People-powered, AI-Generated
Season 4, Episode 8
In our 8th episode for Season 4 we deep dive into Israel's hypocrisy of using starvation of a weapon and cover historical uses of starvation as a weapon including Stalin's use of Holimodor against Ukrainians in 1933. We also introduce and outro the discussion with the English, Spanish and Arabic song "Fire That Rebuilds __ Fuego que renace __ النار اللي بتعيد البناء (Trilingual Global Resistance)".
To read the article discussed in this episode:
https://guywolf070425.substack.com/p/starvation-as-a-weapon-from-hitler?r=5d8qd2
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:19):
Toss and beat us dying and we'reblowfare together we rise, you
needle sinfare rise up. They want the bed.
We let the sky and save our sun before we live from every shore
we break the chains. No acting more to raise the
flame levels and soul. Rise up, they want the bed.
(00:40):
Oh, before you RIP us, it makes us whole.
The. No Fear, we rise again.
(01:22):
Rise up, live under there. Oh, we let the sky air save our
star. We go lay my Dina.
From every shore we break the chains.
No light there more truth is theflame Lavos del Sol Nah, Nah
shall live Mahada be to rise up,live under there.
Oh the fire rebels. Now we take control.
(01:53):
In every country we rise with truth in revolution, Voice of
light. We light the sky and fame our
(02:20):
stars. We could live our dinner from
every soul. We break the chains to light
them more through this the flamelove of their soul.
And I cannot shall live my hearton me too.
Now we take control in every country.
We rise with truth and resolution.
(03:05):
You know, there are some truths out there that are just
profoundly uncomfortable, so devastating really in what they
imply that often people or systems deliberately bury them.
Right denial, propaganda. It's easier than confronting
them. Exactly.
But confronting them, well, it takes courage, sure.
(03:26):
But if we want to really understand the world, grasp the
patterns, we have to face these things, even the chilling ones.
It's necessary work. And that's really our mission
here on the Deep Dive. Yeah, We take the sources you
provide articles, research, maybe even your own notes, and
we try to meticulously pull out the most vital insights.
(03:47):
You know, the essential stuff. Cutting through the noise.
Yeah, cutting through the noise,the directions, all the
deliberate attempts to obscure things so you can get straight
to the core of what's actually happening and why it's.
Happening. And maybe most importantly, why
it matters directly to you. Absolutely.
OK, so let's unpack this one. Today we're diving deep into a
really powerful, and I have to say, pretty chilling set of
(04:08):
sources. We're exploring A tactic that,
well, it's been used by authoritarian regimes throughout
history, weaponizing starvation.Now, it's really crucial we
state this upfront. Here on The Deep Dive, we
explore the arguments within your sources.
Our job is to dissect those arguments, the information they
present. Right, not necessarily endorsing
(04:30):
them. Exactly.
We're not here to endorse or refute specific political views,
but to really understand the patterns and perspectives the
source puts forward. And this isn't just about, you
know, food scarcity from a drought or economic collapse,
which is tragic enough. No, this is different.
This is something far more insidious.
It's about the deliberate, calculated use of hunger, using
(04:51):
it as a tool. A tool for dehumanization.
Yeah, humanization, destruction,and ultimately for domination.
It's about engineering a crisis to achieve certain goals.
Political, strategic, maybe evenethnic.
And as we get into this, you'll start to see a pretty horrifying
pattern emerge, one that repeatsitself with, well, tragic
(05:13):
regularity across time, across different places.
What our main source lays out isessentially an authoritarian
blueprint. An authoritarian systematic
method for oppression that just keeps showing up.
It connects events that might seem totally separate, you know,
decades apart, different continents, but it connects them
through this lens of intentionalman made famine.
(05:35):
We'll be looking at how this strategy doesn't just impact
bodies, the physical suffering, the death, which is immense, but
how it attacks the very spirit. The Spirit.
Yeah, the identity, the culture,the fundamental will of people
to resist. And importantly, the source
we're looking at also suggests what can be done about it.
OK. So there's a path forward
(05:55):
proposed too, right? A.
Path for resistance against thiskind of calculated cruelty.
So to guide us through this, this really important though
difficult subject, our main source today is titled
Starvation as a Weapon from Hitler to Netanyahu.
It's published by Educate Resistance.
And it's described, interestingly, as people powered
(06:15):
AI generated. It argues there's this chilling
continuity, this line in how hunger has been used as a weapon
across different times, different conflicts.
That description itself is interesting.
People powered, AI generated. It is, and it grabs you right
away. It pulls you in with this really
stark, unsettling quote right near the beginning.
What's the quote? Quotes Guy Wolf from Educate
(06:36):
Resistance saying famine is the oldest weapon of war, but in the
hands of a modern authoritarian it becomes genocide by design.
Wow, genocide by design. That, that really sums up the
whole premise, doesn't it? It does.
It's stark. It's not just looking back,
sadly at history. It's a direct warning about a
deliberate, methodical approach transforming a basic human need,
(06:59):
hunger, into an instrument of mass destruction.
Yeah. By design implies intent
planning. Exactly.
It's not a casual phrase. It implies this specific
malevolent intent, a meticulously planned approach.
So our mission today is to understand that design, grasp
the intent behind it, and reallycomprehend the devastating,
(07:20):
multifaceted impact of this well, this ancient yet
terrifyingly modern weapon. It forces you to confront that
hunger isn't always just a tragic side effect of war.
No. Often, the source argues, it is
the war. It's the primary weapon in the
authoritarian arsenal. OK, so let's start where the
source starts, the contemporary situation in Gaza.
(07:42):
It's described meticulously in the material, a crisis that
rightly has captured global attention, the source notes.
The world watches the unfolding devastation.
It's presented not just as regional, but as a global
humanitarian emergency. Indeed, and the source is really
clear on this point. What's happening in Gaza isn't
seen as some accidental outcome of conflict, not unavoidable
(08:02):
collateral damage. Instead, it asserts very
strongly that the Netanyahu government is weaponizing
starvation against Palestinians.That distinction is absolutely
critical because it frames it not as tragedy but a strategy,
deliberate, calculated. It's presented as part of a
broader pattern of authoritarianrepression, a conscious move,
(08:23):
not unforeseen. And the intention?
The grim intention, as the source highlights it, is
subjugation, displacement, or disturbingly, the extermination
of population. Seen as well, undesirable,
subhuman or other, that difference between accidental
scarcity and deliberate weaponization is fundamental to
the sources argument. And the source goes into the
(08:44):
specifics of the siege, right? It doesn't just make the claim.
No, it details the components. It specifically mentions the
cutting off of food, water, electricity and humanitarian aid
as core elements. So these aren't just logistical
problems in wartime? Not according to the source.
They're presented as direct instruments of control,
subjugation ultimately. Is there evidence cited for that
(09:07):
intent? The source provides a direct
quote and it's, well, it's chilling.
Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant back in October 2023
quoted by Al Jazeera saying we are fighting human animals and
we are acting accordingly. No electricity, no food, no
water, no fuel. Human animals, that language
it's. Profoundly dehumanizing, as the
(09:29):
source points out, and when you strip a population of its
humanity with rhetoric like that.
It makes extreme measures seem justifiable.
Terrifyingly easier? Yes.
Cutting off life sustaining supplies, it allows acts that
would normally be seen as unspeakable to be framed
differently within a kind of distorted moral landscape where
the suffering of the other is dismissed or rationalized or
(09:51):
even seen as deserved. It's like a psychological
precondition for the physical act.
Precisely that's how the source presents it.
And this grim picture, is it just the source saying this or
are others echoing it? Well, the source points out,
it's echoed with alarming consistency by major
international bodies. Like who?
Human Rights Watch, for instance, they formally accused
Israel of using starvation as a method of warfare, a war crime
(10:13):
under international law. HRW highlighted that early in
2024. A war crime?
That's a heavy charge. It is.
It carries significant weight under international humanitarian
law. Using starvation that way is
specifically prohibited under the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court. It's about intentionally
depriving civilians of things essential to survival, including
(10:35):
willfully blocking relief slides.
So it's a specific legal definition, not just moral
outrage. Correct, and it goes further.
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs, OCH warned in March 2024 that famine is imminent in
Gaza. Imminent famine.
With a staggering statistic, 100% of the population facing
(10:56):
food insecurity. 100%. The entire population.
That's what the UN warning stated, according to the source.
The significance of these bodiesHRW the UN using terms like war
crime and warning of imminent famine for everyone, well, it
can't be overstated. But it underscores the scale,
the horrific scale, Yeah. And it lends significant weight
to the sources argument that this is deliberate, not
(11:17):
unavoidable tragedy. It elevates it beyond a
humanitarian crisis to a grave indictment under international
law. It's it's hard to process that
current situation. But what really struck me in the
source was the point that this tactic, as awful as it is right
now, it's not new. No, it follows this horrifyingly
familiar pattern, a grim blueprint used before.
(11:40):
That's a really profound observation, and it's exactly
where the Source offers some of its deepest insights.
What's truly fascinating and deeply disturbing is how the
Source meticulously connects these dots across history.
Showing this isn't an isolated incident.
Right. Showing that starvation has long
been a hallmark of regimes determined to destroy not just
bodies but spirit, culture, identity.
(12:02):
It reveals this chillingly systematic authoritarian
blueprint A. Playbook for oppression.
A calculated playbook used repeatedly over the last
century, even earlier. It's designed to break
populations from within, make them easier to subjugate, or in
the most extreme cases, pave theway for their eradication by
destroying their ability to resist physically and
(12:22):
psychologically. So what are some of these
historical examples the source brings up?
One of the most harrowing, and one that really resonates with
the argument, is the holodomer. In Ukraine, 1930s.
Exactly. The devastating famine there
between 1932 and 1933. And the source is clear.
This wasn't natural disaster. No drought, no crop failure.
(12:43):
It was, as the source states, unequivocally engineered.
Engineered by Stalin's Soviet regime?
How? How did they?
Do that the term engineered is crucial.
It highlights the deliberate calculated nature.
The source gives chilling specifics.
An estimated 3.5 to 5 million Ukrainians died, Millions.
A significant portion of the pocket population.
And the brutality wasn't random,it was systematic things like
(13:06):
forced grain requisitions. Meaning they just took the food.
Armed brigades swept through villages, confiscating
everything, every last bit of grain, potatoes, leaving
families with nothing. Imagine watching soldiers haul
away the food you grew while your children starve, And at the
same time, while Ukrainians starved, the Soviet Union
(13:27):
continued the export of foodstuffs, shipping grain out
of the country to fund Stalins industrialization.
So it wasn't just neglect, it was active policy.
Deliberate economic warfare. Prioritizing state goals over
human life. And to make sure no aid got in
and people couldn't flee, they set up military blockades of
villages. Turning regions into prisons.
Vast open air prisons, roads, sealed rail lines cut, no food
(13:51):
in, no people out. And Applebaum's work Red
Famines, cited by the source, confirms the purpose.
Use famine as a tool of terror to crush Ukrainian nationalism
and resistance. And assault on their identity.
Exactly their culture, their desire for self determination
designed to break them physically and spiritually.
Then, tragically, the source moves to the Nazi Hunger Plan
(14:11):
1941 to 1945, implemented acrossEastern Europe, targeting Jews
specifically but others too, using starvation not just to
control but to actually depopulate areas.
A terrifyingly deliberate strategy within their broader
genocidal aims, yes. How did that work in practice?
The source sites Adam Tuse's book The Wages of Destruction,
(14:32):
showing the chilling precision The Nazi hunger plan targeted
Jews, Slavs and prisoners of warthey viewed them as.
Useless eaters. That horrific phrase?
Yes, their lives expendable for the benefit of the master race
and the German war effort. The methods were brutally
efficient. Widespread ration denial and
food blockades systematically starving whole populations.
(14:55):
Millions died from this too. Millions directly, and the
source emphasizes contrasting this with other Nazi violence.
Gas chambers, firing squads, those were immediate
extermination. But starvation was different.
It was a distinct, insidious weapon.
It prolonged suffering, systematically weakened people,
created utter despair before death, a slower, agonizing form
of genocide, often a precursor or used alongside other methods
(15:19):
designed to degrade victims physically and psychologically.
The source also mentions the Biofran famine in Nigeria.
Yes, 1967 to 1970. During the Biofran War, the
Nigerian military blockaded the Igbo region.
And the outcome there, the intention.
Catastrophic outcome. The source referencing Medicine
San Fran Tierra states over 1,000,000 deaths from starvation
(15:42):
directly from that blockade. A million people.
And it wasn't just about cuttingoff military supplies.
It was a deliberate campaign to starve civilians into
submission. The source reiterates the
intent. Food was a weapon used to force
surrender. So the hunger was the weapon.
Central to the strategy, not a side effect aimed at breaking
the Biophren people's will. Another example of this
(16:04):
recurring brutal tactic. And it brings us closer to the
present day with Yemen. The Saudi LED starvation
campaign ongoing from 2015, and the source makes a point of
noting this coalition was supported by US arms and
intelligence. Adding another layer of
complexity. Yes, and the impacts in Yemen
have been devastating, the source explains.
Comprehensive naval and air blockades cut off critical
(16:25):
imports. Food, fuel, medicine.
Plunging millions into famine. Exactly.
Widespread malnutrition. Disease especially hitting
children hard. The UN in 2021 called it the
worst humanitarian crisis on Earth.
So Ukraine, Nazi Europe, Biafra,Yemen and now Gaza.
When you connect these as the source does, what's the big
(16:47):
picture take away? The take away is the horrifying
consistency. If we connect this to the bigger
picture, the common thread isn'tjust deprivation, it's
orchestrated deprivation for a specific purpose.
Calculated decision. By a powerful entity to deny
life sustaining resources to civilians.
The purpose? Political control, suppressing
resistance, ethnic cleansing, demographic shifts.
(17:08):
It targets the most fundamental need, food, and turns it into an
instrument of terror. Breaking physical and
psychological. Leaving populations utterly
vulnerable. And again, the source argues,
this isn't just a byproduct of war.
Often it is the war itself, waged through hunger, a slow,
agonizing siege. It reveals this predictable,
horrifying pattern in authoritarian behavior.
(17:29):
Now the source gets into something it calls one of the
most painful aspects of the Gazasituation, the historical irony
Ah. Yes, this is where it becomes
truly paradoxical and difficult.A layer of profound moral
weight. It is.
The source calls it the deepest betrayal, this unsettling
paradox. It elaborates by noting that
(17:50):
many Jewish families in Israel trace their lineage directly
back to Holocaust survivors. Or those who fled pogroms,
ghettos, famines in Europe. Exactly, the source emphasizes.
They know in blood and bone whatweaponized hunger looks like.
They carry that inherited memory, the deep traumatic scars
of this specific kind of suffering, systematic
(18:10):
deprivation designed to break a people.
And yet the source asked this incredibly direct, unsettling
question. It doesn't shy away.
It asks. And yet some descendants of
Holocaust victims now rationalize identical tactics
against Palestinians. How does a people so scarred by
collective trauma arrived at thejustification of inflicting
similar suffering? That's a very hard question.
(18:32):
It forces an uncomfortable reflection, and the source
really emphasizes the deafening echo of the Warsaw Ghetto
starvation. The specific harrowing parallel.
It underscores, it reminds us with chilling precision, over
100, 1000 Jews died from hunger before deportation to
extermination camps. This isn't a vague comparison.
It's invoking a specific historical precedent where
(18:53):
hunger was a direct prelude to mass murder.
So the question becomes, how does that trauma?
How can collective trauma, instead of fostering universal
empathy, A commitment to never again for anyone?
How can it sometimes be inverted, twisted into a
justification for inflicting similar harm on another group?
It challenges that assumption that victimhood automatically,
(19:14):
radically leads to compassion. It suggests a more complex,
maybe more troubling, psychological dynamic might be
at play sometimes. It's a dig into this paradox.
The source brings in the perspective of Israeli historian
Ilan Pepe. A powerful, though sometimes
controversial voice. Quoting him from 2006, the
Zionist narrative has replaced empathy with entitlement.
(19:35):
Victimhood has become a shield to rationalize state violence,
even genocide. That's a profoundly critical
statement. It is Pappy's perspective, as
presented here, delves into thisthis unsettling transformation.
He's suggesting that a narrativebuilt on the legitimate
historical victimhood immense suffering.
Which is undeniable. Undeniable.
But it can, in certain contexts,metastasize, become a perceived
(19:59):
sense of unique entitlement, andthat entitlement, he argues,
becomes a shield. A dangerous one.
Enabling actions that would otherwise be condemned.
Exactly enabling the justification of state violence,
even actions bordering on genocide, actions that would
normally face universal condemnation under international
law and basic morality. It positions a painful past not
(20:21):
as a reason for universal empathy, but almost as a unique
credential. Paradoxically used to
rationalize current actions. Which raises that critical
question. How can shared trauma sometimes
become a barrier, a shield, allowing similar injustices
against others? Instead of building bridges, it
forces a hard look at how historical narratives are built,
remembered and used politically.Now the source shifts focus
(20:44):
slightly, highlighting that it'snot just about starting bodies,
right. Authoritarian regimes, it says,
do not only starve bodies, they starve truth.
The narrative control aspect. Propaganda.
Exactly taking us into that critical realm of censorship and
information warfare just as vital to the blueprint as
(21:04):
physical deprivation. Absolutely critical, the source
explains. Israeli media and pro government
spokespeople tightly control howthe world perceives the siege.
This isn't secondary, it's integral to weaponizing
starvation. Controlling the information
environment is as important as controlling the physical one.
Maybe more so sometimes. If you manage the narrative,
dictate the terms of discussion,you can manage the outrage, the
(21:28):
condemnation, the international response.
It's about shaping perception, stifling dissent, preventing
empathy from taking root globally, rationalizing the
inhumane. And the source draws parallels
here too from history. Stark parallels Justice Stalin
denied the Holodomor and the Nazis filmed happy ghettos, the
source claims. Netanyahu's administration
insists that humanitarian concerns are secondary to
(21:50):
security. That same pattern of denying,
distorting, reframing the reality.
It's disturbingly consistent across authoritarian playbooks.
Stalin engineers a famine, then bans any mention of it, punishes
truth tellers the Nazi starve ghetto inhabitants, then film
propaganda showing them happy and well fed.
A grotesque inversion. So framing everything through
(22:13):
the lens of security. It attempts to legitimize the
siege, according to the source, deflect accusations of war
crimes. It's a deliberate attempt to
control the narrative, dictate how the world interprets events
and block empathy. A psychological battle for
perception as vital as any military move.
But the source suggests this control isn't absolute.
(22:33):
There's a counter narrative emerging.
Yes, a flicker of hope. It emphasizes that censorship is
cracking. Meaning truth is getting out
despite the efforts. It suggests so.
It details the vital role of Israel really whistleblowers,
international NGOs and journalists who are defying the
narrative, pushing back against the controlled information flow.
How crucial are those voices? Absolutely crucial.
(22:54):
They're challenging the propaganda machine, often at
great personal risk, documenting, reporting, speaking
out, sometimes from within the system, trying to suppress them,
exposing the unvarnished truth. Which raises the question, what
happens when that narrative control starts to fray?
How does that impact the regime's ability to maintain
(23:15):
control? And as the source points out,
with a call to action, the global resistance is watching,
documenting and translating the truth.
Underlining the importance of information and fighting back.
When truth is starved, it's thatglobal network, informed people,
civil society, independent journalists that steps and
defeat it to nourish understanding and resistance.
(23:36):
So, to counter this authoritarian starvation of food
facts compassion, the source proposes a solution.
Yes, it says, we must rebuild the mountain they fear most
media and education. That's the Educate resistance
call to action, framed as the ultimate path.
The indispensable path of resistance.
A rallying cry. How does it break that down?
What is rebuilding that mountainlook like?
(23:57):
It lays out four key strategic actions, really concrete steps
to counteract that authoritarianplaybook.
First, expose. Expose war crimes and famine
denial through multilingual journalism.
Shine an unrelenting light on atrocities.
Make sure they can't be hidden or dismissed.
Getting factual reporting out globally in different languages.
(24:19):
Exactly providing that unvarnished counter narrative to
official denials. A direct challenge to censorship
and narrative control, making itimpossible to starve the truth.
OK, that's step one. What's next?
2nd educate globally using history as a weapon of truth.
Using history as a weapon. Meaning, make those historical
parallels resonate today. Show people this authoritarian
(24:42):
blueprint isn't just dusty history, it's a living,
recurring threat. So understanding the Holodomor,
the Hunger Plan, Biafra, Yemen helps us recognize it now.
Precisely recognize and resist similar tactics when they
reappear. History becomes a living tool
for understanding foreseen patterns, for shaping the
present to prevent recurrence. All right, expose in, educate.
What's third? 3rd Create resistance media hubs
(25:05):
that amplify silence voices. So building alternative
platforms, decentralizing information.
Exactly spaces where the marginalized, the oppressed,
those directly experiencing these tactics can be heard
unfiltered, without censorship or manipulation, empowering the
grassroots. Giving a direct platform to
those on the front lines. These hubs become life lines for
(25:27):
information, bypassing state control, fostering direct
communication and solidarity. And the fourth action. 4th
Translate this truth across borders.
Borders authoritarianism fears. Emphasizing the global nature of
the struggle. Because authoritarian regimes
thrive on isolation, on controlling information within
their borders, creating divisions by translating and
(25:49):
spreading truth across languagesand nations, we break down those
barriers. Fostering global understanding
and a unified response. Each point is strategically
vital. In this age of information
warfare, the battle for truth isfundamental.
The source then culminates with this really powerful call for
global unity. One that echoes those historical
lessons. It states global resistance must
(26:12):
say never again for anyone. It's not just a slogan, is it?
It's presented as urgent. Now it's foundational to the
source's whole argument. It expands on that idea that
authoritarianism thrives when welet it divide us into victims
and bystanders. The danger is selective empathy.
Exactly when historical trauma becomes a unique credential, not
(26:32):
a universal lesson, the source'smessage is a powerful call to
unite across faith, nation, and identity.
Because this fight against weaponized hunger, against
starved truth, it's universal. It transcends specific groups or
conflicts. Which raises that question for
all of us. How do we build that truly
unified, principle based global response ensure history's
(26:53):
lessons apply universally to everyone and IT?
Leaves no room for ambiguity about the ACT.
Itself no space for excuses, it declares unequivocally
weaponized starvation is genocide, whether in 1943
Poland, 1933 Ukraine or 2025 Gaza.
Asserting that universality regardless of who or when.
It underscores the horrifying consistency of the blueprint and
(27:14):
the moral imperative to call it what it is.
It challenges any attempt to excuse it based on context,
insists on one universal moral standard.
And it concludes that section with a statement on justice.
A really profound one, summing up its core philosophy.
Justice is not 0 sum. Liberation is for all or none.
(27:34):
Meaning our freedoms are interconnected.
True liberation, true justice, can't be achieved if it costs
another group their freedom or dignity.
It's a powerful call for universal human rights,
asserting our collective liberation is inextricably
linked. So we've covered a lot an
incredibly challenging, but I think essential deep dive today
definitely into this terrifying history and the present reality
(27:55):
of weaponized starvation from the Holodomor, the Nazi Hunger
plan, Biafra, Yemen, and tragically Gaza.
We see this consistent, deliberate tactic.
A chilling pattern? Yeah.
A repeating blueprint across decades continents.
And crucially, beyond the physical hunger, we explored how
it's also about deliberately starving truth and compassion.
(28:15):
Which is why the source hammers home the critical role of media
and education in resisting exposing truth, challenging
narratives, fostering global understanding.
It's a battle on multiple frontsfor bodies, for facts.
And for the human spirit itself.So as you listening, reflect on
these painful patterns, these current devastating events.
(28:38):
Consider that powerful idea. Understanding history, even its
worst repetitions, might be our strongest tool against
recurrence. What stands out most profoundly
to you from this deep dive? Yeah, think about that.
And that critical, unsettling question the source raises.
How can historical trauma sometimes be repurposed to
enable rather than revent similar atrocities?
(29:00):
How do we, individuals, the global community, make sure the
lessons of the past really inform our actions now, so that
never again truly means never again for everyone universally,
no exceptions? It's the core challenge.
If the deep dive resonated, if it sparked something
understanding urgency, remember that.
Educate, resistance, call to action.
It's the backbone of the source we discussed.
They directly urge you share this post.
(29:21):
Get this knowledge out there. And subscribe for free to
receive new posts and support our work.
Your engagement is part of that resistance through knowledge.
And they offer more resources toaudio analysis of this article
and others on Spotify in English, Spanish and Arabic.
Bositel, Avidad and ISEC. Exactly, and you can join us for
a conversation on blueskithelinkisbrisky.aprofile.educatorresistance.piski.socialorvisittheirfreeciviceducationportal@github.com
(29:51):
Free civis education. Lots of ways to continue your
own deep dive. Connect with others.
Become part of rebuilding that mountain of media and education.
Engage with these ideas, discussthem with friends, family,
online. Take action by being part of
that informed resistance. You're understanding, sharing
what you learn, asking critical questions.
(30:11):
Those are powerful tools againstforces trying to starve bodies,
in truth. If you found this deep dive
useful, please do consider liking sharing.
Subscribing your support helps amplify these crucial insights.
Be. Part of the world you want to
see, not the one dictators want to impose.
Stay curious. Stay informed.
Thank you for joining us on the Deep Dive.
We hope this gave you powerful insights, A deeper
(30:32):
understanding. We'll see you on the next Deep
dive. None.
(31:21):
It makes us whole. No Fear.
(31:55):
We rise again, rise up, live under there.
Oh, we let the sky yell. We go from every shore, we break
the chains now. We take control in every
(32:29):
country. We rise with truth in
revolution. The.
(33:12):
Now we take control.
Toss and beat us dying and we'reblowfare together we rise, you
needle sinfare rise up. They want the bed.
We let the sky and save our sun before we live from every shore
we break the chains. No acting more to raise the
flame levels and soul. Rise up, they want the bed.
(00:40):
Oh, before you RIP us, it makes us whole.
The. No Fear, we rise again.
(01:22):
Rise up, live under there. Oh, we let the sky air save our
star. We go lay my Dina.
From every shore we break the chains.
No light there more truth is theflame Lavos del Sol Nah, Nah
shall live Mahada be to rise up,live under there.
Oh the fire rebels. Now we take control.
(01:53):
In every country we rise with truth in revolution, Voice of
light. We light the sky and fame our
(02:20):
stars. We could live our dinner from
every soul. We break the chains to light
them more through this the flamelove of their soul.
And I cannot shall live my hearton me too.
Now we take control in every country.
We rise with truth and resolution.
(03:05):
You know, there are some truths out there that are just
profoundly uncomfortable, so devastating really in what they
imply that often people or systems deliberately bury them.
Right denial, propaganda. It's easier than confronting
them. Exactly.
But confronting them, well, it takes courage, sure.
(03:26):
But if we want to really understand the world, grasp the
patterns, we have to face these things, even the chilling ones.
It's necessary work. And that's really our mission
here on the Deep Dive. Yeah, We take the sources you
provide articles, research, maybe even your own notes, and
we try to meticulously pull out the most vital insights.
(03:47):
You know, the essential stuff. Cutting through the noise.
Yeah, cutting through the noise,the directions, all the
deliberate attempts to obscure things so you can get straight
to the core of what's actually happening and why it's.
Happening. And maybe most importantly, why
it matters directly to you. Absolutely.
OK, so let's unpack this one. Today we're diving deep into a
really powerful, and I have to say, pretty chilling set of
(04:08):
sources. We're exploring A tactic that,
well, it's been used by authoritarian regimes throughout
history, weaponizing starvation.Now, it's really crucial we
state this upfront. Here on The Deep Dive, we
explore the arguments within your sources.
Our job is to dissect those arguments, the information they
present. Right, not necessarily endorsing
(04:30):
them. Exactly.
We're not here to endorse or refute specific political views,
but to really understand the patterns and perspectives the
source puts forward. And this isn't just about, you
know, food scarcity from a drought or economic collapse,
which is tragic enough. No, this is different.
This is something far more insidious.
It's about the deliberate, calculated use of hunger, using
(04:51):
it as a tool. A tool for dehumanization.
Yeah, humanization, destruction,and ultimately for domination.
It's about engineering a crisis to achieve certain goals.
Political, strategic, maybe evenethnic.
And as we get into this, you'll start to see a pretty horrifying
pattern emerge, one that repeatsitself with, well, tragic
(05:13):
regularity across time, across different places.
What our main source lays out isessentially an authoritarian
blueprint. An authoritarian systematic
method for oppression that just keeps showing up.
It connects events that might seem totally separate, you know,
decades apart, different continents, but it connects them
through this lens of intentionalman made famine.
(05:35):
We'll be looking at how this strategy doesn't just impact
bodies, the physical suffering, the death, which is immense, but
how it attacks the very spirit. The Spirit.
Yeah, the identity, the culture,the fundamental will of people
to resist. And importantly, the source
we're looking at also suggests what can be done about it.
OK. So there's a path forward
(05:55):
proposed too, right? A.
Path for resistance against thiskind of calculated cruelty.
So to guide us through this, this really important though
difficult subject, our main source today is titled
Starvation as a Weapon from Hitler to Netanyahu.
It's published by Educate Resistance.
And it's described, interestingly, as people powered
(06:15):
AI generated. It argues there's this chilling
continuity, this line in how hunger has been used as a weapon
across different times, different conflicts.
That description itself is interesting.
People powered, AI generated. It is, and it grabs you right
away. It pulls you in with this really
stark, unsettling quote right near the beginning.
What's the quote? Quotes Guy Wolf from Educate
(06:36):
Resistance saying famine is the oldest weapon of war, but in the
hands of a modern authoritarian it becomes genocide by design.
Wow, genocide by design. That, that really sums up the
whole premise, doesn't it? It does.
It's stark. It's not just looking back,
sadly at history. It's a direct warning about a
deliberate, methodical approach transforming a basic human need,
(06:59):
hunger, into an instrument of mass destruction.
Yeah. By design implies intent
planning. Exactly.
It's not a casual phrase. It implies this specific
malevolent intent, a meticulously planned approach.
So our mission today is to understand that design, grasp
the intent behind it, and reallycomprehend the devastating,
(07:20):
multifaceted impact of this well, this ancient yet
terrifyingly modern weapon. It forces you to confront that
hunger isn't always just a tragic side effect of war.
No. Often, the source argues, it is
the war. It's the primary weapon in the
authoritarian arsenal. OK, so let's start where the
source starts, the contemporary situation in Gaza.
(07:42):
It's described meticulously in the material, a crisis that
rightly has captured global attention, the source notes.
The world watches the unfolding devastation.
It's presented not just as regional, but as a global
humanitarian emergency. Indeed, and the source is really
clear on this point. What's happening in Gaza isn't
seen as some accidental outcome of conflict, not unavoidable
(08:02):
collateral damage. Instead, it asserts very
strongly that the Netanyahu government is weaponizing
starvation against Palestinians.That distinction is absolutely
critical because it frames it not as tragedy but a strategy,
deliberate, calculated. It's presented as part of a
broader pattern of authoritarianrepression, a conscious move,
(08:23):
not unforeseen. And the intention?
The grim intention, as the source highlights it, is
subjugation, displacement, or disturbingly, the extermination
of population. Seen as well, undesirable,
subhuman or other, that difference between accidental
scarcity and deliberate weaponization is fundamental to
the sources argument. And the source goes into the
(08:44):
specifics of the siege, right? It doesn't just make the claim.
No, it details the components. It specifically mentions the
cutting off of food, water, electricity and humanitarian aid
as core elements. So these aren't just logistical
problems in wartime? Not according to the source.
They're presented as direct instruments of control,
subjugation ultimately. Is there evidence cited for that
(09:07):
intent? The source provides a direct
quote and it's, well, it's chilling.
Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant back in October 2023
quoted by Al Jazeera saying we are fighting human animals and
we are acting accordingly. No electricity, no food, no
water, no fuel. Human animals, that language
it's. Profoundly dehumanizing, as the
(09:29):
source points out, and when you strip a population of its
humanity with rhetoric like that.
It makes extreme measures seem justifiable.
Terrifyingly easier? Yes.
Cutting off life sustaining supplies, it allows acts that
would normally be seen as unspeakable to be framed
differently within a kind of distorted moral landscape where
the suffering of the other is dismissed or rationalized or
(09:51):
even seen as deserved. It's like a psychological
precondition for the physical act.
Precisely that's how the source presents it.
And this grim picture, is it just the source saying this or
are others echoing it? Well, the source points out,
it's echoed with alarming consistency by major
international bodies. Like who?
Human Rights Watch, for instance, they formally accused
Israel of using starvation as a method of warfare, a war crime
(10:13):
under international law. HRW highlighted that early in
2024. A war crime?
That's a heavy charge. It is.
It carries significant weight under international humanitarian
law. Using starvation that way is
specifically prohibited under the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court. It's about intentionally
depriving civilians of things essential to survival, including
(10:35):
willfully blocking relief slides.
So it's a specific legal definition, not just moral
outrage. Correct, and it goes further.
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs, OCH warned in March 2024 that famine is imminent in
Gaza. Imminent famine.
With a staggering statistic, 100% of the population facing
(10:56):
food insecurity. 100%. The entire population.
That's what the UN warning stated, according to the source.
The significance of these bodiesHRW the UN using terms like war
crime and warning of imminent famine for everyone, well, it
can't be overstated. But it underscores the scale,
the horrific scale, Yeah. And it lends significant weight
to the sources argument that this is deliberate, not
(11:17):
unavoidable tragedy. It elevates it beyond a
humanitarian crisis to a grave indictment under international
law. It's it's hard to process that
current situation. But what really struck me in the
source was the point that this tactic, as awful as it is right
now, it's not new. No, it follows this horrifyingly
familiar pattern, a grim blueprint used before.
(11:40):
That's a really profound observation, and it's exactly
where the Source offers some of its deepest insights.
What's truly fascinating and deeply disturbing is how the
Source meticulously connects these dots across history.
Showing this isn't an isolated incident.
Right. Showing that starvation has long
been a hallmark of regimes determined to destroy not just
bodies but spirit, culture, identity.
(12:02):
It reveals this chillingly systematic authoritarian
blueprint A. Playbook for oppression.
A calculated playbook used repeatedly over the last
century, even earlier. It's designed to break
populations from within, make them easier to subjugate, or in
the most extreme cases, pave theway for their eradication by
destroying their ability to resist physically and
(12:22):
psychologically. So what are some of these
historical examples the source brings up?
One of the most harrowing, and one that really resonates with
the argument, is the holodomer. In Ukraine, 1930s.
Exactly. The devastating famine there
between 1932 and 1933. And the source is clear.
This wasn't natural disaster. No drought, no crop failure.
(12:43):
It was, as the source states, unequivocally engineered.
Engineered by Stalin's Soviet regime?
How? How did they?
Do that the term engineered is crucial.
It highlights the deliberate calculated nature.
The source gives chilling specifics.
An estimated 3.5 to 5 million Ukrainians died, Millions.
A significant portion of the pocket population.
And the brutality wasn't random,it was systematic things like
(13:06):
forced grain requisitions. Meaning they just took the food.
Armed brigades swept through villages, confiscating
everything, every last bit of grain, potatoes, leaving
families with nothing. Imagine watching soldiers haul
away the food you grew while your children starve, And at the
same time, while Ukrainians starved, the Soviet Union
(13:27):
continued the export of foodstuffs, shipping grain out
of the country to fund Stalins industrialization.
So it wasn't just neglect, it was active policy.
Deliberate economic warfare. Prioritizing state goals over
human life. And to make sure no aid got in
and people couldn't flee, they set up military blockades of
villages. Turning regions into prisons.
Vast open air prisons, roads, sealed rail lines cut, no food
(13:51):
in, no people out. And Applebaum's work Red
Famines, cited by the source, confirms the purpose.
Use famine as a tool of terror to crush Ukrainian nationalism
and resistance. And assault on their identity.
Exactly their culture, their desire for self determination
designed to break them physically and spiritually.
Then, tragically, the source moves to the Nazi Hunger Plan
(14:11):
1941 to 1945, implemented acrossEastern Europe, targeting Jews
specifically but others too, using starvation not just to
control but to actually depopulate areas.
A terrifyingly deliberate strategy within their broader
genocidal aims, yes. How did that work in practice?
The source sites Adam Tuse's book The Wages of Destruction,
(14:32):
showing the chilling precision The Nazi hunger plan targeted
Jews, Slavs and prisoners of warthey viewed them as.
Useless eaters. That horrific phrase?
Yes, their lives expendable for the benefit of the master race
and the German war effort. The methods were brutally
efficient. Widespread ration denial and
food blockades systematically starving whole populations.
(14:55):
Millions died from this too. Millions directly, and the
source emphasizes contrasting this with other Nazi violence.
Gas chambers, firing squads, those were immediate
extermination. But starvation was different.
It was a distinct, insidious weapon.
It prolonged suffering, systematically weakened people,
created utter despair before death, a slower, agonizing form
of genocide, often a precursor or used alongside other methods
(15:19):
designed to degrade victims physically and psychologically.
The source also mentions the Biofran famine in Nigeria.
Yes, 1967 to 1970. During the Biofran War, the
Nigerian military blockaded the Igbo region.
And the outcome there, the intention.
Catastrophic outcome. The source referencing Medicine
San Fran Tierra states over 1,000,000 deaths from starvation
(15:42):
directly from that blockade. A million people.
And it wasn't just about cuttingoff military supplies.
It was a deliberate campaign to starve civilians into
submission. The source reiterates the
intent. Food was a weapon used to force
surrender. So the hunger was the weapon.
Central to the strategy, not a side effect aimed at breaking
the Biophren people's will. Another example of this
(16:04):
recurring brutal tactic. And it brings us closer to the
present day with Yemen. The Saudi LED starvation
campaign ongoing from 2015, and the source makes a point of
noting this coalition was supported by US arms and
intelligence. Adding another layer of
complexity. Yes, and the impacts in Yemen
have been devastating, the source explains.
Comprehensive naval and air blockades cut off critical
(16:25):
imports. Food, fuel, medicine.
Plunging millions into famine. Exactly.
Widespread malnutrition. Disease especially hitting
children hard. The UN in 2021 called it the
worst humanitarian crisis on Earth.
So Ukraine, Nazi Europe, Biafra,Yemen and now Gaza.
When you connect these as the source does, what's the big
(16:47):
picture take away? The take away is the horrifying
consistency. If we connect this to the bigger
picture, the common thread isn'tjust deprivation, it's
orchestrated deprivation for a specific purpose.
Calculated decision. By a powerful entity to deny
life sustaining resources to civilians.
The purpose? Political control, suppressing
resistance, ethnic cleansing, demographic shifts.
(17:08):
It targets the most fundamental need, food, and turns it into an
instrument of terror. Breaking physical and
psychological. Leaving populations utterly
vulnerable. And again, the source argues,
this isn't just a byproduct of war.
Often it is the war itself, waged through hunger, a slow,
agonizing siege. It reveals this predictable,
horrifying pattern in authoritarian behavior.
(17:29):
Now the source gets into something it calls one of the
most painful aspects of the Gazasituation, the historical irony
Ah. Yes, this is where it becomes
truly paradoxical and difficult.A layer of profound moral
weight. It is.
The source calls it the deepest betrayal, this unsettling
paradox. It elaborates by noting that
(17:50):
many Jewish families in Israel trace their lineage directly
back to Holocaust survivors. Or those who fled pogroms,
ghettos, famines in Europe. Exactly, the source emphasizes.
They know in blood and bone whatweaponized hunger looks like.
They carry that inherited memory, the deep traumatic scars
of this specific kind of suffering, systematic
(18:10):
deprivation designed to break a people.
And yet the source asked this incredibly direct, unsettling
question. It doesn't shy away.
It asks. And yet some descendants of
Holocaust victims now rationalize identical tactics
against Palestinians. How does a people so scarred by
collective trauma arrived at thejustification of inflicting
similar suffering? That's a very hard question.
(18:32):
It forces an uncomfortable reflection, and the source
really emphasizes the deafening echo of the Warsaw Ghetto
starvation. The specific harrowing parallel.
It underscores, it reminds us with chilling precision, over
100, 1000 Jews died from hunger before deportation to
extermination camps. This isn't a vague comparison.
It's invoking a specific historical precedent where
(18:53):
hunger was a direct prelude to mass murder.
So the question becomes, how does that trauma?
How can collective trauma, instead of fostering universal
empathy, A commitment to never again for anyone?
How can it sometimes be inverted, twisted into a
justification for inflicting similar harm on another group?
It challenges that assumption that victimhood automatically,
(19:14):
radically leads to compassion. It suggests a more complex,
maybe more troubling, psychological dynamic might be
at play sometimes. It's a dig into this paradox.
The source brings in the perspective of Israeli historian
Ilan Pepe. A powerful, though sometimes
controversial voice. Quoting him from 2006, the
Zionist narrative has replaced empathy with entitlement.
(19:35):
Victimhood has become a shield to rationalize state violence,
even genocide. That's a profoundly critical
statement. It is Pappy's perspective, as
presented here, delves into thisthis unsettling transformation.
He's suggesting that a narrativebuilt on the legitimate
historical victimhood immense suffering.
Which is undeniable. Undeniable.
But it can, in certain contexts,metastasize, become a perceived
(19:59):
sense of unique entitlement, andthat entitlement, he argues,
becomes a shield. A dangerous one.
Enabling actions that would otherwise be condemned.
Exactly enabling the justification of state violence,
even actions bordering on genocide, actions that would
normally face universal condemnation under international
law and basic morality. It positions a painful past not
(20:21):
as a reason for universal empathy, but almost as a unique
credential. Paradoxically used to
rationalize current actions. Which raises that critical
question. How can shared trauma sometimes
become a barrier, a shield, allowing similar injustices
against others? Instead of building bridges, it
forces a hard look at how historical narratives are built,
remembered and used politically.Now the source shifts focus
(20:44):
slightly, highlighting that it'snot just about starting bodies,
right. Authoritarian regimes, it says,
do not only starve bodies, they starve truth.
The narrative control aspect. Propaganda.
Exactly taking us into that critical realm of censorship and
information warfare just as vital to the blueprint as
(21:04):
physical deprivation. Absolutely critical, the source
explains. Israeli media and pro government
spokespeople tightly control howthe world perceives the siege.
This isn't secondary, it's integral to weaponizing
starvation. Controlling the information
environment is as important as controlling the physical one.
Maybe more so sometimes. If you manage the narrative,
dictate the terms of discussion,you can manage the outrage, the
(21:28):
condemnation, the international response.
It's about shaping perception, stifling dissent, preventing
empathy from taking root globally, rationalizing the
inhumane. And the source draws parallels
here too from history. Stark parallels Justice Stalin
denied the Holodomor and the Nazis filmed happy ghettos, the
source claims. Netanyahu's administration
insists that humanitarian concerns are secondary to
(21:50):
security. That same pattern of denying,
distorting, reframing the reality.
It's disturbingly consistent across authoritarian playbooks.
Stalin engineers a famine, then bans any mention of it, punishes
truth tellers the Nazi starve ghetto inhabitants, then film
propaganda showing them happy and well fed.
A grotesque inversion. So framing everything through
(22:13):
the lens of security. It attempts to legitimize the
siege, according to the source, deflect accusations of war
crimes. It's a deliberate attempt to
control the narrative, dictate how the world interprets events
and block empathy. A psychological battle for
perception as vital as any military move.
But the source suggests this control isn't absolute.
(22:33):
There's a counter narrative emerging.
Yes, a flicker of hope. It emphasizes that censorship is
cracking. Meaning truth is getting out
despite the efforts. It suggests so.
It details the vital role of Israel really whistleblowers,
international NGOs and journalists who are defying the
narrative, pushing back against the controlled information flow.
How crucial are those voices? Absolutely crucial.
(22:54):
They're challenging the propaganda machine, often at
great personal risk, documenting, reporting, speaking
out, sometimes from within the system, trying to suppress them,
exposing the unvarnished truth. Which raises the question, what
happens when that narrative control starts to fray?
How does that impact the regime's ability to maintain
(23:15):
control? And as the source points out,
with a call to action, the global resistance is watching,
documenting and translating the truth.
Underlining the importance of information and fighting back.
When truth is starved, it's thatglobal network, informed people,
civil society, independent journalists that steps and
defeat it to nourish understanding and resistance.
(23:36):
So, to counter this authoritarian starvation of food
facts compassion, the source proposes a solution.
Yes, it says, we must rebuild the mountain they fear most
media and education. That's the Educate resistance
call to action, framed as the ultimate path.
The indispensable path of resistance.
A rallying cry. How does it break that down?
What is rebuilding that mountainlook like?
(23:57):
It lays out four key strategic actions, really concrete steps
to counteract that authoritarianplaybook.
First, expose. Expose war crimes and famine
denial through multilingual journalism.
Shine an unrelenting light on atrocities.
Make sure they can't be hidden or dismissed.
Getting factual reporting out globally in different languages.
(24:19):
Exactly providing that unvarnished counter narrative to
official denials. A direct challenge to censorship
and narrative control, making itimpossible to starve the truth.
OK, that's step one. What's next?
2nd educate globally using history as a weapon of truth.
Using history as a weapon. Meaning, make those historical
parallels resonate today. Show people this authoritarian
(24:42):
blueprint isn't just dusty history, it's a living,
recurring threat. So understanding the Holodomor,
the Hunger Plan, Biafra, Yemen helps us recognize it now.
Precisely recognize and resist similar tactics when they
reappear. History becomes a living tool
for understanding foreseen patterns, for shaping the
present to prevent recurrence. All right, expose in, educate.
What's third? 3rd Create resistance media hubs
(25:05):
that amplify silence voices. So building alternative
platforms, decentralizing information.
Exactly spaces where the marginalized, the oppressed,
those directly experiencing these tactics can be heard
unfiltered, without censorship or manipulation, empowering the
grassroots. Giving a direct platform to
those on the front lines. These hubs become life lines for
(25:27):
information, bypassing state control, fostering direct
communication and solidarity. And the fourth action. 4th
Translate this truth across borders.
Borders authoritarianism fears. Emphasizing the global nature of
the struggle. Because authoritarian regimes
thrive on isolation, on controlling information within
their borders, creating divisions by translating and
(25:49):
spreading truth across languagesand nations, we break down those
barriers. Fostering global understanding
and a unified response. Each point is strategically
vital. In this age of information
warfare, the battle for truth isfundamental.
The source then culminates with this really powerful call for
global unity. One that echoes those historical
lessons. It states global resistance must
(26:12):
say never again for anyone. It's not just a slogan, is it?
It's presented as urgent. Now it's foundational to the
source's whole argument. It expands on that idea that
authoritarianism thrives when welet it divide us into victims
and bystanders. The danger is selective empathy.
Exactly when historical trauma becomes a unique credential, not
(26:32):
a universal lesson, the source'smessage is a powerful call to
unite across faith, nation, and identity.
Because this fight against weaponized hunger, against
starved truth, it's universal. It transcends specific groups or
conflicts. Which raises that question for
all of us. How do we build that truly
unified, principle based global response ensure history's
(26:53):
lessons apply universally to everyone and IT?
Leaves no room for ambiguity about the ACT.
Itself no space for excuses, it declares unequivocally
weaponized starvation is genocide, whether in 1943
Poland, 1933 Ukraine or 2025 Gaza.
Asserting that universality regardless of who or when.
It underscores the horrifying consistency of the blueprint and
(27:14):
the moral imperative to call it what it is.
It challenges any attempt to excuse it based on context,
insists on one universal moral standard.
And it concludes that section with a statement on justice.
A really profound one, summing up its core philosophy.
Justice is not 0 sum. Liberation is for all or none.
(27:34):
Meaning our freedoms are interconnected.
True liberation, true justice, can't be achieved if it costs
another group their freedom or dignity.
It's a powerful call for universal human rights,
asserting our collective liberation is inextricably
linked. So we've covered a lot an
incredibly challenging, but I think essential deep dive today
definitely into this terrifying history and the present reality
(27:55):
of weaponized starvation from the Holodomor, the Nazi Hunger
plan, Biafra, Yemen, and tragically Gaza.
We see this consistent, deliberate tactic.
A chilling pattern? Yeah.
A repeating blueprint across decades continents.
And crucially, beyond the physical hunger, we explored how
it's also about deliberately starving truth and compassion.
(28:15):
Which is why the source hammers home the critical role of media
and education in resisting exposing truth, challenging
narratives, fostering global understanding.
It's a battle on multiple frontsfor bodies, for facts.
And for the human spirit itself.So as you listening, reflect on
these painful patterns, these current devastating events.
(28:38):
Consider that powerful idea. Understanding history, even its
worst repetitions, might be our strongest tool against
recurrence. What stands out most profoundly
to you from this deep dive? Yeah, think about that.
And that critical, unsettling question the source raises.
How can historical trauma sometimes be repurposed to
enable rather than revent similar atrocities?
(29:00):
How do we, individuals, the global community, make sure the
lessons of the past really inform our actions now, so that
never again truly means never again for everyone universally,
no exceptions? It's the core challenge.
If the deep dive resonated, if it sparked something
understanding urgency, remember that.
Educate, resistance, call to action.
It's the backbone of the source we discussed.
They directly urge you share this post.
(29:21):
Get this knowledge out there. And subscribe for free to
receive new posts and support our work.
Your engagement is part of that resistance through knowledge.
And they offer more resources toaudio analysis of this article
and others on Spotify in English, Spanish and Arabic.
Bositel, Avidad and ISEC. Exactly, and you can join us for
a conversation on blueskithelinkisbrisky.aprofile.educatorresistance.piski.socialorvisittheirfreeciviceducationportal@github.com
(29:51):
Free civis education. Lots of ways to continue your
own deep dive. Connect with others.
Become part of rebuilding that mountain of media and education.
Engage with these ideas, discussthem with friends, family,
online. Take action by being part of
that informed resistance. You're understanding, sharing
what you learn, asking critical questions.
(30:11):
Those are powerful tools againstforces trying to starve bodies,
in truth. If you found this deep dive
useful, please do consider liking sharing.
Subscribing your support helps amplify these crucial insights.
Be. Part of the world you want to
see, not the one dictators want to impose.
Stay curious. Stay informed.
Thank you for joining us on the Deep Dive.
We hope this gave you powerful insights, A deeper
(30:32):
understanding. We'll see you on the next Deep
dive. None.
(31:21):
It makes us whole. No Fear.
(31:55):
We rise again, rise up, live under there.
Oh, we let the sky yell. We go from every shore, we break
the chains now. We take control in every
(32:29):
country. We rise with truth in
revolution. The.
(33:12):
Now we take control.
Popular Podcasts
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!