October 8, 2024 • 33 mins
Are political tensions undermining crucial hurricane relief efforts? We kick off this episode by dissecting the role of media in shaping public perception, spotlighting a recent 60 Minutes interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. Our narrative unfolds with a deep dive into the alleged media bias and its ripple effects on public opinion, before shifting focus to a critical examination of the federal government's response to hurricane disasters, particularly FEMA's contentious fund allocations. The episode heats up with a discussion on the fiery exchange between Vice President Harris and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, exposing the political maneuvers that emerge during crises.
Critics argue that Vice President Harris’s stances on pivotal issues like fracking, immigration, and healthcare are ever-changing. We scrutinize her attempts to build consensus amidst skepticism over her gun ownership claims and economic plans. Questions loom over her authenticity and leadership, particularly regarding her strategies for expanding the child tax credit and offering tax breaks for first-time homebuyers. Our conversation uncovers the challenges she faces in establishing a consistent public persona and the feasibility of her economic promises.
As the urgency for disaster relief funding intensifies, we underscore the Biden administration's dedication to rallying support from Congress. We critique the opposition's stance while highlighting the political dynamics that influence disaster relief policy-making. Our closing segment reinforces the necessity of staying informed and navigating the political landscape with discernment, promising more insightful discussions in our future episodes. Whether you're interested in the intricate dance of politics, disaster relief mechanisms, or government policy intricacies, this episode offers a thorough exploration of today's pressing issues.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling,incoherent response were you
even close to anything thatcould be considered a rational
thought.
Everyone in this room is nowdumber.
For having listened to it isnow dumber for having listened
(00:26):
to it.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
You don't know what that ought is, mr Trash, I'd
show you, but I'm too old, I'mtoo tired.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
I'm too fucking blind .
If I were the man I was fiveyears ago, I'd take a
flamethrower to this place.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Do you understand the words that are coming out of?
Speaker 1 (00:52):
my mouth.
You want answers.
I think I'm entitled.
You want answers.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
I want the truth.
You can't handle the truth.
Oh, we've said it once, we'vesaid it before, we've said it a
million times the truth shallalways be free.
This is Tim.
It's good enough for my lawn.
The mad ramblings of a Gen Xerneed to talk about hurricane
Kamala, the FEMA, Kamala inchief.
I need to also talk about thattrain wreck of a 60 minutes
interview that she gave.
(01:17):
Oh, great balls of fire.
I was literally watching this,this, this interview, this, this
60 minute interview she had,and I just didn't get it.
I really didn't.
You heard her talk.
You heard her speak and I lovedit because you finally had
(01:39):
somebody go after Kamala Harrisand and hold her feet to the
fire.
A little bit about what she'stalking about what, what, what
she, what she's trying to say.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
All right, explain this to me like I'm a two year
old.
Okay, because there's anelement to this thing.
I just cannot get through mythick head.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
And there was an element to that interview that
she just couldn't get throughher thick head really couldn't
and she again didn't sayanything.
And anyone that watched thisinterview back in the back in
the day, when Mike Wallace andall the all the other guys were
on 60 minutes they were thishard hitting news organization.
You know now it's been prettymuch a um, a, a segment of the
liberal media, but, but duringthat interview I was stunned, I
(02:26):
was shocked.
First thing I want to talkabout, though, is is everything
going on with the hurricanes?
You have Helene, you have theMilton coming in now, and it
looks like it's going to crossright over into Tampa, and it's
just a bad situation.
And you got people in theCarolinas that aren't getting
the resources they need.
The federal government is not,I'm not going to say dragging
their feet, but they're just notdoing the job that they need to
(02:48):
do.
And, yes, money was divertedfrom FEMA to the illegal
immigration issue, and I laughbecause and I don't really laugh
because you have the likes ofKorean Jean Pierre sitting there
and trying to deny vehementlythat at no point in time was any
relief money being moved fromfema to help illegal immigrants.
(03:13):
I gotta, let's, let's, let's.
Can we listen to this clip asecond?
I think we have to hold on.
Let's see if we can.
Speaker 5 (03:19):
It is not true it is a false statement.
No b Biden did not take FEMArelief money to use to use on
migrants.
Funding is also availablethrough FEMA's emergency food
and shelter program to eligiblelocal governments and not for
not for profit organizations,upon request to support
humanitarian relief for migrants.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
The first statement was on October 4th of 2024.
The last statement was onSeptember 16th of 2022.
If you go on the FEMA website,you can see how you can apply if
you're an illegal immigrant,how you can apply for housing
and funds and all this fun stuff.
But we're stupid and thevenerable Korean Jean-Pierre is
(04:02):
just amazing, as usual.
How this, how that I want touse a bad word but how she has
not been fired is amazing to me.
It re, it really is it just.
It just makes you.
It just makes you cringe.
So vice president Kamala Harrishas basically called out Ron
DeSantis as being selfish fornot taking her hurricane related
(04:25):
calls.
I love it because I had thepicture on the thumbnail of her
standing at the head of FEMA.
Look at me, I'm in charge ofeverything.
The Democrats will never passup a good disaster as an
opportunity.
They never.
They never passed that shit up.
You got to give them credit forthat because the vice president
, all these years and all thesehurricanes and I lived in
Florida has always been frontand center calling the governors
(04:47):
of the states doing thesethings to help facilitate FEMA
and the relief effort.
It's always happened.
So it's always happened since Ican remember, not, the vice
president is never involved inthis shit.
It's always the presidentworking with the governors.
You never hear this vicepresident with the governors.
You never hear, well, this vicepresident just the vice
president came here to floridaand everything's fine.
(05:11):
So this whack job says peopleare in desperate need of support
right now and playing politicalgames at this moment is in
these crisis situations.
It's just utterly irresponsible.
It's selfish.
Harris said that was on monday.
It's all about politicalgamesmanship.
It's selfish.
Harris said that was on Monday.
It's all about politicalgamesmanship.
It's doing your job that youtook an oath to do, which is to
put people first.
So she's sitting in FEMAheadquarters at the head of the
(05:31):
table, which I've never seenbefore, because you need a
political, you need a politicalphoto op opportunity for an
election, and she's calling outDeSantis for this.
Now you gotta love.
You gotta love big Ron, becausebig Ron doesn't take any shit.
He really doesn't, because heknows what this is and he had a
(05:53):
response to the wonderful KamalaHarris.
Speaker 4 (05:57):
Hold on a minute Focus on leveraging all
resources available, includingfrom the federal government and
I've been in touch with bothFEMA and the president as well
as marshalling all our stateagencies and working to support
our local communities.
And so for Kamala Harris to tryto say that my sole focus on
the people of Florida is somehowselfish is delusional.
(06:19):
She has no role in this.
In fact, she's been vicepresident for three and a half
years.
I've dealt with a number ofstorms under this administration
.
She has no role in this.
In fact, she's been vicepresident for three and a half
years.
I've dealt with a number ofstorms under this administration
.
She has never contributedanything to any of these efforts
, and so what I think is selfishis her trying to blunder into
this.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
No, and here's the thing she has no role.
Speaker 4 (06:41):
No, she has no role in this process.
I'm in contact with thepresident of the United States.
I'm in contact with FEMAdirector.
I'm obviously managing all ourstate agencies.
We're supporting all our localgovernment.
And I will say this I've hadstorms under both President
Trump and President Biden, andI've worked well with both of
them.
She's the first one who'strying to politicize the storm,
(07:03):
and she's doing that justbecause of her campaign.
She's the first one who'strying to politicize the storm
and she's doing that justbecause of her campaign.
She's trying to get some typeof an edge.
She knows she's doing poorly,and so she's playing these
political games.
I don't have time for politicalgames.
I've got peoples whose livesare on the line.
I've got peoples whose homesand their possessions are on the
line, and we are focused 100%on that mission.
(07:26):
I'm not worried about playingher political games, and so she
is being selfish by trying toblunder into this when we're
working just fine.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
I don't think she saw that one coming.
I don't think she sees muchcoming because she's not very
bright.
People get mad at Trump forwhen they say Kamala Harris, he
says all the time Kamala Harrisisn't bright, she's not the
sharpest tool in the shed.
We know this.
But literally, like I said, ifanyone's trying to be political
(08:02):
about this, anyone's looking fora photo op, if anyone's looking
for an opportunity to look goodat something, it's Kamala
Harris, because she doesn't lookgood at anything.
Her policies are scary.
Her thought process on currentevents or just world events, or
just anything that has to dowith anything, is a muddling
(08:26):
mess and this is the woman thatwe're going to have handle our
foreign affairs against China,against Russia, against the
aggression in Iran, against theHouthis.
This is the person that's goingto put a stop to all this.
You should be scared if youeven consider voting for this
(08:47):
crackhead, and I shouldn'tinsult crackheads that way.
I do apologize for all thecrackheads out there.
So 60 minutes did an interviewwith her.
Oh lordy, was that, lordy?
Was that a train wreck?
I love the one question ifchina attacks taiwan?
One question If China attacksTaiwan, will you use military
force to support China?
Speaker 3 (09:07):
If China attacks Taiwan, would we use military
force to support Taiwan?
Bill.
Speaker 6 (09:12):
I'm not going to get into hypotheticals, but listen,
we need to make sure that wemaintain a one China policy, but
that includes supportingTaiwan's ability to defend
itself, including what we needto do to ensure the freedom of
the Taiwan Strait.
We need to make sure we haveopen lines of communication with
China, in particular, militaryto military.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
She is clueless.
She is clueless, she isspeckless.
So we're going to military tomilitary.
We're going to talk to China.
Our militaries are going to gettogether, we're going to sing
Kum Fucking Baiya, becausethat's what adversaries do, and
I'm not going to sit there andtell you I support Taiwan.
I'm not going to come out andsay that because if I did say
that, well, I would actuallyhave made it and had a thought,
(09:55):
an opinion on anything.
I really can't.
I can't believe this.
But here, this, this, this is.
I got to play this clip.
Speaker 3 (10:10):
Let's get to this clip as well.
Hold on a second.
I'll tell you what your criticsand the columnists say.
Okay, they say the reason somany voters don't know you is
that you have changed yourposition on so many things.
You were against fracking, nowyou're for it.
You supported looserimmigration policies, now you're
tightening them up.
You were for Medicare for all,now you're not so many that
people don't truly know what youbelieve or what you stand for,
(10:35):
and I know you've heard that.
Speaker 6 (10:37):
In the last four years I have been vice president
of the United States and I havebeen traveling our country and
I have been listening to folksand seeking what is possible in
terms of common ground.
I believe in building consensus.
We are a diverse peoplegeographically, regionally, in
terms of where we are, in ourbackgrounds and what the
(10:59):
American people do want is thatwe have leaders who can build
consensus, where we can figureout, compromise and understand.
It's not a bad thing as long asyou don't compromise your
values to find common sensesolutions, and that has been my
approach.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
She has literally compromised all of her values,
everything that she has saidover the last 10 years, to try
to get elected, and you knowshe's just going to revert back
to what she was, which is themost liberal Senator that's ever
been in office.
She was voted that and againshe doesn't answer the question.
(11:37):
And she's.
I love how she's, as, as herrole as vice president, she's
always traveling.
I never see her traveling much.
The last three and a half years, until she went and decided
that she's going to steal thenomination, I didn't really see
her traveling that much, did you?
Because this is the same womanthat's never been to the border,
but she's also never been toEurope, so I don't get what
you're talking about.
Never been to Europe, why doesthat matter?
(11:58):
It's sometimes just the idiocyof this and, like I said, for
the fact that this is, for thefact that this is your vice
president and the person thatwants to run this country is
crazy, to me is insane.
I love this when she talksabout how she owns a Glock.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
You recently surprised people when you said
that you are a gun owner andthen if someone came into your
house, that was not the firsttime I've talked about it.
Speaker 6 (12:30):
That's not the first time I've talked about it.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
So what kind of gun do you own, and when and why did
you get it?
Speaker 6 (12:35):
I have a Glock and I've had it for quite some time
and I mean, look Bill, mybackground is in law enforcement
.
And I mean, look Bill, mybackground is in law enforcement
.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
And so there you go.
Have you ever fired it?
Speaker 6 (12:49):
Yes, of course I have At a shooting range.
Yes, of course I have.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
That nervous laughter just tells you she doesn't own
a gun.
And I love it how she.
I was in law enforcement.
You are a district attorney.
You're not carrying a gun,you're not on the streets with
the cops, you're not makingarrests.
And I love it because if youtalk to an actual gun owner,
someone that actually knowsabout their firearm, they won't
sit there and tell you I own aGlock.
No, they'll sit there and tellyou I own a Glock 45.
(13:19):
I own a Glock 19.
I own a Glock 26.
I own a Glock 28.
I own a Sig Sauer 226.
They're not going to just say Iown a Glock.
That's what I got a Glock.
Because that's such a greatbuzzword, such a key word I own
a Glock, that's it.
And of course, the nervouslaughter after being called out
(13:40):
and being asked by that is is isoutstanding because you know
she's lying, because normallywhen you laugh like that you
ought to you automatically knowthat person is full of shit.
You own a Glock.
Okay, tell me about your Glock.
Tell me about how you can breakdown your Glock.
Tell me all, tell me all thesethings about it.
(14:01):
Just give me some information,not just just don't throw out a
name brand.
It's like if someone, if youown a car, most car owners will
say, well, I own a Lexus.
But most astute car owners willsay, I own a Lexus ES 350.
They're not going to just say,well, I own a Glock PS350.
(14:24):
They're not going to just say,well, I own a Glock.
Oh, the shit that this womanspews is just beyond crazy.
It really is.
It just kind of makes you sad alittle bit and makes you
worried about what's going to goon with this nation if she ever
got elected.
I mean, that is just thescariest thing to me that I've
ever seen.
And this interview continues.
(14:45):
It goes on and I laugh becauseif you listen to her and you
listen to her talk okay, we gotto talk about how she's going to
pay for everything.
I got to hear this.
Here we go.
I got to listen to this.
Speaker 3 (15:00):
You want to expand the child tax credit.
Speaker 6 (15:03):
Yes, I do.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
You want to give tax breaks to first-time homebuyers
and people starting smallbusinesses?
Right, how are you going to payfor that?
Speaker 6 (15:12):
My economic plan would strengthen America's
economy, his would weaken it.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
But pardon me, Madam Vice President, the question was
how are you going to pay for it?
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
I own a Glock.
I own a Glock.
That's how I'm going to pay forit.
Why ask me stupid questionsthat you want me to answer and
then have a follow-up question.
How dare you have the audacityto ask me how am I going to pay
for it?
I love this.
I love this.
I love this clip too.
Speaker 3 (15:41):
Hold on, wait, I've got to play this clip.
Which foreign country do youconsider to be our greatest
adversary?
Speaker 6 (15:47):
I think there's an obvious one in mind, which is
Iran.
Iran has American blood ontheir hands.
Okay, this attack on Israel 200ballistic missiles on Israel,
200 ballistic missiles.
What we need to do to ensurethat Iran never achieves the
(16:08):
ability to be a nuclear power.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
That is one of my highest priorities and that must
be so if you have proof thatIran is building a nuclear
weapon, would you take militaryaction?
Speaker 6 (16:15):
I'm not going to talk about hypotheticals at this
moment.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
I love that you I'm not going to talk about
hypotheticals at this moment.
I love it.
I'm not going to talk abouthypotheticals because then I
might have to have an answer.
You've already told Israel,your administration, not to go
after the nuclear facilities inIran, and you eased the
sanctions off of Iran that Trumpput into place, and now they
have hundreds of billions ofdollars in oil which they're
selling to another one of ouradversaries in Russia, of
(16:40):
billions of dollars in oil whichthey're selling to another one
of our adversaries in Russiabecause of you easing the
policies and the sanctionseconomic sanctions against Iran.
And then you go out and tellyou go out and tell Israel don't
attack, don't attack, or else,oh, I got to play.
(17:01):
I got to play this illegalimmigration clip.
This is the gift that justkeeps on giving.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
I've been covering the border for years, and so I
know this is not a problem thatstarted with your administration
Correct, correct, but there wasan historic flood of
undocumented immigrants comingacross the border the first
three years of youradministration.
As a matter of fact, arrivalsquadrupled from the last year of
(17:30):
President Trump.
Was it a mistake to loosen theimmigration policies as much as
you?
Speaker 6 (17:38):
did.
It's a longstanding problem.
Problem and solutions are athand and from day one, literally
, we have been offeringsolutions.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
What I was asking was was it a mistake to kind of
allow that flood to happen inthe first place?
Speaker 6 (17:56):
I think the policies that we have been proposing are
about fixing a problem, notpromoting a problem.
Okay, but the numbers?
Speaker 3 (18:05):
did quadruple.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
The numbers quadrupled, but our policy,
we're about fixing things.
It only got four.
For help, I'm going to help herout.
It only got four times worse,because I know quadruple is a
big word Numbers today becauseof what we have done.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
We have cut the flow of illegal immigration by half.
We have cut the flow offentanyl by half.
Speaker 6 (18:30):
But we need Congress to be able to act to actually
fix the problem.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
It's all Congress's fault, even though it was the,
the, the swipe of a pen thatremoved everything that Trump
had in place, which worked.
Oh my God, I mean this, this.
This is just getting to a pointwhere you're like, you know,
can you tell the borders arethat you need to take care of
(18:59):
the border?
Could you do that please?
And the fact that they'reholding her feet to the fire in
reference to her, herimmigration policies and and
everything that she wants to do,everything that she wants to
pay for is is is astounding, isastounding, and I and I love
cause we have to go back to thatformer interview with CBS
(19:22):
Excuse me with Fox with 60Minutes.
I love it because this is whenshe talks about Iran again.
What's the message?
Speaker 3 (19:29):
to Iran.
Don't, as President Biden said,just don't Exactly.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
One word, pretty straightforward, that's a
deterrent.
As a Glock owner, that is aboutas deterrent as you can get.
Don't, don't what?
Don't keep selling that oil toRussia, making billions of
dollars so they can financeterrorism against Israel and the
United States and our allies.
You don't want to do that.
(19:55):
Oh my God, I got to play thisclip too.
This is another great clip.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
hold on, this is another great clip but it seems
that uh, prime ministernetanyahu is not listening well
bill.
Speaker 6 (20:09):
The work that we have done has resulted in a number
of movements in that region byIsrael that were very much
prompted by or a result of manythings, including our advocacy
for what needs to happen.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
What the fuck is she talking about?
Seriously, seriously, what isshe literally, what is she
talking about?
I mean, this interview is fullof uh, full of gems, is full of
disasters, and I love, I lovethis.
We gotta, we gotta talk aboutthis one.
(20:48):
Hold on, we gotta talk aboutthis one.
Well, I gotta play this one too.
Speaker 6 (20:52):
My plan is about saying that when you invest in
small businesses, you invest inthe middle class and you
strengthen America's economy.
Small businesses are part ofthe backbone of America's
economy.
Speaker 3 (21:06):
But pardon me, Madam Vice President, the question was
how are you going to pay?
Speaker 6 (21:12):
for it.
Well, one of the things I'mgoing to make sure that the
richest among us who can affordit pay their fair share in taxes
.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
I have to stop that for a minute because this is
crazy to me.
He's going to get into this,but I had to stop this.
They always talk about goingafter the billionaires.
There's like 825 billionairesin this country in the United
States alone, and they actuallypay about 46% of the tax revenue
in this country.
These 850 people you havealmost 50% of the population
(21:45):
that gets a refund check thatdoesn't pay taxes, and then you
have the middle class, which hasto sit in the middle and eat a
big shit sandwich.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
It is not right that teachers and nurses and
firefighters are paying a highertax rate than billionaires and
the biggest corporations, and Iplan on making that fair.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
But we're dealing with the real world here, but
the real world includes how areyou going to get this through
Congress?
Speaker 6 (22:14):
You know, when you talk quietly with a lot of folks
in Congress, they know exactlywhat I'm talking about, because
their constituents know exactlywhat I'm talking about.
Their constituents are thosefirefighters and teachers and
nurses.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
My plan I've said this before.
She's like masturbating with acheese grater it's highly
amusing at first, and thenextremely painful.
I love this, this.
This is what I'm.
This is my favorite clip,though, and I want to talk about
this.
This is what I was trying toget to, cause I could do this
all day.
That's what she said.
Speaker 3 (22:51):
Was democracy best served by president Biden
stepping down and basicallyhanding you a nomination?
You didn't have to go through aprimary process.
You didn't have to fight offother contenders.
That's not really the way oursystem was intended to work.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
President Biden made a decision that I think history
is going to show is rare amongleaders You're right, because
most people who are dealing withAlzheimer's and senility
usually aren't electedpresidents, so it is very rare
for that type of person to stepdown because of the fact they
probably don't even know they'restepping down.
Speaker 6 (23:32):
Which was to put country before self, and I am
proud to have earned the supportof the vast majority of
delegates and to have.
Speaker 2 (23:44):
I got support of the vast majority of delegates but
not the 3 million plus wholiterally voted in the primary.
Speaker 6 (23:51):
I've been elected the Democratic nominee.
I am proud to have received theendorsement of leaders around
this country from everybackground and walk of life to
fight in this election over thenext month for our democracy.
Speaker 3 (24:11):
But I think this truncated process is why people
think or say they don't reallyknow who you are.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
people think or say they don't really know who you
are.
Look, because she circumventedthe entire system to get elected
or try to get elected.
Okay, can we talk about that?
Can we think about that for aminute?
It's, it's the Glock owner.
It's the Glock owner that sheis her thought process in her
(24:42):
mind process.
That's just.
That's just the way when you'rea Glock owner works.
You just have to, you just haveto think about these things.
It's a train wreck, man.
This whole thing was a trainwreck and watching this train
wreck just makes you cringe evenmore.
That she potentially can beelected to the highest office in
my, my mind, in the world andwe have to sit there and hope
(25:04):
and pray she doesn't fuck thingsup even more than she's
probably going to.
It's a sad thought process.
It's a sad moment for democracybecause Elon Musk had it best.
Had it best when he at the atthe Trump rally over in Butler,
pennsylvania.
He's basically like listen, youare going to destroy democracy
(25:30):
If you do this, if you allowthis person to come into this
office.
They talk about savingdemocracy.
They're going to destroy it.
They're going to destroy theeconomy.
Mark Cuban even came out as ahuge Democratic supporter saying
listen, these unrealized taxgains excuse me, the tax on the
unrealized gains in my heydaywould have bankrupted me.
And they talk about how it'sonly going to attack
(25:51):
millionaires.
But I've said this beforeyou're a small farm owner.
You have property worth $2million and let's say it goes up
to $3 million.
So you're now going to have topay the unrealized gains tax.
Same thing If you, if you giveor you will your property to a
child, they're going to have topay the death tax.
Then they're going to have topay the unrealized gain tax on
(26:13):
top of that property.
So you're not going to be ableto keep small businesses and
farms in the in within thefamily because they are going to
be taxed to death.
I love Peter Doocy.
I got to play a little bit ofPeter Doocy because he's just
not.
He's just not dealing with JeanKorean, jean Pierre anymore.
(26:35):
This, this, I just got to getinto this.
One last thing.
This is about the hurricanerelief.
Speaker 7 (26:40):
And on this issue of funding, the administration has
money to send to Lebanon withoutCongress coming back, but
Congress does have to come backto approve money to send to
Lebanon without Congress comingback.
But Congress does have to comeback to approve money to send to
people in North Carolina.
Do I have that right?
Speaker 5 (26:55):
Here's what I'm going to be very clear about the
president and the vice president.
You're throwing a lot of bigwords at me, boo.
The president has had a robustwhole of government response to
this.
Hundreds of millions of dollarsI said it at the top more than
$200 million that we havedirectly.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
And you probably need about $6 billion.
Speaker 5 (27:17):
Put towards survivors here for disaster help, and
that's because of thispresident's commitment to make
sure that we are there forcommunities that are impacted.
We take this very seriouslyagain.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
We take this very seriously.
People dying in this country.
We take very seriously, likethat's something you should be
proud of.
Shouldn't that just be a given?
Speaker 5 (27:40):
Very seriously, and before the hurricane hit, we
prepositioned more than 1,500federal folks on the ground to
help, and so these are the samefederal folks that are taking up
hotel rooms that could be usedto house the hurricane survivors
.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
But we're not going to get into that.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
We have made sure that every state has gotten
their storm.
Requested emergency declaration.
They requested it.
Speaker 2 (28:11):
You got a declaration which is basically the
government's version of an IOU.
Speaker 5 (28:16):
And we made sure they received it.
We've taken this very seriously, more than $200 million that we
have provided to the impactedareas, but instead people want
to do disinformation,misinformation, which is
dangerous, which is dangerous,which is dangerous because then,
when folks on the ground hearthat, they may not want to.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
Folks on the ground are the ones that are posting
TikTok videos and Twitter videosand things on YouTube that are
showing the lack of governmentresponse.
Speaker 5 (28:43):
Ask for the help that they need.
That is there for them.
That is there for them.
That's our focus here.
Speaker 7 (28:48):
But President Biden is fond of saying show me your
budget and I will tell you whatyou value.
If he's got money for people inLebanon right now without
Congress having to come back,what does it say about his
values?
There's not enough money rightnow for people in North Carolina
.
That's not misinformation.
Speaker 5 (29:07):
Wait, no, that is your whole.
Your whole.
Premise of the question ismisinformation.
Sir, what?
Speaker 2 (29:13):
you do yes.
Speaker 5 (29:13):
Yes.
Speaker 7 (29:14):
It's misinformation.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
We're going to get into the misinformation tag to
now in the next episode, becausethat's how the Democrats are
attacking, are going to beattacking and limiting your
freedom of speech, and that'sthat's even scarier than some of
the things we're hearing now.
Speaker 5 (29:33):
I just mentioned to you that we provided more than
$200 million to folks who areimpacted in the area, and I just
shared with you that people aredeciding not to people are
deciding not to, not to wait.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
People are deciding not to accept aid.
Listen, I lost everything myhouse just floated away.
I don't have a car, I don'thave cash, I don't have clothes.
I don't need aid Like those 850million, 850 millionaires,
billionaires in this country.
I'm so well off that I don'tneed any assistance.
She's so full of shit.
(30:08):
We're talking about the.
Speaker 5 (30:10):
SBA disaster loan, that's money for people in North
Carolina and that's important,and people in North Carolina
need that.
Wait, this is nothing new,Peter.
This is nothing new.
Congress comes together.
They provide money millions ofdollars for disaster relief.
We're asking them to do the jobthat they have been doing for
some time.
Speaker 7 (30:30):
The letter that President Biden sent to Johnson,
mcconnell, schumer and Jeffries.
The president's letter is notmisinformation.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Well, you send a letter from the president.
That's not misinformation,that's just a letter from the
president and he probablydoesn't remember even sending
the letter.
So technically I guess that ismisinformation.
Speaker 5 (30:47):
Do you agree?
No, the way you're asking methe question is misinformation.
There is money.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Oh, it's the way the question's asked.
I'm so glad they're here,because we're all so stupid.
Speaker 5 (30:58):
That we are allocating to the impacted areas
and there's money there to helppeople who truly need it.
There are survivors who needthe funding, who need the
funding, and it's there.
Speaker 7 (31:08):
You don't like misinformation.
Speaker 5 (31:10):
I said that.
I actually said we have themoney.
Speaker 2 (31:12):
That's what I like about Peter Doocy.
You can't just if you don'tlike a question, you can't just
label it misinformation, becausethat's what a banana republic
does and that's what thisadministration does.
So we're going to, like I said,that's, that's a whole.
We've already run almost 45minutes to an hour here, so
we're going to wrap this up in aminute, but I got 43 seconds.
I have to continue to play.
Speaker 5 (31:32):
Available to help survivors of Hurricane Helene
and also Hurricane Milton.
Speaker 2 (31:40):
Now there's going to Okay, listen, I know it's bad
and I shouldn't say it, but I'mgoing to say it anyways.
Every time I hear HurricaneMilton, I think of Milton from.
I think of Milton from officespace.
I'm sorry, it always just popsinto my mind.
I don't know why.
Speaker 5 (31:57):
Be a shortfall right, because we don't know how bad
it's Hurricane Milton is goingto be, and so we're going to
need additional funding.
We're going to need additionalfunding.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
So don't send funding to Lebanon.
Speaker 7 (32:08):
Exactly what I just asked about, and you said it was
misinformation.
What?
Speaker 5 (32:12):
you're asking me is why Congress needs to come back
and do their job.
That's what you're asking me.
Congress needs to come back anddo their job and provide extra
assistance, extra funding todisaster relief fund.
That's what Congress needs todo and we're going to continue
to urge that.
You may not want that, butthat's OK.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
That's what this president wants and that's what
the vice president wants.
Thanks, everybody, and I loveit.
As he just leaves, I'm done.
You think it's a mic dropmoment, but she's just trying to
get the hell out of therebecause liar, liar, your binders
on fire.
Oh, this was a fun episodetoday.
Make sure you stay tuned forthe new ones coming up and, as
always, the truth, she alwayssets you free.
This is Tim is going.
Is Ken?
I'm out of here.
What you just said is one of the most insanely
idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling,incoherent response were you
even close to anything thatcould be considered a rational
thought.
Everyone in this room is nowdumber.
For having listened to it isnow dumber for having listened
(00:26):
to it.
Speaker 3 (00:28):
You don't know what that ought is, mr Trash, I'd
show you, but I'm too old, I'mtoo tired.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
I'm too fucking blind .
If I were the man I was fiveyears ago, I'd take a
flamethrower to this place.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Do you understand the words that are coming out of?
Speaker 1 (00:52):
my mouth.
You want answers.
I think I'm entitled.
You want answers.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
I want the truth.
You can't handle the truth.
Oh, we've said it once, we'vesaid it before, we've said it a
million times the truth shallalways be free.
This is Tim.
It's good enough for my lawn.
The mad ramblings of a Gen Xerneed to talk about hurricane
Kamala, the FEMA, Kamala inchief.
I need to also talk about thattrain wreck of a 60 minutes
interview that she gave.
(01:17):
Oh, great balls of fire.
I was literally watching this,this, this interview, this, this
60 minute interview she had,and I just didn't get it.
I really didn't.
You heard her talk.
You heard her speak and I lovedit because you finally had
(01:39):
somebody go after Kamala Harrisand and hold her feet to the
fire.
A little bit about what she'stalking about what, what, what
she, what she's trying to say.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
All right, explain this to me like I'm a two year
old.
Okay, because there's anelement to this thing.
I just cannot get through mythick head.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
And there was an element to that interview that
she just couldn't get throughher thick head really couldn't
and she again didn't sayanything.
And anyone that watched thisinterview back in the back in
the day, when Mike Wallace andall the all the other guys were
on 60 minutes they were thishard hitting news organization.
You know now it's been prettymuch a um, a, a segment of the
liberal media, but, but duringthat interview I was stunned, I
(02:26):
was shocked.
First thing I want to talkabout, though, is is everything
going on with the hurricanes?
You have Helene, you have theMilton coming in now, and it
looks like it's going to crossright over into Tampa, and it's
just a bad situation.
And you got people in theCarolinas that aren't getting
the resources they need.
The federal government is not,I'm not going to say dragging
their feet, but they're just notdoing the job that they need to
(02:48):
do.
And, yes, money was divertedfrom FEMA to the illegal
immigration issue, and I laughbecause and I don't really laugh
because you have the likes ofKorean Jean Pierre sitting there
and trying to deny vehementlythat at no point in time was any
relief money being moved fromfema to help illegal immigrants.
(03:13):
I gotta, let's, let's, let's.
Can we listen to this clip asecond?
I think we have to hold on.
Let's see if we can.
Speaker 5 (03:19):
It is not true it is a false statement.
No b Biden did not take FEMArelief money to use to use on
migrants.
Funding is also availablethrough FEMA's emergency food
and shelter program to eligiblelocal governments and not for
not for profit organizations,upon request to support
humanitarian relief for migrants.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
The first statement was on October 4th of 2024.
The last statement was onSeptember 16th of 2022.
If you go on the FEMA website,you can see how you can apply if
you're an illegal immigrant,how you can apply for housing
and funds and all this fun stuff.
But we're stupid and thevenerable Korean Jean-Pierre is
(04:02):
just amazing, as usual.
How this, how that I want touse a bad word but how she has
not been fired is amazing to me.
It re, it really is it just.
It just makes you.
It just makes you cringe.
So vice president Kamala Harrishas basically called out Ron
DeSantis as being selfish fornot taking her hurricane related
(04:25):
calls.
I love it because I had thepicture on the thumbnail of her
standing at the head of FEMA.
Look at me, I'm in charge ofeverything.
The Democrats will never passup a good disaster as an
opportunity.
They never.
They never passed that shit up.
You got to give them credit forthat because the vice president
, all these years and all thesehurricanes and I lived in
Florida has always been frontand center calling the governors
(04:47):
of the states doing thesethings to help facilitate FEMA
and the relief effort.
It's always happened.
So it's always happened since Ican remember, not, the vice
president is never involved inthis shit.
It's always the presidentworking with the governors.
You never hear this vicepresident with the governors.
You never hear, well, this vicepresident just the vice
president came here to floridaand everything's fine.
(05:11):
So this whack job says peopleare in desperate need of support
right now and playing politicalgames at this moment is in
these crisis situations.
It's just utterly irresponsible.
It's selfish.
Harris said that was on monday.
It's all about politicalgamesmanship.
It's selfish.
Harris said that was on Monday.
It's all about politicalgamesmanship.
It's doing your job that youtook an oath to do, which is to
put people first.
So she's sitting in FEMAheadquarters at the head of the
(05:31):
table, which I've never seenbefore, because you need a
political, you need a politicalphoto op opportunity for an
election, and she's calling outDeSantis for this.
Now you gotta love.
You gotta love big Ron, becausebig Ron doesn't take any shit.
He really doesn't, because heknows what this is and he had a
(05:53):
response to the wonderful KamalaHarris.
Speaker 4 (05:57):
Hold on a minute Focus on leveraging all
resources available, includingfrom the federal government and
I've been in touch with bothFEMA and the president as well
as marshalling all our stateagencies and working to support
our local communities.
And so for Kamala Harris to tryto say that my sole focus on
the people of Florida is somehowselfish is delusional.
(06:19):
She has no role in this.
In fact, she's been vicepresident for three and a half
years.
I've dealt with a number ofstorms under this administration
.
She has no role in this.
In fact, she's been vicepresident for three and a half
years.
I've dealt with a number ofstorms under this administration
.
She has never contributedanything to any of these efforts
, and so what I think is selfishis her trying to blunder into
this.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
No, and here's the thing she has no role.
Speaker 4 (06:41):
No, she has no role in this process.
I'm in contact with thepresident of the United States.
I'm in contact with FEMAdirector.
I'm obviously managing all ourstate agencies.
We're supporting all our localgovernment.
And I will say this I've hadstorms under both President
Trump and President Biden, andI've worked well with both of
them.
She's the first one who'strying to politicize the storm,
(07:03):
and she's doing that justbecause of her campaign.
She's the first one who'strying to politicize the storm
and she's doing that justbecause of her campaign.
She's trying to get some typeof an edge.
She knows she's doing poorly,and so she's playing these
political games.
I don't have time for politicalgames.
I've got peoples whose livesare on the line.
I've got peoples whose homesand their possessions are on the
line, and we are focused 100%on that mission.
(07:26):
I'm not worried about playingher political games, and so she
is being selfish by trying toblunder into this when we're
working just fine.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
I don't think she saw that one coming.
I don't think she sees muchcoming because she's not very
bright.
People get mad at Trump forwhen they say Kamala Harris, he
says all the time Kamala Harrisisn't bright, she's not the
sharpest tool in the shed.
We know this.
But literally, like I said, ifanyone's trying to be political
(08:02):
about this, anyone's looking fora photo op, if anyone's looking
for an opportunity to look goodat something, it's Kamala
Harris, because she doesn't lookgood at anything.
Her policies are scary.
Her thought process on currentevents or just world events, or
just anything that has to dowith anything, is a muddling
(08:26):
mess and this is the woman thatwe're going to have handle our
foreign affairs against China,against Russia, against the
aggression in Iran, against theHouthis.
This is the person that's goingto put a stop to all this.
You should be scared if youeven consider voting for this
(08:47):
crackhead, and I shouldn'tinsult crackheads that way.
I do apologize for all thecrackheads out there.
So 60 minutes did an interviewwith her.
Oh lordy, was that, lordy?
Was that a train wreck?
I love the one question ifchina attacks taiwan?
One question If China attacksTaiwan, will you use military
force to support China?
Speaker 3 (09:07):
If China attacks Taiwan, would we use military
force to support Taiwan?
Bill.
Speaker 6 (09:12):
I'm not going to get into hypotheticals, but listen,
we need to make sure that wemaintain a one China policy, but
that includes supportingTaiwan's ability to defend
itself, including what we needto do to ensure the freedom of
the Taiwan Strait.
We need to make sure we haveopen lines of communication with
China, in particular, militaryto military.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
She is clueless.
She is clueless, she isspeckless.
So we're going to military tomilitary.
We're going to talk to China.
Our militaries are going to gettogether, we're going to sing
Kum Fucking Baiya, becausethat's what adversaries do, and
I'm not going to sit there andtell you I support Taiwan.
I'm not going to come out andsay that because if I did say
that, well, I would actuallyhave made it and had a thought,
(09:55):
an opinion on anything.
I really can't.
I can't believe this.
But here, this, this, this is.
I got to play this clip.
Speaker 3 (10:10):
Let's get to this clip as well.
Hold on a second.
I'll tell you what your criticsand the columnists say.
Okay, they say the reason somany voters don't know you is
that you have changed yourposition on so many things.
You were against fracking, nowyou're for it.
You supported looserimmigration policies, now you're
tightening them up.
You were for Medicare for all,now you're not so many that
people don't truly know what youbelieve or what you stand for,
(10:35):
and I know you've heard that.
Speaker 6 (10:37):
In the last four years I have been vice president
of the United States and I havebeen traveling our country and
I have been listening to folksand seeking what is possible in
terms of common ground.
I believe in building consensus.
We are a diverse peoplegeographically, regionally, in
terms of where we are, in ourbackgrounds and what the
(10:59):
American people do want is thatwe have leaders who can build
consensus, where we can figureout, compromise and understand.
It's not a bad thing as long asyou don't compromise your
values to find common sensesolutions, and that has been my
approach.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
She has literally compromised all of her values,
everything that she has saidover the last 10 years, to try
to get elected, and you knowshe's just going to revert back
to what she was, which is themost liberal Senator that's ever
been in office.
She was voted that and againshe doesn't answer the question.
(11:37):
And she's.
I love how she's, as, as herrole as vice president, she's
always traveling.
I never see her traveling much.
The last three and a half years, until she went and decided
that she's going to steal thenomination, I didn't really see
her traveling that much, did you?
Because this is the same womanthat's never been to the border,
but she's also never been toEurope, so I don't get what
you're talking about.
Never been to Europe, why doesthat matter?
(11:58):
It's sometimes just the idiocyof this and, like I said, for
the fact that this is, for thefact that this is your vice
president and the person thatwants to run this country is
crazy, to me is insane.
I love this when she talksabout how she owns a Glock.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
You recently surprised people when you said
that you are a gun owner andthen if someone came into your
house, that was not the firsttime I've talked about it.
Speaker 6 (12:30):
That's not the first time I've talked about it.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
So what kind of gun do you own, and when and why did
you get it?
Speaker 6 (12:35):
I have a Glock and I've had it for quite some time
and I mean, look Bill, mybackground is in law enforcement
.
And I mean, look Bill, mybackground is in law enforcement
.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
And so there you go.
Have you ever fired it?
Speaker 6 (12:49):
Yes, of course I have At a shooting range.
Yes, of course I have.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
That nervous laughter just tells you she doesn't own
a gun.
And I love it how she.
I was in law enforcement.
You are a district attorney.
You're not carrying a gun,you're not on the streets with
the cops, you're not makingarrests.
And I love it because if youtalk to an actual gun owner,
someone that actually knowsabout their firearm, they won't
sit there and tell you I own aGlock.
No, they'll sit there and tellyou I own a Glock 45.
(13:19):
I own a Glock 19.
I own a Glock 26.
I own a Glock 28.
I own a Sig Sauer 226.
They're not going to just say Iown a Glock.
That's what I got a Glock.
Because that's such a greatbuzzword, such a key word I own
a Glock, that's it.
And of course, the nervouslaughter after being called out
(13:40):
and being asked by that is is isoutstanding because you know
she's lying, because normallywhen you laugh like that you
ought to you automatically knowthat person is full of shit.
You own a Glock.
Okay, tell me about your Glock.
Tell me about how you can breakdown your Glock.
Tell me all, tell me all thesethings about it.
(14:01):
Just give me some information,not just just don't throw out a
name brand.
It's like if someone, if youown a car, most car owners will
say, well, I own a Lexus.
But most astute car owners willsay, I own a Lexus ES 350.
They're not going to just say,well, I own a Glock PS350.
(14:24):
They're not going to just say,well, I own a Glock.
Oh, the shit that this womanspews is just beyond crazy.
It really is.
It just kind of makes you sad alittle bit and makes you
worried about what's going to goon with this nation if she ever
got elected.
I mean, that is just thescariest thing to me that I've
ever seen.
And this interview continues.
(14:45):
It goes on and I laugh becauseif you listen to her and you
listen to her talk okay, we gotto talk about how she's going to
pay for everything.
I got to hear this.
Here we go.
I got to listen to this.
Speaker 3 (15:00):
You want to expand the child tax credit.
Speaker 6 (15:03):
Yes, I do.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
You want to give tax breaks to first-time homebuyers
and people starting smallbusinesses?
Right, how are you going to payfor that?
Speaker 6 (15:12):
My economic plan would strengthen America's
economy, his would weaken it.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
But pardon me, Madam Vice President, the question was
how are you going to pay for it?
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
I own a Glock.
I own a Glock.
That's how I'm going to pay forit.
Why ask me stupid questionsthat you want me to answer and
then have a follow-up question.
How dare you have the audacityto ask me how am I going to pay
for it?
I love this.
I love this.
I love this clip too.
Speaker 3 (15:41):
Hold on, wait, I've got to play this clip.
Which foreign country do youconsider to be our greatest
adversary?
Speaker 6 (15:47):
I think there's an obvious one in mind, which is
Iran.
Iran has American blood ontheir hands.
Okay, this attack on Israel 200ballistic missiles on Israel,
200 ballistic missiles.
What we need to do to ensurethat Iran never achieves the
(16:08):
ability to be a nuclear power.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
That is one of my highest priorities and that must
be so if you have proof thatIran is building a nuclear
weapon, would you take militaryaction?
Speaker 6 (16:15):
I'm not going to talk about hypotheticals at this
moment.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
I love that you I'm not going to talk about
hypotheticals at this moment.
I love it.
I'm not going to talk abouthypotheticals because then I
might have to have an answer.
You've already told Israel,your administration, not to go
after the nuclear facilities inIran, and you eased the
sanctions off of Iran that Trumpput into place, and now they
have hundreds of billions ofdollars in oil which they're
selling to another one of ouradversaries in Russia, of
(16:40):
billions of dollars in oil whichthey're selling to another one
of our adversaries in Russiabecause of you easing the
policies and the sanctionseconomic sanctions against Iran.
And then you go out and tellyou go out and tell Israel don't
attack, don't attack, or else,oh, I got to play.
(17:01):
I got to play this illegalimmigration clip.
This is the gift that justkeeps on giving.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
I've been covering the border for years, and so I
know this is not a problem thatstarted with your administration
Correct, correct, but there wasan historic flood of
undocumented immigrants comingacross the border the first
three years of youradministration.
As a matter of fact, arrivalsquadrupled from the last year of
(17:30):
President Trump.
Was it a mistake to loosen theimmigration policies as much as
you?
Speaker 6 (17:38):
did.
It's a longstanding problem.
Problem and solutions are athand and from day one, literally
, we have been offeringsolutions.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
What I was asking was was it a mistake to kind of
allow that flood to happen inthe first place?
Speaker 6 (17:56):
I think the policies that we have been proposing are
about fixing a problem, notpromoting a problem.
Okay, but the numbers?
Speaker 3 (18:05):
did quadruple.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
The numbers quadrupled, but our policy,
we're about fixing things.
It only got four.
For help, I'm going to help herout.
It only got four times worse,because I know quadruple is a
big word Numbers today becauseof what we have done.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
We have cut the flow of illegal immigration by half.
We have cut the flow offentanyl by half.
Speaker 6 (18:30):
But we need Congress to be able to act to actually
fix the problem.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
It's all Congress's fault, even though it was the,
the, the swipe of a pen thatremoved everything that Trump
had in place, which worked.
Oh my God, I mean this, this.
This is just getting to a pointwhere you're like, you know,
can you tell the borders arethat you need to take care of
(18:59):
the border?
Could you do that please?
And the fact that they'reholding her feet to the fire in
reference to her, herimmigration policies and and
everything that she wants to do,everything that she wants to
pay for is is is astounding, isastounding, and I and I love
cause we have to go back to thatformer interview with CBS
(19:22):
Excuse me with Fox with 60Minutes.
I love it because this is whenshe talks about Iran again.
What's the message?
Speaker 3 (19:29):
to Iran.
Don't, as President Biden said,just don't Exactly.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
One word, pretty straightforward, that's a
deterrent.
As a Glock owner, that is aboutas deterrent as you can get.
Don't, don't what?
Don't keep selling that oil toRussia, making billions of
dollars so they can financeterrorism against Israel and the
United States and our allies.
You don't want to do that.
(19:55):
Oh my God, I got to play thisclip too.
This is another great clip.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
hold on, this is another great clip but it seems
that uh, prime ministernetanyahu is not listening well
bill.
Speaker 6 (20:09):
The work that we have done has resulted in a number
of movements in that region byIsrael that were very much
prompted by or a result of manythings, including our advocacy
for what needs to happen.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
What the fuck is she talking about?
Seriously, seriously, what isshe literally, what is she
talking about?
I mean, this interview is fullof uh, full of gems, is full of
disasters, and I love, I lovethis.
We gotta, we gotta talk aboutthis one.
(20:48):
Hold on, we gotta talk aboutthis one.
Well, I gotta play this one too.
Speaker 6 (20:52):
My plan is about saying that when you invest in
small businesses, you invest inthe middle class and you
strengthen America's economy.
Small businesses are part ofthe backbone of America's
economy.
Speaker 3 (21:06):
But pardon me, Madam Vice President, the question was
how are you going to pay?
Speaker 6 (21:12):
for it.
Well, one of the things I'mgoing to make sure that the
richest among us who can affordit pay their fair share in taxes
.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
I have to stop that for a minute because this is
crazy to me.
He's going to get into this,but I had to stop this.
They always talk about goingafter the billionaires.
There's like 825 billionairesin this country in the United
States alone, and they actuallypay about 46% of the tax revenue
in this country.
These 850 people you havealmost 50% of the population
(21:45):
that gets a refund check thatdoesn't pay taxes, and then you
have the middle class, which hasto sit in the middle and eat a
big shit sandwich.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
It is not right that teachers and nurses and
firefighters are paying a highertax rate than billionaires and
the biggest corporations, and Iplan on making that fair.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
But we're dealing with the real world here, but
the real world includes how areyou going to get this through
Congress?
Speaker 6 (22:14):
You know, when you talk quietly with a lot of folks
in Congress, they know exactlywhat I'm talking about, because
their constituents know exactlywhat I'm talking about.
Their constituents are thosefirefighters and teachers and
nurses.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
My plan I've said this before.
She's like masturbating with acheese grater it's highly
amusing at first, and thenextremely painful.
I love this, this.
This is what I'm.
This is my favorite clip,though, and I want to talk about
this.
This is what I was trying toget to, cause I could do this
all day.
That's what she said.
Speaker 3 (22:51):
Was democracy best served by president Biden
stepping down and basicallyhanding you a nomination?
You didn't have to go through aprimary process.
You didn't have to fight offother contenders.
That's not really the way oursystem was intended to work.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
President Biden made a decision that I think history
is going to show is rare amongleaders You're right, because
most people who are dealing withAlzheimer's and senility
usually aren't electedpresidents, so it is very rare
for that type of person to stepdown because of the fact they
probably don't even know they'restepping down.
Speaker 6 (23:32):
Which was to put country before self, and I am
proud to have earned the supportof the vast majority of
delegates and to have.
Speaker 2 (23:44):
I got support of the vast majority of delegates but
not the 3 million plus wholiterally voted in the primary.
Speaker 6 (23:51):
I've been elected the Democratic nominee.
I am proud to have received theendorsement of leaders around
this country from everybackground and walk of life to
fight in this election over thenext month for our democracy.
Speaker 3 (24:11):
But I think this truncated process is why people
think or say they don't reallyknow who you are.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
people think or say they don't really know who you
are.
Look, because she circumventedthe entire system to get elected
or try to get elected.
Okay, can we talk about that?
Can we think about that for aminute?
It's, it's the Glock owner.
It's the Glock owner that sheis her thought process in her
(24:42):
mind process.
That's just.
That's just the way when you'rea Glock owner works.
You just have to, you just haveto think about these things.
It's a train wreck, man.
This whole thing was a trainwreck and watching this train
wreck just makes you cringe evenmore.
That she potentially can beelected to the highest office in
my, my mind, in the world andwe have to sit there and hope
(25:04):
and pray she doesn't fuck thingsup even more than she's
probably going to.
It's a sad thought process.
It's a sad moment for democracybecause Elon Musk had it best.
Had it best when he at the atthe Trump rally over in Butler,
pennsylvania.
He's basically like listen, youare going to destroy democracy
(25:30):
If you do this, if you allowthis person to come into this
office.
They talk about savingdemocracy.
They're going to destroy it.
They're going to destroy theeconomy.
Mark Cuban even came out as ahuge Democratic supporter saying
listen, these unrealized taxgains excuse me, the tax on the
unrealized gains in my heydaywould have bankrupted me.
And they talk about how it'sonly going to attack
(25:51):
millionaires.
But I've said this beforeyou're a small farm owner.
You have property worth $2million and let's say it goes up
to $3 million.
So you're now going to have topay the unrealized gains tax.
Same thing If you, if you giveor you will your property to a
child, they're going to have topay the death tax.
Then they're going to have topay the unrealized gain tax on
(26:13):
top of that property.
So you're not going to be ableto keep small businesses and
farms in the in within thefamily because they are going to
be taxed to death.
I love Peter Doocy.
I got to play a little bit ofPeter Doocy because he's just
not.
He's just not dealing with JeanKorean, jean Pierre anymore.
(26:35):
This, this, I just got to getinto this.
One last thing.
This is about the hurricanerelief.
Speaker 7 (26:40):
And on this issue of funding, the administration has
money to send to Lebanon withoutCongress coming back, but
Congress does have to come backto approve money to send to
Lebanon without Congress comingback.
But Congress does have to comeback to approve money to send to
people in North Carolina.
Do I have that right?
Speaker 5 (26:55):
Here's what I'm going to be very clear about the
president and the vice president.
You're throwing a lot of bigwords at me, boo.
The president has had a robustwhole of government response to
this.
Hundreds of millions of dollarsI said it at the top more than
$200 million that we havedirectly.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
And you probably need about $6 billion.
Speaker 5 (27:17):
Put towards survivors here for disaster help, and
that's because of thispresident's commitment to make
sure that we are there forcommunities that are impacted.
We take this very seriouslyagain.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
We take this very seriously.
People dying in this country.
We take very seriously, likethat's something you should be
proud of.
Shouldn't that just be a given?
Speaker 5 (27:40):
Very seriously, and before the hurricane hit, we
prepositioned more than 1,500federal folks on the ground to
help, and so these are the samefederal folks that are taking up
hotel rooms that could be usedto house the hurricane survivors
.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
But we're not going to get into that.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
We have made sure that every state has gotten
their storm.
Requested emergency declaration.
They requested it.
Speaker 2 (28:11):
You got a declaration which is basically the
government's version of an IOU.
Speaker 5 (28:16):
And we made sure they received it.
We've taken this very seriously, more than $200 million that we
have provided to the impactedareas, but instead people want
to do disinformation,misinformation, which is
dangerous, which is dangerous,which is dangerous because then,
when folks on the ground hearthat, they may not want to.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
Folks on the ground are the ones that are posting
TikTok videos and Twitter videosand things on YouTube that are
showing the lack of governmentresponse.
Speaker 5 (28:43):
Ask for the help that they need.
That is there for them.
That is there for them.
That's our focus here.
Speaker 7 (28:48):
But President Biden is fond of saying show me your
budget and I will tell you whatyou value.
If he's got money for people inLebanon right now without
Congress having to come back,what does it say about his
values?
There's not enough money rightnow for people in North Carolina
.
That's not misinformation.
Speaker 5 (29:07):
Wait, no, that is your whole.
Your whole.
Premise of the question ismisinformation.
Sir, what?
Speaker 2 (29:13):
you do yes.
Speaker 5 (29:13):
Yes.
Speaker 7 (29:14):
It's misinformation.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
We're going to get into the misinformation tag to
now in the next episode, becausethat's how the Democrats are
attacking, are going to beattacking and limiting your
freedom of speech, and that'sthat's even scarier than some of
the things we're hearing now.
Speaker 5 (29:33):
I just mentioned to you that we provided more than
$200 million to folks who areimpacted in the area, and I just
shared with you that people aredeciding not to people are
deciding not to, not to wait.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
People are deciding not to accept aid.
Listen, I lost everything myhouse just floated away.
I don't have a car, I don'thave cash, I don't have clothes.
I don't need aid Like those 850million, 850 millionaires,
billionaires in this country.
I'm so well off that I don'tneed any assistance.
She's so full of shit.
(30:08):
We're talking about the.
Speaker 5 (30:10):
SBA disaster loan, that's money for people in North
Carolina and that's important,and people in North Carolina
need that.
Wait, this is nothing new,Peter.
This is nothing new.
Congress comes together.
They provide money millions ofdollars for disaster relief.
We're asking them to do the jobthat they have been doing for
some time.
Speaker 7 (30:30):
The letter that President Biden sent to Johnson,
mcconnell, schumer and Jeffries.
The president's letter is notmisinformation.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Well, you send a letter from the president.
That's not misinformation,that's just a letter from the
president and he probablydoesn't remember even sending
the letter.
So technically I guess that ismisinformation.
Speaker 5 (30:47):
Do you agree?
No, the way you're asking methe question is misinformation.
There is money.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Oh, it's the way the question's asked.
I'm so glad they're here,because we're all so stupid.
Speaker 5 (30:58):
That we are allocating to the impacted areas
and there's money there to helppeople who truly need it.
There are survivors who needthe funding, who need the
funding, and it's there.
Speaker 7 (31:08):
You don't like misinformation.
Speaker 5 (31:10):
I said that.
I actually said we have themoney.
Speaker 2 (31:12):
That's what I like about Peter Doocy.
You can't just if you don'tlike a question, you can't just
label it misinformation, becausethat's what a banana republic
does and that's what thisadministration does.
So we're going to, like I said,that's, that's a whole.
We've already run almost 45minutes to an hour here, so
we're going to wrap this up in aminute, but I got 43 seconds.
I have to continue to play.
Speaker 5 (31:32):
Available to help survivors of Hurricane Helene
and also Hurricane Milton.
Speaker 2 (31:40):
Now there's going to Okay, listen, I know it's bad
and I shouldn't say it, but I'mgoing to say it anyways.
Every time I hear HurricaneMilton, I think of Milton from.
I think of Milton from officespace.
I'm sorry, it always just popsinto my mind.
I don't know why.
Speaker 5 (31:57):
Be a shortfall right, because we don't know how bad
it's Hurricane Milton is goingto be, and so we're going to
need additional funding.
We're going to need additionalfunding.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
So don't send funding to Lebanon.
Speaker 7 (32:08):
Exactly what I just asked about, and you said it was
misinformation.
What?
Speaker 5 (32:12):
you're asking me is why Congress needs to come back
and do their job.
That's what you're asking me.
Congress needs to come back anddo their job and provide extra
assistance, extra funding todisaster relief fund.
That's what Congress needs todo and we're going to continue
to urge that.
You may not want that, butthat's OK.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
That's what this president wants and that's what
the vice president wants.
Thanks, everybody, and I loveit.
As he just leaves, I'm done.
You think it's a mic dropmoment, but she's just trying to
get the hell out of therebecause liar, liar, your binders
on fire.
Oh, this was a fun episodetoday.
Make sure you stay tuned forthe new ones coming up and, as
always, the truth, she alwayssets you free.
This is Tim is going.
Is Ken?
I'm out of here.
Popular Podcasts
Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes present: Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial
Introducing… Aubrey O’Day Diddy’s former protege, television personality, platinum selling music artist, Danity Kane alum Aubrey O’Day joins veteran journalists Amy Robach and TJ Holmes to provide a unique perspective on the trial that has captivated the attention of the nation. Join them throughout the trial as they discuss, debate, and dissect every detail, every aspect of the proceedings. Aubrey will offer her opinions and expertise, as only she is qualified to do given her first-hand knowledge. From her days on Making the Band, as she emerged as the breakout star, the truth of the situation would be the opposite of the glitz and glamour. Listen throughout every minute of the trial, for this exclusive coverage. Amy Robach and TJ Holmes present Aubrey O’Day, Covering the Diddy Trial, an iHeartRadio podcast.
Betrayal: Season 4
Karoline Borega married a man of honor – a respected Colorado Springs Police officer. She knew there would be sacrifices to accommodate her husband’s career. But she had no idea that he was using his badge to fool everyone. This season, we expose a man who swore two sacred oaths—one to his badge, one to his bride—and broke them both. We follow Karoline as she questions everything she thought she knew about her partner of over 20 years. And make sure to check out Seasons 1-3 of Betrayal, along with Betrayal Weekly Season 1.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.