December 16, 2024 • 25 mins
Is it time for the United States to reevaluate its role in NATO, or is the heavy financial burden a necessary evil for global stability? Join us as we kick off this episode with a candid critique of President Zelensky's warnings to the U.S. about its contributions to the alliance and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. With a mix of humor and critical analysis, we question if it's time to reconsider America's role in global alliances, drawing parallels to policies from former President Trump. This conversation is bound to spark debate and reflection on the future of international relations and military funding, as we explore the financial dynamics and the sheer magnitude of U.S. contributions to NATO.
The mood lightens as we take a whimsical yet serious look at the mysterious drone sightings over New Jersey. Confirmed by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, these sightings have stirred public curiosity and conspiracy theories alike. We journey through speculative narratives—from military surveillance and foreign threats to alien invasions—while stressing the importance of transparency to quell public fears. Along the way, we ponder the impact of past incidents like the Chinese spy balloon and chat about potential explanations, including foreign involvement. Join us for a rollercoaster of theories that encourages critical thinking and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling,incoherent response were you
even close to anything thatcould be considered a rational
thought.
Everyone in this room is nowdumber.
For having listened to it isnow dumber for having listened
(00:26):
to it.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
You don't know what that ought is, mr Trash.
I'd show you.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
but I'm too old, I'm too tired, I'm too fucking blind
.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
If I were the man, I was five years ago, I'd take a
flamethrower to this place.
Do you understand the wordsthat are coming out of?
Speaker 1 (00:52):
my mouth.
You want answers.
I think I'm entitled.
You want answers.
I want the truth.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
You can't handle the truth.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
We've said it once, we've said it before we've said
it a million times the truthshall always be free.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
This is Tim.
Let's get off my lawn the madramblings of a Gen Xer.
Once we've said it before,we've said it a million times
the truth shall always be free.
This is Tim.
Let's get off my lawn the madramblings of a generation.
Oh, we need to talk aboutdrones again, because there's so
much information,misinformation and every other
types of information.
Also want to talk about theUkraine's president, mr Zelensky
.
I'm not going to call himPresident Zelensky, because he
was a former actor pretendingnow to be a president,
(01:26):
pretending now to be a militarygeneral, and he's come out with
stern warnings for Trump and theUnited States.
He has come out and said that hewarns that the United States
risks in losing its pivotal rolein NATO and its global
leadership, getting over a cold,risks in losing its pivotal
role in NATO and its globalleadership excuse me, I'm
(01:46):
getting over a cold if itwithdraws funding from the
ongoing war in Ukraine.
Dun-dun-dun, oh, you mean thatthe four-year blank chuck is
going to stop?
What kind of fucking crazinessis that?
We're just not going to justkeep sending billions of dollars
of arms and aid to a countrythat we don't really know or
(02:12):
have any idea what's beingaccounted for and what's not
being accounted for, because thedefense department hasn't been
able to balance a budget in howmany months?
How many years?
Oh, since the Bidenadministration, it's saying now.
The statement sparked a debateacross social media platform,
with some users expressingskepticism about the necessity
of nato's current structure andus involvement, while others
(02:36):
empathize, empathize, empathize.
Excuse me, I really can't talktoday the critical role of
america's support and thealliance operation.
So so when you pay into NATO,you're basically paying in a
portion of your GDP and theUnited States is just pouring
money and has been pouring intoNATO since its inception.
So when Trump was president Iknow it's going to be great to
(03:00):
say that again, oh, you knowwhat to blow some liberals minds
.
That's what she said, merrychristmas.
But when it was, when I meansince its inception, we have
been flipping a large portion ofthis bill and some wonder,
especially wondering aloud.
Some people are saying the quietpart out loud, especially in
(03:21):
the trump administration anddonald trump himself, is is it
necessary for us to keep fundingthis?
We have our own military weneed to fund.
We have our own military, weneed to rebuild.
And you had countries thathaven't been paying for years
until Trump came along and saidlisten, you don't put in, you
don't pay what you're supposedto pay.
We're not going to keepflipping the bill for this.
(03:42):
You know, and it's basically analliance to protect.
You know Europe and our alliesand I understand that, and you
know if you are an ally, we willreadily come to your aid.
If you go back to, you know,the first Gulf War, how much of
the fighting force there, when alot of it was supposed to be
NATO countries as well, was theUnited States Just asking for a
(04:06):
friend because he would like toknow?
I don't know sometimes.
So the federal government hasnow said that people in New
Jersey are no question seeingdrones.
I don't know how long did itcome out for them to finally say
no, no, no, no, no.
There's no question, there aredrones being sighted, none
(04:30):
whatsoever.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
Mr Secretary, thank you forjoining us this morning.
Can you clear up the confusionhere?
Speaker 3 (04:39):
Absolutely, George, and thank you very much for
having me.
There's no question that peopleare seeing drones.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Now wait, now wait.
This is the best part.
This is Alejandro Mayorkas,your federal government.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
To assure the American public that we in the
federal government have deployedadditional resources, personnel
technology, to assist the NewJersey State Police in
addressing the drone sightings.
Some of those drone sightingsare in fact drones.
Some are manned aircraft thatare commonly mistaken for drones
(05:12):
, and we do see duplicativereporting, but there's no
question that drones are beingcited.
Let me set the record straighthere, George there are thousands
of drones.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
I love this part, because now you have to have the
caveat, Now you have to havefor Alejandro Mayorkas.
Why?
Speaker 3 (05:30):
you people are stupid .
Blown every day in the UnitedStates Recreational drones,
commercial drones.
That is the reality and inSeptember of 2023.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
So the reality is that drones are following Coast
Guard cutter ships.
Drones are coming in fromacross the ocean.
Drones are.
These drones are, at times, areso sophisticated that
commercial drones used by policedepartments cannot follow or
track these drones, and they areon a frequency that we're not
(06:06):
familiar with.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
The Federal Aviation Administration, the FAA, changed
the rules so that drones couldfly at night, and that may be
one of the reasons why now so ohGod, the FAA changed the rules
that drones can fly at night.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
You stupid motherfuckers, Don't go outside
and look up into the sky.
What is wrong with you?
Speaker 3 (06:27):
There's nothing to see here, people are seeing more
drones than they did before,especially from dawn to dusk,
and so that is the reality, butI want to assure the American
public that we are on it.
Make the bad man stop.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
We're on it, don't worry, because there was a spy
balloon flying over the countryfor like a month, going over
slowly, I mind you, going oversensitive military installations
, transmitting data back toChina, and we were told we
didn't.
That's not a balloon.
Speaker 3 (07:06):
Working in close coordination with state and
local authorities, and it iscritical, as we all have said
for a number of years, that weneed from Congress additional
authorities to address the dronesituation.
First, it's the FAA that causedthis problem.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
Now it's Congress not giving Alejandro Mayorkas more
money so he cannot spend it atthe border.
I cannot wait for thismotherfucker to be gone.
Speaker 3 (07:33):
Our authorities currently are limited and they
are set to expire.
We need them extended andexpanded.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
What exactly do you need?
Speaker 3 (07:44):
We want state and local authorities to also.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
I just love looking at George Stephanopoulos
concerning he just lost, gotsued and lost to Trump have the
ability to counter droneactivity under federal
supervision.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
That is one important element that we have requested,
and we've heard it echoed bythe state and local officials
themselves.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Okay, so you have the FFA, faa, and let's say there's
some drones illegally flyingover into sensitive areas.
So you're telling me the UnitedStates government, if there is
an unidentified flying objectflying over their military
installations, they're notallowed to take action against
it?
I'm sorry, my friend, I have toliterally call bullshit, knock,
(08:32):
knock.
Who's there?
Bullshit, bullshit, knock,knock.
Who's there?
Bullshit?
I mean, it's one of thosethings that.
Do they actually believe thatwe are this stupid?
I'm just asking, just askingfor a friend.
Do they believe that we arethis stupid?
They must, because it's trulyand literally the only
explanation, not for the drones,just for the lack of
(08:56):
forthrightness that thisadministration has put forth in
reference to any type ofinformation.
Now there are speculations thatthis drone could be a lot of
things.
One of the speculations is thefact that this is being used by
the CIA, that they're connected.
The CIA is doing some type ofcovert cover-up or covert
operation, which the CIA reallydoesn't operate on US soil.
(09:18):
Now, under this Bidenadministration, lord knows what
the fuck could be happening, butthey really don't operate.
The CIA, the CentralIntelligence Agency, whole
operation is basically overseas.
You know, keeping an eye on ourbad guys, keep an eye on those
bad guys that are out there thatare off to do us harm.
So can I, can I see that it's a, that it's a CIA operation?
(09:41):
Uh, I, I gotta kind of say no alittle bit on that one.
I was kind of thinking about itand you know the, the they're,
you know and I don't know.
It's just kind of weird.
What's going on here Now.
Congress all of a sudden isgoing to start taking action
against these drones, evidently.
But we have to kind of wait andsee what happens right there,
(10:02):
because our US government rightnow is a bunch of talk and
nothing else going on.
But I cannot see this beingsome type of covert military
operation.
There are also some speculationsand talks by some people on
Twitter and Joe Rogan hasactually kind of hooked his
(10:23):
wagon to this that he says he'sgenerally concerned about the
drones after watching footagethat floated across unverified
theories, of course, that theunmanned fighters are sniffing
out harmful substances.
So John Ferguson, ceo of RemoteAircraft Systems Company, which
is in Kansas, did a TikTokvideo on Saturday and it says
(10:43):
the drones are attempting tosmell out either gas or
radioactive materials somewheresomewhere else on the ground.
He said the only reason youever fly an unmanned aircraft at
night is if you're looking forsomething.
All right, listen.
So okay.
So a hiker gets lost in themountains, a child is lost in
(11:07):
the woods, let's just say, andyou want to cover the area more
quickly?
So you're basically telling methat the only way you could do
that is to fly a drone at night.
You're searching for a suspectwho is eluding police.
Don't they have policehelicopters during the day?
Oh no, let him go.
We can't catch that guy.
(11:28):
We can only search for peopleat night.
The only reason you fly everfly an undermined aircraft at
night is when you're looking forsomething, says ferguson,
noting he doesn't believe thedrones are nefarious.
I don't believe the drones arenefarious, but I believe they're
looking for something.
So my belief is that they'retrying to.
(11:48):
They're trying to smellsomething on the ground gas leak
, radioactive material, whatever.
So then you have peoplespeculating onto this theory
that there is a dirty bomb,there's a nuclear dirty bomb
somewhere here on the east coast, and the united states
government and their infinitewisdom is sending up thousands
of drones at night to try andfind it.
This, this is the shit thathappens.
(12:11):
These are the online theories.
That happens when you don'tprovide any information.
And he said I've not bouncedthis idea off anyone, it's just
my opinion.
Okay, well, you know what?
You put it on TikTok, you putit on Twitter, you put it on
everyone else.
People are going to look at itas a speculation, that this is
an anti-terrorism task forcelooking for a dirty bomb
(12:36):
somewhere on the East Coast.
I don't know, guys, I mean thatone's up there and Joe Rogan I
like Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan has come out andbasically said you know, he's
like.
He said this is the first videoabout these drones.
That has me generally concerned.
(12:56):
He wrote on Twitter and then healso previously called the
claims of the US governmentafter National Security Advisor
Kirby said the drones were not apublic safety concern and many
reported sightings are actuallymanned aircrafts.
And listen, I can believe that.
I can believe that some of thesightings are manned aircraft.
I can believe that some of thesightings are recreational
(13:17):
purposes, but I do think thatthe United States government is
using that as a cover-up becauseof the fact that this has been
going on for 20 plus days nowand if you watch some of the
videos and you see some of themovements and you could see that
clearly.
These are sophisticated typedrones.
Homeowners have said that theyhave shined flashlights on the
drones and all the lightingsystems on the drones would go
(13:37):
out, that there's some type oflight sensitivity to these
drones.
I personally think it's sometype of military operation,
because there is an Air Forcebase not too far from the
location where all these dronesare coming out.
That maybe they're testingcertain types of top secret
drone technology, because Area51 was overbooked.
(14:01):
We have too many aliens rightnow in Area 51.
But when you this is theproblem when you don't provide
any details, you don't provideany substance, you don't provide
any information.
These are the types of rampantspeculations that you get that
now there's a.
This is what causes panic.
Same thing with the balloon.
You tell us.
(14:22):
You tell us there's no, there'sno balloon.
What are you crazy balloon,what are you crazy?
But then you sit there and say,well, yeah, there is a balloon,
there is a balloon, but youknow.
But you know, don't worry aboutit, it's nothing, it's a, it's
(14:47):
a weather balloon.
Then we find out it's a Chinesespy balloon.
One of the other theories that Ithat I've come across the
internet is that it's, of course, the Iranians that we've talked
about that, that it's an.
There is an alien, there's analien we're going to get to
aliens too.
There's a there are Iranianmothership drone ship that
that's off the coast, east coastsomewhere, flying these drones
over, testing our defenses,which I actually you know that
there there could be somecredence to that, because
(15:08):
evidently, defenses which Iactually you know that there
there could be some credence tothat, because evidently there
the Iranians have a former Iguess it was a tanker which they
converted into a drone aircraftcarrier which left.
I believe I ran back onDecember 5th, I think they were
saying and the United Statesgovernment doesn't know where
it's at, they think it's goingto the Persian Gulf.
(15:30):
I love our government now Don'tyou just feel safe and warm
with the Biden administration?
We don't know where that droneship went, but don't worry, it's
not parked off the East Coastbecause we have no idea where it
is.
I mean, come on.
I mean, could there be somecredence in that?
Yeah, I do think so.
(15:51):
But like I said, I keep comingback to government for
surveillance, our own governmentsurveillance, I don't think
it's I.
It could potentially be foreignsurveillance, but if that's the
case, how come we cannot findthe mothership off the east
coast?
We have radar, we have alltypes of tracking equipment.
And then I love it because yougot people saying also it's kids
playing a prank, so all thesekids got together.
(16:13):
It's like the crop circles.
Some of the crop circles arefake, but I saw the movie signs.
I seen it.
What a Mel Gibson's betterflicks.
But that's just something.
Also think of that.
You do have a aircraft carrierfor drones, owned by the
(16:35):
Iranians, which left port on Ibelieve it was December 5th and
we don't know where it's at.
We think it's in the.
How do you lose?
This is worse than Pearl Harbor.
How do you, especially withtoday's technology, how do you
lose a ship like that?
How do you not be able to havethe capacity to track a former
tanker ship that was convertedinto an aircraft carrier?
(16:59):
The other one out there is alieninvasions.
This is an alien invasion.
Yeah, that's what it is.
The aliens are using dronetechnology to sniff out this,
our, our, our, our defenses.
I like that one the best.
I like the alien invasion thebest because of the fact that if
(17:26):
these aliens are notsophisticated like the ones that
we saw like in the TV show V,the Mark Singer TV show V, not,
not, not the battery make, orindependence day, not
independence day to the WillSmith independence day, and they
have to use drone technology toprobe our country.
That's what she said.
(17:46):
I'm not uh, I'm, I'm not.
I'm not really overly concernedabout what we like to refer to
as the you know someone that'sthe, that extraterrestrial
intelligence.
That doesn't.
That doesn't concern me as much.
That doesn't sit there and goto myself.
Huh, interesting.
The aliens have to use drones.
I am going to tell you this,though.
(18:09):
Have to use drones.
I am going to tell you this,though, and maybe, maybe, maybe
I am speaking a little.
Um, maybe I am speaking alittle at a turn, because the
other day I was on the NewJersey turnpike and I didn't
have my easy pass, so I had togo in to get a ticket Blaine,
(18:29):
where you going to get a ticketand I saw a van full of what
looked like aliens trying tofigure out how to get a ticket
out of the machine so they cancontinue on the turnpike.
The only problem was they wereillegal aliens.
Hey-oh, another one of theconspiracy theories is going to
(18:50):
be it's project, blue beam.
This we we did a whole video onproject blue beam.
Oh God, I think it was a yearago, you know, uh, and it's one
of those.
It's one of those theories andas one of those things in
conspiracy theories that hasbeen going on for uh, uh, I
think, since the ninetiestheories that has been going on
(19:14):
for I think since the 90s.
It's originated, yeah, it wasby a Canadian journalist who
died in 96.
It was in the 90s.
It alleges a covert operationby government elites to
establish a Taltarian worldgovernment by orchestrating fake
celestial or supernaturalevents using futuristic NASA
technology.
The proponents of the theoryinitially expect the project to
(19:36):
begin in 1995 and 1996, but thenthe guy who was, you know, the
guy whose theory this was, hedied, so it kind of went by the
wayside and it's basically usedto create global panic and
dismantle existing religion andsocial structure.
Now some people are saying that,because Trump won the election,
that that's what the Bidenadministration is trying to do,
because we always talk aboutTrump being the guy that wanted
(20:00):
to be the dictator, being theguy that doesn't want to get
pushed out of office.
I think a lot of the people inthe Biden administration are
afraid what's going to happenwhen Trump comes in the office.
So you keep people thinkingabout this, thinking you know
what?
This could be, something thatthe government's using.
Next, they're talking aboutprojecting holographic images
that would simulate the returnof divine figures.
(20:21):
So Jesus is going to come backand say what the fuck are you
people doing here?
What are you crazy?
And these are going to becustomized per each region so
you could have Allah, you couldhave Vishnu, you could have
whoever followed by, and there'sgoing to be a unifying God
speaking to all people.
Then I always love this part.
(20:45):
Then the technology wouldmanipulate human thoughts,
creating an illusion of directcommunications with the deities
and simulating an alien invasionto justify authoritarian
control.
I don't know.
I think that one might be myfavorite, I think that one might
(21:07):
be my favorite of all time and,like I said, this has been
going around since the 90s andit was supposed to take effect
in 95, 96, and then the guy whocame up with, the Canadian
journalist that came up withthis theory, he died.
I do think at times there couldbe a factor in this that the
government is trying to dosomething to you know to, to
(21:30):
maybe hold on to the power thatthey currently have.
So I think the biggest fearthat this Biden administration
has is their corruption will beexposed, unmanned by the Trump
administration, because of thefact that there is just so much
shit going on.
There's just so much shitthey're going to try to do.
(21:50):
I love the fact that Biden iseither pardoned or commuted the
sentences of 1500 people.
Either pardoned or commuted thesentences of 1500 people.
The record before that was 300plus by Obama, so Biden was just
like his is 330 plus.
I'm going to do 1500.
(22:10):
And then I love it because thenhe gives the pardon to his son
and he makes it all sweeping forthe last 10 years that, no
matter what he did the last 10years, he cannot be charged for
a crime.
Wow, that's one hell of afucking part and one hell of a
little bit of corruption goingon here.
You know there has been someweird shit going around for a
(22:37):
while now and I'm not going todisplace anyone's thought
processes or their beliefs ofwhat may be causing this
information.
I want to see this guy.
This is a researcher.
(22:58):
Dr Stephen Green accuratelypredicted the rollout of Project
Bluebeam.
This is happening now.
Speaker 4 (23:04):
There's a new video this morning that some say may
be proof we're not alone in theuniverse.
A UFO in the form of a brightlight is seen descending over
the dome of the rock inJerusalem.
The video is said to be takenover the weekend.
Then suddenly, the light shootsup into the sky.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
That's part of it.
Let's get to this guy.
I got it Because this talksabout all the aliens that we're
seeing and everything going.
Here's the guy.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
The office.
Beware the military industrialcomplex.
We must guard against theacquisition of unwarranted
influence, whether sought orunsought, by the
military-industrial complex.
He wasn't talking about hisbrethren in the military.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
No, he said a technological elite in control
of it.
We must also be alert to theequal.
This is from Alex Jones andthey're the champion of
conspiracy theory, so we're notgoing to continue playing that
whatsoever.
But I just thought it wasinteresting that I mean you
could easily dispel these rumorsif you're in the United States
government, if you could justsay, yeah, it's military testing
, you know that's what?
Literally I would have came outand said, yes, the military is.
(24:03):
Even if it wasn't true,military is testing some drone
technology weapon down the Eastcoast.
So we have a betterunderstanding of the use of this
technology because we alreadyknow we are behind on drone
advancement.
That's the China's smokiness inreference to this.
So I mean, I would think atthat point in time you would
kind of just say you know whatI'm now that I'm thinking about
(24:23):
this.
You guys are right, just comeout with a story, come out with
a plan.
It's the misinformation thatcauses panic and, like always,
panic is caused by the truth notbeing told and, as always here,
the truth shall set you free.
This is Dennis.
Get off my lawn the madramblings of a Gen Xer and I'm
out of here.
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling,incoherent response were you
even close to anything thatcould be considered a rational
thought.
Everyone in this room is nowdumber.
For having listened to it isnow dumber for having listened
(00:26):
to it.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
You don't know what that ought is, mr Trash.
I'd show you.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
but I'm too old, I'm too tired, I'm too fucking blind
.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
If I were the man, I was five years ago, I'd take a
flamethrower to this place.
Do you understand the wordsthat are coming out of?
Speaker 1 (00:52):
my mouth.
You want answers.
I think I'm entitled.
You want answers.
I want the truth.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
You can't handle the truth.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
We've said it once, we've said it before we've said
it a million times the truthshall always be free.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
This is Tim.
Let's get off my lawn the madramblings of a Gen Xer.
Once we've said it before,we've said it a million times
the truth shall always be free.
This is Tim.
Let's get off my lawn the madramblings of a generation.
Oh, we need to talk aboutdrones again, because there's so
much information,misinformation and every other
types of information.
Also want to talk about theUkraine's president, mr Zelensky
.
I'm not going to call himPresident Zelensky, because he
was a former actor pretendingnow to be a president,
(01:26):
pretending now to be a militarygeneral, and he's come out with
stern warnings for Trump and theUnited States.
He has come out and said that hewarns that the United States
risks in losing its pivotal rolein NATO and its global
leadership, getting over a cold,risks in losing its pivotal
role in NATO and its globalleadership excuse me, I'm
(01:46):
getting over a cold if itwithdraws funding from the
ongoing war in Ukraine.
Dun-dun-dun, oh, you mean thatthe four-year blank chuck is
going to stop?
What kind of fucking crazinessis that?
We're just not going to justkeep sending billions of dollars
of arms and aid to a countrythat we don't really know or
(02:12):
have any idea what's beingaccounted for and what's not
being accounted for, because thedefense department hasn't been
able to balance a budget in howmany months?
How many years?
Oh, since the Bidenadministration, it's saying now.
The statement sparked a debateacross social media platform,
with some users expressingskepticism about the necessity
of nato's current structure andus involvement, while others
(02:36):
empathize, empathize, empathize.
Excuse me, I really can't talktoday the critical role of
america's support and thealliance operation.
So so when you pay into NATO,you're basically paying in a
portion of your GDP and theUnited States is just pouring
money and has been pouring intoNATO since its inception.
So when Trump was president Iknow it's going to be great to
(03:00):
say that again, oh, you knowwhat to blow some liberals minds
.
That's what she said, merrychristmas.
But when it was, when I meansince its inception, we have
been flipping a large portion ofthis bill and some wonder,
especially wondering aloud.
Some people are saying the quietpart out loud, especially in
(03:21):
the trump administration anddonald trump himself, is is it
necessary for us to keep fundingthis?
We have our own military weneed to fund.
We have our own military, weneed to rebuild.
And you had countries thathaven't been paying for years
until Trump came along and saidlisten, you don't put in, you
don't pay what you're supposedto pay.
We're not going to keepflipping the bill for this.
(03:42):
You know, and it's basically analliance to protect.
You know Europe and our alliesand I understand that, and you
know if you are an ally, we willreadily come to your aid.
If you go back to, you know,the first Gulf War, how much of
the fighting force there, when alot of it was supposed to be
NATO countries as well, was theUnited States Just asking for a
(04:06):
friend because he would like toknow?
I don't know sometimes.
So the federal government hasnow said that people in New
Jersey are no question seeingdrones.
I don't know how long did itcome out for them to finally say
no, no, no, no, no.
There's no question, there aredrones being sighted, none
(04:30):
whatsoever.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
Mr Secretary, thank you forjoining us this morning.
Can you clear up the confusionhere?
Speaker 3 (04:39):
Absolutely, George, and thank you very much for
having me.
There's no question that peopleare seeing drones.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Now wait, now wait.
This is the best part.
This is Alejandro Mayorkas,your federal government.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
To assure the American public that we in the
federal government have deployedadditional resources, personnel
technology, to assist the NewJersey State Police in
addressing the drone sightings.
Some of those drone sightingsare in fact drones.
Some are manned aircraft thatare commonly mistaken for drones
(05:12):
, and we do see duplicativereporting, but there's no
question that drones are beingcited.
Let me set the record straighthere, George there are thousands
of drones.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
I love this part, because now you have to have the
caveat, Now you have to havefor Alejandro Mayorkas.
Why?
Speaker 3 (05:30):
you people are stupid .
Blown every day in the UnitedStates Recreational drones,
commercial drones.
That is the reality and inSeptember of 2023.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
So the reality is that drones are following Coast
Guard cutter ships.
Drones are coming in fromacross the ocean.
Drones are.
These drones are, at times, areso sophisticated that
commercial drones used by policedepartments cannot follow or
track these drones, and they areon a frequency that we're not
(06:06):
familiar with.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
The Federal Aviation Administration, the FAA, changed
the rules so that drones couldfly at night, and that may be
one of the reasons why now so ohGod, the FAA changed the rules
that drones can fly at night.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
You stupid motherfuckers, Don't go outside
and look up into the sky.
What is wrong with you?
Speaker 3 (06:27):
There's nothing to see here, people are seeing more
drones than they did before,especially from dawn to dusk,
and so that is the reality, butI want to assure the American
public that we are on it.
Make the bad man stop.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
We're on it, don't worry, because there was a spy
balloon flying over the countryfor like a month, going over
slowly, I mind you, going oversensitive military installations
, transmitting data back toChina, and we were told we
didn't.
That's not a balloon.
Speaker 3 (07:06):
Working in close coordination with state and
local authorities, and it iscritical, as we all have said
for a number of years, that weneed from Congress additional
authorities to address the dronesituation.
First, it's the FAA that causedthis problem.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
Now it's Congress not giving Alejandro Mayorkas more
money so he cannot spend it atthe border.
I cannot wait for thismotherfucker to be gone.
Speaker 3 (07:33):
Our authorities currently are limited and they
are set to expire.
We need them extended andexpanded.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
What exactly do you need?
Speaker 3 (07:44):
We want state and local authorities to also.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
I just love looking at George Stephanopoulos
concerning he just lost, gotsued and lost to Trump have the
ability to counter droneactivity under federal
supervision.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
That is one important element that we have requested,
and we've heard it echoed bythe state and local officials
themselves.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Okay, so you have the FFA, faa, and let's say there's
some drones illegally flyingover into sensitive areas.
So you're telling me the UnitedStates government, if there is
an unidentified flying objectflying over their military
installations, they're notallowed to take action against
it?
I'm sorry, my friend, I have toliterally call bullshit, knock,
(08:32):
knock.
Who's there?
Bullshit, bullshit, knock,knock.
Who's there?
Bullshit?
I mean, it's one of thosethings that.
Do they actually believe thatwe are this stupid?
I'm just asking, just askingfor a friend.
Do they believe that we arethis stupid?
They must, because it's trulyand literally the only
explanation, not for the drones,just for the lack of
(08:56):
forthrightness that thisadministration has put forth in
reference to any type ofinformation.
Now there are speculations thatthis drone could be a lot of
things.
One of the speculations is thefact that this is being used by
the CIA, that they're connected.
The CIA is doing some type ofcovert cover-up or covert
operation, which the CIA reallydoesn't operate on US soil.
(09:18):
Now, under this Bidenadministration, lord knows what
the fuck could be happening, butthey really don't operate.
The CIA, the CentralIntelligence Agency, whole
operation is basically overseas.
You know, keeping an eye on ourbad guys, keep an eye on those
bad guys that are out there thatare off to do us harm.
So can I, can I see that it's a, that it's a CIA operation?
(09:41):
Uh, I, I gotta kind of say no alittle bit on that one.
I was kind of thinking about itand you know the, the they're,
you know and I don't know.
It's just kind of weird.
What's going on here Now.
Congress all of a sudden isgoing to start taking action
against these drones, evidently.
But we have to kind of wait andsee what happens right there,
(10:02):
because our US government rightnow is a bunch of talk and
nothing else going on.
But I cannot see this beingsome type of covert military
operation.
There are also some speculationsand talks by some people on
Twitter and Joe Rogan hasactually kind of hooked his
(10:23):
wagon to this that he says he'sgenerally concerned about the
drones after watching footagethat floated across unverified
theories, of course, that theunmanned fighters are sniffing
out harmful substances.
So John Ferguson, ceo of RemoteAircraft Systems Company, which
is in Kansas, did a TikTokvideo on Saturday and it says
(10:43):
the drones are attempting tosmell out either gas or
radioactive materials somewheresomewhere else on the ground.
He said the only reason youever fly an unmanned aircraft at
night is if you're looking forsomething.
All right, listen.
So okay.
So a hiker gets lost in themountains, a child is lost in
(11:07):
the woods, let's just say, andyou want to cover the area more
quickly?
So you're basically telling methat the only way you could do
that is to fly a drone at night.
You're searching for a suspectwho is eluding police.
Don't they have policehelicopters during the day?
Oh no, let him go.
We can't catch that guy.
(11:28):
We can only search for peopleat night.
The only reason you fly everfly an undermined aircraft at
night is when you're looking forsomething, says ferguson,
noting he doesn't believe thedrones are nefarious.
I don't believe the drones arenefarious, but I believe they're
looking for something.
So my belief is that they'retrying to.
(11:48):
They're trying to smellsomething on the ground gas leak
, radioactive material, whatever.
So then you have peoplespeculating onto this theory
that there is a dirty bomb,there's a nuclear dirty bomb
somewhere here on the east coast, and the united states
government and their infinitewisdom is sending up thousands
of drones at night to try andfind it.
This, this is the shit thathappens.
(12:11):
These are the online theories.
That happens when you don'tprovide any information.
And he said I've not bouncedthis idea off anyone, it's just
my opinion.
Okay, well, you know what?
You put it on TikTok, you putit on Twitter, you put it on
everyone else.
People are going to look at itas a speculation, that this is
an anti-terrorism task forcelooking for a dirty bomb
(12:36):
somewhere on the East Coast.
I don't know, guys, I mean thatone's up there and Joe Rogan I
like Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan has come out andbasically said you know, he's
like.
He said this is the first videoabout these drones.
That has me generally concerned.
(12:56):
He wrote on Twitter and then healso previously called the
claims of the US governmentafter National Security Advisor
Kirby said the drones were not apublic safety concern and many
reported sightings are actuallymanned aircrafts.
And listen, I can believe that.
I can believe that some of thesightings are manned aircraft.
I can believe that some of thesightings are recreational
(13:17):
purposes, but I do think thatthe United States government is
using that as a cover-up becauseof the fact that this has been
going on for 20 plus days nowand if you watch some of the
videos and you see some of themovements and you could see that
clearly.
These are sophisticated typedrones.
Homeowners have said that theyhave shined flashlights on the
drones and all the lightingsystems on the drones would go
(13:37):
out, that there's some type oflight sensitivity to these
drones.
I personally think it's sometype of military operation,
because there is an Air Forcebase not too far from the
location where all these dronesare coming out.
That maybe they're testingcertain types of top secret
drone technology, because Area51 was overbooked.
(14:01):
We have too many aliens rightnow in Area 51.
But when you this is theproblem when you don't provide
any details, you don't provideany substance, you don't provide
any information.
These are the types of rampantspeculations that you get that
now there's a.
This is what causes panic.
Same thing with the balloon.
You tell us.
(14:22):
You tell us there's no, there'sno balloon.
What are you crazy balloon,what are you crazy?
But then you sit there and say,well, yeah, there is a balloon,
there is a balloon, but youknow.
But you know, don't worry aboutit, it's nothing, it's a, it's
(14:47):
a weather balloon.
Then we find out it's a Chinesespy balloon.
One of the other theories that Ithat I've come across the
internet is that it's, of course, the Iranians that we've talked
about that, that it's an.
There is an alien, there's analien we're going to get to
aliens too.
There's a there are Iranianmothership drone ship that
that's off the coast, east coastsomewhere, flying these drones
over, testing our defenses,which I actually you know that
there there could be somecredence to that, because
(15:08):
evidently, defenses which Iactually you know that there
there could be some credence tothat, because evidently there
the Iranians have a former Iguess it was a tanker which they
converted into a drone aircraftcarrier which left.
I believe I ran back onDecember 5th, I think they were
saying and the United Statesgovernment doesn't know where
it's at, they think it's goingto the Persian Gulf.
(15:30):
I love our government now Don'tyou just feel safe and warm
with the Biden administration?
We don't know where that droneship went, but don't worry, it's
not parked off the East Coastbecause we have no idea where it
is.
I mean, come on.
I mean, could there be somecredence in that?
Yeah, I do think so.
(15:51):
But like I said, I keep comingback to government for
surveillance, our own governmentsurveillance, I don't think
it's I.
It could potentially be foreignsurveillance, but if that's the
case, how come we cannot findthe mothership off the east
coast?
We have radar, we have alltypes of tracking equipment.
And then I love it because yougot people saying also it's kids
playing a prank, so all thesekids got together.
(16:13):
It's like the crop circles.
Some of the crop circles arefake, but I saw the movie signs.
I seen it.
What a Mel Gibson's betterflicks.
But that's just something.
Also think of that.
You do have a aircraft carrierfor drones, owned by the
(16:35):
Iranians, which left port on Ibelieve it was December 5th and
we don't know where it's at.
We think it's in the.
How do you lose?
This is worse than Pearl Harbor.
How do you, especially withtoday's technology, how do you
lose a ship like that?
How do you not be able to havethe capacity to track a former
tanker ship that was convertedinto an aircraft carrier?
(16:59):
The other one out there is alieninvasions.
This is an alien invasion.
Yeah, that's what it is.
The aliens are using dronetechnology to sniff out this,
our, our, our, our defenses.
I like that one the best.
I like the alien invasion thebest because of the fact that if
(17:26):
these aliens are notsophisticated like the ones that
we saw like in the TV show V,the Mark Singer TV show V, not,
not, not the battery make, orindependence day, not
independence day to the WillSmith independence day, and they
have to use drone technology toprobe our country.
That's what she said.
(17:46):
I'm not uh, I'm, I'm not.
I'm not really overly concernedabout what we like to refer to
as the you know someone that'sthe, that extraterrestrial
intelligence.
That doesn't.
That doesn't concern me as much.
That doesn't sit there and goto myself.
Huh, interesting.
The aliens have to use drones.
I am going to tell you this,though.
(18:09):
Have to use drones.
I am going to tell you this,though, and maybe, maybe, maybe
I am speaking a little.
Um, maybe I am speaking alittle at a turn, because the
other day I was on the NewJersey turnpike and I didn't
have my easy pass, so I had togo in to get a ticket Blaine,
(18:29):
where you going to get a ticketand I saw a van full of what
looked like aliens trying tofigure out how to get a ticket
out of the machine so they cancontinue on the turnpike.
The only problem was they wereillegal aliens.
Hey-oh, another one of theconspiracy theories is going to
(18:50):
be it's project, blue beam.
This we we did a whole video onproject blue beam.
Oh God, I think it was a yearago, you know, uh, and it's one
of those.
It's one of those theories andas one of those things in
conspiracy theories that hasbeen going on for uh, uh, I
think, since the ninetiestheories that has been going on
(19:14):
for I think since the 90s.
It's originated, yeah, it wasby a Canadian journalist who
died in 96.
It was in the 90s.
It alleges a covert operationby government elites to
establish a Taltarian worldgovernment by orchestrating fake
celestial or supernaturalevents using futuristic NASA
technology.
The proponents of the theoryinitially expect the project to
(19:36):
begin in 1995 and 1996, but thenthe guy who was, you know, the
guy whose theory this was, hedied, so it kind of went by the
wayside and it's basically usedto create global panic and
dismantle existing religion andsocial structure.
Now some people are saying that,because Trump won the election,
that that's what the Bidenadministration is trying to do,
because we always talk aboutTrump being the guy that wanted
(20:00):
to be the dictator, being theguy that doesn't want to get
pushed out of office.
I think a lot of the people inthe Biden administration are
afraid what's going to happenwhen Trump comes in the office.
So you keep people thinkingabout this, thinking you know
what?
This could be, something thatthe government's using.
Next, they're talking aboutprojecting holographic images
that would simulate the returnof divine figures.
(20:21):
So Jesus is going to come backand say what the fuck are you
people doing here?
What are you crazy?
And these are going to becustomized per each region so
you could have Allah, you couldhave Vishnu, you could have
whoever followed by, and there'sgoing to be a unifying God
speaking to all people.
Then I always love this part.
(20:45):
Then the technology wouldmanipulate human thoughts,
creating an illusion of directcommunications with the deities
and simulating an alien invasionto justify authoritarian
control.
I don't know.
I think that one might be myfavorite, I think that one might
(21:07):
be my favorite of all time and,like I said, this has been
going around since the 90s andit was supposed to take effect
in 95, 96, and then the guy whocame up with, the Canadian
journalist that came up withthis theory, he died.
I do think at times there couldbe a factor in this that the
government is trying to dosomething to you know to, to
(21:30):
maybe hold on to the power thatthey currently have.
So I think the biggest fearthat this Biden administration
has is their corruption will beexposed, unmanned by the Trump
administration, because of thefact that there is just so much
shit going on.
There's just so much shitthey're going to try to do.
(21:50):
I love the fact that Biden iseither pardoned or commuted the
sentences of 1500 people.
Either pardoned or commuted thesentences of 1500 people.
The record before that was 300plus by Obama, so Biden was just
like his is 330 plus.
I'm going to do 1500.
(22:10):
And then I love it because thenhe gives the pardon to his son
and he makes it all sweeping forthe last 10 years that, no
matter what he did the last 10years, he cannot be charged for
a crime.
Wow, that's one hell of afucking part and one hell of a
little bit of corruption goingon here.
You know there has been someweird shit going around for a
(22:37):
while now and I'm not going todisplace anyone's thought
processes or their beliefs ofwhat may be causing this
information.
I want to see this guy.
This is a researcher.
(22:58):
Dr Stephen Green accuratelypredicted the rollout of Project
Bluebeam.
This is happening now.
Speaker 4 (23:04):
There's a new video this morning that some say may
be proof we're not alone in theuniverse.
A UFO in the form of a brightlight is seen descending over
the dome of the rock inJerusalem.
The video is said to be takenover the weekend.
Then suddenly, the light shootsup into the sky.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
That's part of it.
Let's get to this guy.
I got it Because this talksabout all the aliens that we're
seeing and everything going.
Here's the guy.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
The office.
Beware the military industrialcomplex.
We must guard against theacquisition of unwarranted
influence, whether sought orunsought, by the
military-industrial complex.
He wasn't talking about hisbrethren in the military.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
No, he said a technological elite in control
of it.
We must also be alert to theequal.
This is from Alex Jones andthey're the champion of
conspiracy theory, so we're notgoing to continue playing that
whatsoever.
But I just thought it wasinteresting that I mean you
could easily dispel these rumorsif you're in the United States
government, if you could justsay, yeah, it's military testing
, you know that's what?
Literally I would have came outand said, yes, the military is.
(24:03):
Even if it wasn't true,military is testing some drone
technology weapon down the Eastcoast.
So we have a betterunderstanding of the use of this
technology because we alreadyknow we are behind on drone
advancement.
That's the China's smokiness inreference to this.
So I mean, I would think atthat point in time you would
kind of just say you know whatI'm now that I'm thinking about
(24:23):
this.
You guys are right, just comeout with a story, come out with
a plan.
It's the misinformation thatcauses panic and, like always,
panic is caused by the truth notbeing told and, as always here,
the truth shall set you free.
This is Dennis.
Get off my lawn the madramblings of a Gen Xer and I'm
out of here.
Popular Podcasts
Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes present: Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial
Introducing… Aubrey O’Day Diddy’s former protege, television personality, platinum selling music artist, Danity Kane alum Aubrey O’Day joins veteran journalists Amy Robach and TJ Holmes to provide a unique perspective on the trial that has captivated the attention of the nation. Join them throughout the trial as they discuss, debate, and dissect every detail, every aspect of the proceedings. Aubrey will offer her opinions and expertise, as only she is qualified to do given her first-hand knowledge. From her days on Making the Band, as she emerged as the breakout star, the truth of the situation would be the opposite of the glitz and glamour. Listen throughout every minute of the trial, for this exclusive coverage. Amy Robach and TJ Holmes present Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial, an iHeartRadio podcast.
Betrayal: Season 4
Karoline Borega married a man of honor – a respected Colorado Springs Police officer. She knew there would be sacrifices to accommodate her husband’s career. But she had no idea that he was using his badge to fool everyone. This season, we expose a man who swore two sacred oaths—one to his badge, one to his bride—and broke them both. We follow Karoline as she questions everything she thought she knew about her partner of over 20 years. And make sure to check out Seasons 1-3 of Betrayal, along with Betrayal Weekly Season 1.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.