Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's a problem we all face the day after Saint
Patrick's Day. What to do with your slightly used leprechaun
top of the morning?
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Do you?
Speaker 1 (00:08):
After all, you can't just abandon him by the curb.
He's not a mattress. Introducing Little the Leprechaun Intensive technical
Training for life enterprise. At Little, we prepare your Leprechaun
for jobs tailor made for someone who's a foot tall,
like cleaning beneath sofas, fixing a clogged garbage disposal, taking
(00:30):
your chihuahua for rides, assembling iPhones, test driving Barbie's dream car,
and of course, becoming the new star of the Mission
Impossible movies.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
I do my own stunts.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
Little, because a tiny, adorable drunk is a terrible thing
to waste.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Hello and welcome. Do you know what today is? And
you can't me? Please?
Speaker 4 (00:53):
I see if you think it's not, it's both.
Speaker 3 (00:56):
It's not jugging.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
It is today National Sloppy Joe, Dick.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
It's all right, Sloppy Joe Day. Today is National Sloppy
Joe Day. Get yourself some sloppy Joe's this. Stop the show,
come on, it's showtime.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to
our problem. Government is the problem. This is Charlotte County Speaks.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
Your chance to let your voice be heard on local, state,
in national issues, and now broadcasting live from a dumpy
little warehouse behind a taco bell, the host of Charlotte
County Speaks.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Ken Love, Joy, Hego, Johnny News Radio fifteen eighty, one
hundred point nine FM, WCCF Radio dot Com ten eleven.
Here at Charlotte County Speaks. Phone lines are nine four
one two zero six fifteen eighty, toll free eight eight
eight four four one fifteen eighty. The email address CEC
speaks at live dot com. Let's dive right to the
(01:58):
phones and discuss current events with Dan Perkins. Dan, how
you doing good?
Speaker 6 (02:03):
Morning to Bryan, thank you and yourself doing good?
Speaker 2 (02:06):
Hey this just in Uh, it's okay to get a
taco bell soft beef taco. You can celebrate Sloppy Joe
Day that way as well, because today is Taco Tuesday
as well. But it's sloppy Sloppy Joe Day, National Sloppy
Joe Day, so soft beef talk.
Speaker 6 (02:27):
It was an interesting combination. Find a job for a
lepor gun and sloppy Joe Day.
Speaker 7 (02:32):
That was like you like that?
Speaker 6 (02:36):
Yeah, I did. I enjoyed it. That regardless funny and
so it was sloppy Joe Day, It's funny.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
So what's going on Dan? Big things?
Speaker 6 (02:45):
Well, I I spent a good part of the weekend
working on a new commentary, okay and child send to
you hopefully today. I'm looking at pardons and and more
specifically what the implication is based on the story in
(03:06):
the Daily Mail about the Heritage Foundation finding that the
vast majority of Biden's official documents, not notes to his
girlfriends or all that stuff, but real documents, pardons, executive orders,
bills worse, he used he used the autopen to sign him. Well,
(03:27):
he didn't sign him, the pen signed him.
Speaker 7 (03:29):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (03:29):
So the question. I started looking into the number of
Heiden's Biden's hardens that he had completed. And what was
interesting is that his first pardon was in twenty twenty two,
and he did nine. In twenty three, he did four
(03:54):
or five. And he didn't write his first pardon in
twenty twenty four, the last year of his presidency, until
April twenty fourth. From April twenty fourth to January the nineteenth,
he supposedly signed over eight thousand pardens. Now that means
(04:22):
it was two hundred and seventy one days he had
to sign a pardon more than thirty a day, so
more than one an hour, twenty four hours a day,
seven days a week until he left the office in
order to assess successfully execute eight thousand pardons. Now, but
(04:46):
those are the ones he supposedly signed. It took a while,
but I found out how many were submitted for review,
over fourteen thousand, now, fourteen thousand pardons.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
And that was just from the and that was just
from April from November, or from April, from April to November.
Speaker 6 (05:09):
April to January twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
Five, fourteen thousand were.
Speaker 6 (05:15):
Submitted, fourteen thousand were submitted.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
Eight thousand were done, and we're and we're supposed And now,
now what else I want you to know? Because I
tell us, because I hope you've looked at this too.
Have you matched the dates of the signing of these
with where actually Joe was at the time, because we
know he was where Saint Croix or something where when
seven or eight of these were being signed.
Speaker 6 (05:42):
Right, No, I have. I didn't take it that far because,
as I read the regulations. Under Article one, there are
two ways that you can apply for a pardon. You
could go to the Office of the Pardon Ofttorney and
the Justice Department Justice Department and you submit your request.
(06:05):
And we know that based on what they're telling us
that there were fourteen thousand pardon submissions to the office. However,
the second way to a quest a pardon is to
write directly to the White House. Now the White House
is not releasing how many they receive, but I think
(06:28):
it's something that are not included in the fourteen thousand.
Fourteen thousand are only the ones that went to the
Pardon Office attorney. So my point is he as under
the pardon powers in the first Article one, he has
a moral responsibility to review the case before he decides
(06:51):
whether or not he's going to issue the pardon. So
he didn't have in my opinion, he didn't have the
time to review at least fourteenth partons and making a
decision whether he was going to pardon eight thousand or
nine thousand or two thousand. He supposedly did it as
it happened, So what we don't know is how many
(07:11):
pardons were submitted to the White House directly, which would
go not go through and not be in the part
in office records. So the question then becomes, if he
didn't do it, then who did well? Who had control
of the auto penow I should say plural auto pens
(07:32):
because it appears to me, and I'll give you some
other logic to it, it appears to me that the
pardons were given and signed for by a staff person,
unelected staff person in the White House who's used the
power of the president because he is the only one
(07:52):
by constitution who can issue the part. Nobody else. Yeah,
So that they decided to use the autopen and to
complete these pardons and give out eight thousand pardons in
two hundred and seventy one days now, Who had control
(08:13):
of the pen? Because the question that we've been asking
for four years when he was president, who was really
in control? We never knew, But clearly the person who
was able to manipulate the auto pen to sign his
signature and give out eight thousand pardons either way, at
(08:35):
eight thousand pardons just the pardons alone, the estimated legal
fees were eighty million dollars that they paid lawyers who
represent them to do that. That went to the Pardon Office. Now,
if they signed all these pardons and it wasn't the
(08:55):
president who signed them, what's what's the ramification. Well, I'm
making a case and I'll give you the three reasons
why I'm making the case that I agree with mister
Trump that the pardon should be down, loll and void.
I agree number one. Number one. The attorney who did
the investigation for the Justice Department, mister her concluded at
(09:18):
the end of his report that he believed that Joe
Biden did, in fact violate the Federal the Presidential Records
Acts by illegally possessing and not properly maintaining security for
those records. And I've got photographs of the records in
his garage on treadmills and step ladders and all this stuff.
(09:39):
So he violated that position of the law. Now, the
attorney said, and you may remember this, that he decided
that even though he was guilty, he couldn't prosecute Joe
Biden because he believed them to be an elderly man
(10:00):
who was having memory difficulties.
Speaker 7 (10:02):
Yes, he was feeble, So he chose.
Speaker 6 (10:04):
So, well, that's one he chose not to. So a
federal attorney did an analysis of his capabilities and his
ability to function, and concluded that he that he could
not win a case because he would be a sympathetic
person and the jury would not convict him because of
(10:25):
his age, his infirmitating in his lack of memory. Lack
of memory is important because that means can you process
eight thousand partners? Can you read eight thousand parts?
Speaker 2 (10:35):
And can you filter through the Yeah, you're going to
give it to him, and can you filter through the
fourteen thousand that showed up first?
Speaker 6 (10:40):
You know, right now it has to go through those two.
Second point was that the Speaker of the House in
December the fifth of or in November of twenty twenty four,
was at a meeting at the White House discussing what
(11:04):
was going on in Ukraine. But they also talked about
the liquefied natural gas facility that was projected being built
in Louisiana. And he's from Louisiana, and he questioned the
president afterwards, it says, why did you sign in an
executive order postponing the construction of the facility. It would
(11:26):
have made great sense for the people of Europe to
wean themselves away from Russia and would give my state
thousands of jobs, good paying jobs, and it would have
held the economy. And he said, quote, I didn't sign it.
I don't remember signing it.
Speaker 7 (11:43):
Yep.
Speaker 6 (11:43):
So now this was within a few weeks of of
supposed signing. And the Speaker said, well, I can go
to your secretary and get a copy of it. Nope,
I just didn't remember signing period done. So now we
have the Speaker of the House else who is speaking
with the President, who openly denies that he ever signed it.
(12:07):
Now we have another example. Remember the time when he
was doing this particular meeting and he wanted to ask
the woman who was in charge of bringing the meeting
to come up because he wanted to acknowledge what she'd
done and where are you? Where are you? And she
was dead, she had been killed a month before in
an outible accident. Didn't know what he was doing. Then again, memory,
(12:34):
let's go to the presidential debate with Donald Trump. Such
a disaster. He didn't know where he was, what he
was talking about, what was going on, and it was
the end of his opportunity to be president. And he
presented an image that the Democrats were just destroyed trying
(12:56):
what to do. The last point is, on December fifth,
twenty twenty four, he went to Africa to wake celebration
of a new dam that was being built, and Joe
Biden falls asleep at the table, and nobody wakes and
nobody wakes him up. All these are examples of the
(13:16):
inability of this person to function as president, and the
decision upon the staff who knew that he was a
problem and tried to hide it from the American people,
from Congress and from the news media for the entire
time that he was president. All these, all these things
that I've given you, it says that the man was
not mentally competent, and there's no way he could have
(13:39):
processed over fourteen thousand pardon applications. He couldn't. He couldn't
have done that. So somebody else stepped in and took
over the role of president, because the president, by the Constitution,
is the only one that can sign these pardons.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
I think we might know who it is. I think
we might know who I think we might know who
it is.
Speaker 7 (13:59):
A punt.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
It had an article near a tandon near a tandin
was the White House staff secretary when Joe Biden auto
penned pardons while he was at a golf course in.
Speaker 7 (14:12):
The US Virgin Islands.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
She was frequently mentioned in the leaked Podesta emails by Wikilea.
She was a very vocal Russiagate.
Speaker 7 (14:24):
Person, and.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
One insider told The New York Post that he feared
near a Tandarn quote, I feared no one as much
as I feared that staffer. To me, the staffer basically
was the president end quote. No one ever questioned near
a Tandern period that was coming from this source. So
(14:52):
it could be her who was signing all this autopen stuff.
Speaker 6 (14:57):
Yeah, but I leave given the volume of auto pens
and the volume of all the pardons that had to
be reviewed, she wasn't alone.
Speaker 3 (15:11):
Oh she was.
Speaker 6 (15:11):
She made because there was a report. I saw that
there was. There were several There are several autopen devices.
So I think you had a team of people who
was processing the pardons. They were making it. They were
making the decision, not the president. They were making the
decision who was going to get the parton who wasn't.
And as a result, we had them signed even though
(15:36):
we're you're using the autopen signature, not not signed and
reviewed by the president. They should all be invalid.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
I I agree, particularly the ones where they're unprecedentedly given
a pardon for something they haven't even been accused of doing.
Speaker 6 (15:53):
Yes, And that's where the courts have an opportunity to
to to uh to get intervening because the pardon process,
according to Article one, you have to have been convicted
and it's been been incarcerated for a minimum of five
years before you can apply for a pardon. So this
(16:13):
idea of giving a person a pardon or something that
they haven't committed yet or hasn't been discovered that they've committed,
is questionable. The other thing is the other thing is
and this is to me, the most damaging part of
what happened. At the time he was president, there were
approximately forty three to forty five people on death row
(16:40):
in federal prisons. He commuted thirty seven of those to
life in prison with no parole. Now it seems strange
that thirty seven out of forty forty two we're all
given commutations to life imprisonment with no parole. And by
(17:00):
the way, those people who were making and doing these
pardons put themselves in a position that they were going
to be the ultimate judge of what was going to
happen to these people, and they paid no attention to
or any consideration for the families of these people. Oh
(17:20):
they were murdered.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
No, they don't care.
Speaker 7 (17:23):
They don't care. They could care less. That's the Democrat motto.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
We love your votes, we want your money, but we
could really care less about you.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
So I think this story has got legs on it.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
Oh yeah, yeah, I agree, because you know, again, stuff
like this needs to be adjudicated. You know, that's it's insane.
And these this cabal of people who were actually making
these decisions and running the country while Joe's mumbling about
eating ice cream. I mean this it needs to be outed.
(17:58):
And again there has to be accountability. If there's no accountability,
they're only going to try and do it again. And
you're also going to raise the risk of vigilanteism.
Speaker 6 (18:09):
Mm hmm, well I agree. I mean, it's it's it's
it's it's it's not a miscarriagter justice. It's it's usurping
the power of the president. And you are the ones
that are now going to decide your non elected officials
are going to decide who's going to get pardoned, who
isn't going to get a parton who's going to get
(18:29):
off of death row. I mean the idea that that
thirty seven out of forty plus people are all pardoned
on the same day in federal prisons on death row,
that's that's doesn't make logical sense.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
No, because it's not logical.
Speaker 6 (18:47):
It's macs of everybody, just somebody saying, well, let's just
release them all. Let's convert everybody which says they didn't
do their homework as as to whether or not it
was justification. And these people, even the president, if President
Biden were functional, I'm not sure that the president has
the right to be the ultimate trial judge and determiner
(19:09):
whether or not somebody should be should be facing murder
charges and execution for what he did. That that they
are the greatest, they are the ultimate arbiture of justice,
and they're not. We have a justice system, and as
a result of that justice system, it was it was corrupted.
(19:29):
And the idea that that he that they got these pardons,
that he signed them is is bogus. There I have
a link on in the story to x where shows
five of the pardons that were supposedly signed on the
morning of of Trump's inauguration and the video takes all
(19:57):
four all five of the pardons signature pages and focuses
them on top of each other, and they're perfect matches. Well, nobody,
nobody writes the same signature twice or something a little different.
And so that there this is evidence that those five,
those five pardons that were given on the morning of
(20:21):
the inauguration of Donald Trump, we're done on the auto pin.
The President of the United States, who had nothing else
to do that day except to go watch it. Uh,
the new president be inaugurated, couldn't sit down and sign
those five parts. They had to do it on an
auto pen. So I think it's it's it was fascinating
(20:43):
research to get get into that and find out and
how difficult it is to find out information because it
was we don't have that information. You go to the
National Archived, we don't have that, and on and on
and on all these places. Well we don't have it
at night, And I've kept kept on digging and digging
and finally found it. But you know, two hundred and
(21:04):
seventy one days to vet and to vet over fourteen
thousand pardons and sign eight thousand of them in two
hundred and seventy one days. No, he didn't have the strength.
We didn't have the strength to do that. And so
what we have is the deep state again deciding that
they know what's best for the country and best for people.
(21:27):
So they're taking over the power from the president to
do this.
Speaker 7 (21:33):
Well, we're gonna have to correct them, Dan.
Speaker 6 (21:36):
Yeah. And then you saw the story, I'm sure you
saw the story yesterday of the rogue judge who said
to the president, turn them planes around and bring those people.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Well, we've had our discussion about Bossburg.
Speaker 6 (21:47):
Yes, yeah, and now they're talking about impeaching him.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
Yes, hell yes. First of all, do you hear about
his daughter?
Speaker 6 (21:56):
No, she.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
Works for a five oh one c three called Partners
for Justice that gives criminal illegal illegal aliens and gang
members legal advice. Just wow, you know, no conflict there, huh?
First of all known. But look, let's put a side
the fact he's out of his jurisdiction. Let's put aside
(22:20):
the fact that he doesn't have the power to issue
the orders that he's doing. Now he's got his daughter
with a massive conflict of interest, and he's still out
there making himself look like he's somebody.
Speaker 6 (22:32):
Right, right, And and you're right, his jurisdiction is the
geographical area of his court. He can't he can't take
on a case in Texas when he lives in Maryland.
I mean, it's just but but but again, it's another
example of the elites trying to decide that they know
(22:53):
what's best and they're going to control and they're trying,
and they're I think it's this is this is law
fair point zero. It is the Democrats are still trying
to get Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
And they're trying, and they're they're banking on the fact
that their base is so illiterate regarding civics that they'll
buy into whatever. You know, these Jiha judges and there
are little common gaze missions boast about they've oh Trump's illegal,
he can't do that. But you know, because they don't know,
(23:27):
they don't understand how it works.
Speaker 6 (23:30):
There's got to be a way in which the court,
the Supreme Court can rule without instead of doing these
cases one at a time, that they can take one
of these cases and make it an example for everybody else. Well,
you have to stay within your jurisdiction. You can't. You
can't you serve Article two of the Constitution, which gives
(23:52):
the president the right to do things.
Speaker 2 (23:54):
Also, isn't there isn't there a law? I'm pretty sure
there is. I read about it last week. I can't
remember it off the top of my head, which says,
before these guys can pull this law air, they got
to put money up and it's not being enforced. They
got to put money up in case what they're what
what in case they lose, and and that this whole
(24:16):
case may have impeded or harmed people that could have
benefited from.
Speaker 7 (24:21):
This government action.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
They got to put up money.
Speaker 7 (24:24):
To cover to cover the legal fees.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
Uh, this these jiha judges, and I don't think that
law has been being enforced. And if that starts getting enforced,
then they got to put money up behind this.
Speaker 7 (24:34):
Maybe it'll slow it down.
Speaker 6 (24:37):
Yeah, that's that's that's that's a good point. I'll look
into that. I wasn't familiar with that, but neither was
I know that. I know that in the case, like
for example, it Trump's case in New York, for him
to appeal, he has to put up a huge Yeah
he had to put money up.
Speaker 7 (24:51):
Yeah he did.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
And then from what I've read, the these jihad judges
got to put money up if they're if they're putting
this from what I've read, I got to find it out,
find that art, dig that article out again and look
at But I'm.
Speaker 7 (25:06):
Pretty sure that there's that either way.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
These guys, I keep saying, and I agree with it.
Ignore these judges. Keep doing what you're doing as you're
appealing them, impeaching them and disbarring them.
Speaker 6 (25:23):
Right right. The other thing is I thought was interesting
and nothing new pardons. But another blow for the Democrats
is that SpaceX went to the Space Capsule List Stay
station and rescued the American astronauts.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
And what does that say that you know that they
wouldn't let Musco get them during the Biden administration because
they didn't want Musk looking good during an election year.
They were going to let two people hang up there
in space who couldn't get home because the crap rocket
that they went up there might not have gotten them home.
(26:03):
And they're up there for how long? Eight months? Almost
nine months? And Biden wouldn't let Musco get him because
they didn't want must to look good. That's how disgusting
the Democrats have become.
Speaker 6 (26:17):
Right absolutely, and I think the I think the Democratic
Party is imploding the idea that they they all the
things that are happening, whether it was the continuing resolution
and Schumer and now that the rescue of the astronaut,
all these things are happening at Democratic expense, and that
(26:41):
you know, Kamala for the longest time after the presidential election,
was number one contender for the Democratic nomination. In twenty
twenty eight, she had about twenty through twenty three percent.
She's now down to almost single digits. And who's number one?
Speaker 2 (26:57):
Aoc No, can't you believe that? I mean, it's just
it's a joke. It's a joke. What's even funnier, guess it.
Speaker 6 (27:12):
The question is is she gonna Is she going to
run for president or is she going to run it
to primary shooter so that she can become New York Center.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
I know they're losing it on Schumer because do they
not Do they not realize how bad they would have
looked during a government shutdown?
Speaker 6 (27:31):
Mm hmm.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
And I wouldn't. I didn't care. I'm fine with shutting
it down. But so Schuber does actually the strategically smart thing,
and now his own people can't can't put him through
the meat grinder quick enough, right, And AOC. Seriously, I mean,
do you know what's her? What her degree is in?
(27:56):
No economics?
Speaker 6 (27:58):
Okay, I wouldn't have guessed that.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
Yeah, and to listen to her talk about economics, you
wouldn't guess it either. Oh God, Well it's Dan Perkins.
Ladies and gentlemen, give it up for him, and please
go check out his website, Dan Perkinsmedia dot org. Dan
Perkinsmedia dot org. Thank you, my friend. Have a great week.
Speaker 7 (28:19):
We'll talk to you again soon.
Speaker 6 (28:21):
Happy believed, Thank you, I appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (28:26):
Here's a quick secret about today's show. They're making toasts
down the hall. Ever notice, toasters are like the radio.
You turn them on and they work, no pesky upgrades needed.
Sometimes you have to shake out the crumbs and that
goes for the toaster too. That wonderful smell of toast.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Enjoy the show.
Speaker 8 (28:50):
We'll be right back with Charlotte County Speaks on news
radio fifteen eighty WCCF.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
I bought a toothbrush, some toothpaste, a flannel for my face, pajamas, hairbrush,
new shoes, and a case. I said, to my reflection,
let's get out of this place. That's the church and
steeple the laundry on the hill, builboards and buildings. Memories
(29:33):
of it still keep colling and coling. But forget it off.
I know I will tempted by the food, over and over,
tempted that the truth is discovered. What's been going on
(29:58):
now that you have gone this food?
Speaker 2 (30:05):
The news radio fifteen eighty one hundred point nine FM
WCCF ten forty two Here Charlotte County speaks. Phone lines
open nine four one two zero six fifteen eighty toll free,
eight eight eight four four one fifteen eighty toll free.
Does that mean anything anymore? I guess maybe if you
(30:26):
still got a home and you got dial up.
Speaker 7 (30:30):
I don't know anyway.
Speaker 2 (30:32):
Oh Man, Canada, Canada.
Speaker 7 (30:41):
Over to the Conservative tree house.
Speaker 2 (30:43):
I don't like him either, this this new Canadian prime minister.
Speaker 7 (30:49):
And what so I guess they install him.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
Trudeau's still got time left or something, so they stick
They're sticking this guy in uh Mark Carney getting elected
to run Canada, Sundan says, would be the greatest benefit
to mogonomics in the United States. The insufferable Dufus is
completely enthralled with the views, perspectives, and ideologies of globalism.
(31:17):
Prime Minister Carney's conservative opponent Pierre Marcel Poitier, which who
comes across like a great guy when he's talking to
the press, but he's actually gentler and more effeminate version
of Mitt Romney. He growls through his cashmere. In short,
(31:38):
Canada's screwed now. Normal thinking Canadians need to get through
a Romney to get Trump. So perhaps it's better if
Canada just increases the speed of the downward economic slope
by installing Carney. Somewhere around eighty percent of Canadians have
absolutely no concept of how their economy is functioning. Most
(31:59):
Canadians seem to think they have some form of capitalistic
system in operation and tweaking the knobs is going to
fix things.
Speaker 7 (32:07):
It won't from.
Speaker 2 (32:09):
An American political perspective, having Mark Carney carry out his
policies and watching the system they're in collapse might break
the borg mindset in Canada. It will be massively painful
for Canadians when their currency hits around twenty five cents
to the US dollar. However, that currency collapse will more
(32:30):
than eliminate any Trump tariff impact. So Carney outline yesterday
how he's going to increase the industrial carbon tax in
order to align with the UK and the EU trade
partners on the issue of climate change. So taxing carbon,
Carney says, is the key to unlocking excellent trade agreements
(32:54):
with other global trade partners, who can then fill the
void created by disconnecting Canada from the US economy. He
really believes this with all his heart. In these economic
comments come on the heels of Mark Carney telling French
President Emmanuel Macron in public that Canada was the most
(33:18):
European of countries outside of the EU.
Speaker 7 (33:27):
He actually said that, uh, it's not gonna work.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
Because their Canadian dollars is going to be devalued to ours,
and even with the tariffs, it's still only going to
cost us maybe five bucks more. You know, it's not
This isn't gonna work for them. I'm liking how this
is gonna go. It's not gonna work in Europe, It's
(33:56):
not gonna work in Canada. And uh oh, America once again,
ladies and gentlemen, winning going up America's hottest new curse word.
Speaker 7 (34:06):
Kleman, We'll tell you what it means.
Speaker 8 (34:08):
After this, We'll be right back with Charlotte County Speaks
on news radio fifteen eighty WCCF.
Speaker 9 (34:17):
We've got twelve people on the moon.
Speaker 10 (34:20):
Ever since we've done that, you hear about people who
get upset about little things in their life, and they
blame the fact that we've been on the moon for
their problems, as if there's a possible tie in, you know,
like if their phone card is all tangled up, they
can put a man on the moon, but they can't
make a damn phone card that won't pun up.
Speaker 3 (34:43):
They can put a man on the mouth.
Speaker 9 (34:48):
Maybe if we never did that, they'd be happy.
Speaker 10 (34:50):
Huh, hasn't our phone cart driving you crazy?
Speaker 3 (34:54):
Nah? We haven't even had a man on the moon yet.
Speaker 9 (35:03):
Why would I let something like this bother me? I
think life's of bullet cherries.
Speaker 3 (35:34):
One of the last man of you turn up My
cat in my six doesn't miss on my less. I
didn't you know I would balls when I fell? What
didn't that old deal be made?
Speaker 9 (35:51):
It?
Speaker 3 (35:51):
When I'm roll back the sad.
Speaker 2 (35:58):
News Radio fifteen one hundred point nine FM WCCF, Charlotte
County speaks at ten fifty two. Yeah, like Georg has
a bad penny. What Canada is planning on doing? What
they've outlined. What they're gonna do is the same thing that,
as is pointed out in sun Dance's article here, that
(36:21):
China and the EU did back in twenty seventeen, eighteen
and nineteen, and it didn't work. Not against us. We
were fine because the devaluation of their currency. Even with
the tariffs, we wound up paint about the same price
for the goods. And that's pretty much what's gonna happen
(36:43):
with Canada.
Speaker 5 (36:49):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (36:50):
And you got the G seven coming up too, and
where's it going to be held?
Speaker 7 (36:55):
Canada?
Speaker 2 (36:57):
So we'll see how that goes. But I'm not I'm
not really worried about Canada for some reason. I mean,
what have they got They they can't they can't even
really put their own military together. They're about population wise,
(37:18):
they're about the size of California. Huh, fifty first possibility,
fifty first state. And guess what, and guess what, We're
not gonna let Carnie be governor either. So there you
had your chance, you blew it, And now it's.
Speaker 3 (37:40):
Time for five.
Speaker 2 (37:47):
However, it does look like we are going to have
to we're going to be taking Panama back. Hang on
just a second, caller, I have to get through these
five random facts. Your first five of your five ran efacts. Today,
the band Train has more monthly listeners on Spotify than
(38:11):
Led Zeppelin, the Eagles, Van Halen, Tom Petty, YouTube, Pearl
Jam or Elvis.
Speaker 7 (38:17):
Why the hell is that.
Speaker 2 (38:20):
They had? Like what one good song? Huh? I don't
get that one anyway. On number two, on average, giraffes
sleep for less than two hours a day. On the
flip side, pythons sleep for at least eighteen hours.
Speaker 7 (38:37):
Number three.
Speaker 2 (38:38):
Carrots are actually bad for rabbits and can cause health problems.
Tell that all the bunnies that eat all the carrots
that I would throw out for them anyway, but because
of bugs, bunny pretty much everyone thinks rabbits love carrots.
Speaker 8 (38:54):
What they do?
Speaker 2 (38:59):
Number four, Doctor Dre. Apparently they're not good for carrots,
aren't good for the bunnies, but they love them. They'll
eat them up, Doctor Dre. Number four, Doctor Dre didn't
know Eminem was white until they met in person. Dre
says he was happy when he found out because, quote.
Speaker 7 (39:15):
It was so different. Okay.
Speaker 2 (39:18):
Number five of your five random facts. The designer who
created the NBA logo also made the ten forty easy
tax form, And there's your five random facts. High caller,
you're on the air.
Speaker 11 (39:35):
Hey, good morning. I that's a Canadian. About three months ago,
we were at the King's House having lunch also known
as Burger King, and I was talking to her about
Trudeau's tendering his resignation. She says, yeah, she says, I'm
really happy about that. I'm so happy to be here
in the States because I'm looking forward to getting back
(39:56):
to Canada. At least we have socialized medicine. But everything
helse sucks.
Speaker 6 (40:00):
Yeah, very true.
Speaker 2 (40:02):
Well, you know, but I've heard so many different things
about their socialized medicine in Canada, like if you need MRIs,
if you need some surgery, stuff like that, people are
coming to the still coming to the States for that
because the lines, the waiting lists are so long, the
wait time is so long, which is the same thing
(40:24):
that happened to the what do they call it the
nih over in the UK. They're starting to come out
of socialized medicine because it's not working. You're stacking up
dead bodies in the wait time for like MRIs and
certain surgeries and stuff like that can be almost prohibitive
to where you're going to want to find an alternative.
Speaker 11 (40:46):
She was being a little more than sarcastic with me,
but she's still had a smile on her face because
she was only here for six months. Then she's got
to go back and pay every shible.
Speaker 2 (40:55):
I'm sorry we lost you, but thank you for the call. Yeah,
that's true. You know, say what you will. I don't
think it's that great of a deal myself. You like,
do you like a banking system that can look at
your social media and see that you're a truck driver
who's protesting and all of a sudden just shut your
bank off your bank account oft where you can't access
(41:16):
any of your funds. Is that that the kind of
that old Canada.
Speaker 7 (41:22):
Don't worry.
Speaker 2 (41:22):
We'll let you keep the maple leaf as a state flag.
I'll let you do that. But Carney's not going to
be your governor. I'm just telling you, Carney's not going
to be the governor. It makes sense, maybe, Pollie, it's
kind of Romney light, but what the hell he compared
(41:44):
to what I've seen in Canada, he's about as conservative
as you're going to get.
Speaker 7 (41:50):
Right now. Who's popular? And I hope he wins, but
I think I think it's I think it's true.
Speaker 2 (41:58):
Uh oh, give it up a jelly roll, losing weight
and winning Country Artist of the Year for the jelly role.
Speaker 7 (42:11):
Who says facial tattoos can't pay off.
Speaker 2 (42:15):
Tesla's self driving feature got tricked by wiley coyote type
fake wall popular YouTuber Mark Roper. You can check it out.
It's on the YouTube. Tesla's self driving feature got tricked.
He painted a wall, a big styrofoam wall, put it
up over a road, made it look exactly like the road,
(42:38):
and Tesla's car still thought it was a road, drove
right through it, didn't even slow down. It's fun to watch.
Didn't hurt the car at all. It was all styrofoam,
but still proves a point.
Speaker 7 (42:52):
They got a little work to do.
Speaker 2 (42:56):
Yeah, maybe you should look. Is that for solid objects in.
Speaker 7 (42:59):
Front of you? Wouldn't that wouldn't that with the radar?
Speaker 2 (43:02):
Well, it was styrofoam, so maybe you couldn't. Maybe you
gotta have metal.
Speaker 3 (43:09):
Rebar.
Speaker 7 (43:10):
Who knows.
Speaker 2 (43:12):
Anyway, that's all we have time for today, kids, Uh
time to uh you can go go go try those
KFC fried mashed potato poppers. Tell me how they are.
I'm not gonna be I want, I want to know
how they are.
Speaker 7 (43:30):
Anybody got any more jokes, any funny?
Speaker 6 (43:32):
Nope, nope.
Speaker 7 (43:33):
All right, see you folks.
Speaker 8 (43:36):
We're news Radio fifteen eighty AM w CCF Punda Gorda
and FM one hundred point nine W two sixty five EA,
Punda Gorda
It's a problem we all face the day after Saint
Patrick's Day. What to do with your slightly used leprechaun
top of the morning?
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Do you?
Speaker 1 (00:08):
After all, you can't just abandon him by the curb.
He's not a mattress. Introducing Little the Leprechaun Intensive technical
Training for life enterprise. At Little, we prepare your Leprechaun
for jobs tailor made for someone who's a foot tall,
like cleaning beneath sofas, fixing a clogged garbage disposal, taking
(00:30):
your chihuahua for rides, assembling iPhones, test driving Barbie's dream car,
and of course, becoming the new star of the Mission
Impossible movies.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
I do my own stunts.
Speaker 1 (00:43):
Little, because a tiny, adorable drunk is a terrible thing
to waste.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Hello and welcome. Do you know what today is? And
you can't me? Please?
Speaker 4 (00:53):
I see if you think it's not, it's both.
Speaker 3 (00:56):
It's not jugging.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
It is today National Sloppy Joe, Dick.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
It's all right, Sloppy Joe Day. Today is National Sloppy
Joe Day. Get yourself some sloppy Joe's this. Stop the show,
come on, it's showtime.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to
our problem. Government is the problem. This is Charlotte County Speaks.
Speaker 5 (01:21):
Your chance to let your voice be heard on local, state,
in national issues, and now broadcasting live from a dumpy
little warehouse behind a taco bell, the host of Charlotte
County Speaks.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Ken Love, Joy, Hego, Johnny News Radio fifteen eighty, one
hundred point nine FM, WCCF Radio dot Com ten eleven.
Here at Charlotte County Speaks. Phone lines are nine four
one two zero six fifteen eighty, toll free eight eight
eight four four one fifteen eighty. The email address CEC
speaks at live dot com. Let's dive right to the
(01:58):
phones and discuss current events with Dan Perkins. Dan, how
you doing good?
Speaker 6 (02:03):
Morning to Bryan, thank you and yourself doing good?
Speaker 2 (02:06):
Hey this just in Uh, it's okay to get a
taco bell soft beef taco. You can celebrate Sloppy Joe
Day that way as well, because today is Taco Tuesday
as well. But it's sloppy Sloppy Joe Day, National Sloppy
Joe Day, so soft beef talk.
Speaker 6 (02:27):
It was an interesting combination. Find a job for a
lepor gun and sloppy Joe Day.
Speaker 7 (02:32):
That was like you like that?
Speaker 6 (02:36):
Yeah, I did. I enjoyed it. That regardless funny and
so it was sloppy Joe Day, It's funny.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
So what's going on Dan? Big things?
Speaker 6 (02:45):
Well, I I spent a good part of the weekend
working on a new commentary, okay and child send to
you hopefully today. I'm looking at pardons and and more
specifically what the implication is based on the story in
(03:06):
the Daily Mail about the Heritage Foundation finding that the
vast majority of Biden's official documents, not notes to his
girlfriends or all that stuff, but real documents, pardons, executive orders,
bills worse, he used he used the autopen to sign him. Well,
(03:27):
he didn't sign him, the pen signed him.
Speaker 7 (03:29):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (03:29):
So the question. I started looking into the number of
Heiden's Biden's hardens that he had completed. And what was
interesting is that his first pardon was in twenty twenty two,
and he did nine. In twenty three, he did four
(03:54):
or five. And he didn't write his first pardon in
twenty twenty four, the last year of his presidency, until
April twenty fourth. From April twenty fourth to January the nineteenth,
he supposedly signed over eight thousand pardens. Now that means
(04:22):
it was two hundred and seventy one days he had
to sign a pardon more than thirty a day, so
more than one an hour, twenty four hours a day,
seven days a week until he left the office in
order to assess successfully execute eight thousand pardons. Now, but
(04:46):
those are the ones he supposedly signed. It took a while,
but I found out how many were submitted for review,
over fourteen thousand, now, fourteen thousand pardons.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
And that was just from the and that was just
from April from November, or from April, from April to November.
Speaker 6 (05:09):
April to January twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
Five, fourteen thousand were.
Speaker 6 (05:15):
Submitted, fourteen thousand were submitted.
Speaker 2 (05:19):
Eight thousand were done, and we're and we're supposed And now,
now what else I want you to know? Because I
tell us, because I hope you've looked at this too.
Have you matched the dates of the signing of these
with where actually Joe was at the time, because we
know he was where Saint Croix or something where when
seven or eight of these were being signed.
Speaker 6 (05:42):
Right, No, I have. I didn't take it that far because,
as I read the regulations. Under Article one, there are
two ways that you can apply for a pardon. You
could go to the Office of the Pardon Ofttorney and
the Justice Department Justice Department and you submit your request.
(06:05):
And we know that based on what they're telling us
that there were fourteen thousand pardon submissions to the office. However,
the second way to a quest a pardon is to
write directly to the White House. Now the White House
is not releasing how many they receive, but I think
(06:28):
it's something that are not included in the fourteen thousand.
Fourteen thousand are only the ones that went to the
Pardon Office attorney. So my point is he as under
the pardon powers in the first Article one, he has
a moral responsibility to review the case before he decides
(06:51):
whether or not he's going to issue the pardon. So
he didn't have in my opinion, he didn't have the
time to review at least fourteenth partons and making a
decision whether he was going to pardon eight thousand or
nine thousand or two thousand. He supposedly did it as
it happened, So what we don't know is how many
(07:11):
pardons were submitted to the White House directly, which would
go not go through and not be in the part
in office records. So the question then becomes, if he
didn't do it, then who did well? Who had control
of the auto penow I should say plural auto pens
(07:32):
because it appears to me, and I'll give you some
other logic to it, it appears to me that the
pardons were given and signed for by a staff person,
unelected staff person in the White House who's used the
power of the president because he is the only one
(07:52):
by constitution who can issue the part. Nobody else. Yeah,
So that they decided to use the autopen and to
complete these pardons and give out eight thousand pardons in
two hundred and seventy one days now, Who had control
(08:13):
of the pen? Because the question that we've been asking
for four years when he was president, who was really
in control? We never knew, But clearly the person who
was able to manipulate the auto pen to sign his
signature and give out eight thousand pardons either way, at
(08:35):
eight thousand pardons just the pardons alone, the estimated legal
fees were eighty million dollars that they paid lawyers who
represent them to do that. That went to the Pardon Office. Now,
if they signed all these pardons and it wasn't the
(08:55):
president who signed them, what's what's the ramification. Well, I'm
making a case and I'll give you the three reasons
why I'm making the case that I agree with mister
Trump that the pardon should be down, loll and void.
I agree number one. Number one. The attorney who did
the investigation for the Justice Department, mister her concluded at
(09:18):
the end of his report that he believed that Joe
Biden did, in fact violate the Federal the Presidential Records
Acts by illegally possessing and not properly maintaining security for
those records. And I've got photographs of the records in
his garage on treadmills and step ladders and all this stuff.
(09:39):
So he violated that position of the law. Now, the
attorney said, and you may remember this, that he decided
that even though he was guilty, he couldn't prosecute Joe
Biden because he believed them to be an elderly man
(10:00):
who was having memory difficulties.
Speaker 7 (10:02):
Yes, he was feeble, So he chose.
Speaker 6 (10:04):
So, well, that's one he chose not to. So a
federal attorney did an analysis of his capabilities and his
ability to function, and concluded that he that he could
not win a case because he would be a sympathetic
person and the jury would not convict him because of
(10:25):
his age, his infirmitating in his lack of memory. Lack
of memory is important because that means can you process
eight thousand partners? Can you read eight thousand parts?
Speaker 2 (10:35):
And can you filter through the Yeah, you're going to
give it to him, and can you filter through the
fourteen thousand that showed up first?
Speaker 6 (10:40):
You know, right now it has to go through those two.
Second point was that the Speaker of the House in
December the fifth of or in November of twenty twenty four,
was at a meeting at the White House discussing what
(11:04):
was going on in Ukraine. But they also talked about
the liquefied natural gas facility that was projected being built
in Louisiana. And he's from Louisiana, and he questioned the
president afterwards, it says, why did you sign in an
executive order postponing the construction of the facility. It would
(11:26):
have made great sense for the people of Europe to
wean themselves away from Russia and would give my state
thousands of jobs, good paying jobs, and it would have
held the economy. And he said, quote, I didn't sign it.
I don't remember signing it.
Speaker 7 (11:43):
Yep.
Speaker 6 (11:43):
So now this was within a few weeks of of
supposed signing. And the Speaker said, well, I can go
to your secretary and get a copy of it. Nope,
I just didn't remember signing period done. So now we
have the Speaker of the House else who is speaking
with the President, who openly denies that he ever signed it.
(12:07):
Now we have another example. Remember the time when he
was doing this particular meeting and he wanted to ask
the woman who was in charge of bringing the meeting
to come up because he wanted to acknowledge what she'd
done and where are you? Where are you? And she
was dead, she had been killed a month before in
an outible accident. Didn't know what he was doing. Then again, memory,
(12:34):
let's go to the presidential debate with Donald Trump. Such
a disaster. He didn't know where he was, what he
was talking about, what was going on, and it was
the end of his opportunity to be president. And he
presented an image that the Democrats were just destroyed trying
(12:56):
what to do. The last point is, on December fifth,
twenty twenty four, he went to Africa to wake celebration
of a new dam that was being built, and Joe
Biden falls asleep at the table, and nobody wakes and
nobody wakes him up. All these are examples of the
(13:16):
inability of this person to function as president, and the
decision upon the staff who knew that he was a
problem and tried to hide it from the American people,
from Congress and from the news media for the entire
time that he was president. All these, all these things
that I've given you, it says that the man was
not mentally competent, and there's no way he could have
(13:39):
processed over fourteen thousand pardon applications. He couldn't. He couldn't
have done that. So somebody else stepped in and took
over the role of president, because the president, by the Constitution,
is the only one that can sign these pardons.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
I think we might know who it is. I think
we might know who I think we might know who
it is.
Speaker 7 (13:59):
A punt.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
It had an article near a tandon near a tandin
was the White House staff secretary when Joe Biden auto
penned pardons while he was at a golf course in.
Speaker 7 (14:12):
The US Virgin Islands.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
She was frequently mentioned in the leaked Podesta emails by Wikilea.
She was a very vocal Russiagate.
Speaker 7 (14:24):
Person, and.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
One insider told The New York Post that he feared
near a Tandarn quote, I feared no one as much
as I feared that staffer. To me, the staffer basically
was the president end quote. No one ever questioned near
a Tandern period that was coming from this source. So
(14:52):
it could be her who was signing all this autopen stuff.
Speaker 6 (14:57):
Yeah, but I leave given the volume of auto pens
and the volume of all the pardons that had to
be reviewed, she wasn't alone.
Speaker 3 (15:11):
Oh she was.
Speaker 6 (15:11):
She made because there was a report. I saw that
there was. There were several There are several autopen devices.
So I think you had a team of people who
was processing the pardons. They were making it. They were
making the decision, not the president. They were making the
decision who was going to get the parton who wasn't.
And as a result, we had them signed even though
(15:36):
we're you're using the autopen signature, not not signed and
reviewed by the president. They should all be invalid.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
I I agree, particularly the ones where they're unprecedentedly given
a pardon for something they haven't even been accused of doing.
Speaker 6 (15:53):
Yes, And that's where the courts have an opportunity to
to to uh to get intervening because the pardon process,
according to Article one, you have to have been convicted
and it's been been incarcerated for a minimum of five
years before you can apply for a pardon. So this
(16:13):
idea of giving a person a pardon or something that
they haven't committed yet or hasn't been discovered that they've committed,
is questionable. The other thing is the other thing is
and this is to me, the most damaging part of
what happened. At the time he was president, there were
approximately forty three to forty five people on death row
(16:40):
in federal prisons. He commuted thirty seven of those to
life in prison with no parole. Now it seems strange
that thirty seven out of forty forty two we're all
given commutations to life imprisonment with no parole. And by
(17:00):
the way, those people who were making and doing these
pardons put themselves in a position that they were going
to be the ultimate judge of what was going to
happen to these people, and they paid no attention to
or any consideration for the families of these people. Oh
(17:20):
they were murdered.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
No, they don't care.
Speaker 7 (17:23):
They don't care. They could care less. That's the Democrat motto.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
We love your votes, we want your money, but we
could really care less about you.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
So I think this story has got legs on it.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
Oh yeah, yeah, I agree, because you know, again, stuff
like this needs to be adjudicated. You know, that's it's insane.
And these this cabal of people who were actually making
these decisions and running the country while Joe's mumbling about
eating ice cream. I mean this it needs to be outed.
(17:58):
And again there has to be accountability. If there's no accountability,
they're only going to try and do it again. And
you're also going to raise the risk of vigilanteism.
Speaker 6 (18:09):
Mm hmm, well I agree. I mean, it's it's it's
it's it's it's not a miscarriagter justice. It's it's usurping
the power of the president. And you are the ones
that are now going to decide your non elected officials
are going to decide who's going to get pardoned, who
isn't going to get a parton who's going to get
(18:29):
off of death row. I mean the idea that that
thirty seven out of forty plus people are all pardoned
on the same day in federal prisons on death row,
that's that's doesn't make logical sense.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
No, because it's not logical.
Speaker 6 (18:47):
It's macs of everybody, just somebody saying, well, let's just
release them all. Let's convert everybody which says they didn't
do their homework as as to whether or not it
was justification. And these people, even the president, if President
Biden were functional, I'm not sure that the president has
the right to be the ultimate trial judge and determiner
(19:09):
whether or not somebody should be should be facing murder
charges and execution for what he did. That that they
are the greatest, they are the ultimate arbiture of justice,
and they're not. We have a justice system, and as
a result of that justice system, it was it was corrupted.
(19:29):
And the idea that that he that they got these pardons,
that he signed them is is bogus. There I have
a link on in the story to x where shows
five of the pardons that were supposedly signed on the
morning of of Trump's inauguration and the video takes all
(19:57):
four all five of the pardons signature pages and focuses
them on top of each other, and they're perfect matches. Well, nobody,
nobody writes the same signature twice or something a little different.
And so that there this is evidence that those five,
those five pardons that were given on the morning of
(20:21):
the inauguration of Donald Trump, we're done on the auto pin.
The President of the United States, who had nothing else
to do that day except to go watch it. Uh,
the new president be inaugurated, couldn't sit down and sign
those five parts. They had to do it on an
auto pen. So I think it's it's it was fascinating
(20:43):
research to get get into that and find out and
how difficult it is to find out information because it
was we don't have that information. You go to the
National Archived, we don't have that, and on and on
and on all these places. Well we don't have it
at night, And I've kept kept on digging and digging
and finally found it. But you know, two hundred and
(21:04):
seventy one days to vet and to vet over fourteen
thousand pardons and sign eight thousand of them in two
hundred and seventy one days. No, he didn't have the strength.
We didn't have the strength to do that. And so
what we have is the deep state again deciding that
they know what's best for the country and best for people.
(21:27):
So they're taking over the power from the president to
do this.
Speaker 7 (21:33):
Well, we're gonna have to correct them, Dan.
Speaker 6 (21:36):
Yeah. And then you saw the story, I'm sure you
saw the story yesterday of the rogue judge who said
to the president, turn them planes around and bring those people.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Well, we've had our discussion about Bossburg.
Speaker 6 (21:47):
Yes, yeah, and now they're talking about impeaching him.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
Yes, hell yes. First of all, do you hear about
his daughter?
Speaker 6 (21:56):
No, she.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
Works for a five oh one c three called Partners
for Justice that gives criminal illegal illegal aliens and gang
members legal advice. Just wow, you know, no conflict there, huh?
First of all known. But look, let's put a side
the fact he's out of his jurisdiction. Let's put aside
(22:20):
the fact that he doesn't have the power to issue
the orders that he's doing. Now he's got his daughter
with a massive conflict of interest, and he's still out
there making himself look like he's somebody.
Speaker 6 (22:32):
Right, right, And and you're right, his jurisdiction is the
geographical area of his court. He can't he can't take
on a case in Texas when he lives in Maryland.
I mean, it's just but but but again, it's another
example of the elites trying to decide that they know
(22:53):
what's best and they're going to control and they're trying,
and they're I think it's this is this is law
fair point zero. It is the Democrats are still trying
to get Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
And they're trying, and they're they're banking on the fact
that their base is so illiterate regarding civics that they'll
buy into whatever. You know, these Jiha judges and there
are little common gaze missions boast about they've oh Trump's illegal,
he can't do that. But you know, because they don't know,
(23:27):
they don't understand how it works.
Speaker 6 (23:30):
There's got to be a way in which the court,
the Supreme Court can rule without instead of doing these
cases one at a time, that they can take one
of these cases and make it an example for everybody else. Well,
you have to stay within your jurisdiction. You can't. You
can't you serve Article two of the Constitution, which gives
(23:52):
the president the right to do things.
Speaker 2 (23:54):
Also, isn't there isn't there a law? I'm pretty sure
there is. I read about it last week. I can't
remember it off the top of my head, which says,
before these guys can pull this law air, they got
to put money up and it's not being enforced. They
got to put money up in case what they're what
what in case they lose, and and that this whole
(24:16):
case may have impeded or harmed people that could have
benefited from.
Speaker 7 (24:21):
This government action.
Speaker 2 (24:23):
They got to put up money.
Speaker 7 (24:24):
To cover to cover the legal fees.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
Uh, this these jiha judges, and I don't think that
law has been being enforced. And if that starts getting enforced,
then they got to put money up behind this.
Speaker 7 (24:34):
Maybe it'll slow it down.
Speaker 6 (24:37):
Yeah, that's that's that's that's a good point. I'll look
into that. I wasn't familiar with that, but neither was
I know that. I know that in the case, like
for example, it Trump's case in New York, for him
to appeal, he has to put up a huge Yeah
he had to put money up.
Speaker 7 (24:51):
Yeah he did.
Speaker 2 (24:53):
And then from what I've read, the these jihad judges
got to put money up if they're if they're putting
this from what I've read, I got to find it out,
find that art, dig that article out again and look
at But I'm.
Speaker 7 (25:06):
Pretty sure that there's that either way.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
These guys, I keep saying, and I agree with it.
Ignore these judges. Keep doing what you're doing as you're
appealing them, impeaching them and disbarring them.
Speaker 6 (25:23):
Right right. The other thing is I thought was interesting
and nothing new pardons. But another blow for the Democrats
is that SpaceX went to the Space Capsule List Stay
station and rescued the American astronauts.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
And what does that say that you know that they
wouldn't let Musco get them during the Biden administration because
they didn't want Musk looking good during an election year.
They were going to let two people hang up there
in space who couldn't get home because the crap rocket
that they went up there might not have gotten them home.
(26:03):
And they're up there for how long? Eight months? Almost
nine months? And Biden wouldn't let Musco get him because
they didn't want must to look good. That's how disgusting
the Democrats have become.
Speaker 6 (26:17):
Right absolutely, and I think the I think the Democratic
Party is imploding the idea that they they all the
things that are happening, whether it was the continuing resolution
and Schumer and now that the rescue of the astronaut,
all these things are happening at Democratic expense, and that
(26:41):
you know, Kamala for the longest time after the presidential election,
was number one contender for the Democratic nomination. In twenty
twenty eight, she had about twenty through twenty three percent.
She's now down to almost single digits. And who's number one?
Speaker 2 (26:57):
Aoc No, can't you believe that? I mean, it's just
it's a joke. It's a joke. What's even funnier, guess it.
Speaker 6 (27:12):
The question is is she gonna Is she going to
run for president or is she going to run it
to primary shooter so that she can become New York Center.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
I know they're losing it on Schumer because do they
not Do they not realize how bad they would have
looked during a government shutdown?
Speaker 6 (27:31):
Mm hmm.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
And I wouldn't. I didn't care. I'm fine with shutting
it down. But so Schuber does actually the strategically smart thing,
and now his own people can't can't put him through
the meat grinder quick enough, right, And AOC. Seriously, I mean,
do you know what's her? What her degree is in?
(27:56):
No economics?
Speaker 6 (27:58):
Okay, I wouldn't have guessed that.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
Yeah, and to listen to her talk about economics, you
wouldn't guess it either. Oh God, Well it's Dan Perkins.
Ladies and gentlemen, give it up for him, and please
go check out his website, Dan Perkinsmedia dot org. Dan
Perkinsmedia dot org. Thank you, my friend. Have a great week.
Speaker 7 (28:19):
We'll talk to you again soon.
Speaker 6 (28:21):
Happy believed, Thank you, I appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (28:26):
Here's a quick secret about today's show. They're making toasts
down the hall. Ever notice, toasters are like the radio.
You turn them on and they work, no pesky upgrades needed.
Sometimes you have to shake out the crumbs and that
goes for the toaster too. That wonderful smell of toast.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Enjoy the show.
Speaker 8 (28:50):
We'll be right back with Charlotte County Speaks on news
radio fifteen eighty WCCF.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
I bought a toothbrush, some toothpaste, a flannel for my face, pajamas, hairbrush,
new shoes, and a case. I said, to my reflection,
let's get out of this place. That's the church and
steeple the laundry on the hill, builboards and buildings. Memories
(29:33):
of it still keep colling and coling. But forget it off.
I know I will tempted by the food, over and over,
tempted that the truth is discovered. What's been going on
(29:58):
now that you have gone this food?
Speaker 2 (30:05):
The news radio fifteen eighty one hundred point nine FM
WCCF ten forty two Here Charlotte County speaks. Phone lines
open nine four one two zero six fifteen eighty toll free,
eight eight eight four four one fifteen eighty toll free.
Does that mean anything anymore? I guess maybe if you
(30:26):
still got a home and you got dial up.
Speaker 7 (30:30):
I don't know anyway.
Speaker 2 (30:32):
Oh Man, Canada, Canada.
Speaker 7 (30:41):
Over to the Conservative tree house.
Speaker 2 (30:43):
I don't like him either, this this new Canadian prime minister.
Speaker 7 (30:49):
And what so I guess they install him.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
Trudeau's still got time left or something, so they stick
They're sticking this guy in uh Mark Carney getting elected
to run Canada, Sundan says, would be the greatest benefit
to mogonomics in the United States. The insufferable Dufus is
completely enthralled with the views, perspectives, and ideologies of globalism.
(31:17):
Prime Minister Carney's conservative opponent Pierre Marcel Poitier, which who
comes across like a great guy when he's talking to
the press, but he's actually gentler and more effeminate version
of Mitt Romney. He growls through his cashmere. In short,
(31:38):
Canada's screwed now. Normal thinking Canadians need to get through
a Romney to get Trump. So perhaps it's better if
Canada just increases the speed of the downward economic slope
by installing Carney. Somewhere around eighty percent of Canadians have
absolutely no concept of how their economy is functioning. Most
(31:59):
Canadians seem to think they have some form of capitalistic
system in operation and tweaking the knobs is going to
fix things.
Speaker 7 (32:07):
It won't from.
Speaker 2 (32:09):
An American political perspective, having Mark Carney carry out his
policies and watching the system they're in collapse might break
the borg mindset in Canada. It will be massively painful
for Canadians when their currency hits around twenty five cents
to the US dollar. However, that currency collapse will more
(32:30):
than eliminate any Trump tariff impact. So Carney outline yesterday
how he's going to increase the industrial carbon tax in
order to align with the UK and the EU trade
partners on the issue of climate change. So taxing carbon,
Carney says, is the key to unlocking excellent trade agreements
(32:54):
with other global trade partners, who can then fill the
void created by disconnecting Canada from the US economy. He
really believes this with all his heart. In these economic
comments come on the heels of Mark Carney telling French
President Emmanuel Macron in public that Canada was the most
(33:18):
European of countries outside of the EU.
Speaker 7 (33:27):
He actually said that, uh, it's not gonna work.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
Because their Canadian dollars is going to be devalued to ours,
and even with the tariffs, it's still only going to
cost us maybe five bucks more. You know, it's not
This isn't gonna work for them. I'm liking how this
is gonna go. It's not gonna work in Europe, It's
(33:56):
not gonna work in Canada. And uh oh, America once again,
ladies and gentlemen, winning going up America's hottest new curse word.
Speaker 7 (34:06):
Kleman, We'll tell you what it means.
Speaker 8 (34:08):
After this, We'll be right back with Charlotte County Speaks
on news radio fifteen eighty WCCF.
Speaker 9 (34:17):
We've got twelve people on the moon.
Speaker 10 (34:20):
Ever since we've done that, you hear about people who
get upset about little things in their life, and they
blame the fact that we've been on the moon for
their problems, as if there's a possible tie in, you know,
like if their phone card is all tangled up, they
can put a man on the moon, but they can't
make a damn phone card that won't pun up.
Speaker 3 (34:43):
They can put a man on the mouth.
Speaker 9 (34:48):
Maybe if we never did that, they'd be happy.
Speaker 10 (34:50):
Huh, hasn't our phone cart driving you crazy?
Speaker 3 (34:54):
Nah? We haven't even had a man on the moon yet.
Speaker 9 (35:03):
Why would I let something like this bother me? I
think life's of bullet cherries.
Speaker 3 (35:34):
One of the last man of you turn up My
cat in my six doesn't miss on my less. I
didn't you know I would balls when I fell? What
didn't that old deal be made?
Speaker 9 (35:51):
It?
Speaker 3 (35:51):
When I'm roll back the sad.
Speaker 2 (35:58):
News Radio fifteen one hundred point nine FM WCCF, Charlotte
County speaks at ten fifty two. Yeah, like Georg has
a bad penny. What Canada is planning on doing? What
they've outlined. What they're gonna do is the same thing that,
as is pointed out in sun Dance's article here, that
(36:21):
China and the EU did back in twenty seventeen, eighteen
and nineteen, and it didn't work. Not against us. We
were fine because the devaluation of their currency. Even with
the tariffs, we wound up paint about the same price
for the goods. And that's pretty much what's gonna happen
(36:43):
with Canada.
Speaker 5 (36:49):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (36:50):
And you got the G seven coming up too, and
where's it going to be held?
Speaker 7 (36:55):
Canada?
Speaker 2 (36:57):
So we'll see how that goes. But I'm not I'm
not really worried about Canada for some reason. I mean,
what have they got They they can't they can't even
really put their own military together. They're about population wise,
(37:18):
they're about the size of California. Huh, fifty first possibility,
fifty first state. And guess what, and guess what, We're
not gonna let Carnie be governor either. So there you
had your chance, you blew it, And now it's.
Speaker 3 (37:40):
Time for five.
Speaker 2 (37:47):
However, it does look like we are going to have
to we're going to be taking Panama back. Hang on
just a second, caller, I have to get through these
five random facts. Your first five of your five ran efacts. Today,
the band Train has more monthly listeners on Spotify than
(38:11):
Led Zeppelin, the Eagles, Van Halen, Tom Petty, YouTube, Pearl
Jam or Elvis.
Speaker 7 (38:17):
Why the hell is that.
Speaker 2 (38:20):
They had? Like what one good song? Huh? I don't
get that one anyway. On number two, on average, giraffes
sleep for less than two hours a day. On the
flip side, pythons sleep for at least eighteen hours.
Speaker 7 (38:37):
Number three.
Speaker 2 (38:38):
Carrots are actually bad for rabbits and can cause health problems.
Tell that all the bunnies that eat all the carrots
that I would throw out for them anyway, but because
of bugs, bunny pretty much everyone thinks rabbits love carrots.
Speaker 8 (38:54):
What they do?
Speaker 2 (38:59):
Number four, Doctor Dre. Apparently they're not good for carrots,
aren't good for the bunnies, but they love them. They'll
eat them up, Doctor Dre. Number four, Doctor Dre didn't
know Eminem was white until they met in person. Dre
says he was happy when he found out because, quote.
Speaker 7 (39:15):
It was so different. Okay.
Speaker 2 (39:18):
Number five of your five random facts. The designer who
created the NBA logo also made the ten forty easy
tax form, And there's your five random facts. High caller,
you're on the air.
Speaker 11 (39:35):
Hey, good morning. I that's a Canadian. About three months ago,
we were at the King's House having lunch also known
as Burger King, and I was talking to her about
Trudeau's tendering his resignation. She says, yeah, she says, I'm
really happy about that. I'm so happy to be here
in the States because I'm looking forward to getting back
(39:56):
to Canada. At least we have socialized medicine. But everything
helse sucks.
Speaker 6 (40:00):
Yeah, very true.
Speaker 2 (40:02):
Well, you know, but I've heard so many different things
about their socialized medicine in Canada, like if you need MRIs,
if you need some surgery, stuff like that, people are
coming to the still coming to the States for that
because the lines, the waiting lists are so long, the
wait time is so long, which is the same thing
(40:24):
that happened to the what do they call it the
nih over in the UK. They're starting to come out
of socialized medicine because it's not working. You're stacking up
dead bodies in the wait time for like MRIs and
certain surgeries and stuff like that can be almost prohibitive
to where you're going to want to find an alternative.
Speaker 11 (40:46):
She was being a little more than sarcastic with me,
but she's still had a smile on her face because
she was only here for six months. Then she's got
to go back and pay every shible.
Speaker 2 (40:55):
I'm sorry we lost you, but thank you for the call. Yeah,
that's true. You know, say what you will. I don't
think it's that great of a deal myself. You like,
do you like a banking system that can look at
your social media and see that you're a truck driver
who's protesting and all of a sudden just shut your
bank off your bank account oft where you can't access
(41:16):
any of your funds. Is that that the kind of
that old Canada.
Speaker 7 (41:22):
Don't worry.
Speaker 2 (41:22):
We'll let you keep the maple leaf as a state flag.
I'll let you do that. But Carney's not going to
be your governor. I'm just telling you, Carney's not going
to be the governor. It makes sense, maybe, Pollie, it's
kind of Romney light, but what the hell he compared
(41:44):
to what I've seen in Canada, he's about as conservative
as you're going to get.
Speaker 7 (41:50):
Right now. Who's popular? And I hope he wins, but
I think I think it's I think it's true.
Speaker 2 (41:58):
Uh oh, give it up a jelly roll, losing weight
and winning Country Artist of the Year for the jelly role.
Speaker 7 (42:11):
Who says facial tattoos can't pay off.
Speaker 2 (42:15):
Tesla's self driving feature got tricked by wiley coyote type
fake wall popular YouTuber Mark Roper. You can check it out.
It's on the YouTube. Tesla's self driving feature got tricked.
He painted a wall, a big styrofoam wall, put it
up over a road, made it look exactly like the road,
(42:38):
and Tesla's car still thought it was a road, drove
right through it, didn't even slow down. It's fun to watch.
Didn't hurt the car at all. It was all styrofoam,
but still proves a point.
Speaker 7 (42:52):
They got a little work to do.
Speaker 2 (42:56):
Yeah, maybe you should look. Is that for solid objects in.
Speaker 7 (42:59):
Front of you? Wouldn't that wouldn't that with the radar?
Speaker 2 (43:02):
Well, it was styrofoam, so maybe you couldn't. Maybe you
gotta have metal.
Speaker 3 (43:09):
Rebar.
Speaker 7 (43:10):
Who knows.
Speaker 2 (43:12):
Anyway, that's all we have time for today, kids, Uh
time to uh you can go go go try those
KFC fried mashed potato poppers. Tell me how they are.
I'm not gonna be I want, I want to know
how they are.
Speaker 7 (43:30):
Anybody got any more jokes, any funny?
Speaker 6 (43:32):
Nope, nope.
Speaker 7 (43:33):
All right, see you folks.
Speaker 8 (43:36):
We're news Radio fifteen eighty AM w CCF Punda Gorda
and FM one hundred point nine W two sixty five EA,
Punda Gorda
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!