others of the Gospels.
So the lessons in this Torah portion, I believe if we press
in and look at the Hebrew words and exercise our mind past the
program and not get snared and triggered by those keywords that

(02:25:07):
have been laid as a foundation of beguiling and hoodwinking us
through the good old boys and through the religious spirits.
Because the religious spirit will always rise itself up
against the knowledge of the living yacht.
Always because it requires preeminence.

(02:25:28):
And I think we all understand that.
Anyway, let me see here, there was some keywords in the Torah
portion this morning. Like it opens up with talking
about vows and, and it breaks down for us the family system
that it's one thing if you're a woman that is in her father's

(02:25:53):
house as a virgin or you come back home after you're divorced
and you're under his covering. And it's another thing if you're
a widow, because it says that, you know, a widow or a divorced
woman that doesn't have a man's covering, she'll, you know,
she's going to be, her soul is bound to those words.

(02:26:17):
That she has. Vowed and so so we see the
family system and we are so broke down in our society that
many, many, many of us have no covering.
And some of it's because of having to draw the line and
realize once we know the declension of the name.

(02:26:38):
You know, I had a Christian. I've got some really dear
brothers, my, my Blood Brothers that are Christian, but I'm not
welcome in their home anymore. So excuse me, I'm sorry.

(02:26:58):
But. There's a place in Yahshua al
for me, and So what I saw today through the vows, because
looking at where these words areused, it's first used at Bayet
al when Yaakov sees the angels ascending and descending, and
then it's used. Which word are you talking

(02:27:20):
about? Which word are you talking
about? I'm.
Talking about the word, it's #5088 and it's NEDER nadir, and
that's a word for a vow. And the first time we see it in
the 66 books is at the gate of Heaven where Yakov had the

(02:27:42):
interaction with Yahwah, with the living Yah.
And then the next time that it'sused, it's used regarding the
altar and it's spoken to at her own.
And it's talking about ablationsand, and things like that, vows
and offerings. And we know that the bulls of

(02:28:02):
our lips, you know, that's our offering and our prayer.
And then we have it in in Leviticus and in numbers and
it's talking about defiling, notyourself.
And it's giving the understanding of giving an
unblemished offering. And then it talks about fire

(02:28:24):
makes the thing clean and water makes a thing purified.
That's all in that context. And then next we seem and and
that's spoken to whomsoever. So those are all individual
context. And then we step over into the
into vows regarding Yashrael andhow we are to be and, and what I

(02:28:52):
see as the body being led by thehead.
Anyway, it's just a progression of things and our instructions
very specific for us as individuals and very specific
for us as the collective people called Josh Rael.

(02:29:12):
And anyway, I'm just extremely encouraged and I don't, I mean,
I could go on and on about this.It's just so beautiful.
But let's go back to Bilham for just a minute because he he was
tempted and beguiled by the rewards of divinition.
And father told him don't go even to the point that he sends

(02:29:35):
the Angel in and the mule sees him.
And it says in the scripture that that Yahwah opened the eyes
of Milam. Well, he got back on his donkey
after threatening to beat the heck out of her and he just goes
on his merry way after he'd donebeen told to stay home.
You know, he waited an extra night and he decided to go on.

(02:29:56):
And anyway, it ends out that Yahshua kills him with the sword
is what it says in today's Torahportion.
And so to me, that is the warning of even if somebody is a
true prophet, if they're not obedient, they will be cut off.
And that's not to even speak of the false prophets that are

(02:30:19):
running after another Jesus. So if we can just all take a
deep breath and allow Father to change the way we see these
things, we'll be able to come into unity and not be triggered
off and thinking somebody's saying something they're not
saying. And some of the questions that
are in our head are just part ofthe program.

(02:30:41):
And we need to go to y'all with those things.
We need to go to you and ask himto change our mind.
Because what these people, our words will produce exactly what
we say and their words will produce exactly what they say.
And so thank you that here we are in this gathering.

(02:31:03):
And I feel in a large way, Steven, that the truth that you
bring forward has become a covering for me.
And I thank you. Well, Catherine, I'm so sorry to
hear that you you're suffering rejection inside of your family.
But I do. I know the feeling, you know, I
mean, I've been cast out myself,you know, and of course, to my

(02:31:28):
family members said it rejected me.
All I have to say is, well, I'm still here.
You know, the door is still open.
You know, I don't harbor any animosity or any meanness or
anything else. You know, I'm just, wait, what
can I tell you? But you know, for those that
that who have no understanding, you know, and quite often we
really see it really powerfully in the Pentecostal movement,

(02:31:52):
man, when the Pentecostal rejects you, man, they've reject
you big time, you know, and you know, but you know, myself, you
know, and I see this thing is sometimes I worry about the
Pentecostal movement because they worship this Holy Spirit,
whatever the Spirit that may be.And they worship that Holy

(02:32:12):
Spirit above the Scripture. They worship that Holy Spirit
above the Son and they worship that Holy Spirit above the
Father. They do.
And they see the Holy Spirit as a separate persona that governs
everything they do. So they can speak in tongues and
pray in tongues. And then they can have all
these, you know, you know, Pentecostal moments where

(02:32:33):
they're lying on the floor and doing emotional stuff and all
this other stuff. But when you when you poke them
and you say, look, do you think the Holy Spirit is a person?
Oh, yeah, very definitely. And then when you assert
Scripture that contradicts wherethey are, or they absolutely
rebuke you and reject you, not recognizing that that they may
not have the discernment to knowwhich spirit it is that they're

(02:32:55):
following. You know, quite often you see
the spirit of Kundalini is very present in these, in a lot of
these Pentecostal operations. And we see other spirits as well
that are made manifest. And so when you see the idea,
for instance, when you start talking about a translating, you
know, and I mean, I'll grant youthat there is scripture that

(02:33:19):
talks about Hanoke being translated.
Isaiah was translated into the throne room.
He saw the Seraphine. John was translated into the
throne room, he saw the Seraphine.
Right. There's been and and Paul talks
about his I know a guy who is, you know, translated into the
3rd heaven. But you have to be very careful
when you're saying I'm going to be astral projected into some

(02:33:41):
place else. You know, you're no longer
talking about the Ruach ha kodesh.
And remember the Ruach ha kodesh.
And this is where people get upset with me when I tell them,
but it's the just the flat fact.Ruach is the word for wind or
breath, just as Numa in the Greek is the word for breath.

(02:34:02):
The Hagia Numa, called by the King James interpreters a Holy
Ghost or apparition, or phantasma and the Holy Spirit,
also a ghost or phantasma, is anincorrect identification of
what's being said in both languages.
It is the sacred breath, the breath of Yahwah, the Ruach

(02:34:23):
Hakodesh, the sacred breath of Yahwah, and it's the same thing
with the Hagia Numa in the Greek.
It's the sacred breath of Yahwah.
And so it's very clear when you look at the name of the Yodheh,
Vahbe Yahwah, that the sacred breath, you know, proceeds from
both the Father and the Son, TheYod, the marker of the Father,

(02:34:44):
the closed hand of he who finished creation.
And then the head, the breath, then the VOB, the, the mark of
the nail on the Son, and then the head, the breath.
So when you see, yeah, yeah, I am Yod, Hey, I breathe is what
that also means. I breathe.
And so the whole idea of the Ruach Hakodesh is the breath of

(02:35:06):
Yahwah. It is the breath.
It is not something else. And so and so you can very, you
can see it very clearly. And the breath was within him.
Well, is he breathing? Yeah, he's breathing.
And his breath left him. You know His Ruach left him, His
breath left Him. When you realize that the breath
that you have is a breath that'sgoing to keep going, even if

(02:35:28):
somebody knocks you out, you getknocked unconscious, you can't
control a thing, you're still breathing.
Why? Because the breath doesn't
belong to you, it belongs to Yah.
Your breath belongs to Yahwah. It belongs to Yahwah.
And the more that your soul comes to know Yahwah, what does
it say? In John 17?

(02:35:48):
It says this is eternal life, the knowledge of the Father and
the Son whom He sent. This is eternal life.
That's what it says in John 17. This is eternal life, the
knowledge of the Father and the Son whom He sent.
So we can see that the progress of your soul to an eternal
status is one that is made manifest by your knowledge of

(02:36:13):
the Father and the Son. So in recognizing that you have
a Creator, your nephesh becomes a wuach.
In recognizing that the Creator has a name, your ruach becomes
neshama. When you understand the Father
and the Son, your ruach becomes Kaya, eternally living.

(02:36:35):
And the only thing that awaits from this point is when you are
unified as Yahad with the Father.
So this, this is the natural progression of the soul, which
by the way, the progression of the soul is best understood in
the prayer of Mashiac in John chapter 17.
That's where you come to understand that.
So when you see these kinds of things that go on with Balak and

(02:37:00):
and Balaam and so on and so forth, it's a very, you know,
once again, this is a story fromthe OT that is warts and all,
right? It's like people making mistake
after mistake after mistake after mistake after mistake.
And they do. And as a result, death comes,
you know, it's like a Hob, right?
A Hob, you know, we know him as Ahab, right?

(02:37:22):
Ahab and Jezebel, but his name was a Hob.
What does a Hob mean? Love.
His name was love. And yet he he wanted that guy's
vineyard. He stole the vineyard.
And yah told him you're going tobleed to death on that very
vineyard, right? That's what he said.
And so we see these kinds of things.
So the long the shirt of it is Catherine, I just want to say to

(02:37:42):
you, look, be blessed in all that you do and know and be
gentle with your tongue. Be very keep your door open and
some food on the table when you over poured to your brothers and
sisters and then you are mistored.
Just say, well you know, I'll come on in and eat and let's sit

(02:38:04):
down and talk and know that my words to you have been nothing
but love. Not condemnation, not jockeying
for position, not contention, not mid ration words of love.
Amen, Amen. Rejection does soften.
Yes, rejection is hard, man. It hurts.

(02:38:26):
It hurts every day. It hurts every day.
There's there's suffering every day in in the ruach.
There's suffering every day. But even though it hurts,
recognize that Yah knows that. And he has not abandoned you,
and he will not leave you, nor forsake you, even unto the end
of the age. Amen.
I do not feel abandoned whatsoever whatsoever.

(02:38:47):
I feel very blessed and I'm, I'mreally thankful to have a, a
people group here that are, are pursuing after truth because and
we've watched people come and goand some remain and ultimately
everybody has a path, but father's going to get us where

(02:39:07):
we all need to. Yeah, that's the truth of it.
That's the truth. OK.
All right. Thanks, Catherine.
Blessings to you. OK.
Hallelujah. Hallelujah.
Yeah, I agree with that. Hallelujah.
Yeah. Amen.
OK, Brian, go ahead. I just wanted to ask you a

(02:39:29):
question, off topic question. You don't mind about it,
Matthew, sorry, Mark 228. But in the meantime, when you're
looking it up, I wanted to make a comment about the father son
relationship. We're told in Corinthians, the
father is head of the the son and the son is the head of the
body. And we're created in the image
of the Father and son. So to me you get this picture of

(02:39:52):
a body. Now the son cannot be the father
and the father is. So I say, oh, the father is the
head and, and, and the father saves.
You know, all the Christians want to run around and say,
well, Jesus saves whatever, no. The Father says, but he says
through his son, the door, door to the Kingdom, if you don't
come through the door, you're coming through the window.

(02:40:14):
And if you're in the window you get thrown out.
So you got to come through the door.
But the son is not the Father. And the Father, you know what
I'm saying? He, he's like, I, I want to call
him really Ben Yahuwah because he's really a junior.
He says because he's given a name above of the name.
What name is that? It's the Father's name.
He's been given the Father's name.
So he's really Ben Yahuwah. He's the son of Yahweh.

(02:40:36):
He's the junior. OK, if you only really look at
scripture, but we use Yahusha because it that's similar,
because it's a take off in the Father.
It's Yahushua saves, Yah saves. Well, he saves to the Son.
So that's all That's why I wanted to bring up about that.
You know, there this Trinity thing is wrong because that's

(02:40:57):
not it is It's all part of a bigbody or I like to use as an
automotive. It's a little better.
You know, you, you know, the whole thing is, is yeah.
But you know, you have the father and you got one part, you
know, saying it's different parts.
So to me, the Father's the brain, the son is the right
hand. You see what I'm saying?
So, and, you know, we make up the rest of the body and we,

(02:41:19):
we're supposed to strive to be part of that body.
And. I think we come a part of that
body on the 8th day. We become part of that body on
the 8th day, but it's just my thinking.
But any anyway, Mac, I'm sorry, Mark 228.
I'm trying to figure out what you done here at the scripture
because it doesn't it's been changed in the in the apps

(02:41:40):
versus the hard copy. So you you got to read you got a
reading. There is therefore Yahuwah is
the son of Adam and the son of the Sabbath.
So if you take that conjunction means that means Yahoo is the
son of Adam and he's also the son of the Sabbath.
That makes zero sense to me. Where thread in the in the King
James Bible, it reads as. It reads as therefore the Son of

(02:42:05):
man or the son of Adam is masterover the Sabbath.
This, this, this what, in 228? What you got here is not making
any sense to me. I'm trying to figure out what
you're doing here. Yeah.
OK. And So what this is is that Mark
is not the best statement of this.
Really the best statement of this concept is in Matthew.

(02:42:26):
But we'll take a look at it and let me just share.
Let's look first of all at the passage as it's found in the
sepher, OK? So what it says here in the
sepher is therefore Yahwah is the son of Adam and the Sabbath.
OK, not the Son of the Sabbath, but and the Sabbath.

(02:42:49):
All right, now with that, let's take a look now.
And we're going to take a look at this passage as we find it.
Just one moment here, let me seeif I can share it.
Yeah, here we go. So let me share this and let me
pull this up. OK, there we go.

(02:43:11):
All right, now let's go into Mark and we'll go into Chapter 2
and we'll go into 228. Now the difficulty here is that
when you're talking about this, there comes, there comes a point
where you can see that we've gotsome words here that are kind of
difficult to construe out of theGreek.

(02:43:31):
OK? So you can see it in this
construct. And again, this is not
necessarily the Texas Receptus, but we can see some of it.
So you can see here that you seecurious right here.
OK, Now, so the King James interpreters, they take this as
master, but curious, we adopted a policy that's not 100%, but

(02:43:51):
it's pretty close because curious was the word that was
used in the Septuagint that replaced the yod hey, Bob hey in
7000 places. So when you read the Septuagint,
you read Curious that is in place of the yod Hey, Bob.
Hey. OK, then you see Kai, which is
and and then Sabaton. OK, so they say, curious.

(02:44:14):
So Lord and Shabba and the Sabbath and the Sabbath.
OK, but we can see here that when you say the EOS anthropos,
right, the Son of Man, the Son of Man.
Now it's possible to say the Sonof Man, but in our case, what we
say instead of the Son of Man isthe Son of Adam, and in some

(02:44:37):
cases the Ben Adam, the Ben right, or Yahwah is the Ben Adam
and the Shabbat. Now again, what this means is
that the very nature, the very character of Yah as the Son of
man is in fact the Sabbath. In other words, like I say, the

(02:44:58):
math, the Matthew passage that deals with this same issue is
much clearer, and I should say much clearer.
Well, I think it isn't. What's, what's the first
citation in, in Matthew? Do you know, is it Matthew 12?
Matthew 12? OK, let me see if I can find out
because. Yeah.
All right. Let me see if I can find it

(02:45:22):
because. I because I use this, I used to
use this scripture a lot for andmy wife's making writing a
teaching and she's the one is more asking the question.
My wife and my son and they reminded me to ask this
question, but she's doing a teaching because I use this
scripture a lot. For the the 7th day or the 7th

(02:45:42):
Millennium, I call it the 7th day because there's six days
man's in charge, The 7th Yahushais in charge, and the 8 days it
could turn gets turned over to the Father.
It's Matthew. So that this scripture here is I
thought it was the son of Adam, which is the Son of man, which
be Yahusha is master over the Sabbath, over the Sabbath day.

(02:46:05):
The concept, yeah, but the concept is that is that the
wrong concept to hear? Is that is that wrong here then?
No, it's not wrong. It's it's that here take a look
at 12-8 and you can see it in the Sepher here, OK. 12/8.
In, in, in 12. Yeah.
Let me see if I can share that screen and then we'll come back
to Sword Searcher here. Just a minute.
Let me go in here to 12/8. And in this passage here we see

(02:46:35):
that it reads for Yahwah is the essence and the Shabbat, the son
of Adam. Now this may be a this may be a
difficult concept. However, in reading the Greek,
this is how it is spelled out, right?
Yahwah is the essence and the Shabbat.

(02:46:57):
So the whole nature of the Shabbat, and this is what with
the point of this structure is, is that when you're talking
about Mashiach being the Lord ofthe Sabbath, people misconstrue
that because they say, oh, Jesusis the Lord of the Sabbath,
therefore I don't have to honor the Sabbath anymore, not too.
Correct. Yeah, I get that.
Yeah, I understand that, Yeah. And but, but this.
But this isn't the case at all because the Sabbath, the Shabbat

(02:47:21):
like Jubilees talks about, is kept in heaven, right?
This is not something that is, Gee, we're going to do a
routine. I'm going to put it on my
calendar and then every, you know, every Sabbath we're going
to, we're going to keep it. That isn't what's going on at
all. The essence of Yahwah is
Shabbat, the essence of Yah. This is the rhythm of life.
This is the, the just as a man is awake 16 hours and sleeps 8,

(02:47:45):
So, so the, the rhythm, the essence of Yahwah is the Shabbat
and and also Yahwah is the essence and the Shabbat and the
son of Adam and he's the Benedam.
And so again these, this is consistent with Philippians 211.
The Yahwah is the Benedam. Yahwah is Yahusha to the glory.

(02:48:06):
Of right. But he is the essence, he is the
Shabbat and he is the Benedam, right?
Yeah, they. They acted the Christians like
to twist the scripture because they're thinking of the the
weekly Shabbat, but it's actually I think it's talking
about the 7th day, which is the 1000 year rest when they're when
Yahusha is in charge. This is what this is talking

(02:48:29):
about the thousand year rest. I believe it's not talking about
the weekly Shabbat, but it's a picture.
It goes back to it goes back to Genesis where you get the
picture of on the 7th day Yah rested and that is a picture of
man's in charge for 6000 years and the 7th day Yah rest.
And that's this is my understanding.

(02:48:50):
This is what this is talking about, but it you if you have a
different understanding here, I'm trying to figure out what
you're saying here. That's what I'm trying to say.
I agree with what you're saying,I'm just saying that it means
both. It means all of it.
It means the 7th day. It means the 7th year.
It means the Jubilee year. It means the 7000 years.
It means all of that. It's all contained in that.
That's kind of a biphatic expression, if you will.

(02:49:12):
That's expressed both in the micro and it's expressed in the
macro, and then even in the Super macro.
OK, got you 7. 1000 year rain, Yeah.
And I agree with you. I agree with your point on that,
that it is talking about that and so but this the whole point
of these passages. But when I looked at this
passage, I said, OK, we got to look at the Greek on that.
And the Greek is very, very difficult, especially given the

(02:49:34):
fact that we see curious in bothpassages, both in the Mark and
the Matthew passage, we see curious in there.
So this infers the name Yahwah. Now, not in every instance does
it do that, but for the most part in the New Testament, it
infers the name Yahwah. And so when I began to look at
it, this whole idea of he's Lordof the Sabbath, this idea that

(02:49:55):
Jesus could just run roughshod over the Sabbath in the, in the
interpretation of some Christianpastor somewhere saying we're
just going to completely ignore the 4th entirely.
Right, right. So the way it works, because
when you read the Greek, you seethat Yahwah is the essence.
He is the essence and the Shabbat and the Benedam.

(02:50:16):
And so the, the, the passage in Mark is a bit more cryptic.
It's a little more hard to understand because the Greek
there is, is a little clunky. It's just clunky and you just
can't get and this is what this is what Andrew Roth was arguing,
he says. You know, when it comes to the
languages, Greek is a very clunky language for expressing
theological ideas, right? And again, we're we're at the

(02:50:40):
mercy of Constantine who translated this from the Hebrew
into Greek, where I believe all the Gospels were in written in
Hebrew and the Revelation was written in Hebrew.
Now there's some a lot of letters like Paul wrote, like
Romans. I think they were probably
written in Greek, different languages.
I can see that Galatians, but this here is a Hebrew concept

(02:51:02):
and and I believe the sun God worshipper Constantine changed
it a little bit because I think you're at the mercy to
translate. I think he changed it enough to
mess people up well. You got to remember that this,
the foundational documents that become the New Testament
happened in the late 4th centuryand they're done primarily by
Eusebius Hieronymus, who put horns on Moses, who decided to

(02:51:25):
use the name for the name of Mashiac, who created the name
Lucifer out of whole cloth. You know, these kinds of things.
This was done by Eusebius beforethat.
I and I, I got to disagree with you in one respect, Brian.
I don't. Well, I do believe that the vast
majority of the New Testament was conceived in Hebrew.

(02:51:45):
I do not believe it was written in Hebrew, but that the
tradition was to pass the the instruction by word of mouth.
This was, and again, this is a tradition that sprung out of.
You might call it the, but you. Don't think it was you don't
think it was written in Hebrew. You thought it was just it by by
translation, by mouth, not written.

(02:52:05):
OK, I I see and. That's why you see discrepancies
between the Gospel of Mark, the Gospel of Matthew, the Gospel of
Luke. Some have more stories, some
have less, some have the backs. It's because they were being
related in different area, right?
They were being related verbally, they were being
related orally. And so we got a little bit of

(02:52:27):
this, a little bit of discretionary fact items that
were a little bit different here, there, and everywhere.
Now, that's not indicate the truth of the Gospels.
But the fact is, is that when you look closely at this issue,
we talked about it in canonicity.
When you look closely at this issue, the concepts are Hebraic.
Now the argument is that in fact, when we go to the Vatican

(02:52:50):
Library, we're trying to look for these documents that are
allegedly 1st century gospels inthe Aramaic language.
No one has been able to find these and no one has been able
to prove these. Allegedly, one author has
claimed that these documents exist in the Vatican.
So we're making an approach. Ephraim and Sylvia are helping

(02:53:11):
us with this. We have a doctor in the Aramaic
language in Italy that's going to attend with us.
We've identified the documents and we're going to.
These are the ones we want to see.
Whether they'll let us into the Vatican is another story.
Whether they'll let us in to do this research, we don't know.
And whether we'll find these documents, we don't know.
But the way it stands right now,these allegedly exist and we
don't know if that's the case, we're going to go there and take

(02:53:32):
a look now. If they don't exist, then we are
stuck with the reality that no written scripture of the New
Testament exists before around 400 AD.
There's no written record well, but there's, you know, 370 years
of practice, 364 years of practice in the Arimathean

(02:53:56):
community that was in Britain before.
These things are written well. We know that the traditions in
the Arimatheic community, which would be in the British Isles,
was to transmit ideas through oral tradition.
They did not believe in writing things down.
They believed in transmitting the knowledge using what were
called triads. And usually they would sing the

(02:54:19):
triads, they would sing the triads, and then the knowledge
would be memorized in terms of asong.
And it went from generation to generation.
And so like, I mean, I can give you an example, you know, the
song The 12 Days of Christmas, the 12 Days of Christmas is
Christian doctrine described as gifts in order to transmit the

(02:54:41):
teaching of the gospel using code, using code at a time where
it couldn't be done. Well, you had other things like
this that were being done. And so there would be songs that
were sung and these songs would transmit the, the truth of, of
the gospel because they believedthat if you wrote it down, you
killed it. So the traditions were, that's

(02:55:01):
why there's absolutely nothing in writing.
You don't get anything in writing in Britain until the
Book of Kells, which is like maybe 8 hundreds.
And that's in Latin. And when you when you see the
Latin construct by Eusebius Anonymous or you see the
construct in the Aramaic, which of the earliest renditions we
can see if any of that is 4th century, 5th century, AB around

(02:55:24):
400 between 4O5415AD. This is when these documents
begin to be created for the first time.
Now there is a person who said, OK, well we've looked at
fragments and I forget who this,this scholar is, but they did
find fragments in the 2nd century in Greek of the Gospel
of John, the Book of Revelation and the Gospel of Matthew.

(02:55:47):
Those and they're only small fragments and they're, those are
the only three fragments from the 2nd century.
In the 3rd century we begin to get more and more fragments of
Greek, of the Gospels, in Greek and of the other books.
But there is no Greek fragment of Second Timothy at all.
The only time we get Second Timothy is in the 5th century

(02:56:10):
and that is in Aramaic. It does not exist in Greek.
OK, Second Timothy. So when you talk about these
books, you're seeing fragments. 2nd century is the earliest that
you get any fragments, then the 3rd century, then the 4th
century, and those were early Greek fragments.
Now keep in mind too, you want to keep in mind that when you're

(02:56:30):
talking about this area, would you guys mind if I shared Google
Earth for a moment? Let me share Google Earth for
just a minute because we can seea little bit what I'm talking
about here. Let's see, here we go.
Let me just share this real quick.
OK, here we go. Now on this map here, so I'm

(02:56:54):
going to get rid of some of thispolitical boundaries.
Let's get rid of the political boundaries.
There we go. All right, now we can take a
look a little bit and let's swing over here to this area.
Now what we have to keep in mindis that with Alexander the

(02:57:22):
Great, which is discussed in First Maccabees, we're going to
see that in fact, Alexander had conquered an area that was
something like this. OK, that was the Alexandrian

(02:57:57):
Kingdom, but he died and when hedid, this got segregated off
into one Kingdom. This got segregated off into one
Kingdom, and then these two became the two dominant
kingdoms. You might call this the King of
the North and this the King of the South, but this was known as

(02:58:20):
the Ptolemaic Empire because it was under leaders called
Ptolemy. This empire here was called the
Saleh. You said empire, and its capital

(02:58:47):
was Antioch right here. That's its capital right there.
This capital was Alexandria, right here.
Now, interestingly enough, the formal languages of all four
empires was Greek. That was the legal language.

(02:59:07):
The formal legal language was Greek.
That means the language was in Cyrillic.
The ones who were best at speaking Greek were down here,
the Ptolemaic Empire, and they had former members of the House
of Yasherel who had fled the destruction in 586AD BC.

(02:59:28):
Rather they were in Alexandria, and this is where the septuagan
was created. The septuagan was created and
the septuagan in the Greek language, in Greek, Greek
language. This was circa, you know, 250 to

(02:59:56):
280 BC, 250 BC OK, Now, when youget into the Sir Lewis Empire,
look at the size of the Sir Lewis Empire.
You see how big it is. How many languages do you think
were spoken there? My guess would be over 100

(03:00:17):
languages were spoken there and there were multiple religions
that were going on there. But there was one language that
was fairly dominant, other than the formal Greek language.
There was one language that was fairly dominant in this region,
and that was Aramaic. Now they say that the priestly

(03:00:41):
class also spoke Hebrew. The priestly class spoke Hebrew.
OK, but this Aramaic language, Now the question is you have the
Septuagint created in the Greek,then you see the Aramaic, the
Aramaic tonic, right? The peseta tonic, and also the

(03:01:03):
Aramaic Targum meme, which is the beginning of rabbinical
opinion. The Targum meme is beginning of
rabbinical opinion that doesn't begin to emerge until about 150
BC. So you're talking 100 years
later now, the Dead Sea Scrolls in Hebrew, which originated

(03:01:30):
here, the DSS, the Dead Sea Scrolls, these go back and
dating to about 190 BC. All right, now that's going to

(03:01:51):
this is going to tell you some truth about the construction of
these scriptures. OK, so it's my belief that the
Greeks scriptures were read aloud in the Seleucid Empire and
read aloud and then can reconstruct it in Aramaic and

(03:02:12):
then written down in Aramaic, and which makes the Aramaic
source secondary to the Greek source.
And the Greek source is openly stated to have been translated
from a previous Hebrew text, which does not exist.
Why doesn't it exist? Because they burned the library
at Alexandria three times. OK, so you can see that this

(03:02:39):
idea of formal Greek being spoken to the Ptolemaic Empire
is going to create the first sceptu again, the Sceptu again,
as I mentioned to you before, all four books of the Maccabees,
the Odes of Solomon, the Psalmist of Solomon, all the
books of the Apocrypha, they're all there.
No Enoch and no Jubilees in the Ace.
In the Aramaic translations, however, we do have Enoch.

(03:03:01):
We do have first Baruch, second Baruch, and 3rd Baruch.
We do have all four Maccabees, we have the Oaths, and we have
the Psalms of Solomon in addition to the Apocrypha in
Aramaic. And then at the Dead Sea Scrolls
we find both Enoch and Jubilees.Now, I haven't mentioned the
Ghese tradition and the reason Ihaven't mentioned the Ghese
tradition is because there's a bunch of lies out there about

(03:03:24):
the Ghese tradition and the Western world tries to tell us
that nothing occurred in Ethiopia before the 7th century.
And I don't believe that's true.I just don't believe that's you.
I think a lot occurred there before the 7th century and that
in fact, they had an Ethiopian Bible as early as the 2nd
century AD. OK, so you guys can kind of see

(03:03:48):
you guys kind of see the elements here, right?
You see the elements and how these language influences are
there. So even though Greek was the
official language of the Seleucid Empire, the the lingua
franca on the ground for the most part in the Tigris
Euphrates area was Aramaic. Aramaic.
OK. And so as a result, we see

(03:04:11):
constructs of both Aramaic and Greek, and we also see the Dead
Sea Scrolls in Hebrew. OK Where's the New Testament in
all of this? Why is there no New Testament in
Hebrew? Because it was kept in an oral
tradition, That's why. That's what I believe.
OK. All right.
OK. Dave, Beryl, Go ahead, brother.

(03:04:34):
We had a couple of scriptures that only it's found on and it
has to do with several things that's been spoken.
And John chapter 5, it's I couldgo on and on about it, but I'm
going to look at 36 and 37. I have a greater witness than
that of Yohannan for the works which the Father has given me to

(03:04:55):
finish. The same works that I do bear
witness of me, that the Father has sent me, and the father
himself which has sent me, has borne witness of me.
And he goes on and talks about who's heard his voice.
You haven't heard his voice. The door, the dilette, the door

(03:05:22):
was made When there he became the door.
The door to what? The door to life and the door to
the the giver of life, because it was shut.
It was shut and protected with flaming swords of fire that
wouldn't allow the fallen Adam to get back in there to be able

(03:05:46):
to partake of the tree of life and live forever because he
couldn't have that. That fallen mindset eternalized.
Well, I would was given the ISR scriptures and it didn't have
the OSHA is come in the flesh. It has OSHA has come in the

(03:06:08):
flesh. And then when I got I was really
looking to find out whether I was going to be confirmed to
look into because the Father wastalking to me about moving in
and fellowshipping with you in the supper.
And I saw that you use the word is come in the flesh and that
means it's a present. It is come is.

(03:06:30):
It's being fulfilled. It's is come as a present,
present, imperfect explanation of that.
It's being fulfilled still. So when the door came, the word
of Yahuwah is come in the flesh to be the way back to

(03:06:55):
fellowshipping with life and being changed into his image to
to having the earth becoming subdued from the fall of the
pollution, the defoundment that could not go back through.
That's why the flaming swords offire were there.
OK, so you know, I started seeing that when the veil was

(03:07:18):
rent at his perishing and exposethat there was no throne in the
in Herod's temple. There's a type in the shadow of
this manifestation of the door coming.
Well, I have to have in my understanding that manifestation

(03:07:40):
of the word that is come in the flesh in this world.
I say in this world in the fleshmeans in this world and in me in
my in this body in this mind therenewing of my mind.
If it's not then what are we doing?
We're just practicing something that ain't happening.

(03:08:01):
No the the works that he does bear witness of that the father
has sent him what is come in theflesh handle me OK.
So when we we have that opening that that in the covenant passes

(03:08:22):
through the veil where the forerunner is has become even
Yoshua through the veil. What into the presence of your
this is this is the door. You can't do that without the
door. So today, while it is called
today, if I hear his voice, I'm not going to harden my heart

(03:08:45):
because he's talking to me aboutpassing through into his
presence through that door so that his word will become
manifest in this world. If it doesn't, then what are we
doing? Just beat in the air?
So I had to progress and progress until I'm going Oh, OK.

(03:09:11):
And then and then and then I said, OK, I'm, I'm looking.
And then it says, OK, now just look at the way I, that Steven
knows my name. I'm going, yeah, that's a real
big one to me because when I started calling you what you
told me, ya wah, I got persecuted really hard from a

(03:09:33):
whole lot of places everywhere because I was declaring your
name as ya wah. Well, he says Steven didn't just
come to that just out of his ownintellect.
I said, well, that's pretty obvious to me because he's
talking about the door. Well, OK, you got me in.

(03:09:53):
I'm, I'm, I'm going to do what you said.
I'm, I'm in the game. I'm in with it with the supper
and I'm in with fellowship and with Stephen.
I mean, I want to know him personally.
So I'll end up, I went up North Dakota to see you separately.
But the issue is, is that the word of Yahuwah, we have access
to the door, the galette. You know, I was in a messianic,

(03:10:19):
a strict Messianic Judaic assembly where the rabbis were
really upset at me and Byrne andSteve declaring the name of
Yahuwah in their assembly. And one of the real earnest kids
that were sitting there at the table said, I just read in the
Talmud that the name is hidden in the in the name Yauda.

(03:10:41):
I said, yeah, it is. You just look through the door,
the delect, and you see that when they, when the Hebrews
spread their deals like that, it's either a Bob or a shin.
But when you see that, you see the name of Yahwah.
You can't get to that without the door.

(03:11:04):
You can't go through the veil tothe word manifest in this flesh.
The the, the the the manifestation of his works
confirming his that it's Him, his mighty power that that
created heaven and earth. That's what testifies of Him.

(03:11:24):
We have access now through the new and living ways, the door
into the presence of the throne that will manifest His Word
through our mouths in submissionto Him and given Him the esteem
for His Word.