Should Compliance Be a Part of Legal?

Welcome to a new season of Compliance Man. This season is called True or False? In this series, I am joined by Tim Khasanov-Batirov, a compliance practitioner who focuses on compliance at international markets for over 20 years. Based on his work experience at six countries as in house compliance officer Tim now consults senior managers and compliance officers globally on complex ethics and compliance matters as partner and Head of Compliance practice for ETERNA LAW.   Tim is a co-founder of Compliance Club, an international community of practitioners. You can learn more about Tim, his Compliance Manillustrated series, a YouTube channel and request advice from him by clicking at Timur Khasanov-Batirov at Linked in.   In each podcast, we will take on a different issue with Tim; a hot, very often a very provocative topic from the corporate’s real life agenda and find out if is it true or false. It will be a tough and very straightforward talks. We invite you to participate in these discussions by commenting each podcast and proposing topics for True or False series. The most active listeners will be invited to join us. Let’s have a sincere conversation! Today we will try to find out if it is a negative when compliance is a part of the corp legal function. Highlights include: What is the role of the corporate legal function in the US and emerging markets. Who should compliance report up to in an organization? What happens when compliance says NO? Resources Tim on LinkedIn Tim on Eternal Law Eterna Law Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices