Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
Thank you.
Thank you, hello everybody.
I'm a little early today and Ihope everybody is watching.
Today I have some news for youand some updates on the book I'm
working on and some of theother books that I work on, and
let's discuss what I do and whoI am.
For the people that are new tothe groups, let me just take the
(02:45):
chat here.
I will have the chat for alittle bit, but not not forever,
okay, um, so if I get newcomments, I get to see it on the
screen.
However, I don't know how wellthis is going to work out, okay,
uh, sometimes, groups okay so,um, for the people that are new
(03:24):
to the group, I am broadcastingto several channels.
I'm broadcasting to my ownstream on the Lydia Lopinto.
I'm also broadcasting to thenew group, save the Humpback
Whales from Windmills, which isbrand new and it's growing, uh,
(03:44):
quite well.
And at the same time, I'mbroadcasting to my publishing
house, which is cloverleafpublications.
So, uh, we have some great newsabout the trolls.
As you know, I've been engagingthe trolls.
(04:22):
As you know, I've been engagingon a donkey of our whales, a
tribute to all the dead whales.
It's got poems, it's gotstories about baby whales, it's
got everything.
It's got data.
It also has two sides of everystory the pro-wind people saying
(04:43):
that it wasn't the windmillsthat did it and the activists
saying it was the windmills thatdid it.
So, for every whale, I showedthe two sides of the story and
you can decide which one youside with.
But for my group, I know whichside you're siding with with.
But for my group, I know whatside you're siding with.
(05:06):
Okay, so it's going to be a fewminutes before the time that I
announced, which was 730.
And it's been kind of anexciting week for me because,
for some reason, somebody haspaid for trolling, because the
(05:26):
people that have been trollingme are not amateurs.
These are people that knowexactly what to say on a troll
post.
I took some of their posts,which were huge.
They post huge posts of things,post huge posts of things and
(05:49):
I'm like who are these peopleand where do they get the time
to post 300 words on a postabout a book, about mourning our
whales?
I don't understand this.
What is going on with thesepeople?
But they do.
They also don't like this groupsaving the humpback whales from
windmills.
I really cannot even begin tofathom what kind of people see
(06:15):
this group with all these deadwhales in the picture, all these
windmills in the back, and theycome in and they put laughing
emojis on it.
I have to say that's prettybizarre.
Well, that's dark, that'sreally dark and cold.
(06:39):
They're going to laugh at thedead whales.
I don't understand how thesepeople operate, but I do.
What I do is there areannouncements for the group that
I advertise and on thisannouncements, um, sometimes
they post an emoji to show howunhappy they are.
Except I don't think theyunderstand that a haha emoji
(07:02):
means you're laughing at it.
I I don't know if these trollsare Americans, or they could be
Chinese or Russian, because, asI posted in my group, there is a
whole set of campaigns toastroturf the green energy power
from windmills, and that hasintensified since Mr Trump, or
(07:25):
President Trump, is now going tobe inaugurated and he will be
president as of January 20th, Ithink, and I posted that he said
on a news program that he wasgoing to end the subsidies for
(07:47):
the windmills.
Now let me explain to you howimportant this statement he made
is.
For every billion dollarwindmill project that's out
there and there are many uh,this means that they're going to
lose all their jobs.
(08:07):
They're not going to be able tobuild these things without a
subsidy, because the subsidyamounts to 30% of the total
project.
That's no small amount.
That means they're not going tohave any kind of profit,
because generally profit isabout 30 percent.
So the one, for example, thatwe're getting here at um
(08:33):
atlantic shores, uh, which Ijust put in my public comment
for by mr murphy or governormurphy, um, those people are
very worried because, while theNew Jersey state is all Democrat
, the subsidies are coming fromthe federal government and so,
(08:55):
without that money, if thatTrump just cuts off the money.
You know he's hiring Elon Muskto do the cutting.
He's the man, is man, has gotno soul.
He'll do it.
You know They'll just cut thesubsidies.
That means they're not gettinga check, even though they might
(09:16):
have had an agreement that theywere going to do this and when
they got done they were going toget a check.
They're not getting a check, sowho's going to pay for these
windmills?
In addition to that, as thingsstart changing in the local
governments, more and moreanti-wind people are going to be
in there, and anti-wind there'snot just Republicans, as you
(09:41):
might think.
Republicans, as you might think, anti-wind could be.
Any number of environmentalists, could be Democrat or
Republican, any number of peoplewho are independents the
independents are a big group andthey would not be in favor of
(10:02):
the wind generally and a lot ofthe people that are pro-wind, a
lot of the people like theteachers and the ones that are
real Democrats, that have alwaysbeen Democrat, and they'll go
along with whatever seems,whatever narrative the Democrats
put out, no matter how bizarreit might be.
(10:24):
Okay, so, pretty much knowingthe market, I could tell you
that in New Jersey we're havingkind of a change, kind of a
reset, and the Republicans maybe much more in charge, but
we're also talking not justRepublicans, we're talking
independents and we're talkingDemocrats who don't want the
(10:46):
whales harmed, who don't thinkthis is the right green energy
that we should be pursuing.
First of all, it's four timesas expensive as windmills on the
ground on land, and it is toomany subsidies and with the
subsidies being cut off, they'renot going to be able to make a
(11:08):
profit.
So what will happen if Mr Trumpdecides I'm sorry, president
Trump decides to cut off all thesubsidies to these incoming
windmills windmills?
It's going to be disastrous forthat industry.
Of course they're desperate andthey're trolling me, thinking
(11:30):
that I'm going to do somethingto their business.
I'm not.
What I am is an independentjournalist.
I research thingsscientifically, I go through and
collect information andsummarize it.
I don't make up the stuff.
I use AI to summarize theinformation.
(11:53):
I go and grab information fromlocal newspapers, because
they're the last vestige of truejournalism left in this country
.
Everything else isunfortunately compromised.
Everything else is managed bythe narrative of whoever wants
(12:17):
to push a certain agenda.
It could be Democrats, but itcould be other people.
It could be Democrats, but itcould be other people.
Okay.
So what I find is that many ofthe search engines are biased
and I do actual scientific teststo show that something is
biased.
I use AI and other tools todetermine if the listings that
(12:42):
they put out are biased, todetermine if the listings that
they put out are biased, andthat would actually detect the
algorithm that they're using.
And many of these searchengines that are mainstream
search engines, the ones thateverybody uses, are going to be
biased.
So I have to skip those and goto other, lesser known but very
(13:07):
good search engines.
I mean, a lot of people don'trealize that there are many,
many, many search engines outthere, including foreign ones,
and they put out goodinformation, because it's
basically a data aggregator.
It goes around trolling I don'tknow if I say trolling or
scraping the information on theinternet throughout the internet
(13:29):
, summarizing it and listing itin some way that it can be
searched.
It's really an index.
So a search engine is nothingout of this world.
They existed years ago, beforeGoogle started, and they have
many of these, these and they'revery good.
(13:49):
They do probably as good a jobor better than Google, except a
lot of them are not politicallycompromised.
They don't take money fromgroups in order to prioritize
the search engines data.
Okay, so that's what I'mlooking for Now, as far as the
local journalists are the peoplethat first see that whale,
(14:14):
other than the people who foundthe whale.
That person who found the whalemight call either the local
police or the fire departmentand someone will tell the
newspaper that this happened,and the newspaper from the local
organization in that townbecause these are very small
(14:37):
towns, you know will come overand take a picture, make a
little report, find out anythingthey can find out about this
whale from the people there.
Now, if they want to do anecropsy, which is they have to
figure out what killed thiswhale well, they have to pay for
(15:00):
it.
I don't think they're all free.
Okay, so they have to get ahold of an organization that has
a crop c?
Uh group that can come in andfigure out what's wrong with
this, what, what happened tothis.
Well, well, in my databases Itake the data.
I find out that at leastsomething like 50% or less are
(15:25):
actually evaluated to see whathit them.
Less than 50%.
The people that do the necropsyare very busy people and they
don't get to every whale, sothey'll pick and choose which
whales they're going to reporton and, of course, because
they'll usually pick the onesthat have been caught in a net
(15:48):
or they think had been run overby a ship.
You know, the ones that werenot are usually just buried in
the sand.
And this I'm getting off fromthe articles.
I don't, you know.
I read the articles and findout what happened to the whale.
Sometimes they let it float outto sea and leave it there to
(16:10):
decompose, which is a hazard, ahazard to navigation.
I don't know why they even dothat, because this thing is huge
and other times they simplybring in bulldozers and bury it
deep in the sand and let itdecompose by itself.
Before, if there was nonecropsy done, because they
(16:33):
couldn't get a hold of thepeople that come and do it.
It's too far sometimes, ormaybe they don't have a service.
Sometimes, if they're in LongIsland, it also seems to be a
service to do that.
We have a service here in NewJersey, but not everywhere that
I've seen.
The other thing I found out isthat some of the whale watching
(16:54):
clubs, they name these whalesaccording to the tail markings.
So in other words, when thiswhale dives, the tail is up from
the markings on the tail, whichwould be like a pattern like my
fingers.
Okay, they can tell thebinoculars what whale that was
(17:17):
and they have little names forthem to sort of track them.
I'm not sure of how accuratethis method of naming whales
really is.
Uh, they say that each markingcould be like a fingerprint, but
I've seen catalogs of thesemarkings and I couldn't tell
from adam which one was which I.
(17:40):
I went on whaling trip.
They give you.
I went on a whaling trip andthey give you these catalogs for
you to look at and to see ifthey can identify.
But I couldn't.
And I looked at it and lookedat it and couldn't tell.
So I really don't know howaccurate this identification
(18:12):
really is.
But when the whales die, if thewhale has not had their tail
bitten off by a shark, whichwill always be the case the
other animals, once the whalepasses away, they'll come in and
start biting at it and by thetime it gets to shore, pieces of
it are going to be gone andthey end up on shore.
Maybe not a whole whale, maybeit's just a piece of it.
So going to be gone and theyend up unsure.
Maybe not a whole whale, maybeit's just a piece of it.
So if the tail's not there,it's an unnamed whale and that
is most of the cases.
(18:33):
Most of the cases there's noname because they couldn't match
that whale to the originalcatalog that the whale watch is
used, and I think there areseveral uh around.
So I don't know.
I'm not sure that all thesenames are cataloged in a
database where they can reallyexchange information and, as I
(18:56):
said, it takes a good eye toreally determine what the name
of that particular whale wasfrom the tail.
If the tail's not there, youhave no luck.
So in order to, since part ofmy book is data, the other part
is a little dramatization ofwhat each whale went through
(19:20):
before they died and who theirfamily was, what their role in
the pod is, because these arefamilies and each has a role
depending on the age, and weknow the age of the whale, we
know the species of the whale,we know how big it was, we know
if they had a name or not, so wecan get a lot of information
(19:43):
from that data.
We also know what thejournalists said about the whale
when they published their localarticle.
It could be a small press, asmall independent newspaper that
published it.
It could be a little largernewspaper.
This is before the mainstreammedia, as I call the national
(20:06):
news, picks up on that.
Now, for over 100 whales that Ihave cataloged, there's only a
handful.
Actually, these were picked upby the main media or the
national media Very, very few.
They're not going to devote anytime to a dead whale in a small
(20:29):
town in Long Island or in NewJersey.
They just won't.
It's not national news.
Okay, they have other storiesto talk about, such as, you know
, celebrities or whatever youknow, whatever they talk about,
that sells them newspapers andsells them advertising.
(20:49):
They're not going to spend anytime on a dead whale.
They might mention it as like atiny headline and they're
definitely not going to give youall the information because
there's no room and time forthat.
So, and they may pick this uponly if the local news actually
(21:11):
publishes this in some sort ofdigital network that will
distribute that news.
Not everybody does that becausethat costs money and they're
not going to always do it.
So if you're running a smallnewspaper or a small, sometimes
the newspaper is advertising forthe town, or it could be many,
many types of newspapers, or itcould just be a website that
(21:35):
they run with the news.
They may not have the money ortime to really send information
to the mainstream media becausethey're not in the business of
distributing information.
They're in the business ofbasically serving the local
community.
So there's no profit to be madeby giving this information to
(21:58):
NBC News, cbs News, any of those.
Why should they?
And the articles?
As I know some people that havebeen working as independent
journalists in these small towns.
A lot of newspapers getsyndicated articles from routers
and other places.
(22:18):
It costs money to get those andto publish those.
Or they may have a localreporter or a young person
usually that goes out and doesthe light work and goes out and
and takes a look at the whaleand does everything that needs
to be done.
They file the article with thenewspaper and they've made money
(22:41):
.
Okay, as a reporter.
That reporter that's anindependent reporter like Clark
Kent.
Okay, in Superman it's ClarkKent.
He was a reporter although heworked for a publishing company.
But they don't get news fromReuters.
They don't get news from themand from many other syndicated
(23:09):
journalists' copy they don't.
So they may have some articlesthat they'll use to fill in, but
mostly they try to publisharticles that are for the
community.
Some small newspapers don'thave a local reporter that
(23:30):
they're paying, so they're maybeonly publishing things that
come in in the syndicatedsystems.
Okay, so it depends on eachtown how they're going to report
this whale.
Okay, now there areorganizations throughout that
have the job of compiling thedata on the dead whale.
(23:54):
They will do necropsies, theywill identify them, they'll do
any number of things and keeplarger databases them.
They'll do any number of thingsand keep larger databases.
However, if something happenstoday, it's going to take a few
weeks before the organizationgets to that data and puts it on
their website or actuallyanalyzes it.
(24:19):
They have many towns they'reworking with, so there's a big
delay between the data beingfound by the reporter if there
was a reporter and then the databeing sent to an organization
that catalogs that data, keepsit on spreadsheets and then
(24:42):
publishes reports, keeps themspreadsheets and then publishes
reports.
The other problem, of course, isthese organizations need money
to operate, to run theircomputers and run their
spreadsheets and everythingthey're doing and the people do
the necropsies.
They need money, and where arethey going to get the money?
There's not that much money outthere that will pay for their
(25:07):
time from donations fromactivists.
Activists don't have any money,so it's the companies trying to
sell the windmills themselvesthat usually like to pay for
these services, or thegovernment.
And if the government grant isgoing to be skewed because the
(25:30):
government is pushing thewindmill, so you can see that
there's a little problem there.
And who's funding the research?
Okay, so you're going to see alot of bias in the results and
that you have to analyze eachreport and go through and
determine if this report makessense, which is not an easy task
(25:52):
.
Okay, so, as a researcher, Irely on a number of numerous
programs that go through thetext and the data to determine
these things, and I put thistogether into articles for each
whale.
And I and I have other articlesin the book talking about or
educating you about wind power,about how the government deals
(26:18):
with it, about how the shipsavoid the whales and any number
of other things and information,so that it becomes sort of a
reference as well as a nice bookto honor each whale.
So enough about this.
I think I've talked about thisbook enough.
I am only 30% done with it,which is frustrating me because
(26:42):
I keep finding more whales and Iwant to give them all an equal
chance.
So it's going to take meseveral weeks to finalize this
book.
So let's move on to trying toseveral weeks to finalize this
book, okay.
So let's move on to trying toread you a piece of this book.
And let me get to the notes.
And, okay, the whale's name isEcho, okay.
(27:13):
Okay.
So the whale's name is Echo andeach whale has a name.
And I describe the whale basedon the age of the whale.
We know what kind of role theyhad in their pod because they
(27:36):
are a social animal.
They are an intelligent animal.
They are a self-aware animal,which rates them very high on
the intelligence scale.
Any animal that is self-awareand recognizes themselves in a
mirror is highly intelligent.
I believe chimpanzees and maybegorillas can determine that
(28:01):
this is them in the mirror andnot somebody else.
I'm not sure, but I know whalescan and they've done tests
about this and all of this.
So, self-aware whales.
I don't know if that means thatwe should care more about the
whales, because they'reself-aware, instead of caring
(28:25):
equally about the dolphins.
Okay, the dolphins, okay.
So I think that.
Let me read to you this and andread to you one of the chapters,
of many chapters, in this book.
(28:45):
Okay, morning prayer for echo.
Oh, morning Prayer for Echo.
O gentle, spirit of the opensea, your journey ended too soon
, too silently, with callsunanswered and pathways unclear.
You left behind a tale we musthear.
(29:06):
May your memory guide our wayto protect you, your kin and
oceans each day.
Date of his death was November7th, 2023.
Type of whale was a humpbackwhale.
Location in New York, newJersey, bight, and from the
(29:28):
nearest wind farm to this whalewas 55 miles from the South Park
wind farm.
Okay, the age of this juvenilewas five years old.
Now let me explain.
A five-year-old whale, it'slike a five-year-old child.
Okay, in the whale world it'snot an adult yet they live about
(29:51):
80 years, so this is quite ayoung animal.
Echo's story.
Echo was a young and vibranthumpback whale just beginning to
explore the vast ocean world.
At five years old, she was at acritical stage of her
(30:13):
development, learning the vitalskills needed for survival,
navigating the currents, findingfood and understanding the
calls of her pod.
Born in the southern breedinggrounds, she had already made
several migrations with herfamily to the rich feeding
(30:33):
waters of the north.
So it's important to know thatthey migrate several times.
He might have migrated fivetimes already, but the whales of
the New York, new Jersey, oncehaven for marine life, had
become a treacherous environment.
The constant hum of humanactivity, from vessels to
(30:58):
underwater turbines, turned theocean into a cacophony of noise.
For echo, these disruptionscreated a barrier of confusion
masking the sounds she relied onto locate her pod, find prey
and avoid dangers.
Okay, so for those like thetrolls who call me and tell me
(31:22):
that I don't have evidence forthis, all I can say is President
Trump just said that thewindmills drive all the whales
crazy.
A man has a way to reallysummarize it to the bare
essentials, doesn't he?
And it's true.
It's true, it's driving themcrazy.
(31:43):
Okay.
Pro-wind comments.
I have a pro-wind and ananti-wind comments summar.
I have a pro wind in an antewind comments summarized for
each whale, so they get thepro-wind.
People get 100 entries of atleast one or two paragraphs in
this database, so they can'tcomplain that I left them out,
(32:05):
okay.
Pro-wind comments.
Advocates for offshore windenergy dismissed connections of
ECHO's death, attributing itinstead to prey scarcity caused
by climate change.
They emphasize the magic wordclimate change.
All right, let me stop here.
(32:25):
Climate change, give me a break.
Climate change, give me a break.
Climate change.
The wheels go from all the wayup north, where it's cold, where
it's frozen, all the way to thesouth in one year, where it's
hot.
Climate change will haveabsolutely nothing to do with
their demise.
There is food everywhere, okay,the food that they eat can live
(32:49):
in the cold, they can live inthe warm, they can live in
different places.
So they have zero evidence,zero scientific evidence that
shows that there is less foodbecause of climate change.
They don't have any temperaturedata.
They don't have any fish counts.
They don't have any informationto verify that.
(33:11):
This is just garbage.
It's not scientific whatsoever.
This is part of their narrative, okay, and I don't believe it.
There's no climate change.
Whales have been on this earthfor millions of years, through
hot periods, ice ages, all kindsof things, and now the climate
(33:35):
change they've invented is goingto change.
No, I'm pretty sure that thosegiant machines that make a lot
of noise and have a lot of powerand wires all over the place,
I'm pretty sure those thingshave something to do with the
dead whales.
But they say I need scientificevidence, as if the numbers
(33:58):
themselves, of which they keeppiling up every month.
There's more.
Those are not evidence.
I don't know what kind ofevidence they have, but they
have zero evidence that a sheephurt this whale or that a net
hurt the whale, because in themajority of cases there was no
necropsy, because they eithercouldn't afford it, the people
(34:22):
weren't available and they justburied the whale before it
smelled too much and harmedpeople with decomposition.
Of course, for health reasons,they have to bury it.
So I don't blame the town forburying the whale.
They have to.
What are they going to do?
It's decomposing.
These people might not show upfor weeks.
They can't leave that whalethere decomposing outside.
(34:45):
They don't have a service forthe necropsy, so they take
advantage of the fact thatnecropsy services are
unavailable and they say thatthat's why we don't have any
evidence, while there's peopleobserving the whale and people
take notes and they tell youwhat it looks like.
Oh, they don't accept that.
So the pro-wind industry andthe trolls are full of it.
(35:10):
They just want to protect theirindustry.
They don't want the money tostop.
They think that by trollingpeople with information like
myself, they're going to somehowsave their industry.
And I'm not going to read therest of this because I have too
much other stuff to say.
You can purchase the book whenit's ready, but all I can tell
(35:35):
you is the more whales Idocument, the more the patterns
become very familiar.
We're talking about originalarticles by the local newspapers
.
We're talking aboutorganizations that catalog the
(35:59):
data.
We're talking about independentreports that talk about this
and, yes, there are people thatdo believe that windmills are
killing whales.
I do believe that windmills arekilling whales.
There's been a recentdocumentary about it, showing
you exactly what the noise isand what these whales have to
(36:19):
deal with, and there's alsobooks written about it.
There's a lot of people thatwrote about this, not just me
know.
Of course there are.
I just have a differentapproach to how I'm documenting
this, in a different researchmethod.
But there are many people doingthis work, but they're silenced
(36:42):
constantly, silenced constantly,trolled constantly.
They come in and they try todemoralize you, call your names,
libel you all kinds of thingsthat they're doing.
I have posted in my group someof the posts on the trolls.
It's getting so bad that I haveto have AI analyze these posts
(37:06):
to see if they're trolls enoughand they are, and AI has no
heart.
It it's brutal.
It'll tell you right away thisis a troll.
And not only that is he a troll, he's being paid to be a troll.
Ai can recognize that from thetext.
It's amazing.
It saved me so much time,because I used to read these
(37:28):
things, this garbage, and now,instead of getting upset about
it, I just cut and paste it intothe AI and it tells me oh,
don't worry about this, this istotal garbage, this is just a
troll, get rid of this andthat's it.
So I really have to be carefulabout my time, because I'm
working on a book and I have acouple of other books that I'm
(37:50):
working on and so I don't havetime for these trolls.
But they are relentless.
They come in and one of thembegged me four times to get into
the group so he can educateeverybody about how this is a
group that thinks that windmillsare killing the whales.
Everybody that comes in thinksthat windmills are killing the
(38:10):
whales, so comes in, thinks thatwindmills are killing the whale
.
So he asked me if he could comein and present the evidence
that it's not true.
I said I don't care about yourevidence, I don't believe your
evidence.
Your only evidence is that wehave no proof, and at the same
time I could say that you haveno proof.
So where are we?
There's no evidence here thatyou have.
(38:32):
You have no evidence ofanything.
So I think we have evidence, wehave data, and it doesn't
matter if there's data or not.
If people perceive that theseanimals are dying because of the
windmills and they know intheir hearts that they've seen
more and more deaths of theseanimals over the span of three
(38:56):
years, I trust those people.
They live there all their lives.
If these people don't thinkthese machines look good in
front of their water, I don'tcare.
I think they're right.
They're still ruining theenvironment.
If these people think that it'shurting the fish or hurting the
marine life, they sure right.
They're still ruining theenvironment.
If these people think that it'shurting the fish or hurting the
marine life, they sure do.
They make a lot of noise.
(39:16):
They're pollution.
They have oil that leaks.
And if these people think thatthese things should be
dismantled now, before thecompanies run off and leave them
to rust in the middle of thewater to harm the wildlife, I
tend to agree with them.
So I really don't care about thetrolls' evidence, when they
(39:37):
come in with an attitude ofdismissing what we stand for,
dismissing our evidence, andalso insult me.
He came in with an insultingapproach, which AI identified,
and then he asked me if he couldjoin my group please.
I said no, you're being nasty,go away.
(40:00):
You know, come in with a betterattitude.
Maybe you can come in, but withthis attitude of yours I don't
think you're coming in.
You know so, that was I.
You're coming in.
You know so that was I.
Had, like, I think, two orthree trolls today.
They come in to troll me.
I don't know what their problemis.
You know, I really don't know.
(40:22):
I think either.
I can't believe that thesepeople are not paid to do their
work because they're trolling me.
During like work hours, two orthree o'clock in the afternoon,
they're trolling me.
So what are they doing for aliving?
How are they working?
They're not working.
That is their job.
(40:42):
That's why they're doing it.
They sit in an office and theyget paid to do this job.
So that's why they're doing itand they have plenty of time
because that's what they getpaid to do this job.
So that's why they're doing itand they have plenty of time
because that's what they getpaid for.
If they were volunteers notgetting paid to do this, they
would have no time to do it.
They'd be at McDonald's orBurger King flipping burgers.
(41:03):
They would have no time totroll me, so they're getting
paid to do it.
Now I exposed the three maincompanies that engage the trolls
.
And yes, there are majorcompanies that are busy
greenwashing and astroturfingenvironmental groups, and this
(41:24):
is a big issue, and I summarizedan article that appeared in a
major publication.
Summarize an article thatappeared in a major publication.
Yes, they astroturf because,you know, this is how they
protect their business.
Of course, they have toastroturf and they hire these
people to go around.
It's the equivalent ofadvertising the trolling.
(41:45):
And the companies that offerthese services, you know, claim
that they get better results ifthey troll rather than they just
put out an advertisement thatthey pay for per click.
Okay, this is a business totroll, but there are three major
companies.
(42:05):
One is a Russian company, theother one is a Chinese company,
is a Russian company, the otherone is a Chinese company and the
third one, I think, is Crowd.
It's in my.
You have to go into my websiteand find out.
It's Crowd something.
It's basically they hire peopleto go to demonstrations to
(42:27):
pretend that they have a lot ofsupport to troll and do these
kinds of things, so showing toyou that this is all fake, that
none of the stuff you see ontelevision is real, that if
somebody's demonstrating forsomething, they've been paid to
do so and the company advertisesthis and you can go and buy
(42:48):
yourself 100 people to show upif you want to, if you have
enough money, whatever money youhave, you can show up and
demand 1,000 people and theyhave a network and they'll
travel there and they'll eachget paid for showing up.
It's a very simple system.
You make money that way.
You might want to sign up, okay?
So it's all fake.
(43:10):
All of the stuff that you seeon the news, all this it's fake.
There are companies that arepaid to change narratives by
advertising, by trolling, byshowing up at demonstrations,
and the government is trying todo something about it, but so
far it hasn't gotten anywhere,because they use these services
(43:32):
themselves when they run forelections, okay, so, yeah, we do
have these trolling companiesand I pretty much have
identified them, and when theycall me, I go.
How's it going at that companywhere you work for.
You know how much money arethey spending on me and trolling
(43:54):
me?
I mean, I know they get paid alot for each of these posts, a
couple hundred dollars, I think.
I said how do you think my bookis that important that they're
spending money on trolling me?
I don't understand.
So I didn't think my book, this, this one, is this important.
Okay, I'm sorry, but it's notthat important.
(44:17):
It's a small book.
I will sell it on Amazon andI'll have a few people buy it,
but it's not going to be in themainstream media.
I don't write books like that,okay.
So I don't know what they'reafraid of, but they come to
troll me.
It's pathetic.
They must be losing somehow.
They're losing because they'redesperate to troll somebody
(44:40):
small instead of trolling.
Trump, who is actually outright, said that he doesn't want the
windmills.
Okay, why don't they troll him?
So it's really, really pathetic, in my opinion.
Before I end, I didn't go overthe children's books.
We didn't have time.
I'll go over it another time.
(45:02):
No, let's go over it now,because I'm tired of talking
about this chat.
So, oh, okay, I was supposed totalk about this.
There's a book that I wroteseveral.
(45:30):
Climate change is really more ofa political thing rather than a
science-based thing, that thescience is too buried in the
politics.
And so I wrote a book talkingabout the business of climate
(45:52):
change and why it has become,instead of a science-based
endeavor, it has become apolitical endeavor, and that, in
reality, this whole panic isfalse and that the figures prove
it.
The chemistry proves it.
(46:14):
Okay, it proves it.
So I also have a database abouta hundred scientists that have
said that they don't agree withthe climate change narrative and
have done studies that disproveeverything that they've done.
Okay, so, anyway, as I say, I'man aggregator of information.
(46:41):
I take summaries from differenttypes of articles and put them
together into a book, like mostwriters do with books like this.
Most writers do that they goand they look at references and
they come to conclusions andthey write a book.
So I'm a book writer, okay, uh,but this book has taken off.
This book is doing very wellout there, so I'm surprised.
(47:05):
But being that this is the basisfor the re, for having the
windmills in the first place andspending more money on that
energy than you would for othertypes of energy, then we're in
trouble because the whole thingis based on a lie, okay, and if
(47:27):
you read the book, you'llrealize it's a lie and it's
scientifically proven.
It's a lie.
It's just that, whatever datathe scientists came up with, the
politics twisted it to thepoint that they made a panic out
of it and they created a wholebusiness around it, because
(47:48):
anytime there's a panic you cansell something to.
And, according to them, if wejust pay more taxes, the whole
climate change will go away.
They'll actually be able tostop it.
Climate change is in the handsof politicians who tax you.
The more taxes you pay, themore they can stop the climate
(48:09):
change.
Okay, when you say it like this, of course it sounds ridiculous
, but that's how ridiculous itis.
Okay, so let's go back here,okay, okay, so I'm going to try
to go to the children's books.
(48:30):
So, unfortunately, the way thisworks, I'm going to try to go
to the children's books.
So, unfortunately, the way thisworks, I have to kind of search
, replace, replace, replace.
I don't know why it looks likethis.
Children's books, okay, solet's quickly go through the
children's books.
(48:50):
Okay, as you know, I own apublishing company called
Cloverleaf Publications.
I've had this for a long time.
I had changed the name a whileback because of a conflict with
another publishing company, fromGreenleaf Publications to
Cloverleaf Publications.
Okay, and I've been writing.
(49:13):
I've been expanding my list ofchildren's books and some of my
best sellers are this this, thislittle guy here, lily the worry
Monster, is one of them.
And this guy, the Worry Monster, a story about childhood
(49:35):
anxiety.
This is one of my best sellersright now in the UK.
I sell these everyday.
Ok, it's about anxiety and kidsdo have a lot of anxiety and
you know how to address that.
Okay, this other book is alsofairly popular.
(49:56):
This is Licorice Inventors.
This is my dog and it talksabout the wildlife in my little
neighborhood.
We have a little small forestin the back of our neighborhood.
It's about five acres.
(50:17):
It's very small but it has somany wild animals you wouldn't
believe.
And this is a story about mydog exploring the wildlife A
fictional story.
He never escaped through theforest, but I may believe he did
.
And the cat that he meets andit's a very cute story.
It never escaped to the forest,but I may believe he did in the
cat that he meets and it's avery cute story.
It's very localized, it's aboutLittle Lake Harbor, osborne
Island, and there arerecognizable characters because
(50:39):
a lot of the people here theyknow these animals, they see
them, they have names for them.
This is how close the peopleliving in an area like this
become to the actual wildanimals that live there.
We know them by name, okay, weknow who's who, and we cherish
(51:00):
these animals.
So this is another book that isvery popular.
This one here, liquorice's BigAdventure Don't Patrol at
Graveling Point Beach, littleLake Harbor, new Jersey, talks
about the amazing cats of LittleLake Harbor.
These are the condos, these arethe dogs.
(51:20):
This is a cute story and it'sreally local, but it actually
sells overseas, believe it ornot.
Sells overseas, believe it ornot.
And this one also.
It talks about RutgersUniversity and the wildlife over
there, the wildlife that we'retrying to protect.
I'm not just trying to protectwhales.
(51:42):
Each group protects a differentanimal and this is one of my
favorites Leah and Spotty, theheartwarming rescue of a seal by
a budding marine biologist.
A paperback, and this is abouta young girl who becomes
attached to an animal, meetsSpotty, this little spotted seal
(52:04):
, and she plays with him and she, you know, plays ball with it
and she helps him heal and wantsto take him home and put him in
the bathtub, as most kids would, wouldn't they?
So, yeah, so that's whathappens.
(52:27):
And well, that's what happens.
And kids become very attachedto these animals and in this the
picture in the front is Leahcrying because she has to let go
of her little puppy, her littlespotted seal, which is like a
puppy.
They're really puppies.
They're absolutely gorgeous andcute and everything and cuddly.
(52:52):
Okay, these animals, the spottedseals, are also part of the New
Jersey wildlife and I amstudying to see if these animals
are getting and are beingharmed by the windmills.
I know of many dolphins thathave been harmed by windmills
(53:13):
and other things the fact thatwe have a lot of boats, a lot of
recreational boats, and we seea lot of dead dolphins.
So I am also studying thehealth effects of the nearby
windmills on humans, becausepeople have reported that they
(53:35):
get earaches, their dogs getseizures, all kinds of things
that I didn't know about.
So the next book is going tostudy that, to see if people
have been reporting these thingsand if they're being dismissed
because of the wind industry.
People have been reportingthese things and if they're
being dismissed because of thewind industry.
So, of course, one of the bigbooks that I'm going to be
(53:57):
writing after this.
One is called BeyondAstroTurfing because, as we
explained, the narrative hasbeen manipulated by industry in
the woke movement, pushing outthe garbage.
And let me explain whathappened to me today.
(54:18):
So you know, okay.
So you know what happened.
All right, today.
Today, I was told by a trollthat I was spreading this
information.
Have you heard that term before?
I'm sure you have.
And I said to him oh, so you'rea fascist, because we were
(54:38):
chatting, you know.
I said you're a fascist.
So who do you work for?
Russia or China?
I said because you know thatthat term is fascist term, right
?
He says no, it's not.
I said yeah, when you say tosomebody you're spreading
disinformation, what you'resaying is that you want to limit
their freedom of speech andfreedom of the press, and you
(55:02):
want to ban my book because I'msaying something different than
what your narrative is.
So in America, I explained tohim, we have freedom of the
press.
That means I can publish thisbook and I can say whatever I
want in the book.
And if it's not disinformation,it's information and you can
(55:23):
decide to do whatever you wantwith it.
As long as you pay for it.
You can do what you want withit.
Lots of people publish all kindsof books and they are
information or disinformation.
You know whatever side you'rein if they're information or
disinformation.
(55:44):
But disinformation is a fascistterm.
It's a term invented by themedia to restrict our freedoms
of speech and freedom of thepress.
What I am doing is independentjournalism.
Nobody has the right to come inand tell me I'm spreading
(56:04):
disinformation.
Nobody has that right, becausethis is America.
I live in America.
If I wanted to live in Russia, Iwould be in Russia, but I'm not
there.
I would be in China.
I'm not there because here I bein China.
I'm not there because here Ican publish my book and they
can't do anything about it.
They can, of course, troll meand spread lies about me and try
(56:26):
to ruin my life and distract me, but they're not going to stop
me from publishing the book.
I will be publishing the bookand if they don't let me publish
it, I'll give it away.
There's nothing they can do, sothey should really stop
bothering me because they're notgoing to win.
I've decided that I'm not goingto let them win and I'm going to
(56:47):
publish this beautiful book.
It's really a beautiful,beautiful book.
You're going to love it.
You're going to love thestories about the whales.
You're going to see them likeyou do your dog, like you do
animals that you love.
You'll see that the realanimals that have families, that
have intelligence, that theydeserve better than what this
(57:08):
wind industry is giving themBetter.
And the lies that are beingtold are so blatant and even the
trolls are just kind of takingtheir masks off and showing who
they really are that it'scriminal.
(57:28):
I think it's criminal what'shappening to the whales.
I think these companies thathave installed these because
there are internationalregulations to protect whales,
and none of these companies thatinstalled these things quickly
because they were getting the30% money from the government
(57:49):
really followed the rules orcared about international law.
They didn't do enough studies,they didn't do enough research,
they didn't do enough research,their permits were rushed
through and now the whales aredying.
Maybe if they had done thingsright and they had put these
windmills in areas where thesewhales did not regularly travel
(58:13):
for their yearly migrations,maybe it would have been okay.
But because they didn't do anyresearch and I'm not saying they
didn't do any research becauseI don't know I downloaded the
proposal from Atlantic Shores.
I sent Mr Murphy my opinion.
(58:35):
I didn't trust my owninterpretation, so I fed the
whole thing to AI and AI read itand said it was a piece of
garbage.
Okay, that's what AI says, thatit's missing information.
I wouldn't say it's a piece ofgarbage, but they strategically
left out information such as thewhale mortality rates, which
(58:59):
are available free from theirown funded organization.
The Marine Mammal StrandingCenter has the data but somehow
is missing from the report.
So I think we've spoken enough.
I think you guys know enoughabout what's going on.
I think you're on the righttrack.
(59:20):
I left you some articles abouthow you can make a difference.
I know you think we're too few.
We can't make a difference.
There's too many trolls.
There's too many industrypeople fighting us.
No, that's not true.
They hire a bunch of troll,rent-a-troll guys from Russia to
(59:43):
troll you.
There's not that many of them.
There's just a handful who aremanipulating the narrative in
changing things.
So it seems to you that you'realone.
You're not alone.
You're a powerful voice asmembers of this group, and what
(01:00:04):
I suggest to you and I left youan article is write letters to
the editor.
Every town has a small newspaper.
Make a list of this and you canlook them up online and send
them each.
Not a letter on the email, no,no, don't do that.
Write it down by hand, ifpossible, and send it with a
(01:00:27):
stamp.
Trust me, that makes so muchmore of a difference than if you
send it by email in just howit's processed.
Okay, so do that.
If you can't write a letter,you have problems writing, I
suggest you go to chat GPTthere's a free version of it and
(01:00:50):
tell them what you want theletter to look like and it'll
write it for you.
Also, I think that google gmailhas a writing tool right now so
it can help you out.
So if you don't know how towrite for reason, or you can't
see, well, whatever reason youmay have you can get these tools
to help you write it and youcan write it.
(01:01:12):
And if you take the time towrite one of these letters every
week, even more often, if youcan write it.
And if you take the time towrite one of these letters every
week, even more often, if youcan, and send them to a
different newspaper, you'regoing to see that if every
person in this group does that75 people so far.
If you all do that, it's goingto make a difference.
(01:01:32):
Trust me, it makes a hugedifference.
So write these letters andthat's part of your activism
homework for today.
Don't listen to the trolls.
Don't listen to these nastypeople.
They're a handful of hiredhands, rented trolls.
They're not the majority ofAmericans.
Okay, you have to also thattrolling works both ways.
(01:01:57):
If you see their pagessomewhere, you know you can also
leave emojis or, you know,troll them if you have time.
Okay, thank you very much.
Bye, bye, everybody.
Thank you.
Thank you, hello everybody.
I'm a little early today and Ihope everybody is watching.
Today I have some news for youand some updates on the book I'm
working on and some of theother books that I work on, and
let's discuss what I do and whoI am.
For the people that are new tothe groups, let me just take the
(02:45):
chat here.
I will have the chat for alittle bit, but not not forever,
okay, um, so if I get newcomments, I get to see it on the
screen.
However, I don't know how wellthis is going to work out, okay,
uh, sometimes, groups okay so,um, for the people that are new
(03:24):
to the group, I am broadcastingto several channels.
I'm broadcasting to my ownstream on the Lydia Lopinto.
I'm also broadcasting to thenew group, save the Humpback
Whales from Windmills, which isbrand new and it's growing, uh,
(03:44):
quite well.
And at the same time, I'mbroadcasting to my publishing
house, which is cloverleafpublications.
So, uh, we have some great newsabout the trolls.
As you know, I've been engagingthe trolls.
(04:22):
As you know, I've been engagingon a donkey of our whales, a
tribute to all the dead whales.
It's got poems, it's gotstories about baby whales, it's
got everything.
It's got data.
It also has two sides of everystory the pro-wind people saying
(04:43):
that it wasn't the windmillsthat did it and the activists
saying it was the windmills thatdid it.
So, for every whale, I showedthe two sides of the story and
you can decide which one youside with.
But for my group, I know whichside you're siding with with.
But for my group, I know whatside you're siding with.
(05:06):
Okay, so it's going to be a fewminutes before the time that I
announced, which was 730.
And it's been kind of anexciting week for me because,
for some reason, somebody haspaid for trolling, because the
(05:26):
people that have been trollingme are not amateurs.
These are people that knowexactly what to say on a troll
post.
I took some of their posts,which were huge.
They post huge posts of things,post huge posts of things and
(05:49):
I'm like who are these peopleand where do they get the time
to post 300 words on a postabout a book, about mourning our
whales?
I don't understand this.
What is going on with thesepeople?
But they do.
They also don't like this groupsaving the humpback whales from
windmills.
I really cannot even begin tofathom what kind of people see
(06:15):
this group with all these deadwhales in the picture, all these
windmills in the back, and theycome in and they put laughing
emojis on it.
I have to say that's prettybizarre.
Well, that's dark, that'sreally dark and cold.
(06:39):
They're going to laugh at thedead whales.
I don't understand how thesepeople operate, but I do.
What I do is there areannouncements for the group that
I advertise and on thisannouncements, um, sometimes
they post an emoji to show howunhappy they are.
Except I don't think theyunderstand that a haha emoji
(07:02):
means you're laughing at it.
I I don't know if these trollsare Americans, or they could be
Chinese or Russian, because, asI posted in my group, there is a
whole set of campaigns toastroturf the green energy power
from windmills, and that hasintensified since Mr Trump, or
(07:25):
President Trump, is now going tobe inaugurated and he will be
president as of January 20th, Ithink, and I posted that he said
on a news program that he wasgoing to end the subsidies for
(07:47):
the windmills.
Now let me explain to you howimportant this statement he made
is.
For every billion dollarwindmill project that's out
there and there are many uh,this means that they're going to
lose all their jobs.
(08:07):
They're not going to be able tobuild these things without a
subsidy, because the subsidyamounts to 30% of the total
project.
That's no small amount.
That means they're not going tohave any kind of profit,
because generally profit isabout 30 percent.
So the one, for example, thatwe're getting here at um
(08:33):
atlantic shores, uh, which Ijust put in my public comment
for by mr murphy or governormurphy, um, those people are
very worried because, while theNew Jersey state is all Democrat
, the subsidies are coming fromthe federal government and so,
(08:55):
without that money, if thatTrump just cuts off the money.
You know he's hiring Elon Muskto do the cutting.
He's the man, is man, has gotno soul.
He'll do it.
You know They'll just cut thesubsidies.
That means they're not gettinga check, even though they might
(09:16):
have had an agreement that theywere going to do this and when
they got done they were going toget a check.
They're not getting a check, sowho's going to pay for these
windmills?
In addition to that, as thingsstart changing in the local
governments, more and moreanti-wind people are going to be
in there, and anti-wind there'snot just Republicans, as you
(09:41):
might think.
Republicans, as you might think, anti-wind could be.
Any number of environmentalists, could be Democrat or
Republican, any number of peoplewho are independents the
independents are a big group andthey would not be in favor of
(10:02):
the wind generally and a lot ofthe people that are pro-wind, a
lot of the people like theteachers and the ones that are
real Democrats, that have alwaysbeen Democrat, and they'll go
along with whatever seems,whatever narrative the Democrats
put out, no matter how bizarreit might be.
(10:24):
Okay, so, pretty much knowingthe market, I could tell you
that in New Jersey we're havingkind of a change, kind of a
reset, and the Republicans maybe much more in charge, but
we're also talking not justRepublicans, we're talking
independents and we're talkingDemocrats who don't want the
(10:46):
whales harmed, who don't thinkthis is the right green energy
that we should be pursuing.
First of all, it's four timesas expensive as windmills on the
ground on land, and it is toomany subsidies and with the
subsidies being cut off, they'renot going to be able to make a
(11:08):
profit.
So what will happen if Mr Trumpdecides I'm sorry, president
Trump decides to cut off all thesubsidies to these incoming
windmills windmills?
It's going to be disastrous forthat industry.
Of course they're desperate andthey're trolling me, thinking
(11:30):
that I'm going to do somethingto their business.
I'm not.
What I am is an independentjournalist.
I research thingsscientifically, I go through and
collect information andsummarize it.
I don't make up the stuff.
I use AI to summarize theinformation.
(11:53):
I go and grab information fromlocal newspapers, because
they're the last vestige of truejournalism left in this country
.
Everything else isunfortunately compromised.
Everything else is managed bythe narrative of whoever wants
(12:17):
to push a certain agenda.
It could be Democrats, but itcould be other people.
It could be Democrats, but itcould be other people.
Okay.
So what I find is that many ofthe search engines are biased
and I do actual scientific teststo show that something is
biased.
I use AI and other tools todetermine if the listings that
(12:42):
they put out are biased, todetermine if the listings that
they put out are biased, andthat would actually detect the
algorithm that they're using.
And many of these searchengines that are mainstream
search engines, the ones thateverybody uses, are going to be
biased.
So I have to skip those and goto other, lesser known but very
(13:07):
good search engines.
I mean, a lot of people don'trealize that there are many,
many, many search engines outthere, including foreign ones,
and they put out goodinformation, because it's
basically a data aggregator.
It goes around trolling I don'tknow if I say trolling or
scraping the information on theinternet throughout the internet
(13:29):
, summarizing it and listing itin some way that it can be
searched.
It's really an index.
So a search engine is nothingout of this world.
They existed years ago, beforeGoogle started, and they have
many of these, these and they'revery good.
(13:49):
They do probably as good a jobor better than Google, except a
lot of them are not politicallycompromised.
They don't take money fromgroups in order to prioritize
the search engines data.
Okay, so that's what I'mlooking for Now, as far as the
local journalists are the peoplethat first see that whale,
(14:14):
other than the people who foundthe whale.
That person who found the whalemight call either the local
police or the fire departmentand someone will tell the
newspaper that this happened,and the newspaper from the local
organization in that townbecause these are very small
(14:37):
towns, you know will come overand take a picture, make a
little report, find out anythingthey can find out about this
whale from the people there.
Now, if they want to do anecropsy, which is they have to
figure out what killed thiswhale well, they have to pay for
(15:00):
it.
I don't think they're all free.
Okay, so they have to get ahold of an organization that has
a crop c?
Uh group that can come in andfigure out what's wrong with
this, what, what happened tothis.
Well, well, in my databases Itake the data.
I find out that at leastsomething like 50% or less are
(15:25):
actually evaluated to see whathit them.
Less than 50%.
The people that do the necropsyare very busy people and they
don't get to every whale, sothey'll pick and choose which
whales they're going to reporton and, of course, because
they'll usually pick the onesthat have been caught in a net
(15:48):
or they think had been run overby a ship.
You know, the ones that werenot are usually just buried in
the sand.
And this I'm getting off fromthe articles.
I don't, you know.
I read the articles and findout what happened to the whale.
Sometimes they let it float outto sea and leave it there to
(16:10):
decompose, which is a hazard, ahazard to navigation.
I don't know why they even dothat, because this thing is huge
and other times they simplybring in bulldozers and bury it
deep in the sand and let itdecompose by itself.
Before, if there was nonecropsy done, because they
(16:33):
couldn't get a hold of thepeople that come and do it.
It's too far sometimes, ormaybe they don't have a service.
Sometimes, if they're in LongIsland, it also seems to be a
service to do that.
We have a service here in NewJersey, but not everywhere that
I've seen.
The other thing I found out isthat some of the whale watching
(16:54):
clubs, they name these whalesaccording to the tail markings.
So in other words, when thiswhale dives, the tail is up from
the markings on the tail, whichwould be like a pattern like my
fingers.
Okay, they can tell thebinoculars what whale that was
(17:17):
and they have little names forthem to sort of track them.
I'm not sure of how accuratethis method of naming whales
really is.
Uh, they say that each markingcould be like a fingerprint, but
I've seen catalogs of thesemarkings and I couldn't tell
from adam which one was which I.
(17:40):
I went on whaling trip.
They give you.
I went on a whaling trip andthey give you these catalogs for
you to look at and to see ifthey can identify.
But I couldn't.
And I looked at it and lookedat it and couldn't tell.
So I really don't know howaccurate this identification
(18:12):
really is.
But when the whales die, if thewhale has not had their tail
bitten off by a shark, whichwill always be the case the
other animals, once the whalepasses away, they'll come in and
start biting at it and by thetime it gets to shore, pieces of
it are going to be gone andthey end up on shore.
Maybe not a whole whale, maybeit's just a piece of it.
So going to be gone and theyend up unsure.
Maybe not a whole whale, maybeit's just a piece of it.
So if the tail's not there,it's an unnamed whale and that
is most of the cases.
(18:33):
Most of the cases there's noname because they couldn't match
that whale to the originalcatalog that the whale watch is
used, and I think there areseveral uh around.
So I don't know.
I'm not sure that all thesenames are cataloged in a
database where they can reallyexchange information and, as I
(18:56):
said, it takes a good eye toreally determine what the name
of that particular whale wasfrom the tail.
If the tail's not there, youhave no luck.
So in order to, since part ofmy book is data, the other part
is a little dramatization ofwhat each whale went through
(19:20):
before they died and who theirfamily was, what their role in
the pod is, because these arefamilies and each has a role
depending on the age, and weknow the age of the whale, we
know the species of the whale,we know how big it was, we know
if they had a name or not, so wecan get a lot of information
(19:43):
from that data.
We also know what thejournalists said about the whale
when they published their localarticle.
It could be a small press, asmall independent newspaper that
published it.
It could be a little largernewspaper.
This is before the mainstreammedia, as I call the national
(20:06):
news, picks up on that.
Now, for over 100 whales that Ihave cataloged, there's only a
handful.
Actually, these were picked upby the main media or the
national media Very, very few.
They're not going to devote anytime to a dead whale in a small
(20:29):
town in Long Island or in NewJersey.
They just won't.
It's not national news.
Okay, they have other storiesto talk about, such as, you know
, celebrities or whatever youknow, whatever they talk about,
that sells them newspapers andsells them advertising.
(20:49):
They're not going to spend anytime on a dead whale.
They might mention it as like atiny headline and they're
definitely not going to give youall the information because
there's no room and time forthat.
So, and they may pick this uponly if the local news actually
(21:11):
publishes this in some sort ofdigital network that will
distribute that news.
Not everybody does that becausethat costs money and they're
not going to always do it.
So if you're running a smallnewspaper or a small, sometimes
the newspaper is advertising forthe town, or it could be many,
many types of newspapers, or itcould just be a website that
(21:35):
they run with the news.
They may not have the money ortime to really send information
to the mainstream media becausethey're not in the business of
distributing information.
They're in the business ofbasically serving the local
community.
So there's no profit to be madeby giving this information to
(21:58):
NBC News, cbs News, any of those.
Why should they?
And the articles?
As I know some people that havebeen working as independent
journalists in these small towns.
A lot of newspapers getsyndicated articles from routers
and other places.
(22:18):
It costs money to get those andto publish those.
Or they may have a localreporter or a young person
usually that goes out and doesthe light work and goes out and
and takes a look at the whaleand does everything that needs
to be done.
They file the article with thenewspaper and they've made money
(22:41):
.
Okay, as a reporter.
That reporter that's anindependent reporter like Clark
Kent.
Okay, in Superman it's ClarkKent.
He was a reporter although heworked for a publishing company.
But they don't get news fromReuters.
They don't get news from themand from many other syndicated
(23:09):
journalists' copy they don't.
So they may have some articlesthat they'll use to fill in, but
mostly they try to publisharticles that are for the
community.
Some small newspapers don'thave a local reporter that
(23:30):
they're paying, so they're maybeonly publishing things that
come in in the syndicatedsystems.
Okay, so it depends on eachtown how they're going to report
this whale.
Okay, now there areorganizations throughout that
have the job of compiling thedata on the dead whale.
(23:54):
They will do necropsies, theywill identify them, they'll do
any number of things and keeplarger databases them.
They'll do any number of thingsand keep larger databases.
However, if something happenstoday, it's going to take a few
weeks before the organizationgets to that data and puts it on
their website or actuallyanalyzes it.
(24:19):
They have many towns they'reworking with, so there's a big
delay between the data beingfound by the reporter if there
was a reporter and then the databeing sent to an organization
that catalogs that data, keepsit on spreadsheets and then
(24:42):
publishes reports, keeps themspreadsheets and then publishes
reports.
The other problem, of course, isthese organizations need money
to operate, to run theircomputers and run their
spreadsheets and everythingthey're doing and the people do
the necropsies.
They need money, and where arethey going to get the money?
There's not that much money outthere that will pay for their
(25:07):
time from donations fromactivists.
Activists don't have any money,so it's the companies trying to
sell the windmills themselvesthat usually like to pay for
these services, or thegovernment.
And if the government grant isgoing to be skewed because the
(25:30):
government is pushing thewindmill, so you can see that
there's a little problem there.
And who's funding the research?
Okay, so you're going to see alot of bias in the results and
that you have to analyze eachreport and go through and
determine if this report makessense, which is not an easy task
(25:52):
.
Okay, so, as a researcher, Irely on a number of numerous
programs that go through thetext and the data to determine
these things, and I put thistogether into articles for each
whale.
And I and I have other articlesin the book talking about or
educating you about wind power,about how the government deals
(26:18):
with it, about how the shipsavoid the whales and any number
of other things and information,so that it becomes sort of a
reference as well as a nice bookto honor each whale.
So enough about this.
I think I've talked about thisbook enough.
I am only 30% done with it,which is frustrating me because
(26:42):
I keep finding more whales and Iwant to give them all an equal
chance.
So it's going to take meseveral weeks to finalize this
book.
So let's move on to trying toseveral weeks to finalize this
book, okay.
So let's move on to trying toread you a piece of this book.
And let me get to the notes.
And, okay, the whale's name isEcho, okay.
(27:13):
Okay.
So the whale's name is Echo andeach whale has a name.
And I describe the whale basedon the age of the whale.
We know what kind of role theyhad in their pod because they
(27:36):
are a social animal.
They are an intelligent animal.
They are a self-aware animal,which rates them very high on
the intelligence scale.
Any animal that is self-awareand recognizes themselves in a
mirror is highly intelligent.
I believe chimpanzees and maybegorillas can determine that
(28:01):
this is them in the mirror andnot somebody else.
I'm not sure, but I know whalescan and they've done tests
about this and all of this.
So, self-aware whales.
I don't know if that means thatwe should care more about the
whales, because they'reself-aware, instead of caring
(28:25):
equally about the dolphins.
Okay, the dolphins, okay.
So I think that.
Let me read to you this and andread to you one of the chapters,
of many chapters, in this book.
(28:45):
Okay, morning prayer for echo.
Oh, morning Prayer for Echo.
O gentle, spirit of the opensea, your journey ended too soon
, too silently, with callsunanswered and pathways unclear.
You left behind a tale we musthear.
(29:06):
May your memory guide our wayto protect you, your kin and
oceans each day.
Date of his death was November7th, 2023.
Type of whale was a humpbackwhale.
Location in New York, newJersey, bight, and from the
(29:28):
nearest wind farm to this whalewas 55 miles from the South Park
wind farm.
Okay, the age of this juvenilewas five years old.
Now let me explain.
A five-year-old whale, it'slike a five-year-old child.
Okay, in the whale world it'snot an adult yet they live about
(29:51):
80 years, so this is quite ayoung animal.
Echo's story.
Echo was a young and vibranthumpback whale just beginning to
explore the vast ocean world.
At five years old, she was at acritical stage of her
(30:13):
development, learning the vitalskills needed for survival,
navigating the currents, findingfood and understanding the
calls of her pod.
Born in the southern breedinggrounds, she had already made
several migrations with herfamily to the rich feeding
(30:33):
waters of the north.
So it's important to know thatthey migrate several times.
He might have migrated fivetimes already, but the whales of
the New York, new Jersey, oncehaven for marine life, had
become a treacherous environment.
The constant hum of humanactivity, from vessels to
(30:58):
underwater turbines, turned theocean into a cacophony of noise.
For echo, these disruptionscreated a barrier of confusion
masking the sounds she relied onto locate her pod, find prey
and avoid dangers.
Okay, so for those like thetrolls who call me and tell me
(31:22):
that I don't have evidence forthis, all I can say is President
Trump just said that thewindmills drive all the whales
crazy.
A man has a way to reallysummarize it to the bare
essentials, doesn't he?
And it's true.
It's true, it's driving themcrazy.
(31:43):
Okay.
Pro-wind comments.
I have a pro-wind and ananti-wind comments summar.
I have a pro wind in an antewind comments summarized for
each whale, so they get thepro-wind.
People get 100 entries of atleast one or two paragraphs in
this database, so they can'tcomplain that I left them out,
(32:05):
okay.
Pro-wind comments.
Advocates for offshore windenergy dismissed connections of
ECHO's death, attributing itinstead to prey scarcity caused
by climate change.
They emphasize the magic wordclimate change.
All right, let me stop here.
(32:25):
Climate change, give me a break.
Climate change, give me a break.
Climate change.
The wheels go from all the wayup north, where it's cold, where
it's frozen, all the way to thesouth in one year, where it's
hot.
Climate change will haveabsolutely nothing to do with
their demise.
There is food everywhere, okay,the food that they eat can live
(32:49):
in the cold, they can live inthe warm, they can live in
different places.
So they have zero evidence,zero scientific evidence that
shows that there is less foodbecause of climate change.
They don't have any temperaturedata.
They don't have any fish counts.
They don't have any informationto verify that.
(33:11):
This is just garbage.
It's not scientific whatsoever.
This is part of their narrative, okay, and I don't believe it.
There's no climate change.
Whales have been on this earthfor millions of years, through
hot periods, ice ages, all kindsof things, and now the climate
(33:35):
change they've invented is goingto change.
No, I'm pretty sure that thosegiant machines that make a lot
of noise and have a lot of powerand wires all over the place,
I'm pretty sure those thingshave something to do with the
dead whales.
But they say I need scientificevidence, as if the numbers
(33:58):
themselves, of which they keeppiling up every month.
There's more.
Those are not evidence.
I don't know what kind ofevidence they have, but they
have zero evidence that a sheephurt this whale or that a net
hurt the whale, because in themajority of cases there was no
necropsy, because they eithercouldn't afford it, the people
(34:22):
weren't available and they justburied the whale before it
smelled too much and harmedpeople with decomposition.
Of course, for health reasons,they have to bury it.
So I don't blame the town forburying the whale.
They have to.
What are they going to do?
It's decomposing.
These people might not show upfor weeks.
They can't leave that whalethere decomposing outside.
(34:45):
They don't have a service forthe necropsy, so they take
advantage of the fact thatnecropsy services are
unavailable and they say thatthat's why we don't have any
evidence, while there's peopleobserving the whale and people
take notes and they tell youwhat it looks like.
Oh, they don't accept that.
So the pro-wind industry andthe trolls are full of it.
(35:10):
They just want to protect theirindustry.
They don't want the money tostop.
They think that by trollingpeople with information like
myself, they're going to somehowsave their industry.
And I'm not going to read therest of this because I have too
much other stuff to say.
You can purchase the book whenit's ready, but all I can tell
(35:35):
you is the more whales Idocument, the more the patterns
become very familiar.
We're talking about originalarticles by the local newspapers
.
We're talking aboutorganizations that catalog the
(35:59):
data.
We're talking about independentreports that talk about this
and, yes, there are people thatdo believe that windmills are
killing whales.
I do believe that windmills arekilling whales.
There's been a recentdocumentary about it, showing
you exactly what the noise isand what these whales have to
(36:19):
deal with, and there's alsobooks written about it.
There's a lot of people thatwrote about this, not just me
know.
Of course there are.
I just have a differentapproach to how I'm documenting
this, in a different researchmethod.
But there are many people doingthis work, but they're silenced
(36:42):
constantly, silenced constantly,trolled constantly.
They come in and they try todemoralize you, call your names,
libel you all kinds of thingsthat they're doing.
I have posted in my group someof the posts on the trolls.
It's getting so bad that I haveto have AI analyze these posts
(37:06):
to see if they're trolls enoughand they are, and AI has no
heart.
It it's brutal.
It'll tell you right away thisis a troll.
And not only that is he a troll, he's being paid to be a troll.
Ai can recognize that from thetext.
It's amazing.
It saved me so much time,because I used to read these
(37:28):
things, this garbage, and now,instead of getting upset about
it, I just cut and paste it intothe AI and it tells me oh,
don't worry about this, this istotal garbage, this is just a
troll, get rid of this andthat's it.
So I really have to be carefulabout my time, because I'm
working on a book and I have acouple of other books that I'm
(37:50):
working on and so I don't havetime for these trolls.
But they are relentless.
They come in and one of thembegged me four times to get into
the group so he can educateeverybody about how this is a
group that thinks that windmillsare killing the whales.
Everybody that comes in thinksthat windmills are killing the
(38:10):
whales, so comes in, thinks thatwindmills are killing the whale
.
So he asked me if he could comein and present the evidence
that it's not true.
I said I don't care about yourevidence, I don't believe your
evidence.
Your only evidence is that wehave no proof, and at the same
time I could say that you haveno proof.
So where are we?
There's no evidence here thatyou have.
(38:32):
You have no evidence ofanything.
So I think we have evidence, wehave data, and it doesn't
matter if there's data or not.
If people perceive that theseanimals are dying because of the
windmills and they know intheir hearts that they've seen
more and more deaths of theseanimals over the span of three
(38:56):
years, I trust those people.
They live there all their lives.
If these people don't thinkthese machines look good in
front of their water, I don'tcare.
I think they're right.
They're still ruining theenvironment.
If these people think that it'shurting the fish or hurting the
marine life, they sure right.
They're still ruining theenvironment.
If these people think that it'shurting the fish or hurting the
marine life, they sure do.
They make a lot of noise.
(39:16):
They're pollution.
They have oil that leaks.
And if these people think thatthese things should be
dismantled now, before thecompanies run off and leave them
to rust in the middle of thewater to harm the wildlife, I
tend to agree with them.
So I really don't care about thetrolls' evidence, when they
(39:37):
come in with an attitude ofdismissing what we stand for,
dismissing our evidence, andalso insult me.
He came in with an insultingapproach, which AI identified,
and then he asked me if he couldjoin my group please.
I said no, you're being nasty,go away.
(40:00):
You know, come in with a betterattitude.
Maybe you can come in, but withthis attitude of yours I don't
think you're coming in.
You know so, that was I.
You're coming in.
You know so that was I.
Had, like, I think, two orthree trolls today.
They come in to troll me.
I don't know what their problemis.
You know, I really don't know.
(40:22):
I think either.
I can't believe that thesepeople are not paid to do their
work because they're trolling me.
During like work hours, two orthree o'clock in the afternoon,
they're trolling me.
So what are they doing for aliving?
How are they working?
They're not working.
That is their job.
(40:42):
That's why they're doing it.
They sit in an office and theyget paid to do this job.
So that's why they're doing itand they have plenty of time
because that's what they getpaid to do this job.
So that's why they're doing itand they have plenty of time
because that's what they getpaid for.
If they were volunteers notgetting paid to do this, they
would have no time to do it.
They'd be at McDonald's orBurger King flipping burgers.
(41:03):
They would have no time totroll me, so they're getting
paid to do it.
Now I exposed the three maincompanies that engage the trolls
.
And yes, there are majorcompanies that are busy
greenwashing and astroturfingenvironmental groups, and this
(41:24):
is a big issue, and I summarizedan article that appeared in a
major publication.
Summarize an article thatappeared in a major publication.
Yes, they astroturf because,you know, this is how they
protect their business.
Of course, they have toastroturf and they hire these
people to go around.
It's the equivalent ofadvertising the trolling.
(41:45):
And the companies that offerthese services, you know, claim
that they get better results ifthey troll rather than they just
put out an advertisement thatthey pay for per click.
Okay, this is a business totroll, but there are three major
companies.
(42:05):
One is a Russian company, theother one is a Chinese company,
is a Russian company, the otherone is a Chinese company and the
third one, I think, is Crowd.
It's in my.
You have to go into my websiteand find out.
It's Crowd something.
It's basically they hire peopleto go to demonstrations to
(42:27):
pretend that they have a lot ofsupport to troll and do these
kinds of things, so showing toyou that this is all fake, that
none of the stuff you see ontelevision is real, that if
somebody's demonstrating forsomething, they've been paid to
do so and the company advertisesthis and you can go and buy
(42:48):
yourself 100 people to show upif you want to, if you have
enough money, whatever money youhave, you can show up and
demand 1,000 people and theyhave a network and they'll
travel there and they'll eachget paid for showing up.
It's a very simple system.
You make money that way.
You might want to sign up, okay?
So it's all fake.
(43:10):
All of the stuff that you seeon the news, all this it's fake.
There are companies that arepaid to change narratives by
advertising, by trolling, byshowing up at demonstrations,
and the government is trying todo something about it, but so
far it hasn't gotten anywhere,because they use these services
(43:32):
themselves when they run forelections, okay, so, yeah, we do
have these trolling companiesand I pretty much have
identified them, and when theycall me, I go.
How's it going at that companywhere you work for.
You know how much money arethey spending on me and trolling
(43:54):
me?
I mean, I know they get paid alot for each of these posts, a
couple hundred dollars, I think.
I said how do you think my bookis that important that they're
spending money on trolling me?
I don't understand.
So I didn't think my book, this, this one, is this important.
Okay, I'm sorry, but it's notthat important.
(44:17):
It's a small book.
I will sell it on Amazon andI'll have a few people buy it,
but it's not going to be in themainstream media.
I don't write books like that,okay.
So I don't know what they'reafraid of, but they come to
troll me.
It's pathetic.
They must be losing somehow.
They're losing because they'redesperate to troll somebody
(44:40):
small instead of trolling.
Trump, who is actually outright, said that he doesn't want the
windmills.
Okay, why don't they troll him?
So it's really, really pathetic, in my opinion.
Before I end, I didn't go overthe children's books.
We didn't have time.
I'll go over it another time.
(45:02):
No, let's go over it now,because I'm tired of talking
about this chat.
So, oh, okay, I was supposed totalk about this.
There's a book that I wroteseveral.
(45:30):
Climate change is really more ofa political thing rather than a
science-based thing, that thescience is too buried in the
politics.
And so I wrote a book talkingabout the business of climate
(45:52):
change and why it has become,instead of a science-based
endeavor, it has become apolitical endeavor, and that, in
reality, this whole panic isfalse and that the figures prove
it.
The chemistry proves it.
(46:14):
Okay, it proves it.
So I also have a database abouta hundred scientists that have
said that they don't agree withthe climate change narrative and
have done studies that disproveeverything that they've done.
Okay, so, anyway, as I say, I'man aggregator of information.
(46:41):
I take summaries from differenttypes of articles and put them
together into a book, like mostwriters do with books like this.
Most writers do that they goand they look at references and
they come to conclusions andthey write a book.
So I'm a book writer, okay, uh,but this book has taken off.
This book is doing very wellout there, so I'm surprised.
(47:05):
But being that this is the basisfor the re, for having the
windmills in the first place andspending more money on that
energy than you would for othertypes of energy, then we're in
trouble because the whole thingis based on a lie, okay, and if
(47:27):
you read the book, you'llrealize it's a lie and it's
scientifically proven.
It's a lie.
It's just that, whatever datathe scientists came up with, the
politics twisted it to thepoint that they made a panic out
of it and they created a wholebusiness around it, because
(47:48):
anytime there's a panic you cansell something to.
And, according to them, if wejust pay more taxes, the whole
climate change will go away.
They'll actually be able tostop it.
Climate change is in the handsof politicians who tax you.
The more taxes you pay, themore they can stop the climate
(48:09):
change.
Okay, when you say it like this, of course it sounds ridiculous
, but that's how ridiculous itis.
Okay, so let's go back here,okay, okay, so I'm going to try
to go to the children's books.
(48:30):
So, unfortunately, the way thisworks, I'm going to try to go
to the children's books.
So, unfortunately, the way thisworks, I have to kind of search
, replace, replace, replace.
I don't know why it looks likethis.
Children's books, okay, solet's quickly go through the
children's books.
(48:50):
Okay, as you know, I own apublishing company called
Cloverleaf Publications.
I've had this for a long time.
I had changed the name a whileback because of a conflict with
another publishing company, fromGreenleaf Publications to
Cloverleaf Publications.
Okay, and I've been writing.
(49:13):
I've been expanding my list ofchildren's books and some of my
best sellers are this this, thislittle guy here, lily the worry
Monster, is one of them.
And this guy, the Worry Monster, a story about childhood
(49:35):
anxiety.
This is one of my best sellersright now in the UK.
I sell these everyday.
Ok, it's about anxiety and kidsdo have a lot of anxiety and
you know how to address that.
Okay, this other book is alsofairly popular.
(49:56):
This is Licorice Inventors.
This is my dog and it talksabout the wildlife in my little
neighborhood.
We have a little small forestin the back of our neighborhood.
It's about five acres.
(50:17):
It's very small but it has somany wild animals you wouldn't
believe.
And this is a story about mydog exploring the wildlife A
fictional story.
He never escaped through theforest, but I may believe he did
.
And the cat that he meets andit's a very cute story.
It never escaped to the forest,but I may believe he did in the
cat that he meets and it's avery cute story.
It's very localized, it's aboutLittle Lake Harbor, osborne
Island, and there arerecognizable characters because
(50:39):
a lot of the people here theyknow these animals, they see
them, they have names for them.
This is how close the peopleliving in an area like this
become to the actual wildanimals that live there.
We know them by name, okay, weknow who's who, and we cherish
(51:00):
these animals.
So this is another book that isvery popular.
This one here, liquorice's BigAdventure Don't Patrol at
Graveling Point Beach, littleLake Harbor, new Jersey, talks
about the amazing cats of LittleLake Harbor.
These are the condos, these arethe dogs.
(51:20):
This is a cute story and it'sreally local, but it actually
sells overseas, believe it ornot.
Sells overseas, believe it ornot.
And this one also.
It talks about RutgersUniversity and the wildlife over
there, the wildlife that we'retrying to protect.
I'm not just trying to protectwhales.
(51:42):
Each group protects a differentanimal and this is one of my
favorites Leah and Spotty, theheartwarming rescue of a seal by
a budding marine biologist.
A paperback, and this is abouta young girl who becomes
attached to an animal, meetsSpotty, this little spotted seal
(52:04):
, and she plays with him and she, you know, plays ball with it
and she helps him heal and wantsto take him home and put him in
the bathtub, as most kids would, wouldn't they?
So, yeah, so that's whathappens.
(52:27):
And well, that's what happens.
And kids become very attachedto these animals and in this the
picture in the front is Leahcrying because she has to let go
of her little puppy, her littlespotted seal, which is like a
puppy.
They're really puppies.
They're absolutely gorgeous andcute and everything and cuddly.
(52:52):
Okay, these animals, the spottedseals, are also part of the New
Jersey wildlife and I amstudying to see if these animals
are getting and are beingharmed by the windmills.
I know of many dolphins thathave been harmed by windmills
(53:13):
and other things the fact thatwe have a lot of boats, a lot of
recreational boats, and we seea lot of dead dolphins.
So I am also studying thehealth effects of the nearby
windmills on humans, becausepeople have reported that they
(53:35):
get earaches, their dogs getseizures, all kinds of things
that I didn't know about.
So the next book is going tostudy that, to see if people
have been reporting these thingsand if they're being dismissed
because of the wind industry.
People have been reportingthese things and if they're
being dismissed because of thewind industry.
So, of course, one of the bigbooks that I'm going to be
(53:57):
writing after this.
One is called BeyondAstroTurfing because, as we
explained, the narrative hasbeen manipulated by industry in
the woke movement, pushing outthe garbage.
And let me explain whathappened to me today.
(54:18):
So you know, okay.
So you know what happened.
All right, today.
Today, I was told by a trollthat I was spreading this
information.
Have you heard that term before?
I'm sure you have.
And I said to him oh, so you'rea fascist, because we were
(54:38):
chatting, you know.
I said you're a fascist.
So who do you work for?
Russia or China?
I said because you know thatthat term is fascist term, right
?
He says no, it's not.
I said yeah, when you say tosomebody you're spreading
disinformation, what you'resaying is that you want to limit
their freedom of speech andfreedom of the press, and you
(55:02):
want to ban my book because I'msaying something different than
what your narrative is.
So in America, I explained tohim, we have freedom of the
press.
That means I can publish thisbook and I can say whatever I
want in the book.
And if it's not disinformation,it's information and you can
(55:23):
decide to do whatever you wantwith it.
As long as you pay for it.
You can do what you want withit.
Lots of people publish all kindsof books and they are
information or disinformation.
You know whatever side you'rein if they're information or
disinformation.
(55:44):
But disinformation is a fascistterm.
It's a term invented by themedia to restrict our freedoms
of speech and freedom of thepress.
What I am doing is independentjournalism.
Nobody has the right to come inand tell me I'm spreading
(56:04):
disinformation.
Nobody has that right, becausethis is America.
I live in America.
If I wanted to live in Russia, Iwould be in Russia, but I'm not
there.
I would be in China.
I'm not there because here I bein China.
I'm not there because here Ican publish my book and they
can't do anything about it.
They can, of course, troll meand spread lies about me and try
(56:26):
to ruin my life and distract me, but they're not going to stop
me from publishing the book.
I will be publishing the bookand if they don't let me publish
it, I'll give it away.
There's nothing they can do, sothey should really stop
bothering me because they're notgoing to win.
I've decided that I'm not goingto let them win and I'm going to
(56:47):
publish this beautiful book.
It's really a beautiful,beautiful book.
You're going to love it.
You're going to love thestories about the whales.
You're going to see them likeyou do your dog, like you do
animals that you love.
You'll see that the realanimals that have families, that
have intelligence, that theydeserve better than what this
(57:08):
wind industry is giving themBetter.
And the lies that are beingtold are so blatant and even the
trolls are just kind of takingtheir masks off and showing who
they really are that it'scriminal.
(57:28):
I think it's criminal what'shappening to the whales.
I think these companies thathave installed these because
there are internationalregulations to protect whales,
and none of these companies thatinstalled these things quickly
because they were getting the30% money from the government
(57:49):
really followed the rules orcared about international law.
They didn't do enough studies,they didn't do enough research,
they didn't do enough research,their permits were rushed
through and now the whales aredying.
Maybe if they had done thingsright and they had put these
windmills in areas where thesewhales did not regularly travel
(58:13):
for their yearly migrations,maybe it would have been okay.
But because they didn't do anyresearch and I'm not saying they
didn't do any research becauseI don't know I downloaded the
proposal from Atlantic Shores.
I sent Mr Murphy my opinion.
(58:35):
I didn't trust my owninterpretation, so I fed the
whole thing to AI and AI read itand said it was a piece of
garbage.
Okay, that's what AI says, thatit's missing information.
I wouldn't say it's a piece ofgarbage, but they strategically
left out information such as thewhale mortality rates, which
(58:59):
are available free from theirown funded organization.
The Marine Mammal StrandingCenter has the data but somehow
is missing from the report.
So I think we've spoken enough.
I think you guys know enoughabout what's going on.
I think you're on the righttrack.
(59:20):
I left you some articles abouthow you can make a difference.
I know you think we're too few.
We can't make a difference.
There's too many trolls.
There's too many industrypeople fighting us.
No, that's not true.
They hire a bunch of troll,rent-a-troll guys from Russia to
(59:43):
troll you.
There's not that many of them.
There's just a handful who aremanipulating the narrative in
changing things.
So it seems to you that you'realone.
You're not alone.
You're a powerful voice asmembers of this group, and what
(01:00:04):
I suggest to you and I left youan article is write letters to
the editor.
Every town has a small newspaper.
Make a list of this and you canlook them up online and send
them each.
Not a letter on the email, no,no, don't do that.
Write it down by hand, ifpossible, and send it with a
(01:00:27):
stamp.
Trust me, that makes so muchmore of a difference than if you
send it by email in just howit's processed.
Okay, so do that.
If you can't write a letter,you have problems writing, I
suggest you go to chat GPTthere's a free version of it and
(01:00:50):
tell them what you want theletter to look like and it'll
write it for you.
Also, I think that google gmailhas a writing tool right now so
it can help you out.
So if you don't know how towrite for reason, or you can't
see, well, whatever reason youmay have you can get these tools
to help you write it and youcan write it.
(01:01:12):
And if you take the time towrite one of these letters every
week, even more often, if youcan write it.
And if you take the time towrite one of these letters every
week, even more often, if youcan, and send them to a
different newspaper, you'regoing to see that if every
person in this group does that75 people so far.
If you all do that, it's goingto make a difference.
(01:01:32):
Trust me, it makes a hugedifference.
So write these letters andthat's part of your activism
homework for today.
Don't listen to the trolls.
Don't listen to these nastypeople.
They're a handful of hiredhands, rented trolls.
They're not the majority ofAmericans.
Okay, you have to also thattrolling works both ways.
(01:01:57):
If you see their pagessomewhere, you know you can also
leave emojis or, you know,troll them if you have time.
Okay, thank you very much.
Bye, bye, everybody.
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com