Shabbath September 6 2025

Shabbath with Cepher Publishing

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Good morning you all. Welcome to the Sefer Shabbat
meeting, to all of you. Good.
Morning, good. Morning we have.
Been waiting. For.
You goodbye, I was a little. Slow on the draw, I'll grant you
that. Yeah, I'm, I'm trying a new

(00:21):
technique, which is to restart my computer before we get going
on this. So maybe I can get a nice and
complete recording. That would be really good.
And so I'm, I want to welcome you all and Pastor Ephraim.
How are you, brother? Fine.
Thank you. You everything OK?

(00:41):
Looks like looks like you've gota nice evening going there, yes?
Yeah, beautiful. Yeah.
Well, it's been, it's been quiteinteresting up here in Alaska.
We've had a very good year this year.
It's been a long summer and a good summer.
And of course, you know, I knew we were going to have a late
fall predicated upon the calendar.

(01:03):
And of course, you know, the calendar again is going to be
predicting many things. So I think we're going to have a
fairly normal year next year in terms of in terms of its timing.
And because of that, we should have an expectation that you
know, you're going to see springcoming, it's usual season,
summer coming as usual season, etcetera.

(01:24):
Fall this year has been slow coming on had a long summer
Shabbat Shalom. It's been beautiful.
So that's been a very good thing.
And so as a consequence, you know, again, I mean, I was
thinking about talking about thecalendar.

(01:45):
We're going to get back into theBook of Jubilees today, of
course, as part of our Sabbath study.
And before we get started, I wanted to take a moment to talk
about some issues, if you don't mind.
Because of course we've had, youknow, I guess I have been
bringing the spirit of, of controversy to a couple of

(02:08):
items. And I want to address those
items here today because, you know, one of the discussions
that we've had that became an issue of controversy, and I
think some people have left the Sabbath group because of it.
It was the issue of the locationof the true Jerusalem.
And we spend a great deal of time looking at some of the

(02:31):
difficulties in the Torah, in particular in Exodus and in
Genesis. That did not give us a clear a
description of the location of Jubilees, excuse me, of the
location of Jerusalem. And we also see that there are
there's other indicators too later on that the narrative that

(02:55):
we have been given is not necessarily structurally sound.
I'll put it you that way. And this becomes a very large
issue. It's a big issue.
Hi, Jesse Knock. Hey, hi.
Hey, good. Evening.
Hi, Steven. And I want to kind of raise this
to you because of course, the research that we'd find gives us

(03:23):
puts, presents questions, and a lot of it has to do with the
etymology of the Hebrew. And so when we look at the
etymology of the Hebrew, this iswhere we run into the
controversy, right? And so two weeks ago we had the
issue was also raised about Esauand Jacob, right, A Sue and
Yaakov being two nations in the womb of Rivka.

(03:47):
And one person asked me, well, what's your second witness to
this idea? And these are always, you know,
they're interesting. That's a very good question and
also difficult questions. And so I have, you know, I've
got kind of three issues that are that are pretty
controversial, the idea about a SU and Yaakov and the idea about

(04:08):
the location of Jerusalem. And then we'll get to the third
issue as soon as I remember it. But I wanted to bring these
issues before you so that so that you knew what my position
is. Now, first of all, I'm going to
state this, that on all of thesepositions, this is just my
understanding, OK? And you might have a different

(04:30):
understanding and you might believe differently.
But the, you know what, for instance, I think the third is
Kumar, whether Kumaran is the mask or not.
But when we look at some of these issues, we find, for
instance, we're in a, we're in aworld right now that is really
quite curious, quite curious because we have seen, we have

(04:56):
seen a structured environment that has caused us to reach the
precipice of World War Three andreally a massively destructive
World War Three. Because there is a group of
people on Earth that are using very sophisticated and very

(05:22):
ruthless tactics to take controlof the whole world.
You know, you know, Tears For Fears used to sing, everybody
wants to rule the world, right? And love that song.
But the point being is that thisgroup does want to rule the
world. And they came close when they
were controlling the Soviet Union.

(05:44):
And but with the collapse of theSoviet Union, which by the way,
was the ordinance of beyond was nothing else, right?
It was the ordinance of the AH that collapsed the Soviet Union.
And if you look closely at you will see that in Russia, Russia
was a Christian Orthodox nation and was the heir of the

(06:06):
Byzantine Empire. And the Byzantine Empire was of
course, where Christianity was formed under Constantine.
Now I used that name Christianity to distinguish it
from the faith in the Messiah, which was a different faith
altogether. It's 1 portion of Christianity,

(06:26):
but it is a different faith altogether.
Christianity, IE what we might call Catholicism or Orthodoxy,
was not formed until the Councilof Nicaea, and then was
structured around 7 Constantinian councils, and
those councils were binding bothin the West and in the East.

(06:50):
The these councils, then the Western Church, would go on to
have 21 more councils that were not recognized by the Orthodox
Church. And in those councils they
established Roman Catholicism, Adistinctly different brand of
the Christianity created by Constantine.

(07:13):
But the Christianity created by Constantine.
Remember that that Christianity was formed around the Greek
language, whereas the Christianity formed in Rome was
formed around the Latin language.
And Latin like Aramaic is the Hebrew.
Aramaic is downstream from Hebrew, Latin is also downstream

(07:36):
from Greek. But Latin would abandoned the
Cyrillic alphabet and begin to develop the Latin alphabet, and
the Cerrillic alphabet would remain dominant in Orthodoxy.
So if you look at the Greek alphabet, you'll see it's Greek
Cyrillic, and it has many thingsin common with the Russian

(07:57):
Cyrillic. They're basically the same
alphabet, except the Russians have more letters and they have
some distinctions. But the Russians considered
themselves the heir of Byzantium.
So you had the great Christian faith that was in all of Rome.
Then Rome divided very early on after Constantine's death, by

(08:20):
about 389, Rome was beginning its division from West to east,
and then the eastern portion of the empire began to loot the
western portion of the empire. Now, this is what's been going
on in the United States now veryseriously since 1990.
We have been. We have been and we are being

(08:42):
looted. That's what's going on.
We're being looted and the looting was also taking place of
Eastern Rome, looting Western Rome, which of course caused its
weakness, which then caused its vulnerability, which then caused
Rome to be burned 8 times by theGermans, by the Visigoths and
others. And but look at what happened in

(09:05):
the East. So you had a Greek language
dominant and the Greek language was part of the Byzantine Empire
and it reached all across northern Africa.
It includes all of the Levant, reached up into the Balkans and
into Central Europe. In fact, it even reached into
Venice. Venice is a very interesting

(09:25):
city in that north of the Grand Canal they practiced Byzantium,
the Byzantine form of Christianity, and South of the
canal that practiced Catholicism.
And you can see a notable difference between the two
because where Catholicism was practiced, that half of Venice
is impoverished compared to the northern half of the island,

(09:47):
which was extremely prosperous. It's very interesting.
And by the way, in Venice, the centerpiece in Venice is the
Piazza San Marco, and there is achurch there that allegedly
contains the bones of Mark the the author of the Gospel of
Mark. So at any rate, when

(10:09):
Constantinople finally falls in 1453, the last daughter of the
Last King, whose name was Zoe Paleolog, married the Russians.
On. The third, she married the
Patriarch of the Czar and the Russian and Russia, who was Ivan

(10:29):
the 3rd. And so she brought with her as
the heiress, if you will, of Byzantium into Moscow.
And Moscow then took the position that it was the Third
Rome. Rome was #1 Constantinople #2
Moscow #3 and then the Russians began to build a really the most

(10:51):
orthodox place on earth. In fact, when the Bolshevik
Revolution broke out, Moscow hadmore churches in it as a city
than any other city on earth, many more churches.
And so, no, I'm not saying that Russian people were reverent,
but there was something that wasreally bad in Russia, and I will

(11:14):
explain to you what that is. But what took place is because
of the decadence and the defilement that came into the
Russian society. Yah chose to give them 70 years
of famine, and it was 70 years of famine from 1921 to 1991 that
they experienced famine of the Word.

(11:36):
They experienced the famine of the Word.
That is to say, the Scriptures were removed and the Bolsheviks
took over. And when the Bolsheviks took
over, they knocked down the crosses off all the churches.
The larger churches they converted into movie theaters
and the most important church inMoscow was a church called

(11:58):
Christ Our Savior was the name of the church in Russian.
Now there were other churches there, but the other churches
had different names, right? Like St.
Basil's Cathedral, St. Basil Sabor, probably the most
beautiful church ever built in the world, sitting there in Red
Square. And there were churches inside

(12:18):
the Kremlin, the Church of the Assumption, the Church of the
Annunciation, the church bell tower of Ivan the Terrible, the
Church of Saint Michael's. But you would have churches
named after these different names.
But the main church in Moscow was the church called Christ Our
Savior, which was a white churchon the Moscow River.
And Stalin hated that church. And so Stalin decided I'm going

(12:40):
to build a, I'm going to build a100 story building on that very
site. And we're going to put up a 70
story statue of Lenin on top of that building.
So that, and the idea was to create the tallest building in
the world with a 70 story statueof Lenin on top.

(13:00):
And Lenin, by the way, was hoisted up as the God of the
Soviet Union. And so there are very tall
statues, you know, the typical Soviet style stand where you
have, you know, big, you know, oversized people.

(13:21):
And there's a statue of London in virtually every town in
Russia, and it's in the in the square.
And so at any rate, he tore downChrist our Savior.
He tore down the church, Christ our Savior, and he instead was
going to build this tower. Well, the engineers went in
there and said, well, we hate tobreak the news to you Joe, but

(13:45):
that swamp and it will not support the foundation for the
building you're talking about building.
So instead he converted it to the municipal swimming pool, the
Visine for all of Moscow. And so these big Olympic style
swimming pools were put in rightthere on the grounds of Christ
our Savior. And so this will give you an

(14:08):
example of what happened. But now it's very important to
see the tactics that were used to overthrow Russia and the
tactics that were used to overthrow Christian Russia were
tactics of defilement and demoralization and destruction
of the family. And to do this from the inside

(14:30):
so that the social order is defiled, demoralized and
destroyed. And then once the social order
is defiled, demoralized and destroyed, then you're basically
sitting ducks. And you're sitting ducks both
spiritually and physically. And so this is what happened.
And so, yes, Moscow and Saint Petersburg with the subject of a

(14:52):
great deal of sexual defilement,sexual demoralization, familial
demoralization. And this goes, by the way,
there's no discussion about thisin the West.
There's no discussion about it at all.
But this was the case. And by the time you get to 1917
and the failure of the Russians in World War One and the

(15:16):
Russians failed in World War Onebecause the czar was inattentive
and a poor general didn't know what he was doing.
And he left to go up to the front to represent the Russian
troops for two years while his wife stayed home and had an A
notorious affair with Rasputin, who was a decadent and defiled

(15:36):
monk, who was practicing sorceryand who believed in lawlessness.
He believed in the Lutheran doctrine that shall we send that
grace might abound. And his answer was yes.
And this is what he taught. And eventually it got to the
point where the nobility in Saint Petersburg assassinated
him. But he was a very difficult
person to assassinate because they had, they had poisoned him

(16:01):
with enough poison to kill five men and he'd eaten it all.
And he was there was, he didn't have any problem.
It wasn't bothering him at all. So then they shot him and that
didn't work. So then they threw him down in
a, they stabbed him four times and threw him down in a canal.
Well, he got up and was walking and the only reason he died is
because he couldn't get out of the canal because it was too icy

(16:23):
and too slick and he died from exposure.
Rasputin. And so because of this and the
decisions that the Czar made to impose tyranny on the people,
which is what he did, he imposedtyranny on the people, and he
engaged in a mass slaughter of the peasants in front of the
palace in Saint Petersburg with 200 Cossack horsemen, cutting

(16:46):
him down with sabers. Well, when that happened, of
course, the American banks, Jacob Schiff in particular, sent
$28 million in gold to Vladimir Lenin to overthrow the tsar. 28
million in gold. It's a lot of money that'll
finance a revolution, and it didfinance a revolution.
And the Bolsheviks took over. Now, the Bolsheviks were 84%

(17:10):
Jewish. In fact, the leadership of the
Soviet Union was 84% Jewish. The head of the KGB, the head of
the Gru, the family that assassinated the Tsar and killed
him and his whole family and then dismembered their bodies
and put him down in a belt was all Jewish people.
Trotsky was actually a guy namedLev Bronstein.

(17:32):
Stalin is Yosef Jugishvili, he was a Georgian Jew.
Vladimir Lenin was Ulyana False,a Russian Jew, and they were
atheist Talmudists and their idea to control the world was to
control as a super elite controlling the Kohin.
Now for those of you that don't know the rhetoric of Monaco,

(17:54):
Michenersen Menachem Schneerson who is the head of Habad
Lubavitch, he came out and told everyone in the world look the
the goyim. The only reason the goyim are on
earth is to serve the Jews. The Jews have two souls, the
goyim only have one. And that the laws under the

(18:15):
Talmud allow for the rape of a goyim of a goy woman.
They allow for the promotion of abortion among the goy.
You can exploit the goy with a ridiculous usury on.
And all these kinds of things can be done.
And Menachem Schneerson, you know, created this organization
called Khabad Lubavitch. Khabad Lubavitch last year, I

(18:37):
think it was, got raided in New York.
And they found all these underground caves that were
connecting one place after another.
And they found places where infants were being kidnapped and
they were being pulled down through tunnels on the streets
inside Brooklyn. And of course, everybody went
nuts when they raided these places because that wasn't

(18:59):
supposed to be found. But it was found.
Now we know. And of course, Candace Owens has
just done a huge expose on on aninterview with a Scottish
fellow. And it's really quite good
concerning Robert Maxwell, the father of Key Lane Maxwell, and

(19:20):
the kind of enterprise he was engaged in with Jeffrey Epstein,
which of course we look at it, we hear about the sex scandal,
but really Epstein and Maxwell were involved in huge
embezzlement schemes, moving billions of dollars out of the
United States and out of the UK off the books into Israel.

(19:41):
And so the definement that came into Russia in the late 1890s
and going all the way through World War One would then
transfer into Germany following World War One and the German
culture would become more and more defiled.
If you if you, it's very easy tofind, you can go back and look

(20:01):
at the research of what Berlin was like in the 1920s all the
way up until the appointment of Hitler.
Go and look and see what it was.You had the same defilement, the
same demoralization, the same destruction of the family.
That was being practiced in Germany.
And this destruction comes from the sexualism that is taught in

(20:24):
the Talmud. And I know some people have have
actually gone to look at the excerpts from the Talmud talking
about how it's permissible to have sex with children under 3,
how it's permissible to have sexwith children under 9, how a
priest can marry a three-year old.
All of these things are in the Talmud.
And six genders, 6 sexes, and eight genders found in the

(20:46):
Talmud. If you have something to eat,
and with those things being taught and those things being
promoted in society, and they'repromoted in society very
innocuously, the first thing is to get you slowly immune to the
next level of defilement. We start with a little bit of

(21:07):
defilement, then you get immune to that.
Then it goes to the next level of defilement, you get immune to
that. Then it goes to the next level
of defilement. You get immune to that until
pretty soon somebody's arguing for same sex marriage at the
Supreme Court, until pretty soonsomebody's arguing for the
codification of pedophilia, until somebody's arguing for the

(21:27):
legalization of incest. You know, all of these things
happen. And then the next thing you
know, you've reached the precipice where you are a
defiled society, you are a demoralized society, and you are
a destroyed society. Now, we've been destroyed for
some time. We've been defiled and
demoralized for some time. It's been gone.

(21:48):
It's been a long time. And so as a consequence, our
nation is on the threshold of exactly where the Soviet Union
was or where Russia was in 1920 when we were when they were
overthrown and given a 70 year famine of the word.
Now, again, a lot of people don't know this, but it is the

(22:09):
great Holocaust of our time whenthis, when Russia was overthrown
and the Bolsheviks took power, they began a campaign of
extermination of Christians. And Stalin was responsible for
the death of 66 million OrthodoxChristians in Russia, 66

(22:30):
million. And he killed them in the most
ruthless and brutal ways you could imagine.
Everything that you see going onin Gaza right now is what Stalin
did in Russia. Everything you see going on in
Gaza, Stalin did before. And he did that before.

(22:56):
He did that before Germany. And so when you look at that, I
mean, when you see some of the excesses that we've got, for
instance, there is a thing called the whole of Damar, which
no one wants to talk about. And again, these are facts that
I mean, even in Russia, the Russians won't tell you this.

(23:17):
But I'm telling you this becausethe Russians want to pretend
that the Stalin era was good andso forth, because it brought
them out of being an agrarian society full of serfs into an
industrial society. Yeah, but the cost was enormous.
And when you look at what he did, the whole of the MAR was in

(23:39):
1933 and 1934, Stalin decided that Ukraine was having record
banner wheat crops and that he wanted to make that money and
not any of those privatized Ukrainian farmers.
So he went down and collectivized the farms.
In other words, he seized all oftheir farms and said, the state
now owns these farms, not you. And I'm shipping all of you out

(24:03):
to the Urals where you can farm out there.
And we're going to bring people from the Urals who don't farm as
well as you to come out here andfarm here.
That's part of the collectivization of the Soviet
Union. And the Ukrainian said, we're
not doing that. He said, fine, He seized all the
wheat and all the other food fortwo years in a row, and he
starved 10 million Ukrainians todeath.

(24:26):
The New York Times, an organization which was
controlled by Bolshevik sympathists, was calling him
Papa Stalin this whole time, bathing him in the light of he's
so friendly and the communist experience is so good and so
loving and so nice and so beautiful.
This was bathed by New York propagandists who, by the way,

(24:48):
were the same ones who funded it.
And he got away with it. There was not a single word of
discussion about it. So do you want to know why the
Ukrainians are willing to fight to the last man against Russia
and Ukraine? Because there was an intense

(25:08):
hatred to the point that when Hitler invaded Ukraine, Stepan
Bandera took most of the westernUkrainians and joined the Nazis.
So most people don't know that the the Nazi army that was
responsible for the slaughter and the depths in the Warsaw
Ghetto were most of the Ukrainian.

(25:29):
Those were most of the Ukrainians.
The largest slaughter of Jews inEurope happened in Ukraine by
the Bandarites who were killing these Jews because they were
inflicting collective punishmenton the Jews for the excesses of
the atheist Jews that sat in Moscow controlling the Soviet

(25:50):
Union. Now the same group would then
use British colonization tacticsto grab the Levant, and when
they grabbed the Levant, they were doing the work of British
Bankers, namely the Road Shield family.
Go back and read the Balfour Declaration.
It was a letter written by Balfour to Jacob Roadshield

(26:13):
saying here we go. We've got Parliament to agree to
create a Jewish state in the Ottoman Empire, this area called
Palestine, where people from Central Europe are going to be
able to go down and take the property of the people who live

(26:33):
there in this, in these discreteareas.
And so this is what happened. And when that happened, it was
called the Nakba. When the Nakba happened in 47
and 48, the land that was given to the Jews by the UN Resolution
S 181, they just went in there, shot the families and took their
house and all their stuff. And so it was a vicious

(26:58):
slaughter that took place in 48.And it was certainly not
engendered to make friends and influence people.
But this was done by the road shield bankers.
And the reason why is because they wanted to have an element
of colonization in the Levant that would destabilize all of
the governments that were controlling the oil in the

(27:21):
region. They wanted to have all of those
governments destabilized so thatthey could loot the oil and
basically keep all of those indigenous people off their feet
so the oil could be exploited. And this is how we got $0.17 a
gallon in the United States. And the Rockefellers were part

(27:41):
of that same machination. So when we understand that, and
then you see what's going on to try to understand entirely this
business of Talmudism and this business that has resulted.
And it's not just Talmudism, it's radical Talmudism that some
people call Zionism, but it's radical Talmudism and this

(28:06):
radical Talmudism. And you see it preached and it's
been taught in the Christian churches and it's been taught
erroneously in the Christian churches because when you see it
being taught, those who bless Israel will be blessed, those
who curse Israel will be cursed.That's an inaccurate statement
that comes out of the Scofield Bible, who himself was an agent

(28:27):
of the synagogue. When you look at the true
translation in Genesis 12, three, it's those who bless
Abraham will be blessed and those who curse Abraham will be
cursed. And Abraham is declared to be
the father of the Melo Goyim or the Goem Gadul, a great nation,

(28:52):
a wide nation, many nations madelo goem.
And so this blessing on Abraham is going to go to all the
children of Abraham. We'll remember that Abraham had
a son named Ishmael, who had twelve sons who were blessed.
He also had six sons through Hagar or through Katura rather.

(29:12):
And in addition to yet shock. And so all of those tribes were
blessed. They're all blessed, they're all
the seed of Abraham and they're all blessed.
And to say that we're going to take one tribe and bless it at
the expense of everyone else is a huge mistake.
So the Scriptures have been expropriated and violated and

(29:38):
used to disguise a group of people who do not believe in
those scriptures at all. They what they believe in is
they believe in the Talmudic discussion surrounding those
scriptures, not the scriptures. And as a consequence, they're
using those scriptures to obtainan advantage that will allow

(30:01):
them to govern the world by deception.
This is their statement. By deception, we wage war.
That's their philosophy. And so by deception they have.
And So what we know now is, is that it is a central group that

(30:22):
has been doing this for some time.
They created a great deal of damage in the 20th century,
being responsible for 66 milliondeaths in Russia.
Their followers in China would kill another 50 million.
And then of course, we would allthe expenditures that were the
Cold War, as the West tried to resist in the international calm

(30:43):
small. And the International Calm small
was working inside and outside. So that we saw the followers of
Victor Mordecai, who called himself Karl Marx, that those
followers of Karl Marx would infiltrate all of the
universities in the United States.

(31:04):
The practitioners of Zionism would control all the
publications. They would control the media in
New York. They would control the movie
industry, the film industry and the music industry.
If you did not, I mean, I can tell you I was in the music
industry for years, as I know Angela was.
When you, when you would go up, when it came time for you to try

(31:25):
to get into a national status asa musician.
I can remember we were looking at this in the 1980s.
Let's just look and see who was advanced in the 1980s who
received better than 90% of all the music dollars that were
spent in the United States. It was 3 artists.

(31:46):
It was Madonna who was engaged in Catholic sacrilege as a
profession. It was Elton John, the most
conspicuous homosexual in the industry, and it was Michael
Jackson. These three were taking 90% of
all the money in the music industry throughout all the 80s.

(32:07):
In fact, Elton John at one pointwas making $16,000,000 a month.
Madonna was making 60 million a year, Michael Jackson 80 million
a year, and they were pushed forward.
Now there were other artists that would be pushed forward
too, but they would be pushed forward on 2 tenants.
Either 1. You advanced homosexuality or

(32:28):
you advanced the use of heroin. That was it.
And if you weren't willing to doeither one of those, well, then
you weren't going to move forward.
In the music industry, you could, but it would be only by
hook or cook. You'd have to do it in spite of
them, not because of them. And then in the film industry,
you see over and over again the normalization of homosexuality,

(32:51):
the normalization of fornication, the normalization
of adult, the normalization of divorce, right?
It's all that. All that stuff was normalized,
normalized, normalized, normalized.
And all of this was done by design to defile and to
demoralize the culture. And so the culture was defiled

(33:14):
and demoralized. And This is why you see a
culture right now. That is, I mean, you know, we're
like a bad windshield that, you know, came out of the car and
fell onto the ground and got splattered on the curb.
It's broken in pieces everywhere.
Our social order is broken in pieces.
It's completely broken. It's a broken social order.
Who are we as Americans? Who are we?

(33:39):
Who are we? You know, if you wanted to get a
definition that's kind of close to who we are, then you have to
start talking about Boomers and Millennials and Gen.
X and Gen. Z and Jen this and Jen, the
other thing. And each one of those
generations being distinctly different in their opinion, in
their views and how they act. Is there a generation American?

(34:01):
Nope. That doesn't exist anymore.
That doesn't exist. There's a culture, a strong
dominant culture, I think in Texas.
There's a strong culture in the South in about the South of the
Mason Dixon line. I suppose there's a strong
culture in California. They sure know how to export it
when they leave. But where's the American

(34:22):
culture? Where's the American culture?
So because of this, because of this pattern, so my question is
this, when I started getting into the Scriptures, to begin
with, we wanted to take the position that we were going to.
First of all, we took the position in this effort that the

(34:44):
Old Testament of course, was conceived and written in Hebrew.
Now anymore that might be a radical position because we see
the very first writing, the stepat least that exists in
modernity, came through the Septuagint in Greek.
So the Septuagint was created around 250 BC in Greek.

(35:05):
And the Greek writing would would remain dominant such that
the New Testament would be written in Greek.
And even though the all of the books in the Septuagint would be
translated into Aramaic, and even though the the Greek
writings in the New Testament would also be translated into
Aramaic, where are the Hebrew originals?

(35:27):
Where are the Hebrew originals? Now?
We don't know where they are. And I think what happened was
the vast majority of them were burned, burned and reburned.
And they were burned primarily by Constantinian Christians.
After the legalization of Christianity, the Christians in

(35:50):
Alexandria burned that library three times.
Augustine, Augustine went out and burned every Hebrew scroll
he could find. That's what he built his career
on, was burning Hebrew scrolls. So we have, we've got a real
issue when you're talking about the original language of the

(36:12):
text. Now I can tell you one thing to
my dismay that I discovered and when when we were doing the
Psalms, is that the Psalms appear to be particularly in the
Masoretic Text translations fromthe Greek.
The Psalms were translated back into the Hebrew from the Greek

(36:32):
because there are a couple of Psalms in particular where the
Hebrew writers didn't understandthe Greek and they got it wrong.
They got it, it was incorrect. So we these things make it for
some very curious issues. Now when I talked with Andrew
Roth, he was telling me that when the Aramaic Peshita was
first created, the Tanak Peshita, it was created using

(36:56):
the Torah and the Nebiim, that is to say the five books of
Moshe and the and the books of the Prophets.
It did not include the Kettuveim, the writings, the
Psalms, the writings of the Proverbs, the writings of
Solomon, etcetera. Did it didn't include that, but
eventually it did by the time wegot to the 1st century.

(37:19):
Nonetheless, we have taken the position that the Septuagan was
a translation. This is the narrative that goes
to the Septuagint that it was translated by Jewish scholars
living in Alexandria for Ptolemythe King around 250 BC.
This means that there were original Hebrew texts.

(37:41):
Now, the Hebrew texts do have a great deal of authenticity
because of the Hebrew language. The Hebrew language is
incredibly different from every other language.
It has depth of truth in the language that just keeps going
and going and going and it it keeps going in its truth without
contradiction. It's like peeling away an onion.

(38:04):
And the farther you get into theword, the more true it becomes
at a different level of truth. This is why I do believe Hebrew
to be the conceived language of Scripture.
And but you have to recognize that the Scripture that was
given, the only thing that was really kept meticulously was the

(38:25):
Torah. And even then you have a passage
in Jeremiah that says the lying pen of the scribes made
modification, and the greatest modification of them all, you,
the Torah says the Torah ends inDevarim.
And it says what you do not add to and do not take away from
this Torah, right? Don't do it.

(38:49):
But when you get into the 7th and 8th, 9th centuries in
Europe, central Europe, again, the same group of people began
to modify every word of the text, every word of the text,
and they modified it by using nikudo.

(39:12):
The nikudo are the cookie crumbs.
The cookie crumbs are the lines and dots that you find
intermingled with the Hebrew text when you're reading it.
Now, arguably, let's do the positive side of this or the
first affirmative as to the nicodote.
The Hebrew language had died many times at by at this point.

(39:35):
And so the rabbi's said, well, we're going to put together a
pronunciation guide so you can figure out how to pronounce
these Hebrew words. But they created a pronunciation
guide that in my opinion, was deadly wrong because they
claimed there were no vowels. And there's very conspicuously

(39:56):
vowels in the Hebrew language. But they tell you there are no
vowels. And then they're going to create
the vowels with the cookie crumbs.
Well, those cookie crumbs do things like add.
They add vowels to a word that don't exist.
They'll add an O to a word, or they'll add an O to a word, or

(40:17):
they'll add an E to a word. Sometimes they add an ah to a
word. Then they also add consonants to
the word. They have a thing called the
doubling dot and the doubling dot.
If it appears in a lamid, or it appears in a man, or it appears
in a noon, or appears in a bait,it creates 2 consonants that

(40:38):
otherwise don't exist. They otherwise don't exist.
So the Mazarites then modified every single word of the Torah,
and they modified every single word of the remainder of the
tonic using these foul sounds. Now where does this become

(41:03):
important? It becomes important when you
have a word spelled one way and you're getting different
pronunciations for the same word.
Like just an example, Adam Adam is aleph Dalit meme, but the
word Edom is also aleph Dalit meme and the word adom meaning

(41:26):
red is aleph Dalit meme. So which one is being said here?
Well, that became the preferenceof the Mazarite who was doing
the text. So if it said and Esau was Edom,

(41:47):
what if that was saying and Esauwas Adam?
Oh, that's a big distinction, isn't it?
Because when you talk about Adamites, what are you talking
about? You're just talking about men.
Mankind just be just became a general mankind, right?
Oh, no, we're going to specify Edom.
Now this kind of misleading doctrine would get more and more

(42:10):
intense once you added the rabbinical in in discussion to
it, in what's called the Talmud,or what's also called the
Gemara, which is rabbinical opinion concerning the
Scripture. So when you begin to see this,
the ancient text, what we have to look to is now we have to

(42:30):
look to all kinds of resources to see what exactly was the
ancient text. What does the Septuagint say and
how does it different from the Masoretic Text?
What does the Samaritan Pentateuch say and how does it
differ from the Masoretic Text? What does the Aramaic, Tanakh,

(42:52):
Bashida say and how does it varyfrom the Masoretic Text?
Because all of them are translations.
Now, when we, when we came into the New Testament, we take the
position in particular, I take the position, I should make that
clear. I take the position that the

(43:13):
Gospels were conceived in Hebrew.
They weren't written in Hebrew though, but they were conceived
in Hebrew. And there's plenty of reason to
believe they were conceived in Hebrew because of course, you
have a lot of Hebrew sayings. You also have a great deal of

(43:34):
quotes, direct quotes from the Old Testament that are
throughout the Gospels. You have Mashiac reading from
the Isaiah 61 scroll that was done in Hebrew.
You know, you have the you have the recitation of the Shema in
Mark 12 that was done in Hebrew.So there's reason to believe

(43:54):
that it was conceived in Hebrew.Now not all of the Gospels were
conceived in Hebrew, but it's very clear in Luke chapter 1,
Luke is going to tell you that these gospels were declared unto
you, but I'm going to set them forth in writing and in order.

(44:17):
So this is in the 1st chapter ofthe Gospel of Luke.
So Luke is basically telling youthat the Gospel of Matthew and
the Gospel of Mark had been declared unto people.
It had been declared unto peopleand which gives rise to the idea
and I think does establish with some credibility that the gospel

(44:40):
narrative was a group of storiesthat we're told as as accurately
as they could be recalled by thedisciples from person to person
to person to person. Do you remember when he taught
the parable of the vineyard? Yeah, I remember that.
Do you remember when he taught the parable of the fig tree?

(45:02):
Yeah, I remember that. Do you remember when he healed
that woman that had the blood issue?
Oh, yeah, I remember that. You remember when he cast out
the demon of the blind? Oh, yeah, I remember that.
And so these narratives were told and perfected, perfected
and done in the oral tradition, by the way, that had been
present in the world for 600 years at this point.
The. I have the idea of transmitting

(45:23):
an oral position mainly using triadic expression and so I
believe that this was the case behind the Gospel of Matthew and
the Gospel of Mark. Some of the guys telling the
narrative and not Mark got a fewof the.
Facts twisted up a little bit. And they forgot a number of the

(45:45):
stories, but Matthew remembered them and put them back in the
Gospel. And then Luke had done further
research to determine, you know,read the vast majority of the
story. But you might recall that the
story of the Magi appears only in the book of Matthew, and it
does not appear in the book of Luke.
It appears only in the book of Matthew.

(46:07):
And there's other narratives that appear only in the book of
Luke. But Luke is the one who's going
to give us the timing of everything.
He's going to tell us when Meshiach was born, what time of
year he was born. He's going to tell us when John
the Baptist was born. He's going to tell us when, what
year Mashiacs ministry starts. That's all of that is very, very
clear. And he lays all of that out.

(46:29):
And so Luke was probably writtenand probably written in the
Greek language. Now, what do we know about Luke?
Well, I just picked up a book that is called The Triads of
Britain, and this is, you know, only for those of you that are
like hardcore into the Celtic language.

(46:50):
I want to read this book becauseit's definitely hardcore Celtic.
But in this book they do establish and the credibility of
this book, by the way, is extremely high.
In fact, half the book is written about its credibility.
And one of the things they pointout is that karate was karate AB

(47:11):
Bran. This means that Karadik was the
son of Brand the Blessed and there is no distinction and
there's no other names that comein into that group.
It's Brand the Blessed. But then Karadik, Karadik was
taken to Rome and Karadik son was Lucius or Luke and Luke.

(47:33):
And what was interesting is, is that when Karadik was taken to
Rome, he was already a believer in Mashiac.
And in fact, his whole family, they were already believers in
Mashiac. How is this possible?
Paul hadn't shown up there at all.
Paul hadn't even been to Britain.
How was it possible that karate was a believer?

(47:56):
But he was, and his whole familywas.
And it turns out that when you look at what happened with
karate, his son Lucius is going to be the one that Paul is going
to ordain as the first Bishop ofRome.
And Luke would go on to write the Gospel of Luke, the book of
Acts, Second Corinthians. I believe he also wrote the book

(48:19):
of Hebrews. That's me.
Some people assign Hebrews to Timothy, but I don't think so.
I think it was Luke that wrote it.
Luke was, you know, he was a polylinguist and he was very
well educated, very brilliant man and would then layout these

(48:41):
huge books that are so importantto the New Testament.
I know. What about the other parts of
the New Testament? What about the writings of Paul?
Well, the writings of Paul are are written in Greek and I think
they were written in Greek by scribes.
That's why you see so much of the pseudepigraphal statements
made in book after book of this book was written by Epiphanius.

(49:05):
So this book was written by Stephanus.
This book was written by Tertius.
This book was written by Timotheus.
I mean, all of these are listed in the King James Version.
AB telling you who the scribes were that set forth the epistles
of Paul. And I think the reason that
happened is because Paul could not read or write Greek.

(49:26):
And so he had translators working with him.
He was a Hebrew speaker and his Greek was therefore clunky.
And so the Greek translators were were trying to put in Greek
what Paul was saying in Hebrew. And some of it is A1 size fits
all shoe. And so this is one of these, one

(49:47):
of the difficulties you see withPaul.
And so there's lots of stuff that got lost in translation
between Paul saying it and the scribes writing it.
And we know that Paul was a Hebrew speaker.
How do we know that? Well, what's to tell you in the
book of Acts when he's going down to Damascus and he's
knocked off the ass, Mashiach speaks to him.

(50:10):
And, and by the way, the witnesses did not see the
blinding light. They did not see Mashiach.
Paul did, but no one else did. But they heard the voice.
And the witnesses testified thatthe voice spoke to him in the
Hebrew language. That's what it says.
He was spoken to in the Hebrew language when Paul was in in the

(50:32):
Holy Land and he was facing the death penalty because he tried
to introduce Greeks into the temple.
There were a group of people whosaid we will not eat or drink
again until Paul is dead. So they had to take him out of
Jerusalem and take him to the capital, which was not
Jerusalem. The capital was Caesarea.

(50:53):
And he went out to Caesarea to plead his case to 1st Agrippa
and then Festus. And he pled his case In what?
What language did he use to plead his case?
He's on, he's on trial, he's facing the death penalty.
What language did he use? He used Hebrew.
He was a Pharisee who had grown up in the in the priest

(51:16):
tradition, a high end Pharisee who'd read every scroll.
Was he fluent in Hebrew? Of course he was fluent in
Hebrew. It was his tongue.
And so he spoke Hebrew. So when you see this, when it,
so you can see that. And now when you look at the
Book of Revelation, Revelation, and we have it footnoted in, in

(51:37):
the Zephyr, Revelation has paragraph on paragraph on
paragraph, all taken from the Old Testament.
One thing after another from theOld Testament, the Old
Testament, the Old Testament, the Old Testament.
Well, if it was taken from the Old Testament, there's reason to
believe that it it too was conceived in the Hebrew
language. In fact, Revelation 9/11 says in

(52:01):
the beast that rose out of the abyss had a name in the Hebrew
which was Abaddon, but in the Greek his name was Apollyon.
Why would you put but in the Greek if it was written in the
Greek? 16 Two is the same way.
So we believe that Revelation was conceived in Hebrew.

(52:22):
We believe most of the epistles of Paul were conceived in
Hebrew. We believe John, Kafa first,
John second, John third, John, James, K1K2, and Jude were all
conceived in the Hebrew language, and that Matthew and
Mark were also conceived in the Hebrew language.

(52:43):
Is there reason to believe that the Gospel of John was conceived
in Hebrew? Yes, there is.
And again, when you look at the Gospel of John, the Gospel of
John is completely unique. It's not consistent with
Matthew, Mark, or Luke. Those 3 gospels are pretty much
the same. They're called the Synoptic
Gospels. But John details a widely

(53:05):
different narrative, mostly on atheological level.
Discussing the Logos, for instance, begins with the
discussion of the Logos. Look at some of the high end
discussions that take place between the Mashiach and the
Pharisees in John. It goes on and on.
The narrative goes on and on andon, and we see kind of a

(53:25):
different grouping of facts as well.
So we took the position that fundamentally the New Testament
was Hebraic in nature and not Greek in nature.
Even though it was first writtenin Greek, it was conceived in
the Hebrew language primarily. Now, because of this, we wanted

(53:45):
to take the Sepher and harmonizethe Old Testament names with the
New Testament names. So to give me an example, when
you read in the King James, you'll see that it's Isaiah in
the Old Testament, but Isaias inthe New Testament.
It's Elijah in the Old Testament, but Elias or even

(54:06):
Eliezus in the New Testament. It's Holy Spirit in the Old
Testament and Holy Ghost in the New Testament.
And these distinctions we don't think are justifiable,
particularly given the polyglot,which was the Septuagint
combined with the Greek New Testament called the polyglot,

(54:29):
didn't have those distinctions in them.
Neither did the Aramaic text in its discussions.
Therefore, why are these distinguished?
So we wanted to not only transliterate, but to also
harmonize the names. And again, our initial concept
was we wanted to be able to reach the Talmud readers.

(54:52):
That's who we were trying to reach.
The Talmud readers. Well, believe me, they have four
or five walls up between US and them.
It doesn't mean that there aren't Jews that have been
reached. However, there are many, many
messianic believers in Israel. Most people don't know that, but

(55:15):
they're there and they have to be very quiet about it.
Even guys who run around in black suits with deadlocks.
Believers in Messiah, some of them.
So at any rate, with this being said, you can see that the
initial thrust of the Sephora was to reach the Talmud reader.

(55:37):
And so This is why we transliterated the names of the
books into their Tanak names. Yisha Yu, Yirma Yahoo Zakar.
Yahoo Devri Hayamim. Trey Asar all of these names
Kehlim Mishlei so that the Tanakh reader would immediately

(55:59):
recognize these books and may feel the desire to read the
testimony in in the Brit Hadashah.
Well, this reach. On one hand, has proved
successful in many other ways, but in other ways, no, it hasn't
gone anywhere. And so we can see that in fact,

(56:23):
what we can see going on now is a very extreme effort.
And the extreme effort right nowis we're at the climax of
history. And this is what I hope everyone
in this group understands. We're at the climax of history
right now. And this climax of history has
to do with the culmination of the Gog and Magog War.

(56:48):
It also has to do with the rise of Mystery Babylon and who that
is. And we are going to see now in
the United States, we have some very interesting, we have some
very interesting issues that have to be addressed as a

(57:09):
people. One question is, who are we?
That's a question. Who are we?
And we have been subject to overthrow from day one.

(57:29):
And because we've been subject to overthrow from day one, the
definition has yet to be achieved.
But I can tell you, if we do notdiscover who we are and do not
find our way back to the ancientpath, what lies ahead is 70
years of famine. And I mean, look, I just, I have

(57:52):
to just tell you this, OK? Because this week we're entering
into this world. If, as I mentioned to you
before, when you look at what happened with the defilement and
demoralization and the destruction of the family in
Russia, it took place over a period of about 30 to 40 years.

(58:13):
And at the end of that 40 year period, a bloodthirsty,
ruthless, brutal dictator rose up that completely enslaved the
entire country under a reign of terror that would continue from
1921 to 1991 that resulted in the slaughter of 66 million

(58:37):
people who were killed ruthlessly and arrogantly and
audaciously and irrationally. Oh, I don't like your statement.
Boom, shoot you in the back of the head.
Somebody wrote a letter about you?
Boom, shoot you in the back of the head.
No trial, no nothing. If you read The Gulag
Archipelago, Alexander Solzhenitsyn talks about how he

(59:00):
was imprisoned because he saw Germany.
And because he saw Germany, Stalin could not allow him to be
in public because Stalin was telling everybody we have the
very best in the world. And anybody who had seen Germany
knew that wasn't true. So he got put into the Gulag
because he'd seen Germany and hetalks about it.

(59:21):
It's in the opening of the book.He talks about how he was
arrested and he was put into a closet that had a 200 Watt light
bulb, the top of the closet, 12 foot ceiling, and he was put
into this closet with seven other guys so they could figure
out how they could lay on their side at night on the floor and

(59:41):
all seven of them could sleep. He said by the end of the first
week, they added two more guys. By the end of the second week,
they added four more guys. This was the kind of thing that
you saw. This was common practice by the
Soviets, common practice. So.

(01:00:03):
And if they did all this to exact the confession?
Why did they need a? Confession.
They didn't need a confession, right?
Why'd they need a confession? All right, so you saw the rise
of ruthless dictator following the 40 years of defilement.
Then you see this defilement coming to Berlin, and that
continues until 1934 with the appointment of Adolf Hitler.

(01:00:27):
And here comes a brutal, ruthless dictator who is going
to create a war machine that youwere.
You were either. Fighting on the front.
Or you were in a concentration camp and he too killed 23
million people. Well, here we are in the United
States and what is happening right now is the United States

(01:00:49):
is being collapsed from within in every respect and a techno
fascist tyranny is being imposed.
And the people that are creatingthis techno fascist tyranny are
the ones who promised us, you know, labor saving devices in
the digital world, beautiful social networks where we could

(01:01:13):
all get together and talk to oneanother.
And what they are now creating is a total surveillance state.
Bill Gates apparently is put up more satellites than Elon Musk.
Most people don't know that, butthe report I saw this week is
that Gates has the satellite system to visualize the entire

(01:01:36):
world. He can see the entire world.
He's got every square inch of the world covered in his
satellite systems, and he is talking about a surveillance
state that will discover and monitor and check everything you
do know. Anybody who uses Windows knows
that Windows is listening to everything you say and storing

(01:01:58):
it in their cloud. And in fact, anything you create
on your computer, they use keystroke indicators to know
what you're typing and it's all sequestered away in a cloud
under your name. A Pelletier under Peter Thiel is
now creating a scraping softwarethat will scrape the Internet

(01:02:20):
and anything that you have ever done, any transaction you've
ever had, any digital interface you've ever had will be locked
away in a single file in data centers that are being built all
over the country. Because we are about to enter
into a techno fascist tyranny. Robert Kennedy, RFK Junior, just

(01:02:40):
testified in front of Congress about this very issue.
We're about to enter into a techno fascist tyranny that will
be a surveillance state unmatched by any tyranny
anywhere in the world ever. Now, again, I'm going to come
back to the question, who are we?

(01:03:05):
Who are we? And yeah, David, before I come
to you, let me go to Angela first.
Angela, did you have a question here?
Yes, I wanted to. What you wanted to do and what

(01:03:27):
you can do are two different things because you just got
locked up. OK, Angelo, I'm going to come
back to you. Dave Barrow.
Go ahead, brother. We are the.
Generation that has been blessedto come to the stature that you

(01:03:49):
has prophesied. For for, for this end time
battle and the remnant that believes and doubts not in their
heart presses towards the mark of that stature.
We but we are believers and not doubters believing in the OSA

(01:04:10):
balls, the sovereign of armies. We are believers that what is
impossible with man is possible with Yahwah says we're going to
do, we're going to declare the Basora of the Kingdom in all of
the earth. Well, that's completely
impossible with man. I mean how you going to declare

(01:04:34):
the Basora of Yahwah in Outer Mongolia in the in the Mongolian
step? You're right, right?
I mean, Hallelujah the. Jungles of the Congo.
Yeah, yeah. Hallelujah.
It's going to take power past what?

(01:04:55):
And this is the power that he's promised that's going to be
poured out. And we're going to pour out his
living water from the bellies ofthat he's given us, from this
fountain of living water that springs forth unto eternal life.
And bless the nations. This is past what man can do.

(01:05:16):
Hallelujah. That's who we are.
OK, I could get. I'm.
Yeah. I'll get up on the box from
here. I'm going to quiet down.
Thank you, Steven. Yeah, you know, somebody,
somebody posted in the chat, youknow, I need Yasharrel.
I am Yasharrel. And there are those who don't
want to hear the name Yasharrel.Well, that's good.

(01:05:39):
Never let it cross your lips. If you don't want to hear the
name Yasharrel, never let it cross your lips.
I need Yasharrel. I am Yasharrel.
Yeah. Yeah.
And it's true. And I believe.
I believe the words that Paul said that by your confession in
your with your mouth and the belief in your heart, you are a

(01:05:59):
child of Abraham and an heir. According to the promise.
Yeah. Angelo was going to say
something, but he's really got abandwidth promise.
I'm going to wait for him to come back on and we'll get we'll
get. We'll get back in.
Raina. Go ahead.
Go ahead, sister. But can you hear me, Steven?
Yeah, I can hear you, Angelo. Yeah, I'm sorry.
The minute. You hold on me.

(01:06:23):
My power went out, then it came back on, and I tried to come
back on, and then my Wi-Fi went out.
So if they attack my mobile, we'll all know that someone's
listening to somebody, I guess. All right, Anyway, you know, you
know, just like boom, boom, boom.
You heard this gal say, she said.
So somebody told me that. Somebody told me that our all of

(01:06:43):
our digital devices are listening on on us.
I don't believe that. And her father laughed, and
Alexa laughed, and Siri laughed,and Cortana laughed.
Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah, they're arguing with each other in my house.
Yeah. I wanted to share 2 two things I
just real quick, what you had mentioned about originally in

(01:07:05):
Hebrew and Greek, you know, it's, it's interesting like
you'll see in Greek a generalization of a word Noma,
like all covers everything, you know, like in Hebrew instruction
Torah, you have pointed times orDame, you've got a mitzvah,
you've got all, you know, very, very detailed language.
And you notice that in Greek there'll be some generalizations

(01:07:26):
that'll just cover everything like feasts cover, you know, and
every not everything's a feast, in case anybody had noticed, you
know, that kind of thing. So, so just a brief kind of out
of this is out of the complete works of Josephus and under the
section the Jewish war in book five.
I've got to get my magnifying glass on.

(01:07:47):
My eyes are getting so bad, I can barely read, but this is
tiny print. But the validation of this is so
incredible. When you go to book 5, chapter
5, this is on page 857. You're giving great description
of the going into the temple andthen what the priest would wear.

(01:08:10):
And so I'm not going to cover all that, but I do want to cover
a piece of a paragraph to get the credibility of this when
he's talking about the embroidery.
And then he talks about two verylarge and very excellent sardon
sardon axes having the names of the tribes of the nation
engraved upon them. On the other part hung 12
Stones, and then four in ace, sardis, Topaz, emerald,

(01:08:36):
carbuncle, Jasper, sapphire, andso on and so forth.
List each one. But what's curious about this?
It says at a mitre. Also a fine linen encompassed
his head. This is referring to the one who
would be the high priest on Atonement day, which was tied by
a blue ribbon, about which therewas another golden crown and

(01:09:00):
which was engraven. Here we go, the sacred name of
God. It consists of four vowels, 4
vowels, not consonants. This is some 800 years in
advance of Masoretic whatever and even Dead Sea Scroll

(01:09:20):
information, when we can read the Great Book of Yeshiyao, if
you will, most of it. And you can see difference.
You see great difference in things that have to do with
certain. You can see the difference
between Septuagint and Dead Seas.
But Masoretic Text, there's a lot of things there's a lot of

(01:09:48):
like for instance, you know, yes, yeah, 53 different.
But this one is the point that really caught my attention
because I had remembered readingthis years ago.
I first your site back and I think it was 18, 2018 roundabout
making specific videos on the name and the four vowels.

(01:10:08):
It was funny. I got behind somebody in traffic
and they, they were from the state of Iowa and I was looking
at it. Yahwah, Yahwah, you know, the
four vowels. It was very, it was very fast.
And you know, God has a sense ofhumor.
Yahwah has a sense of humor rather, you know what I mean?
It was like right at the same moment I'm listening to this,
I'm hearing Yahwah and you're and you're breaking it down.
Go E I/O I and I'm and I'm looking at this license plate

(01:10:31):
and I'm going, yeah, I get it. Thank you.
And. And of course that's that's 4.
Vowels though. You have 4 vowels.
And and remember that Josephus is the only ear witness that we
have. There's no one else that heard
the name. No one else in any, in any
recording anywhere heard the name.

(01:10:51):
But Josephus heard it and he told us.
Now, my friend Catherine Wilmot sent me over some very
interesting information about get this Pope hilarious.
OK, there was a Pope named Pope Hilarious.
You know, people used to laugh at his name, but he but, you
know, he would suppress that, you know, even though, you know,

(01:11:14):
making statements like, yeah, hewas hilarious.
Anyway, Pope Hilarious is the one who gave enforcement to the
ineffable name doctrine and Catholicism.
He's the one that gave enforcement to it.
But as I mentioned to Catherine,you know, Judge and Martyr, who
had spent time with the Rabbi's,also took the position that the

(01:11:35):
ineffable name doctrine should be in place.
Even though that's anathema to the teaching of Scripture,
Scripture is very clear. Moshe published a name, David
declared the name, Mashiach saidthat I had declared your name
and will declare it. And so the question is when you
go to. Declare it.
What are these 4 vowels? Is it a Yahweh?

(01:11:57):
Well, why would you know? Show me another example where
the hair at the end of a word inthe Hebrew language is
pronounced A. Show me.
I just want to see one other example somewhere in the text
where the hair is pronounced a I've never seen it.

(01:12:17):
Iowa, if it, if it's ah, the first time it appears, it's ah,
the second time it appears. And not only that, but when you
look at. Shalom ah.
Torah serah, Adama, gedulla, gebura, gifera, memleca, all of

(01:12:38):
these end with the hair, which gives an ending.
Ah, there's no A and yet I, you know, I hear it over and over
and over again. I hear people, they want to use
Yahweh and Yeshua. And I'm just going to say it
again, you know, and I call it. Again, you know.
You know who gave the most brilliant conversation about

(01:13:00):
this was actually an AI bot thatsaid one of the things about
using Yeshua, Yeshua does mean salvation.
OK, but when you say his name issalvation, you missed the key
point because #1 Yeshua does nothave the name of Yahwah in it.

(01:13:22):
That's extremely important. And Yahwah, Yahusha means Yahwah
saves. It's a combination of Yahwah and
Yasha. Yasha means to save, to redeem,
to atone, to deliver, to avenge.Yahwah, of course, is the sacred

(01:13:43):
name, Yahwah, Yasha. When you put those together,
Yahusha. And so when to fully grasp into
fully grok the New Testament andparticularly the words of Paul
in Philippians 2, he was given aname above all names.

(01:14:04):
If you give him a name that is separate from the name of the
Father, you are creating an Elohim that sits in front of the
Father. You shall have no other Elohim
before me. Oh well, we have another
elloween before you because we gave him a name that is
different from your name and have said that is the name above

(01:14:25):
all names. Do you see what that does?
Do you see what that does? And then when you understand
that Yeshu is a Jewish acronym that stands for may his name be
blotted out and it be of remembrance evermore, of no
remembrance evermore. Did you know that that Yeshu

(01:14:46):
means may his name be blotted out?
This is why the Jews have no problem using the name Yeshua
and Yahweh because they can't pronounce the true name.
Therefore they can say Yehovah. Therefore they can say Yahweh
because they're not pronouncing the true name.

(01:15:07):
And it's the same thing with Yeshua when they say, oh, you're
a believer in Yeshua. You're, if you're a believer in
the name that is to be blotted out and remembered no more.
So, you know, I just, I want to go back and try to make this and
I'm not picking on anybody, but I'm just saying, you know, for

(01:15:27):
people who want to. Let it roll off their tongue to
say Yeshua. You need to be careful about
that. You need to be careful about
that, and you need to be carefulabout the term Yahweh.
You know, we used to say, you know, look, it's Yahweh or the
highway, right? Get it in gear here be to figure
it out. But but you know, but I'm
telling you, there is no Hebrew exegesis that can justify an A

(01:15:54):
at the end of that name. There's no exegesis that's out
there that can do that. So, OK, so that's one of the
issues I want to talk about. No, go ahead, go ahead.
Angela, do you want to say? Something I wanted to say, well,
first of all, I want to say Shabbat Shalom to you and to
everyone. I'm sorry I got cut out.
The last is simply a question. I would like to know when you

(01:16:16):
said the footnotes on revelationon this, it's in the millennial
or it's a lecture version of that as well.
I don't. I was just asking to update.
It's in the Millennium edition, the footnotes are in the
Millennium edition, and you'll see that the that there is so
much of Revelation. It's just right out of the Old

(01:16:37):
Testament. Sometimes it's a verse,
sometimes it's a whole chapter. Sometimes there will be one
verse in Revelation that refers to a chapter in Isaiah.
And so all of these things are, it's very critical.
To understand, and this is part of the reason why in the
Millennium Edition, we have all of the quotations that are
direct quotations from the Old Testament.

(01:16:58):
We have them inset. They're inset in the New
Testament. So you can thumb through the
book of Romans or the book of Hebrews and you can see quote
after quote after quote after quote.
From the Old Testament. So when somebody hears you, I'm
a New Testament guy only, well, how do you do that with all the
quotes from the Old Testament sitting in the middle of your
New Testament? How do you do that, you know?

(01:17:19):
And yeah, I was sharing this with somebody.
The other yeah, I was sharing this with my wife who doesn't
currently have a respect or scripture in this level yet I
use the word. Yet little by little it's we're
we're getting there. But when, for instance, like
when Peter is quoting from Leviticus, when he's saying, you
know, you must be holy as you'reI'm getting English version, you

(01:17:40):
must be holy as your heavenly Father's holy will.
It's, it's breaking down an entire chapter of well, what
does that mean to be set apart? Well, he's talking about incest,
homosexuality, things that are abominations.
Well, right there, right in the middle is the food that the,
the, the describing the unclean animal was never food.
And even in Greek we get the word bromo.

(01:18:02):
It means what's ceremonial cleanunder the law, What's clean?
It's not, it's clean and uncleananimals.
It's not clean and unclean food.Just trying to break that down.
And you don't see that in a typical English Bible.
It's just not there. You don't even realize he's
quoting from that. He just always just saying
something. You must be Holy Father.
So it's like, no, these are direct quotes from Torah, you

(01:18:25):
know? Yeah, yeah.
And you know when it, when you look closely at that, just to
make your point a little bit stronger, that idea be holy, for
I am holy. It actually means be clean for I
am clean. That's really the best way to
understand that. And then when you look at the
passage in the 10 commandments that says, oh, you shall bring

(01:18:47):
my, not bring my name to nothing.
You should not bring my name to nothing.
And if you do, I will not see you as clean.
I will, I will not, you know, I will not render you clean.
You will be unclean in my sight if you bring my name to nothing.
That's the warning. That's the warning that you just

(01:19:08):
gave. Don't say that replacement of
his name and and think that you're doing good.
That's the warning. You just made it more clear it
danger. Don't do it.
And David, I got to tell you, listen, you have been kind of
you've been very strong on this issue and I appreciate that
because I can tell you the more I see this look, the more I when

(01:19:32):
you. Look at that passage in
Philippians 2. The more I see that passage, the
more this just registers in my mind as so powerful.
And again, you know, look. You guys know that I've given my
life for the Scripture and you know that ultimately I'm
probably going to end up giving my life for the Scripture.

(01:19:54):
And, and not only am I going to end up giving my life for the
Scripture, but I can guarantee you that even after I'm gone
that there is going to be a war over the supper.
There's going to be a war. And all I can tell you is that
when you look at that passage inPhilippians 211, Paul could not
have written that passage the way he wrote it.

(01:20:18):
If the son did not have the nameof the Father, he could not have
done it. He could not have done it.
And so when you see the use of the name Jesus, which is very
common in the churches, oh that if those who confess the name of
Jesus, there's no other name under heaven by which every knee
should bow and every tongue should confess, but the name of

(01:20:41):
Jesus. How was the name of Jesus
related to the name of the Father?
How was the name of the Father in that?
What you have done is you have taken a name.
And you have. Placed it above the name of
Yahwah, Yahwah to whom the Messiah prays in John chapter
17. Yahwah, the one that Messiah

(01:21:03):
directs you to direct your prayers to.
You pray to the Father. You begin your prayer with
Avinu. You don't begin your prayer with
dear Jesus, You begin your prayer with Avinu.
Why would how is it that you cancreate a name and place it above

(01:21:24):
the name of the Father? When you do that, you are in
direct violation of the second commandment, right?
Anki Yahwah Elohakim, you shall have no others before me.
Oh well, we put another name in front of you.
We put another name that we but every knee, every knee shall
bow, and every tongue shall confess.

(01:21:45):
And how does that comport with Isaiah 45, which Paul quotes in
Romans 14? How does that possibly comport
with Isaiah 45 that says I, Yahwah, am alone, the only one.
I am your Savior. There is no one but me.
There is no one but me. How does that comport?
How does that comport? There's only one possible way

(01:22:08):
that it can comport. The name of Yahwah has to be in
the Son. And the Son says I come in the
name of the Father. You do not know me.
Not only do you not know me, youwon't call me by my name, you're
going to call me by some other name.
You're not going to even pretendthat you know me.
You're not even going to act like you know me.

(01:22:29):
You're not going, you're not, you're not going to bother to
look and for me, you know, and anymore, I mean, I didn't see
this when we first created the stuff.
I didn't see this at all. All we were looking at was the
strict construction of the phrase in Philippians 211 which
gave that Yahwah is Yahusha to the glory of Elohim the Father.

(01:22:50):
And you know if if if. This is not understood.
You miss 100% of the scripture you you miss.
Yeah, Reyna, go ahead. Reyna.
Doctor P, We need to pray for those.
May I the last one? OK, hold on just a minute.
Somebody's talking. Just a minute.
I was just wanted to complete the thought, I'm sorry.

(01:23:13):
OK, hold on, Angela. Let's go ahead.
Reyna. We need to pray for those that
Yahuwah will unveil their eyes, that those blinders will come
off their eyes. Yeah, yeah.
Hallelujah. Let's let's do that right now,
right now. Let's pray right now, OK?

(01:23:45):
Can we? Elohai Yashadel, Avinu Maulam
Badolam, Blessed are you Yahwah,the head of the Commandments.
The King of all kings, the creator of heaven and earth, You
who breathed life into the nostrils of Adam, You who carry

(01:24:08):
us, You who walk with us, You who stand beside us, You who
spread your wings on us. Yahwah.
Hear our prayer. So we lift them up now for those
who have been caught in the blindness of Talmudism.
Father, I pray for each soul whoin their heart has confessed a
love for you, but who is on the path of blindness and who is

(01:24:32):
caught up in the trappings of rabbinical order and rabbinical
commands and the sins of man's. Father, I pray that you would
show them that redemption is available to them through the
blood of your son, Yahushua Hamashiach, that the blood was
not spilled in vain, but that the blood was spilled.
For all of mankind, that those who would claim you would become

(01:24:55):
heirs according to the promise. Father, unblind their eyes.
Let them see. Let them see in the in the
Hebrew language, let them see intheir own scriptures the truth
of you as revealed as you have revealed yourself through that,
that they're they would have eyes that could see and ears
that could hear even now, and that they would repent and turn

(01:25:17):
from their ways and call out. To you saying the Yahwah civil
old Al Qadoshaka, blessed be you.
Baruchata, Baruchata, Yahwah, blessed be you, blessed be you,
in the name of Yahusha Mashiah. Hallelujah, Hallelujah.

(01:25:38):
Hallelujah. Amen.
Amen. Thank you, Reyna, for that call
to prayer. Thank you, sister.
I really appreciate that. I'll wait for the other my my
other after Angelo finishes. Oh, OK, OK.
Angelo, did you have something else you wanted to to?
Conclude Yeah yeah, it was just yes it was just a conclusion on

(01:26:01):
on everything here. Hallelujah on that because of
ship that pray very hard. My wife's name is Sandra and to
come out of this cult. The thing that scares me for
many reasons yeah I was more powerful.
I don't mean in fear of that, but when they invoke the name

(01:26:25):
that they then the father, what they take and where that comes
from, You know that that complete error of adding three
vowels of another word into whatwas considered to be consonants.
And this all comes from, you know, 1280 Ramone, this martini,
if you will, that's historicallythis error is also used in

(01:26:47):
Masonic teaching. It's used in high levels of
things. It invokes false Elohim and it
scares me because I hear her declare it.
And when I hear the people declare this, I've seen it
happen where they, I've seen people's eyes kind of glaze over
and they get what they call likea, what they refer to as a
spiritual paradise. The more they call us.

(01:27:08):
And then as a group, I've been there.
I was associated with that in the past and when it went, my
eyes opened up to this years ago.
One last I might have to enter their one of their buildings.
I had to get out of there real fast.
Don't watch your eyes when there's still the spiritual war
going on in attack. So for me that's a concern as

(01:27:31):
well. Not only have error going on,
but when you, when you're havinga hybrid name, if you will
hybrid and you're invoking something coming to you, you
know, you're giving permission for a false Elohim fallen one to
come to you. And I have felt it at moments
where I seen it fill a house. I mean, you know, it's

(01:27:52):
dangerous. You know, there's spiritual
warfare going on there, you know, so I declare many times
I'm, I'm up 3/4 5:00 in the morning, I go outside the house
and declare Yao's name and declare Yao's name and just just
pray with hands raised for the veil to come off.
So I appreciate her requesting for a prayer like that because

(01:28:14):
but you know, the closer we get,it's, it's this battle of
Elohim, you know, and, and, and we invoke the name, we publish
it. It comes off our mouth from our
hearts. Oh my goodness, what an attack,
not only on the name, but on theseed.
Everything you know, you can seethe the demonic entities as well

(01:28:34):
as Asatan himself in this. Yeah.
Yeah. Well, you know, when you talk
about that, you know, this wholeidea of the Masons, OK, you have
to keep in mind that the Masons are polytheist.
They worship a bevy of Eloeen and, and you can see that the

(01:28:59):
advancement of, for instance, this Star of David, you know,
this hexagram, that advancement came through the Masons.
And if you don't think that the Masons are involved in Israel,
well, you've never been into theIsraeli Supreme Court in
Jerusalem. I went in there, walked it, and
it was very, very interesting because the main staircase that

(01:29:22):
goes up to the courtrooms has anupside down cross on it.
So you trod on an upside down cross to get up to the
courtrooms? And you come up 30 steps.
So that when you get to the courtrooms, you're on the 31st
floor and then you go into the library and the library has a

(01:29:45):
translucent pyramid over the topof the library and there's three
floors in the library. There's the main floor that you
where you enter in. Then there's a 32nd floor which
is only for the judges and the lawyers.
And then there is a 33rd floor on the top of this building.

(01:30:06):
So there is no absolutely no question at all that the Israeli
Supreme Court is a Masonic Temple period.
Now, when we talked about who are we as Americans, when
William Bradford arrived in America with the with the the

(01:30:27):
Pilgrims that came off the Mayflower.
And they landed there in in Massachusetts.
They were getting along with theindigenous people quite well.
They found a place to live. Squanto was there and welcomed
them help. They helped them to teach them
how to plant, how to live, and basically to create a community.
Even though most of them died that winter, they did manage to

(01:30:49):
make it through. And establish A foothold.
Well, as soon as they established A foothold, John
Winthrop shows up, and John Winthrop comes in a Mason and
begins to impose a Masonic orderover the top of the Puritans.
Now you can see witness of this if you ever travel through the
graveyards of Boston, you'll seethese Egyptian obelisks all over

(01:31:13):
the graveyards in New England. That's Masonic.
Those are Masonic graves. And the Masons were completely
seized, completely complete control of the colonies.
And it was Masons that created the United States of America.
It was Masons that created the Constitution.
It was Masons that created a secular government to govern

(01:31:34):
over what were otherwise a deeply spiritual people.
And so the Masons have had complete control of the
authority in the United States since, you know, 16401650.
And so as a result, this is a polytheist place.

(01:31:54):
And you can see it very clear that all of the gods that are
worshipped inside the Masonic table, the temple, are evident
in the United States. And so you can see the
exaltation of the hexagram, you can see the exaltation of the
Baphomet, you can see the exaltation of the sickle.
Moon, you can see all these things and in these practices

(01:32:17):
also comes wickedness because yes, there's human sacrifice
that takes place inside the Masonic temples.
There are other things, you know, people don't want to talk
about it, but this is the 33rd degree level of what takes place
at the 33rd degree level and. So this is an important aspect
for us to understand. And so when you're talking about

(01:32:38):
having the names confused, the names were intentionally
obfuscated. They've been intentionally
obviously being recorded. They they were intentionally
obfuscated in the they were intentionally obfuscated in the
Latin Bible. They were intentionally
obfuscated in the English Bible.They've been intentionally

(01:32:59):
obfuscated in the church. And the problem with that is
that. You can see it very clearly now.
You can see it when you look at the scriptures.
If the names are incorrect, thenyou create spiritual anomalies.
You create stuff that is otherwise going to lead you into
nothing but trouble. And look where we are today.

(01:33:23):
Look 55,000,000 Americans, 55,000,000 Americans.
Do not believe, even though theyattend church, they do not
believe the passage that says I am the way, the truth and the
life. No one comes to the Father but
through me. They don't believe that.

(01:33:47):
They think there are a group of people that have an inside
passage into heaven that are chosen and selected, and they're
chosen and selected to control the whole world.
And if they don't worship at their feet, then they're going
to be cursed. That's what they believe.

(01:34:09):
OK, let me come back to Reyna. Reyna.
Go ahead, Reyna. Try pressing your space bar,
Rena. OK, the OK again the blinders.

(01:34:38):
Yeah, there's blinders. Yeah, I agree with that.
Go ahead. The blinders have to be removed
because it it wasn't time for Yahoo to reveal where Yasharel
is, where the land of Yasharel is, and that's coming to
fruition. Yeah.
For those that do not want to adhere to the truth, will not

(01:35:02):
adhere to the truth of YEAH. Yeah, instead they will be given
over to a great delusion. They will be given over to a
great delusion. This.
Is the. Thessalonians too.
They don't even they have to contemplate when they asked for
land. The first was Africa.

(01:35:23):
Yeah, closed that door. Yeah.
He closed that door because it was not time.
Yeah. You're talking about the the
original Zionist approach was togo into Uganda.
Is that what you're talking about?
Yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

(01:35:46):
It's pretty sure. Everything in his time.
Everything in his time. Yeah, yeah, Granted.
And it's interesting how they would want to go into Uganda,
because Uganda appears to satisfy all the criteria of the
promised land given to Abraham. A place with copper, a place
with iron, a place with preciousstones, a place replete with

(01:36:07):
water, a good and plentiful landwith milk and honey and camels
and asses and so on. And all of that appeared in in
the Ugandan wilderness, in particular in the Serengeti and
in that area, which is a wilderness that has been
maintained as a wilderness and is still a wilderness to this
very moment. Yeah, thank you for that right

(01:36:27):
now. And you know, when we talk about
the blinders, I'm going to give an example of the blinders.
You see this very clearly in Matthew 23 when Mashiac is
talking to the Pharisees. He says, you blind scribes and
Pharisees, you claim that it is swearing by the gold of the
altar that makes an oath binding, not recognizing that it

(01:36:50):
is the altar that sanctifies thegold, not the other way around.
Instead, what is so good about this gold?
It's the gold of the altar, therefore it makes the oath
binding. It's the altar that sanctifies
the gold. So why would you not swear by
the altar? Well, this same blindness is
what you see continually, for instance in the Circumcision.

(01:37:12):
With the circumcision, people think that by the circumcision
of the flesh that they have an immediate pathway into the
Kingdom of Yah, but they don't have an immediate pathway to the
Kingdom of the Yah because. Paul arguing the Torah in the
Book of Galatians. He's arguing the Torah with
those who know the Torah, sayinglook, under the Torah your

(01:37:37):
physical circumcision becomes uncircumcision if you're in
violation of the Torah. Therefore the physical
circumcision means nothing. Obedience to the Torah means
everything. Why can't you see that?
Because it is a circumcision of the heart, not a circumcision of

(01:37:57):
the flesh. Yet there are people this very
moment who are arguing that circumcision is mandatory.
It's going on. It's happening.
So this is what Paul is saying. He's arguing to those who know
the Torah. OK.
OK. Catherine.
Catherine Wilmot, did you did you want to say something?

(01:38:19):
We were talking before about hilarious, Pope.
Hilarious. Yes, I'm doing a very, very deep
study on all the councils and what I found really shocking,
these happy clappy churches, Protestism.
I can't if that's the way it's said because, you know, I'm
dyslexic. I've probably got verbal

(01:38:40):
dyslexia as well. But they also in the 1500s
wanted the Apocrypha books out and they got them out.
And just reflecting on all thesedifferent councils is not just

(01:39:01):
the Roman Catholic Church, but it's multiple churches that have
fallen short of y'all. And also, I wanted to thank
Rayner very, very much. I believe that she was led by
the Royal Hakadesh in that prayer.
Because, you know, I've probablybeen sharing the extension of my

(01:39:22):
visions to you. And I just want to encourage
Rayner because I'll just give a small section to you, Rayner.
And these blinded people that come from the tribe of Judea and

(01:39:45):
Benjamin, the people in Yashiro,Yah is going to save some of
them because of what I shared with Stephen a couple of days
ago. And the ones that do not have
the scales of their eyes when Yao says run very similar to

(01:40:13):
what happened at Sodom and Gomorrah in the end times, they
are going to flee to the mountains.
And those are the ones who don'tturn back.
Will be protected. Yeah, Hallelujah.
Those who don't turn, those who don't, look back and don't.
Yes, that's what I mean. Look back because I I've shared

(01:40:39):
very, very deep visions of things that have been happening
to me with Stephen and Rayna. I just want to thank you very
much for requesting prayer because I think we, knowing
we're part of Yasharel, we've also got to pray for our stiff

(01:41:00):
necked brothers in the tribe of Judah.
Sorry, but it's the truth. Yeah, but extend that love and
keep praying for them, all of us.

(01:41:20):
Well again, when we talk about this, when you talk about the
love of Yah, that the extension of the love of Yah is in the
declaration of His name. John 17 last verse I have
declared your name unto them, and will declare it, that the
love that is in, that the love of you that is in me might be in

(01:41:45):
them, that the love of God mightbe in them.
And in declaring the name to them, you know, I've had some
people who whose name will go without mention.
But he did a video denouncing this effort.
It was almost a 60 minute long video.
And when it came to the name Yahwah, he said I can't even
pronounce the name. Well, it's not surprising you

(01:42:06):
can't pronounce the name becauseYah took it right out of your
mouth and he's not going to put it back in there.
And so such is the way it is. But anyway, thank you,
Catherine, and we'll talk again soon, OK?
There's, I'm finding interestinginformation for you on the
Council of Trent fascinating. That's that's very interesting,

(01:42:28):
you know, but when you look at the taking away of the.
Apocrypha, let's talk about thatfor a minute.
OK, because in the Apocrypha we see a number of things.
For one, for instance, if you take a look at the Book of
Tobit, Tobin has sets forth the example that here is this demon
called Asmodeus who is killing all the husbands of Sarah.

(01:42:53):
Now Sarah is going to end up being the wife of Tobin, but
first she marries a man, Asmodeus kills him, she marries
his brother, Asmodeus kills him,she marries his brother,
etcetera. She marries all seven brothers,
and all seven of them were. Killed.
Well, this is directly quoted. In the Gospel of Matthew, when
the when the when the sadhukim come to Mashiach and say, hey,

(01:43:18):
here's this woman, she married this guy, he dies, she marries
his brother, he dies, etcetera. They go down the list.
And then the question is, when she dies, whose wife is she in
heaven? Right?
Where did they get that example?Was that just out of the clear
blue sky? No, they took it right out of
Tobit. Now one of the reasons why they
took Tobit out of Scripture has to do with the Hebraicism found

(01:43:41):
in Tobet and the Hebraicism found in Tobet is this.
The demon that is assigned to the to this killing of her seven
husbands is in the Greek called Asmodeus, but in the Hebrew he
is identified in Second Kings chapter 17.

(01:44:02):
Ashemi and which the shemi is actually a prefix meaning Hashem
means I will be the name, I willbe the name.
And so hashemi is my, I will be the name.
And the this demon Asmodeus is also known in the Hebrew as
Hashem Dai. And this is the name that was

(01:44:27):
invoked by the Maccabees to be the name that was the name to be
worshipped inside of the Talmud,so that whenever.
Is. That when that whenever you saw
the yodhe vape, you would say HaHashem Hashem.
I've been looking at that as well funny enough.

(01:44:47):
Yeah. So what?
Let me finish on this, Catherine.
So when you see this, when you see this use of when you have
somebody instructing you to say you can't say yeah, wah, you
have to say Hashem, they're telling you.
They're naming the Elohim they worship.
They're the Elohim they worship.Yeah, but even Elohim is not the

(01:45:13):
Father's name. No, it's a title.
It's another title. It's, you know.
Yeah, it's a, it's a, it's a status.
Elohim is a status. Yeah.
And you know, and again, the, you know, and I've had people
say, oh, it's not Elohim, it's Aluhim.
No, no, the OM the OMBU are Masoretic injections into the

(01:45:35):
text the correct. Exactly, I've found so much
evidence of of that, but I've, I've got a bit of a pile up, but
I'll in the next couple of days,I'll slowly get on the
different, different councils for you and I'll I'll, I don't
know how to I'm going to ask Sherry to help help me because

(01:45:55):
I'm not technical. I'm not great, but I need to add
churches in Torah research because I've got a bit of a
backlog that I need to stick on there.
But I need one especially for for churches and I don't know

(01:46:21):
how to do it. So I'm going to see Sherry can
help me because as you know, I'mnot very good on computers.
Well OK great. Well this this sounds good and I
appreciate that research. Bear in mind this that all the
councils that took place in Romeafter 10/16 are were totally non

(01:46:44):
binding on the Orthodox Church and in fact many of the councils
after the 4th century AD that were done in Rome there were 21
councils total that are completely outside of Orthodoxy
that Orthodoxy does not agree with or admit.
And you know, and again, let me go back to the Apocrypha again
because I want to talk about a couple other things.

(01:47:06):
In the Apocrypha too. You have to keep in mind that
when you look at some of the apocryphal writings and the
opposition to this, by the way, in the Protestant Church in the
United Kingdom, when you when you when you think about this,
this is really a quite anathema.To really the the solid English

(01:47:31):
tradition. Now let me give you an example.
What I'm talking? About when, you know, first of
all, we're going to be in Letterworth and Letterworth.
And by the way, Jesse, I am going to prepare a document for
us talking about about how the sufferer was really given birth,
not only in the United Kingdom but in all of Europe in
Letterworth at the first conference.

(01:47:53):
That Shane and you sponsored there in Letterworth at the Town
Hall. And that it was in the spirit of
Wycliffe. Now, what I mean, what I mean by
that is Wycliffe acted with no authority whatsoever to
translate the Bible from Latin into the English language.

(01:48:14):
And not only did he no authority, but he did it in the
face of the Pope and everybody else.
So he was operating, shall we say, extrajudicially.
He was outside the scope of Parliament, he was outside the
scope of the church and going from Latin to English.
Now it's the same thing with this effort.
We in the spirit of Wycliffe, wehave done the same thing.

(01:48:36):
We have transliterated where theWestminster Confession and the
rules of King James would not allow for transliteration but
insisted on the vulgar language.So we, we have acted in the
spirit of Wycliffe to create, topush the boundaries, to create
the suffer in the same way that Wycliffe did.
So we did. So the spirit of Wycliffe is

(01:48:58):
really with us. And this is good.
This is going to be the kind of story that I'm going to present
to the museum. I'll send you a document on that
Jesse, so we can. Put that up.
Now in addition to that, when you look at what take what took
place, the reason that these books were pulled out was
because of the Masonic influencein Scotland.

(01:49:18):
The Masonic Freemasons had taken.
Hold Yes, Yes. I agree.
And the Mason? We're talking about the
Freemasons. There's something very important
I need to tell you. There's a scripture, you know, I
can't remember where I read scriptures.
You cannot profound the name of Yah, but it's the Masons that

(01:49:43):
are using Yahwah as entries to go through their secret names.
They're using all the ancient Hebraic names as passwords
through the different doors, andit's.
Just although I do think I do think they use Yahweh.
Yahweh. Yeah, yeah.

(01:50:05):
But they. Use Yahweh.
Yeah, from ancient Hebrew roots and their philosophies, very
much like King Solomon, because he's King Solomon David's son.
He started off as the wisest manbut he ended up becoming the

(01:50:26):
most foolish man because his songot got punished for him
marrying all these women that were not.
Becoming and him becoming polytheist.
And so you can see the polytheism that's expressed in
the. Masons.
Yeah, the same things happened with the Masons.
Exactly they've they've followed.

(01:50:48):
And walking in Solomon's foolishfootsteps.
Right exactly. Now let me continue because
someone. And Doctor Pi was going to tell
you that's, you know, Solomon's cave in or the a cave you go to
in Jerusalem. It it's you walk in and it's yo
to the Freemasons. Yeah, yeah.

(01:51:09):
And there you go. And that was probably created by
the Freemasons. So when you look at what the
Freemasons did, they did not want the Wisdom of Solomon or
the wisdom of Ciroc in the handsof the average British citizen.
They wanted to remove those books because they were secret
knowledge that belonged to them and them only.

(01:51:30):
Now I want you. I want to show you how anathema
the Westminster Confession is when you look at what took
place, the decisions that were made early on when the, you
know, when Tyndale, also a rebel, Tyndale came out and he
was working with Miles Coverdaleand he said, you know, let's

(01:51:51):
create the book in, let's createthe Scripture in the English
language. Now, all of this happened around
the same time. OK, So let me just give you a
quick background. Constantinople falls in 1453.
They had many, many copies of all of Scripture in the Greek
language. Those copies came N It took him

(01:52:13):
about 50 years to get N, but they eventually ended up in
Belgium and the Netherlands, which at that time was 1
country. And in that area there was a guy
named Desiderius Erasmus. And as soon as he got his hands
on the text, he began to craft aBible.
He began to craft the New Testament in the Greek language.
In his singular construction. This was called the Erasmus

(01:52:37):
Textus Receptus. Well, he did it very quickly,
and so it was sloppy. And so a guy named Betza came in
and corrected it and corrected it and corrected it.
Beta did a pretty good job, but it was Stephanus that came in
and did most of the lion's shares corrections.
Well, when this happened, all ofthis happened in the early
1500s. Now you're going to see Henry

(01:52:59):
the Eighth is going to declare sovereignty from the Pope in
1530. 4 but before. That Tyndale and Miles Coverdale
begin crafting an English version based upon this Textus
Receptus that came from Stephanus.
They begin building a New Testament in the English
language. Well, Tyndale made the mistake

(01:53:21):
of crossing the the Straits of Dover into Europe, where the
Catholics were in complete control.
They caught him, arrested him, hanged him, and then burned his
body at the stake. Miles Coverdale did not make
that mistake. He didn't leave England.
He stayed in England and he began to continue to craft well.
In 1532, Henry the Eighth broke away from the church.

(01:53:43):
In 1534, the Bishop at Saint Paul's Cathedral in London
burned his copy of the Tyndale, saying only the Bible can only
be in the Latin language. Bear in mind that Wycliffe had
translated the Bible into English 200 years before.
But here you see this Bishop saying the IT can only be in the

(01:54:04):
Latin language. He burned the Tyndale 1538.
Four years later, Parliament passes a law saying that the
Bible shall be in English and itshould there be shall be a copy
of the Bible in every church in England, and the door shall
remain unlocked so that any British citizen can walk into
the church and read the Bible. And so William Coverdale's Miles

(01:54:28):
Coverdale's book, The Great Bible was called, The Great
Bible would be published the following year and put in all
the churches in Britain. And Miles Coverdale's Bible had
the Apocrypha. And then Miles Coverdale began
to work with John Calvin, a radical Frenchman who was living
in Geneva. If he hadn't been living in
Geneva, he'd have been burned atthe stake.

(01:54:49):
But he was a controlling factor in Geneva who was willing to use
force against any Catholic who came against him.
And and John Calvin would work with Miles Coverdale to create
in 1560 the Geneva Bible which contained all of the Apocrypha.
And in 1587 the Bishops Bible would be created which was a

(01:55:14):
correction of Miles Coverdale's great Bible, the Bishops Bible.
And in 1611, King James would authorize the King James Version
to make sure that the Bible saidchurch and not congregation,
because he didn't want any of the elements of democracy
encroaching on the King's authority.

(01:55:35):
And so he authorized the King James Version, which by the way,
plagiarized the the 1587 BishopsBible in about 94% of the
script, which by the way was about 96% Koverdale's work, all
of which contained the Apocrypha.
Even the 1789 Benjamin Blaney version of the King James, which

(01:55:59):
is the first time you see the word Jesus appeared that J
appears for the first time in the 1789 Benjamin Blaney version
of the Bible. It contained the Apocrypha and
it's now called the Oxford Complete Bible because he was an
Oxford scholar when he did this.But for the Westminster

(01:56:19):
Confession to come out and say, oh, the Apocrypha is historical
only and cannot be read. That contradicted King James,
that contradicted John Calvin, that contradicted Miles Cobra
Dale, that contradicted the bishops, that contradicts, it's
going to contradict Benjamin Blaney.
It contradicted everything that was the source of the English

(01:56:41):
Bible, and it was done by who? Scottish Rite Freemasons.
Who forced? Can I just force it to?
Yeah, go ahead, Catherine. There was also sorry it's called
the Queen's Bible. In 1953 it had the Apocrypha

(01:57:03):
books in it. I would like if I'm allowed to
bring the Bible so you can use to show evidence.
Yeah, I would love to see it. Yes, Thank you.
Just just, you know, at Latterworth, because it was
still printing the Apocrypha in 1953.

(01:57:23):
Nineteen. 53 So you can see thatthe Westminster Confession was
not respected in Britain and butI've had I've had people, in
fact I had comments on the last show that Jesse and I did on,
on. Ewall.
Someone was commenting that those Apocrypha books aren't
absolutely not scripture. Where did they get that idea?

(01:57:44):
They got it from the WestminsterConfession.
And, and when you before the Westminster Confession, you can
see all the English Bibles containing it.
It was contained in the Septuagint.
It's contained in all the Aramaic writings.
There's apocryphal books found in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
What's going on here? What's going on here?
Well, you have somebody who is trying to keep you away.

(01:58:06):
And I can tell you that the Scottish Rite Freemasons,
they're not, it's not just that authority that is in there,
because there is the synagogue inside that organization.
And the synagogue has said, look, just as they have said,
the name is only for us, the Torah is only for us.
You get the Noahide laws, we getthe Torah, you get Lord and God,

(01:58:31):
we get the name. You don't.
We do, we get the additional books.
You don't. Why?
Because you're unworthy. You're dogs, you're goyim.
You only get to read the 39 books of the Old Testament.
You're not worthy enough to readanything else.
This is the whole, this is the underlying tenor of what's
there. So when we see this now, you can

(01:58:52):
see. Now let me come back now,
Catherine, please don't interrupt me, OK?
So I can finish this concept. Yes.
Yes, yes. OK, so when we talk about again,
going back to these apocryphal books, when you look for
instance, at the book of Judith,the book of Judith discloses
that Judith is going to is goingto kill the king.

(01:59:13):
I forget his name now, slip my mind, but this is a story of a
woman being victorious. Why would they want to cut that
out? Well, that's merely historical.
When you look at the story of Belle and the dragon, right, the
priests pretending that the dragon was eating this food and
Daniel being able to come in andprove to the king, Nope.

(01:59:35):
See, and what the whole point ofSusanna and Belle and the Dragon
is that you cannot just be accepting the testimony blind of
two witnesses, particularly if those two witnesses are not
telling the truth. And it may even include the
priesthood. That's not telling you the
truth. That's what Belle and the Dragon
is all about. What about the prayer of
Azariah? Is that merely historical?

(01:59:57):
What about the complete version of Esther that has a prayer to
Yahwah? Is that merely historical?
What about the prophecies that are contained in Fourth Ezra?
Is that merely historical? That accurately predicted the
coming of Mashiach, who would die in. 400 years, is that
merely historical? And the fact that Mashiach
quotes directly from 4th Ezra, but he says how I will long to

(02:00:19):
gather you as chicks under my wings, that's taken from first,
first or second Ezra. Is that merely historical?
Is that merely historical? No, absolutely not, Absolutely
not. And This is why this machination
that we see inside of. And did they do us any favors by
redacting the Apocrypha from theBible?

(02:00:40):
Did they do us any favors? We'll look what happened after
they redacted the Apocrypha. Then Wescott and Hort felt the
freedom to come in and make 2000redactions from the New
Testament, including the narrative about the resurrection
in the Gospel of Mark, and then telling us that Mark was the
original gospel and all the other resurrection nonsense was

(02:01:00):
added by lying scribes. So do you see how Westcott and
Hort de deified and completely destroyed the idea of the risen
and ascended Mashiac? They completely destroyed that
idea. And this is being perpetrated
throughout the United States. In fact, virtually all the Bible

(02:01:23):
is used, and now I shouldn't sayall.
Most of the Bible is used in most of the Christian churches
in America, which are now not Christian.
They're Zionist. They are not Christians.
They say I'm a Christian Zionist.
No, I'm sorry. You're either one or the other.
And if you're going to label yourself as a Zionist, then take
out an eraser and erase through that part that says Christian

(02:01:44):
because you're not Christian. You are not a Christian.
You're not Christian. Stop pretending to be Christian.
You don't read your Bible. You don't know what it says and
you don't believe it even if youdid read it.
Stop calling yourself a Christian.
You're not. You're not.
You're converted, so just stop it.

(02:02:05):
And so when you see this kind ofthing, it's no surprise that
when you give people a license to redact what was considered
scripture, they keep right on redacting.
They keep right on redacting, they keep right on taking out,
they keep right on removing, they keep right on destroying.
And then you have a bunch of people who want to tell you,
well, you can't read that. Why can't we read that?

(02:02:27):
Because I put my pants on both legs at the same time, whereas
you put your pants on one leg ata time.
Therefore, I can read it and youcan't.
Oh, OK. All right.
And so this is what happens. So what do you see now?
We see the calling out of Yasharel.
The calling out of Yasharel has come to us because the iniquity

(02:02:51):
of Yahshariel came to an end in 2008.
The prophecy from Ezekiel 4-5, the iniquity of Yahshariel came
to an end. And when it came to an end, Yah
began to reveal His name to the world, and Yah began to reveal
the name of the Son to the world.
And as He did, you are no longerallowed.

(02:03:14):
You are no longer to have Yah wink at your iniquity.
That's over and so to continue to cling to the formulas that
worked in the church, formulas that are based upon manipulative
praise songs in order to generate a tithe in order to

(02:03:37):
build the building. When Stephen told the the the
rabbi's where will you house me?I own the cattle on 1000 hills
where. Will you house?
Me and yet it's all about building a building and
elevating the ego of the pastor.I'm more holy than that guy down

(02:03:57):
the street because my building is bigger.
Is that cleanness? Is that cleanness?
And So what we see is we can seenow that some of these
contradictions that have been contained in the in the vulgar
translations of the Bible, they're now coming to fruition.

(02:04:22):
You know, it's like, for instance, if you harbor
contradictions in your own mind and in your own heart concerning
reality, right? Like you might hold the
contradiction in your mind that says, you know, I obey all the
driving laws. But I'm competent to drive at
120 miles an hour. I know that in my own heart I'm
competent to drive at 120. And so one day, you just

(02:04:45):
unleash. It at 120.
And the next thing you know, you're over the guard rail and
down a Cliff. How'd that happened?
Because the contradiction was not addressed and ultimately
came to fruition. And it's the same thing we see
in Scripture. When you have these
contradictions in the Scripture,well then they come to bear.
So when we talk about the Apocrypha, whether you're

(02:05:09):
talking about Judith, whether you're talking about the
complete edition of Esther, whether you're talking about.
Susanna, whether you're talking about Bell and the dragon, where
you're talking about the prayer of Menasha, whether you're
talking about first and 2nd estrus, whether you're talking
about the wisdom of Ciroc or theWisdom of Solomon, these books

(02:05:30):
are all illustrative and informative.
You know, it's the Wisdom of Solomon that tells you if you,
if you do not have the wisdom ofSolomon, you see that Moshe
lifted up a serpent. In the desert.
And those who looked on that serpent were healed.
Then you read in the New Testament, Mashiac says as Moshe

(02:05:53):
lifted up a serpent in the desert, so the Son of Man must
be lifted up. Does that invoke serpent
worship? Who?
Tells us why it doesn't invoke serpent worship.
It's in the wisdom of Solomon. That very issue is discussed.

(02:06:18):
OK, so when I see and then then when I see these, you know,
people say, well, we can't talk about Enoch.
And yet Luke gives us hard evidence of Enoch in the 70
generations from Mashiac to Enoch in Luke Chapter 3 and in
Enoch chapter 10, it says the demon shall be locked up for 70
generations. And then when Mashiach's first

(02:06:41):
miracles include casting out demons, and the rabbi's look at
them and say we've never seen this done in Yahshua before,
that's because the demons weren't on the loose before, but
they were in the generation of Mashiach.
And that's why casting out demons became a new but critical
part of the gospel testimony. Then you also see the Our Father

(02:07:04):
prayer. When you look at the Our Father
prayer, and this for me, it's just outrageous because I know
it was redacted because the prayer was taken from First
Chronicles 29 beginning in verse10.
Baruchata, Yahweh Elohai Yasharel avinu ma olan vadolam.
Blessed are you, Yahwah, the Elohai of Yasharel, our Father

(02:07:26):
forever and ever. Take out that first part so
nobody could see that name. We don't want that name being
disclosed. We want them thinking they're
praying to me, the Pope who calls himself Papa.
I'm the father. Pray to me.
But where'd they get the idea oflead us not into temptation and

(02:07:47):
deliver us from evil? Where'd that come from?
Is that just made-up? Just had a whole cloth besheak
made that up. No, it comes right out of
Jubilees chapter 12. How about the identification of
Canaan in Luke chapter 3? Who's this Canaan guy?

(02:08:07):
What's he doing there? Well, guess what?
Jubilees Chapter 8 tells you exactly who he is.
Imagine that. So we can begin to see that this
idea of limiting the books in Scripture is one that was done
because people were trying to sequester the knowledge for

(02:08:30):
themselves at the expense of mankind.
But this is not the way of Yah. Yah did not.
Withhold himself from some people.
In fact, he's called each one ofus equally to the Kingdom.
And by our confession, we are the true heirs of Abraham.

(02:08:50):
Dave Morgan. Go ahead, brother.
Yeah. So I have a question going back
to your original statements in regards to obviously what's
happening in the world, in our nation.
But in, in, in, in second Baruchchapters 25 through 29, I think

(02:09:12):
it relates to these times that it talks about a stupor.
But the question I have is in Baruch 29 two, when yah talks
about his protection, he says for at that time I will protect
only those who are found in the self same days, those days that

(02:09:32):
he's referring to those last days in this land.
So is that does that mean you have to find the correct land
and do we have to move there or what's your thought on that?
Yeah. And OK, hold on.

(02:09:53):
I'm like this is in Baruch. Is that referring to the second
exodus? What may Hold on, Let me let me
answer it. So this is in Second Baruch
chapter 29. Which verse?
Second Baruch chapter 29, verse two.
Yeah. Yeah.
OK, Yeah. Now, well, let's here let me
just put that up on the screen here and we can take a look at

(02:10:16):
that. OK.
I love. 2nd Baruch. So here we go to 2nd.
Baruch chapter 29 And he answered and said into me,
whatsoever will then befall willbefall the whole earth.

(02:10:41):
Therefore all who live will experience them.
This is an extremely important teaching because when he's what
he's talking about is the tribulation is going to be
experienced by the whole earth. We see a mountain.
We see a mountain in the silo, in a barn.
Sorry. Doctor Peak.

(02:11:02):
OK. Is is it by Chelsea or as they
say in the Italian BD Spiachi? Sorry.
No, no, thank you, Sherry. Thank you for that correction.
Let me try it again here. Let's try this, see if that will
do it. Is that it hasn't came up Yes

(02:11:23):
there we go OK OK thank you Sherry.
I appreciate that thank you And he answered and said it to me
whatsoever will then befall would befall the whole earth.
Therefore all who live will experience them for at that time
I will protect only those who are found in those self same
days in this land. Now, when he's talking about in

(02:11:46):
this land, again, I think that this is a spiritual concept more
than a physical concept because remember that when we're talking
about in the wilderness, right? What is the wilderness?
Well, I can tell you for those of you who have come out of
Babylon and you find yourself isolated, your friends have

(02:12:09):
disowned you, maybe even family members have disowned you.
There are people who won't talk to you.
You're on a no contact list, youknow, You know, you know the
feeling. I'm talking about that in those
circumstances, the you're in thewilderness.

(02:12:31):
That's why you're experiencing that because you're in the
wilderness. And so when we talk about this
shall be found in the self same days in this land.
Now again, if you're talking about so here, let's go back
just a little bit and read in 28.
Nevertheless, whoever understands shall then be wise.

(02:12:52):
For the measure and reckoning ofthat time are two parts a week
of seven weeks. And I answered and said, there
goes seven weeks, right, Seven weeks of years.
And I answered and said, it is good for man to come and behold,
but it is better that he should not come lest he fall.
But I will say this also will. He who is incorruptible.

(02:13:13):
Despise those things which are corruptible, and whatsoever
befalls in the case of those things which are corruptible, so
that he might look only to thosethings which are not
corruptible. But if, O Yahwah, those things
shall sure assuredly come to pass which You have foretold to
me, so do you show this also unto me, if I indeed have found

(02:13:33):
grace in Your sight. Is it in one place or in one of
the parts of the earth that those things have come to pass
or will the whole earth experience then?
And then he says, well, he says it's going to be fall the whole
earth for at that time it will protect only those who are found
in those self same days in this land.

(02:13:55):
All right, now let's take a lookat this David.
Let's say this is the physical aspect of that.
OK, that what is that land? That's a question.
What is that land that he's talking about in that Holy Land?
Now you know our friend John Truth, I love that kid.

(02:14:16):
He's just doing really well downthere in South Africa and he's
been placed in South Africa because y'all put him there and
I'm kind of sad because y'all could have put me there but he
didn't put me there. He put John truth there instead.
So, you know, you know, once again, you know, anyway, but but
we're. But John has said, look, because
of the Poland version and so forth.

(02:14:38):
In fact, as Stacy, Stacy Hubbard, Are you with us here
today, Stacy? Yes, Sir.
Always here. Yeah.
Could you talk a little bit about what John Truth was saying
in that he thought South Africa was the Holy Land?
Yeah. He believes that it's the Holy
Land simply because the older maps that he's researched, he
noticed an inversion of 180 thatwas done on the map.

(02:15:01):
So everything that we see now that was east, it was actually W
everything we see there was N isactually South.
And that's why they have confused the land.
And he shows in one of his videos about the Sea of Galil
and he used to actually live close by there.
And so that's what he was referring to.

(02:15:21):
And As for this being physical as well, I think Lisa was right.
When you look at Jeremiah who 23, three through 8, it talks
about the second exodus, y'all bringing us out of all these
different lands and taking us tothe Holy 1.
So if you pull that up and read that, I mean, it talks about
that. So yeah, yeah, that's that's
absolutely fascinating, Stacy. And you know, I'll tell you when

(02:15:43):
we, when I was looking at Revelation and we're looking at
Revelation 13, and I think the first 3 passages of Revelation
13 are interesting in that, you know, you're looking at this.
You know you. Look at this sign, that is, you
know, rising out of the sea, right?
I stood on the sand of the sea, and behold, I saw a beast
arising from the sea, and that appears to be at least in one

(02:16:07):
Take a again, a wonder in heavenstanding on the sand of the sea
is talking about. I stood among humanity because
Abraham's children are called the sand of the sea.
And I looked up and I saw this sign in the heavens.
Well, this is Draco and Ursa, Ursa Minor operating in a
certain area. Then we see a shift that says

(02:16:29):
the Dragon's going to give his seat power and authority to this
hyena kind of thing with the leopard, the lion and the bear,
the leopard, the lion and the bear.
The leopard is a constellation, I believe, called the little
Leo. And so you see Ursa Major,
little Leo and Leo joined up in a constellation.
This indicates to me that that could be prophesying yet another

(02:16:52):
pole shift, yet another pole shift.
Now, of course, you know, there are some of us that are into
this study a little bit more than others, but there has been
a minor pole shift already. The magnetic pole has moved from
Baffin Island to near the coast of Siberia.
This is causing inordinate pressure on the tectonic plates.

(02:17:14):
And because the tectonic plates are now moving laterally that
you're getting a lot of volcaniceruptions in the ocean, 3
volcanoes of which are much bigger than Yellowstone that are
erupting in the ocean right now.And there's multiple volcanoes
that are erupting in the Arctic Ocean that are heating the ocean
to 2000°F at the base of the ocean.

(02:17:36):
And This is why the ice in the Arctic is melting, which is why
the Russians are exploiting, exploiting this for a traffic
area to be able to, to move freight.
And they moved actually 33 million tons of freight last
year along this passageway. So we see a lot of things
happening now if there is a poleshift coming.
And of course, there's this thing called A1 Atlas that's,

(02:17:59):
you know, is, you know, they're in the sky.
They're not sure what it is yet.But we have all of these
anomalies that are coming upon the earth.
The scriptures say that men's heart will faint with fear from
what they see coming on the earth.
If there was a pole shift prior and they're there most likely
was a pole shift prior, that what that what John is talking

(02:18:20):
about. There most likely was a pole
shift at one other time, at least one other time that yes, W
would be east and N would be South.
And Isaiah says every mountain will be moved out of place,
right? Every island will be changed,
right? All the jet streams will change.
Everything will be different. And so if this is possible, it
could be possible. And that that would show that

(02:18:41):
the Holy Land may be in in, in South Africa.
Now, I can tell you one thing that kind of lends credence to
this idea is the fact that remember that the Holy Land that
was given to Abraham include copper, gold, iron.
It also was well watered. It was a land good and pleasant

(02:19:03):
and it contained all these otherthings.
Well, all of those things are found, of course, in Africa.
None of them are found in the Levant.
And equally true, there's a cavethat is outside of Centurion and
I think, I think Michelle is with us here and I think she is
from Centurion there in South Africa.
But there is a cave that is not far from Centurion that they

(02:19:27):
went in and they took a look at this cave.
And this cave had this kind of mysterious opening that was very
flat and long and it was very narrow and OK, nobody was going
down there, but they kind of putcameras down there and stuff.
Well, finally two young women decided we're going down there.
Now, this is not me. I'm not doing this.
But they did it and they went through this narrow opening and

(02:19:50):
they ascended to the bottom of this cave where they found human
remains in the bottom of this cave.
Now I don't know any other cave you can talk about in the world
where they found human remains in the bottom of The Cave.
But this gives evidence that it could have been the Marat
Macapilla. This could have been where
Abraham and Sarah and Yitzhak and Rivka are buried.

(02:20:15):
That could that could, that could have been their burial
ground in that cave. That could be The Cave of
memory. Now in addition to that.
There's other indicia that this may be the Holy Land as well.
Like for instance, we went out to Adam's Calendar.
Now, Adam's Calendar is a uniqueplace that is way up in the
hills in South Africa. And this has been explored by

(02:20:39):
Michael Challenger. He's the one that gave the name
Adam's Calendar. And again, Adam's calendar is a
pretty hard evidence of a pole shift going on.
And the reason I say that is because there's a center stone
in Adam's calendar and stones that line up with it that were
depicting true north. But at some era later, those

(02:21:04):
stones, there were new stones placed to depict another true
north. So you can see that there was a
motion of the magnetic North Pole.
And by the way, many of the stones there at Adam's calendar
are magnetic. You know, you can put stuff on,
you can feel the magnetism. And they had some, the guy had
some kind of electric reader that he could also put on the

(02:21:26):
stones to see the magnetism. Well, one of the things we saw
there is that this Adams calendar sits up on a hill and
then it looks down on a lower valley.
And of this lower valley is interesting because Michael
Tellinger was trying to say thatthis calendar was an
antediluvian calendar, and I have to disagree with him.

(02:21:51):
I do not think it was an antediluvian calendar because of
the things that it looked down on.
One of the things that looked down appears to be an ancient
pyramid that's buried in the back half of that valley.
And so that pyramid was probablyantediluvian, but this was not.

(02:22:11):
This is post diluvian anyway. There is a rock that is in that
site and it is the size of a man.
And so one of the guys that was with us on this research trip,
he got up and laid on the rock and he said he was healed on
that rock from laying on that rock.

(02:22:32):
I don't remember exactly what his ailment was, but he claimed
he was healed laying on that rock.
Well, I got to looking at that rock and it struck me that that
very easily could have been the stone where Abraham was
intending to sacrifice Yitzhak was at that very spot.
And so do I know this? No.

(02:22:53):
All I'm trying to say to you is that the spot where Adam's
calendar is, is it's a very interesting spot.
It's got magnetic stones and it has hard evidence in the site
itself showing a pole shift oversome period of time because
again, the stones were lined up to predict north-south, east and

(02:23:14):
West. And they there's two sets of
stones. They put in two separate sets of
stones because N had moved. OK, so with all of that being
said, all I can tell you is, is that having done the research
that we've done on the Scriptureand relying upon the Hebrew, one

(02:23:36):
of the issues of controversy is the location of the Holy Land.
Now I want to say this, I do believe that when we're talking
about the crucifixion of Mashiacthat that took place in the
Levant. Did it take place in the town
they're currently calling Jerusalem?
That I don't know, because thereis a strong possibility that the

(02:23:57):
Jerusalem of the Maccabean era was actually in the Tigris
Euphrates area and not along that coastline.
And there's reason to believe this because of the narrative
that is given in the Maccabees. The area that the Maccabees was
conquering was in the Tigris Euphrates area, going from Erbil

(02:24:18):
down to Baghdad. So it's one of the no.
Think about that for a minute. Think about that.
Suppose that Baghdad was the true Jerusalem, or even worse,
Karbala was the true Jerusalem. Remember that Karbala is the
city where that is dedicated to Tammuz.

(02:24:40):
No, excuse me, I misspoke. Karbala is the city that is
dedicated to Hussein, the grandson of Muhammad, and it is
the Shiite capital. It's the capital of Shia Islam,
Karbala. And again, it's possible that

(02:25:01):
this was the true Jerusalem. I mean, because when you're in
the Jerusalem, they call the Jerusalem.
Today there's some real problems, even though there
there's a continual non-stop stream of, let's call it news,
but I think more generously saidpropaganda that oh, we found
this artifact that proves this is the true Jerusalem.

(02:25:23):
Oh, we found this bit of Scripture that proves this is
the true Jerusalem. Oh, we found a stone.
Oh, we found a headstone. Oh, we found a coin.
Oh, we found a, you know, we found a mosaic on the floor.
But there's real problems. For instance, let me give you
some of the problems. There's no Mount Zion in
Jerusalem. You've got a place that can call

(02:25:46):
the Mount of Olives, but there'sno Mount Zion.
And so the story given is that, oh, well, that was bladed by
Shimon Maccabee and pushed into the Valley of the Cheese Mongers
to flatten out that area. Where's the Jebusite fortress?
The Jebusite fortress, which wasimpregnable.
Where is that fortress? And then when you talk about

(02:26:08):
Solomon's Temple, you know the Jews will not allow you to say
that there was a temple any place other than on top of the
Temple Mount. On top of the Temple Mount is
that Dome of the Rock. The Dome of the Rock is on an 8
sided foundation. That 8 sided foundation is the
former foundation of a temple ofJupiter, which was common to

(02:26:28):
have an 8 sided foundation. That was the Temple of Jupiter.
So where was the temple? Well when you try to say that,
well the temple was found in thecity of David, your anathema to
the entire Israeli state. If you say that, they will not
allow you to say it. And I'm not sure that what they
found in the City of David was in fact the Temple of Solomon
and not something else. Lisa Tig, go ahead.

(02:26:52):
Yeah, Just real quick, as we were talking about this
particular passage, the reason why I immediately went to the
exit second Exodus is because I'm kind of doing a word by word
on the New Testament going back to the original Greek.
And I'm going to butcher this, but it's Senago, which when you

(02:27:13):
look at E sword, it'll tell you the definition and then it'll
have a colon and say how it was actually interpreted.
And it means to lead together. And it's 2 words, which means
with and I'll go to lead, to bring, to drive, to induce.
So what I found is that throughout the New Testament,

(02:27:35):
they translated that as gatheredtogether.
And so when Yosha is talking about how the angels were all
come for the four corners of theearth and gather together,
actually that word is tsuago, and it means to lead together,
that he's talking about the second exodus.
And so you actually find that inmany places you find it in.

(02:27:56):
I actually started in Revelation, the last book, and
then kind of went forward. But yeah, it is.
But also another thing is that there is no place where it says
spirit. That is not either suke, which
means breath, or pneuma, which means breath and so.
Of course we know. Totally agree with.
I totally agree with that. Yeah, so we don't have.

(02:28:18):
So not only did they lie about Yoshi's name and about Yahweh's
name, they lied about the rural Kakadesh, not just his name, but
his actual persona. Because he's breath.
That's what. He is, I totally agree with
that. And when you talk about the
breath, so when you look at this, it's in the Nicene Creed

(02:28:41):
and it appears about the Creed of Nicaea and whether it's in
the Orthodox or in the Roman Church, but it talks about how
the breath proceeds from the Father and the Son.
So the Western Church takes the position that the Ruach proceeds
from the Father and the Son. In the Eastern Church they say
the Ruach proceeds only from theFather.

(02:29:03):
But when you look at the idea that it is breath and not a
persona, this changes the scope of everything.
Because now you can see that it is the breath of Yahwah, the
Neshamah Haim, that is breathed into the nostrils of Adam that
makes him a living soul, NepheshHayah.
So there are two things that constitute life on the earth.

(02:29:27):
Life is in the blood. The the life of the soul is in
the blood, but the life of the flesh is in the breath.
It's in the breath. So to say that he becomes a
living soul means that he is breathing and the breath is what
the breath belongs Holy 100%. Your breath belongs to Yahwah.

(02:29:48):
Your breath does not belong to you.
Your breath 100% belongs to Yahwah.
And so when we talk about the idea of the, the Ruach Hakodesh
Ruach, the breath, the holy or the set aside breath, the Hagi
Enuma, the set aside breath, thesacred breath.
So when you talk about that, this is not a persona, This is

(02:30:10):
the breath of Yah. And from the breath of Yah comes
the voice of Yah. And in the voice of Yah speaking
over the universe, I believe he was singing over the universe,
frankly, not just speaking, but in his speaking and singing over
the universe such that all of creation was created in the
breath of Yah. And so when you see and his

(02:30:33):
spirit left him, you'll read it in some places in scripture.
No, His breath left him. If you've ever been around
anybody who died, they take a last breath and.
All these times when they say hegave up the spirit, no, he gave
up the breath. Say that again, Lisa.
So, you know, yeah, like you said, it said he gave up his

(02:30:53):
spirit. No, he gave up his breath.
And and, and again, when you think about how distinctly
different that those two concepts, even on our own mind
is the difference between breathand spirit, because it's just
like spirit seems to be again like a different section of us.
Breath is not only do we not seeit, but, and we don't really

(02:31:16):
necessarily aren't really aware when we're breathing, but boy we
noticed is when it's gone. Yes, yeah, very much so.
Yeah. And so, I mean, really, really,
really good point, Lisa. It's a really, really good
point. And to understand these things.
And again, you know, by just digging out the words, you know,
getting the shovel out and digging out the words, OK, look,

(02:31:38):
we're doing it. We're doing an archaeological
dig. We find something, we dig around
it. Look, we get the brushes, we
brush it off, we pull it out, wedig it out and we see what it
says. And when we do that, all of a
sudden we begin to see the truthof what's being told in the
Scripture. And in and in seeing the truth
of what's being told in the Scripture, it all harmonizes.
And so all of the arguments, so many of the arguments that have

(02:32:01):
happened in the Protestant churches, 49,000 denominations
have happened because vulgar language was used, because the
common language was used and it wasn't specific and it wasn't
accurate. It was just a rough in.
We get 49,000 denominations. If we had had accuracy, then

(02:32:27):
there would be a lot less debategoing on about the meaning of
this word, the meaning of that word and some of the teaching
that goes on that is really, really, really just totally
outside of scripture. So when you think about the idea
of Holy Spirit, or as they put it in the King James Holy Ghost,

(02:32:48):
you know, with that whole concept comes from the old
summer texts that used to personify everything is as a
person. Oh, the wind, that's a God,
right? Oh, the fire, that's a God.
Oh, Thunder, that's a God. That's a person.
That's Enlil. That's you know, that's whoever

(02:33:08):
they were. That's Anki.
That's this, that's the other. They put a name on all of these
things, personifying the gods toto say Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost
is to engage in summer theology,injecting that into the text.
When it is not there, it's not there.

(02:33:28):
Oh, and one other thing I wantedto say about did you talk about
really going back about the circumcision?
You know, these people in Paul'sday that were relying on them,
they didn't make that decision. Their parents made that decision
for them and they were relying on that.
Just like these people sometimestoday rely on their ancestry to
say, oh, well, I'm chosen because of my ancestry.

(02:33:49):
You didn't make a choice. Since when does y'all not give
us a choice? And so I think that was a lot of
what, when I look at it in that context, when he was saying
that, hey, you know, this wasn'teven your own choice.
You didn't at 8 days decide hey yeah I'm going to get
circumcised. And that is what you.
Think is saving you. Huh.

(02:34:11):
Before you could say Mama, you decided to get circumcised,
right? Exactly.
Exactly. And so it's just like it's
always so anyway. So when I look at it in that, in
that perspective, obviously it'sdifferent from someone like
Abraham who as an adult made that choice completely different
thing. But anyway, so, but when I look
at it that way is I can see whathe, I think what he is trying to

(02:34:34):
convey is very clear. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
My voice is moving out, so I'm going to let you go.
I wish I just I wish we could, you know, I mean, but you cannot
believe, I mean, there are people that are just adamant, Oh
no, you have to be circumcised and you know the you know, and
this ignores the work of the IT works.

(02:34:55):
It ignores the blood of Mashiac.And you know, and again of this
is something that is when you, when you get proper translations
in Galatians 5 and in Ephesians 3, you'll see that by the
circumcision of Mashiac, the uncircumcised gained entrance
into the Kingdom because there was blood let and no more blood

(02:35:20):
needed to be let thereafter. So that's just the answer to
that question. But you know, going back to the
second exodus, you know, I don'thave the answer for you in terms
of the second exodus. And for that matter, I don't
have an answer for you concerning the geography.
All I can tell you is, is that there are many anomalies in the

(02:35:43):
text which are very hard to discern to make the conclusion
that somehow they ended up in really this limestone deposit
called the Levant. I mean, when you look, when you
look at really what that what that ground is from the
mountains of Lebanon down to theSinai Peninsula and rolling all

(02:36:04):
the way back into into Iraq. That's just a gigantic limestone
deposit where the Mediterranean has just taken beaches and has
retreated from those beaches, depositing limestone, limestone,
limestone, limestone. When you're in Israel, you know,
I don't care where you are in Israel, you start digging down,

(02:36:25):
you're going to find limestone and it's actually very easy to
carve and very easy to make intoa cave or whatever.
But I mean, when, when I was in Haifa, they were putting in a
gas station and they brought outa traco, you know, to dig up the
ground to put in, to put in their gas tanks.
It was solid white. I mean, when they got through
the 1st 2 feet or three feet of of earth, it was solid white,

(02:36:49):
solid white limestone. The whole of Mount Carmel is
limestone. We went into the caves that were
down around, well, I don't know,center of Israel.
And in those caves they were allcarved out in limestone, carved
out in limestone. But where are where are the
elephants that would create the ivory for Solomon's throne?

(02:37:10):
Where is the gold that would cover Solomon's throne?
Where are the trees that would create myrrh?
Where are these mines? Where all of these stones of the
aphold would be found? Where are those mines?
Where is all this stuff? Where is the copper?
There's no copper in Israel. Where's the iron?
There's no iron in Israel. There's no gold in Israel.

(02:37:31):
Where is all this stuff a well watered land?
No, it's not well watered at all.
So where is all this stuff? And so it leads to the
conclusion that it sells. Where?
And then when you deal with the idea of the Exodus with Moshe,
you know, a week I've talked to,you know, one of my, one of my
friends from Saskatchewan, they're farm, they're cattle

(02:37:54):
farmers. And we talked about how much
ground would be necessary for Solomon to have 10,000 bulls to
sacrifice for the opening of theTemple.
And we estimated that the grazing range would have to be
at least 300,000 acres of of ample grazing stock, 300,000

(02:38:15):
acres. How much water would need to be
consumed for a million cattle tomove with the tribes of Israel
out of Egypt? Oh, about 20 million gallons a
day. A day.
How do you do that in the desertof the Sinai?

(02:38:37):
You know, these are all big, bigquestions.
Big, big questions. So again, when we talk about the
area where Mashiach was crucified, we talk about that
balance between, you know, Herodthe Edomite, and Antigonus, the
Hasmonean. Well, where was the Hasmonean
capital? Actually, where was we know what

(02:39:00):
the capital of Herod's Edomite empire was?
It was not Jerusalem, it was Caesarea.
And you can see hard proof of that right now.
If you go to Israel, you will see that Caesarea is where Herod
had his house. That's where Herod had his
amphitheater. That's where Herod has his
Hippodrome for chariot braces. That's where he had his port for

(02:39:23):
landing Roman ships. That was the capital.
That's where Paul went to defendhimself from being executed,
right? That's where Paul went.
So these are all questions as tothese distances from these
places. Nonetheless, we still have the
idea that Mashiac was nonetheless crucified in that

(02:39:45):
area. All right, let me go to thank
you, Lisa, for that, for that research and for that testimony.
I appreciate that. OK, Ashley.
Ashley Bruny, go ahead. Hello brother.
My question for you is, you knowI heard your SO John Truth is a
dear brother and friend and I heard your first interview.

(02:40:09):
I did not hear. I guess like stays, there's a
podcast that he was just on. And my question to you is during
that first interview, you had mentioned that you came across a
couple scripture where it says no one can say that Yahusha is
Yahoo except by the Ruha Khakodesh.
So kind of going along with whatI think Lisa was saying is what,

(02:40:39):
what do you, what are you to sayabout that?
Do you believe that Yahusha is Yahuwah?
And what is that? What does that mean?
Because when I first came to theunderstanding of then, then the
name was Yahusha instead of Jesus.
I was doing a one for one replacement.
And then that's when I started doing more research and saying

(02:40:59):
it's not a one for one replacement.
It's, you know, it's completely different set of rules.
You know, me being Christian in the past, I was as lawless as
can be, if you think about it, like I wasn't keeping Shabbat
set apart or anything like that or kadosh.
And so now that I then then I remember watching a few of

(02:41:21):
John's videos and I was like, this is what exactly that I'm
like struggling with because it was now it was I don't believe
in the Trinity. Then I believed in a twinity,
right? Like AI believe that there was a
a son and a father. But then when I read scripture
and it says that he took the place of Yasharal, that he came

(02:41:43):
as his son. And he anyway, I'm I'm rambling,
but you do. Yeah, I'm sure you understand
what I'm saying. You're not not rambling at all.
You're raising a very interesting point.
And so I'm going to try to show this because when we talk, when
we talk about the use of the term son, OK, the use of the
term son is, you know, when you talk about the word, because in

(02:42:08):
the Hebrew, the word is Ben. OK, Ben, Ben.
And if Ben actually has a more than just the meaning of son, it
actually means to to give life to the heritage of and.
So in fact, I should look that up here and let me just share

(02:42:29):
that with you because. It is important.
In fact, let me, let me let's start there.
Let me just look at that first. OK, so I want to get up an app
here just a moment and we'll take a take a look at it.
Because when you're talking about the idea of again, we have
to deal with the English language and what we deal with

(02:42:51):
the English language. The English language is very
flat. It has a meaning.
It doesn't have any other meaning.
But the Hebrew language is not flat.
The Hebrew language is an onion.And so you have layers of truth
inside the word. All right, now I'm going to take
a look here. And I didn't put that in there.

(02:43:28):
See. OK, so the word Ben.
OK, let me see if I can expand this out.
Here is where you take a look. OK?

(02:43:59):
OK, so when we look at this word, Ben Bane is actually the
better pronunciation. We'll see that.
This says OK, well, this is fromH1129.
OK, H 11/29 which comes from theprimitive root bana, which
literally means to build, to obtain children, to make repair,

(02:44:23):
to set up. But it but it comes from the
root to build. So what we see here is the word
bane actually means a builder ofthe family name.
OK, so in English we say oh son.But the reality of the word in
Hebrew means a builder of the family name, OK.

(02:44:46):
And so then we get all the rest of this one born, etcetera,
etcetera. But the meaning of the word
fundamentally is a builder of the family name.
All right. Now when we see one of the key
dispositions that you see when you're dealing with the Shiah is
you're dealing with the idea that the word was made flesh and

(02:45:09):
tabernacled among us. Now this is also very
interesting too, because you know, again, in the Aramaic text
they had to deal with this word.And this word is a little bit
more complex than you thought, but I want to show you because
in with the name Yawa, we have what's called the declension of

(02:45:29):
the name. So we start off with let's just
start off with yod. And so the yod means I.
Then we go to the next form of it, which is yod.
Hey now, this is identified by the King James translators in

(02:45:50):
Psalm 68, four saying his name is Yeah, yeah, iah.
And this is I am. I am.
OK. Next we find Yode.
Hey, Yode, this is Yahi. And this is literally it's my I

(02:46:21):
am. You can kind of understand this
as my essence. Then you have Yode.
Hey Bob pronounced Yahoo like Benjamin Netanyahu Isha Yahoo
obeyed Yahoo Zakhar Yahoo 167 names in the Old Testament and

(02:46:44):
with Yahoo and this means I am he.
Then we get to yod. Hey, Bob.
Hey, this is I am he. Who?

(02:47:06):
Breathes life. This name appears for the first
time in Genesis 2 when he's breathing into the nostrils of
Adam. Then finally we have the name
Yod. Hey, Bob Sheen Iyan.

(02:47:30):
This means I am he who saves. Who saves, who delivers who,
Avengers, who atones. So we see that all of these are
the declension, the declension of the name of the father.

(02:48:05):
So also you have to keep in mindthat this Yodhe Vabhshinayan is
a combination of this is a combination.
Let me change color here just a minute.
This is a combination of 2 words.
You have yod, hey Bob, hey, and you have Yod, Sheen, ayan.

(02:48:33):
So this is Yahwah. Yahwah.
This is Yasha. This literally means Yahwah
saves. So in the name Yahusha is the
meaning Yahwah saves. So the critical aspect about

(02:49:01):
understanding this is to understand that Yahusha is
something of Yahwah. Yahwah is Yahusha.
There is something of Yahwah in Yahusha.
There is a singular entity, Yahwah.
But in His expression when He made His Word manifest on earth,

(02:49:22):
He made His Word manifest on earth as Yahusha.
Yahwah saves. So this is so.
Yahusha is a portion of Yahwah. Now, when you get in, when you
get into grave, difficulty is, of course, in reading about the
Lamb slain from the foundation of the earth, from the

(02:49:43):
foundation of the world, that the Lamb who was slain sits
beside Yahuwah, the Father in heaven.
So this creates kind of a difficulty in the mind.
What's this lamb doing there? OK, yeah.
And this is again, this is what is described as the great
mystery in the New Testament. So what do we understand about

(02:50:08):
creation? Well, creation is something that
Yah did. So Yah, there's no aspect of
creation that is outside of Yah.He exists before creation.
He exists in creation. He is all of creation.
There is nothing in creation that is outside the
manifestation of Yahwah. Yet we have scripture that

(02:50:29):
begins with in the beginning. And so because in the beginning
exists, we can see that there was a creation that took place.
This is the word Bara creation. There was a creation that took
place. And in this creation, this is
something distinct from Yah. This is something that is of
Yahwah, but it's distinct. It's it's something distinct.
And we see the same thing with the sun.

(02:50:52):
The sun is something, some aspect of Yahwah that is
distinct from Yahwah. It's distinct from Yahwah
because the Word was made flesh and the Word was made flesh and
put on earth that Yah himself might experience the death that
had come to Adam, the death of the flesh.
And so in understanding all of this, you know, I mean, don't.

(02:51:15):
I wish I could give you an easier understanding of this
great mystery, but nonetheless, from a legal point of view, Yah
had to die in the flesh that we might inherit the Kingdom.
This is talked about in the bookof Hebrews pretty extensively.
There are no heirs until you have the death of the testator.

(02:51:38):
Then you have an heir. And we are heirs according to
the promise because the Brit, because the covenant in its
initial in its initial Brit was given, but it was a conditional
covenant. It was given where in Exodus
chapter 19 where Yah spoke to them face to face and said, if

(02:51:58):
if you obey my voice and keep mycommandments and My statutes and
My judgments, then you will be aholy nation of kings and priests
to me. If if you obey my voice, then he
proceeded to speak to them to show them the voice that they

(02:52:19):
needed to obey. And that's in Exodus chapter 20
where He speaks to them, the 10 commandments.
He spoke directly to them face to face.
And then it is set forth in writing that he scribed himself,
scratched it on the rocks himself, etched it on the rocks
himself. And in Deuteronomy 5/22 it says

(02:52:42):
what He added, nothing further. So this is what Yah Himself
delivered to mankind. They and that was He called it
His covenant, the Tendevorine, My covenant.
And what did they do? Read in Jeremiah 11/6.
The House of Yahsharel and the House of Yahudah broke that

(02:53:04):
covenant. So they were no longer a Kingdom
of kings and priests to Him because they broke His covenant.
Therefore, the writer in Hebrewstells us that covenant waxed
old. They forgot it, they didn't
believe it, they didn't do it. It got forgotten.
They never talked about it anymore.

(02:53:24):
It disappeared. But Mashiach would come in and
say what he said. The most difficult things you
could imagine. I tell you the truth, if you
don't eat my flesh and you don'tdrink my blood, you have no part
of me. And my flesh is real food, and
my blood is real drink. And what happened?
All the disciples quit. But the 12th, I'm not following

(02:53:45):
that guy anymore. He's way outside the pop
culture. I'm out of here.
Then he explains at the Last Supper, This bread is my body
broken for you. This wine is my bloodshed for
you. But he even went so far as to
say what? Brett Hadashah Badami, this is

(02:54:11):
the renewed covenant in my blood.
And in this renewed covenant, a covenant that is not going to
take effect until his blood is shed, because the testator has
died and we have become heirs ofthe Brit Hadashah by that death.
But just as is the case in any will or covenant when your name

(02:54:35):
is an heir, you can disavow the inheritance.
Hey, I want to give you this piece of property.
Yeah, but that's an environmental war zone that's
got $8 million for the cleanup associated on it.
I don't want that piece of property.
Too bad you're going to inherit it because I gave it to you in
the will. No, you can disavow that
inheritance, just as the inheritance of the Brit Hadashah

(02:54:56):
can be disavowed by the words ofyour mouth.
But by the words of your mouth, you can also avow the
inheritance. And This is why Paul says, hey,
when you confess the inheritancewith your lips and you believe
in your heart, then you are a child of Abraham and an heir
according to the promise. There are no other heirs.

(02:55:22):
There's no other heirs. The Old Covenant was come
materially breached, as we say in the legal world, and those
who had been chosen are no longer chosen.
That's why the temple was destroyed in 586 and they were
taken into exile. That's why the Northern Kingdom
was routed in 722 BC and dispersed all over the world,

(02:55:43):
because they were in breach of the covenant and, yeah,
terminated their relationship asthe chosen people.
And he said what? I will choose a people who are
not my people, the low on me, and to them I will give the
covenant. But by the work of Mashiach, who

(02:56:04):
died on the cross, by the work of his bloodletting, salvation
becomes available to every humanbeing on earth.
There are no subhuman humans, there are only human beings.
There are no subhuman humans. There are only human beings, and

(02:56:27):
every single one of them has an opportunity to confess the truth
of Mashiac and to be an heir of Abraham.
Every one of them. And no person on earth has the
right to use language that denies that reality to another

(02:56:49):
human being. So I hope this explains a little
bit in terms of the understanding of Mashiac.
He was given the name above all names.
He was given the name of Yahwah,Yahwah, Yahwah.
All four of those vowel sounds are found in the name Yahusha.

(02:57:14):
But you don't think he's a you don't think he's a second
person. But is what I'm saying, because
in Isaiah it says that there is like so I would agree with John
that Yahoo, I would so I would agree that Yahusha is Yahuwah,
because it says that, you know, he will be called wonderful
counselor, counselor mighty Illua everlasting father.

(02:57:37):
This is talking about the Messiah.
So you know, it doesn't say everlasting son now.
And obviously, like when it's when somebody tells him, Hey,
you are good and he says, Hey, there's, there's only one that's
good and that's the father. He didn't come out and rightly
say, cuz isn't that part of Torah?
Like you don't you don't, you know, I'm not to say I'm, I'm a

(02:57:59):
deity. I'm the most high.
He was observing Torah and you know, he's like, he said, I did
not come to abolish, but to fulfill.
So he was fulfilling Torah by saying, Aha, yes, if you're
saying that I'm good, then there's and there's nobody good
but the father dot dot dot. Like, who do you think I am?
You know, so like, you know, even he when he said to Philip,

(02:58:22):
you know, if you've seen me, you've seen the father like in
not so many words saying that orhe'll tell the Pharisees, Well,
that's who you say that I am. You know, that kind of thing.
So. How do you how do you wreck?
How do you reconcile though in the garden when he said not your
will but my will be done. If they aren't two people, they

(02:58:42):
are united together, they are cut, they are one in in
everything. But just like we can be 1 when
with Yasha we are still separate, just like, you know,
he's 1. So Yahusha is one with Yahwah
and we can be one with Yahusha, which makes US1 with Yahwah.

(02:59:05):
We are not, we don't then and then cease to exist.
We become one with that. Because also when it said that
he was going out and, you know, praying to the Father, was He
praying to Himself? Well.
To answer that question, I wouldsay, I mean, I'm not.
This is why, I mean, I know whatI believe and I know I can say

(02:59:29):
that like I'm not the best at explaining things.
But, you know, I would say that when John the Immerser was
immersing Yahusha, he says, you know, let's just, he says you
should be doing this to me. And he said, he replied, let's
do this to fulfill all righteousness.
You know, and, and my understanding, we're linear
chronological beings and we, we can't, we don't exist out of

(02:59:52):
time and space. But yeah, it does.
So he's able, he's omnipresent. He's able to do whatever he
wants to do. I don't understand how he was
able. Now, I disagree with you that
we're linear beings. Our flesh is linear beings,
correct? But we do exist out of time and
space. Well, I'm Ashley in the Flash

(03:00:12):
right now, so. But Yahusha also said that no
one has seen the Father. And so he, he made that
statement. And then when they said, well,
let us see him, if you see, if you've seen me, you've seen Him
because He is His representativeall through the scriptures.
When y'all was shows up, that's Yahusha.
It was Him on, you know, giving the 10 commandments.

(03:00:33):
It was Him in the burning Bush. It was Him in front of Joshua.
It was him. Yeah, it was.
It was his. Representative, which is why he
was called all those, all those titles and that.
Why? And the reason why, Lisa, that
you're saying that is because Peter tells us that yah, the
Father is a consuming fire, which no man has seen.

(03:00:56):
And so This is why I think you guys are on the same page really
in all of this, that when Mashiach says, if you've seen
me, you've seen the Father, because that's all you're going
to get to see. And I think that this is kind of
an interesting personification. Now, maybe what what we see in
heaven is something different, but it's, it's very curious when
you're talking about this, because the prophecy that

(03:01:17):
appears in Zechariah concerning Yahweh, the high priest, right,
that he appears in filthy rags and Satan is standing beside him
accusing him to the Father, right?
And then they say, let us put him in in clean linen and put a
white turban on his head. And then it says, you know, if
you will do these things, then you will come to judge my

(03:01:37):
people. This is, again, a difficult
prophecy and it's a difficult concept.
We're all kind of wrestling withthis idea.
I'd like to be able to say that I have 100% understanding of
this mystery and I can just disclose it to you.
I don't. But you would say though that
Yahushua is Yahoo? I like that's what you believe,
because I know. No, no, Yahuwah is Yahushua.

(03:02:01):
Yes, yes, I agree. There's a difference.
But not two different persons. Well, when you talk about a
person, this is where we get into an interesting idea because
the idea of personifying, yeah, is something we should not be
engaged in. Like I can tell you one thing

(03:02:23):
that is absolutely certain, God in three persons is completely
out of the window. Correct.
And so that that idea of that idea of three personas is not a
cod. In trying to understand the a
codness of Yah though, remember that Yah is Yah alone.

(03:02:43):
And even then you can see a distinction, because when will
heaven and earth pass away? No one knows.
But the father? Not even the Son knows this.
So there is a distinction between the Father and the Son,
and there appears to be a distinction even in heaven
because the Son sits at the right hand of the Father.
What that right hand means, I don't know what that what that

(03:03:05):
that language means. It's analogous what it could
mean, or if it's metaphorical, what it could mean.
I know that the vision seen in heaven was the Ancient of Days
sitting on the throne and the Lamb that was slain before the
foundation of the earth laying beside him.
So there is this whole idea thata yacht did something on the

(03:03:26):
earth. He did something real on the
earth in a physical sense, He did something on the earth that
included the shedding of blood, which by the way was
contemplated from the first timethe name Yahwah is introduced in
Scripture. I suggest you that it's even
contemplated in Genesis one, onethat we would see these things.
So you know, Ashley, that you know, you know, I am.

(03:03:53):
I am Mashiacheen. You know, I am Yasharel.
I'm also net serene. You know, I believe in the Son.
I believe in the redemption of the Son.
I believe that he lived, died, resurrected and ascended.
I believe all those things. And I believe that that is how

(03:04:14):
we understand the inheritance that we have.
And I'm part of that inheritance.
Thank you. Yeah, I'm part of that
inheritance. And so I'm not going to disclaim
it. And so in terms of this
understanding, Ashley, I wish I could give you a better answer
to this. I think Lisa has made some very
good points concerning this. But you know, I would encourage

(03:04:36):
you take a look again at that passage in Philippians 2 and see
how that reads, right? And remember that the whole idea
that the whole message given to us in John chapter 1, the word
of Yahwah was made flesh. Well, which word?
I suggest to you that the word was Yahwah itself that was made
flesh. The name Yahwah was made flesh

(03:04:58):
and tabernacled among us becausehe was looking for a place to
place his name on the earth. And so when we look at it, we
said with Gee, but what is who'sYahweh Shah?
He is the name of Yah that was made flesh, correct?
OK, so I'm going to leave it at that.
I'm going to leave it at that, Ashley.

(03:05:18):
And we just, we're going to haveto take it from there.
OK? You OK with that?
I would, I would love, I would love for you to call me one day
and help me parse through this. This is this is a big deal to

(03:05:41):
me. I'm not going to be able to get
there. I mean, you cannot imagine.
You're so busy. I don't have enough time to
breathe, so I can't. I just can't do that.
Yeah, I understand. I think we all struggle with
this. Well, I.
All we we all struggle to really, truly understand what
this means. I just, it's so clear to me.

(03:06:01):
It's so clear that like now it'slike I can't Unsee it that like,
yeah, who says Yahuwah? Like he came as his son,
Yahshiro. Even it says in Matthew that
like the reason why it said thatJoseph and Miriam took Yahusha
into Egypt was so that and he quoted so I can call my son out
of Egypt. And so, you know, to fulfill

(03:06:24):
that scripture that that prophecy.
So it's just very clear to me. You can't have two first.
You can't have two last. And another thing is like, you
know, he says he's the author and the finisher.
He's the olive and the top right.
So he. Was talking when he was on the
Mount of Olives that said this is my son, listen to him.

(03:06:46):
When he. Was he was on the mountain
olives When when from the heavens, from the my shame it
says this is my son, the elect one listen to him.
Correct. So what I would say what you
know who you know who you shouldtalk to.
Like when I listen to John's truth stuff, I'm just like, yes,

(03:07:10):
this makes 1000. It may just make so much sense
to me. I am just like not confused.
I'm not even confused now. I just don't know how to explain
it as eloquently as he does. I would just.
Go ahead. And John, awesome.
I think he's great. I think my guide is is
scriptures. So I'm not saying that it's not.

(03:07:32):
I'm just for sure. I don't.
Yeah, we can just leave it at that.
Let me let me show you one otherthing, OK?
And this is kind of a way that Ikind of understand it too, at
least. And so one of the things that we
see in Scripture is the idea that he was the Lamb slain from

(03:07:52):
the foundation of the world, andalso what that he was with the
Father in the beginning, right? John 11 again, he was with
Eloeen in the beginning. OK.
So I kind of look at like I lookat it like this that you have
yeah, here who is an infinite line going in an infinite set of

(03:08:15):
directions, occupied in infinitedimensions infinitely.
But there was a ray of light that was the consubstantial with
the Father. Now this ray of light is the
light that's going to divide thedarkness, and the darkness is

(03:08:38):
not going to attach to it. The darkness is not going to
understand it. And so when you see the ray of
light that comes through, this ray of light is going to divide
the darkness. How it's going to divide the
darkness in these multi dimensional equations that are
fractals, fractals of the equations that are dividing the

(03:09:01):
darkness with the light. And this is all of creation.
So that all of creation, there'sno material world.
There is only the division of the darkness by the light into
these miraculous equations that we perceive as reality.
We perceive it as reality, but all it is really is light

(03:09:23):
dividing the darkness and the power that is, that is retained
in the darkness creates electromagnetism.
From the division of the light through the darkness,
electromagnetism is created, andthis is we see the functioning
of the universe. But this light that shines
through the darkness is the sun.So we see that before creation

(03:09:47):
is the Father, which occupies everything.
And then the creation is made bythe light dividing the darkness
so that all of creation is in the sun.
So do we have to distinguish if you, if you try to say this, oh,
it's a, it's a twinity instead of a Trinity.
This again is kind of myopic thinking.

(03:10:11):
The best way to think about thisis that there was something that
presupposed all of creation. This is the eternal and the
omnipotent. Yeah.
Then the creation begins with the words in the beginning.
In the beginning there was a starting point, and this
starting point is the Son. And so this is the

(03:10:32):
distinguishment between the consuming fire of the Father and
the creation, which is the Son. OK.
And so we can sit here and and and try to say, well, that is
obviously a twinity, but it really, I mean it is and it
isn't. It's all of the same thing.

(03:10:53):
It's all part of the father. But there is a distinction.
There is a distinction between that which was and that which is
because there because of the word in the beginning.
OK, now we're now we're going toleave it.
That's where we're going to leave it.
So thank you, Ashley, and thank you, Lisa, for your
participation in this. We really appreciate this

(03:11:14):
discussion. Good discussion.
All right, Bass Joe, how are youguys doing?
We're doing well. Shalom, Shalom, Shalom.
Good to see you. Yeah.
Regarding the the ending with the hey, I know one word.
It's not ending on R in the Scripture, but probably we

(03:11:38):
should change it also. And it is ninfay.
It should, it should probably benin.
What? Which which word is it again?
Ninfay. Minsay.
Ninfay. The the from Jonah.
Oh, from Jonah. Yeah.
Ninfay. OK, we're going to take, we're

(03:11:59):
going to take care of that one. We're not going to let that hang
out and make trouble. Yeah.
And and the the other thing regarding yeah, the the
personification of the of the the Ruh, the Ruach, yeah, you
talked about Yeah, but yeah is also Ruach.

(03:12:23):
So he will say, yeah, we can also not personify Yawa, but
yeah, he has characteristics of a person.
So it's also one of the the things difficult to grasp.
Yeah. And who is the Ancient of Days,
right. Yeah, yeah.

(03:12:44):
The Ancient of Days. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So yeah. Do we have the answers?
No. Well, I wouldn't say I wouldn't
see. I wouldn't say that he's also
the Ruach. I would say that he is the
Ruach. He's the creator.
He's the wind, the life and the breath, and we can't see him.
He's the invisible Lua. And so when it's Yah with us,

(03:13:05):
it's I, I believe that it's he is the rue.
He it is him with us. And just like you know, it says
in Genesis that he made us in his image.
Well, Yah is spirit. It says Yah is rule.
So then how then we are invisible?
Like we were creating in psalms that says we were created into

(03:13:26):
in the depths of the earth, right?
So we were or we were formed, I guess in the wording.
And so we are, we are he he breathed life into us and so
therefore we are we are how we're made in his image is where

(03:13:46):
you would get the sun. You know, for instance, I'm I'm,
I'm at a park right now. I'm looking at a tree.
You know, y'all made that tree. I don't say that the tree is ya
right, but I, I don't know what I'm saying.
Just forgive me. OK, all right, Ashley, we're
going to leave it. No, I'm just kidding you.
No, the I understand, though I do think that the tree is part

(03:14:08):
of Mushiyah. I think that the earth is part
of Mushiyah. I think the universe is part of
Mushiyah. It's all it's There is nothing
outside of Yah. Nothing.
There's nothing. There's nothing outside of Yah.
Every aspect of everything is part of Yah.
All of his creation belongs to him.
The key issue is whether or not we worship the creator or the
creation. Whereas my friend.

(03:14:30):
Frank Smith used to say to the Flat Earth community.
The thing you want to remember about the shape of the Earth is
that it's more important to be on it than to be in it.
But it's a great. Discussion And I'm A and I'm a
flat earther, so I can even findI find that funny.
That's hilarious. I agree with that.
OK, so I'm going to go to Steve Hall.

(03:14:51):
Steve Hall, How are you doing, brother?
Just fine. How are you today, Steve?
Hey, I'm doing great. Hey, I, you know, did I tell you
I got, I finally got those tireson right on my quad, right?
Yeah, yeah, I had them. I put them on backwards
initially. I heard that last last Sabbath.
But you're breakable. We all do things like that,
don't we? Yeah.
Yeah. Right, You're going to pick this

(03:15:12):
back up. You said you just you was going
to put it down, but you about topick it back up.
You know how when you're playingmusic, you're doing more than
one thing at the time, right? When you're playing, you're
singing, you're reading music, you're doing 3 or 4 things at
the time. So could Yahuwah be in the

(03:15:35):
physical plane in his mind whilehe's, you know, I mean, he's
doing 3 or 4 different things atthe same time.
So he's Yahushua in the physicalplane.
That's why he is the Father and the Son.
He says if you've seen my physical body, you have seen me.

(03:15:55):
Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. That's possible.
That's absolutely possible, yeah.
And. Is that how I see it?
Yeah, yeah. And I think that's a very good
way of putting. I mean, for instance, when
you're a man, you're also a husband, you're also a father,
you're also a farmer, you're also a worker.
You're also a businessman. You're also, you know, you're

(03:16:16):
also maybe you're a scout leader.
You're also a member of this particular council.
You know, you know what I'm talking about.
You have all of these different things that describe you.
And that's why I'm saying that the name ya in in a declension
is the best way to understand that because the great I appears
before the great I am. I am or I breathe is even a

(03:16:38):
better way to put it. Not just I am, but I breathe and
I'm. Sure, He created the physical
dimension, you know what I mean?Why and how we, you know, that's
beyond our we'll maybe learn oneday.
But you know, just like an author, when he writes a book,
I'm quite sure that he knows theend when he starts the

(03:16:58):
beginning, you know what I'm saying?
He had pretty much has an idea where he's going to go with that
book. No.
And books I write, I don't have the slightest idea where I'm
going. I'm like a bad driver, you know,
gets on the road and just leaves.
Where are you going? Hey, I don't know.
We'll get there. Well, I'm sure you got an idea
of what, you know what I mean, where, where you're headed with

(03:17:19):
this. You know what I'm saying?
And so that's that's the way I see it anyway.
It's just that he, you know, we all do 3 or 4.
You know, you could be reading abook and thinking about
something else or somebody's talking to you and you get
bored. Your mind sort of wanders off on
when you're. Playing.
I can see him doing multiple things at one time.

(03:17:40):
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And you know, when you're
playing music, you know, particularly if you're singing
and playing and it'd be, it's, it's much more difficult to sing
and play bass than it is to singand play guitar.
Cause guitar you just, you know,put your fingers down once and
you strum. But with the bass you have to
lay down the foundation of both the harmony and the rhythm.
And then, and then you get counter rhythms in your vocal.

(03:18:03):
So there's two rhythms going on at the same time.
And it really. And if you're reading the music,
yeah, you, you sort of have to look ahead at what's coming.
So it's it gets pretty complicated, but you're doing
multiple things at one time. Yeah, yeah, multitasking at the
same time. Yeah, Yeah.
It's, I think that is a very good point of view and a very

(03:18:25):
good way to express it. Yeah.
Yeah. Well, thank you, Steve.
I appreciate that. OK, let's go to Mary and Rod and
then we will wrap her up for theday.
I don't know if I should bring this up, Doctor P, It's kind
about the same line. Are you done with it?
AM. I done with what?
You know what we're talking about.
I was going to talk about maybe the other 7000 years prior in

(03:18:53):
the angels falling and I was kind of wondering if since it's
the same from the beginning, I'mtrying not to get nervous.
The same from the beginning to the end.
And Yahushua is after the priesthood of Melchizedek.
So if we go back the bread and the wine, we go back to the
beginning. Has he always had a high priest?

(03:19:17):
And so then and the seraphim arelooking and so he's a high
priest over everything, all the good angels, the bad angels, all
that kind of stuff. And then when we roll down, and
so our praise, like in Daniel, our praise.
Assists. That I'm not sure, but and he's

(03:19:39):
bringing forth, you know, the Seraphim are out there looking
and he's bringing forth the praises and the things that who
listens to. And so I was wondering if it end
in the rock that followed. So if it kind of follows that.

(03:20:02):
Yeah. I mean, you know, we raising the
issue of Malikit Siddiq is goingto be an interesting issue and I
will try to address that. I'm not going to address that
today, but I will try to try to address Malikit Siddiq because
the again, that's an office, right?
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
Like this is the office that serves.

(03:20:22):
That serves the most. Yeah, and over forever.
And he's bringing forth all of the releases of the praise and
then also the correction and. Yeah.
But I got to tell you, Mary, I can't deal with that today.
I'm going to have to deal with it later, OK?

(03:20:42):
Sorry. No, it's, it's OK.
It's just, but it's a very largetopic that's going to take a lot
more time than we have today. OK.
But I am going to, I am going todiscuss that because we can deal
with that prophecy in Zechariah concerning Yahusha, the high
priest, and how that relates to that, OK?
Because there's a whole bunch offulfillment and enclosed in

(03:21:04):
that, OK. So in summary, guys, I just want
to say that some of the radical positions that I take, like
concerning the birth of Esau, which is which is again, my
opinion predicated upon how I'm seeing what's written in the
Hebrew and my position on the geography of where Yerushalayim

(03:21:24):
is located. I am not settled on that issue
yet at all. And there are other issues as
well that where I've taken kind of radical positions.
And for some people, it's causedthem to pull away from being a
part of this, being a part of this ministry.
But it's OK, you know, but everybody is welcome to have

(03:21:45):
their own opinion. I'm not trying to force anybody
into an opinion. I'm just sharing with you what
my opinion is on some of these issues and why I think those
things, OK. And so, and of course, we kind
of take a radical position in terms of the number of books
that we present in a single binding.
And so we're going to hold to that.

(03:22:06):
And as we prepare, you know, we're starting, we're coming in,
we're just a month away from theSukkot beginning.
And I'm really looking forward to seeing everybody in Florida
for that, for that period of time.
And so until then, let's just pray for the blessings.
Let's pray for the blinders to come off those who are lost.
Let's pray for our brothers and sisters who are suffering in

(03:22:28):
illness and who are suffering inany other way that you can think
of, whether they're struggling spiritually, financially,
whether they're struggling psychologically, whether they're
struggling, however their struggle may be.
May y'all lift that burden. May the Wuach Hakodesh be upon
them. May the breath of Yah breathe
life into them and read life around them.

(03:22:48):
May we come under the cover of Yah.
May we come under the under the wings of Yahwah.
Come. Under his name as the children
of Yasharrel. And so I say to you, Baruch
Kataya was save OD El kadoshi kadhiya shadel elohaiya shadel
meleka melekim ABI numa olam badolam kitov kila olam hastu.

(03:23:09):
For you are good, and your mercyendures forever.
Hallelujah. Yeah.
Be with us now in spirit and in truth, and walk and in truth,
that we might walk with you in the way that you have called us,
that we could be faithful and strong to do what you have
called us to do in this earth. Even unto our last breath, even
under our last breath. May you be praised.

(03:23:30):
May your name be on our lips on our last breath.
Hallelujah to you, Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Amen and Hallelujah.
OK, OK. With that I will say Shabbat
Shalom. Shalom, thank you.
Shalom. Shalom.

(03:24:01):
Shalom. And.
Thank you for your. Opinions, Doctor P Because, you
know, you get us thinking. We've had so many lies taught to
us, you know, from the womb. To the tomb.
And you know, unless you unless you take things.

(03:24:21):
Apart. And really start looking at
them, you know, in the Hebrew, you're going to continue on.
You know, you have to dig into these things.
You know, they might be something they may not.
Amen. Yeah.
Yeah, Yeah. Hallelujah.
Thank you, Sherry, for that word.
Yeah. Thank you.
Shalom Shabbat Shalom, but Shalom, Shalom, Shalom.

(03:24:43):
Always awesome. But Shalom, Chris.
Hey, Doctor P. Are we?
Going. To get together for Yum Taru.
You know, I hadn't thought aboutthat, but we should think about
that. Let me see what I can do to put
something together. Lisa.
OK, That. 'D be awesome, please and thank

(03:25:06):
you. Everybody needs to make sure
that they can adjust their Zoom microphone to accommodate their
shofar blast. Yeah, a lot of silence going on
there if that doesn't work out right.
Exactly. Going to be Yom.

(03:25:26):
Excuse me, I can't hear you, Yom.
What? What was that?
Then I'll have to. I'm going to have to sing the
Shofar Blast instead, which I'm not beyond doing.
Come on. Against people.
Hold. US.
Doctor P has Stephanie, Yeah. My son blows it forward.
We'll do. We'll do.
Yeah, we'll do. OK, guys.

(03:25:46):
All right, we will see you next week.
Blessings to you in the name of.You love everybody, love you.