March 29, 2025 • 25 mins
Fashion isn't typically a life-threatening choice, but in the summer of 1943 Los Angeles, wearing a zoot suit could get you assaulted in the street. When military servicemen and civilians began violently stripping Mexican-American and Black youths of their distinctive wide-shouldered jackets and flowing pants, they unleashed five days of terror that exposed America's racial fault lines during World War II.
We dive deep into this forgotten chapter of American history, exploring how a distinctive clothing style became both cultural armor and lightning rod for violence. The zoot suit—with its dramatic silhouette and excess fabric during wartime rationing—represented more than fashion to its wearers. For young Mexican-Americans, African-Americans, and other minority youth, it embodied cultural pride and self-expression in a society that often demanded conformity and invisibility.
Through examining the buildup of tensions in wartime Los Angeles, the infamous Sleepy Lagoon murder case, and the shocking police complicity during the riots, we reveal how profoundly this "fashion crime" illuminated American prejudice. Perhaps most disturbing was the aftermath: instead of protecting victims, Los Angeles banned zoot suits entirely, effectively criminalizing cultural expression. It would take nearly 80 years for the city to formally apologize for its role in the violence.
This remarkable story serves as a powerful reminder that expressions of cultural identity can become powerful acts of resistance when marginalized communities refuse to be invisible. The zoot suit's journey from symbol of rebellion to target of violence to emblem of pride offers striking parallels to ongoing struggles for representation and respect in American society. Join us for this eye-opening exploration of when clothing became crime—and how the legacy of that moment continues to resonate today.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
Picture this it's summer of 1943, World War II is
raging across the globe and inthe United States, the city of
Los Angeles, like many Americancities at the time, was buzzing
with the clamor of wartimeproduction Servicemen gearing up
for deployment, overseasfactories humming with activity
and a palpable sense ofpatriotic unity in the face of a
(00:45):
common enemy.
But the unity was only surfacedeep.
During that same swelteringsummer, on June 3, 1943, Los
Angeles was the scene of a verystrange attack.
This attack was primarilycarried out by white military
servicemen and civilians againstBlack and Latino youth.
That in itself wasn't thestrange part.
(01:06):
As I'm sure many of you outthere know, the United States
has a history of racial conflict.
The strange part was that mostof the Black and Latino youth
who were attacked were wearing aparticular style of clothing
called zoot suits, and thosecarrying out the attack seemed
focused on forcibly strippingtheir victims of those zoot
suits and destroying them.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Welcome to History's Greatest Crimes.
Today we're delving into atruly unique and, frankly,
unsettling chapter of Americanhistory.
We're examining a peculiar formof perceived crime the wearing
of the zoot suit, popular amongMexican-American and
African-American youths in the1940s, and the very real brutal
(01:48):
violence it provoked during thatfateful summer of 1943.
This wasn't a case of espionageor sabotage, nor a bank robbery
or kidnapping.
Instead, we're looking at asocial explosion fueled by
deep-seated racial prejudice andthe anxieties of a nation at
war.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
I'm Michael, and with me, as always, is my esteemed
colleague and beloved wife,elena.
Today we're venturing into theseemingly bizarre world of the
Zoot Suit riots, a series ofviolent clashes during the
summer of 1943 that, on thesurface, appeared to be about
nothing more than fashion.
But, as we'll uncover, theseriots revealed profound and
(02:29):
disturbing truths about Americansociety during one of its most
tumultuous periods.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
And it's precisely the inexplicable nature of this
so-called crime, Michael, thatmakes it both compelling and
crucial to examine.
How could a piece of clothing,not much more than mere fabric,
become the catalyst for suchwidespread violence, even
garnering the tacit approval oflaw enforcement in some cases?
Who gets to define deviance,and how do those definitions
(02:59):
serve to marginalize entirecommunities?
Buckle up listeners.
This story is stranger thanfiction, and the lessons it
holds are as chillingly relevanttoday as they were over 80
years ago.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
All right, Elena, we've set the stage with the
dramatic arrival of the zootsuit riots.
But to truly grasp the gravityof this situation, our listeners
need to understand exactly whata zoot suit was in the peculiar
context of wartime Los Angeles.
So let's start with the basics.
What are we even talking aboutwhen we say zoot suit?
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Indeed, michael.
The zoot suit was a verydistinctive style of clothing
that emerged in the 1930s andsoared in popularity among young
people during the 1940s.
It was characterized bybroad-shouldered jackets that
were long or draped, andwide-legged pants that were
tapered at the bottom.
Often wearers would also flauntlong-chained watches,
(04:00):
flamboyant hats and thick-soledshoes, and, besides making a
bold fashion statement, theappeal of the outfit seemed to
be its flowy fit, which lookedgood on the dance floor.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
Absolutely, and while its exact origins are a bit
obscure, the zoot suit was firstassociated with
African-American communities,particularly in Harlem, new York
, where Black culture and musicwas celebrated during the Harlem
Renaissance.
Such outfits were popularamongst jazz musicians like Cab
Calloway.
But over the next decade or so,the zoot suit style became very
(04:38):
popular among Mexican-Americanyouths known as Pachucos, and it
also spread to other minorityyouths including
Filipino-Americans,italian-americans and Jewish
American men.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
That's a critical point, michael.
While the Los Angeles zoot suitriots of 1943
disproportionately targetedMexican Americans, the wearing
of zoot suits was a broaderphenomenon among minority youth.
But to understand why thisfashion choice sparked such an
outrage, we need to step intothe world of wartime Los Angeles
(05:06):
.
Imagine a city with over 50,000servicemen stationed there.
The attack on Pearl Harbor hadtaken place only a year and a
half before and it was stillfresh in the nation's memory,
leading to heightened patriotismand calls for conformity.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
Precisely, and in this environment of wartime
austerity, fabric was strictlyrationed to support the war
effort, primarily to makemilitary uniforms.
The zoot suit, with itsperceived excessive use of
material, was immediately seenby many as unpatriotic and even
wasteful.
Servicemen and other criticsderided the wearers as draft
(05:44):
dodgers, despite the fact thatmany of those youths were too
young to serve.
One has to admit, elena, thatit was rather a bold statement
in a world of drab uniforms,wouldn't you say?
Almost like serving afive-course meal during a famine
.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
A rather flamboyant rebellion against sartorial
sobriety, michael.
Rather flamboyant rebellionagainst sartorial sobriety,
michael.
But beneath this clash ofstyles lay a much deeper issue
the pre-existing racialdiscrimination against Mexican
Americans in Los Angeles.
This wasn't something new, andit was particularly an issue in
the western United States wherelarge populations of Mexican
(06:20):
Americans lived.
As Los Angeles grew, so didracial and ethnic tensions.
Young Mexican-American men andwomen formed gangs for
territorial control andprotection.
Members often embraced thePachuco style and, unfortunately
, zoot Suit and Pachuco soonbecame shorthand for gang.
(06:40):
City officials and otherresidents of Los Angeles
suspected that the activities ofthese gangs were representative
of all Mexican Americans,although that was actually far
from the truth.
Throughout the late 1930s, theLos Angeles City Council
commissioned a specialinvestigation into what it saw
as a Mexican-American crime wave, despite having little evidence
(07:03):
of Mexican-American culpability.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
And to add fuel to the fire.
In Los Angeles in 1942, a yearbefore the zoot suit riot, 17
Mexican-American youth and youngmen were arrested and found
guilty of murder In what becameknown as the Sleepy Lagoon
murder case.
The 17 boys and men prosecutedwere forced to wear the zoot
suits many were wearing at thetime of the murder.
(07:27):
The district attorney requestedthis order on the grounds that
the jury should see thedefendants in the zoot suits
that, he argued, were worn onlyby hoodlums.
Every time a defendant's namewas mentioned by a witness or
the district attorney, the nameddefendant was required to stand
up.
The judge also permitted atestimony from an expert witness
(07:47):
from the Los Angeles Sheriff'sOffice.
In that testimony, the expertwitness stated that Mexicans as
a community had a quotebloodthirst and a biological
predisposition to crime andkilling, citing the culture of
human sacrifice practiced bytheir Aztec ancestors.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Interestingly, in 1944, two years after the Sleepy
Lagoon murder case and one yearafter the Zoot Suit riots, the
conviction of the 17 wasoverturned by the Court of
Appeals due to a lack ofevidence against those
prosecuted and the clear racialbias of the judge.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Exactly so.
The Zoot suit wasn't just afashion statement in a vacuum.
It landed in a city alreadysimmering with racial prejudice,
exacerbated by the anxieties ofwartime.
And for the young peoplewearing these suits,
particularly theMexican-American Pachucos, it
represented much more than justan outfit.
It was a defiant gesture ofgroup identity, a way of
(08:47):
rebelling against racialinjustices.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Absolutely.
It was a powerful form ofself-expression and pride in
one's appearance.
For youths wearing zoot suits,it was a way to connect with
jazz culture, a form of musicthat in itself was seen as
rebellious and outside themainstream.
Remarkably, evenMexican-American women began
borrowing the zoot suit pants tocreate their own style,
(09:13):
underscoring the widespreadcultural significance of this
attire.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
So, to recap, we already have this incredibly
eye-catching some might even sayaudacious style of dress
emerging among minority youth.
In a city gripped by wartimeconformity and simmering racial
tensions, the zoot suit, withits seemingly wasteful use of
rationed material, became avisible symbol that clashed
(09:37):
directly with prevailingpatriotic sentiments.
And for the young men and womenwho wore them, it wasn't just
about fashion.
It was a badge of identity, aconnection to a vibrant culture
and a silent, powerful assertionof their presence in a society
that often wished they wouldsimply disappear.
This collision of fashion, warand prejudice.
(09:58):
Elena was a powder keg ready tospark, so we've established the
.
Los Angeles was a pressurecookie waiting to blow.
But what exactly lit the fuseon this powder keg of tension?
How did the simmeringresentment suddenly explode into
a full-blown riot?
Speaker 2 (10:20):
That's the crucial question, michael.
Several incidents acted asprecursors, each one fanning the
flames of anger and mistrustbetween zoot suit wearers and
servicemen.
As we've already discussed, theSleepy Lagoon murder case fed
into racial tensions in LosAngeles between zoot suiters,
young Mexican-American youth andthe more than 50,000 servicemen
(10:42):
in Los Angeles.
And even more fuel to the firejust a few weeks before the zoot
suit riots, the infamous LakePier incident took place on May
8th of 1943.
At that time in May, rumorsstarted circulating that a
sailor had been stabbed by azoot suitor at Lake Pier near
Santa Monica, california.
Within hours of the supposedevent, nearly 500 servicemen
(11:06):
arrived to search for theculprits.
As they rampaged along the pier, they attacked anyone they
found in a zoot suit.
This event clearly demonstratedthe servicemen's willingness to
resort to violence based onmere hearsay, targeting anyone
wearing that distinctive style.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
So that sounds like a mob mentality ultimately
bubbling over, and it seems likethis was just the prelude to
the main event, the Zuzu riots,which took place just a few
weeks later, on June 3rd of 1943.
What's interesting is that onJune 3rd there didn't seem to be
one particular event that setoff the riots, but rather a
series of events Around thattime a rumor began to circulate
(11:46):
that a group of MexicanAmericans had beaten up a group
of white sailors.
That rumor encouraged groups ofmilitary men to leave their
armory and start attackingMexican American neighborhoods
in Los Angeles.
At the same time, another rumorcirculated that two zoot
suiters gave a Nazi salute topassing servicemen, causing them
(12:06):
to also attack and get violent.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Regardless of the exact catalyst, whether it was
retaliation for alleged attacksor a perceived act of disrespect
the response was immediate andbrutal.
About 50 sailors armed withmakeshift weapons first stormed
Alpine Street in the city, butunable to find zoot suiters
there, they proceeded to a localmovie theater that was in the
(12:32):
process of showing a film.
What happened next was atargeted assault.
After turning on the houselights, the sailors roamed the
aisles looking for zoot suiters.
The first victims of the zootsuit riots, 12 and 13-year-old
boys, were guilty of little morethan being in the wrong place
at the wrong time.
The sailors tore the suits offtheir bodies and beat and
(12:52):
clubbed the boys.
Can you imagine, michael, theterror these young boys must
have felt being attacked in apublic place simply for their
choice of clothing?
Speaker 1 (13:01):
It's a stark and disturbing image, elena, and it
highlights the nature of theviolence.
The quote ritualistic strippingof the zoot suitors end quote
in the movie theater wasn'tmerely about setting a personal
score.
It was a public spectacle ofhumiliation designed to
dehumanize those who dared toexpress themselves through style
.
To dehumanize those who daredto express themselves through
(13:24):
style as a word of these initialattacks spread like wildfire,
fueled by rumor and perhaps amisguided sense of righteous
indignation.
More servicemen and whiteAmerican civilians joined the
fray and for five days, fromJune 3rd through June 8th, they
carried out similar attacksacross the city.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
Exactly After attacking people in the movie
theater, the mob decided to takethe fight into the
Mexican-American neighborhoodsof East Los Angeles and Boyle
Heights.
Thus, their retaliatory strikebecame an assault on the
Mexican-American communityitself.
What began as targeted attackson individuals based solely on
their attire rapidly escalatedinto a broader campaign of
(14:03):
racial violence.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
In short, the initial spark, whether ignited by a
rumor, retaliation or aperceived insult, quickly spread
into a conflagration of racialfury.
This eruption engulfed not justthe Zoot Suiters but the wider
Mexican-American community,leaving a trail of fear and
devastation that lasted for days.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
And now listeners, the stage is set.
Over the next few days, losAngeles witnessed a sustained
period of brutality, a time whenthe city streets became
battlegrounds and the veryidentity of the community was
under siege.
Stay with us as we delve deeperinto these harrowing days of
fury, uncovering the events andexamining the chilling details
(14:47):
of this dark chapter in Americanhistory.
What began as confrontationswith young men in distinctive
attire on June 3rd of 1943quickly metamorphosed into
something far more insidious.
The initial pretext oftargeting zoot suiters dissolved
(15:08):
as the violence broadened,engulfing the Mexican-American
community at large.
It wasn't merely aboutflamboyant fabric anymore.
The angry attackers, oftenfueled by alcohol and a mob
mentality, swept throughMexican-American neighborhoods.
Their anger indiscriminate andtheir purpose chillingly clear.
Accounts detail how theystormed into bars, cafes and
(15:31):
theaters, turning on the houselights and darkened cinemas to
identify and drag out anyone whofit their prejudiced profile.
Even individuals not adorned inthe now infamous zoot suits
became targets.
As one source chillingly notes,the attack expanded to include
African Americans and FilipinoAmerican zoot suiters and,
(15:52):
disturbingly, those who werejust simply of color.
In every location of violence,zoot suits and any other symbol
of foreignness that were foundwere left burning in the streets
.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
Perhaps one of the most shocking aspects of this
period was the abject failure,or perhaps complicity, of law
enforcement.
The Los Angeles PoliceDepartment often stood by as
these violent acts unfolded.
Their silence as deafening asthe chaos on the streets
unfolded.
Their silence as deafening asthe chaos on the streets.
(16:23):
Witnesses reported that policewould, quote, wait until GIs had
left the scene and thenarrested the Mexican-Americans.
End, quote the very victims ofthese savage assaults getting
arrested themselves.
The justification A perverseclaim of protection.
The authority stating they werearresting the beaten and
stripped individuals.
Quote for their own protection.
This inaction, this blatantdisregard for the safety of
(16:46):
minority citizens effectivelysanctioned the servicemen's
rampages.
It fostered an environmentwhere the attackers operated
with impunity, while those whowere targeted were further
victimized by the veryinstitutions meant to safeguard
them.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
Adding fuel to the already raging fire was the role
of the media.
Most press coverage wassympathetic to the servicemen,
often portraying them as heroesor vigilantes standing up for
their country.
Newspapers engaged in unfaircoverage of the zoot suiters,
demonizing them as nothing morethan delinquents and criminals.
However, there were exceptions.
Al Waxman, editor of the EastSide Journal, a local community
(17:29):
newspaper, offered a starklydifferent perspective.
He witnessed firsthand thequote massive humanity locked in
violent struggle end quote andthe brutal treatment of young
Mexican-Americans at the handsof both serv quote and the
brutal treatment of youngMexican Americans at the hands
of both servicemen and thepolice.
His voice, though a minority inthe mainstream press, serves as
a crucial reminder of the truthobscured by much of the
(17:51):
contemporary reporting.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
In the face of such widespread and brutal violence,
a chilling anomaly emergesDespite days of intense riotings
, beatings and ritualisticstripping of countless
individuals, there is a surpriseabsence of documented murders
directly resulting from theseclashes.
While injuries were certainlyinflicted, the lack of fatality
suggests a disturbing, almosttheatrical focus to the violence
(18:17):
.
The primary objective, it seems, was not necessarily to inflict
lasting physical harm, butrather to symbolically dismantle
the zoot suit and the identityit represented.
The intense aggression directedat tearing and burning clothes,
while the lives of the wearerswere, against all odds, largely
spared from outright murder,speaks volumes about the warped
(18:39):
priorities and the deeplysymbolic nature of this reign of
terror.
The focus on the garment itselfunderscores the perceived
threat it posed to theestablished social order.
The seamless, endless wave ofviolence finally ended and began
to recede on June 8th.
(19:00):
The decisive factor, quote USmilitary personnel were barred
from leaving their barracks.
End quote.
With their movements restrictedby their own commanders, the
organized attacks largely ceased.
Yet in the aftermath, zootsuits were banned from public,
making wearing a zoot suitpunishable by a 50-day jail
sentence.
Furthermore, the officialnarratives attempted to downplay
(19:22):
the profound racial animus thathad fueled the unrest.
Mayor Bowron, for instance,offered an explanation that
conveniently deflected blamefrom the city's deep-seated
prejudice, attributing the riotsto quote juvenile delinquents
and by white Southerners endquote while vehemently denying
racial prejudice in his own city.
This stance stood in starkcontrast to the findings of a
(19:44):
citizens committee appointed bythe governor of California.
Their report, a crucialcounter-narrative quote,
determined racism to be acentral cause of the riots,
directly challenging the mayor'sself-serving conclusions.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Over time, the simplistic explanations that
sought to blame gangs orisolated incidents have been
thoroughly dismantled byhistorians.
The Zoot Suit riots are nowunderstood as a powerful and
disturbing manifestation ofwartime prejudice and ethnic
strife, a direct consequence ofracial discrimination that had
(20:20):
been simmering for decades inLos Angeles.
The events are increasinglycharacterized as a pogrom
against the Mexican-Americancommunity, highlighting the
systematic and targeted natureof the violence.
The ritualistic stripping ofthe zoot suiters takes on an
even more sinister meaning inthis light, understood as an act
of symbolic annihilation, anattempt to erase not just a
(20:43):
style of dress but the culturalidentity and self-expression of
an entire group.
This wasn't merely aboutdisrobing individuals.
It was about stripping awaytheir sense of belonging and
their right to existauthentically in the public
sphere.
Speaker 1 (20:58):
The echoes of the zoot suit riots reverberate even
today, serving as a starkreminder of persistent societal
challenges that continue toexist into the present.
We continue to struggle withincidents of police brutality,
biased or false media coverageand racism from regular people
as well as public officials whoare reluctant to acknowledge
(21:18):
systemic prejudice.
The tendency to demonize youthculture and expressions of
identity that deviate from themainstream also remains a
relevant issue.
The language used to describecertain groups, the snap
judgment based on theirappearance and the fear of the
other are threads that connectthe Los Angeles of the 1940s to
(21:39):
the present moment.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
Ironically, despite the violence and the subsequent
ban of the outfit in public, thezoot suit did not disappear
entirely.
Instead, it transcended itsinitial demonization to become a
potent symbol of resistance Forthe Chicano community and other
minority groups targeted duringthe riots.
The zoot suit evolved into apowerful emblem of cultural
(22:04):
pride, self-determination anddefiance against oppression.
It inspired later generationsof civil rights activists,
embodying a spirit of standingup against injustice through
self-expression.
Even though the style largelyfaded from mainstream fashion
after the war, its symbolicweight endured, a testament to
(22:25):
the resilience and agency ofthose who dared to be different
in the face of violentintolerance.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
In a significant, albeit belated, acknowledgement
of the historic injustice quote,on June 9th 2023, roughly 80
years after the attacks, the LosAngeles City Council publicly
condemned the Zoot Suit riotsand apologized for its role in
contributing to it.
End quote.
This formal apology marks acrucial step in confronting the
(22:52):
painful legacy of the riots andacknowledging the systemic
racism that underpinned itracism that underpinned it.
While the scars of this periodremain, this act of public
condemnation offers a glimmer ofhope for a more honest
reckoning with the past and arenewed commitment to addressing
the persistent issues of racialprejudice and discrimination in
the present.
Speaker 2 (23:13):
In conclusion, it's crucial to remember that the
Zoot Suit riots were about farmore than just a clash over
clothing.
They exposed the deeplyentrenched racial prejudice that
permeated Los Angeles, andthese were inflamed by the
wartime anxieties of the era andtragically demonstrated that
violent suppression of culturalexpressions that were deemed
(23:35):
defiant or un-American.
Ultimately, the crime herewasn't the fashion, it was the
intolerance and violence itprovoked.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
Thanks for joining us on this episode of History's
Greatest Crimes.
We hope this exploration of theZuzu riots has shed some light
on a complex and overlookedchapter of American history.
For Elena, I'm Michael.
Until next time, stay curious.
Bye.
Picture this it's summer of 1943, World War II is
raging across the globe and inthe United States, the city of
Los Angeles, like many Americancities at the time, was buzzing
with the clamor of wartimeproduction Servicemen gearing up
for deployment, overseasfactories humming with activity
and a palpable sense ofpatriotic unity in the face of a
(00:45):
common enemy.
But the unity was only surfacedeep.
During that same swelteringsummer, on June 3, 1943, Los
Angeles was the scene of a verystrange attack.
This attack was primarilycarried out by white military
servicemen and civilians againstBlack and Latino youth.
That in itself wasn't thestrange part.
(01:06):
As I'm sure many of you outthere know, the United States
has a history of racial conflict.
The strange part was that mostof the Black and Latino youth
who were attacked were wearing aparticular style of clothing
called zoot suits, and thosecarrying out the attack seemed
focused on forcibly strippingtheir victims of those zoot
suits and destroying them.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Welcome to History's Greatest Crimes.
Today we're delving into atruly unique and, frankly,
unsettling chapter of Americanhistory.
We're examining a peculiar formof perceived crime the wearing
of the zoot suit, popular amongMexican-American and
African-American youths in the1940s, and the very real brutal
(01:48):
violence it provoked during thatfateful summer of 1943.
This wasn't a case of espionageor sabotage, nor a bank robbery
or kidnapping.
Instead, we're looking at asocial explosion fueled by
deep-seated racial prejudice andthe anxieties of a nation at
war.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
I'm Michael, and with me, as always, is my esteemed
colleague and beloved wife,elena.
Today we're venturing into theseemingly bizarre world of the
Zoot Suit riots, a series ofviolent clashes during the
summer of 1943 that, on thesurface, appeared to be about
nothing more than fashion.
But, as we'll uncover, theseriots revealed profound and
(02:29):
disturbing truths about Americansociety during one of its most
tumultuous periods.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
And it's precisely the inexplicable nature of this
so-called crime, Michael, thatmakes it both compelling and
crucial to examine.
How could a piece of clothing,not much more than mere fabric,
become the catalyst for suchwidespread violence, even
garnering the tacit approval oflaw enforcement in some cases?
Who gets to define deviance,and how do those definitions
(02:59):
serve to marginalize entirecommunities?
Buckle up listeners.
This story is stranger thanfiction, and the lessons it
holds are as chillingly relevanttoday as they were over 80
years ago.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
All right, Elena, we've set the stage with the
dramatic arrival of the zootsuit riots.
But to truly grasp the gravityof this situation, our listeners
need to understand exactly whata zoot suit was in the peculiar
context of wartime Los Angeles.
So let's start with the basics.
What are we even talking aboutwhen we say zoot suit?
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Indeed, michael.
The zoot suit was a verydistinctive style of clothing
that emerged in the 1930s andsoared in popularity among young
people during the 1940s.
It was characterized bybroad-shouldered jackets that
were long or draped, andwide-legged pants that were
tapered at the bottom.
Often wearers would also flauntlong-chained watches,
(04:00):
flamboyant hats and thick-soledshoes, and, besides making a
bold fashion statement, theappeal of the outfit seemed to
be its flowy fit, which lookedgood on the dance floor.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
Absolutely, and while its exact origins are a bit
obscure, the zoot suit was firstassociated with
African-American communities,particularly in Harlem, new York
, where Black culture and musicwas celebrated during the Harlem
Renaissance.
Such outfits were popularamongst jazz musicians like Cab
Calloway.
But over the next decade or so,the zoot suit style became very
(04:38):
popular among Mexican-Americanyouths known as Pachucos, and it
also spread to other minorityyouths including
Filipino-Americans,italian-americans and Jewish
American men.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
That's a critical point, michael.
While the Los Angeles zoot suitriots of 1943
disproportionately targetedMexican Americans, the wearing
of zoot suits was a broaderphenomenon among minority youth.
But to understand why thisfashion choice sparked such an
outrage, we need to step intothe world of wartime Los Angeles
(05:06):
.
Imagine a city with over 50,000servicemen stationed there.
The attack on Pearl Harbor hadtaken place only a year and a
half before and it was stillfresh in the nation's memory,
leading to heightened patriotismand calls for conformity.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
Precisely, and in this environment of wartime
austerity, fabric was strictlyrationed to support the war
effort, primarily to makemilitary uniforms.
The zoot suit, with itsperceived excessive use of
material, was immediately seenby many as unpatriotic and even
wasteful.
Servicemen and other criticsderided the wearers as draft
(05:44):
dodgers, despite the fact thatmany of those youths were too
young to serve.
One has to admit, elena, thatit was rather a bold statement
in a world of drab uniforms,wouldn't you say?
Almost like serving afive-course meal during a famine
.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
A rather flamboyant rebellion against sartorial
sobriety, michael.
Rather flamboyant rebellionagainst sartorial sobriety,
michael.
But beneath this clash ofstyles lay a much deeper issue
the pre-existing racialdiscrimination against Mexican
Americans in Los Angeles.
This wasn't something new, andit was particularly an issue in
the western United States wherelarge populations of Mexican
(06:20):
Americans lived.
As Los Angeles grew, so didracial and ethnic tensions.
Young Mexican-American men andwomen formed gangs for
territorial control andprotection.
Members often embraced thePachuco style and, unfortunately
, zoot Suit and Pachuco soonbecame shorthand for gang.
(06:40):
City officials and otherresidents of Los Angeles
suspected that the activities ofthese gangs were representative
of all Mexican Americans,although that was actually far
from the truth.
Throughout the late 1930s, theLos Angeles City Council
commissioned a specialinvestigation into what it saw
as a Mexican-American crime wave, despite having little evidence
(07:03):
of Mexican-American culpability.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
And to add fuel to the fire.
In Los Angeles in 1942, a yearbefore the zoot suit riot, 17
Mexican-American youth and youngmen were arrested and found
guilty of murder In what becameknown as the Sleepy Lagoon
murder case.
The 17 boys and men prosecutedwere forced to wear the zoot
suits many were wearing at thetime of the murder.
(07:27):
The district attorney requestedthis order on the grounds that
the jury should see thedefendants in the zoot suits
that, he argued, were worn onlyby hoodlums.
Every time a defendant's namewas mentioned by a witness or
the district attorney, the nameddefendant was required to stand
up.
The judge also permitted atestimony from an expert witness
(07:47):
from the Los Angeles Sheriff'sOffice.
In that testimony, the expertwitness stated that Mexicans as
a community had a quotebloodthirst and a biological
predisposition to crime andkilling, citing the culture of
human sacrifice practiced bytheir Aztec ancestors.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
Interestingly, in 1944, two years after the Sleepy
Lagoon murder case and one yearafter the Zoot Suit riots, the
conviction of the 17 wasoverturned by the Court of
Appeals due to a lack ofevidence against those
prosecuted and the clear racialbias of the judge.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Exactly so.
The Zoot suit wasn't just afashion statement in a vacuum.
It landed in a city alreadysimmering with racial prejudice,
exacerbated by the anxieties ofwartime.
And for the young peoplewearing these suits,
particularly theMexican-American Pachucos, it
represented much more than justan outfit.
It was a defiant gesture ofgroup identity, a way of
(08:47):
rebelling against racialinjustices.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
Absolutely.
It was a powerful form ofself-expression and pride in
one's appearance.
For youths wearing zoot suits,it was a way to connect with
jazz culture, a form of musicthat in itself was seen as
rebellious and outside themainstream.
Remarkably, evenMexican-American women began
borrowing the zoot suit pants tocreate their own style,
(09:13):
underscoring the widespreadcultural significance of this
attire.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
So, to recap, we already have this incredibly
eye-catching some might even sayaudacious style of dress
emerging among minority youth.
In a city gripped by wartimeconformity and simmering racial
tensions, the zoot suit, withits seemingly wasteful use of
rationed material, became avisible symbol that clashed
(09:37):
directly with prevailingpatriotic sentiments.
And for the young men and womenwho wore them, it wasn't just
about fashion.
It was a badge of identity, aconnection to a vibrant culture
and a silent, powerful assertionof their presence in a society
that often wished they wouldsimply disappear.
This collision of fashion, warand prejudice.
(09:58):
Elena was a powder keg ready tospark, so we've established the
.
Los Angeles was a pressurecookie waiting to blow.
But what exactly lit the fuseon this powder keg of tension?
How did the simmeringresentment suddenly explode into
a full-blown riot?
Speaker 2 (10:20):
That's the crucial question, michael.
Several incidents acted asprecursors, each one fanning the
flames of anger and mistrustbetween zoot suit wearers and
servicemen.
As we've already discussed, theSleepy Lagoon murder case fed
into racial tensions in LosAngeles between zoot suiters,
young Mexican-American youth andthe more than 50,000 servicemen
(10:42):
in Los Angeles.
And even more fuel to the firejust a few weeks before the zoot
suit riots, the infamous LakePier incident took place on May
8th of 1943.
At that time in May, rumorsstarted circulating that a
sailor had been stabbed by azoot suitor at Lake Pier near
Santa Monica, california.
Within hours of the supposedevent, nearly 500 servicemen
(11:06):
arrived to search for theculprits.
As they rampaged along the pier, they attacked anyone they
found in a zoot suit.
This event clearly demonstratedthe servicemen's willingness to
resort to violence based onmere hearsay, targeting anyone
wearing that distinctive style.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
So that sounds like a mob mentality ultimately
bubbling over, and it seems likethis was just the prelude to
the main event, the Zuzu riots,which took place just a few
weeks later, on June 3rd of 1943.
What's interesting is that onJune 3rd there didn't seem to be
one particular event that setoff the riots, but rather a
series of events Around thattime a rumor began to circulate
(11:46):
that a group of MexicanAmericans had beaten up a group
of white sailors.
That rumor encouraged groups ofmilitary men to leave their
armory and start attackingMexican American neighborhoods
in Los Angeles.
At the same time, another rumorcirculated that two zoot
suiters gave a Nazi salute topassing servicemen, causing them
(12:06):
to also attack and get violent.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Regardless of the exact catalyst, whether it was
retaliation for alleged attacksor a perceived act of disrespect
the response was immediate andbrutal.
About 50 sailors armed withmakeshift weapons first stormed
Alpine Street in the city, butunable to find zoot suiters
there, they proceeded to a localmovie theater that was in the
(12:32):
process of showing a film.
What happened next was atargeted assault.
After turning on the houselights, the sailors roamed the
aisles looking for zoot suiters.
The first victims of the zootsuit riots, 12 and 13-year-old
boys, were guilty of little morethan being in the wrong place
at the wrong time.
The sailors tore the suits offtheir bodies and beat and
(12:52):
clubbed the boys.
Can you imagine, michael, theterror these young boys must
have felt being attacked in apublic place simply for their
choice of clothing?
Speaker 1 (13:01):
It's a stark and disturbing image, elena, and it
highlights the nature of theviolence.
The quote ritualistic strippingof the zoot suitors end quote
in the movie theater wasn'tmerely about setting a personal
score.
It was a public spectacle ofhumiliation designed to
dehumanize those who dared toexpress themselves through style
.
To dehumanize those who daredto express themselves through
(13:24):
style as a word of these initialattacks spread like wildfire,
fueled by rumor and perhaps amisguided sense of righteous
indignation.
More servicemen and whiteAmerican civilians joined the
fray and for five days, fromJune 3rd through June 8th, they
carried out similar attacksacross the city.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
Exactly After attacking people in the movie
theater, the mob decided to takethe fight into the
Mexican-American neighborhoodsof East Los Angeles and Boyle
Heights.
Thus, their retaliatory strikebecame an assault on the
Mexican-American communityitself.
What began as targeted attackson individuals based solely on
their attire rapidly escalatedinto a broader campaign of
(14:03):
racial violence.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
In short, the initial spark, whether ignited by a
rumor, retaliation or aperceived insult, quickly spread
into a conflagration of racialfury.
This eruption engulfed not justthe Zoot Suiters but the wider
Mexican-American community,leaving a trail of fear and
devastation that lasted for days.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
And now listeners, the stage is set.
Over the next few days, losAngeles witnessed a sustained
period of brutality, a time whenthe city streets became
battlegrounds and the veryidentity of the community was
under siege.
Stay with us as we delve deeperinto these harrowing days of
fury, uncovering the events andexamining the chilling details
(14:47):
of this dark chapter in Americanhistory.
What began as confrontationswith young men in distinctive
attire on June 3rd of 1943quickly metamorphosed into
something far more insidious.
The initial pretext oftargeting zoot suiters dissolved
(15:08):
as the violence broadened,engulfing the Mexican-American
community at large.
It wasn't merely aboutflamboyant fabric anymore.
The angry attackers, oftenfueled by alcohol and a mob
mentality, swept throughMexican-American neighborhoods.
Their anger indiscriminate andtheir purpose chillingly clear.
Accounts detail how theystormed into bars, cafes and
(15:31):
theaters, turning on the houselights and darkened cinemas to
identify and drag out anyone whofit their prejudiced profile.
Even individuals not adorned inthe now infamous zoot suits
became targets.
As one source chillingly notes,the attack expanded to include
African Americans and FilipinoAmerican zoot suiters and,
(15:52):
disturbingly, those who werejust simply of color.
In every location of violence,zoot suits and any other symbol
of foreignness that were foundwere left burning in the streets
.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
Perhaps one of the most shocking aspects of this
period was the abject failure,or perhaps complicity, of law
enforcement.
The Los Angeles PoliceDepartment often stood by as
these violent acts unfolded.
Their silence as deafening asthe chaos on the streets
unfolded.
Their silence as deafening asthe chaos on the streets.
(16:23):
Witnesses reported that policewould, quote, wait until GIs had
left the scene and thenarrested the Mexican-Americans.
End, quote the very victims ofthese savage assaults getting
arrested themselves.
The justification A perverseclaim of protection.
The authority stating they werearresting the beaten and
stripped individuals.
Quote for their own protection.
This inaction, this blatantdisregard for the safety of
(16:46):
minority citizens effectivelysanctioned the servicemen's
rampages.
It fostered an environmentwhere the attackers operated
with impunity, while those whowere targeted were further
victimized by the veryinstitutions meant to safeguard
them.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
Adding fuel to the already raging fire was the role
of the media.
Most press coverage wassympathetic to the servicemen,
often portraying them as heroesor vigilantes standing up for
their country.
Newspapers engaged in unfaircoverage of the zoot suiters,
demonizing them as nothing morethan delinquents and criminals.
However, there were exceptions.
Al Waxman, editor of the EastSide Journal, a local community
(17:29):
newspaper, offered a starklydifferent perspective.
He witnessed firsthand thequote massive humanity locked in
violent struggle end quote andthe brutal treatment of young
Mexican-Americans at the handsof both serv quote and the
brutal treatment of youngMexican Americans at the hands
of both servicemen and thepolice.
His voice, though a minority inthe mainstream press, serves as
a crucial reminder of the truthobscured by much of the
(17:51):
contemporary reporting.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
In the face of such widespread and brutal violence,
a chilling anomaly emergesDespite days of intense riotings
, beatings and ritualisticstripping of countless
individuals, there is a surpriseabsence of documented murders
directly resulting from theseclashes.
While injuries were certainlyinflicted, the lack of fatality
suggests a disturbing, almosttheatrical focus to the violence
(18:17):
.
The primary objective, it seems, was not necessarily to inflict
lasting physical harm, butrather to symbolically dismantle
the zoot suit and the identityit represented.
The intense aggression directedat tearing and burning clothes,
while the lives of the wearerswere, against all odds, largely
spared from outright murder,speaks volumes about the warped
(18:39):
priorities and the deeplysymbolic nature of this reign of
terror.
The focus on the garment itselfunderscores the perceived
threat it posed to theestablished social order.
The seamless, endless wave ofviolence finally ended and began
to recede on June 8th.
(19:00):
The decisive factor, quote USmilitary personnel were barred
from leaving their barracks.
End quote.
With their movements restrictedby their own commanders, the
organized attacks largely ceased.
Yet in the aftermath, zootsuits were banned from public,
making wearing a zoot suitpunishable by a 50-day jail
sentence.
Furthermore, the officialnarratives attempted to downplay
(19:22):
the profound racial animus thathad fueled the unrest.
Mayor Bowron, for instance,offered an explanation that
conveniently deflected blamefrom the city's deep-seated
prejudice, attributing the riotsto quote juvenile delinquents
and by white Southerners endquote while vehemently denying
racial prejudice in his own city.
This stance stood in starkcontrast to the findings of a
(19:44):
citizens committee appointed bythe governor of California.
Their report, a crucialcounter-narrative quote,
determined racism to be acentral cause of the riots,
directly challenging the mayor'sself-serving conclusions.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Over time, the simplistic explanations that
sought to blame gangs orisolated incidents have been
thoroughly dismantled byhistorians.
The Zoot Suit riots are nowunderstood as a powerful and
disturbing manifestation ofwartime prejudice and ethnic
strife, a direct consequence ofracial discrimination that had
(20:20):
been simmering for decades inLos Angeles.
The events are increasinglycharacterized as a pogrom
against the Mexican-Americancommunity, highlighting the
systematic and targeted natureof the violence.
The ritualistic stripping ofthe zoot suiters takes on an
even more sinister meaning inthis light, understood as an act
of symbolic annihilation, anattempt to erase not just a
(20:43):
style of dress but the culturalidentity and self-expression of
an entire group.
This wasn't merely aboutdisrobing individuals.
It was about stripping awaytheir sense of belonging and
their right to existauthentically in the public
sphere.
Speaker 1 (20:58):
The echoes of the zoot suit riots reverberate even
today, serving as a starkreminder of persistent societal
challenges that continue toexist into the present.
We continue to struggle withincidents of police brutality,
biased or false media coverageand racism from regular people
as well as public officials whoare reluctant to acknowledge
(21:18):
systemic prejudice.
The tendency to demonize youthculture and expressions of
identity that deviate from themainstream also remains a
relevant issue.
The language used to describecertain groups, the snap
judgment based on theirappearance and the fear of the
other are threads that connectthe Los Angeles of the 1940s to
(21:39):
the present moment.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
Ironically, despite the violence and the subsequent
ban of the outfit in public, thezoot suit did not disappear
entirely.
Instead, it transcended itsinitial demonization to become a
potent symbol of resistance Forthe Chicano community and other
minority groups targeted duringthe riots.
The zoot suit evolved into apowerful emblem of cultural
(22:04):
pride, self-determination anddefiance against oppression.
It inspired later generationsof civil rights activists,
embodying a spirit of standingup against injustice through
self-expression.
Even though the style largelyfaded from mainstream fashion
after the war, its symbolicweight endured, a testament to
(22:25):
the resilience and agency ofthose who dared to be different
in the face of violentintolerance.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
In a significant, albeit belated, acknowledgement
of the historic injustice quote,on June 9th 2023, roughly 80
years after the attacks, the LosAngeles City Council publicly
condemned the Zoot Suit riotsand apologized for its role in
contributing to it.
End quote.
This formal apology marks acrucial step in confronting the
(22:52):
painful legacy of the riots andacknowledging the systemic
racism that underpinned itracism that underpinned it.
While the scars of this periodremain, this act of public
condemnation offers a glimmer ofhope for a more honest
reckoning with the past and arenewed commitment to addressing
the persistent issues of racialprejudice and discrimination in
the present.
Speaker 2 (23:13):
In conclusion, it's crucial to remember that the
Zoot Suit riots were about farmore than just a clash over
clothing.
They exposed the deeplyentrenched racial prejudice that
permeated Los Angeles, andthese were inflamed by the
wartime anxieties of the era andtragically demonstrated that
violent suppression of culturalexpressions that were deemed
(23:35):
defiant or un-American.
Ultimately, the crime herewasn't the fashion, it was the
intolerance and violence itprovoked.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
Thanks for joining us on this episode of History's
Greatest Crimes.
We hope this exploration of theZuzu riots has shed some light
on a complex and overlookedchapter of American history.
For Elena, I'm Michael.
Until next time, stay curious.
Bye.
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.