Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome, welcome, welcome to thedeep dive.
Imagine a world where the path to success isn't just paved with
the largest bank accounts or, you know, the most celebrated
superstar players. What if instead, the real secret
to victory lay hidden in a different kind of currency
entirely? Information meticulously
gathered and strategically deployed.
(00:23):
We've all witnessed those incredible stories.
Teams seemingly rising from obscurity, defying all financial
odds to challenge the traditional giants of their
sport. It makes you lean in and wonder
how do they do it? It really does.
Today we are embarking on a truly fascinating deep dive into
the very strategy behind these unexpected triumphs.
That's precisely what we're herefor.
(00:43):
This deep dive is entirely focused on Moneyball, A
revolutionary approach that first made waves, really made
ways in baseball, but has since profoundly transformed how
football clubs, or soccer clubs as many of you know them,
operate across the globe. Yeah, its influence is huge now.
Absolutely. We're going to pull back the
curtain on its surprising origins, dissect exactly how it
(01:03):
has been adapted for the incredibly dynamic and, let's
face it, often chaotic world of football.
Definitely chaotic sometimes. Celebrate the incredible success
stories of clubs that have trulyembraced this philosophy.
And yes, we'll also candidly address the inherent challenges
and, you know, limitations that come with such an innovative and
(01:24):
often disruptive philosophy. OK, great.
Our mission today, then, is to thoroughly unpack this powerful,
often misunderstood concept for you.
We'll delve into its core principles, reveal the cutting
edge ways it's currently being used to unearth hidden talent,
optimize player performance beyond traditional metrics,
guide shrewd financial decisionsin the transfer market, and
(01:44):
ultimately demonstrate that smart data informed thinking can
consistently outmaneuver sheer spending power in the beautiful
game. It really can.
Get ready for some genuine aha moments, because here's where it
truly gets captivating. So to properly understand
Moneyball's impact on football, we really have to start at its
genesis back in the late 1990s and early 2000s with a
(02:07):
relatively small, struggling baseball team, the Oakland
Athletics. The Oakland A's.
Yeah, the movie made them famous.
Exactly. Their general manager, a truly
visionary individual named BillyBeane, faced an almost
insurmountable challenge. He had to construct a winning
team, consistently competitive on an absolutely minuscule
budget. Tiny compared to the big guy.
(02:29):
Tiny contrast this with financial Titans like the New
York Yankees, who at the time could spend 3 or even 4 times as
much on player salaries. For context, like in 1998, the
Oakland A's were spending around$22 million on player salaries.
OK, well, the Yankees were slashing out $71 million.
By 2003, that gap had widened even further, with the A's at
(02:49):
$50 million and the Yankees at astaggering $152 million.
Wow, that's that's not just a gap, it's a chasm.
It is. This wasn't just a budget
constraint. It was, you know, an existential
crisis for a small market team trying to compete.
That's an astronomical disparity, and what made it even
harder was that traditionally stouting in baseball, much like
football at the time, actually relied heavily on subjective
(03:11):
observations, gut feelings and aplayer's established reputation.
Eye test. Exactly.
It was all about the eye test. Scouts would assess a players
physique, their tools, their perceived athleticism, their
look. You know, the kind of thing.
Oh yeah, the classic Scout profile.
But being facing that massive financial handicap fundamentally
(03:31):
challenged this long held conventional wisdom, He argued
it was outdated and frankly prone to bias.
Hugely prone to bias. He truly believed there had to
be a smarter, more efficient wayto identify value, especially
when you couldn't simply throw money at every problem.
Precisely this radical thinking led to the full scale adoption
(03:51):
of what's known as sabermetrics,which is basically a scientific
data-driven analysis using advanced statistics to
objectively measure player performance.
Sabermetrics, right? Instead of chasing obvious star
players who commanded exurbitantsalaries being shifted focus
entirely to obscure, often undervalued statistical
categories, consider on base percentage, which measures how
(04:15):
often a batter raised base safely.
However they get there. However they get there walk hit
by pitch or a base hit, it's a matter or on base plus slugging
percentage, which combines reaching base with hitting for
power. OK.
And traditional scouts weren't looking at this stuff.
Often overlooked. They often overlooked these
metrics in favor of flasher stats like batting average or
(04:37):
home runs. They love the hero player who
hit the long ball, you know, even if they struck out often or
didn't get on base consistently.So the truly counterintuitive
truth here was that a team meticulously built from players
who consistently excelled in these overlooked statistical
categories would theoretically create far more scoring
opportunities and ultimately winmore games.
(04:58):
Yeah, that was the hypothesis. Regardless of their perceived
star power or how much they costindividually, it became less
about buying a collection of bignames and more about assembling
a highly efficient scoring machine.
Exactly. It's like, why pay a premium for
the flashy exterior when you canpay a fraction for the essential
internal function that actually wins you the game?
(05:18):
That's where the aha moment truly resides for me.
It absolutely does. To use a different analogy,
imagine if instead of buying a top of the line Ferrari, which
everyone recognizes fast and expensive, Bean essentially took
an older model like a Ford Focus, but instead of just
making it run better, he completely re engineered its
core. He stripped it down.
(05:40):
Perhaps replaces combustion engine with innovative solar
panels, let's say. Oh OK, I like it.
And then watched it consistentlyoutperform much more expensive,
traditionally powered cars in a race.
It was about buying wins throughefficiency, through process,
through measurable contribution.Not just buying players.
Not just buying players based ontheir brand name or subjective
appeal. He identified what truly
(06:03):
contributed to winning in a measurable, objective way, and
then found players who were cheap because, well, others
hadn't yet seen that value. That Ford Focus analogy
perfectly encapsulates the essence of the original
Moneyball. But let's clarify something,
because the term Moneyball oftengets a simplified or even
distorted definition in popular culture.
(06:24):
It really does. There's a common misconception
that it's simply about acquiringinexpensive players just being
cheap. Yeah, buy low, sell high.
Right, while cost efficiency is definitely a component, the true
essence of Moneyball is far moreprofound and strategic than just
being cheap. It truly is a deeper philosophy.
At its heart, Moneyball is aboutapproaching conventional
(06:45):
problems from unconventional angles.
It's about constantly challenging the status quo,
asking what can we do differently to improve our
chances of winning? Always questioning.
Always questioning and embracingwhat you might call an
iconoclastic worldview. This means deliberately
challenging established norms, questioning why things have
always been done this way, and relentlessly seeking out new
(07:08):
market inefficiencies before anyone else does.
Finding the edge. Finding the edge.
It's about understanding why certain players or skills are
undervalued by the broader market and then strategically
exploiting that gap. For example, if every club is
looking for AI, don't know a towering center back.
The classic big defender. An iconoclastic approach might
(07:28):
discover an undersized but maybeexceptionally quick and
positionally intelligent defender is actually more
effective against modern attacking styles and crucially,
can be acquired for less. And this next point is
absolutely crucial, I think, because it speaks to the very
soul of the philosophy. It's data informed, not
data-driven. This is so important.
(07:50):
This is not about replacing human intuition or traditional
scouting with cold spreadsheets and detached algorithms.
Not at all. On the contrary, the philosophy
is about profoundly enhancing human expertise.
The data provides invaluable insights.
It helps filter, compare, highlight patterns, reveal
potential. It guides the eye.
Exactly. But then human scouts and
(08:11):
coaches step in. They use their irreplaceable
experience to assess contextual fit, a player's mentality, their
adaptability to a new league or culture, their leadership
qualities, their ability to integrate into a specific team
dynamic. All the stuff numbers can't
easily capture. Right.
It's a powerful, symbiotic blendof objective evidence and
(08:32):
subjective, experienced understanding.
You can't just feed numbers intoa program and expect a
championship team to magically appear.
That is a vital distinction and one that's often overlooked.
The underlying theory of using different criteria and
evaluations to spend money more efficiently is what remains
valid. And, you know, Evergreen.
It's a continuous quest, an ongoing intellectual challenge.
It never stops. Never to understand what is
(08:56):
truly valuable and crucially, what is currently undervalued by
the market. Because the moment everyone
catches onto an inefficiency, say the value of on base
percentage of baseball or maybe a specific defensive action in
football, that inefficiency disappears.
Poof. And you have to find the next
one. You immediately have to pivot to
find the next hidden gem, the next undervalued skill.
(09:16):
It's a never ending pursuit of competitive advantage.
OK, let's unpack how this revolutionary thinking has been
adapted for the world of football then.
Because for years, particularly in the late 20th and early 21st
centuries, many in the football establishment firmly believed
the sport was simply too fluid, too chaotic.
Too beautiful, some might say. Too artistic, perhaps, to be
(09:38):
effectively analyzed by cold, hard data, unlike the more
structured, repetitive nature ofbaseball, where every pitch,
every at bat, every play felt like a discreet, measurable
event. Right, very distinct phases.
The idea that statistics could somehow decode the beautiful
game was met with significant, often quite passionate,
skepticism. And you can understand why that
(10:00):
skepticism existed, can't you? The fluidity of football, where
a single action can cascade intoa multitude of unpredictable
outcomes, makes it inherently far more complex to quantify
than a sport like baseball. Much harder.
Much harder where plays are highly codified and often
isolated. In baseball, as you mentioned,
you can precisely calculate the probability of a team winning if
(10:23):
they're down by two runs in the third inning with runners on 1st
and 3rd and one out, because it's this giant interconnected
web of probabilities. Yeah, they have models for
everything. But in football, how do you
truly quantify the exact value of a perfectly executed step
over in midfield to createspace for a pass?
Or how a seemingly simple sideways pass alters the winning
(10:43):
probability of the entire game? These nuances, These intangible
moments of brilliance, they wereseen as insurmountable barriers
to data analysis. Yet Despite that deeply
ingrained resistance, a few stubborn pioneers dared to
disagree, and they went on to spark nothing short of a data
revolution within the sport. They really did.
The successful case studies of clubs who wholeheartedly adopted
(11:04):
data analytics have unequivocally proven that it's
not only possible to rigorously analyze football, but those who
do it properly gain a profound, almost unfair competitive
advantage. It's not theory anymore.
No, it's a proven pathway to success and even Billy Bean
himself, the original Moneyball architect, has shown deep and
sustained interest in football, even advising clubs on how to
(11:27):
apply these principles. And the momentum has been
building exponentially. Over the past two decades we've
witnessed an explosion in both the technology supporting data
collection, everything from incredibly advanced tracking
systems, high definition aerial cameras, caturing every
movement. The tech is amazing now.
It really is to a sophisticated video analysis platforms and a
(11:48):
corresponding surge in human capital clubs are now
integrating dedicated data scientists, statisticians,
research analysts, even physicists.
Physicists. Into their core staff.
This widespread investment has expanded the applications of
football analytics far beyond what anyone initially expected,
touching almost every facet of aclub's operation.
So let's get into the nitty gritty.
(12:10):
How are clubs actually applying this in the real world?
And for many, the most obvious application is smart scouting
and recruitment, finding those diamonds in the rough that
traditional scouting might completely overlook.
Right, this is where a lot of the focus goes.
Clubs leveraging data go far beyond the obvious hunting
grounds of top tier leagues and established names.
(12:31):
They cast an incredibly wide net, deliberately searching in
less scouted leagues and regions.
Think about Scandinavia, West Africa, the Balkans, Eastern
Europe. Places that maybe weren't
traditional hotspots. Exactly.
Or even lower divisions in majorfootballing nations where talent
might be abundant but the exposure limited.
(12:52):
They also meticulously scrutinize the academies of big
clubs, knowing that highly talented players might be
released early if they don't fita specific profile or are just,
you know, stuck behind a more established player.
And it's not just about broad geography.
It's about precision. Targeting data helps identify
players with what you might callstylistic mismatches.
What does that mean exactly? Well, it means they don't
(13:14):
conform to a common mold or expectation, but excel in
specific, incredibly valuable ways that aren't immediately
apparent just by watching them casually.
They might not look like a typical winger, but their
numbers for creating chances areoff the charts.
OK, I say, finding unique skill sets.
Exactly. They also actively target
(13:35):
players with minor or past injury histories who might be
undervalued by the market precisely because of those
concerns, even if the data showsthe injury is manageable or not
performance limiting. Risky, but potentially high
reward if the data is right. Potentially, or they might look
for players in positions that are currently undervalued in the
market, perhaps because the prevailing tactical trends don't
(13:57):
highlight their specific strengths at that moment.
This is truly where it gets captivating, because we're
moving far beyond just basic goals and assists.
We're talking about the incredible power of advanced
metrics to reveal what's really happening on the pitch.
Go deeper than the surface stats.
Way deeper. Instead of just looking at a
player's total goals, clubs are now obsessing over efficiency,
(14:18):
how many goals a player scores relative to their time on the
pitch, pitch or their success rate with shots, often known as
shot conversion. Makes sense.
A player with five goals from ten shots is far more clinical
than one with five goals from fifty shots.
Right. Absolutely.
Efficiency is key. And then we have expected goals
or SG, which is arguably one of the most transformative metrics
(14:39):
to hit football analysis in recent years.
XG Everyone talks about it now. They do, and basically XG
quantifies the probability of any given shot resulting in a
goal. It considers a myriad of
factors. The distance from goal, the
angle of the shot, which body part was used, the playing
situation. Was it open play?
A counter attack? A set piece.
All of that matters. All of it, and even the presence
(15:01):
and density of defenders betweenthe shooter and the goal.
By analyzing hundreds of thousands, even millions, of
similar shots across historical data, a precise probability is
assigned to each shot. Give me an exam.
OK, so a penalty kick typically has an XG of around .76, meaning
there's a 76% chance it's scoredbased on history.
(15:21):
But a speculative shot from a tight angle way out on the edge
of the box might only have an XGof say .05 or 5%.
And why does XG matter so much beyond just being a fancy
number? Because it helps assess true
goal scoring, threat and finishing ability beyond the
fickle hand of luck. Or just, you know, random
variation. OK, explain that.
Imagine a striker who has scoredonly three goals in 10 games.
(15:45):
Traditional analysis might labelhim as out of form or not
clinical. Yeah, the headlines would say
Gold Route. Exactly, but if their XG over
those games was say 7 point O, it tells you they were
consistently getting into high probability scoring positions.
They're doing the hard part right.
So they were just unlucky or maybe poor finishing.
It could be either or a combination, but it forces a
(16:07):
different question. It tells you the process of
getting into good spots is working.
A player consistently over performing their XG like an
Erling Hallen who notoriously outperforms his XG season after
season. He scores chances others
wouldn't. Right, he might be an elite
finisher. Conversely, 1 consistently
underperforming might be unluckyor indeed a genuinely poor
(16:28):
finisher who needs specific coaching.
It shifts the focus from just the outcome to the underlying
process of chance creation and quality.
That makes a huge difference in evaluating a player.
Huge and building on that, we have expected assists or XA
drive directly from XGXA measures the probability that a
created chance, what some call akey pass, will actually result
(16:52):
in a goal based on the quality of the shot the teammate takes.
So it measures the quality of the pass essentially.
It measures the quality of the chance created by the pass.
This metric is incredibly powerful for highlighting truly
skilled creators, even if their teammates aren't finishing the
opportunities they provide. So if a midfielder plays amazing
passes but the strikers miss. Their XA will still be high even
(17:12):
if their actual assist count is low.
For example, you might see a player like Killian and Bape who
in a given season has maybe 5 actual assists, but his XA per
90 minutes might be say .625 which is massive.
Indicating he's setting up greatchances consistently.
Exactly, it shows his exceptional creative output
regardless of his teammates finishing ability on that day.
(17:35):
He's doing his job as a creator.And it's absolutely not just
about offensive metrics, right? Defense and pressing matter
hugely. Oh massively for high intensity
systems like Jurgen Klopp's famous geek and pressing at
Liverpool where players press aggressively high up the pitch
immediately after losing possession to win the ball back.
Relentless. Pressure data is absolutely
(17:57):
essential. It helps evaluate a players off
the ball, work rate, their ball recoveries, interceptions, the
percentage of defensive duels. 1things you don't always notice
easily. Like Firmino at Liverpool.
Roberto Firmino is a classic example.
He famously revolutionized the false nine position for
Liverpool. He wasn't known for conventional
goal tallies, not like a traditional #9.
No, not huge goal numbers, but data.
(18:19):
Beautifully captured his crucialpressing metrics, his tireless
work rate, his pressures leadingto turnovers and his exceptional
link up play that made him indispensable to collapse
system. Before data, a coach might have
been pressured to replace him with a more traditional high
scoring striker. And missed his real value.
Completely missed his profound system defining impact.
(18:41):
Yes. And we also delve into
positional and game state data, which is about understanding how
players move and perform under different circumstances, right?
Exactly how does a specific midfielder perform when their
team is maintaining a high pressversus when they're sitting deep
protecting a lead? How do they react to counter
attacks? This granularity is vital for
(19:02):
tactical planning. And then specialized metrics for
specific roles. Of course, things get even
deeper. Successful dribbles per 90 for
wingers, chances created per 90 for creative midfielders, blocks
and successful tackles for central defenders or even
heading statistics. Aerial dual success rates for
teams that employ a more direct long ball tactical approach.
It's about building a unique statistical fingerprint for
(19:24):
every player. Precisely A detailed profile.
It's all about painting that incredibly granular yet complete
picture of a player's contribution far beyond what the
eye test or basic stats could ever provide.
And this granular data often feeds into holistic player
evaluation tools. Right, tools that try to
(19:44):
synthesize all this information.Take something like the Soccer
Mint Performance Rating, or SPR.This isn't just one number, it's
a comprehensive measure that quantifies a player's overall
contribution across different phases of the game.
Defense. Build up attack.
Covering the whole pitch. Exactly.
Factoring in virtually all discernible events on the pitch
and meticulously adjusting for specific player roles, it tries
(20:08):
to provide a single score that acts as a true proxy for overall
on pitch value. And then you have performance
indexes, often visualized strikingly in those spider
charts you see online. Yeah, the web charts, they look
cool. They do, and they offer a
synthetic measure of very specific aspects of a player's
performance, like their vision, their passing IQ, their
dribbling prowess or their defensive positioning.
(20:30):
So you can see where they excel instantly.
Exactly. They're powerful scouting
because they immediately highlight outliers, players who
are exceptional in certain, perhaps niche areas regardless
of their age or general reputation.
It's about spotting that hidden gem, that player who doesn't fit
the typical mold but has one or two world class traits.
(20:51):
That may be traditional scouts miss.
That traditional scouts might miss if they're focused on a
more generalized, well-rounded profile.
All of this data also has an absolutely massive impact on a
club's financial strategy and, crucially, risk reduction.
Yes, the business side is huge. This objective, quantifiable
data significantly reduces the financial risks associated with
(21:12):
player acquisitions. It provides A clearer, far more
objective picture of a player's potential performance and their
likely future career trajectory.Which helps justify the price
tag. Yeah.
Or argue it down. Precisely this helps immensely
in justifying higher wages or transfer fees for your own
existing players because you have the numbers to back up
their value, or, conversely, negotiating lower prices for
(21:34):
transfer targets earned with a precise understanding of their
market value and potential fit. Knowledge is power in
negotiations. Absolutely, Plus the ability to
search through vast, detailed databases of players worldwide
saves clubs incredible amounts of time and money in the initial
scouting process. Sending scouts everywhere is
expensive. Very expensive.
(21:55):
The idea, as always, is that technology complements the human
scout, providing them with better leads and objective
evidence, rather than replacing them entirely, making them more
efficient. OK, so beyond recruitment data
analytics provides incredibly deeper insights into actual
player and team performance, right?
Post match analysis and things like that.
Absolutely. It helps clubs understand
(22:16):
exactly how A-Team or individualplayer performed over a single
match or an entire season, moving far beyond basic stats
like shots on target or simle ball possession.
Which can be misleading sometimes.
Very misleading. Ossession doesn't always mean
control or threat. This granular data gives coaches
and analysts a far more defined and complete picture of what
(22:38):
truly happened on the pitch. It allows them to precisely see
if they're pre match. Tactical instructions were
followed if key areas of the pitch were exploited or a
specific defensive strategy is actually worked as intended.
And this is revolutionizing tactical strategy, as you were
saying, pushing coaches to fundamentally rethink how they
approach the game. It really is.
(22:58):
A deeper analysis of XG, for example, is literally forcing
coaches to reconsider with theirattacking strategies, especially
regarding shot location. Where should we be trying to
shoot from? Like the NBA example you
mentioned. Exactly like the radical change
we've seen in NBA shooting locations over the last 15
years, there's been a dramatic increase in highly efficient 3
pointers and a corresponding reduction in less effective mid
(23:19):
range 2 pointers. Because the data showed 3
pointers were more valuable overtime.
Precisely. In football, it means coaches
are now directing players towards higher XG shot
locations, emphasizing getting into prime scoring positions
inside the box rather than just taking speculative shots from
distance or bad angles. Fewer A hopeful long shots, more
(23:40):
calculated attacks. Ideally, yes, you wouldn't just
throw up a shot from a low percentage area, you'd aim to
work the ball into the highest probability zones.
What's also fascinating here is that this data, particularly XG,
can provide incredibly objectivemeasures to evaluate coach
performance too. Yes, this is a bit more
controversial perhaps, but very powerful Powerful.
(24:02):
It can help distinguish between poor results that are genuinely
caused by bad luck. For instance, A-Team generating
many high XG shots that just aren't converted due to maybe
poor finishing on the day or an exceptionally good opposing
goalkeeper having a world. Beat.
You've all seen those games we have.
Versus results caused by genuinely poor team performance
where the team isn't even creating high quality chances in
(24:22):
the 1st place. The process is flawed.
So it separates bad luck from bad management to some extent.
It helps it moves coaching evaluation beyond simply looking
at the final score, allowing formore nuanced understanding of
the underlying performance trends.
Are we playing well and getting unlucky, or are we just not
playing well? Moneyball is also profoundly
(24:43):
impacting player development andcultivation, truly helping to
build the future of the game from the ground up in the
academies. Yes, this is a huge area of
growth. Data analytics is increasingly
vital in youth development academies.
Providing objective and measurable feedback to young
players and their coaches can significantly speed up learning
processes. Faster improvement.
(25:04):
Potentially, yes, and create powerful virtuous development
cycles instead of just a coach saying you need to improve your
passing, which is quite vague, yeah.
Get better isn't helpful. Data can show a young midfielder
their passing accuracy under pressure, their progressive
passing success rate, or their ability to break defensive lines
with passes. Specific actionable feedback.
(25:25):
Essentially, data becomes a sophisticated tool to help
predict and cultivate a player'slong term potential, guiding
their training and progression with unparalleled precision.
That's the goal, the motto oftenheard in data-driven academies.
We don't by success we created truly embodies this philosophy.
Nice motto. It is by understanding specific
(25:46):
strengths and weaknesses of a young talent through granular
data, perhaps identifying a potential future role based on
their physical traits or early statistical tendencies.
Academies can nurture well-rounded talents
meticulously prepared for the rigors of professional football,
focusing on individual needs within the overarching team
structure. Daily development.
(26:06):
And finally, data analytics has become an absolute game changer
for injury prevention and rehabilitation.
This is huge for clubs, keeping players on the pitch.
Absolutely critical. Keeping your best players fit is
maybe the biggest competitive advantage, and the journey of
data and injury management actually began surprisingly
early, famously with Milan Lab, founded way back in 2002 by
(26:27):
Italian giants AC Milan. 2002 That's early for this kind of
thing. Very early.
It's groundbreaking goal was to proactively reduce injury risk,
accelerate recovery times and personalized training regimes.
It's often cited as extending the careers of aging stars like
the legendary Paolo Maldini. Maldini played forever.
He did played at the highest level until he was nearly 40,
(26:50):
thanks in part to their tailoreddate informed programs managing
his workload and recovery. Incredible.
And now Fast forward to today and high level clubs
consistently monitor players using incredibly sophisticated
tools. GPS tracking vests sworn during
training and matches. Wearable sensors that track bio
mechanics. Advanced video analysis
platforms. The players look like cyborgs
(27:12):
sometimes with all the gear. A little bit.
These tools provide real time data on movement patterns,
velocity, acceleration, deceleration, standard levels,
physical impacts, measuring what's called external load, or
the precise amount of work performed by a player.
So they know exactly how hard everyone's working.
Exactly, and crucially, how thatload accumulates over time.
(27:34):
Researchers have discovered, forexample, that a high number of
short bursts of high speed during training over, say, a
three-week period significantly increases injury risk for
certain muscle groups. Really specific patterns predict
injuries. They've even found that players
often show higher meters of per minute covered in the weeks
immediately preceding an injury,indicating an increased
(27:54):
intensity load that can act as awarning sign.
Maybe they're being pushed too hard.
Wow. So this comprehensive
performance monitoring allows clubs to precisely optimize
individual training loads, gain clearer real time insights into
players fitness levels and readiness to perform.
Red flags before something breaks.
And proactively manage fatigue before it leads to injury.
(28:16):
It provides invaluable objectiveassistance to coaching and
medical staff, shifting the paradigm from being reactive to
injuries. Patching players up after
they're hurt. To being intensely proactive in
player health and longevity, keeping them on the field.
So after exploring the theory and application, let's look at
who's truly getting it right in football.
With this data-driven approach, we have some truly remarkable
(28:39):
case studies. Liverpool FC is often cited as
the gold standard, wouldn't you say?
A true data dream team. Yeah, Liverpool always comes up
first in these conversations. When American company Fenway
Sports Group, who also owned theBoston Red Sox baseball team.
The original Moneyball connection, Sort of.
Sort of, yes. When they acquired Liverpool in
(29:00):
2010, they brought with them a deep, almost zealous belief in
data analytics stemming from their baseball success.
And they didn't just talk the talk, they really invested,
right? Put their money in their
scientific acumen, where their mouth was.
They absolutely did. They assembled a truly
revolutionary data science team led by Dr. Ian Graham, who holds
a PhD in physics as Head of Research.
(29:22):
A physicist running football research.
Amazing. And he was joined by William
Spearman, another PhD in physicsand an ex CERN researcher.
CERN like the particle accelerator.
The very same Tim Waskett, who holds a PhD in astronomy and
daffod steel, a highly skilled statistical researcher.
This level of academic rigor anddiverse scientific background
(29:44):
was virtually unprecedented in football at the time.
That's not your typical footballbackroom staff.
Not at all. Most clubs might have had one or
two analysts back then. Maybe Liverpool built an entire
scientific department, a veritable football analytics
dream team. So what did this dream team do?
This elite team then used advanced mathematical models to
(30:05):
identify players whose underlying metrics highlighted
their potential impact within Jurgen Klopp specific high
intensity tactical framework, even if their traditional stats
didn't immediately jump off the page to conventional scouts.
Finding players who fit the system based on data.
Exactly. Think about their strategic
acquisitions. Muhammad Saleh in 2017 for 36.9
(30:26):
million. At the time, his acquisition
raised eyebrows. Yeah, people remembered him
struggling at Chelsea. They did, but Graham's model
highlighted his exceptional off the ball movements, his
incredible speed to get into dangerous areas and crucially,
his consistently high XG numbers.
He was getting chance. And he went on to shatter goal
scoring records for them. Shatter them.
(30:47):
Then there's Saudi Omani, boughtfor 34 million in 2016.
The data metrics accentuated hisunique ability to carve out goal
scoring opportunities, his relentless pressing, his
disruption of defensive alignments, all absolutely
crucial for Klopp's demanding geese and pressing system.
Another perfect fit, identified by data.
And Roberto Firmino, a 29,000,000 Town investment in
(31:08):
2015. As we discussed, not a
conventional striker in terms ofpure goal output, the false 9,
the false 9. But his pressing metrics, his
tireless workrate, his exceptional link up play
brilliantly spotlighted by the model, made him utterly
essential to Liverpool's fluid frontline.
So these three players, Salamone, Firmino costing a
combined total of less than 100 million, which sounds like a
(31:30):
lot, but isn't for three world class attackers.
Relatively speaking, in today's market, yeah.
They became one of the most feared attacking trios in world
football, scoring countless goals and spearheading Liverpool
successes. It truly proved the power of
data to identify synergistic talent players who, when
combined, elevate each other andthe team far beyond the sum of
(31:52):
their individual traditional stats.
The whole was greater than the sum of its parts.
And the model wasn't just for shrewd acquisitions.
It was for strategic sales too, showcasing the financial acumen
inherent in Moneyball. The Gutino sale.
Yes, the staggering 142 million transfer of Philippe Cutino in
2018, whom they had originally bought for just 8.5 million.
(32:14):
Incredible profit. Incredible.
It was identified by the data team as a peak market value
opportunity. They correctly predicted using
their models that his value wouldn't increase significantly
further and the timing was perfect to cash in.
And that money wasn't just banked, was it?
No, absolutely not. The immense profit from the
single sale directly funded the crucial acquisitions of
defensive linchpins Virgil Van Dyke and Allison Becker, who are
(32:38):
arguably the final pivotal pieces in Liverpool's journey
back to Champions League and Premier League glory.
Turning 1 asset into two key foundational players.
Smart. Very smart.
Liverpool's story stands as a prime example of how astute did
informed recruitment, coupled with a world class coaching
philosophy can allow a club to consistently outperform rivals
(33:00):
with far deeper pockets. It's a compelling case study of
successfully merging traditionalscouting with cutting edge
analytics, punching above their financial weight on the grandest
stage. Beyond the giants like
Liverpool, there are numerous smaller clubs truly punching
above their weight, making intelligent use of data to
compete in increasingly competitive leagues.
You mentioned Matthew Benham. Yes, take Brentford FC in
(33:23):
England and FC Migiland in Denmark, both owned by the Scoot
ex City trader Matthew Benham. He basically applied his
analytical mindset from professional betting markets
directly to football. Interesting background.
And these clubs share a core philosophy maximizing returns in
the transfer market driven by data informed decisions to
consistently compete on significantly smaller budgets
(33:46):
than their rivals. Brentford took a really radical
step, didn't they, with their Academy?
They did. Brentford famously took a bold,
almost revolutionary step in 2016 by closing its traditional
youth Academy entirely. A huge move.
Why did they do that? They decided it wasn't cost
effective for them compared to finding slightly older,
undervalued players, so instead they focused all their resources
(34:09):
on a data-driven B team model, scouting extensively for
undervalued players from lower leagues across Europe or those
released by bigger academies. And developing them.
And developing them within theirsystem.
Neil will play as a classic example sign for modest fee.
His XG numbers relative to his playing time were exceptional,
indicating he was getting into high quality scoring positions
consistently even if he wasn't always finishing them.
(34:31):
The underlying numbers were good.
Exactly. He went on to score 41 goals in
two seasons for them and was later sold to Brighton for a
significant profit. That's the model.
And Michelin. FC Michelin, his Danish club,
were actually pioneers in beta driven football using
proprietary algorithms for scouting and match analysis
almost from their inception. When Benham got involved, they
(34:52):
built a strong track record by targeting players who excelled
in underappreciated areas like their prowess and set pieces and
aerial duels, finding niche advantages.
Then there are Brighton and HoveAlbion in the Premier League and
Union St. Gilouise in Belgium, both
connected through ownership by Tony Bloom.
Another professional gambler andanalytical mind.
(35:13):
You see a pattern here? Definitely, these clubs truly
embody smart, data-driven recruitment.
Brighton in particular is renowned for systematically
exploiting gaps in the market. They're very good at it.
Often signing players from smaller nations and leagues who
possess specific desirable underlying metrics.
Think of Moises Casado from Ecuador and Alexis McAllister
from Argentina. Both sold for huge profits
(35:36):
eventually. Exactly.
Both identified initially for underlying metrics like
defensive duels, 1 ball progression, pressing intensity.
They employ a wide net approach to signing young players for a
relatively low fees, then systematically developing them
within their robust club structure before selling them
on. Union SG, his Belgian club,
(35:56):
operates similarly, but perhaps even more focused on system fit.
They build their recruitment strategy precisely around a
defined tactical system. Aggressive ressing, fast
transitions, a direct attacking style.
So every signing has to fit thatspecific puzzle.
Precisely ensuring every signingfits the puzzle perfectly.
They frequently target undervalued leagues like
(36:18):
France's League 2, looking for players who might not have the
big name but exhibit the exact statistical profile needed for
their system. It's a fantastic example of a
system first data-driven approach to recruitment.
Mercy Dortmund in Germany is another prime example, maybe
slightly different model focusing on youth.
Yes, excelling at identifying and cultivating future
superstars. Leveraging data to spot talents
(36:40):
before they explode onto the global stage, they've
consistently brought in players like Erling Highland.
Obvious talent, but maybe the data confirmed the hype.
The data confirmed the hype and maybe quantified why he was so
special. Staggering goal conversion
rates. Unmatched understanding of off
ball movement even at a young age and Jude Bellingham
(37:01):
identifies for his incredibly mature passing metrics,
defensive efficiency and pressing intensity when he was
just 17 years old. So they spot them young using
data. Spot them young, develop them
incredibly well within their system, and then sell them for
significant profits, which critically funds their entire
operations and allows them to compete with financially
(37:21):
stronger rivals like Bayern Munich.
It's a sustainable model. And AZ Alkmar in the Netherlands
you mentioned. Billy Bean advises them.
Yes, Billy Bean himself serves in an advisory capacity there,
and AZ Alkmar embodies this developmental philosophy.
Their motto? We don't buy success we created
speaks volumes. Same as the Academy idea.
Exactly, they use data to predict and cultivate player
(37:43):
potential from a young age. Players like Calvin Stangs that
create a midfielder with remarkable vision and a high XA,
or Myron Bodu, a modern striker exceptionally skilled at finding
space and making runs behind defenses.
Their focus is on maximizing intrinsic talent through data
guided development. The Major League Soccer MLS in
North America has also transformed itself, right?
(38:05):
Embracing MLS moneyball. Yes, it's fascinating.
Driven by strict salary caps, MLS clubs must innovate
financially. They don't have the option of
just outspending everyone. The cap forces efficiency it.
Forces efficiency and innovation.
They have to balance talent imports from abroad with
developing and exporting their own talent.
Codes like FC Dallas and New York Red Bulls prioritize
(38:26):
Academy development, viewing players as valuable assets that
increase in value and can then generate significant transfer
profits. Like Pepe or Sloanina?
Exactly. Ricardo Pepe sold for $20
million, Gabriel Sloanina for $15 million.
That's serious money generated through development, identified
partly through data. It's a true player trading model
enabled by data. And some MLS clubs are using AI
(38:49):
during games. Yes.
What's even more advanced is howsome MLS clubs are using data in
real time. LASC, for instance, uses
sophisticated AI systems to analyze live match information
and opponent tactical patterns, enabling real time tactical
adjustments during games. Like a coach getting live data
feeds to change tactics. Essentially, yes.
(39:10):
It's much like how hedge fund managers constantly modify their
strategies in response to live market data.
It's a truly sophisticated application of data moving
beyond just recruitment to influencing immediate match
outcomes. And we're even seeing this
revolution take hold in African football now, moving beyond just
gut feeling. Absolutely.
Moving beyond traditional gut feeling, scouting analytics
(39:31):
platforms are identifying data-driven diamonds from
various leagues across the continent.
Clubs like Orlando Pirates in South Africa even used a coach
ID service. A service was based on data
profiling algorithms to successfully find their head
coach, Jose Rivero. Despite a relatively thin
traditional CV, the data suggested a perfect stylistic
and philosophical match for the club.
(39:51):
And did it work? It did.
He led them to immediate trophy wins.
It's a powerful testament to Data's ability to spot potential
beyond conventional resumes. And you know who knows who?
OK, so it sounds incredibly successful.
But despite all this incredible success and revolutionary
impact, it's absolutely crucial to acknowledge the inherent
(40:13):
challenges, the misconceptions, and the limitations that still
exist in football analytics. Absolutely.
It's not a magic bullet. First, let's address the idea
that Moneyball is kind of a lie.You hear that sometimes.
A common criticism. You do, and it's important to
recognize that even the Oakland A's, the original Moneyball
team, had foundational strengthsand existing star players like
Miguel Tejada and Mark Mulder, They weren't starting from
(40:35):
absolute 0. Right, they had some good
players already. Moneyball is about optimizing
and finding complementary piecesto turn a good starting lineup
into a potential title winning squad through smart, efficient
additions. It's not necessarily about
building a championship team entirely from no one's or
magically conjuring success out of thin air.
It's about leveraging existing strengths more effectively and
(40:58):
finding value on the margins. And as we touched on earlier,
football's extreme fluidity versus baseball's codified
nature remains a huge hurdle, doesn't it?
It's probably the biggest conceptual challenge, yes.
One of the biggest challenges lies in football's highly fluid,
open and continuous nature compared to baseball's rigid,
repeatable and stop start plays.Much harder to isolate
(41:19):
variables. Exactly, it's fundamentally much
harder to quantify the precise value of every single action in
football. How much is a perfectly weighted
pre assist pass that doesn't directly lead to a shot truly
worth in terms of winning probability?
Does a seemingly insignificant sideways pass from a defender
significantly alter the team's chance of scoring or conceding
(41:41):
down the line? Those ripple effects are hard to
measure. Incredibly difficult.
These nuanced, interconnected actions make direct statistical
translation incredibly difficultcompared to a discreet event
like a walk or a strikeout in baseball, which have very clear
start and end points and probabilities.
There's also the ever present unquantifiable human element.
(42:02):
You can't measure everything. Absolutely not.
Data, no matter how sophisticated, simply cannot
capture everything. Intangible qualities like true
leadership. A player's genuine adaptability
to a completely new culture or environment.
Moving country, new language. Exactly the vital team spirit,
the cohesion within the squad, the chemistry between players on
(42:22):
the pitch, these are absolutely crucial in football, yet they
remain incredibly hard, if not impossible to measure with
numbers alone. How do you measure team spirit?
You can't put a statistical value on a captain's rallying
cry in the locker room at halftime, or a player's
willingness to sacrifice personal glory for the teens
collective good. Those things matter hugely.
(42:43):
Then there's the inherent preoccupation with specific
styles of play that many football managers possess.
The manager's philosophy. Yes, the manager factor is huge.
Managers often have deeply ingrained philosophies about how
the game should be played, whether it's high pressing,
possession based, direct long ball tactics, whatever.
And the data might suggest a player who doesn't fit that
(43:05):
style. Precisely, a data-driven
recruitment department might identify a player with an
incredibly high pass completion percentage and exceptional ball
retention. A really tidy player.
But if the coach insists on a direct long ball game, that
bypasses the midfield entirely. That player skills are useless
in that system. Their specific value might be
(43:26):
completely negated. For the Moneyball strategy to
truly work effectively, there needs to be total trust and
harmony, a shared vision betweenthe analytical department, the
recruitment team and the coaching staff.
Everyone pulling in the same direction.
Otherwise you end up with expensive data, expensive
analysis that simply ignored or misinterpreted.
I can only imagine the eye rollsfrom seasoned scouts in those
(43:47):
early days being told a spreadsheet knows more than
their gut feeling forged over decades.
Yeah, that cultural resistance must have been immense.
And that leads directly to cultural resistance.
The widespread adoption of data and analytics across football
has certainly faced headwinds and degrees of resistance, as
you expect. People don't like change.
(44:08):
Generally not, especially when it challenges long held
practices. This is because it often
encroaches on how things have been done in the past for
generations. It requires people from scouts
to coaches to board members to think differently, to challenge
their long held beliefs, which could be profoundly challenging
and uncomfortable for those accustomed to traditional
(44:31):
intuition based methods. It's not just about adopting
technology, it's about changing minds.
It's a massive cultural shift, absolutely.
Looking at the risks and limitations of the model itself,
beyond just cultural hurdles, one key challenge is market
efficiency and poaching right aseveryone gets smarter.
The low hanging fruit disappears.
As more and more clubs adopt sophisticated data-driven
(44:52):
models, the market naturally becomes more efficient.
This means those valuable inefficiencies, the undervalued
players are skills, become harder and harder to exploit
because more clubs are looking for exactly the same things.
The secret gets out. The secret gets out Moreover,
successful data-driven clubs, especially the smaller ones,
also face the constant risk of their best players, the ones
(45:15):
they identified and developed, and even their invaluable
analytical staff. The brains behind the operation.
Being poached by wealthier rivals who can offer exorbitant
salaries and resources, it's hard to keep success contained.
There's also the potential risk of over reliance on sales.
You mentioned treating players just as assets.
Yes, treating player trading primarily as a revenue model
(45:37):
where you constantly buy low andsell high carries inherent
risks. This is especially true in a
volatile or down market where player values might plummet
unexpectedly. Can't always guarantee a profit.
No. Furthermore, a high player
turnover, while potentially financially beneficial in the
short term, can sometimes negatively impact team
chemistry, tactical stability, and even the connection with the
(45:59):
fan base who get attached to players.
And for smaller clubs, just getting the data can be hard.
Definitely. Data accessibility and quality
can be a huge barrier. They might struggle to afford
the sophisticated analytical platforms, the expensive
tracking technology needed for granular data, and crucially,
the highly trained personnel required to collect, clean and
(46:20):
accurately interpret that high quality data.
Creates a data divide. It really does a digital divide
within the sport between the haves and have nots in terms of
analytical capability. But despite all of that, one
truth remains paramount, the indispensable human element.
Always, despite the ever increasing power and
sophistication of data, the verybest decisions in football,
(46:41):
whether it's recruitment, tactics, player development, man
management, still blend analytical insights with the
irreplaceable knowledge, intuition and sheer experience
of seasoned scouts, coaches and sporting directors.
Data is a tool, not the whole answer.
Exactly. Data enhances, it informs, it
provides powerful tools. But it does not, and likely
(47:02):
never will, completely replace human expertise, empathy,
context and judgment. It's a powerful collaborative
partnership. Or at least it should be.
So what does the future hold forMoneyball in football?
Where is this all heading? Well, it's abundantly clear that
the future is irrevocably data-driven.
I think we can say that safely, but it will absolutely remain
(47:22):
human LED. We are already witnessing
massive, unprecedented growth ininvestment in data analysts,
data scientists, software developers within professional
sports teams. Bigger analytics departments
everywhere. Much bigger.
Some leading clubs now employed dozens of dedicated
professionals in these roles, a far cry from a decade ago when
perhaps one or two existed, if that.
(47:44):
The Tampa Bay Rays, for instance, a baseball team often
seen as analogous to Liverpool'sapproach, famously have
something like 39 dedicated professionals in their analytics
department. 39 people just for data.
Just for data, football's catching up fast.
And the next frontier involves even more sophisticated AI and
predictive analytics, you think?I think so.
(48:04):
Imagine AI systems that can simulate a player's performance
not just in one tactical setup, but across various formations
and styles, helping to predict their adaptability before you
even sign them. How would player X fit into our
specific system versus another? Wow, virtual scouting.
Almost. Almost or AI that can scour vast
data sets to identify hidden patterns and predict future
(48:27):
performance trends, perhaps evenidentifying injury risks or
signs of decline before a playershows visible signs of slowing
down or spotting emerging talentearlier.
Think about the strategic evolution, too.
As the MLS example vividly shows, clubs are increasingly
operating much like financial organizations.
Like portfolio managers. Yeah, meticulously balancing
(48:47):
talent imports with developing and exporting players for
profit. All meticulously driven by data.
The Moneyball model in that sense will play an ever
increasing role, with clubs needing to focus on strategic
data, informed investments rather than just impulsive big
money purchases based on reputation.
Wearable technology will also continue its rapid advancement,
providing instant real time insights into players fitness,
(49:10):
form and recovery times. Often stream directly to
coaching staff on the sidelines during training and maybe even
matches eventually. More data, faster.
Exactly. This will lead to highly
personalized player profiles that include not just physical
data, but maybe insights into nutrition, sleep patterns,
mental resilience, track throughapps, and incredibly detailed
(49:31):
movement patterns giving a complete 360° view of the
athlete. Trying to optimize every single
thing. That's the goal.
Optimize every single facet of human performance to gain that
tiny edge. And at the core of it all is
this constant quest, isn't it? This never ending chase.
It is the never ending statistical chase, the
continuous development of new styles and tactical approaches
(49:52):
to outsmart the competition. It means that clubs must
constantly evolve their strategyand innovate their scouting and
analytical methods just to stay ahead, let alone get an
advantage. Standing still means falling
behind. Absolutely.
It's not a destination, It's a continuous arms race of
information and innovation wherestagnation means you get left
(50:12):
behind very quickly. What an incredible deep dive
we've had. We've journeyed from the
baseball fields of Oakland, witnessing Billy Bean's
groundbreaking revolution, all the way to the football pitches
of the Premier League and beyond.
Around the globe, really. Exploring how the revolutionary
Moneyball philosophy has perfected It's clear that in a
(50:34):
world of ever increasing financial disparities,
outsmarting your rivals by leveraging data to find hidden
value, optimize performance, andstrategically manage assets is
not just a competitive edge, it's becoming essential.
It often seems like an essential.
Survival strategy. For many clubs, I think that's
fair to say. You've seen how data.
Illuminates paths to. Victory, unearthing talents and
(50:55):
strategies that others overlook,and how it's changing the very
fabric of the game we watch every week.
It certainly is so as the beautiful game.
Continues its. Captivating dance with
algorithms and ever advancing technology.
Here's a thought for you listening.
What other undervalued aspects of football?
Perhaps things like player mental well-being, genuine fan
(51:16):
engagement beyond merchandise, or even the nuanced psychology
of team dynamics and leadership might be ripe for radical
disruption through the power of data in the future.
That's a great question. What's the next frontier?
How might the continuous evolution of analytics?
Reshape our fundamental understanding of what it truly
means to win, not just on the pitch, but in the entire
sprawling ecosystem of the sport.
(51:37):
What stands out to you about howthis relentless shift will
influence the future of the gamewe all love?