"Climate Trails Review, Part Two," , November 26, 2025

💡 Welcome to the IPS Think Tank

🔹 Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/timozman
🔹 Cash App: cash.app/$infiniteplanesociety
"Climate Trails Review, Part Two," , November 26, 2025
host’s critique of the **"Climate Trails" documentary**, which focuses on chemtrails and weather modification. The speaker finds the latter half of the documentary to contain "pretty bad filler" and "emotional appeals," including an individual who wept while claiming chemtrails gave him cancer. The review is used as a launching point for a detailed discussion on media literacy, the failings of the "Trutherville" community, and the emergence of the "off-world stage perspective".

The host argues that the anti-geoengineering movement is flawed because it relies on conflations and emotional responses rather than verifiable knowledge. The documentary, which the speaker notes is available on Amazon, is characterized as poorly made and largely existing for monetary gain. The speaker asserts that many people are "on lockdown" in their ingrained orthodoxies, making logical debate futile. The conversation then broadens to encompass methods of media control, including predictive programming, and the necessity of applying rigorous skepticism—treating events as **"fake until proven real"**—to both mainstream and alternative media narratives.

***

### Key Topics

* **Chemtrails and Climate Change as Equivalents:** The discussion posits that anti-geoengineering movements are the logical equivalent of climate change belief and function as controlled opposition to the climate change narrative.
* **Critique of the Documentary's Emotional Appeals:** The speaker criticizes the film for relying heavily on emotional pleas, such as featuring a witness who breaks down in tears, rather than presenting any environmental scientists to support their claims.
* **The Conflation of Concepts:** A specific point of criticism is that the documentary conflates the established practice of cloud seeding with the non-existent phenomenon of chemtrails, labeling terms like "stratospheric aerosol injection" as dishonest attempts to imply spraying.
* **The "Off-World Stage" Perspective:** The host emphasizes the distinction of their think tank as a **third platform** separate from both mainstream NPCs and alt-media NPCs, both of whom are deemed wrong and stuck in the same duopoly.
* **Premeditated Future Events (PSYOPs):** The host presents a model where major historical events are simulated, scripted, and scheduled decades in advance, utilizing predictive programming (like the South Park episode mirroring real events) and concurrent programming (like Netflix releases aligning with news events) to manufacture a controlled mass worldview.

***

### Quotes

1. "My main takeaway here is that **anti-geoengineering is the equivalent to climate change**".
2. "Beliefs aren't really affected by logic or reasons. **These are emotional things**".
3. "They have conflated cloud seeding with chemtrails".
4. "the entire anti-geoengineering movement is as well-funded and as big as the climate change thing. **It's the controlled opposition to it**".
5. "We're living through a **predetermined set of events**".