Shabbath August 30 2025

Shabbath with Cepher Publishing

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Good morning. Good morning.
Good. Morning to you.
Good morning to you and Shabbat Shalom.
Hijiki, Sherry Bachelom. Bachelom.
Steve Hall. Goodbye Shalom.
About Shalom. Hey, Stacey, good to see you.
The sheriff box alone, Doc. That's pop aside by.
Jabba's mom, Doctor Pigeon. Hey.

(00:24):
Nice to see you. Hey, Marcus.
Glad you're here. Good to see you, brother.
All right, let's see here. Oh, there's Debari.
Hi, Debari. Shabbat Shalom to you.
Good. Morning or afternoon?
What time is it there? It is actually 9:00 AM.
It's 9:00 AM. Oh, and for Stacey, I think in
Indonesia it's much earlier. Stacey, what do you have about

(00:44):
5:00 AM there? It's actually 22 AM, but I'm now
in San Francisco. Oh, you're in San Francisco.
Oh, OK. Well, that's a much better time
zone. Maybe because now you're at 10
AM. That's that beats.
Yeah. Yes, yes. 10:00 And there's Dale
and Peggy. Hi, Dale and Peggy.
Hi. Hey.
Good to see you. And and Gabriella was waving.

(01:06):
I saw her there. We're we're we're preparing for
our trip into Finland. Gabriella, I hope people speak
English in Helsinki because I don't speak a word to Finnish.
Yeah, right. Don't worry.
Everybody speaks English. OK.
All right. Fantastic.
Hi, Amanda. Grace, I think your computer is
working. Good to see you.

(01:27):
And Dave Barrow. Good morning to you, brother.
Shabbat Shalom, Steven. Shabbat Shalom.
All right. Good to see you.
Rick is here. Hi, Rick.
Good to see you. All right, Penny Cantrell.
Hi, Penny. Hey, Sandy Blair, How are you?
Hello. Shabbat Shalom.
Hey, Sandy. That was such a productive
meeting we had last week. That was just really the best.

(01:48):
And now I just have to be equally productive at my end,
which, you know, is always a bitof an issue trying to get
everything accomplished all at once.
And good morning, Marcus Ellis. Good to see you there, brother.
Glad you're here. Hi, Carol Wilson.
Hi, Renee. Glad, glad you're here.
Hey, Gene, good to see you. All right.
And so we gather again. There's Melissa.
Hi, Melissa. Glad you're here.

(02:09):
Burn. Good morning to your brother.
And So what we see is that we see the, you know, we have been,
we've been pushing pretty hard at trying to get everything
squared away for the fall. And we're just not getting there
because there's just, you know, how it is in summer in Alaska.
You have everything to do that is other than what you're
supposed to be doing. You know, So we have, you know,

(02:29):
they, they, we've got two seasons up here, winter and
maintenance. You know, we're in the middle of
maintenance right now. So, you know, it's, there's
always something I haven't got managed to get my quad running
when I, you know, pulled it out from the winter.
There was with a flat tire, you know, the and the tire was
completely, you know, completelytanked.
I mean it was gone. There was no rescuing it.

(02:51):
So I finally got the tires on. Then they put them on backwards.
So I had to put them on twice. Yeah, I really looked dumb doing
that one man, I'll tell you, my brother-in-law looks at me and
goes, I guess you want the treadwork, you know, effective for 4
wheel drive so you can go equally as well backwards as
forward. I said what are you talking
about? He said look, whoops.
OK, so I had to redo that and I'm trying to do a closet

(03:15):
remodel, which is, I'll tell youit, just trying to figure it
out. It's been overwhelming.
Plus we have to do things what we're doing now.
And hey, Pastor Ephraim, good tosee you, brother.
And thank you, Ephraim, for someof the things that you have
suggested in the Italian translation.
I'm going to be taking a look atthat this morning and seeing

(03:37):
what's there. I don't know if you can hear me,
Ephraim. Can you hear me?
Ephraim? Boljano Segati, come on, stay.
I don't think he has his volume up yet.
All right, come back. And I want to welcome everybody
else who who are here today. Glad you were here.
Glad you're here for the Sabbathmeeting.
We're going to have a very interesting discussion.

(03:59):
We're going to pick up kind of where we left off last week,
which means that it's going to be a bit problematic because
we're going to be dealing with geographic areas and trying to
determine what's going on. And some of the stuff is just,
you know, because the names havebeen changed to protect the

(04:20):
innocent and the guilty, you know, and we're going to see
some things also. Ephraim, can you hear me now,
brother? Yes, I hope to have an answer
for you on, on the issue on the Shamot here later this
afternoon. Should be able to get that done.
Ah, yes, yes, and then we're going to try I'm going to try to

(04:41):
do some other things. I'm going to try to do some more
video recording today for the museum.
The, the museum presentation is really becoming a significant
event in our life for, you know,and I can tell you that where as
suffer is concerned, you know, you know, we, you know, we, we

(05:03):
are working very diligently to make sure that we have a website
that is comfortable and functional.
We've had our problems with the new website.
There's been some things going along that have been a little
bit, you know, iffy. But Sandy, can you take a second
to explain what's going on with the Spotify accounts or the

(05:23):
podcast accounts on Sephir and what's available on the website
now? Yes.
So in the pod, we're calling it the podcast area or you can just
think media we have everything is directly uploaded to Spotify.
Also Apple also iHeartRadio. It filters out to multiple

(05:44):
places. A lot of people, this just is a
convenience thing. They're all LinkedIn on that one
page on the website. So you can watch them there,
listen there to the respective. Is my is my thing on?
Respective. OK.

(06:05):
Keep. Keep going, Sandy.
Sorry. Oh no, that's fine.
So we we have several moments, which is the favorite, all the
things from YouTube that everyone enjoyed.
They're all there. You can listen to those, can
listen to them there, or you canclick Spotify.
It's just kind of your preference.
But I've gotten a lot of feedback from people who love

(06:27):
just, oh, it's all in one place.So that's their suffer
commentaries, which is just the reading of scripture.
And so far we've got bare sheep.So that's Doctor P going at his
pace as he gets that accomplished.
We upload them there and they'resimultaneously like when they go

(06:49):
on Spotify, they simultaneously appear on that page so as well
as all the Shabbat meetings. So it's just everything in one
place for your convenience. And just to reiterate,
everything is still there. I know it's been a lot of
changes throughout the year, butit's it's hopefully more

(07:09):
organized for everything, for everyone.
The content is all there. The zip drive side note is for
your convenience. If you just want everything all
in one place, that's obviously that was not cheap to do and to
get. So it is, you know, for sale,
but all of that same info is still on the website, just so no

(07:34):
one is confused about that. Yeah, so there is a flash drive
that is available with all the content, correct?
Right. Yeah.
So that has that has, that has the separate moments, that has
the crossing over videos, it goes all the way back to 2015.
And it also includes the PowerPoint presentations.

(07:57):
And in other words, there's a lot of intellectual property.
We loaded up everything we possibly could to put it onto a
flash drive. So in the event that we lose
Internet or that we're kicked off the Internet because of
what's coming in the world, you'll have you can have access
to all that material. It's all I'm saying.
I've got 1 and it's, it's reallyawesome.

(08:17):
And they put all that information in one flash drive.
I've got one I got. I think it it's really awesome.
Sorry I didn't. It's a.
It's a huge flash drive, Dave. I mean, what's the, what's the
capacity on that flash drive, Sandy?
Seems like it's 500 gigabytes I think. 500 gigs.

(08:38):
I mean, that's more than my computer.
You know that's what I have on my computer, right?
Yeah. So the point is you can add to
that and at some point we will figure out a a way that as you
know if Doctor Pierre for the blogs and information that if
you purchase that then you can add to your zip drive.

(09:02):
So if anyone's concerned about that.
Yeah, there you go. So if you know the long and the
short of it is it does give you a long archived record that you
can have for your own convenience and allows you to
study as you wish and to be ableto access the material as you
wish. And so that was the point of the
thumb drive. So we had, we went through a
real kind of metamorphosis this year.

(09:25):
One of the things that we wantedto do was we wanted to update
the website because I wanted the, the website to be a much
more personal experience and notan assault on the eyes.
This has been the kind of approach we've been taking with
this effort to is that we went from the the 3rd edition, which

(09:45):
was pretty harsh in terms of howit was presented.
There were a lot of all bold, all cap words, which you know,
when I go back to my old legal days, you know, this is the way
we all we did things. And of course, I didn't realize,
you know, that, you know, when you're practicing law, you know,
you just do what the forms tell you to do.
You know, this is how we did. You know, this is how your
complaint supposed to be filed. This is how your affidavit is

(10:08):
supposed to be signed. This is how your deed is
supposed to be drawn up. Not recognizing that the use of
all capital letters in a word was a really a kind of a form of
slavery. I didn't recognize that.
I didn't know that. I had no idea because an all
capitalized word is actually grammatically incorrect.

(10:29):
The word is not capitalized. It's symbolized.
It's symbolized and that is the difference.
And so of the idea of of losing all the symbolized words in the
suffer, which we did between the3rd edition and the Millennium
edition. When we went into the Millennium
edition, we lost all of those symbolized words and we replaced

(10:52):
them with capitalized words. And then we went to fonts that
were much more easy to read, easier on the eyes, friendlier
fonts. And we also took out the first
we used to have the first word of every chapter in bold in
symbolized language, all caps. And it was ridiculous because,

(11:18):
you know, here we are. We're talking about, I guess the
word, therefore is much more important than the rest of the
text in the chapter, you know, or, and or now you know, it was
it was absurd, really. It was really quite absurd.
And so intake it was down. We've made the text more
friendly to the eyes. And you know, this is something

(11:40):
that really it's, it's one of these things that you don't see
when you're reviewing stuff, Youknow, when you don't think
out-of-the-box, you know, when you say, let's think, well, what
is the box, right? What is the box?
How were you locked in? And you know, you can be locked
in with that without even knowing it.
And so people will say, you know, you need to read your

(12:02):
Bible and then you open up your Bible and it's in a six point
font, 5 columns, all justified using symbolized English all
over the place. The most hostile reading
environment you could imagine. You'd never read a fiction book
if a fiction book was presented that way, you'd never read it
because it's just so hostile to the eyes.

(12:24):
And then when you get, when you get into the language, like for
instance in Matthew 1 and Abraham begat Isaac and Isaac
begat Jacob and Jacob, and you're like, am I going to be
able to read this or not? Right.
There's big questions in terms of the presentment of the text
as to whether or not it is readable.

(12:44):
And of course, the Zephyr has always had an issue because of
our transliteration that the book is more difficult to read,
generally speaking, than the average text because you're
reading names you've never seen before.
And who's Yakiski Yahoo? What are we talking about?
Who's this Yakisky? Who's Yoshi Yahoo?

(13:05):
Who are these people? I've never seen these names
before, Not to mention the namesof places that are also
transliterated. And so in under those
circumstances, you know, we provide the lexicon.
So you have a text you can go toreference.
The lexicon is included in the app.
So when you buy the app, you getthe Lexicon and you get the

(13:26):
search engine that automaticallyaccesses it.
The app has also been recently updated.
And all of these things, by the way, cost us a lot more money
than we thought it was going to cost us.
I mean, a lot more. And so these have been pretty
big issues for us to continue topush forward to make the Sephir

(13:49):
website and the Sephir experience the best we can make
it for people, you know, So whenyou're looking at, when you're
looking at the, when you're looking at the text, now you're
finding something that's much more friendly.
You know that the, the large print, for instance, the large
font book, that has to be a 14 point font to make the

(14:11):
representation that it's a largepoint book.
You can't do it in a 12 point and say, Gee, that's big enough
for my eyes, should be big enough for yours.
As a matter of commerce, commercial trade, it has to be a
14 point font before you can call it a large print.
Well, we went through a bunch ofproblems trying to get that

(14:32):
done. We knew that a large font was
necessary because many of our readers are not 21 anymore.
You know what I mean? And so your eyes get a little
bit tired. You need to have a bigger text.
And so, you know, we, when we initially printed it, we printed
it in this huge book, 17 by I think it was 17 by 10.

(14:53):
It was a very large book. We could only get it done in
Britain and. Good for lifting weights.
Yeah. Well, it became, yeah, it was,
you know, and it weighed 35 lbs.You know, you could work out
with it. And, you know, so it was, there
were a lot of issues with that book.
And so we tried to crunch it. We tried to crunch it into a 7
by 10 like our other book. And when we did, it became a

(15:17):
printing nightmare. And the poor guys in Britain
were like, we can't do this, we can't do this.
And we, and we ended up with, wehad a huge defective rate, I
mean like about a 40% defective rate in every printing.
It was that bad. And so finally we were able to
resolve the issue and we resolved the issue in the, in

(15:37):
the large point, the large printedition, you see now, which by
the way, in this large print edition, there's some really
cool things about this when you talk about it, because in the
large print edition, you know, it has it.
This is what's called a flexi bind.
And this is a flexi bind as compared to a hardbound edition.

(15:59):
And the flexi bind, this particular cover looks and feels
like leather, but it's not. It's a polyurethane.
And this means that the book will hold up for practically
forever. And for a lot of people who were
objecting to the sepphur becauseof our leather cover, we're
saying, look, you know, I'm a vegetarian.

(16:20):
I don't believe in the killing of animals at all.
Well, OK, that objections gone. Now you have a book that looks
and feels like leather but wearslike a tire.
And the the printing quality is very, very high.
And guess what? We get it with gold leaf on the
exterior, dual ribbons still Smythe sewn binding.

(16:41):
So the quality is very, very, very high and the book is
reasonable in its width to be able to hold in a single hand
rather than that big thick thingthat we used to have before.
And so these kinds of things, you know, we, we do these things
to make the text, to make the book more friendly.

(17:05):
The text is not becoming any more friendly, but the book
itself becomes much more friendly environment, much
easier to read now. It's the same thing with the
website, with the new separate website.
We've gone, we've you know, I said, look, we can't do this red
stuff anymore on the separate website.
That red, it has too much inflammatory insinuation in the

(17:29):
eyes, you know, and typically itmeans stop, right?
When you see a red sign, stop, ared lightning stop.
And so the red, it struck me when we were first doing it, we
were kind of wrapped up in thesecolors of red and gold at this
kind of a thing. And I thought, and I was looking
at the website and I thought this is just too hostile in
environment. It's too hostile in environment.

(17:50):
We want to have an environment that is much more at ease, put
you at ease when you look at thewebsite.
And so now the website has been gone, has been placed into some
very convenient pastels and the pastels are really quite from
the on the eyes. The navigability on the website
is improved and in fact our our site developers have come back

(18:14):
and said this is my favorite website.
And you know why it's their favorite website?
Because I unleashed them to do the best job they could instead
of me coming in and telling you this is what I want and then
going, this guy's an idiot, but we'll do it the way he said to
do it. Now I'm saying, why don't you
guys put your best foot forward and give me your best work?

(18:36):
And this is what they're doing. And so the so we've gone, you
know, we've been, it's still notcompletely healed, but the
website is 98% functional. And so because of that, now
we're, you know, we've got a little bit of this, we've got a
few things here. We got some misspellings here, a
couple of typos there. You know, it's the usual thing
you'd see. But the website now is coming

(18:59):
together in a much better shape and in a much better way.
And also in part of what we've done over the last two years, we
had people that were really praying on us and we didn't know
it that they were taking the Sefer and they were selling it
on Amazon for twice the rate. They were selling it for $195 on

(19:23):
Amazon and that they were buyingit from various distributors
from us and then selling it on Amazon at twice our market rate.
And we looked at that and went, you know, first of all, it's not
fair to the average buyer to be paying double because they don't
know about the Sephir website, you know, and the, and the
Sephir website, you know, you buy the package deal, we send

(19:44):
it, we ship it to you for free, right?
So there's not a lot of distinction between US and your
prime delivery on Amazon. And you get the book in two
days, which for me is remarkablebecause, I mean, I got to tell
you the, you know, getting FedExto where our warehouse is, you
have no idea. I mean, the warehouse is in the
middle of nowhere in Montana, 3 miles from the Canadian border.

(20:08):
And it was like, what? And we, when we first started
moving the books, we were going to sell a couple here, a couple
there. So we'd have like maybe two or
three books go down to the post office every other day, right?
Well, then pretty soon it becamebooks every day.
And pretty soon we went down to the post office and we saw the,
the backroom full of our books that had not been mailed for 8

(20:30):
or 10 days. So we contacted FedEx and FedEx
says, Oh yeah, we'll come out and see you guys.
I was like, you got to be kidding me.
You know, we're 15 miles from a,from a town that has 20 people
in it, right? And so we're like, oh, yeah, OK,
All right. Now FedEx and UPS and USPS make

(20:50):
daily trips to the Suffer warehouse daily trips.
And so it's very typical in the United States to receive your
suffering in 2 days. But we eventually said, OK,
look, we're not going to stiff Amazon anymore.
And so we actually overtook the market in Amazon and the market

(21:11):
at Walmart and the market and some of these other online
retailers in order to represent the book at the same price.
We have it at the Sephir website.
So whether you buy it on Amazon or you buy it through Walmart,
whoever you buy it from, you should be getting the same price
that we have at the sephir. Now you have to remember we
established the price for the Sephir at $95 the very first

(21:34):
year we open for business, whichwas in 2013.
Since 2013, we've had price inflation that has gone up and
up and up and up and up. But we have taken extraordinary
steps as much as we possibly canto be able to maintain the price
at $95.00. So you haven't seen a price

(21:57):
increase in the cost of the booksince we started the company?
Doctor P, Are you doing that in?Canada.
Amazon Canada. I don't know if it's Amazon
Canada or if it's available on Amazon Canada, but we can get
the book into Canada with no problem.
I went to your website one day to buy the thumb drive and the

(22:22):
$85 US when it converts 150 or something 100 and no 100 and
I've forgotten what it was. But The thing is, let's see
shipping through FedEx. The price of the thumb drive
landed here in Canada is $280 roughly Yeah.

(22:46):
It it well, that's I could I, I,you know what I'll, I'll text
you. I'll text you.
I I I took a shot of your website giving me the Canadian
Press. That is, that's just incredible
area. Well, I'll tell you you know the
best way. The best way to get around that

(23:06):
is to buy another book with the thumb drive and then you get the
FedEx for free. I, I I have another book.
I've already got one. Someone left me.
Someone left me with Christy. Someone left me.
You know, I am so sorry to hear that.
I'm so sorry to hear that narrative.
Well, here's here's the. Problem FedEx is charging you

(23:28):
something like 113 or $114.00. You asked for the shipping on a
thumb drive and when Brayden died I had to send the funeral
stuff to the United States. It cost me $5 in shipping.
So the problem is FedEx and it'sjust a thumb drive.
So why not just send it to the US Post Office?
Yeah. And I think we'll have to we'll

(23:48):
have we'll make that adjustment over the over the company.
It would if I we had no idea. So my packaging and my shipping
was under $10 to get them to NewYork.
Yeah. So why can't we just send it,
you know, mail, send it by mail.OK, we'll do that.
That's a very good tip area. We'll make that adjustment.
I'll let everybody know at the warehouse we need to send by

(24:08):
mail. Yeah, we've had we've had
problems with like tariffs, right.
Some places like in Europe, theyslap 100% tariff on the book
when it comes in. And so, you know, you're trying
to buy the book in Britain and it's 200 and something pounds to
to buy a Zephar. You know, so these are these are
all of these things are issue, issue, issue, issue, issue, you

(24:29):
know, and we we try to cure the best we can, but it's good to
hear that report area. We will cure.
We will cure on that. OK, And now Jesse knock, can you
talk to us just a little bit about the cost of this effort in
Britain? What's going on with that?

(24:49):
We've actually got to discuss that on the meeting on Monday.
So we're looking at that. But now we are going to be
distributing this effort consistently through the UK and
then to Europe. So we try especially for feasts,
that's when we try to do a reduced price.
But it really just depends, Stephen.
So we will try and match at least what you're doing in

(25:11):
America to the UK and European. So it's affordable, but in the
past I think we have done them for about 60 to 85 lbs.
So you know that's been fairly cheap.
And last year for one of the feasts we did at 45 lbs for a
special offer for the for the feasts.

(25:32):
So we really try it depends on what the the opportunity is,
what feast we're doing and what the funds are that we need to
raise etcetera to do it and stick to it.
So now we have to get a structure in place really to
look at that and I need some advice from you with that as
well. Yeah, we'll have to talk about
that. So the good news is where Jesse

(25:54):
is concerned is that there's been a beautiful story that's
taken place in her town called Lilbourne.
And by the way, Jesse, you know,when I was looking at the map,
we're going to be looking at Google Earth today.
By the way, when I was looking at the map, Lilbourne is almost
the dead center of England. Did you know that?
It's almost exactly the center. And that kind of surprised me.

(26:17):
I mean, I didn't know that, but but anyway, there's Lilbourne is
a very small town and it really has nothing going on at all.
And there was a church that's right behind Jesse's house.
That's on Chapel Lane, isn't it?It's on Chapel Lane.
The church. Yeah.
And it has been closed for some period of time.

(26:41):
And so the church fathers said, well, we're going to sell this
building. And they weren't particularly
caring to whom they sold it or for what purpose, but they were
going to unload the building. And so Jesse approached and
said, well, I'd like to buy the building.
And they said, well, we're not selling it to you because you're
involved with that suffer group and they're weird cult and on
and on and on. I down to think they said that,

(27:02):
but they were not going to sell to her.
And so she was trying to work out some means to maybe create,
you know, a straw man to do the purchase.
Anyway, one day there's a knock at the door and there's a guy in
the community that says, I'm buying the church.
And I want you to run it to makesure that it doesn't lose its
character as a church. And so this has happened.

(27:25):
So this miracle has taken place.And this is going to be a
staging environment for the supper in Britain.
And it's also an interconnect between US and Lilbourne and
what's happening in Lederworth, because Lilbourne is a community
right next to Lederworth. Lederworth is where the Wycliffe
Museum is. And we're getting ready to put a

(27:49):
display of the Sepher in the Wycliffe Museum.
And the Wycliffe Museum itself is expanding its Wycliffe
materials. So when you come into the
museum, you know the Wycliffe isthe first one to translate
scripture from Latin into English.
He was the very first one to do it and he would preceded Tyndale

(28:11):
by 200 years. And because of that he is very
celebrated. And then this museum is about
him because he did this in Lutterworth.
And so they've had a display about Wycliffe.
We approached the museum and they were interested in putting
the Sephir in the Wycliffe Museum alongside the Wycliffe

(28:32):
materials, and we're presenting the Sephir.
And the fundamental difference between the Sephir and the
Wycliffe materials is Wycliffe did a translation into English,
but the Sephir is in addition toa translation.
It's also a transliteration and it is a transliteration.

(28:53):
And of course it includes many more scriptural books than did
then Wycliffe was translating. Although I have to tell you that
when you go back and look at that period of time, I looked at
a Bible that had been given to Richard the 1st and the Bible
that had been given to Richard the first.
I actually held it in my hands at the British Library included,

(29:16):
in addition to including Revelation, it also included the
Gospel of Nicodemus. And this gives you an idea that
even in the 1300s, in the 1400s,there was nothing resolved as to
what constituted the Bible. Most people don't know this, but

(29:36):
even the Roman Church did not canonize the Scripture until
1536 at the Council of Trent. And when it did, it canonized
the 66 books of the Bible as canonical and the 11 books of
the Apocrypha as Deutero canonical.

(29:57):
Second books, Deutero Canonical,and this canonization of the
Apocrypha. The Apocrypha has always been
canonized, and it appeared in all of the early English Bibles.
The 1539 Coverdale, the 1560 Geneva, the 1587 Bishops, the
1611 KJB, even the 1789 BenjaminBlaney included the Apocrypha.

(30:23):
It was only the act of the Westminster Confession that
limited the books to 66 books, and it did so because it had
been advised by the synagogue's to reduce its Old Testament to
39 books and 39 books only. If you read the Westminster

(30:44):
Confession you will see that deference to the synagogue's
being given at that time. Now of course, it wasn't just
deference to the synagogue's, itwas also deference to the
banking community that was overtaking Great Britain at that
time. So the thinking in the

(31:05):
Westminster Confession and remember that one of the the
fundamental differences between the United States and Great
Britain is Great Britain. When Henry the Eighth expelled
Rome from from Great Britain, when he did that, he became the

(31:25):
Pope, he became vicarious filio day.
He became the defender of the Church and the head of the
Church. But under the British common
law, the Parliament in the UK had all authority in matters
theological, matters ecclesiastical, and so the

(31:47):
Church was subject to the edictsof Parliament period.
There was no authority that was above Parliament in terms of
determining what would be the prayers, what would be the
Bibles, what would be the practices.
None of that. In 1539, seven years after Henry
the Eighth expelled the Roman Church part of, excuse me, 1538,

(32:13):
Parliament passed a law saying that all Bibles in England
should be in English and that every church should have a Bible
and that every church should have its doors unlocked so that
anybody at any time could walk into any church anywhere in the
Kingdom and read the Bible. The 1539 Bible that went into

(32:33):
all the churches thereafter was the Cloverdale Bible called the
Great Bible, which included the Apocrypha.
So you can see that the machination that took place of
Westminster Confession and Act of Parliament was a political
manipulation to take away books like The Wisdom of Solomon and

(32:54):
the Wisdom of Ciroc and Tobit and 1st and 2nd Estrus in order
to secure those writings to the secret societies like the Masons
who said these are our books andnot yours.
That's what the big push was. Now the difference in the United
States, the United States took acompletely different tack, which

(33:18):
is expressed in the 1st Amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion. So this means whereas in England
the Parliament had all the authority over religion, in the
United States Congress has no authority over religion.

(33:39):
No authority. So to this, that is probably the
single most largest distinction between the government of the UK
and the government of America. That distinction.
The UK is still to this day a theocracy, an Anglican
theocracy. By law it's not in practice, but

(34:00):
by law it's an Anglican theocracy.
Now we can see now that in Britain there has been much
pushback against the WestminsterConfession.
You know, when you can introducethe Quran and the and the Hadid
and the Sunnah and you can introduce the the Babylonian
Talmud and other writings and soon into the common literature in

(34:20):
the UK and the king himself appears to have converted to
Islam, one wonders what the situation truly is in the UK.
And so because of this, the restoration of the books in the
Sefir are take the point of view, and it's a very important
point of view. We're going to recreate in the

(34:42):
Sepphor those books that were found in the Septuagint.
And we have all of the books found in the Septuagint except
the Odes and the Psalms of Solomon, because it's our
understanding that those were actually 3rd century AD.
We also have all the books that were contained in the Aramaic

(35:03):
writings. In other words, there's
translations that have been donein Aramaic, and those
translations include the Book ofEnoch.
They include one through 4 Maccabees, they include first
and 2nd Baruch, they include allof the the Apocrypha, all of the
39 books of the Old Testament. And we also see that in the

(35:23):
Pashita that we have all of the books of the New Testament also
found in the Aramaic. So if the Aramaic tradition says
we're going to print up one through 4 Maccabees and one
through 4 Maccabees is found in the Septuagint, then we're going
to include one through 4 Maccabees in the Sepher.
The fact that first and 2nd peruke were found in the Aramaic

(35:45):
tradition allows us to include first and 2nd peruke in the
text. The fact that Enoch was found in
the Aramaic allows us to includeit.
So the big issue is now we've got three issues remaining in
the Sepher that are questionable. 1 is the Book of
Jubilees, one is the Book of Jasher, and the other is the

(36:06):
29th chapter to the Book of Actsand the Book of Jubilees.
Well, if you're asking yourself when was that ever canonized?
Well, the most authoritative texts that we find at all
anywhere is of course, the Dead Sea Scrolls.
And the Dead Sea Scrolls are really kind of the stone of

(36:30):
biblical tradition. And those Dead Sea Scrolls,
there were 10 copies of the Bookof Jubilees found in those Dead
Sea Scrolls. There were 5 copies of Hanoke,
one of which was in Aramaic and the others were in Greek.
This means that that the Greek extrapolation could have been

(36:51):
included with the Septuagint origin.
Who compiled the Hexapla, which was the foundation of the
Septuagint, said he believed that Enoch was Scripture.
Tertullian, who is his friend, said he believed Enoch was
Scripture. Jude, who wrote one of the
epistles in the New Testament, quotes directly from Enoch.

(37:14):
It appears that Enoch was read by all of the disciples at the
time of Mashiac, and there were multiple copies found in the
Dead Sea Scrolls. But 10 copies of the Book of
Jubilees found in the Dead Sea Scrolls is illustrative of the
fact that those people who were writing those scrolls to secure
them for posterity's sake believed that Jubilees was

(37:37):
extremely important. OK, we also find that Enoch and
Jubilees were preserved and maintained in the Ethiopian
tradition, in the Eritrean tradition.
So all right, that gives pretty good credence.
But what about this book of Jasher?
Well, Jasher is an abnormal bookin the respect that it is

(37:59):
directly mentioned in the book of Joshua.
And in Second Samuel there's a direct reference to the book of
Jasher. So the question is, is the
Jasher that's on the table in anauthentic text?
Well, we've had the English translation verified against the
Hebrew. We have a copy of the Hebrew
that is a downloadable copy on the website at Zephyr.

(38:22):
This copy of the Hebrew Jasher was a scroll that was maintained
in Spain that was published in Hebrew in the 1400s, translated
in the 1800s. Well, what was this scroll?
Yashar. Yashar.
What was it doing there in Spain?
The narrative is that the scrollwas rescued from the temple

(38:42):
before the temple was destroyed in 70 AD.
That a Roman guard took the scroll with a Hebrew scholar who
said we got to get this out of here.
And they took the scroll to Sevilla, Spain.
And it remains sequestered in Sevilla for some 1400 years
before it was finally published in Italy.

(39:04):
So there's large questions as tothe veracity of the scroll.
Now, as you might imagine, thereare a number of people who are
deathly afraid of the Book of Jasher.
Why? Because number one, it was not
massaged by the Mazarites. All the remaining text of the
New Testament was massaged by the Mazarites.

(39:25):
All you have to do is look at the Masoretic text to see every
word has been manipulated with the Nikudote.
And there are many people who believe that the man, including
Jewish scribes and Jewish scholars today.
In fact, there was an interview two weeks ago that Stephen,
Stephen Benoon did with a Jewishscholar who said, oh, yeah,

(39:48):
those books were completely distorted by the rabbi's,
completely distorted by the rabbi's with literally thousands
of references in the Torah that predicted and prophesied the
coming Mashiac. I think he said some 1000 verses
had been deleted. 1000 Propheticreferences to the coming Messiah

(40:11):
in the mouth of Moshe that had been taken from the Torah.
You might say, Oh well, no, the the Torah has been maintained
with integrity. Really.
The Torah says you shall not addto nor detract from these five
books of the Torah. Yet the Mazarites, in adding the
Nikka dote, modified every single word of the Torah by

(40:37):
putting their vowel preferences on every word.
They added vowels to words like OS and U's and is.
By putting a dot, whether it's ahollom, A shurik, or a hirik,
they'd add a dot and you get an extra vowel.

(40:59):
You also see them adding consonants.
There's a thing called a doubling dot, and with the
doubling dot they could add an L, they could add AB, they could
add an M, they could add an N, they can add additional
consonants to the words, additional vowels to the words,
and by placing nikkudote on the word tell you that the word is

(41:20):
Edom, not a Dome. Now it's Adam and not Edom.
Same spelling, same word, but weput different dots and dashes to
give it a different meaning in accordance with our
understanding, which this didn'thappen until the 8th century AD
that they began to do this. The book of Ezekiel is

(41:43):
completely out of order. They admitted this at the
Council of Jamia. In fact the word Yeka scale
means out of order. They put the book out of order.
It's self-evident that it's out of order when you read it in the
in the way the truth and the life we have put it back in
order and it is available in order as a download at the

(42:03):
separate website. The book of Daniel has been
placed out of order. I believe the book of judges is
out of order. When you talk about those last
chapters and that great tragedy that befell the House of
Benjamin with the slaughter by the House of Judah, right?
I believe that that's also out of order.
So the rabbi's have admitted in the in the modern world that

(42:25):
they have grievously manipulatedthe text and Jeremiah says it
outright, the lying pen of the scribes.
So we have to deal with what we have to deal with.
Now we know for instance, there's a Samaritan Pentateuch.
The Samaritan Pentateuch has 3000 differences with the

(42:46):
Masoretic Torah, 3000 differences.
And a lot of people say, well, they're, they're not
substantive. The Septuagint has many radical
differences from the from the Masoretic Text.
One of those differences includes the fact that all of
the patriarchs in the Septuaginton up to, I think Yasharel all

(43:07):
lived 100 years longer than is stated in the Masoretic text.
There's 100 years as to every one of them more in their life.
So you can see that under these circumstances, what the sufferer
is trying to do and what the sufferer tried to do is we tried
to say, look, we're not going totake the political opinion of

(43:30):
Parliament that was being manipulated by Masons, frankly,
and by the synagogue to eliminate books.
We're not going to take their opinion as dispositive,
particularly when they're over ruling the foundation of
scripture in the English language.

(43:51):
Come on, the great Bible is the great Bible, the the, the John
Calvin Geneva, the Bishops Bible, the KJV, the Benjamin
Blaney. All of these books had the
Apocrypha who is the WestminsterParliament to come in and say,
oh get rid of those. We're now declaring the KJVAV to
be illegal in Britain. We're now declaring the 1560
Geneva to be illegal in Britain,to be unauthorized.

(44:13):
Well, you wonder why you get confusion, right?
And then when you talk about what?
And again, when you talk about this, you shall not add to or
detract from. Then you get to Westcott and
Hort in the 19th century, 2 atheists from Cambridge who came
forward with a text called the Codex and Atticus claiming that
this text was the oldest text inthe world.

(44:35):
Now, there's all kinds of indicia associated with that
text indicating that that text was a modern work.
For instance, there's the testimony of Constantine
Simonides, who published for three years in the Manchester
Herald in England. I wrote it.
I wrote it. I wrote it.
I wrote it, I wrote it. Tishburn, who founded in a trash

(44:58):
can in this monastery in the Sinai, claiming it was the
oldest text in the world, even though the monks were pulling
pages out to start fires from this ancient text, that the
monks didn't believe it was ancient, only Tishburn believed
it was. X was ancient, and in doing so
Simonides contradicted him. Well, now there's other indicia
of modernity. That is to say a modern script

(45:20):
using modern ink. All the same handwriting
throughout the entirety of the text.
Totally consistent with the testimony of Simonides that he
is the one that wrote it. Yet that text was proffered by
Wescott and Hort as the definitive text.
They blended it with the Codex Vaticanus, which we know is
hopelessly corrupted, the churchchanging any word it didn't

(45:42):
like, deleting passages. And they took those two and
married them together to create the Westcott and Hort text,
which is the foundation of virtually every modern Bible in
the United States. There's at least 2000 redactions

(46:03):
in the New Testament alone. In those texts, 2000 redactions
and most critically, and this isthe most important part about
the West Cotton port text, they deny the last passages of the
Gospel of Mark. They say that didn't appear in
the original text because Simonidis had to limit had

(46:24):
eliminated it. Well, that's the portion that
talks about the resurrection of Mashiac and they claimed that
Mark was the first Gospel. Everything else was added on,
therefore, because Mark did not include a discussion of the
resurrection. All this discussion about the
resurrection in Matthew and in Luke and in John, that was

(46:46):
additional church stuff that wasmade-up by later writers.
OK, do you see? Do you see how deadly that
combination of thinking is in a New Testament?
That is what has been taught in American churches for the last
100 years. Now.

(47:07):
I was talking with Doctor SherryTenpenny and she shared with me
that when she was at a Bible camp when she was young, the the
Bible teacher was telling her, look, every comma and every
period in that text is inerrant.It's inerrant to the point of

(47:28):
every comma and every period. And I said, really?
You realize that in the underlying Hebrew and in the
underlying Greek, there are no commas and there are no periods?
She said, what? Yeah.
And not only there are no commasand no periods, but when you go
back in the Hebrew text, there'sno capital letters capitalizing

(47:50):
any proper noun either. What?
So the long and the short of it is to have somebody hold up a
Westcott and Horse court based text that was, you know,
basically created on a corrupt Old Testament and a forged New
Testament. Which they justified with forged

(48:13):
minutes from the Council of Laudakia, which is not a formal
council of the Catholic Church, never was.
And trying to claim that the 66 book Canon was enshrined in the
Council of Laudakita in 385, which is a forgery and a lie.
And then taking a book that has 2000 redactions from the

(48:34):
Stephanus Textus Receptus that was used to build all of the
English Bibles prior to that. And have a pastors that hold up
that book and say this is the inerrant word of God in a
church. Have you got any idea how
outrageous that is? And this has been going on in

(49:01):
the American churches now for, like I say, about 100 years.
So is it a shock to you that we would find lawlessness coming
out of the church? Is it a shock to you that you
would find theological confusion?
Is it a shock to you that you would see the Christians biting
down on any hook that happens tobe put in front of the mouth of

(49:22):
that particular salmon? It was a shock, but now it's
not. Yeah, yeah, yeah, we, we now see
and you know, so when when I look at this situation, if I
mean it's like, for instance, for me, it's very clear if you
have a redacted Bible that says all the passages at the end of

(49:43):
the mark of the end of mark werefake, including that or they
were added to later on. And so you leave them out and
including the passage that talksabout the resurrection and then
to say that Mark was the very first gospel from which all the
other gospels were taken, and therefore the resurrection was
added on after the fact by fiction writers.

(50:05):
Well, what do you think the situation?
What do you think your Christianity is?
What do you think the essence ofyour faith is predicated upon
that idea? You don't believe in the
resurrection. Now, if you don't believe in the
resurrection, that you, it's just like what Paul was talking
about in the epistles. What did he say?
He said, look, if we have just the death of Mashiac on the

(50:25):
cross, we don't have much. But with the death and the
resurrection and the ascension, we have everything because he
conquered death. And so to eliminate that is to
eliminate the the center of the faith.
Now the other thing that I pointed out, and I pointed it
out many times and I'll point itout again here is the inherent

(50:48):
contradiction that appears between Matthew 1 and Luke 3.
Those contradictions are so significant that if the
contradiction in Matthew 1 remains, it is fatal to the
entire narrative of the New Testament.
Because if you cannot establish that Mashiac is in the line of

(51:09):
David, then he is not the Ben David.
The opening line in Matthew 1 says Yahushua ha Mashiach, the
son of Abraham, the son of David.
Is that a true statement or a false statement?
Can you substantiate it with thetext you're about to read?
Yes or no? Can you?
You can't. In the almost every English

(51:32):
Bible, you cannot substantiate the link between Mashiach and
David. You can't.
And even worse, you have Matthew1 telling you this is the
genealogy of Joseph, the husbandof Mary, and Luke 3 telling you
this is the genealogy of Joseph,the supposed father of the

(51:54):
Messiah. That's the same person.
There's no two different Joseph's there.
The husband and the supposed father are the same person.
Would anybody like to argue thatthey're not the same person?
That there was some Joseph that was sneaking around the barn
that was other than Joseph the husband, no same person.

(52:17):
Why are the genealogies radically different one from the
other? Why?
And when you look at Matthew 1 and you see these women listed,
Tamar the incestuous daughter-in-law, Rahab the
prostitute, Ruth the Moabite, Bathsheba the adulteress,

(52:41):
they're all referenced in Matthew 1.
But they are not counted in the 14 generations from Abraham to
David. They're not counted in the 14
generations from David to Yekon Yahoo, and they're not countered
in the 14 generations from YekonYahoo to Mashiac.
How then do you count Miriam as the wife of Joseph?
How do you do that? You can't do it under a proper

(53:06):
exegesis. You cannot.
You didn't do it with Tamar. You didn't do it with Rahab.
You didn't do with Ruth. Ruth, you didn't do with
Bathsheba. You can't do it with Miriam.
There's no connect between Joseph and his wife Miriam.
Therefore, though everything yousee in Matthew 1/14/14 and 14
doesn't appear, it's 1414 and 13and you cannot link the Messiah

(53:30):
to David. Therefore, verse 1 is a lie.
Don't you think that's a fatal flaw in the text?
I see that as a fatal flaw, inherently contradictory,
unsubstantiated on the text itself, illogical, irrational

(53:54):
and unable to compute. So with with those kinds of
things that you see in the text,those things for me are like
critically important in terms ofmaking adjustments in the New
Testament to correctly identify what exists.
Now, there's a couple of problems that the reason why
these identifications were not undertaken.

(54:18):
And one is of course, that the average Christian believer for
many, many centuries was essentially illiterate.
They didn't read the Old Testament.
They didn't study the Old Testament.
They didn't understand the Old Testament.
They were only interested in what the pastor or the reverend

(54:39):
or the vicar or the Parson was teaching them from the pulpit.
Now, there were some good preachers.
I'm not saying there weren't, but unless you understood the
nuances of the Torah, you can't really understand what's going
on in the New Testament. So let me give you an example
what I mean. If your understanding of the

(55:02):
Sabbath is that there's only oneSabbath, it's the 7th day, then
you don't understand the High Sabbath at the first day of
Matzah. You don't understand the high
Sabbath at the last day of Matzah.
You don't understand the Sabbathof Shavuot.
You don't understand the High Sabbath of Yom Teruah, You don't

(55:23):
understand the High Sabbath of Yom Kippur.
You don't understand the High Sabbath that begins tabernacles,
and you don't understand the High Sabbath that is Simgatora
or Shimini azaret. You don't understand any of
those. You don't understand that.
So what happens as a result of the fact that you do not
understand those Sabbaths is that you get a misread in

(55:44):
Matthew 28 one, and because you get a misread in Matthew 28 one,
you're thinking, Oh, well, Joseph Aramathea had to take the
body off the cross before the Sabbath began, therefore he must
have been crucified on Friday. Do you see that?
Do you see how that reasoning was obtained?

(56:05):
Joseph Aramathea had to get him off the cross before the Sabbath
began, therefore he must have been crucified on Friday.
That's how they reached that conclusion, because they didn't
understand that there was a highShabbat that began matzo earlier
in the week. They didn't know that.
Now, similarly, you have other dispositions in the Torah, for

(56:27):
instance the guardianship of a woman.
Most people do not understand how the Torah computes the
guardianship of a woman. And that guardianship, it's
very, very clear Now, a lot of women in modernity, they don't
want to talk about this at all. It's like there's nobody who's

(56:47):
my cover. I'm a independent woman.
I'm a feminist. I do my own thing.
And you know, men can all drop dead.
When you look at the Torah, the Torah says that a woman is under
the cover of her father until her husband comes and says to
the father, I'm capable of maintaining a cover over this

(57:09):
woman. And he sells himself to the
father as being able to do that,and also sometimes to the
brother who wants to take him out and pound and we're trying
to date his sister. You know, so you have this kind
of approach that's made. I'm capable of being the cover
of this woman. And then when everybody agrees,
including the woman, then they become man and wife and the wife

(57:31):
comes under the cover of her husband.
Now it's very clear in the Torah.
And again, feminist may not likethis, but in the Torah, if a
woman enters into a contract andher husband has not been a part
of that contract, he can take a look at that contract and when
he sees it, he can vitiate the contract.
Nope, we're not doing that. You know, a door to door

(57:53):
salesman comes by, sells your wife a $5000 set of Encyclopedia
Britannica. She's willfully signs on to the
contract. Husband comes home and sees it
and says, Nope, we're not doing that.
Contract vitiates it. It's done.
Same thing with a daughter. Now a widow on the other hand,
she's subject to her own contract decisions.

(58:15):
But if you read in the Torah, it's very clear that the husband
can vitiate the contract of his wife when he discovers it.
Now what happens when the husband dies?
Well, there's a couple of things.
You can be exposed as a widow ifthere's no children.
But if there is a son, when the son turns 20, the woman, the

(58:40):
widow, comes under the cover of her son.
She comes under the cover of herson and he has this
responsibility until his mother dies.
But what happens if the son predeceases the mother?
Then what? Then what?
Well, there's a couple of circumstances that can happen.

(59:00):
One, she could be essentially adopted by somebody else's son
who says I will be your cover. Or if her father is still
living, she can come under the tutelage of her father again.
She can come back under his cover now.

(59:22):
So when you look at Matthew 1, you have to recognize several
things #1 the Gospels do not discuss Joseph, the husband of
Mary, any longer after the incident that takes place at the
synagogue when Mashiac is 12 years old.
After that event, there's no discussion of Joseph.

(59:43):
He doesn't appear anywhere else in the narrative, even to the
point when you see the disciplescome to Mashiac and say Mashiac,
your mother, your brothers, and your sisters are outside waiting
for you. There's no mention of his father
or Joseph at all. No mention.
Joseph does not appear at the cross.
Joseph is not interested in the body.

(01:00:04):
There's no mention of this Joseph at all.
He's not there. This gives you a pretty clear
indication. It can be inferred and reasoned
that in fact Joseph had died. This means that Miriam would be
under the cover of her son Yahushua, who would save from
the cross to the disciple whom he loved.

(01:00:26):
This is your mother. And he looked at his mother and
said, this is your son attempting to put Miriam under
the cover of one of his disciples.
You see that now? This becomes pretty clear.
I mean, you now you've got some pretty compelling evidence that
the narrative that I'm telling you is accurate in and

(01:00:47):
consistent with the Torah. However, there is no indicia in
the historical record at all that Miriam ever came under the
cover of Jochen of the Revelatoror Jochen and the writer of the
Gospel. There's no indicator of that at
all. There is indication, however,
that she did come back under thecover of her father, Joseph

(01:01:10):
Aramathea. Now people say, well, there's no
evidence that Joseph Aramathea is the father of Miriam.
Well, actually there is, and this has to do with the word of.
So when you see Joseph Aramatheadescribed in the Greek this,
there's no of that connects Joseph to Arama Thea.

(01:01:31):
That is inferred. That's added by Bible
interpreters who thought the word Arama Thea was a
geographical place. But it's not a geographical
place. It is a discussion of his
status. Now remember that Joseph Arama
Thea was known in the Roman textas Nobelius de Curiae.

(01:01:54):
He was a particularly well knownindividual member of the Roman
Senate. He was also a member of the
Sanhedrin, and there's a reference to him in the Greek as
being a righteous or honorable man.
There's a phrase that they use in the Greek that also refers to
this, but the name ah Rama Thea is in itself telling you that he

(01:02:15):
is first the alpha in the high place of God.
That is to say, ah Rama Thea, that is to say, first in the
divine line of kings. Who is who are the divine line
of kings? Well, it's given to you very
expressly and explicitly in Matthew 1.

(01:02:37):
Matthew 1 when you get to David is going to list in that for the
next 14 elements in row all of the kings of Yahood.
You know from David to Solomon to Rehoboam and down the list
through Menasha, through Yoshiyahu all the way to Yekon
Yahoo who would be taken into exile in Babylon thereafter.

(01:03:01):
All the names that follow Yekon Yahoo in Matthew One are exile
arc kings. They would have been the kings
of Yahoo, but Yah took it away from them and said you will
never sit on the throne of Yahooagain.
That doesn't mean you won't be kings, but you won't be kings
over Yahood because that is taken away.

(01:03:22):
This is why there is 6° of separation between Yosef, the
father of Miriam, and the birth of Mashiach, because the
Mashiach is disconnected from the direct YDNA of David, as if
he'd had a if if there had been a man there instead of Miriam,

(01:03:42):
he would have had the direct white DNA of David.
But he does not. He has the Y DNA that is found
in his mother, other than his divine conception.
So he is in the Direct Line of David through his mother, who's
in the Direct Line of David through her father Yosef, which
is the correct term for the guardian discussed in that

(01:04:04):
passage in the Greek. So you can see that Shaltiel and
Zarah, Babel and all that, the next 14 names that are going to
come under that litany were exile arc kings in the divine
line of David. This is what the phrase ah,
Ramathea means first in the divine line of kings.

(01:04:29):
So Joseph Aramathea is his name alone is telling you who he is.
So it is reasonable to infer that the Joseph who is
identified as the husband of Miriam in Matthew 1 is actually
the father of Miriam in Matthew One, the one who would be
returning to the position of guardian.

(01:04:51):
And is there any other evidence that would support that he is
relationally linked to Miriam and to the Messiah?
Well, he's the one that gets thebody off the cross.
He's the one that goes to pilot and says I'm here for the body.
Who are you? Oh, I'm a rich guy.
I'm going to be doing the Frankenstein experiment.

(01:05:12):
No, you come under Roman law, you're not going to get the body
unless you are the patriarch of the family.
And so who told us that Joseph Arimathea was an uncle to
Mushiyak? Who told us that?
Who made-up that story? It was a rabbi who made-up that
story. It was a rabbi that told us he

(01:05:35):
was the uncle. And so all the British
historians go, oh, yeah, well, he's believed to be an uncle.
By who? By a rabbi that told us that he
was the uncle. When it's pretty clear in the
name Arimathea and in a correct exegesis of Matthew one, that
Joseph, the father of Miriam, was in fact Joseph Arimathea.

(01:05:56):
And she came back under his cover.
And historically, this is borne out by the record we see in the
South of France, by the record we see in Cornwall, by the
record we see in Anglesey, and the discussion of Avalon, by the
record that's set forth in the Doomsday Book, the Domesday Book
of William the Conqueror of 1066.

(01:06:16):
Now, are these important points to understand in the Gospel?
Absolutely. They're absolutely deadly
important because we cannot understand the true Mecca
nations of the New Testament faith unless we understand how
it was birthed. And this is where you get into,
you know, people accuse me of being a British Israelite, but

(01:06:39):
I'm not a British Israelite. But I do believe in this
narrative that a Rama Thea and you know, and you know, after
walking the hills of Cornwall with Tony Wright and Jesse was
there for that. We were there in March for
Basoc. We walked the hills of Cornwall.
We went down to Mara Zion, we went down to Penzance.
We saw some of the places and some of the things and the

(01:07:00):
legends that are being told of Cornwall.
And you know, what's interestingabout the legends in Cornwall is
that there's no other place on Earth that has this claim.
No place else on Earth claims that Mashiac was there from his
12th birthday until his 30th birthday.
No one else on Earth makes that claim.

(01:07:21):
No one. Nobody in India, nobody in
Japan, nobody anywhere else makes that claim.
It's possible that maybe the Mormons made it, that Joseph
Smith made it. I don't know.
I don't know that literature very well.
But there's no other claim. And the legends are replete.
And not only are the legends replete, but songs like I saw
three ships Come Sailing In. This is a discussion of a Rama

(01:07:43):
Thea coming in with Mashiac. And there are other ancient
songs, ancient sayings that comeout of the tin mines in
Cornwall. And one of the mines, it's
called the, I want to say the Dingle mine.
That's not what it's not. It's not something that's
called, anyway, the mine has been around since about 1500 BC

(01:08:10):
and they have all these legends and sayings and so on and so
forth concerning these mines. And so when you look at the bulk
of the mythology and the claim, which is singular only the
Cornwall, you get an idea that this may have an odyssey of
truth, particularly when we saw Mars, Zion of the island there.
And then what you see in terms of how that faith bloomed in the

(01:08:33):
British Isles was quite astounding because what happened
with the when the faith was presented in the British Isles,
it had to be presented to the intellectual class governing the
aisles at that time. Well, who was this intellectual
class that was governing the aisles?
Who were the judges? The show 15 And what were they

(01:08:54):
using to judge these judges? Well, these judges were meeting
in places that were unhewn stone, unhewn stone gathered
under oak trees. Read the end of Joshua and see
what it says. What he did.
He took an unhewn stone and he put it under an oak tree.

(01:09:14):
And he said, this is in memorialof the fact that you have
consented to do the covenant of Yahwah.
That's in the end of the book ofJoshua.
And then you see the prophecy inIsaiah 61.
He says I'm going to call you oaks of righteousness, right
planted oaks of righteousness. Well planted oak in the ancient

(01:09:37):
language was Druice, which was which was construed as Druid.
This brand system of judging chauffeur team.
They were judging on a Torah that had been brought to them by
Jeremiah and 581 BC such that the king and queen established

(01:09:57):
their crown on a land called Tara.
And from this Torah sprang the common law and these Brethon
were teaching high end geometry,high end botany, high end
astronomy. Are you talking to high end
astronomy? How high end?
Well, you know, Stonehenge predicts the elliptical mean of

(01:10:20):
all 10 planets to within 3 decimal points.
That's how high end when you look at that, when you look at
the hieroglyphs at now it predicts the montonic if the
18.4 year resolution of the mooncycle to the sun cycle.
It shows 10 planets in orbit around the sun.
It shows the seven day week. These things are are in ancient

(01:10:42):
hieroglyphs on the stones in Ireland.
When you get when you step into a stone circle that the Druids
built out of unhewn stone. If you know of those stone
circles, you can tell what day of the month it is, what month
of the year it is, and what hourof the day it is, just by
looking at the shadows. These brethen the intelligentsia

(01:11:02):
of all Europe. When they heard the narrative
and the testimony of Mashiac in the hands of Arimathea and met
the mother, Miriam accepted the narrative as being true.
They accepted the narrative, andbecause they accepted the
narrative, the word of Eloeen was merged with the testimony of

(01:11:24):
Mashiac to create the machinations of the true faith
on the ancient path in its correct way, in the hands of
those who were directly related to Mashiac.
Now why am I making this point? Because the 29th chapter of the

(01:11:48):
book of Acts makes reference to these very facts.
So we had a guide. When we initially published the
sephir, he read Acts 29 and thenhe made a video of him putting
the Sephir in a wood stove and burning it over the references
in Acts 29. So I started going to Britain to

(01:12:12):
see if I could prove the claims found in Acts 29, and I got so
much proof it was ridiculous. The proof was over the top,
beginning with the moratorium fragment.
And of course, I was talking with Brad Hawkins the other day
and Brad told me that first Clement also discusses Paul's
trip to the far western ends of Europe.

(01:12:36):
We found book on book on book onbook on book detailing Paul's
journeys and the journey into the two journeys into the
British Isles, which were very well documented.
Him preaching at Mount Lewd, himinstalling a Bishop, Aristabolis
the 5th as the first Bishop of London.
You know, all of these things that took place.

(01:12:56):
And then his trip back into Switzerland where he went to the
mountain where Pontius Pilate committed suicide.
Oh, you can't put that in the text.
We didn't put anything in the text.
This was a text that so Nino claimed that he had found at,
you know, in the in the mosque at the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul.
OK, Is there a mountain where Pontius Pilate committed suicide

(01:13:17):
and spitzed up? We can ask Ephraim, but I can
tell you it's a fact. Everybody knows the mountain.
Everybody who lives there knows that's the mountain where pilot
committed suicide in spitzed in Switzerland.
So all the facts alleged in Acts29 have been proven true.
So again, here you are, Jasher, the ancient texts that the

(01:13:41):
master rights couldn't touch with, whose veracity is being
proven over and over and over and over and over again.
And Acts 29, whose veracity has been proven over and over and
over and over again. And the Book of Jubilees, which
was 10 copies found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, adopted as

(01:14:04):
canonical in the Eritrean and Ethiopian churches, and
apparently was canonical according to those who crafted
the Dead Sea Scrolls. So This is why we reached the
conclusions we did as to what was going to come under the
cover of the Sepher. And we had an obligation to that

(01:14:24):
veracity more than we had an obligation to respect a
corrupted Parliament from the mid 1600s that would eventually
be disbanded by Oliver Cromwell for their corruption.
OK All right. So now you know the opening
story, the opening story of whatwe're doing in the Sepher and

(01:14:47):
why there's 87 books there. OK All right.
OK. Now before I get into our
discussion of the Book of Jubilees, which is where we're
going to go today, and we're going to deal with some issues
on Google Earth. Let's hear from Sis Robbie and
maybe we can pick up a couple ofother people who had some other
things too. Sis Robbie, go ahead.
Shabbat Shalom. How are you doing, Doctor

(01:15:10):
Pigeon? I'm doing all right.
And the family Shabbat Shalom. Yeah, I didn't hear the all of
it. I missed the part about it's
very interesting about Miriam, her husband Joseph.
Is there like 2 different Joseph's or is it just one
Joseph? There's that Miriam was under
the covering for like, does she get married to a Joseph who took

(01:15:34):
her as his wife? We didn't have relations with
her until after she had our Messiah and then they went to
Egypt to hide her from King Herod.
And then is there another Josephthat was her father is how she
gets her lineage for King David.How does that work?
Yeah, that's correct. There's two different Josephs,

(01:15:56):
two different Josephs, Joseph her father and then a different
Joseph her husband. Now, when you're asking that
question, oh, hold on here. I got to try to get this all
squared away here. Just a moment.
The Greek word that's found there is this word aner aner.

(01:16:17):
OK, Now this this aner just means man.
OK. And so you can understood this.
If, if, if you were just going to do a direct, a direct
translation, it would say and Jacob begat Yosef, the man of
Mary, the man of Mary. Well, what man?

(01:16:37):
When you're talking about the idea of man, you're talking
about the idea of, of the idea of the cover, the man who was
her cover. And This is why, This is why to
fully understand this, it's veryeasy to say, oh, you know, when
you're when you're a, when you think really in kind of the

(01:16:57):
straightforward English language, we translate that word
is this. Well, sometimes it doesn't
translate as that. Sometimes it's got a broader
meaning. And so, and in this particular
case, it had to have a broader meaning if you're going to
correct the inherent contradiction in the text.
And so This is why we believe this is referring to the man who
was her cover. OK.

(01:17:20):
Yeah. And it's 22 separate guys.
Joseph, the father is a different guy from Joseph the
husband or the supposed father of Mashiac.
Two different guys. OK, Randall McFarland.
Go ahead, brother Randall. Yeah, I'm sorry I had to unmute.
You know, that whole thing's a interesting, interesting story.

(01:17:40):
I heard the translation on that for what he said it was, man.
The translation of what I heard was The Guardian, which would
put that under her father because Joseph, the supposed
father, and Mary were not married yet.
Anyways, it's very interesting. I've gotten to several

(01:18:00):
discussions with people regard that, trying to tell me that the
Luke account or that lineage wasMiriam's.
And I'm like, the name's not even in there and I don't know.
I don't. Know how they get that it?
Mentions Joseph and his father Eli.
And anyway, I had a question about the, the thumb drive.

(01:18:25):
If you've taken some of the if you've taken classes with you,
are those recordings? Can you get those recordings?
You can the ones that you've paid.
For those are not on the thumb drive.
But yes, if you have all the classes you can go to suffer
Academy and the and those are available to you.

(01:18:45):
So you can download them after you if you of course purchase
the course. If you purchase the course, yes,
you can get you can get all of the videos and all of the
PowerPoints. Is there enough room on the
thumb drive as it is to add those to to it?
You know, I think there may be there may be, you know, I don't
really know. I don't know exactly what you're

(01:19:06):
going to have to check the thumbdrive when you when you get it.
I think, you know, to be specific on a Randall, I think
the thumb drive is like 534 gig.It's something like that.
And how much would we have loaded up on there?
I don't know. There, there may be, you know,
there may be, you know, I don't know, 3540 gig.
I don't know how much is left, Idon't know but.

(01:19:27):
I think these are all those are just.
These are all just one second, Randy.
Go ahead, Sandy. I think there's probably room
the I need to check on the fact I'm not sure that they're
downloadable. It's that you have perpetual
access. That's how it works on Suffer
Academy. You have perpetual access, but
not downloadable. Yeah, yeah.

(01:19:48):
And. It would be unfair to be able to
download them for people that pay and then then all the, you
know, it just wouldn't be fair to charge anybody if things got
out to all over. Yeah, that's a very good point,
Sandy. Thank you.
And it's just a place where deeper study takes place.
You can ask questions if you're in the live classes and it's

(01:20:11):
more there than anywhere else. That's for the purpose of the
classes. Yeah, we've been, we have been
really very, very detailed in those classes.
You know the discussion for instance, when we did the 10
Devarim, that was 67 classes on the 10 commandments, right.
And when we the you know, the Hebrew studies that are there

(01:20:33):
and including a rightly dividingthe word, which is quite
instructive in terms of how to read the Hebrew, how to how to
how to figure out the Hebrew is really what it's about.
So there's been a lot of detailed classes and Sandy's
right. So if you have paid for the
class, you can access it online with with no problem, but
otherwise not downloadable. Thank you, Sandy.

(01:20:55):
I appreciate that. Yeah, I noticed you could.
You could go back and, you know,I wouldn't back to catch up with
Revelation because you started anew class and I had no idea.
I had no idea I paid for it until later.
And then I've already missed a ton of the classes.
And so I've been trying to go back and rewatch those.

(01:21:17):
But yeah, I was just wondering. Yeah, I was just, I was just
wondering if if they are not available on the, I pretty much
figured they were not available on thumb drive because you know,
not everybody paid for that. Right, right.
But I was. Just wondering if they were
something that you can go back and if you had paid for it if
you could could go back and download it at some point if

(01:21:39):
it's not available now to download.
Yeah, and complete the courses. Catherine asks.
How much the courses are there. Typically they run about 45
bucks a month. Right.
I noticed some of the ones that are in that that you've done are
now there's A1 price. I think you were from 2:50 to

(01:22:00):
$400.00 just to buy the course after the fact.
Yeah, depending on how much content is there.
And then when you buy the courseyou have access to all the
videos. And it's 40, it's 48 per month.
If it's a live class, 48 per month, yes.
Yeah. And so when and the live class,
I'm going to give you an example.

(01:22:20):
But we we just finished Week 3. We did three weeks on Revelation
12, just on that one chapter. We did three weeks on that
chapter. And I think we're going to be
doing this a summarization. There'll be a fourth week on
that chapter. Next week.
We're going to summarize everything we've learned in

(01:22:41):
Revelation 12. And so it's really quite
comprehensive. And for for many of us, I think
Sherry Islamo would agree on this.
We've had some pretty interesting revelation in that
class, have we not? Yes, absolutely we have.
That's why I like going over these classes with you, Doctor
P, because you get into the original Hebrew and Greek and

(01:23:04):
you break it down as it says, not just as it's been
translated. Yeah.
And so we, when we begin to lookat some of those things, man,
I'm telling you, it's some of itis shocking.
And we've had things come up that's just like, you got to be
kidding me. That can't really say that.
Well, yeah, it does. And it has application in
modernity just like in your face.

(01:23:25):
Whoops. Is that?
Did that really say that? Yeah, it really said that.
And you can see that so much of the, you know, and there's been
a very interesting discussion recently, and I know we're a
little bit kind of astray from where I wanted to go yet, but
I'm going to talk about this. There was a very interesting
discussion that took place amongsome of the commentators,
political commentators. I watch who they have, no matter

(01:23:47):
what they do, ultimately they have to deal with issues
ecclesiastical. They have to deal with those.
And so one of the questions was why the inordinate hatred of
Russia in the United States? And most people believe that
Russia is a group of, you know, orcs that are, you know, the,

(01:24:09):
they're the fruition of the Antichrist and that they're the
army of the Antichrist. Well, where do they get these
ideas? Well, most of that was hatched
by Hal Lindsay in his book The Late Great Planet Earth, when he
equated the Antichrist to whoever is going to be leading
the Soviet Union and the Gog andMagog army was coming out of
Russia because of two bulk of two bulks and Moscow being the

(01:24:32):
same as Tubal and Meshech, the tribes.
Well, it was pretty ignorant on his part and pretty myopic, but
it did turn a lot of Americans towards a visceral hatred of
Russia, thinking that they are the forces of the Antichrist.
Now, Russia now is a Christian nation.
They are an Orthodox Christian nation, and they have more

(01:24:55):
churchgoers in Russia than we have in the United States.
So it's pretty difficult to callthem Antichrist when they're
when they're Christians, they'reOrthodox Christians.
Now, what do Americans know about Eastern Orthodoxy?
Zippo, what do Americans know about Eastern Orthodox?
They don't know anything. I mean, you know, in, for
instance, in the Eastern Orthodox Church, they have no

(01:25:17):
chairs. When you go into that church,
you stand for the whole service.There's no chairs.
They have 8 sacraments instead of seven.
There's no heat in the building.Think about that in Russia, when
you're going into a church and there's no heater and no chairs
and you're going to be there fortwo hours or three hours
depending on how long the service goes.

(01:25:38):
Somebody who sits there before the priest comes out and sings
the Psalms for maybe two hours, and while he's singing the
Psalms out loud, there is somebody else who has an incense
who's giving recognition and praying for those who have built
the faith in that particular church.
They're not talking about Saint Thomas and Saint Christopher and
St. Columbus, They're talking about

(01:26:00):
so and so who lived their whole life dead broke trying to build
this church. So and so, you know the local
people they're talking about, and they bring memory,
remembrance of those people before they begin to service.
And then of course, you see the icons, which of course are
anathema and most in the Westernworld.
But their reasoning for the icons is because most of the
people in the Eastern world couldn't read.

(01:26:23):
So they would give the Gospel story in a picture because a
picture says 1000 words. And so they'd have all these
icons up. Well, when you look at that wall
of icons, when those icons open up, there's a Holy of Holies
behind there where they have this act where they prepare the
sacrament of communion that happens in the Holy of Holies.

(01:26:43):
So when you're talking about theand I'm not up, I'm not saying
I'm converting to Orthodoxy or that I'm going to ever be in an
Orthodox Church, but it would help people in America to
understand that that is the foundation of Eastern Orthodoxy.
And the difference between Eastern Orthodoxy and Western or
there's two things that are three things really that are
different. One is, is that the Eastern

(01:27:06):
Orthodox Church has not modifiedanything since the seven
constant councils of the 4th century.
The Catholic Church is all over the road.
They're like a car on slippery ice.
You know, they're sliding everywhere in a four wheel
slide. And now you see, you know, we
had this this trans shooter who shot up a Catholic school during

(01:27:27):
Mass. And the Pope's response to that
is to celebrate LGBTQ people in Rome.
You know, it's a very interesting transition, what's
happening in Rome compared to what's happening in Eastern
Orthodoxy. And so, you know, whereas the
Roman Church split away from theEastern Church, the Roman Church

(01:27:50):
now shattered into 49,000 denominations.
Eastern Orthodoxy remains Eastern Orthodoxy.
The the Western Church is pyramidic in its structure very
and allows for a singular Pope to control everything in a
hierarchy. In the, in the Eastern Orthodox

(01:28:10):
Church, it's a bunch of bishops doing what each Bishop is going
to do, very little head, very little authority in the head of,
in the hands of the patriarch who is Corrill in the Russian
Orthodox faith, but it's bishops, bishops, bishops much
more democratic focus. Finally, the third difference is
that in Western, the Western Church, they're completely

(01:28:31):
intolerant of any other faith. When the Western Church shows
up, you either convert or we bring you at the stake, or we
cut your throat or we hang you or we subject you to inquisition
or we do whatever. And so there's been some 400
million people killed by the Western Church in creating Roman
Catholicism worldwide. You don't see that history in
the Eastern Church at all. So these are these are the three

(01:28:54):
fundamental differences. Now these commentators who were
looking at this deal and they were saying, look, why is there
this inordinate and irrational hatred for Russians given the
circumstances? And they pinned it back to how
Lindsey and the Left Behind series and that eschatology and
also the teaching of the Scofield Bible and John Darby

(01:29:17):
and the work of these people in creating the doctrines of the
rapture and also in exalting Israel.
Because the text in Genesis 12 three says those who bless
Abraham will be blessed, those who curse Abraham will be
cursed. But Scofield extrapolated that
to say, oh, that means those whobless Israel will be blessed and

(01:29:39):
those who curse Israel will be cursed.
This was done in the Scofield Bible, in the Scofield Bible has
been rightfully denounced by virtually all Bible translators
who understand what's going on. And so here we go.
So these are some of the problems we have in the United
States. And the point I'm making is
what? That you can't reach political

(01:30:00):
commentary in the world. You can't discuss political
commentary in the world until you understand matters
theological and matters ecclesiastical.
You really can't discuss it if you don't understand the history
of Russia as an Orthodox nation and as the heirs to the
Byzantine Empire, which is whereChristianity began.

(01:30:21):
That's the foundation of the, the, and I'm calling it the
Christian faith, which was the blending done by Constantine,
not the Nazarene faith or the faith of Mashiac.
And so these are like, these arelike fundamental differences.
They're huge differences to understand and we as a people,
you can't just sit back and be adummy.

(01:30:43):
You can't. You can't sit back and having
read a 90 page book in the 70s and basing your eschatology on
that, you can't do it and we don't.
When you get into a much greaterunderstanding and you leave all
that behind, you find out that there are many things that are
like forget like I'll give you an example.
One of the things that popped mybubble on that stuff was when I

(01:31:06):
found out that there is no quoteUN quote Antichrist.
That whole idea, you know, and Iknow all kinds of religious
scholars that still want to talkabout the Antichrist.
There is no the Antichrist. The two times that the that the
word Antichrist appears is in first John and 3rd John, and it
says the spirit of Antichrist isthe spirit that denies Mashiach

(01:31:29):
came in the flesh. There's no person called the
Antichrist that was made-up by by what's his face.
Oh, the Antichrist is coming. No, no, there's no Antichrist.
There are there's many Antichrist.
There's many people that are Antichrist.
For instance, Gnostics are Antichrist because they believe
that the Mashiac only appeared spiritually.

(01:31:51):
Muslims are Antichrist because they do not believe that he is
the Messiah. Well, I shouldn't say that they
do believe he came in the flesh.They just don't believe he's the
son. So you can't really say that
Islam is Antichrist, but you cancertainly say Judaism is
Antichrist. There's no question.
But a singular individual comingis Antichrist.

(01:32:11):
No, there's a single individual that will come, possibly as the
lawless one, who is the man of sin and the son of perdition.
There's a false prophet that will rise.
There's a beast that comes out of the sea.
There's a beast that comes out of the earth.
There's a vile horn that rises up in Daniel, but none of those
are the quote UN quote Antichrist.
OK, So when when people start talking about all the Antichrist

(01:32:34):
is going to be here, well, really, that's not a scriptural
concept. What are you talking about
exactly? So people used to say to me, you
know, do you think Obama's the Antichrist?
I would say no, but I do think he's the White Horse in
Revelation 6. I do believe Obama was the White
Horse in Revelation 6. He was definitely a marker that
said the seals in Revelation Sixwere being opened.

(01:32:57):
He was given a crown to go forthand conquer, right?
And a rainbow. The word there is bow.
He was given a bow. He's given a rainbow to go forth
and conquer and conquering, right?
Did he have a rainbow in his hands?
Did he go forth and conquer? Yeah, He conquered the world
with a rainbow. While you're on this subject may
I ask can I say the Antichrist or anti Messiah would be anti

(01:33:24):
word of the of the most high manifest in the flesh?
The anti word against the word manifest in the flesh.
That's the way I see him. The Spirit, but do not assign it
to a singular person. This is what I'm trying to say.
Do not assign it to a singular person.
If you want to talk about a singular person, talk about the

(01:33:46):
false prophet. If you want to talk about a
singular person, talk about the beast rising out of the earth.
If you want to talk about a singular person, talk about the
vile horn that's predicted in Daniel 11.
If you want to talk about a singular person, talk about the
lawless one that's described in 2nd Thessalonians 2.
Fine, now we can talk about thateschatology.
But a singular Antichrist? No, that is absolutely a how

(01:34:07):
Lindsay construct that does not exist.
So then. Scam by it's a scam by the devil
is what it is. Excuse me?
I got excited. I'll shut up.
Well, yeah, I mean, you can, youcan put it's a satanic
deception, if you will. But remember that in 2nd
Thessalonians 2, we have a couple of markers. 1 is that you
will be given over to a great delusion.

(01:34:29):
Yeah, we'll give you over to a delusion and you're going to be
given over to a delusion. What?
What's it say? Because you did not love the
truth, because you did not love the truth, you're going to be
given over to a great delusion. And you know, I see that
delusion kind of pretty clearly right now.
But you know, I'm not going to reference at this point.
I'm just saying to you that, youknow, you know that when you're

(01:34:51):
talking about, when you're talking about these ideas, these
eschatological ideas, they need to be, you know, you have to
tear down that old Gray wall, you know, tear down that old
Gray wall. And instead learn the new
information that you can find bydiscovering the more in depth
writing to the scripture. That's what I'm saying to you,

(01:35:14):
Doctor Fey. Yeah, go ahead, Ralph.
You, you were talking earlier about, you know, why there's
such disdain towards Russia. And I was just wondering, when
did how Lindsay write his book? Was it in the 70s?
I think it's 75 maybe? So you hear of these stories,
not that I wasn't born yet. And then maybe it's probably

(01:35:36):
going on when I was born, but you may have a better idea of
this. And I've seen this in, I don't
know, you know, Satan reveals his stuff through media, movies,
TV, blah, blah. But you had this period of time
where everybody was on heightened alert and being

(01:35:56):
accused of being, you know, Russian communist.
And this was back in I think thethat was the 50s and 60s.
Yeah, the, the, the so-called Red Scare was in the 50s under
Eugene McCarthy. Yeah.
So is this basically, you know, propaganda to try to influence
America to have this hatred towards Russia?

(01:36:18):
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. This.
This is a very important thing and it's something that I've
tried to explain over and over again, but you can get a clear
indication of what I'm talking about if you I think it's on.
It's either on rumble or on bit shoot.
But there is a series called Europa Europa and you need to
watch this. I think it's about 3 hours worth

(01:36:39):
of videos. But this series on Europa talks
about what happened to Russia, and it is particularly dealing
with the Soviet period. And you need to see this and you
need to understand this to fullyunderstand what took place in
Russia. But I'm I'm just going to give
you the shortened thumbnail of it, OK?
Yeah, I went a little tough, Europa, and it was a, it was a

(01:37:02):
science fiction movie about traveling to the moon.
Europa. That's a.
Different. That's a different.
I think that was Isaac Asimov that wrote that.
But this is this is a, this is ahistorical set of videos
concerning what happened in the Soviet Union.
So let me give you the thumbnail.

(01:37:22):
Let me just go through this veryquickly, OK?
Remember that Russia considered itself the heir to Byzantine.
The Last King of the Byzantine Empire had a daughter named Zoe
Paleolog. She ended up marrying Yvonne the
third, the father of Ivan the Terrible.
And so the Russians construe, that is the passing of the

(01:37:44):
crown, the Orthodox crown, from Constantinople to Moscow.
Now remember that Constantine formed Constantinople and it was
in Constantinople that the Christian faith was legalized
under the Roman Empire. That faith had 7 councils.
It was built upon 7 councils called the Constantinian
Councils. That all took place in the 4th

(01:38:05):
century. That faith has been the same
since then. The Roman Church on the other
hand, split off and has had 21 additional councils that are
exclusive to Rome that Constantinople did not accept.
The Roman Empire split away. The Western Roman Empire
collapsed around 4:50 AD and theWestern Church split from the

(01:38:27):
Eastern Church in 1016 in what'scalled the Great Schism.
This is never healed. It's this is never healed.
The Western Church has always held the Eastern Church with
disdain and has wanted to completely destroy the Eastern
Church either through an inside overthrow or by overt attacking
of the, the, the capital of the,of the, of the Eastern Orthodox

(01:38:50):
Empire, which is Moscow, the successor to Constantinople, the
successor to Rome. OK, so this, all of this nation,
the largest nation on earth was a Christian nation
fundamentally. There were of course elements of
Islam throughout the area, but it was fundamentally a Christian
nation and this Christian nationwas going to was governed by the

(01:39:13):
czars. So if you ever go into Moscow
and you see, you know, you walk into the Kremlin, there's five
major churches inside the Kremlin.
One of those churches is called the Church of the Assumption.
And this is it the oldest Orthodox main cathedral in, in
Russian history. And it has, you know, almost all

(01:39:35):
of the patriarchs of the Orthodox Church are buried
there. It has thousands of icons
against the back wall. You know, I've been inside this
place. It's really quite incredible.
Then you go over to the, the Church of Saint Michael.
This is where all the czars are buried.
So it's very and, and then the Church of the, there's another
Church of the Assumption there, which is where the Annunciation
where all the czars children were baptized.

(01:39:56):
All of this is inside the Kremlin when the capital was
moved to Saint Petersburg. Go up to Saint Petersburg and
see when Alexander the Third wasassassinated, they built a
church at the spot where he was assassinated.
It's called the Church on Spilled Blood, and it rivals,
you know, the Sabor in Red Square.
There's a huge church in in Saint Petersburg called St.

(01:40:18):
Isaac's, maybe the most significant church in all of
Russia. There's another church right on
the Nepsky prospect called the Kazan Cathedral.
Huge, massive edifice. And there's the Church of Peter
and Paul on the fortress of Peter and Paul, very clearly,
very conspicuously Orthodox Christian capitals, period.
When you, when you walk into RedSquare, even during the time of

(01:40:39):
the Soviets, you had St. Basil some more, St.
Basil's Cathedral, the most beautiful church in the world.
And when the Soviet Union fell, the church, the most important
church in Moscow, was a church called Christ our Savior.
It was on the Moscow River. Stalin tore it down to put up a
swimming pool. And as soon as the Soviet Union
fell, Yuri Lushkov rebuilt Christ our Savior right on that

(01:41:00):
very same spot. So you're seeing, you begin to
see this Orthodox history. Now, what happened was that
there was the rise of radical Talmudism that had begun in
Central Europe, mainly in Germany, but but it was also
happening in Russia. And what do you see when you see

(01:41:21):
radical Talmudism begin to rise in a culture?
Well, what you see is you see a divorce begin to happen.
You see promiscuity, you see adultery.
And then you begin to see homosexuality, You begin to see
pedophilia, you begin to see transgenderism, you begin to see
Poly, polyamory, these kinds of things.
All of these things begin to spring up because the Talmud

(01:41:43):
provides for six sexes and eightgenders.
And so when this is preached privately in this in the
culture, the culture begins to become defiled in those ways.
And this happened in Tsarist Russia during the reign of
Nicholas the Second. And all of that began, by the
way, because the Jesuits in the 1890s were informed by the

(01:42:03):
Catholic Church that they were going to go to Russia to
undermine Orthodoxy, to overthrow the Orthodox Church.
Now remember that before that, Napoleon had tried to defeat
Russia, invading Russia with some, I think he, I think he
came into Russia with 2.2 million troops, went home with
22,000 men total. He'd wiped out virtually all of

(01:42:25):
the armies of all of the allies.They were all, they all died in
Moscow because they forgot the one part of the Russian army
that everybody forgets called Winter.
And when they got to Moscow, theRussians had abandoned Moscow.
They let Napoleon come in. Then they burned the city to the
ground when winter hit and said OK here you are, let's see how
you do in 40 below in 100% humidity with a wind.

(01:42:48):
And guess what they didn't do well at all and so they tried to
flee the winter. When they tried to flee the
winter, the Russians just pickedthem off 1 by 1 until that was
the end of Napoleon. Now of course Hitler tried the
same stupid stunt. He got the same result.
So what was decided was that it was decided in America that
Russia, which was the last peasant controlling nation about

(01:43:11):
in Europe, maybe the last ones that had serfs that were not
freed, they decided they were going to turn that into a worker
society. And who decided that?
Well, you have to remember that the ideology that was being
preached was created and writtenby a guy named Victor Mordecai
who took the name Karl Marx. He rewrote all of history to try
to create a communist ideology, and he did create a communist

(01:43:35):
ideology in a work called Das Capital and in an essay that he
wrote called The Communist Manifesto.
This was at all times political Talmudism.
This was at all times political Talmudism.
And this was based on the idea that there are certain people
who have two souls and everybodyelse is a goyim that only has

(01:43:56):
one soul, and the only reason the goy are alive on earth is to
serve the people with two souls.This was the doctrine that was
being taught. And so this doctrine was then
funded by radical Talmudist bankers in the United States,
namely Jacob Schiff and others, who put 28 million in gold in
the hands of another radical Talmudist in Russia named

(01:44:18):
Vladimir Ulyadov and his good friend Joseph Jugashvili,
another radical atheist Talmudist from Georgia, and
another radical atheist Talmudist named Lev Bronstein,
who would become Trotsky. Jewish feeling would become
Stalin. Olganaf would become Lenin.
And these three then created a political class that by the way,

(01:44:40):
the governing class of the Soviet Union was 84% Jewish.
All the leadership of the KGB, all the leadership of the Gru,
all the radicals, the one, the ones who murdered the czars,
they were all radical atheist Talmudists who were putting
political feet on radical atheistic Talmudism that had a

(01:45:03):
super elite governing a group ofcattle.
And they did this because the bankers in the West thought they
could create a worker state thatwould be nothing but slaves that
they could exploit to drive the cost of Labor down in the United
States. So the communist state was
created by American bankers, period.

(01:45:24):
And that communist state was notChristian Orthodox.
It was atheist Talmudism, that'swhat it was.
And they and and Leon Trotsky was spreading the idea of an
international overthrow, the heat.
He created the international consomal.
And we're going to overthrow every single nation on earth

(01:45:44):
with this worker state because we have the right to rule the
world as a super small elite. And you cattle are going to do
what we tell you to do, and we're going to murder you on a
wholesale basis if you don't. Which is exactly what Stalin
did, killing 66 million OrthodoxChristians in Russia over a 30
year period of time in the most brutal ways you could possibly

(01:46:06):
imagine. They exceeded the excesses of
Adolf Hitler over the top, much,much, much worse than anything
Hitler ever did. Nobody ever talks about it.
Nobody ever is ever going to talk about it.
But the big scare, the whole thing that caused the Nazis to
rise is was Trotsky coming into Germany with the International

(01:46:26):
Council Mall trying to overthrowthe government of Germany when
it was weak following its loss in World War 1.
And the Germans freaked out. That's what drove them into
Nazism. That's what formed the Nazi
party in the United States. Yes, there were Nazis in the
United States. You go back and look, in fact,
just look it up right now if youwant see pictures of Nazis in

(01:46:46):
Madison Square Gardens with the swastikas zig heiling in the in
the 1930s. Yeah, it was going on in
America. And So what you saw was after,
after World War 2 was over and the bulwark that had been
created by Europe to prevent communism from invading Europe
was the Nazi party. And they had been defeated. the

(01:47:09):
United States imported all of the s s.
The Secret Service brought them into the United States under
Operation Paper clip, brought inall of their scientists and
other key top German personnel, including Otto Scorzini,
including Joseph Mangala, including of, you know, a number
of the Nazi leaders. And they created the CIA, which

(01:47:29):
was called the OSS, using Gestapo personnel, and they did
so in order to stop the rise of radical atheist dominism that
went under the banner communism.Now, Stalin recognized that this
was ultimately going to cause the world to turn against the
Soviet Union. And so he had Trotsky
assassinated in Mexico City, so he'd shut his mouth and they

(01:47:52):
could shut down the international consomal.
Too late. The infection that was created
by the international consomal completely infected the Democrat
Party in 1959. They adopted wholesale the 1932
Socialist Workers Platform as a Democratic Party platform and
became a Communist Party. And they were seeking to create

(01:48:13):
communism in the United States, and they did so by creating a
cultural revolution that began in 1959 under radical Zionist
James Angleton. And who was a traitor to the
nation who allowed Israel to become a nuclear power behind
the back of Eisenhower and JFKJFK, wanted nuclear
accountability for Israel, opposed them having nuclear

(01:48:36):
weapons, wanted the IAEA to inspect them.
And the next thing you know, JFKis dead.
And the guy who was who said thenight before, we won't have to
put up with this. So, so be much longer became the
president who then turned a blind eye to the open attack on
the USS Liberty in 1967, when Israeli planes killed 67 US

(01:48:56):
sailors and tried to sink the ship in order to blame it on
Egypt. So we joined the war with a
false flag. LBJ turned a blind eye to that
because he too was a traitor to the United States.
And so you saw this radical Talmudism called communism begin
to infect the whole culture. What was being taught in the
hippie culture? What was being taught in hippie

(01:49:17):
culture? Where did the hippies live?
Communes. What were they being taught?
Communism. What did they do?
They infected and took over all of the positions inside the
universities. So it's impossible to go into a
university, at least it was fromabout 1980 on, where every one
of your professors weren't hardcore Marxists.

(01:49:37):
It was impossible. Whether you're talking about
your math teacher, your science teacher, your history teacher,
your philosophy teacher, they were all Marxists, died in the
wool because they had obtained control of the gate, which is
the HR department that hires theprofessors.
So was there a fear of politicalTalmudism coming to the United

(01:49:58):
States? Yes.
Was it an overflow of the Nazis who had been, you know, a zig
heiling at Madison Square Gardens in the mid 30s?
Yes. Did they ultimately lose?
Well, yes, they ultimately lost,and I would say that loss took
place with the assassination of JFK and the country has been
cursed ever since. Cursed.

(01:50:20):
Oh, those who bless Israel will be blessed.
Those who curse Israel will be cursed.
Well, let's talk about our blessings since we began
blessing them, right? The family has fallen apart.
Divorce is the prevalence situation.
Better than half the children are born out of wedlock.
Adultery is rampant. Fornication is rampant.
Homosexuality is rampant. LGBT is the thrust of the day.

(01:50:43):
We have anti Cray in the streets.
We've become the chief debtor inthe world.
We're not the creditor anymore. We're the largest debtor in the
world. We're longer live the head.
We're the tail. How's our blessing coming?
How's our blessing coming? Doctor Pigeon, sorry to

(01:51:03):
interrupt you, but I wanted to let you know that the name of
the Europa, it's actually calledEuropa the Last Battle and just
look up Europe Europa the last battle.net and I checked rumble
and bit shoot the documentaries have been removed.
There's no videos there. So they do.

(01:51:24):
They have a Telegram channel though.
Where? You can watch it for free.
Oh, OK. OK, I just I just scrolled back
and saw like it said, the first video was February of 2024.
So it's just their Telegram channel.
Is Europa the last battle? I just want to make sure Randall
knew that I haven't. Watched it either looking for
it. Yeah.
I was, I was looking for it and it wasn't, yeah, like you said,

(01:51:47):
it wasn't unrumble. And so I just Googled it and I I
just, I haven't been able to find where you can watch it.
You said there's a Telegram channel, Do you?
You don't happen to know what the channel is?
Yeah, the Randall, why don't youjust message me on Telegram,
Karen Lahote? You'll see.

(01:52:07):
On there and then I'll I'll sendit to you.
I'm not that technical, but I think I can handle that.
But those those videos were up just a few, couple of months
ago, Doctor Pigeon, until you started talking about them.
Yeah, I'll tell you, it's, it's very, it's very well worth
seeing. Now I want to, I want to share
this because I do need to kind of clear this up a little bit

(01:52:27):
because there's a lot of rabbis now that are taking similar
positions to what I'm expressingto you today.
There's rabbis in New York that have taken his position, rabbis
in London and so forth. Because there are many rabbis
who believe that the faith that they practice in Judaism has
nothing to do with this radical stuff that's going on in the

(01:52:49):
nation of Israel. That they have been Co opted,
that they have been expropriatedand that the faith has been used
in order to create political machinery.
Now, you can rest assured that was the case in the Soviet Union
when the atheist Talmudists, we're using it as a platform to
execute against Christians, against Orthodox Christians.

(01:53:12):
And believe me when I tell you the excesses, I mean, you know,
just the whole of Damar alone exceeded everything that Hitler
did. You know, it means Stalin came
into Ukraine in 33 and 34 and took all of the food, starved 10
million people to death because he wanted to make a profit on
the, on the wheat #1 and #2 theywouldn't collectivize.

(01:53:33):
He was trying to steal their farms and they were resistant to
it. So he starved them all to death.
He was a ruthless, blood 30s, bloodthirsty, savage, mass
murdering psychopath. And he was trying to spread this
stuff worldwide. And so there was an inordinate
fear in the United States that this was taking birth.
And it did take birth. Whether Eugene McCarthy was a

(01:53:53):
heroin addict, by the way, whether he was right or wrong,
it made no difference. It still spread.
It still became the dominant paradigm.
It became the dominant paradigm in the university, and it's a
dominant paradigm really in the social culture in the United
States, although most people don't know it because they don't
recognize what Marxism is, they can't see it.
And so these ideas, but I just want to say this because I'm

(01:54:16):
not, I'm not somebody who's condemning Judaism, OK?
It's not the faith for me because they deny Mashiac, but
so does Islam, so does Shintoism, so does Buddhism, so
does Taoism. You know, all these other
religions are not prepared to accept Mashiac.
So they're not of my faith. So.
So what? I can live and let live.

(01:54:37):
You want to go to the synagogue?Go to the synagogue, but don't
call me goyim and don't tell me you're going to rule over me and
that the only reason I'm on earth is to serve you like
Menachem Schneerson said, right?Menachem Schneerson, who they
claim is the as the Messiah. His picture is all over Israel,
in case you're wondering. They claim his as the Messiah,

(01:54:59):
the founder of Kabad Lubavitch, and the one that George Bush
celebrated in 1991, declaring that the Noahide laws were the
moral foundation of the United States.
When the Noahide laws do not exist in Scripture, they only
exist in the Talmud, a creation of Maimonides.
Menachem Schneerson said point blank.

(01:55:21):
We have two souls. The goyim have one The only
reason they're on earth is to serve us.
He was the one that. Ordained.
How does the code code of shame rule over the nation's or do
they rule over the nation's using a rod of iron?
Isn't there some dominion there that manifests through the

(01:55:41):
chosen ones that proclaim the love and dominion of your Wow
of? Course I mean.
That's really that's. Really, the Dominion then
that's, you know, is it going toallow all this wavering around
and evil? No, David.
David, the Kingdom belongs to Yahwah and his Mashiac.

(01:56:01):
So do I. That's declared in Revelation
12, and that's just about that'sthe beginning and the end.
There's really nothing more to talk about that.
All I'm saying is is that I don't want you to perceive me as
being a person who just viscerally hates Jews because I
do not viscerally hate Jews. And I have I, you know, I used
to have many friends in Israel, and I was the one who was

(01:56:24):
willing to, you know, when the random Jewish guy showed up at
some of the conferences, I welcomed him to stay in our
cabin. You know, I mean, I'm not a
person who hates Jews, but do I hate political Talmudism?
Yes. Do I just, you know, I just want
to make that clear. OK.
All right. I'm just saying it's a pretty,

(01:56:44):
pretty big deal. They start talking about.
I'm just, I just had to jump in there and.
Well, you have to understand it.You need to know what happened.
When you, when you, when you come to understand what happened
in the Soviet Union and what they did, you're going to
recognize this was the greatest crime against humanity ever done

(01:57:05):
by anybody. It was the greatest crime of
humanity against humanity ever done by anyone and no one talks
about. Big crime.
What you did in Great Britain when they overthrew what Oral
Messiah did in Great Britain, they and they set up that cabal
of that banking system. That's just a terrible thing.

(01:57:28):
Well, that banking system, yeah,I mean, it is.
But you know the thing. But it's nothing compared to the
slaughter of 66 million people outright.
I mean, David, you know, Stalin told the mayor of Minsk,
Belarus. I want you to take select 250
people every week and take him out in the woods on Sunday and
shoot him. And that went on for years and

(01:57:50):
years and years. So the rest of the people in
Belarus knew that they had to work and if they didn't, they
would be on that list and they'dbe shot.
He told the mayor of your Katrinberg, I need 3000 more
dead this month. Just take him out and kill him.
Pick 3000 people take him out and kill him.
The kinds of things that he thatyou know Europa describes the
kinds of things that he did whenyou see that when you see what

(01:58:13):
he did yeah. So here we go.
So Gerald Pulaski puts right up here, rabbi yes.
Royal Dolby vice Zionism is the real anti-Semitism, a betrayal
of Judaism. Boom bingo, bingo.
An accurate description by a rabbi.
It's not just me saying it. OK, Now when you look at when

(01:58:36):
you look at this, so this is what the communist scare was all
about, Randall. And you know, people were trying
to because we have a real issue in the United States because of
the 1st Amendment when we said Congress has no law, can it has
no authority, it respecting an establishing of religion, well
then any religion can come in here and begin to manipulate.

(01:58:57):
And of course, it opened the door in particular for Roman
Catholicism, which had been banned in all the colonies.
And sure enough, the Roman RomanCatholic churches overcome the
United States. But now the Islam is competing.
Now Judaism is competing. Now all kinds of different kinds
of religions are competing because Congress can make no law
saying this is the country we are.

(01:59:19):
That was done by a Catholic operative by the name of Thomas
Jefferson who did that. And he did that in order for us
to secure the funding to get theFrench to fight on our behalf so
that we can win the revolution. OK, now I've got my blood
pressure up high enough. Angelo.
Let's speak to me. Angelo.

(01:59:41):
Angelo, go ahead about Shalom, dear brother.
How about I have missed you. I have been out of, how shall we
say, doing better physical and mental challenges anyway, but
getting better. So. 2 two things I want 1 is a

(02:00:02):
comment that will have to do with Jubilees and another one is
a question I had watched on one of the broadcast about a month
ago. So I'll just open up with a
stupid joke. Since we were talking about
communism, I remember being called Woodstock.
I was, I was there at 13 and that's where all of those guys,

(02:00:24):
they're the guys that run the show in the United States now,
right? All socialists so anyway, but
they remember George Carlin saidreally leery Timothy Leary's
brother really Leary started a religion today that teaches that
when you die your soul goes to agarage in Buffalo.

(02:00:46):
There's a there's a wacky joke anyway for all of those who want
to start a new cult OK, Jubilees.
I think this is fascinating thatone of the things I could be
wrong on this, but I just wantedto verify isn't it in the
narrative that gives the explanation that you won't find

(02:01:07):
in Genesis as far as Canaan being there that they should
have been their property should should have been down like
closer to Africa. Is that correct?
But that thing you've raised theissue.
This is exactly where I was going to go today in the
teaching. And so Angela, save your
question because I have to go there in this teaching.

(02:01:29):
Oh, good. OK.
Holy spell Ruach Kadesh working there.
Right. See.
Yeah, right on. Thank you for asking that
question. Yeah.
OK. So the the last one is, is this
this actually was a question in regards to because I get
confused with this. The DDK you did a broadcast was
it about with Jessica and a couple other about a month and a

(02:01:51):
half ago? I think it was something along
that line, but isn't it a mistranslation that, you know,
when it's speaking about going from Saturday to Sunday to
dedicate being the Lord's Day? I mean, I know to me it's like,
isn't that it's referring to theSabbath, isn't it?
Or, or or is that? Yeah, you're right.
That is what that is, is church machination.

(02:02:12):
That's church. You know, I call it Roman
overreach or Roman overwrite andthey came back.
It was a non canonical work. So they could overwrite it if
they wanted to. Just like the Epistle of
Barnabas who also has overwrite in it, the Epistle of Thomas or
the Gospel of Thomas has overwrite.
They could just overwrite it. And remember, the church tells
you point blank. The Catholic Church will tell
you we are the first priority. The Scripture is second.

(02:02:35):
We reserve the right to change the scripture to agree with our
catechism. And so they did.
So it's just that simple. Now, again, I missed part of
that. So is it accurate to say that
that was probably penned around the time of the destruction of
the temple or before? After what?
When would you say the DDK showed up?

(02:02:57):
The DDK. DDK rather, Yeah.
You know, I don't know. I don't have, I don't have the
data on when that book appeared because the Ethiopian text
doesn't appear for a couple 100 years.
Yeah. Yeah.
I had read something along that line possibly.
But again, it's just that, you know, for me personally, I see
it in Ignatius's writings where it's intentional on his part,

(02:03:19):
where you get this first mentionof a Bishop having all
authority. You know, that's that cut.
That's a universal. I want to universalize
everything here to 1. You see the roots of it.
And then of course, you see Sunday at anything, as he called
it, anything Judaism, you know, which eventually would be in in
those councils in Constantinople.

(02:03:40):
So to me, I see the roots of that, you know, like we're
Polycarp. My understanding was a student
of John. He kept Passover and did not go
after Easter. So, you know, they, they're
contemporaries and they're writing to each other.
But that doesn't mean we follow church fathers.
What is it? Our, our faith is based on the

(02:04:02):
law of the prophets, our Messiahand what the apostles.
That's what our foundation is. So anything beyond that, you
know, there it is. I mean, and when you deal with
Ignatius, he was, you know, he was a radical anti Judaizer.
You know, anything, anything that he considered to be Jewish
was off the table. Well, you know, you know, that

(02:04:22):
would, you know, pretty much push the Messiah off the table
because after all, he did have links directly to Yahuda
according to Matthew 1. Yeah.
It's a lot like the modern day. You know, Satan keeps everybody
busy with arguing with each other over nothing because
they're all wrong. Everybody's got a piece of this,
a piece of that. It's like, you know, where, you
know, the whole deal of it is. It's like all of that noise.

(02:04:44):
It's like, man, keep it simple. Revelation declares the chapter
12, Chapter 14, like what we shared earlier.
Brother, I apologize. I'm I'm having a real struggle
with my with my memory as of late.
The brother that looks like he'sgot the entire emerald crown
thrown over him when he was talking behind that screen

(02:05:07):
behind him. Who is it?
John. What's his name?
I'm sorry, you know what I'm talking about the brother that
that that was talking. He's got a great screen behind
him there. It look like he's right over at
the Arctic Circle with the oh, you're talking about David.
Yeah, he's got the yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Just wanted to say hello to him.Yeah, yeah.
About the fact of that. Our whole faith is right there.
It's like guardianship of the commandments, confession of, you

(02:05:29):
know, Yosha, there we are, right.
So I mean, it really is. And it's that simple.
When we start adding to when youstart taking a bunch of extra
scriptural stuff that is, you know, church overreach and this
kind of thing in order to createa catechism, then we create
places where we're not supposed to be and we erect burdens that
we're not supposed to carry. And that's really the most

(02:05:52):
important part, right, Is what it says in Matthew 11.
My, my yoke is easy. My burden is light.
We need to keep that very clear and very well understood.
Now, God bless your brother and thank you very much.
Hello to everybody and happy to be back in alive, so to speak.
And I'm breathing it up above. There you go.
It's like, it's like my friend Frank Smith said about the Flat

(02:06:13):
Earth issue. He told this Flat Earth guy.
He said, listen, So the only thing you need to remember about
the Earth is that you should be thankful that you're on it and
not in it. There you go.
There you go. And I didn't show up in the
obituaries today. So it's a good day.
Yeah. It's a good day.
Yeah. There.
Hallelujah. OK, Angela, Thanks again, man.
And, and Shabbat Shalom to everybody again, and I look

(02:06:34):
forward to this on that on Jubilees very much.
OK, well, let's let's drop in tothank you for giving us the
precursor so that we can talk about it.
So we're going to deal with, that's why I'm saying I've got
Google Earth open here today, sowe can try to deal with some of
the difficult issues we're goingto find in this chapter in
Chapter 9 of the book of you of Halim.

(02:06:56):
OK, so here we go. And we're going to, we'll just
pick it up. We we left off at Chapter 8 last
time we were here. Let's take a look at Chapter 9
and see what kind of writing we get.
It looks like he kicked him out.Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It yeah. I don't know what happened.
They kind of, you know, you never know.
My computer is, you know, is it's, it's like a bad Western,

(02:07:19):
Right. OK.
And so here we go. And am I still sharing the
screen? No, not yet.
Let's go back and share it again.
Try it again, see if this time Ican keep everybody open and
let's share the screen. Come on, let's let's share it.

(02:07:40):
There we go. Share the screen.
OK, All right. There we go.
OK, so and Ham. Ham and Ham divided amongst his
sons and the first portion came forth for Kush towards the east
and to the West of him permits Rahim and to the West of him for

(02:08:02):
put and to the West of him and to the West there up on the sea
for Canaan. All right, stop.
Let's stop right there and go onto Google Earth and let's just
see what we're talking about here.
OK, so so now remember that in in chapter 8, we were told that

(02:08:23):
OK, Ham is going to get the hot stuff to the South, Japheth is
going to get the N stuff to the north, and Sham is going to get
both hot and cold in the middle.So what we see here is we're
going to see the hot stuff is going to be over here hot.
It's going to be hot here. All right, so with that being

(02:08:46):
said, let's drop over there and get an idea what we're talking
about now, the continent of Africa.
Now assuming what we're talking about, let's do some division
here, just kind of general division.

(02:09:06):
So Kush is going to get the first part, and so that's going
to be over here. Kush is going to be over here.
Mitsraim is going to be here. What's going to be over here and
Kanan's going to be over there. So we see, you know, Kanan is

(02:09:32):
here, Put is here, Mitzrayim here and Kush here.
Generally speaking, generally speaking now, Kush is not going
to go here or Kanan is not goingto go here.
Kanan is going to go somewhere back over here and the question

(02:09:54):
is where is Kanan going to go because he's not going to hang
out over here on this seacoast. All right, so let's get back and
take a look and see what is actually said there in terms of
the scriptura, as they say in the Italian Yo-yo bisonio de

(02:10:22):
Cheri Las scriptura. See Alberto?
OK, so Shem also divided amongsthis son.
The first portion came forth forElam and his sons to the east of

(02:10:47):
the river Hidekal till it approaches the east, the whole
land of India and on the Red Seaand on its coast.
Oh, OK. The Red Sea is not what we call
the Red Sea today. It's a different Red Sea and the

(02:11:07):
waters of D Dan and all the mountains of Mabry and Elam and
all the land of Shushan and all that is on the side of Farnakh,
Farnakh to the Red Sea and the Rivertina.
So this could be a very interesting indication here what
we're talking about Elam and we're going to we're going to
get to that. And I sure came forth the second

(02:11:28):
portion, all of the land of Ashura, Nineveh and Shinar and
to the border of India and it ascends and skirts the river.
What river? We'll talk about that too, OK.
And for Araf cassette came forththe third portion, all the land
of the region of the Casteem to the east of the parath boarding

(02:11:48):
on the Red Sea, and all the waters of the desert close to
the tongue of the sea which looks toward Mitzrayim.
All the land of Lebanon sign near and Amman out to the border
Parath. This is probably I ear.
And oh man, go ahead, Sherry. Is this being recorded?
Somebody said that the recordingstopped.

(02:12:12):
I think Sandy Blair has this recording going directly to the
cloud. OK.
It came back on. Cherry it's back on, rightly,
but it's my turning back on. Oh, OK.
All right. Yeah.
I think the recording stopped because I, you know, bombed out.
Now I'm back on. It it's on.
OK. And then of course we see.

(02:12:33):
And the land of Iran came forth,the 4th portion, all the land of
Iran, Nahreen between the Hidkeland the Parath, to the north of
the Casteem and to the border ofthe mountains, Usher and the
land of Ararat. All right, so let's go back and
we're going to start with Aram and Araf Cassette.
OK, All right, let me get done down here.

(02:12:58):
And because we're going to see some things here that hopefully
will be a little bit explanatory.
None of this is going to be easy.
I mean, I got up at 6 O clock this morning looking at this
going, can I figure this out? You know?
Well, that's a question, all right.
But when we talk about the Hidekal and the parath, so we've

(02:13:21):
got some rivers that have to be talked about, right?
And let me just look at these rivers real quick, because these
rivers are going to be extremelyimportant.
Remember that the that the name Nile does not appear in
Scripture. Somebody may have added it to

(02:13:42):
your Bible, but it is not calledthe Nile.
It's called the river of Mitzrayim.
And I'm going to see here just aminute.
Yeah. OK.
So we see that we have a river went out of Eden, the water, the
garden. From thence it parted and became

(02:14:04):
4 heads. The name of the first Pishon.
It encompasses the whole land ofHevila where there is gold, and
the gold of that land is Good and Bedelium and the Onyx stone.
And the name of the second riveris Gihon.
It encompasses the whole land ofKush.
And the name of the third river is Hidekal, which goes toward
the east of Azure. And the fourth river is Parath.

(02:14:28):
OK, now there's a couple of things that we could see here.
We could try to construe the Hidekal as the Tigris.
OK, So we're going to lean in here a little bit and we're
going to take a look. So if this is the hit of Kel

(02:14:51):
here, this is the Tigris. OK, Let me see if I can get my
notation up here so we can see alittle bit.
So this is the Tigris here. The Tigris.
Now we're going to assume for the purposes of this discussion

(02:15:14):
that this is the Hidekal. So I'm just going to put chapter
Hidekal. This is the river Euphrates
here, and that appears to have at its source the word parath.

(02:15:38):
Now, again, these are modern constructions of these labels.
OK, so now you can see here thatthe Tigris is quite distinct
from the Euphrates up in this area.
Then it's going to narrow down here, it's going to get close,
and then it's going to split apart and become a different
area. So I'll show you what I mean as

(02:16:01):
we take a look at this. So you can see here that the
Tigris has this kind of run herethat runs down like this, nears
the Euphrates, and then splits apart this way and goes all the
way down into this Gulf. And so there's another river

(02:16:24):
that's talked about here, and this is the river Tina.
Now the River Tina, it may very well be this river right here,
and this is an extremely important river that runs down
here. This river is called the Indus
River now, but this may be what's being referred to as the

(02:16:52):
Tina River, the Tina. Now, if this is the case, then,
and I'm getting, I'm counting this with if this is the area of
Elam, the son of Shem. So this today is modern day

(02:17:13):
Iran, and we might be able to conclude that in fact, most of
the Persians who live here are in fact from the tribe of Elam,
which makes them Semitic becauseElam was the son of Shem.
That makes them a Semitic people.

(02:17:33):
OK, so this is Elon. Now what I'm trying to say to
you is, and I think this is the case, that the Red Sea is
actually here. This is the Red Sea right here.
We are the Red Sea, and this over here is what's called the

(02:18:01):
tongue of Mitzrayim, the tongue.Now you could, you might
understand the waterway as the tongue or it's possible to
construe this as the tongue, right?
How would you describe it? You know, peninsula, a tongue.

(02:18:23):
How would you describe it geographically?
This may be the tongue. Saudi Arabia.
All right, now going back, we'regoing to see that Aram, Aram.
Let me see if I can get it wherewe can get it kind of blown up
here a little bit. We're going to see two things
here that are going to make it, I think, pretty clear that Aram

(02:18:48):
is going to be nestled in here. Aram and Aram appears between
these two rivers and to the north of this and going up into
the mountains of Ararat. It doesn't say going up to Mount
Ararat, it says going up to the mountains of Ararat.

(02:19:16):
Now this area down here where you see the Tigris Euphrates in
the delta, this is the area of the cast dem.
The cast dem are the children ofwho Arafka said.
This is why it's no longer our pakshad because our pakshad is a

(02:19:37):
Yiddishized form of the word that describes the fact that
Arafka said was the father of the cast Deem, Arafka said.
So this is in here now. Shushan is over here.
So this is a Lam over here. It's a very broad district,
Alam, very large area, Elam. And then we're going to see

(02:20:04):
Assure is up here. Assure, however, when we read
about, Arafka said, Arafka said isn't just merely in here in
between the Tigris and Euphrates, but the jurisdiction

(02:20:26):
runs very significantly, right? Let me clear this.
Because it runs all the way to the tongue of the mitts ringing.
So it's very possible that Araf Cassade is going to run all the
way over here. And in this case, we're talking

(02:20:48):
about Araf Cassade having a jurisdiction that is kind of
like this. Doctor P.
Yes. Are you referring the water as
the tongue or the peninsula? It could be either one, I'm not
sure which one they're talking about.
I. Thought the tongue was the
landmass because it looks like atongue.

(02:21:10):
It could be the landmass. Now this also could be the
tongue of Mitzrayim, right? The cyanide, I mean.
Let's take a. Look at that.
That's what I'm talking about. That little bitty piece of land
there is that. I thought.
I thought that was the tongue. Because it looks like a tongue.
Yeah, it does kind of look like a tongue, doesn't it?

(02:21:30):
So it when it talks about a Rafasaid it controls Lebanon and
well, let me read the passage toyou just one second.
So this is kind of hard because I kind of have to go back from
screen share to screen share, soit'd be nice if I could share 2
screens at the same time, but I can't.
So here you see. And for a Rafa Said came forth

(02:21:55):
the third portion, all of the land of the region of the cast
steam to the east of the Parath,bordering on the Red Sea and all
the waters of the desert close to the tongue of the sea, tongue
of the sea. See that close to the tongue of
the sea which looks towards Mitzrayim and all the land of
Lebanon and Sahir and Amana. Now when you see that that Amana

(02:22:21):
to the border Parath, Sahir to the border of the parath.
So again, going back to that jurisdiction, Sahir, Oman and
Lebanon, depending on how you look at it, assuming that
Lebanon is in fact the White Mountains we're talking about.
And I'm not so sure that it is because again, Lebanon just

(02:22:42):
means White Mountains. But when we're talking about
that, if you're going to construe that as the White
Mountains, then we could see something that looks more like
this, that again, it goes to, itgoes to from here, this area

(02:23:03):
here to the east of the Parath, which is up to the Tigris, and
then it runs over to the tongue of the sea of the Mitzrayim.
But the problem is, is that if it includes Oman and Sahir, now
Sahir is here, there's a Sahir here.

(02:23:26):
Are these the White Mountains ofLebanon OR is this something
else? And when we're talking about
that, this is what I mean, we could be talking about the White
Mountains that are also down here, particularly if this Amana
is, we're dealing with what is now called Oman.
So Oman is here and the tongue of the midstream, see here and

(02:23:54):
the White Mountains here. So all of this could be a raft
cassette. That's what I'm saying.
Now, I want to make this point because let's, let's drop back
into the text keeping this in mind.
And like I say, I know this is Iknow this is difficult to do

(02:24:18):
because we, you know, bombing back and forth between the map
and the text. But when we look at the text
here, let's keep reading. You'll see here, we can see here
that where Iran is concerned, there came forth that portion,
all the land of Iran, the harem between the Hidekal and the

(02:24:41):
Parov to the north of the Casteem, to the borders of the
mountains. That sure in the land of Ararat.
OK, that's pretty clear. There came forth for Ludi, the
5th portion, the mountains of Escher and all opportunity to
them till it reaches the Great Sea and it reaches the east of
Escher, his brother. So this is probably going up to
the Black Sea. And so this is really talking

(02:25:02):
about all of the Anatolian Peninsula, all of the Anatolian
Peninsula where the seven churches would be that belonged
to Lewd. So you're talking pretty large
land grants here, big massive land grants, with the exception
of a ROM, because a ROM is caught in between Azure and

(02:25:23):
Arpakshan. OK, so this is, this makes for a
very interesting idea because ifin fact it went this reached all
the way to midstream, then when you see Canaan coming to occupy,
where exactly did Canaan come tooccupy this?
It's going to tell us that Canaan came over and took land

(02:25:44):
that didn't belong to him. OK.
Now, we talked last week about Yefet dividing the land of his
inheritance among his sons. And I spent a little bit of time
with this with Jesse when we didE whale talking about Gogan
Magog. But you're going to see this to
what I'm talking about here. The first portion came forth to

(02:26:07):
Gomer, to Khmer, to the east of the north side of the River
Tina. So this means he's going to be
north of the Indus River. That place is Gomer in
Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, in that region in north.
It came forth for Magog all the inner portions of the north
until it reaches the Sea of Mayat that he's talking about

(02:26:28):
the land that is between the Caspian Sea and the Black Sea.
The inner portions belong to Magog between the Caspian Sea
and the Black Sea. As for made I came forth his
portion that he should possess from the West of his two
brothers to the islands and to the coast of the islands.
Well, Made I is going to reject this possession, which would be

(02:26:50):
the Crimean Peninsula. He rejects it, and he does.
And as we'll see later on, he doesn't take that land.
He moves elsewhere. And for Yvonne came forth the
4th portion, every island, and the islands which are toward the
border of Ludi, that's Greece, all the islands of the Aegean
Sea, because the border of Ludi is what we now call Turkey.

(02:27:12):
And for two ball, there came forth the 5th portion, which is
in the midst of the tongue, which is approaches the border
of the portion of Ludi to the second tongue.
Now this tongue you're talking about is really the
Peloponnesian peninsula. So remember the difference
between the Athenians and the Spartans, They were two
different people. The end.
So 2 ball is going to end up down here in the Peloponnesia.

(02:27:35):
As for Meshech, came forth the 6th portion, all the reaching
behind the third beyond the third tongue till approaches
Gadir or Gadri. This is the Italian peninsula.
OK, the Italian peninsula. And then As for Thrace, there
came forth the 7th portion, 4 great islands in the midst of
the sea which reached a portion of Ham in the islands of

(02:27:58):
Cambaturi came out for Araf cassette.
OK, going back to the map, I'm sorry, this, I know this is kind
of taxing. I hope you guys can bear with me
on this because I do think it's important for us to try to get
some kind of geography laid out here.
So when we're talking about ArafCassad, we're talking about

(02:28:24):
something that's going to be a little bit more difficult, But
what is important to remember about Trace?
And again, none of these tribes are really going to stay put, at
least not in particular. But when you're talking about
Thrace, it's talking about four islands.
Well, these four islands that belong to Thrace are going to
be, let me put it up so you can see it.

(02:28:54):
You're talking about Corsica, Sardinia, Sicilia and Malta,
which is down here. These four islands, OK, the
there's going to be other islands as well, but the the

(02:29:17):
portion that's going to be Tubalis going to be here on the
Italian peninsula. The portion that's going to be
Meshech is here on the Peloponnesian peninsula and
Yavan is here. Now here's what the difficulty
is. So let me put this out.
So this is going to be see people when you read it in the

(02:29:38):
King James, it reads Tyrus, but it's not really Tyrus.
It is Thrace the race. OK, so Thrace on the islands,
Tubal here, Meshech here, Yavon here, Ludi here.

(02:30:14):
Now the tribe of Lud would eventually occupy and be the
people group in the city of Troy, but Troy would be
controlled by Darda, who was theson of Sarak.
And so the kingship would be, and guess what?
The scepter would be in the hands of the son of Judah and

(02:30:35):
the lawgiver between his feet. Darda would rule over Troy.
Now, Thrace is not going to stayhere because Thrace is going to
move from here, from these islands to this area here, which
is going to be called trace. It's going to be called trace,

(02:30:55):
all right. And Tubal also is going to be
doing migration and Meshech is going to be doing migration all
northward. Yvonne is this is the father of
Greek Yavani Yavon. OK.
Now when we look at when we lookat these other tribes, though,

(02:31:21):
we're going to see here that you're going to see in a huge
way, Gemer is over here. Now the reason we call him Gemer
in this effort is because the O first of all is not justified
because O may not exist in any Hebrew language.

(02:31:43):
Because you see in this spelling, you see the idea of
Kimmel maim raish. So this could be spelled just,
no, I just put an apostrophe or gamer gamer to say Gomer is

(02:32:06):
absolutely a Yiddishized term. What we know historically is
that this tribe would be known as the Chimerians.
Chimerians. Gemer, Chimer, Chimer, Chimer.
Which one did I say? Did I say G or C?
Chimer, Chimer, Chimer. Chimer.
It's got the same explosive, right?

(02:32:27):
So Gemer. And then we see the tribe of
Magog here. Magog is located here.
Then Mayday. Mayday was given this land here,

(02:32:47):
but as Jubilees will tell us, they rejected it and may die.
Move down here instead and they would become what's called the
Medes. So the empire that would emerge
would be called the Medo PersianEmpire because the tribe of May
Die had joined with the tribe ofElam down here to greet the Medo

(02:33:10):
Persian Empire. So they didn't stay.
Thrace moved to here. This is now Thrace and Gamer, by
the way, didn't stay either. Gamer ended up moving here and
also all the way over to here. Camarians.

(02:33:34):
So with Gemer in here, in the inthe land of Magog, who are the
children of Gemer, right. Who are the children of Gemer?
Well, you have Togarmah. That's one of the sons.
Togarmah, you also have great Feith.

(02:34:00):
I'm not going to put him in here.
And then of course, the third son, Ashkenaz.
So what we're going to see form with these tribes here, and in
particular, these tribes are named in particular in Ezekiel

(02:34:22):
38. Who's named in Ezekiel 38?
Magog Gamer. Ashkenaz is not named Togarmah.
Meshech this way, this is Tubal here, Tubal and Meshach, and

(02:34:44):
both of these tribes, by the way, are going to migrate north.
All of these are mentioned now this area right here going from
the Caucasus, let me put it in adifferent color.
Let's put it in yellow. Let's say this, we can do that

(02:35:05):
yellow. All of this area here went up to
the Volga River, crossing over this way, over through Kiev,
stretching all this way. This becomes the Kazarian
Empire. So the Kazarian Empire can be

(02:35:34):
construed as the land of Magog, the land of the tribe of Magog.
And so we see that this house, this house, this house, this
house and this house are all named as tribes coming out of

(02:36:00):
the north that would come and take a land of unwalled villages
where the people dwelled safely in a desolate spot.
OK. That's what's prophesied in
Ezekiel 38. So this is what we talked about
before. So this gives you some idea of

(02:36:22):
this geography. And remember that when we deal
down here, what color? Oh, let's use white again.
We're dealing with lewd here. Lewd.

(02:36:43):
Aram, Ashur Alam, these are all the Semitic tribes living here.
And then of course, Arafka said down here.

(02:37:07):
OK, So does this give you an idea of where the tribes are
laid out now, how they're laid out, where these jurisdictions
are? It gives you some idea of of
what's happening here in terms of the tribe.
So yeah, that is located in the north where it's cold.
A ram is located in the middle where it's both hot and cold,

(02:37:28):
and ham is located in the South where it's hot.
That's the prophecy in Jubilees.And I think this is a pretty
good description of where they are.
OK, All right. So I am going to conclude this
rather, I know this discussion has been a bit boring, but been
a little bit academic, but I wanted to go through that with

(02:37:52):
you because even though theologically it is, you know,
you're talking about going back to the ancient world, right?
You're talking about going back to ancient, ancient scripture
and the ancient division of the land.
But I think once you see that, once you can see how that how
that relationship is. It's still a question about

(02:38:12):
where the Kingdom of Judea was, where the Kingdom of Israel was,
where the true Jerusalem was, and and also the land of Haran,
where that truly was the land ofor where that truly was.
Those questions still remain. I don't have the answer for you.
And we have a lot of people in the modern world trying to say,

(02:38:34):
well, most certainly was here, but we don't know that, you
know, Noah was buried on Mount Lubar, Where's Mount Lubar?
Who knows? And remember that the the ark
came down in the mountains of Ararat just as a Sioux lived in
the mountains of Siyir. And so all of those are

(02:38:56):
questions and OK, so does anybody have any other comments
or any other questions here today about these, about this
passage? OK, Well, if that's the case,
then let's bomb in and get off this geography lesson for a
minute and we'll get into back into Jubilees and we're going to

(02:39:19):
finish up this chapter. Doctor C Doctor, go ahead.
Yeah, it's. Felix.
It's Felix. No, I, I, I did, I, I did have a
few questions concerning this because I noticed those areas
that you were talking about withthe czars that's in, that's in
the area of what, what would be modern day Ukraine, right?

(02:39:40):
That's correct. OK, so that's the modern day
Ukraine. And what I was looking at is and
these people, they have migratedinto what we call now is what
would be the Levant or Palestineor, you know, where Israel is
at, correct? Right.

(02:40:00):
So that's where they've migrainethey've migrated to.
So I've seen it's kind of like kind of like a mimic of of the
northern. And this is kind of weird.
I might, I might, I might sound like, you know, far fetched, but
it's of course it's conjecture, but almost like the mimic of the

(02:40:22):
northern and southern Kingdom ofYasharel and and Yahood, right.
Oh, if you have, you have Ukraine to the north.
And these people are it's if they're expanding, they're
expanding claim to lands that are not theirs.
Yeah, that's the bigger problem.I mean, it says that, you know,

(02:40:42):
when you again, looking at the prophecy of Ezekiel 38, you
know, they come down on the landlike a cloud.
They come down like a on the land like a cloud with a mighty
army. And and they they take, they
take a prey and they take a spoil.
And the neighbors ask, are you here to take a prey, to take a

(02:41:02):
spoil? And this is the kind of thing
that is that is imagined. Yeah.
So this is, it's very interesting that that they would
come down from the north to do this.
Yes, you know, when you're talking about that whole region,
that region has a very interesting, it's a, it's such a
confused past, but it's a very difficult past because, you

(02:41:23):
know, again, Randall raised the issue of the Red Scare in 19 in
the 1950s in the US. Well, that Red Scare had was
very dominant in Europe. So one of the things you see,
and in fact this is something that is kind of breaking news
today that I think is very important for us to all, for all
of us to understand that the so you have the whole of Damar and

(02:41:50):
the whole of Damar was this hugegenocide that was perpetrated in
Ukraine. It was perpetrated in Ukraine,
and it was perpetrated in Ukraine by an atheist Talmudist
government out of Moscow that was 85% Jewish.
And they came in and they starved 10 million Ukrainians to

(02:42:11):
death who would not allow them to just steal their farms.
Well, the Ukrainians, as you might imagine, took umbrage to
that. So when Hitler invaded Ukraine,
about half of the Ukraine joinedthe Nazis.
Right. The Ukrainian, The Ukrainian

(02:42:32):
leadership under Stepan Bandera joined the Nazis and then
Ukraine became the single largest slaughterhouse for the
death of Jews in World War Two. There were more Jews killed in
Ukraine than in any other nation.
Second was Belarus, third was Poland.
But these Ukrainian, these Ukrainian excesses of the people

(02:42:52):
that were killed in Poland, manyof those people were killed by
the Ukrainian Nazis. It was Ukrainian Nazis that
maintained the control over the ghetto in Warsaw.
Those were Ukrainian Nazis doingthat.
And the Ukrainian Nazis were theones were responsible for about
1,000,000 deaths of Jews in Poland.
So you're talking about of the so-called 6,000,000 killed in

(02:43:15):
World War, 22 to 3 million of them were killed by Ukrainian
Nazis who had risen up, you know, to repay the leadership of
the Soviet Union for what they had done in 33 and 34.
It was a form of collective punishment, a collective
punishment. Now that kind of collective

(02:43:37):
punishment is going to result in, of course, the Zionist
movement getting legs, which is really nothing more than British
colonialism. But it doesn't have much to do
with Judaism. It's really British colonialism
exploiting Judaism, as the rabbisaid in this piece that was put
in the chat here, exploiting Judaism to allow British
colonialism to destabilize the oil producing areas of the

(02:44:01):
world. So companies like British
Petroleum can, you know, make hay with all the oil that's
there. And so they came down like a
storm cloud. They came down like a cloud
covered the land. They covered the land where
people were dwelling safely in, you know, unwalled villages,
where they were raising cattle and sheep and living in a land
that had been desolate for years, that had been brought

(02:44:23):
back, brought back by the sword.So this Kazarian enterprise
again would be the remnant of those people that survived that
slaughter by Stepan Bandera and those Ukrainians.
Now Poland is now going, hey, wait a minute, what are we doing
putting billions and billions ofdollars in all of our tanks and

(02:44:44):
all of our aircraft into this Ukraine when they haven't
apologized for killing a millionPoles, that this came out today,
This came out today. If the Poles are angry, they're
going, what are we doing supporting this nation when they
killed 1,000,000 Poles? So the Polish government is now
turning against Ukraine. They're like, why are we?
Why are we unified with you guys?

(02:45:05):
And of course, most of Europe doesn't realize, particularly
Germany doesn't realize that it is aiding and abetting a Nazi
regime, which is totally illegalunder German law to do that.
And they have been, they've nonetheless been doing it.
So it's, I mean, it's completelyillegal, you know, so you have
some very serious issues. And so this Caesaria now and

(02:45:27):
the, and the, this push back between these two entities is
ongoing. This is still, this is a repeat
of World War 2, which was a repeat of the whole of Damar
right, which was a repeat from World War One.
And so none of this stuff is over yet.
But the leap to do what took place by moving these, these

(02:45:48):
Kazarian Jews out of Central Europe and putting them into
Palestine, to take a spoil, to take a prey, this is unique.
This hasn't been done any other time in history.
And you know, it's one thing to colonize, it's another thing to
completely displace and just claim as a matter of

(02:46:08):
international law, we have the right to your house, right?
And so all of this has an expiration date and the
expiration date is coming very, very soon.
And it's us as believers to continue to maintain the love of
Mashiach and the love of Yah, even those who are blinded.
I mean, we have to maintain that.
But do we have to bless those who are perpetrating murder and

(02:46:31):
committing genocide? No, we don't.
No, we don't. No, we don't.
We don't. And so, so anyway, so all of
these things are kind of on the table.
And I think, you know, This is why it's so important when we
look at the book of Jubilees that that we can see that
Jubilees is, is going to give usthese, even some of these ideas

(02:46:52):
are, you know, we deal with kindof typos and we deal with the
kind of transliteration errors and there's other dating errors
inside of Jubilees. Nonetheless, we can see the
generally speaking that we get an idea of how the world was
laid out and where these tribes were.
And so to say when we're talkingabout this geography, when you

(02:47:14):
realize that Persia is full of the House of Islam, Iraq is full
of Asher and and Arafka said, you know, Turkey is full of lewd
and Aram. You know who you call an
anti-Semitic right? Right.
Correct. That's correct.
Exactly. And you have Ashkenaz and you

(02:47:37):
know, Ashkenazi Jews, you think about it, it's like, OK, they're
not Hebrew at all. They're they're from Jpath, so
they can't be Hebrew at all. So there's a lot of usurping
going on, you know, which is that's pretty much the normal
thing when you start looking at all of this, you know, these
people are usurping that these people are usurping this just
like we have this E Asus thing going on with Edom and that

(02:48:00):
there's a lot of there's a lot of moving parts.
And I had a question about, there was another question about
this that I, because when you were showing us the map, the map
last week on Shabbat, I know well, I noticed and I, I know
other people have probably seen this too, that when you look at

(02:48:21):
the world map today, it looks like it's an expansion, like
things have expanded out. Yes, yes, yes, yes.
You know this is a. Good thing have dropped you
know, like like you've seen where you know, portions of land
are below the below the below seen at the level now.
And I always wonder, I've, I've always wondered about this thing

(02:48:42):
Pangaea that they talk about, about it being all one
continent. And, you know, we've had some
great earthquakes that could have caused this course.
Of course, even Mashiac was, waswas crucified and a lot of
landmass did, I mean did did, did things move in a great

(02:49:03):
massive way? Yeah, No, I think what you're
talking about, I mean, there's apassage, and I believe it's in
Jubilees, we might get up to it that we may have already passed
it, where it says Noah perceivedthat the earth was expanding.
Noah perceived that the earth was expanding.
So is it possible that the earthwas actually much smaller?

(02:49:24):
Now think about this for a minute.
If the earth was much smaller and man was much bigger, so that
the average man was like 18 feettall and and the earth was much
smaller, the earth was much, youknow, it wasn't as big around as
it is today. And if the and, and, but there

(02:49:46):
was some kind of massive expansion that took place during
the great deluge. And this is what what it says
that, you know, the, the, the fountains of the deeper opened
that this was a great opening inside the earth that could only
be done with the hand of yah, because otherwise the earth
would just fall apart, just comeapart at the seams.
But it didn't. It just opened up.
And as it opened up, you had a combination of magma and water

(02:50:09):
coming out and this magma and water coming out and the rains
coming down is cooling a lot of the magma.
And so you see that the earth just expands and it goes from a
360 day year to a 364 day year. And ultimately then the during
the times of Joshua to a 365 dayyear, this shows the earth in
motion. So you can imagine that if man

(02:50:31):
was 18 feet and not 6 feet, thatmeans what what is a mile to us
would have been 3 miles to him or what was 3 miles to us would
have been a mile to him is a better way to put it, right,
right, Right. Because he's three times as
tall, right? So he could walk three times the
distance that we would walk and would be nothing to it.
And if the earth was even smaller still, if the earth was

(02:50:52):
half the size that it is now, then he could walk what would be
6 miles to us would be one mile to him, right?
And so this means that this, theidea of where Abraham went, you
know, and how he wandered the world and where he went, this
could be completely different than what we think, right?
Right. Right.

(02:51:12):
Yeah, because I mean when we think about like the copper that
that the Egypt well, well Mitzrine was gathering from all
these different well from the great lake areas.
If the world was smaller at the time, if it was, if it was
easier to circumnavigate, you know, as opposed to cause having

(02:51:33):
to cross full oceans, as opposedto just following a coastline
before everything expanded there.
You know, basically what possibly could have happened is
where where the land moved. That's where people just, well,
they basically wrote it like a big surfboard kind of that makes
any sense, you know that. Makes perfect sense.

(02:51:54):
I mean, when you think about thepeople that that are occupying
Hawaii, you know, or Tahiti or, you know, how'd they get to
those islands, right? Right.
So, you know, all of that stuff does kind of add up that if the
oceans were far smaller and theyweren't as turbulent and if they
were far more shallow than they are now.
I mean, all of these things werethe kind of, you know, and these
are questions that I think are, I think they're worthy of

(02:52:14):
exploring, sit in some kind of myopic idea and say, well, the
Earth was always this big aroundand the Earth always had this
because we find all kinds of stuff that shows, no, the North
Sea was at one time solid land. No, Britain was at one time
connected to France. Ireland was at one time
connected to Britain. There's, you know, there's
obviously a big shelf off the coast of Africa that's got a

(02:52:35):
major city that's underwater. There's a big shelf off the
coast of Japan and off Indonesiathat was a big city that's
underwater. You know, there's stuff off
Bahamas that appears to be a bigcity that's underwater.
Yes, yes, and all the trenches too.
It just shows expansion and growth.
Yeah, yeah. And we're seeing the same thing
right now. Look, it looks very quick, like

(02:52:56):
it happened quickly, like, you know, seconds, minutes.
It happened quickly from. Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Especially from, I mean, when
you look at things, it's like, because, especially from the way
thing, when something's done, because I mean, before I was a
computer scientist, I was, you know, a contractor before that.

(02:53:16):
And you know, into remodeling and, and, and when you, you
notice debris, how it falls apart, you know, when you're
breaking something up to rebuildit or whatever, you know how
debris falls a certain way. And there just seems to be a lot
of debris on our planet. That makes sense.

(02:53:37):
More of the you know, when you look at it, it looks like things
have. How could I say that things have
expanded? Yeah, yeah.
And I think, and, you know, we're seeing it now, too.
I mean, you know, when you look at the number of huge volcanoes
that are that are undersea, I mean, you're talking volcanoes

(02:53:59):
that make Yellowstone look small.
So there's massive, including one off the coast of Oregon,
there's at least three volcanoesthat are dwarfing Yellowstone
that have the potential for massive eruptions.
And this whole thing that's happened up in at Kamchatka and
all these earthquakes that have been happening at the earthquake
swarm, it's very inordinate. And we also know that the Arctic

(02:54:22):
Ocean, you know, the, the, the, the Central Atlantic trench that
runs up the middle of the Atlantic.
It runs up through Iceland and then it runs along the eastern
coast of Greenland and right through the middle of the Arctic
Ocean. That trench in the Arctic Ocean
has a bunch of volcanoes erupting and they boil the water
in the Arctic Ocean to 2000°. This is not man caused global

(02:54:46):
warming. This is volcanoes blowing up in
the Arctic Ocean. It's causing the ice to melt.
Right. So, you know, This is why these
things and this has been changing the weather as you
might imagine. Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah. And we're like here in
California, you know, because we're in the, we're in the the
mountains here. And I'm telling you, like I tell

(02:55:06):
Melissa all the time, I'm like these, you know what, these
clouds, you only see this stuff like in the Midwest.
You don't. These clouds are looking weird.
Like there's just certain thingsthat are just seeing out of
place. You know, the weather, it's
just, it's, it's, it's the last few days.
Well, we had weather where for about four or five days we were
over 100°, which that is not normal up here.

(02:55:29):
And then all of a sudden, three days, three days later and it
feels like it's fall and you have to wear a jacket outside.
It's like, what the heck is going on, you know?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And of course there's like.
I'm noticing the patterns a lot,you know.
We saw it so inordinately in Alaska last winter.
We didn't have any snow all winter, you know, I mean, so it

(02:55:52):
was, but it was the worst possible condition because we
get rain in the afternoon. So it'd be like 38, we get rain
and then it would drop to 23 at night.
So that became an ice rink. And I mean, I mean, you had to
see it to believe it. In my neighborhood.
I was wondering how people couldpossibly get their car.
I mean, you look at it and it's like, OK, that's a ice rink
running downhill. That looks like the Zamboni has

(02:56:14):
just been over the top of it. You know it's true.
Yeah. And so we are getting weird
weather, but it's totally explained.
If you realize that the Arctic Ocean is being heated by
volcanoes, that's going to change the weather conditions.
It's going to change wind patterns and everything else.
And plus we also know that the magnetosphere is out of place

(02:56:35):
that we have, we're getting hit with inordinate CME's now and
ultraviolet radiation is coming all Deep South.
You've seen the Northern Lights in Alabama now.
And in addition to that, there is this what with A1 Atlas or
something that's a third the size of the sun that's coming in
and they, they're not sure what it is, but it's headed in this

(02:56:56):
direction. I don't know if you've heard
about this at all, but anyway, all of these things, you know,
men's hearts will faint with fear from what they see coming
of the earth because it ain't normal.
No it's not, but y'all has us. We're good, all right.
Let me finish up real quick thislast paragraph all right, in

(02:57:18):
Chapter 9. Thank you, Doctor Penn.
Oh, I still have it up. Sharing, right?
I'm still sharing it. Chapter 9.
Yes. OK, yeah, let's finish that up.
OK so and so we see that that Thrace came force the 7th
portion 4 great islands which reached to the portion of Ham,
that is to say they go down to Africa.

(02:57:39):
And the islands of Camatori cameout for a lot for the sons of
Araf Cassaid. That would be the island of
Cyprus. So that's going to be part of
the of the land grant to Araf Cassaid.
And thus the sons of Noah divided unto their sons in the
presence of Noah their father, and he bound them all by an oath
implicating a curse. Everyone that sought to seize

(02:58:01):
the portion which had not fallento him by his lot.
Very, very important, particularly when we're talking
about the tribes of Japheth fromthe land of Magog, trying to
take land that belongs to the land of Shem, trying to take
that land from Shem to put in the hands of Magog, creates a
curse. And they said all.

(02:58:22):
So be it. So be it for themselves and
their sons forever, throughout their generations, till the Day
of Judgment, upon which Yahwah Elohim shall judge them with a
sword and with fire, for all theunclean wickedness of their
errors, wherewith they had filled the earth with
transgression and uncleanness and fornication and sin.

(02:58:44):
All right, well, let's just talkabout that transgression,
uncleanness, fornication and sin.
Sounds a lot like a gay rights parade, doesn't it?
OK. All right, Angela, go ahead.

(02:59:09):
He's tying a couple of thoughts in together with judgement and
fire. What's interesting is when you
think of, we'll go back to the mid 1800s, for instance, when we
will, we'll pick on John Rockefeller for, for instance,
an oil ban. Where does oil come from?
But from the fossil fuel, from the flood, is that correct?

(02:59:35):
We're talking about sludge that would have come from that to.
Well, I mean, no, actually I think anymore, I think most
geologists accept and you can kind of see it in your own
backyard if you check on it. If you leave leaves, you know,
you wake up leaves, you leave them in a mud puddle and you
leave them there all winter long.

(02:59:56):
When you come out to the spring and you look, you begin to see
like a black sludge beginning toform.
Yeah, I misspoke. What I mean by the massive
amount of waters that came down on that amount of plant life.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So what I mean by that is, is this just it's just a, for
instance, you have a massive amount of of this water that

(03:00:17):
comes down. And of course, we know that some
2/3 or 3/4 of the Earth's salt water are undrinkable.
Not, not, that's not for the sake of conversation.
This, this thing, no, but it's interesting that what fuels the
Babylonian world, if you will, this, this, this, this order
that we've lived in through thisenergy, it's by products are two

(03:00:38):
things which are plastic and pharmacy.
Now I find that fascinating on so many levels because what
dominates every molecule now they're saying microplastic is
in everything. There's really nothing man can
do to eliminate that. There is something, however,
that can eliminate that. Volcanoes, when you think about

(03:01:00):
how it forms new land, right? When you, you, you literally
probably Hawaiian Islands, for instance, we use that as an
example. We've seen it in video in the
20th century where we see something forming, coming.
We're bubbling ripe out of the ocean.
So when when you put this together with Sodom and Gomorrah
with a type of intense heat coming down, but when we have

(03:01:21):
these which are happening the whole entire continent of
Europe, 24 super volcanoes underneath that are starting to
be active everywhere across the face of Europe.
Wouldn't it be interesting if part and parcel is some of this,
when he said he would never destroy again with a flood, but
then when it's referring to thisfire, wouldn't it be interesting

(03:01:42):
that that would be a total like,in other words, delivering his
people miraculously in such a way from here to there, some
type of an exodus right to some place wherever.
But that is cleansing. He says.
I'm making all things new. Wouldn't it be interesting if
that was part of that, that literally would form and reform
and would make everything brand new again.

(03:02:04):
It's just a thought. But that sin itself, what man
brings upon himself, those thoseballs of anger that'll be coming
his way from Yah. These are these are judgments on
on, on these things that had been foretold.
And and again, when you go back to scriptures like in Jubilee,
when you even see curses of people doing what so many

(03:02:26):
generations ago by disobeying Yah means what he says.
Yah means what he says, and I think it's something fascinating
about how when you take like a when you take an area that a
volcano, just the level of the intensity of it and they and it

(03:02:46):
like cleanses everything and within a decade you have, well,
look at Mount Saint Helens, the part of that that blew off,
right? It's like you have this it's
it's like a cleansing and a renewing of some sort judgement
at the same time. You know what I'm saying?
I find it fashion. Yeah.
I mean, I've often thought of this, Angelo that when I read
and Peter, Peter says, you know,the first time man was consumed

(03:03:08):
by water, but the second time byfire.
That's how that's how it reads in second Peter.
So yeah. And for and for sinners in Sodom
and Gomorrah. We know what that meant for lot.
It was Angel came and takes him out.
We're going to be delivered out right.
You know, it's just fascinating to me that we have nothing to be
concerned with. We, we, we want to, you know,

(03:03:29):
stop the, the YouTube land and the date seeking and on and on
it goes and the Youtubers and then on it.
It's like focus on our deliverance, our deliverer and
our confession and our guardianship.
And let's be a voice. Be that voice to those who the
majority of the religious world are the ones that really who's

(03:03:51):
just referring to when he says get away from me.
I never knew you. You called me Lord, Lord, you
know, I just, there's so much rapidly happening and, and like
everybody's testifying to no matter what part of the world
you're living in, you're seeing it coming from every direction.
Now this is when it just fires. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom,
boom, boom, everything, sun, moon and stars.

(03:04:12):
And then this thing of this visitor coming from and the
great delusion and on and on it goes.
Well, man, I'll tell you what itsays.
We raise our heads erect when wesee these things because we
know. But that's how near our
deliverance is and and Amen and Hallelujah to that.
But I just, I just thought that's fascinating about that.

(03:04:32):
The the the fire, this intensity.
How many times does it describe it for us that when we go
through our own fiery trials, right?
What does it serve to do it? Well, I might think the worst
thing is happening to us right now, but it's not it's cleansing
us, it's strengthening us. We're going through endurance.
We're being refined. The Ruach Kadesh is getting to

(03:04:54):
manifest itself inward, outward,everywhere.
Oh, my goodness, you cannot. I mean, you'd have to be Ray
Charles and Stevie Wonder not tosee this.
I mean, you know, there's this stuff that's in front of us.
It's just amazing. The definition of blind.
It says they'll be a veiled. They don't see.
Well, you know, when you're talking about marvelous, it is
in our eyes to see it, right? Right in front of us.

(03:05:17):
Remember, the blindness has beenbrought on because of disbelief,
right? And it's a spiritual blindness.
It's a spiritual blindness. It's a spiritual deafness.
They have ears that hear but cannot understand, eyes that see
but cannot perceive. And this is how it's written in
the Gospels. And it's because it's just not
going to compute Comes the stimulus comes in, but it does

(03:05:38):
not compute in the brain. And it doesn't be in the brain
because Yah has intended it thatway.
Because what the people did not love the truth, they did not
receive. I love this too.
There's one translation. They didn't receive the love of
the truth. It's, you know, he gives us a
gift. There's a lot of intelligent
people out there and, and you know, not, I don't claim to be

(03:06:00):
one of them. I'm just saying it's a gift,
this gift, this love of the truth that he puts on our heart.
It's like all praise to him for this.
That's all coming from Muraka Kadesh.
Look at the fruitage, right? The nine, if you will.
Divide them up. That first one, Lovejoy, peace.
This gift, this measure of faiththat he gives us.

(03:06:20):
Wow. I mean, how humbling is that to
realize that that what, what is it about me that that you, that
you so care for me? It changes everything when those
commandments get in your heart. Now it's no longer you have to
tell me not to do something. It's like, please tell me
everything you want me to do. I will do it.
Please let me know what you don't like, you know, and it

(03:06:42):
puts it right in your heart. This walk that I've read about
all my life in different religions and always been
interested in scripture, now comes to life in the last few
years in such a degree where it's just jumping off the page
and isn't he making his name known?
He's making his name known. You can't make this up the way

(03:07:03):
he's doing it. It's just off the wall and, and,
and right in front of our eyes, as you know, it's marvelous.
And, and, and in in conclusion, we'll go right back to Casey on
right Revelation, where it's describing the seven conditions,
right? These 7 representing these these
these congregations, if you will.

(03:07:23):
But the, the status of spiritualcondition, what is it always
say? Let he who has ears hear what
the spirit is saying. Yeah, that's right.
Yeah. And can you see?
Come and see? Doesn't say.
Come and think. If I live between my ears, that

(03:07:44):
Greek word ego, then I'm the highest thing I got.
Boy, am I in sad shape. I am in sad shape if this is all
I got was between my ears. But what it says, come and see.
And then he who has ears hear what the Spirit says.
And the apostles, what separatedthem from the majority of the
people who even got fed and healed, besides ungratefulness

(03:08:06):
and greed? They didn't take the time to go
to their Messiah and ask him a question.
The ones that asked him that said I have the secrets of the
Kingdom. You have the secrets of the
Kingdom. Why?
Because you ask me. Imagine that it says ask me,
ask, seek, knock. Wow.
How about that? They're the ones that took the

(03:08:28):
time, right? Take the time and ask.
I seek him out. I go into the word.
I peer into it. Yeah, it's a blessing.
Yeah, it's a gift. It's all those things.
But where's the part in the covenant with me?
Amen. Now it's like, what can I do for
you? I love you so much.
Show me what you want from me. Here I am.

(03:08:50):
Send me. But not on my time schedule.
I go ahead of it. I went ahead of it years ago and
I made more damage and I'm stillcorrecting that.
Damn, I'm still making amends. It was, it was out of zeal, but
it was out of ignorance, excitement, and a little too
much cockiness, quite frankly, coming out of a rebellious
generation. And sometimes it's hard to take

(03:09:13):
those words back. You know, it becomes a living
amends, which he he honors that too.
So I know I'm kind of talking cryptically, but I, you know, I
just wasn't shy about what I wassharing a long time ago, though
it was in total error. And, you know, you can get
backed up against the wall with that, but I know.

(03:09:34):
I know I'm forgiven it. Do not revisit it.
Do not revisit it. Yeah.
Don't revisit it like he's the fact that you made an error.
When you revisit it, you make the error again.
Yeah. Let it be.
Let it be. Let it be.
Yeah. Thank you.
Appreciate that. Yeah.
Well, well, beautiful, Angelo. Thank you.
I appreciate that sharing. Thank you.

(03:09:56):
All right, Dave Barrow, go ahead, brother.
I got a question that's come up with me since you've been
sharing the nation in the two nations in the womb of Rifka.
That question, yes. Got a question with this.
It started with this and I started seeing Rifka as the

(03:10:19):
field and and and the sower was was Isaac.
You suck. And I thought then there was the
I began to say the redheaded, the the furry redheaded stranger

(03:10:40):
as a as something that was sown in the field like a terror.
I'm going. I might be getting too far off
the deal, but I'm thinking that we're having a living, a demo
recorded demonstration of something that is, you have a

(03:11:01):
cause and effect. Look what the cause and effect
was of the relationship of Esau and Esau.
Look at the cause and effect. See, everything we got going on
now is cause and effect, like the cause and effect of what
happened in the British islands with now we got the witches
everywhere, witchcraft and the the banking cabal.

(03:11:26):
And then we got the other going on with the, with the cause and
effect of the, the lion hegemonythat has deceived the, the, the
entire Christian community with the Rabbinical Judaism.
I mean, there's a cause and effect that's going on that
there's tears amongst the wheat so much that the judgement of

(03:11:51):
all this is going to be is coming into the light.
It just amazes me. I, I don't know whether I'm too
far off to the off the end of the diving board with this Rivka
and the two nations looking at that that way.
I just, I just, it just started dawning on me like, oh, we might

(03:12:14):
be seeing actually a demonstration of the tears sown
in the field. And, and then the, what happens
when the tears are sown in the field?
This is the effect of it. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
And we're seeing the effect of that kind of tears sown in the
field of the Earth, so many places.

(03:12:36):
And now we get now, now with this light that's coming,
Steven, this light that is coming now.
And at this time in history, you're, you're, you're being
gifted with exposing some thingsthat are in the darkness that
people are going, whoa, look at that.
And then there's people that areseeing it.

(03:12:57):
What's happened with this with, you know, like Judge Napolitano
and Larry and those guys are saying they came up with some
rabbinic stuff that we're talking about the chosen
generation and the Christian community that's running along
with it. And they said, oh, that's why
I'm just recently on Judge Napolitano.
I'm going, this is light coming,then the earth we're there, see.

(03:13:22):
And then we're going to be the agents now being used with these
with this, with the mind of Messiah to speak the things that
bring more light. I just, I didn't mean to keep it
going, but I. I want to, I want to share this,
David, I'm going to put up on the screen here, I'm going to

(03:13:43):
share this now. This is the this is the sword
searcher here. And I want to show you, I want
to kind of show you guys this passage when we look at this,
this is when you're talking about two nations.
OK? So this passage is Genesis 2533.
And Yaakov said, swear unto me this.

(03:14:03):
Let's see. Excuse me, 2523, not 33.
And when her day is to be delivered, behold, there were
excuse me. And Yahwah said unto her, two
nations are in your womb. All right, now let's look at
this for a minute in the actual agreed.
OK, so the Ibrite is Hello, where are you?

(03:14:28):
Here, Just a minute. There we go.
So when you see in the Ibrite, you're going to see a little
it's going to be a little bit clearer.
You see here, these are this is the phrase leher sheni goyim,
goyim. OK, goyim.

(03:14:49):
So you can see, you see the wordhere.
If you look closely, you'll see it here that this is this word
that is spelled, you know, like this.
You have gimel yod yod mem safitgoyim.

(03:15:14):
OK, now when we go back, let's go back in in here and let's
take a look and see what they say here.
This is saying to her, see this says this says Shanee goye.
OK, so they're going to tell us,Oh no, no, it's not goyeem, it's
goye. Well, that's because they're not

(03:15:34):
giving you, they're not giving you the word that appears there.
They're giving you the root word.
But when you look at the root word, what do you see?
You see? OK, rarely shortened to just
goy. Muted or something happened,
Steven. Am I muted?

(03:15:54):
I can't hear you. OK, hold on.
Just yeah, you. Aren't muted.
You're. You're not.
I can hear you, I. Can hear you.
Are you must have you must have your speakers off David, David
you. Know.
Yeah, you can hear it. You can hear now, yes.
Sir. OK, so when you look at at this
scene going now, This is why youhave to look at the Hebrew.
You can't just say, oh, OK, well, I don't like your, you

(03:16:16):
know, I don't like your translation because you can see
here it says goy, apparently from the same root as age 1465,
a foreign nation, a foreign nation.
OK, that's the first understanding of goyim, a
foreign nation, a troop of animals, a flight of locusts, A

(03:16:38):
heathen, a nation or a people. So when he says two nations,
Shin Lehe, Shani Goyim, 2 people, two people.
So does this mean two different personalities, two different
character traits? I mean, it could, you could be

(03:16:59):
dealing with two fraternal twinsthat are just like night and day
different from each other. It's possible, but I don't think
so. I think what it's being said
here, two nations, two people groups, 2 distinct forms of DNA
is what I believe is being said here.
And I think, and some people saywhere's the second witness?
Well, first of all, you have to look at the Hebrew to see what

(03:17:22):
the first witness is. What is being said there is, you
know, particularly when you, forinstance, when you look at let's
continue down just a little bit because in the next verse it
says twins were to be delivered and twins is this word Tom and

(03:17:42):
it means literally or figuratively twins, OK.
And it comes from the word Tam, which means twinned, duplicate,
jointed, coupled together to bear twins, OK, coupled
together. So it even though she it says
here that she bore twins, she gave birth to twins.

(03:18:03):
The verse previous says there's two nations in her womb.
Two people group inner womb. I think that means 2 DNA.
That's just my take on it. OK.
All right. So it has to be, no, I mean, it
has to be a major point that you're making to me.
And I just looked at it like, oh, this is where the tears come

(03:18:25):
in. This is the cause and effect of
what tears produce. What this?
I think it very, I think I just think it very well could be.
I think you could. And no, like somebody says in
the terrorist in the terrorist parable that the planter came in
and planted the wheat and somewhat snuck in.
Someone snuck in and planted tears, right?

(03:18:48):
That's how it's put. OK.
All right. So with that being said, let's
leave it at that and have just, but I want, I want to say this
to conclude, to make my, to makeit clear, I'm giving you my
opinion about what that reads OK.

(03:19:08):
And I'm telling you the reason why I believe that.
I think that the Hebrew does justify that conclusion.
It doesn't set it in stone, but it's more likely that it means
that then that it means two different personalities or two
different characters or fraternal twins that were just

(03:19:29):
slightly different. It's indicating 2 nations are
going to spring from these, fromthese two sons, two different
nations. All right, OK, so that is my
opinion, all right. And I just want to let you know
it's an opinion and not set in stone.
OK, Ray, go ahead. Ray.
Good to hear from you, brother. Good to see you.

(03:19:50):
Good to see you as well, Steven.Yes, thanks very much for taking
a question from me here. So I've been like a dog in a
bone here with this, the conceptof the Son of God, Ben.
My understanding, just breaking down the two Hebrew characters,

(03:20:11):
bait is like the house, Noon is like the seed, but it also
denotes motion. It's like this House of motion
for the Heavenly Father. It's how He came to interact
with us. But at the same time I'm working
with Dabar, Yahuwah and the wordof the Lord like in Jeremiah so

(03:20:37):
many places, Ezekiel, all the prophets and the word of the
Lord came unto me saying I'm really struck by a personal
presence that it's not. I believe Jeremiah in the early
chapter it says and the word of the Lord reached out and touched

(03:20:59):
me. So I'm I'm dealing with these
different things. But then I got thinking about
all right, I was listening to some teaching and I heard the
scripture verse spoken of in John chapter 5, verse 46.
For had ye believed Moses, you would have believed me, for he

(03:21:22):
wrote of me. And I got thinking about this
word of man. There's a wonder if there's not
an alternate meaning to the wordthat we have there, Perry, in
G4012. So I looked up Strong's and both

(03:21:47):
Strong's and Thayer properly as well.
Just to back up, you know, I've been searching through the
prophets, searching through Moses and the prophets, seeing
the Messiah in there, but I'm thinking that there's more,

(03:22:09):
there's a deeper meaning, literal meanings.
So that is around figuratively, figuratively with respect to
used in various applications of place, cause, or time.

(03:22:31):
Here we go about above against and here's the the
interpretation on behalf of and if you look at Thayers, the
Thayers is definition for that G4012 is about concerning or on
account of. So.

(03:22:54):
When you read John 546, it says,For had you believed Moses, you
would have believed me. For he wrote of me.
Or we could easily say on behalfof me.
But ye believe not his writings,how shall you believe my words?

(03:23:16):
But if you believe not his writings, how shall you believe
my words? I'm just you know, we have what
happens in Christianity where wemake such a difference between
the old. The Christians make a big
difference between the Old Testament and New Testament.
Well, that was that was Moses and Moses really gets a bad rap.

(03:23:41):
But had if if we view that the Father and the Son are 1 John 11
in the beginning was the word, you know, we I see that there's
not nearly enough red letters inthe red letter Bible.
So anyways, there I've spewed a few things.

(03:24:03):
Yeah, yeah. Well, you know, we look when you
talk about red letters in in thescripture, you know, we look at
the idea of potentially putting the words of Yahwah in blue.
But I can tell you, you know, no, it's, it's, it's impossible
to do because of the way that the Old Testament is written.
OK, there's so much paraphrasingand going on and what Moshe said

(03:24:25):
and what Yah said. And then when does the, you
know, when you're dealing with the New Testament, you have very
clear statements by the Mashiac and Mashiac said unto them,
blah, blah, blah, blah. OK, put that in red letter.
But when you dealing with the Old Testament, it is not easy.
I tried to do it and it is not easy to do and and because you
run into what is that him sayingit or is that Moses saying what

(03:24:47):
he said to him or did did he saythat to him or how is this going
to what is the paraphrase here? And the answer is is that you
can't. I found it impossible to do it.
I couldn't I couldn't discern it.
But when you deal with the idea of what's being said by Yahwah
and what's being said by Moshe and so forth.
First of all, this Rabbi that like I said, it was being

(03:25:08):
interviewed by Stephen Manoon, said that the the Mazarites cut
out thousands of verses out of the Torah that referred to
Mashiac. And some of those verses could
have been cut out by just changing the context of what's
being said, deleting a word, adding a different word, you
know, so on and so forth. But when you talk about the idea

(03:25:30):
of when you talk about the idea of the prophecy, there is,
there's one singular prophecy. I think it's Deuteronomy 34 when
Moshe says I will send a prophetand you will do what he says.
And this was a prophecy concerning the coming Messiah.
But from my point of view, Leviticus 1711 is the most
specific prophecy about the coming Mashiac.

(03:25:53):
And, and in particular, it's a prophecy about the bloodletting
of Bashiah because it says, you know, the life of the soul is in
the blood, right? He and I, he and I, it's who of
Rodney that's written in there. He and I, he and I have

(03:26:14):
appointed this blood as atonement for your soul, For his
blood in your soul is atonement,right?
That prophecy right there tells you that all of the animal
sacrifice and everything else isbasically going to be, you know,
a stopgap until this is accomplished.
It's the singular blood of Mashiac that's referred to in
1711, I think. Now you have other things too,

(03:26:38):
which is that when you see the pattern of the Mishkan, the
pattern of the Mishkan, Mashiachis going to tell you in the I am
statements in the Gospel of Johnthat he is the Mishkan.
You know I am the gate, right? And then when you come inside
the inner Tabernacle, what do you find there?
You know you find that you find the altar of sacrifice and you

(03:27:01):
find the the the washing basin, right?
This is the baptism and the sacrifice.
And then when you enter into theTabernacle, you have the
menorah. He says I am the light of the
world. You have the showbread.
I am the bread of life. And you have the incense burner.
His name is the incense that present presents your prayers to
the Father. When you come, when you come

(03:27:22):
into the Holy of Holies, what doyou see?
You see the Ark of the Covenant and inside the Ark of the
Covenant is the 10 Devarim. And what does Mashiac say?
I am the way, the truth, and thelife.
And what does what does Psalm One 19143 say the Torah is the
truth? What does Psalm 19 one say that

(03:27:44):
the Torah is the way? And what does Deuteronomy 32
say? That the Torah is your life.
Amen. So when Mashiac says I am the
way, the truth, and the life, he's telling you I am the Torah,
I am the I am the Brit hadashah.He even goes so far as to say,
look, this cop right here, I'm going to, I'm going to pour this
cup. ZE Brit hadashah Badami, this

(03:28:06):
cup is the renewed covenant in my blood, right?
Then he's telling you I am the new covenant.
I am the new covenant. I am the Brit Hadashah.
My body and my blood are the Brit Hadashah.
And so he's telling you he is the Mishkan.
All of the I am statements to John tells you he I am the

(03:28:28):
living Mishkan. I am the living.
I am the living temple. And so This is why and then this
is discussed throughout the Gospels that it is a temple
built without hands. It was stones made and carved
without hands, right, and that Ihave the ability to raise from
these stones. You know that the the children
of Abraham, because the childrenof Abraham are stones cut

(03:28:51):
without hands. And so all of this, you could
call it symbolism, but it's not just symbolism, it is spiritual
reality because, and this is what is so important about our
faith to really recognize that the estate of the Father,
Yahwah, the estate that he created, which was the promised
land and all the gifts and the blessings that would come to

(03:29:13):
Avraham and his children, right?The covenant, give it to
Abraham, became an oath to Yitzhak, which became a law unto
Yakov and an everlasting covenant to the House of
Yasharel. But that covenant is going to
return to Yahwah because of the transgression of Yahsharel and
Yahudah. That's in Jeremiah 11/6 saying

(03:29:33):
that Yahusha, Yasharel, and Yahudah broke the covenant.
They materially breached the covenant.
The estate returns to the Father, but then what happens?
The estate goes to the heirs through the death of the
testator, right? The testator had to die for
there to be heirs. That's discussed in the book of

(03:29:55):
Hebrews. The testator had to die for
there to be heirs, and then the heirs are taking of this
covenant. But as in the case with any
estate that goes from the testator to the heirs, you have
to accept the gift. If somebody says, you know,
listen, listen, I'm willing you my property, you know, you're
the sole heir to my property. And then you go overlook at the

(03:30:16):
property and it's a municipal landfill that's got $1 million
in of environmental cleanup attached to it.
You might want to disclaim that that gift that, you know, I'm
not the heir to that property. You keep it right, so you have
the opportunity to either claim or disclaim your inheritance,
which is the Brit Hadashah that has passed you from the death of

(03:30:37):
the testator, which is why Mashiac said this is the renewed
covenant in my blood because theblood had to be shed that the
covenant might pass to the heirs.
And then what does Paul tell us who the heirs are?
If you have believed Mashiac, ifyou have believed his testimony,
if you have believed in his death and his resurrection and
in his ascension, and you have confessed the same with your

(03:30:59):
lips, then you are a child of Abraham.
And what an heir, according to the promise.
Amen, Amen. And yes, along along with that,
the divorce decree is ended because the testator, the
husband, died. That's correct, and so, and as a

(03:31:23):
consequence, Nuya Shirel can be once again married to the
father. Amanda Yeah, yeah.
And the blood, the blood and water issued from his side, the
blood for the forgiveness of sins and the water for the
cleansing, for our cleansing areit's another.

(03:31:44):
It's not just a indicator that his he actually had died in the
pericardium filled up with fluidand whatnot.
No, he the the blood that issuedfrom him was for our forgiveness
and the the water that issued from his side was for our
cleansing. Yeah, I mean, you know,
beautifully spoken, right? Beautifully spoken and so true.

(03:32:06):
It is right that the blood, the blood that was shed on the
cross, the blood, all the blood of Mashiac that was ever shed,
yes, was atonement for the sins of mankind.
Leviticus 1711. His blood in your soul.
I have He, and I have given His blood as atonement for your
soul. Amen.
Yeah, there it is. Yeah, Yeah, brilliantly said.

(03:32:26):
Well, thank you, Ray. And listen, we'll always, you
know, thanks for being a part ofour community, brother.
Well. Love it and anyways, blessings
to you and Stephanie. Thanks so much, Steven.
Thanks, Ray. We'll catch you.
Give my blessings to Hollywood. You betcha.
Thanks, brother. OK, Chad Hudson.
How's it going, brother? Hey, to add to what Ray was just

(03:32:48):
talking about, about Yahushua being in the Old Testament, what
about all the times that the ET,the off and the tab were removed
from the Old Testament? Is is that not Yahushua's stamp
all over the Old Testament? Bingo, bingo.
Yeah, bingo, bingo, bingo. I had forgotten about that Chad.
And thanks for raising that issue.
And and just for a lot of peoplethat are new to the Zephyr, you

(03:33:09):
know, the Zephyr is called the ET Zephyr because of the
featuring of the Aleph tab. And the Aleph tab is such a big
deal because when we take the idea that the book has own which
literally every chapter in Hazone is predicated upon
something that was pre stated inthe Old Testament, they all
revert back to statements, paragraphs, chapters even in the

(03:33:32):
Old Testament that support what's being said in Hazone or
Revelation. So therefore, to try to say that
Revelation was written in Greek,well, it may have been written
in Greek, but conceptually it appears in Ebrite in Hebrew
because it is relating the Hebrew Old Testament to you.
So, and we have evidence of thatinside of Revelation, which is

(03:33:53):
Revelation 9/11 and Revelation 16 two.
But in Revelation 9/11 it says, Oh yeah, the beast coming out of
the abyss, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek his
name is Apollyon. Why would you put but in Greek
if it was written in Greek? That's a question.

(03:34:14):
And so you see two, you see these bits of evidence that
point to the idea that the conception of the Book of
Revelation was in Hebrew. It was an Eve read, it was in
Hebrew. OK, Now with that being said,
then we have to ask ourselves the question, what does it mean
when it says I am the Alpha and the Omega?
I am the 1st and the last? Oh well that means he was the
1st and the last in the Greek alphabet.

(03:34:35):
But when you construe it as the Hebrew the 1st letter and the
last letter of the Hebrew alphabet, the Aleph and the top
boom the whole thing comes alivein a huge way.
Because when you see this idea of the Aleph tab and Mashiach
saying I am the Aleph and the tab.
So you have a whole bunch of things to go into this.

(03:34:58):
One is you have this idea that the Aleph is the ultimate
authority of Yah, the creator ofheaven and earth, and you see
that the top is the sign of salvation.
We know this because it appears in Ezekiel 8 where the angels
with the slaughter weapon are told, OK, all you angels with
the slaughter weapon go into theholy city, go right up to the

(03:35:21):
temple, start right at the temple and start killing
everybody. And they're getting ready to do
this. But before they do this, one
Angel with the inkhorn is set in.
But wait, before you go in thereand hit him with the slaughter
weapons, bring in the Angel withthe inkhorn who will mark those
who are righteous, who are not going to be slaughtered.
And it says Atava hatav. Place a mark upon them is how it

(03:35:46):
reads in the average English Bible.
But what it really says there place a tav upon them.
Atava tav. The mark is specifically called
a tav. It's called a tav and so the tab
is this mark of what salvation. The tab is a mark of salvation

(03:36:07):
that causes death to Passover. So the aleph and the tab is the
authority of the Father and the salvation in the hands of the
Son. That is Mashiach, who says I am
the aleph and the tab the 1st and the last, the beginning and
the end, Who was, who is and whois to come.
Now, when you see this in Genesis 11 where you can see it

(03:36:29):
in the seven words of Genesis 11, you will see, and they just
let me point this out to you. We can do this right here on the
infamous Sword Searcher. Let's pop in here.
Sword Searcher will go into Genesis 1 and we'll look at
Genesis 11, the very first verse, and let's take a look at

(03:36:52):
it in the Hebrew. OK, so here we go in the Hebrew,
so you see better sheet Bara El aim ET aleftav hashemim, they ET
aleftav hareds. So you have 6 words here

(03:37:15):
appearing in Genesis 117, words appearing in Genesis 11, and you
have the aleftav here as word #4and you have it as word #6.
Now this can be expressed on theseven candled menorah.
You can put up the seven candledmenorah and we'll just kind of
draw it here. Let's put up the seven candle
menorah. And so we see better sheath Bara

(03:37:46):
eloim ET ET shamim, they ET Haaretz.
So Mashiach tells us I am the aleph and the tav.

(03:38:07):
I am the aleph and the tav. So we see the aleph appearing
here in position #4 and we see it appearing in position number
six. Now, if the Word tells us that a
day to Yahwah is 1000 years to us, day one, day 2, day three,
day four, at the conclusion of day four, or at the conclusion

(03:38:28):
of 4000 years, we see the arrival of the sun.
At the conclusion of 6000 years,we see the return of the sun,
the aleph tab, only this time when the sun returns, instead of
just being the aleph and the tablike this, the aleph and the

(03:38:51):
tab, he's marked with the nail this time, this time just here,
just the aleph and the tab. And so this is a very good
point, Chad, when you're talkingabout this, that we see the
Aleph tab throughout the ancientscriptures giving us the marker

(03:39:13):
that the Son, the Aleph tab, I am the Aleph and the tab, the
beginning and the end, the firstand the last.
That this is going to appear over and over repeatedly
throughout the Scripture, givingnot only an idea of the the
divinity of Messiah, but also the prophetic statement even in

(03:39:35):
Genesis one, one of his arrival and his return, even in Genesis
11. OK.
And so that's where we're going to leave it today.
And so I want to thank you guys for participating in this
discussion today and going through which kind of a
laborious, you know, geography today.
But I think it was worth seeing to discuss the House of you at

(03:39:58):
the House of Shem and the House of Shem and its displacement in
the world. And so thank you for being a
part. We'll get these videos as soon
as we can. Hallelujah.
Excellent teaching, Doctor P AndI'm just glad to know that the
curly red headed stranger is notWillie Nelson because he was
down here in Renfeld Ballyhut too long ago.
So I'm just happy to know that. Sorry.

(03:40:18):
Sorry about that. We can we can rule out Willie
Nelson. I I think we can rule out Willie
Nelson. Right.
OK. All right.
OK. Well, let me pray and then we
can. When?
Then we can call it a day. OK.
Barukata barukata yawa Bara Hashemim V Haaretz.

(03:40:40):
Blessed be you, O Yawa Sibode alKadosh, the Holy One, to be a
Shirel, for you are good, and your mercy endures forever.
And you are an Elohim of compassion and loving kindness,
who looks upon your children andsees that you have blessed us

(03:41:01):
with so many things, and you have called us into your
presence. And you have expended the things
that are most beloved to you, that you might be rejoined to
us. Not that you ever went away, but
then we went away. And yet you have prepared a
wedding table for us. May we be clothed in the

(03:41:23):
appropriate dress when we come to the wedding of the Lamb.
We pray that you would bless us and keep us.
Now look upon us with your favor.
Shine and turn your face towardsus.
Fill us with Your grace and Yourmercy, calling us into your
faith, strengthening us that we may be warriors for the Kingdom
in accordance with your call andyour will in our life, and

(03:41:45):
blessing us with your good measure, pouring out the
treasuries you have stored for us in the heavens in accordance
with your good measure and your goodwill.
Bless us in the name of you yourself, and may your blessings
be with us until we see you faceto face.
So, yeah, but look at that. Elohaya shalal avinu ma olam vad

(03:42:10):
olam, and set your name upon us and our children, and bless us
as you have promised. Hallelujah in the name of
Yahushua. Hallelujah.
Hallelujah. Hallelujah.
Amen. Amen.
OK. Shabbat Shalom.
Hallelujah. Hallelujah.

(03:42:43):
Brothers and sisters, thank you,Steve.