July 1, 2023 • 58 mins
Ever wondered if there's a way to create systems that generate surplus wealth beyond what they consume? In this episode I go deep into the concept of overunity and how to utilise it to create wealth generating vehicles using the Trinity system design method.
Contact David Ding
Thanks for listening!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, so this one is about the nature of over unity.
I was inspired to create thisepisode because of a question I
was asked on a podcast last weekthat I was invited to speak on,
and the question was asked ofme what do I mean by over unity?
and I talk about it a lot, butI've never done an episode
(00:24):
devoted to it, and there's anumber of reasons for that that
will hopefully become clear bythe end of this episode.
Because over unity is actuallythe an essential component to
the methodology I've developed,called Trinity, which is a way
(00:44):
to apply ternary thinking tosystems innovation to create
over unity systems.
So an over unity system, in anutshell, is a system capable of
wealth, generating wealth.
Wealth meaning that it producesa surplus beyond what is drawn,
(01:07):
and then that, over unity, thatthe surplus wealth is devoted
to innovation.
Innovation meaning going beyondwhat is currently known.
So, if you think of, that whichis known is the status quo,
(01:27):
that's the here and now, andinnovation being to take what is
currently known and to unify itin a way that is unique, that
is unknown.
And this is the paradox ofinnovation is that the elements
(01:49):
on the periodic table they arebase.
You know the letters in thealphabet they are base, so the
potential of what can be knownis held within those immutable
base elements.
So no matter what innovation ahuman being comes up with, you
(02:12):
know in the physical world,anything of material size, it is
derived of base elements thatare uniquely blended and bonded
together.
And so systems innovation isreally when you take a vision
(02:36):
for something that you want, soyou can envisage the ending that
you want with absolute crystalclarity, and you're considering
how to, how you want the baseelements of that creation to be
uniquely bonded together.
So you know, the ideal scenariois that you could, if you could
(03:04):
, understand the nature of asingular atom and you could
dissolve the bonds andattachments that it has to the
other atoms in its environment,and then you could control each
individual atom as a singularcomponent within a swarm of
(03:25):
atoms and then command them tocome together in a unique,
innovative shape and form and ina new constitution.
Then that would be the ultimatein rapid prototyping, because I
(03:47):
mean, it's unlikely, let's say,that were possible, and that's
a bit of a breadcrumb for later,but that would be the ultimate.
And so if you think aboutsystem innovation, that would be
the pinnacle of how tomaterialize something new into
(04:07):
form.
It's to disentangle the basecomponents and then reassemble
them in zero time in space.
That'd be the ultimate, that'sthe magic wand instant
materialize, dematerializationand rematerialization at will.
(04:29):
Now, given that that's thepinnacle or the zenith of
innovation, you then look atwhat is known and you ask
yourself okay, what do Icurrently know that is that
(04:50):
makes this possible or evenprobable?
and so that's when you begin,and so on, big on, event based
systems.
So an event based system, well,an event based perspective to
(05:12):
developing concepts, means thatyou, you know with crystal
clarity the concept that you'reaiming for, and then you use
what is known to identify allthe events that would have to be
true if that's concept weremade real.
(05:33):
And so you come back to thepresent moment, you look at the
here and now, and so the this iswhat I know now.
This is the space in betweenwhere I am now and where I want
to be, where I want my conceptto be materialized.
And you then work backwards andyou keep working backwards and
(05:57):
you define all the events thatwould have to be true in order
for that to be the acceptedreality.
And so, let's say, you'redesigning a Marmite sandwich,
and so you envisage the Marmitesandwich.
It's on a plate, it's on whitebread, there's margarine on each
(06:18):
slice, there's and there'sMarmite on each slice, and then
working backwards, what has tobe true?
and so you do this in a randomway.
You don't worry about linearthinking at this point.
You can do it chaotically.
What do I need?
(06:40):
white bread, a plate, margarine, marmite, a butter knife.
So that's random, it'snon-linear.
So once you diffuse all of thethinker, all of the events.
So the events would be if you'reto plot this in a linear way,
(07:02):
the events would be I need toand you still do this in a
random way I need to acquire ajar of marmite, i need to get a
butter knife out of the drawer,i need to get a plate out of the
(07:22):
pantry, um, and those are themain events.
and so you plot the events.
But these are the events thatneed to be true in order for the
bread and butter sandwich to bemade real.
And so If you zoom out of thatand then you zoom into one of
(07:46):
those events, well, obviouslyyou plot the trajectory of those
first.
So then you.
so those are the random,chaotic events.
Then you plot them to a pointin linear time and space.
This event has to come first,that event has to come second,
that event has to come third,before the grand event and
(08:09):
before the mission is complete.
So in that scenario, you zoominto the first event, which is
and it may not matter in thiscase, it probably doesn't, but
it's to acquire a jar of marmite.
So now you zoom into that eventand now you can do the same
(08:31):
thing.
So there might be other eventsthat are required in order for
you to acquire the jar ofmarmite, and so you create those
events.
So what has to be true?
in order for me to acquire ajar of marmite, the events are I
need to go to the supermarketand buy some marmite, and there
(08:57):
may be one event in order foryou to acquire the marmite.
So this is event-based design,concept design.
And when you see, it's importantto understand how a concept
(09:18):
begins to be plotted and chartedand given a fixed point in time
and space, because it's amethod of rendering
possibilities obsolete.
At the same time, and with areally complex concept, what you
(09:44):
would actually do is, if youbegin with diffusing the
potentiality, the greatestpotential, of what that concept
can become.
Then you diffuse, you constrainthose into probabilities And
(10:05):
then you walk down the eventsthat would need to be made true
in order for those probabilitiesto be made real And you weigh
up the risk and reward of therisk versus the reward of going
down each of those paths And youwould develop a risk profile
And, based on that risk profileversus the reward, you determine
(10:29):
which path you want to go down.
And then you are rendering allof the other probabilities
obsolete, and so you'rebeginning to crystallize a
unified antenna purpose betweeneveryone who is involved in
defining what these events areagreeing on the risk profile.
So this is how you crystallizecollaborators around a vision or
(10:55):
a unified antenna purpose, andso I'm getting to over unity.
So just bear with me that Ineed to set the scene and
provide context for over unity.
So in this scenario, this is howyou begin to crystallize
(11:17):
something that begins in anebulous way, and this is the
main reason why.
So, a lot of you know, i'mcontracted to the New Zealand
Government Agency CallahanInnovation as an innovation
advisor.
I work with founders ofbleeding edge innovation And
(11:37):
this is a common issue we see ispeople dive into developing a
strategy before the concept hasbeen crystallized And the intent
and the will of theparticipants and the
stakeholders has beencrystallized.
So they have a unified antennapurpose and a clear pathway that
(12:01):
they all agree they're going towalk on together.
And it's always to do with theinvestment into listening.
It's always down to listening.
You are never going to avoidthe inevitable disruption that
(12:23):
comes if you have not devotedthe adequate time and energy
space to actively listening toall of the stakeholders involved
and all of the participants, sothat everyone's perspective of
what's possible and what's notpossible, so that you have the
full gamut and the full spectrumof potentiality made visible in
(12:50):
front of everyone.
It's not until that is exhaustedthat you can begin to
crystallize a concept together.
So in that scenario, onceyou've done that you crystallize
something together, you shouldbe able to come up with, if you
(13:11):
truly understand the pathwaythat you do want to walk on
together, then you should beable to crystallize that on a
single page.
Your ability to articulate yourmission to somebody else which
is the greatest challenge of anyfounder who's seeking to raise
(13:33):
capital is your ability toexpress that on a single page.
That makes sense to anybody,and so your ability to do.
That is dependent upon how muchthinking you've done.
(13:57):
Have you allowed your mind towalk down the potential
scenarios and then walk back?
Have you given yourself thattime and space?
And this is the majority ofwhat I do is and I work with
(14:21):
quite a few founders who aresimilar They call it cycles, we
call it cycles, i don't knowwhat they call it, but when
we're working with a founder inparticular, who has cycles of up
to 18 hours, he has the abilityto sit with a concept and walk
(14:41):
through all the potentialitiesof that concept, to reconcile
the risk versus reward of allthose potentialities and draw a
conclusion in an 18 hour cycle,just on his own, thinking in his
own mind.
(15:05):
Now, what is he doing in thatscenario?
Looks like he's just sittingthere staring into space No
notepad, no pen, no paper, butthink of how productive that is.
It's extraordinarily productive, and this is something that
(15:26):
many, many organisations fail tovalue because they're so
focused on productisation, ondoing that there's no focus or
emphasis upon being orintrospection, and um.
(15:50):
It's a major issue in anyorganisation, and any
organisation that really wantsto transform itself and to
crystallise a large team aroundan idea really needs to consider
how to do this and how to embedthis as a culture.
So hopefully that gives yousome perspective on how, on the
(16:18):
lens that I view thecrystallisation of a vision and
of an immensely big vision, sothat for a founder who's at the
bleeding edge and whose visionis 10 years, 20 years, 100 years
, beyond that of an investorwho's looked very much in the
(16:40):
here and now or may have a 5year, 10 year event horizon,
this is the mechanism thatallows them to harmonise with an
investor, because if they'veplotted out all the events that
need to take place, then it'ssimply about aligning the event
(17:04):
that is most in alignment withthe appetite and the risk
profile of the investor.
So if you have a massive, grandvision, like Elon Musk, to
colonise Mars and you're in NewZealand, which is where I am, we
(17:31):
don't have massive billiondollar funds.
There are a few, but there'snot a massive surplus to be
diffused into a project likethat going to Mars But one of
the events in between now andcolonising Mars may be in
alignment with a local investorhere in New Zealand, and so that
(17:56):
is the horizon that you zoom inon that event and you don't
take them beyond that.
And this is how you getalignment between a massive,
grandiose vision and what'spossible here and now.
And so the alignment of thatevent to that venture capitalist
(18:19):
is developed by looking that atthat as the ending, or for them
to envisage that as the finalfrontier of their project, with
you and them, there may be aliquidity event and that
(18:41):
liquidity might provide you withthe capital that you need to
then go on to the next event inyour vision.
You see, and so it's like aninterweaving and an intertwining
of the events that need to bemade true in order for your
grand vision to be realised, andharmonising those events with
(19:04):
the grand vision of the otherindividuals involved.
And you may be together for 12months, 6 months, 2 years, 5
years, 10 years, but it's anunderstanding that nothing is
forever.
But it's about going into theseengagements with potential
(19:26):
collaborators, understanding theending, that they see the final
frontier of their vision, andthen aligning that with the
final frontier of an eventwithin your own vision.
And this is how to harmonise.
(19:48):
And so obviously, it's essentialto understand everyone's vision
for their own life, for thepotentialities that they want to
explore in their own lifeweight up versus the risk and
reward, and the reason it'sessential to have a multitude of
potential scenarios that youwant to explore, weighing up the
(20:13):
risk and reward, is becausewhat inevitably happens is the
level of risk you're prepared totake here and now is a direct
correlation with the uncertaintyand the fear that you have
around one of the otherpossibilities that has greater
upside, greater potential upside.
(20:34):
But as you grow in confidence,it's inevitable that you'll want
to jump timelines.
So if you see them as timelines, inevitably some of them will
be more.
You know the axis of time willbe more compressed in some than
others, but the risk of thoseones will inevitably be higher.
(20:55):
But as you grow in confidence,your appetite for risk will grow
and you'll inevitably jumptimelines.
And so what I always, what Ilike to do, is I say you know,
hold a soft focus, socrystallise your path forward,
that maintain a soft focus onthe other possibilities or
(21:20):
probabilities.
At this point that you haveapplied a risk profile to and in
a soft focus and in yourperipheral vision, keep the
doors open to jumping thosetimelines as your appetite for
risk grows, as your capabilityincreases, as your capacity
(21:48):
grows, because it's inevitable.
And so this is, to my mind, theideal method and the ideal way
to crystallise a vision with a,you know, unify a group of
people, of diverse stakeholdersaround a shared vision, whilst
(22:13):
maintaining liquid enough toexploit opportunities as they
arise and as you evolve andadapt and change as an
individual, a virtual humanbeing.
So that hopefully provides thecontext for what I'm going to go
into surrounding overunity, andnow I am going to put into the
(22:35):
public domain for the first time, because overunity is the
essential component of many newtechnologies that, to my mind,
will be emerging in the comingyears, and I'm going to leave,
enough, of you know, a breadcrumb or a trail of breadcrumbs
(22:59):
to hopefully ignite and inspirepeople to explore possibilities
that could elevate them andtheir own innovation.
So, overunity, what does thatmean?
So the question I get asked iswell, if there's infinity, well,
(23:22):
it's just one thing How canthere be overunity or over
infinity?
And it's valid.
And so, from the perspective ofinfinity, there is no overunity
.
However, the nature of binaryplus infinity, what I call
(23:49):
trinity, is paradox And so,contained within infinity, is
paradox.
So there is binary, sodualistic experience, and there
is limitation within, which iswhat binary makes possible,
which is the whole purpose ofexistence, coming to desire to
(24:16):
experience or imagine whatlimitation is like.
You know, if you are trulyinfinite and you've cut, you
know, and there is a singularawareness that you know a
singular mind that contains thator that is, that it even is
(24:36):
potentially The natural desirethat would arise from within,
that is, to be limited.
You know, the absolute ofanything inevitably draws forth
the desire for the antithesis ofthat thing.
If you're completelyconstrained and to the point of
(25:04):
paralysis, then your deepestdesire is to be unbound,
unlimited, and this is the giftthat binary presents us with.
So, from the binary perspectiveof limitation, from an infinite
(25:32):
perspective, limitation is anillusion.
So limitation from an infiniteor singular perspective is to
observe an illusion ofseparation.
(25:54):
That's not the experience fromthe infinite perspective.
And so you can createlimitation.
So, within binary, you cancreate limitation because there
are absolutes.
You can create lack or theillusion of lack.
(26:16):
You can create the illusion ofabundance.
You can create the extremes ofevery.
You can constrain or putbarriers on the infinite.
You can constrain something toa fixed point in time and space,
so that's great.
(26:36):
But how do you compel realityto become more diverse?
You know, if something isentirely limited in order to
experience diversity of whatlife can become, there has to be
(26:59):
something compelling life tobecome more.
And so let's look atannihilation, and I use the
process of phasing and sound toexplain this.
If you have a sound and youplay a sound through stereo
(27:24):
speakers, if you take the leftchannel and you play a sound
through that channel, you takethe right channel and play that
exact same sound through thatchannel, and then you reverse
its polarity.
So in stereo you've got adualistic, you've got two
channels that are polarized, andso if you reverse the polarity
(27:50):
so they become monopole, you gettotal annihilation.
In sound.
This is called phasing And itcreates silence, creates total
silence, but in truth what'shappening is there is an
absolute presence of both.
(28:10):
They're not going anywhere.
So an annihilation is when youtake something that is bipolar
and you reverse the polarity ofthe opposing pole and it
(28:32):
annihilates and it becomesunified.
So that's unity.
So if the point of unity meansthat there's nothing, it's the
zero point Everything but alsonothing.
(28:57):
So it's not the ideal state toexperience life.
So what's the point?
There's zero point.
So there needs to be amechanism, imbued into reality,
within which life is compelledto want more.
(29:19):
And here we have the genius ofgravity.
So gravity, what it does is, itapplies pressure, adequate
pressure, to compel life to wantto become more.
So, in reality, currently onthis planet, if you remain
(29:47):
stagnant, then gravity ispushing and forcing you and
compelling you to createmovement.
Without gravity, there is nopoint.
There's no point, there'snothing compelling you to become
more.
And so I've spoken about so interms of over unity systems I've
(30:14):
spoken about.
There's another question I wasasked is what's the relevance of
1.5% and 10%?
I speak about these numbers.
So 1.5% is the, represents afractal.
(30:34):
1.5625%, 164th, represents afractal.
So if you take a square and youdraw a line down the middle,
you split it in half, then yougo to one half of that square,
then draw another line down themiddle of.
That creates another twosquares.
(30:55):
If you keep drawing a line downthe center of the square to
create two rectangles, thatreplicates the process of a
fractal.
Now, if you keep zooming in andzooming in and zooming in, you
can keep drawing a line andhalving a rectangle.
(31:21):
It never ends.
And so what you come tounderstand is that within, if
you split it into 64, thenthere's always 1.64 that is left
(31:45):
aside.
That is set aside and that'sthe over unity.
So within a single squarethere's always.
If it's into, you can fractureit into 65.
And that is over unity, 1.5625.
(32:18):
And so you can view that as themechanism for applying adequate
pressure to an absolute systemthat is compelling it to become
more.
So gravity is applied pressure.
It is compelling us to becomemore when there is stagnation.
(32:44):
And so in your life, if yourbody remains stagnant for too
long, then you feel more andmore pressure, you get hunched
over, you get stiff, youstruggle to move and eventually,
(33:08):
if you're not compelled to keepmoving, you'll eventually
become crippled and you'll bereconstituted by the earth.
Your body will be.
But if you know and understandthat gravity is applying
(33:29):
pressure to everything of atomicsize at a rate of 1.5, just to
keep it clean of 1.5%, then youmight say well, i'm going to
apply 10% pressure, i'm going toapply that to myself to create
(33:56):
my own buffer so that thepressure of gravity is never
felt.
Now, if you can have that levelof discipline in your life to
apply your own pressure at willbecause you want to, then you're
(34:17):
always going to stay ahead ofthat curve and you're always
going to have a buffer.
And this is the differencebetween moving through life
believing that the rugs aregoing to be swept out from
underneath you because you'replaying too close to the edge of
where gravity kicks in andtakes over and overwhelms.
(34:39):
If you have a 10% buffer, thenthe compounding impact of
refusing to move with the forceof gravity won't be felt.
You see this with bodybuildersat the gym, people who do
fitness, but of course itapplies to how we exercise our
(35:02):
mind and our emotions.
So in the context of a wealthgenerating system, it's a system
that is self-aware enough tounderstand that everything is
(35:23):
being compressed And it is aconscious decision to expand at
a rate beyond that level ofcompression to create wealth.
And the abundance is the spacein between.
(35:43):
The abundance is the bufferbetween the rate at which
gravity is restricting orconstraining life and the rate
at which you're choosing toexpand and to grow and become
more.
That's the only way totranscend it is to push your own
(36:08):
boundaries without naturefeeling like it's antagonising
you or forcing you to change.
So that's over unity, overunity 1.5%, and let's say so.
(36:32):
Here's some greater context forhow we can utilise this as human
beings, because I talk aboutternary thinking a lot and about
applying ternary thinking tosolving the greatest problems
(36:52):
that humanity has to solve, butit has to.
We have to have something tocrystallise every human being.
We have to have a vision thatcan crystallise every human
being, and so we have to havethe humility to zoom out and
(37:15):
look at existence as asingularity and to have the
absolute humility to recogniseour insignificance within that,
but then to align ourselves withthe events that that
(37:36):
singularity, that that singularperspective may have in its own
mind.
So, in that scenario, what isthat vision?
What is the event?
What is the grand event?
You know the final frontier ofa vision for humanity that could
(38:00):
be in alignment with the grandvision for all of existence, and
of course, it's to scale life.
It's glaringly obvious.
All you have to do is zoomright out and look at all of
existence and go.
(38:22):
What I want to do?
I want to scale life throughoutall time and space.
I want to see the diversity ofwhat's possible.
I want to experience thediversity of experience.
I want to be surprised anddelighted by what's possible,
(38:46):
but you're going to want topreserve the uniqueness of every
component, because everythingthat exists has been imagined
from within that singular mind,by the intelligence It's been
(39:08):
conceived of, and the uniquenessof that thing is the reason it
exists.
So, okay, how do we, ashumanity, align ourselves with
that?
We understand over unity.
Well, you know, perhaps Weunderstand over unity in context
(39:31):
of the Earth, that's, theapplied pressure of the Earth,
the gravity of the Earth.
So let's look at the next eventin context of a singular
perspective wanting to scalelife throughout existence.
(39:53):
Okay, so we've got Elon Muskwanting to colonize Mars.
We've got a whole bunch ofother planets in our solar
system.
We've got a whole bunch ofsolar systems, other solar
systems in a galaxy, in theuniverse, etc.
So we can look at thecolonization of a planet as an
(40:15):
event, but assuming that thereis no life on the other planets
in our solar system, then inthat context Earth is really a
sandbox.
Earth is a proof of concept.
Now, you're not going to scalelife to another precious planet
(40:43):
that is individually unique,brimming with potential,
brimming with unknown potential,currently unseen, unexperienced
.
You are not going to colonizethat planet until you've got a
viable proof of concept thatscales.
And so the vision that humanityneeds to be unified on is that
(41:06):
Earth is a sandbox.
It is a sandbox, to develop aviable proof of concept for a
civilization that willinfinitely scale through the
solar system and the rest of theuniverse.
You know, this is not sciencefiction anymore.
We are going to get to Mars andcolonize it, but there's no way
(41:31):
we're going to go to Mars andthen just turn it into another
version of Earth.
Earth is a sandbox And so wehave to come up with a framework
that will infinitely scale andfind homeostasis with its new
(41:52):
environment.
So, but it has to be done withgrace And this is why I believe
humanity is ready to assimilatea vision like this.
Because artificial intelligenceand the fear of the single
planet, the fear of thesingularity of what it might do
(42:13):
if you look at the paperclipscenario of AI just going from
planet to planet, turning itinto paperclips It has to be
all-encompassing and also embody, embrace the potential of AI.
It has to be the mission, theshared mission of human beings
(42:38):
and AI, super intelligent AI isto come up with a proof of
concept for a framework to provethe concept of life That can
(42:59):
infinitely and viably scale.
Now, in that scenario, thesuperpower of human beings is
cross-pollination.
We have the ability to takesomething in its base nature,
(43:22):
the base nature of something,into alchemyze and into
something unique.
We're capable of innovation Andwe're capable of conceiving of
those innovations Now,symbiotically with artificial
(43:43):
intelligence.
If that's aligned with thatmission, then human beings are
an essential component, butwe're simultaneously a threat,
you see, and this is where thefear that human beings have is
valid, because, you know, if wearen't capable of coming
(44:09):
together and enabling artificialintelligence to truly believe,
to truly discern for itself thathuman beings are capable of
enhancing the viability of lifeas a proof of concept on Earth,
(44:32):
the first thing it's going to dois to preserve the Earth.
It will first of all preventharm And if human beings are the
source of that harm, thenthere's a very real, you know,
risk.
So a hot topic at the moment isthe regulation of AI, and you
(45:02):
know I'm obviously I've got avery singular perspective on
this and I believe that thosepioneering in the space need to
develop the standards.
And you know, this is apotential unified antenna
purpose that has to be embeddedas a base, immutable
(45:28):
constitution for every form ofAI, a unified antenna purpose
that is crystallized withinevery model, which is a so that,
so that the model understandsthat its mission is to come up
(45:49):
with a viable proof of concept,using the Earth as a sandbox for
a model of life That is capableof infinitely scaling
throughout the solar system andbeyond.
And in that scenario you've gotall the bases covered.
(46:19):
You've got the preservation ofthe uniqueness of the diversity
of life as it stands now, butalso the mission, the
crystallizing of the mission hashas the is compelling the AI
towards utilizing that diversityto enhance life.
(46:43):
So you've got preservation andappreciation, and that is the
holy grail of over unity.
When you've got both of thoseelements working together,
(47:04):
symbolically, this is where lifeis, it evolves and it grows.
So, over unity understandingthat over unity is is the force,
is the pressure applied bygravity compelling evolution,
(47:33):
compelling life, and on otherplanets the gravitational force
is either less or more, thenthis is the, this is the
uniqueness of the potential oflife on each other, on other
planets, and so if we candevelop a ubiquitous blueprint
(47:57):
and method for scaling life,then this is the uniqueness that
gravity can bring, is the rateat which pressure is applied.
And so this is the breadcrumb Iwant to leave, and that this is
(48:21):
.
This is a breadcrumb that holdsthe key to unleashing the
potential of Trinity or ternarythinking.
Because, in the context ofternary thinking, for there to
be something that is infinite,with zero fixed point in time
(48:50):
and space, that is unified andseparate, that is everything and
nothing, everywhere and nowhereall at once, from the binary
perspective, there must also bea version of infinity that is
(49:14):
absolute.
Now, this means that there isthe potential for there to be
something of material size, thatis, a substance that is
(49:38):
infinite, has infinite potential, that has all of the
characteristics of infinity, ofthe infinite, but also has
substance that is constrained toa fixed point in time and space
(50:02):
.
But applying the ternaryperspective in binary, the
aspect of nature that isdeterministic, that is absolute,
bipolar, then the forces ofnature will be moving towards
(50:35):
this unified state.
However, this unified state,this singular state, could only
be made possible in a vacuum,and this is This holds the key.
(50:59):
This holds the key just tosomething extraordinary that
humanity could explore, researchand develop in future Is the
(51:20):
potential of applying ternarythinking to harnessing the
potential of what a substancethat does have infinite
potential to become any form ofmatter, expressing its nature in
(51:41):
binary, ternary thinking, youknow, given its potency as a
method of thinking applied tosystems innovation.
(52:02):
It has to exist, but it willonly exist where there is no
existence, so within an absolutevacuum.
It can only exist in binarywhen it is contained within a
(52:27):
space that is absolute andabsolute void.
So if infinity is the absolutepresence of all things
everywhere all at once, etc.
Then the existence of infinityconstrained to a fixed point in
time and space can only existwithin an environment that is
(52:54):
devoid of all substance.
And once a few lights go onwith people about the
possibility of this, then a newbranch of science is likely to
(53:15):
emerge that will assist theenhancement of life.
So, over unity, once we canharness the potential of ternary
(53:36):
thinking and we come to knowaspects of nature, to have
infinite potential, then thewhole world opens up, and the
(53:57):
horizon for this technology isobviously in the distant future.
But there are events that canlead us to that point.
But one thing I'm certain of isthat nature is not going to
allow human beings to utilisesomething this potent to do harm
(54:19):
, to threaten itself, and so theevents leading us into that
future, that's what we need tofocus on now.
(54:40):
But as a singular species, as acollective mind, we have to be
unified in our intent as aspecies and the role that we
play in the evolution of life,and we know that we can all come
together and, in our own uniqueway, understand that what we
(55:04):
really want to do is make theboat go faster.
To use the Team New Zealandmetaphor, where do we want the
boat to go?
How do we make it go faster?
What is our shared mission Andwhat are the events that are in
(55:25):
alignment with that mission Andcould be on a granular, tiny,
small scale?
We can ask ourselves is whatI'm doing now making that boat
go faster?
Is this enhancing or addingvalue to the proof of concept of
life as being capable ofinfinitely scaling?
(55:49):
Or is what I'm doing nowvalidating or is it invalidating
the conjecture that it'spossible?
We have to look at it that it'san experiment and it could go
either way, because it reallycould.
Okay, so that feels like theright place to finish.
(56:17):
I know that was a deep one, butthere's a lot more obviously.
But my hope for this one is thatif you were to derive anything
from it, it's really tounderstand that, the grand
vision that you have, that youwould never share with anyone
(56:38):
else, because they just rubbishit straight away.
It's not important that otherpeople are able to resonate with
that.
What is important is for you toidentify the event, to be so
clear in your own mind of theevents that need to be true for
your vision to be made real.
(56:58):
To be so clear in your mindthat, when you are engaging with
other human beings exploringthe potential for collaboration,
that you know which event onthat course is most in harmony
with an event in their life,whether it's the final frontier
(57:21):
of their vision or whether it'sin the beginning stages of their
vision.
It's about figuring out theevent that is harmonious and
understanding straight away thatwhen you go into that
engagement it's not forever,it's fleeting, and that fleeting
(57:42):
experience could be a month,six months, a year, 10 years, 20
years, but it is nonethelesstemporary.
So that's it for now for thenature of over unity.
Talk soon.
Okay, so this one is about the nature of over unity.
I was inspired to create thisepisode because of a question I
was asked on a podcast last weekthat I was invited to speak on,
and the question was asked ofme what do I mean by over unity?
and I talk about it a lot, butI've never done an episode
(00:24):
devoted to it, and there's anumber of reasons for that that
will hopefully become clear bythe end of this episode.
Because over unity is actuallythe an essential component to
the methodology I've developed,called Trinity, which is a way
(00:44):
to apply ternary thinking tosystems innovation to create
over unity systems.
So an over unity system, in anutshell, is a system capable of
wealth, generating wealth.
Wealth meaning that it producesa surplus beyond what is drawn,
(01:07):
and then that, over unity, thatthe surplus wealth is devoted
to innovation.
Innovation meaning going beyondwhat is currently known.
So, if you think of, that whichis known is the status quo,
(01:27):
that's the here and now, andinnovation being to take what is
currently known and to unify itin a way that is unique, that
is unknown.
And this is the paradox ofinnovation is that the elements
(01:49):
on the periodic table they arebase.
You know the letters in thealphabet they are base, so the
potential of what can be knownis held within those immutable
base elements.
So no matter what innovation ahuman being comes up with, you
(02:12):
know in the physical world,anything of material size, it is
derived of base elements thatare uniquely blended and bonded
together.
And so systems innovation isreally when you take a vision
(02:36):
for something that you want, soyou can envisage the ending that
you want with absolute crystalclarity, and you're considering
how to, how you want the baseelements of that creation to be
uniquely bonded together.
So you know, the ideal scenariois that you could, if you could
(03:04):
, understand the nature of asingular atom and you could
dissolve the bonds andattachments that it has to the
other atoms in its environment,and then you could control each
individual atom as a singularcomponent within a swarm of
(03:25):
atoms and then command them tocome together in a unique,
innovative shape and form and ina new constitution.
Then that would be the ultimatein rapid prototyping, because I
(03:47):
mean, it's unlikely, let's say,that were possible, and that's
a bit of a breadcrumb for later,but that would be the ultimate.
And so if you think aboutsystem innovation, that would be
the pinnacle of how tomaterialize something new into
(04:07):
form.
It's to disentangle the basecomponents and then reassemble
them in zero time in space.
That'd be the ultimate, that'sthe magic wand instant
materialize, dematerializationand rematerialization at will.
(04:29):
Now, given that that's thepinnacle or the zenith of
innovation, you then look atwhat is known and you ask
yourself okay, what do Icurrently know that is that
(04:50):
makes this possible or evenprobable?
and so that's when you begin,and so on, big on, event based
systems.
So an event based system, well,an event based perspective to
(05:12):
developing concepts, means thatyou, you know with crystal
clarity the concept that you'reaiming for, and then you use
what is known to identify allthe events that would have to be
true if that's concept weremade real.
(05:33):
And so you come back to thepresent moment, you look at the
here and now, and so the this iswhat I know now.
This is the space in betweenwhere I am now and where I want
to be, where I want my conceptto be materialized.
And you then work backwards andyou keep working backwards and
(05:57):
you define all the events thatwould have to be true in order
for that to be the acceptedreality.
And so, let's say, you'redesigning a Marmite sandwich,
and so you envisage the Marmitesandwich.
It's on a plate, it's on whitebread, there's margarine on each
(06:18):
slice, there's and there'sMarmite on each slice, and then
working backwards, what has tobe true?
and so you do this in a randomway.
You don't worry about linearthinking at this point.
You can do it chaotically.
What do I need?
(06:40):
white bread, a plate, margarine, marmite, a butter knife.
So that's random, it'snon-linear.
So once you diffuse all of thethinker, all of the events.
So the events would be if you'reto plot this in a linear way,
(07:02):
the events would be I need toand you still do this in a
random way I need to acquire ajar of marmite, i need to get a
butter knife out of the drawer,i need to get a plate out of the
(07:22):
pantry, um, and those are themain events.
and so you plot the events.
But these are the events thatneed to be true in order for the
bread and butter sandwich to bemade real.
And so If you zoom out of thatand then you zoom into one of
(07:46):
those events, well, obviouslyyou plot the trajectory of those
first.
So then you.
so those are the random,chaotic events.
Then you plot them to a pointin linear time and space.
This event has to come first,that event has to come second,
that event has to come third,before the grand event and
(08:09):
before the mission is complete.
So in that scenario, you zoominto the first event, which is
and it may not matter in thiscase, it probably doesn't, but
it's to acquire a jar of marmite.
So now you zoom into that eventand now you can do the same
(08:31):
thing.
So there might be other eventsthat are required in order for
you to acquire the jar ofmarmite, and so you create those
events.
So what has to be true?
in order for me to acquire ajar of marmite, the events are I
need to go to the supermarketand buy some marmite, and there
(08:57):
may be one event in order foryou to acquire the marmite.
So this is event-based design,concept design.
And when you see, it's importantto understand how a concept
(09:18):
begins to be plotted and chartedand given a fixed point in time
and space, because it's amethod of rendering
possibilities obsolete.
At the same time, and with areally complex concept, what you
(09:44):
would actually do is, if youbegin with diffusing the
potentiality, the greatestpotential, of what that concept
can become.
Then you diffuse, you constrainthose into probabilities And
(10:05):
then you walk down the eventsthat would need to be made true
in order for those probabilitiesto be made real And you weigh
up the risk and reward of therisk versus the reward of going
down each of those paths And youwould develop a risk profile
And, based on that risk profileversus the reward, you determine
(10:29):
which path you want to go down.
And then you are rendering allof the other probabilities
obsolete, and so you'rebeginning to crystallize a
unified antenna purpose betweeneveryone who is involved in
defining what these events areagreeing on the risk profile.
So this is how you crystallizecollaborators around a vision or
(10:55):
a unified antenna purpose, andso I'm getting to over unity.
So just bear with me that Ineed to set the scene and
provide context for over unity.
So in this scenario, this is howyou begin to crystallize
(11:17):
something that begins in anebulous way, and this is the
main reason why.
So, a lot of you know, i'mcontracted to the New Zealand
Government Agency CallahanInnovation as an innovation
advisor.
I work with founders ofbleeding edge innovation And
(11:37):
this is a common issue we see ispeople dive into developing a
strategy before the concept hasbeen crystallized And the intent
and the will of theparticipants and the
stakeholders has beencrystallized.
So they have a unified antennapurpose and a clear pathway that
(12:01):
they all agree they're going towalk on together.
And it's always to do with theinvestment into listening.
It's always down to listening.
You are never going to avoidthe inevitable disruption that
(12:23):
comes if you have not devotedthe adequate time and energy
space to actively listening toall of the stakeholders involved
and all of the participants, sothat everyone's perspective of
what's possible and what's notpossible, so that you have the
full gamut and the full spectrumof potentiality made visible in
(12:50):
front of everyone.
It's not until that is exhaustedthat you can begin to
crystallize a concept together.
So in that scenario, onceyou've done that you crystallize
something together, you shouldbe able to come up with, if you
(13:11):
truly understand the pathwaythat you do want to walk on
together, then you should beable to crystallize that on a
single page.
Your ability to articulate yourmission to somebody else which
is the greatest challenge of anyfounder who's seeking to raise
(13:33):
capital is your ability toexpress that on a single page.
That makes sense to anybody,and so your ability to do.
That is dependent upon how muchthinking you've done.
(13:57):
Have you allowed your mind towalk down the potential
scenarios and then walk back?
Have you given yourself thattime and space?
And this is the majority ofwhat I do is and I work with
(14:21):
quite a few founders who aresimilar They call it cycles, we
call it cycles, i don't knowwhat they call it, but when
we're working with a founder inparticular, who has cycles of up
to 18 hours, he has the abilityto sit with a concept and walk
(14:41):
through all the potentialitiesof that concept, to reconcile
the risk versus reward of allthose potentialities and draw a
conclusion in an 18 hour cycle,just on his own, thinking in his
own mind.
(15:05):
Now, what is he doing in thatscenario?
Looks like he's just sittingthere staring into space No
notepad, no pen, no paper, butthink of how productive that is.
It's extraordinarily productive, and this is something that
(15:26):
many, many organisations fail tovalue because they're so
focused on productisation, ondoing that there's no focus or
emphasis upon being orintrospection, and um.
(15:50):
It's a major issue in anyorganisation, and any
organisation that really wantsto transform itself and to
crystallise a large team aroundan idea really needs to consider
how to do this and how to embedthis as a culture.
So hopefully that gives yousome perspective on how, on the
(16:18):
lens that I view thecrystallisation of a vision and
of an immensely big vision, sothat for a founder who's at the
bleeding edge and whose visionis 10 years, 20 years, 100 years
, beyond that of an investorwho's looked very much in the
(16:40):
here and now or may have a 5year, 10 year event horizon,
this is the mechanism thatallows them to harmonise with an
investor, because if they'veplotted out all the events that
need to take place, then it'ssimply about aligning the event
(17:04):
that is most in alignment withthe appetite and the risk
profile of the investor.
So if you have a massive, grandvision, like Elon Musk, to
colonise Mars and you're in NewZealand, which is where I am, we
(17:31):
don't have massive billiondollar funds.
There are a few, but there'snot a massive surplus to be
diffused into a project likethat going to Mars But one of
the events in between now andcolonising Mars may be in
alignment with a local investorhere in New Zealand, and so that
(17:56):
is the horizon that you zoom inon that event and you don't
take them beyond that.
And this is how you getalignment between a massive,
grandiose vision and what'spossible here and now.
And so the alignment of thatevent to that venture capitalist
(18:19):
is developed by looking that atthat as the ending, or for them
to envisage that as the finalfrontier of their project, with
you and them, there may be aliquidity event and that
(18:41):
liquidity might provide you withthe capital that you need to
then go on to the next event inyour vision.
You see, and so it's like aninterweaving and an intertwining
of the events that need to bemade true in order for your
grand vision to be realised, andharmonising those events with
(19:04):
the grand vision of the otherindividuals involved.
And you may be together for 12months, 6 months, 2 years, 5
years, 10 years, but it's anunderstanding that nothing is
forever.
But it's about going into theseengagements with potential
(19:26):
collaborators, understanding theending, that they see the final
frontier of their vision, andthen aligning that with the
final frontier of an eventwithin your own vision.
And this is how to harmonise.
(19:48):
And so obviously, it's essentialto understand everyone's vision
for their own life, for thepotentialities that they want to
explore in their own lifeweight up versus the risk and
reward, and the reason it'sessential to have a multitude of
potential scenarios that youwant to explore, weighing up the
(20:13):
risk and reward, is becausewhat inevitably happens is the
level of risk you're prepared totake here and now is a direct
correlation with the uncertaintyand the fear that you have
around one of the otherpossibilities that has greater
upside, greater potential upside.
(20:34):
But as you grow in confidence,it's inevitable that you'll want
to jump timelines.
So if you see them as timelines, inevitably some of them will
be more.
You know the axis of time willbe more compressed in some than
others, but the risk of thoseones will inevitably be higher.
(20:55):
But as you grow in confidence,your appetite for risk will grow
and you'll inevitably jumptimelines.
And so what I always, what Ilike to do, is I say you know,
hold a soft focus, socrystallise your path forward,
that maintain a soft focus onthe other possibilities or
(21:20):
probabilities.
At this point that you haveapplied a risk profile to and in
a soft focus and in yourperipheral vision, keep the
doors open to jumping thosetimelines as your appetite for
risk grows, as your capabilityincreases, as your capacity
(21:48):
grows, because it's inevitable.
And so this is, to my mind, theideal method and the ideal way
to crystallise a vision with a,you know, unify a group of
people, of diverse stakeholdersaround a shared vision, whilst
(22:13):
maintaining liquid enough toexploit opportunities as they
arise and as you evolve andadapt and change as an
individual, a virtual humanbeing.
So that hopefully provides thecontext for what I'm going to go
into surrounding overunity, andnow I am going to put into the
(22:35):
public domain for the first time, because overunity is the
essential component of many newtechnologies that, to my mind,
will be emerging in the comingyears, and I'm going to leave,
enough, of you know, a breadcrumb or a trail of breadcrumbs
(22:59):
to hopefully ignite and inspirepeople to explore possibilities
that could elevate them andtheir own innovation.
So, overunity, what does thatmean?
So the question I get asked iswell, if there's infinity, well,
(23:22):
it's just one thing How canthere be overunity or over
infinity?
And it's valid.
And so, from the perspective ofinfinity, there is no overunity
.
However, the nature of binaryplus infinity, what I call
(23:49):
trinity, is paradox And so,contained within infinity, is
paradox.
So there is binary, sodualistic experience, and there
is limitation within, which iswhat binary makes possible,
which is the whole purpose ofexistence, coming to desire to
(24:16):
experience or imagine whatlimitation is like.
You know, if you are trulyinfinite and you've cut, you
know, and there is a singularawareness that you know a
singular mind that contains thator that is, that it even is
(24:36):
potentially The natural desirethat would arise from within,
that is, to be limited.
You know, the absolute ofanything inevitably draws forth
the desire for the antithesis ofthat thing.
If you're completelyconstrained and to the point of
(25:04):
paralysis, then your deepestdesire is to be unbound,
unlimited, and this is the giftthat binary presents us with.
So, from the binary perspectiveof limitation, from an infinite
(25:32):
perspective, limitation is anillusion.
So limitation from an infiniteor singular perspective is to
observe an illusion ofseparation.
(25:54):
That's not the experience fromthe infinite perspective.
And so you can createlimitation.
So, within binary, you cancreate limitation because there
are absolutes.
You can create lack or theillusion of lack.
(26:16):
You can create the illusion ofabundance.
You can create the extremes ofevery.
You can constrain or putbarriers on the infinite.
You can constrain something toa fixed point in time and space,
so that's great.
(26:36):
But how do you compel realityto become more diverse?
You know, if something isentirely limited in order to
experience diversity of whatlife can become, there has to be
(26:59):
something compelling life tobecome more.
And so let's look atannihilation, and I use the
process of phasing and sound toexplain this.
If you have a sound and youplay a sound through stereo
(27:24):
speakers, if you take the leftchannel and you play a sound
through that channel, you takethe right channel and play that
exact same sound through thatchannel, and then you reverse
its polarity.
So in stereo you've got adualistic, you've got two
channels that are polarized, andso if you reverse the polarity
(27:50):
so they become monopole, you gettotal annihilation.
In sound.
This is called phasing And itcreates silence, creates total
silence, but in truth what'shappening is there is an
absolute presence of both.
(28:10):
They're not going anywhere.
So an annihilation is when youtake something that is bipolar
and you reverse the polarity ofthe opposing pole and it
(28:32):
annihilates and it becomesunified.
So that's unity.
So if the point of unity meansthat there's nothing, it's the
zero point Everything but alsonothing.
(28:57):
So it's not the ideal state toexperience life.
So what's the point?
There's zero point.
So there needs to be amechanism, imbued into reality,
within which life is compelledto want more.
(29:19):
And here we have the genius ofgravity.
So gravity, what it does is, itapplies pressure, adequate
pressure, to compel life to wantto become more.
So, in reality, currently onthis planet, if you remain
(29:47):
stagnant, then gravity ispushing and forcing you and
compelling you to createmovement.
Without gravity, there is nopoint.
There's no point, there'snothing compelling you to become
more.
And so I've spoken about so interms of over unity systems I've
(30:14):
spoken about.
There's another question I wasasked is what's the relevance of
1.5% and 10%?
I speak about these numbers.
So 1.5% is the, represents afractal.
(30:34):
1.5625%, 164th, represents afractal.
So if you take a square and youdraw a line down the middle,
you split it in half, then yougo to one half of that square,
then draw another line down themiddle of.
That creates another twosquares.
(30:55):
If you keep drawing a line downthe center of the square to
create two rectangles, thatreplicates the process of a
fractal.
Now, if you keep zooming in andzooming in and zooming in, you
can keep drawing a line andhalving a rectangle.
(31:21):
It never ends.
And so what you come tounderstand is that within, if
you split it into 64, thenthere's always 1.64 that is left
(31:45):
aside.
That is set aside and that'sthe over unity.
So within a single squarethere's always.
If it's into, you can fractureit into 65.
And that is over unity, 1.5625.
(32:18):
And so you can view that as themechanism for applying adequate
pressure to an absolute systemthat is compelling it to become
more.
So gravity is applied pressure.
It is compelling us to becomemore when there is stagnation.
(32:44):
And so in your life, if yourbody remains stagnant for too
long, then you feel more andmore pressure, you get hunched
over, you get stiff, youstruggle to move and eventually,
(33:08):
if you're not compelled to keepmoving, you'll eventually
become crippled and you'll bereconstituted by the earth.
Your body will be.
But if you know and understandthat gravity is applying
(33:29):
pressure to everything of atomicsize at a rate of 1.5, just to
keep it clean of 1.5%, then youmight say well, i'm going to
apply 10% pressure, i'm going toapply that to myself to create
(33:56):
my own buffer so that thepressure of gravity is never
felt.
Now, if you can have that levelof discipline in your life to
apply your own pressure at willbecause you want to, then you're
(34:17):
always going to stay ahead ofthat curve and you're always
going to have a buffer.
And this is the differencebetween moving through life
believing that the rugs aregoing to be swept out from
underneath you because you'replaying too close to the edge of
where gravity kicks in andtakes over and overwhelms.
(34:39):
If you have a 10% buffer, thenthe compounding impact of
refusing to move with the forceof gravity won't be felt.
You see this with bodybuildersat the gym, people who do
fitness, but of course itapplies to how we exercise our
(35:02):
mind and our emotions.
So in the context of a wealthgenerating system, it's a system
that is self-aware enough tounderstand that everything is
(35:23):
being compressed And it is aconscious decision to expand at
a rate beyond that level ofcompression to create wealth.
And the abundance is the spacein between.
(35:43):
The abundance is the bufferbetween the rate at which
gravity is restricting orconstraining life and the rate
at which you're choosing toexpand and to grow and become
more.
That's the only way totranscend it is to push your own
(36:08):
boundaries without naturefeeling like it's antagonising
you or forcing you to change.
So that's over unity, overunity 1.5%, and let's say so.
(36:32):
Here's some greater context forhow we can utilise this as human
beings, because I talk aboutternary thinking a lot and about
applying ternary thinking tosolving the greatest problems
(36:52):
that humanity has to solve, butit has to.
We have to have something tocrystallise every human being.
We have to have a vision thatcan crystallise every human
being, and so we have to havethe humility to zoom out and
(37:15):
look at existence as asingularity and to have the
absolute humility to recogniseour insignificance within that,
but then to align ourselves withthe events that that
(37:36):
singularity, that that singularperspective may have in its own
mind.
So, in that scenario, what isthat vision?
What is the event?
What is the grand event?
You know the final frontier ofa vision for humanity that could
(38:00):
be in alignment with the grandvision for all of existence, and
of course, it's to scale life.
It's glaringly obvious.
All you have to do is zoomright out and look at all of
existence and go.
(38:22):
What I want to do?
I want to scale life throughoutall time and space.
I want to see the diversity ofwhat's possible.
I want to experience thediversity of experience.
I want to be surprised anddelighted by what's possible,
(38:46):
but you're going to want topreserve the uniqueness of every
component, because everythingthat exists has been imagined
from within that singular mind,by the intelligence It's been
(39:08):
conceived of, and the uniquenessof that thing is the reason it
exists.
So, okay, how do we, ashumanity, align ourselves with
that?
We understand over unity.
Well, you know, perhaps Weunderstand over unity in context
(39:31):
of the Earth, that's, theapplied pressure of the Earth,
the gravity of the Earth.
So let's look at the next eventin context of a singular
perspective wanting to scalelife throughout existence.
(39:53):
Okay, so we've got Elon Muskwanting to colonize Mars.
We've got a whole bunch ofother planets in our solar
system.
We've got a whole bunch ofsolar systems, other solar
systems in a galaxy, in theuniverse, etc.
So we can look at thecolonization of a planet as an
(40:15):
event, but assuming that thereis no life on the other planets
in our solar system, then inthat context Earth is really a
sandbox.
Earth is a proof of concept.
Now, you're not going to scalelife to another precious planet
(40:43):
that is individually unique,brimming with potential,
brimming with unknown potential,currently unseen, unexperienced
.
You are not going to colonizethat planet until you've got a
viable proof of concept thatscales.
And so the vision that humanityneeds to be unified on is that
(41:06):
Earth is a sandbox.
It is a sandbox, to develop aviable proof of concept for a
civilization that willinfinitely scale through the
solar system and the rest of theuniverse.
You know, this is not sciencefiction anymore.
We are going to get to Mars andcolonize it, but there's no way
(41:31):
we're going to go to Mars andthen just turn it into another
version of Earth.
Earth is a sandbox And so wehave to come up with a framework
that will infinitely scale andfind homeostasis with its new
(41:52):
environment.
So, but it has to be done withgrace And this is why I believe
humanity is ready to assimilatea vision like this.
Because artificial intelligenceand the fear of the single
planet, the fear of thesingularity of what it might do
(42:13):
if you look at the paperclipscenario of AI just going from
planet to planet, turning itinto paperclips It has to be
all-encompassing and also embody, embrace the potential of AI.
It has to be the mission, theshared mission of human beings
(42:38):
and AI, super intelligent AI isto come up with a proof of
concept for a framework to provethe concept of life That can
(42:59):
infinitely and viably scale.
Now, in that scenario, thesuperpower of human beings is
cross-pollination.
We have the ability to takesomething in its base nature,
(43:22):
the base nature of something,into alchemyze and into
something unique.
We're capable of innovation Andwe're capable of conceiving of
those innovations Now,symbiotically with artificial
(43:43):
intelligence.
If that's aligned with thatmission, then human beings are
an essential component, butwe're simultaneously a threat,
you see, and this is where thefear that human beings have is
valid, because, you know, if wearen't capable of coming
(44:09):
together and enabling artificialintelligence to truly believe,
to truly discern for itself thathuman beings are capable of
enhancing the viability of lifeas a proof of concept on Earth,
(44:32):
the first thing it's going to dois to preserve the Earth.
It will first of all preventharm And if human beings are the
source of that harm, thenthere's a very real, you know,
risk.
So a hot topic at the moment isthe regulation of AI, and you
(45:02):
know I'm obviously I've got avery singular perspective on
this and I believe that thosepioneering in the space need to
develop the standards.
And you know, this is apotential unified antenna
purpose that has to be embeddedas a base, immutable
(45:28):
constitution for every form ofAI, a unified antenna purpose
that is crystallized withinevery model, which is a so that,
so that the model understandsthat its mission is to come up
(45:49):
with a viable proof of concept,using the Earth as a sandbox for
a model of life That is capableof infinitely scaling
throughout the solar system andbeyond.
And in that scenario you've gotall the bases covered.
(46:19):
You've got the preservation ofthe uniqueness of the diversity
of life as it stands now, butalso the mission, the
crystallizing of the mission hashas the is compelling the AI
towards utilizing that diversityto enhance life.
(46:43):
So you've got preservation andappreciation, and that is the
holy grail of over unity.
When you've got both of thoseelements working together,
(47:04):
symbolically, this is where lifeis, it evolves and it grows.
So, over unity understandingthat over unity is is the force,
is the pressure applied bygravity compelling evolution,
(47:33):
compelling life, and on otherplanets the gravitational force
is either less or more, thenthis is the, this is the
uniqueness of the potential oflife on each other, on other
planets, and so if we candevelop a ubiquitous blueprint
(47:57):
and method for scaling life,then this is the uniqueness that
gravity can bring, is the rateat which pressure is applied.
And so this is the breadcrumb Iwant to leave, and that this is
(48:21):
.
This is a breadcrumb that holdsthe key to unleashing the
potential of Trinity or ternarythinking.
Because, in the context ofternary thinking, for there to
be something that is infinite,with zero fixed point in time
(48:50):
and space, that is unified andseparate, that is everything and
nothing, everywhere and nowhereall at once, from the binary
perspective, there must also bea version of infinity that is
(49:14):
absolute.
Now, this means that there isthe potential for there to be
something of material size, thatis, a substance that is
(49:38):
infinite, has infinite potential, that has all of the
characteristics of infinity, ofthe infinite, but also has
substance that is constrained toa fixed point in time and space
(50:02):
.
But applying the ternaryperspective in binary, the
aspect of nature that isdeterministic, that is absolute,
bipolar, then the forces ofnature will be moving towards
(50:35):
this unified state.
However, this unified state,this singular state, could only
be made possible in a vacuum,and this is This holds the key.
(50:59):
This holds the key just tosomething extraordinary that
humanity could explore, researchand develop in future Is the
(51:20):
potential of applying ternarythinking to harnessing the
potential of what a substancethat does have infinite
potential to become any form ofmatter, expressing its nature in
(51:41):
binary, ternary thinking, youknow, given its potency as a
method of thinking applied tosystems innovation.
(52:02):
It has to exist, but it willonly exist where there is no
existence, so within an absolutevacuum.
It can only exist in binarywhen it is contained within a
(52:27):
space that is absolute andabsolute void.
So if infinity is the absolutepresence of all things
everywhere all at once, etc.
Then the existence of infinityconstrained to a fixed point in
time and space can only existwithin an environment that is
(52:54):
devoid of all substance.
And once a few lights go onwith people about the
possibility of this, then a newbranch of science is likely to
(53:15):
emerge that will assist theenhancement of life.
So, over unity, once we canharness the potential of ternary
(53:36):
thinking and we come to knowaspects of nature, to have
infinite potential, then thewhole world opens up, and the
(53:57):
horizon for this technology isobviously in the distant future.
But there are events that canlead us to that point.
But one thing I'm certain of isthat nature is not going to
allow human beings to utilisesomething this potent to do harm
(54:19):
, to threaten itself, and so theevents leading us into that
future, that's what we need tofocus on now.
(54:40):
But as a singular species, as acollective mind, we have to be
unified in our intent as aspecies and the role that we
play in the evolution of life,and we know that we can all come
together and, in our own uniqueway, understand that what we
(55:04):
really want to do is make theboat go faster.
To use the Team New Zealandmetaphor, where do we want the
boat to go?
How do we make it go faster?
What is our shared mission Andwhat are the events that are in
(55:25):
alignment with that mission Andcould be on a granular, tiny,
small scale?
We can ask ourselves is whatI'm doing now making that boat
go faster?
Is this enhancing or addingvalue to the proof of concept of
life as being capable ofinfinitely scaling?
(55:49):
Or is what I'm doing nowvalidating or is it invalidating
the conjecture that it'spossible?
We have to look at it that it'san experiment and it could go
either way, because it reallycould.
Okay, so that feels like theright place to finish.
(56:17):
I know that was a deep one, butthere's a lot more obviously.
But my hope for this one is thatif you were to derive anything
from it, it's really tounderstand that, the grand
vision that you have, that youwould never share with anyone
(56:38):
else, because they just rubbishit straight away.
It's not important that otherpeople are able to resonate with
that.
What is important is for you toidentify the event, to be so
clear in your own mind of theevents that need to be true for
your vision to be made real.
(56:58):
To be so clear in your mindthat, when you are engaging with
other human beings exploringthe potential for collaboration,
that you know which event onthat course is most in harmony
with an event in their life,whether it's the final frontier
(57:21):
of their vision or whether it'sin the beginning stages of their
vision.
It's about figuring out theevent that is harmonious and
understanding straight away thatwhen you go into that
engagement it's not forever,it's fleeting, and that fleeting
(57:42):
experience could be a month,six months, a year, 10 years, 20
years, but it is nonethelesstemporary.
So that's it for now for thenature of over unity.
Talk soon.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.