October 7, 2025 • 30 mins
🎙️ EP#377 | DSD | Sanchez Stabbed, Kirk Silenced, Gaza Spun: Truth Bombs Incoming
After a brief recharge, Ray is back—and diving in headfirst. In this raw and rapid-fire solo episode, Ray unpacks a wild mix of recent headlines, controversies, and cultural shifts. From Mark Sanchez’s bizarre parking-lot stabbing incident to the deeper implications of weaponized religion, this episode brings the trademark DSD intensity with unfiltered insight and a sharp lens on media narratives.
Ray breaks down the growing divide over Christianity’s role in politics, sparked by voices like Reverend Munther Isaac and the post-Charlie Kirk fallout. He critiques the redefinition of religious loyalty as political allegiance, exposing how verses like Genesis 12:3 are used to justify blind support for modern geopolitical agendas. This conversation leads straight into the ideological battles within the MAGA movement and how certain factions are exploiting theology to manipulate public opinion.
He doesn’t stop there. Ray calls out the mainstream media and political elites—from Van Jones' Gaza remarks to possible AI-generated Trump Oval Office clips. He questions why key figures have gone silent or moved on post-Charlie Kirk, including Kirk's own inner circle. The final segment hits hard with Rob O’Neill’s piercing analysis of the assassination footage and the suspiciously quick cleanup of the crime scene—reigniting doubts and sharpening suspicions. Strap in for 30 minutes of truth bombs and razor-sharp reflection.
🔥 Top 7 Key Points
⚖️ Mark Sanchez's Career Wrecked Over Parking Lot Fight📖 Reverend Munther Isaac Debunks Biblical Misuse in Politics🧠Christianity Is Being Weaponized—And It's Strategic🧱 Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: Sus Behavior All Around🔍 Van Jones & Misinformation: Gaza Narrative Control🤖 AI Trump? Ray Thinks So—And Here's Why🧱 Rob O'Neill Calls Out Major Red Flags in Kirk Shooting
🔑 Keywords & ThemesMark Sanchez, stabbing, parking dispute, Fox Sports, Reverend Munther Isaac, Gaza, Christianity in politics, Genesis 12:3, Israel, MAGA divide, Charlie Kirk, assassination theories, Candace Owens, Turning Point USA, Rob O'Neill, sniper analysis, Van Jones, Gaza babies, AI Trump, Tucker Carlson, Lindsey Graham, neoconservatives, neoliberalism, disinformation, Iran, Qatar, TikTok influence, Trump Oval Office speech, JFK assassination, 9/11 parallels, political theater, grieving process, media silence, Erica Kirk, Deep State, weaponized religion, conspiracy, Republican infighting
⏳ Chapters & Timestamps
00:00 – Ray returns after a short break00:51 – Mark Sanchez stabbing & downward spiral03:29 – Ray’s lifestyle evolution & health focus04:51 – Reverend Munther Isaac on misused scripture06:41 – Weaponization of religion in politics08:29 – Defining “God’s chosen people”09:51 – Charlie Kirk, MAGA, and deepening political divides11:18 – JFK vs 2025: Are we falling for the same playbook?13:22 – The “Magic Bullet” and narrative manipulation14:48 – The strange behavior of Kirk’s inner circle17:29 – Van Jones & Gaza disinformation claims20:20 – Trump Oval Office address: AI deepfake?22:29 – Nobody’s following up on supposed “peace deals”24:07 – Erica Kirk tweet & public skepticism25:47 – Rob O’Neill dissects the Kirk shooting footage29:17 – University paved over the crime scene30:00 – Final thoughts & Zipix sponsor shout-out
📢 Follow Deep Shallow Dive on Social Media
đź“Ś Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepshallowdive
đź“Ś Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/deepshallowdive/
đź“Ś TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@deepshallowdive
đź“Ś YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@deepshallowdive
đź“Ś Twitter: https://twitter.com/deepshallowdive
đź“Ś Threads: https://threads.net/@deepshallowdive
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:01):
Free audio post production. Byalphonic.com the following.
Podcast is a deep shallow dive production.
And you're going to love it. OK, let's go.
All right. Oh, my God, I am back.
My apologies to everybody, and thanks for the folks that
reached out and said, dude, is everything OK?
(00:22):
You haven't put out a podcast ina few days.
But yeah, everything was fine. I just needed a little break,
man. I'm not going to lie.
It's literally been two years, two years solid that I think I
have put out an episode, not daily, but heck, probably at
least three times a week. So, yeah, man, I just needed to
(00:43):
recharge a little bit. I really did.
I started last week, you know, not doing my my normal or not my
normal, but not doing one on Monday.
And then anyway, things just gothectic.
OK, enough with that. But I am back and and hopefully
better than ever. All right, first thing, super
weird situation involving formerNFL quarterback Mark Sanchez,
(01:06):
USC Trojan guy. And although Sanchez didn't
really, he kind of was a bust inthe NFL, but he's doing amazing
as a Fox Sports analyst. But then I guess on Saturday
night or Friday night in Indianapolis, It says former NFL
quarterback Mark Sanchez is now facing a felony battery charge
for what authorities said Mondaywas a fight over parking, in
(01:31):
addition to the misdemeanor charges that the Fox Sports
analyst was already facing from the weekend incident in
Indianapolis. Basically it says we are
literally talking about people fighting over a parking space
and or a dispute about where people are parking and it
resulted in someone receiving just incredibly significant
(01:54):
injuries. So Sanchez got stabbed by a 69
year old truck driver who backedinto a hotel's loading dock in
downtown Indianapolis, leading to the confrontation.
Anyway, the learning from that is just, I think at a certain
(02:18):
age, if you've had too many beverages, just go to your hotel
room. Oh my God.
Like Mark Sanchez now has prettymuch thrown away his, his
football analyst career. And, you know, this was
interesting. What got reported initially was
(02:39):
that Sanchez got stabbed and it almost made it look like the the
guy was at fault. And then as, as things
developed, I guess her, her social media, the, the, the, the
script flipped and they realizedit was Sanchez who was the
aggressor. And I guess this 69 year old
(03:00):
dude was pretty much defending himself against Sanchez, who
again, from what I'm reading waspretty hammered.
Anyway, that is just dumb. Absolutely dumb.
So if any of you still party like that, which I do not party
like that at all, God, I have not been drunk in a long time.
(03:24):
Oh my God, Like in a really longtime.
Like maybe several years. Now that I think about it,
that's pretty insane. For those of you that knew me
back in the day, back in the LA Ray days, when, when my famous
quote to my brother was I'm going to party every weekend for
the rest of my life. I literally said that I think I
(03:47):
was in my mid 20s at the time. So I probably felt that in my
mid 20s. But I will tell you what, I do
not feel that now. And I am such a freak about,
about my health that there's no way I, I could even remotely
live that kind of lifestyle. That's funny.
That is funny. Things change for the better.
(04:08):
Thank God. OK, let's talk about what's
going on. We've all heard it.
Genesis 12. Three.
I will bless those who bless you.
Politicians like Ted Cruz and Mike Johnson use it to say
Christians must support the modern state of Israel.
But here's the truth. This verse is about Abraham, not
a political state founded in 1948.
(04:31):
All right, I don't think you'll recognize that voice, but that
is Reverend Munther Isaac. He's actually a super famous
Christian reverend and doctor that lives in Gaza City, I
believe. And he's been very vocal about
what's been taking place in thatPalestine area.
(04:51):
And he was on Tucker Carlson andhe's been on a bunch of things.
By the way, it is kind of cool. I'm getting guys that have been
on Tucker Carlson. That's that's a little feather
in my cap actually. And I'll take that.
I'll take that as a compliment. But anyway, I actually
interviewed with this guy today or I did an interview with him
today and it turned out really good.
And he's super, super interesting guy.
(05:12):
And it, you know, continues thateducation process that that
quite frankly, I'd like to take you guys through in terms of
just understanding the Christianmindset and understanding
Christianity from quite frankly,what I think are real
Christians. And the reason I'm doing this is
because I do think this is a major theme of what is going on
(05:34):
in the United States and it's going to be a major theme of
what takes place in the world. I really do.
I am seeing a tremendous surge in, I mean, the way I'm going to
say it is the weaponizing of Christianity and the weaponizing
of religion. And and I'm really seeing that
(05:55):
host Charlie Kirk situation and we're going to talk a little bit
more about that as well. But give a listen to the rest of
what Reverend Isaac says. The New Testament, the promise
is fulfilled in the seed of Abraham and that's it is Jesus
Christ. The blessing isn't military
power or political deals. It's salvation through Christ
(06:16):
for all nations. When leaders twist this text to
demand loyalty to a secular state.
So this is really what the wholeargument is, and that is, is the
Bible talking about the secular state of Israel, the modern day
state of Israel? Is it talking about Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?
(06:38):
Obviously, I don't think it is. And I'm not even Christian, let
alone do a lot of people. Man, there's a lot of chatter on
this right now, and it's really dividing, especially the
Republican and even MAGA movement into two distinct
sides. So let's listen to the rest of
this. They turn faith into fear and
(07:00):
God into a vending machine for blessing.
That's not the gospel, It's favoritism, it's exceptionalism.
And Scripture says God chose no partiality.
God's heart is for justice, mercy and truth, not political
manipulation. All right.
I will say, I mean, that makes alot of sense to me.
(07:20):
Like it's so funny as a non religious person, if I think
about OK, who are God's chosen people?
I mean, in my mind, I'm like, OK, if God is such a wonderful
entity, which obviously I think he is because I personally do
believe in a God, then I think that God is not going to choose
(07:42):
based on DNA or choose based on where in this planet you were
born or anything. Again, it has to be something
bigger and broader than that. You know, for example, maybe
God's chosen people are the people that I don't know, live a
certain way or you know, people like Reverend Isaac, you know,
(08:06):
their, their thought is that it's people that have chosen
Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
That actually makes sense to me.Again, for them, not for me, but
that makes sense to me that in their eyes they'd say, OK, if
you have accepted Jesus into your life, then we'd think that
you are part of God's chosen people because again, Jesus to
(08:31):
the Christians is God. That's pretty wild, man.
Man, I've learned a lot about this stuff.
I really have. And I and I find it very
interesting. And honestly, I'm so glad I've
learned a lot about this becauseit is really, it is really
playing a huge role in what's going on in our politics, in our
(08:51):
everything, I mean, in everything, everything that is
being drilled down through the Trump administration has a
thread of Christianity to it. And again, the the scary part is
if if that Christianity gets weaponized for a particular
(09:12):
agenda. I mean, that's really the scary
part. And again, if you think about
it, the this was already done. Like, this playbook has kind of
been created and that's what happened in 2001 after 911 and
the creation of this War on Terror and creation of, you
know, weapons of mass destruction.
(09:34):
And Muslims are bad and we need to go to war with Muslims.
Now. Ironically, I don't remember
them necessarily making Christians good then and Muslims
bad. It was more just saying Muslims
are bad. But what I see taking place
right now is a little bit the opposite.
(09:55):
It's the building up of Christians.
But you know, I'm going to knockon wood because I hope this
doesn't happen. I hope we don't get another
Charlie Kirk type event. And I don't necessarily mean an
assassination. I mean something awful that's on
a grand scale that has, you know, maybe mass casualties.
(10:16):
And I'm hoping that doesn't happen.
And then if it did happen again,let's pray it doesn't, you know,
it's, it's pinned on, you know, kind of the, the 19 Muslims with
box cutters, which was the deal of 911.
And now all of a sudden we've got a global division taking
place between Christianity and Islam.
(10:39):
And then in the United States, Imean, you're seeing it right
now. There's really this division
that continues to be widened between the left and the right.
And whether that's the I, I don't really think the Charlie
Kirk situation is, well, actually it is kind of widening
it because obviously they, they,they are saying Tyler Robinson,
(11:00):
who is, you know, has a trans lover and you know who, who was
a furry and all that. So obviously they're trying to
drive, you know, that division with the trans community.
So that is one of the key key dividers between left and right.
Anyway, just pay attention to all this stuff.
(11:23):
It, it is pretty formulaic. You know, this is interesting.
I posted something on Instagram the other day that talked about,
you know, 1963 versus 2025. And so obviously with 1963, I'm
kind of referencing the JFK assassination.
And here, hold on, let me, let me read it.
Maybe it's just easier if I readit.
(11:43):
Let's see, where is it? OK, I said.
Over the past two years, I've looked into so many things,
mainly out of curiosity. The JFK assassination still
blows my mind that the American public was so naive to believe
such a unlikely narrative about Lee Harvey Oswald.
And gosh, how many still believethat?
(12:05):
But that was 1963, a much simpler time back then, so maybe
that explains it since it was 62years ago.
Then again, I wonder if someone will make this exact same post
in 2087. I bet they do.
OK, you see what I did there? I tried to be clever.
I tried to be clever. And my point was that, you know,
(12:29):
in 1963, in broad daylight, the sitting president of the United
States was assassinated. And again, I mean, if you think
that was a single bullet by Lee Harvey Oswald, wow, I would have
to disagree with you. I will respect your opinion, but
(12:52):
I will absolutely have to disagree with you.
You know, we've talked about that magic bullet theory, you
know, the bullet changing directions in the air, going
through, you know, people 7 times and then magically
appearing on the Gurney in the hospital in pristine condition.
I mean, that's insane to me thatthe American public would
(13:14):
believe it. And the point of my post was to
say, hey, look what we fell for in 1963, but I almost feel like
we're falling for the same thingin 2025.
And obviously this is in reference to the Charlie Kirk
situation. There are so many open ends to
this and so much that just doesn't make sense.
(13:37):
But it's it's pretty wild. Like people are just moving on,
like just completely have moved on.
And that includes Turning Point USA, honestly, it includes his
wife. It includes all of the
conservative Republican dudes. And really the only person that
it doesn't include is pretty much Candace Owens and then, you
(14:02):
know, to an extent, Tucker Carlson.
But it is pretty interesting to me how fast everybody seems to
have moved on from poor Charlie Kirk, whom, by the way, I'm not
going to lie, I genuinely feel bad for him.
Like, I genuinely feel like, man, he just got played.
(14:23):
He absolutely got played. And like, I don't know, I am
seeing so little of his friends actually be what I consider true
friends. And, you know, the only one I
really consider as a true friendis Candace Owens.
Now, I've had this discussion with a few people.
(14:44):
I mean, you know, I keep one eyeopen on her as well, and a lot
of that goes back to the way her, her and Tucker Carlson were
against that Nick Fuentes kid. I mean, I thought that was
weird. That was super SUS and it was
the first time it caused me to really doubt Candace Owens, You
know, so it's not like I take everything she says or does as
(15:05):
gospel anymore. I really don't.
Same thing with Tucker. You know, obviously I do.
I do listen to the two of them, not as much actually, and I do
still respect them. But I will say in terms of the
Charlie Kirk stuff, I think she's doing excellent, excellent
work on that. And she's really turning over
all the all the stones that blows me away that that his true
(15:27):
friends are not his true friendsare just like, it's, it's like,
here's the best way to describe it.
It's as if they are acting like Charlie Kirk was a 95 year old
guy who peacefully died in his sleep and they moved right to
celebration of life. You know what I mean?
And and I'm not a fan of that. I'm really not like anyone that
(15:50):
has a tragic death. I don't know how you move right
to celebration of life. I really don't.
I don't know how you just get over the grieving so easily and
move to celebration of life. Gosh, when our dad passed away
and our dad's, you know, our dad's passing, he was 84 and you
know, it wasn't tragic. Now it was sudden.
(16:11):
He did, he did kind of suddenly pass.
So I guess there's a little bit of tragicness to that.
But I mean, I've said it before and I'm going to say it again.
I, I, I grieved for a solid year.
And I know my brother grieved and I know our, our mom really
grieved. Our mom actually grieved for
like 2 years, believe it or not.And, and I'm talking like
(16:33):
serious grieving, like like likenot being able to to really be
yourself. And so with Charlie, I just
don't get it. Like I don't get how his wife
can, you know, go on Twitter theother day and I guess she was
appearing in Chicago for something and she tweeted out
like like like how y'all do in Chicago or something like that.
(16:57):
I don't know, man. I just find it odd.
I find it odd. I think it's very, very
interesting, for lack of a a more descriptive word that you
can get through the grieving phase so fast.
I just I think that's odd. I think that's odd and that's a
little bit off to me. So, OK, All right, next clip are
(17:19):
this is Van Jones. He's that CNN political analyst,
super liberal, super Democrat. But this is what I call a
neoliberal. And what I mean by that is this
guy to me is no different than someone like Lindsey Graham or
Ted Cruz. He just wears the Democrat
(17:41):
T-shirt. If you are a young person, you
open up your phone and all you see.
Is dead Gaza baby dead? Gaza baby dead guys, baby Diddy
dead. Guy's a baby.
Dead guy's a baby. I love this conversation because
I think people, those of us who went to college, give a lot.
More. Credit to college courses for
How the world. Works than I do.
This is not about. Critical race theory on college
(18:02):
campus this is about. Iran, Iran and Qatar have come
up with a disinformation campaign that they are.
Running through tik. T.O.K and Instagram.
That is massive. If you are a young person, you
open up your phone and all you see is dead.
Gaza baby dead. Gaza baby dead Gaza baby Diddy.
Dead Gaza baby. Dead Gaza baby.
(18:26):
So. That's not.
That's not. DEI that.
Is a Geo play, but the adversarythat is, that is, that is
deliberately trying to divide the West against itself.
You know, I don't know what was worse with that clip him kind of
like downplaying dead babies, dead Gaza babies.
In that case, I don't know if that was worse or if the crowd
(18:47):
laughing at it was worse when hesaid dead Gaza baby, dead Gaza
baby, dead Gaza baby Diddy dead,Gaza baby dead.
You know, like the, the, the whole thing was just horrible.
And again, when I say a neoliberal is the same thing as
a neoconservative and that someone like Van Jones is no
different than Lindsey Graham, it's because they're both again,
(19:11):
trying to sell people on the narrative that Iran and Qatar
are infiltrating young people's minds by putting that stuff in
their social media speed. And all that's meant to do is
divide the West. And you know what?
That is just such a crock of shit because all of that stuff
(19:36):
is not being done by Iran and Qatar.
They give they give those countries, well, they do it on
purpose, but they try to act like they're like these genius
PR infiltrators and genius marketers and they're just not
like they're absolutely not. That stuff is on the feeds
because that is the reality of what is taking place.
You know, there are dead babies in Gaza, unfortunately.
(19:59):
And so obviously Van Jones's bread or matzo is but.
Exactly where Ted Cruz and Lindsey Grahams are, and so I'm
going to let you read between the lines on that one.
I want to thank the countries that helped me put this
together, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan.
(20:20):
All right, So while Van Jones issaying Qatar or Qatar is feeding
disinformation, here's PresidentTrump on Friday talking about
the supposed peace deal that ends the war in Gaza.
Now, again, this was another presidential address from the
Oval Office, by the way. I think he's using AI to do
(20:41):
these things. And obviously you can't see this
in a video, but if you see any of his recent presidential
addresses from the Oval Office where he's basically sitting
behind a desk, it's his hands. The hands are the dead giveaway
because they're in the same position every time.
And they, they kind of do this like weird twitching.
(21:01):
It's, it's very strange. I absolutely think they are
using an AI version of Trump with the voice, by the way.
And that stuff is totally easy to do now with the progress in,
in that technology. But I do think that's AI Trump.
But listen to the rest of this and so many others.
So many people fought so hard. This is a big day.
(21:26):
We'll see how it all turns out. We have to get the final word
down and concrete. Very importantly, I look forward
to having the hostages come hometo their parents and having some
of the hostages, unfortunately, you know, the condition they're
in, come home likewise to their parents because their parents
(21:46):
wanted them just as much as though that young man or young
woman were alive. So I just want to let you know
that this is a very special day,maybe unprecedented in many
ways. It is unprecedented.
But thank you all, and thank youall to those great countries
that helped. We were given a tremendous
(22:08):
amount of help. Everybody was unified in wanting
this war to end and seeing peacein the Middle East, and we're
very close to achieving that. Thank you all, and everybody
will be treated fairly. You know the other reason why I
think that's AI, because he didn't like toot his own horn
very much. I'm not even kidding.
(22:31):
Most of the time when he talks about something, especially
something that he's accomplished, I mean, he thanks
himself like 50 times during that process.
And so in that clip, he did not toot his own horn or pat himself
on the back. That's another reason why I
think it's totally AI. OK, anyway, let's see what
happens. I mean, that was a big to do
(22:52):
over the weekend and then kind of like nothing, like, is the
war over? Are we done?
Were the hostages released? I mean, who knows?
They, they really don't follow up.
It's, it's, it's I'm realizing the MO is to like put a big
piece of news out there and thenjust never talk about it again.
And they think everyone's going to forget because nine times out
(23:15):
of 10, they do forget. I guess you can use the JFK
assassination as the best example.
I mean, again, it blows my mind that the American public didn't
demand more in 1963. But here we are in 2025 with the
Charlie Kirk assassination. And honestly, I can't say the
(23:35):
American public in, in totality is demanding more.
There's there's probably a very small group that's centered on
the Republican MAGA side. They're the only ones demanding
more. OK, let me read you this.
Here's the quote from Erica Kirk, or here is the tweet from
her that she did on 10/2. It says, hey, Chicago, what do
(24:01):
you say with a question mark? So obviously she was headed to
Chicago and somebody replied they said.
This might be unpopular but I find it very weird how a widow
has stepped into the CEO role atTurning Point USA, delivered 2
speeches, 1 at a stadium memorial where Charlie's parents
(24:21):
weren't even present, and is already going on podcast and
traveling around the country just two weeks after her husband
was assassinated brutally in front of the world.
Shouldn't she be home with her two young children who just lost
their dad? I mean, that's a good take,
brother. That is a good take.
(24:42):
James Herbinger. So you know, what are your
thoughts on that? What do you guys think?
Do you think it's SUS? Do you think it's, it's just
crazy how, how much she's out and about on podcast laughing,
acting like nothing really happened.
Again, when I think of the grieving process and you know,
(25:05):
for me, that's really been been our dad, man.
There's no way I could have had that mentality 2 weeks after.
I did not have that mentality probably for a full year.
I'm not even kidding. I really think it affected my
personality and just my outlook on not not necessarily my
outlook, but just the way I acted like I just wasn't in a,
(25:27):
you know, happy go lucky place really for a full year.
I I really wasn't. I really wasn't.
So anyway, all right, let me seeif there's anything else.
Oh, you know what? I do want to play this clip.
This is funny. So this is Rob O'Neill, the guy
that, according to Deep Shallow Dive guest Matt Kubler, did not
kill Osama bin Laden. And if you listen to that
(25:48):
episode, God, I don't even know how long ago that was, but that
was actually a great episode. If you haven't listened to that,
go look up, look up Matt Kubler or Kubler, you can actually go
to the deep shallow dive.com website, go to the guest tab and
then easily find it. Or what am I saying, you can use
the deep shallow dive search tool and just type in like Osama
(26:08):
or bin Laden. It should come up anyway.
Remember, he was the one, Matt, that is that said, Rob O'Neill,
the guy that's credited with killing bin Laden, did not
really do it. And by the way, I actually
totally agree with him on that. I totally agree with him on
that. But now Rob O'Neill kind of
makes the rounds, and here he ison Piers Morgan and talking
(26:31):
about the Charlie Kirk shooting,and he gives a really good take
on this. So hey, remember, we're all
about judging the take. So whether he killed Bin Laden
or not, this is a great take. That's an easy shot.
Yeah, even for someone, I think they they throw the word sniper
around almost as much as they throw the word hero around way
too often. Anyone with a hunting rifle, a
(26:51):
30 out six like that, that's an easy shot. 200 yards as a
sniper, which I am, you pick which nostril you want and I'll
put it in it. So that's easy.
The the issues just for me, I mean, it it, it was off it right
from the beginning for me. It from do we not guard rooftops
anymore? There's been assassinations,
assassination attempts all over the world.
(27:12):
Why aren't we looking at rooftops?
And then when I was sent the I was sent the video with this at
the same message where they saidCharlie Kirk was just shot.
When I watched that horrific video, he was obviously dead
before he hit the ground. But the questions immediately
started to come to me. That was, but that was not an
entry wound that we saw. We saw an exit wound.
So where'd that bullet come from?
You don't bleed like, and I've shot guys closer than the camper
(27:34):
was and an exit. An entry wound doesn't look like
that. An exit wound does.
Why did his shirt move the way it did?
When I've shot people, their their shirts didn't move like
that. And then the initial reaction,
well, he was obviously wearing body armor and it was
deflection. One, no, he wasn't wearing body
armor. And two, it doesn't deflect like
that off of body armor. Why was his shirt moving from
right to left? Why were people being
(27:54):
interviewed saying yeah they came from my left to right, from
his right to left immediately shut down.
And then did they tear the crimescene down immediately just
right off the bat from seeing it, knowing he was dead, saying
a lot of this is is bad. Not even getting into the the
soliloquy of text messages that 22 year olds don't send their
trans lover. So immediately it's just the the
(28:15):
the official story sounds like it needs to be investigated.
But now you know the whole crimescene is gone.
They paved over it. Nothing to see here.
All right, that last part, I mean, that whole that whole take
was good, but the last part is insane.
So the university basically ripped up the entire little
foyer area, which basically was the crime scene.
(28:36):
I keep saying basically, basically, I've never been on
live TV before. And apparently what was that
kid? Oh yeah, he was the apparently
kid. Anyway, so the fact that the
university completely tore up the basically like that little
area that Charlie Kirk was seated and that he was shot,
(28:58):
they they ripped out the concrete and repaved it, that
that is super SUS. Like that is super SUS.
And the people online are sayingthey wanted to remove any, any
potential residue, gunpowder residue, DNA, who the heck
(29:19):
knows. But like, the university made no
or gave no explanation as to whythey did that.
They just literally repaved the crime scene.
That is super SUS man. It really is.
All right, we are coming up on 30 minutes.
Anyway, sorry again for being gone for a week.
Got a good week of stuff ahead. We'll definitely try to get 3,
(29:41):
maybe 4 episodes done and get some interviews out and that's
about it. Everybody call your parents,
call a spade a spade, keep both eyes open and talk to you soon.
This episode was brought to you by Zip X Nicotine Toothpicks.
Zip More Smoke Less. Totally satisfying, discreet and
delicious, Zip X nicotine infused toothpicks are available
(30:03):
in six great flavors, each containing at least 2 milligrams
of nicotine to curb those cravings.
Zip X is FDA registered and proudly made in the USA.
Use discount code DSD for 10% off your order at Zip
xtoothpicks.com. Zip more, smoke less, Save 10%.
Free audio post production. Byalphonic.com the following.
Podcast is a deep shallow dive production.
And you're going to love it. OK, let's go.
All right. Oh, my God, I am back.
My apologies to everybody, and thanks for the folks that
reached out and said, dude, is everything OK?
(00:22):
You haven't put out a podcast ina few days.
But yeah, everything was fine. I just needed a little break,
man. I'm not going to lie.
It's literally been two years, two years solid that I think I
have put out an episode, not daily, but heck, probably at
least three times a week. So, yeah, man, I just needed to
(00:43):
recharge a little bit. I really did.
I started last week, you know, not doing my my normal or not my
normal, but not doing one on Monday.
And then anyway, things just gothectic.
OK, enough with that. But I am back and and hopefully
better than ever. All right, first thing, super
weird situation involving formerNFL quarterback Mark Sanchez,
(01:06):
USC Trojan guy. And although Sanchez didn't
really, he kind of was a bust inthe NFL, but he's doing amazing
as a Fox Sports analyst. But then I guess on Saturday
night or Friday night in Indianapolis, It says former NFL
quarterback Mark Sanchez is now facing a felony battery charge
for what authorities said Mondaywas a fight over parking, in
(01:31):
addition to the misdemeanor charges that the Fox Sports
analyst was already facing from the weekend incident in
Indianapolis. Basically it says we are
literally talking about people fighting over a parking space
and or a dispute about where people are parking and it
resulted in someone receiving just incredibly significant
(01:54):
injuries. So Sanchez got stabbed by a 69
year old truck driver who backedinto a hotel's loading dock in
downtown Indianapolis, leading to the confrontation.
Anyway, the learning from that is just, I think at a certain
(02:18):
age, if you've had too many beverages, just go to your hotel
room. Oh my God.
Like Mark Sanchez now has prettymuch thrown away his, his
football analyst career. And, you know, this was
interesting. What got reported initially was
(02:39):
that Sanchez got stabbed and it almost made it look like the the
guy was at fault. And then as, as things
developed, I guess her, her social media, the, the, the, the
script flipped and they realizedit was Sanchez who was the
aggressor. And I guess this 69 year old
(03:00):
dude was pretty much defending himself against Sanchez, who
again, from what I'm reading waspretty hammered.
Anyway, that is just dumb. Absolutely dumb.
So if any of you still party like that, which I do not party
like that at all, God, I have not been drunk in a long time.
(03:24):
Oh my God, Like in a really longtime.
Like maybe several years. Now that I think about it,
that's pretty insane. For those of you that knew me
back in the day, back in the LA Ray days, when, when my famous
quote to my brother was I'm going to party every weekend for
the rest of my life. I literally said that I think I
(03:47):
was in my mid 20s at the time. So I probably felt that in my
mid 20s. But I will tell you what, I do
not feel that now. And I am such a freak about,
about my health that there's no way I, I could even remotely
live that kind of lifestyle. That's funny.
That is funny. Things change for the better.
(04:08):
Thank God. OK, let's talk about what's
going on. We've all heard it.
Genesis 12. Three.
I will bless those who bless you.
Politicians like Ted Cruz and Mike Johnson use it to say
Christians must support the modern state of Israel.
But here's the truth. This verse is about Abraham, not
a political state founded in 1948.
(04:31):
All right, I don't think you'll recognize that voice, but that
is Reverend Munther Isaac. He's actually a super famous
Christian reverend and doctor that lives in Gaza City, I
believe. And he's been very vocal about
what's been taking place in thatPalestine area.
(04:51):
And he was on Tucker Carlson andhe's been on a bunch of things.
By the way, it is kind of cool. I'm getting guys that have been
on Tucker Carlson. That's that's a little feather
in my cap actually. And I'll take that.
I'll take that as a compliment. But anyway, I actually
interviewed with this guy today or I did an interview with him
today and it turned out really good.
And he's super, super interesting guy.
(05:12):
And it, you know, continues thateducation process that that
quite frankly, I'd like to take you guys through in terms of
just understanding the Christianmindset and understanding
Christianity from quite frankly,what I think are real
Christians. And the reason I'm doing this is
because I do think this is a major theme of what is going on
(05:34):
in the United States and it's going to be a major theme of
what takes place in the world. I really do.
I am seeing a tremendous surge in, I mean, the way I'm going to
say it is the weaponizing of Christianity and the weaponizing
of religion. And and I'm really seeing that
(05:55):
host Charlie Kirk situation and we're going to talk a little bit
more about that as well. But give a listen to the rest of
what Reverend Isaac says. The New Testament, the promise
is fulfilled in the seed of Abraham and that's it is Jesus
Christ. The blessing isn't military
power or political deals. It's salvation through Christ
(06:16):
for all nations. When leaders twist this text to
demand loyalty to a secular state.
So this is really what the wholeargument is, and that is, is the
Bible talking about the secular state of Israel, the modern day
state of Israel? Is it talking about Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?
(06:38):
Obviously, I don't think it is. And I'm not even Christian, let
alone do a lot of people. Man, there's a lot of chatter on
this right now, and it's really dividing, especially the
Republican and even MAGA movement into two distinct
sides. So let's listen to the rest of
this. They turn faith into fear and
(07:00):
God into a vending machine for blessing.
That's not the gospel, It's favoritism, it's exceptionalism.
And Scripture says God chose no partiality.
God's heart is for justice, mercy and truth, not political
manipulation. All right.
I will say, I mean, that makes alot of sense to me.
(07:20):
Like it's so funny as a non religious person, if I think
about OK, who are God's chosen people?
I mean, in my mind, I'm like, OK, if God is such a wonderful
entity, which obviously I think he is because I personally do
believe in a God, then I think that God is not going to choose
(07:42):
based on DNA or choose based on where in this planet you were
born or anything. Again, it has to be something
bigger and broader than that. You know, for example, maybe
God's chosen people are the people that I don't know, live a
certain way or you know, people like Reverend Isaac, you know,
(08:06):
their, their thought is that it's people that have chosen
Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
That actually makes sense to me.Again, for them, not for me, but
that makes sense to me that in their eyes they'd say, OK, if
you have accepted Jesus into your life, then we'd think that
you are part of God's chosen people because again, Jesus to
(08:31):
the Christians is God. That's pretty wild, man.
Man, I've learned a lot about this stuff.
I really have. And I and I find it very
interesting. And honestly, I'm so glad I've
learned a lot about this becauseit is really, it is really
playing a huge role in what's going on in our politics, in our
(08:51):
everything, I mean, in everything, everything that is
being drilled down through the Trump administration has a
thread of Christianity to it. And again, the the scary part is
if if that Christianity gets weaponized for a particular
(09:12):
agenda. I mean, that's really the scary
part. And again, if you think about
it, the this was already done. Like, this playbook has kind of
been created and that's what happened in 2001 after 911 and
the creation of this War on Terror and creation of, you
know, weapons of mass destruction.
(09:34):
And Muslims are bad and we need to go to war with Muslims.
Now. Ironically, I don't remember
them necessarily making Christians good then and Muslims
bad. It was more just saying Muslims
are bad. But what I see taking place
right now is a little bit the opposite.
(09:55):
It's the building up of Christians.
But you know, I'm going to knockon wood because I hope this
doesn't happen. I hope we don't get another
Charlie Kirk type event. And I don't necessarily mean an
assassination. I mean something awful that's on
a grand scale that has, you know, maybe mass casualties.
(10:16):
And I'm hoping that doesn't happen.
And then if it did happen again,let's pray it doesn't, you know,
it's, it's pinned on, you know, kind of the, the 19 Muslims with
box cutters, which was the deal of 911.
And now all of a sudden we've got a global division taking
place between Christianity and Islam.
(10:39):
And then in the United States, Imean, you're seeing it right
now. There's really this division
that continues to be widened between the left and the right.
And whether that's the I, I don't really think the Charlie
Kirk situation is, well, actually it is kind of widening
it because obviously they, they,they are saying Tyler Robinson,
(11:00):
who is, you know, has a trans lover and you know who, who was
a furry and all that. So obviously they're trying to
drive, you know, that division with the trans community.
So that is one of the key key dividers between left and right.
Anyway, just pay attention to all this stuff.
(11:23):
It, it is pretty formulaic. You know, this is interesting.
I posted something on Instagram the other day that talked about,
you know, 1963 versus 2025. And so obviously with 1963, I'm
kind of referencing the JFK assassination.
And here, hold on, let me, let me read it.
Maybe it's just easier if I readit.
(11:43):
Let's see, where is it? OK, I said.
Over the past two years, I've looked into so many things,
mainly out of curiosity. The JFK assassination still
blows my mind that the American public was so naive to believe
such a unlikely narrative about Lee Harvey Oswald.
And gosh, how many still believethat?
(12:05):
But that was 1963, a much simpler time back then, so maybe
that explains it since it was 62years ago.
Then again, I wonder if someone will make this exact same post
in 2087. I bet they do.
OK, you see what I did there? I tried to be clever.
I tried to be clever. And my point was that, you know,
(12:29):
in 1963, in broad daylight, the sitting president of the United
States was assassinated. And again, I mean, if you think
that was a single bullet by Lee Harvey Oswald, wow, I would have
to disagree with you. I will respect your opinion, but
(12:52):
I will absolutely have to disagree with you.
You know, we've talked about that magic bullet theory, you
know, the bullet changing directions in the air, going
through, you know, people 7 times and then magically
appearing on the Gurney in the hospital in pristine condition.
I mean, that's insane to me thatthe American public would
(13:14):
believe it. And the point of my post was to
say, hey, look what we fell for in 1963, but I almost feel like
we're falling for the same thingin 2025.
And obviously this is in reference to the Charlie Kirk
situation. There are so many open ends to
this and so much that just doesn't make sense.
(13:37):
But it's it's pretty wild. Like people are just moving on,
like just completely have moved on.
And that includes Turning Point USA, honestly, it includes his
wife. It includes all of the
conservative Republican dudes. And really the only person that
it doesn't include is pretty much Candace Owens and then, you
(14:02):
know, to an extent, Tucker Carlson.
But it is pretty interesting to me how fast everybody seems to
have moved on from poor Charlie Kirk, whom, by the way, I'm not
going to lie, I genuinely feel bad for him.
Like, I genuinely feel like, man, he just got played.
(14:23):
He absolutely got played. And like, I don't know, I am
seeing so little of his friends actually be what I consider true
friends. And, you know, the only one I
really consider as a true friendis Candace Owens.
Now, I've had this discussion with a few people.
(14:44):
I mean, you know, I keep one eyeopen on her as well, and a lot
of that goes back to the way her, her and Tucker Carlson were
against that Nick Fuentes kid. I mean, I thought that was
weird. That was super SUS and it was
the first time it caused me to really doubt Candace Owens, You
know, so it's not like I take everything she says or does as
(15:05):
gospel anymore. I really don't.
Same thing with Tucker. You know, obviously I do.
I do listen to the two of them, not as much actually, and I do
still respect them. But I will say in terms of the
Charlie Kirk stuff, I think she's doing excellent, excellent
work on that. And she's really turning over
all the all the stones that blows me away that that his true
(15:27):
friends are not his true friendsare just like, it's, it's like,
here's the best way to describe it.
It's as if they are acting like Charlie Kirk was a 95 year old
guy who peacefully died in his sleep and they moved right to
celebration of life. You know what I mean?
And and I'm not a fan of that. I'm really not like anyone that
(15:50):
has a tragic death. I don't know how you move right
to celebration of life. I really don't.
I don't know how you just get over the grieving so easily and
move to celebration of life. Gosh, when our dad passed away
and our dad's, you know, our dad's passing, he was 84 and you
know, it wasn't tragic. Now it was sudden.
(16:11):
He did, he did kind of suddenly pass.
So I guess there's a little bit of tragicness to that.
But I mean, I've said it before and I'm going to say it again.
I, I, I grieved for a solid year.
And I know my brother grieved and I know our, our mom really
grieved. Our mom actually grieved for
like 2 years, believe it or not.And, and I'm talking like
(16:33):
serious grieving, like like likenot being able to to really be
yourself. And so with Charlie, I just
don't get it. Like I don't get how his wife
can, you know, go on Twitter theother day and I guess she was
appearing in Chicago for something and she tweeted out
like like like how y'all do in Chicago or something like that.
(16:57):
I don't know, man. I just find it odd.
I find it odd. I think it's very, very
interesting, for lack of a a more descriptive word that you
can get through the grieving phase so fast.
I just I think that's odd. I think that's odd and that's a
little bit off to me. So, OK, All right, next clip are
(17:19):
this is Van Jones. He's that CNN political analyst,
super liberal, super Democrat. But this is what I call a
neoliberal. And what I mean by that is this
guy to me is no different than someone like Lindsey Graham or
Ted Cruz. He just wears the Democrat
(17:41):
T-shirt. If you are a young person, you
open up your phone and all you see.
Is dead Gaza baby dead? Gaza baby dead guys, baby Diddy
dead. Guy's a baby.
Dead guy's a baby. I love this conversation because
I think people, those of us who went to college, give a lot.
More. Credit to college courses for
How the world. Works than I do.
This is not about. Critical race theory on college
(18:02):
campus this is about. Iran, Iran and Qatar have come
up with a disinformation campaign that they are.
Running through tik. T.O.K and Instagram.
That is massive. If you are a young person, you
open up your phone and all you see is dead.
Gaza baby dead. Gaza baby dead Gaza baby Diddy.
Dead Gaza baby. Dead Gaza baby.
(18:26):
So. That's not.
That's not. DEI that.
Is a Geo play, but the adversarythat is, that is, that is
deliberately trying to divide the West against itself.
You know, I don't know what was worse with that clip him kind of
like downplaying dead babies, dead Gaza babies.
In that case, I don't know if that was worse or if the crowd
(18:47):
laughing at it was worse when hesaid dead Gaza baby, dead Gaza
baby, dead Gaza baby Diddy dead,Gaza baby dead.
You know, like the, the, the whole thing was just horrible.
And again, when I say a neoliberal is the same thing as
a neoconservative and that someone like Van Jones is no
different than Lindsey Graham, it's because they're both again,
(19:11):
trying to sell people on the narrative that Iran and Qatar
are infiltrating young people's minds by putting that stuff in
their social media speed. And all that's meant to do is
divide the West. And you know what?
That is just such a crock of shit because all of that stuff
(19:36):
is not being done by Iran and Qatar.
They give they give those countries, well, they do it on
purpose, but they try to act like they're like these genius
PR infiltrators and genius marketers and they're just not
like they're absolutely not. That stuff is on the feeds
because that is the reality of what is taking place.
You know, there are dead babies in Gaza, unfortunately.
(19:59):
And so obviously Van Jones's bread or matzo is but.
Exactly where Ted Cruz and Lindsey Grahams are, and so I'm
going to let you read between the lines on that one.
I want to thank the countries that helped me put this
together, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan.
(20:20):
All right, So while Van Jones issaying Qatar or Qatar is feeding
disinformation, here's PresidentTrump on Friday talking about
the supposed peace deal that ends the war in Gaza.
Now, again, this was another presidential address from the
Oval Office, by the way. I think he's using AI to do
(20:41):
these things. And obviously you can't see this
in a video, but if you see any of his recent presidential
addresses from the Oval Office where he's basically sitting
behind a desk, it's his hands. The hands are the dead giveaway
because they're in the same position every time.
And they, they kind of do this like weird twitching.
(21:01):
It's, it's very strange. I absolutely think they are
using an AI version of Trump with the voice, by the way.
And that stuff is totally easy to do now with the progress in,
in that technology. But I do think that's AI Trump.
But listen to the rest of this and so many others.
So many people fought so hard. This is a big day.
(21:26):
We'll see how it all turns out. We have to get the final word
down and concrete. Very importantly, I look forward
to having the hostages come hometo their parents and having some
of the hostages, unfortunately, you know, the condition they're
in, come home likewise to their parents because their parents
(21:46):
wanted them just as much as though that young man or young
woman were alive. So I just want to let you know
that this is a very special day,maybe unprecedented in many
ways. It is unprecedented.
But thank you all, and thank youall to those great countries
that helped. We were given a tremendous
(22:08):
amount of help. Everybody was unified in wanting
this war to end and seeing peacein the Middle East, and we're
very close to achieving that. Thank you all, and everybody
will be treated fairly. You know the other reason why I
think that's AI, because he didn't like toot his own horn
very much. I'm not even kidding.
(22:31):
Most of the time when he talks about something, especially
something that he's accomplished, I mean, he thanks
himself like 50 times during that process.
And so in that clip, he did not toot his own horn or pat himself
on the back. That's another reason why I
think it's totally AI. OK, anyway, let's see what
happens. I mean, that was a big to do
(22:52):
over the weekend and then kind of like nothing, like, is the
war over? Are we done?
Were the hostages released? I mean, who knows?
They, they really don't follow up.
It's, it's, it's I'm realizing the MO is to like put a big
piece of news out there and thenjust never talk about it again.
And they think everyone's going to forget because nine times out
(23:15):
of 10, they do forget. I guess you can use the JFK
assassination as the best example.
I mean, again, it blows my mind that the American public didn't
demand more in 1963. But here we are in 2025 with the
Charlie Kirk assassination. And honestly, I can't say the
(23:35):
American public in, in totality is demanding more.
There's there's probably a very small group that's centered on
the Republican MAGA side. They're the only ones demanding
more. OK, let me read you this.
Here's the quote from Erica Kirk, or here is the tweet from
her that she did on 10/2. It says, hey, Chicago, what do
(24:01):
you say with a question mark? So obviously she was headed to
Chicago and somebody replied they said.
This might be unpopular but I find it very weird how a widow
has stepped into the CEO role atTurning Point USA, delivered 2
speeches, 1 at a stadium memorial where Charlie's parents
(24:21):
weren't even present, and is already going on podcast and
traveling around the country just two weeks after her husband
was assassinated brutally in front of the world.
Shouldn't she be home with her two young children who just lost
their dad? I mean, that's a good take,
brother. That is a good take.
(24:42):
James Herbinger. So you know, what are your
thoughts on that? What do you guys think?
Do you think it's SUS? Do you think it's, it's just
crazy how, how much she's out and about on podcast laughing,
acting like nothing really happened.
Again, when I think of the grieving process and you know,
(25:05):
for me, that's really been been our dad, man.
There's no way I could have had that mentality 2 weeks after.
I did not have that mentality probably for a full year.
I'm not even kidding. I really think it affected my
personality and just my outlook on not not necessarily my
outlook, but just the way I acted like I just wasn't in a,
(25:27):
you know, happy go lucky place really for a full year.
I I really wasn't. I really wasn't.
So anyway, all right, let me seeif there's anything else.
Oh, you know what? I do want to play this clip.
This is funny. So this is Rob O'Neill, the guy
that, according to Deep Shallow Dive guest Matt Kubler, did not
kill Osama bin Laden. And if you listen to that
(25:48):
episode, God, I don't even know how long ago that was, but that
was actually a great episode. If you haven't listened to that,
go look up, look up Matt Kubler or Kubler, you can actually go
to the deep shallow dive.com website, go to the guest tab and
then easily find it. Or what am I saying, you can use
the deep shallow dive search tool and just type in like Osama
(26:08):
or bin Laden. It should come up anyway.
Remember, he was the one, Matt, that is that said, Rob O'Neill,
the guy that's credited with killing bin Laden, did not
really do it. And by the way, I actually
totally agree with him on that. I totally agree with him on
that. But now Rob O'Neill kind of
makes the rounds, and here he ison Piers Morgan and talking
(26:31):
about the Charlie Kirk shooting,and he gives a really good take
on this. So hey, remember, we're all
about judging the take. So whether he killed Bin Laden
or not, this is a great take. That's an easy shot.
Yeah, even for someone, I think they they throw the word sniper
around almost as much as they throw the word hero around way
too often. Anyone with a hunting rifle, a
(26:51):
30 out six like that, that's an easy shot. 200 yards as a
sniper, which I am, you pick which nostril you want and I'll
put it in it. So that's easy.
The the issues just for me, I mean, it it, it was off it right
from the beginning for me. It from do we not guard rooftops
anymore? There's been assassinations,
assassination attempts all over the world.
(27:12):
Why aren't we looking at rooftops?
And then when I was sent the I was sent the video with this at
the same message where they saidCharlie Kirk was just shot.
When I watched that horrific video, he was obviously dead
before he hit the ground. But the questions immediately
started to come to me. That was, but that was not an
entry wound that we saw. We saw an exit wound.
So where'd that bullet come from?
You don't bleed like, and I've shot guys closer than the camper
(27:34):
was and an exit. An entry wound doesn't look like
that. An exit wound does.
Why did his shirt move the way it did?
When I've shot people, their their shirts didn't move like
that. And then the initial reaction,
well, he was obviously wearing body armor and it was
deflection. One, no, he wasn't wearing body
armor. And two, it doesn't deflect like
that off of body armor. Why was his shirt moving from
right to left? Why were people being
(27:54):
interviewed saying yeah they came from my left to right, from
his right to left immediately shut down.
And then did they tear the crimescene down immediately just
right off the bat from seeing it, knowing he was dead, saying
a lot of this is is bad. Not even getting into the the
soliloquy of text messages that 22 year olds don't send their
trans lover. So immediately it's just the the
(28:15):
the official story sounds like it needs to be investigated.
But now you know the whole crimescene is gone.
They paved over it. Nothing to see here.
All right, that last part, I mean, that whole that whole take
was good, but the last part is insane.
So the university basically ripped up the entire little
foyer area, which basically was the crime scene.
(28:36):
I keep saying basically, basically, I've never been on
live TV before. And apparently what was that
kid? Oh yeah, he was the apparently
kid. Anyway, so the fact that the
university completely tore up the basically like that little
area that Charlie Kirk was seated and that he was shot,
(28:58):
they they ripped out the concrete and repaved it, that
that is super SUS. Like that is super SUS.
And the people online are sayingthey wanted to remove any, any
potential residue, gunpowder residue, DNA, who the heck
(29:19):
knows. But like, the university made no
or gave no explanation as to whythey did that.
They just literally repaved the crime scene.
That is super SUS man. It really is.
All right, we are coming up on 30 minutes.
Anyway, sorry again for being gone for a week.
Got a good week of stuff ahead. We'll definitely try to get 3,
(29:41):
maybe 4 episodes done and get some interviews out and that's
about it. Everybody call your parents,
call a spade a spade, keep both eyes open and talk to you soon.
This episode was brought to you by Zip X Nicotine Toothpicks.
Zip More Smoke Less. Totally satisfying, discreet and
delicious, Zip X nicotine infused toothpicks are available
(30:03):
in six great flavors, each containing at least 2 milligrams
of nicotine to curb those cravings.
Zip X is FDA registered and proudly made in the USA.
Use discount code DSD for 10% off your order at Zip
xtoothpicks.com. Zip more, smoke less, Save 10%.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.