April 9, 2025 • 45 mins
What if the U.S. Navy accidentally discovered time travel in 1943? The Philadelphia Experiment stands as one of the most persistent conspiracy theories of the 20th century—a tale of a destroyer escort that allegedly vanished from the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, only to reappear moments later in Norfolk, Virginia.
We explore the fascinating claims surrounding this supposed military experiment, including reports that crew members became embedded in the ship's metal structure, suffered mental breakdowns, or became permanently invisible. While the Navy has consistently denied any such experiment took place, the legend has only grown stronger with time, fueled by accounts from people like Carlos Allende who claimed to witness the extraordinary event.
The most mind-bending aspect of this story involves two crew members who reportedly jumped ship during the experiment and found themselves transported 800 years into the future. They described returning with knowledge of an AI-driven society with no government as we know it—raising the tantalizing question: could our rapid technological advancement since the 1980s be influenced by knowledge brought back from the future?
Our conversation ventures beyond the Philadelphia Experiment into broader questions about time travel paradoxes, historical figures who might actually be time travelers (Nikola Tesla, anyone?), and those viral photos of historical people who bear uncanny resemblances to modern celebrities like Keanu Reeves. We even contemplate whether our dreams might be glimpses into parallel dimensions where alternate versions of ourselves live different lives.
Whether you're a dedicated conspiracy theorist or a curious skeptic, this episode challenges you to question the nature of time, reality, and just how much classified research might exist beyond public knowledge. Share your thoughts on time travel—would you take the opportunity to visit the past or future if given the chance?
Hosted by: Cottman, Crawford & The Jersey Guy
Contact us: CCandNJGuy@gmail.com
Links & socials: https://linktr.ee/ccandnjguy
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:06):
Hello and welcome to Colin Crawford and the Jersey
Guy Podcast.
Appreciate you guys coming,how's?
Speaker 2 (00:12):
everybody doing.
Not too shabby brother.
We're good how you doing, I'mgood yeah.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
Yeah, just chilling, man.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Yeah, it's Friday night.
Friday's just got to be.
You know what?
I wish we were in the pocket.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
So for not everybody that knows I come, I take like
an hour drive but it's all backroads so, like During the winter
, it's just sticks.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
You know what I mean.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
But now it's looking.
So it's such a scenic ride.
I enjoy it.
I actually enjoy Driving up.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Everything's blooming now, right it's so nice All the
.
You know, leaves are on thetrees All the budding Flowers.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
It's so nice.
All the you know, leaves are onthe trees, All the budding.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Flowers.
It's awesome.
You and bud, it's pretty.
Everything's budding, budding,budding, budding.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
That is funny as hell Too much.
So I'm glad everybody's good.
So let's do it.
Lou, Talk to us.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
What's today's topic?
So I was thinking like what?
For some reason, philadelphiaExperiment popped into my head.
It's a good story, right, itwas always interesting.
I remember watching the moviewhen I was a kid.
You know it was a big deal atthat time because, you know, we
were already into that kind ofstuff.
We just didn't have what theyhave now today with the movies
that make it look like super,you know, fragilistic.
(01:19):
You know what I'm saying?
Speaker 3 (01:20):
Yeah, expiatitudes, yeah right right, exactly, but
there was always this thingabout Philadelphia Experiment.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
Yeah, some information on it, right?
Speaker 2 (01:28):
now Explain what.
I'll take it, but the glassesaren't right dude.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Okay, philadelphia Experiment is an alleged
military experiment that tookplace in 1943 at the
Philadelphia Navy's shipyard.
The story claims that the USNavy attempted to make the US
Eldridge, a destroyer escort,invisible to radar using a form
of electromagnetic fieldmanipulation.
According to conspiracytheories, the experiment
resulted in unintendedconsequences such as
(01:55):
teleportation, time travel,serve, physical and
psychological effects on thecrew.
Speaker 3 (02:01):
Right.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
What.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Yeah, okay, okay, okay.
So now, if that did happen, Iwant to know the proof.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
You know what I'm saying, like I would like to see
a story to those guys who's tosay it didn't.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
No, no, I'm saying like you know, like I would like
to see, well, I guess, more.
I wonder if, because they didit that one time, they were able
to recreate.
Well, because they did it thatone time, they were able to
recreate.
Well, I'm sure they did.
And everything now is, like youknow, of course, the super
altered future that would have,should have been.
You know what I mean?
That's craziness, dude, that iscrazy.
Speaker 1 (02:34):
Let me read on a little bit more.
Go ahead.
The legend largely stems fromaccounts by Carl M Allen, also
known as Carlos Allende, whoclaimed to have witnessed an
experiment, wrote letters aboutit in the 1950s.
He claims were laterpublic-sized books, I'm sorry
such as Philadelphia ExperimentProject Invisibility 1979 by
(02:59):
Williams.
The ship was said to havevanished from Philadelphia and
reappeared in Norfolk, virginia,but before returning.
Some reports claim that crewmembers were embedded in the
ship, metals, suffered mentalbreakdowns and were left
permanently invisible.
Like the Invisible man right,yeah, wow, that's crazy, that's
nuts.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
That's crazy, yeah.
So now when they got off theship you know like they were
stuck in that other dimension.
I guess you know what I mean.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Like that in-between thing, I wonder if people were
able to see, like thermalscanners, though Like were they
like the predator?
Were they invisible, like youdefinitely couldn't see them?
Or were they like bending light, like the predator?
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Like we could see them.
That's pretty crazy, though.
Man like the president, like wecould see that.
Speaker 3 (03:45):
That's pretty crazy, though man see that little, yeah
, like the glass, like theirglass right.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Right, that's great, yeah, because then that.
But then that would be thequestion too as far as them on
the boat, because they so ifthey were going to beat radar.
So radar is just a matter of um, how they made the ship that
the sound waves would reflectdifferently like the stealth
bomber right, exactly that, andthat's what they use now of
course.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
Right, at least we know.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
I'm sure it was working on other shit that we'd
saw, so now, and then they sayand then now, what they're using
are cameras to make somethingseem invisible.
So then they'll do like theyput cameras on one side of it
and then the TV screen, if youwill, on the opposite side.
(04:27):
This way it looks like you'relooking through, you know what
I'm saying?
And so then this so I mean, Ididn't see all of that lou, so
was it is they were doing it?
Speaker 1 (04:34):
dude, I'm having a big deal.
This movie came on.
If you watch it, man yeah, I'mgonna have to check it out
there's no credible evidencethat such experiment occurred
right of course, the unitedstates navy has repeatedly
denied the story, saying that nosuch invisibility or
teleportation experiment wasconducted.
Some researchers believe thatthe myth may have been
influenced by real projects likeProject Rainbow, a classified
(04:58):
World War II effort related toradar camouflage.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Yeah, see, that's what I'm saying, so that then I
want to know what it was thatthey were doing.
So what I mean is, as far aslike, was it through electricity
, like electromagnetic, that'swhat they said, electromagnetic,
that it got overloaded?
You know what I'm saying that'swhat I'm saying, that's what I
would like to know.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
You mean because people got caught in the metal
and all that?
Right, yeah, they didn't knowhow to control it.
Obviously it was the first time, so they didn't know what was
going to happen.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
They were like let's see what happens we?
Speaker 1 (05:29):
put these two things together man and we just turn it
on.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Exactly Dude.
That's insane man.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
That is just so crazy , I know, oh my God, but that
fact that it supposedly traveledfrom Philly to Norfolk,
invisible, invisible.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
Yeah, invisible, but not teleported.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
No, no, invisible.
I don't know.
Does it say invisible?
Speaker 3 (05:54):
No, invisible.
No, that's what you said.
It says it vanished fromPennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
So I guess, that means invisible, invisible.
I'm going to say invisible,because then, when it came, back
.
For some reason reason, my mindgoes to teleportation.
Yeah, I don't know why, but youknow what I mean.
So it makes sense.
Because if and that's what Iwas going to say next because
teleportation, if we remember,uh, somebody, you know little
crazy funny sci-fi movies thatwe've seen when they were doing
the teleportation, right, youknow somebody from the ship down
(06:18):
to the planet that they cameback all mush because their
cells and everything was allmixed up.
So then, if it was somethinglike a teleportation and they
ended up, you said they werepart of the metal on the ship,
right?
Speaker 1 (06:39):
When they came back, phased back in.
They probably were not in syncand they wound up forming with
inside the ship itself.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
Some shit happened to them mentally.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
Exactly.
Speaker 3 (06:45):
And then the crate, but there are some types of
teleportation theories.
So, there's that kind where itbreaks it down, and then there's
the where it bends space andtime.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
Where this?
Point A and this point's here,and you just step through it,
you're just walking through adoor.
But then if that was the casewith this boat I don't think
that was the case with this boat, but this but yeah.
Speaker 3 (07:05):
But I don't think that was the case with the boat.
I think they made the shitinvisible.
They did like some fuckingRight, they did something tapped
into something too, becausePredator type shit.
Right.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
Yeah.
Or like or the ninja guy.
Yes, I forgot about that.
Metal Gear Cyber Ninja.
Yeah, so now this was in whatyear?
1943,.
I think you said so, when didthe spaceship crash at Roswell?
Oh, in the 50s.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
Escort.
Chachibite Around that time?
Speaker 3 (07:37):
yeah, when did the UFO crash in Roswell, New Mexico
?
Don't tell me he's talking tohis classes.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Kick it, michael P.
Did the ufo crash in roswell,new mexico?
Speaker 3 (07:44):
don't tell me he's talking to michael pio.
Tell me 47, 47.
Four years later, four yearslater, to hear that, yeah,
that's crazy, so now it'sawesome 47.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
So now, if they were trying to reverse engineer some
of the things that they found onthe spaceship, that did not
technology, they weren't sureexactly how it worked Right, and
then that's probably where theFUBAR came in and they ended up.
You know what they were tryingto just be invisible.
Time travel just ended uphappening.
Speaker 3 (08:14):
That's like oops.
I wonder if that audio can gothrough.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
I bet you it did.
I'm sure it did, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (08:19):
I hope our listeners do.
Yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 1 (08:21):
Just the fact that they even tried to do that, yeah
, and they phased in and out ofnot only invisibility, but
possibly time as well.
Which is Right?
Which?
Speaker 2 (08:29):
is really crazy, because they probably didn't
even know what they did to timetravel.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
They probably only had an idea.
Yeah, and it was enough forthem to go, okay let's do it.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
See, that's straight like Twilight Zone stuff for me,
bro you know what.
Speaker 3 (08:44):
I mean for them to go .
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Okay, let's do it.
See, that's straight liketwilight zone stuff for me, bro.
You know, like it's just of allthe things that you can't, you
couldn't like hold on to, andyou know what I mean to to
harness, if you will, or just tosee, and it was that time
travel, you know, and the boatis probably gone now.
You know what I mean.
Like they said then they saidthe boat was gone.
Did I read that before?
That the boat they don't evenhave the boat they don't.
(09:06):
We can't see the boat Like it'snot like on.
This place somewhere, like in amuseum or whatever, like we
can't even see the boat.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
You know what I mean.
Oh, in other words, it's not.
Yeah, I don't know, it's not acommission.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
You know what I mean.
They probably broke it down.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
You know it's hidden in the no, they recycled it, we
just built something else.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
There's something else with it because, man, you
know how crazy I would love tobe able to see that boat.
That would have been so crazy,and oh yeah yeah, it was
invisible.
I couldn't see it, I wouldn'tbe able to maybe that's why we
don't have it on display.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
You can't see it.
It's right here.
We can't even see it.
It's right here.
You think you can see it, we?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
can't see this.
Red and green glasses.
You can see anything.
Yeah, wow, yeah, but not, bro.
So imagine, oh, let's say, thatthey did end up harnessing it
and that'd be fun just making ajoke yeah like, like, can we see
the boat?
Speaker 3 (09:59):
you can't see it, they won't, let us see it but
they were, were just telling you, you can't see it.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
Right.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
They were just saying you can't see it.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
That's freaking hilarious, but yeah, so.
I mean now again, you know howmany things are there, stories
that we don't know about, Ofcourse that you know what I'm
saying.
I don't know, I guess for me,to an extent, you know there's
certain things that thegovernment shouldn't tell people
.
You know, because if that's asecret, and it's, you know well,
(10:26):
they try to.
Speaker 1 (10:27):
Sometimes it leaks out, right yeah, people who, uh,
they didn't really handle theexperiment.
Yeah, too well, there waspeople on the ship, right?
Yeah, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
They had a crew because they were invisible.
So now their voices.
There was an experiment and wewere caught in the boat.
And then you, you're thinkinglike oh my God, that's a great
story.
You can start writing it down.
You know what I mean.
You make a great flick about it.
And it was really that it wasone of the invisible guys that
was on that ship when it cameback and docked, got off the
boat and he's talking to hisfamily and shit.
(10:57):
You know, jimmy spoke to me.
Jimmy spoke to me Meanwhile'slike I'm right here, it's like
Star Trek stuff.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
Yeah, different phase Dimension, uh huh, you can see
them, but they can't see you,right yeah?
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Yeah, I'm telling you , man, that's so that then how
many times has it happened andpeople have disappeared Because
it was done On a larger scale?
You know what I mean?
Yeah, so then it's not reallythat a lot of people have quote
unquote disappeared.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Probably made it more confined, or what's the right
word I'm looking for?
Speaker 2 (11:31):
Oh yeah, yeah, I'm talking about, like by now, more
controlled Right, right, by nowthey have.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Hey, let's do this right in the middle of the ocean
?
Speaker 2 (11:37):
Yeah, but think of how many things they've done in
the past, like with nuclearweapons.
When they practice, you know,testing them out either on the
ground or on the water and then,you know, people just happen to
get caught in the way.
That's how the incredible Hulkbecame.
Oh, I got you.
You know what I'm sayingthere's a crossover, right?
Speaker 3 (11:53):
yeah, you go the super crossover, but you know,
what I'm saying.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
It's like it's one of those things like you know, the
military or you know everycountry that they could have
just done.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
Yeah, military, you know they're doing shit that we
probably don't even know about.
Speaker 2 (12:10):
I mean, think about it, the stealth bomber was what
back in the 50s and 60s thatthey were looking at, that they
were testing the idea of havingit, not actually maybe flying it
, using it as mission onmissions and stuff, but they
were looking at that technologyto make it invisible.
You know right they use the uh,what they have on it now, right
and then.
(12:31):
That was the other thing too.
Is that the way that they madethe engines on radar right, so
as it's.
So they made the engines thatyou can't hear.
It as it's coming to you whenyou hear the engines on those
airplanes when they left is whenthey left, so now it's like you
know, you don't even hear ityeah you know, you just, it's
just like right there, it's likeyo, what's that?
And you're caught in the middleof the bombs.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
You know I'm saying so, but it's so high anyway,
you're not gonna see that well,yeah, that thing is operating at
like a level of freakingaltitude where you can't be seen
.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
At the same time, listen it's it's wild man and
it's cool and super interestingbecause you know all the movies
that we've seen.
Uh, you know, they said likethe Manhattan Project and stuff
like that.
You know what was the one thatthey just did that made all that
money last year?
Um, it was one of the greatestmovies, the best movies of the
year, um, hoppenheimer.
Speaker 3 (13:23):
Oh yeah, yeah, you know I never.
You know what I'm saying.
No, I never saw it.
Yeah, I didn't get to see iteither.
I saw it.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
It was a good movie, just that, like just there are
parts of the story that I'm surehaven't been told, but just the
idea that these were governmentprojects that had happened.
They were doing some wild shit.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
They were just trying to do whatever, doing some wild
shit.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
they were just trying to do whatever, so like that's
the thing, that always makes mewonder right if they were doing
wild stuff like that right backthen, right.
Speaker 3 (13:51):
What are they doing now?
Speaker 1 (13:52):
oh, forget it.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
You don't want to know, man, I don't even want to
know, like, like, what kind ofor I don't because, I I find it
hard to believe to be like allright, we got to stop this guys
like I doubt highly that rightbut, like you know, and is this
where, like a lot of quantum,like mechanics, come in?
Oh, definitely, bro.
Yeah, like more tens of wildstuff.
Well, and think about it,brainiac shit.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
Yeah, well, even look too.
They were talking about exos,six million dollar man having
this cybernetic stuff, you know,uh, limbs and things like that
suit, you get into a whole suitor whatever.
On that now actually and theykeep making it better and better
and to do all these things.
So it's something that had beenthought about before, whether
(14:36):
it was something that somebodysaw technology.
It's better, right exactlybecause something that they saw
out of a comic book or somethingthat they thought they saw in
in a movie sci-fi, sci-fisomething comes alive.
You know exactly, and that'swhat it is many movies back to
the future.
You know, when marty parked thecar and he wanted to get um, he
had on the uh, the hazmat suit,so they thought that he was an
(14:58):
alien.
You know, when he, when hecrashed the car into the barn
and he comes out like, oh right,so you know, it's just now,
that little kid that was onthere saw it.
We're just talking, like I said, if you know, if it was real
life.
You know, somebody just sawsomething, because of this.
But he now says you know, thisis a good story, now it becomes
a story, Now one of us reads itand we're geniuses.
(15:20):
And now we're going to havethat.
I'm just saying that's where mymind goes.
And as far as military isconcerned, dude, what haven't
they done?
What haven't they tried?
I don't want to know.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
That's what I keep saying.
I don't want to know, I'm kindof nosy.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
I mean, there's some things that you probably don't
want to know Do you think theyinvented time travel, do you
think?
Speaker 1 (15:43):
they invented time travel.
I think they did I think ifthey did though I don't think
it's anything you get into Ithink it's like what you said
before, where you walk throughsomething and you teleported.
If we're living right, now.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
And if they did invent time travel, that means
they've used it already, right?
Which means, whatever they did,they did.
Yes.
Whoever used time travelbecause we're living in present
day, so I think so it affectsthe past.
What did they Possibly?
You know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
Well, right.
So then now let's think aboutthis though Time travel, if they
did it, not so much to change,let's just say regular history,
so much to change, um, let'sjust say regular history.
You know, just, you know tomake whatever technology.
You know what I mean, and theexcuse, or the whatever you want
to call it was, it was aliensthat they've given us this
(16:29):
technology.
In actuality, it was just us,right, and we, you know, travel
or military, whomever travelback and forth into time, you
know, was able to bring some ofthat stuff back to make it
happen a little faster.
And, like we spoke before inone of our other, shows how fast
technology has jumped in thelast 50 years.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Oh, and it keeps just making more and leaves some
balance.
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Dude.
It went from vinyl to cassettes, to 8-tracks, to cassettes, to
MP3, to DVDs, to the iPods.
You?
Speaker 1 (17:01):
know what.
I'm saying Like it's just allthese things, and now it's just
streaming services, and now it'sjust streaming.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
Yeah, and that's in the last 60 years.
Now it's just streaming music,Right exactly.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
So in the last 60 years we've gotten to where we
have all these things, computers, what they were and weren't
from.
You know what I'm going tomention.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
I remember I can't help it.
I had that computer.
Speaker 3 (17:20):
I'm going to digress a little bit.
I can't help it, I got to say.
I just find it interesting howwe'll get back to the main topic
.
I promise we won't sidebar toomuch but no, like how awesome it
is now to like in the.
I know a lot of musicians dostruggle, but the whole access
to having music.
People now can start findingmusic that they might not have
(17:44):
liked or more underground stuffcan become available and it's
crazy.
Even now I'm listening to allthese artists and discovering
all this music that I never hadaccess to because we only the
record companies.
This is what we're dishing outto you.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
Listen to this, listen to this, listen to this.
They still do that, but nowlike.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
A lot of people are just discovering more music and
stuff like that.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Yep, we'll change the rap.
That's technology right.
It gives everybody good freedomto to do that exactly.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
Cool time now we just listen to whatever you like or
like what you do.
You have like this crazy mix.
I love it's like your mix likeit goes from this to that, to
this, to that, when you haveyour music on.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Yeah, yeah, because I like so much, so much different
music.
Yeah, and I thank my parentsfor that because they were so
they loved so much difference.
And then whoever, and I justlove music period right, just
for piano music I think I thinkhe used piano music before.
Speaker 3 (18:37):
We have, uh, the podcast we lou has his music on
and it's just like all different, all the different stuff we're
just listening to but you'resaying about people losing
mutant money.
You know artists musicians orwhatever that's like so like you
had this uh, but it's how theymake their money.
Now you know I'm saying so now.
It's marketing.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
They have a chance to market like I started to say
before you had chance to rapper,chance to rapper didn't sign
with any music labels, he just,you know, did it on his own.
He was, you know, social mediafamous and whatnot.
Diy, yeah, diy stuff ExactlyAll day long and he promoted
himself, sold his own music theway that we have podcasts on all
these streaming services, moremoney now right, you know what
I'm saying, because now, he'sable to do music.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Exactly.
That's the other flip side.
Right are the record companiesare kind of becoming kind of
like a not needed thing, becauserecord companies make records,
right.
What do they make now, right?
Speaker 2 (19:26):
no, no one yeah uses.
It's not the same yeah so likewho are they?
They're just like banks nowright exactly for like funding
like well, yeah, yeah, they'relike yeah, that's.
Speaker 3 (19:36):
They're basically like investors.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Yes, now, that's all they are now yep, yep, and
they're still trying to get thebig money off.
You know they're trying to getthat.
You know 40 instead of the, youknow 10 and whatnot, but no,
you're right.
So then, with all that beingsaid, look at how, how it's
possible that this time travelyeah because of the philadelphia
experiment, that this is whatnow this of the Philadelphia
experiment, that this is whatnow.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
This is the conversation we're having, you
know like we just like oh my godwell, they were messing around
with it with then.
I'm sure they were doing itbefore that too, that we don't
know about it.
Right, you know so it's.
But you know, when we thinkabout all that stuff you got to
save yourself, yeah, they'rethinking about that stuff too,
because a bunch of nerds overthere working on that shit.
Speaker 2 (20:16):
Yeah, trying to make it real, yep, like you, like
you're saying so now bellic andbellic, a bell tech, but like
bellic claimed that you know heand his brother, uh duncan uh,
were crew members on the on theuss eldridge.
Now they got away.
So that then if they got awayon the other page second one so
(20:36):
now if they got away they werenever found again.
Like no, they were rightbecause they jumped off the ship
.
Speaker 1 (20:43):
Right said then but they still ended up time
traveling.
They wound up instead landingin water and they found
themselves transported throughtime vortex and ended up in the
year 2749, right.
Speaker 2 (20:54):
So now it's 800 years into the future, into the
future.
So now they're there, nowthey're bugging out and they're
talking about all the thingsthat have happened.
So then how did they get back?
Because they were phasing it inand out of time.
There you go.
So now in that time, that's atleast the idea of what was going
on.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
So now we're going to assume they told everybody they
went back to their presentRight and this is what they told
everyone and then they cameback, right.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
So then, when they came back, now it's like they
came back.
So what the theory is?
They were there for a while andthen came back, exactly so,
phasing in and out.
Quote unquote phasing in andout, but they may have.
When they came back, right,they came back with all the
knowledge from the future.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Well, whatever they saw or experienced or lived,
they may have and they came backolder.
No, they can't.
Oh, they came back.
Who they the way they were.
I don't know if they aged ornot, I don't think so I'm trying
to.
Speaker 2 (21:50):
That's what I'm saying.
I don't remember what it wasthat few minutes that they were
out there they saw all thesethings that they brought it back
, and it was in 1983 that theycame back and, like I said, look
at how fast technology jumpedin the 70s and 80s.
I love what it says though thefuture is, though, what do you
(22:10):
mean?
Speaker 3 (22:11):
He described the future of society with no
government as we know it andeverything is controlled and
AI-driven.
Can you imagine that?
Speaker 2 (22:19):
yeah, I do.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
That would be a cool society living, you know that's
something I thought about, youknow, one day, when I was
pondering right right, right,right, yeah, yeah, you know what
I'm talking about man yeah,yeah, but like man gets out of
its way, eventually they'll getto that point where they're able
to live life not with distress,right?
imagine a futuristic society,picture this right, where you
have this ai and you'd be like Iwant this house and you just ai
(22:44):
build your house, yeah, andlike the economy is just based
on contributions, like everybodyjust contributes to society,
but like there's no.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
There's no money, like they don't need to work,
but you have a job right, Ibuild your house.
Speaker 3 (22:59):
I built your own furniture, designed your own
furniture, everything you justcould design to spec, and it
fucking builds.
Yeah, and then like same thingfood, you know you can, and all
your.
Your house is always clean.
We already got that.
We already got just to sweep thefloor basically or start having
robots that just take care ofyour house, that cook for you,
that do everything Right.
Can you imagine, yeah, it'd belike and we would have time to
(23:20):
just like kind of be able tolike live life a little bit
better now because like youcould like pursue more interests
and do things because, likeeverything's being done for you.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
We'll see that and that's where the catch comes in.
Go ahead.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
You go where the catch comes in, right.
Yeah, first I think you'regoing to say the same thing I'm
going to say, but you would wantto still keep things.
I think we would get to a pointwhere they we realized that
relying on one thing all thetime and not doing other things
wasn't good for our health rightso then they found that balance
where they do both right, right, but like, even like and jobs
that like excuse are really badand require hard labor.
Speaker 3 (23:58):
You know that like we like some of the like, some of
the shit I know what peopledon't like to talk about but
like a lot of our chocolate islike fucking slave labor.
It's fucked up, yeah, but nowyou're right, excuse me sorry,
all right, bless you, thank you.
Robots, the, the, uh, the robotyou can have, just you know ai
driven robots doing all the youknow farming and all the heavy
(24:19):
hard labor that, like you knowwhat I mean, right right, well
again, though, but that and but,I'm not gonna say that it's
taking the jobs right.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
No, but it's easy to take away the jobs that like
what?
This is well, because it's notlike that we do.
Speaker 3 (24:33):
but there has to be a way to balance where, like now,
those people that do you knowthat is work for those people,
though they get paid.
Like now, they won't have jobs.
So, like you got to find, we'llsee.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
So, like for me, here's my thing, you know.
I like the idea of havingmechanical things helping
helping.
You know like people werecomplaining about having the
electric vehicles.
My thing is that now we evolveas far as what we do, so our job
before was to build the car andonly maintain this.
You know, combustion engine.
(25:04):
Now it's about now teaching thepeople who built the cars how
to build and maintain anelectric vehicle for the
hydrogen right, like, but that'sthe thing that it's now a
matter of us evolving, you know,into different things.
Cleaner energy, you know, nomatter how you try to put it,
you know or try to make it sound, but that's the thing that it's
now a matter of us evolvinginto different things.
Cleaner energy, no matter howyou try to put it or make it
sound any kind of different, weneed cleaner energy.
(25:24):
You know what I'm saying?
Absolutely.
We all are victims of what isin the air right now, what's in
our food, and such, andcontributors Right, and
contributors all at the sametime, because we're like, oh
well, my footprint isn't thatbig.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
It's still big enough to where it is.
You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
You're straight, you're, you're kind of
restricted by the times that youhave right, you got gasoline.
Mostly is the dominant thingand that's what's being used so
that then now, if we get towhere you know robots or any
kind of ai is now taking over ordoing those things?
Speaker 1 (25:53):
you know what I'm saying?
Speaker 2 (25:54):
yeah, because you got that movie with will smith the
I robot.
Oh, yeah, right so that thennow you're looking at all the
things in that movie, that'salways the hollywood version.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
Yeah, oh yeah, no, no .
Speaker 2 (26:02):
But I'm saying but it's because it's still the
thought.
You know, I'm saying it's juststill that idea.
Now we've turned around, andI'm not saying the bad part of
the movie, I'm just saying nowwe have these robots that are
doing most of our stuff for us.
You know what I'm saying?
Uh, are we gonna end upoverweight because now we don't
have to go and do those things?
Speaker 3 (26:19):
yes, I guess, to be health conscious, as people will
have to exercise right, you'llhave to do you know they would.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
It will remind you when it's time for you to
exercise.
If you got ai, it's gonna doall that for you you know I mean
it's gonna be your assistant.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
It's gonna teach you how to.
It's gonna cook for you and belike you're not going to let.
Maybe you can have it set.
Be like don't let me getoverweight, where it'll cook,
Like it'll make healthy food foryou.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
Yeah, more portion control and stuff like that.
Yeah, more control.
But you said you still have toget up and do it because they
were you know again because Ilove movies and they.
Speaker 3 (26:55):
you know, oh you know , we got a soccer game tonight.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
Right, yeah For kids.
Speaker 3 (26:59):
You know, we don't have time to cook and it makes a
meal for you.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
Right, but then, like on other nights, you make your
own meals, right, and it justyou know Well, but that's the
balance that we, but that's thebalance that we are saying, like
yo, we're going to turn around,and then that's.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
Right, that's who you want to be.
Speaker 3 (27:18):
Well then, maybe it should be up to the software
designers to tell people andinform them.
Be like, let you know that youshould be doing this yourself
most days because you are goingto get overweight and just build
Like.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Teach people, yeah, but I mean, I get it and I hear
that you do it to your own Right.
You can do it now, right.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
You do it to your own stream.
You can do it now, right.
We still have devices that weuse now that we monitor no but
the.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
AI will be telling you because they're going to be
talking to you.
Speaker 1 (27:41):
Only because you want it to right.
I would imagine you're the onewho's directing it.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
It's the same way you talk to JVC.
Speaker 3 (27:46):
You have C3PO in your house all the time.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Right, exactly, he's like sorry sir, but I cannot
cook for yourself because youare getting fat.
Sorry, sir, but I must tell youyou are getting fat.
Yes, it is against myprogramming.
I cannot cook.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
How would you say, sir fat bastard?
Speaker 2 (28:04):
wow, dude I think of awesome powers but yeah but you
know, but.
But again you know me with mymovie stuff.
There was that movie wally uhcartoon and they were showing
the robots doing everything andthe people were sitting in like
these hover chairs oh, and theywere fat, and they were fat,
they're all overweight.
(28:24):
Everybody on there wasoverweight.
Speaker 3 (28:26):
They kept throwing them the whatever and they went
to space because they pollutedthe land because they polluted.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
They had that one robot on the land, wally wally,
who was crushing that all upright and making up, and then he
found the flower, because, yeah, because Eve yeah she was one
of the robots from the space Eva.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
Yeah, she came through and she was from the
spaceship, yeah, you know, anddoing that stuff.
And then on the spaceship, thecomputer, the robot that was up
there helping the captain, he,you know, ended up like no, no,
no, we want to stay here becausewe don't want these people to
take care of themselves, becausewe're taking care of them right
, right to live and doeverything.
So the machine was making you aslave, exactly for the most
(29:05):
part, you know what I mean.
Like I said, that's why I wouldlove to be able, would have been
able to speak to these guys tosee, you know, to hear from them
directly what they saw in thefuture.
You know what I mean, likebecause it was going to be where
there was no government and allthat other stuff, and it was.
You know, there's everybodyliving in harmony.
You know, right, to me it'slike, well, how did how did it
(29:26):
happen?
Like, let us know?
You know, like really sit hereand show there's more
information.
get up easy to find out whatbecause, man, listen that, that
that should be where we aregetting to now, because what we
got like 2 000 years before thatyou know we get to that kind of
thing you know there wasanother, uh, philadelphia 2.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Philadelphia experiment 2, 1993.
A remake made television in2012, also titled the
philadelphia experiment.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
Let me know if you're thinking of those stories so it
says credibility of the story,says there's no horrors.
Uh sorry, historical orscientific reference to support
bleak's claims.
Many researchers consider hisstory to be a fabrication
inspired by science fiction andconspiracy theories.
There you go.
His version of the philadelphiaexperiment was not part of the
original reports or legends butemerged from later, coinciding
(30:17):
with the release of the 1984movie the philadelphia
experiment which may have beenright said.
Then he said so was he right,or is this just a discredit?
Speaker 2 (30:26):
right, that's what I'm saying.
That's why I'm playing.
You know me, I'm on both sides.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
So you know it's like you know what?
Speaker 3 (30:32):
what is it that we, these guys, even as far as ours-
but we're just gonna, we'regonna talk about it like as if
it is though, right, okay, fairenough, yeah, but no, but I know
what you mean.
Yeah, but, but I don't, I don'tmean to cut you off.
No, no, no, no, I'm sorry atthe same time when they did
freaking, all right you can'tsay that anymore.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Right, right, Exactly .
Yeah, I guess I mean because,dude, how would you not be able
to cool with that If you livedthere for a little while?
Exactly.
So then you would end upbringing somebody and I laugh
because again another movie,Demolition man and instead of
(31:10):
using toilet paper they wereusing seashells.
Right, you know what I mean.
So it's like you know, it's oneof those things.
Yeah, you know well you scrapeit all out and got it whatever.
But I don't know, man, it'sjust one of those things you
know, you I would love to beable to to.
I don't know if I want to saytime travel, you know what I
mean.
I would like to maybe go todifferent dimensions, just to
(31:31):
see how you know, just see whatit is for different dimensions
to how they live and whatthey're doing.
Speaker 3 (31:37):
Or like the, or like other dimensions that are
slightly different than thisdimension.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
Yeah, I would like to see that little bit To be like
a spectator where you're notnecessarily involved or in the
way of what's going on.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
But like?
What about?
Like ones where it's like Iwent to a dimension where, like,
the only differences is that Ihave blonde hair.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
Or I'm six foot two.
Yeah, like that's thedifference like everything's the
same.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
I'm sitting here right next to you, but I'm just
a little taller, yeah maybe Ihave.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Yeah, maybe I have hair yeah long like a long hair
like a ponytail every time hespeaks, his hair just flows in
like there's just a breeze.
He's just like ah.
Shaking his head.
I can feel it right now, yeahyes, sure, but yeah, that would
be a cool thing for me, you knownot so much yes, yes, man, yes,
that's funny as hell.
(32:28):
Cobra kai, yeah, but you know,and that's what I'm saying, dude
, that would be.
I would like that better, youknow, and if these guys had, you
know, I wish there was moreproof from them, you know what I
mean, or just that they were.
You know that there was morepublications, yeah, that there
were more publications, I'msorry, from from them, things
that we could show that it wouldbe able, that it would be
(32:50):
substantial proof.
You know, to say, yeah, wetraveled.
You know, I get it like we saidbefore.
You know, things should staysome kind of secret, but, man,
you know then, but and then thefunny, well, not the funny, but
the wild is that, yeah, youheard the what's?
Speaker 3 (33:06):
oh sorry, I'm going back and forth too.
Go ahead.
No, I was saying because on theon it says he he's also linked
to other theories too, like themontola project right, an
alleged secret program involvingtime travel, mind control and
interdimensional experienceslike you were talking about, and
then Nikola Tesla's supposedrole he claimed Nikola Tesla.
Nikola Tesla was involved inearly teleportation experiments.
Speaker 2 (33:30):
Now here's the thing too, if we all listen to some
crazy shit too man.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Well, that's the shit .
So now.
Speaker 3 (33:34):
Tesla.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
Tesla got kicked in the nuts because of the way that
he was trying to do theelectricity.
It wasn't beneficial to bigbusiness.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
He had the right idea , but I think he was going for
the Bluetooth thing is what hewas trying to do Basically.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
Yes, so then because Edison had turned around and had
it that it was going to bemonetarily feasible for big
business to run the wires, asopposed to having everything
through the air for everybody toget.
That it was going to be freethrough Tesla.
Tesla was going to give freepower to everybody.
Speaker 1 (34:13):
That's not monetarily feasible for any of the big
businesses.
Hopefully that'll be anotherthing too, where you can use
your own source of power topower your, your home or
whatever.
What do you mean?
Well, you don't have to worryabout paying someone else to
power your home, whether there'sgas, but then that's where.
Speaker 2 (34:27):
Like that, but that's where the windmill comes in,
that's where the the solarpanels come in and things like
that, because if you have themall set up and especially like
here, where you are dude, youcan literally unplug from the
grid and you can do and haveyour own power here.
You know what I mean, so it youcan already do that, you know,
and uh, but again, tesla was oneof the ones.
(34:51):
Tesla was almost like the, the,the tony, stark yeah you know
what I mean?
Speaker 3 (34:55):
back then, yeah, whatever year is there was I
don't know what years yeahwhenever, but you know he was a
tony stark you know what yeardid nikola tesla invent the
tesla coil?
Speaker 2 (35:08):
nikola tesla developed the tesla coil in 1891
1891 so think about that bro1891.
This is what this man isinventing.
So now, if in 1891 this was hisidea, you figure, five, ten
years later, wow, you know, I'msaying that this is what they're
talking about with time traveland things like that.
(35:30):
Come on, man, that's what.
You know what I'm saying?
So to me, if we?
So what?
If tesla was really from thefuture, yeah, and he was in this
, in the Manhattan Project or inthe Philadelphia Project, and
that he ended up going back thatfar?
Wow, you know what I'm saying?
Yeah, because if they're sayingthat he was a part of this,
(35:53):
da-da-da, you know what I mean.
And because, go, ahead.
Speaker 3 (35:58):
See, it got me thinking.
I'm like I thought of thisweird theory Go ahead, it's a
loophole theory, okay, wherethere's no, because someone went
back in time that there's noorigin and no one knows where
the origin came from.
So, like, get this, this wouldbe a good one of those theories.
(36:19):
Say, like a man working forTesla, right, invents time
travel, right, this guy, nikolai.
So he goes under this.
He works for Tesla, so he goesback in time and uses his name,
(36:41):
the name of the company he worksfor, to invent all this stuff
and then Elon Musk goes andinvents Tesla and it's like we
don't know where the originstarted from, because he got it
from that, but that came fromthere, and then that's like one
of those theories of I forgetwhat it's called, but it's a
time travel theory where there'sno origin of something because
a paradox is created.
It's like kind of a paradox.
I was saying I was, except theway I was telling Kenny there's,
(37:01):
I forget it's like kind of aparadox.
I was saying I was, since theway I was telling Kenny there's,
I forget.
It's like not a paradox theory.
I forget what the theory iscalled.
We could probably look it up.
But like, where someone goes intime, right, say like Tesla,
say this would be an interestingtheory because we're talking
about Nikola Tesla.
Right, Say like someone worksfor Tesla, right the car company
, and they invent time travel.
Works for tesla, right the, thecar company, and they invent
(37:22):
time travel.
And then the guy goes back intime and invents all this stuff,
but he uses the last name teslabecause it was the company's
work.
Right, he doesn't want to usehis real last name in case it
comes up.
Right?
yeah and he invents the teslacoil he's nikolai tesla, yeah,
and then the company's createdoff of his name, so where's,
where'd it come from right?
Speaker 2 (37:39):
so when did the name?
Speaker 3 (37:40):
Tesla come from.
There's no origin.
Speaker 2 (37:42):
now Exactly, it's a loophole and there's a few
things like that.
Speaker 3 (37:45):
That's a time travel loophole.
Speaker 1 (37:47):
Right, because there's a few people in history
that that applies to.
Yeah, where there's no origin,there's no origin to where those
people came from, like evenwith Merlin.
Speaker 2 (37:55):
Yeah, you know what I'm saying.
Even like, as far as like theKnights of the Round Table yes,
merlin is one of those theoriesyou know, because you never saw
where he came from, you don'tknow where he went, you don't
know what.
You know what I'm saying.
Like he's in the story but hehad these you know kind of
powers and stuff.
It was like oh, I'm just sayinglike I'm with you, brother,
that makes crazy sense.
Speaker 3 (38:16):
It's like a Paradox.
Paradox is where you mess upthe time and space continuum or
something.
What about this stuff?
Speaker 1 (38:21):
Because I was just thinking about what you guys
were saying.
Yeah, one of the most famousviral stories about a man with a
camera and travel comes fromthe 1941 photo taken reopening
the South Fork Bridge in British.
Speaker 3 (38:36):
Columbia, yes, canada .
Someone tried explaining thatin a video.
Speaker 1 (38:40):
In the image, among a crowd of people.
Speaker 3 (38:43):
He looks like a hipster.
Speaker 1 (38:44):
Dressed in a 1940s attire.
There's a man who appears to beOut of place.
Yep, he just wears what lookslike A modern Sunglass and logo
t-shirt and holds A portablecamera.
This sparked Internet theoriesthat he was a time traveler.
Speaker 2 (39:01):
Right, he wasn't like a hippie, he was just like us,
like diving out.
No, it was cool.
This is what it says.
It says the time traveling.
Speaker 1 (39:06):
Hipster Photo is what it's called.
Speaker 3 (39:08):
Oh, it was called hipster, but they had an
explanation Is that people weremorally dressed.
He looked out of place, butthey think he came right from
college.
Like he came, like he was inschool.
Oh, okay, and he was in school,oh, okay, and he was dressed
like that because he's wearing alacrosse, because it's like a
lacrosse shirt, yeah, and thesunglasses he had they say were
around that time, right, and thecamera, they think, is like a.
Speaker 2 (39:32):
Oh, the wind of that, yeah, but still it's the whole
idea.
Speaker 3 (39:35):
He looks like someone .
Right but that maybe it is atime traveler.
But maybe that's just Someonejust trying to make sense.
Speaker 2 (39:41):
Yeah, because there's a few things like that, because
there was the other one Likethe Wasn't.
There was a guy that he was.
It was the 1940s I think it was1940s, 1950s and it was the
same idea that he was like inthe background.
And they have him with what'sit called?
Oh, and what was Keanu Reeves?
Keanu Reeves.
Speaker 3 (39:58):
Yes, what about the old like?
There's a bunch of paintings ofpeople that look like Keanu
Reeves yeah, and you everrealize how Keanu Reeves doesn't
seem like he's aging at all.
No, at all.
Speaker 2 (40:06):
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 3 (40:08):
Exactly, bro.
He's like an immortal person.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
Yep, they had a few of those, man, they have a few.
There's one, I think it was one, of Tom Cruise.
There was what's his name?
Oh, jesus, married to AngelinaJolie, not Jesus, no, it wasn't
Jesus.
Brad Pitt, brad Pitt.
There's one of Brad Pitt, Ithink it was.
There was another.
There was a couple of actors.
(40:30):
There's a handful of them, yeah, but now again, it's one of
those things.
Is it that it's time travel, or?
Speaker 3 (40:36):
there, or are these people that look like?
Speaker 2 (40:37):
them?
Are these people that look like?
Speaker 3 (40:38):
them.
These people look like them.
Speaker 2 (40:39):
Or is it that they themselves are traveling in and
out of time.
Speaker 1 (40:42):
What about this Time travel caught on film Charlie
Chaplin, the Circus 1928.
Speaker 2 (40:48):
I haven't heard that one.
Speaker 1 (40:49):
A clip from a DVD extra of Charlie Chaplin's
Circus.
The Circus shows a womanwalking seemingly down,
seemingly talking on a cellphone, decades before such
technology existed.
Some speculated she was a timetraveler.
In reality, experts believe shewas likely using hearing aid
device, which was held similarlyto how we hold phones now.
Speaker 2 (41:11):
But wait a minute.
But then that was back thenCharlie Chaplin days.
Speaker 3 (41:15):
Hmm, I got an interesting theory that.
Speaker 2 (41:17):
I just came up with in my head.
Speaker 3 (41:19):
To explain the old paintings that look like
celebrities, right, right.
Can you imagine if time travelwas, did exist and like there
were people that, like they,they went to celebrities to get
money?
They were like oh, we'll get anold painting made of you in the
1600s, we'll bring you back intime.
And you got to give us like twomillion dollars and they, and
(41:40):
now there's a painting out thereof keanu reeves because he paid
two million dollars to go backin time and have someone paint
him up.
A famous artist paint him up.
Well, but then you know what?
Speaker 2 (41:50):
but then that that even with that theory it kind of
holds water because they hadthe I'm gonna tell you what I'm
saying da vinci uh, was it.
Or picasso?
They in some of their paintingsit's people that are looking up
into the sky, right, and wehave what looks to be either
like ufos or airplanes andthings like that.
(42:10):
That's the only reason why I'msaying that.
You know it looks like it.
You know that could hold waterthat theory you know what I mean
that people were actually beingbrought back into time.
You know what I'm saying.
It could be.
That's, in essence, anothershit.
I said that's how you know timetravel is real right, bro, look
what.
Look at how it is that these,that the elite, rich, yeah, the
celebrities, now they aretraveling in space, like they're
(42:31):
going up in space, and you knowthe the um uh, was it x?
And and um, what was it?
Speaker 3 (42:38):
basel, yeah, basel, basel.
Speaker 2 (42:39):
Here we go.
You know what I'm saying.
So it's like, dude, if theelite paying for that, the super
elite, can probably pay fortime travel, and that's probably
how they became so rich fromthe time travel.
Going back to what you said,that it could be that it's.
You know, musk is the one thatwent back in and there's no
where he came from, who he is,if he's really even he might be
(43:01):
the original Tesla.
Speaker 1 (43:02):
Listen to this, this is cool Andrew Carlson, supposed
time traveler who turned $800and $350 million in the stock
market, arrested by the SEC.
He allegedly claimed to be from2002-256.
No records of him exist beyondthe story which originated in
(43:25):
the satirical uh um, I'm sorrypublication.
I apologize right.
Speaker 2 (43:30):
So that then?
So that he was born in the inthe 20 and so later on.
He's not so.
He's probably born in 2040 or2030 yeah and then he comes back
in time because he said he'sfrom 2056.
You know what I'm saying.
So then he was an adult, cameback here.
That's the hot tub time machine.
Yeah, you know what I'm saying.
The dude stayed, he bought abunch of Google stuff.
Speaker 3 (43:52):
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, lugol.
Speaker 2 (43:53):
Yeah, lugol, right, yeah, and he was.
And poison, exactly, yes,exactly, that's what I'm saying,
bro.
Listen, all this stuff isamazing.
I love all this shit, man.
I think it's awesome, you knowyou should say that you didn't
go.
Yeah, I said, you know me.
Speaker 1 (44:14):
This stuff doesn't happen.
Speaker 2 (44:15):
But that was, you know, one of the other things
that I had said, and we hearpeople talking about in one of
our other shows too how it isthat in our dreams they say that
our dreams, when we see usourselves as something else,
somebody else as far as, likeyou know, I'm a rock star here,
I'm a race car driver there, I'mthe president over here, like
all these things.
(44:35):
Are you tapping into your um,other person from a different
dimension, yeah, who hasachieved those things?
You know, I'm saying, and ifthat's the case, if you know, I
said, if we're looking atinterdimensional travel, right,
you know, or it could be thatyou know, that's just what the
different timelines look likebecause of all the shit, like,
(44:56):
was it loki?
How all the different timelineshappen.
Right, that's what I'm saying.
And, dude, I keep referencingall these TV shows and movies
because that might be where thetruth is at.
You know what I mean.
But so, with that, this wasawesome.
I had fun with this shit.
I appreciate you guys.
So, thank you much.
Enjoy you guys.
Speaker 1 (45:16):
Yeah same here, bro, waiting for that Jesus like
pulling teeth and shit, so withthat love, peace and hair grease
.
Speaker 2 (45:20):
Live long and prosper .
Yeah, same here, bro.
Speaker 1 (45:21):
Sorry I'm waiting for that, jesus God, I have to
think like pulling teeth andshit.
Speaker 2 (45:23):
I don't know the fuck .
You don't like that.
So with that, love, peace andhair grease, live long and
prosper and go vegan, holla.
Hello and welcome to Colin Crawford and the Jersey
Guy Podcast.
Appreciate you guys coming,how's?
Speaker 2 (00:12):
everybody doing.
Not too shabby brother.
We're good how you doing, I'mgood yeah.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
Yeah, just chilling, man.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Yeah, it's Friday night.
Friday's just got to be.
You know what?
I wish we were in the pocket.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
So for not everybody that knows I come, I take like
an hour drive but it's all backroads so, like During the winter
, it's just sticks.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
You know what I mean.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
But now it's looking.
So it's such a scenic ride.
I enjoy it.
I actually enjoy Driving up.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Everything's blooming now, right it's so nice All the
.
You know, leaves are on thetrees All the budding Flowers.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
It's so nice.
All the you know, leaves are onthe trees, All the budding.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Flowers.
It's awesome.
You and bud, it's pretty.
Everything's budding, budding,budding, budding.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
That is funny as hell Too much.
So I'm glad everybody's good.
So let's do it.
Lou, Talk to us.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
What's today's topic?
So I was thinking like what?
For some reason, philadelphiaExperiment popped into my head.
It's a good story, right, itwas always interesting.
I remember watching the moviewhen I was a kid.
You know it was a big deal atthat time because, you know, we
were already into that kind ofstuff.
We just didn't have what theyhave now today with the movies
that make it look like super,you know, fragilistic.
(01:19):
You know what I'm saying?
Speaker 3 (01:20):
Yeah, expiatitudes, yeah right right, exactly, but
there was always this thingabout Philadelphia Experiment.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
Yeah, some information on it, right?
Speaker 2 (01:28):
now Explain what.
I'll take it, but the glassesaren't right dude.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Okay, philadelphia Experiment is an alleged
military experiment that tookplace in 1943 at the
Philadelphia Navy's shipyard.
The story claims that the USNavy attempted to make the US
Eldridge, a destroyer escort,invisible to radar using a form
of electromagnetic fieldmanipulation.
According to conspiracytheories, the experiment
resulted in unintendedconsequences such as
(01:55):
teleportation, time travel,serve, physical and
psychological effects on thecrew.
Speaker 3 (02:01):
Right.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
What.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Yeah, okay, okay, okay.
So now, if that did happen, Iwant to know the proof.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
You know what I'm saying, like I would like to see
a story to those guys who's tosay it didn't.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
No, no, I'm saying like you know, like I would like
to see, well, I guess, more.
I wonder if, because they didit that one time, they were able
to recreate.
Well, because they did it thatone time, they were able to
recreate.
Well, I'm sure they did.
And everything now is, like youknow, of course, the super
altered future that would have,should have been.
You know what I mean?
That's craziness, dude, that iscrazy.
Speaker 1 (02:34):
Let me read on a little bit more.
Go ahead.
The legend largely stems fromaccounts by Carl M Allen, also
known as Carlos Allende, whoclaimed to have witnessed an
experiment, wrote letters aboutit in the 1950s.
He claims were laterpublic-sized books, I'm sorry
such as Philadelphia ExperimentProject Invisibility 1979 by
(02:59):
Williams.
The ship was said to havevanished from Philadelphia and
reappeared in Norfolk, virginia,but before returning.
Some reports claim that crewmembers were embedded in the
ship, metals, suffered mentalbreakdowns and were left
permanently invisible.
Like the Invisible man right,yeah, wow, that's crazy, that's
nuts.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
That's crazy, yeah.
So now when they got off theship you know like they were
stuck in that other dimension.
I guess you know what I mean.
Speaker 3 (03:27):
Like that in-between thing, I wonder if people were
able to see, like thermalscanners, though Like were they
like the predator?
Were they invisible, like youdefinitely couldn't see them?
Or were they like bending light, like the predator?
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Like we could see them.
That's pretty crazy, though.
Man like the president, like wecould see that.
Speaker 3 (03:45):
That's pretty crazy, though man see that little, yeah
, like the glass, like theirglass right.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Right, that's great, yeah, because then that.
But then that would be thequestion too as far as them on
the boat, because they so ifthey were going to beat radar.
So radar is just a matter of um, how they made the ship that
the sound waves would reflectdifferently like the stealth
bomber right, exactly that, andthat's what they use now of
course.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
Right, at least we know.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
I'm sure it was working on other shit that we'd
saw, so now, and then they sayand then now, what they're using
are cameras to make somethingseem invisible.
So then they'll do like theyput cameras on one side of it
and then the TV screen, if youwill, on the opposite side.
(04:27):
This way it looks like you'relooking through, you know what
I'm saying?
And so then this so I mean, Ididn't see all of that lou, so
was it is they were doing it?
Speaker 1 (04:34):
dude, I'm having a big deal.
This movie came on.
If you watch it, man yeah, I'mgonna have to check it out
there's no credible evidencethat such experiment occurred
right of course, the unitedstates navy has repeatedly
denied the story, saying that nosuch invisibility or
teleportation experiment wasconducted.
Some researchers believe thatthe myth may have been
influenced by real projects likeProject Rainbow, a classified
(04:58):
World War II effort related toradar camouflage.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
Yeah, see, that's what I'm saying, so that then I
want to know what it was thatthey were doing.
So what I mean is, as far aslike, was it through electricity
, like electromagnetic, that'swhat they said, electromagnetic,
that it got overloaded?
You know what I'm saying that'swhat I'm saying, that's what I
would like to know.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
You mean because people got caught in the metal
and all that?
Right, yeah, they didn't knowhow to control it.
Obviously it was the first time, so they didn't know what was
going to happen.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
They were like let's see what happens we?
Speaker 1 (05:29):
put these two things together man and we just turn it
on.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Exactly Dude.
That's insane man.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
That is just so crazy , I know, oh my God, but that
fact that it supposedly traveledfrom Philly to Norfolk,
invisible, invisible.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
Yeah, invisible, but not teleported.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
No, no, invisible.
I don't know.
Does it say invisible?
Speaker 3 (05:54):
No, invisible.
No, that's what you said.
It says it vanished fromPennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
So I guess, that means invisible, invisible.
I'm going to say invisible,because then, when it came, back
.
For some reason reason, my mindgoes to teleportation.
Yeah, I don't know why, but youknow what I mean.
So it makes sense.
Because if and that's what Iwas going to say next because
teleportation, if we remember,uh, somebody, you know little
crazy funny sci-fi movies thatwe've seen when they were doing
the teleportation, right, youknow somebody from the ship down
(06:18):
to the planet that they cameback all mush because their
cells and everything was allmixed up.
So then, if it was somethinglike a teleportation and they
ended up, you said they werepart of the metal on the ship,
right?
Speaker 1 (06:39):
When they came back, phased back in.
They probably were not in syncand they wound up forming with
inside the ship itself.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
Some shit happened to them mentally.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
Exactly.
Speaker 3 (06:45):
And then the crate, but there are some types of
teleportation theories.
So, there's that kind where itbreaks it down, and then there's
the where it bends space andtime.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
Where this?
Point A and this point's here,and you just step through it,
you're just walking through adoor.
But then if that was the casewith this boat I don't think
that was the case with this boat, but this but yeah.
Speaker 3 (07:05):
But I don't think that was the case with the boat.
I think they made the shitinvisible.
They did like some fuckingRight, they did something tapped
into something too, becausePredator type shit.
Right.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
Yeah.
Or like or the ninja guy.
Yes, I forgot about that.
Metal Gear Cyber Ninja.
Yeah, so now this was in whatyear?
1943,.
I think you said so, when didthe spaceship crash at Roswell?
Oh, in the 50s.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
Escort.
Chachibite Around that time?
Speaker 3 (07:37):
yeah, when did the UFO crash in Roswell, New Mexico
?
Don't tell me he's talking tohis classes.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Kick it, michael P.
Did the ufo crash in roswell,new mexico?
Speaker 3 (07:44):
don't tell me he's talking to michael pio.
Tell me 47, 47.
Four years later, four yearslater, to hear that, yeah,
that's crazy, so now it'sawesome 47.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
So now, if they were trying to reverse engineer some
of the things that they found onthe spaceship, that did not
technology, they weren't sureexactly how it worked Right, and
then that's probably where theFUBAR came in and they ended up.
You know what they were tryingto just be invisible.
Time travel just ended uphappening.
Speaker 3 (08:14):
That's like oops.
I wonder if that audio can gothrough.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
I bet you it did.
I'm sure it did, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (08:19):
I hope our listeners do.
Yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 1 (08:21):
Just the fact that they even tried to do that, yeah
, and they phased in and out ofnot only invisibility, but
possibly time as well.
Which is Right?
Which?
Speaker 2 (08:29):
is really crazy, because they probably didn't
even know what they did to timetravel.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
They probably only had an idea.
Yeah, and it was enough forthem to go, okay let's do it.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
See, that's straight like Twilight Zone stuff for me,
bro you know what.
Speaker 3 (08:44):
I mean for them to go .
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Okay, let's do it.
See, that's straight liketwilight zone stuff for me, bro.
You know, like it's just of allthe things that you can't, you
couldn't like hold on to, andyou know what I mean to to
harness, if you will, or just tosee, and it was that time
travel, you know, and the boatis probably gone now.
You know what I mean.
Like they said then they saidthe boat was gone.
Did I read that before?
That the boat they don't evenhave the boat they don't.
(09:06):
We can't see the boat Like it'snot like on.
This place somewhere, like in amuseum or whatever, like we
can't even see the boat.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
You know what I mean.
Oh, in other words, it's not.
Yeah, I don't know, it's not acommission.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
You know what I mean.
They probably broke it down.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
You know it's hidden in the no, they recycled it, we
just built something else.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
There's something else with it because, man, you
know how crazy I would love tobe able to see that boat.
That would have been so crazy,and oh yeah yeah, it was
invisible.
I couldn't see it, I wouldn'tbe able to maybe that's why we
don't have it on display.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
You can't see it.
It's right here.
We can't even see it.
It's right here.
You think you can see it, we?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
can't see this.
Red and green glasses.
You can see anything.
Yeah, wow, yeah, but not, bro.
So imagine, oh, let's say, thatthey did end up harnessing it
and that'd be fun just making ajoke yeah like, like, can we see
the boat?
Speaker 3 (09:59):
you can't see it, they won't, let us see it but
they were, were just telling you, you can't see it.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
Right.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
They were just saying you can't see it.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
That's freaking hilarious, but yeah, so.
I mean now again, you know howmany things are there, stories
that we don't know about, Ofcourse that you know what I'm
saying.
I don't know, I guess for me,to an extent, you know there's
certain things that thegovernment shouldn't tell people
.
You know, because if that's asecret, and it's, you know well,
(10:26):
they try to.
Speaker 1 (10:27):
Sometimes it leaks out, right yeah, people who, uh,
they didn't really handle theexperiment.
Yeah, too well, there waspeople on the ship, right?
Yeah, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
They had a crew because they were invisible.
So now their voices.
There was an experiment and wewere caught in the boat.
And then you, you're thinkinglike oh my God, that's a great
story.
You can start writing it down.
You know what I mean.
You make a great flick about it.
And it was really that it wasone of the invisible guys that
was on that ship when it cameback and docked, got off the
boat and he's talking to hisfamily and shit.
(10:57):
You know, jimmy spoke to me.
Jimmy spoke to me Meanwhile'slike I'm right here, it's like
Star Trek stuff.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
Yeah, different phase Dimension, uh huh, you can see
them, but they can't see you,right yeah?
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Yeah, I'm telling you , man, that's so that then how
many times has it happened andpeople have disappeared Because
it was done On a larger scale?
You know what I mean?
Yeah, so then it's not reallythat a lot of people have quote
unquote disappeared.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Probably made it more confined, or what's the right
word I'm looking for?
Speaker 2 (11:31):
Oh yeah, yeah, I'm talking about, like by now, more
controlled Right, right, by nowthey have.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Hey, let's do this right in the middle of the ocean
?
Speaker 2 (11:37):
Yeah, but think of how many things they've done in
the past, like with nuclearweapons.
When they practice, you know,testing them out either on the
ground or on the water and then,you know, people just happen to
get caught in the way.
That's how the incredible Hulkbecame.
Oh, I got you.
You know what I'm sayingthere's a crossover, right?
Speaker 3 (11:53):
yeah, you go the super crossover, but you know,
what I'm saying.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
It's like it's one of those things like you know, the
military or you know everycountry that they could have
just done.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
Yeah, military, you know they're doing shit that we
probably don't even know about.
Speaker 2 (12:10):
I mean, think about it, the stealth bomber was what
back in the 50s and 60s thatthey were looking at, that they
were testing the idea of havingit, not actually maybe flying it
, using it as mission onmissions and stuff, but they
were looking at that technologyto make it invisible.
You know right they use the uh,what they have on it now, right
and then.
(12:31):
That was the other thing too.
Is that the way that they madethe engines on radar right, so
as it's.
So they made the engines thatyou can't hear.
It as it's coming to you whenyou hear the engines on those
airplanes when they left is whenthey left, so now it's like you
know, you don't even hear ityeah you know, you just, it's
just like right there, it's likeyo, what's that?
And you're caught in the middleof the bombs.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
You know I'm saying so, but it's so high anyway,
you're not gonna see that well,yeah, that thing is operating at
like a level of freakingaltitude where you can't be seen
.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
At the same time, listen it's it's wild man and
it's cool and super interestingbecause you know all the movies
that we've seen.
Uh, you know, they said likethe Manhattan Project and stuff
like that.
You know what was the one thatthey just did that made all that
money last year?
Um, it was one of the greatestmovies, the best movies of the
year, um, hoppenheimer.
Speaker 3 (13:23):
Oh yeah, yeah, you know I never.
You know what I'm saying.
No, I never saw it.
Yeah, I didn't get to see iteither.
I saw it.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
It was a good movie, just that, like just there are
parts of the story that I'm surehaven't been told, but just the
idea that these were governmentprojects that had happened.
They were doing some wild shit.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
They were just trying to do whatever, doing some wild
shit.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
they were just trying to do whatever, so like that's
the thing, that always makes mewonder right if they were doing
wild stuff like that right backthen, right.
Speaker 3 (13:51):
What are they doing now?
Speaker 1 (13:52):
oh, forget it.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
You don't want to know, man, I don't even want to
know, like, like, what kind ofor I don't because, I I find it
hard to believe to be like allright, we got to stop this guys
like I doubt highly that rightbut, like you know, and is this
where, like a lot of quantum,like mechanics, come in?
Oh, definitely, bro.
Yeah, like more tens of wildstuff.
Well, and think about it,brainiac shit.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
Yeah, well, even look too.
They were talking about exos,six million dollar man having
this cybernetic stuff, you know,uh, limbs and things like that
suit, you get into a whole suitor whatever.
On that now actually and theykeep making it better and better
and to do all these things.
So it's something that had beenthought about before, whether
(14:36):
it was something that somebodysaw technology.
It's better, right exactlybecause something that they saw
out of a comic book or somethingthat they thought they saw in
in a movie sci-fi, sci-fisomething comes alive.
You know exactly, and that'swhat it is many movies back to
the future.
You know, when marty parked thecar and he wanted to get um, he
had on the uh, the hazmat suit,so they thought that he was an
(14:58):
alien.
You know, when he, when hecrashed the car into the barn
and he comes out like, oh right,so you know, it's just now,
that little kid that was onthere saw it.
We're just talking, like I said, if you know, if it was real
life.
You know, somebody just sawsomething, because of this.
But he now says you know, thisis a good story, now it becomes
a story, Now one of us reads itand we're geniuses.
(15:20):
And now we're going to havethat.
I'm just saying that's where mymind goes.
And as far as military isconcerned, dude, what haven't
they done?
What haven't they tried?
I don't want to know.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
That's what I keep saying.
I don't want to know, I'm kindof nosy.
Speaker 3 (15:36):
I mean, there's some things that you probably don't
want to know Do you think theyinvented time travel, do you
think?
Speaker 1 (15:43):
they invented time travel.
I think they did I think ifthey did though I don't think
it's anything you get into Ithink it's like what you said
before, where you walk throughsomething and you teleported.
If we're living right, now.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
And if they did invent time travel, that means
they've used it already, right?
Which means, whatever they did,they did.
Yes.
Whoever used time travelbecause we're living in present
day, so I think so it affectsthe past.
What did they Possibly?
You know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
Well, right.
So then now let's think aboutthis though Time travel, if they
did it, not so much to change,let's just say regular history,
so much to change, um, let'sjust say regular history.
You know, just, you know tomake whatever technology.
You know what I mean, and theexcuse, or the whatever you want
to call it was, it was aliensthat they've given us this
(16:29):
technology.
In actuality, it was just us,right, and we, you know, travel
or military, whomever travelback and forth into time, you
know, was able to bring some ofthat stuff back to make it
happen a little faster.
And, like we spoke before inone of our other, shows how fast
technology has jumped in thelast 50 years.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Oh, and it keeps just making more and leaves some
balance.
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Dude.
It went from vinyl to cassettes, to 8-tracks, to cassettes, to
MP3, to DVDs, to the iPods.
You?
Speaker 1 (17:01):
know what.
I'm saying Like it's just allthese things, and now it's just
streaming services, and now it'sjust streaming.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
Yeah, and that's in the last 60 years.
Now it's just streaming music,Right exactly.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
So in the last 60 years we've gotten to where we
have all these things, computers, what they were and weren't
from.
You know what I'm going tomention.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
I remember I can't help it.
I had that computer.
Speaker 3 (17:20):
I'm going to digress a little bit.
I can't help it, I got to say.
I just find it interesting howwe'll get back to the main topic
.
I promise we won't sidebar toomuch but no, like how awesome it
is now to like in the.
I know a lot of musicians dostruggle, but the whole access
to having music.
People now can start findingmusic that they might not have
(17:44):
liked or more underground stuffcan become available and it's
crazy.
Even now I'm listening to allthese artists and discovering
all this music that I never hadaccess to because we only the
record companies.
This is what we're dishing outto you.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
Listen to this, listen to this, listen to this.
They still do that, but nowlike.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
A lot of people are just discovering more music and
stuff like that.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Yep, we'll change the rap.
That's technology right.
It gives everybody good freedomto to do that exactly.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
Cool time now we just listen to whatever you like or
like what you do.
You have like this crazy mix.
I love it's like your mix likeit goes from this to that, to
this, to that, when you haveyour music on.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Yeah, yeah, because I like so much, so much different
music.
Yeah, and I thank my parentsfor that because they were so
they loved so much difference.
And then whoever, and I justlove music period right, just
for piano music I think I thinkhe used piano music before.
Speaker 3 (18:37):
We have, uh, the podcast we lou has his music on
and it's just like all different, all the different stuff we're
just listening to but you'resaying about people losing
mutant money.
You know artists musicians orwhatever that's like so like you
had this uh, but it's how theymake their money.
Now you know I'm saying so now.
It's marketing.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
They have a chance to market like I started to say
before you had chance to rapper,chance to rapper didn't sign
with any music labels, he just,you know, did it on his own.
He was, you know, social mediafamous and whatnot.
Diy, yeah, diy stuff ExactlyAll day long and he promoted
himself, sold his own music theway that we have podcasts on all
these streaming services, moremoney now right, you know what
I'm saying, because now, he'sable to do music.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Exactly.
That's the other flip side.
Right are the record companiesare kind of becoming kind of
like a not needed thing, becauserecord companies make records,
right.
What do they make now, right?
Speaker 2 (19:26):
no, no one yeah uses.
It's not the same yeah so likewho are they?
They're just like banks nowright exactly for like funding
like well, yeah, yeah, they'relike yeah, that's.
Speaker 3 (19:36):
They're basically like investors.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Yes, now, that's all they are now yep, yep, and
they're still trying to get thebig money off.
You know they're trying to getthat.
You know 40 instead of the, youknow 10 and whatnot, but no,
you're right.
So then, with all that beingsaid, look at how, how it's
possible that this time travelyeah because of the philadelphia
experiment, that this is whatnow this of the Philadelphia
experiment, that this is whatnow.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
This is the conversation we're having, you
know like we just like oh my godwell, they were messing around
with it with then.
I'm sure they were doing itbefore that too, that we don't
know about it.
Right, you know so it's.
But you know, when we thinkabout all that stuff you got to
save yourself, yeah, they'rethinking about that stuff too,
because a bunch of nerds overthere working on that shit.
Speaker 2 (20:16):
Yeah, trying to make it real, yep, like you, like
you're saying so now bellic andbellic, a bell tech, but like
bellic claimed that you know heand his brother, uh duncan uh,
were crew members on the on theuss eldridge.
Now they got away.
So that then if they got awayon the other page second one so
(20:36):
now if they got away they werenever found again.
Like no, they were rightbecause they jumped off the ship
.
Speaker 1 (20:43):
Right said then but they still ended up time
traveling.
They wound up instead landingin water and they found
themselves transported throughtime vortex and ended up in the
year 2749, right.
Speaker 2 (20:54):
So now it's 800 years into the future, into the
future.
So now they're there, nowthey're bugging out and they're
talking about all the thingsthat have happened.
So then how did they get back?
Because they were phasing it inand out of time.
There you go.
So now in that time, that's atleast the idea of what was going
on.
Speaker 1 (21:12):
So now we're going to assume they told everybody they
went back to their presentRight and this is what they told
everyone and then they cameback, right.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
So then, when they came back, now it's like they
came back.
So what the theory is?
They were there for a while andthen came back, exactly so,
phasing in and out.
Quote unquote phasing in andout, but they may have.
When they came back, right,they came back with all the
knowledge from the future.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Well, whatever they saw or experienced or lived,
they may have and they came backolder.
No, they can't.
Oh, they came back.
Who they the way they were.
I don't know if they aged ornot, I don't think so I'm trying
to.
Speaker 2 (21:50):
That's what I'm saying.
I don't remember what it wasthat few minutes that they were
out there they saw all thesethings that they brought it back
, and it was in 1983 that theycame back and, like I said, look
at how fast technology jumpedin the 70s and 80s.
I love what it says though thefuture is, though, what do you
(22:10):
mean?
Speaker 3 (22:11):
He described the future of society with no
government as we know it andeverything is controlled and
AI-driven.
Can you imagine that?
Speaker 2 (22:19):
yeah, I do.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
That would be a cool society living, you know that's
something I thought about, youknow, one day, when I was
pondering right right, right,right, yeah, yeah, you know what
I'm talking about man yeah,yeah, but like man gets out of
its way, eventually they'll getto that point where they're able
to live life not with distress,right?
imagine a futuristic society,picture this right, where you
have this ai and you'd be like Iwant this house and you just ai
(22:44):
build your house, yeah, andlike the economy is just based
on contributions, like everybodyjust contributes to society,
but like there's no.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
There's no money, like they don't need to work,
but you have a job right, Ibuild your house.
Speaker 3 (22:59):
I built your own furniture, designed your own
furniture, everything you justcould design to spec, and it
fucking builds.
Yeah, and then like same thingfood, you know you can, and all
your.
Your house is always clean.
We already got that.
We already got just to sweep thefloor basically or start having
robots that just take care ofyour house, that cook for you,
that do everything Right.
Can you imagine, yeah, it'd belike and we would have time to
(23:20):
just like kind of be able tolike live life a little bit
better now because like youcould like pursue more interests
and do things because, likeeverything's being done for you.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
We'll see that and that's where the catch comes in.
Go ahead.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
You go where the catch comes in, right.
Yeah, first I think you'regoing to say the same thing I'm
going to say, but you would wantto still keep things.
I think we would get to a pointwhere they we realized that
relying on one thing all thetime and not doing other things
wasn't good for our health rightso then they found that balance
where they do both right, right, but like, even like and jobs
that like excuse are really badand require hard labor.
Speaker 3 (23:58):
You know that like we like some of the like, some of
the shit I know what peopledon't like to talk about but
like a lot of our chocolate islike fucking slave labor.
It's fucked up, yeah, but nowyou're right, excuse me sorry,
all right, bless you, thank you.
Robots, the, the, uh, the robotyou can have, just you know ai
driven robots doing all the youknow farming and all the heavy
(24:19):
hard labor that, like you knowwhat I mean, right right, well
again, though, but that and but,I'm not gonna say that it's
taking the jobs right.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
No, but it's easy to take away the jobs that like
what?
This is well, because it's notlike that we do.
Speaker 3 (24:33):
but there has to be a way to balance where, like now,
those people that do you knowthat is work for those people,
though they get paid.
Like now, they won't have jobs.
So, like you got to find, we'llsee.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
So, like for me, here's my thing, you know.
I like the idea of havingmechanical things helping
helping.
You know like people werecomplaining about having the
electric vehicles.
My thing is that now we evolveas far as what we do, so our job
before was to build the car andonly maintain this.
You know, combustion engine.
(25:04):
Now it's about now teaching thepeople who built the cars how
to build and maintain anelectric vehicle for the
hydrogen right, like, but that'sthe thing that it's now a
matter of us evolving, you know,into different things.
Cleaner energy, you know, nomatter how you try to put it,
you know or try to make it sound, but that's the thing that it's
now a matter of us evolvinginto different things.
Cleaner energy, no matter howyou try to put it or make it
sound any kind of different, weneed cleaner energy.
(25:24):
You know what I'm saying?
Absolutely.
We all are victims of what isin the air right now, what's in
our food, and such, andcontributors Right, and
contributors all at the sametime, because we're like, oh
well, my footprint isn't thatbig.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
It's still big enough to where it is.
You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
You're straight, you're, you're kind of
restricted by the times that youhave right, you got gasoline.
Mostly is the dominant thingand that's what's being used so
that then now, if we get towhere you know robots or any
kind of ai is now taking over ordoing those things?
Speaker 1 (25:53):
you know what I'm saying?
Speaker 2 (25:54):
yeah, because you got that movie with will smith the
I robot.
Oh, yeah, right so that thennow you're looking at all the
things in that movie, that'salways the hollywood version.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
Yeah, oh yeah, no, no .
Speaker 2 (26:02):
But I'm saying but it's because it's still the
thought.
You know, I'm saying it's juststill that idea.
Now we've turned around, andI'm not saying the bad part of
the movie, I'm just saying nowwe have these robots that are
doing most of our stuff for us.
You know what I'm saying?
Uh, are we gonna end upoverweight because now we don't
have to go and do those things?
Speaker 3 (26:19):
yes, I guess, to be health conscious, as people will
have to exercise right, you'llhave to do you know they would.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
It will remind you when it's time for you to
exercise.
If you got ai, it's gonna doall that for you you know I mean
it's gonna be your assistant.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
It's gonna teach you how to.
It's gonna cook for you and belike you're not going to let.
Maybe you can have it set.
Be like don't let me getoverweight, where it'll cook,
Like it'll make healthy food foryou.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
Yeah, more portion control and stuff like that.
Yeah, more control.
But you said you still have toget up and do it because they
were you know again because Ilove movies and they.
Speaker 3 (26:55):
you know, oh you know , we got a soccer game tonight.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
Right, yeah For kids.
Speaker 3 (26:59):
You know, we don't have time to cook and it makes a
meal for you.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
Right, but then, like on other nights, you make your
own meals, right, and it justyou know Well, but that's the
balance that we, but that's thebalance that we are saying, like
yo, we're going to turn around,and then that's.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
Right, that's who you want to be.
Speaker 3 (27:18):
Well then, maybe it should be up to the software
designers to tell people andinform them.
Be like, let you know that youshould be doing this yourself
most days because you are goingto get overweight and just build
Like.
Speaker 2 (27:29):
Teach people, yeah, but I mean, I get it and I hear
that you do it to your own Right.
You can do it now, right.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
You do it to your own stream.
You can do it now, right.
We still have devices that weuse now that we monitor no but
the.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
AI will be telling you because they're going to be
talking to you.
Speaker 1 (27:41):
Only because you want it to right.
I would imagine you're the onewho's directing it.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
It's the same way you talk to JVC.
Speaker 3 (27:46):
You have C3PO in your house all the time.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Right, exactly, he's like sorry sir, but I cannot
cook for yourself because youare getting fat.
Sorry, sir, but I must tell youyou are getting fat.
Yes, it is against myprogramming.
I cannot cook.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
How would you say, sir fat bastard?
Speaker 2 (28:04):
wow, dude I think of awesome powers but yeah but you
know, but.
But again you know me with mymovie stuff.
There was that movie wally uhcartoon and they were showing
the robots doing everything andthe people were sitting in like
these hover chairs oh, and theywere fat, and they were fat,
they're all overweight.
(28:24):
Everybody on there wasoverweight.
Speaker 3 (28:26):
They kept throwing them the whatever and they went
to space because they pollutedthe land because they polluted.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
They had that one robot on the land, wally wally,
who was crushing that all upright and making up, and then he
found the flower, because, yeah, because Eve yeah she was one
of the robots from the space Eva.
Speaker 2 (28:43):
Yeah, she came through and she was from the
spaceship, yeah, you know, anddoing that stuff.
And then on the spaceship, thecomputer, the robot that was up
there helping the captain, he,you know, ended up like no, no,
no, we want to stay here becausewe don't want these people to
take care of themselves, becausewe're taking care of them right
, right to live and doeverything.
So the machine was making you aslave, exactly for the most
(29:05):
part, you know what I mean.
Like I said, that's why I wouldlove to be able, would have been
able to speak to these guys tosee, you know, to hear from them
directly what they saw in thefuture.
You know what I mean, likebecause it was going to be where
there was no government and allthat other stuff, and it was.
You know, there's everybodyliving in harmony.
You know, right, to me it'slike, well, how did how did it
(29:26):
happen?
Like, let us know?
You know, like really sit hereand show there's more
information.
get up easy to find out whatbecause, man, listen that, that
that should be where we aregetting to now, because what we
got like 2 000 years before thatyou know we get to that kind of
thing you know there wasanother, uh, philadelphia 2.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Philadelphia experiment 2, 1993.
A remake made television in2012, also titled the
philadelphia experiment.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
Let me know if you're thinking of those stories so it
says credibility of the story,says there's no horrors.
Uh sorry, historical orscientific reference to support
bleak's claims.
Many researchers consider hisstory to be a fabrication
inspired by science fiction andconspiracy theories.
There you go.
His version of the philadelphiaexperiment was not part of the
original reports or legends butemerged from later, coinciding
(30:17):
with the release of the 1984movie the philadelphia
experiment which may have beenright said.
Then he said so was he right,or is this just a discredit?
Speaker 2 (30:26):
right, that's what I'm saying.
That's why I'm playing.
You know me, I'm on both sides.
Speaker 1 (30:30):
So you know it's like you know what?
Speaker 3 (30:32):
what is it that we, these guys, even as far as ours-
but we're just gonna, we'regonna talk about it like as if
it is though, right, okay, fairenough, yeah, but no, but I know
what you mean.
Yeah, but, but I don't, I don'tmean to cut you off.
No, no, no, no, I'm sorry atthe same time when they did
freaking, all right you can'tsay that anymore.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Right, right, Exactly .
Yeah, I guess I mean because,dude, how would you not be able
to cool with that If you livedthere for a little while?
Exactly.
So then you would end upbringing somebody and I laugh
because again another movie,Demolition man and instead of
(31:10):
using toilet paper they wereusing seashells.
Right, you know what I mean.
So it's like you know, it's oneof those things.
Yeah, you know well you scrapeit all out and got it whatever.
But I don't know, man, it'sjust one of those things you
know, you I would love to beable to to.
I don't know if I want to saytime travel, you know what I
mean.
I would like to maybe go todifferent dimensions, just to
(31:31):
see how you know, just see whatit is for different dimensions
to how they live and whatthey're doing.
Speaker 3 (31:37):
Or like the, or like other dimensions that are
slightly different than thisdimension.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
Yeah, I would like to see that little bit To be like
a spectator where you're notnecessarily involved or in the
way of what's going on.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
But like?
What about?
Like ones where it's like Iwent to a dimension where, like,
the only differences is that Ihave blonde hair.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
Or I'm six foot two.
Yeah, like that's thedifference like everything's the
same.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
I'm sitting here right next to you, but I'm just
a little taller, yeah maybe Ihave.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
Yeah, maybe I have hair yeah long like a long hair
like a ponytail every time hespeaks, his hair just flows in
like there's just a breeze.
He's just like ah.
Shaking his head.
I can feel it right now, yeahyes, sure, but yeah, that would
be a cool thing for me, you knownot so much yes, yes, man, yes,
that's funny as hell.
(32:28):
Cobra kai, yeah, but you know,and that's what I'm saying, dude
, that would be.
I would like that better, youknow, and if these guys had, you
know, I wish there was moreproof from them, you know what I
mean, or just that they were.
You know that there was morepublications, yeah, that there
were more publications, I'msorry, from from them, things
that we could show that it wouldbe able, that it would be
(32:50):
substantial proof.
You know, to say, yeah, wetraveled.
You know, I get it like we saidbefore.
You know, things should staysome kind of secret, but, man,
you know then, but and then thefunny, well, not the funny, but
the wild is that, yeah, youheard the what's?
Speaker 3 (33:06):
oh sorry, I'm going back and forth too.
Go ahead.
No, I was saying because on theon it says he he's also linked
to other theories too, like themontola project right, an
alleged secret program involvingtime travel, mind control and
interdimensional experienceslike you were talking about, and
then Nikola Tesla's supposedrole he claimed Nikola Tesla.
Nikola Tesla was involved inearly teleportation experiments.
Speaker 2 (33:30):
Now here's the thing too, if we all listen to some
crazy shit too man.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Well, that's the shit .
So now.
Speaker 3 (33:34):
Tesla.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
Tesla got kicked in the nuts because of the way that
he was trying to do theelectricity.
It wasn't beneficial to bigbusiness.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
He had the right idea , but I think he was going for
the Bluetooth thing is what hewas trying to do Basically.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
Yes, so then because Edison had turned around and had
it that it was going to bemonetarily feasible for big
business to run the wires, asopposed to having everything
through the air for everybody toget.
That it was going to be freethrough Tesla.
Tesla was going to give freepower to everybody.
Speaker 1 (34:13):
That's not monetarily feasible for any of the big
businesses.
Hopefully that'll be anotherthing too, where you can use
your own source of power topower your, your home or
whatever.
What do you mean?
Well, you don't have to worryabout paying someone else to
power your home, whether there'sgas, but then that's where.
Speaker 2 (34:27):
Like that, but that's where the windmill comes in,
that's where the the solarpanels come in and things like
that, because if you have themall set up and especially like
here, where you are dude, youcan literally unplug from the
grid and you can do and haveyour own power here.
You know what I mean, so it youcan already do that, you know,
and uh, but again, tesla was oneof the ones.
(34:51):
Tesla was almost like the, the,the tony, stark yeah you know
what I mean?
Speaker 3 (34:55):
back then, yeah, whatever year is there was I
don't know what years yeahwhenever, but you know he was a
tony stark you know what yeardid nikola tesla invent the
tesla coil?
Speaker 2 (35:08):
nikola tesla developed the tesla coil in 1891
1891 so think about that bro1891.
This is what this man isinventing.
So now, if in 1891 this was hisidea, you figure, five, ten
years later, wow, you know, I'msaying that this is what they're
talking about with time traveland things like that.
(35:30):
Come on, man, that's what.
You know what I'm saying?
So to me, if we?
So what?
If tesla was really from thefuture, yeah, and he was in this
, in the Manhattan Project or inthe Philadelphia Project, and
that he ended up going back thatfar?
Wow, you know what I'm saying?
Yeah, because if they're sayingthat he was a part of this,
(35:53):
da-da-da, you know what I mean.
And because, go, ahead.
Speaker 3 (35:58):
See, it got me thinking.
I'm like I thought of thisweird theory Go ahead, it's a
loophole theory, okay, wherethere's no, because someone went
back in time that there's noorigin and no one knows where
the origin came from.
So, like, get this, this wouldbe a good one of those theories.
(36:19):
Say, like a man working forTesla, right, invents time
travel, right, this guy, nikolai.
So he goes under this.
He works for Tesla, so he goesback in time and uses his name,
(36:41):
the name of the company he worksfor, to invent all this stuff
and then Elon Musk goes andinvents Tesla and it's like we
don't know where the originstarted from, because he got it
from that, but that came fromthere, and then that's like one
of those theories of I forgetwhat it's called, but it's a
time travel theory where there'sno origin of something because
a paradox is created.
It's like kind of a paradox.
I was saying I was, except theway I was telling Kenny there's,
(37:01):
I forget it's like kind of aparadox.
I was saying I was, since theway I was telling Kenny there's,
I forget.
It's like not a paradox theory.
I forget what the theory iscalled.
We could probably look it up.
But like, where someone goes intime, right, say like Tesla,
say this would be an interestingtheory because we're talking
about Nikola Tesla.
Right, Say like someone worksfor Tesla, right the car company
, and they invent time travel.
Works for tesla, right the, thecar company, and they invent
(37:22):
time travel.
And then the guy goes back intime and invents all this stuff,
but he uses the last name teslabecause it was the company's
work.
Right, he doesn't want to usehis real last name in case it
comes up.
Right?
yeah and he invents the teslacoil he's nikolai tesla, yeah,
and then the company's createdoff of his name, so where's,
where'd it come from right?
Speaker 2 (37:39):
so when did the name?
Speaker 3 (37:40):
Tesla come from.
There's no origin.
Speaker 2 (37:42):
now Exactly, it's a loophole and there's a few
things like that.
Speaker 3 (37:45):
That's a time travel loophole.
Speaker 1 (37:47):
Right, because there's a few people in history
that that applies to.
Yeah, where there's no origin,there's no origin to where those
people came from, like evenwith Merlin.
Speaker 2 (37:55):
Yeah, you know what I'm saying.
Even like, as far as like theKnights of the Round Table yes,
merlin is one of those theoriesyou know, because you never saw
where he came from, you don'tknow where he went, you don't
know what.
You know what I'm saying.
Like he's in the story but hehad these you know kind of
powers and stuff.
It was like oh, I'm just sayinglike I'm with you, brother,
that makes crazy sense.
Speaker 3 (38:16):
It's like a Paradox.
Paradox is where you mess upthe time and space continuum or
something.
What about this stuff?
Speaker 1 (38:21):
Because I was just thinking about what you guys
were saying.
Yeah, one of the most famousviral stories about a man with a
camera and travel comes fromthe 1941 photo taken reopening
the South Fork Bridge in British.
Speaker 3 (38:36):
Columbia, yes, canada .
Someone tried explaining thatin a video.
Speaker 1 (38:40):
In the image, among a crowd of people.
Speaker 3 (38:43):
He looks like a hipster.
Speaker 1 (38:44):
Dressed in a 1940s attire.
There's a man who appears to beOut of place.
Yep, he just wears what lookslike A modern Sunglass and logo
t-shirt and holds A portablecamera.
This sparked Internet theoriesthat he was a time traveler.
Speaker 2 (39:01):
Right, he wasn't like a hippie, he was just like us,
like diving out.
No, it was cool.
This is what it says.
It says the time traveling.
Speaker 1 (39:06):
Hipster Photo is what it's called.
Speaker 3 (39:08):
Oh, it was called hipster, but they had an
explanation Is that people weremorally dressed.
He looked out of place, butthey think he came right from
college.
Like he came, like he was inschool.
Oh, okay, and he was in school,oh, okay, and he was dressed
like that because he's wearing alacrosse, because it's like a
lacrosse shirt, yeah, and thesunglasses he had they say were
around that time, right, and thecamera, they think, is like a.
Speaker 2 (39:32):
Oh, the wind of that, yeah, but still it's the whole
idea.
Speaker 3 (39:35):
He looks like someone .
Right but that maybe it is atime traveler.
But maybe that's just Someonejust trying to make sense.
Speaker 2 (39:41):
Yeah, because there's a few things like that, because
there was the other one Likethe Wasn't.
There was a guy that he was.
It was the 1940s I think it was1940s, 1950s and it was the
same idea that he was like inthe background.
And they have him with what'sit called?
Oh, and what was Keanu Reeves?
Keanu Reeves.
Speaker 3 (39:58):
Yes, what about the old like?
There's a bunch of paintings ofpeople that look like Keanu
Reeves yeah, and you everrealize how Keanu Reeves doesn't
seem like he's aging at all.
No, at all.
Speaker 2 (40:06):
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 3 (40:08):
Exactly, bro.
He's like an immortal person.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
Yep, they had a few of those, man, they have a few.
There's one, I think it was one, of Tom Cruise.
There was what's his name?
Oh, jesus, married to AngelinaJolie, not Jesus, no, it wasn't
Jesus.
Brad Pitt, brad Pitt.
There's one of Brad Pitt, Ithink it was.
There was another.
There was a couple of actors.
(40:30):
There's a handful of them, yeah, but now again, it's one of
those things.
Is it that it's time travel, or?
Speaker 3 (40:36):
there, or are these people that look like?
Speaker 2 (40:37):
them?
Are these people that look like?
Speaker 3 (40:38):
them.
These people look like them.
Speaker 2 (40:39):
Or is it that they themselves are traveling in and
out of time.
Speaker 1 (40:42):
What about this Time travel caught on film Charlie
Chaplin, the Circus 1928.
Speaker 2 (40:48):
I haven't heard that one.
Speaker 1 (40:49):
A clip from a DVD extra of Charlie Chaplin's
Circus.
The Circus shows a womanwalking seemingly down,
seemingly talking on a cellphone, decades before such
technology existed.
Some speculated she was a timetraveler.
In reality, experts believe shewas likely using hearing aid
device, which was held similarlyto how we hold phones now.
Speaker 2 (41:11):
But wait a minute.
But then that was back thenCharlie Chaplin days.
Speaker 3 (41:15):
Hmm, I got an interesting theory that.
Speaker 2 (41:17):
I just came up with in my head.
Speaker 3 (41:19):
To explain the old paintings that look like
celebrities, right, right.
Can you imagine if time travelwas, did exist and like there
were people that, like they,they went to celebrities to get
money?
They were like oh, we'll get anold painting made of you in the
1600s, we'll bring you back intime.
And you got to give us like twomillion dollars and they, and
(41:40):
now there's a painting out thereof keanu reeves because he paid
two million dollars to go backin time and have someone paint
him up.
A famous artist paint him up.
Well, but then you know what?
Speaker 2 (41:50):
but then that that even with that theory it kind of
holds water because they hadthe I'm gonna tell you what I'm
saying da vinci uh, was it.
Or picasso?
They in some of their paintingsit's people that are looking up
into the sky, right, and wehave what looks to be either
like ufos or airplanes andthings like that.
(42:10):
That's the only reason why I'msaying that.
You know it looks like it.
You know that could hold waterthat theory you know what I mean
that people were actually beingbrought back into time.
You know what I'm saying.
It could be.
That's, in essence, anothershit.
I said that's how you know timetravel is real right, bro, look
what.
Look at how it is that these,that the elite, rich, yeah, the
celebrities, now they aretraveling in space, like they're
(42:31):
going up in space, and you knowthe the um uh, was it x?
And and um, what was it?
Speaker 3 (42:38):
basel, yeah, basel, basel.
Speaker 2 (42:39):
Here we go.
You know what I'm saying.
So it's like, dude, if theelite paying for that, the super
elite, can probably pay fortime travel, and that's probably
how they became so rich fromthe time travel.
Going back to what you said,that it could be that it's.
You know, musk is the one thatwent back in and there's no
where he came from, who he is,if he's really even he might be
(43:01):
the original Tesla.
Speaker 1 (43:02):
Listen to this, this is cool Andrew Carlson, supposed
time traveler who turned $800and $350 million in the stock
market, arrested by the SEC.
He allegedly claimed to be from2002-256.
No records of him exist beyondthe story which originated in
(43:25):
the satirical uh um, I'm sorrypublication.
I apologize right.
Speaker 2 (43:30):
So that then?
So that he was born in the inthe 20 and so later on.
He's not so.
He's probably born in 2040 or2030 yeah and then he comes back
in time because he said he'sfrom 2056.
You know what I'm saying.
So then he was an adult, cameback here.
That's the hot tub time machine.
Yeah, you know what I'm saying.
The dude stayed, he bought abunch of Google stuff.
Speaker 3 (43:52):
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, lugol.
Speaker 2 (43:53):
Yeah, lugol, right, yeah, and he was.
And poison, exactly, yes,exactly, that's what I'm saying,
bro.
Listen, all this stuff isamazing.
I love all this shit, man.
I think it's awesome, you knowyou should say that you didn't
go.
Yeah, I said, you know me.
Speaker 1 (44:14):
This stuff doesn't happen.
Speaker 2 (44:15):
But that was, you know, one of the other things
that I had said, and we hearpeople talking about in one of
our other shows too how it isthat in our dreams they say that
our dreams, when we see usourselves as something else,
somebody else as far as, likeyou know, I'm a rock star here,
I'm a race car driver there, I'mthe president over here, like
all these things.
(44:35):
Are you tapping into your um,other person from a different
dimension, yeah, who hasachieved those things?
You know, I'm saying, and ifthat's the case, if you know, I
said, if we're looking atinterdimensional travel, right,
you know, or it could be thatyou know, that's just what the
different timelines look likebecause of all the shit, like,
(44:56):
was it loki?
How all the different timelineshappen.
Right, that's what I'm saying.
And, dude, I keep referencingall these TV shows and movies
because that might be where thetruth is at.
You know what I mean.
But so, with that, this wasawesome.
I had fun with this shit.
I appreciate you guys.
So, thank you much.
Enjoy you guys.
Speaker 1 (45:16):
Yeah same here, bro, waiting for that Jesus like
pulling teeth and shit, so withthat love, peace and hair grease
.
Speaker 2 (45:20):
Live long and prosper .
Yeah, same here, bro.
Speaker 1 (45:21):
Sorry I'm waiting for that, jesus God, I have to
think like pulling teeth andshit.
Speaker 2 (45:23):
I don't know the fuck .
You don't like that.
So with that, love, peace andhair grease, live long and
prosper and go vegan, holla.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!