September 9, 2024 • 28 mins
What if the secrets buried within a seemingly perfect marriage could unravel everything you thought you knew about justice and truth? In this episode, we dissect the case of Kathleen Peterson's death and the tumultuous trial of her husband, Michael Peterson. On a cold December night in 2001, Michael's frantic 911 call marked the beginning of a story filled with hidden truths, unexpected revelations, and a legal battle that would shock the nation. Step into the lives of Michael and Kathleen, as their idyllic existence in Durham, North Carolina, is shattered, exposing secrets that would fuel media frenzy and public intrigue. Journey with us through the labyrinth of legal proceedings. We reflect on the broader implications for forensic science, media influence, and the justice system, while acknowledging the enduring pain experienced by the Peterson family. This episode promises not only an engrossing recount of events but also a provocative examination of the human cost behind one of the most talked-about cases in recent history. For further exploration, we recommend watching "The Staircase" and reading Michael Peterson's "Behind the Staircase" as well as Diane Fanning's "Written in Blood." Don't miss exclusive content and updates on our website and social media channels.
Paris Rhône
Paris Rhône main products include household items, polishers, and coffee grinders.
Babbily
10% Off Month 1 with promo code dark10
Please send cases you want covered or stories you want read on the podcast to darkcrossroadspodcast@gmail.com. Don't forget to like, share, rate, review, and subscribe wherever you're listening to us. You can subscribe through the link in the episode notes to receive bonus content, discounts on future merchandise, and other extras.
Be Weird. Stay Different. Don't Trust Anyone!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Welcome to Dark Crossroads Podcast, hosted by
Roxanne Fletcher.
This is your stop for allthings true crime and paranormal
.
From the infamous story of theNew Bedford Highway Killer to
the chilling tale of the BlackEyed Children, dark Crossroads
Podcast is a truly deep diveinto the stories that frighten
and fascinate you All links tothe show will be provided in
(01:32):
this episode's description, anddon't forget to let us know what
you think of today's episode.
Hello to my fellowcrime-obsessed weirdos, this
podcast is a mixture ofparanormal, true crime, scary,
(01:53):
spooky and sometimes theunexplained.
But today we are meticulouslydissecting one of the most
baffling and controversialcriminal cases in recent history
.
Today we are going to be divingdeep into a case that has
captivated the publicimagination for over two decades
now the death of KathleenPeterson and the subsequent
(02:14):
trial of her husband, michaelPeterson.
On a chilly December night in2001, in the affluent Forest
Hills neighborhood of Durham,north Carolina, a frantic 911
call shattered the quiet ofDurham, north Carolina.
A frantic 911 call shatteredthe quiet.
Michael Peterson, a locallyknown novelist and aspiring
politician, reported finding hiswife, kathleen, unconscious and
(02:37):
bleeding at the bottom of astaircase in their sprawling
mansion.
What followed was a labyrinthseries of events that would span
over a time of years, involvingaccusations of murder,
revelations of hiddensexualities, international
connections to anothersuspicious staircase death and
even a theory involving an owlattacking somebody.
(02:57):
This case would eventuallybecome the subject of the
critically acclaimed documentaryseries titled the Staircase,
bringing it into the spotlightof true crime enthusiasts
worldwide.
But to truly understand thiscase we need to go back to the
very beginning.
Who were Michael and KathleenPeterson?
(03:20):
Michael Ivor Peterson was bornon October 23rd of 1943 in
Nashville, tennessee.
He grew up in a very militaryfamily, moving frequently before
settling in Nashville,tennessee.
He grew up in a very militaryfamily, moving frequently,
before settling in Durham, northCarolina.
Michael attended DukeUniversity where he had
graduated in 1965 with apolitical science degree.
After college, like many youngmen in his generation, peterson
(03:43):
enlisted in the Marine Corps andserved in the Vietnam War.
His time in Vietnam would laterbecome a point of controversy.
Michael had claimed to havereceived a Purple Heart and a
Silver Star for his service, butinvestigations during his
murder trial revealed that theseitems were false.
This revelation would castdoubt on Michael's character and
(04:03):
his credibility.
After his military service,michael pursued a career as a
novelist.
He penned several books,including the Immortal Dragon, a
Time of War and A Bitter Peace.
These novels, largely based onhis experience in Vietnam,
achieved moderate success.
In addition to his writingcareer, michael also worked as a
(04:23):
newspaper columnist for theDurham Herald Sun and dabbled in
local politics, runningunsuccessfully for mayor of
Durham in 1999.
Kathleen Hunt Atwater Petersonwas born on February 21st of
1953.
She had a very differentbackground from Michael.
She was a successfulbusinesswoman known for her
(04:44):
intelligence and dedication toher family and her career.
Kathleen graduated from DukeUniversity in 1973 with a degree
in engineering and later earnedan MBA from Duke's School of
Business.
By 2001, kathleen had risen toan executive position at Nordle
Networks, a telecommunicationscompany.
(05:05):
She was highly regarded in herfield and was known to be a
perfectionist in both herprofessional and personal life.
Friends and family describedher as energetic, meticulous and
deeply committed to her lovedones.
Michael and Kathleen's pathscrossed in 1986, and they
eventually got married in 1997.
It was a second marriage forboth of them and they created a
(05:27):
blended family with theirchildren from previous
relationships.
Michael had two sons, claytonand Todd, from his first
marriage and had adopted twogirls, margaret and Martha
Ratliff, after their mother,elizabeth Ratliff, a family
friend died in Germany in 1985.
Kathleen had one daughter,caitlin, from her first marriage
.
The Peterson family seemed toembody the American dream.
(05:49):
They lived in a beautiful 9,000square foot home in Durham's
prestigious Forest Hillsneighborhood.
By all accounts, michael andKathleen appeared to have a
loving relationship.
They were well respected intheir community and known for
hosting dinner parties andactively participating in local
cultural events dinner partiesand actively participating in
local cultural events.
(06:10):
But, as many would soondiscover, beneath this veneer of
suburban perfection lay a webof secrets and complexities that
would come to light in the mosttragic of circumstances.
Now it is time to turn ourattention to the night that
changed everything, december 9thof 2001.
It was a Sunday night,typically being a quiet time in
(06:34):
the Peterson household.
According to Michael Peterson'saccount, he and Kathleen had
spent a very pleasant eveningtogether.
They had some wine by the pool,watched a movie and Kathleen
had gone to bed around 11pmwhile Michael decided to stay up
to read emails and do a littlebit of extra work on his
computer.
At 2.40 am on December 10th,the Durham 911 dispatch received
(06:57):
a call from a distressedMichael Peterson.
This is an excerpt from thatcall.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
I don't know.
Please get somebody here rightaway, please.
Somebody is dispatching theambulance while I ask you
questions.
It's also in Forest Hills, okay, please, please, sir, somebody
else is dispatching theambulance.
Okay, is she awake now?
Hello, hello, hello, hello,hello, hello.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
The call lasted for about six minutes, during which
Peterson alternated betweenspeaking to the operator and
apparently trying to perform CPRon Kathleen.
When first responders arrivedat the scene, they found a
chaotic and bloody scene.
Kathleen Peterson's body waslaying at the bottom of a narrow
back staircase.
(08:15):
The amount of blood at thescene was immediately striking
to the responding officers andthe paramedics.
Blood spatter extended high upthe walls of the staircase and
pooled around Kathleen's body.
She was wearing a sweatshirtand sweatpants, both heavily
saturated with blood.
Michael Peterson was alsocovered in blood and appeared to
(08:35):
be distraught.
He told the police that he hadbeen sitting by the pool and
came in to find Kathleen at thebottom of the staircase.
He surmised that she must havefallen after consuming wine and
thallium earlier in the evening.
Paramedics quickly determinedthat Kathleen was beyond any
help.
She was pronounced dead at thescene.
The initial impression of manyfirst responders was that this
(08:57):
was a tragic accident.
However, as crime sceneinvestigators began their work,
several elements of the sceneraised red flags.
First and foremost was thesheer amount of blood.
It seemed excessive for asimple fall down the stairs.
The blood spatter patterns onthe wall were particularly
concerning, extending muchhigher than one would expect
(09:18):
from a fall.
Secondly, kathleen's injurieswere very severe and somewhat
unusual for a fall victim.
She had deep lacerations to theback of her head, and the
medical examiner would laternote seven distinct lacerations,
some of which had theappearance of being inflicted by
a weapon rather than an impactwith stairs or the floor.
(09:40):
As dawn broke on December 10thof 2001, what had started as a
presumed tragic accident wasquickly evolving into a
potential homicide investigation.
Michael Peterson suddenly foundhimself at the center of a
storm that would consume thenext two decades of his life.
In the days followingKathleen's death, the
(10:01):
investigation intensified.
The Durham Police Departmentassigned some of their most
experienced detectives to thecase.
Art Holland, a veterandetectives to the case.
Art Holland, a veteraninvestigator, took the lead.
One of the first steps in anypotential homicide investigation
is to take a closer look atthose closest to the victim.
In this case, that meantMichael Peterson.
As detectives dug into thePetersons' life, they began to
(10:23):
uncover information that casts alot of doubt on the image of a
perfect marriage.
Financial records showed that,despite their outward appearance
of wealth, the Petersons werestruggling with debt.
Kathleen's life insurancepolicy, being worth $1.4 million
, suddenly became a veryimportant point of interest.
The question weighing oneverybody's mind is could
(10:45):
financial stress have been amotive for murder?
But perhaps the most shockingrevelation came when
investigators examined MichaelPeterson's computer.
They discovered emailsrevealing that Michael had been
engaging in homosexual affairsand had an extensive collection
of gay pornography.
This discovery would become acornerstone of the prosecution's
(11:08):
case, suggesting a potentialmotive for murder being Kathleen
had discovered Michael's secretlife, leading to a
confrontation that ended in herdeath.
Meanwhile the forensicinvestigation was in full swing.
The North Carolina State Bureauof Investigation, or the SBI,
was called in to assist with theanalysis of the crime scene.
(11:28):
Blood spatter expert DwayneDeaver, whose testimony would
later become a point of majorcontroversy, examined the scene.
Dwayne's analysis suggestedthat the blood spatter patterns
were more consistent with abeating than a fall.
The medical examiner's reportcompleted that.
Dr Deborah Radish classifiedKathleen's death as a homicide.
The report cited the number andnature of the lacerations on
(11:52):
Kathleen's scalp, the lack ofskull fractures typically seen
in a fall, and other injuries,including a fracture to the
thyroid cartilage, which themedical examiner could indicate
was because of strangulation.
On December 20th of 2001, just11 days after Kathleen's death,
michael Peterson was arrestedand was officially charged with
(12:12):
first-degree murder.
The arrest sent shockwavesthrough Durham.
The Petersons were well-knownin this community and the idea
that Michael could have murderedKathleen seemed inconceivable
to many who knew them.
However, as more details of thecase became, public opinion
began to divide.
In the months leading up to thetrial, both the prosecution and
(12:32):
defense teams worked tirelesslyto build their cases.
District Attorney Jim Hardenand Assistant DA Frida Black led
the prosecution, while MichaelPeterson hired high-profile
defense attorney David Rudolph.
The trial began on July 1st of2003 and would last for three
months, becoming one of thelongest trials in North Carolina
(12:55):
history.
The following will be abreakdown of some of the key
elements of the prosecution anddefense's cases.
The prosecution's case centeredaround several key points, the
first one being the bloodevidence.
They argued that the amount andpattern of blood at the scene
was inconsistent with the fall.
Dwayne Deaver testified thatthe blood splatter indicated
(13:16):
Kathleen had been hit at leastfour times with an object.
The second one being Kathleen'sinjuries.
The prosecution emphasized theseverity and nature of
Kathleen's head wounds, arguingthey were more consistent with
being beaten than by falling.
The third one being the missingmurder weapon.
The prosecution suggested thata blow poke, a hollow fireplace
(13:37):
tool given to the Petersons as agift, could have been the
murder weapon.
This blow poke wasconspicuously missing from the
Petersons' home.
Number four being Michael'sbisexuality and his affairs.
The prosecution painted apicture of a marriage in crisis,
suggesting that Kathleen haddiscovered his affairs with men,
(13:57):
leading to a confrontation andresulting in her murder.
The fifth key point was thefinancial motive.
They pointed to the Petersons'death and Kathleen's life
insurance policy as potentialmotives for murder.
The sixth point was Michael'sbehavior.
The prosecution questionedaspects of Michael's behavior on
the night of Kathleen's deathand in the aftermath, suggesting
(14:20):
it was inconsistent withgenuine grief.
The defense, being led by DavidRudolph, countered with their
own narrative.
Their key points were, thefirst one being accident theory.
They maintained that Kathleen'sdeath was a tragic accident,
the result of a fall exacerbatedby the alcohol and valium in
her system.
(14:41):
Brought in their own expertswho testified that the blood
spatter evidence was consistentwith a fall and that
prosecution's interpretation wasflawed.
The third is relationshipstability.
They argued that Michael andKathleen had a loving
relationship and that Kathleenwas aware and accepting of
(15:01):
Michael's bisexuality.
Number four was no evidence ofa motive.
The defense pointed out thatthere was no history of domestic
motive.
The defense pointed out thatthere was no history of domestic
violence between Michael andKathleen and that their
financial issues were not severeenough to motivate murder.
The fifth key point was amissing weapon.
They highlighted that no murderweapon was ever found and that
(15:21):
the prosecution's theory aboutthe blow poke was speculative at
best.
One of the most dramaticmoments of the trial came when
the defense produced the missingblowpoke.
It had been found in thePeterson's garage, covered in
cobwebs and undamaged, seeminglyruling it out as the murder
weapon.
The trial was not just a legalproceeding.
(15:42):
It became a media sensation.
Court TV broadcasted this triallive and it garnered national
attention.
The presence of a Frenchdocumentary crew filming what
would become the series, theStaircase, added another layer
of scrutiny to the proceedings.
As the trial progressed, analternative theory began to
(16:03):
circulate, one so unusual thatit would capture public
imagination and add yet anotherlayer of complexity to an
already bizarre case.
This was the infamous owltheory.
The owl theory was notpresented at the original trial
but was developed later byattorney T Lawrence Pollard, who
(16:26):
was a neighbor of the Petersons.
The theory suggested thatKathleen was attacked outside
her home by a barred owl, aspecies common in North Carolina
and known for its aggressiveterritorial behavior.
According to this theory, theowl's talons could have
inflicted the lacerations onKathleen's scalp.
Disoriented and bleeding fromthe attack, kathleen could have
(16:47):
stumbled inside and fell downthe stairs, explaining both her
head injuries and the fall.
While this might soundfar-fetched, proponents of this
theory point to several piecesof evidence, the first being
microscopic owl feathers wereallegedly found in a clump of
Kathleen's hair that wasclutched in her hand.
The second is the lacerationson Kathleen's scalp were tri-lo
(17:11):
the house on the front walkway.
And the fourth was there havebeen documented owl attacks on
humans.
In this area, the owl theory,while never presented in court,
has become a subject offascination for many following
this case.
It represents the kind ofoutlandish yet not entirely
(17:35):
implausible alternativeexplanation that often emerges
in complex criminal cases.
After three months of testimony,mountains of evidence and
intense media scrutiny, thiscase went to the jury On October
10th of 2003,.
After 14 hours of deliberation,the jury returned with their
verdict.
Michael Peterson was foundguilty of first-degree murder.
(17:58):
He was sentenced to life inprison without the possibility
of parole.
This verdict was a crushingblow to Michael and his
supporters, who had maintainedhis innocence throughout the
entire trial.
However, this was far from theend of the story.
In the years following hisconviction, michael Peterson's
case would take severalunexpected turns, keeping it in
(18:20):
the public eye and raisingquestions about the nature of
justice and the reliability offorensic evidence.
The first major developmentcame in 2011, when it came to
light that Dwayne Deaver, theblood splatter analysis who had
been a key prosecution witness,had falsely represented his
expertise and withheldexculpatory evidence in this and
(18:43):
other cases.
This revelation sent shockwavesthrough North Carolina's
justice system.
Dwayne Deaver was fired fromthe SBI and many convictions
that relied on his testimonycame under scrutiny.
In December of 2011, judgeOrlando Hudson, who had presided
over the original trial,vacated Michael Peterson's
(19:04):
conviction and granted him a newtrial based on the issues with
Duane Deaver's testimony.
Michael Peterson was releasedfrom prison and placed under
house arrest while awaiting hisnew trial.
During this time, interest inthe case was reignited by the
release of the documentaryseries the Staircase, originally
filmed during the first trialand its aftermath.
(19:25):
The series was updated with newepisodes covering the latest
developments.
The documentary provided anintimate look at Peterson, his
family and his defense team,bringing new attention to the
case and sparking debates aboutMichael Peterson's guilt or
innocence.
As preparations for the newtrial were underway, another
twist emerged Prosecutorsoffered Michael Peterson an
(19:49):
Alford plea deal.
An Alford plea is a type ofguilty plea where the defendant
maintains their innocence, butthey acknowledge to the court
that the prosecution has enoughevidence to likely secure a
conviction.
On February 24th of 2017, justas jury selection for the new
trial was about to begin,michael Peterson accepted the
(20:10):
Alford plea to the reducedcharge of voluntary manslaughter
.
He was sentenced to timealready served and was freed.
Sentenced to time alreadyserved and was freed.
This resolution left manyquestions unanswered.
Michael Peterson wastechnically convicted of causing
Kathleen's death, but hemaintained his innocence.
The plea allowed him to regainhis freedom without the risk of
(20:33):
another trial, but it also meantthat the full truth of what
happened that night in 2001might never be known.
As we reflect on MichaelPeterson's case, it's clear that
it raises numerous importantquestions about our justice
system and the nature of truthitself.
Firstly, the case highlightsthe potential availability of
forensic evidence.
The controversy surroundingDwayne Deaver's testimony
(20:56):
underscores the need forrigorous standards and oversight
in forensic science.
How many other cases might havebeen affected by flawed and
misrepresented forensic evidence.
Secondly, the case brings intofocus the role of sexuality and
personal privacy in criminalinvestigations.
The revelation of MichaelPeterson's bisexuality in the
(21:17):
extramarital affairs played asignificant role in the
prosecution's case.
This raises questions about theextent to which a person's
private life should bescrutinized in a criminal trial
and how societal prejudicesmight influence jurors'
perceptions.
Thirdly, the Michael Petersoncase demonstrates the powerful
(21:38):
impact of media on high-profiletrials.
The presence of documentaryfilmmakers during the original
trial and the subsequent releaseof the Staircase series
undoubtedly shaped publicopinion and kept the case in the
spotlight for years.
This intersection of true crimeentertainment and real-world
justice is a phenomenon that hasonly grown more prevalent in
(22:01):
recent years.
Lastly, the resolution of thecase through an Alford plea
leaves us in an ambiguousposition.
It's a stark reminder that thelegal concept of guilt and the
absolute truth of what occurreddon't always align.
The justice system is, afterall, a human institution subject
to the limitations andcompromises inherent in any
(22:24):
human endeavor.
So where does this leave us andwhere does it leave Michael
Peterson as of 2024,?
Michael Peterson now is in hisearly 80s and is a free man.
He's written a book about hisexperience, titled Behind the
Staircase, and has giveninterviews maintaining his
innocence.
Some of his children,particularly Margaret and Martha
(22:45):
Ratliff, have stood by himthroughout this ordeal.
Others, including Kathleen'sdaughter Caitlin and sister
Candace, remain convinced of hisguilt and have expressed
frustration with the finalresolution of this case.
The Peterson case has left anindelible mark on the landscape
of true crime.
It has been the subject ofnumerous books, documentaries
(23:06):
and even a dramatized HBO Maxseries.
Each new iteration brings fresheyes to this case, sparking new
debates and theories.
But amidst all the speculationand media attention, we must not
lose sight of the human tragedyat the core of this case.
Kathleen Peterson, by allaccounts, was a vibrant and
loving woman who lost her lifeon that December night in 2001.
(23:29):
Her family and her friends havehad to grapple not only with
her loss but with the years oflegal battles and public
scrutiny that followed.
As we conclude this episode, Iwould like to encourage our
listeners to reflect on thecomplexities we've discussed.
The death of Kathleen Petersonand the subsequent legal saga of
Michael Peterson serve as astark reminder that sometimes,
(23:52):
even after years ofinvestigation and legal
proceedings, absolute certaintycan remain elusive In the realm
of true crime.
It's easy to get caught up inthe drama and the mystery, but
cases like this remind us of thevery real human costs behind
these stories.
They challenge us to thinkcritically about our justice
(24:12):
system, about the nature oftruth and about the sometimes
fine line between guilt andinnocence.
Thank you for joining us onthis deep dive into the Michael
Peterson case and, if you'reinterested in learning more, or
the sometimes fine line betweenguilt and innocence.
Thank you for joining us onthis deep dive into the Michael
Peterson case.
And if you're interested inlearning more or delving deeper
into this case, I highlyrecommend watching the Staircase
documentary series, whichprovides an in-depth look at the
case and its many twists andturns.
(24:34):
You might also want to readMichael Peterson's book for his
perspective of this case, aswell as Written in Blood by
Diane Fanning for an alternativeview of the case.
Alrighty, so it's that time,guys, to say goodbye, but before
(24:58):
I do so, I just want to send athank you to all of my listeners
for your continued love andsupport and for sending in cases
that you want covered andstories that you want read on
the podcast.
We truly accept all stories,including scary, paranormal and
funny.
Any cases you want covered orstories that you want read on
the podcast.
Just please send them in todarkcrossroadspodcasts at
(25:20):
gmailcom.
Thank you for hanging out againtoday, and if you want any more
information about the podcast orcases and stories that we cover
, then head on over to thewebsite at
wwwdarkcrossroadspodcastcom.
There you can find all of theinformation about the podcast, a
link to our merch and also ourblog covering all of the cases
(25:40):
that we cover.
You can also find us on allsocial media platforms.
Don't forget to like share,rate, review, subscribe wherever
you're listening to us.
You can subscribe to thepodcast for bonus information.
There is a link in all episodesin the notes that will send you
to our subscription page andwith that you will get bonus
content, discount on futuremerch and a lot of extra goodies
(26:01):
.
Every single dollar that comesthrough donations or through our
subscription goes straight intothe podcast, helping fund
research, and it really helps usout and keeps this podcast
going.
And with all of this said,please don't forget to be weird,
stay different and don't trustanyone.
Welcome to Dark Crossroads Podcast, hosted by
Roxanne Fletcher.
This is your stop for allthings true crime and paranormal
.
From the infamous story of theNew Bedford Highway Killer to
the chilling tale of the BlackEyed Children, dark Crossroads
Podcast is a truly deep diveinto the stories that frighten
and fascinate you All links tothe show will be provided in
(01:32):
this episode's description, anddon't forget to let us know what
you think of today's episode.
Hello to my fellowcrime-obsessed weirdos, this
podcast is a mixture ofparanormal, true crime, scary,
(01:53):
spooky and sometimes theunexplained.
But today we are meticulouslydissecting one of the most
baffling and controversialcriminal cases in recent history
.
Today we are going to be divingdeep into a case that has
captivated the publicimagination for over two decades
now the death of KathleenPeterson and the subsequent
(02:14):
trial of her husband, michaelPeterson.
On a chilly December night in2001, in the affluent Forest
Hills neighborhood of Durham,north Carolina, a frantic 911
call shattered the quiet ofDurham, north Carolina.
A frantic 911 call shatteredthe quiet.
Michael Peterson, a locallyknown novelist and aspiring
politician, reported finding hiswife, kathleen, unconscious and
(02:37):
bleeding at the bottom of astaircase in their sprawling
mansion.
What followed was a labyrinthseries of events that would span
over a time of years, involvingaccusations of murder,
revelations of hiddensexualities, international
connections to anothersuspicious staircase death and
even a theory involving an owlattacking somebody.
(02:57):
This case would eventuallybecome the subject of the
critically acclaimed documentaryseries titled the Staircase,
bringing it into the spotlightof true crime enthusiasts
worldwide.
But to truly understand thiscase we need to go back to the
very beginning.
Who were Michael and KathleenPeterson?
(03:20):
Michael Ivor Peterson was bornon October 23rd of 1943 in
Nashville, tennessee.
He grew up in a very militaryfamily, moving frequently before
settling in Nashville,tennessee.
He grew up in a very militaryfamily, moving frequently,
before settling in Durham, northCarolina.
Michael attended DukeUniversity where he had
graduated in 1965 with apolitical science degree.
After college, like many youngmen in his generation, peterson
(03:43):
enlisted in the Marine Corps andserved in the Vietnam War.
His time in Vietnam would laterbecome a point of controversy.
Michael had claimed to havereceived a Purple Heart and a
Silver Star for his service, butinvestigations during his
murder trial revealed that theseitems were false.
This revelation would castdoubt on Michael's character and
(04:03):
his credibility.
After his military service,michael pursued a career as a
novelist.
He penned several books,including the Immortal Dragon, a
Time of War and A Bitter Peace.
These novels, largely based onhis experience in Vietnam,
achieved moderate success.
In addition to his writingcareer, michael also worked as a
(04:23):
newspaper columnist for theDurham Herald Sun and dabbled in
local politics, runningunsuccessfully for mayor of
Durham in 1999.
Kathleen Hunt Atwater Petersonwas born on February 21st of
1953.
She had a very differentbackground from Michael.
She was a successfulbusinesswoman known for her
(04:44):
intelligence and dedication toher family and her career.
Kathleen graduated from DukeUniversity in 1973 with a degree
in engineering and later earnedan MBA from Duke's School of
Business.
By 2001, kathleen had risen toan executive position at Nordle
Networks, a telecommunicationscompany.
(05:05):
She was highly regarded in herfield and was known to be a
perfectionist in both herprofessional and personal life.
Friends and family describedher as energetic, meticulous and
deeply committed to her lovedones.
Michael and Kathleen's pathscrossed in 1986, and they
eventually got married in 1997.
It was a second marriage forboth of them and they created a
(05:27):
blended family with theirchildren from previous
relationships.
Michael had two sons, claytonand Todd, from his first
marriage and had adopted twogirls, margaret and Martha
Ratliff, after their mother,elizabeth Ratliff, a family
friend died in Germany in 1985.
Kathleen had one daughter,caitlin, from her first marriage
.
The Peterson family seemed toembody the American dream.
(05:49):
They lived in a beautiful 9,000square foot home in Durham's
prestigious Forest Hillsneighborhood.
By all accounts, michael andKathleen appeared to have a
loving relationship.
They were well respected intheir community and known for
hosting dinner parties andactively participating in local
cultural events dinner partiesand actively participating in
local cultural events.
(06:10):
But, as many would soondiscover, beneath this veneer of
suburban perfection lay a webof secrets and complexities that
would come to light in the mosttragic of circumstances.
Now it is time to turn ourattention to the night that
changed everything, december 9thof 2001.
It was a Sunday night,typically being a quiet time in
(06:34):
the Peterson household.
According to Michael Peterson'saccount, he and Kathleen had
spent a very pleasant eveningtogether.
They had some wine by the pool,watched a movie and Kathleen
had gone to bed around 11pmwhile Michael decided to stay up
to read emails and do a littlebit of extra work on his
computer.
At 2.40 am on December 10th,the Durham 911 dispatch received
(06:57):
a call from a distressedMichael Peterson.
This is an excerpt from thatcall.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
I don't know.
Please get somebody here rightaway, please.
Somebody is dispatching theambulance while I ask you
questions.
It's also in Forest Hills, okay, please, please, sir, somebody
else is dispatching theambulance.
Okay, is she awake now?
Hello, hello, hello, hello,hello, hello.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
The call lasted for about six minutes, during which
Peterson alternated betweenspeaking to the operator and
apparently trying to perform CPRon Kathleen.
When first responders arrivedat the scene, they found a
chaotic and bloody scene.
Kathleen Peterson's body waslaying at the bottom of a narrow
back staircase.
(08:15):
The amount of blood at thescene was immediately striking
to the responding officers andthe paramedics.
Blood spatter extended high upthe walls of the staircase and
pooled around Kathleen's body.
She was wearing a sweatshirtand sweatpants, both heavily
saturated with blood.
Michael Peterson was alsocovered in blood and appeared to
(08:35):
be distraught.
He told the police that he hadbeen sitting by the pool and
came in to find Kathleen at thebottom of the staircase.
He surmised that she must havefallen after consuming wine and
thallium earlier in the evening.
Paramedics quickly determinedthat Kathleen was beyond any
help.
She was pronounced dead at thescene.
The initial impression of manyfirst responders was that this
(08:57):
was a tragic accident.
However, as crime sceneinvestigators began their work,
several elements of the sceneraised red flags.
First and foremost was thesheer amount of blood.
It seemed excessive for asimple fall down the stairs.
The blood spatter patterns onthe wall were particularly
concerning, extending muchhigher than one would expect
(09:18):
from a fall.
Secondly, kathleen's injurieswere very severe and somewhat
unusual for a fall victim.
She had deep lacerations to theback of her head, and the
medical examiner would laternote seven distinct lacerations,
some of which had theappearance of being inflicted by
a weapon rather than an impactwith stairs or the floor.
(09:40):
As dawn broke on December 10thof 2001, what had started as a
presumed tragic accident wasquickly evolving into a
potential homicide investigation.
Michael Peterson suddenly foundhimself at the center of a
storm that would consume thenext two decades of his life.
In the days followingKathleen's death, the
(10:01):
investigation intensified.
The Durham Police Departmentassigned some of their most
experienced detectives to thecase.
Art Holland, a veterandetectives to the case.
Art Holland, a veteraninvestigator, took the lead.
One of the first steps in anypotential homicide investigation
is to take a closer look atthose closest to the victim.
In this case, that meantMichael Peterson.
As detectives dug into thePetersons' life, they began to
(10:23):
uncover information that casts alot of doubt on the image of a
perfect marriage.
Financial records showed that,despite their outward appearance
of wealth, the Petersons werestruggling with debt.
Kathleen's life insurancepolicy, being worth $1.4 million
, suddenly became a veryimportant point of interest.
The question weighing oneverybody's mind is could
(10:45):
financial stress have been amotive for murder?
But perhaps the most shockingrevelation came when
investigators examined MichaelPeterson's computer.
They discovered emailsrevealing that Michael had been
engaging in homosexual affairsand had an extensive collection
of gay pornography.
This discovery would become acornerstone of the prosecution's
(11:08):
case, suggesting a potentialmotive for murder being Kathleen
had discovered Michael's secretlife, leading to a
confrontation that ended in herdeath.
Meanwhile the forensicinvestigation was in full swing.
The North Carolina State Bureauof Investigation, or the SBI,
was called in to assist with theanalysis of the crime scene.
(11:28):
Blood spatter expert DwayneDeaver, whose testimony would
later become a point of majorcontroversy, examined the scene.
Dwayne's analysis suggestedthat the blood spatter patterns
were more consistent with abeating than a fall.
The medical examiner's reportcompleted that.
Dr Deborah Radish classifiedKathleen's death as a homicide.
The report cited the number andnature of the lacerations on
(11:52):
Kathleen's scalp, the lack ofskull fractures typically seen
in a fall, and other injuries,including a fracture to the
thyroid cartilage, which themedical examiner could indicate
was because of strangulation.
On December 20th of 2001, just11 days after Kathleen's death,
michael Peterson was arrestedand was officially charged with
(12:12):
first-degree murder.
The arrest sent shockwavesthrough Durham.
The Petersons were well-knownin this community and the idea
that Michael could have murderedKathleen seemed inconceivable
to many who knew them.
However, as more details of thecase became, public opinion
began to divide.
In the months leading up to thetrial, both the prosecution and
(12:32):
defense teams worked tirelesslyto build their cases.
District Attorney Jim Hardenand Assistant DA Frida Black led
the prosecution, while MichaelPeterson hired high-profile
defense attorney David Rudolph.
The trial began on July 1st of2003 and would last for three
months, becoming one of thelongest trials in North Carolina
(12:55):
history.
The following will be abreakdown of some of the key
elements of the prosecution anddefense's cases.
The prosecution's case centeredaround several key points, the
first one being the bloodevidence.
They argued that the amount andpattern of blood at the scene
was inconsistent with the fall.
Dwayne Deaver testified thatthe blood splatter indicated
(13:16):
Kathleen had been hit at leastfour times with an object.
The second one being Kathleen'sinjuries.
The prosecution emphasized theseverity and nature of
Kathleen's head wounds, arguingthey were more consistent with
being beaten than by falling.
The third one being the missingmurder weapon.
The prosecution suggested thata blow poke, a hollow fireplace
(13:37):
tool given to the Petersons as agift, could have been the
murder weapon.
This blow poke wasconspicuously missing from the
Petersons' home.
Number four being Michael'sbisexuality and his affairs.
The prosecution painted apicture of a marriage in crisis,
suggesting that Kathleen haddiscovered his affairs with men,
(13:57):
leading to a confrontation andresulting in her murder.
The fifth key point was thefinancial motive.
They pointed to the Petersons'death and Kathleen's life
insurance policy as potentialmotives for murder.
The sixth point was Michael'sbehavior.
The prosecution questionedaspects of Michael's behavior on
the night of Kathleen's deathand in the aftermath, suggesting
(14:20):
it was inconsistent withgenuine grief.
The defense, being led by DavidRudolph, countered with their
own narrative.
Their key points were, thefirst one being accident theory.
They maintained that Kathleen'sdeath was a tragic accident,
the result of a fall exacerbatedby the alcohol and valium in
her system.
(14:41):
Brought in their own expertswho testified that the blood
spatter evidence was consistentwith a fall and that
prosecution's interpretation wasflawed.
The third is relationshipstability.
They argued that Michael andKathleen had a loving
relationship and that Kathleenwas aware and accepting of
(15:01):
Michael's bisexuality.
Number four was no evidence ofa motive.
The defense pointed out thatthere was no history of domestic
motive.
The defense pointed out thatthere was no history of domestic
violence between Michael andKathleen and that their
financial issues were not severeenough to motivate murder.
The fifth key point was amissing weapon.
They highlighted that no murderweapon was ever found and that
(15:21):
the prosecution's theory aboutthe blow poke was speculative at
best.
One of the most dramaticmoments of the trial came when
the defense produced the missingblowpoke.
It had been found in thePeterson's garage, covered in
cobwebs and undamaged, seeminglyruling it out as the murder
weapon.
The trial was not just a legalproceeding.
(15:42):
It became a media sensation.
Court TV broadcasted this triallive and it garnered national
attention.
The presence of a Frenchdocumentary crew filming what
would become the series, theStaircase, added another layer
of scrutiny to the proceedings.
As the trial progressed, analternative theory began to
(16:03):
circulate, one so unusual thatit would capture public
imagination and add yet anotherlayer of complexity to an
already bizarre case.
This was the infamous owltheory.
The owl theory was notpresented at the original trial
but was developed later byattorney T Lawrence Pollard, who
(16:26):
was a neighbor of the Petersons.
The theory suggested thatKathleen was attacked outside
her home by a barred owl, aspecies common in North Carolina
and known for its aggressiveterritorial behavior.
According to this theory, theowl's talons could have
inflicted the lacerations onKathleen's scalp.
Disoriented and bleeding fromthe attack, kathleen could have
(16:47):
stumbled inside and fell downthe stairs, explaining both her
head injuries and the fall.
While this might soundfar-fetched, proponents of this
theory point to several piecesof evidence, the first being
microscopic owl feathers wereallegedly found in a clump of
Kathleen's hair that wasclutched in her hand.
The second is the lacerationson Kathleen's scalp were tri-lo
(17:11):
the house on the front walkway.
And the fourth was there havebeen documented owl attacks on
humans.
In this area, the owl theory,while never presented in court,
has become a subject offascination for many following
this case.
It represents the kind ofoutlandish yet not entirely
(17:35):
implausible alternativeexplanation that often emerges
in complex criminal cases.
After three months of testimony,mountains of evidence and
intense media scrutiny, thiscase went to the jury On October
10th of 2003,.
After 14 hours of deliberation,the jury returned with their
verdict.
Michael Peterson was foundguilty of first-degree murder.
(17:58):
He was sentenced to life inprison without the possibility
of parole.
This verdict was a crushingblow to Michael and his
supporters, who had maintainedhis innocence throughout the
entire trial.
However, this was far from theend of the story.
In the years following hisconviction, michael Peterson's
case would take severalunexpected turns, keeping it in
(18:20):
the public eye and raisingquestions about the nature of
justice and the reliability offorensic evidence.
The first major developmentcame in 2011, when it came to
light that Dwayne Deaver, theblood splatter analysis who had
been a key prosecution witness,had falsely represented his
expertise and withheldexculpatory evidence in this and
(18:43):
other cases.
This revelation sent shockwavesthrough North Carolina's
justice system.
Dwayne Deaver was fired fromthe SBI and many convictions
that relied on his testimonycame under scrutiny.
In December of 2011, judgeOrlando Hudson, who had presided
over the original trial,vacated Michael Peterson's
(19:04):
conviction and granted him a newtrial based on the issues with
Duane Deaver's testimony.
Michael Peterson was releasedfrom prison and placed under
house arrest while awaiting hisnew trial.
During this time, interest inthe case was reignited by the
release of the documentaryseries the Staircase, originally
filmed during the first trialand its aftermath.
(19:25):
The series was updated with newepisodes covering the latest
developments.
The documentary provided anintimate look at Peterson, his
family and his defense team,bringing new attention to the
case and sparking debates aboutMichael Peterson's guilt or
innocence.
As preparations for the newtrial were underway, another
twist emerged Prosecutorsoffered Michael Peterson an
(19:49):
Alford plea deal.
An Alford plea is a type ofguilty plea where the defendant
maintains their innocence, butthey acknowledge to the court
that the prosecution has enoughevidence to likely secure a
conviction.
On February 24th of 2017, justas jury selection for the new
trial was about to begin,michael Peterson accepted the
(20:10):
Alford plea to the reducedcharge of voluntary manslaughter
.
He was sentenced to timealready served and was freed.
Sentenced to time alreadyserved and was freed.
This resolution left manyquestions unanswered.
Michael Peterson wastechnically convicted of causing
Kathleen's death, but hemaintained his innocence.
The plea allowed him to regainhis freedom without the risk of
(20:33):
another trial, but it also meantthat the full truth of what
happened that night in 2001might never be known.
As we reflect on MichaelPeterson's case, it's clear that
it raises numerous importantquestions about our justice
system and the nature of truthitself.
Firstly, the case highlightsthe potential availability of
forensic evidence.
The controversy surroundingDwayne Deaver's testimony
(20:56):
underscores the need forrigorous standards and oversight
in forensic science.
How many other cases might havebeen affected by flawed and
misrepresented forensic evidence.
Secondly, the case brings intofocus the role of sexuality and
personal privacy in criminalinvestigations.
The revelation of MichaelPeterson's bisexuality in the
(21:17):
extramarital affairs played asignificant role in the
prosecution's case.
This raises questions about theextent to which a person's
private life should bescrutinized in a criminal trial
and how societal prejudicesmight influence jurors'
perceptions.
Thirdly, the Michael Petersoncase demonstrates the powerful
(21:38):
impact of media on high-profiletrials.
The presence of documentaryfilmmakers during the original
trial and the subsequent releaseof the Staircase series
undoubtedly shaped publicopinion and kept the case in the
spotlight for years.
This intersection of true crimeentertainment and real-world
justice is a phenomenon that hasonly grown more prevalent in
(22:01):
recent years.
Lastly, the resolution of thecase through an Alford plea
leaves us in an ambiguousposition.
It's a stark reminder that thelegal concept of guilt and the
absolute truth of what occurreddon't always align.
The justice system is, afterall, a human institution subject
to the limitations andcompromises inherent in any
(22:24):
human endeavor.
So where does this leave us andwhere does it leave Michael
Peterson as of 2024,?
Michael Peterson now is in hisearly 80s and is a free man.
He's written a book about hisexperience, titled Behind the
Staircase, and has giveninterviews maintaining his
innocence.
Some of his children,particularly Margaret and Martha
(22:45):
Ratliff, have stood by himthroughout this ordeal.
Others, including Kathleen'sdaughter Caitlin and sister
Candace, remain convinced of hisguilt and have expressed
frustration with the finalresolution of this case.
The Peterson case has left anindelible mark on the landscape
of true crime.
It has been the subject ofnumerous books, documentaries
(23:06):
and even a dramatized HBO Maxseries.
Each new iteration brings fresheyes to this case, sparking new
debates and theories.
But amidst all the speculationand media attention, we must not
lose sight of the human tragedyat the core of this case.
Kathleen Peterson, by allaccounts, was a vibrant and
loving woman who lost her lifeon that December night in 2001.
(23:29):
Her family and her friends havehad to grapple not only with
her loss but with the years oflegal battles and public
scrutiny that followed.
As we conclude this episode, Iwould like to encourage our
listeners to reflect on thecomplexities we've discussed.
The death of Kathleen Petersonand the subsequent legal saga of
Michael Peterson serve as astark reminder that sometimes,
(23:52):
even after years ofinvestigation and legal
proceedings, absolute certaintycan remain elusive In the realm
of true crime.
It's easy to get caught up inthe drama and the mystery, but
cases like this remind us of thevery real human costs behind
these stories.
They challenge us to thinkcritically about our justice
(24:12):
system, about the nature oftruth and about the sometimes
fine line between guilt andinnocence.
Thank you for joining us onthis deep dive into the Michael
Peterson case and, if you'reinterested in learning more, or
the sometimes fine line betweenguilt and innocence.
Thank you for joining us onthis deep dive into the Michael
Peterson case.
And if you're interested inlearning more or delving deeper
into this case, I highlyrecommend watching the Staircase
documentary series, whichprovides an in-depth look at the
case and its many twists andturns.
(24:34):
You might also want to readMichael Peterson's book for his
perspective of this case, aswell as Written in Blood by
Diane Fanning for an alternativeview of the case.
Alrighty, so it's that time,guys, to say goodbye, but before
(24:58):
I do so, I just want to send athank you to all of my listeners
for your continued love andsupport and for sending in cases
that you want covered andstories that you want read on
the podcast.
We truly accept all stories,including scary, paranormal and
funny.
Any cases you want covered orstories that you want read on
the podcast.
Just please send them in todarkcrossroadspodcasts at
(25:20):
gmailcom.
Thank you for hanging out againtoday, and if you want any more
information about the podcast orcases and stories that we cover
, then head on over to thewebsite at
wwwdarkcrossroadspodcastcom.
There you can find all of theinformation about the podcast, a
link to our merch and also ourblog covering all of the cases
(25:40):
that we cover.
You can also find us on allsocial media platforms.
Don't forget to like share,rate, review, subscribe wherever
you're listening to us.
You can subscribe to thepodcast for bonus information.
There is a link in all episodesin the notes that will send you
to our subscription page andwith that you will get bonus
content, discount on futuremerch and a lot of extra goodies
(26:01):
.
Every single dollar that comesthrough donations or through our
subscription goes straight intothe podcast, helping fund
research, and it really helps usout and keeps this podcast
going.
And with all of this said,please don't forget to be weird,
stay different and don't trustanyone.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.