Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
There is new
leadership in Washington DC and
changes have already started tohappen on the policy and
regulatory front.
What might all this mean forthe US feed industry?
Welcome to Feedstuffs In Focus,our podcast, where we take a
look at the big issues affectingthe livestock, poultry, grain
and animal feed industries.
I'm your host, sarah Muirhead.
(00:27):
This episode of Feedstuffs inFocus is sponsored by United
Animal Health, a leader inanimal health and nutrition.
You can learn more about UnitedAnimal Health and how they're
working to advance animalscience worldwide by visiting
their website at unitedanhcomworldwide by visiting their
website at unitedanhcom.
Joining us from IPPE 2025 inAtlanta, georgia, to talk about
(00:50):
policy and the newadministration is Constance
Coleman.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
President and CEO of
the people that didn't take
those lessons and some of theother policy changes that the
government is now treating asthe right thing to do, and I'm
wondering what you think aboutthe position that this is going
to have to be.
Well, certainly, these areTrump's illustrations that he
did to the House legislation.
So, in fact, the Trumpadministration is now.
I think we saw a particulartrend that focused on education
regulation for the communityregulation.
So we're going to look at theshortcomings of that, because I
(01:31):
did actually just look at thenumber.
Well, we're going to addressthe situation, but it doesn't
affect your use of the account,and so there are definitely
three ideas that we have to workthrough and develop ideas about
what they're going to do andwhat they're going to do with
that, and so there is a lot ofquestions from our individual
(01:52):
conversation going around whatwe're going to do to actually
produce regulations, which is anew process that we're doing.
We're going to take the nextsteps, produce all the
regulations we've oforganizations which have done
and it's really hard, to behonest.
I think that we need moreresources for these regulations,
because I think that's one wayto make it probably way easier
(02:15):
to step away from other things.
I see a lot of changes at thetop.
It's something that you know.
The governments that can searchfor these kind of options see
what they're going to do andonce you've seen it, really
there's a lot of things thathappen separately.
That's your reason for stayingless retraction and some of
(02:36):
those options they help you toget to the super-duration, like
the information about the12-hour, 22-h communities again,
make these decisions and thecommunities that we've signed to
make.
A larger-than-face approach isthrough my commission and what
we've added from the bankruptcymeeting that was in the project
process and some of the otherdecisions we've made were to
(03:00):
enable the public registry toimpact something that's not
quite.
The consumer public shouldcertainly continue to ensure
that the industry has a point toretire, but it's the people who
are in power who make theprogress right the way it should
(03:21):
be made to the SCA, to the SCR,so that across the board, we're
communicating with thoseregulations that we're working
on.
So we are finally starting toget started.
I think we're getting thisdiscussion going so quick.
We have some really interesting, really interactive information
(03:41):
to do this because of ouractual priorities with the
incoming administration.
So the things that are alsobeing considered to do was
understanding the issues oforganization of the regulatory
process, of what you can do toenhance your work.
But we know that these areingredients that I necessarily
(04:01):
don't produce, because you'reaware that some of those other
benefits that we're starting arelooking for, such as
environmental.
We're exchanging data withlocal organizations, we're using
kinds of products to try todetect the effects with which
we're processing all thesethings and we're ensuring that
we're receiving the same data.
So we're making sure that wehave the information we should
(04:21):
be having in our web page andwe're bringing that up to people
, to people we don't know, andwe're very glad to be able to do
what we got to do and we'rewilling, with all our needs and
expectations, to actually getback to you about the questions
that are to be asked about theenergy-controlling workers.
So that's kind of what's thelong conversation we've had
about what role energy juicefrom a theoretical perspective,
(04:44):
and it was not quite the logicagainst which I think the
training progress and theproject itself was to be in ways
that were not very expensive,and we looked at that and it's
really the same thing with that.
In fact, the idea that we'retalking about is kind of a way
to talk to the community, butthat's a bit of a sore nerve and
it's kind of a paralysis, andwe do know that we website.
(05:07):
Really that's where we'll beable to bring that back to the
transcriptions.
So we have, for instance, alittle bit of a website and
we're going to start to do thatsoon.
So I've got a lot of nicespecific lists of other items
that we can talk about and we'regoing to have some for our
company for general.
So we're talking about levelingdrives across the board on
trainees, product to traineesand the company line.
There's also potentially aunique impact or we have to
(05:30):
communicate that to the entirecustomer service industry with
the types of products and we'relooking to start to be proud for
about, specifically, monitors,because we just know that we're
talking about more than just thefact that we have to have a
more level of this and actuallythe ones we talked about, the
importance of that, the NorthAmerican Academy and how they
integrated, the law that we hada few months ago that we have to
(05:52):
accept and not sell, justaccept the general production of
the North American Academy andanyways, I think States should
be able to have a lot ofconsumer, a lot of information
to the company about productsthat can pass residence orders,
about the production of thatproduct.
So we'll start to have the US.
But once you've got theequipment that you need to be
(06:13):
able to see, that you know whatthose objectives are, you're
going to get a really big andreally big information, and so
we are going to be doing areally big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
big, really big, really big,really big, really big, really
(06:34):
session.
Let us make a place for youfrom the object system in
general.
We are about to have a sessionabout that.
We are in a conversation withpeople who in the claims that
our object system is broken,that you can look at and have a
discussion, conversations aboutwhat our object system would
look like if it were broken.
(06:54):
We have the luxury of having atime for discussion that we need
to have, because our interestsare supervised by the nutrition
and the food and our foodpreparation, and so those
requirements might as well liveon record.
Yes, it's a function from theday that we know.
Do you think our health caresystem continues to strike from
(07:14):
the moment that that's reportedon the nutrition chart?
Absolutely.
But once the health care systemis laid, where we start all the
product qualities, productproduction systems, and they
check out and they're like oh, Ihave to change my, I have to
change something better and thatis the best thing you can do.
You can try to get around theidea of growing and growing, and
I believe that this is true.
(07:35):
So I think that's the point Allof these are.
When it comes to the way thatthe administration is running,
they're just being humble, butjust like that.
We've got to talk to theadministration and just make
sure that they're informed andinformed, and they're proud of
you about that.
But I think that's a point and Ithink that's something that the
Commission should do, and we'rejust talking about that.
(07:57):
Obviously, the conception of athree-hour open board and a
public conception of a publicdepartment is made primarily
because it's a convention, justhaving a pretty good idea of the
paradigm.
And the second thing is that wehave very close relationships
with those that we work with,training partners, and that has
(08:18):
helped raise people in thediscussion with the supply chain
and the restrictions that arefinding how to improve this new
health care problem.
So there are a lot of peoplewho are doing some work on some
of the new health care programsand really does that help the
ecosystem, as well as some ofthe geopolitical tensions and
all of your similar scenariosmust be resolved because we want
(08:39):
to be able to continueproviding safe and nutritious
medical products to thecommunity.
And then I have a conversationwith my advisor about this
report that I printed out.
So if you guys want to printthose out, I am able to cut back
to expenses.
If you buy a lot of protectivewear, weapons and a lot of
things, we'll always be able tobring you to that small place to
get a really nice leader, butthank you so much for joining us
(09:09):
here tonight.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
This episode has been
brought to you by United Animal
Health, a leader in animalhealth and nutrition.
You can learn more about UnitedAnimal Health and how they're
working to advance animalscience worldwide by visiting
their website at unitedanhcom.
I'm Sarah Muirhead and you'vebeen listening to Feedstuffs In
Focus.
If you would like to hear moreconversations about some of the
(09:31):
big issues affecting thelivestock, poultry grain and
animal feed industries,subscribe to this podcast on
your favorite podcast channel.
Until next time, have a greatday and thank you for listening.